I would like males out there to consider that all this talk about motor reflexes and lack of control is silly. The only explanation I can find is that people consider 'sex' to only be the part when you are finally past the gates, hip-deep in the well, and within moments of giving up the seed.
there is a point after which the movement becomes hysterical. it is what is designed to increase the speed of the mating so that it will result in ejaculation, and hopefully pregnancy, by nature.
it is also the reason why the mating is too short, unfortunately, opposite to what we would desire. all the effort there is designed for the ejaculation part for pregnancy. nature wanted to make sure pregnancy happens, and the process does not get interrupted by either party losing interest due to any reason or other kinds of urges, desires, overcoming the mating process at its final stages.
you should file your complaints with nature. you cant change biology and physiology with political correctness. blunt reality of life.
idiot, it is the status you are in. of course, its understandable, for, in order to see that one may need a long education in finance, and a hobby of history reading to complement it, and having friends, colleagues in important career positions in global megacorporations. so, you may lack these, and therefore come up believing the bullshit you are fed because you cant see the backside of what is being fed you.
but actually, one can do even without these. for, for a sufficiently dedicated researcher, there is enough material on the internet to make out the interest relationships and the conglomerates that span the world.
no, its not conspiracy. its shareholdership information, stake ownership, financial partnerships. they are all legitimate, officially declared and audited information that shows who owns what and who.
only the morons who have a half-assed dedication to using their brain can fall for the multiple branding, and think that there is actually competition, more than one interest in any given economy/country.
the truth is whatever you see, end up being owned by a few conglomerate interest holderships. these are not hidden information. they are all declared in balance sheets and income statements to public. but public, naive fools like you, do not get interest in these boring financial details. however they are actually the info which shows who owns you. it goes through dozens of proxy companies and international partnerships, but their ownership ends up in the few individuals.
you are as free as any middle ages english serf, who thought they were free, because, unlike the ones in france, they were sometimes allowed to move and migrate, and own small lots of land. compared to french serfs who could not move and own land by purchase, they thought themselves free. however, wherever they moved, they fell under the rule of one of the 5 major dukes ruling england.
you are similar to them. you can move, and change where you live, and own small property, but you will still be owned by any of the 5-10 dukes owning whatever country you are in.
the only difference is that, the king is now elected from among the patricians which these dukes support. and you think that is freedom.
so, its ok if a country's government is not controlling the lives of its citizens completely, but, doing it to 90% through use of indirect means ?
so, you think you have a freedom of choice because you can buy 4 different brands of detergent in your local store ? ALL of which are buying their base materials from p&g or unilever ?
or, you think, you have a freedom of choice because you are told that you can leave where you are whenever you want ? then leave now. can you ? can you leave your kids behind ? family ? your job ? how will you feed yourself ?
so you are free. 80% of the news in your country (assuming you are american) is owned by parents of 4 major movie studios. ALL that you can gleam from media, comes from either these, or their counterparts in press. so, you are free ? you are not even able to see what they dont want you to see. there was internet, and as you can see, they are trying to set up control mechanisms for it too. and again, that will not happen through government, in order not to wake the fools like you up - it will be done privately - they will kill network neutrality, and 3 major corporations owning entire networks will censor information as they will, while maintaining the illusion of choice for fools like you.
YOU ARENT EVEN ALLOWED TO LEARN WHAT YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN DECEIVING YOU WITH.
yet you purport that you are free, and your government is totalitarian.
that is the problem with you people. if something is not being done by government, you think that it is not totalitarianism.
you are the moron who is buying 'if it is government it is totalitarianism' brainwashing cue and then going about the internet calling others moron for seeing what you are not able to see.
totalitarianism is totalitarianism, regardless of the propagator is public or private. YOU END UP BEING CONTROLLED. directly or indirectly. 90% or 80%. its as simple as that.
