fool. dont talk sarcastically on matters you dont know about.
the 'rape' in swedish law is nothing like the rape you know elsewhere in the world. after having consentual sex, a woman can come up days later and declare that it was not consentual. and it becomes rape.
moreover, in this case, that wasnt even the case - the prosecutor have extended the swedish law in SUCH a way that it made continuing sex after a condom broke, a rape.
no, it isnt rape, according to rational mind/societal acceptances of contemporary human civilization. for the better or for the worse, swedish law has an off-scale definition of rape.
dont worry. Internet is a series of interconnected peaches. size of the peach is its bandwidth, and the icky hairs on its skin is its traffic. so, it will keep functioning even if you put it in the fridge.
which is actually also a reason why there is no investment. they dont want to invest AND want more. and they are using that monopolizing situation to force everyone to their will.
so, they have no choice. or, they should be left with no choice. noone in a monopoly situation, has the right to their 'private property'. because once youre in a monopoly or near monopoly (or oligopoly, cartel) position, it means that you are controlling the lives of people to a great extent without choice. and it is against the concept of freedom.
the bandwidth blabber is just an excuse for pushing anti net neutrality. telcos had, and do have the means to make investments that would render the bandwidth/traffic issue a non question.
IT IS SO EASY. all you need to do is to grab a laptop which some idiot have logged into a website with autologin cookies and YOU ARE A HACKER !!!
so thinks a moron, who somehow ended up as prosecutor in united states of america, random state. tells millions about the quality of education in usa (helloo capitalism) and justice system. (hi again capitalism)
this 'rape' wordage regarding this business befuddles me. the women CONSENSUALLY had sex with the person. then, they have openly and legally declared that the sex was consensual. EVEN after the rape allegations.
yet, fscking american media still talks of 'rape'. when you look into legalese of that rape in swedish law, it comes up as something that more than half of american males would be charged with, every few months in their lives.
yet, whore of an 'opinionated entertainment' (in their own legalese) channels like fox and whatnot still fool the gullible with talk of 'rape'.
but i digress. really. its too much effort.
if, one is that gullible enough to be manipulated like that, like a moron, they should be let to be manipulated and exploited. its their choice.
what should not be let, however, manipulators to manipulate much more people than could be dangerous, like mass media, fox, and other mouthpiece newswhores.
you know that it was as such, when the perpetrators of the case first merrily publish blog posts titled 'how to take revenge on him through legal system', telling how disgruntled women should abuse the legal system to exact revenge on males, and then delete the post once the internet community becomes aware of it.
what relevance does this have ? telcos consolidated because of the all you can eat prices ? they werent going to consolidate, if there wasnt such a model ? youre talking as if consolidation didnt happen in ALL other sectors left without regulation.
let me put bluntly : if you allow it, big dog eats the small dog.
since the line sharing agreement (hellooo regulation) ended in 2006, there are no small regional isps left anymore in the first place ? how that has been any different ?
instead of emphasizing anti-censorship tools, the US should be fighting Egypt's recent mandatory licensing of
u.s. is emphasizing anti-censorship tools ? like how they pressured spain government to put out a censorship law, and failed ? like how they pressured heaven knows how many other governments to put out censorship laws ? like wikileaks ? like coica ?
yees yes. sum of their people yes. like, riaa corporations have 100 million shareholders.... 'indie content provider'... yeah. definitely its about those. you make me want to pull out world's smallest violin. naive fool.
its not companies. its those who own them. do you think the people who owned majority of the financial institutions which effected the wall street scam are gone now ? no. the corporations may have gone under, but they are still there. and they are setting up new ones.
and these arent even the 'real' powerful corporate holders. the really powerful corporation does not need to engage in scams like wall street.
dont be mistaken - these wordage only give the impression that there are a lot of people involved in these occurrences. there arent. there are a few influential shareholders among the 10-20 biggest shareholders of these companies. and they think that it should be that way. and, they put people who will do their bidding at the helm of the corporations.
and these use the vast resources of those corporations to place who support them in power, or pressurize those who are already in power.
and you end up with this situation.
had those shareholders died out, as they should have, of old age, and different people came in place of them, everything would change. at the whim of a dozen individuals. best you would expect them would be to die out fast, just like how the people in middle ages hoped for their oppressive kings or lords to die. there is nothing democratic about a corporation. its private aristocracy. aristocracy privatized. however you put it.
this is the eventual result of capitalism. the one with the gold makes the rule. you are politically free. but because exercise of any freedom is tied to money privately, those who have the money have all the freedoms, and even can restrict the freedoms of those who dont have as much money as them.
