Slashdot Mirror


Use Astrology To Save Britain's Health System, Says MP

An anonymous reader writes: An MP from the governing Conservative Party has said that using astrology could radically improve the performance of Britain's National Health Service and that its opponents are "racially prejudiced" and driven by "superstition, ignorance and prejudice." David Treddinick even claims he has "helped" fellow legislators through astrology.

320 comments

  1. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/health/aortic-aneurysms-caused-by-movement-of-saturn-admits-nhs-2015022595714

    1. Re:Oblig by shpokas · · Score: 1

      what research, specifically, was performed?

    2. Re:Oblig by JRV31 · · Score: 1

      Next are they going to try to tell us alchemy is not medieval junk science?

  2. Please tell me this is satire by Headw1nd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is...is this real? Not some wayward story from The Onion?

    1. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately it's real. Tredinnick has been infamous for these sorts of comments for years now.

    2. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Barsteward · · Score: 0

      hopefully he'll join UKIP soon as UKip is the holding pen for all crackpots

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    3. Re:Please tell me this is satire by knightghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I blame the people that voted him in. Politicians are the result, voters are the cause.

    4. Re:Please tell me this is satire by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the bright side, it's nice to be able to point to this guy when some European elitist claims that Americans (or more specifically, southerners) somehow have a monopoly on unscientific idiocy.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Racemaniac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm actually wondering what the result would be if they began implementing this.

      From a pure biological point of view it's ofcourse pure bullshit.

      But we can hardly deny that our current doctors just suck with the psychological side of feeling bad/illnesses. A lot of the power in "alternative medicine" is to support the people mentally, which as the placebo effect shows also helps quite a bit. It doesn't cure your cancer, but adding some spiritual side to the process that doesn't treat the people as patient #145563255 might actually give quite a positive result.

      I think that no longer ignoring the psychological needs of people who are ill is one of the next big medical challenges. I've read people who fought cancer who said that the interaction with doctors & staff is also one of the hardest things. They seem to think you should be able to deal with all the shit that comes with it yourself and be fully informed and pay attention to every detail etc... while you're feeling like shit due to chemotherapy and are trying to resolve everything in your life before it's too late.

      Now we seem to have 2 branches of "medicine". One that cures your body, but doesn't care much about your mind. And one that's full of "you should feel good and be happy" but doesn't know shit about your body (well, depending on the alternative medicine. there are some that do know some things, but still won't cure cancer).

    6. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm getting a feeling that most people here are going to say some incredibly anti-democratic things in here in a moment without even realising it.

      Reality is, democratically elected parliament isn't supposed to be a bunch of elites but a cross-section of electorate. That means it needs to have a few superstitious people to be able to properly represent the population which also has such people in statistically significant amounts.

    7. Re:Please tell me this is satire by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      "Reality is, democratically elected parliament isn't supposed to be a bunch of elites but a cross-section of electorate."
      Yes and no.
      No they are not supposed to be elites in fact the whole idea of anyone being elite is counter to a democracy society in my opinion. But the UK does seem to like there royals and giving people knighthoods.
      But the people elected are supposed to be the best person to represent the population and that should include again IMHO a certain level of education and intelligence.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Please tell me this is satire by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 2

      That's actually the first thing I thought as well when I read TFS

    9. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      You seem to ignore psychology.

      The problem is basically funding, highly trained professionals getting not enough resources to helt people.

    10. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first thought (and I'm a european).

    11. Re:Please tell me this is satire by pr100 · · Score: 2

      You're surprised by politicians being scientifically clueless? I guess you can't be an American....

    12. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      And he's part of the Conservative Party instead of the Silly Party?

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    13. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Racemaniac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I mean in common treatment. Unless you complain about psychological issues (or act really really weird), you won't see anyone who really cares about your mental status. People with serious illnesses who go to modern medicine for treatment end up in a pharmacological & scientific world where their body will be scanned, probed, checked, double checked, analysed, etc.... they'll be given substances & treatments to cure whatever they find. But psychological assistance to go along with this just doesn't belong in that world it seems. You're here for cancer, not for feeling good about yourself.
      And i think we still vastly underestimate how much also feeling good actually helps us get trough things, and helps our body going in such grave situations.

    14. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha point to that guy. The southerns do not have a monopoly, there is at least one guy from england who is on the same level.

    15. Re:Please tell me this is satire by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was thinking Texas, in particular.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    16. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

      I could see that in a proportional-representation system. If 10% of the population is really into homeopathy, they could vote for a party that represents those interests. But the UK has a first-past-the-post system, like the US, meaning members are elected by getting the most votes in a specific district. Is Tredinnick's district really majority in favor of astrology being funded by the NHS? My guess is no, and that he's elected despite this issue, not because of it. Incumbents are very hard to knock off, especially outside of marginal districts (his district is a Conservative stronghold, and the UK has no party primaries), so he keeps winning regardless of whether his district's residents think astrology is useful or not.

    17. Re:Please tell me this is satire by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did the voters really have a choice? For a start the choice at the general election is for both the ruling party and local MP, so if your national party of choice puts up an idiot as your local candidate you can support one or the other but not both.

      Tredinnick had a 9% majority in 2010, ahead of the the Liberal Democrats. Their vote has collapsed now though... The most realistic alternative might be UKIP in his constituency. So it's a choice between someone who believes in astrology and closet racists, or maybe treacherous liars if the LDs can pull it back together.

      We rejected the alternative vote and I imagine would reject PR on similar grounds (too thick to understand it), so this is what we are going to be stuck with for the foreseeable future.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or you will wake up and realise that each party has its 'crackpots' regardless of which ones you would prefer to focus on.

    19. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this.

      A relative of mine has had much the same experience: They might experience kindness or compassion at the hospital, but it seems to be a situation where the individual nurse decides on a case-by-case base to take time out of their duties - there are apparently no institutional procedures or goals related to the mental welfare of patients with somatic (non-psychological) illnesses.

    20. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      You seem to ignore psychology.

      The problem is basically funding, highly trained professionals getting not enough resources to helt people.

      You mean psychiatry. Psychology is a not a medical discipline and therefore treatment by a psychologist is actually alternative treatment.

    21. Re:Please tell me this is satire by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      This might work... But not because astrology works, but because enough people believe in it.
      If someone believes in their horoscope and says today should be a good day to be adventurous, they may use that day to take more risks, and injure themselves in the process. Or the fact that particular stars are visible during different seasons. So while Orion is visible, then there is a higher chance to get the flu.
      Astrology isn't science, but it is just a bunch of data loosely correlated with results. These data correlations could be used to predict higher health care activity.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    22. Re:Please tell me this is satire by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      You seem to ignore the psychological needs of doctors, who have 60 patients and are going to lose 1 of them every week. By the time they stop they have filled a graveyard. With no place at home to talk about their cartload of deaths and dyers.

    23. Re:Please tell me this is satire by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      Is...is this real? Not some wayward story from The Onion?

      If you are old enough, perhaps you will remember Nancy Reagan...

    24. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a UK citizen and someone whose tax contributions help to pay this fucktard's wages I urge him to prove that astrology can help the sick. This can be achieved by infecting him with a virulent pathogen then observing carefully just how effective applied astrology is in curing the resuling illness. If, for example, he were to survive say ebola or lassa fever purely by astrology related treatment I would reconsider his claims, until then this is nothing but Woo from someone in a position of governmental resposibility in the fields of both health care and science and technology and a serious worry for those of rational thought and outlook.

      C'mon Mr Tredinnick, lets see your money where your mouth is.

    25. Re:Please tell me this is satire by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      This is UK, they don't really count as European (true Scotsmen usually do, but this MP isn't)

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    26. Re:Please tell me this is satire by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it's real.

      Why's that unfortunate? Do you have any evidence that acting randomly would be inferior to what we have now?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    27. Re:Please tell me this is satire by itzly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did the voters really have a choice?

      No, it was in the stars.

    28. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Onion is not fake, they are just ahead of reality. They predicted:

      - RIAA sues radio stations for playing free music

      - Gillette creates 5-blade razor

      - Neil Armstrong's widow cleans out closet of "space crap" (finds museum gems)

      - Joe The Plumber ("dude" pundit)

      - Charlie Sheen going violent

      - Newly elected Bush announcing era of peace and prosperity is over (911, Iraq, mortgage crash)

      - Ann Coulter saying radiation good for you. (Oh wait, Onion missed that one.)

    29. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice load of bollocks you uttered, but still bollocks!.

    30. Re: Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its rural Leicestershire. Our equivalent of banjo country.

    31. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      The alternative is that he best represents the level of education and intelligence of his constituents....

    32. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      did i anywhere imply it's the current staff that needs to add this to their huge list of tasks?
      Dedicated people trained to handle this who bridge the gap between the science part and the person would probably be a far better idea.

    33. Re:Please tell me this is satire by hawkfish · · Score: 1

      This is UK, they don't really count as European (true Scotsmen usually do, but this MP isn't)

      "Heavy Fog In Channel. Continent Cut Off"
          -- Headline in The Times, October 22, 1957

      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    34. Re:Please tell me this is satire by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      To be fair, he's just a low level back-bench MP without too much power. It's like we found the dumbest guy in the country and elected him president or something.

      Still, you have a point. We have yet to see an atheist Prime Minister. Can't seem to abolish the monarchy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In which country are you that a doctor does not earn high enough to afford private (let alone service/system/association/union-provided) psychological support? I am genuinely fucking curious what kind of though process creates a strawman comparing a voluntary professional with someone who falls ill.

    36. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People usually have higher priorities than side issue "quirks" some politicians have. People may vote for someone regardless of what other sides they take in other issues if they take the right issues for things they care most about. When you consider that the crazier ideas like this are unlikely to gain any traction and don't do much other than create headlines, it factors even less in to the decision who to vote for, even if you are disgusted at the idea of astrology becoming part of the NHS.

    37. Re: Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Medicine is not a Science so therefore it too is an alternative treatment.

      Failure of medicine to address patient psychology is well documented and well known for contrary results.

    38. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If 10% of the population is really into homeopathy, they could vote for a party that represents those interests.

      If 10% of the population is really into homeopathy, what percentage of that would consider that the top issue to base their voting on? And even if the other 90% is really anti-homeopathy, how many of them would prioritize homeopathy over more traditional conservative-liberal splitting issues? Although there is a bias towards incumbents, I don't think that is a major factor in getting crackpot ideas like this into office, but more people picking what they perceive as the lesser of evils.

    39. Re:Please tell me this is satire by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

      One day, we will find his money in the hands of trained medical professionals as he shushes aside his astrologer in favor of a life-saving procedure. Of course, until then, he'll simply be determining the treatment of UK citizens based on star charts and snake oil.

      Wait, ya'll have snakes over there, right?

    40. Re:Please tell me this is satire by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1

      Hey, having an ornamental monarchy is actually a pretty cool thing. It's not like they are a huge cost on the budget, and they more than make up for it in the tourism they generate.

      Be very careful getting rid of them, because once they are gone, re-establishing them is incredibly difficult.
      -

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    41. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have republican religious fuckwits - we have conservative fuckwits! He is probably COE so not religious.

    42. Re:Please tell me this is satire by cusco · · Score: 1

      It's like we found the dumbest guy in the country and elected him president or something.

      We in the US have a head start, we elected Reagan in 1980. His wife Nancy's astrologer seems to have had a say in a number of policy decisions, especially later in his second term when the Alzheimers was setting in.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    43. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Homeopathy works better the fewer people believe in it.

    44. Re:Please tell me this is satire by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, his idiot opinion on astrology doesn't really matter, since he's not going to make much headway against hundreds of other MPs. In the US, a well-place committee member can make his personal biases and idiosyncracies matters of law. I don't know if this guy has similar power; he is on the Health Committee and Sci-Tech committee but I don't think he has a lot of pull there.

      My bigger concern, though, is in the constellations. Not of stars, but of beliefs. Poor reasoning in one area doesn't have to mean he reasons poorly in every area, but I've found that certain kinds of stupidities tend to cluster together. If he's just a guy with a stupid idea about the stars, even a well-placed guy, there's only so much harm he can do, and his constituents can be forgiven for electing him despite a foible. But it would not surprise me to discover that he buys into other conspiracy theories and applies similar poor reasoning to other areas. If that's the case, yeah, I blame his constituents.

