Slashdot Mirror


Linux Kernel Switching To Linux v4.0, Coming With Many New Addons

An anonymous reader writes Following polling on Linus Torvald's Google+ page, he's decided to make the next kernel version Linux 4.0 rather than Linux 3.20. Linux 4.0 is going to bring many big improvements besides the version bump with there being live kernel patching, pNFS block server support, VirtIO 1.0, IBM z13 mainframe support, new ARM SoC support, and many new hardware drivers and general improvements. Linux 4.0 is codenamed "Hurr durr I'ma sheep."

264 comments

  1. Bad name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about calling it Linux 10, codenamed "Deep throating Microsoft"?

  2. New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does it come with systemd?

    1. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, it's the kernel. systemd is a crap load of applications. Applications that ignore stderr, drop higher priority syslog messages, and ignores nonzero exit statuses.

    2. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least we finally get some understandable technical arguments instead of "it's a monolithic blob" or "it does not respect the UNIX way of doing things".

    3. Re:New version! by invictusvoyd · · Score: 5, Funny

      No . Systemd now includes a new daemon called kerneld 4.0 .. and all these afre included in .... .... .... EMACS mwhahahahaha

    4. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it's the kernel. systemd is a crap load of applications. Applications that ignore stderr, drop higher priority syslog messages, and ignores nonzero exit statuses.

      What the fuck is up with you trolls repeating these stupid lies?

      systemd may or may not have problems, but it demonstrably does not "ignore stderr, drop higher priority syslog messages, [or] ignore nonzero exit statuses".

      If it does, or ever has done, any of these things where is the fucking bug report.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    5. Re:New version! by Ash-Fox · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it does, or ever has done, any of these things where is the fucking bug report.

      The server running the bug reporting solution dropped the bug report.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    6. Re: New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just witnessing individuals exiting from this industry. Fuck em.

    7. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Keep an eye out for kdbus...

    8. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Hello, I'm somebody who wrote a low level linux utility and I want to release it under a free license. However, I have inspected systemd and got terrified by the style their developers treat the community. Therefore I want to ensure my software never gets maintained or picked up by systemd developers. Which license should I chose to accomplish this?

      Thank you for your help.

    9. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, systemd does not take over existing projects, it only rewrites them poorly.

    10. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "it does not respect the UNIX way of doing things" IS a valid technical argument.

    11. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're in binary. You need systemd to read them.

    12. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it does, or ever has done, any of these things where is the fucking bug report.

      Where do you start reporting bugs if you consider that the design is buggy from the concept?

    13. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      No, even if they fix the problems he listed, it would still be a monolithic blob of half assed code, all strung together in a take-it-all-or-leave-it package.

      Thankfully I don't suffer Debian, and systemd I can leave it.

    14. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if those "technical arguments" are lies?

      Seriously -- there are no reliable reports of systemd doing what these anonymous trolls report it as doing.

      One of the advances of systemd is that it does log stderr from processes it starts, so some clown has decided to complain that it doesn't.

      There are no reliable reports of this behaviour -- it's all a bunch of AC posts on Slashdot plus one on Reddit (which was immediatley refuted), plus a few paranoid claims about bug reports being "deleted". How do you delete a bug report from bugzilla? You can't.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    15. Re:New version! by awing0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, exactly. I'm running Debian Jessie and I'm not really comfortable with binary logs. It takes decades of log practice and throws it away. For what? Search capability? Maybe there's some security benefit, honestly I don't know enough about it to comment. I'll be forwarding my logs to nice text files for the foreseeable future though, until I for one welcome my new systemd overlord.

      --
      Cthulhu Saves.
    16. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously?

      The GP posts a straight out lie, some moron mods it "interesting".

      I point out that it is a lie. I get moderated "flamebait".

      Even if you hate systemd, try to beat it with facts. If you start to base your arguments on verifiable lies we begin to doubt your sanity.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    17. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      when you say 'the UNIX way of things', you mean like AIX does, like Solaris does or like HPUX does? because those UNIX stopped using custom scripts years ago

    18. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      If you were using Debian you could simply uninstall systemd (assuming that you weren't one of the 22 people using gummiboot (soon to be called sd-uefi)).

      # sudo apt-get install sysvinit-core systemd-shim systemd-sysv-

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    19. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, exactly. I'm running Debian Jessie and I'm not really comfortable with binary logs.

      The default configuration on Debian Jessie is to log everything to syslogd as before.

      What difference did you notice in the logging?

      I'll be forwarding my logs to nice text files for the foreseeable future though

      Why are you doing that? The system already does it for you.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    20. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a bold statement.

    21. Re:New version! by Megol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most Unix stuff doesn't follow the Unix "way of doing things"...
      Wake up, this is the real world...

    22. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Droll

    23. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Hello, I'm somebody who wrote a low level linux utility and I want to release it under a free license. However, I have inspected systemd and got terrified by the style their developers treat the community. Therefore I want to ensure my software never gets maintained or picked up by systemd developers. Which license should I chose to accomplish this?

      Thank you for your help.

      What you want is by definition not a free license.

      Take the "do no evil" license from JSON.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    24. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

      Maybe you should look harder. "systemd-sysv-" means "REMOVE systemd-sysv".

      The systemd-shim is to make pam-systemd work without systemd being installed. gdm3 needs pam-systemd.

      If you don't need/want gdm3 just remove pam-systemd and don'n install systemd-shim.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    25. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I forgot the damned "</b>". Makes me sound like an angry person. Not that I could ever be mistaken for an angry person otherwise.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    26. Re:New version! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      At least we finally get some understandable technical arguments instead of "it's a monolithic blob" ".

      Steve McQueen didn't have time for technical arguments.

    27. Re: New version! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      You are just witnessing individuals exiting from this industry.

      OK

      Fuck em.

      So ... are they moving to the sex industry?

    28. Re:New version! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      If it does, or ever has done, any of these things where is the fucking bug report.

      Where do you start reporting bugs if you consider that the design is buggy from the concept?

      Most people start by posting to irrelevant slashdot articles..... but you know that already.

    29. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe "doesn't look" for you, but for me, someone who is familiar with apt-get syntax, it looks like it does replace systemd with sysvinit and installs systemd-shim so apps using systemd APIs directly can still work.

    30. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The new version is actually incompatible with systemd. At least my Debian jessie laptop does not boot anymore gracefully as I have a NFS mount in /etc/fstab and if the NFS server is not accessible, the systemd pauses for 90 seconds. One can only wonder, what were the systemd guys smoking when they deciced that fstab is not supported anymore and their own collection of config files is somehow better.

    31. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      So you'd prefer the job of a full time spreader of FUD?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    32. Re:New version! by donaldm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "it does not respect the UNIX way of doing things" IS a valid technical argument.

      What pray tell is the UNIX way of doing things?

      I have been using Unix (BSD, Ultrix, Tru64, AIX, SunOS, IRIX, HPUX, Solaris, SCO (when they were the good guys) and others) for over 35 years and what you have just said would get you laughed out of a design meeting.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    33. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh just call the WAAAAMBULANCE already.

    34. Re:New version! by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      its called "i've haven't got a proper argument so i'll make something up to divert you" (and post AC to save their "possible" reputation)

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    35. Re:New version! by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      You need systemd to read them." no, that comment shows how little you know. you need journalctl to read them unless you've configured rsyslog to run as well.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    36. Re:New version! by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. I'm running Debian Jessie and I'm not really comfortable with binary logs.

      Have you ever heard to utmp and wtmp they are binary logs?

      How do you think you can read an ASCII file since in reality it is a binary file? Don't believe me well try to open an ASCI file without the appropriate software to open that file. Examples of that software are: cat, more, less, pg, view, vi, vim, gvim, emacs, - I could go on if you like. Like it or not ASCII files are a binary file consisting of ones and zeros.

