these are all fancy talk and logic. let me tell you the real reason why people and businesses are not moving to win7 : what they have works fine enough for them. there is NO NEED TO UPGRADE.
and thats the stupid statement i was waiting for. no apologies, its stupid.
it doesnt matter whether they are removing them 'in tandem'. if, they are both being removed, it means that that 'tandemness' was NOT working.
if it worked, ie, if ccs and cc immunities offset each other, there would be NO NEED to remove them. but, apparently, they arent.
and, they are not. a cc immunity that can be popped up for 5 seconds every 1 minute for only one's own toon cannot counter the ccs that are being spammed from every toon every minute. you use it for 5 seconds, and the 6th second, someone else's random aoe cc gets you.
all these only work in scarce encounters, in which the sides are either 1v1, 2v2, 3v3 or combinations of these. they do not work once you get to an encounter larger than 5v5.
and it kills mass pvp. hence, since they are wanting to concentrate on rated battlegrounds and started 'balancing' the game around 10-15 man encounters, they are removing them.
but apparently you had no clue about either these news, or these issues. yet, you keep making statements.
yeah have a hard time believing that im talking about the same game, despite the developers of the very game have stated that they were going to remove a lot of ccs and cc immunities come cata. apparently, they dont agree with you.
see now, we are all free to vote, free to become candidates, right ? right. but, it takes phenomenal amounts of finances to make yourself known, right ? riiiight. so, in case you dont have a big media conglomerate you own, you need to find cash somewhere. even then, even if you find the cash, big media companies, who can reach the voters you want, may not allow you to give ads in their networks or give you air time, in case your policies and ideas dont suit them. ooook, right. so, that makes it so that, you can not get elected EVEN if you have the money. you need to either own a big media conglomerate, or, get one behind your back.
and the result is what ? in the capitalist system, your freedom goes only as far as your cash goes. can anyone define that as being 'free' ?
for any idiot who would venture down the path that is 'you can make cash', i would like to remind the 2004 statistic of income and wealth distribution in u.s. that comes up as 7% top of society owning 72% of the pie, and bottom 80% having to do with 15%. http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html
actually its much worse, top 1% has 52% or so of the pie.
and that basically means, 1% of the american nation is ruling over the rest, despite all being 'free'. and anyone's chances of getting into that 1%, without being born into that class, is, practically nil. even our much applauded tech stars are not in that segment. serfs in middle ages had more chance to be made a baron due to bravery in the wars they were conscripted to fight in for their lord.
first, democrats are left ? haahahahaha hahahahahahaha hahaahahahah...... that was a good laugh.
and
"Their political values trump financial concerns at the organizational culture level", and, they are phenomenally successful ? maybe we should all have our political values trump financial concerns.
made on bullshit statistics again..com is the riskiest, because internet = com for A LOT of people on the face of planet, and whatever is done, is done on com domains, be it legit business or fraud.
this is the second time some bull was served to us on slashdot based on ridiculous statistics in 2 days' time.
yeah. look how much money bp has made up till a few months ago. then what happened. now they are trying to sell it because they are going to go bankrupt. and, i cant understand how the hell 'they are superior to you' morondom came into the discussion. they have made more money than me, therefore they are right ? is it that kind of idiotic logic ? and, because they have made so much money so far, they cant make mistakes or they are infallible in their throne from now on ?
get some brains and proper logic procedures first, and then talk with people in online discussions.
have you or have you not read how apple lawyers keep suing people around australia for using the letter "i" in any kind of i.t. brand, and in u.s. the companies that use 'pod'.
either you havent, or the system again allowed a witless fanboi to get mod points.
getting downmodded isnt a problem. the zealotry is.
now you wont be able to use the word 'data' anywhere else in i.t. field either. since they put out something by appending 'i' in front of it, apple's legal team probably already have started to think that they own the word 'data'.
and what does that mean exactly ? what will happen is, eventually them or some other greedy pigs are going to patent something like this somewhere, and attempt to enforce it through international treaties. for, this is what patent system is : giving ownership of logic concepts to individuals. no different than letting a lord own a river and toll anyone who passes over it.