7 Dec 2010... Wikileaks Assange 'Rape' Accuser Linked To Notorious CIA Operative Swedish prosecutors told AOL News last week that Assange was not wanted....
no, its not totalitarian. it's wrong, but its not totalitarian
it is totalitarian.
it doesnt matter through what means totalitarianism is affected. you people in usa seem to think that totalitarianism is issuing rules and expecting everyone to obey them, and punish them if they dont.
that is a very stupid, and narrow american approach to the concept.
end results matter. totalitarianism is, the state of making the masses conform to certain formats. this is the definition of totalitarianism in practice.
you may persuade masses to conform to a format. by talking and goodwill.
you may kill them to conform. by force
you may lie them, deceive them to conform.
you may brainwash them to conform. like how catholic church did for close to a thousand years.
you can exploit their psychological weaknesses to conform.
and you may use a mix of all these elements, with lies being in storefront, exploiting their weaknesses and self-interest through societal mechanics that are designed to force people to be self-indulgent and self-centric, and brainwash them to believe that this is actually freedom, while also straying to directly repressing or killing them by force if they go out of the affect area of the above elements occasionally.
this is the state of current western 'democracy', and it has all elements of totalitarianism discovered up till this date.
we know that. internet has circulated with the blog post, and the routes the two woman took, going to police only after discovering that the guy slept with both of them, plainly states the fact.
the 'reports' that say when assange didnt stop, when told to stop (probably deep in penetration), are from the mouths of the women he slept with.
that is, leaving aside the hilarious fact that, the biology of human orgasm makes the male unable to stop, moving like motor-reflex like functions during sex intercourse. which is what the nature designed the male/female mechanic on this planet.
all that bastardry, all that treachery, villainery, corruption, double dealing, betrayal of high principles, bullying, killing people, torturing people, greed, then justifying all these in the name of 'freedom' and calling it democracy, and WE, as 'the people', bearing the brunt of all this,
and afterwards we are expected to be calm and serene.
why.
really, why ?
are we mazoschists ? or, are we morons so that we will do nothing to the people who undo millions of others for their own tiny profit, so they will just keep doing that over and over, and we pay for it ?
"they are exploiting, repressing, suppressing, lying, deceiving us, but, see, i am calm, for some fucking unknown reason, i am STILL calm"
is it ?
no i wouldnt say that calm, i would say either idiot, or mazoschist. or, keep staying calm. so that you are exploited forever in that calmness.
interpretation of the law is not broad. else it wouldnt be law. there is only a certain amount of interpretation is allowed with every law. and every piece of law aims to be specific as possible. except the ones lobbies in usa are buying.
Or it might even be a someone that thinks that, according to the intent of their laws, that not stopping when the condom breaks is rape.
oh geee. so all it left is to interpretation. how long until an 'not evil but incompetent' politician, craving for attention or something else, reinterprets the first few amendments of american constitution ?
thats what its all about. whores. 'activists' for a long time, 'feminist warriors'.... ending up to be the whores who have given the powers that be, the VERY sources that propagate the male-dominant society, the means to end an effort for truth.
im calling them whores in front of the public. there are a lot of men who would stomach a rape in the ass so that these kind of filth came out, and truth be known, but these bitches werent able to handle a single man's infidelity.
curse on their souls, in both sides of this reality. i hope they get treated like whores they are, in this life.
From the provided link:
Earlier this year, Sarah is reported to have posted a telling entry on her website, which she has since removed. But a copy has been retrieved and widely circulated on the internet.
Entitled ‘7 Steps to Legal Revenge’, it explains how women can use courts to get their own back on unfaithful lovers.
Step 7 says: ‘Go to it and keep your goal in sight. Make sure your victim suffers just as you did.’ (The highlighting of text is Sarah’s own.)
Chief prosecutor dropped the case, saying there was nothing to make a case about. two girls also did not make any accusations or allegations.
but then, a swedish politician intervened. after the intervention of that dipshit, the case was reopened, and a MORONIC interpretation of the law was made, saying that 'not stopping after a condom broke is rape'.
the asswipes, INVENTED a new law, right on the spot.
and you are saying that cia was not involved. speaking of which, i have a bridge to sell you.
posting with a real userid, and showing some spine first ? and he says 'pansy minded'. you dont even have the guts to get a userid and post with your own identity. wimp.