    45. Re:Please tell me this is satire by cusco · · Score: 1

      One of the more amusing aspects of astrology is that the tables that they use were not accurate to start with, and didn't allow for precession, stellar movement, etc. Now 800 years later when "Jupiter is in Orion" according to their charts it probably isn't actually anywhere near it.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    46. Re:Please tell me this is satire by puppetman · · Score: 1

      We in Canada have a born-again Christian as Prime Minister. We win!

    47. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's satire, but if you couldn't bother to check out the main page of dailymash.co.uk in order to realize that it is UK's version of the onion, you probably deserve to believe that.

    48. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes indeed we do have snakes although only the Adder is likely dangerous and then only if you start pissing them off.

      I guess the point I was trying to make is that all of these Woo peddlers should be forced, on pain of being forced to publicly retract their claims and surrender any position of authority they may hold, to provide the ultimate proof of their claims by offering to 'cure' themselves of the lethal illness of their choice, under controlled scintific conditions, without recourse to any other form of treatment.

      I remember an expose type current affairs programme from the '90s investigating a woman who had published a book on living on prana, (god's light,) and also ran a centre to train people how to do so by living on nothing but water for a period of around a month. Secret filming showed emaciated people lying on basic cots, some little more than skin and bone, unable even to raise themselves to sit, being berrated and insulted because they weren't trying hard enough. Some left the training before they were deemed to have completed their 'transformation' and were ridiculed, branded as failures, and held up as examples to those who remained. Unsurprisingly the centre was closed shortly after one 'trainee' died of malnurishment however the woman in charge was never prosecuted and was allowed to continue peddling her nonsense in her book without any caveat. It may not come as any surprise either that, when offered the oportunity to respond by the programme makers, she could not provide details of trainees who had succeeded, stuck to her claims, and even had the audacity to say that the person who had died didn't believe enough and had not made the effort required to sustain themself purely on god's light. When asked if she would like to submit to controlled observation to prove her claims that she herself was able to live on nothing more than prana, she claimed that at that time she only did so for a few weeks at a time and actually didn't feel she had any thing to prove.

      I would like to offer an open challenge to any of these charlatans to come forward and prove the effectiveness of their treatment/remedy/health regime by undergoing said process themselves. At risk, their life should they fail. At stake, verifiable evidence to prove their claims and a profitable corner of the health care market.

    49. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue here is not that he was elected to government holding beliefs like this, (we've had our fair share of 'special' MPs in the past,) it's that this guy actually holds positions of authority on comitees with responsibility for science and technology and most importantly in this case health. This is like giving Richard Dawking authority to decide the future direction of the church of england.

      People like this are why homeopathy is now recommended and provided as an alternative to conventional medicine on the NHS. For his stated beliefs he should be stripped of any position he currently holds requiring ration thought. Let him stay in his constuency seat as long as he can keep getting re-elected but FFS keep him away from the important shit.

    50. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Zephyn · · Score: 1

      Or a certain Bloom County comic.

    51. Re:Please tell me this is satire by kanweg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Reality is, democratically elected parliament isn't supposed to be a bunch of elites but a cross-section of electorate. That means it needs to have a few superstitious people to be able to properly represent the population which also has such people in statistically significant amounts."

      We let the people who can cook well be cooks, the people who drive well be drivers, etc. etc. Except politicians. Apparently it is perfectly possible to run a country without any qualifications (except perhaps the skill to convince other to vote for you). Or by averaging the opinion of milions of people. That is a terrible kind of democracy.

      I would like politicians to pass various exams before they're allowed to "rule". (Logical reasoning, fallacies, decision making).
      I would like anyone to be able to comment on whatever is up for vote (in a moderated system where any comment is allowed only once). So, a single individual could change the outcome, by having a strong argument or a better idea, benefitting everyone.

      Why choose for a form of democracy that results in mediocrity, instead of excellence?

      Bert

    52. Re:Please tell me this is satire by kqs · · Score: 1

      Huh. In the US, the conservative party IS the silly party.

    53. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      every party certainly does have crackpots but not to the extent of UKip, they have "gay marriage caused the storms" type members, not seen that in any other UK party as yet.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    54. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      no, the hippie ones tend to be in the Green party but every party is united in being against UKip. hippie is not the same as crackpot

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    55. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      there is more than one for example.. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-e...

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    56. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      he should be nowhere near a Sci-Tech committee if he has these beliefs

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    57. Re:Please tell me this is satire by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      I usually just point to the widespread European opposition to genetically engineered crops for that one. At least our creationists aren't opposing lifesaving technology and actively destroying scientific research. As a plant scientist, I have to say I view Europe as a fairly hostile place for science. Europeans have absolutely no room to act as if Americans are the only ones with the problem of opposition to science when that sort of attitude is so prevalent in their own backyard.

    58. Re:Please tell me this is satire by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      British politicians become more - Well, what is the right word for it? - nuts and nuts in recent years. Their chieftain is Cameron, but there are other super strange and politic actors around, like Farage. Also Tony Blair the previous chieftain was not much different. There are a lot of funny stories about him and his wife about not so scientific methods. However, they are only there to play politics while Murdoch decides what public opinion is and the City decides what real politics have to look like.

      Maybe, they will sink themselves and vote for Brexit. We will see.

    59. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logically then, when no one believes, then homeopathy will cure everything??

      Well sign me up!

    60. Re:Please tell me this is satire by kqs · · Score: 1

      This depends on the doctor. My doctor is very good at explaining things and going through the details and side effects of treatments, which greatly improves my mental status. I know some doctors don't do that though, which is a problem. And some people need more help from their provider than others.

      Also, many people have mental issues which are not tied with their physical symptoms, and those people are poorly treated both by the US health care system (which treats mental issues as second class) and by the US culture (which treats mental issues as "your fault").

      Note that the ACA is a major step forward here; now, all health plans have to cover mental illnesses and rehabilitative services.

    61. Re:Please tell me this is satire by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I believe that won't work for you.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    62. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. It's not first *past* the post. It's *closest* to the post.

    63. Re:Please tell me this is satire by mattsday · · Score: 1

      To be fair, he's just a low level back-bench MP without too much power. It's like we found the dumbest guy in the country and elected him president or something.

      Still, you have a point. We have yet to see an atheist Prime Minister. Can't seem to abolish the monarchy.

      Both Clement Atlee and James Callaghan were atheists - that's two.

      Fortunately though religion has been at the fringe of our leaders manifesto and I hope it long continues!

      --
      Now there's one hoopy frood who really knows where his towel is!
    64. Re:Please tell me this is satire by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      She's the richest woman in the country but still gets tax money. We would get far more money from tourism if we opened up the various palaces and state buildings she has exclusive use of to the public. She would still be around, just as an ordinary citizen instead of a constitutional monarch.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    65. Re:Please tell me this is satire by ftolar69 · · Score: 1

      I wish someone would do likewise to some of our more notorious nitwits. an idiot in government is a bad thing.

    66. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh burn! That's some hard hitting satirical commentary...
      for the 5th grade.

    67. Re:Please tell me this is satire by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I assumed that what Tredinnick meant was NHS was so bad that anything would be an improvement. If he's talking about making diagnosis based on a person's horoscope, that would be pretty loonie; if he's talking about head nurses not letting staff take extra time off durring full moons in OB, ER or mental health then that would make sense.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    68. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Right. His not being Labour was probably important and outweighed the consideration that he was an utter loon.

    69. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      However the UK often likes to deny that it's really European, as that would associate them with the continentals who bathe in a different manner. Similarly, I suspect a lot of Europeans would like to consider the UK as not really one of them, sort of like the crazy uncle who tells inappropriate jokes at family gatherings.

      Actually I suspect if you grab a "typical" European and point out all the politicians and leaders in Europe who are just a goofy as American politicans and leaders, they'll have plenty of excuses why those people don't count. As in they're part of the racist party that no one pays attention to, unless there's an unexpected showing at an election in which case all right thinking Europeans go into a panic. Or they're from on of those warm climates like Greece or Spain which messes up the brain. Or they're from one of the "new" EU countries and not really European. Or many other excuses to maintain the fiction.

    70. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Isn't a democracy about not caring what the MP or congress member believes as long as they all vote exactly as directed by party leadership? At least that's what all the modern democracies seem to be about.

    71. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      We used to have a "Natural Law Party" which was basically a very thin disguise over Transcendental Meditation. They would campaign on a platform of "proven" scientific techniques to reduce crime and recidivism through programs in prison, and other things like that. Eventually they got so few votes that they were dropped from the ballot in California.

    72. Re:Please tell me this is satire by mjwx · · Score: 1

      But the UK does seem to like there royals

      I dont expect you to understand but, it's nice to have a leader you dont have to be disappointed in. Even if they're only a symbolic leader and haven't wielded any real power in 400 years.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    73. Re:Please tell me this is satire by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Homeopathy works better the fewer people believe in it.

      So what you're saying is if we dilute the belief in homoeopathy, it'll start working?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    74. Re:Please tell me this is satire by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Huh. In the US, the conservative party IS the silly party.

      They're the silly party everywhere.

      However I believe even the Official Monster Raving Loony Party would refuse to accept homoeopaths.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    75. Re:Please tell me this is satire by compro01 · · Score: 1

      We had one of those up here. They were a somewhat popular protest vote in the 90s. They got 0.63% of the national vote in 1993, which is better than the Libertarians or Communists have ever managed.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    76. Re:Please tell me this is satire by packrat0x · · Score: 1

      if he's talking about head nurses not letting staff take extra time off durring full moons in OB, ER or mental health then that would make sense.

      That would be using astronomy, not astrology.

      --
      227-3517
    77. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet Reagan was a better president than LBJ, Nixon, Carter, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Obama.

      Next time, pick a better example.

    78. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We in Canada have a born-again Christian as Prime Minister. We win!

      I have difficulty trusting your statement. I find that most politicians lie about their religious views in order to be elected.

    79. Re:Please tell me this is satire by packrat0x · · Score: 1

      You're surprised by politicians being scientifically clueless? I guess you can't be an American....

      In America, most politicians are educated as lawyers (and rarely in an additional profession). They usually weren't good enough at being a lawyer to succeed in private practice. Then look at the typical undergraduate and graduate coursework a lawyer does (in America). Not one rigorous science course at all. Why do we wonder that politicians are "scientifically clueless" ?

      --
      227-3517
    80. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame the people that voted him in. Politicians are the result, voters are the cause.

      Just like Hitler and Obama.

    81. Re:Please tell me this is satire by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      "Virgos, today you will be waterboarded by the state to facilitate a confession of terrorism charges. Move to your safe house before 10am today. Make sure to switch off your phone and remove the SIM card before leaving the house. Use public transport away from surveillance cameras."

      Why is astrology advice never as pointed and useful as that? Instead you get...

      "Virgos, today will bring many things. Travel is a possibility, and expect to meet some new people."

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    82. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Kaitiff · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that having a cross section of society includes people that think the movement of the stars has some sort of pseudo-psychic effect on people that can be predicted and influenced. Another great example of people believing in and depending on flights of fancy are the various religious sects of the world that still have an undue amount of influence in the major political systems of the world. To be honest, as shocked as I was at first when I read this, how is it any different substantively than falling to your knees/falling prostrate on the floor and praying for guidance on decisions that effect us all. In the US we had a president that claimed that he was told BY GOD to become president and wage war on other countries. Not only did he become president once, he got re-elected. I don't see how being a palm reader, astrologer or diviner of tea leaves is any different.

      --
      If I sound stupid, it's not me talking....
    83. Re:Please tell me this is satire by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You mean you are not disappointed with Prince Charles? What about Prince Andrew?
      The idea that someone is "better" than I am just because of who their mother and or father goes counter to the idea of a free society IMHO.
      I of course would show the correct respect if I ever meet with any of them in real life out respect for the citizens of the UK because it would be wrong to do otherwise to just be a jerk.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    84. Re:Please tell me this is satire by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Somewhat True... but there are problems in the system we love called democracy.

      1) People get elected on the basis of how good they campaign. This is not necessarily the same skill set that will serve you well in actually governing.

      2) The current election cycle makes you spend a huge amount of time working on your next election cycle. A shockingly low amount of time actually governing.

    85. Re: Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.....it is awfully dry in many countries that persecute homosexuals. Perhaps they are passing up a good remedy for drought?

