By adding a predator to an island where a species of lizards lived with no predators
And who do you think you are, gods, to play with local evolutionary process of a isolated place ? Which idiot local government official gave you the permission to toy with the island ?
But most important of all, HOW can you muster the guts to come up in front of scientific community after breaking something irreperably while trying to observe it ?
if i had +insightful mod points, you would get them.
WHAT the hell is web 3.0 ? WHAT was 2.0 ? huh ?!
on
Can the Web Survive v3.0
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I just dont get this ! its like someone built and people used web 2.0, and there is now talk of web 3.0
I dont see anyone around much web 2.0 ? i myself scarcely chance on sites that use this so-called web 2.0 stuff, let the clients who us ask for such 'web 2.0'ish developments are rapidly declining too.
what i am starting to think is these web 2.0, 3.0 shit are just buzzwords invented to sell more books, courses, certificates and such to the interested community.
just yesterday ms (balmer ?) was able to say something like "linux owes us" just out of the blue,without any solid stuff around. so this wont be anything that will be exploitable by ms lawyers you say ?
some sources get the confidential information about some people, then they will use this to entice these people to do their bidding. election fraud maybe ? politics ?
actually i dont remember which country as the talk was a long time ago. however still, article suggests that $100 be spent in other ways - which is the problem here ; spending will generally mean putting money in the wheels of state corruption. if $10 reaches the destination, i would get surprised.
For violating fair use conditionals in expense of the consumer in this and many other incidents and continuing harrasment, intimidation and oppression of consumers through use of law agencies ?
Why dont we 1000-2000 (heck maybe hundreds of thousands) people file a lawsuit and let them get a few billion $ payment in punitive damages ? like in paypal case ?
From now on i see record labels, universal emi and such as public enemys. i place them in the same position as the aristocracy before french revolution.
one of my acquintances had worked in a peace mission for unicef in africa. she has informed me that the warlords (tribe leaders) there were confiscating the food at the distribution point, and selling it to the highest bidders or export it. only a token amount of it reached the hands of the intended needy targets.
its worse for the money - you cant track it easily. transfer some money to some local authority, and its gone.
excuses are a prerequisite when you will fail to meet any client's demands. you cant just come up and outright say that 'there was a bigger client, we filled their order' or 'we decided to pull the SAME market gig just like everytime we did, so, masses, we are therefore producing very little'.
EVEN if we accept that this time it was blue ray, what was it last time ? the time before that ?
How does hyping a product make them responsible for this?
its not hyping a product. it is hyping a product and very probably knowingly putting limited supply to stores many times over and over.
If they had more, or could produce more, don't you think they would do that. Demand right now is high. When demand is high you get your product out there and sell it as quickly as technically feasable.
No they are able to hand a ps3 to every kid in africa. Thats the kind of financial and manufacturing power they are. They are more than able to forecast what demand will be at what point and immediately meet it.
You should give a crap about what my background is, since it is industrial engineering, it is a combination of production/management systems/operations, and exactly stuff like this was going to be what i did for earning a wage if i did not turn to IT.
And with that background i am telling you again that sony is more than capable of handing out ps3s to anybody in united states, or russia, or china, if they set the mind to it. But they are not meeting the limited demand that surges in launch KNOWINGLY.
why ? simple - publicity - "people are fighting each other over ps3 - this thing has to be something good" - this is what it is.
- problems so that people will be obliged to try to solve problems between them and polticians ?
you have sucked people's blood for over centuries. very little 'people's men/women' have been able to pass through your elite circle and become heads of state/ministers.
go away pal. no can do. internet is a new thing, it is 'us', and 'we' are going towards direct democracy step by step.