      Reading so called binary logs with the appropriate software is no more different than reading an ASCII file with the appropriate software.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    37. Re:New version! by Barsteward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      modding is the ONLY tactic they have left, all the so called "serious" issues raised have been shot to pieces. its now just a tirade of red herrings, lies and personal insults coming from the gutter because they don't like systemd

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    38. Re:New version! by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      so configure it to suit your needs

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    39. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should look harder. "systemd-sysv-" means "REMOVE systemd-sysv".

      The systemd-shim is to make pam-systemd work without systemd being installed. gdm3 needs pam-systemd.

      If you don't need/want gdm3 just remove pam-systemd and don'n install systemd-shim.

      Which is precisely what people are complaining about - more and more packages (like gdm3, gnome, etc) *needing* (being written to require) systemd... or some "shim" to get around it, which starts making packages less and less able to be ported to other OS's (BSDs, Solaris...).

    40. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct!

      However, it does mostly~ follow the argument of, Keep It Simple Stupid. The same can not be said for systemd.

    41. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I have been using Unix (BSD, Ultrix, Tru64, AIX, SunOS, IRIX, HPUX, Solaris, SCO (when they were the good guys) and others) for over 35 years and what you have just said would get you laughed out of a design meeting.

      I've been using UNIX longer than that, and your question would get you laughed out of any number of design meetings. "The UNIX way of doing things" in this context has been made quite clear time and time again: small applications that do one thing well and play nice with other applications, consumes human-readable configuration files and produces human-readable output and logs." One could go into more detail, but that sums up most of the requirements, which pretty much anyone with any knowledge of UNIX is already aware of and would acknowleged. Unless they're simply being contrary or engaging in systemd-fanboi-ism by defending indefensible design decisions.

    42. Re:New version! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Most Unix stuff doesn't follow the Unix "way of doing things"...

      Most of the stuff that the system depends on and that actually makes it Unix does follow the Unix Way. Maybe your favorite application doesn't, but we're talking about the actual system here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got it all wrong, systemd will develop its own kerneld.

    44. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind us again in which packages we can find journalctl? And hows that Windows or OSX port of Journalctl coming along?

    45. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, kdbus is actually nice if you look at it by the correct angle (it is going to be used by people who think D-bus is not the braindamaged retarded bastard child of corba and something from an even worse hellpit).

      You're still an incompetent if you use it for something that should be using zero-mq instead, but still... it is far less worse than d-bus. At least it can be made safe.

      What is a big annoyance is that nobody else is going to implement kdbus, so you'll have even more linux lock-in, which might bite us in the arse later.

    46. Re:New version! by sjames · · Score: 1

      And just look at them now! Severely marginalized and barely clinging to existence.

    47. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh ? I don't have systemd but how is it different from sysV init ?
      If a process double-forks and closes stderr, as it is common for demons, both the exit status and stderr are lost. I don't know about the dropped syslog message (is it a bug or a design flaw ?).

    48. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't give a shit about systemd, I just like to be able to add programs I use to the machines I uses, and get this, I like to be able to take them off again. Anything that won't allow that is not welcome.

      The packaging/dependencies of systemd is nothing short of vandalism of the package repos.

      Anyone who supports this kind of vandalism is very much one of them rather than one of us. Whenever we find ourselves in the company of these people we wander off to do our thing elsewhere, and they try and reinvent macos or windows and wonder why no one is using it. (hint: if the developer are using macs with vm for their development machines, the target audience are using macs or windows already that leaves precisely none using what you produce)

      repeating: haters gonna hate isn't going to change anything, but good luck with your project.

    49. Re:New version! by OrangeTide · · Score: 0

      Just because our enemies (other unix platforms) can't get thier shit right doesn't mean we have to give up trying to kill systemd.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    50. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with being a full time FUD spreader, someone has to keep the fields fertile with bullshit.

    51. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Just talking about Debian, because that's tbe only one I know.

      How many packages depend on systemd?

      Answer -- one, gummiboot.

      Some vandalism.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    52. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Actualy that's not true for systemd -- if a process double forks and exits systemd can still capture tbe exit code -- that's (part of) what cgroups is for.

      I can find no evidence of the mysterious 'dropped syslog' claims, nobody ever seems to have reported it as a bug and it doesn't happen on any system I have access to.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    53. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what it does. It's demonstrably true; are you high? The fecking logs can be set to clear text, and this can all be read in plain English, if you're really that interested. Or, hell... just plug it into Google to save some time, since all the heavy lifting has been done for you time and time again, you astroturfing troll.

      People are tired of submitting bug reports to a project that doesn't address them. Systemd doesn't listen to the users, and its feature creep is causing a literal exodus of enterprise-level customers from the Linux ecosystem. I just left a meeting probing our potential migration strategies to move away from RHEL, since 7 goes headlong into that bullshit, and as one of the largest medical payment processors on the planet, you can bet we're following the industry trend.

      But, hey... don't take my word for any of it. Look back in five years and see where the chips fucking fell. See you on the other side.

    54. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      (Of course /sbin/init also gets the exit status -- it's just that /sbin/init has no concept of services, the whole sysvinit system just pretends to manage services but hardly uses /sbin/init at all).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    55. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, so it doesn't send stderr to /dev/null, instead it hijacks it and writes it to a binary file in an undocumented way. for most people is there a practical difference?

    56. Re:New version! by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      why would there need to be a port of journalctl to Windows or OSX?

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    57. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      If you want text logs install syslogd.

      Is that hard?

      Would you rather have stderr scrolling up the (probably not attached) screen in some remote data centre or have the message written to syslog?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    58. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data centers in my $80 billion pharmaceutical company beg to differ, sir.

    59. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go home, Poettering. You're drunk.

    60. Re:New version! by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Exodus to what? Solaris? HP-UX? Windows?

      Good luck.

    61. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just read Fox News comments for my views on systemd. Just replace the word Obama with systemd and you get some pretty insightful opinions.

    62. Re:New version! by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      The thing is that they cannot beat it with facts because the vast majority of these people wouldn't know systemd even if it hit them on the head. I bet a large percentage of them also isn't even Linux-users to begin with.

    63. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what it does.

      No, it isn't.

      Or, hell... just plug it into Google to save some time, since all the heavy lifting has been done for you time and time again, you astroturfing troll.

      Plug what in? I've tried every way of posing the question I can think of and it all comes back to here or that one incorrect reddit post.

      People are tired of submitting bug reports to a project that doesn't address them

      Name one.

      (Fucking slashdot went down again while I was posting this reply. Did they install systemd or something?)

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    64. Re:New version! by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Actually that would have been a great thing considering how horrible the EventLog in Windows are. Something like Journald would be heaven in comparison. And the people who compares the two have obviously never programmed against either.

    65. Re:New version! by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      I agree that binary logs is not something that I fancy either. I do however understand why he went that way since he want's to enable meta-data to the logging and also I must say that the log search in RHEL7 is lightning fast compared with grep and that it's nice to issue a "journalctl " and get all the syslog aswell as all the stderr and stdout from combined in one place.

    66. Re:New version! by exomondo · · Score: 2

      "it does not respect the UNIX way of doing things" IS a valid technical argument.

      What exactly is "the UNIX way" of doing things? Because in looking at the existing UNIX-derived operating systems like AIX or HPUX and the UNIX-certified ones like OSX this move to systemd (whether you like it or not) certainly does seem to be in keeping with the UNIX way of doing things.

      Perhaps what you mean is that you're complaining that it isn't doing things the way UNIX did them 20-odd years ago, which may well be a valid complaint but calling that "the UNIX way of doing things" doesn't give much confidence that you know what you're talking about. If that's what you mean and that's how you prefer it to be then certainly your preference is a valid complaint to take onboard.