Wasnt it because the 'harder to read' fonts made the 'aliens' linked to that sample look more 'authentic' and therefore increased interest in their information.
aaaah sarcasm. something 'very rare' and hilarious, and never seen before, on the internet. and, yes, everyone has to spend their mental energy to discern whether or not some random schmock on the internet is practicing sarcasm at that particular moment or not...
i dont give a flying fuck whether it was sarcasm or not. if someone wants to talk, s/he should directly talk and speak their mind.
i dont need to turn anything to my benefit either, for, i am not 'victimized', or living in anyone's basement. these however, doesnt prevent me from making an observation, and seeing what is wrong with what's going on.
noone should need to 'turn' anything 'to their favor' in a system that supposedly gives equal opportunity by the way. and definitely not 1 out of 100 k.
it isnt a shame to have to live in parents' basement in an excessively hostile, exploitation-oriented monetary system in which people cant even have a chance to 'make it', without having sufficient amounts of money to even start their education. a society in which, the top 7% gets 72% of the wealth & income, and the bottom 80% has to do with 15%. that is the 2004 statistic for united states of america.
Slashdot Mirror
these are all fancy talk and logic. let me tell you the real reason why people and businesses are not moving to win7 : what they have works fine enough for them. there is NO NEED TO UPGRADE.
and thats the stupid statement i was waiting for. no apologies, its stupid.
it doesnt matter whether they are removing them 'in tandem'. if, they are both being removed, it means that that 'tandemness' was NOT working.
if it worked, ie, if ccs and cc immunities offset each other, there would be NO NEED to remove them. but, apparently, they arent.
and, they are not. a cc immunity that can be popped up for 5 seconds every 1 minute for only one's own toon cannot counter the ccs that are being spammed from every toon every minute. you use it for 5 seconds, and the 6th second, someone else's random aoe cc gets you.
all these only work in scarce encounters, in which the sides are either 1v1, 2v2, 3v3 or combinations of these. they do not work once you get to an encounter larger than 5v5.
and it kills mass pvp. hence, since they are wanting to concentrate on rated battlegrounds and started 'balancing' the game around 10-15 man encounters, they are removing them.
but apparently you had no clue about either these news, or these issues. yet, you keep making statements.
'notice' ? i have TOLD that they are. you are telling me to notice it ..
yes, they are removing cc immunities and ccs, because they made the game a stop motion animation.
yeah have a hard time believing that im talking about the same game, despite the developers of the very game have stated that they were going to remove a lot of ccs and cc immunities come cata. apparently, they dont agree with you.
see now, we are all free to vote, free to become candidates, right ? right. but, it takes phenomenal amounts of finances to make yourself known, right ? riiiight. so, in case you dont have a big media conglomerate you own, you need to find cash somewhere. even then, even if you find the cash, big media companies, who can reach the voters you want, may not allow you to give ads in their networks or give you air time, in case your policies and ideas dont suit them. ooook, right. so, that makes it so that, you can not get elected EVEN if you have the money. you need to either own a big media conglomerate, or, get one behind your back.
and the result is what ? in the capitalist system, your freedom goes only as far as your cash goes. can anyone define that as being 'free' ?
for any idiot who would venture down the path that is 'you can make cash', i would like to remind the 2004 statistic of income and wealth distribution in u.s. that comes up as 7% top of society owning 72% of the pie, and bottom 80% having to do with 15%. http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html
actually its much worse, top 1% has 52% or so of the pie.
and that basically means, 1% of the american nation is ruling over the rest, despite all being 'free'. and anyone's chances of getting into that 1%, without being born into that class, is, practically nil. even our much applauded tech stars are not in that segment. serfs in middle ages had more chance to be made a baron due to bravery in the wars they were conscripted to fight in for their lord.
first, democrats are left ? haahahahaha hahahahahahaha hahaahahahah...... that was a good laugh.
