i expect they used their healthy subsidies to build that network or at least used that as the excuse to be "encouraged" to build it. Its in their own interests to build it because they can get solar power from households at a cheaper rate and sell it expensively to someone else ( and a lot less grief than buying coal/gas to burn )
if your house was well insulated, you could to use the AC less. the less leaks in a house envelope the better but you'd have to work out some sort of ventilation system that cools air coming in from outside (opposite to the normal heat ventilation recovery systems http://yourhome.honeywell.com/... )
why do all the detractors expect the new systems to be as close to 100% efficient immediately when fossil fuel power generation like coal power has taken over 100 years to get to the current 30%-40% efficient (with huge amounts of subsidies over the years)
"the idea that there shouldn't be any fee or cost to selling your power back is about the same as thinking ups or fedex should ship all the stuff I sell on ebay for me at no cost." - do the utilities charge the coal and gas producers for delivering product to their power generating stations? its less effort for them to receive power from premises with solar than ordering coal and gas and burning it. premises with solar are suppliers not consumers (if they create more than they use)
yes, they should buy it for less and sell for more but why should the supplier pay for any infrastructure?
every party certainly does have crackpots but not to the extent of UKip, they have "gay marriage caused the storms" type members, not seen that in any other UK party as yet.
modding is the ONLY tactic they have left, all the so called "serious" issues raised have been shot to pieces. its now just a tirade of red herrings, lies and personal insults coming from the gutter because they don't like systemd
You need systemd to read them." no, that comment shows how little you know. you need journalctl to read them unless you've configured rsyslog to run as well.
"Bullshit. Why was OOXML created? Why did LibreOffice adopt it? Nobody needed OOXML, it's all about vendor lock-in. LibreOffice does not support OOXML because they love it." - did you ask them or did you just make an assumption?
as for reading that posting, whats the point, its just an opinion with no facts backing it up
"Many of us already have systems that have been broken by this new shit." - why did you install it before testing? y anecdote is "it works just fine for my system
"Bad design. Poorly thought through." - i think we'd prefer to trust the opinion of RH Suse etc over slashdot posters with negative agendas
Slashdot Mirror
i expect they used their healthy subsidies to build that network or at least used that as the excuse to be "encouraged" to build it. Its in their own interests to build it because they can get solar power from households at a cheaper rate and sell it expensively to someone else ( and a lot less grief than buying coal/gas to burn )
if your house was well insulated, you could to use the AC less. the less leaks in a house envelope the better but you'd have to work out some sort of ventilation system that cools air coming in from outside (opposite to the normal heat ventilation recovery systems http://yourhome.honeywell.com/... )
thats only until home battery storage catches up, http://www.theverge.com/2015/2...
why do all the detractors expect the new systems to be as close to 100% efficient immediately when fossil fuel power generation like coal power has taken over 100 years to get to the current 30%-40% efficient (with huge amounts of subsidies over the years)
"the idea that there shouldn't be any fee or cost to selling your power back is about the same as thinking ups or fedex should ship all the stuff I sell on ebay for me at no cost." - do the utilities charge the coal and gas producers for delivering product to their power generating stations? its less effort for them to receive power from premises with solar than ordering coal and gas and burning it. premises with solar are suppliers not consumers (if they create more than they use)
yes, they should buy it for less and sell for more but why should the supplier pay for any infrastructure?
he should be nowhere near a Sci-Tech committee if he has these beliefs
there is more than one for example.. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-e...
no, the hippie ones tend to be in the Green party but every party is united in being against UKip. hippie is not the same as crackpot
every party certainly does have crackpots but not to the extent of UKip, they have "gay marriage caused the storms" type members, not seen that in any other UK party as yet.
hopefully he'll join UKIP soon as UKip is the holding pen for all crackpots
slackware or gentoo (and devuan eventually) is there for you
why would there need to be a port of journalctl to Windows or OSX?
you just proved my point, thanks.
so configure it to suit your needs
modding is the ONLY tactic they have left, all the so called "serious" issues raised have been shot to pieces. its now just a tirade of red herrings, lies and personal insults coming from the gutter because they don't like systemd
You need systemd to read them." no, that comment shows how little you know. you need journalctl to read them unless you've configured rsyslog to run as well.
its called "i've haven't got a proper argument so i'll make something up to divert you" (and post AC to save their "possible" reputation)
so the answer is "no" then
how strange, software has bugs. no-one never knew or expected that. There doesn't seem to be any bugs marked critical in that list
please, no. my browser is just for viewing pages
"It is quite well known systemd was a political backed decision and not a technical one." - can you back that up with a trusted citation?
"Bullshit. Why was OOXML created? Why did LibreOffice adopt it? Nobody needed OOXML, it's all about vendor lock-in. LibreOffice does not support OOXML because they love it." - did you ask them or did you just make an assumption?
as for reading that posting, whats the point, its just an opinion with no facts backing it up
don't get too complacent.. FreeBSD's Jordan Hubbard sees need for a modern init system with features like systemd/launch
"Many of us already have systems that have been broken by this new shit." - why did you install it before testing? y anecdote is "it works just fine for my system
"Bad design. Poorly thought through." - i think we'd prefer to trust the opinion of RH Suse etc over slashdot posters with negative agendas
repeating your post doesn;t make it any smarter