    67. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Which is precisely what people are complaining about - more and more packages (like gdm3, gnome, etc) *needing* (being written to require) systemd... or some "shim" to get around it, which starts making packages less and less able to be ported to other OS's (BSDs, Solaris...).

      gdm3 needs some functions that used to be provided by consolekit. Until very recently nobody could be bothered to maintain consolekit.

      systemd provides those functions.

      And that's systemd's fault?

      Stop whining. Work.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    68. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      The "big" "error" was to not write text logs and a binary index/metadata file.

      However it wouldn't have stopped the trolls, they are clearly insane.

      (For me "journalctl" isn't the win, it's "systemctl status").

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    69. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Should be embarrasingly easy.

      Why haven't you done it if you want it?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    70. Re:New version! by sjames · · Score: 1

      My last contact with a pharmaceutical company was installing a Linux cluster.

    71. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just look at them now! Severely marginalized and barely clinging to existence.

      Yet Linux's biggest success has been in Android, which did indeed ditch "the unix way of things".

    72. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The UNIX way of doing things" in this context has been made quite clear time and time again: small applications that do one thing well

      That works well with simple systems but these days systems are much more complex, something as common as "sound" has been a nightmare to the point that all the small applications means there is no proper way to do a master volume. Networking was predicated on it being one network interface, these days we have multiple interfaces switching on and off, connecting to different networks with different trust levels and sometimes to the same network with multiple interfaces to co-operate and increase bandwidth. Or all the problems with hibernation and power management on Linux systems.

      Traditional Linux systems have always been behind and playing catchup on these because of the Unix philosophy which is why successful Unix-like systems like Android and OSX abandoned that simple-minded approach so they could deal with complex systems and scenarios.

      and play nice with other applications

      So long as they have an API (which systemd utils do) they can easily play nice with other applications.

      consumes human-readable configuration files and produces human-readable output and logs.

      But you can still do that so what is the idea that nobody should be allowed to do it any differently?

      Now I realize in the capacity of audio, video, power management, etc these dont really apply to servers so for server applications in the instance that you really dont like systemd just use a distro that doesnt implement it or use a BSD instead or maintain a non-systemd codepath for existing distros or fund somebody else to maintain it. If the disdain for systemd is truly as loud as the complainers suggest then there is most definitely a viable and profitable market for some enterprising folk to capitalize on.

    73. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that a single corrupted bit can make binary files impossible to open.

      With a text file a corrupted bit doesn't make it unreadable.

    74. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass missed the point.

      journalctl is welded onto systemd to the point that they might as well be one executable.

      Adding more bloat to get back sane logging is hardly a step forward.

      Damn you are a fucking clueless fuckwit.

    75. Re:New version! by sjames · · Score: 1

      Given the form factor, it's nearly inevitable. Though you can get a shell and run bash scripts on Android.

    76. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you don't know Debian either. 4583 packages depend on "systemd" - see http://lkcl.net/reports/removi...

    77. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      No it isn't.

      Why bother posting such nonsense?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    78. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Then you don't know Debian either. 4583 packages depend on "systemd" - see http://lkcl.net/reports/removi...

      Apparently I know a shit more about Debian that lkcl does. He claims those are packages that depend on libsystemd0, which largely exists to make sure packages don't depend on systemd. And he gets it wrong!

      Just take the first example on that list, "0ad":

      # apt-cache show 0ad | grep systemd
      [ crickets ]

      If you want to know what depends on libsystemd (but why care?)

      # apt-cache rdepends libsystemd0 | wc -l
      71

      Alarming? Not.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    79. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His ass is almost as good as yours ;^)

    80. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, so "somebody" removed features from consolekit to make the systemd a requirement instead?

    81. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      No.

      "somebody" (i.e. Lennart Poettering) went to some trouble to make sure that gdm3 still worked with consolekit.

      "somebody" (i.e. you) didn't bother to fix the bugs in consolekit, so nobody wants to use it.

      Stop whining. Work.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    82. Re:New version! by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like someone decided to bork a perfectly fine and stable piece of software. Software doesn't rot.

    83. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How do you delete a bug report from bugzilla? You can't.

      Yes, you can do it. We do it all of the time. Every time one of our product guys sees a stupid bug created, they delete it immediately. It's so easy our product people do it. They do something like this:

      DELETE FROM bugs WHERE =123;
      ALTER TABLE bugs AUTO_INCREMENT=123;

      Apparently the systemd guys are doing the same, because the bugs I've opened have disappeared several times, and a different bug appeared with the same ID. I bet there's even an add-on to Bugzilla to automate the process.

    84. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove your claim. Of course you stupid Republicans can't. You're destroyed every popular Linux distribution with your systemd garbage. Your kind is disgusting. Go take your Republican xianism somewhere else. I know you hate us and want us to die, but your systemd lies are over the top. Stop deleting our stderr. We need it. I know you Republicans don't understand stdout vs stderr, but stop trying to destory Linux with that ignorance.

    85. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Ah, I love the smell of conspiracy theories in the morning.

      Ever seen the bug list for consolekit?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    86. Re:New version! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for confirming your complete lack of actual arguments.

    87. Re:New version! by Megol · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of everything from the kernel architecture, command line, programs proper.

    88. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      So you work for an organism that employs sociopaths. Nice for you.

      Luckily some of us are not in that position.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    89. Re:New version! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    90. Re:New version! by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Agreed, systemctl status is a big winner. Actually I think that in a few years time most admins will warm up to the idea and wonder what all the fuss was about.

    91. Re:New version! by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      How is a different init script for every distribution simple? Some of the archtectual ideas in systemd are quite simple. For example to make the most out of parralelism they just start everything at once and let each deamon wait/poll/notify for thier dependencies to be ready enough before proceeding. This is a lot simpler to configure that explicitly schedualling okay start thses three deamons A,B, and C. Lauch D,E,F, and G when A is finished, and H and I when B is finished, then after C, E,F, and I are done it's safe to launch L, and after L you can launch X ---- YUCK!.

    92. Re:New version! by WorBlux · · Score: 2

      Systemd via journald can actually capture more log info than systemV init, and can gaurantee the authenticity of certain parts of the data, and can pass it to a traditional loggin deamon if you need it to. Systemd is made from modular components, only a small number are required. All systemd configuration files are plain text and configuration is declarative in style (getting rid of a lot of the complexity in prodecural systemV scripts). So far you actually haven't listed a requirement where systemd fails or can pass with trivial modification to the system.

      Systemd actually brings back a old favorite feature of Unix. multiseat computing, you can have a single high-end computer drive 2-4 seats instead of a low-end driving a single seat, saving money and reducing wastes at the intitutional level.

    93. Re:New version! by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Somebody being the prior maintainers who purposely marked the project as depreciated. Apearently there is a fork called ConsoleKit2, but I'm not confident in it's long-term longevity.

    94. Re: New version! by reverieee · · Score: 1

      The plural of UNIX is Unices, is it not?

    95. Re:New version! by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Mine can't even start a swap partition if it's in fstab, if it happens to be an LVM volume. So glad distros decided it was production ready.

  3. Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, I assume that a bunch of nitwits are going to show up and say that Linux is never going to be used professionally unless they get their naming together. Inevitably GIMP will be brought up as another example. (And perhaps even GNU.)

    Being that I work with distributors and customers from different nations I occasionally encounter people with not only names that are mildly funny but even obscene in my native language.
    Guess what the professionals do? They don't give a shit about the name because if you let the name of something have an impact on your decisions then your choices will be limited by them and that itself is highly unprofessional.
    Fancy names and shiny appearance is marketing tools to hide whatever is under the hood. Don't let that deceive you.