and
"Their political values trump financial concerns at the organizational culture level", and, they are phenomenally successful ? maybe we should all have our political values trump financial concerns.
made on bullshit statistics again. .com is the riskiest, because internet = com for A LOT of people on the face of planet, and whatever is done, is done on com domains, be it legit business or fraud.
this is the second time some bull was served to us on slashdot based on ridiculous statistics in 2 days' time.
yeah. look how much money bp has made up till a few months ago. then what happened. now they are trying to sell it because they are going to go bankrupt. and, i cant understand how the hell 'they are superior to you' morondom came into the discussion. they have made more money than me, therefore they are right ? is it that kind of idiotic logic ? and, because they have made so much money so far, they cant make mistakes or they are infallible in their throne from now on ?
get some brains and proper logic procedures first, and then talk with people in online discussions.
im using ff, chrome, and occasionally opera. i tested various websites on ie versions and sometimes other odd browser.
i want to know what browser, specifically, outstripts firefox for features ? or was it just balooney bullshit to get attention ?
probs the best name for a windows os that will be released in 2012. double win. both windows, and 2012 date. they both have the traits for cataclysm.
wasnt it just new ? what is going on ?
someone used the phrase 'get a life' !! ahaa haa ahaha ahaha ahah ahah aaha yoeap...
yeah he could. if he could acquire it in 'what little time' they had.
have you or have you not read how apple lawyers keep suing people around australia for using the letter "i" in any kind of i.t. brand, and in u.s. the companies that use 'pod'.
either you havent, or the system again allowed a witless fanboi to get mod points.
getting downmodded isnt a problem. the zealotry is.
now you wont be able to use the word 'data' anywhere else in i.t. field either. since they put out something by appending 'i' in front of it, apple's legal team probably already have started to think that they own the word 'data'.
and what does that mean exactly ? what will happen is, eventually them or some other greedy pigs are going to patent something like this somewhere, and attempt to enforce it through international treaties. for, this is what patent system is : giving ownership of logic concepts to individuals. no different than letting a lord own a river and toll anyone who passes over it.
Wasnt it because the 'harder to read' fonts made the 'aliens' linked to that sample look more 'authentic' and therefore increased interest in their information.
The socialism ensures that people don't eat each other alive when they fail, or in fear of failing.
that. and that is what differentiates the quality of society you are living in, from the one in america.
aaaah sarcasm. something 'very rare' and hilarious, and never seen before, on the internet. and, yes, everyone has to spend their mental energy to discern whether or not some random schmock on the internet is practicing sarcasm at that particular moment or not ...
i dont give a flying fuck whether it was sarcasm or not. if someone wants to talk, s/he should directly talk and speak their mind.
i dont need to turn anything to my benefit either, for, i am not 'victimized', or living in anyone's basement. these however, doesnt prevent me from making an observation, and seeing what is wrong with what's going on.
noone should need to 'turn' anything 'to their favor' in a system that supposedly gives equal opportunity by the way. and definitely not 1 out of 100 k.
yeah. sure you will. sure you will. like all those 1 out of every 100,000 which have become wealthy. keep working and clamoring your life away.
almost all american megacorporations have been doing it for decades. these, or other means to rip the govt. off. the ones like wb, warner, this, that.
the thing is, if you dont do it yourself, they eventually surpass you in power and buy you out. so, its a survival matter.
maid cafes are a japanese cultural thing.
it isnt a shame to have to live in parents' basement in an excessively hostile, exploitation-oriented monetary system in which people cant even have a chance to 'make it', without having sufficient amounts of money to even start their education. a society in which, the top 7% gets 72% of the wealth & income, and the bottom 80% has to do with 15%. that is the 2004 statistic for united states of america.
what is wrong with someone living in his/her parents' basement ? or, playing with action figures of anime, and hanging out in maid cafes ?
you arent an 'extreme nerd' then ... a very unfortunate statement to make, in slashdot ...
dont worry, im sure razor1911 or others will find a way to offset all those worries ...