    86. Re:Please tell me this is satire by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way about some very prominent members of the US science and technology committees.

    87. Re:Please tell me this is satire by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Modern astrologers consider the Sun and the Moon to be astrological planets and the belief that planetary positions influence behavior and events is what astrology is all about.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    88. Re:Please tell me this is satire by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      If that's so, then as soon as the seats in parliament were half filled with intelligent people, you would be required to fill the rest with idiots.

      So I guess you are right.

    89. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simon
              Okay, he's stabilising. Now, does anybody know what sort of car hit him?
      Nurse
              Blue Ford Mondeo apparently.
      Simon
              Right, get me a bit of Blue Ford Mondeo, put it in water, shake it, dilute it, shake it again, dilute it again, do some more shaking, dilute it some more, then put three drops on his tongue. If that doesn't cure him, I don't know what will.

    90. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the exams are held at Oxford and Cambridge and called PPE.

    91. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a pure biological point of view it's ofcourse pure bullshit.

      OMG a totally non emo statement! /sarcasm

    92. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's review. Reagan damaged the economy with what Bush 1 accurately described as "voodoo economics". Although, I will give Reagan credit for seeing the error of his ways and increasing taxes and starting to balance the budget in his 2nd term, policies that Clinton improved on to bring us the biggest non-war time economic boom the country has ever seen. Carter had great plans, but unfortunately thought he could bring transparency to government. His attempts to open up closed door meetings caused both parties to decide to not implement any of his policies, so the country was effectively run by Congress during his admin. And Obama has saved the country from the Great Recession caused in large part by the deregulation from the Reagan era. From an article on Newsmax by Juan Williams, September 29, 2014, "On Obama’s watch, 5.1 million jobs have also been added to payrolls, the S&P/Case-Shiller national home price index is up about 17 percent and the S&P 500 stock index has more than doubled while hitting all-time records". "... the unemployment rate has been lower for the past five months than during the last five years, and is now at 6.1 percent. Meanwhile, the Dow Jones industrial average is near an all-time high, now regularly closing at over 17,000 points." "Consumer confidence is also up, said Williams, to its highest point in nearly seven years." All of which was accomplished while the Republicans in Congress were playing block the government from doing anything. Lastly, Reagan needlessly endangered everyone who flies by firing all the Air Traffic Controllers in order to break the Union. Ironically, he now has an airport named after him. Reagan was definitely NOT a better president than LBJ (civil rights), Clinton or Obama.

    93. Re:Please tell me this is satire by werepants · · Score: 1

      See, I was thinking (hoping) this was a brilliant move by the national health system. Embed actual, good advice based on medical statistics but do it through the astrology column in the paper. For instance, encourage people to stay in at night when there's a new flu strain sweeping around, or on a night prone to partying and drunk driving. Discourage people from eating unhealthy foods, or encourage extra exercise. Suggest saving money, or suggest avoiding a traditional but injury-prone activity.

      There are a lot of social phenomena that are undesirable yet predictable as clockwork, statistically speaking. If you have a significant portion, even a few percent, of the population that listens to and enacts astrological advice, you could sneak in a real and tangible public benefit that way.

    94. Re:Please tell me this is satire by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      asps

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    95. Re:Please tell me this is satire by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Phew! A good thing it is not because of how WELL they campaign.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    96. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This shit you talk...is shit...

    97. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plant scientist? You FAIL.

    98. Re:Please tell me this is satire by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      What? Are you serious? How much more disappointing do people have to be to meet your low threshold?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    99. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychiatry is a load of shit. Expensive worthless shit. Thank you Freud and his whore daughter for foisting that bullshit on humanity.

    100. Re:Please tell me this is satire by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      think of the doctors! For god's sake think of the doctors! Nah, fuck them.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    101. Re:Please tell me this is satire by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that would totally work. Problem solved.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    102. Re:Please tell me this is satire by werepants · · Score: 1

      I'm getting a hint of sarcasm. What objections do you see?

    103. Re:Please tell me this is satire by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Officially sanctioned directives about health or other issues are generally not effective for the very reason that they are a form of government propaganda. Think about it. Would you be swayed by such messages?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    104. Re:Please tell me this is satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what Jellomizer does. Utter bollocks. There's no stopping him. Surprisingly his post lacks the usual slew of typos and bad spelling so you caught him on a good day.

    105. Re:Please tell me this is satire by werepants · · Score: 1

      That's the point - apparently some amount of people DO listen to the advice in the astrology column. Dispensing useful, data-driven advice would certainly be better than dispensing random advice, yes?

  3. I still have hope ... by mlkj · · Score: 2

    ... that this is all a dream and I'm going to wake up.

    1. Re:I still have hope ... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      And you think real life will be better than the dream? I'm very sad for you...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  4. He is linking homeopathy to astrology by abies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Ninety per cent of pregnant French women use homeopathy. Astrology is a useful diagnostic tool enabling us to see strengths and weaknesses via the birth chart."

    At first, I have failed to see the common ground between homeopathy and astrology - these two sentences sounded completely unrelated. But they are actually related - it says
    "90% of French women are gullible enough to fall for homeopathy. This means that most of them are stupid enough to also believe astrology crap, so market is ripe"

    1. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2

      Sounds like Bill Nye needs to lambast Britain and France next since he had so much fun calling out Americans for irrational behavior

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    2. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

      "Ninety per cent of pregnant French women use homeopathy. Astrology is a useful diagnostic tool enabling us to see strengths and weaknesses via the birth chart."

      At first, I have failed to see the common ground between homeopathy and astrology - these two sentences sounded completely unrelated. But they are actually related - it says "90% of French women are gullible enough to fall for homeopathy. This means that most of them are stupid enough to also believe astrology crap, so market is ripe"

      That would be true only if all French women are pregnant.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by glaciator · · Score: 2

      Rightly so, if you permit me. He's pointing out that since 90% (a figure for which he has no proof, of course...) of women in France use homeopathy and pay lots of money for it, and since homeopathy has exactly the same scientific justification as astrology (i.e. zero), why not use astrology as well? Makes perfect sense.

    4. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by abies · · Score: 1

      Well, amount of pregnant women is big enough to be representative. Unless there is a selection bias which links pregnacy to stupidity/gullability...

    5. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The stat about French women is a lie. Even if he means it in the sense that "90% of pregnant French women drink water", which is all homeopathic medicine is, it would still be wrong as I'm sure 100% of them do.

      This guy is up for re-election in a few months, let's hope he loses his seat.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Guybrush_T · · Score: 5, Informative

      I confirm that here in France, homeopathy is very common, and even MDs frequently use it.

      But let's be serious. The placebo effect is one of the most effective thing in medical problems. The problem with it is that if you don't believe in it, it no longer works. Building false theories that makes sense for most people is therefore a skill that can be much more effective than finding real cures.

      So, in a way, I can't blame people who use it just because, as an ultra-rational guy, I do not have the "chance" of being able to use those things with a positive effect. Maybe using astrology and homeopathy would indeed increase the efficiency of the health system. Not because it prevents illnesses, but just because we have to recognize that it really works by misleading people's brain.

    7. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your logic is that if Bill Nye criticizes one person for being ignorant then he has to travel the entire world and seek out everyone else who is guilty of the same sin. Sounds like ole Bill needs to get crack'n cuz he has a lot of work to do. Although, if this were really the case it should drastically lower the level of criticism in the world. Who has that much time?

    8. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never heard of preggo-brain, I see.

    9. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the French, but I've noticed the US having a lot of homeopathic crap in the children's medicines aisles of the major supermarkets and drug stores, usually with the homeopathic angle hidden in small print, and "natural", "non-drugs", "Ages 0+" and other language over the rest of it. If I didn't know what homeopathy was, I can say it'd have been highly likely I'd have bought some of this stuff while our baby was colicy, just because anything with drugs is generally marketed as unsuitable for anyone below 2-5 years old.

      I'm not sure "gullible" is the right term. "Desperate" and "Lacking critical information needed to make an informed decision" is a better term. I wouldn't be surprised if 90% of the 90% of pregnant French women who "use homeopathy" have no idea what homeopathy is, and are simply taking something marketed as being "safe" because it uses "natural ingredients".

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by sociocapitalist · · Score: 2

      "Ninety per cent of pregnant French women use homeopathy. Astrology is a useful diagnostic tool enabling us to see strengths and weaknesses via the birth chart."

      At first, I have failed to see the common ground between homeopathy and astrology - these two sentences sounded completely unrelated. But they are actually related - it says
      "90% of French women are gullible enough to fall for homeopathy. This means that most of them are stupid enough to also believe astrology crap, so market is ripe"

      And that figure of 90% actually comes from where? I mean other than out of Tredinnick's ass of course.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    11. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Did the nasty man huwt your feewings?

    12. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Kjella · · Score: 1

      But let's be serious. The placebo effect is one of the most effective thing in medical problems. The problem with it is that if you don't believe in it, it no longer works. Building false theories that makes sense for most people is therefore a skill that can be much more effective than finding real cures.

      And the "anti-placebo" effect if you know doctors and nurses are liars and frauds so you think the actual treatment which has a pretty good track record is just more astrology/homeopathy/placebo bullshit? I mean you have to have a rather big medical community that knows this is as good as sugar pills. And you have to quite often tell that truth to limit the resources taken away from actual medical treatment to spend on placebo. Yes, the truth can be tough to deal with. No, having our real doctors pushing snake oil and superstition won't help. Now if we were talking about better psychological care to people suffering from severe physical conditions I'd be all for that, but not this.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your not doing much to get rid of the idea that the french are backwards peasants

    14. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scammed is probably the best term!.

    15. Re: He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "sleep deprived to the point of brain shutdown"? I've been there!

    16. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 1

      Actually, the placebo effect still works even when you know it's just a placebo. Go on, give it a try. You'll feel better.

    17. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, amount of pregnant women is big enough to be representative. Unless there is a selection bias which links pregnacy to stupidity/gullability...

      Considering the existence of birth control I'd wager just such a bias exists.

    18. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I confirm that here in France, homeopathy is very common, and even MDs frequently use it.

      But let's be serious. The placebo effect is one of the most effective thing in medical problems. The problem with it is that if you don't believe in it, it no longer works. Building false theories that makes sense for most people is ...

      Fraud, and a violation of the Hippocratic Oath.

      Constructing elaborate and known to be false theories to convince people to take ineffective medicine does more hard in the long run then telling them you can't to anything to help directly and maybe they should just relax for a while.

      Placebos aren't medicine. They're lies.

    19. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by cheaphomemadeacid · · Score: 1

      well yeah, that's because most people seem to think that astrology is a replacement/in competition/additive to physical medicine, this is completely and utterly wrong, it should be compared to psychology, i think that would lead to way more interesting discussions

    20. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, placebos can work even when you know they are fake due to subconscious effects.
      https://nccih.nih.gov/research/results/spotlight/091112

    21. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Millennium · · Score: 2

      But let's be serious. The placebo effect is one of the most effective thing in medical problems. The problem with it is that if you don't believe in it, it no longer works. Building false theories that makes sense for most people is therefore a skill that can be much more effective than finding real cures.

      Only by creating a system in which, in order to work properly, information must be hidden from the patient. This is unacceptable, full stop.

    22. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by kqs · · Score: 1

      Well, the 90% figure is based on 90% more facts than homeopathy. Or astrology, for that matter.

    23. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Well, the 90% figure is based on 90% more facts than homeopathy. Or astrology, for that matter.

      Basing a statement on a baseless reference of a jackass makes one, in turn, a jackass.

      Defending a jackass with poor math doesn't do much better.

      90% of nothing is still nothing.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    24. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but in France (and Belgium) Homeopathy also means Phytotherapy (the use of medicinal plants).
      IMHO it is totally incorrect to label Phytotherapy as Homeopathy. Since the former can be very efficient
      and the latter is a hoax, only acceptable as a legalized placebo effect.

    25. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Additive. No respectable astrologer will tell you that they know what's going to happen in detail. They may pick out particular health risks from a horoscope (and confirmation bias will give them more confidence), and they may suggest certain dates and times for medical procedures.

      (As a young man, I studied lots of different things, most of which turn out to have some validity to them. This has left me with at least some insight into the practice of astrology, although no real ability to derive anything besides age and probably nationality from date, time, and place of birth.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re:He is linking homeopathy to astrology by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Wait. What? If you know a person's date, time and place of birth you can accurately determine their age and nationality? Astrology really works and you are a genius! Hooray! I knew this science thing was just a hoax.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  5. I was sceptical.. by 91degrees · · Score: 2

    But I asked a magic 8-ball if it was a good idea and it said "Without a doubt". Who am I to argue with science?