    1. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will SO fucking puke if the kernel is named Millenium edition or someting like that .. me ok with 4.0

    2. Re:Unprofessional by Kjella · · Score: 0

      And you really can't see any difference between a light snicker at a Japanese called Fok Yoo and the facepalm of Honda introducing the new Honda Fokyoo for sale in the US? Another reason nerds won't be taking over the world, I guess...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Unprofessional by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well Toyota did release the MR2 in France....

    4. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what proffessionals do? They hire lawyers to protect their trademark. Which is partly why Coca Cola doesn't call it Cuddly Cola and Pepsi ditched System4d. Otherwise, you are right sleazy marketers don't let anything get in their way of making a buck. But remember, those guys are peons that lied on their resume to get that sales job at the call center.

    5. Re:Unprofessional by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      The reason that professionals don't let it get under their skin is that these foreigners didn't choose their names. Software projects do choose their own names, and those names are frequently either puerile or embarrassing. They are rightfully ridiculed and the open source community should have learned by now that names matter.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Unprofessional by ProzakLord · · Score: 2

      And there was a Mitsubishi Pajero too. I will let you google that from Spanish.

    7. Re:Unprofessional by hodet · · Score: 1

      i would drive that. especially if it was a SUV that got 2 miles per gallon.

    8. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And you really can't see any difference between a light snicker at a Japanese called Fok Yoo and the facepalm of Honda introducing the new Honda Fokyoo for sale in the US? Another reason nerds won't be taking over the world, I guess...

      I'm not familiar with a Fokyoo from Honda, but Honda Jazz used to be called Honda Fitta, they changed name when they found out that it means "cunt" in Swedish.
      Also a bit silly since it only led to a light snicker anyway.

    9. Re:Unprofessional by Sir_Substance · · Score: 1

      It is, however, important that when I tell my mother to google search your product, she gets results pertaining to your product rather than fetish clothing. If she's going to get fetish clothing, I think I'll just tell her to use paint.net

    10. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't call it MR2 in France, but MR (in French the pronouciation of MR2 is very close to "merdeux" which is strongly anticommercial, believe me).

    11. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honda Fitta

    12. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will SO fucking puke if the kernel is named Millenium edition or someting like that .. me ok with 4.0

      Is that 4.0 Home Edition, Corporate Edition, Enterprise Edition, or Ultimate Edition? ;)

    13. Re:Unprofessional by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      And you really can't see any difference between a light snicker at a Japanese called Fok Yoo and the facepalm of Honda introducing the new Honda Fokyoo for sale in the US? Another reason nerds won't be taking over the world, I guess...

      I'm not familiar with a Fokyoo from Honda, but Honda Jazz used to be called Honda Fitta, they changed name when they found out that it means "cunt" in Swedish. Also a bit silly since it only led to a light snicker anyway.

      Mitsubishi Pajero anyone? (wash your hands)

      What's the difference between a wanker and a Pajero driver?

      About 1 tonne.

    14. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason that professionals don't let it get under their skin is that these foreigners didn't choose their names.

      No, the reason professionals don't let it get under their skin is that it is completely irrelevant. It doesn't matter if the customer is a complete asshole that named his firstborn to a direct insult against you. You still have a job to do.
      If you choose an inferior product because the name sounds more professional then you didn't do your job.

    15. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit! Are you really that naive?

      I know that you probably don't want to hear this, but your mother had sex at least once.
      She has also probably tried drugs once in her life and the fetish clothing that showed up in the search result is probably a link that she has visited previously.

      Over the ages it has varied what is acceptable to write publicly. What people does in the bedroom haven't.
      Your grandparents have most likely experimented more in the bedroom than you have.

    16. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pajero is sold as the Montero in Spanish-speaking countries.

    17. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is, however, important that when I tell my mother to google search your product, she gets results pertaining to your product rather than fetish clothing. If she's going to get fetish clothing, I think I'll just tell her to use paint.net

      Your mother probably could not use LaTeX anyway...

    18. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, will you lose sleep over it too? Maybe you can develop a fucking sense of humour instead of sleeping.

    19. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GIMP was better than the original name "Asperger's Syndrome Photoshop Inspired Environment" or ASPIE.

    20. Re:Unprofessional by sjames · · Score: 1

      I wouldn'ty be surprised if the name BOOSTS sales because it IS funny.

    21. Re: Unprofessional by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 0

      How about non-systemd edition? I would buy that!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    22. Re: Unprofessional by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      slackware or gentoo (and devuan eventually) is there for you

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    23. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, naming a release after a semi-random animal is professional?

    24. Re:Unprofessional by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      No, naming every release after the same animal is "professional".

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    25. Re:Unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about the "Audi e-tron" ...

  4. "im a sheep?" well played, Mr Torvalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Very clever of Linux to make a very obvious dig at the recent feminist hijacking attempts made by the SJW community that is vague enough to keep from disrupting business, but clear enough to be caught by those of us in the know.

    Well played, indeed.

    1. Re:"im a sheep?" well played, Mr Torvalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a clever reference to the Chinese New Year, close to the release date.

    2. Re: "im a sheep?" well played, Mr Torvalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the year of the goat, not sheep.

    3. Re: "im a sheep?" well played, Mr Torvalds by _merlin · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's the same character for both in Chinese - you have to disambiguate if you want to be more specific. There are more goats than sheep in China, so it's usually translated as goat if not specific.

    4. Re:"im a sheep?" well played, Mr Torvalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus insults people on an equal opportunity bases. The linux kernel release "Eternal Virginal Neckbeard" was named after MRAs.

    5. Re:"im a sheep?" well played, Mr Torvalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's certainly what it was. There's no middle ground here, it's always horribly offensive because we're all socially awkward, amiright?!

      Or it's named that way because of the Chinese New Year. It's not like he's named them after holidays before. Greased-Turkey was actually a scathing critique about the corruptibility of the Turkish politicians and their government at the time. It didn't have anything to do with the American Thanksgiving holiday that it was released around.

  5. Code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who uses the code name? I've always heard the Linux kernel referenced by version number. FWIW, if unprofessionalism is what Linus was going for then the new name is even better than the last.

    1. Re:Code name by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      I just assumed the codename thing is a jab at Ubuntu. After all, it only exists in the Makefile and nowhere in the actual code. ...

      Yes, I'm aware that Debian started the code name thing, but Ubuntu changes theirs every 6 months so it's way more noticeable.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:Code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody does. They're basically an easter-eggs in each release.

  6. btrfs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would really be nice to have a stable next-gen file system that can scale. ZFS is for the most part FreeBSD only and I'm just not reayd to switch to FreeBSD.

    1. Re:btrfs? by armanox · · Score: 1

      So switch to Solaris and use a real UNIX?

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    2. Re:btrfs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So switch to Solaris and use a real UNIX?

      He already said he wasn't ready to switch to a real Unix.

    3. Re:btrfs? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      It would really be nice to have a stable next-gen file system that can scale. ZFS is for the most part FreeBSD only and I'm just not reayd to switch to FreeBSD.

      There's a Linux version of ZFS. As far as I know, it works quite well, though I can't make any guarantees.

    4. Re:btrfs? by Bengie · · Score: 1

      In FreeBSD you can share ZFS directly into a jail, allowing the "root" of the jail to manage their own volumes, snapshots, etc, but the host can still maintain restrictions on the jail.

      Another fun fact about jails. The host can configure how many jails can be in a jail. Because jails act like a virtualized system, you can just keep chaining jails under jails, each jail can have its own root user, and with ZFS, each jail can manage its own volumes. There is still some work with ZFS resources management that needs to be done to keep jails from DOS'n the host, but you can see how flexible this system is.