They didnt start advertising and hyping the product 1-1.5 year earlier, and surprisingly for the n'th time in product launches, somehow failed to produce enough units to even supply half of the demand ? With all the marketing, planning, operations divisions full of million $ yearly wage employees ? AND despite the preorders ? Forecasts ?
which is the value of n ? how come it always happen to be so that products never go near even the initial demand ?
watch out, i wont take any 'they do not know how many units will be sold so that they are cautious' crap, since im from an industrial engineering background, i can assure you that especially a big manufacturer like sony can churn out just enough units to meet the initial surge and then supply all the upcoming demand with 'just in time' production methods without ever incurring a noticeable inventory.
Ps'es, Star wars galaxies (soe division), rootkit-installing cds, crappy consumer electronics support.. havent you people learned your lesson yet ?
Now they are letting you fight over their products like roosters - pecking at each other in stores to get a limited supply shit - and thinking it is a good publicity.
Microsoft would have to back off when i say that my bicycle was microsoft's product and i was forced into buying it by microsoft-imposed laws/practices/monopoly, and wanted to buy some other bicycle instead.
With the monopolist pressure they are forcing my relatives, my employers, my contractees, my government to use their own software and wont let them bail out, limiting me on what i can or cant do with my audio&visual equipment in my own house, increasingly deciding what i can or cannot see on the internet, oppressing my open source community, suing people to the extent of harrassment, causing my relatives, friends, close ones to get into pain over their lacking&incapable&insecure softare and me to run fix-up errands for them, trying to funnel cash into decision makers to influence political decisions against my democratic wishes.
In short, they are using me and all the people i know for their own personal profit against their wishes.
i request that microsoft cease and desist immediately
Slashdot Mirror
on evolution :
By adding a predator to an island where a species of lizards lived with no predators
And who do you think you are, gods, to play with local evolutionary process of a isolated place ? Which idiot local government official gave you the permission to toy with the island ?
But most important of all, HOW can you muster the guts to come up in front of scientific community after breaking something irreperably while trying to observe it ?
Lack of Jackson in hobbit will cost more than the gain you will make wrangling over the accounting issues.
... said President Gates in a press conference yesterday.
Its "They made it, they prevented others from making it, they forced me to it, they are making unfair profit over it, hence im entitled to it".
Theres broad difference between what you say and what is the reality.
if i had +insightful mod points, you would get them.
I just dont get this ! its like someone built and people used web 2.0, and there is now talk of web 3.0
I dont see anyone around much web 2.0 ? i myself scarcely chance on sites that use this so-called web 2.0 stuff, let the clients who us ask for such 'web 2.0'ish developments are rapidly declining too.
what i am starting to think is these web 2.0, 3.0 shit are just buzzwords invented to sell more books, courses, certificates and such to the interested community.
come on.
just yesterday ms (balmer ?) was able to say something like "linux owes us" just out of the blue,without any solid stuff around. so this wont be anything that will be exploitable by ms lawyers you say ?
Man. come on. One needs to be subtle when pulling a trick.
2 days earlier novell gig, then 'linux owes us' 1 days ago, and now, this.
Its TOO obvious to fool anyone, even supreme court judges who are totally inaware of i.t. technology.
some sources get the confidential information about some people, then they will use this to entice these people to do their bidding. election fraud maybe ? politics ?
actually i dont remember which country as the talk was a long time ago. however still, article suggests that $100 be spent in other ways - which is the problem here ; spending will generally mean putting money in the wheels of state corruption. if $10 reaches the destination, i would get surprised.
For violating fair use conditionals in expense of the consumer in this and many other incidents and continuing harrasment, intimidation and oppression of consumers through use of law agencies ?
Why dont we 1000-2000 (heck maybe hundreds of thousands) people file a lawsuit and let them get a few billion $ payment in punitive damages ? like in paypal case ?