economy and politics cannot be separate from each other. never. you cant expect to make one democratic and the other undemocratic and expect it to work. one will affect the other, eventually.
there you have it. 10-20 individuals are set on limiting freedoms of people, even at the cost of hampering a MAJOR new technology that is making the civilization to have a great step forward, and there is nothing you can do about it. the appalling part is, all what is happening are acceptable and legal, in terms of capitalism and its illusion storefront of political freedom.
so that people can sleep like morons, forgetting that the current government is practicing a worse type of censorship and repression on all freedoms in collaboration with private interests - worldwide too. popping up one censorship method after another, pressurizing foreign governments to implement censorship laws, trying to label journalists who go 'out of line' as terrorists....
just like it was with 'terror' an external threat needs to be invented so that all kinds of practices violating freedoms can be justified.
censorship ? we are doing it for security on internet.
Because, they just stick to their word. just like how wall street did, just like how bp did. just like how any other company does. because... well, because companies are made of love !
The patent system went from spurring innovation to crippling innovation via endless lawsuits.
it was certain that it would end up that way. in the end, its just a process of feudalizing. just like how capitalist system does to resources (eventual consolidation into a hierarchy), patent system does the same to intellectual life. and copyrights also do the same for arts. its just that the phase of suing successful artists because they have used shapes or sounds that were similar to copyrighted ones has not started yet.
The so-called patent is a joke. If you read the blog post, a "method patent".. "issued long ago" - hint for the clueless, these things expire, so this is just someone having random fun at your expense.
yeah yeah, justify, rationalize, explain. spend THAT much effort to portray it as workable, despite we are seeing another problem every 1-2 days, on major scale.
Slashdot Mirror
fool. dont talk sarcastically on matters you dont know about.
the 'rape' in swedish law is nothing like the rape you know elsewhere in the world. after having consentual sex, a woman can come up days later and declare that it was not consentual. and it becomes rape.
moreover, in this case, that wasnt even the case - the prosecutor have extended the swedish law in SUCH a way that it made continuing sex after a condom broke, a rape.
no, it isnt rape, according to rational mind/societal acceptances of contemporary human civilization. for the better or for the worse, swedish law has an off-scale definition of rape.
dont worry. Internet is a series of interconnected peaches. size of the peach is its bandwidth, and the icky hairs on its skin is its traffic. so, it will keep functioning even if you put it in the fridge.
But they have to want to make that investment.
they dont have that choice. they are physically monopolizing connectivity.
http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/04/18/1318210
which is actually also a reason why there is no investment. they dont want to invest AND want more. and they are using that monopolizing situation to force everyone to their will.
so, they have no choice. or, they should be left with no choice. noone in a monopoly situation, has the right to their 'private property'. because once youre in a monopoly or near monopoly (or oligopoly, cartel) position, it means that you are controlling the lives of people to a great extent without choice. and it is against the concept of freedom.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336291/Wikileaks-Julian-Assanges-2-night-stands-spark-worldwide-hunt.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
the bandwidth blabber is just an excuse for pushing anti net neutrality. telcos had, and do have the means to make investments that would render the bandwidth/traffic issue a non question.
IT IS SO EASY. all you need to do is to grab a laptop which some idiot have logged into a website with autologin cookies and YOU ARE A HACKER !!!
so thinks a moron, who somehow ended up as prosecutor in united states of america, random state. tells millions about the quality of education in usa (helloo capitalism) and justice system. (hi again capitalism)
how can morons like these, can become prosecutors, and take on cases they do not know shit about ?
this 'rape' wordage regarding this business befuddles me. the women CONSENSUALLY had sex with the person. then, they have openly and legally declared that the sex was consensual. EVEN after the rape allegations.
yet, fscking american media still talks of 'rape'. when you look into legalese of that rape in swedish law, it comes up as something that more than half of american males would be charged with, every few months in their lives.
yet, whore of an 'opinionated entertainment' (in their own legalese) channels like fox and whatnot still fool the gullible with talk of 'rape'.
but i digress. really. its too much effort.
if, one is that gullible enough to be manipulated like that, like a moron, they should be let to be manipulated and exploited. its their choice.
what should not be let, however, manipulators to manipulate much more people than could be dangerous, like mass media, fox, and other mouthpiece newswhores.
you know that it was as such, when the perpetrators of the case first merrily publish blog posts titled 'how to take revenge on him through legal system', telling how disgruntled women should abuse the legal system to exact revenge on males, and then delete the post once the internet community becomes aware of it.