Given a choice between the most damaging items being leaked slowly, a few at a time, every week, for the next several months
vs. killing off Assange (or whatever) and causing the whole thing to go public all at once...
They might choose the latter. Sure it would be bad for a little while, but eventually it would blow over and people would lose interest.
and usa would lose its entire spy network, because all the names will be out openly. middle east will be swarming with terrorists trying to kill those names.
there is an entire crew running the datacenter. if assange doesnt assure them regularly - voila.
im sure similar setups have been put in place for all crew. if everyone vanished from sight, there would be some random person somewhere, unknown, releasing the key.
another insurance. if he gets killed, governments will be held responsible. especially, u.s.. it will directly put u.s. govt in the place of a total oppressor in the eyes of 7 billion in this planet (minus 250 m). and there will be no remedying that. all the behavior set, choices of all the world people will change.
wikileaks is doing the removals with the counsel and help of nyt, guardian, washington post and 1 other media outlet they contracted with. the VERY thing that u.s. state dept refused to do.
i know it. because this is the official declaration of wikileaks, and the reason for encrypted insurance files all over the internet. that file, is whole file, uncensored.
Hey America, guess who's the new Soviet Union now?
in soviet union, you, me, actually any citizen had not only the right, but also the possibility to get elected and rise to high ranks in government through democratic process. you didnt need money to mount election campaigns.
in america, if you arent rich, you cant use your right to get elected.
Slashdot Mirror
I would like males out there to consider that all this talk about motor reflexes and lack of control is silly. The only explanation I can find is that people consider 'sex' to only be the part when you are finally past the gates, hip-deep in the well, and within moments of giving up the seed.
there is a point after which the movement becomes hysterical. it is what is designed to increase the speed of the mating so that it will result in ejaculation, and hopefully pregnancy, by nature.
it is also the reason why the mating is too short, unfortunately, opposite to what we would desire. all the effort there is designed for the ejaculation part for pregnancy. nature wanted to make sure pregnancy happens, and the process does not get interrupted by either party losing interest due to any reason or other kinds of urges, desires, overcoming the mating process at its final stages.
you should file your complaints with nature. you cant change biology and physiology with political correctness. blunt reality of life.
idiot, it is the status you are in. of course, its understandable, for, in order to see that one may need a long education in finance, and a hobby of history reading to complement it, and having friends, colleagues in important career positions in global megacorporations. so, you may lack these, and therefore come up believing the bullshit you are fed because you cant see the backside of what is being fed you.
but actually, one can do even without these. for, for a sufficiently dedicated researcher, there is enough material on the internet to make out the interest relationships and the conglomerates that span the world.
no, its not conspiracy. its shareholdership information, stake ownership, financial partnerships. they are all legitimate, officially declared and audited information that shows who owns what and who.
only the morons who have a half-assed dedication to using their brain can fall for the multiple branding, and think that there is actually competition, more than one interest in any given economy/country.
the truth is whatever you see, end up being owned by a few conglomerate interest holderships. these are not hidden information. they are all declared in balance sheets and income statements to public. but public, naive fools like you, do not get interest in these boring financial details. however they are actually the info which shows who owns you. it goes through dozens of proxy companies and international partnerships, but their ownership ends up in the few individuals.
you are as free as any middle ages english serf, who thought they were free, because, unlike the ones in france, they were sometimes allowed to move and migrate, and own small lots of land. compared to french serfs who could not move and own land by purchase, they thought themselves free. however, wherever they moved, they fell under the rule of one of the 5 major dukes ruling england.
you are similar to them. you can move, and change where you live, and own small property, but you will still be owned by any of the 5-10 dukes owning whatever country you are in.
the only difference is that, the king is now elected from among the patricians which these dukes support. and you think that is freedom.
and you are beyond moron.
so, its ok if a country's government is not controlling the lives of its citizens completely, but, doing it to 90% through use of indirect means ?
so, you think you have a freedom of choice because you can buy 4 different brands of detergent in your local store ? ALL of which are buying their base materials from p&g or unilever ?
or, you think, you have a freedom of choice because you are told that you can leave where you are whenever you want ? then leave now. can you ? can you leave your kids behind ? family ? your job ? how will you feed yourself ?
so you are free. 80% of the news in your country (assuming you are american) is owned by parents of 4 major movie studios. ALL that you can gleam from media, comes from either these, or their counterparts in press. so, you are free ? you are not even able to see what they dont want you to see. there was internet, and as you can see, they are trying to set up control mechanisms for it too. and again, that will not happen through government, in order not to wake the fools like you up - it will be done privately - they will kill network neutrality, and 3 major corporations owning entire networks will censor information as they will, while maintaining the illusion of choice for fools like you.
YOU ARENT EVEN ALLOWED TO LEARN WHAT YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN DECEIVING YOU WITH.
yet you purport that you are free, and your government is totalitarian.
that is the problem with you people. if something is not being done by government, you think that it is not totalitarianism.
you are the moron who is buying 'if it is government it is totalitarianism' brainwashing cue and then going about the internet calling others moron for seeing what you are not able to see.
totalitarianism is totalitarianism, regardless of the propagator is public or private. YOU END UP BEING CONTROLLED. directly or indirectly. 90% or 80%. its as simple as that.
http://www.google.com/search?q=wikileaks+accuser+linked+to+cia&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
http://www.google.com/search?q=wikileaks+accuser+linked+to+cia&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
7 Dec 2010 ... Wikileaks Assange 'Rape' Accuser Linked To Notorious CIA Operative Swedish prosecutors told AOL News last week that Assange was not wanted ....
no, im talking as a citizen. and that is my personal opinion about the women involved, since a long time.
they are of the same character that betrays their ideals for selfish purposes.
so you are naive and not too deep in your observations .... here :
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1899690&cid=34473606
no, its not totalitarian. it's wrong, but its not totalitarian
it is totalitarian.
it doesnt matter through what means totalitarianism is affected. you people in usa seem to think that totalitarianism is issuing rules and expecting everyone to obey them, and punish them if they dont.
that is a very stupid, and narrow american approach to the concept.
end results matter. totalitarianism is, the state of making the masses conform to certain formats. this is the definition of totalitarianism in practice.
you may persuade masses to conform to a format. by talking and goodwill.
you may kill them to conform. by force
you may lie them, deceive them to conform.
you may brainwash them to conform. like how catholic church did for close to a thousand years.
you can exploit their psychological weaknesses to conform.
and you may use a mix of all these elements, with lies being in storefront, exploiting their weaknesses and self-interest through societal mechanics that are designed to force people to be self-indulgent and self-centric, and brainwash them to believe that this is actually freedom, while also straying to directly repressing or killing them by force if they go out of the affect area of the above elements occasionally.
this is the state of current western 'democracy', and it has all elements of totalitarianism discovered up till this date.
we know that. internet has circulated with the blog post, and the routes the two woman took, going to police only after discovering that the guy slept with both of them, plainly states the fact.
the 'reports' that say when assange didnt stop, when told to stop (probably deep in penetration), are from the mouths of the women he slept with.
that is, leaving aside the hilarious fact that, the biology of human orgasm makes the male unable to stop, moving like motor-reflex like functions during sex intercourse. which is what the nature designed the male/female mechanic on this planet.
i would not want the u.s. to do ANYthing. for, ANYthing they are doing is being detrimental to both the world and their own citizens.
all that bastardry, all that treachery, villainery, corruption, double dealing, betrayal of high principles, bullying, killing people, torturing people, greed, then justifying all these in the name of 'freedom' and calling it democracy, and WE, as 'the people', bearing the brunt of all this,
and afterwards we are expected to be calm and serene.
why.
really, why ?
are we mazoschists ? or, are we morons so that we will do nothing to the people who undo millions of others for their own tiny profit, so they will just keep doing that over and over, and we pay for it ?
"they are exploiting, repressing, suppressing, lying, deceiving us, but, see, i am calm, for some fucking unknown reason, i am STILL calm"
is it ?
no i wouldnt say that calm, i would say either idiot, or mazoschist. or, keep staying calm. so that you are exploited forever in that calmness.
im not misrepresenting anything. this was the official interpretation that the second prosecution has moved on.
interpretation of the law is not broad. else it wouldnt be law. there is only a certain amount of interpretation is allowed with every law. and every piece of law aims to be specific as possible. except the ones lobbies in usa are buying.
However, Assange views Wikileaks as a tool to bring down Western governments (the U.S. in particular) that he views as "totalitarian".
what is the scare quotes used there for ? are you talking to a bunch of kids, or are you an idiot yourself ?
maintaining a 'free' storefront and doing freedom rhetoric, but, moving heaven on earth to prevent from finding out the truth, is not totalitarian ?
Or it might even be a someone that thinks that, according to the intent of their laws, that not stopping when the condom breaks is rape.
oh geee. so all it left is to interpretation. how long until an 'not evil but incompetent' politician, craving for attention or something else, reinterprets the first few amendments of american constitution ?
im calling them whores in front of the public. there are a lot of men who would stomach a rape in the ass so that these kind of filth came out, and truth be known, but these bitches werent able to handle a single man's infidelity.
curse on their souls, in both sides of this reality. i hope they get treated like whores they are, in this life.
From the provided link: Earlier this year, Sarah is reported to have posted a telling entry on her website, which she has since removed. But a copy has been retrieved and widely circulated on the internet. Entitled ‘7 Steps to Legal Revenge’, it explains how women can use courts to get their own back on unfaithful lovers. Step 7 says: ‘Go to it and keep your goal in sight. Make sure your victim suffers just as you did.’ (The highlighting of text is Sarah’s own.)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336291/Wikileaks-Julian-Assanges-2-night-stands-spark-worldwide-hunt.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Chief prosecutor dropped the case, saying there was nothing to make a case about. two girls also did not make any accusations or allegations.
but then, a swedish politician intervened. after the intervention of that dipshit, the case was reopened, and a MORONIC interpretation of the law was made, saying that 'not stopping after a condom broke is rape'.
the asswipes, INVENTED a new law, right on the spot.
and you are saying that cia was not involved. speaking of which, i have a bridge to sell you.
i was saying that, there are morons out there lacking reading comprehension. however, apparently, you have missed that too.
posting with a real userid, and showing some spine first ? and he says 'pansy minded'. you dont even have the guts to get a userid and post with your own identity. wimp.
Given a choice between the most damaging items being leaked slowly, a few at a time, every week, for the next several months
vs. killing off Assange (or whatever) and causing the whole thing to go public all at once...
They might choose the latter. Sure it would be bad for a little while, but eventually it would blow over and people would lose interest.
and usa would lose its entire spy network, because all the names will be out openly. middle east will be swarming with terrorists trying to kill those names.
there is an entire crew running the datacenter. if assange doesnt assure them regularly - voila.
im sure similar setups have been put in place for all crew. if everyone vanished from sight, there would be some random person somewhere, unknown, releasing the key.
another insurance. if he gets killed, governments will be held responsible. especially, u.s.. it will directly put u.s. govt in the place of a total oppressor in the eyes of 7 billion in this planet (minus 250 m). and there will be no remedying that. all the behavior set, choices of all the world people will change.
wikileaks is doing the removals with the counsel and help of nyt, guardian, washington post and 1 other media outlet they contracted with. the VERY thing that u.s. state dept refused to do.
i know it. because this is the official declaration of wikileaks, and the reason for encrypted insurance files all over the internet. that file, is whole file, uncensored.
Hey America, guess who's the new Soviet Union now?
in soviet union, you, me, actually any citizen had not only the right, but also the possibility to get elected and rise to high ranks in government through democratic process. you didnt need money to mount election campaigns.
in america, if you arent rich, you cant use your right to get elected.