From now on i see record labels, universal emi and such as public enemys. i place them in the same position as the aristocracy before french revolution.
if you dont spend it on a laptop.
one of my acquintances had worked in a peace mission for unicef in africa. she has informed me that the warlords (tribe leaders) there were confiscating the food at the distribution point, and selling it to the highest bidders or export it. only a token amount of it reached the hands of the intended needy targets.
its worse for the money - you cant track it easily. transfer some money to some local authority, and its gone.
excuses are a prerequisite when you will fail to meet any client's demands. you cant just come up and outright say that 'there was a bigger client, we filled their order' or 'we decided to pull the SAME market gig just like everytime we did, so, masses, we are therefore producing very little'.
EVEN if we accept that this time it was blue ray, what was it last time ? the time before that ?
How does hyping a product make them responsible for this?
its not hyping a product. it is hyping a product and very probably knowingly putting limited supply to stores many times over and over.
If they had more, or could produce more, don't you think they would do that. Demand right now is high. When demand is high you get your product out there and sell it as quickly as technically feasable.
No they are able to hand a ps3 to every kid in africa. Thats the kind of financial and manufacturing power they are. They are more than able to forecast what demand will be at what point and immediately meet it.
You should give a crap about what my background is, since it is industrial engineering, it is a combination of production/management systems/operations, and exactly stuff like this was going to be what i did for earning a wage if i did not turn to IT.
And with that background i am telling you again that sony is more than capable of handing out ps3s to anybody in united states, or russia, or china, if they set the mind to it. But they are not meeting the limited demand that surges in launch KNOWINGLY.
why ? simple - publicity - "people are fighting each other over ps3 - this thing has to be something good" - this is what it is.
- problems so that people will be obliged to try to solve problems between them and polticians ?
you have sucked people's blood for over centuries. very little 'people's men/women' have been able to pass through your elite circle and become heads of state/ministers.
go away pal. no can do. internet is a new thing, it is 'us', and 'we' are going towards direct democracy step by step.
Oh yea, they didnt ?
They didnt start advertising and hyping the product 1-1.5 year earlier, and surprisingly for the n'th time in product launches, somehow failed to produce enough units to even supply half of the demand ? With all the marketing, planning, operations divisions full of million $ yearly wage employees ? AND despite the preorders ? Forecasts ?
which is the value of n ? how come it always happen to be so that products never go near even the initial demand ?
watch out, i wont take any 'they do not know how many units will be sold so that they are cautious' crap, since im from an industrial engineering background, i can assure you that especially a big manufacturer like sony can churn out just enough units to meet the initial surge and then supply all the upcoming demand with 'just in time' production methods without ever incurring a noticeable inventory.
Ps'es, Star wars galaxies (soe division), rootkit-installing cds, crappy consumer electronics support .. havent you people learned your lesson yet ?
Now they are letting you fight over their products like roosters - pecking at each other in stores to get a limited supply shit - and thinking it is a good publicity.
sony should be sued for creating such a chaos.
Microsoft would have to back off when i say that my bicycle was microsoft's product and i was forced into buying it by microsoft-imposed laws/practices/monopoly, and wanted to buy some other bicycle instead.
upcoming vista and its shitload of drm
With the monopolist pressure they are forcing my relatives, my employers, my contractees, my government to use their own software and wont let them bail out, limiting me on what i can or cant do with my audio&visual equipment in my own house, increasingly deciding what i can or cannot see on the internet, oppressing my open source community, suing people to the extent of harrassment, causing my relatives, friends, close ones to get into pain over their lacking&incapable&insecure softare and me to run fix-up errands for them, trying to funnel cash into decision makers to influence political decisions against my democratic wishes.
In short, they are using me and all the people i know for their own personal profit against their wishes.
i request that microsoft cease and desist immediately
it appears that with the passing years the microsoft top brass is getting old, and surprisingly losing their sanity before their due time.
arent they already aware that eu is bashing them because of their similar behaviour ?
do they think that eu will just let them force people to use their own 'partner''s distro just like that ?
i can see fines raining down like hell.
i didnt notice that - what a fantastic combination
yea we were also careful with permissions and security, hence all they did was placing some stuff in tmp directory.
hits might be anything. visits generally contain actual 'people' with pcs.