what you speak of, is capitalism. as long as profit maximization is the goal, and businesses are allowed unregulated freedom, they will do these.
what relevance does this have ? telcos consolidated because of the all you can eat prices ? they werent going to consolidate, if there wasnt such a model ? youre talking as if consolidation didnt happen in ALL other sectors left without regulation.
let me put bluntly : if you allow it, big dog eats the small dog.
since the line sharing agreement (hellooo regulation) ended in 2006, there are no small regional isps left anymore in the first place ? how that has been any different ?
instead of emphasizing anti-censorship tools, the US should be fighting Egypt's recent mandatory licensing of
u.s. is emphasizing anti-censorship tools ? like how they pressured spain government to put out a censorship law, and failed ? like how they pressured heaven knows how many other governments to put out censorship laws ? like wikileaks ? like coica ?
...
this has to be a joke
he is a crook, yet, even he doesnt attempt to prevent anyone from selling figures or anything with huge bobble head action figures ?
what does this tell for steve jobs' character ?
if it is good. it is so with any product/service. if its good, its special and it will sell.
yees yes. sum of their people yes. like, riaa corporations have 100 million shareholders .... 'indie content provider' ... yeah. definitely its about those. you make me want to pull out world's smallest violin. naive fool.
its not companies. its those who own them. do you think the people who owned majority of the financial institutions which effected the wall street scam are gone now ? no. the corporations may have gone under, but they are still there. and they are setting up new ones.
and these arent even the 'real' powerful corporate holders. the really powerful corporation does not need to engage in scams like wall street.
Then write letters to them explaining WHY you're not buying from them.
they would care about that.
"corporations who want to make a buck on content" .... i almost felt sad for corporations .... fucking moron ...
http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/07/13/1737224
dont be mistaken - these wordage only give the impression that there are a lot of people involved in these occurrences. there arent. there are a few influential shareholders among the 10-20 biggest shareholders of these companies. and they think that it should be that way. and, they put people who will do their bidding at the helm of the corporations.
and these use the vast resources of those corporations to place who support them in power, or pressurize those who are already in power.
and you end up with this situation.
had those shareholders died out, as they should have, of old age, and different people came in place of them, everything would change. at the whim of a dozen individuals. best you would expect them would be to die out fast, just like how the people in middle ages hoped for their oppressive kings or lords to die. there is nothing democratic about a corporation. its private aristocracy. aristocracy privatized. however you put it.
this is the eventual result of capitalism. the one with the gold makes the rule. you are politically free. but because exercise of any freedom is tied to money privately, those who have the money have all the freedoms, and even can restrict the freedoms of those who dont have as much money as them.
economy and politics cannot be separate from each other. never. you cant expect to make one democratic and the other undemocratic and expect it to work. one will affect the other, eventually.
there you have it. 10-20 individuals are set on limiting freedoms of people, even at the cost of hampering a MAJOR new technology that is making the civilization to have a great step forward, and there is nothing you can do about it. the appalling part is, all what is happening are acceptable and legal, in terms of capitalism and its illusion storefront of political freedom.
so that people can sleep like morons, forgetting that the current government is practicing a worse type of censorship and repression on all freedoms in collaboration with private interests - worldwide too. popping up one censorship method after another, pressurizing foreign governments to implement censorship laws, trying to label journalists who go 'out of line' as terrorists ....
just like it was with 'terror' an external threat needs to be invented so that all kinds of practices violating freedoms can be justified.
censorship ? we are doing it for security on internet.
Because, they just stick to their word. just like how wall street did, just like how bp did. just like how any other company does. because... well, because companies are made of love !
The patent system went from spurring innovation to crippling innovation via endless lawsuits.
it was certain that it would end up that way. in the end, its just a process of feudalizing. just like how capitalist system does to resources (eventual consolidation into a hierarchy), patent system does the same to intellectual life. and copyrights also do the same for arts. its just that the phase of suing successful artists because they have used shapes or sounds that were similar to copyrighted ones has not started yet.
yes, i see it now. it was a non-issue. we successfully discovered that this was a non issue. this means the patent system works !
The so-called patent is a joke. If you read the blog post, a "method patent" .. "issued long ago" - hint for the clueless, these things expire, so this is just someone having random fun at your expense.
yeah yeah, justify, rationalize, explain. spend THAT much effort to portray it as workable, despite we are seeing another problem every 1-2 days, on major scale.
yeah.