  7. Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I had to check that this wasn't a joke. Fucking hell ... words fail me.

    How about "Ha ha you can't trust us to behave even slightly professionally, as we have just neatly demonstrated"

    Imagine the poor fucking foot soldier in a meeting with the CIO.

    "Yes boss, we should skip MSFTs new offering and switch to the latest Linux update."
    "What's it called?"
    "Hurr durr I'ma ...... ah fuck it, I'm quitting IT forever"

    1. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It's called Linux 4.0."

      How's that?

      Already some versions of Linux has been everything from Lucid Lynx to Trust Tahr. Windows is technically Chicago, isn't it?

      And, sorry, but my software on my desktop at the moment consists of Xibo, Google, Putty, Audacity, GIMP, MonkeyJam, Scratch, GLPI (colloquially known as "gloopy"), and numerous others. And I work in a very posh independent school. This is what the kids see every day. Are the school bothered? No.

      If you're put off by the name, use the version number like everyone else. And if your CIO doesn't allow you to deploy something because of a nickname, yet it fulfills all your business purposes and doesn't have the name visible ANYWHERE, he's an idiot.

    2. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why deliberately sabotage your product's appeal with a ludicrous name?

      Imagine you were running for President. You're leading the polls. Things are going well.

      Would you choose to announce that your school nickname was "Cunt-Shuffler JizzHydrant"? After all, it would show how "wacky" and "fun-loving" you were. Cunt-Shuffler 2016!

    3. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by stjobe · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Hurr durr I'ma sheep" won over the alternative "I like online polls" which got 38% of the votes. ...in a vote Torvalds asked people not to vote in, and yet 5,796 people did.

      In the real poll, "v4.0" beat out "v3.20" by 56% to 44% out of 29,110 votes.

      Since nobody ever use the kernel code name, it doesn't matter in the slightest what it's called. Everyone will refer to the kernel as "4.0".

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    4. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I work for a Fortune 500 company and I can assure you that my company's project names are no less ridiculous.

      The only difference is that my company's products aren't open source, so the public almost never gets to see the project names and all the other silly things that show up in the comments of the code.

    5. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      The Linux distros would have done a lot better if they were codenamed after an animal, without the stupid adjective. Lucid Lynx - crap name. Lynx - acceptable name suitable to interest PHBs.

      Its not so much the name but the sense that people who are coming up with these names are finding it amusing or humorous and so it comes across as unprofessional. Anybody who isn't already deeply into Linux and open source will look at such a name and think its a toy or joke, not something to bet the business on. This is why Microsoft sells Windows, if Linux wants to make inroads they have to appear professional first.

      Its like putting your CV up for a job, if its full of schoolboy humour, jokes and nonsense, then you're never going to be invited to interview, no matter how good your qualifications, enthusiasm and intelligence are.

    6. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      The Linux distros would have done a lot better if they were codenamed after an animal, without the stupid adjective. Lucid Lynx - crap name. Lynx - acceptable name suitable to interest PHBs.

      So... Ubuntu is now 'the Linux distros'?

      Those names are typical for Ubuntu and its derivatives, other distributions like Debian, Fedora and SuSE use different naming schemes.

      Disclaimer: I'm a mostly satisfied Ubuntu user.

    7. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The company I work for is currently code-naming their projects after cartoon characters.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by Nadir · · Score: 1

      Actually Ubuntu versions are YY.MM. The adjective and animal name are (mostly) hidden. On Ubuntu's download page I cannot see any mention of Utopic Unicorn, but just 14.10.

      --
      --
      The world is divided in two categories:
      those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
    9. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by tepples · · Score: 1

      "Lynx" by itself sounds more like an Atari handheld video game system or a possible OS X nickname.

    10. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by jafac · · Score: 1

      Dang. In DoD contracting, everything has to be all serious. And they have to form some kind of aggressive acronym. Really gets tiresome.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    11. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Also, most places that do use them internally (eg. the apt repositories) seem to only use the adjective and ditch the animal.

    12. Re:Hurr durr I'ma sheep?? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, trying to work out the backronym for DIE MUTHERFUKER was a pain.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  8. Linus Git message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    .. after extensive statistical analysis of my G+ polling, I've come to
    the inescapable conclusion that internet polls are bad.

    Big surprise.

    But "Hurr durr I'ma sheep" trounced "I like online polls" by a 62-to-38%
    margin, in a poll that people weren't even supposed to participate in.
    Who can argue with solid numbers like that? 5,796 votes from people who
    can't even follow the most basic directions?

    In contrast, "v4.0" beat out "v3.20" by a slimmer margin of 56-to-44%,
    but with a total of 29,110 votes right now.

    Now, arguably, that vote spread is only about 3,200 votes, which is less
    than the almost six thousand votes that the "please ignore" poll got, so
    it could be considered noise.

    But hey, I asked, so I'll honor the votes.

    Source

    1. Re:Linus Git message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But hey, I asked, so I'll honor the votes.

      This just shows how good Linus Torvalds really is as a Benevolent Dictator. Let "The People" vote on something every now and then that isn't really that important, then pretend that you actually care what they think. Kim Jung-un could learn a lot from this guy.

    2. Re:Linus Git message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A copy/paste of the commit message linked in the article is at +5? I must be on /.

  9. So does this mean... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    ... that 4.0 really is a big step up from 3.19 or is it simply the same amount of new stuff that would have gone into a 3.20 release anyway? Not that it really matters, Linux version numbers make about as much sense as Firefox ones these days.

    1. Re:So does this mean... by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      They make more sense than most, as you get a new version every 3 months or so, which either increases the minor version number or occasionally as in this case the major version number. Patches come with the 3rd number. This easily makes more sense than almost all others, Java's numbering scheme seems like it was designed by Kafka, who knows where nvidia generate their driver numbers from.

      So you don't get particular milestones in minor or major version number changes, you get a degree of stability when new will exist and a reliable, predictable change. It makes more sense than the 2.6.xx scheme.

    2. Re:So does this mean... by Trevelyan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Big step from 3.19: No
      Same work as 3.20: Yes

      The reference point is 3.0. Kernel development is now 'inline' (as opposed to the old even=release, odd=development system). That means the minor number just gets bigger and bigger, and the kernel gets further and further away from what 3.0 was.

      This means at somepoint one should bump the major version number; the question is when? Linus has the answer for this: Basically when the minor number gets asthetically displeasing to him, he'll bump the major number and start the minor number again at 0.

      One might ask what will Linus do when the major number gets too big (e.g. >20) ?
      Others might ask, why don't they just use a year/calendar based version number? Like Ubuntu does.

    3. Re:So does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make more sense than most, as you get a new version every 3 months or so, which either increases the minor version number or occasionally as in this case the major version number. Patches come with the 3rd number. This easily makes more sense than almost all others, Java's numbering scheme seems like it was designed by Kafka, who knows where nvidia generate their driver numbers from.

      So you don't get particular milestones in minor or major version number changes, you get a degree of stability when new will exist and a reliable, predictable change. It makes more sense than the 2.6.xx scheme.

      Nah, it just has to do with stupid people who want to see 'a new major release more often'.
      Nobody cares that you've gone from 2.6.28 to 2.6.29, and nobody wants to see 3.19 to 3.20, they want to see "version 4"! Just look at Firefox when they starting making the major number go up every time because being stuck at 3.x (where x keeps changing) isn't as sexy as your competition is at version 21 where it'll be version *22* next!! Whoa, the competition is improving far faster!! People think we're falling behind! We're gonna have to change from 3.x to bumping major versions up and we can be up to our own version 23 within just a couple of years!