  6. Nutjob Tory MP in Irrational Lunacy Shock by Oxygen99 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tredinnick's a nut who has form for this kind of statement.

    Still. At least he's not on the House of Commons Health Committe or anything. What's that? Oh...

    --
    I had a dream, bright and carefree, but now there's doubt and gravity
    1. Re:Nutjob Tory MP in Irrational Lunacy Shock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep he's a proper nut job, voted for by lunatics.
      Market Bosworth was best avoided when I lived round that way.

    2. Re:Nutjob Tory MP in Irrational Lunacy Shock by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      The man has a smile like a fox eating shit from a wire brush.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  7. April fools day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not aprils fools day yet is it? If MP says that for real, they better lock him to tower dungeon in horry.

  8. US Monopoly by crunchy_one · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to remind David Treddinick, and any other non-US citizens contemplating similar actions, that we in the US take our intellectual property rights seriously. We believe that we and we alone enjoy the right to use or sell crackpot politicians. Unless Mr. Teddinick has a license for our technology, he's set himself up to be on the receiving end of some very strongly worded letters from our attorneys.

    1. Re:US Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we here in Spokane would be happy to send coucilman Fagan to you to keep you in compliance with aforementioned IP rights. I know he is only local but his ego is nation-sized. They should get along grand as he doesn't believe mumbo-jumbo like vaccines and global warming so it sounds right up his alley. The other 2 members of the HEALTH BOARD would probably even buy him a ticket ;p

  9. "pat on the back" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I change the word "Astrology" for a "pat on the back" in that article, it makes more sense.

  10. One reason there'll always be a Britian by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    And here I thought the USA got all the nut jobs after the American War. Good to see the UK retained a few.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:One reason there'll always be a Britian by kwiecmmm · · Score: 2

      And the good news is most of these nuts are in politics, a profession that doesn't have any repercussions for everyone else...

  11. Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Democrats used voodoo to come up with Obamacare. What's the difference?

    1. Re:Why Not? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      What's the difference? Obamacare was based on Romneycare, which itself was bipartisan.

      Is Astrology bipartisan? If so, then I'm wrong about that being the difference.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    2. Re:Why Not? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They borrowed it from Republican Mitt Romney who referenced Republican Newt Gingrich.

      Which makes sense when one considers the voodoo Republicans have with trickle down economics (witness the wonderful state Kansas is in) or that swallowing a small camera can somehow lead to being able to perform a gynecological exam.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:Why Not? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The Democrats used voodoo to come up with Obamacare. What's the difference?

      Voodoo involves sticking pins through a simulacrum of your nemesis. Sticking giant pins through Republicans can certainly be seen as something contributing to the greater good - at the very least it is quite cathartic.

      And catharsis is a powerful healing tool.

      QED.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Why Not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romneycare wasn't bipartisan. Republicans in Massachusetts put up a hell of a fight. It just came down to the simple fact that there's not that many republicans in Massachusetts.

      Astrology is certainly bipartisan. Idiots of both parties believe in the swirling of the heavens and that on the rare occurrence when their stars align perfectly in Vega and the goat's blood is covering the sacrificial virgin just right, they can rule the world and Cthulhu will be resurrected.

      But seriously. Politics has nothing to do with fuckhead retards and their beliefs. They exist everywhere. Just look at the anti-vaccination people.

    5. Re:Why Not? by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 1

      They borrowed it from Republican Mitt Romney who referenced Republican Newt Gingrich.

      Which makes sense when one considers the voodoo Republicans have with trickle down economics (witness the wonderful state Kansas is in) or that swallowing a small camera can somehow lead to being able to perform a gynecological exam.

      Well the trickle down isn't voodoo, it's just that, a trickle. Only a small benefit making it down to the lower layers. If you take a second to count America as symbolic of trickle down capitalism and the USSR as symbolic of socialism then in practice capitalism has left the lower end better off than socialism. Of course those are terribly flawed analogies, but there is more to the notion of trickle down economics than 'voodoo'. The one thing capitalism undeniably has in it's favour is that it 'works' when the metric is economic growth, and without economic growth, everyone is sharing pieces from a smaller pie.

    6. Re:Why Not? by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Romney signed it. He is a Republican.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    7. Re:Why Not? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      So voodoo produces 1200 pages of legalize that does nothing the title of the document suggests it might? (need I say "Affordable Care")

      It must be time to ban the first religion in the United States them....

      /sarcasim

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    8. Re:Why Not? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      And he was one at the time, a Republican who was governor of a largely democratic state...

      But all this brew-ha-ha overlooks the fact that what Romney signed was a STATE law, which IMHO is the correct venue for laws like this. The Federal government has little business being involved in such things constitutionally, unless you use a pretty contrived interpretation of the commerce clause...

      So can we dispense with this "it was a republican idea" canard. It wasn't and republicans oppose it almost universally now as they did then.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    9. Re:Why Not? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      The USSR isn't "socalist" like Norway, it's a flat-out keptocracy.

  12. The Ghost of Nancy Reagan Lives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OOoooo! Spoooky.

    ARS

  13. ..and we're done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We had a good run from post WWII to about the early 21st century. For some reason, science and technology had to wait for a major war, then suddenly we accepted science and technology as we gave ourselves a great orgy of technology.

    Now that the wind has run out of that sail, and we've hit plateaus on pretty much everything, and university education is dumbed down and sold like a late-night infomercial, humanity will slide back to what we always were; a bunch of emotionally-driven lunatics hungry for power.

    1. Re:..and we're done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, we are continuing to have an awesome run, bleeding edge today is lightyears ahead of stuff done in last century. Might not be obvious to a layman tho, because guess what, the awesome technology today is no longer something Joe Anyguy can wrap his head around. WW2 era stuff was downright primitive, anyone can figure out how that stuff works. Not to say last century didn't see some awesome advancements - it did, just like Newton made awesome advancements in his time. These ideas and technologies were awesome for the time, but you cannot seriously compare it to the stuff that is being developed today.

    2. Re:..and we're done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Might not be obvious to a layman tho, because guess what, the awesome technology today is no longer something Joe Anyguy can wrap his head around."

      No, it's because we can't see it. We can't see it because all this progress you talk about is about processing information.

      We can see the Wright Brothers, the WWI Sopwith Camel, WWII jet planes, the Blackbird, the Boeing 747. What have you seen since then? Fly higher? Fly faster? Nope. If anything, we don't even have the Concorde anymore, we've gotten slower and lower.

      "WW2 era stuff was downright primitive, anyone can figure out how that stuff works."

      Really? Jet engines, nuclear bombs, digital voice encryption?

      " but you cannot seriously compare it to the stuff that is being developed today."

      Yes I can. The "stuff" is just fluff. It doesn't do as much as the "stuff" did a hundred years ago. Compare indoor plumbing to some stupid app on a phone.

    3. Re:..and we're done by the+gnat · · Score: 2

      . . . says yet another person who appears to be totally ignorant about history. Do you really believe that if you went back in time to, say, 1950, you couldn't find politicians saying equally idiotic things, perhaps in even greater numbers? And do you think "technology" is limited to, say, space travel?

      I am carrying, in my pocket, a computer significantly more powerful than anything I used as a child (and much cheaper in absolute dollars), with access to a global information network containing most of human knowledge, and the ability to instantaneously communicate with anyone in the world. The overall computing infrastructure is rapidly overtaking the technology depicted in a 20th-century show about 24th-century space exploration. Meanwhile, hundreds of millions of people across the planet, whose parents lived in virtually pre-industrial economies and regularly suffered from pandemics and famine, now have relatively comfortable middle-class lives thanks to improved technology and the expansion of the global economy. These improvements have mostly happened within my lifetime (i.e. since 1980 or so). So I'm not exactly losing sleep over the fact that the developed world still has a handful of proudly ignorant fools in government.

      It's also worth remembering for context that shortly after the close of World War II, the British government drove one of its greatest scientists to commit suicide at the age of 41 because it was run by superstitious, self-righteous prudes who disapproved of his homosexuality. Today, the UK has some random back-bencher spouting nonsense about homeopathy. I think that's an improvement.

  14. What an idiot... by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 5, Funny

    but what else would you expect from a capricorn...

    --
    -- Make America hate again!
  15. I prefer reading snail entrails ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it's more down-to-earth.

  16. Wow .... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    David Tredinnick ... come on down, you're our next contestant on "how did I live so long being such a fucking moron?"

    I'm sorry, but no.

    The MP for Bosworth, in Leicestershire, who is a Capricorn and in 2010 paid back £755 he had claimed in expenses for software that used astrology to diagnose medical conditions, told Astrological Journal: "I do believe that astrology and complementary medicine would help take the huge pressure off doctors".

    Dumb as a box of hammers, looking to spend taxpayer money on unproven voodoo, and this guy is a conservative??

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Wow .... by Erikderzweite · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dumb as a box of hammers, looking to spend taxpayer money on unproven voodoo, and this guy is a conservative??

      Well, yes. I fail to see the contradiction though.

    2. Re:Wow .... by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's what 'conservative' means - living in the past. Its a bit like being amish but you can have serfs work the land for you.

    3. Re:Wow .... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Ah, gotcha ... so being a conservative means you have stupid beliefs, which are contradictory to science, completely not based in evidence, and can't be proven ... of course.

      That actually explains a lot.

      Silly bunt.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Wow .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much, yeah, that's where the evidence leads us.

    5. Re:Wow .... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm more bothered he's a Capricorn, I mean, really! Us Capricorns don't generally believe in this astrology crap.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Wow .... by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It means "holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation" which yes would usually mean you have stupid beliefs. Since "traditional" is another word for "old" with a connotation that that is better than something new just because it is older.

      Whereas non-stupid beliefs would be those that are justified by evidence, and you wouldn't need to label them traditional to justify them since you have that evidence even when they are in fact old.

    7. Re:Wow .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, I feel the same about this old notion we have about an "economy" and how we must all find "jobs" or we starve to death.

      Oh, THAT old idea must never be questioned!

    8. Re:Wow .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Labour are controlled by the trade unions and full of Marxists"

      Long ago, certainly not now.

  17. Is this Slashdot or The Onion? by DavidHumus · · Score: 1

    Good to hear about the trans-Atlantic stupid-party co-operation.

  18. Put up or Shut up. by kenj123 · · Score: 1

    Treddinick and his family with withdraw from the NHS and use astrology for 10 years as a test of the effectiveness. If he's still alive then we can talk.

    1. Re:Put up or Shut up. by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      He's talking nonsense, but he's talking about diagnosis. Withdrawing from the NHS would involve withdrawing from treatment as well, so that's not really a fair challenge.

    2. Re:Put up or Shut up. by Talderas · · Score: 1

      It's not even diagnosis. That implies you have an issue. It's predicting what sort of ailments are likely to befall someone based on astrology.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:Put up or Shut up. by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      OK, he and his family can use astrology for diagnosis, and homeopathy for treatment.

      Seems like over a few years this would be a self correcting problem.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  19. Yes, racist! by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    Anyone who laughs at using the predictable alignment of stars and planets to make earthbound decisions is clearly only doing it because they hold an ugly prejudice against ancient Sumerians.

    Few things are more disgusting than an anti-Urist. Come on people, its not 1965 (BC) anymore!

    1. Re:Yes, racist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sumerian? I hardly knew her!

    2. Re:Yes, racist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you ask me Gilgamesh and Enkidu were a bit too friendly if you catch my drift. Clearly they had to be no good liberal hippy pinko-es.

  20. When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by HnT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT for treating not-actually-existing issues plaguing patients. Essentially you are applying a placebo to a patient who is feeling "nervous" or something else rather hypochondriac and if the placebo producer did not violate production regulations you end up giving them a bit of sugar and like that you cured the non-existing with the not-healing.
    Despite tongue-in-cheek I do mean this serious because there are people who DO suffer from non-existing issues, yes it is all in their head, and that's where homeopathy can help. So even homeopathy does have its uses.

    The real question is whether it should be covered by a national healthcare system and I am inclined to saying absolutely not.

    --
    "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In those instances, why bother with homoeopathy? Why not go straight to sugar pills/water?

      And THAT is the problem with his claims.

      It isn't important whether reading YOUR horoscope makes YOU "feel" better about YOURSELF.

      It's whether reading someone else's AND BELIEVING IT IS YOURS makes you "feel" better about yourself.

      So ..... do we foster an anti-science belief system because some people can self-invoke the placebo effect? Or do point out that it is nothing more than the placebo effect?

    2. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Because the pateint doesn't believe in medicine. They believe in homeopathy...

      Sugar pills will be net zero or net negative because they believe medicine is harmful overall...

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Funny

      When applied correctly, Xanax is a safe and effective palindrome.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is whether it should be covered by a national healthcare system and I am inclined to saying absolutely not.

      Agreed. Cover it with a "national (taxpayer funded) healthcare system will drive costs up. Thus screwing the taxpayer. Again.

      --

      Posting AC due to mod system.

    5. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An interesting ethical dilemma.

      Should a doctor make up bullshit in order to help his patients, because his patients are retarded fucks who will not "believe" in actual medicine?

    6. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by amber_of_luxor · · Score: 1

      You do realize that 100% of the published peer-reviewed research, where the patients were diagnosed according to the standard protocols of homeopathy, resulted in a 100% cure, don't you.

      And you do further realize that 70% of the published peer-reviewed research on homeopathy does not diagnose the patient according to the standard protocols of homeopathy, don't you.

      --
      Wind Beneath Thy Wings
    7. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Hippocratic oath is "do no harm"

      If you think your patient will be harmed by the nocebo effect, then you have to bullshit them.

    8. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      50mg of placebo daily is also effective in treating some real illnesses. Strange but true.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:When applied correctly homeopathy is GREAT! by werepants · · Score: 1

      There was a study a while back that suggested that placebo effect worked even if people were fully aware it was a placebo. So you tell people it is bullshit, but tell them to keep doing it anyway because it will still make them feel better.

  21. and and you know what by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

    its opponents are driven by superstition !! .. oh my god i'm gonna laugh my ass out .. I cant stop ..

  22. Actually Astrology can help the health care system by gurps_npc · · Score: 0
    See what you do is ask every doctor and nurse if they believe in Astrology.

    Those that say "Yes" get demoted, those that say "No" get promoted.

    BOOM, instant increase in efficiency.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  23. This made my day... by MiniMike · · Score: 2

    But I'm only laughing because I'm not British. This would terrify me if I were British. Not that we don't have plenty of similar nuts in Congress.

    Has anyone checked recently if Treddinick weighs as much as a duck? I think it's time.

    1. Re:This made my day... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      He's one MP out of 650. This astrology stuff doesn't bother me because it will never amount to anything unlike the Tories austerity policies which are causing stagnation and they do everything possible to widen the wealth divide / screw the poor for every penny they have.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    2. Re:This made my day... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      the Tories austerity policies which are causing stagnation

      So you'd have done what? Continued to spend money profligately that we just don't have? Raised taxes to fuck over middle income earners even more? Done a Greece or a Cyprus?

      Get a fucking clue.

      they do everything possible to widen the wealth divide / screw the poor for every penny they have

      That's just bullshit.

      If you want to argue that they favour "big business" too much, I'll agree. If you want to challenge the integrity and honesty of senior ministers and how their policies benefit the public, the UK as a whole and their group of friends, then I'm happy to join you. But they're not screwing the poor and they're not trying to increase the wealth divide.

      There are plenty of solid reasons to complain about the current government. Try and pick some of them instead of making shit up.

    3. Re:This made my day... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2

      Raise minimum wage (=less benefits and more tax).
      Tax the rich more.
      Close tax loopholes.
      Put an end to the double Irish.
      Invest in high quality sustainable housing.
      Deal with pollution.

      No crazy spending or crazy borrowing necessary, but the rich and stupid wouldn't like those policies.

      Those are policies that would lower the deficit, put people in work and give them a higher standard of living.

      The Tories aren't screwing the poor? You are blind.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    4. Re:This made my day... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Raise minimum wage (=less benefits and more tax).

      You'd have to raise it a fuck of a long way before it offset tax credits.

      Tax the rich more.

      The current government raises more tax from the top earners than the previous one. Who do you class as 'rich' anyway? Are you calculating this by assets or income, or both? I think dual-income families are rich.

      Raising taxes is a shit way to boost the economy.

      Close tax loopholes.

      People will find and exploit more. The current government has already closed many, and made it harder to legally exploit the ones that remain - you now need to declare them to the Inland Revenue.

      Or did you mean things like Premium Bonds and ISAs?

      Put an end to the double Irish.

      Again, the current government are already working to increase tax revenue from companies that try and siphon earnings overseas. This is an international problem and if you have a way to solve it that actually works, then HMRC would love to hear from you.

      Invest in high quality sustainable housing.

      Where? What do you class as 'sustainable'? What's 'affordable'? Surely 'affordable', 'high quality' and 'where people can get a job' are mutually exclusive.

      Any capital investment in social housing would largely be a waste of money anyway, unless the 'right to buy' legislation changes; you're just giving cash away. That's not necessarily bad for the economy but it's a kick in the teeth for people that pay taxes and don't get government handouts - and we're already subsidising over half the country anyway.

      Deal with pollution.

      Hmm. More detail needed.

      No crazy spending or crazy borrowing necessary, but the rich and stupid wouldn't like those policies.

      Only the stupid would put them forward and think they're workable, without providing rather more detail.

      The rich would indeed resent being treated as a cash cow by the lazy, the ignorant and the stupid.

      The Tories aren't screwing the poor? You are blind.

      How? Maybe I am blind, or maybe I'm not poor because I make personal sacrifices to assure my financial security. Forgive me for expecting other people to make similar compromises.

    5. Re:This made my day... by packrat0x · · Score: 1

      Put an end to the double Irish.

      Again, the current government are already working to increase tax revenue from companies that try and siphon earnings overseas. This is an international problem and if you have a way to solve it that actually works, then HMRC would love to hear from you.

      Eliminate income, payroll, and VAT taxes. Replace with retail sales tax.

      --
      227-3517
    6. Re:This made my day... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      The super rich would absolutely love that.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    7. Re:This made my day... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      slightly rich = starting from £100,000pa, rich = > £250k pa.

      Again, the current government are already working to increase tax revenue from companies that try and siphon earnings overseas

      What, by cutting HMRC staff? don't make me laugh, this gov't could of closed the tax deficit by closing loop holes and working with the EU et al to end tax avoidance.

      If you think the British Conservative party are going to stop money from going into their rich mates pockets by dealing with tax avoidance then you are delusional.

      Deal with pollution.

      Hmm. More detail needed.

      That's not complicated, if you want to know what pollution is, google it.

      The rich would indeed resent being treated as a cash cow by the lazy, the ignorant and the stupid.

      No, the rich want to take all of the money for themselves and are too stupid to understand that the economy grinds to a halt when they do that.

      Put please do tell me how people on minimum wage are somehow capable of treating the rich like a 'cash cow'

      Come one, explain that, is it like the trickle down effect, perhaps you could explain that too.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    8. Re:This made my day... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Given that people on minimum wage get tax credits, benefit from health and education services they can't afford and generally make a net gain from the Government it's pretty clear that they aren't paying an equal share. Someone has to fund all of this and you seem to think it's that tiny pool of people on over £100k.

      I'd love to earn that much, but I already make a sizeable net contribution to the government to cover the benefits that lower earners, the disabled, the unfortunate and the feckless get. Taxing the rich more won't reduce that burden and won't intrinsically benefit the economy. I'm already treated as a cash cow by politicians from all parties who use my money to buy votes from parents, pensioners, public sector workers, people on benefits et all.

      I'm still confused by your thoughts on pollution. Which pollution is holding back the economy exactly, and what are you proposing to do that will resolve this?

    9. Re:This made my day... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Given that people on minimum wage get tax credits, benefit from health and education services they can't afford and generally make a net gain from the Government it's pretty clear that they aren't paying an equal share. Someone has to fund all of this and you seem to think it's that tiny pool of people on over ã100k.

      If these people were paid properly then they would be paying their fair share.

      At no point did I suggest that people earning over £100k should pay all taxes and that no-one else should pay tax so that's really a stupid fallacious argument.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    10. Re:This made my day... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Did I say pollution is holding back the economy, it may well be but I think that peoples health and the environment come 1st.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    11. Re:This made my day... by packrat0x · · Score: 1

      My solution is not about making people happy. It's about efficient collection of taxes.

      --
      227-3517
  24. A difficult birth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Astrology is a useful diagnostic tool enabling us to see strengths and weaknesses via the birth chart."

    Doctor: Hmm, I've consulted the charts and I'm afraid you're in for a difficult birth. It would seem that on the due date your Sun will be in Uranus.

    1. Re:A difficult birth... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      That'll be really difficult as their head's already there.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:A difficult birth... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Reproductive biology fail.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  25. He is a Capricorn, what do you expect? by daveewart · · Score: 1

    The funniest line in this article is "The MP for Bosworth, in Leicestershire, who is a Capricorn..." -- well done to the journalist who wrote this!

    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
  26. Pompous Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You pompous Americans have no idea how juvenile you are at the art of political asshattery. The house of commons, this year, will create more asshattery than your entire congress has over your short history.

    1. Re:Pompous Americans by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 0

      Ah, but the GOP-controlled congress has only just started its descent into full-on madness. With the teabaggers leading the way, we'll be #1 before summer.

  27. Oh I see! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *their* stuff is unscientific nonsense, but the Death Asteroid and Mars One, *that's* real science!!!

  28. Mentally incompetent? by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

    Surely this is grounds for him being dismissed as an MP. What a truly stupid man.

    1. Re:Mentally incompetent? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Surely this is grounds for him being dismissed as an MP. What a truly stupid man.

      If being mentally incompetent was grounds for being dismissed as an MP the chambers would be almost empty

    2. Re:Mentally incompetent? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Surely this is grounds for him being dismissed as an MP. What a truly stupid man.

      I can't believe anyone would vote him back in anyway.

      I assume he's in a safe Tory seat?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Mentally incompetent? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Appears largely be so, yes. This muppet has held the seat continuously since 1987. Last election he won the seat by nine points (runner up was Lib Dem, not Labour, incidentally).

    4. Re:Mentally incompetent? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Appears largely be so, yes. This muppet has held the seat continuously since 1987.

      So, stupid idiots, with beliefs based neither on reality nor evidence ... get re-elected by stupid idiots, with beliefs based neither on reality nor evidence.

      This really is what is wrong with the world ... stupid people elect stupid people.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Mentally incompetent? by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

      What may not be apparent to others is that the UK system of parliamentary 'seats' and first past the post ballots can lead to situations like this.

      A party gets into power. They then get the boundaries commission to look at population densities and 'correct anomalies' so that each set has roughly the same number of voters [this is their job]. Of course what they actually do is to ring-fence areas where there is a great deal of support for them and spread areas with largely opposition support amongst many seats to dilute their effectiveness.

        This leads to the concept of "safe seats" (where you could safely bet on an outcome because people would vote for a monkey if it had the right coloured rosette). In reality UK politics is decided by a relatively small number of 'marginal seats' where the outcome is less predictable.

      What this means in practice is that the majority party in parliament rarely (almost never) has a majority of the popular vote (typically only around 35%). They are 'first past the post' in more seats but fewer supporting voters overall. It also means party officials can reward people with safe seats for following directions.

      Two take away points:

      1) Don't judge the British on the basis of the politicians we've got -- we are not all so inept/clueless

      2) Even by the standards of most MPs this guy is seriously out of step with reality. He is in a party that would like to dismantle the NHS and farm it out to their chums in private medicine so it's no surprise he's on a committee that could cause sabotage.

    6. Re:Mentally incompetent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're completely wrong on point 2. Labour are the only party to have ever privatised an NHS hospital. The current shadow health minister no less. Before you say it was November 2010, read the timeline.

      The Labour party however are the party that thinks that money grows on trees and relies on the fact that the average voter can't count to numbers bigger than 10 ( 12 in Norfork ).

  29. Bad tools are always bad by tomxor · · Score: 1

    ... even when used with good intentions.

    It may do good in the short term for some people, much the same as a placebo, but unlike a placebo it brings with it a whole load of baggage (like homoeopathy and it's pseudo science research that was government funded in the UK until only recently).

    The last thing anyone wants to see is astrology becoming more widely accepted as anything other than fiction... Stick with the placebo pill, it has the same effect and is a plain white lie with no baggage polluting minds of the mass ignorant.

  30. Prejudiced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's certainly true for me. I have a deep prejudice against astrology and homeopathy and unrelated (so far as I know) Eastern traditional medicines that are commonly practiced today.

    What luck! There is a really well thought out system of hypethesis and testing and validation of results that can be used to demonstrate the efficacy of these and any other misunderstood medical process. Advocates should have no trouble proving, one way or another, whether these systems actually work, even over the objections of someone as prejudiced as myself!

  31. He actually could be right. No joke. by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously.

    I did consult a homeopath in the 90ies and early 2000nds, mostly because my mother was all super-pushy about it and I wanted her to quit pestering me. He would question me on the phone for 40 to 60 minutes. His anamnesis was the best I ever had. I don't recall if I even opened the package that came a week or so later containing the "LM Potence" of some obscure Homeopathic substance, i.e. a water and alcohol mixture in a small important looking flask. But I do remember being way calmer and way more educated on my condition. I thought I had heart problems and he pin-pointed reflux after the extensive questionaire and talk on the phone.
    I've never spoken to an doctor for that long and I'd be suprised if any doctor had time or could afford such a thing. I would like to have such a medical expert to talk to that does not push obscure 'treatment' on me, that would be optimal.

    I treated my reflux with healing-earth, baking soda, meditation/relaxation excercise and a change in diet and told my MD who wanted to sell me a "heart and lung condition" diagnosed in the record time of 2.5 minutes to fuck off. Never had problems since.

    The point is: Good Homeopaths are actually quite well medically educated and can be terrific "anameticists" (wording?), because their main job actually is to talk to the patient, find out what's bugging him and - ideally - do a solid diagnose. That they only prescribe sugar-pills is a minor nuiscance from that perspective.

    If astrology would lead to a new occupation in which the main purpose is talking to the patient and find out what exactly the condition is, it could be a good thing. Wether the professional in question would be a homeopath, an astrologer, magician or whatnot wouldn't really matter. Only treatment then, of course, would need to be decided upon by a different party.

    Modern medicine need a profession specifically for anamnesis. Until that happens, homeopaths and perhaps even astrologers will fill that gap. Poorly at time perhaps, but they'll fill it.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anamnesis is a philosophy that we subconsciously know information from our past lives. "Anameticist" isn't a word. I have no idea what word you actually meant to use.

    2. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Crackpot.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definition #3 from Dictionary.com: the medical history of a patient.

    4. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Definition #3 from Dictionary.com: the medical history of a patient.

      Ah, that makes a lot more sense. I should have looked in dictionary instead of just googling it. And if his story is correct, he has an excellent point. If homeopaths are spending a good deal of time with their patients getting their history than doctors do and getting more accurate diagoses as a result, then they're performing a valuable service, even if their actual cures are bunk.

    5. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by sribe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've never spoken to an doctor for that long and I'd be suprised if any doctor had time or could afford such a thing.

      No, but a decent doctor could do the differential diagnosis of reflux vs heart problems in about 1 minute flat, without spending most of an hour on irrelevant bullshit intended only to impress the gullible (which looks like it worked, at least in this case).

    6. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gullible as well, eh.

      > I treated my reflux with healing-earth, baking soda, meditation/relaxation excercise and a change in diet and told my MD who wanted to sell me a "heart and lung condition" diagnosed

      You changed your diet. That's what made you better. Eedjit

    7. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I believe it means diagnosis through talking with the patient ("medical history" in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...).
      And it is indeed a case for alternative medicine, as doctors commonly do not take the time to talk to their patients.

      Alternative medicine practitioners typically spend a lot of time listening to their patients, making them feel at ease, while at the same time encouraging them to improve their lifestyle (eat healthier food, exercise, better sleep habits, etc...). And guess what, most of the times, it works. The ritual they use (sugar pills, planting needles, calling spirits, trinkets, ...) doesn't really matter.

    8. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should have googled it.

      anamnesis
      ËOEanÉ(TM)mËniËsÉs/
      noun
      noun: anamnesis; plural noun: anamneses

              1.
              recollection, especially of a supposed previous existence.
              2.
              Medicine
              a patient's account of their medical history.

              3.
              Christian Church
              the part of the Eucharist in which the Passion, Resurrection, and Ascension of Christ are recalled.

      Origin

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    9. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was in a similar position, getting bad headaches a couple of times a week, I didn't believe in homeopathy but went to keep my mother happy. 2nd time lucky with the tablets, I went from 2 headaches a week to about 1 to 2 mild headaches a year!! I know it wasn't chemistry so I'm at a loss to explain.

      If it works, what does it matter how it works, even if homeopathists are just good at getting people to psychosomatically heal themselves.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    10. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never spoken to an doctor for that long and I'd be suprised if any doctor had time or could afford such a thing.

      No, but a decent doctor could do the differential diagnosis of reflux vs heart problems in about 1 minute flat, without spending most of an hour on irrelevant bullshit intended only to impress the gullible (which looks like it worked, at least in this case).

      Possible. More likely they'd jump the gun prescribe a generic cure-all at you. I am NOT saying that homeopathy is anything but 100% pure A-grade BS (it is), but it is also true (at least in my experience) that many doctors are absolutely appalling listeners. They want to get you in, find a way to suppress your symptoms, and get you out ASAP. No long-term view of your condition. No analysis of the possible underlying problems. Just squash the symptoms and move on.

      The hardest part of illness is finding a doctor who will listen.

    11. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      > I treated my reflux with...a change in diet All the rest of it was window-dressing.

    12. Re:He actually could be right. No joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His point is the doctor got it wrong in 2.5 minutes.

  32. The Guardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Guardian is a left-wing newspaper which supports Labour to a ridiculous degree.

    There are stupid politicians of both colours, take the Labour MP who claims to be the son of a 9ft alien.

    1. Re:The Guardian by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The Guardian is a left-wing newspaper which supports Labour to a ridiculous degree.

      There are stupid politicians of both colours, take the Labour MP who claims to be the son of a 9ft alien.

      If the Guardian had simply made up this story about a Tory MP in order to discredit the Conservative Party, you might have a point, although it would still only be partially counterbalancing the anti-Labour bias in most of the UK media..

      But as it appears to be a true representation of what he said, it's irrelevant whether the newspaper is a mouthpiece for the Communist Party or the Catholic Church.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  33. He Is Right by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 1

    Astrology and Homoeopathy are both extremely effective, especially for difficult conditions such as mental health issues. Now sure, this is only due to the placebo effect, but doctors are pretty rubbish at exploiting the placebo and the placebo is extremely powerful! Something seems to prevent them from telling a patient nonsense that will make them believe they will get better and thus actually help them get better. Astrologists and Homoeopaths have no such issues, so this politician is completely correct that utilising astrologists and homoeopaths could help take the load of the NHS.

  34. This is the most sensible Tory statement on NHS by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    This is the most sensible Tory policy on the NHS that I have heard for a long time ...... sad but true

  35. True dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never under estimate what you don't understand. After all it is the root if modern science, which is another form of mystical mumbo jumbo.

  36. Total fruitcake by hairykrishna · · Score: 2

    The guy is a well known loon. In the past he's been very vocal in his support of homeopathy and various other quackery. If memory serves he once also publically claimed that blood won't clot under a full moon.

    He sits on the Science and Technology Select Committee and the Health Select Committee. An astonishingly clear example of an elected official not being fit for purpose.

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  37. 90% only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ninety per cent of pregnant French women use homeopathy. Astrology is a useful diagnostic tool enabling us to see strengths and weaknesses via the birth chart."

    At first, I have failed to see the common ground between homeopathy and astrology - these two sentences sounded completely unrelated. But they are actually related - it says
    "90% of French women are gullible enough to fall for homeopathy. This means that most of them are stupid enough to also believe astrology crap, so market is ripe"

    90% of pregnant French women are deluded into believing in superstitions. (aka being stupid)
    Carry on.

  38. That's hilarious by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    I guess it might be less so if you were actually british though.

  39. here he is wasting parliamentary time with his BS by dominux · · Score: 1

    http://www.theyworkforyou.com/...

    what a complete and utter waste of democracy this man is.

  40. "racially prejudiced" by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Ahh yes, crying racism is the new solid defense against anti-batshit/religious/woo claims.

    I don't know who this asshole is, but I am willing to bet he is a white christian, which makes the claim even more hilarious.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:"racially prejudiced" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wanted to hear a bit more about his "racism" claim. I can only assume a rational brown skinned person laughed at him in the street or something.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:"racially prejudiced" by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I am not a minority in any way, but I would think actual minorities should be annoyed by the use of this.

      But perhaps just pointing and laughing is the best response.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  41. Re:here he is wasting parliamentary time with his by dominux · · Score: 1

    here is the working group list referred to in the parliamentary answer http://www.publications.parlia...

  42. Normal by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "An MP from the governing Conservative Party..."

    Why am I not surprised.

    The stars are also against the EU, I presume.

  43. There is some truth to it by MagickalMyst · · Score: 0

    Okay, maybe your daily horoscope in the newspaper is computer generated nonsense, but it is a fact that planets and celestial objects have an effect on human behaviour and the environment.

    Ask any police officer or health care provider how people act during the full moon. They will almost always tell you that they are busier and people are crazier around that time of the month - consistently - although they can't quite explain why. The moon also affects the tides of the oceans. This is a scientific fact. Celestial phenomenon is called astronomy. The effects of astronomy on human behaviour is called astrology.

    We live in a world where everything is connected, and every action has a reaction associated with it. To think that there is absolutely no basis in truth regarding astrology is simply wrong.

    The practice of astrology would not have survived for thousands of years if there were no truth to it. Granted, modern astrology is generally considered the realm of snake-oil peddling charlatans; but when we scrape the multiple layers of bull$hit off, we reveal an ancient artform that actually does have some merit to it.

    It should not be idly dismissed just because we don't completely understand it yet.

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    1. Re:There is some truth to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, astrology has survived for so long because the scientific method of inquiry has only recently had the time to blast astrology out of the water. Studies have shown (I've seen several on emergency rooms, have to dig them out) that there's no connection between time of the lunar cycle and births/deaths/injuries/crazy. The phenomenon, like most of astrology, is that once an idea is created, even a wrong one, people start looking for evidence for it and exclude evidence against it in their brains.

      You'll then say "Ah, but that's what you're doing, throwing out data that supports astrology!". But there's no data that supports astrology. It's just plain wrong. And wrong isn't science and shouldn't be supported.

    2. Re:There is some truth to it by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ask any police officer or health care provider how people act during the full moon. They will almost always tell you that they are busier and people are crazier around that time of the month - consistently - although they can't quite explain why.

      Confirmation bias. I've heard the same thing from nurses, but the fact is, no correlation has been found.

    3. Re:There is some truth to it by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      but it is a fact that planets and celestial objects have an effect on human behaviour and the environment.

      No, it's not. The sun and the moon have effects. So does anything that actually runs into the Earth. Everything else is too damn far away.

      Ask any police officer or health care provider how people act during the full moon. They will almost always tell you that they are busier and people are crazier around that time of the month - consistently - although they can't quite explain why.

      And, guess what? They're wrong. They remember the weird stuff that happens during the full moon because they expect weird stuff to happen during the full moon. Numerous studies have been made looking for the so called "Lunar effect". No actual correlation between human behavior (including police calls, emergency room visits and such) and the full moon has been found,

      To think that there is absolutely no basis in truth regarding astrology is simply wrong.

      Is simply right. There is no known mechanism by which the planets or other stars could affect human life on Earth in this fashion. It's bunkum, pure and simple.

      The practice of astrology would not have survived for thousands of years if there were no truth to it.

      The evidence shows fairly conclusively that selective remembering of evidence and wishful thinking is perfectly capable of sustaining a practice with no basis in reality for several thousand years. It's happened a lot of time. People sincerely worshipped Zeus for thousands of years. Do you believe in Zeus?

    4. Re:There is some truth to it by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      It's related to day of the week - Friday and Saturday nights are the crazy ones (after payday, natch). So is the beginning of the month (gov't cheques).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:There is some truth to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More natural light (this might have been more noticeable before electric lights everywhere) means more people out and about. More people = more crime?

    6. Re:There is some truth to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The practice of astrology would not have survived for thousands of years if there were no truth to it.

      You can apply the same argument to any modern religion, ever. Even the ones that contradict each other meaning that at least some of them must be wrong.

    7. Re:There is some truth to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a correlation with the lunar cycle and police or health care providers believing people are busier or crazier, so that readily refutes the land of edit wars wikipedia.

    8. Re:There is some truth to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confirmation bias?
      RACIST!!!

    9. Re:There is some truth to it by genner · · Score: 1

      Ask any police officer or health care provider how people act during the full moon. They will almost always tell you that they are busier and people are crazier around that time of the month - consistently - although they can't quite explain why.

      Confirmation bias. I've heard the same thing from nurses, but the fact is, no correlation has been found.

      There have been studies showing it messes with a good nights sleep. Your own link even admits that, Lack of sleep does tend to make people a little crazier.

    10. Re:There is some truth to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it is a fact that planets and celestial objects have an effect on human behaviour and the environment.

      No, it's not. The sun and the moon have effects. So does anything that actually runs into the Earth. Everything else is too damn far away.

      Well technically this argument is an effect of the movements of planets on human behavior. I mean, if the planets didn't move we wouldn't be arguing about the validity of basing government decisions on a complex system for deriving a person's character traits from their date of birth, and the movement of the planets.

    11. Re:There is some truth to it by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      >"People sincerely worshipped Zeus for thousands of years. Do you believe in Zeus?"

      Yes, I do. And here's why:

      Zeus, and indeed, all deities - are psychological archetypes for personal self development; not supernatural beings. Hollywood has implanted many fairy tales into the minds of humanity and twisted their perception of reality. But when you peel away the multiple layers of illusion, you are left with the bare truth.

      Jesus - as a human - may or may not have physically existed. Nobody can prove it either way, regardless of what they would like to believe. It is irrelevant. But that does not prevent people from "finding Jesus within" or truly achieving the "Christ consciousness", or connecting with the higher self.

      Likewise, "occultists" are said to be able to summon demons to do their bidding. Aleister Crowley, through years of research, determined that the demons are not real in a physical sense, but summoned into one's mind and consciousness. Fighting demons and facing one's fears is key to personal development.

      That doesn't mean that the bogeyman is sitting in your closet, although the bogeyman may be quite real to you.

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    12. Re:There is some truth to it by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Yes, the link includes studies showing a correlation with something that could conceivably cause weird behaviour (sleep cycles), but haven't actually found a correlation with the weird behaviour.

      So either there's no "lunar effect", or whatever effect there is results in a nonexistent/negligible increase in hospital/police activity.

  44. The empire rots from within by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    In a high tech world, we can no longer afford to be governed by the innumerate, technically challenged and the uneducated. Democracy as currently constructed is failing.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  45. Sign the Petition... by Elegor · · Score: 1

    ...to have him removed from the Health committee and the Science and Technology Committee: http://epetitions.direct.gov.u...

  46. Re:Will Bennett weigh in? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    He'll have to consult the stars - same as always :-)

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  47. I'm confused... by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    Brits here on Slashdot keep telling us how wonderful their single payer system is and how backwards the US is for not having it adopted long ago.

    Are the stories of long wait times and poor service in the UK true after all? Do the Brits perhaps just manage to live a long life because they know their health care system is sh*t and they therefore avoid getting sick in the first place?

    1. Re:I'm confused... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Brits here on Slashdot keep telling us how wonderful their single payer system is and how backwards the US is for not having it adopted long ago.

      Are the stories of long wait times and poor service in the UK true after all? Do the Brits perhaps just manage to live a long life because they know their health care system is sh*t and they therefore avoid getting sick in the first place?

      The NHS isn't perfect, and I'm sure if you're a paying customer at a private hospital you get quicker service, but the bottom line is that if you get ill here, you don't have to worry about bankrupting yourself to pay for a new body part.

      Some of us quite like that comfort blanket.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:I'm confused... by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      Public healthcare in the UK is much better than public healthcare in the USA. Much better outcomes, much wider coverage, much more availability and it's cheaper (yes, cheaper per capita than US public healthcare). It's good enough that most people don't even bother buying private healthcare.

      Private healthcare in the UK is much better than private healthcare in the USA. Much better outcomes, much cheaper. And by much cheaper I mean that if I decided to buy private healthcare with all the options and zero excess, it would cost me about $150 a month. That's pretty much the most expensive I can get short of having my own personal staff.

      Are you less confused now? Do you now understand why everyone with who's considered the matter thinks your system is crap?

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    3. Re:I'm confused... by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      The NHS isn't perfect, and I'm sure if you're a paying customer at a private hospital you get quicker service, but the bottom line is that if you get ill here, you don't have to worry about bankrupting yourself to pay for a new body part.

      No, you don't have to "worry about it" because it's completely out of your hands. You pay for it whether you ever would want it or not, and other people make the decision of whether you can and should get it.

      Some of us quite like that comfort blanket.

      No doubt. But you could have that safety blanket with simple private insurance, without imposing your choices on everybody else.

    4. Re:I'm confused... by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Are you less confused now? Do you now understand why everyone with who's considered the matter thinks your system is crap?

      Obviously, not only is your sarcasm detector broken, you also know sh*t about health care in the US and Europe.

    5. Re:I'm confused... by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      I understood you were attempting sarcasm. It was embarrassingly poor, so I ignored it.

      I know a great deal about healthcare in both the US and Europe. It's telling that you can't identify anything that's actually inaccurate in my post. But you still have to cling to your pitiful belief that you're paying 3 times as much as anyone else for *something* good. Because what kind of idiot would pay vastly more for an inferior service? What kind of idiot indeed...

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    6. Re:I'm confused... by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      It's telling that you can't identify anything that's actually inaccurate in my post.

      You rattle off a number of statistics ("much better outcomes, much wider coverage, much more availability and it's cheaper ") that have nothing to do with what I was referring to: waiting times and poor service.

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

      But you still have to cling to your pitiful belief that you're paying 3 times as much as anyone else for *something* good.

      Not at all: there are plenty of things wrong with the US health care system. But adopting the shitty British model is not the answer.

    7. Re:I'm confused... by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, half of the US medical system is already publicly financed and government-run. It covers only about 28% of the population and is still more than 3x as expensive as the NHS. So, obviously, the problem with the high cost of medical care in the US is not primarily private insurance, it's the government-run system.

    8. Re:I'm confused... by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      Typical idiocy. Your "evidence" is an article in a right-wing newpaper that doesn't even compare the waiting times with the US system.

      The waiting times for US public healthcare are much worse. You didn't even consider the waiting times for private healthcare in the UK, now did you?

      The British model beats your crappy system in every way, including waiting times and service. As you would know if you bothered educating yourself.

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    9. Re:I'm confused... by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Typical idiocy. Your "evidence" is an article in a right-wing newpaper that doesn't even compare the waiting times with the US system.

      Do you have anything to say other than ad hominems?

      The British model beats your crappy system in every way,

      Be that as it may, you are ignoring the simple fact that the US already has a vast public health care system like the NHS that consumes about half of the entire US health care spending. The US spends more per capita across the entire population for just its public health care system than the UK spends on its entire health care system.

      Therefore, the idea that what ails the US is a lack of an NHS-like system is clearly wrong. If going to an NHS-like solution would work in the US, the US could simply extend coverage of its existing public health care system to the entire population without any changes to the private system and lower taxes at the same time. But the fact is that, for whatever reason, the existing public health care system in the US sucks badly and is highly inefficient, and extending it to the entire population would just not work.

    10. Re:I'm confused... by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      Do you have anything to say other than ad hominems?

      Quit whining. You started with sarcasm, based on ignorance, and followed it up with a link to the Telegraph. That deserves a lot more abuse than a simple 'idiocy'.

      Be that as it may, you are ignoring the simple fact

      That would be the simple fact that I told you about in the previous post.

      But the fact is that, for whatever reason, the existing public health care system in the US sucks badly and is highly inefficient

      You refused to allow Medicare to negotiate for the prices of the drugs it buys. You stop it from making itself more efficient. In short, you cripple your public healthcare, because you don't want it to put pressure on your private healthcare.

      Let Medicare off the lease, run it properly, let it compete with private healthcare and extend it to cover everyone. It still wouldn't be the best healthcare system in the world, but it would be so much better than your current state of affairs.

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    11. Re:I'm confused... by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      Quit whining. You started with sarcasm, based on ignorance,

      You keep demonstrating your ignorance.

      You refused to allow Medicare to negotiate for the prices of the drugs it buys.

      That is only $80 billion out of a $1.1 trillion budget, so that's obviously not responsible.

      Let Medicare off the lease, run it properly, let it compete with private healthcare and extend it to cover everyone.

      The notion that a government service paid for with mandatory taxes "competes" with private healthcare is ludicrous.

      It still wouldn't be the best healthcare system in the world, but it would be so much better than your current state of affairs.

      We'll take your advice for what it's worth... nothing.

  48. Oblig by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    "But the village idiot's dirty smock and wall falling are a far cry from the modern world of the urban idiot. What kinds of backgrounds do these city idiots come from?"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  49. There's more than that by DingerX · · Score: 1

    It also is, as Mr. T. said, an ancient practice that was well respected before modern science. Mind you, there have always been astrological crackpots, those who don't apply it scientifically, but just make stuff up. And, yes, the inference is "the sun's position in the sky has a direct and obvious effect on existence below the sphere of the moon; the moon's position in the sky also has an influence, although less strong (think: tides); therefore, the position of the other celestial spheres - mercury, venus, mars, jupiter, saturn and uranus - against the sphere of fixed stars, notably the constellations of the ecliptic, should have an influence.

    Of course, it doesn't quite work that way. The inference is false, and the whole thing collapses.

    1. Re:There's more than that by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's not possible to apply astrology scientifically, because there's no science there. It is based on philosophical ideas that have rarely been scientifically tested, and those tests found nothing.

      If you were to read an astrology text, you'd read about various natures (of houses, planets, and zodiac signs) whose meanings have been handed down from a long time ago, although occasionally changed for no obvious reason. Read several, and you'll find varying interpretations, such as what happens when planets are separated by sixty vs. ninety degrees at the time of birth. You will find that, although the houses are important divisions of the sky, there is no agreement on how to calculate them, so one astrologer might have a planet in the second house and another in the third house. (Signs of the Zodiac are thirty-degree sections of sky that are semi-fixed to the stars (the constellations have shifted since this got started, which is something all astrologers know and have reasons to discount). There are twelve houses, and the only complete agreement is that the first house starts with the point of the Zodiac that is rising at the time and the starts of the last six houses are opposite the starts of the first six, and less complete agreement that the fourth house is directly overhead.)

      You may be presented with selected horoscopes of selected people where things about their life are explained in terms of their horoscopes. That's as close as you're going to get to empirical evidence, aside from a few possible references to "in my experience", where that is general impressions the astrologer has formed over the years.

      Astrologers generally do not make stuff up, but rather work from what earlier astrologers have written, picking and choosing as they go.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  50. I seek clarity by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    but isn't astrology just superstition?

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:I seek clarity by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Astrology advocates often point to the Moon's effects on biological systems, but though the effects of the lunar cycle is well known, that is almost certainly embedded into biological systems due to its indirect effects, mainly the tides and the light, rather than any gravitational or other effects of the Moon itself. And of course the effect of the Sun is quite strong. For example, the variance of the shoreline with tides. These macro lunar effects made for a convenient phase-matching mechanism for biology. Once any small cohort of a species started coming onto shore during a brightly moonlit shore, those critters would have had a slight survival advantage due to what we might call the Network Effect, so reproduced more babies. This might have started with a single individual's children. So the indirect effects of the Moon are sufficient to explain the behavior of all the biological systems. No other body but the Sun has any observable effect on any biological system.

      It's worth noting that while modern 'Western' astrologers emphasize the effects of the Sun, Moon, and "rising sign", ancient astrologers and Chinese astrologers have different, often conflicting, interpretations. IIRC Egyptian astrologers considered the Rising Sign as most important, and ignored the Sun. To add to the confusion, due to precession the present signs are approximately two complete 'houses' (signs) different from what they were back then. E.g. if your Sun sign is marked as 'Pisces' today, you're really a Taurus or Sagittarius (I forget which way it's off.) If the effects of these planetary alignments had any validity, then they would be the same for all cultures and epochs. Since they are not, that is good evidence against any validity.