      How often have I heard "but (application) hasn't had an update in 3 years" - as if that means anything if it's a stable app and does everything you need it to do, bug free. But we've reached 'moron saturation' to where it's 'important' to have the 'latest and greatest thing', thus people camp in line to get the new iPhone6 when they just spent $500 on the 'new' iPhone5 a year before, and really don't 'need' any new features. Gotta have, gotta have, gotta have... it's *new*, have to have it! OMG, you mean there isn't a 'new' one coming out at least every year for me to 'upgrade' to? Must be a piece of junk then.

      And, FYI, Brawndo has got electrolytes. They're what plants crave. Brawndo

    4. Re:So does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odd/even thing died silently during early kernel 2.6, somewhere during the bitkeeper age. Then came the git age, which cemented the merge window and -rc thing. Even the stable-kernel trees started much earlier (the 2.6.16.y branch being one of the most sucessful kernel releases ever).

      Nowadays there is linux-next, which is an integration testing tree (you must be crazy to run that in anything other than test rigs), and the several per-subsystem development trees, which people _do_ run.

    5. Re:So does this mean... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Others might ask, why don't they just use a year/calendar based version number? Like Ubuntu does.

      Mark my words, Y2.1K is coming for Ubuntu.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    6. Re:So does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll take a while, since the major version probably will remain smaller than the current year number for many decades to come, and I get the impression Linus doesn't want to move the major version past 2000 for no good reason given the aversion to minor versions well under half a hundred.

  10. Re:Its a symptom of larger problem. by ruir · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will luck, we also won't have idiotics ACs too!

  11. In Kernel X Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a complete X Server in the kernel yet? You know you want it.

    1. Re:In Kernel X Server? by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Its the other way round:
      http://youtu.be/GWQh_DmDLKQ?t=...

    2. Re:In Kernel X Server? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

      Is there a reliable and efficient process init and monitor server in the Kernel yet? I think that's what people would really be more interested in getting.

    3. Re:In Kernel X Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A video of some dude flipping Powerpr0n slides, with a laugh track? Go fuck yourself, wannabe MBA scum.

    4. Re:In Kernel X Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Not yet, but the as the kdbus is now submitted to lkml, it can be used as a trojan horse to sneak the rest of systemd into kernel. And before one gets to hit the preview-button, systemd has likely assimilated at least X11, emacs and other essential parts of any init system into it.

  12. Well played, Mr Trollvalds, well played. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

    1. Re:Well played, Mr Trollvalds, well played. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NT is Microsoft tech, you silly goat!

    2. Re:Well played, Mr Trollvalds, well played. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> NT is Microsoft tech, you silly goat!
      Sheep, not goat, you silly sheep.

  13. v39 soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    v4.0? Well, it won't be long before it's up to v39 if Firefox is any indicator.

    1. Re:v39 soon by donaldm · · Score: 1

      v4.0? Well, it won't be long before it's up to v39 if Firefox is any indicator.

      Chrome is already up to 40 whilst konqueror is up to 14 (both web browsers if you are interested) if that is any help.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  14. Party like it's 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1999 welcomed Windows NT 4.0.

    Let's all welcome Linux 4.0 to the 21st century.

    Everybody now!

    Psst. Windows 10 coming in A FEW MONTHS!

    1. Re:Party like it's 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So? If Linux was renamed Linux v6,000,000 would this make better than Windows and MacOS ??

    2. Re:Party like it's 1999 by spauldo · · Score: 2

      NT 4.0 came out in 1996, not 1999. Earlier versions had the same look and feel as Windows 3.x, which would have been _really_ out of place in 1999.

      We had it installed on a 166MHz Alpha back in '97, I think. Funny thing - flood ping the thing and it's like a pause button. Everything just stops. Stop pinging, the clock skips forward and everything goes on as normal.

      My friend with the Aplha wasn't amused. He was less amused every time he left and came back to Linux running on it.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  15. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My IBM mainframe is no longer collecting dust!

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't get the permit to attach yours to the citywide long-distance central heating system? Thankfully, we can all call ourselves sheeples after the upgrade.

  16. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All Linus is showing here is that he's an arrogant twat who "put a poll up as a joke" and then got pissed off that people used it despite him saying not to use it. Image: Linus with hands clenched either side, red faced and screaming out "YOU DIDN'T DO LIKE I WANTED!!!!! YOU ALL POOOP HEADS!!!!". What a fucking babby.

    [Bill Gates] Steve - put the chair down now, I'm still in it!
    We're just about broke so you'll have to throw one of the old one's (again). Or maybe a box of those fucking phones no-one wants...

  17. And yet Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the richest company of all time. So much for professionalism.

    1. Re:And yet Apple by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      is the richest company of all time. So much for professionalism.

      So much for facts.

  18. Linux? Is that still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Back when I was reading slashdot in the 90s I was assured it was just weeks away from taking over the world. Now I'm looking for any serious answer as to why it's anything more than "work for embedded device manuafcturers without getting paid."

  19. Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Hurr durr I'ma sheep."

    (setq sarcasm 'on) Well, that will certainly help me convince the boss to upgrade our infrastructure. (setq sarcasm nil)

    I wish people in Open Source realized that Open source means you are living in a fishbowl, and everyone can see your shit. In a closed system you can call your work anything you like, the marketers will take care of the image. Yet open source, for good or ill, is visible to all, including this kind of nonsense. Juvenile stuff just doesn't work with people who have the authority to make major decisions. You would think that there would be a natural sense of shame in trying to practice marketing when you are really an engineer. Stick to coding guys!

    One reason we use a lot of BSD here instead of linux a few years ago, is that not only is it open source but also there is a very simple release cycle and no one feels the need to name each release some sort of catchy name. The version numbers also actually mean something. It is an engineered solution, not a marketing project for high school nerds.

    Linux will always remain a toy until the people coding it learn to grow up and actually promote its true abilities as an industrial strength tool for doing real work. Hurr durr just doesn't give that message. Even Red Hat has learned this and stuck to a very predictable release numbering which is what the bean counters like. Predictability is what makes risk management possible, and that is why people will invest money in it. Sheep do not get to play that game.

    But well, it's just the kernel, so one could just use the number, but damn this sort of stuff is exactly why linux will never be taken that seriously, even if it is free. /rant off

    1. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bawwww, go give a blowjob to your pointy haired BOSS with your suit and tie. Remember to keep your attitude professional, it's not good for your career to smile in the process. Don't bend your back either, real professionals are always standing tall even if they are being anally probed.

    2. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 2

      "Hurr durr I'ma sheep."

      (setq sarcasm 'on) Well, that will certainly help me convince the boss to upgrade our infrastructure. (setq sarcasm nil)

      I wish people in Open Source realized that Open source means you are living in a fishbowl, and everyone can see your shit. In a closed system you can call your work anything you like, the marketers will take care of the image. Yet open source, for good or ill, is visible to all, including this kind of nonsense. Juvenile stuff just doesn't work with people who have the authority to make major decisions. You would think that there would be a natural sense of shame in trying to practice marketing when you are really an engineer. Stick to coding guys!

      One reason we use a lot of BSD here instead of linux a few years ago, is that not only is it open source but also there is a very simple release cycle and no one feels the need to name each release some sort of catchy name. The version numbers also actually mean something. It is an engineered solution, not a marketing project for high school nerds.

      Linux will always remain a toy until the people coding it learn to grow up and actually promote its true abilities as an industrial strength tool for doing real work. Hurr durr just doesn't give that message. Even Red Hat has learned this and stuck to a very predictable release numbering which is what the bean counters like. Predictability is what makes risk management possible, and that is why people will invest money in it. Sheep do not get to play that game.

      But well, it's just the kernel, so one could just use the number, but damn this sort of stuff is exactly why linux will never be taken that seriously, even if it is free. /rant off

      Linux not taken seriously? Are you insane? It's the most widely distributed kernel on the planet.

      First look at:

      http://droidhyper.com/wp-conte...

      Notice how smart phones and tablets are far outselling PCs? Now look at the distribution of phone operating systems being sold:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

      The kernel is shipping in every single one of those android phones. If you guys are basing your decision on whether or not to use Linux vs BSD servers based on whether or not the releases are named, I think Linux can probaly do ok without you.

    3. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are full of shit. Businesses don't make system decisions based on a kernel code names. They go with Red Hat, Oracle et al. Anyone using BSD is because they are shysters not wanting to comply with the GPL. Nothing more, nothing less. They want others to do all the work then pass it off as their own. I'm going to call you out as a liar or shill. Let's see these products you sell and the board's decisions on why you they were selection. I'm waiting...

    4. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by afairch · · Score: 1

      this sort of stuff is exactly why linux will never be taken that seriously

      Thanks for letting me know it will never be taken seriously - since I have been using it at work (at some pretty serious places) for many years now, this obviously came as a bit of a surprise to me.

    5. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      (setq sarcasm 'on) Well, that will certainly help me convince the boss to upgrade our infrastructure. (setq sarcasm nil)

      What crappy programming style. setq? Really? The proof that a real Fortran programmer can wriet Fortran in any language.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    6. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pro-BSD bias disguised as anti-Linux rant, how tedious and tiresome

      a) nobody who would take offence is going to see the name

      b) the numbering scheme isn't plucked straight from /dev/random (obviously)

      c) if your workplace bases their tech decisions based on what a product's codename your workplace is, uh, not so clever

      d) you sound totally sanctamonious, you might want to take something for that

    7. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Ah the troll is strong with this one!

      But well, it's just the kernel, so one could just use the number, but damn this sort of stuff is exactly why linux will never be taken that seriously, even if it is free. /rant off

      Over one billion android smartphone and tablet users world wide might disagree with you and that is over 65% of the market.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    8. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by donaldm · · Score: 1

      The kernel is shipping in every single one of those android phones. If you guys are basing your decision on whether or not to use Linux vs BSD servers based on whether or not the releases are named, I think Linux can probaly do ok without you.

      I concur I did not want to comment any further for what I consider a troll. Personally I don't have any issue with BSD Unix since it actually was the first Unix I ever worked on in 1980 but many business or at least those that want to make money want an OS they know is going to be supported and the track record of the company that is going to support that OS.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    9. Re:Another Reason Businesses prefer BSD by sjames · · Score: 1

      OK, so I suppose Linux isn't doing well in the ass diamond industry, but otherwise it is widely used.

  20. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, a chair throwing joke with Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer? Shows how out of touch you are with Microsoft

  21. Single Quote? by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All I'm wondering is whether there has ever been a single quote in the codename before? Virtually guaranteed to break someone's build system...

    1. Re:Single Quote? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      That's a feature, not a bug.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    2. Re:Single Quote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      Besides, one would think people learned to not have braindamage in build scripts after the amount of crap that broke with 2.6.x.y and later 3.x.y.

    3. Re:Single Quote? by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      There hasn't, but I wouldn't expect it to matter. I don't believe the name is actually used anywhere (everyone just uses the version number), and its only defined in a makefile that's part of the kernel git repo. I'm not even sure if there's a rule for when it should be changed - I suspect it's merely whenever Linus feels like it.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  22. Why not to 11! by HnT · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should have just gone straight to eleven because, you know, it's one more than ten plus that way they could have one-upped OS X _AND_ Windows! (and it's a freaking prime on top of that!)

    --
    "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Why not to 11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless your playing the game like a round of golf... in case they are all ready winning and OS X and Windows have gone way beyond par!

    2. Re:Why not to 11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory These go to Eleven!

    3. Re:Why not to 11! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Well, four is, like, twice a prime, so nyah nyah nyah!

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:Why not to 11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is linux tap: "This OS goes to 11."

    5. Re:Why not to 11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also the fourth number (fourth four = squarish rootish thingy) in the pyramid for 10, which is _half_ of 20, which would've been the minor for 3.x. Half Life 3 AND Half Life 4 confirmed!

  23. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by DenaliPrime · · Score: 1

    You've obviously never read a post by Linus where he was genuinely pissed off. Reading comprehension would tell you that he was expressing mild disgust over the number of people who either failed to comprehend his instructions, or comprehended them and did it anyway.

    But hey, believe what you want if it makes you happy! :)

    --
    I! Tego Arcana Dei.
  24. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, Linux is only on embedded devices. It's not running on my phone, laptop, desktop, and server at all.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  25. Click bait for Moronix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they did was quote Linus' G+ post. Fail. They're officially as bad as OSNews.

  26. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have you no clue who linus is? you havent heard one of his rants? i mean hell i would never touch the linux kernel code (im not even in that realm of coding comprehension) but i do subscribe to the mailing list mainly to read him go off the handle on people who deserve it (atleast in my opinion)

  27. What happens when the major number gets too high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If Linus' main motivation for bumping the kernel's version is because he doesn't like how high the minor version number is getting, and he keeps bumping the major number because of that, at some point, the major number is going to get as high as the minor number gets when he starts not liking how big the number is. So, presumably, he'll be unhappy with how high the major number is at that point, but what's he going to do? What do you do when you have Linux 19 and don't likely how high the number is? Change the name to something other than Linux? You might be able to go from 3.20 to 4.0, but the version number after 19.19 is going to end up with a 20 in it either way. Maybe that's when he'll retire and let someone else run things...

  28. TOO FAST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Four major version in 22 years, this is too fucking fast! You just want to replace everything with systemd and wayland! FUCK CHANGE!

    1. Re:TOO FAST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA behind the systemd push?

  29. The top-level domain by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you can tell her to use Paint.net, then you can tell her to use GIMP.org.

  30. Goat Something Else by tepples · · Score: 1

    So perhaps "sheep" was used to keep people from thinking of Goat Something Else (GoatSE). And do NOT search for that at work.

    1. Re:Goat Something Else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not search for that EVER, unless under a quite impressive amount of privacy shields. The ad networks will start pushing nightmare fuel crap to supposedly work-safe pages if they correlate that domain with your profile...

  31. Maturity of tools for a particular format by tepples · · Score: 1

    The difference is that there are more, more varied, and more mature tools to work with the binary formats "ASCII text" and "UTF-8 text" than the binary format "systemd log".

    1. Re:Maturity of tools for a particular format by samwichse · · Score: 1

      journalctl -f... use whatever tool you want. Just like using tail -f, but eebil because it contains systemd code?

    2. Re:Maturity of tools for a particular format by shaitand · · Score: 1

      For starters it's evil because it's called "journalctl." Sounds like a step in the direction of the ugly, clunky, and unintuitive powershell.

  32. Good job Barsteward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The little scumbags with their sockpuppet armies downmod "weapon" is effete when everyone knows how they work (as both yourself & Eunuchswear pointed out) to *try* to effetely "hide" ANYTHING that upsets THEIR "agendas" and makes them look like shit (with them running from a straight & fair challenge Eunuchswear put to them here http://linux.slashdot.org/comm... that they can't live up to).

    APK

    P.S.=> This place has serious honesty issues & reflects the morals of those who created it... how? Ok - WHY WON'T THEY LET YOU SEE WHO DOWNMODDED YOU?? ANSWER = the owners & sponsors here do it is why along with their "cronies" & it would show patterns of mod abuse used that way, no questions asked...They illustrate they can't BACKUP THEIR BULLSHIT! Facts and truth to them? No big deal, just downmod it away! They'll CLAIM "it would start flamewars" well, assholes? YOU HAVE THEM ANYWAY! This would help stop it... they don't WANT it stopped.