      Of course as planets were discovered since the invention of the telescope, the effects of these new planets were 'magically' discovered by astrologers. These effects were unknown and unpredicted prior to the discoveries, making for the weakest science possible.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    2. Re:I seek clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astrologers do account for the procession of the Earth, and tropical astrology bases the signs on their associations with certain degrees in the sky - the constellations are an arbitrary layer meant more to reflect mythopoetics - while sidereal astrology reflects directly where the signs are now based on that procession.

      Additionally, Chinese and Egyptian systems of Astrology stem from a Vedic background, and Vedic astrology should be noted too - as much as a great deal of Greek/Roman myths had their background in Indian pantheism, a lot of astrology stems from a few central practices, with different opinions or interpretations arising from there.

      It's more consistent across cultures than you'd think, but still not perfect - but a lot of science isn't, either. You'll find fevered arguments over whether or not string theory has any validity (I think it's a complete load of bunk) and various cultures still have different views on medicine, with China still using some remedies that existed in the Tang Dynasty, for example.

      Cross-cultural astrological comparisons is very interesting, and any astrologer worth their salt should know that history and be able to compare the schools, but it's a very messy, complex issue - which only serves to reinforce that astrology itself is complex and messy and shouldn't be used to determine medical treatments.

    3. Re:I seek clarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, and I forgot to add - astrologers accounted for 'unseen bodies' in the arrangement of ancient charts, understanding that we could only see so far. If anything, they often predicted too many planets within our solar system, adding one or two past Pluto, but many estimated ancient planetary bodies in astrology correlate with modern discoveries.

      It's important to remember - up through Kepler, and a bit past, astronomy and astrology were well blended, and Kepler himself was only a half-skeptic, still talking about aspects and believing that the planets had an effect on the Earth's weather. Astrology is not ignorant of astronomy, and many astrologers, myself included, are passionate about astronomy and follow NASA's efforts and astrophysicists as much as we're interested in our own little interpretive art.

  51. Not so lonely anymore by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    It's good to know that USA does not have a monopoly on anti-science whackjob politicians.

    Maybe we can swap politicians to keep 'em fresh: We'll trade you 2 witches and a faith healer for 2 astrologers and a Stonehenge cultist.

  52. nurse practitioner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think what you are looking for is a nurse practitioner. You can actually afford an hour of their time. The trick is getting insurance to agree that this is covered treatment.

    A nurse practitioner can look up shit they don't know. It's not as satisfying as getting a diagnosis from a doctor, but I'll take a carefully-considered diagnosis of a nurse practitioner over a diagnosis of a doctor based on incomplete info and an assumption the patient is lying or doesn't mean what he says.

    My reflux problems could have been diagnosed in my 20's if any doctor had taken me seriously. Instead, I got a self-diagnosis in my 40's after a coincidental diet change.

  53. He should team up with Vito Barbieri by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Since Vito Barbieri thinks woman can swallow a camera for a gynecological exam these two would make a great pair for medical reform. http://www.startribune.com/lif...

  54. Based on a study by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Based on a study that shows the average Briton doesn't take nearly enough placebo.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  55. I guess this explains a few things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most of the stupid anti-porn laws recently enacted such as face-sitting, female ejaculation (money shot from a guy is ok though, rolls eyes) and other retarded non-sense.

  56. Astrology? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    As a Virgo, I'm very skeptical of such things.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Astrology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virgo as a Sun sign just means you approach things in an analytic manner (Sagittarius is the skeptic, per Arthur C. Clarke's declaration that as a Sagittarius, he was skeptical of astrology), or may favor the abstract concept of order, or universal systems, but that's a faint blush over the rest of your chart which would include your Moon's position, the placement of your "ascendant" (where the first house begins), the placement of the 12 houses, what constellations (or range of degrees) are contained within those houses, what planets, asteroids, and astrological markers are within those houses, and how those markers and planets intersect with each other, what those angles mean in relation to each other and the unique meaning of each.

      Actually practicing astrology is an exercise in combinatorial explosion which is what makes people like the lawmaker in question even stupider - even if astrology is real, how exactly are you going to parse some kid's future out of that?

  57. the stars say: bring out yer dead... by swschrad · · Score: 1

    "But I'm feeling better..."

    "You are Sagittarius, dammit, you're dead." bonks him with the crystal ball.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  58. Tredinnick is Hollywood bound by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Astrology-based medicine could be the next social activism trend beyond anti-vax. Spend some time walking around in Hollywood (I have relatives there) and you will notice the creepy omnipresence of Scientology. The LA practice of putting company names on buildings makes this pretty obvious. In this environment, I can see a market for Tredinnick's outpourings. Watch for him on The View by summer and hosting the Oscars next year.

  59. Reagan believed in Astrology by romons · · Score: 1

    So, despite his handicap (beliving in the paranormal) he was elected president, and remembered by most Republicans as "The Greatest President".

    --
    Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:Reagan believed in Astrology by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Actually IIRC it was his wife, not him.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  60. Goodbye Mr Tredinnick by c_g_hills · · Score: 1

    As a resident in Mr Tredinnick's ward I am looking forward to voting him out at the next election. He also voted against the legalisation of gay marriage.

  61. "helped", huh? by chilenexus · · Score: 1

    > "helped" fellow legislators through astrology.

    In much the same way I "helped" yesterday's lunch through my sphincter this morning.

  62. Did you read the whole article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is most likely that the full-moon lunatic effect serves a similar purpose to Grimm's fairy tales.

    The latter keep (kept) children close to home and family/tribe, out of the dangerous forest, and also less likely to meet up for unapproved nocturnal activities.

    The former kept hominids in their caves during a full moon, away from the hunting lions and other predators.

    No doubt our brains are still wired to avoid being outside during a full moon, unless we have other protection. Of course the predators among us may be wired to go outside when conditions for hunting are best.

    Most crime goes unreported (rapes, minor theft, fights, beatings, muggings, etc.) or is removed from the statistics by modern police manipulation (lies, damned lies, and statistics) so any effect is unlikely to be verified by studies.

  63. Surely Cameron has to sack him now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an embarrassment to the Conservative Party, parliament, and the United Kingdom.
    It is shocking that such a moronic individual has risen to a position of power and responsibility.

  64. Can you pay a homeopath with a stack of paper ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you pay a homeopath with a stack of paper with one dollar stuck in there somewhere?

    Only seems right.

  65. Funny thing - NHS data was used to disprove by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    I recall an article a couple of years ago, about the results of a scientific survey of all NHS data since World War II - essentially all the medical data about every UK citizen since WWII, which is about as comprehensive a data set (presumably anonymized of course) as could possibly be found, including the required birth date and time information. They found zero correlation between these medical histories and any astrological profiles.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  66. Problem with the British Healthcare System? by brownshoe · · Score: 0

    Wait... there's a problem with the British Healthcare System? I thought that was one of the the arguments for implementing ObamaCare in the first place - the argument that theirs was so much better than ours. Silly Rabbit.

  67. Names! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    David Treddinick even claims he has "helped" fellow legislators through astrology.

    Names! We require names! It's the right of every voter.

  68. Chinese or Greek? by genner · · Score: 1

    ........cause there's a difference.

  69. Astrologer chiming in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an actual, practicing astrologer and I would like to say: this is the stupidest idea I've ever heard.

    Astrology, as I practice it for my clients, is a tool for self-actualization and critical reflection upon oneself, personality, and goals.

    It has no discovered factual basis - and while I choose to believe in it, I believe in it based on the notion that I can practice it in a way that's helpful whether it's "false" or not, and using it as some sort of medical treatment is NOT that case.

    Additionally, horary, or predictive astrology, is notoriously used by flim-flam artists and is shaky as can be. There is nothing in astrology that remotely suggests it can predict the future or that any astrological body has an actual effect on the physical body or the events of the day-to-day world. Good astrology does not dismiss: genetics, physics, chemistry, or psychology, and good astrology does not seek to supplant any of these things - just as good religion doesn't view science as an enemy. Good astrology is philosophy, not medicine.

    I'm not surprised though, the UK is the birthplace of bad astrological practices and where you're find most scam artists who use astrology, no better than John Edwards and his ilk.

    It's a niche interest and that's completely fine, don't try to act like it's universally good.

    1. Re:Astrologer chiming in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding, you can think of it this way - even if astrology is real based on a yet undiscovered factor, it would still be just as easy to predict the future with it as it is to predict the future based on the weather in a given place. "Rainy day, 35mph winds, ah! Yes, any child born now will eventually have to deal with lupus." At most you just know it's a shitty, rainy day, and that's far more accurate than you'd be able to get with any astrological horoscope anyways - sure, mercury's in retrograde, but what is it aspecting? what part of the sky is it in? Where is it in the person's chart? And that's after literally every other more immediate physical, environmental, scientifically measurable effect. If it shades anything, it shades it in a way that's internal, and not some sort of external narrative.

      But people don't make the big bucks off of telling people what some of their pervasive, unfixable flaws are.

  70. Medical Horoscope: Sign of the Feted Barnacle by MegOnWheels · · Score: 1

    As you were born under the sign of the feted barnacle, today you will have doubts but tomorrow will be a new day and there will be a sense of resigned indifference before first coffee. Initially, as the sun moves into the burrow of the Aardvark you will be unable to find comfort but later a game of exploding kittens and fails videos on Youtube will cheer you up and your, cancer predicted in your previous medical horoscope, will be gone. Later in the week you will be standing beside someone on packed public transport, reach out to this person, but be prepared to duck as they may not like your advances.

  71. Re:Can you pay a homeopath with a stack of paper . by sweet+reason · · Score: 1

    Can you pay a homeopath with a stack of paper with one dollar stuck in there somewhere?

    Only seems right.

    you don't actually leave the dollar in there. you dump a hundred slips of paper and one dollar bill into a jar bang it on the table a few times. then you dump it all out, put one of the treated slips and a hundred fresh ones into the jar and bang it... repeat 10 times and that's a jar of 10C homeopathic dollar bills. you'd have to ask a homeopath what the actual value of each of those bills is.

    --
    Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- A.E.
  72. Astrology is the same as science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why listen not use the stars to shape your global outlook as opposed to the 5'o clock news. the media has a vested interest in selling you something and making a profit from science. However, I can thrwart their efforts just looking up at the sky and ordering your life around those pretty lights. The stars do not lie to me. They may not tell the truth or say anything, but they do not lie. Unlike the media, the stars have never told me I should smoke cigarettes for my health. Unlike the media, which changes its mind as to what is healthy constantly, the stars remain the same.

  73. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The really terrifying idea is...he might be right.

  74. Of course astrology works. But here? by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

    Anybody who is dead set against astrology has never bothered to explore it beyond the newspaper entertainment section and various skeptical papers claiming to disprove it. *Never* at the subject itself. That's a plain, simple truth.

    The critics of astrology choose to play it safe and lazy, attacking from the side. "Confirmation bias!" "Cold reading!" "I don't need to look because I already know!"

    Yes, yes. People can be tricked, this is true. -But you're still a biased coward playing at pretend science with sacred 'truths' lodged in your brain. No. Hush. You really are.

    Until you genuinely explore without bias, your opinion remains based purely on populist dogma and smarty-pants bluster. Those who look, truly look, inevitably come away stunned by the discovery that astrology is not all BS. But having to say, "Gosh! I was wrong," is too big a fear to face for most people when their sense of self-worth is so wrapped up in their long-stated opinions.

    That being said...

    When I think of commercial/government policy being involved in alternative medicine, I get cold shivers. It's alternative precisely because the main stream is so limited in certain areas. (Not all.)

    Big pharma is collectively one of the shadiest cons currently running.

  75. Laughter by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    Well, they do say laughter is a good medicine so horoscopes could add something.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  76. Oh, the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The irony here is that he's pointing to practices from a time when they were popular simply because there was a lack education and understanding amongst the populous, and claiming that those who are now intelligent and educated enough to *demonstrate* scientifically that they are nonsense, are in fact ignorant.

    Sure, the positive state of mind and attitude associated with the placebo effect are undeniably powerful, but that's all he's got. I've got a magic penny which is just as effective. Well, I don't, but if I did, there's no doubt in my mind it'd be just as good.