    The little fucks doing bogus downmods KNOW it would betray their sockpuppetry & be a LOT OF WORK to maintain the karma farming they do via sockpuppets to mod up their OWN posts and downmod anyone's that doesn't fit their LIMITED MIND view (& they are limited no questions asked - they're easily seen through) - thoe people? PUREST TRASH! apk

    1. Re:Good job Barsteward by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      you just proved my point, thanks.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  33. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by donaldm · · Score: 1

    Back when I was reading slashdot in the 90s I was assured it was just weeks away from taking over the world. Now I'm looking for any serious answer as to why it's anything more than "work for embedded device manuafcturers without getting paid."

    I suggest you look at your smartphone or tablet, over one billion people might disagree with you.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  34. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Linus is showing here is that he's an arrogant twat who "put a poll up as a joke" and then got pissed off that people used it despite him saying not to use it.

    Linus is actually referring to another test poll in which he has the options "I like online polls" and "Hurr durr I'ma sheep". Check out his Google+ page. I'm not sure what the purpose of that test poll is, but I suppose that Linus is metatrolling to try to see how easily people just chuck random votes to random online polls. Or something like that.

  35. Could have been worse by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    At least it didn't end up as the 'Butt-head memorial kernel'

  36. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you are showing is that you have no sense of humor.

  37. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's not on any of our three servers, or any of our laptops/desktops, or on our router, or on our wireless extender, or on our TV, or on either of our smartphones. Or maybe it is on all these things...

  38. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it is not better than Windows anymore...

  39. Long live the Terminator! by SirMasterboy · · Score: 1

    Coming soon...

    https://lh5.googleusercontent....

    (notice the kernel version)

    1. Re:Long live the Terminator! by TFlan91 · · Score: 1

      Thankfully it reads 4.1.15-1.1381_SKYN12nnmp

      I will be watching ever so closely for this build number and will be running to my bomb shelter when it comes.

    2. Re:Long live the Terminator! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will consider the "slawes.sky.net" means "Slackware Awe" after Skynet deciding to use Slackware to not become a slave of systemd, the true greatest criminal AI.

    3. Re:Long live the Terminator! by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      In the (excellent) Sarah Connor Chronicles, SPOILERS the AI the main characters thought was going to become Skynet was actually working against another AI who seems more likely to have become Skynet. What I'm saying is, the true nature of systemd won't be apparent for another few twists and turns of time travel at least . . .

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  40. Good Job Eunuchswear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Put 'em on the spot by asking for proof they can't produce.

    * IF they produce those errors from a reputable source, they'd have a valid point.

    ( Clearly, they do not. You win easily...)

    The little schmucks even DOWNMODDED my congratulating you here before as that's all they know how to do http://linux.slashdot.org/comm... well, fuck them - this is how & WHY I defeat them easily - by letting them BURN UP THEIR MODPOINTS & I just post again (no limits ac poster here, no stupid "10 posts per day" from me, assholes - I nullify your bullshit, everytime, easily - better HOPE I don't tell everyone & ANYONE here how it's done, weasels... lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> It's the surefire way of shutting the trolling shitbrains around here the fuck up, every time... apk

  41. It's a step up from Diseased Newt, I guess. by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    ...

  42. Re:What happens when the major number gets too hig by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    linux seems to average a release about every 2 months. Which would mean a series every 40 months. To fill up series 4 through 19 inclusive would take about 16*40=640 months = ~ 53 years. According to google linus is currently 45 so that would make him 98.

    I would expect him to be at the very least retired and quite possiblly dead by then.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  43. Fragility by tepples · · Score: 1

    If a text editor is defective, you can use a different text editor. If the program that writes a text file is defective, you can still extract strings and resynchronize after the defective part by seeking toward the next newline. But if journalctl fails to read your binary log files, whether due to a defect in the logging process or due to a defect in journalctl itself, then how do you get information out?

    1. Re:Fragility by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      It would be a really horrible binary format if there wasn't an included newline equivalent.
      http://www.freedesktop.org/wik...

      Because the format is designed to be mostly append-only you should be able to skip over most corruption in the reader, and the writer should rotate the log file if any corruption is found. Additionally there is a mechanism that lets you know with high certainty weather a section of the file has been corrupted since it was tagged. "Tag objects are used to seal off the journal for alteration. In regular intervals a tag object is appended to the file. The tag object consists of a SHA-256 HMAC tag that is calculated from the objects stored in the file since the last tag was written, or from the beginning if no tag was written yet"

  44. Re:What happens when the major number gets too hig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's gone up a whole four major versions in 22 fucking years. Get a grip.

  45. Re:What happens when the major number gets too hig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or he could become the first zombie kernel admin. Once again Linux brings innovation.

  46. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by caseih · · Score: 2

    Yeah you've been gone a long time. Not just from Sashdot, but apparently there are yet rocks one can hide under!

    Turns out that the Slashdot predictions in the 90s about taking over the world pretty much came to pass. The obscure project Linux is now known by everyone, and Linux is pretty much everywhere now for good or bad. Maybe not on the desktop, which is an every shrinking small part of the overall picture. Linux dominates the mobile world, pretty much swept clean the super computing world and the cloud computing landscape, and is still a huge player in the server world. It's not work for free either. Linux development is mostly done by full-time paid employees of quite a few companies that depend on Linux, and make serious money from it. So Linux really has been wildly successful, and makes people working on it a lot of money, and we all benefit. Pretty amazing picture.

  47. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where have you been for the last 10 years ? It has taken the world, outside of PC.

      A Linux kernel powers 99% of smart TV, 85% of mobile phones and tablets, and basically ALL the "things". It also runs 95%+ of all the servers in the world, 98%+ of the supercomputers, your car internal computer... I could go on ...

  48. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by sjames · · Score: 1

    It did a pretty good job of it. Not only is it all over the embedded space, it has over half of the servers on the internet. So much so that the big expensive commercial Unix alikes went away.

  49. Re:New crap in Linux kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well put, gentlesir!

  50. The GIMP is still lame. by westlake · · Score: 0

    I occasionally encounter people with not only names that are mildly funny but even obscene in my native language. Guess what the professionals do?

    They keep their big mouths shut out of respect for their hosts.

    This has nothing to do with the geek's deeply embedded compulsion to inflict his sophomoric sense of humor on a larger audience.

    Externals matter. Marketing matters, even in FOSS.

  51. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it is not better than Windows anymore...

    It is Windows now that we have systemd.

  52. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some people simply don't get sarcasm, particularly when it's in a written form.

    In my experience the ratio of those who get it to those who don't varies enormously from country to country; UK residents are more likely to think it's a joke while Americans are more likely to get upset, shoot their neighbors dog and start burning down buidings owned by some other ethnicity.

    But I digress...

  53. Deprecate systemD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about time somebody said something about systemd.

  54. ftape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ftape or I'm not coming

  55. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is just about broke huh?

    wow what colour is the sky in your fantasy world?

  56. Re:Linus pissed people didn't do as he wanted. by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    > What a fucking babby.

    how is linus formed

  57. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    At my home and my office it dominates the desktop, too.

  58. Re:Linux? Is that still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    psssh. the M$ sheep might know.

  59. You're welcome... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put it THIS way: I've lived thru their machinations myself & KNEW *exactly* what you meant...

    * Downmods, as they're done here @ least, are PUREST AGENDA FURTHERING BULLSHIT (which is WHY they won't let you SEE WHO DOWNMODDED YOU, so you can @ least confront them directly to justify those "hit & run" hide a post downmods they issue...)

    APK

    P.S.=> It truly DOES say a lot about the "moral fiber" of those who designed & run this site (zero morals)... apk

  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion