Slashdot Mirror


The PlayStation 3 Launches In the U.S.

Sony's next-gen console has officially launched in the states, complete with an NYC launch party, and a giant line in San Francisco. While many gamers went home happy, the night was not without incident. There was also some ugliness, with individuals being hired to stand in line, as was done in Japan earlier this week. Overall, though, the news is positive for the hundreds of gamers who waited through the night for their new console. "As midnight approached, the first person in line, New York native Angel Paredes, was escorted into the SonyStyle Store where he was handed the first North American PS3 by Hirai and Stringer. The console's box also included a personal autographed message from Hirai. Paredes, his voice hoarse from interviews and arms tired from repeatedly hoisting the console, was a good sport, standing still for the multitude of photographers and offering a few words for anyone who asked. The first three gamers in line were comped their PS3s. Once the media buzz died down, the rest of the attendees were ushered in to get what they had been waiting for all week. Though the consoles' next destinations were unknown — many are expected to be posted on eBay for a quick profit — the next destinations of the new PS3 owners was clear — go home and get some rest. " Any readers spend the night in lines, and want to share about it? Did you eBay the thing, or are you just taking a break from Resistance? Let us know how things went, and what the system is like.

578 comments

  1. I won't expect reviews for a good while by Svippy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seriously, those who have the console now will probably be away for a good week, because who needs friends when you have a PS3?

    --
    Clicked pie.
    1. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by Rastignac · · Score: 5, Funny

      You need friends just to show them that you've got one and they don't...

      --
      -- Rastignac was here.
    2. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by LordVader717 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      People who don't want to play Wii tennis on their own.

    3. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, that huge library of spectacular PS3 launch titles look so absorbing, they might not be back for months!

    4. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, except for Resistance (88%), the PS3 exclu launch titles are all real stinkers:

      Mobile Suit Gundam - 30%
      NBA 07 - 66%
      Untold Legends : Dark Kingdom - 65%
      Genji - 57%

      For comparison, the 360 launch exclus got much better score, overall (PDZ - 80%, Condemned 83%, PGR3 88%, Kameo 81%)

      (percentage are from www.gamerankings.com)

    5. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL , scam bidding ftw

    6. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by jimbojw · · Score: 1

      Well, we know there's at least one first person shooter.

    7. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by Mursk · · Score: 1
      The good news: he just made $100 million.

      The bad news: he owes eBay some percentage of that. ;)

      Does anyone know what the percentage would be if the auction were legit? It's been a while since I sold anything on eBay.

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    8. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just mention PDZ and PGR3? PDZ is ridiculed even by many xbox fans as being one of the crappiest, overhyped games ever and PGR3 is inferior to PGR2 in everything but graphics.

      The average scores of Xbox 360 launch titles were vastly higher than what they deserved and even many reviewers admitted that months later.

    9. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      PDZ is ridiculed even by many xbox fans as being one of the crappiest, overhyped games ever

      Give 'em Daikatana and ask them again.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    10. Re:I won't expect reviews for a good while by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      What I find funny is that when you look at the GR frontpage under PS3 there's LOADS of red numbers (i.e. really bad) and only some green for Resistance while when you look under Wii there's a lot of green and very little red.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  2. eBay by perlionex · · Score: 5, Informative

    It looks like the going rate is anywhere from $3000-$5000...

    1. Re:eBay by tourvil · · Score: 4, Funny

      It gets better

    2. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one just sold for $9,000.00
      http://cgi.ebay.com/Sony-Playstation-3-PS3-System- 60GB-Premium-Presale_W0QQitemZ130047198895QQihZ003 QQcategoryZ62054QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
      Do you know what I could do with 9K? not buy a freakin playstation for one thing..

    3. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Lord..... $23,000 and 44 bids???? That's just insane...

    4. Re:eBay by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It looks like the going rate is anywhere from $3000-$5000...

      The first three gamers in line were comped their PS3s.

      now, THAT would have made for a decent profit for a week's worth of waiting in line... imagine if the first 3 people lived together and sold off 2 of them. goddamn. think of what they'd fetch for the autographed system.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    5. Re:eBay by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1

      It's funny, the winning bidder has a score of 2, but the seller clearly states that he will only sell it to somebody with a score of at least 10, and a positive feedback percentage of 98%. Somehow, I think this auction is going to be voided and the seller is going to try again. That, or the winning bidder is a plant to force this auction to end in this manner.

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    6. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, keep refreshing. it's skyrocketing.

      my god.

    7. Re:eBay by k_187 · · Score: 1

      it doesn't matter, the guy selling it was bidding up the price. It got to 9 million before he outbid the last guy. Greedy sod.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    8. Re:eBay by Daemonstar · · Score: 1

      Say what? It shows 9Mil now with 13 minutes left. :P Look at the history of bids.

      --
      I don't reply to Anonymous posts; if you have something to say to me, identify yourself or I won't reply.
    9. Re:eBay by k_187 · · Score: 1

      20 mil now. Somehow I don't think he will collect

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    10. Re:eBay by IdleTime · · Score: 1, Redundant

      * YAWN *

      Wake me up when PS3 Mark 3 comes out. It will have most of the bugs fixed and the price will be reasonable enough to buy it,

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    11. Re:eBay by gormanly · · Score: 1

      Current bid: US $99,000,100.00

    12. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently there's a $100,000,000 limit on eBay.
      Who'da thought?

    13. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awww, fun's over? :(

    14. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time you finished typing that the bid had gone up to $99,999,999.00 with 69 bids W00t!

    15. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and gentlemen, it appears that eBay maxes out at $99,999,999.00

    16. Re:eBay by Thansal · · Score: 1

      It was at $99,999,999 with 3 mins left

      then droped to 90 mill, and is dropping further

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    17. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird. It went down again. Final bid US $89,000,100.00. Good luck with that.

    18. Re:eBay by shmlco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of yawns, did you catch the one line, "...the next destinations of the new PS3 owners was clear--go home and get some rest."

      Is that guy serious? These people stand in line for days after waiting for MONTHS for the PS3 to be released... and they finally get one... and this guy thinks that now they're going to go home and SLEEP???

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    19. Re:eBay by brunascle · · Score: 1

      going, going, SOLD to eyelyktoys for an astonishing $89 million.

      congratulations, you stupid shit.

    20. Re:eBay by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

      Closing price was $89,000,100.00 - that's 89 million, 100 dollars - seems perfectly reasonable...

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    21. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the auction ended at $89,000,100.00. The seller must be pissed.

    22. Re:eBay by keithpreston · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you 89 million dollars that this transaction never goes through. The people that Hijack Ebay accounts have just been waiting for the ps3.

    23. Re:eBay by iapetus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps the $99,999,999 bid turned out to be fraudulent, so they just dropped back to the next genuine bidder.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    24. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The seller probably cancelled the bid because the bidder's score was less than ten.

    25. Re:eBay by Thansal · · Score: 1

      Final Price?
      $89,000,100.00

      Now, can some one explain the bid history to me?

      It says only actual bids, not the incremental ones up to your max as shown.
      So why do we see people with 3 bids in a row?
      Is this caused by them placing a flat bid, not a max bid that promptly gets overwritten by some one elses auto bid (that is thus not shown)?

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    26. Re:eBay by gerphimum · · Score: 1

      You try sleeping on concrete in the blistering cold for a week. It's not as easy as one might imagine.

    27. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i just saw one end at $99,999,999.00 yes that is us$
      when i checked the bids started at $0.99
      i could quit school and live confortably on that

    28. Re:eBay by Withen · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! Have a few minutes to kill? Sit there and keep refreshing a ps3 auction... I just watched one spiral to over $7000 ...

    29. Re:eBay by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It looks like the going rate is anywhere from $3000-$5000...

      Sure, there are a few idiots out there, but I expect that now the market is flooded with PS3s that the price is going to take a dump. PS3s might be in short supply but I expect that if you preordered one now (now that launch is over) that you'd probably have it before Christmas. For retail price.

    30. Re:eBay by StarvingSE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apparently sony was right about that $600 price point.. hell they could have charged the full $800 that the thing costs to make ;)

      --
      I got nothin'
    31. Re:eBay by maynard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At $3000, that's about five times the retail price and significantly more than my monthly mortgage payment. Supposing I did have $3000 in surplus cash, were I to use those funds to pay down principal on my mortgage instead of buying that PS3 I would shave a bit more than a years worth of mortgage payments from the end of the loan. Thus, to pay five times retail for a toy would incur a long term loss in excess of $24,000.

      Think about that.

    32. Re:eBay by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 4, Informative

      The buyer is probably just out to screw over scalpers by making bids they won't pay. When you exhaust all avenues stipulated on ebay for time until you have to pay vs. the relatively small penalties for canceling a bid, this could force the seller to delay selling it to a time when the hype dies down so they're paid less and have to wait longer.

      Neat strategy -- but your ebay account won't do too well.

    33. Re:eBay by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Someone else entered a bid, but failed to outbid the existing high bidder. Instead of seeing the internal bidding war, you just see the result, so it looks as if a bidder is bidding against himself.

    34. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have got to be an absolute fucking moron to spend that much for a console. You could build a monster pc for those $$!! Dual/quad cores, 4 way SLI 8GB's RAM,etc, etc..

      It just goes to show... "a fool and their money, are soon parted"

      my2c

    35. Re:eBay by dlim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does that include shipping?

    36. Re:eBay by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      EETimes has a couple of good articles about the PS3 and it's real cost ($840 for the 60GB model...ouch!)

      Inside pics and teardown video

      Teardown cost analysis

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    37. Re:eBay by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Exactly, someone keeps reentering bids because they keep getting beaten so each one shows up.

    38. Re:eBay by Bipoha · · Score: 1

      What amazes me, is how much complaining and whining I heard from people when Sony revealed the prices of the Playstation 3 systems. Customers are obviously willing to pay $2,000 for a unit. Maybe Sony and Microsoft will wake up, and when they release their subsequent system, charge the arm and leg the systems are going to actually be selling for. Only this time, they'll make some money. People will still complain, but they'll also still be buying. Samsung's blu-ray player isn't going to be $1,000 forever. Sony should use the same pricing model for video game systems. Adjust the price according to demand. Heck, a Sony Blu-ray burner for your PC costs more than a Playstation 3. They should have hired the guy who priced the Blu-ray burner to come up with the price for the Playstation 3.

      These launches always remind me of the "Game Slave 2" episode of Invader Zim.

    39. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol scam bidding

    40. Re:eBay by autophile · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...imagine if the first 3 people lived together...

      Must...stab...eyes out...

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    41. Re:eBay by cmorriss · · Score: 1

      These people are stupid. Using the right search, you can find Playstation 3 on ebay for much less.

      --
      10 minutes working on a sig. What a waste.
    42. Re:eBay by imdx80 · · Score: 1

      Its when the 'excitement' dies down when you can judge that $600 is a good price point

    43. Re:eBay by Actuator+Man · · Score: 1
      I'll bet you 89 million dollars that this transaction never goes through.

      Are you sure you want to do that?
      • I pay the guy who placed the final bid $89.000.050 to get me that PS3
      • He sells it to me with a $50 profit
      • I retrieve your 89M$
      Net result: I have a shiny new PS3 for just $50. The bidder made a $50 profit. The owner made a ~89M$ profit. You're in trouble.

    44. Re:eBay by blaster151 · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine being foolish enough to buy something that is GUARANTEED to depreciate 5-10x within several months. That anyone would pay a price so much higher than retail just to buy something a few weeks sooner . . . man. It's the same lack of financial education that leads to credit card problems, interest-only mortgages, personal bankruptcies, etc.

    45. Re:eBay by Nevyn · · Score: 1
      now, THAT would have made for a decent profit for a week's worth of waiting in line... imagine if the first 3 people lived together and sold off 2 of them. goddamn. think of what they'd fetch for the autographed system.

      Say you get $2,500 each for the comped. normal PS3's. 3 x 4 x 24 = 288 hours. That's $8.68 dollars an hour. In NY city.

      I'm not sure how much the autograph would go for, my guess is not much though. Certainly noone buying PS3's on eBay right now is buying it for the autographed version. So I don't see you making money over just working at McDonalds.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    46. Re:eBay by epedersen · · Score: 1

      Looks like the canseled the item, but I got a PDF of the item before they did. http://www.asteriskhardware.com/eBay_ps3.pdf

    47. Re:eBay by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      ew, dude... why are you imagining THAT?

      too bad they weren't sexy coeds... who had a make-out contest to decide which gets to play theirs first. oh yeah.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    48. Re:eBay by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      "interest-only mortgages,"

      Please tell me you are making this up...I've never heard of it but it scares the living crap out of me if it is real.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    49. Re:eBay by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      Say you get $2,500 each for the comped. normal PS3's. 3 x 4 x 24 = 288 hours. That's $8.68 dollars an hour. In NY city.

      but it's not like you're working. I mean... they were probably sitting there with their DSs or PSPs or whatever and rocking out to tunes (or rapping... out to samples... based on their dress-style)

      This is like getting paid for idle time. If someone was like "dude, I'll

      besides, if they got the hypothetical 2500$ each for 2 systems, that's 5000$. $5000 / 288h = $17.36/hr. tax free (if they choose not to claim it). That's $1666.66 to each of them, plus they have a PS3 sitting in the livingroom. Hell, they could even re-invest that 5000$ into a really nice HDTV.

      and getting paid 17$/hr to wait in line really is quite good. ...spike

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    50. Re:eBay by blaster151 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I'm not making it up! A friend who works in finance tells me he sees more and more of this, along with those who live upscale lifestyles but maintain tens and tens of thousands of dollars in credit card debt. It's interesting that in today's society you can't tell much about someone's true net worth by the lifestyle they appear to lead. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interest-only_mortgag e

    51. Re:eBay by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
      Do you know what I could do with 9K?
      Buy 36 Wii?
    52. Re:eBay by oc255 · · Score: 1

      Fine, then I bet you my own $50 that you don't have the $89,000,050 to start this process to begin with.

    53. Re:eBay by oc255 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a fantastic question. I know my own answer but I can't answer for everyone. My 360 checkout was $722 with wireless ($99) and other things. MS really nickels and dimes you to death. But that doesn't make the PS3 cheap.

    54. Re:eBay by jam244 · · Score: 1
    55. Re:eBay by ejp1082 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's simple supply and demand. Right now there's only 400k of them in the country, much much fewer than rabid Sony fanboys and hardcore gamers. That drives the price up (in an open market such as ebay, anyway).

      Once Sony gets the production issues worked out, the supply/demand won't be in their favor anymore - supply will go up and demand will go down as the fanboys get their console. Once it gets to the point that anyone who wants a PS3 can get one at retail, then we'll find out if the $600 is above what the market will bear.

      And we won't even know that for several years. Console price drops are just a form of market segmentation. Sony will sell every PS3 it can to the people who are willing to shell out $600 for it, then drop the price and sell it to everyone willing to pay at that level, then do it again, and again, and again, etc.

      There's other factors involved besides price, like the size and quality of the game library at a given point in time, and the age of the console... but what you might find is that there's a big spike in sales when the console finally hits that "sweet spot", which my guess is around $300, the same price range that most every successful console launches at.

    56. Re:eBay by Sicnarf · · Score: 1

      i was watching those auctions, and one PS3 just sold for $15099, wow!

    57. Re:eBay by nomadic · · Score: 1

      That's $8.68 dollars an hour. In NY city.

      That's enough to pay for 3 hot dog meals at Gray's Papaya and you'll still have enough money to buy a newspaper to use as a blanket as you wait on line!

    58. Re:eBay by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Are you an American? Because if you are this wouldn't suprize you. I will assume you live somewhere else so I will give you a list of things that are Guaranteed to depriciate 5-10x in several months that people inluding yourself buy consistently.

      New Clothes.

      Any produce

      CDs

      DVDs

      Carpet

      Paint

      Concert Tickets

      and on and on. Many Items are considerably more and you get no value back from them other than intangible feelings. (with the exception of Produce and clothes).

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    59. Re:eBay by Thansal · · Score: 1

      the auction that wient for $89,000,100.00 has been pulled by Ebay.

      heh

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    60. Re:eBay by Manmademan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You have got to be an absolute fucking moron to spend that much for a console. You could build a monster pc for those $$!! Dual/quad cores, 4 way SLI 8GB's RAM,etc, etc..
      ..and be able to play a grand total of ZERO Ps2 games and Blu-Ray movies.
    61. Re:eBay by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 0, Troll

      You, sir, are obviously a moron! Don't try to talk sense to people rabidly buying into hype to get a _chance_ to get an already overpriced console for even more money. I mean christ, there is like almost one good game for it and it play's Blu-Ray DVD's like... wait for it... Adam Sandler's Click!

      $3000 now plus an extra two hundred for extra's, Resistance and Click DVD is way more important than getting ahead in life by a measly $24k!

      Puh-Shaw!

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    62. Re:eBay by Nevyn · · Score: 1
      but it's not like you're working

      Of course you are, you might think it's an OK job ... but it's not like you can leave.

      If they got the hypothetical 2500$ each for 2 systems, that's 5000$

      You're right, I used 2,500 by accident and it looked about right from other calculations I'd done (but this is a significantly more profitable scenario, unrealistically so IMO). But, even if all the numbers above were a given, I still think your time has to be pretty cheap to wait in line 24hrs a day for 4 days ... just for a one off 17.36/hr job. And I think most people are getting much closer to $10/hr ... although "only" waiting for 48 hrs or so.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    63. Re:eBay by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, all the campers brought fold up chairs and even comforters. I wouldn't have any trouble sleeping like that.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    64. Re:eBay by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Neat strategy -- but your ebay account won't do too well.

      It's not that hard to sign up for a dummy ebay account. All the hardc0re gam3rz who are bitter that they didn't get/can't afford a PS3 have lots of time on their hands anyway, and trolling ebay with fake bids is probably as satisfying to them as yelling epithets over Xbox Live.

    65. Re:eBay by Philnet.HFZ · · Score: 1

      Technically, it might not actually be needed. Say that they guy who purchased it for $89,000,000 did so on credit. Then, he was paid $89,000,050 in credits. Net result= $50 credit to account. $89,000,000 bet being used as payment, a PS3 was theoretically purchased for $50. I'll collect on that $50 bet now.

      --
      I don't get why posts are limited to 120 characters. Seems unreasonable to me. I mean, just because I like having a real
    66. Re:eBay by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      It really depends on what you're doing in line, though. My friend wanted to get in line this past monday at the 23rd street Bestbuy, here in manhattan. I had to work (as did he) or I would have. I've waited in line for worse, although not for 4 days.

      Back in 1999 or whenever it was, I waited in line for 36 hours to get tickets to Episode 1... and let me tell you... it was fun, although it rained and and there was NO place to piss (cops were there and the guy in front of me in line got a ticket for pissing in the lot)... although the payoff was really... not worth it. at all.

      I think the PS3 may have been worth it. especially if it turned out that I'd get comp'd for those systems.

      And, if you're in school and don't have a job, that would have been a killer turnout for a week's worth of your time.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    67. Re:eBay by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      What do you think supported the housing boom the last few years? You think millions of people were suddenly able to afford $500k+ RE? LOL. If you really want to see what a mess we're going to be in if things start going badly check out neg-am (hint, you don't even have to pay all the interest each month if you chose not to. All the while, banks get to book revenue like you paid the full amount and get to book the interest on the amount you didn't pay as revenue, f'd up I tell you) mortgages...

    68. Re:eBay by intangible · · Score: 1

      Give me $9 million and I will build you a computer to do it.

    69. Re:eBay by blaster151 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really consider small-ticket items like CDs as a valid comparison (and even when I do buy CDs, I buy them used and often sell them again for almost the same price I paid for them). I also don't think concert tickets really count, either - you're paying for a one-time experience, which you receive fully - I wouldn't consider that depreciation. I do agree that it's not unheard of to buy big-ticket items with the full knowledge that they will lose some value. Usually it's amortized over a matter of years, though, not weeks! I bet in a month and a half these people are going to feel silly when they wake up and realized they pissed away $1500+ by paying several times retail just to get a video game console a little earlier.

    70. Re:eBay by SilverLaker · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'll sell you a device for playing PS2 games. Only $1000, cash in hand!

      How many Blue-Ray movies do you own?

    71. Re:eBay by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Think of the look on everyone's face if someone with an autographed system threw it to the ground, stomped on it for a bit and then made a W gang-sign while shouting, "fsck the PS3, Wii rulez!!!!" I'm a bit surprised that stunts like this haven't happened. It would only take a small amount of money and time for what would no doubt be huge exposure.

    72. Re:eBay by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      I drove by some stores in the Chicago area last night. People were camped out (literally, with tents) at the Best Buy in Downers Grove for the midnight sale. There were easily 100+ people in line; pretty stupid for the 50th person onward since they would have better luck at an 8:00 opening. However, at the Best Buy on North Ave. in Chicago I counted a little over forty people in line at 7:30 PM for 34 units. A thirteen or fourteen hour wait would have landed you a console there.

      I was kicking myself for not arriving earlier and making some money, but is it really worth $1,500 to sit on the sidewalk in the cold all night? Instead I ended up buying Bully and Final Fantasy XII for the PS2 along with season one of the original Star Trek. I think I got the better deal.

    73. Re:eBay by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Didn't really think about the housing boom the past few years, just graduated college in aug. However I just wikipedia-ed Neg-Am Loans, and what can I say but are there really people that use loans such as this? It just sounds like financial suicide.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    74. Re:eBay by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      It just sounds like financial suicide.

      I know that and you know that. Now try telling all the people whose mantra was 'but real estate always goes up...they aren't making anymore land' that :)

      This is a fun site to read. Just remember that they like to paint a very bleak picture. I think it's somewhere between those people and the RE agents to where things will play out in the end.

    75. Re:eBay by zimus · · Score: 1
      Do you know what I could do with 9K? ...

      I'll tell you what I'd do, man: two chicks at the same time, man.
      --
      Is your terror cell living in terror? Is your safe-house not so safe? If so, read the New York Times, the jihad journal.
    76. Re:eBay by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Blue-ray movies? Who cares. As for PS2 games, I could just buy a PS2.

    77. Re:eBay by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Good luck finding people, an email "I need to move 89M$ around, if I can enlist your help you'll get a share of it" won't get much response these days.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    78. Re:eBay by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know what kind of bank would agree to a 89 million $ credit that easily.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    79. Re:eBay by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Ahh, you buy used CDs, that requires a bit of intelligence. I personally wont spend more than $8 on any album, maybe if it were vinyl.

      The point (although flawed) that I was trying to point out, was that people, especially us americans. Are absolutely moronic when it comes to finances. I mean real idiots.

      Americans need that brand new car, when they could get every feature of that new car by buying one 3 years old and saving around $20K. People arent interested in the future, they are interested in the here and now.

      And along with getting bragging rights with your PS3, people will pay a premium to sit a couple rows closer in a concert, pay $10 extra to listen to a CD 6 months before it hits the used or online market. In the town I live we have a $2 theater, plays every major movie that comes out, just 6 months or so later, yet everyone still pays 7.5-10 to watch it as it comes out!

      The list goes on and on, Name brand clothes rather than going to Target, K-Mart, or another retailer.

      But judging from what you just said you are not one of these people, and like me where you will buy the concert tickets because, hey, the experience is awesome. You still have a head to say, $800 for a console? no way. 5K? ludicrous.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    80. Re:eBay by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      This is why I play Odyssey 2!!! Vintage games rule!!!

    81. Re:eBay by SimHacker · · Score: 1

      Will you please explain why you publically claim that gays are "sinners", and why you condemn the "gay lifestyle"? What proof do you have? What stake do you have in this? Why do you care if gays get married?

      Answer this simple question: What would you do if your kids turn out to be gay: Would you stop hating gays, or would you start hating your kids?

      If you can't justify and won't stand by your hate speech, then SHUT THE FUCK UP.

      -Don

      --
      Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  3. Who will win? by kidtux1 · · Score: 1

    Looks like the battle for the next gen console is finally underway. Personally I'm voting for the Wii, but the 360 and PS3 both have amazing graphics! ---------- http://www.iheartmygeek.com/

    1. Re:Who will win? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 3, Informative
      Who will win?

      I don't know who will win, but I know a guy who lost! Well, he lost a PS3 chance, but is probably going to win a few 100 grand in a lawsuit. Seriously, this Wal-Mart manager who thought a 'race' to 10 seats was a good idea should be fired.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    2. Re:Who will win? by Thansal · · Score: 1

      no, he should be tossed in prison.

      Insighting a Riot?
      Distrubing the peace?
      I don't care, what he did was not stupid, it was blatently incouraging violence.

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    3. Re:Who will win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm voting for the Wii as well!

      Drooool...

    4. Re:Who will win? by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      Is that all? Musical chairs? Try getting shot over one of these damned machines.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    5. Re:Who will win? by kidtux1 · · Score: 1

      I agree that is was a stupid thing for the manager to do, but I don't think it's worthy of a 100k lawsuit. At most Wal-Mart should just issue an apology and give the guy a PS3.

    6. Re:Who will win? by ptelligence · · Score: 1

      He can have a contest of his own now...The first lawyers to sit in these three chairs can have the case. Hahaha

    7. Re:Who will win? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wouldn't even question the idea that the manager just wanted to see them fight for seats for his own humor. West Bend isn't far from where I live and it's pretty much the talk of the town in Wisconsin. Heck, even the older moms in accounts payable are all talking about it over the water cooler.. and they don't even know what a PS3 is! hehe I had a conversation with them...

      me: "Yes, the PS3 is expensive because it plays Blu-Ray".
      mom1: (look of confusion) "What's that?".
      me: "It's the next generation of DVD formats. It has a lot larger storage capacity and is to work with new TV's that support high-definition video for better quality."
      mom2: "Oh, I heard of those HD-TV's. No one I know will buy them."
      mom1: "I need to get my kids a gift for X-Mas. Can I get a PS3?" ...

      Well, to make a long conversation short, I basically informed her about the Wii which she's going to go out and get, given that it's likely going to be far easier for her to find.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    8. Re:Who will win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Insighting a Riot?
      Distrubing the peace?
      I don't care, what he did was not stupid, it was blatently incouraging violence.

      Wow. I think prison's pretty harsh penalty for something like that. Now if he'd been

      Inciting a Riot
      Disturbing the peace
      or encouraging violence,

      yeah, throw him in the slammer for a while... but this isn't malevolence, it's just stupidity.
    9. Re:Who will win? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1
      agree that is was a stupid thing for the manager to do, but I don't think it's worthy of a 100k lawsuit.

      I wouldn't doubt that the lawyer will start the suit nearer to $1 million and settle for a few hundred grand. The point I see for this suit is simple... 1) Wal-Mart is the largest retail in the world 2) Wal-Mart easily at fault for negligence for concocting this 'promotional seat race'. Sure it wasn't the corporates idea, just an employee, but that won't make a difference in court. 3) there are more than enough witness to claim Wal-Mart created the environment for stampede.

      It wouldn't be much different than all the suits that happen for a person who trips over a carpet or wet floor. You can get millions for spilling coffee on your lap from McD's, I'm sure a guy with a dislocated jaw can get a few hundred grand. Not to say 3rd degree burns from coffee are comparable to a dislocated jaw, but there's enough precedence, and I'm sure it won't be hard to find a jury who would award a large cash settlement to a plaintiff in this case. It's not like $100,000 or $300,000 is much for Wally World.

      Of course, it is not close to being shot. =)

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    10. Re:Who will win? by andrewd18 · · Score: 1

      I live about 20 minutes away from West Bend... I very well might go up there tonight and give that manager a piece of my mind. Seriously, WTF.

    11. Re:Who will win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can get millions for spilling coffee on your lap from McD's"

      No, you can't. McDonalds was punished for the temperature of their coffee which they refused to address, and she did not make anywhere close to a million dollars.

    12. Re:Who will win? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1
      No, you can't. McDonalds was punished for the temperature of their coffee which they refused to address, and she did not make anywhere close to a million dollars.

      Some sites...

      But now - days after a jury here awarded $2.9 million to an 81-year-old woman scalded by McDonald's coffee
      The jury awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages, which was later reduced to $160,000 because the jury found Liebeck 20% at fault. It also awarded Liebeck $2.7 million in punitive damages. The trial court subsequently reduced the punitive award to $480,000, even though the judge called McDonalds' conduct reckless, callous and willful.

      Also, what I said...

      Not to say 3rd degree burns from coffee are comparable to a dislocated jaw,

      I know the reason the woman won the case was not because the coffee was 'hot' but because it was unreasonably hot (she suffered 3rd degree burns). She also was awarded millions of dollars before an appeal lowered the amount of punitive damages. Like I said, I expect the first damages amount will be very high, but will be reduced. The exact legal details on how at fault this person is, I cannot truly guess. But there's no doubt, in my mind, that Wal-Mart can be held responsible and I cannot see it being difficult to find a jury who will feel sorry for a 19 year old 'kid' being forced to 'fight' for a game system, especially after you throw in pity testimony to win the hearts of the jury of how this kid stood in line for a day, in the rain and snow and blah, blah, blah. Then you claim the game was going to be a Xmas gift for his sick dying cousin or something, lol. The Jury will have no pity for Wal-Mart. Hehe, reminds me of that Travolta Movie, Cival Action where he tries to use pity to win money in a legal case, but wasn't allowed to.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    13. Re:Who will win? by wolfgang_spangler · · Score: 1

      The PS3, the cabbage patch toy of '06.

    14. Re:Who will win? by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely that it was a dumbass idea and the wal-mart manager needs to be fired, but is it really wal-mart's fault that the guy got hurt?
      If the challenge had been to soak in gasoline and jump through a flaming ring, wouldnt most people agree that whoever actually did it was an idiot? Would it be wal-mart's fault that he chose to do something so obviously stupid?
      Playing a game of musical chairs with 60 people that are all batty for a ps3 is a stupid idea. People have no sense of self-responsibility any more, its always someone else's fault. Wal-mart didnt force him to participate, but someone did smack him into a flag pole. IMO, that is who he should be suing. I doubt that the loonies that knocked him around in the race are as juicy a target as wal-mart, though.

    15. Re:Who will win? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      He'll probably settle for a Playstation and an extra controller.

    16. Re:Who will win? by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1
      If the challenge had been to soak in gasoline and jump through a flaming ring, wouldnt most people agree that whoever actually did it was an idiot?

      Actually, that's not too bad of an argument. However, it would be easy to point out, that when 'entities' (be it stores, schools, TV shows, etc) do some sort of 'event' that could involve physical activities (I doubt Jeopardy needs ones), they have the 'participants' sign a waiver saying they know what the consequences are, have been told what can/could happen, etc and that they will not hold the 'entity' liable should injuries occur due to 'normal' use.

      Then, the 'entity' needs to have all kinds of 'protection' preventing an accident from happening or minimizing damage once it does. People who jump through flaming hoops will need flame-retardent suits, have EMS ready, etc. If the guy jumps through, did not sign a waiver, and was not given PPE (personal protective equipment), then yes, that 'entity' is liable because they organized the event and need to assure the event is safe.

      Some examples... paintball and Bungee Jumping require waivers. People also 'expect' the danger. No one 'expects' a big-box retailer to force people to basically fight over a product and unless the store first told customers about the event, had them sign waivers, and made sure there was the smallest chance of injury, such as clear the isles, etc. Then it would be much harder to prove fault on the account of the stores promotion. Of course, I cannot say it's 100% at fault, but easily greater than 51%, which is all that's needed in most cases.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  4. Wow by Tadrith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm watching the news right now.

    This is possibly the dumbest, saddest thing I've ever seen.

    1. Re:Wow by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 5, Funny
      This is possibly the dumbest, saddest thing I've ever seen.

      You're new here, aren't you?

    2. Re:Wow by saboola · · Score: 1

      Welcome to America Borat. We are so glad you could make it!

    3. Re:Wow by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm watching the news right now. This is possibly the dumbest, saddest thing I've ever seen.

      It is dumb and sad but even sadder is that every console needs guinea pigs to queue up for the new console in order to generate the hype needed to claim a successful launch.

      Personally I'd love a PS3 but I don't see what the attraction is of owning one when there are only a dozen or so games, you're queueing all night to get one and there is a real possibility that it might flawed / broken and you have no way to replace it. Same goes for the Wii. New consoles have flaws, too much hype (and fud) is flying around, there is no way either console will meet all expectations. Calmer heads wait and see when reality has set in.

      I look forward to see how the PS3 behaves in the next few months. I'm already thinking of the ways I can use a PS3 (e.g. as a Linux box when not gaming), but if the thing sucks then I can hold off. Let other people fight over something which we'll all be practically tripping over soon enough.

    4. Re:Wow by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      Actually, since its about 200 to 300 cheaper then the cheapest Blu Ray stand alone DVD player (if you prefer bluray to HDDVD, I dont care for either since I still have a std 10 year old 36" crt non hd TV), then its a pretty good deal and I doubt there will be dissapointment, atleast from a usefulness standpoint.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    5. Re:Wow by DrXym · · Score: 1
      True, it's cheaper than blu-ray but I'd ask whether blu-ray (or HD-DVD) in any way justifies spending $600 let alone $800+ on a player? Those are early adopter prices. I bet in a year from now that BD players will be selling for $200. So again patience is a blessing. It's not like BD (or HD-DVD) has titles that are worth buying unless you happen not to own them on DVD already.

      Now I want the PS3 to succeed. I'm salivating over the thought of a $600 console / computer that I can whack Linux onto AND play music / videos AND play games. But I still don't see the point of being Sony's bitch. If its a great console then it will still be great when any production issues are sorted and there is a greater choice of games. Same goes for Nintendo which if anything has even less reason to justify the hype surrounding it.

    6. Re:Wow by MMMDI · · Score: 1

      Yesterday, the vast majority of the Northeast (including my hometown - not NC, but close enough) was under a severe weather alert - you know, tornado watches, heavy rain (complete with flash flood watches), 50mph winds, all of that good stuff.

      So there I am, watching the local news for updates on the weather, seeing which parts of town have been ruined (the river on the other side of town flooded over, causing a very large chunk of damage to the surrounding houses as but one example). Then, they cut over to a piece on how "Outside this Best Buy, people are still waiting in line even after their tents have blown away!"

      Just, wow.

    7. Re:Wow by cmpalmer · · Score: 1

      I hate to put my conspiracy hat on, but how many people believe the low (~400,000) number of launch units was carefully calculated by Sony in order to produce exactly this kind of greedy frenzy? Suppose they released several million and anyone could walk into almost any retailer up until Dec 24th and walk out with one at MSRP.

      I'm asking for a fair financial analysis here - is there a number they could have come up with for a launch that would maximize pre-Christmas sales AND generate enough hype for continued sales in 2007? Or, as I suspect, are the Sony execs sitting back and saying "Wow, people are sitting in freezing rain for 24 hours and it's on the news? People are getting shot over them? Cool!! We'll sell even more now!"

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    8. Re:Wow by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think BluRay or HDDVD will really go anywhere. First of all, who is going to rebuy movies once again? Second, where is the consumer push for it? Are people out there complaining that the current DVD is inadequate? Finally, and this is the big one, there are much more efficient ways to deliver content to the home now. Most cable companies offer HD ondemand. You have MS and Apple hinting around delivering movies to the home over the internet. Why buy any movie at all now when I can pick any one I might want to watch for a couple dollars or just pay a monthly subscription service?

    9. Re:Wow by koreth · · Score: 2, Insightful
      First of all, who is going to rebuy movies once again?

      I hear they might be coming out with some new movies in the future. Just a rumor, though.

    10. Re:Wow by Mark+Maughan · · Score: 1
      I don't think BluRay or HDDVD will really go anywhere.
      That's your opinion.

      First of all, who is going to rebuy movies once again?
      A select few movies I will buy again. But more importantly, I've stopped buying DVD's in anticipation of HD discs. And all future movies I buy will be HD.

      Second, where is the consumer push for it?
      You aren't going to hear about it on luddite Slashot.

      Are people out there complaining that the current DVD is inadequate?
      God yes! DVD's look like shit compared to INHD and HBOHD movies. I don't go to the theater anymore.

      Finally, and this is the big one, there are much more efficient ways to deliver content to the home now. Most cable companies offer HD ondemand.
      I like to own my media. You can't burn that stuff to disc. But what I do do is burn HBOHD movies to DVD using at a good codec at almost 1080 HD. A 2-sided, 2-layer regular DVD would probably be enough for most HD movies.

      You have MS and Apple hinting around delivering movies to the home over the internet. Why buy any movie at all now when I can pick any one I might want to watch for a couple dollars or just pay a monthly subscription service?
      It would take forever to dl and I would want to burn it to an HD disc anyhow. My HardDrive can't hold all of my movies like it can my music. Until TB drives come out, that simply isn't an good option for collectors like me.
    11. Re:Wow by stinerman · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of a book called "Jennifer Government". It's one of my favorite books, and I'd recommend it to anyone.

  5. Will it ever be lanuched in India? by aneeshm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sick and tired of getting everything six months to one year after the USA and Japan. And Sony has been known to delay its product launches for months in markets like India. This encourages a perverted black market, where you get the PS3 within for obscene amounts of money. What's the problem with a simultaneous worldwide launch policy? You prevent black marketeering that way.

    1. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing issues, and in case of sony also a cost issue, the costs are so high that they cannot even push a high number of those machines into the markets in one region. Besides that everything has to be manufactured in certain areas due to cost reasons as well (and environmental reasons, it is cheaper to simply dump the toxic waste into the next lake instead of adding a chemical fab to the original fab to remove the waste from the cycle before it hits nature) Those places although quite big are limited.

    2. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by chrismcdirty · · Score: 4, Informative

      If Sony really cared about black marketeering, they would have launched with ample supplies. I believe a blogger for Kotaku said he talked to 100 people in lines, and only 1 said he was going to keep it to play. They love the black market sales because that increases hype for the system. People see that it's going for $3,000 on ebay, and they think that it must be worth it.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    3. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by simondm · · Score: 1

      This is referred to as "Grey Market", not Black Market.

    4. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Ever been to a popular dance club on a Friday night? Huge lineup outside...then you get in and there's like 20 people. Its all about the hype.

      Sony either is a) inept with their manufacturing, unable to meet anticipated demand, or b deliberately constraining supply to contribute to a 'must have' christmas gift factor.

      I'm opting for 'b', since it appears every console launch has suffered from this syndrome. The real success of the PS/3 won't be judged until probably mid next-year, in contrast to ongoing sales of their competitors. I'm guessing this will be a failure in context to the Wii and previous playstation popularity. (Except in Japan, where Sony is a national cult)

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    5. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by mungtor · · Score: 1

      Not until the US needs to outsource it's gaming.

    6. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by chrismcdirty · · Score: 1

      I would normally agree with you (I said the same thing about the Xbox 360 last year), but I've heard that other manufacturers are having a hard time putting new Bluray players to market because Sony has bought a majority of the lasers. To me, it definitely seems like a production shortage. Supposedly there is a higher-than-usual rate of failure in the Bluray laser production.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    7. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People see that it's going for $3,000 on ebay, and they think that it must be worth it.

      Well if people are bidding $3000 on it then clearly it is worth it to them. Suckers they may be but you can't blame Sony if people are stupid enough to pay that much.

      Having said that, it wouldn't surprise me if the alleged shortages of PS3s are somewhat manipulated to amp up the hysteria for launch. All those recent news stories about boxes being cut from 400,000 to 250,000. It wouldn't surprise me if Sony held back some of those to make the launch pictures all the more impressive.

    8. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by fitten · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't help that much anyway in this case. Such a limited number of units at release would still drive a huge eBay market for the things even with a world-wide launch.

    9. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      we already do, where do you think gold comes from?

    10. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I know people who are veterans in assembly lines and manufacturing industries, and they will tell you that the environment has never been an issue. If they tell you keeping planet earth green is involved, it's fancy public relations and BS. No company in US and Japan care until something is hazardous and could cause them millions in lawsuits.

    11. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by archen · · Score: 1

      Actually I was going to counter your point with the fact that Sony is so short on consoles I don't think it matters. But I realized something else. Because it doesn't matter and they'll be too short, it is actually in their best interest to hold back. Not because of the buzz generated NOW, but because re-releasing some supply on say, the day after Thanksgiving for Christmas shoppers could be a big plus. What we're looking at now is just plain stupidity and greed. But think of how many kids will be the "lucky" ones and spout out about how they got a PS3 for Christmas. Creating that envy is where the biggest marketing is, so I think you're right about them possibly holding back.

    12. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

      Of course, because selling less consoles is in Sony's best interest. I'll bet they actually have millions of consoles in stock were only willing to release 80,000 in Japan. Makes great business sense.

    13. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by ashayh · · Score: 1

      Keep dreaming. The PS2 was officially released in India 3 years after its international launch. But you should be able to buy the PS3 in the grey market in a few months.

    14. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I didn't say they had millions in stock, nor did I say they were withholding them indefinitely. In fact I didn't say they were doing it at all, though it wouldn't surprise if they had for launch day. You only have to look at the headlines on CNN or BBC to see why this might be in their best interest. More hype, more headlines, more near-riots == a better launch.

    15. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Well the perfect counterexample to this claim is europe mainly the chemist industry along the rhein valley, sure there has been a severe toxic accident a while ago, but mainly a huge progress has been made in this region regarding environmental standards. And mainly due to enforcement by law, but it is possible. That companies tend to g where they easily can dump the toxic into the next lake and thus pollute the entire region is another issue, we face a situation here like in the mid 19th century.

    16. Re:Will it ever be lanuched in India? by mink · · Score: 1

      Crazy people urinating on lead.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  6. Paging Angel Paredes by Salsaman · · Score: 1

    well, I figured he must be big geek, and therefore have a Slashdot log in.

    On the other hand, he's probably too busy playing with his new toy.

  7. Near riot at our Best Buy by volpone · · Score: 5, Interesting
    And that's not an exaggeration. When they came out to announce that they only had 30 PS3s, people went nuts. Trashing stuff, punching random people, it was crazy. They had to call a bunch of cops to get things under control.

    It Is Just A Fucking Game, Damn It! I wish everyone would grow the fuck up.

    1. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by freeweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You never had this sort of nonsense when it was just us nerds playing video games.

      Damn you Sony for introducing gaming to the beer-drinking, fist-throwing, truck-driving masses!

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd really like to have one, but how can a grown man justify spending so much on a game system...get a life people !

    3. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      And they say video games don't cause violence ....

      tsk, tsk.

    4. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's definately not just an effin game... it's two weeks pay in a single day on E-Bay.

      Your rioters are perfectly legit businessmen having a discussion about supply and demand.

    5. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by unsouled · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If the people in line were only waiting there for the console so that they could play it, I doubt there would be much rioting(hopefully they would realize its just a game). But these people were looking at the PS3 launch as part of their income, and one could say waiting in line was their 'job' to get paid, and when they don't get anything, well, pissed scalpers insue. Also, not all people make $1,400 to $4,000 a week. Getting that PS3 can be up to 12 weeks(or 24 if your lazy) of pay for us poor college students.

    6. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I hardly play my PS2 as it is - do I really need to shell out hundreds so I can play GTHD once every other month? Now, if there was a new RC Stuntcopter game...

    7. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is as pathetic and embarassing as those idiots who riot over sporting events. If I were a cop I would beat those fuckers half to death for rioting over a god damn overhyped game.

    8. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by lord+sibn · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Going in to work today, I saw signs clearly posted at every entrance notifying customers that there were ZERO PS3 units available there for sale. The store opens at 7, and I went in at 9. I asked the manager on duty how often people ask for them. He said "in the last couple of hours? Six times. I had one woman go off on me because I didn't have any. Like I called Sony up and said 'hey, don't ship these to us. we don't want them.'"

    9. Re:Near riot at our Best Buy by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you're going to be first in line for that console named after urine, right?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  8. PS3 Related Crime by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    Yep, it sure is great that the PS3 is out. The account on Kotaku listed in the summary is nothing, however. No one lost a PS3 (which are selling on eBay for several thousand even after launch). For those of you interested in criminal activity, Engadget has an amusing collection of articles:
    • Drive bys with BB guns in Kentucky.
    • A riot for spots in line in Burbank.
    • Read - 10 to 12 people robbed in PS3 line (dubious, but possible). [Via Digg]
    • Read - Sheriffs shut down another California store for rowdy behavior.
    • Read - Police break up NY SonyStyle store fight.
    • Read - Brawl breaks out at another Wally when manager plays musical PlayStation chairs. Seriously, what an idiot. [Thanks Kyle D.]
    • Read - Shots were apparently fired at a Texas Wally. Pics here and here of the 5-0. [Thanks, Jason]
    • Read - Two armed, masked robbers overtook a customer in Springfield. [Thanks, Jason]
    • Watch - North Fresno / Merced had stampede-riot insanity. [Thanks, Jonathan]
    And they even have a link to our very own lovable Senator Jonathon Edwards contacting Wal-Mart for one PS3.

    It's clear that some people are just so into the giving spirit that they will do anything for the perfect gift.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:PS3 Related Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A riot for spots in line in Burbank

      I read this one. As I write this, it is now 9:50 AM EST, which would make it 6:50 AM in Burbank. Note what this article said:

      Best Buy kicked the whole group of its property on Friday afternoon .

      It's not Friday afternoon in Burbank yet, so I'm not going to put any money on the accuracy of this story.

    2. Re:PS3 Related Crime by Hedgethorn · · Score: 1

      People robbed while waiting in line at Best Buy in Indiana: http://www.southbendtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti cle?AID=/20061117/News01/611170325

    3. Re:PS3 Related Crime by 0rbit4l · · Score: 1
      And they even have a link to our very own lovable Senator Jonathon Edwards [prnewswire.com] contacting Wal-Mart for one PS3.
      No, you have a link to a carefully spun press-release by a multinational corporation that's tired of being criticised for its anti-worker policies. It's not nearly as fun to put out a (factual) press release about a staffer working independently to try to do something nice for his boss.
    4. Re:PS3 Related Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I didn't see you come in down-with-corporations guy. Of course this is a fake article planted by evil republicans working for heartless corporations under the supervision of the Bush family. Edwards is a Democrat and therefore one of the good guys and can't possibly be a pompous asshole. I hope someone tazers you in the face while you are whacking off to Jon Stewart.

    5. Re:PS3 Related Crime by laparel · · Score: 1

      Should sony be held responsible for other people's actions? For God's sakes they're supplying a console not some life-saving medicine. The people that commit these idiotic acts should be the only ones responsible for their own actions and not sony.

      I don't think sony is the one to blame on this one. Their limited supply wasn't something they fabricated but rather forced by circumstance and time constraints (at least that seems logical because after all sony would want to sell as many consoles as they can and the timing is just right). They've already launched PS3 slightly late into the holiday shopping season.

    6. Re:PS3 Related Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QUICK ZONK! Update the story with a link to the parent post, and add "GG SONY!" to the end of it! No, seriously - we love it when you do that stuff!

    7. Re:PS3 Related Crime by admdrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      That story was posted this Tuesday, the 14th. The "Friday afternoon" in question was *last* Friday, the 10th. The story also says the people had already been waiting in line for about four days.

    8. Re:PS3 Related Crime by rishistar · · Score: 1

      And this is before they've played a Grand Theft Auto title on it. Imagine what these guys are gonna be like afterwards!

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    9. Re:PS3 Related Crime by shortergirl06 · · Score: 1

      There was also a shooting outside a Walmart in CT: http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/17/playstation.ap/in dex.html

    10. Re:PS3 Related Crime by CarnivoreMan · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you say. The content of your parent post is a good example of the flawed thinking which is sadly so common today. People are responsible for their own actions. Its rather pathetic how so many people always feel the need to blame somebody else. Everyone is a victim.. Damn the man for keeping us all down.

    11. Re:PS3 Related Crime by houghi · · Score: 1

      Well, now it is undenialble: Computer games cause violence and raise crime.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:PS3 Related Crime by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia has a nice list of game day frenzy as well.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    13. Re:PS3 Related Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. Sorry about those mid-term elections. I see it didn't work out as you had hoped.

    14. Re:PS3 Related Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I'm a libertarian and overseas right now anyway so I didn't vote. I just hate smug "it's the corporations guys" who blindly follow what Comedy Central tells them.

    15. Re:PS3 Related Crime by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Well I think this puts to rest any last lingering predictions that the PS3 wasn't going to be popular.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    16. Re:PS3 Related Crime by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Blaming SONY would be like blaming the people who made the "Cabbage Patch Doll" and the original "Tickle me Elmo" (yes, I'm dating myself).

      Both these toys were made for the Holiday Season. Both were "Hot Items". Both caused Riots in stores when there weren't enough (yes, there were far more than there are PS3s, but far more parents wanted to buy them for their children).

      So, by most peoples logic, they shouldn't have released the toys to the store for the Holidays, but instead should have sat on them until they could give one to every kid in the world?

      People are willing to do Crazy and Stupid things when they are trying to get hot gifts/toys (or more likely in the case of the PS3 rioters, a console they think they can make a quick profit on).

      This is like the end of the DotCom era. Suddenly lots of companies started coming out with ludicrous business plans that contained the word "internet" and expected themselves to make money since they'd seen other people do it before. In comparison people saw a relatively few XBox360s sold on ebay for outrageous prices and figured they could do the same thing with the PS3 ... except lots of people chose to do that and the potential customers for the outrageous prices are few and far between. (or like all those Mutual Fund notices: "Past performance is no indication of Future performance")

      I'm very much looking forward to getting a PS3, just as soon as I can either order one from Sony on-line, or walk into a store and get it. In the meantime I'll happily play my PS2 which hasn't stopped working just because the PS3 was launched, and laugh at the people who thought they could triple the price they paid in one day of "easy work".

      Someone should have compiled a list of all those ebayers ... I know a nigerian businessman who needs their help getting money out of his country.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  9. Well, I didn't pre-order one... by Vengeance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But with the prices I'm hearing on Ebay, I'm beginning to wish I had. A night on a long line isn't too bad if you're pulling in four to eight grand profit.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    1. Re:Well, I didn't pre-order one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      4k profit in one week... bah!

      Try consulting. If you're good at it you can make that in 40-50 hours and still go home to a warm hotel room every night.

      These kids should get real hobbies that don't involve electricity. Or focus on improving their earnining potential.

    2. Re:Well, I didn't pre-order one... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      I bet most of them are just stupid kids bidding up themselves. Seriously, I doubt anyone would really pay that much for something that, come new year, will be widely available for $600. I expect them to be trying and trying until christmas, when everyone realises that they won't get that much and just sells it off quickly to get their money back.

    3. Re:Well, I didn't pre-order one... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Dude, my Ebay fraud meter is in the red zone on a lot of those auctions. I'd be surprised if the take was anything like that except on a small handful of auctions with dumb Ebay virgin buyers.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Well, I didn't pre-order one... by jakoz · · Score: 1

      How about tax free dollars, smartass?

    5. Re:Well, I didn't pre-order one... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Try consulting. If you're good at it you can make that in 40-50 hours and still go home to a warm hotel room every night. These kids should get real hobbies that don't involve electricity.

      I assume you're talking about technical consulting, which typically involves electricity.

      Game over; thank you for playing

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Well, I didn't pre-order one... by unsouled · · Score: 1

      Too bad for me it wouldn't have been a long night to get a PS3, it would have been a long 3 days(thats the 1st I checked my Best Buy), and not only would it have been an insanely long wait, but that huge storm that created all those tornados in the south came up for those 3 days and sort of hovered over the north east.

    7. Re:Well, I didn't pre-order one... by woztheproblem · · Score: 1

      Legally, money from sale of a PS3 is not tax free.

    8. Re:Well, I didn't pre-order one... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Legally, the money from your parents' last yard sale isn't tax-free either. In canada that would go under "other income".

      Luckily, the government tends to turn a blind eye to this piece of the market.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  10. More numbers by dolson · · Score: 1

    The WalMart in my city received all of 6 PS3s. I didn't go to the launch (can't afford it, want a Wii not a PS3, etc) but I have friends who work there. The 6 people waited all the way from noon until 8am. The same WalMart claims to have 50 Wiis.

    1. Re:More numbers by MooseMuffin · · Score: 1

      If this topic is for people who actually got a ps3, I'm guessing this will be a short thread...

    2. Re:More numbers by mgblst · · Score: 1

      For the prices they are selling for on ebay, you can't afford not to get a PS3. I am beginning to think that these people who are waiting in lines are the true smart guys. $1300 profit at least, for a days work. Not bad. I wonder if anyone who actually waited in line will be playing the thing.

    3. Re:More numbers by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      i wonder how many of them will really sell for that. I predict a lot of auction headaches with bogus bids and people not paying.

      BTW camping out for 3 days for 1300$ isn't that great... it comes out to about 18 bucks an hour (not taking into account the time it will take to sell on ebay). I sure as hell can afford to 'not a get a ps3'

    4. Re:More numbers by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting way of looking at it. Everybody's saying, "Think of the profit!", but if you've actually got a family, or a job, or a mortgage, what's the *real* net gain of standing in line for a few days and selling the box? Great post.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    5. Re:More numbers by Cartack · · Score: 0

      Well its more than 18hr if you take out sleep. Suppose 6hrs a day of sleep its comes to 24hr... not to shabby.

    6. Re:More numbers by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      that's just 25$ an hour (assuming you can actually get 6 hours of sleep in the conditions...) which is still not THAT great in many areas and doesn't take into account otherexpenses and opportunity costs of camping a store for 3 days (and 3 days is the low end of camping, some were out for a week).

  11. Ugliness by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There was also some ugliness, with individuals being hired to stand in line, as was done in Japan earlier this week

    Why is that ugly? Seems like capitalism at its finest. If someone is willing to pay for a service and someone is willing to perform that service, whats ugly about that?

    Lazy maybe, but hardly ugly

    I don't really follow games, what are the most anticipated titles besides the generic football games?

    1. Re:Ugliness by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 1

      "Why is that ugly? Seems like capitalism at its finest." Since when are "capitalism at its finest" and "ugly" mutually exclusive?

    2. Re:Ugliness by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Reminds me of the late Milton Friedman.
      "A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself."
      It's pathetic, but it's freedom.
      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:Ugliness by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1
      "Why is that ugly? Seems like capitalism at its finest." Since when are "capitalism at its finest" and "ugly" mutually exclusive?

      Fair enough. I still stand by my claim for this instance

    4. Re:Ugliness by kfg · · Score: 1

      If someone is willing to pay for a service and someone is willing to perform that service, whats ugly about that?

      Have you seen her?

      KFG

    5. Re:Ugliness by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why is that ugly? Seems like capitalism at its finest.

      You do know your rebuttle has absolutely nothing to do with the comment you're responding to. Capitalism is not considered, by the majority of people I know, to be a superb thing of beauty that is beyond ugliness. Quite the reverse indeed.

      Greed and excessive, gratuitous, shows of wealth are rarely beautiful. Show me a hundred thousand people with jobs because someone was able to invest in a new technology, and I'll agree that's capitalism at its finest. Show me people paying to get an advantage in a line for an already over-priced luxury item, and you'll be showing me capitalism at its most facile.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Ugliness by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1
      If someone is willing to pay to kill you and someone is willing to perform that service, whats ugly about that?

      Depends on who you're asking. The person who wants me dead would surely say nothing

    7. Re:Ugliness by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Capitalism at its finest is often extremely ugly.

      I find the profiteering understandable, what bothers me is that there are actually some people who want to, you know, PLAY a PS3, and they get fucked over by all this 'capitalism'.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    8. Re:Ugliness by SoapDish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While capitalism can be ugly, I don't think this practice is as bad as the reselling that's going on.

      The people who are hiring are purchasing a luxury service, it's like buying a preorder. The people that stand in line make a little money for standing somewhere. The cost to get the system is only increased for the person buying the system.

      In reselling the system, the same thing is essentially happening, except someone on his own commission profits by taking the opportunity to purchase the system away from someone else.

      It's similar to paying someone to pick up tickets for you, compared to a scalper buying all the tickets, and selling them at a ridiculous margin.

    9. Re:Ugliness by wk633 · · Score: 1

      It's not even 'like' capitalism- it's an essential part of capitalism. Ugly is a personal opinion but Anyone who doesn't want to support 'ugliness' can stop buying pork, beef, sugar, soybeans, heating oil, or anything else sold on the futures market.

      In the case of the PS3 where you KNOW it's going to be worth more on the aftermarket, it's called arbitrage.

    10. Re:Ugliness by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Why is that ugly? Seems like capitalism at its finest.

      Actually, the ugly they were talking about was the homeless people standing in line.

      Unless you have some fetish for homeless meth addicted toothless bag ladies... I seriously doubt you want to be standing next to these people for 12 hours in line.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    11. Re:Ugliness by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a fantastic quote! Thanks.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    12. Re:Ugliness by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      At least to me, the system in practice is quite ugly. A beautiful capitalist system wouldn't have retailers and manufacturers leaving dollars on the table for end consumers. When faced with highly limited supply, a dutch auction would do a better job for manufacturers, and cut out the middlemen warehousers, retailers, and ebayers. If Sony had only made a few hundred thousand more, these ebayers might have even ran at a loss, which at least I would appreciate.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    13. Re:Ugliness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for the majority of people when I say that no one gives a fuck if some whiny Sony fanboys have to wait a month to get a PS3 at MSRP.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Ugliness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      It's similar to paying someone to pick up tickets for you, compared to a scalper buying all the tickets, and selling them at a ridiculous margin.

      You do realize that if half of the goal of a concert wasn't to get people to show up and listen to the music so they're compelled to keep consuming it, that there wouldn't be laws against scalping? See, in this case, Sony just wants their money. They don't actually care about entertaining you. They just want to get paid. If people buy their shit, they're happy.

      Capitalism knows no morality and it is not going to be nice to you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Ugliness by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      so in other words you hate the fact that in about 2 weeks, all the people playing the PS3's that are available are going to be the ones who were able to afford the market price for them(basically, the 480K that are willing to pay the most) rather than what.... those people that were only willing to pay 700 or800 bucks for it?

      no one gets fucked over by capitalism in this case. if you aren't willing to pay as much as the guy standing next to you, why do you think you deserve to have a game sold to you? its not food, shelter, health care, etc. so why whine that the richer gamers get to play it first?

      Now what exactly is ugly about this? I really want to know.

    16. Re:Ugliness by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      no one gets fucked over by capitalism in this case. if you aren't willing to pay as much as the guy standing next to you, why do you think you deserve to have a game sold to you? its not food, shelter, health care, etc. so why whine that the richer gamers get to play it first?

      First of all, its not ME we're talking about. I don't care.

      I had HOPED the lineup was not 99% scalpers, but it seems to be the case. My phrase 'fucked over' sounds a little strong, I'm certainly not shedding any tears, but it does bother me somewhat that there is some kid out there who is dying to play Resistance or whatever and raw profiteering (i.e. capitalism) will keep that kid unhappy till well after christmas (and the parents, consequently). Its not a big deal, I'd just like to have seen a healthier ratio of gamers-to-scalpers, is all.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    17. Re:Ugliness by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I think I speak for the majority of people when I say that no one gives a fuck if some whiny Sony fanboys have to wait a month to get a PS3 at MSRP.

      Fair enough. I reserve my right to be mildly irritated at the situation.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    18. Re:Ugliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Paying someone to stand in line is not ugly

      2) The PS3 is being sold at a loss so I fail to see how it is overpriced to any but the whiny Wii fanboys on Slashdot.

    19. Re:Ugliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding right?

      Some guy gets paid a heap of money just to stand in line for 24 hours.

      - It's probably beautiful to him.

      Some enterprising guy gets $2,000 selling it on eBay.

      - It's probably beautiful to him.

      Some rich idiot with more money than sense manages to get one of the things for $4,000.

      - It's probably beautiful to him.

      His kid gets it for Christmas.

      - It's probably priceless to him.

      This is a textbook example of capitalism increasing value for everyone involved. (And I don't know why you think the opinion of people who aren't involved is even relevant.)

      Capitalism is not considered, by the majority of people I know, to be a superb thing of beauty that is beyond ugliness. Quite the reverse indeed.

      Nothing involving people is beyond ugliness. But let's save the word for things like wars and corporations, rather than apply it to free and voluntary trade between individuals.

      For instance, it's pretty ugly that Sony rushed this product to market knowing damned well that very few fans would be able to get their hands on them for the retail price owing to the shortages.

    20. Re:Ugliness by RoLi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Seems like capitalism at its finest.

      Actually stores with scarce products and looong lines in front of them is communism at it's finest.

      Well, only that it was bread instaed of Playstations people where linnig up to....

    21. Re:Ugliness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Far be it from me to tell you how to feel! Personally my primary feeling is that Sony is to blame, because they reached too high and produced a product that they couldn't produce in volume. Nintendo is reaching for a much closer target in spite of the fact that they're the only ones of this generation actually doing something revolutionary rather than evolutionary. (Microsoft has made a gamepad like the SixAxis before, I gave mine away because trying to actually navigate by tilting a controller is horribly annoying.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Ugliness by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      A bunch of homeless guys have $150 where otherwise they wouldn't have. Some middle-class consumers parted with money they could afford to part with. Is that ugly?

      --
      The cake is a pie
    23. Re:Ugliness by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Personally my primary feeling is that Sony is to blame, because they reached too high and produced a product that they couldn't produce in volume.

      Yeah, I can tell :)

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    24. Re:Ugliness by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      Sony wants you to keep using the system and buying games too. The most recent information I heard is that sony looses $300 on every system. They won't be happy unless people keep buying games.

      The people reselling systems are artificially inflating the price. On one hand sony isn't making as much money as they could (by increasing the price), on the other hand, sony gets some great press out of it (look, we aren't charging way to much for a console, people are willing to spend more than $3000 for it!).

      Whether or not capitalism has morality doesn't matter to this discussion. The point was that the 'ugly' practice of hiring someone to stay in line for you is not uglier than reselling the system.

    25. Re:Ugliness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have other issues with sony, obviously :) I can afford a PS3 when they are available for MSRP although it would be a big financial hit. I do intend to get a Wii. I just blew this month's toy budget on upgrading from my Motorola V555 to a RAZR V3i. Yeah, the reception is mediocre, but this is the one that is a useful mp3 player, and I simply cannot stand nokia. the other credible competitor is sonyericsson... and I'm sure you know how I feel about that...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Ugliness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, okay. I agree with that. Personally I could give a damn how much the units are marked up when they're resold. Sony gets their pound of flesh no matter who sells it and how many times. Ultimately it ends up in the hands of someone who will buy games. If they priced the system higher at launch, there would be even more of a hue and cry about it, and they'd lose even more of their following than they already have just through their price point.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:Ugliness by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I have other issues with sony, obviously :) I can afford a PS3 when they are available for MSRP although it would be a big financial hit. I do intend to get a Wii. I just blew this month's toy budget on upgrading from my Motorola V555 to a RAZR V3i. Yeah, the reception is mediocre, but this is the one that is a useful mp3 player, and I simply cannot stand nokia. the other credible competitor is sonyericsson... and I'm sure you know how I feel about that...

      Heh, I have a SonyEricsson W600i. I like it. (No DRM on that, mind you.)

      I really like the RAZR formfactor. Have they improved the UI?

      On our original topic: remember it doesn't make a lot of sense to lump them all together; Sony is like a corporation with multiple personality disorder. So, by all means go on boycotting or whatever, but just be sure you know what you are taking a stand against. Sony-BMG: rootkit. Sony Electronics: batteries. SCEA: Playstation and PSP. SonyEricsson: phones. They all make independent decisions. I don't buy from SonyBMG personally speaking. SCEA has done nothing but good things for me. (Although even THEY are schizo: witness PSP vs PS3. PSP is locked down firmware, antihacking tech, weird limitations... but no DRM'd media. PS3 can run linux distros, has all standard ports and connectivity, etc.)

      I'm considering picking up a Wii. But I need to play it first. The controller is intriguing. I like the haptics. But I have no idea what it'll be like for, say, an hour. And honestly the game lineup is totally boring to me, with the exception of Zelda. PS3 lineup looks totally boring as well, with the exception of Resistance. One thing I can say in favour of the PS3, is that the March 2007 titles look much stronger to me on the Sony unit. But thats a subjective thing. Cheers.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    28. Re:Ugliness by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Insanity, drug addiction, mental retardation, and the exploitation of an extreme power imbalance is beautiful thing. There is no greater joy than helping the universe punish the inferior.

    29. Re:Ugliness by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      Greed and excessive, gratuitous, shows of wealth are rarely beautiful

      Nor are they a sole aspect of Capitalism. It doesn't matter what system is in place, greed is an aspec tfo humanity. Even in a system/environment where there is true abundance, greed will exist and will be an issue. As such your rebuttal has nothing to do with Capitalism either.

      Greed is not wanting a PS3. Greed is not wanting a PS3 to sell on Ebay for "obscene profit". Greed is not wanting to make a profit, or even large profits. Greed is an excessive desire to acquire or possess more (especially more material wealth) than one needs or deserves. Yup, that makes it relative. if someone is willing to spend 9-12 hour in the cold and then spend 600 bucks for a PS3, that's not a run of greed. They worked for it. How is that any worse than a techie spending half a week at his or her job doing nothing while "supporting" a company's IT department and then spending the money on a PS3?

      Excessive and gratuitous shows of wealth? Pyramids, Vatican, Royal Palaces, The Kremlin. Excessive and gratuitous every one. Brass handled drinking fountains in your local county courthouse? Also excessive and gratuitous. And that at the expense of someone buying something for themselves because the government took their earned money from them to do it.

      Yet the Vatican, Royal palaces, Kremlin, and the Pyramids are all quite beautiful.

      Most such claims of gratuitous displays of wealth and so forth are entirely relative and often made in ignorance. For example, I drive a Corvette. People give me crap about making "so much money" I could afford one. Yet their cars/SUVs/trucks are often more expensive than my Vette.

      Show me people paying to get an advantage in a line for an already over-priced luxury item, and you'll be showing me capitalism at its most facile.

      Yet also Capitalism at it's finest. yeah, the PS3 is so overpriced that people working at the local fast food joint can afford to quit their job to buy one. This tells us a few things. Either they can easily pick up a replacement job (or figure they can) and still be able to buy the "overpriced luxury item"; or they are able to (or figure they can) make a relatively small investment for good returns.

      In the first case, I'd say this argues against the assertion it is an overpriced luxury item. If low-wage workers can afford to get one, quitting their job even, it must not be that overpriced. Not to them anyway.

      In the second, here you have low-wage earners investing a relatively small amount for a decent return. Here they leverage what they do have *time*, to multiply their cash, or credit.

      Consider this scenario:

      You work for 7 bucks per hour. You've got a credit card with a balance of 4,000 and a limit or 5,000, and are making payments of 120/month. For one night of boredom and cold weather, and chargin 600 more on that card, you can turn around in a day or three and sell the product for 3,600. You use that 3,600 to make a lump payment on said credit card and are now down to 1,000 bucks for the balance, having lowered your monthly payments by about 90-100 bucks. How is that not a good thing? Why is this deserving of ridicule?

      For those relatively few who want to keep it, they are choosing to spend their time overnight rather than pay a high auction price later. Why is this a bad move? How long would it have taken this person to do it "the acceptable" way by investing that money in a "normal" investment? First, the person above didn't have cash, and isn't going to find an investor for a $600 investment in the US.

      That is the opportunity that Capitalism as seen here provides. To me the most fascinating thing about Capitalism isn't Capitalism. It is how the beliefs and attitudes of those who promote or attack it shine through in their arguments. Seek and ye shall find applies directly to looking at Capitalism. If you want to attack it you can find what you need in almost every situation. Same goes for defending or supporting

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    30. Re:Ugliness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I really like the RAZR formfactor. Have they improved the UI?

      Not aside from making it a little faster. Samsung has a phone that has a very similar form factor, also has a megapixel camera, and the camera even flips over so it can face towards you, or outward. Keen.

      On our original topic: remember it doesn't make a lot of sense to lump them all together; Sony is like a corporation with multiple personality disorder. So, by all means go on boycotting or whatever, but just be sure you know what you are taking a stand against.

      If I have a problem with ANY Sony company, I have a problem with all of them.

      By the same token, if Fuji film had fucked me over, I wouldn't buy a Subaru.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Ugliness by sdsichero · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time thinking of it as a service. It's not like the people not waiting in ridiculous lines are lazy...

    32. Re:Ugliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps we ought to legalize rape. We wouldn't want what-we-think-they-ought-to-want to take away from rapists getting what they want, they're people too! Child molestation? No problem, don't let us stand in your way and restrict your freedom with what we think you ought to do! Grab what you want and plunder as you see fit! End of sarcasm.

      Just because it isn't harmful to the body doesn't make it harmless, just easier to disguise, and so we stand.

      Flash - he's correct, I think "freedom itself", or absolute freedom, is horrible, and thank goodness it's also impossible! In between, we're just a bunch of monkeys competing for own interests. Those who are winning laud the system they're winning under, shouting the virtues of "free market" "democracy" "the king" "the empire", add your epoch-appropriate banner here.

      The free market gives people what they want? What people? Everyone? Where is the line drawn and what happens to those who fall under it? Should we even give a damn or just let them rot under the comfortable phrase "well, they're free to choose something else.", and walk away all smug?

      Freedom to choose means very little when your options are 1) getting your ass handed to you and 2) getting your ass handed to you on a silver platter.

      This Friedman quote is a rhetorical turd, marketed towards free market supporters who can then promptly ejaculate on it.

      How could one not fear absolute freedom, or "freedom itself"? But, because the rhetorical feces machine shoves freedom down our throat in sound-bite after sound-bite as something we must fight for and want, we can lazily utter "it's pathetic, but it's freedom", as if the word "freedom" exonerates anything done in the name of it. "It's horrible, it's evil, it hurts us, but it's freedom." - there, all is peachy!

      Instead of shouting "Freedom!" maybe we should be shouting "Education!"

      We couldn't, though: because as anyone who's had a superb teacher well knows - don't expect to be free to do whatever you want.

      End of rant

    33. Re:Ugliness by wamatt · · Score: 1

      Greed is .... *good*

  12. Hoping for the wii Launch... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    So does this mean I need to bring a baseball bat with me to buy my Wii tommorow at Target?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Hoping for the wii Launch... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, you bring a remote control with you to Target, and then you pantomime beating the hell out of the people in front of you.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Hoping for the wii Launch... by LMacG · · Score: 1

      Better bring a time machine, since the Wii doesn't go on sale till Sunday.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    3. Re:Hoping for the wii Launch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, not necessary for the geekiest of us; Joystiq reports that Walmart will be doing a midnight release tomorrow, with tickets being handed out at 10pm to reserve your Wii.

      Although, I mean, if you DO have a time machine, that's cool too.

    4. Re:Hoping for the wii Launch... by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Oh, great.
      Once upon a time it was a keyboard and mouse training kids to shoot guns.
      Now Nintendo is about to invade our homes with a revolutionary Baseball Bat* Beating Simulator (it's fun, see? Wiiiii!)

      Thank god Microsoft and Sony aren't following Nintendo's lead in trying to turn our youth into highly-trained, uh, baseball bat* wielding thugs.

      * - cricket bats in some markets

    5. Re:Hoping for the wii Launch... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Nope, just a good book since you'll probably be the only one there.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  13. Europe by Przemo-c · · Score: 1

    I want one too ..please give me one as a christmas present. ;]

    1. Re:Europe by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Actually - there might be another reason

      The European crowd is alot more demanding than US and Japanese customers. It might be as easy as they want to get the bugs out of the system before launching in Europe?

      --
      This is blinging
  14. Before anyone asks... by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, it does run Linux. From Engadget:
    Yes, according to Sony you can install any PowerPC-capable Linux build. Yellow Dog Linux, however, is the most prominently supported distro announced to date.

    1. Re:Before anyone asks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Before anyone asks... by mad_minstrel · · Score: 1

      But for some bizzare reason, the graphics chip won't work. Good work, Sony.

      --
      May the source be with you.
    3. Re:Before anyone asks... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Inaccurate statement.

      What you mean to say is that X has no hardware acceleration, which is not the same as "the graphics chip won't work"

    4. Re:Before anyone asks... by mad_minstrel · · Score: 1

      Riiiiiight. God bless nitpickers.

      --
      May the source be with you.
    5. Re:Before anyone asks... by genooma · · Score: 1
      And it features Enlightenment DR17:

      "We have worked closely with the energetic, determined E17 team to bring this advanced graphical user interface to a state of interface euphoria. It's not about eye candy and unnecessary special effects, it's about finding balance between a lean, uncluttered desktop and a personal environment that is both familiar and powerful. E17 is simply the most incredible thing I have ever used --with any operating system," states Cesar Delgado, System Administrator for Terra Soft.

      How's that for those who call E17 vaporware? =)
  15. Shootings, shortages, and selling by shirizaki · · Score: 4, Informative

    3 S's, and the main reason why i didn't stand out in the farking cold. Kudos to those people who stand out in the cold like that. Whether you're reselling it for profit or playing in your pajamas, those people either have no lives or are dedicated to playing the newest first.

    Otherwise, i still think the PS3 is a great buy if you're into the whole high def DVD thing: by the time you buy a 360 and the HD-DVD add on you're better off buying a PS3 if you want high def.

    Personally, I'm waiting for 2 reasons:

    1) First batch hardware from Sony is almost always shoddy.

    2) Metal Gear Solid.

    When the system actually has over 1 million units produced and the bugs are worked out, then the real battle starts. Not having as many exclusives (Assassins Creed, Grand Theft Auto) might bring the PS3 to a real head on fight with X360.

    Of course I couldn't live without the PS3 and call myself a gamer, so I will own one exentually. It's just a matter of getting quality releases.

    I've enjoyed this LOLer coaster of a ride: Hirai's and Kutaragi's comments, shortages, BD v. Hd disc battles, lack of rumble. *sniff* I'm so sad to see it go.

    Alwell, it's on to the PS4, Xbox 720, and the Nintendo Ballz!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dots slash you!
    1. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by jotok · · Score: 1

      Of course I couldn't live without the PS3 and call myself a gamer, so I will own one exentually. It's just a matter of getting quality releases.

      It's one thing to enjoy games, but...no offense, this "Of course I just had to get one" line sounds childish.

    2. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by Thraxen · · Score: 1

      Ummm... that's not even what he said. He said he will eventually get one after more good games are available. Why would that be childish?

    3. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? Videogames are for kids, and for kids only..

    4. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to enjoy games, but...no offense, this "Of course I just had to get one" line sounds childish.

      I don't know if I'd say "childish" as much as I'd say "bought into the marketing". Of course, my award for that category goes to the guy that was interviewed on the local news Thursday morning. Here's an exact quote of what he said.

      "The Playstation 3 is mainstream. It's got all of the mainstream titles. The other systems are OK but you have to get a Playstation 3 and all of the mainstream titles."

      What...was he reading that interview off a Sony cue card? Maybe I'm out of touch, but what sort of gamer uses the term "mainstream" 3 times in 3 sentences and refers to "games" as "titles" twice?

    5. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by DMorritt · · Score: 0, Troll

      surely its "Nintendo Poo"? kinda offputting but if people will pay for Wii, then theres no real limit to the crap they will accept.

    6. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how can something be "mainstream" if its only sold in limited numbers and most end-users will end up paying over a grand for theirs?

      The PS3 isn't mainstream, it's conspicuous consumption. If it will ever be mainstream, it won't be before 2008.

    7. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by dave420 · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's Nintendo Trrrd, by the way, not ballz. ;)

    8. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Of course I couldn't live without the PS3 and call myself a gamer, so I will own one exentually. It's just a matter of getting quality releases.


      I call myself a gamer, and ironically, I think my decision to never buy a PS3 only reinforces my gamer status.
    9. Re:Shootings, shortages, and selling by Udderdude · · Score: 1

      "I've enjoyed this LOLer coaster of a ride: Hirai's and Kutaragi's comments, shortages, BD v. Hd disc battles, lack of rumble. *sniff* I'm so sad to see it go."

      It's not over yet .. I have a feeling we'll get more dumb Sony comments and the same shortages around December. Not to mention the fallout ..

  16. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just waited in line for days to drop a small fortune on a PS3. Now that I have it, do I:

    A) Go and brag on /. ?
    B) Go get a shower and some sleep ?
    C) ...shut up, I'm still playing...

    Something tells me that anyone who actually got one is probably going to give one of the later two answers.

  17. End of Days? by ThinkWeak · · Score: 1

    What will be used to scroll the page on /. after the Wii and PS3 releases are old news?

  18. Lunatic, especially in Minnesota by MatthewAnderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, I'm a lifer. I'll own a console for a single game or two if necessary (e.g. I'm buying a Wii for Zelda and Smash Bros. I bought a Gamecube for much the same reason).

    I even camped out with my friend to buy a PS2 so we could play Tekken. Another great game.

    As far as I can tell the PS3's launch titles are pretty bad. There's a Madden with pretty graphics along with a handful of other anticlimactic sports titles... There's Call of Duty 3 (....)...

    Gran Turismo HD will be out before New Year's, and Metal Gear Solid isn't even making a debut until 2007. With Sony pledging 800,000 more consoles before 2007.

    Additionally, the entire night campers spent at the nearest Best Buy in Minnesota was below 32F. Somehow I'm not seeing the payoff fulfilling as compared to systems past.

    1. Re:Lunatic, especially in Minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget monkey ball and bomberman!!!

    2. Re:Lunatic, especially in Minnesota by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Exactly, the launch titles aren't great, but neither are the Wii's. Or the XBox 360's when it was launched. For each you could probably pick out a couple of games worth playing with the rest being meh filler (and that includes anything made by EA). I suppose for the PS3 that would be Resistance, Ridge Racer and perhaps Tony Hawk's Project 8 & Marvel Ultimate Alliance. Reviews of the EA games and Call of Duty 3 suggest that they're either identical or sometimes inferior to the 360 - not because the 360 is superior necessarily but because the PS3 is new and not as much effort has gone into making games exploit the system.

      Same goes for the Wii. A couple of good titles with the rest being filler.

      While I'd love a PS3 I don't see much point in buying one at launch. Better to wait until January / February when there are more in stock, and the second generation of games starts appearing.

    3. Re:Lunatic, especially in Minnesota by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The best bomberman game ever is still the one on the Saturn with ten player support. I've actually played with nine. Too bad I don't have a saturn any more... but I still have my bomberman disc. And of course I can play it on Ye Olde Hacked Xbox.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Lunatic, especially in Minnesota by MatthewAnderson · · Score: 1

      I'm not even insisting one wait until next year; Everyone who wants one to give as a gift ought to be successful in the next round of product shipped. There'll probably be more camping involved, but it'll be the "get up at 5am" kind and not the "pitch a tent in a parking lot for a week" variety. Either way, I view the day-one hype to be for gamers by gamers, and in this case I really don't see anything worth getting my undies in a knot over.

      - THPS and CoD are not breakthroughs in gaming.
      - The other big shooter (resistance: fall of man) LOOKS nice but I still fail to see why people are going to sit in the cold to get it.
      - Oblivion will look great but isn't even a new game.
      - After reading up on it, the Sonic game DOES look like it might be pretty good. I'd like to see it, but again wouldn't spend a day off trying to acquire it.

      Sony has a huge success coming with Gran Turismo HD, and even that is a remake, isn't it? At the very least it's a sequel with little room to improve in gameplay.

      At the very least the Wii is boasting some gimmick/innovation with their controller. It [along with the zelda title] has sold me on trying to find one on midnight Sunday. :) I'll wait to see if Metal Gear proves worthwhile and if not, I'll give the PS3 a shot with any of: Final Fantasy, Tekken, VF5, Ninja Gaiden, and let's not forget White Knight story.

    5. Re:Lunatic, especially in Minnesota by MatthewAnderson · · Score: 1

      Cheers to that; it's the reason I keep a saturn and a couple of multitaps boxed up. :)

    6. Re:Lunatic, especially in Minnesota by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I even camped out with my friend to buy a PS2 so we could play Tekken. Another great game.

      Tekken was sweet indeed, but I'd never camp out just to get it. It's a sweet game today, so it certainly would have been sweet 2 weeks or 2 months after the PS2 launch.

      That's just me, though. Personally I have absolutely zero desire to go through that much hassle just to get a piece of consumer electronics. There's no way a game console can change my life, since I'm already a console gamer with games I like to play. I'm not going to battle a bunch of crazy neurotic people who define themselves by what devices they own.

      In two days the Wii launches. While I don't expect that to be nearly as crazy as the PS3 launch (due to larger supply and less of the 'you have to stand in the rain to get the greatest device ever!' type of hype), I won't be going out on Sunday. I may try in the middle of the week, and before I get in my car I'm going to call the store. First, I'm going to ask them if they have any Wii in stock. After they stop snickering, and if they say yes, I'm going to ask them if they have enough in stock that I'm not going to get in a fight with some retard over them. If they sound at all hesitant, then I'll just ask when they're expecting their next shipment, and call again after that date.

      Seriously. Awesome is awesome. None of these consoles will be any less awesome next month. Personally I consider getting one without having to wait in line, refrain from urinating for fear of losing my place in line, getting in a fistfight with some fool, getting stuck in the door trying to charge through with everyone else, and still having the exact same console those tards did (or didn't) get to be the sign of uber leetness.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  19. $ony screws up HD by TheDoctorWho · · Score: 0, Informative

    A 720p game, (what happened to all the 1080p games Sony Liars?) played on a TV set that does not support 720p, but supports 1080i, will down rez to 480p.

    480p is not HD my little tard friends at $ony, didn't you get the memo?

    Gosh, does $ony suck balls.

    1. Re:$ony screws up HD by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      Its SON¥ not $ony

  20. SixAxis by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My biggest problem with the PS3 isin't the $600 price tag. It isin't the forced Blu-ray player. It's the SixAxis. From what I've read, the SixAxis sounds like what happened when Sony looked at the DualShock and figured out you couldn't put any more buttons on it. It just acts like another analog stick (Resistance, Project8, Warhawk), or more buttons (Madden, Resistance). All it seems to do is just make games MORE complex. And no, I'm not a total Nintendo fanboy (playing outrun2 on xbox 1 right now, addicted)

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    1. Re:SixAxis by Jerf · · Score: 1

      To be fair, "another analog stick" could be a big breakthrough for the PS3; maybe not as big as the Wii but still big.

      The problem with analog sticks is that they are too small. Be honest; how often do you really use it as an analog stick, rather than a directional keypad? That is, how often do you really hold the stick "half up"? Not terribly often.

      Now, I'm sure there are some games when you do, so again, be honest: When you do try to use the analog stick as an analog stick, how often do you have trouble getting it right? A quick muscle spams that gets interpreted as "running" and there goes your stealth in a poorly-programmed stealth game, for instance. And just how many distinct gradations can you get out of the stick? It's so small.

      I was able to play Excite Truck in a Gamespot last week, and what really impressed me was how good of an analog stick(/driving control in this case) an entire controller was. It was easy to distinguish between "straight" and "panic turn right" and all manner of turn rates in between, because the controller isn't so small. On an analog stick you usually don't even put "panic turn right" on the stick because a normal user would then be incapable of controlling the vehicle, since they'd always be using it. The SixAxis ought to be able to do the same thing; if not it's a broken design.

      It's not just "another analog stick", it's "another analog stick" that you can actually use. SixAxis may not be quite as rich as the Wii controller but expect to see a lot of racing games using it as a steering wheel, because it's incomparably better than an analog stick. (Or at least the Wii was; I'm extending the SixAxis the benefit of the doubt. The Wii controller was designed for the use Excite Truck uses; the SixAxis was a hasty retrofit and may be a lot more clumsy. We'll have to wait and see.)

    2. Re:SixAxis by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      No kidding! I went into Best Buy last night to see if they'd have the Wii component cable on Sunday (they will), while I was waiting for my wife to get off of work at the Waffle House next door...they had a PS3 demo set up. I had heard about how flimsy the controller feels, so I picked it up. They had a magnet and a cord attached to it (probably so noone would try to walk off with it), and it was STILL too light. Actually, that's not the right word, light just implies lack of weight. It felt cheap and flimsy. It seems like the type of thing that will fall apart in 5 minutes. I can't possibly see how the "motion sensors" in this thing could possibly be of any use whatsoever. The Dual Shock was just not meant to be played while tilted, so using the tilt sensors would make pretty much everything else on the controller useless while you were tilting it. They would've been better off just making it use the standard Dual Shock 2 (even if they wanted it to be wireless)...but they just HAD to go and try to copy Nintendo.

    3. Re:SixAxis by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      My friends ask me all the time "how I do that" in racing games, when I pass them smoothly in a corner or somesuch. Its because I hold those nice analogue sticks half-up, instead of full-up, or maybe 73% up. Using both analogue sticks for steering + throttle/brakes gives much better control in everything from Burnout to Toca.

      http://mikebabcock.ca/gaming

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:SixAxis by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Um...I use the analog nature of the control sticks all the time. It's how you walk instead of run or turn your head slowly to aim in FPSes,it's how you turn smoothly in racers, it's how you control your speed in Marble Blast, and it's how you pan the camera around at the right speed to evaluate the area in 3rd-person games. The analog stick, in fact, is the one thing in FPSes that's better than KB+M; you can move at speeds other than stop/walk/run.

      In fact, the only game I can think of that I don't use the analog sticks that way in is DOA4 - that's pretty much just using the stick like a D-pad. Of course, I'd just use the D-pad in that game if the 360s D-pad wasn't so craptacular.

      Really, I have no idea what you're talking about.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    5. Re:SixAxis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wife works at the waffle house?

    6. Re:SixAxis by Jerf · · Score: 1

      I was careful not to say "nobody ever uses it", because that wouldn't be true.

      But you have to admit that even if you use it "all the time", you're the exception, not the rule. (And self-reporting bias being what it is, I'd lay money that if I actually hooked up logging software to record the amount of time you're on "full" vs. you're actually using "half", "full" would be well over 90%.)

      My real point is that using the whole controller is better. Where you are now the exception and the sibling to your post talks about being the only guy who can pull off tricky things because he knows how to use the analog controls, everybody will be able to do that, and do it within minutes, not with the amount of practice you almost certainly put it. (I know because it's taken me some time to get it right because it's so darned fiddly, even for your thumbs, and even with some practice it's still hard.)

      If you still don't know what I mean, see if you can find a Gamestop with Excite Truck in it. The amount of control you have is no comparision to the amount of control you have with an analogue stick.

    7. Re:SixAxis by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      OK - I'll grant that I'm just as victim to self-reporting errors as the next guy, so you may be right. But by the same token, I don't see any evidence that using the analog sticks as D-pads is the norm, either. In my experience, it isn't. In yours, it is. All I can say is, after playing games like Marble Blast, PGR3, and NFS:MW online, I would be positively stunned if "most" of those people weren't using gradual pressure on the sticks.

      This, however, is not a fair sample selection, since analog use in those games is heavily rewarded, while digital use is heavily penalized.

      While I can't speak to the 360 (as I don't own any sports titles for it, and therefore have no experience), on the original XBox, similar selection occurred in baseball and golf games. Throwing a pitch through the strike zone, for example, required you to hold the stick short of 100% over. Hitting a ball required you to aim the bat, again by holding the stick short of 100% over. Madden rewarded analog use in precision passing. If your character ever wants to sneak in Oblivion, it requires analog use of the stick.

      I mention these specific games because they represent popular titles which all heavily reward analog use of the sticks. I find it a difficult claim to credit without evidence that "most" of the people playing them handicapped themselves by using the sticks as D-pads. Again, I admit that I also don't have evidence that people didn't; it just seems more reasonable to me.

      That being said, there are plenty of games that don't discriminate against digital use. Geometry Wars, for example. Wik, DOA4, Enchanted Arms, to name a few that I own. I'm deliberately ignoring, here, FPS's - I could believe that analog use in most FPSes isn't advantageous enough to force it for successful play. Personally, I couldn't get by without it - but the difference is certainly less pronounced than other titles I've mentioned.

      All that being said:

      My real point is that using the whole controller is better

      This may be true; I haven't used either the SixAxis or the Wiimote as yet. I can say (without even anecdotal or experiential evidence, this is grain-of-salt time) that I am more interested in the Wiimote than the Sixaxis for motion sensing: if motion sensing is going to be how I control a game, I don't care for the traditional, two-handed, controller style to do it. Assuming that the thumb controls are still used, I suspect that it will be difficult to accurately use a thumbstick while cranking the whole controller over in my hands. This is why I gradually broke the habit of sympathetic controller movement while playing, I don't relish having to take it back up again. By breaking the controls up into two independent items, the Wiimote + nunchuk addresses this concern.

      Of course, the proof is in the pudding, as they say, and it's possible the Sixaxis will make me change my mind if/when I get a chance to use it. But I admit to being dubious. I'm (somewhat guardedly) excited about the Wiimote, though - here's hoping there's a restock this week that I can snag a console out of.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  21. Im flying up to Canada by darkchubs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Canada ... usually .... well at least when the 360 was like that.. Ottawa had a surplus. IM going up there this afternoon for the weekend. if they have em my e-bay id is.. :)

    1. Re:Im flying up to Canada by Bagels · · Score: 1

      Don't bother. Canada's getting about 8,000 PS3s, sayeth a friendly Futureshop.ca employee on the Penny-Arcade forums (DeaconKnowledge, if you happen to stop by there sometime). There won't be a surplus.

      --
      --- Bwah?
    2. Re:Im flying up to Canada by freeweed · · Score: 3, Informative

      We're long since sold out, don't bother.

      Local stores here got maybe 10-15 each, and lineups were 50+ people long.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Im flying up to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, don't think you'll see anything fancy in ottawa... it's pretty much sold out here buddy

    4. Re:Im flying up to Canada by darkchubs · · Score: 1

      as I sit here in a delayed flight , and backed up runway Que :) at least I can get tanked in the market :)

  22. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did it reach the orbit...?

  23. Ugliness? How about shooting? by realinvalidname · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Associated Press (CNN, Yahoo), is reporting that masked, armed thugs robbed people waiting in line at a Putnam, Connecticut Wal-Mart for PS3, and shot one person who wouldn't hand over their money.

    Penny Arcade has pretty much nailed the idiocy of this launch, as usual.

    1. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      shot one person who wouldn't hand over their money.

      You can have my PS3 when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "and shot one person who wouldn't hand over their money."

      And all the people behind the shooting victim worked hard to contain their glee at being able to move up a spot, no doubt.

      Seriously, the only people who own a PS3 right now are those who literally have more money than brains. I don't know if this is a sign of the susceptability of young people to marketing/groupthink or what, but there is no rational reason to put up with this nonsense for something that will likely continue to be manufactured and sold for years ("one night only," maybe, but not the launch of a flagship product). If nothing else, the high price of the console is is made all the more unaffordable due to the missed hours of work spent standing in line.

      Here's a litmus test: is standing in line for a PS3 something you would be proud to tell your children about a decade from now?

    3. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      1 - Assuming that they have jobs. 2 - Assuming that their job description ISN'T "Wait in line for a PS3 for me, will ya?"

    4. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by GabboFlabbo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Here's a litmus test: is standing in line for a PS3 something you would be proud to tell your children about a decade from now?
      I think we can rule out children from the equation if they are standing for days in line for a gaming console.
    5. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by crabpeople · · Score: 0, Troll

      I was in a lineup for a ps3 last night. We heard many comments from assholes such as yourself calling us idiots and stupid and retards. That attitutde quickly disapeared when they actually engaged us, found out that all of us were planning on flipping them for between 2000-3000 PROFIT. As one person said to the line, "Looks like some people dont have to work tommorrow", and I yelled back "I AM working!".

      I only stayed till 11pm, after waiting 8 hours in line. I was number 5, and the night manager came out and said that there were only 4 consoles in the store. Fucking assholes. They had been saying between 10 and 8 all day. The first 4 had gotten there two days before me so I didnt feel so bad about loosing out to them.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    6. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by brkello · · Score: 1

      That is an incredibly stupid litmus test. Do you base every action you do on whether or not you will be proud to tell your children about it? Of course not...who cares what your (potential) kids think. If this is something you want then I see nothing wrong with camping out for it. It could be a lot of fun (apart from being unlucky and camping at a location where violence occurs). Also, camping out for it could net a very nice profit...more than you would make working at most jobs. Some people get excited about things...just let them have a good time. The people who are robbing and shooting, they are just criminals exploiting a situation. I am sure you have bought frivolous, high-priced items as well. Do you have more money than brains?

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    7. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least we know what 'literally' means.

    8. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      So you waited in line 8 hours for nothing?
      You did 8 hours of "work" and got nothing for it.
      The guys that got the consoles camped out for two days plus nine hours. Which is 57 hours straight and they may make $2000 Profit?

      What you don't understand is ANYONE THAT PAYS $3000 for a console has more money than brains. In 6 months there will be no line and you can buy them with no waiting.

      So yea it is dumb that anyone can make a bunch of money selling a $600 game that they can buy in three months.
      But if standing in line for 8 hours for nothing makes you happy more power to you.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "We heard many comments from assholes such as yourself calling us idiots and stupid and retards."

      Oh, no, I didn't bother anybody standing in such a line. I shopped where there was no line. I don't like shopping places where I'm going to be accosted by panhandlers and, as I believe I've already said, I don't consider your sort to be much different. So I was not one of the ones who accosted you or your ilk.

      "and I yelled back "I AM working!".

      I only stayed till 11pm, after waiting 8 hours in line. I was number 5, and the night manager came out and said that there were only 4 consoles in the store."


      Yeah, nice pay you got "working" there.

      What you were doing wasn't working, it's called "gambling." You punched the monkey and you lost. You can try to blame the store for not telling you this, but ultimately it is not their job to help you make your bets.

      Of course, did you bother asking how many they would receive before you staked out your claim in line? Or did you just assume the wage slaves would make your time easier out of the kindness of their hearts? Your presence wasn't making their lives any easier (just the opposite), nor were you making them any more money, so why should they care about some fool in a tent on a sidewalk?

      The upshot is those wage slaves made more money in those 8 hours than you did.

      "The first 4 had gotten there two days before me so I didnt feel so bad about loosing out to them."

      And you assume that they will make money? All those people in that line with you who were making the same gamble, and you don't recall meeting anybody who actually intended to keep the console? Here's something to ask yourself: If you were willing to pay $2000 for a $600 console, and you made $20 an hour, wouldn't it have been worth your time to take two days off of work ($320, before taxes) to save that $1400? Heck, to make the break-even, your time would have to be worth $87.50/hr.

      Do you really think that all the consoles that sold would be taking in those $2000+ bids? This assumes that the inflated bids are truly legitimate bidders, which remains to be seen.

      Not only were you gambling that the store would have enough, you were gambling that you were waiting for the must-have toy of the season. Before you take your superior tone, perhaps you should wait a few weeks to see whether even that wager was correct, and see just how much your "work" yesterday was a complete waste of time.

      Also, I'd advise against playing the stock market or visiting Vegas.

    10. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "If this is something you want then I see nothing wrong with camping out for it."

      This isn't "Camping out to get something that only happens once," this is "Camping out to get something that anybody will be able to walk into a store and buy in three months." Camping out for a PS3 does nothing but highlight your own impatience, and any rational person should be embarassed by such a display (which is where my proposed litmus test comes from).

      "Also, camping out for it could net a very nice profit...more than you would make working at most jobs."

      "Could" is not "will." Waiting in line in order to resell it is a gamble, nothing more. And if that's how you want to try to make money, take a trip out to Nevada.

      "Some people get excited about things...just let them have a good time. "

      Then have a good time somewhere else. Your pursuit of a "good time" shouldn't interfere with my ability to walk into my local Sam's Club and get myself some freakin' groceries.

      "The people who are robbing and shooting, they are just criminals exploiting a situation."

      My question is "What did people do after somebody in line got shot?" Did they decide "OK, this isn't fun any more, this isn't worth it," or did they move up to take up the now-empty slot?

      People got robbed. People got injured. People got injured, had their cars towed, were exposed to the elements, and all sorts of other negative events. But they stayed in line, they played along, they fought over musical chairs, they got bones broken, all for a $600 piece of plastic that I will be able to buy in less than five minutes after three months.

      That, if nothing else, indicates a fucked-up belief system.

      "I am sure you have bought frivolous, high-priced items as well."

      I have never camped overnight to make any purchase.

    11. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Tryptch · · Score: 1

      You could always hire this guy

      http://img6.picsplace.to/img6/23/bodyguard.jpg/

    12. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Tryptch · · Score: 1

      You could always hire this guy

      http://img6.picsplace.to/img6/23/bodyguard.jpg/

    13. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      You know it crumbles that way
      At least that's what they say when you play the game

    14. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Raenex · · Score: 1
      This isn't "Camping out to get something that only happens once," this is "Camping out to get something that anybody will be able to walk into a store and buy in three months."

      You're wrong. The PS3 will be in short supply for a lot longer than 3 months. For the people that have money to burn and don't like waiting, then it makes sense for them to pay a premium. For the people that are willing to wait in line to get one to either sell or play, more power to them. Personally I wouldn't pay $2000 or wait in line, but so what?

    15. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by MattinTibet · · Score: 1

      I have a PS3 right now, and I'll go ahead and disagree that this is all ugliness (and worse) to be ashamed of. Our waiting was totally something that I will be proud to tell children and everyone else about a decade from now. Everything about the experience (except being tired today) was spectacular. Note, all temperatures are in F and 30 is a girl.

      I live in Joplin Missouri and we ranked to get about 36 PS3s for the town. I didn't plan on being in line because I heard about others planning to be in line on Monday. It turns out Wed night me and two buddies drove by and no one was there. We frantically rushed to get supplies (as the forecast predicted lows in the twenties) and rushed back to Best Buy. I was there first and promptly sat down next to the door. A few minutes later some other guy stood next to me and said, "I guess I'm 2". In the next fifteen minutes five other people showed up and we started assigning numbers. Everyone was very amiable and pleased to be where they were in line. This continued as if the PS3 Bat Signal had been shown. We were all cold but terribly excited and chattering as if meeting new friends on the first day of school - we all had new names, the number we were assigned. Once the numbers reached the low teens it was decided that we should write your name on your hand and keep track on our "PS3 Line Starts Here" sign how many people were in line. This was a great deal of relief as the line's form no longer mattered much and anyone approaching was immediately greeted with a new name printed clearly on their hand.

      The next day was awesome. A lot of us called in vacation days at work - the true sign that we were all-in at this point. I called in some reinforcements from work to bring coffee and hot chocolate out to us. The sun came out and everything warmed up such that we only need two layers rather than four. Frisbee and football ensued in the unused portion of the parking lot between Best Buy and our newly christened bathroom field. We anxiously awaited the opening of the pizza places and by eleven 3, 9, 10 and I were splitting a pie. 9 had driven over an hour to get to this Best Buy and even had a noble cause. He had a new born son that was born prematurely and the money he is going to make will go to some of the medical bills. There is much talk amongst everyone about how much our prizes will go for. It looks like only 12 (aka Tank) will keep his. In addition to our formal names some, as in any good workforce, got nick names quickly, Tank and Candyman most notably. Candyman downed no less than a quart of Whoppers for breakfast to earn his.

      It's getting warmer and people are showing up to visit and restock us with supplies, "This is easy time" I declare often. A Joplin Globe reporter is the first news on the scene and we happily rant and solve all the world's problems while he snaps candid shots of us. The sun and warmth are enjoyed with more Frisbee, but they fade quickly. No matter. As the sun goes down and early risers start getting off work TV crews start to come and talk to us. The first I admit pompously, "I'm doin' it all for the money, and sure I'm exited about the PS3 launch because of all the bank it's going to deliver for me." The second I profess my love for hardcore gaming and explain how the time between when I get off work on Friday and the following Monday morning will be one marathon gaming session, "...in fact I'm contemplating a catheter." The third promises to be live. I plan with 3 and 9 how I can declare either political or charitable goals. To bad, there was no time. Oh yeah, that's because the live feed only lasts long enough to show off the two story movie that some of the low 20s are projecting on the East wall of Best Buy. This was our movie theater. Where there lights on that side ruining our screen? Yup, luckily the same entertainment MacGyver's brought an extension ladder and trash bags to prevent that.
      Did I mention, tons of visitors? Yup, people came out of the wood work to visit, to call, to bring

    16. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by Damvan · · Score: 1

      This has got to be the funniest post I have read in a long time.

      Got what you deserved for your 8 hours of "work".

    17. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      re:"Here's a litmus test: is standing in line for a PS3 something you would be proud to tell your children about a decade from now"

      If they want to stay in my will - I'll tell-em what I want. Thank you Mr. mind control - you may go fuck yourself now.

    18. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? by inca34 · · Score: 1

      It's okay, Guppy06's a PS3 line troll.

  24. hey by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Pretty cool toy. I was thinking of getting one but prefer my PC for the obvious reasons. o_o'

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  25. got fraud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so, i'm wondering how many people are going to attempt fraud on e-bay in order to get a ps3. when you're dealing with such a high amount of money like that... wouldn't you want cash in hand first before shipping the item.

    same goes for the person wanting the console. wouldn't you want to have a handoff for something like this? someone is going to get ripped off. its only a matter of time.

    what's to say people at ups or fedex aren't scanning boxes with a x-ray machine to identify a box with a ps3 in it ...and "lose it". of course you'd get re-imbursed if you took out insurance... but you'd lose time and money.

    1. Re:got fraud? by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "wouldn't you want to have a handoff for something like this?"

      This already exists. It's called an escrow service.

      "what's to say people at ups or fedex aren't scanning boxes with a x-ray machine to identify a box with a ps3 in it ...and "lose it"."

      The same thing that says people in other professions also should not steal: they'll lose their job and may wind up in jail if caught. That might not stop some FedEx/UPS/USPS employees but I imagine the lion's share of them aren't going to risk their job (all 3 of which have nice benefits and excellent retirement packages though not a flashy payscale) over a $600 game system. And whoever is paying out that insurance is going to be pretty motivated to find the culprit(s).

      I'm sure fraud will happen but far more people will conduct perfectly legal transactions than not.

    2. Re:got fraud? by GJSchaller · · Score: 1

      FedEx at least (and I would imagine other shipping services) have "Loss Prevention" departments to prevent such a thing. I have a friend that worked at FedEx and was "promoted" to this department - he spent his days locked in a secure room, watching monitors and video tapes of shipments to look for specific packages that were reported missing. They were paranoid enough about it he had a partner in there to help him (Apparently it was a recurring issue). It's a good thing they were... the partner was the one doing the theft. If they hadn't doubled up the surveilance, the partner would have been able to cover his tracks.

    3. Re:got fraud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what's to say people at ups or fedex aren't scanning boxes with a x-ray machine to identify a box with a ps3 in it ...and "lose it".


      Yeah, it's so unique that valuable things, such as $600 game systems are sent using Fedex or UPS...

  26. Free graphics preview - slightly disappointing by mihalis · · Score: 5, Informative

    My wife works in the Sony building, so I strolled past it last night.

    One one side of the Sony building were the dedicated or avaricious would-be-purchasers waiting to buy at midnight, but on the other side of the building there were externally visible screens showing PS3 games being played by people in one of the Sony stores. A preview reel looked awesome, but was simply a video of lots of game clips. The only games I saw being played were : some kind of off-road racing game and Madden 2007. Neither would blow my mind if I saw them on my PS2. There was little to no sign of mindboggling performance, in fact the off-road racing game seemed a bit slow.

    I'm a big fan of PS2, having completed several games, but I'm going to wait for my PS3 until a) I can buy one for normal retail price without hassle and b) I see the mind-blowing graphics we're all expecting

    No, I can't get one any earlier because I know an employee. In fact they haven't heard whether there will be any available for staff at all. There might be a raffle for 3, something like that.

    1. Re:Free graphics preview - slightly disappointing by ksattic · · Score: 1

      You probably saw Motorstorm. I played it at Target a few days ago, and I was very disappointed. It ran at what looked like 20fps and the graphics was very low quality - I would go as far as to compare it to the PS2. Low resolution textures and no anti-aliasing. I also played NBA 07, and was even more disappointed. The players just looked shiny. There were no beads of sweat like on the 360, they were just shiny, like someone had given them a uniform specular component. I am hoping that Motorstorm was disappointing just because it was a demo.

    2. Re:Free graphics preview - slightly disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Sony employee...from what I can tell, the only employees who are able to get their hands on a PS3 by anything other than standing in line have titles of the form "C*O".

  27. Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Sodade · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems to me that geeks would rather play on a PC, where you can hack the game if you don't like it. What is the allure of consoles? I don't get it. I bought an Xbox, but I never play games on the thing - I'd rather be on a PC.

    1. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by hnile_jablko · · Score: 1

      AMEN!!!

    2. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by realinvalidname · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can't speak for anyone else, but I find absolutely zero innovation in PC games. It's the same genres (FPS, RTS, MMORPG), over and over again, with different licenses or sequel numbers. You'd think with no barriers to entry, no Sony tax, etc., that you'd see more innovation in PC games, but it just doesn't exist: the Katamari Damacys and Guitar Heros of the world show up first, and only, on consoles.

    3. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by dargon · · Score: 1

      Uhm, yopu may want to rethink that statement, there is a huge barrier to pc development, it's called, NO TWO SYSTEMS ARE EXACTLY THE SAME. Hundreds of different models of video cards alone mean you have to do some serious juggling in the code. consoles on the other hand are, in terms of internal hardware, 100% identical. Every PS3 has the same video, same ram, same processor. This makes development for them, much simpler. As far as the sony/ms/etc tax goes, well, that can just be passed right on to the consumer, we know they'll pay out the ass for something shiny.

    4. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Skater · · Score: 1

      "It just works." I can sit down at my PS2, put in any PS2 game disc, and know it'll work. No screwing with graphics drivers, worrying about upgrading the graphics card, drivers for the controllers, rebooting the PC 15 times because I haven't booted Windows lately and need to install 30 service packs, etc. etc. etc.

      I used to think that there wasn't any point to the consoles, too, but after the headaches listed above, I'll take my PS2 any day.

    5. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Stupid geeks play on a PC. That's a fools game. A graphics card for gaming on the PC that will be out of date in no time costs more than a console. It's expensive, it's constantly changing, and really, who wants to sit around a computer? Console are simpler, fixed cost, and generally set up in a living room where it's easier to sit around with friends and a few beers. I certainly don't want a PC in my living room. Console's are more plug-n-play, and generally just work better than PCs. Who wants hassles when trying to play games?

    6. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Skater · · Score: 1

      I don't have an XBox, and I don't play that many games, so I have no idea what you're yammering about.

      I guess you're claiming there was a game released with some bugs. Well, I hate to break it to you, but PC games are released with bugs all the time, too. So, I'd say both platforms are about equal in that respect, though I could argue that the fixed platform design of the PS2, XBOX, etc., should make for fewer bugs (fewer configurations to support).

    7. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Thraxen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, some of us have friends in real life (i.e. not just online) and very few people have multiple networked PCs capable of modern gaming. And consoles provide a great way to play games with friends in your living room/den. Also, for myself, I really enjoy sitting next the fireplace in my recliner in the evening after work and playing some games. MY PC is upstairs in my office.

      Also, I think the PC gaming market just confuses the average gamer. Most people don't like installs to begin with and then these days you have crap like SLI and PhysX that just confuse the situation further. Do you need that stuff? No, you can just put all your in-game detail sliders to "Low" and somewhat be able to enjoy a modern game. Now before someone points out that you can buy decent videos cards that are a generation or two old for pretty cheap, how many average people have even attempted to change a video card before? You have to stop thinking like a techno-nerd and realize that most people never do stuff like that. They go out and buy a Dell or HP with integrated graphics and never upgrade the thing until they buy a new PC 5 years later.

      Also think about the avergage person's PC setup. Most people have their PCs tucked into a corner and/or on a fairly small computer desk with a cheap computer chair... hell, it might just be a cheap wooden kitchen table type chair.

      The only real advantage that PCs have is graphics... and that only applies to a VERY small percentage of people with the latest video cards. Again, most people are going to have PCs that are 2-5 years old with integrated graphics chips. Modern games will run like total crap on those. PCs also have a control advantage for a few genres (like FPS), but that's just an artificial limitation by the console manufacturers. They could easily support KB&Mouse if they wanted... and I personally wish they would so I could quit hearing the vocal minority crying about it.

      In the end, consoles just provide a different gaming experience than the PC platform. If you don't like it, cool, but it's not hard at all to see the appeal of consoles.

    8. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I got tired of spending the big bucks to maintain a killer PC. Soon I will build a fairly pissed off PC but I'm not spending my money on graphics hardware but on memory and storage because I want to be doing 3d modeling/rendering and video editing. It's nice to have a kick-ass 3D card for your 3d work, but frankly it is not a necessity and a $100 card today beats the living shit out of the sexiest stuff from back in the day - which has always been true but the point is that today even a pile of crap computer is pretty badass.

      But the point is that if I buy a game console, it's cheap, it's replaceable, it's portable, it has good controllers, and there's a huge library of games that I know will work. No fucking with my video drivers. No updating DirectMedia so that I can have out-of-sync streaming video behind my characters in Final Fantasy VII. (Which I do have for both PS1 and PC.) And so on.

      I mean, Mechwarrior III can't seem to properly draw its interface on the last system I had, running Windows XP... old games have "issues" working. Update DirectX to play a new game, and the old games don't work.

      To hell with it. I'll play console games. It does mean I won't be playing first person shooters (I don't believe in playing them without KB+Mouse) but I can live without that. If nothing else it'll probably stop me from burning out my adrenal gland prematurely.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Because games on a console is worry free, and just work. You don't have to worry about drive issues, or NoCD cracks because the copy protection doesn't like your CD-ROM drive. You can play with 2-4 people on the same system with a single screen, and a single copy of the game. Very few PC games support multiplayer on the same screen, because they expect you to just play over network, or that nobody would want a 17 or even 21 inch screen split in half. You can hook the games up to your nice big TV, without having to mess with video settings to make it look nice, and have a huge noisy computer sitting next to your computer. You don't have to wait for the console to boot up. There's many other reasons for using consoles over PCs. Mind you PCs do have some advantages, such as modifiability, and keyboard/mouse for games that need it (FPS,RTS), but consoles are much simpler, and provide a much more relaxed gaming experience.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by brkello · · Score: 1

      Because consoles are a cheaper way to play games. That, and games work out of the box where often in the PC world you need to do the graphic drivers song and dance. Obviously, if you want to hack a game, the PC would be the way to go. But if you just like playing games, then consoles are perfectly acceptable alternatives.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    11. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      "It just works." I can sit down at my PS2, put in any PS2 game disc, and know it'll work. No screwing with graphics drivers, worrying about upgrading the graphics card, drivers for the controllers, ...
      He said "geeks." I think most geeks (not just gamer geeks) keep their OS and drivers (also applications and BIOS) updated, even if they don't need to. A geek's computer "just works," even if it's a Windows PC. I'm sure I'm not the only person that runs Microsoft Update almost every time I boot Windows, then check my important apps (AVG, Opera, Office 2000, etc) and drivers for updates.

      ...rebooting the PC 15 times because I haven't booted Windows lately and need to install 30 service packs, etc. etc. etc.
      There have been 2 service packs for Windows XP, but I'm sure you meant "updates." If there are 30 updates since the last time you booted Windows, then you might not be a gamer geek.
      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    12. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find absolutely zero innovation in PC games. It's the same genres (FPS, RTS, MMORPG), over and over again, with different licenses or sequel numbers.

      Which is totally different from mainstream console gaming, right? Oh, wait - that's just the same genres (FPS, racer, sports) over and over again, with different licenses or sequel numbers.

      You cite Katamari Damacy and Guitar Hero (the latter, at least, was done on the PC in the early 1990s, BTW), but outside the cult market, what are the games that people actually get excited about? Halo N. Metal Gear Solid N. Madden 200N. Project Gotham Racing N. Etc.

      How many of the PS3 launch titles do you think are remotely innovative? I count precisely 0.

      Meanwhile, innovation continues on the PC, too. Is there anything like DEFCON on consoles? (Doubtless you'll write it off as RTS, which it is in the same sense that Katamari Damacy is a platformer.) You can't deny it's innovative - a game that's designed to be playable in the background by an entire office, without getting in the way of their work. Rather different from console games, all of which are designed to take over your full attention at home.

      The fact is that gaming on all platforms is basically stuck in a rut, and innovative games rarely succeed in the mass market. But innovation also prospers on all platforms. Platform snobbery only makes you look ignorant. Please don't bother.

    13. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only morons would buy a system and never play on it...
      It's not like games that are coming out on a platform arent' advertized, you do know what you're getting.

    14. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Skater · · Score: 1

      I never said I was a gamer geek, nor did I think the original poster was talking about gamer geeks only.

      My computer "just works" too. But I very quickly got tired of "chasing the ball" to keep up with the latest graphics cards, processors, motherboards, RAM, etc. Then fighting all the driver issues for those and then Windows activation issues... Plus all the money spent. Nah, I'd rather walk over to the couch and play the game and not have to worry about whether my video card is DirectX 10 compatible with the current drivers I have installed... or whatever.

      This way, I can keep my computer relatively stable; I'm not forced into upgrading so I can play the latest games or whatever. And that's a bonus under ANY operating system - no upgrading means I can get everything working then forget about it until it dies (or becomes painfully obsolete).

      My (used) PS2 cost me $150 for the unit, GT4, an extra controller, and a memory card - and the hardware is set. I don't have to worry about the next PS2 game I get interested in being incompatible with its current hardware. Meanwhile, on the computer front, can you even get a high-end graphics card for $150?

    15. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Lucky you. I had to completely dismantle my PS2 and realign the laser in order to get the thing to even read discs, and the thing hardly gets used heavily (I think 'very lightly' would be indicating more use than it really gets). Not only did I have to worry about completely breaking the thing, I had to be careful not to cause retinal damage with the laser while the thing's in pieces. And just replacing the drive if I had killed the thing wouldn't have really been an option (unlike on a PC) - I'd almost certainly have had to replace the entire unit.

      Thankfully, it seems to work more reliably now than it ever had, but it's far more work than I've ever had to put into getting a game to work on the PC. Well, until I bought FFXII, where I found out that the Sony-branded controllers I was using aren't compatible with the game (somehow I ended up with a DualShock controller instead of a DS2, and I'll be truly stunned if it's extra analoginess gets used in any way whatsoever). Luckily, I've always preferred the keyboard and mouse, but it means the game's been sitting unusable for the past three weeks until I can get home and pick up a compatible controller. I've certainly never seen an "I don't like this mouse" error on any PC game.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    16. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by fritzk3 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention - if you want to try out a game before you buy it, it's easy to head down to your local video rental store and pay $5 for a 5-day trial of a console game. PC games really have no equivalent. (Yes, I realize you can "try" a game for free from BitTorrent, but that's not really the same thing.)

      I own both a PC and a PS2, but for me, when it comes to games, I enjoy the wider variety available for the console, as well as the comfort in knowing that it will work because I already have the exact hardware that's needed.

      --
      All your sig are belong to us.
    17. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by metamatic · · Score: 1
      What is the allure of consoles?

      I get to play video games without supporting the evil Microsoft monopoly.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    18. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innovation? Show me anything like Pathologic or Brigade E5, or GalCiv2 on a console. Even better, show me anything like GearHead or Dwarf Fortress.

    19. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Skater · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a "I don't like this mouse" error on a PC either, but I have seen plenty of issues with video cards not being good enough for certain games or having bugs in the drivers. Basically the same thing - except that new video cards can be expensive, while a replacement DS2 controller is like $20 or $25...

    20. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 1

      On the subject of FFXII:

      The two analog sticks are used. Extensively, in fact. The left stick controls movement and the right stick controls the camera. The D-pad has its
      own functions (namely targeting and selecting the party leader) and can no longer be used for movement, which is fine with me as I've always prefered
      using the analog stick anyway. So in short, with the way the controls are set up in FFXII playing the game without two analog sticks would be quite
      impossible.

      The DualShock isn't a PS2 controller, anyway. It's a PS1 controller that's supported for legacy purposes. Every PS2 I've ever seen comes bundled
      with a DS2. You shouldn't be too surprised that you can't play some PS2 games without a PS2 controller.

      --

      Physics is good

    21. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by namityadav · · Score: 1

      Because geeks can't play a lot of those PC games on their Linux desk/laptops

    22. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      The DualShock has the same two analog sticks. According to the product descriptions I've seen on other websites, ALL of the buttons on the DS2 controllers (save the start and select buttons) are analog. My point was that the DS controller would have been perfectly functional with its two analog sticks unless FFXII requires the []XO/\ and d-pad also need to be analog - which, to my understanding, isn't the case.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    23. Re:Why do geeks buy consoles?? by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      Amen, I can hook any controller I like to my PC, use cheat codes, and build the box myself with much more power than a console and less money spent overall. I have my Odyssey 2 and PS2 if I need a console fix. Yes, I skipped ALL the consoles in between. The console needs to be innovative to grab my interest.

  28. Seriously. by MeanderingMind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The PS3 is neat. The Wii is neat. These people are insane.

    1) It's a video game console, not a cure for cancer. You don't need to get worked up over it.

    2) This isn't the only chance you'll have to get one. If it is, you really don't want one anyway.

    3) If you seriously didn't think you could be in the "I waited days in line for this and got nothing" group you need several reality checks.

    Frankly, I'm scared that I'm going to walk to my car with my brand new Wii and some nut with a gun is going to try and take it from me. These morons seem desperate enough that they'll actually shoot me for it.

    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    1. Re:Seriously. by danpsmith · · Score: 4, Funny
      3) If you seriously didn't think you could be in the "I waited days in line for this and got nothing" group you need several reality checks.

      Don't worry, you are preaching to the choir here, most people here are used to waiting for years and still getting none.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    2. Re:Seriously. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      1) It's a video game console, not a cure for cancer. You don't need to get worked up over it.

      What?! I turned down a bone marrow transplant so that I could stand in line at Walmart!

      Sony's PR screws me again!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Seriously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Frankly, I'm scared that I'm going to walk to my car with my brand new Wii and some nut with a gun is going to try and take it from me. These morons seem desperate enough that they'll actually shoot me for it.


      "Give me your Wii or I'll shoot!"
    4. Re:Seriously. by mqj · · Score: 1
      ... not a cure for cancer. ...


      Actually... isn't Folding@home going to be on it?
  29. Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by thesolo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the Ledger-Enquirer article about the Dentist trying to buy 15 PSPs:

    "I only want one, but I know there's other people that are going to want them, too," said Williams, who has a 7-year-old son..."You're using your money and authority to pay people for what you want, and that's wrong."

    Wait, using money to pay people is wrong now?! Thank you Cindy Williams of Columbus, Ohio for setting us all straight! I know I'll never make that mistake again. By the way, Cindy, can you further explain what authority a dentist has? I mean, unless he commandeered the store, I'm not really sure what authority he abused.

    People with a lot of money can almost always get what they want. It might be unfair, but that's capitalism; deal with it.
    1. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by c0rN_g0aT · · Score: 1

      Actually this happened in Columbus GEORGIA and not Columbus OHIO. In fact you can look at your own link and see.

      Columbus is a little town of about 300,000 people 100 miles south of Atlanta. Its the home of Aflac insurance and Fort Benning -- the largest infantry base in the world.

      Oh and I will be getting a Wii :)

    2. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by LMacG · · Score: 1

      Semi-OT:

      That's Columbus, Georgia.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    3. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by thesolo · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the correction, I didn't realize. Aside from the "More News From" sidebar entry that says "Columbus, GA", I wouldn't have noticed. :)

    4. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      yeah, it couldn't be us anyway, we in Columbus (OH) have other plans this weekend...

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    5. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by Leviance · · Score: 1

      I used to live in Columbus, GA.. All I have to say is that, if the Dentist had been smart, he would have sent his hirelings to the South Columbus Wal-Mart instead of Airport Thruway.... Less competition I imaging. This is definitely a sign of the second coming...

    6. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by brkello · · Score: 1

      This Cindy girl sounds like she might make a good mate for Zonk.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    7. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by vudu · · Score: 1

      Actually it's Columbus, Georgia

    8. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by c0rN_g0aT · · Score: 1

      I only knew because I actually live here in Columbus, GA.

      It was on the front page of the actual news paper as well. People are going crazy over this thing. I know 2 people here a work who are watching their ebay auctions. One guys auction is up to $2700!!!

      Crazy!

    9. Re:Wait, isn't that just capitalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice one, doofus -- only two hours later than the others.

  30. Ebay bid craze by toonworld · · Score: 1
    --
    It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
    1. Re:Ebay bid craze by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Well I'm sure this is a joke, but one bid in particular was up to 9 000 000 000 $USD

      You sure that's a joke? Once I got 428035.42 USD for an original Atari 2600 "Haunted House" game cartridge on eBay. How do you think I afford all the whiskey and hookers?

      I don't like the cynical tone of your posting, pal.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Ebay bid craze by jlf278 · · Score: 1

      Actually there is a logical reason for it - people are getting really pissed off that they can't buy a PS3 for a reasonable price. They go on ebay and see someone trying to take advantage of the supply/demand, so they sabotage the auction and force the seller to relist or sell somewhere else. Petty, but is it completely unwarranted?

    3. Re:Ebay bid craze by toonworld · · Score: 1
      Hey all they have to do is wait a few months and there will be plenty of consoles on the shelves. I just didn't want to wait in line, but if I had bought one, I would probably resell it on e-bay and make a 4400 profit. Hell, some guy bought a 100 of them. Take the average resell price of $2400 USD, make the math.

      check it out http://digg.com/gaming_news/100_PS3s_To_Be_Resold_ By_ONE_GUY?cshow=

      --
      It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
    4. Re:Ebay bid craze by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      Things like this make me nostalgic for things like the 'Xbox 360 Prem Retail Box' auction... now that was an amusing example of truth in advertising. Not to mention a good illustration of people's willingness to jump to conclusions.

      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  31. millions more linux users by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Now something about this really puts a smile on my face, and I could care less about gaming.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:millions more linux users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if they repartition their drive and install Linux for Cell.

      the PS3 RTOS is not Linux.

    2. Re:millions more linux users by Builder · · Score: 1

      How much less could you care ? Or did you mean that you couldn't care less ?

    3. Re:millions more linux users by NotZed · · Score: 1

      Rather surprisingly this is what americans actually say when they mean "couldn't care less". But then, they call main meals "entrees" too.

      --
      _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
      \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
  32. I understand why....but I don't have to like it.. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I understand why the things are limited, but I don't have to like it. What I want to know is, why release these damn things in the busiest season? The only reason I come up with is everyone wants their little Johnny to have that PS3 xmas or to sell them on eBay plus the fact that alot of people in this country lose their heads all in the name of the almighty money spending holiday called Christmas.

    I want a Wii on Sunday, but I'll wait until March. By then, the hype is wore off and a few more games are out.

    --

    Gorkman

  33. Chaos by HappySqurriel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm actually reasonably disturbed by the Chaos that has been created by greed ...

    In practically every interview I have seen the reporter is talking to someone who intends to sell the PS3 for massive profit; in one case a man was talking about how he was going to make $2000 in one days work. I could be wrong but it seems like the PS3 launch has brought out everyone who is desperate to make a little money regardless of the moral cost.

    1. Re:Chaos by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In practically every interview I have seen the reporter is talking to someone who intends to sell the PS3 for massive profit; in one case a man was talking about how he was going to make $2000 in one days work.

      I was discussing this last night with a former manager of a Gamestop. We came to the conclusion that only people that were buying PS3s now were going to sell it on Ebay.

      But the amount of people willing to pay more than $1,000 is very small. So a handful of people will make money, but since Ebay is being flooded with PS3s there is a high chance that many of these Ebayers are going to be sorely disappointed.

      Secondly... Most of those $9,000 bids are just fake bids of people who have no intention of actually buying it.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What is more sad? The seller who makes an outrages profit or the fact that there are buyers willing to pay 3000 USD?
      For me it's the buyers side. The box will be worth 500 USD in a couple of months...

      But that said, I found it funny all those articles on Slashdot about how expensive the PS3 is, and then seeing the PS3 sold for 3000 USD. Kinda sets the 'OMG the PS3 is so expensive' campaign right, it was NOT (too) expensive.

    3. Re:Chaos by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      But that said, I found it funny all those articles on Slashdot about how expensive the PS3 is, and then seeing the PS3 sold for 3000 USD. Kinda sets the 'OMG the PS3 is so expensive' campaign right, it was NOT (too) expensive.

      I'm not so sure a small percentage of people who are willing to pay more than a product is worth demonstrates the product is not overpriced (especially in the case of a gaming system), even if you saw dozens of bids at $100,000 for the PS3 it still can be overpriced. The reason for this is simple, the PS3 is only a decent product (as a gaming system) if it sells enough systems in order to get strong support from developers; this support is necessary to get exclusive games and (enhanced) ports of other games. A gaming system can not be very successful and be a luxury item beyond the means of the average gamer (for very long). Whether $500/$600 is too much has yet to be seen, but I suspect we won't know until January 2008 at the earliest.

    4. Re:Chaos by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      But the amount of people willing to pay more than $1,000 is very small. So a handful of people will make money, but since Ebay is being flooded with PS3s there is a high chance that many of these Ebayers are going to be sorely disappointed.

      Reminds me of a Rolling Stones gig in '82.

      A couple weeks in advance tickets where sold for the equivalent of ~ EUR 200 (that was a sizeable sum in 1982 for a concert ticket).

      At the entrance of the actual venue however, scalpers could be glad to be compensated with a pack of cigarettes for a Stones ticket.

      Serves them right, bloody, greedy bunch.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    5. Re:Chaos by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between what early adopters will pay and what the wider market will bear.

    6. Re:Chaos by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing. We all saw how the xbox360s were sold on ebay so everyone is trying to do the ps3s the same way this time around. After the craziness goes away, I wonder what the price will settle at? Speaking of supply and demand, there are nearly 10k ps3s for sale on ebay now. One has to wonder how many people are out there that are willing to pay 2x-3x retail for something that will be plentiful (and with more games) in just a few months. It's not like Sony is going to quit making them lol, in fact I can promise that Sony will make millions of them when all is said and done :p

    7. Re:Chaos by blork101 · · Score: 1
      ...sell the PS3 for massive profit...
      I suppose you might say they are attacking people's wallets for massive damage.
    8. Re:Chaos by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      We came to the conclusion that only people that were buying PS3s now were going to sell it on Ebay.

      But the amount of people willing to pay more than $1,000 is very small. So a handful of people will make money, but since Ebay is being flooded with PS3s there is a high chance that many of these Ebayers are going to be sorely disappointed.

      This has already happened in Japan: PlayStation 3 Prices Drop in Japanese Auctions

      The PlayStation 3 launched in Japan just 6 days ago, but according to that article, smart bidders are buying them off Yahoo! Japan auctions for near-retail prices ($510 for premium model, $420 for cheaper model).

      When you factor in the eBay fees and shipping hassles, I think some American PS3 scalpers are in for a monumental letdown. I feel sorry for some of them.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    9. Re:Chaos by whoop · · Score: 1

      That's just how the market works. It's a gamble for the investor buying the tickets/video games. If he can unload them for a profit, yay. If he can't, he's screwed. With say, 100k?, PS3s out in the market right now, the few people desperate enough to pay $1000+ will buy theirs and the other 90k people have a big credit card bill next month. At least they could probably take the system back within 30 days and get a refund...

  34. $2000 for three days in line? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    If the games actually move on the auction sites at $2500, that might be a pretty good return.

  35. people outside, sleepy, with $700 apiece ... by peter303 · · Score: 1

    If thats not sitting ducks for crooks, I dont know what is. Maybe the rich suburban teens have "daddy's credit card", but a lot of them dont have high credit lines and carry cash.

    1. Re:people outside, sleepy, with $700 apiece ... by toonworld · · Score: 1

      yeah umm... They're called Credit Cards. Oh and more than a decade ago they invented something called a DEBIT CARD. If anyone is stupid enough to go wait in line for 2 days with $700 cash in their pockets almost deserves to be robbed.

      --
      It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
  36. 3 days in line... by dbizzle · · Score: 1

    and all i got was a lousy t-shirt.

  37. 1st in line, was it worth it? by inca34 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was first in line at a local Target. It started around 330pm Wednesday and filled up by 6pm, and since I got to run the line the way I wanted I still got to go to work and others got to take miderms, go to class, etc. Even so, it was stressful to deal with the hordes of people so desperate that, if provoked, would forcefully take someone's place. The potential for profit drove most of the idiocy. Also, everyone in the line was there to make a profit except for possibly myself--I haven't decided yet.

    The worst part of it was dealing with the corporate nature of Target. The employees were fine and enthusiastic, but the corporate policies were inane. For instance, no tents while they're open (8am to 10pm) with the lows being ~34F and soaking wet. Along with that, no official rules for the line from Target (read this as ass covering) so no waiting inside and no official list guaranteed even after the known slots had been filled--meaning you have to aggressively yet legally assert your place in line with an onslaught of douchebags trying to take your spot when you get up to take a piss.

    Would I do it again? Probably not. Am I glad to have a PS3, HELL YES! After work today is going to be insane!

    1. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by DMorritt · · Score: 1

      you got a PS3 and went to work?

    2. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The employees were fine and enthusiastic, but the corporate policies were inane. For instance, no tents while they're open"

      "Inane?" They're a retail store, not a campground! If anything, you should just be happy that you were allowed to loiter outside the store to begin with, as your presence no doubt had an intimidating effect on the store's more legitimate customers. The people in the lines I saw differed from the people I see on streetcorners holding their cardboard signs only by degree.

      "Along with that, no official rules for the line from Target (read this as ass covering) "

      No, read it as "Not their fucking job."

      "After work today is going to be insane!"

      And after Monday? After next week? Next month? Next year? Will the insanity you participated in still have been worth it once the novelty has worn off?

      Here's a question: of all the people who stood in line for a PS3 in the US, how many voted ten days ago?

    3. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is my '-1 moron' mod when I need it?

    4. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by inca34 · · Score: 1

      Haha... yeah, waiting in line put me a little behind on a few projects. As an engineer, my boss doesn't care about the hours off so long as I get caught back up. It's worth a little sweat to have a PS3. =)

    5. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 2, Funny
      no doubt had an intimidating effect
      Intimidating? I laughed at the campers in our town. We had the heaviest rain we've had in 3 months on Wednesday night... roads were flooded and the Wally's parking lot was a small pond. Hope they *really* enjoy their games...
      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    6. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by mjeppsen · · Score: 1

      >>Along with that, no official rules for the line from Target (read this as ass covering)
      >No, read it as "Not their fucking job."

      It quickly becomes the retail establishment's FJ when someone is injured in a mad rush for the line. Any manager worth his salt would have set in place clear rules to manage the lines. You are asking for lawsuits if you don't. At one area Wal-Mart, they did not allow a line to form until they announced it on the intercom. Instead of a nice orderly line of 10 people, they ended up with a 100+ gamer mad-dash to the line, with people pushing and shoving and a few minor injuries. Again, any decent manager should have seen that coming and made rules to accomodate the situation.

      The good news is that most of the Wal-Mart stores in my area had the lines waiting in the Lawn and Garden area. Several had TV's setup and gamers were hanging out, playing consoles and PSPs (of course), and generally having a good time. The situation was fully under control, there was no pushing and shoving and generally the first 6 in line got PS3's (with vouchers going to the next 4). One local store somehow ended up with 22 Playstations, even the manager admitted that was a complete accident that they got so many. As I understand it, Sony promised Wally-World 10 PS3's each on launch day, and most only got 6. And yes, I managed to get one.

      -MJ

    7. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by inca34 · · Score: 1

      "Inane?" They're a retail store, not a campground! If anything, you should just be happy that you were allowed to loiter outside the store to begin with, as your presence no doubt had an intimidating effect on the store's more legitimate customers. The people in the lines I saw differed from the people I see on streetcorners holding their cardboard signs only by degree.

      Agreed, they are no campground. I much prefer the wooded forests of Red River Gorge, KY than to the slabs of concrete at shopping plazas. However, it was upper 30 degree weather and raining. With no indoors allowed for guaranteed line spots (it was only 8 people) like some of the 24 hour Walmarts did, this presents a unique situation: lose your line spot or suffer from hypothermia. In all reality, if we hadn't banded together to do trips inside while saving others' spots there would be at the least frostbite and at the worst, well, you can imagine. If you don't believe me, try some traditional alpine mountaineering. Fun stuff if you like self-induced misery, the cold, and more misery. As far as the big picture is concerned, which hurts their public image more more, a bunch of frozen kids going to the ER because some exec decided that tents really don't add to the exterior decor of the building or simply allowing the circus to stay for a couple of days?

      As far as the "more legitimate customers", I don't see what's so insignificant about 8 people about to drop 5 grand in less than 15 minutes. Not to mention the last minute supplies that many buy at such locations.

      Granted, we didn't look like much more than vagabonds trying to play PS2 and Gamecube out in the cold. Even so, the customers were on the whole much more accepting of us than you or I might have thought beforehand. Most people cheered us on or were curious in passing. Sure it may have been intimidating to some, but for the most part I saw smiles, enthusiasm, and kindness in general from these so-called "more legitimate customers". So say what you will about defending Target's policies on such things (why you'd stick up for these execs is beyond me), the fact of the matter is that a lot of corporate policies reek of commandments from on high where nothing is questioned, nothing is feasible in the stated form, and you avoid responsibility and accountability at all costs. This strikes me as wasteful and randomly worth mentioning.

      "Along with that, no official rules for the line from Target (read this as ass covering)"

      No, read it as "Not their fucking job."

      Please explain your logic. I don't see how the rules under which my standing outside for 2 days in front of their store for the future release of a product that they are carrying is neither "their fucking job" or, more appropriately, "their fucking" responsibility. How is it not "their fucking" job to administrate the line? Clearly, it ought to be an every man for himself situation with no rules, no allies, no cops, and no order. Because clearly, that's what works out best for everyone. Who else, then, is more appropriate, less biased, and better placed to administrate the line than the store at which you're lined up at? So, I disagree: their ass covering is for the sake of negating liability at other people's expense. Namely, the consumer. Again, why defend this behavior? It's like telling people it's okay to not be responsible for something if they just announce loudly and often they are not responsible for it. Enron... option backdating... what?

      And after Monday? After next week? Next month? Next year? Will the insanity you participated in still have been worth it once the novelty has worn off?

      Wow... Sorry for my enthusiasm, I'll get that fixed right away. I'm really really sorry I posted some of my excitement. Um... as far as your literal question goes, that's entirely up to me and how I use my console. The novelty of Halo C/E and Halo 2 have long since worn off, but yet somehow I still enjoy every moment I play them. I didn't buy the PS3 on a whim

    8. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by inca34 · · Score: 1

      Looking back on a few of the pictures, it does look a little humorous. Of course that's probably because now I'm warm and 3 to 4 layers of clothing lighter. =)

    9. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by inca34 · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly!

      So what are you going to do with it? Sell it, keep it, or play it then sell it?

    10. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by mjeppsen · · Score: 1

      Not a lot of time to play games, I'm far too busy with a myriad of proverbial irons in the fire. No, I am firm believer in capitalism. :-) As such, the PS3 is now listed on eBay at an obscenely high starting price.
      I frankly would rather have a Nintendo Wii, for my 4 year old. Have you seen the experience videos at wii.com? Looks like fun for the whole family.

      -MJ

    11. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "In all reality, if we hadn't banded together to do trips inside while saving others' spots there would be at the least frostbite and at the worst, well, you can imagine."

      If you're trying to ilicit pity, it's not working. You were there voluntarily, your car was parked not 500 feet away, you could have gone home at any time. The fact that you and those around you risked life and limb for a piece of metal and plastic that anybody with the money to spare will be able to easily pick up in three months impresses me only in the amount of foolishness you've shown in pursuing it.

      "Clearly, it ought to be an every man for himself situation with no rules, no allies, no cops, and no order."

      No, clearly you should have just gone home instead of putting up with it.

      "Again, why defend this behavior?"

      Because it is your behavior that's putting them into such an untenable position to begin with. You are attempting to hold them accountable for the outcome of your actions. Again, you had your car keys.

      "The novelty of Halo C/E and Halo 2 have long since worn off, but yet somehow I still enjoy every moment I play them. I didn't buy the PS3 on a whim or as some impulsive purchase. I have a few options: open it and keep it, open it/play/sell at Christmas, sell it untouched. All of which have lasting value to me, thus making it a no-lose scenario for me. Novelty isn't everything."

      Novelty isn't everything, but it is the only reason anybody could possibly line themselves up under such conditions. You mention Halo and Halo 2; they're both still for sale. I could go into any video game store, right now, and pick them both up for around $50. There is no reason for you, I, or any other person to, for example, camp out in sub-freezing temperatures just to play Halo or Halo 2. True, the copies of Halo available aren't the "Collector's Edition," but neither is your PS3.

      I do not doubt the console's lasting value in and of itself. The question is whether the extra three months of use you've bought yourself with your experience is worthwhile; you could have waited three months for the console to become readily available. You didn't camp out because it's what you needed to do to get a PS3, you camped out because it's what you needed to do to get a PS3 now.

      "Well, this certainly came out of no where. Not only is it off topic, but it's mildly insulting."

      Off-topic? Both involve an investment of time waiting in line. One usually involves a relatively short wait and no expenditure (amendment 24), the other one a wait of several days and an expenditure of $600 if you're lucky. One brings about rather esoteric results and, at best, gives one a sense of civic involvement fulfillment of duty, the other brings about the epitome of shiney flashiness and instant gratification.

      Considering that Slashdot now has a poitics section, I think it's important to know what kind of priorities Slashdotters and gamers have. It's obvious what I suspect the general answer to be, but feel free to surprise me and let me know that there may yet still be hope for the Union.

      "Can't wait!"

      Yeah, that seems to be your personal motto in life. There may be irony in that you waited those two days in the elements, but all you waited for was to avoid having to wait three long, agonizing months until you can get your PS3 like a sane person.

    12. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by inca34 · · Score: 1

      Sorry troll. I don't really care what you're saying because, clearly, all you're trying to do is piss on what others enjoy. No matter what anyone says you will not open your mind to the possibility of being wrong, thus there is no point in discussing anything of relevance or logic with your kind. Of course you may refute this as well with some anecdote or funny words, but it will never satisfy anyone who knows how flawed the spoken and written languages are with regard to absolute truth. The word is only ever cousin to the deed, so why persist in misunderstanding people and not trying to find truth in what people say but only point out how your presumptions of what they said is wrong? Do you like posting this style of comment?

      I wonder if you're one of those people that is incapable of allowing other people to enjoy things in life, and as a result stop enjoying things yourself? Who knows, who cares. Certainly I do, but that will never be appropriately communicated. I find myself wanting to respond to your trolled up post line-by-line, but since you didn't return me the favor you technically lose the argument. You totally skipped over the relevance of communicating excitement, enthusiasm, etc. on slashdot; my points on corporate culture; etc. And as such, your arguing is nothing but froth in a sea of FUD.

      Aha! You're just an average every day /. PS3 troll (I hate name-calling/labeling, but this is how you're acting, friend): http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=206976&cid=168 78650
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=206976&cid=168 76782
      P.S. Though parking lots have cameras, that didn't stop people from being robbed for walking out of Target last year with an Xbox 360. The problem is real and, although you don't understand or accept the motivation, perhaps you ought to try. Down play it and piss on us all you want, it won't make you or anyone else better for it.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=207086&cid=168 88114
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=207086&cid=168 84896
      Get a grip.

      I'm proud of my group and how we conducted ourselves in line. We took up what slack we could and filled in the void leadership that Target's management provided as best we could. Granted the arrangement was not optimal, we made it work safely and effectively. The average customers were not affected in any direct manner, especially not in a negative way. Those were our goals and they were achieved to the lowest detectable limit of dissatisfaction: Target's employees. I can't help prospective customers who are afraid of queues. Sorry, don't go to a retail store if you're afraid of people.

    13. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by inca34 · · Score: 1

      I don't have time either. I was just convinced to list mine on eBay. It'll be gone around 7pm. Now we get to see how much my time was really worth.

    14. Re:1st in line, was it worth it? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "it will never satisfy anyone who knows how flawed the spoken and written languages are with regard to absolute truth. The word is only ever cousin to the deed,"

      Glass houses, stones, etc.

      "so why persist in misunderstanding people and not trying to find truth in what people say but only point out how your presumptions of what they said is wrong?"

      I do not doubt what you say about your own thoughts and opinions (if anything, the idea that those words are thruthful frightens me). I feel that what you did was wrong.

      "You totally skipped over the relevance of communicating excitement, enthusiasm, etc."

      You seem to enjoy pointing out the hardships that you and others like you faced in pursuit of a PS3 this past weekend, and you do so with pride. But why did you put yoruself through all this? The only answer you have is this "excitement" and "enthusiasm" you cite, nothing more. If jeopardizing your health (if not your life) is a worthwhile exchange for nothing more than excitement, then what is the difference between what you did and playing Russian Roulette, if not degree?

      "my points on corporate culture;"

      The store's behavior towards you does not justify your own reckless behavior with your own well-being. If nothing else, being aware that the store does not care whether you live or die, and yet continuing anyway, makes me doubt your judgment.

      "Aha! You're just an average every day /. PS3 troll (I hate name-calling/labeling, but this is how you're acting, friend)"

      If that is all there is to me, I'd be out standing in line for a Wii right now.

      "Though parking lots have cameras,"

      Taken out of context; I was referring to the safety and well-being of the store employees in that post, responding to the idea that those standing in line could take vengeance on the store employees, or at least to the idea that they could get away with it.

      "I'm proud of my group and how we conducted ourselves in line."

      Again, you are painting your time in line as if it were an expedition to scale Mount McKinley, except you didn't. You were never more than three minutes away from getting into your car and turning on the heat, and likely not more than ten minutes away from going to your local Denny's. Any and all environmental hazards you faced could be reproduced by camping in your own back yard. The only true obstacle you faced was either your unwillingness to expend the minimal effort to return to civilization, or your own inability to recognize that option; both obstacles are very dangerous, but only in a Darwinian sense.

      When I went to bed last night, instead of turning on the hall light, I decided to skip past the light switch and instead move down the hallway in the dark. I managed to make it without stubbing any of my toes. Would I be justified in boasting this "great" accomplishment to all within earshot, describing the way I survived this great adventure, talking about my conduct in avoiding any invisible obstacles as my chest swells with pride? Should I celebrate my decision to risk broken toes in the name of "excitement?"

      And you still haven't answered whether or not you voted this month.

  38. Moral cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What moral cost? It's called supply and demand. It's not like this is a necessary purchase for survival.

    1. Re:Moral cost? by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      What moral cost? It's called supply and demand. It's not like this is a necessary purchase for survival.

      I wasn't talking about the product having any moral implications, more about how people's actions were reasonably disgusting (Riots, Mobs, fights, etc.). The thing that makes this so much worse is (most of) this could have been prevented by Managers being reasonably intelligent on how they handled it. How difficult would it have been to create a basic "lottery" system where everyone who was at your store 15 minutes before it opened up could enter; the winners get the right to purchase a system and you do not allow them to transfer their "sales ticket".

    2. Re:Moral cost? by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What moral cost? It's called supply and demand. It's not like this is a necessary purchase for survival.

      Last I checked, supply and demand didn't entail fist fights, riots, and robbery.

      For all intents and purposes, these people are acting like getting the PS3 is a matter of life and death...

      Which it is not.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Moral cost? by wk633 · · Score: 1

      Maybe not life and death- but I guarantee it's a lot more important to the unemployed guy who's wondering how he's going to pay the rent this month than it is to the guy who's taking 2 days off work from a high paying job just to stand around in the cold.

    4. Re:Moral cost? by mikael · · Score: 1

      How difficult would it have been to create a basic "lottery" system where everyone who was at your store 15 minutes before it opened up could enter;

      You would still have queues of people outside the store.

      The most civilised method I know of would been to have Sony set up a website for people to pre-order a PS3 and choose which store to collect it from? That was the way the early 3D accelerator boards were distributed.

      Seems too much like Takeshi's Castle to me.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Moral cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last I checked, supply and demand didn't entail fist fights, riots, and robbery.

      Wow. I admire your naive view of human nature. Exactly what do you think is responsible for fist fights, riots, and robbery, then?

    6. Re:Moral cost? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      People are responsible for fist fights, riots and robbery. Supply and demand might have something to do with it only if the item in low supply was required for basic human existence. When people fight or rob over a PS3, or a fancy pair of sneakers, or whathaveyou, then it is just plain people attempting to justify their own immoral actions.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:Moral cost? by nasch · · Score: 1

      I think it was a Best Buy store that did something even better. They knew they were getting 140 systems, so as soon as they had a line that big, they handed out vouchers to the first 140 people in the line and told everyone to go home because nobody else would be able to buy a system from that store. NPR covered it this morning.

    8. Re:Moral cost? by Blue+Fox+USA · · Score: 1

      No kidding, that's what they should have done. The worst that would have happened is a router getting some heavy traffic instead of people getting hurt.

  39. What moral cost? by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm actually reasonably disturbed by the Chaos that has been created by greed ...

    How is reselling a PS3 greed? To label this greed you need to know what financial situation these people are in.

    Are they standing in line to afford a luxury item or is this a rare opportunity to make 2 months rent in a day?

    Ticket/Event/Product Scalping ( reselling ) is not always illegal and many legitimate business do it. Tickmaster at least at one point aunctioned tickets to popular events.

    Finally, who is being hurt by the PS3 resellers? The gamers who have to wait an extra week to get their hands on a PS3?

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:What moral cost? by HappySqurriel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm actually reasonably disturbed by the Chaos that has been created by greed ...

      How is reselling a PS3 greed? To label this greed you need to know what financial situation these people are in.

      Are they standing in line to afford a luxury item or is this a rare opportunity to make 2 months rent in a day?

      Ticket/Event/Product Scalping ( reselling ) is not always illegal and many legitimate business do it. Tickmaster at least at one point aunctioned tickets to popular events.

      Finally, who is being hurt by the PS3 resellers? The gamers who have to wait an extra week to get their hands on a PS3?


      I (personally) see nothing wrong with the act of scalping a product in order to make a decent profit; I do however see a problem with trampling people to get a product in order to sell it online for a decent profit. Regardless of whether your use of your windfall is a noble cause or not, when you callously disregard the wellbeing of your fellow person in order to make the money it becomes an immoral act.

    2. Re:What moral cost? by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1

      I do however see a problem with trampling people to get a product in order to sell it online for a decent profit.

      Agreed. But that was not what I got from your original post.

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  40. nice hourly pay by benicillin · · Score: 1

    yah im hearing stories of 3 days in line - to resell on ebay for 5k - thats about 75 dollars an hour, a very good hourly pay. wish i knew these things would be selling for exorbitant amounts before this happened, i would have sat my butt in line for 3 days!

    --
    "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    1. Re:nice hourly pay by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Except these things won't sell for $5000. Perhaps a few people struck lucky with their eBay auctions but the fact is that right now there are probably 10,000 auctions gone up for the PS3. I expect these people will be lucky if they get more than $1500. There are simply too many PS3s to justify anybody, even the more terminally stupid spending more than that. Besides, I expect Sony will be quietly releasing smaller secondary shipments between now and Christmas meaning if you really wanted one that you stand a fair chance of getting it at retail price with only a small wait.

    2. Re:nice hourly pay by benicillin · · Score: 1

      yeah but the fact remains... there are REALLY stupid people out there with lots of mommy and daddys money to spend on this kind of crap.. and if you took the time to go look on ebay before writing back you would have seen a horde of auctions ending in XX minutes with a price of over $3000, many of them hovering around $5000 and some even above that mark (i saw one for 10k with bids) - so I think being the first in line and being quick to auction it off probably increases your return rate by about 100-300%. either way, even if you make $1500 off of one - you probably weren't the guy waiting in line for 3 days, and you are still making 300% profit off your purchase and sale - not a bad deal...

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
  41. Mod Parent Up! by denverradiosucks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That was supposed to be funny! How many of us remember being kids and your "friends" at school would invite you over just so you could watch them play Nintendo?

    1. Re:Mod Parent Up! by OptimusPaul · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was one of those losers who got to spend hours watching others play vidya games... it was sweet.

    2. Re:Mod Parent Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was one of those "friends", you insensitive clod!

  42. What about the PS3 games distribution? by British · · Score: 1

    For example, if Walmart has only 20 PS3s for sale, do they have only no more than 30 copies of Ridge Racer(or any other available launch title) available?

    If I was a retailer that had only X PS3s for sale, but X+Y # of copies given to me for the same game, I'd be a little ticked. Those extra titles would be gathering dust as there's no sold PS3s to play it on(at least to that store). And with the holiday season, shelf space is going to be quite important.

    Takes me back to the Atari corporate muckety-muck who thought people would buy 2 of the same game for their Atari 2600. One for their home, and another for their ski resort. Yes, let's make more copies of a game than sold consoles.

    1. Re:What about the PS3 games distribution? by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      It's not like cartridges anymore. The production costs for stamping out more copies of a game are minuscule. Bluray discs are a little more expensive since the production lines haven't all been rolled out, but PS3 games can use ordinary DVDs till then.

  43. Something to note about Sony Fanboys by Korexz · · Score: 1

    PS fanboys, eBay sellers, and those paid by unscrupulous business types, waiting out in the cold for days on end ALL get a bit cranky when you drive by at 2:00AM screaming Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!

  44. Does anyone actually *have* one? To play? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    ALRIGHT, we've heard lots and lots about how you would rather buy a Wii. We get it..

    We know the lineups were mad, we read about that yesterday.

    Who has a PS3? Surely one of you can give us a mini-review? Impressions? Anything?

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Does anyone actually *have* one? To play? by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Who has a PS3? Surely one of you can give us a mini-review? Impressions? Anything?

      Assuming one's just picked up a PS3 at retail price, it'd be foolish to keep it. One can fetch much more than retail price selling it on eBay. Then, if one's still interested in the console, those profits can be put towards buying one a few months from now when it's not as scarce.

      I imagine that's what most of the campers are doing. That's why actual system impressions are so scarce.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:Does anyone actually *have* one? To play? by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

      Certainly you aren't advocating people taking it out of the box are you? That would hurt the eBay resale value!

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Does anyone actually *have* one? To play? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Assuming one's just picked up a PS3 at retail price, it'd be foolish to keep it.

      Its unprofitable to keep it, but like I said in another post, I do believe some people want to play the thing. Buying a console at all is foolish by nature - its a toy!

      Was just hoping to hear some honest impressions of the system. I guess its all scalpers right now.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    4. Re:Does anyone actually *have* one? To play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You actually think someone with a PS3 right now will be available for comment!?

    5. Re:Does anyone actually *have* one? To play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose your right. I'm sure they're all very busy making their eBay auction look more appealing than the other 199,999 auctions.

  45. A sad day. by Maajid · · Score: 5, Funny

    We gather here today to mourn the tragic death of Common Sense . . .

    1. Re:A sad day. by toonworld · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to ya, but Common Sense took a steep nose dive off the ugly tree (and hit every branch on the way down) a LOOOONNNNGGG time ago.

      --
      It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
  46. The buyers concern me, not the greedy sellers... by norminator · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say it's the greed that's so disturbing... if someone's willing to wait outside forever, enduring muggings and cold and not showering, then that's fine with me.

    What disturbs me is the things like the auction someone else linked to above... $89 million for a game console??? Sure it's in short supply, but within a few months it probably won't be anymore. Something's fishy about an $89 million bid, I don't see that as being legitimate, but still, seeing that other people are willing to pay 3, 5, or 9 thousand dollars or more is still incredibly insane... What do we value in the world anymore???

  47. supply & demand by mapmaker · · Score: 1
    It looks like the going rate is anywhere from $3000-$5000

    That was the going rate before the resale market was flooded with 400,000 potential new competitors. When supply goes up without a corresponding increase in demand, prices go down.

    1. Re:supply & demand by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1
      When supply goes up without a corresponding increase in demand, prices go down.

      But the supply didn't go up! There were 400,000 units shipped before today and there were still 400,000 units available today. I can only guess that you were talking about the eBay supply? I'm pretty sure those units will all sell for more than $2,000. I guess we'll have to wait a month and do a completed auction search?

    2. Re:supply & demand by mapmaker · · Score: 1
      I can only guess that you were talking about the eBay supply?

      You shouldn't have to guess. That's what this thread is about, the going resale rate on ebay. Now that 400,000 units have sold to the public, the ebay supply is much much higher than it was when only people with confirmed pre-orders were selling on ebay. People putting their just-bought units up for auction are not going to get the same prices as those that sold before the release because they have much more competition.

  48. A new home computer paradigm by marvin_pa · · Score: 1

    Some thoughts:

    A brand new central processing unit (cell), one that is, at least theoretically, able to circumvent the RAM access lag existing in multicore chips.

    A brand new disc format which is both larger and faster

    Of course: 1080p 60fps image quality

    A quiet ventilation system for the living room.

    Unlike some other console online services, direct web access via a top-notch web 2.0 browser (probably rebranded firefox).

    In a few weeks, a free version of Yellow Dog Linux with Firefox, Openoffice and built on Enlightenment.

    Easy plugging in usb mouse and keyboard.

    Oh yeah, and games of course...

    I, for one, am looking forward to March when we poor Europeans will be served.

    1. Re:A new home computer paradigm by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The PS3's built in web browser is more likely based on Netfront code.

  49. Re:I understand why....but I don't have to like it by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1
    What I want to know is, why release these damn things in the busiest season? The only reason I come up with is everyone wants their little Johnny to have that PS3 xmas... people in this country lose their heads all in the name of the almighty money spending holiday called Christmas.
    I believe you've answered your own question.
  50. They're in line to make money, not to own the game by OnTheWay · · Score: 1

    I've read from different sources that many people interviewed in line intend to sell the box, not keep it. Thus, waiting outdoors for days in inclement weather for a sizeable payoff makes a certain amount of sense, but of course only to those with a limited ability to make their free time more effective financially.

  51. Moral cost??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what fucking moral cost?
     
    This guy isn't holding a gun to people's heads and demanding that they pay him $2000 for his PS3. If he makes $2000 on it it's because someone wants to pay him that much for it. Supply and demand.

  52. Come on by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is tilting a controller to fly "more complex"

    I do that already anyway! Now I just won't have to use the thumb stick as well.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Come on by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      He says it's just one more thing that developers can force on you. Imagine the current PS2 controller with another stick added (and you with an additional thumb), that's the idea he's conveying.

      I think it can only help, though. Now less button combinations are needed for the same amount of controls (ie what used to be, say "hold R1 then tap R2" can now just be "tilt forward", which simplifies matters for some"), and the tilting mechanic might be more intuitive or practical in some controls (play Warioware Twisted... it just wouldn't work without the gyroscope).

      It doesn't even approach the Wii's level of control, but it can only help, as long as developers aren't stupid (which is a pretty big assumption).

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    2. Re:Come on by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Hmm, let's see.

      DualShock: Use two sticks and twelve buttons to control.

      SixAxiS: Use two sticks, twelve buttons, and be very careful about how you hold the controller to avoid accidental input.

      Also, for added fun, grab something in both hands as if you were holding a PlayStation controller. Anything solid will do. See how much motion you can get out of it, solely by moving your hands. Now imagine trying to do a sharp banking turn in a flying game. You'll have to start moving your arms to get useful motion out of it.

      Presumably the intention is that people will only be holding the controller one-handed when using the tilt controls. Unfortunately, that'll leave it off-balance, since it continues the original DualShock shape which was designed to be held in two hands.

      Ultimately, though, you'll probably be right: it won't be any more complicated than the PS2, because after the first batch of games that use the tilt feature, no one will be using it any more. How many games did you play that used the analog buttons on the PS2? How many of those were released early in the PS2's life?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  53. ballz, poo, and limited edition boxes by sulfur_lad · · Score: 1

    Ballz! Poo! LOL! Seriously, that made my morning. I'd buy that crap. ;)

    PS3 launched, hurray. Hopefully I am not called a 'non-gamer' because I chose to stay in my warm bed after having shut off my PS2 for the evening a scant 8 hours earlier... which was also being played in my nice warm house where I had nachos and pop and everything, oh my! There won't be a PS3 when I get home today! Oh well, I did get a raise because I don't do things like take the day off to play the one game that came out with a currently over-priced system, I'll just turn on the just-as-good (for now) PS2 again. It came in a fancy GT3 box. I bet all the people who waited in line on its launch date are jealous! It pays to wait, you get a limited edition box. Now that's hip.

    1. Re:ballz, poo, and limited edition boxes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I held off and got the GT3 box. GT3 was, at the time, the only game I cared about besides Metal Gear Solid 2. Well, I've since played through MGS2 (on sleazy mode because I suck) and I'll never play it again. Unfortunately, I won't be playing Gran Turismo 5 either, because I am fucking tired of Sony and their bullshit. I've been telling people left and right about why (Blu-Ray DRM, the ridiculous price, Rootkit CDs, and Sony's general inability to make a reliable optical drive) and the few people I've talked to also say they are planning to get a Wii and not a PS3. Most of them are doing this due to price, and I have been hearing that people really ARE put off by the "kiddie" nature of the games, but they're STILL getting the Wii. I'm not saying Sony is fucked but they are NOT getting the kind of support they need to make the PS3 the kind of success that the PS2 was.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  54. Non-Legitimate Bidders by gyranthir · · Score: 1
    Non-Legit Bidders are making ebay shopping worthless.

    12 bids in a row for $200 to $500 a piece. Cmon. I have been looking at the auctions I think it's like a crew of 40 people just bidding the crap out of every auction because they are mad that they didn't stand in line long enough to get one.

    The "if I can't have it no one will" childish mentality is really irritating. I think once those people get banned and the next couple crews of them get banned as well the price will settle down to like 2k. Which is still high, but a lot more manageable than $8k.

    Ebay should put a limit on who can bid on these. Minimum 100+ feedback or something might be a good idea.

  55. Good. Finally. by OSS_ilation · · Score: 1

    See all the violence? All the mayhem? All the utter stupidity? Get these people off the streets and playing/selling their PS3's, so I can enjoy the Wii launch on Sunday without getting shanked.

  56. Re:I understand why....but I don't have to like it by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but if I was Nintendo or Sony, I would have kept things quite a bit longer and either released next year or like the did with the DSlite....release in June. That way it will sell alot in Jun and in December.

    --

    Gorkman

  57. More Dollars than What? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Funny
    Clearly a lot of people with more Dollars than Sense.

    (Hint: Most people have more Cents than Dollars. Usually 100X more.)

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  58. Entrepreneurs and Walmart Game by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

    First of all, some of you are saying how wrong it is for people to be purchasing PS3's and reselling them for profit. Tell me how that's wrong. It's entrepreneurship at its best. These people have the time and patience to wait in line 5 days while the rest of us have to work. They make some money off it by reselling to people that can afford to pay a crazy price for the console. It doesn't hurt anybody, since the people that can afford the high price get their consoles, the people who stand in line make a profit, and Sony gets the media buzz. It's a win for everyone except the people at the end of the line who really want to keep the system for themselves, but those people should take issue with Sony limiting production, not the people taking advantage of the system. Heck, around here someone paid a homeless person to stand in line for them, which there's also nothing wrong with. Same situation as before, and you have the added benefit of a homeless person making a decent amount of cash for sitting outside.

    Now onto crazy Walmart managers.

    Basically, this idiot Walmart manager decides that instead of giving the first 10 people in line their consoles, he'll set up 10 chairs and have everyone race toward them. REAL SMART. Some guy runs into a pole (don't know how that happens anyway) and ends up in the hospital. Great job by a Walmart employee messing up a situation that would have been really easy to handle.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  59. Pre-Order by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Did they let people pre-order these things? I mean if you wanted one so much then why didn't you pre-order it months ago. I know when the 360 came out my friend pre-ordered it. Then on launch day he was actually out of the country. So I went and picked his up for him. There were like three people there because the GameStop only had pre-order consoles. But the Best Buy across the street had a huge line. I just don't get why you would want to stand in line.

    1. Re:Pre-Order by bilbravo · · Score: 1

      There are only limited numbers of pre-orders. Those people in line at Best Buy were unlucky enough to miss out on the pre-orders (back of the line), and might miss out on the non-pre-order units as well.

    2. Re:Pre-Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox 360's were available for pre-order, but only in ridiculous bundles priced up to 10k (one included a 42" Plasma in the bundle). And most people who pre-ordered didn't even get their boxes for several months because of their shortage, but they got everything else in the bundle (games, controllers, TV, etc). I'd say that's even worse, your friend was very lucky.

  60. Costco Website Down by jmtech · · Score: 1

    I have been waiting around waiting to see if the Costco.com was going to put up a PS3 bundle as rummored. Well they did and their site is completely unreachable as of this writting. If you can get Costco.com's main page they show the PS3 bundle as sold out. jm

  61. Sony = Treating customers like shit by unity100 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ps'es, Star wars galaxies (soe division), rootkit-installing cds, crappy consumer electronics support .. havent you people learned your lesson yet ?

    Now they are letting you fight over their products like roosters - pecking at each other in stores to get a limited supply shit - and thinking it is a good publicity.

    sony should be sued for creating such a chaos.

    1. Re:Sony = Treating customers like shit by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      Dude, just shut the hell up. Sony isn't responsible for the mayhem. They didn't create the chaos.

      That's like saying universities should be sued because fights break out during footballs games between rival schools. We should also sue alcohol companies every time someone gets drunk and decided to get in a brawl. And don't forget women! Women cause fights between men all the time, lets sue women because they are creating so much violence!

      If you excuse me I'm going to sue my mom because she created my brother, and he used to beat me up all the time when I was young.

    2. Re:Sony = Treating customers like shit by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Oh yea, they didnt ?

      They didnt start advertising and hyping the product 1-1.5 year earlier, and surprisingly for the n'th time in product launches, somehow failed to produce enough units to even supply half of the demand ? With all the marketing, planning, operations divisions full of million $ yearly wage employees ? AND despite the preorders ? Forecasts ?

      which is the value of n ? how come it always happen to be so that products never go near even the initial demand ?

      watch out, i wont take any 'they do not know how many units will be sold so that they are cautious' crap, since im from an industrial engineering background, i can assure you that especially a big manufacturer like sony can churn out just enough units to meet the initial surge and then supply all the upcoming demand with 'just in time' production methods without ever incurring a noticeable inventory.

    3. Re:Sony = Treating customers like shit by brkello · · Score: 1

      How does hyping a product make them responsible for this? If they had more, or could produce more, don't you think they would do that. Demand right now is high. When demand is high you get your product out there and sell it as quickly as technically feasable.

      For this particular launch, there was a real problem of having enough blue lasers. This slowed production causing the numbers we have today.

      Who gives a crap what your background is...you clearly have no common sense. If an article here is posted about how some kid shot someone after playing GTA, we are all up in arms about personal responsibility. It is the kids fault for commiting the crime. It is the parents faults for not watching after their children and allowing them access to weapons. But when Sony launches a console, suddenly it is all their fault for causing violence. Give me a break. The violence is caused by very stupid people and the blame should be squarely placed on their shoulders. Just because you have some personal hatred towards Sony doesn't mean you can shift what is right and wrong. There are plenty of legitimate issues with Sony that you can go after. THIS IS NOT ONE OF THEM. People need to take freaking responsibility for their actions. Sony is just selling a console. They are not forcing you to commit crimes. Got it?

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    4. Re:Sony = Treating customers like shit by unity100 · · Score: 1

      How does hyping a product make them responsible for this?

      its not hyping a product. it is hyping a product and very probably knowingly putting limited supply to stores many times over and over.

      If they had more, or could produce more, don't you think they would do that. Demand right now is high. When demand is high you get your product out there and sell it as quickly as technically feasable.

      No they are able to hand a ps3 to every kid in africa. Thats the kind of financial and manufacturing power they are. They are more than able to forecast what demand will be at what point and immediately meet it.

      You should give a crap about what my background is, since it is industrial engineering, it is a combination of production/management systems/operations, and exactly stuff like this was going to be what i did for earning a wage if i did not turn to IT.

      And with that background i am telling you again that sony is more than capable of handing out ps3s to anybody in united states, or russia, or china, if they set the mind to it. But they are not meeting the limited demand that surges in launch KNOWINGLY.

      why ? simple - publicity - "people are fighting each other over ps3 - this thing has to be something good" - this is what it is.

    5. Re:Sony = Treating customers like shit by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      No they are able to hand a ps3 to every kid in africa.

      If you actually believe this, then your "background" in industrial engineering has failed you. It's a well known fact that the PS3 had production problems with the blu-ray technology that limited the amount of units they could produce. You are obviously too biased to take two seconds to google it, so here's a link for you .

    6. Re:Sony = Treating customers like shit by unity100 · · Score: 1

      excuses are a prerequisite when you will fail to meet any client's demands. you cant just come up and outright say that 'there was a bigger client, we filled their order' or 'we decided to pull the SAME market gig just like everytime we did, so, masses, we are therefore producing very little'.

      EVEN if we accept that this time it was blue ray, what was it last time ? the time before that ?

    7. Re:Sony = Treating customers like shit by brkello · · Score: 1

      You don't use any logic. Their competitor, Nintendo, is launching at the same time. Now Nintendo can say they are selling more units. More units in more homes means more interest from game developers. More games means that more people will buy Nintendo products. Yes, I know some companies have used the trick of limiting supply to increase demand. But that just doesn't work in this competitive environment. You are arguing that Sony is using a strategy that is actually detrimental to thier company's ability to make profit. That and the article linked above talking about the issues. The problem is Sony is doing something cutting edge here. It is a lot more difficult to produce cutting edge components than producing something that is already in high supply (like what Nintendo is doing). Yes, they are being more innovative, but the components used to make them are common and easily produced/purchased along with their almost previous gen hardware specs.

      We aren't arguing about previous times. We are arguing about the PS3. So when you say "EVEN if we accept this time it was blue ray" you are admiting that you are wrong about the specific thing we are arguing about.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    8. Re:Sony = Treating customers like shit by unity100 · · Score: 1

      you are missing the point here. nintendo and sony are different companies.

      sony has a very long time behind it with branches in many sectors. and huge resources. its like general motors before they have seperated their divisions in order to be flexible.

      the were well able to put ps3s in high supply.

  62. Re:Who will win? Jackass! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    I don't know who will win, but I know a guy who lost! Well, he lost a PS3 chance, but is probably going to win a few 100 grand in a lawsuit.

    That, and likely immortality in the next Jackass movie! Truth is, no one made him run for one of those chairs except himself. If you can win a lawsuit based on your own stupid actions, then the first lawyer has finally made it to Heaven!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  63. $2000 waiting in line? Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've made $375 sitting at home by buying Nintendo stock a couple weeks before the launch. If only I'd bought it at the beginning of the year I'd have doubled my $5000 investment by now!

  64. Microsoft's Canadian response by ConfusedSelfHating · · Score: 1

    I haven't been able to see packages like this in the U.S., but I have heard about a $100 rebate in one of the smaller chains in the U.S. I can't find a link right now.

    XBox 360 Premium console, Ghost Recon:Advanced Warfighter, Xbox Live Arcade: Unplugged, Ridge Racer 6 and Gears of War for $499.99 CAN at Future Shop. $499.99 CAN is the launch price of the Xbox 360 premium console. Best Buy in Canada is offering the same deal without Ridge Racer 6. Oddly Future Shop is owned by Best Buy.

    I'm hoping that the Nintendo Wii doesn't do as well as predicted at launch. Nintendo has some room to cut prices. I hope there is a price war all around.

  65. Re:The buyers concern me, not the greedy sellers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, an $89,000,000 bid might not be legit. You think so, doctor?

  66. And PS3 Yahoo Email addresses.... by Tmack · · Score: 2, Informative
    are going for upwards of $700: See this example

    Though most have high bidders with 0 feedback, and are probably being shilled to look like a real PS3 by price...

    tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  67. No console comments for sure by WarDancer · · Score: 1

    As it seems everybody trying to get a PS3 right now is doing it to ebay it. So I'm guessing we won't be hearing any comments on the console itself before a few days for the bids to settle and the shipping delays. At first I felt sad that people were willing to stay in line for a console. But seeing the reports on how everybody is doing it to sell them, now I'm just sad to know there are so many people ready to buy it at inflate prices.

    It's not like the PS3 will save the world or something, you're just going to be playing the same games as before with a little more graphics.

    1. Re:No console comments for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's online only and all thoses bundles are already sold out.

      They cannot deliver by mail or pickup in store is no more possible (at least at Montreal).

      As the Xbox launch day, it seems to be sold out as well ...

      So waiting for the Wii, at least there will be stock ...

  68. Editorial Comments by Pinky3 · · Score: 1

    Standing in line for someone else to make a little money is "ugliness," but standing in line to sell a PS3 on ebay to make a little money is praised as the natural behavior of any geek. Please!

  69. That explains it... by dkf · · Score: 1

    There was saturation advertising (every spot except for the small-ads) of the 360 in the Metro free newspaper this morning. I wondered why, and the PS3 and Wii releases explain it quite thoroughly...

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  70. I'll bet by Enry · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..the same people standing in line for a week to get a PS3 can't find the time to vote. If you did, good for you.

    1. Re:I'll bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I stood in line for 3 days, and I have already made a little over $4000. I wouldn't waste my time voting, since it doesn't matter who wins ... they will just do the opposite of what they promise any how.

    2. Re:I'll bet by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I stood in line for 3 days, and I have already made a little over $4000."

      Then you can point to the completed online auction(s) that have already been paid for with a credit card?

      If I were the sort to wait in line like that, I wouldn't consider myself to have made money until that money is in my hand (or at least bank account).

    3. Re:I'll bet by BumBiscuit · · Score: 1
      ..the same people standing in line for a week to get a PS3 can't find the time to vote. If you did, good for you.
      People with such poor common sense and impulse control probably shouldn't be voting anyway.
      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  71. Ahhhhhhh - PS3! by HedRat · · Score: 2, Funny

    PS3 - plan on spending a lot less time masturbating!

    1. Re:Ahhhhhhh - PS3! by keithpreston · · Score: 1

      If the graphics are that much better, wouldn't it be the opposite?

  72. Sony is Stupid !!! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    You know, Sony is stupid!

    Okay, you already know that. Let's discuss where they're stupid today.

    Sony is stupid today for selling PS3 at a significant (>$200) loss per console to people willing to pay more to have it first. Sony could have priced at cost, reverse-auctioned, or otherwise collected far more from early console sales, and likely had less fighting over them, by a more market-aware selling campaign for say the first 1M units. Instead they leave it all on the table -- in this case the auction table at eBay. Has this really gained them equivalent goodwill in return?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  73. Re:More numbers - Truth in Numbers by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    IThe WalMart in my city received all of 6 PS3s.

    Actually it received 106. The first 100 went to managers, employees, concubines, lifetime friends, and anyone else with an In. The whole reason that there were 6 left over is that most WalMart employees can't afford a PS3 on their salaries.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  74. Few reasons by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) PC gaming is expensive. As expensive as $600 sounds for a console, consider that once you've spent it, that's it for hardware. You never need to buy any upgrades save for things like more controllers and such. However with a computer, it's a continuous thing. Graphics cards move at a frantic pace. I bought a $300 graphics card about a year ago, and I'm looking at doing the same thing again now that the DirectX 10 cards are rolling out.

    2) It's more effort. A console game just works. It has to, there's only one platform for it to run on. Put in disc, game runs. Not so for PC games. It's usually like that, but not always. Sometimes it's more like install game, game doesn't run, apply patch, game runs with problems, update graphics drivers, now game runs.

    3) Consoles are better designed for multiplayer in one room. PCs count on there being a single operator so most games are designed with that in mind. Their multiplayer is done such that you connect to other PCs and each gamer has their own system. Consoles are designed for multiple controllers to be played around a TV, so many multiplayer games have provisions for multiple operators to use a single unit. Nice if you have a few friends over and you all want to play.

    4) Exclusive games. In part due to the greater sales and in part due to pressure from the console makers, game companies will sign exclusive deals. Means if you want to play that game, you are doing so on that console. No ports to other consoles or to the PC.

    Personally, I'm a PC gamer. I'd own a high end PC anyways and I find that more of the games that I like are PC only, but I can see why one would own a console.

  75. This is consumer America by blueZ3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    where thinking about the longer-term consequences of your actions isn't just overlooked, it's actively ignored. If you mention "opportunity cost" to the average credit card user out there, you're going to get a look of ignorance that's almost bovine in its nescience.

    Funny thing is, I used to be in pretty much that same frame of mind until I got married. I just never thought more than a couple of months ahead... probably mostly because I got in the habit of living paycheck-to-paycheck when I was in the Army (talk about low pay!) and while I was a college student, I was just living month-to-month on my GI Bill money. My wife (who is brilliant and a 4.0 math major) started pointing out all the things that we were doing that involved long-term tradeoffs and I was totally amazed at the amount of money we were spending on "unnecessaries." Working together, we were able to get ahead of the curve and eventually, we bought both our cars for cash and our house with a nice down payment. We haven't paid interest on a credit card in about five years, and the last time I was out of work, we had enough cash to tide us over. We still spend money on "fun" stuff, but we're always careful to think about the tradeoffs so that we're making informed decisions.

    The moral of my story: if you're not a financial genius, marry someone who is :-)

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:This is consumer America by MS-06FZ · · Score: 5, Funny
      The moral of my story: if you're not a financial genius, marry someone who is :-)


      Certainly sounds better than my plan, of marrying a lusciously sexy girl with big tits...
      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    2. Re:This is consumer America by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      The moral of my story: if you're not a financial genius, marry someone who is :-)

      No truer words have been spoken on /.

    3. Re:This is consumer America by lazyl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      we bought both our cars for cash

      Making large purchases for cash is not correct. You can invest that cash for at least 8% while most dealerships offer financing at less than 5%. Plus, over the term of the loan you'll be paying down the principal which lowers the overall interest. You lost a fair chunk of change paying with cash instead of investing.

      Thinking long term doesn't mean avoiding debt. Often taking out a loan is the best way to maximize long term income. I don't mean to embarras you; just trying to help out. Financial planning can be somewhat complicated which is why people can make careers out of it.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    4. Re:This is consumer America by maynard · · Score: 1

      Just so we're clear, a 5% loan for a car is lower than Fed Funds, which is currently 5.25%. Right now Prime is hovering around 8.25%. Thus, for a car financing entity to lend money at 5% must be a loss leader. These car financing and sales institutions make their money back somehow - where would that be? In the price of that car. Thus, one does not save money by taking out a larger (than necessary) loan with a perceived lower interest rate, regardless of whether one invests cash on hand that might have been used to buy a different (lower margin reflected in sticker price) car.

      And then there is the issue of borrowing money in order to invest it elsewhere at a presumed profit. Multi-billion dollar hedge funds might be able to successfully pull off tricks like that and turn a sustained profit - but not you and me. You simply trade significant risk for a very slim potential profit.

      Seems like a bad plan to me. JMO though.

    5. Re:This is consumer America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking chances with complex financial choices only makes sense if you are in the business. Student loans, car loans, mortgage, private schools for your kids, these add up to complex payment plans. Over 80% of Americans aren't saving enough for retirement according to Frontline/PBS http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/retirement / . They are making payments for cars instead.

      Stop looking for ways to not pay now. If you can't pay for it now, you shouldn't get it now. Simple?

    6. Re:This is consumer America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you're going to get a look of ignorance that's almost bovine in its nescience

      I don't know what you're talking about, but I feel like a cow that knows nothing.
    7. Re:This is consumer America by lazyl · · Score: 1

      Right now Prime is hovering around 8.25%

      Prime here in Canada is currently 6%. Not really important to the discussion; just fyi to put the 5% in better context.

      Thus, for a car financing entity to lend money at 5% must be a loss leader.

      It is. The factory (not the dealer) does the financing and figures it into the cost they charge the dealer. Kind of a scam actually because the buyer can't negotiate a better price in lieu of the cheap financing. Maybe you don't have a similar situation down south. Keep in mind this is only for new cars.

      And then there is the issue of borrowing money in order to invest it elsewhere at a presumed profit. Multi-billion dollar hedge funds might be able to successfully pull off tricks like that and turn a sustained profit - but not you and me.

      30K invested over 5 years in the proper array of mutual funds and bonds should easily return better then prime with minimal risk. Plus, you shouldn't be cashing it out even after the loan is paid off anyway so if it fluctuates a bit that's ok. You keep it invested and use it as collateral for future loans.

      So even if you can't get special low factory financing, if you have 30K in investments then you can sign them as guaranteed collateral and the bank should give you, if not prime then extremely close to it (most banks here will give prime for a loan secured with investments).

      You simply trade significant risk for a very slim potential profit.

      You think it's slim? Let me give you some numbers then. If prime is 8.25 then you should be able to at least get a rate of 8.5% on a fully secured loan (secured with your 30k investments). At 8.5% over five years you will pay $6930 in total interest. Now lets assume that your investments do poorly and return only 8.5% (the same as your loan). 30K over five years at 8.5% turns into $45110. Subtract the $6930 and your still up $8180. I don't consider 8k slim.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    8. Re:This is consumer America by bnenning · · Score: 1

      If you mention "opportunity cost" to the average credit card user out there, you're going to get a look of ignorance that's almost bovine in its nescience.

      Despite having to look up "nescience", this is the best sentence I've read all week.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    9. Re:This is consumer America by maynard · · Score: 1

      You think it's slim? Let me give you some numbers then. If prime is 8.25 then you should be able to at least get a rate of 8.5% on a fully secured loan (secured with your 30k investments). At 8.5% over five years you will pay $6930 in total interest. Now lets assume that your investments do poorly and return only 8.5% (the same as your loan). 30K over five years at 8.5% turns into $45110. Subtract the $6930 and your still up $8180. I don't consider 8k slim.

      You ignore taxes on that $15,110. Further, you are taking on market risk on debt that you may not be able to service. Get into a cash flow squeeze and - *boom!* - you're broke. Also, what happens if the market crashes? Suppose that collateral diminishes and the bank calls your loan? *Boom!* You're broke.

      Hey, I'll borrow money to invest in an income generating asset. I did that with a two-fam five years ago. That's no different from a business borrowing to finance a plant retool on expected revenue or profit gains. But to borrow money in order to reinvest - well, it's your money. Good luck.

    10. Re:This is consumer America by Raenex · · Score: 1
      The moral of my story: if you're not a financial genius, marry someone who is :-)

      Ugh. It really doesn't take a financial genius or a math major to live within your means. It's just common sense budgeting. You get paid X amount a month. You spend Y amount a month. Want to save money? Y < X. It amazes me that people can graduate high school and not understand basic finances.

    11. Re:This is consumer America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's use your numbers then to show why taking out the loan is still stupid. Use your $30,000 in cash to pay for the car. Using your figures of a loan at 8.5% on a $30,000 car you're paying $7386 a year. Instead of just throwing that money out the window like you do in your example, a smart person would reinvest that money (since they were just going to be spending it on a car anyway). So the first year you invest $7386 and earn an 8.5% return to get $8013.81. Then you invest an additional $7386 for a total of $15399.81. The breakdown is this....

      Year One - $7,386 + interest = $8,013
      Year Two - $15,399.81 + interest = $16,708.79
      Year Three - $24,094.79 + interest = $26,142.85
      Year Four - $33,528.85 + interest = $36,378.85
      Year Five - $43,764.80 + interest = $47,484.81

      That's a net profit of $17,484.81 in the same time frame as your net profit of $8000. I think I'll continue paying cash, thanks.

      DISCLAIMER: Yes, it's simplified. There are scenarios where paying on credit can come out better than paying cash, but that requires that your return is greater than the interest on the loan, and let's face it, that is the anomaly, not the norm.

    12. Re:This is consumer America by lazyl · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting people go take out big loans just to re-invest (although an experienced investment banker probably does that all the time with his own money). I'm talking about a situation where you have 30k in cash already and you invest it and then take a 30K loan out against it to buy a car instead of dropping 30k on the car up front. The difference is that if you have 30k cash that you can afford to part with right now then you're not going to go broke if you lose some of it in market fluctuations. It just means having to pay your car loan from your regular income like everybody else instead of your investment income.

      I don't mean to sound condescending but you sound like one of these people that avoids investing because perhaps you don't know much about it and you have an irrational fear of the next 'big market crash'. I would recommend taking off the tinfoil hat. Or at least admit that your wearing it instead of trying to convince me that I'm make poor financial decisions.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    13. Re:This is consumer America by maynard · · Score: 1

      The difference is that if you have 30k cash that you can afford to part with right now then you're not going to go broke if you lose some of it in market fluctuations. It just means having to pay your car loan from your regular income like everybody else instead of your investment income.

      Right. Instead, it means you run the risk of losing that $30K investment if the bank calls your loan. This could be due to having missed a loan payment or market losses of your investment that break whatever collateral terms you have for the loan. You risk this while the primary asset - the car - depreciates over time. That is, the collateral soon becomes worth more than the asset (car) itself. And if you miss a payment - *boom!* - the bank wants its collateral. Not the car, but your $30K investment. Have you ever been laid off?

      Frankly, I'd rather take out a standard car loan, with the car as collateral, than twist my finances up like you suggest. But - hey - call me a tinfoil hatter if you like. We clearly have different standards for acceptable risk.

    14. Re:This is consumer America by maynard · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting people go take out big loans just to re-invest ... I'm talking about a situation where you have 30k in cash already and you invest it and then take a 30K loan out against it to buy a car instead of dropping 30k on the car up front.

      One more point: money is fungible. It makes no difference whether you take a loan out to buy something while investing the same amount of cash on hand elsewhere vs. simply borrowing the money to invest.

    15. Re:This is consumer America by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 1

      You're paying down the principal on the loan to lower the future interest, but you're not deducting that from the invested amount. The same effect can be gained in this case by buying the car outright for cash and putting the monthly loan payment amount into your investment.

    16. Re:This is consumer America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      This is a throwaway comment, I know, but that is the funniest and most appropriate response I have read on /. in a long time. Kudos.

      ++Om

    17. Re:This is consumer America by ChristopherEddie · · Score: 1

      I like your moral, though here is a valuable lesson in finance: Borrowed money is borrowed time. That one sentence has made more men rich than anyone can imagine. Think about it. Apply it.

    18. Re:This is consumer America by lazyl · · Score: 1

      You're paying down the principal on the loan to lower the future interest, but you're not deducting that from the invested amount

      That's why you make more money this way. Go back in this thread a look at the numerical example I gave.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    19. Re:This is consumer America by lazyl · · Score: 1

      If you're in danger of missing some loan payments then you just sell off some investments; that's no problem. Or if you really don't want to sign the investments as collateral then don't; just get a normal car loan with the car as collateral. Your rate won't be as good but you'll be in the same position as everyone else who loses their job with mortgage and car payments to make. If you manage your finances properly you should have enough cash on hand to survive for a few months (making all your payments) while you look for another job, plus you'll have the investments to sell to boost those cash reserves.

      Frankly, I'd rather take out a standard car loan, with the car as collateral, than twist my finances up like you suggest.

      I think you're losing the focus of the discussion. I never said don't use the car as collateral, I said don't pay with cash. And the finances aren't 'twisted'; this is a very standard practice.

      The risk is very low. The only case where you would end up worse off is in the event of the "next big market crash". I'm glad you don't deny wearing the tinfoil hat. Call any financial planner in the phone book and they'll recommend doing exactly what I suggest. The only time you might not is if you don't trust your regular income to support your loan payments, either because it is too small or unusually unstable.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    20. Re:This is consumer America by lazyl · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting people go take out big loans just to re-invest ... I'm talking about a situation where you have 30k in cash already and you invest it and then take a 30K loan out against it to buy a car instead of dropping 30k on the car up front.

      One more point: money is fungible. It makes no difference whether you take a loan out to buy something while investing the same amount of cash on hand elsewhere vs. simply borrowing the money to invest.


      You lose a fair bit of respect in this discussion when you post a reply that ignores half of my comment:

      I'm talking about a situation where you have 30k in cash already and you invest it and then take a 30K loan out against it to buy a car instead of dropping 30k on the car up front. The difference is that if you have 30k cash that you can afford to part with right now then you're not going to go broke if you lose some of it in market fluctuations.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    21. Re:This is consumer America by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pointing out the flaw in your argument. Your interest income is only higher than the interest you pay on the loan because you are putting additional money in by paying the monthly loan payments. In our example where the loan interest and investment interest are the same, if you were to simply invest the monthly loan payments, you would have the same profit as your plan. Let's say a loan of $10,000 and 1% interest each month to be simple, with payments of $250/month on the loan, with a matching investment of $10,000 at the same rate, vs simply depositing $250/month into an investment at the 1% per month.

      Month 0: You owe $10,000 on the loan, and have $10,000 in your investment. I haven't borrowed money or invested, we are both even at this point.
      Month 1: You have accrued $100 interest on both the loan and your investment, and then paid a $250 payment towards your loan. You now owe $9,850 on your loan, and your investment is worth $10,100. The only increase in value at this point is the $250 you invested. At the same time, I put $250 into my investment.
      Month 2: Your loan accrues $98.50 interest, and you pay $250 again, putting the loan balance at $9698.50. Your investment accrues $101, raising it to $10,201. The total increased value is now $502.50, but you added $500 of your own money, so your interest income is $2.50. Meanwhile, I earn $2.50 interest on my investment and add another $250. Now I too have a positive balance of $502.50, and interest earned of $2.50. They are the same. You can expand this as far as you want.

      Of course, this doesn't take into account the availability of the investment at the same rate (you may have to lock in to a CD in order to get a comparable rate, etc.), but essentially the reason you are making ANY money on this proposition is from your recurring investment, which is camoflauged as the monthly payment on your loan.

    22. Re:This is consumer America by lazyl · · Score: 1

      You are correct. It was a bad example for me to use. However if the investment interest is higher then the loan interest, which it always is if you invest properly (hint: not a CD), then you will make more money my way. Plus you have the added benifit of a large investment balance from the start that you can sell in the event that you need emergency cash.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    23. Re:This is consumer America by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Using a car as an investment example is a poor choice. Unless, you take that 30k and put it in the bank and lease a car. In that way, you'll have the capital _and_ you get to drive a new car every 4 years.

      Paying for a car outright if you have the money depends on how much more you have. If you have 75k in the bank, then buying the car outright might be a good idea. If you only have 30k, then buying the car outright is a terrible decision.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    24. Re:This is consumer America by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      American's need to turn off the TV, turn down the radio, and stop succumbing to marketing. The best way to become financially stable is to STOP KEEPING UP WITH THE JONESES.

      I own 2 cars one of them is a $30k BMW and the other is a $1200 Ford Aspire. Guess which one I take to work every day? The Ford Aspire that get's 50MPG or the 330Ci that gets 22MPG? Obviously, I enjoy driving the Bimmer much more, but I have "discipline", and I drive the Ford Aspire because it makes financial sense. I paid $1200 cash for a car that will pay for itself within 1 year (I save $100/month in gas because I commute 50 miles a day). Furthermore, my car insurance went down (multi-car discount) and my gasoline expenses went down ($30/month for fuel, versus $80). To top it all off, the BMW doesn't DEPRECIATE because it sits in the garage all day (until the weekend rolls around... ;).

      In a nutshell, by putting my pride aside and driving a simple little car (sans Leather, great Handling, great looks, etc), I will actually MAKE MONEY by spending money wisely.

      The same thing applies to credit. Do you need a 36" LCD flatpanel TV for $2000? Or could you have waited 18 months to buy it for $300 (like you can this weekend). You'll end up paying $2600 for a $2000 toy if you use credit. A $2000 toy that will be worth less than $300 in 18 months.

      American's need to get over the whole "Gotta have it now" and "Keeping up with Jonses" mindset if they want to be financially stable. Now, for our country as a whole, I'd recommend spend, spend, spend - it's good for the economy.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    25. Re:This is consumer America by Harik · · Score: 1

      If you read the G-GP post, someone who pays cash for a car like that is probably _NOT_ just stuffing the money in his mattress in the meantime. A monthly payment into a compound-interest earning investment can generate you 20k within 5-6 years trivially.

      As a quick example. If I buy a 20k car now, 5 years at 5% APR, my monthly payment will be 377.42.
      If I buy a 20k car 5 years from now and invest at 5% APR, my monthly payment will be 294.09. That takes 5 grand off the price of the car. You only have to do it once with a beater for 5 years and you can have nice cars the rest of your life.

      _AND_ I can skip payments if I'm having problems WITHOUT losing my transportation.

      If I buy a used car, they only run 10-12k for a 2-3 year old off-lease in very good condition. Good luck getting 5% financing
      on a 3 year old car.

  76. WiiSeeker by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

    Checked this morning; the following retailers within three miles around me are expecting the following amount of Wiis:

    • Toys R' Us: 84
    • Wal-Mart: 53
    • Best Buy: 53
    • Target: 60
    • Meijer: Unknown (but they are selling it)
    • Total: 250

    For comparison, they had this many PS3s:

    • Toys R' Us: Unknown
    • Wal-Mart: 4-14
    • Circuit City: 6-18
    • Best Buy: 26-60
    • Target: 5-15
    • Meijer: Unknown
    • Total: 41-107

    Part of me wonders how many casual shoppers (read: moms) are going to walk in looking for a PS3 and walk out with a Wii.

  77. Why by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    Why do they always release the consoles around a month before Christmas? Why wouldn't they do it at least 3 months before Christmas allowing for more time to get more units on the market?

  78. Re:The buyers concern me, not the greedy sellers.. by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    It's okay, our ps3 line (Sam's Club in ohio) just started last night on the 16th. It's cold here so i feel sorry for em. There were eight when i left the store and a tent. Actually maybe the line started earlier and I didn't notice.

    The real reason I feel sorry for em is because we got 1-5 PS3's according to a manager. We were supposed to get 5 but him throwing out the 1-5 number is somewhat scary. It pretty much means we got one unit and we may get the other 4 tomorrow.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  79. The children by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod! Don't you see that for every greedy b-----d who scalps a PS3, some poor child will wake up Christmas morning and find that Santa didn't give him the console he asked for, and to add insult to injury Bill Gatesaclaus left him an XBOX 360 instead? Will someone please think of the children?

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  80. But this is slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would say that you thought about the children, but then, this is slashdot. Children require relationship, you know.

  81. OT: on the subject of buying cars by maynard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know a guy who will walk onto a lot carrying a bank check in the amount he believes a car is worth (after conducting research), walk up to a car sitting on the lot, point to it, and waves the check in front of the salesman. He tries to time this for end of year sales, so he'll pick up the current model just as the lot is transitioning to next years model.

    By doing this he saves interest on the car loan; he avoids buying extra junk to be installed, and drives the exact car he pointed to off the lot right then and there. Then he'll drive that car into the ground over the next decade or so until it's worthless. During that time he saves for the next car - just like he was paying for a car loan - except without the interest.

    He's not rich, he doesn't make a pile of money - he just plans ahead. And it saves him a bundle of money.

    1. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He's an idiot. First off to the dealer cash, cheque or finance makes no difference to them. Secondly car dealers offer some insanely low interest rates (like 0%). If he gets a 0% loan and buys a no load money market fund with his cheque and have his monthly payements transferred out of the fund to pay the loan. He'll pay off the car and have money left.

      By paying cash he loses roughly 25% of it just by signing the deal. That is not wise money management.

      This can work even better by leasing the car. Paying cash for a new car is brain dead stupid.

    2. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      *shrug*

      Car Loan Interest Savings at 2-3% APR This bank is selling 5 year CDs at 8.50%, with a $25,000 payment.

      Is your friend going to end up paying over an 8.50% APR? He shouldn't, not with reputable companies like Honda & Ford offering 0-2% financing.

      Buying all of your assets "cash" is nothing to be proud of; frankly, it is only one step less irresponsible than using credit recklessly. Once you total up all the money you would have made (saved) by utilizing safe banking/investing, you'll be shocked.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    3. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Edit: Less than sign ate my post. Here's a repost:

      *shrug*

      Car Loan Interest Savings at 2-3% APR (is less than) Potential Investment Return at 6-7% APR, which is a fairly easy to get return

      Having Extra Junk Installed != Function of purchasing a Car in cash

      To be honest, I look at people who purchase things like cars & homes 100% cash as people who have no idea how money works.

      There's nothing worse that you could do then lock up all of your moola into depreciating assets. These days, saving for retirment does NOT mean stashing a ton of cash into a checking account. That'll never get you anywhere, unless you're a drug dealer, or are high income with low expenses.

      Any time you could potentially buy something on credit, you should consider the relative advantage of taking the money you would have spent, cash, and investing it on some sort of safe financial instrument. This bank is selling 5 year CDs at 8.50%, with a $25,000 payment.

      Is your friend going to end up paying over an 8.50% APR? He shouldn't, not with reputable companies like Honda & Ford offering 0-2% financing.

      Buying all of your assets "cash" is nothing to be proud of; frankly, it is only one step less irresponsible than using credit recklessly. Once you total up all the money you would have made (saved) by utilizing safe banking/investing, you'll be shocked.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    4. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by maynard · · Score: 1

      First off to the dealer cash, cheque or finance makes no difference to them.

      It makes a huge difference if the dealer is financing the loan. They get all that interest then.

      Secondly car dealers offer some insanely low interest rates (like 0%).

      Around here that's only true for American made cars, and only specific models. Further, the lower interest rates are offset by higher car prices. They don't really give you free money!

      But if you want to buy a decent imported car, there are no financing deals. Your best deal is to negotiate (haggle) and then pay upfront.

    5. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by nasch · · Score: 1

      That's sound advice if one of two things is true. Either nothing unexpected and expensive is going to happen to you, or the investment you make with the money you could have used for the purchase is at least as liquid as the item you purchase. If you buy your car with little money down and put your cash in something you can't withdraw it from quickly, then if something comes up (funeral expenses, medical expenses, lawsuit, unemployment, whatever) you have no money. If you buy the car with cash, you can at least sell the car quickly. OTOH, if you invest in something liquid, you can pull your money back out to deal with your emergency and maybe keep the car too. Financial security is more than just ending up with the greatest amount of wealth at the time of retirement. I would rather have no debt and no investments (other than the house I live in and a retirement account) than lots of debt (mortgage, car loan, student loans) and lots of money invested, even if it means I have less money in the end. But maybe that's just me.

    6. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by maynard · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear: You are recommending that buyers should take out a loan in order to invest the money elsewhere at a profit, for example a five year term bank CD. Do I understand that correctly?

    7. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Buying all of your assets "cash" is nothing to be proud of; frankly, it is only one step less irresponsible than using credit recklessly.

      I agree with you to a point. The problem is that many(most?) people buy too much car on credit that they can't really afford. For this type of person it would've made more sense to save up some cash and buy a 5k car to get them around rather than make payments that they can barely afford for 5-7(for a fn' car!) years. Also, the type of financing you're talking about is generally for a *new* car, which is a complete rip off for so many other reasons. So now the person who is buying this car is buying a car on credit that is most likely way overpriced that they can barely afford.

    8. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by ejp1082 · · Score: 1

      Huh? First of all dealers love financing, because to them interest is just free money. They make a lot less off people who pay in cash.

      Paying any interest at all on a car is f*cking stupid, because unlike a house a car depreciates in value. Cars aren't an investment.

      If you take out a loan for a car (or lease one), not only will you spend $20,000 on a car you'll only get to re-sell for less than half that in a few years time, you'll be paying the dealer an *extra* few grand in interest... for what, exactly? And don't believe 0% interest rates. They always screw you in the fine print.

      If you want to get even smarter, you'd always buy used cars that are 3-4 years old. By then they've already lost most of their value and you can re-sell it down the road for much closer to what you paid for it.

    9. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by maynard · · Score: 1

      He doesn't buy used because he doesn't want to risk taking home a lemon. He doesn't think he has enough experience with automobile innards to make an informed choice on the used market. I've never bought a new car, however, for exactly that reason (not that I'm knowledgeable about cars either). But your post is spot on. These guys borrowing money in order to re-invest are in for one rude awakening some day...

    10. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      You raise some good points but consider that you can generally withdraw your money from a CD early with a penalty. I don't think the penalty would be as great as what you would lose by selling your car as fast as possible.

      I've been trying to do some financial planning and I'm struggling with exactly what you said. Is it better to have high debt and high cash or just a little cash and no debt? At this point in my life (very low net worth) I think the best thing is the former. Like you said, there is a lot of uncertainty. If I lose my job, I would like to be able to service my debt and pay rent, etc for a few months rather than have no debt but be unable to pay my rent.

      Once I have a few months of salary saved up I think switching to your strategy might be better.

    11. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by planetmn · · Score: 1

      While it makes sense to calculate the true cost and look at what your opportunity costs are before paying cash for a car or taking a loan, there are some problems with your scenario described.

      This bank is selling 5 year CDs at 8.50%, with a $25,000 payment.
      That bank is not located in the United States. That bank is not subject to US laws. That bank is not FDIC insured. That CD is not liquid at all. From the website you linked to:
      For the investor who is looking for an alternative to the low rates offered by most domestic banks, is looking for a guaranteed rate of return to avoid market fluctuations, and is willing to relinquish the option to redeem their investment prior to maturity in exchange for a higher yield, Millennium Bank offers Premium Certificates of Deposit.
      Now it doesn't talk about penalties for cashing in early, but use of the term "relinquish" would imply that it is not possible to do, period. So if you are willing to lock up that much money for that long with no liquidity, then it's an option, but most people don't have that option.

      Is your friend going to end up paying over an 8.50% APR? He shouldn't, not with reputable companies like Honda & Ford offering 0-2% financing.
      Generally the low interest rates are in lieu of a cash rebate on the same vehicle. For instance, on an Escape I recently purchased the 0% financing was only offered if you forego the $2500 cash rebate. So there is a calculation that needs to be made, it simply isn't 0% is less than 5%.

      Buying all of your assets "cash" is nothing to be proud of; frankly, it is only one step less irresponsible than using credit recklessly. Once you total up all the money you would have made (saved) by utilizing safe banking/investing, you'll be shocked.

      Safe banking and investing earns you next to nothing. It earns you the prime rate, and generally a little less. Anything that isn't guarenteed, isn't safe investing. Now you can make better than that with smart investing. But this takes some knowledge and risk is involved. Most people can't invest their 401k's properly, and just look at the average day trader when that was hot, while some made some money over a short period of time, most lost over longer terms, because they didn't understand how the markets work.

      In summary, yes, it is always good to look at all of the options, look at your opportunity costs, and isn't good to be afraid of debt, when used properly. But there are always downsides to it as well.

      -dave

      --
      /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
    12. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      He's an idiot. First off to the dealer cash, cheque or finance makes no difference to them. Secondly car dealers offer some insanely low interest rates (like 0%).

      There's no such thing as a "no-interest" loan, especially from a car dealer. All they are doing is inflating the price of the vehicle and recovering their cost of financing up front.

      Next time you are offered a 0% loan, ask how much they will discount the purchase price if you pay cash up front. Even if you don't have the cash, you'll probably find that arranging your own financing with your bank or credit union will yield a lower payment after they discount the price.

      There are exceptions. A dealer offered to lower the price AND match a lower interest rate for a friend of mine, because he had an exemplary credit rating. The dealer said that his money lender required him to "bundle" high-risk borrowers with low-risk borrowers. By signing a loan with my friend, he could offer financing to other buyers with poor credit.

    13. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the bank reference, I didn't even realize that wasn't a US bank.

      Browsing around a bit more, I find that the average CD rate is ~5.5%, which is nothing special. I don't really use a lot of "conservative bank instruments", but I'm still guessing that he'll make slightly more by taking out an auto loan & purchasing a CD.

      I was mainly thinking in terms of superconservative person. Like, someone who buys a Toyota or Honda cash, and then buys a new one (cash) when the warranty runs out (sounds like what the GP poster was talking about).

      As to 0% APR, AFAIK, Toyota, Honda and Ford are not offering these as a contrast to cash back; that's something that GM was/is famous for, but it isn't what these three or doing.

      In terms of actually saving money, your far better off buying a used car. My Lexus is used, I bought it when it was 2 years old.

      In terms of actually investing money, your far better off with certain types of real estate, but the barriers to entry are high. When I say certain kinds, I generally mean rental properties that you can maintain with low overhead. I put every dime I make into my set of buildings, 3 or 4 flats throughout Chicago. I try to buy buildings that require a significant amount of cosmetic work with little to no serious structural issues, and then do 80-90% of the work myself.

      The virtue of rental housing is that rental rates are inversly proportional to interest rates. I can refinance down if the interest rates drop, and I can charge higher rates when the interest rates rise. Life is good on both ends of the spectrum.

      Beyond that, with a modest real estate market, you can make a ton of money. Given that anyone with decent income, low debt, and good credit can get a good rate with 20%, you get a 5:1 margin rate.

      Even if the market is appreciating at a low 5%, the 5:1 margin rate means you're turning 25% APR on your downpayment, and if you're lucky, you'll be making a small payment monthly on rental income.

      It's a lot of work, but its worth it.

      Just my 2 cents. Again, sorry about the CD advise; this is not stuff I'm familar with, and you really should't be taking investment advice from Slashdot. More likely you should use Slashdot posts like this one to evaluate your options.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    14. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the GP is basically talking about leverage. It's great when it works and really bad when it doesn't. Taking all the money (by financing as much of the car as possible) and investing it is great until something unexpected happens like losing your job or your investment tanks, leaving you with a high car payment and no way to pay for it.

      It also requires extreme discipline, which is pretty clear very few people have.

      I'm in the camp that cars are one of those things you should always try to own. When everything goes to shit, you don't want to also be losing your source of transportation.

    15. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by ejp1082 · · Score: 1

      I'm the same way (car idiot), but I do believe that most used cars these days, if you buy em from the dealer, come with the same warranty as a new car (3 year/36,000 mile), though it might depend a bit on the dealer. Some will even put on new brakes and tires before re-selling it. At least that's what mine came with, and having that certainly lowers the risk of getting hit with a big bill from owning the car.

    16. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by maynard · · Score: 1

      The virtue of rental housing is that rental rates are inversly proportional to interest rates. I can refinance down if the interest rates drop, and I can charge higher rates when the interest rates rise. Life is good on both ends of the spectrum.

      I own a two-fam near Harvard University. So, when it comes to borrowing for an income generating asset, especially one that tends to appreciate at or above inflation - I'm with you. But that's a different game from borrowing and investing those funds in a financial asset to offset interest payments elsewhere on a depreciating asset. Especially when cash is available for the primary purchase.

      And yeah, just hold those 4plexes past this housing downturn and you'll be golden. Good strategy IMO...

    17. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by maynard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I understand that. I just wanted him to say it directly. Leverage is great when used to buy an income generating asset with greater cash flow than operating costs plus debt servicing payments. The type of leverage these guys recommend is - IMO - quite risky, however.

    18. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Anytime you use leverage it's risky :)

      If you want to get scared about leverage, check out futures trading sometime :D

    19. Re:OT: on the subject of buying cars by ChristopherEddie · · Score: 1

      To clarify, warranties are totally dependent on the particular dealer selling the car. Some buy warranties from third-parties to include with each vehicle, others offer it at the point-of-sale, and others sell their cars as-is. Most independent dealers that are selling used cars within 5 years old will sell them with a warranty or offer one. And you can even go the extra mile and buy a bumper-to-bumper warranty. I haven't looked into pricing/savings for consumers yet, but... I'd say its not worth it. Yeah, enough rambling.

  82. Not "customers" in general... by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1
    What amazes me, is how much complaining and whining I heard from people when Sony revealed the prices of the Playstation 3 systems. Customers are obviously willing to pay $2,000 for a unit.


    No, "customers" are not willing to pay $2000 per unit - but in the present circumstances, where availability of the system is poor, a select few idiots are willing to pay $2000 per unit.
    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    1. Re:Not "customers" in general... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yes, "customers", a superset of "idiots".

      All the idiots are customers, just not necessarily the other way around.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  83. Hold the stores accountable. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Retailers should be held responsible for their disorganization and ineptitude. Any store that required a police presence should be forced to pay for those services and should be fined for causing a public disturbance. That's essentially what they've done.

    They should have either forced these people to go home or they should have kept things organized. When you've got a crowd of people with such misplaced priorities waiting so long it's inevitable there will be problems. If the store manager didn't have enough sense to prepare the responsibility for whatever problems ensue falls squarely on his shoulders. The tax payers certainly shouldn't be forced to pay to restore order at these stores.

    1. Re:Hold the stores accountable. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Any store that required a police presence should be forced to pay...

      They should have either forced these people to go home..."


      No, pick one. These are not the sort of people who would have been turned away easily ("Can I stand in line now? How about now? Is now OK?"), and the police would have needed to be involved one way or the other (the stores pay taxes as well).

      If these shennanigans happened after the store allowed the shantytowns to be set up and happened during store hours, you may have a case. But holding the property owner accountable for what happens after the store is closed up and everybody but the vagrants have gone home for the night? I see no reasonable expectation of the store looking out for the interests of these people then.

      Heck, with the possible exception of the Wal-Mart that decided to play musical chairs, I don't see how the simple act of allowing a person to occupy a particular space for a particular ammount of time automatically means that the grantor assumes responsibility for your well-being, any more than any other customer in the store.

      Or did you not notice the "This store is not responsible..." signs on most such large establishments when you walked in?

  84. Cool, but does it by Fengpost · · Score: 2, Funny

    come with Duke Nuke'em Forever?

    --
    The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity....Calvin
  85. Limits to my Sony whoredom by Borland · · Score: 1

    I'm a Sony whore turning cheap tricks to make my Final Fantasy come true; however, I can't make myself descend to the Craigslist level and debase myself for launch day.

    Wait few months and you'll be able to get it without humiliating yourself. Plus, if the console does break, there might be a chance in 7 hells you'll be able to get a replacement.

  86. New York wasn't the first North American PS3 by 00Dan · · Score: 1

    Article is wrong. They forgot about Atlantic Canada. We're -1hr from New York, our midnight was at 11:00pm in New York.

  87. Well we can't all get the PS3 by Leviance · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people "standing in line for the PS3" were really just waiting to be the first to get a Wii on Sunday.

    Or alternatively, how many will just stay in line the extra two days since they didn't get Sony's love machine.

    1. Re:Well we can't all get the PS3 by amrust · · Score: 1

      I was just wondering last night... why so many TV/news stories on all the PS3 Campers, and none about anyone camping out for the Wii? I guess that will probably be the talk this weekend, "Wii Campers".

      --
      VOTE!
  88. comped? by muftak · · Score: 1

    that isn't a word...

  89. Re:More numbers - Truth in Numbers by dolson · · Score: 1

    You were probably trying to be funny, but the truth is that the employees (at least the night crew who stock shelves) were not allowed to get one (not at this WalMart anyhow). I would expect the managers and higher-ups did get one if they wanted them though.

  90. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Retail Ebay PS3 Price: $3,300

    That is absolutely sickening to think that some idiot would spend $3,300 on a game system with no games. Not just one idiot, 37 bidding idiots. Wake up, its a video game system for fun. Try a computer, it is like less than half the price and plays better games over the internet, is only limited by the graphics card (which can be upgraded), and can be faster, better audio, etc. Seems to me, even if I was an avid PS fan I would still sell mine for that kind of money. Those people should be ashamed of them selves for being so dumb.

    Frankely I am backing the Microsoft XBOX cause in just about every way that matters to a gamer it is better. So it doesn't have blue-ray, big deal, HD-DVD is winning the war anyway. What happens if blue-ray fails? So it doesn't have built in wi-fi. Who wants to play games over a crappy wi-fi signal anyway. The playstation multiplayer and lack of downloadable content makes a LAN connection almost a must anyway. XBOX is cheaper, downloadable content, better multiplayer games (Halo 2, PSU, Gears of War, etc), downloadable demos and betas (Awaiting the Halo 3 beta in Spring 2007!!!), downloadable content from the video gam conventions, the live arcade games, XBOX Vision, HD-DVD Support, Zune, iPod support, streaming of music and video from local pcs, conenction to a Media Center computer to watch recorded TV shows, customizable skins and face plates, etc. The choice should be obvious.

    1. Re:OMG by blaster151 · · Score: 1

      I agree that that price is idiotic. Remember, though, that 37 bids doesn't necessarily constitute 37 bidders. Two or three idiots can easily bid themselves into a frantic bidding war. I wonder how many of these people are going to get ripped off.

  91. Is this serious, or just obscene? by Leviance · · Score: 1

    http://cgi.ebay.com/PS3-SONY-PLAYSTATION-3-PREMIUM -60GB-SYSTEM-CONSOLE_W0QQitemZ280044007577QQihZ018 QQcategoryZ62054QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem $14,000? No way this wasn't rigged somehow...10-1 the guy was upping his own sale price...

  92. Re:Who will win? Jackass! by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

    And no one forces you to run for the exit when someone yells "fire" in a crowded building...

  93. 2 Reasons by ppp · · Score: 1

    1. Insert disk, play game
    2. My hardware is sufficient

  94. IRS would care by sadler121 · · Score: 1

    The IRS would care about a transaction that was $89 million.

  95. IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... Just a wiley thought but, I wonder if the IRS has any say in the profits made by the eBay-ing of the PS3s. I hope these guys forget to pay the tax man, that would be sweet schodenfreud(sp?).

  96. Re:Who will win? Jackass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting to a chair to get a PS3 != Getting out the door to save your life

  97. Mail thiefs are hard to catch... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    about 4 weeks ago I received a first class letter from my grandmother postmarked 1990... yes you read that right... 17 years ago!

    It was opened and pillaged for the cash within.

    It was the first and last time my grandmother sent cash through the mail, of course now I'm old enough to have her visit my apartment.

    Aaany way.. they never caught the guy.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:Mail thiefs are hard to catch... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I once got $4 in cash in the mail from the Nielsen people. It was a "here's four bucks, please participate" thing.

  98. Metaphor a la Max Headroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the poor people living in the streets but still clinging to the TV sets ?

  99. Re:Who will win? Jackass! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    And no one forces you to run for the exit when someone yells "fire" in a crowded building...

    Especially not if the first person there is crushed to death by the crowd stampeding after them. I'll make the rational decision of which exit can I escape from before the fire gets me. Panic kills more than fires.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  100. Skip the line, buy a PC by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A PS3 costs around $600 for the good one, way more on eBay apparently. So why not just buy a full-on PC? Correct me if I'm wrong, but are there any highly-desired games exclusive to the PS3, that wouldn't be available as PC games? You can get similar controllers, etc. Power-wise, you can certainly have a system that rivals a PS3 for that money, plus it will do real email with a full-size keyboard, and all the other stuff a PC does.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Skip the line, buy a PC by toonworld · · Score: 1
      Since the PS3 will support Linux, the system will be able to do REAL e-mail as well.

      Personally I used to be on the side of PC games with reasonable hardware to play games. I upgraded my computer on several occasions each time spending close to 600 $USD. I am sick and tired of upgrading my computer just to be able to play the new game that demands just too much of computers. Take Battlefield 2142 for example. I checked the MINIMUM system requirements and my system barely meets them. Granted I haven't upgraded in awhile, but I'm not going to either.

      Also you may want to consider that when they code a game for a specific console, they already know exactly what hardware is inside the box, so it makes it easier for the programmers to make a stable game with a lot less bugs than you could think of. You don't need to update your video drivers every time you get a new game...

      I look at it this way: Pay 600 $USD now and your console is good for at least 5 years. Compare that to a PC where you will have to upgrade it at least once every 1.5 years and you can see that the cost is a lot greater than the PS3. Yup, screw PC, I'm moving to consoles now.

      --
      It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
    2. Re:Skip the line, buy a PC by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      MGS4.

      Virtua Fighter 5.

      Tekken 6.

      GTHD.

      Sure there's lots of sequels there, but seeing as how I'm just a plebian and couldn't make it to E3, I can't get excited about titles on a new system that I have had no experience with period.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    3. Re:Skip the line, buy a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first off, you by buying a pc you will not have a system that rivals a ps3 for the money(@600$). secondley, the ps3 isn't just a game console, it's a full fledged pc that calculates floating point at 2 terrabytes per second, that will blow the doors off of any pc you can build for 2000$. I'm waiting to buy my ps3, as their prices will most likely stay the same next year. I really want to buy a cell processor mainboard and build my own system, but i suspect they won't be out till sometime next year and i'm not about to fork out 20,000$ on an ibm system.

    4. Re:Skip the line, buy a PC by natx808 · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt you can build a PC gaming system for $600 that rivals the PS3's capabilities -- for one it won't have a blu ray player.

      $599 alone is worth the cost of the bluray player. The cheapest bluray player you can find for a PC is around $700. It is a no-brainer if you want next generation 1080p home movie viewing. I like to think the PS3's games capabilities are nice added bonus :) The PS3's VPU is a modified GeForce 7900GTX with only 256 MB (512 MB card is going for $450 on the market). Its common practice for console manufacturers to loose money on console sales, sony is loosing $240 per console on the PS3.

      you could use the same PC vs Console argument against the xbox360. but look at the xbox 360 -- it came out in december 2005 with triple core cpu not available for PCs. And the graphics chip it uses is nothing short of spectacular - 278.4GB/s memory bandwidth, unified shader, no performance hit for 4xfsaa, eDRAM, z-culling & tiling. it appears the already year-old xenos outperforms the PS3 GPU - more memory bandwidth and twice as many pixel pipes. From what i hear call of duty is much smoother on the xbox 360.

      i believe there will be a linux distro for PS3 and it has USB ports for keyboard and mouse.

      THe PS3's hard drive is upgradeable and personally I would go for the 20 Gig model and upgrade it yourself. The only thing you are loosing out is the wireless ethernet and memory card reader. I have a long ethernet cable and I have a usb memory card reader.

      PS) I am not a console fanboy :) I have a PC and use it for games more than my PS2. It would be nice to see thi

  101. The Talledega Craze by erwejo · · Score: 1

    Many people think that this madness was over the PS3, but really, this was the only place that you could get the Ricky Bobby movie early. That had to account for at least half the crowd. Right?

  102. Why the PS3 is worth $600.... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of PS3 hate here, and I don't understand why.

    Imagine I started to market a set-top PC:
    1. Near silent.
    2. Very sleak and svelt looking.
    3. Bluetooth/USB/Wifi/SD/Memory stick support.
    3. HDMI output, 1080p included.
    4. Fully supported PPC Linux, out-of-box; no messy kernel hacking!
    5. Blu-Ray support.

    Surely, such a thing would be an absolute bargain at $600. $600 is near the price for some barebone mini-itx systems, and the PS3 is vastly cooler looking (I mean, really, the case is nice!)

    As a side benefit, it apparently runs some games ;-).

    Not even looking at the launch title, but with the vague understand that at some point I'll be able to play a Final Fantasy, and maybe a metal gear solid, this seems like an incredible value to me.

    I just bought an 62" HDTV at a CompUSA that was going out of business for $1400. I've been very seriously thinking about a MythTV box to hook up to it, but I'll never be able to afford the box I want (HD playback, either HDDVD or blu-ray, wireless support, and a nice, near-silent form factor); and here comes along Sony, building something _superior_ to the box I would have designed, at literally less than 1/2 the price.

    Now, I'll be a little whiny that there isn't OpenGL support in Linux, yet; but I wouldn't be surprised to see Sony & YellowDog work out some sort of deal.

    For me, this slaughters the Xbox 360 & Wii. I don't know about you all, but I thought this was a site for nerds. Any of you out there running MythTV should be salivating. Any of you out there playing with XBMC should be salivating. This is hack-free, no modchip required, media center in a box with a blu-ray drive and Linux.

    What more could you possibly have asked for from Sony, other than greater launch day availability?

    Seriously; stop bitching about the price, and sit down and work out how much it would cost you for a MythTV box that even came close to this puppy. Dollars to donuts it would either be more expensive or far uglier, and this doesn't even require you to look at the value-add of the PS3/PS2/PS1 games.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  103. you said... by jftitan · · Score: 1

    Mark Cuban?

    --
    "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
  104. Re:More numbers - Truth in Numbers by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

    Probably not, if it's anything like the XBox 360 release.
    These stores, for the most part are trying to be show that they are fair to everyone involved so they closely monitor where these systems are going and whose getting them.
    The company I work for gives way a lot of electronics as promotions to our customers and as such, we spend between 10 -25K a month with Compusa to get this stuff. While not a huge amount in the big picture, that's a lot of money for one stores single customer, especially since we've had this relationship going on 5 years. We tried to get them to hold a 360 for us on release day, to use for one of our promotions and we were told no way. Even going up the chain of corporate did not do anything for us.
    Of course, one of these days this strategy is going to backfire on the stores. I would argue by not simply taking pre orders or other similar "fair" distribution system, they are encouraging people to line up outside their stores to increase the hype. When somebody gets hurt, as they already have, could they not try and make a claim against the store for promoting these unsafe conditions?

  105. want 60gb ps3? by Voicesinyourhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Email me voices101885@yahoo.com Have in hand and ready to ship.

  106. Re:Who will win? (Yay for Wal-Mart?) by Rhuken · · Score: 1

    I work at a Wal-Mart. I didn't work thursday night, but I was there to watch. We had been telling people all week that there was no official line, they could wait anywhere, but tickets for the midnight sale would be handed out at 10pm in layaway. Apparently, management changed their mind on Thursday and instead of doing something easy, like a day long raffle a nearby Wal-Mart decided to do, they decided to announce the location of where the tickets were to be handed out at 9:30pm over the intercom. We only had two of each kind of PS3, and we were giving out 8 rainchecks for future systems (rainchecks do not a guarantee make by the way).
    I have never seen anything like it beofre. Nearly all of the people in the store were waiting for the announcement, just standing at the heads of aisle waiting to run. It felt like something from a cheesy treasure hunt movie. I'd guess around 200 people waiting, and no one was buying anything at the registers. (Of course, what else do people do in retail stores when they're not really doing anything? Making a mess in the aisles for the associates to clean up, but I digress) At 9:30 when they announced the location in the shoes department, people ran from one side of the store to the other, pushing associates into clothing racks trying to be one of the first 12 when they knew full well they couldn't possibly be with that many people there. Once the peaceful line was formed in shoes, and by peaceful I mean ravenous and by line I mean mob trying to surge through the freight door to get a ticket, interns and management handed out the 12 tickets to grabby, yelling, pushing, nearly crowdsurfing shoppers. There were students, parents, fanboys, and their whole families and every one of their friends. Once the tickets were all handed out, they told everyone to go continue shopping or go home and dissapeared behind the freight doors as the the freight on pallets started being pulled out again.
    All in all, pretty rediculous. But I suppose that's the point. No matter how much bad press something receives, there's always going to be someone that's willing to test the reviews and overlook the shortcomings. This time there were 200 stampeding, writhing, yelling, pushing someones.
    I do, however, work this Saturday for the Wii release. We have 18 of those. I'm predicting a slightly smaller crowd, but who knows. Unfortunately I can't get one. 1: I work there and have to wait 24 hours. 2: I have no money, because I work at Wal-Mart. 3: (possibly the least important?) Little time between studying for school..... I'm sure at least one of those could be ignored.............

  107. Retail by TheTornOne · · Score: 1

    My store had 2 of each unit, and at 1st we had this whole plan set up for where the line would be held. but after this incident hit the news http://playstationteam.com/news/campers-at-ps3-lau nch-robbed-at-gunpoint.htm some campers at circuit city had been mugged on the news, we changed the line into a raffle.

  108. Good luck auctioning on eBay ... you'll need it. by BrianRoach · · Score: 1


    Just casually watching the eBay auctions for a few minutes shows that actually getting your money from your auction would be ... unlikely.

    Basically, there's a bunch of kids (Or just immature adults) that are bidding up every auction to beyond ridiculous. It's the same names over and over, a mixture of new accounts and obviously hijacked ones.

    Looking at "completed" auctions, I would say that about 1 out of every 10 has managed to get an actual buyer (slipped by the kids) and even then as a buyer ... I'd be skeptical that all the bids below me were legitimate.

    Basically ... buying or selling one today on eBay is a nightmare, I wouldn't want to be doing either (Not that I'll be buying one at any time on eBay ... I personally can wait until the first price drop next year ... if at all.

    - Roach

  109. You're a goddamn retard by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    Here's the minimum requirements for BF 2142: http://www.totalbf2142.com/page.php?do=sysreq.

    In case you're too lazy to read it, it's a P4 1.7, 512MB ram, 1.8GB hard drive space and a ATI Radeon 9500 or Nvidia GeForce 5800. The only possible gripe is the requirement of 128MB vRam and DX9.0, but any DX9.0 compatible card usually has 128MB vRam. I mean, I bought my system 2 years ago and it was already "old" then, and it's a P4 2.4 with 1GB of ram and an ATI Radeon 9800. When I bought it it was $400cdn (refurbished). Seriously, these requirements are not that high, and your entire argument is based on the fact they are.

    So, good idea spending $600 on a PS3 that is awkard to use for anything except for games, instead of paying much less for a new computer that can both play games and do development to replace your obvious 10-year old shit box.

    1. Re:You're a goddamn retard by toonworld · · Score: 1
      I said that my PC BARELY made the MINIMUM requirements. I have 1.8 Ghz, 1GB of RAM and a good ATI video card. If you read further down, you'd see:

      In order to play the game at the recommended resolution, detail and performance levels, your computer should match or exceed the following specifications:

      Operating System: Windows XP with latest service pack installed DirectX 9.0c February 2006 edition (included)

      CPU: 3.0 Ghz RAM: 1.5 Gb Video Card: 256Mb DirectX compliant video card, Pixel shader 2.0 and above.

      Hard Drive space: 1.8Gb of space is required to install the game

      Internet connection: 512Mb Cable/DSL connection

      Now since I said I had the MINIMUM requirements, that means I would have to lower the resolution, quality of graphics, details, etc just to be able to play the game at a decent rate. I think the retarded person here is the one that doesn't read the requirements all the way through.

      In order to start taking advantage of the game in the way it was intended to be played, I'd have to upgrade my Motherboard, CPU and RAM which alone would cost me 500 $USD. The ONLY reason I need to upgrade would be to play intense games. So why would I do it? I already have a PC that allows me to touch up photos, write e-mails, surf the web, watch videos, listen to music, etc. Why in the hell would I need to spend another 500 $ just so I can play new games? If I'm going to do that, might as well buy the PS3 and make it a safe bet that I won't need to upgrade for at least 5 years.

      The fact that I can make my own decision and explain WHY I am making this decision makes me intelligent. Since you're resorting to insults, I question if you could truly engage in a battle of the wits... you are obviously unarmed.

      --
      It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
  110. Auction dropped by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    For those wondering it was a buy it now for $49,000 USD. 'Course if you're in the market it looks like the first 10 pages of PS3 systems on ebay, sorted high price to low, have no bids. Expect round 2 on eBay after all those auctions fail.

  111. That's a false choice... by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    It's not an either/or -- you can have both. There are girls who are both smart AND attractive out there, they're just harder to find. But they do exist, 'cause I married one :-)

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:That's a false choice... by keithpreston · · Score: 1

      Even better and harder to find is one that is smart, attractive and doesn't whine (well that might be too far, minimal whining might be better). I have secured myself one of those. She even came from a lower middle class background, so she's not conditioned to spend money.

  112. How about the Wii riot by sponga · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately it was a bunch of kids and they ended up biting eachother; even though they had enough for everybody.

  113. Bought one? by zman01 · · Score: 1

    Could someone who bought one on e-bay for $nk elaborate on why they did it? Really, I'd be interested.

  114. Metreon report SF by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    My own take - and btw - this needs a new thread as I didn't see any REAL posts - just the usual snarkage, meaning if you're reading this - I'm impressed beyond words.

    I got my PS2 in the Meteron in 2000's line on a bit of a lark, coming into line at 3-330pm that day. I was in the last 3rd of the line and it was only in front of the metreon itself.

    This time - to be safe (har har) - I'd show at noon, and see what's up. That and I didn't really want to stand for more than 12 hours. The general on the street buzz was that all passes were gone by 9am, and they made their final wrist count at 10. That said, it was basically spoiled by the Metreon not preventing all-night camping (how they avoided it then I have no idea but they did - perhaps it was because the Moscone extension was still a construction site and Minna wasn't open). Once that happened this go-around, the whole of the next day was alloted already.

    I seem to remember talking about this in line in 2000 and they basically kept that scenario from happening. This time they weren't so lucky. One other factor, it was raining - alot - in 2000. There wasn't any weather factor this time around, although given the tents, not sure that would have mattered either.

    One last group mutter was the ebay effect. Although ebay was happening 6 years ago, it wasn't nearly to the gold-rush degree it is now. People were offering their units for sale this time on the street once they exited the store. Understandable - but kind of sad.

    I stayed in a sub-line that started that afternoon, under the vague notion of another folly that happened in 2000. Back then - there was a line-bump. Basically there were 500 passes and an undermined amount of extras. About 100 more people were bumped into the line very late - and did in fact secure game units. This was also confirmed by one line goer who was a "bumpee" last year (his line position play-by-play matched with the group we spotted that night). I only remember it because we'd refered to them as the "dry ones" as the rest of us were still dripping wet.

    I entertained this not only because I wanted to see some of the "line show" (a truck pulling up with the units and other theatrics for the cameras) but because if there was going to be another bump, I was in the first 10 past the cut-off point. Of course, since this wasn't regulated, I left to hit some hangouts of mine nearby, get a couple of red bulls and return hours later closer to midnight (no I didn't stay in for 12 hours). Plus hell - I paid for all day parking anyway, might as well - again - watch the show.

    Scored some chochkies and used my limited press credentials (photo pass from the devo show and some business cards of clients and various affiliates) and scored a press kit. Didn't get a ps3 - but it wasn't less memorable than 2000.

    Think the Metereon is tapped out. The campers have pretty much insured that the line will begin and end in the first hour. Better to take your chances with pre-orders if you want to muck with first-day-itis at all.

    Met some great people though. So hey. And since this summary is over 500 words - I'm a keepin' my press-pack.

  115. Essentially the same as Wii level of control by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It doesn't even approach the Wii's level of control, but it can only help, as long as developers aren't stupid (which is a pretty big assumption).

    The PS3 controller is capable of measuring the same movement as the Wii is. The Wii has the advantage of external sensors which makes determining absolute position for a longer period more reliable, but you have to calibrate both of them to start anyway. The Wii's shape lens itself a lot more naturally to the whole sword/gun handle kind of thing, but it doesn't mean the detectors are necessarily that much more functional.

    So far developers are making better use of it than I thought they would so I hold out high hopes for the Wii having a lot of titles will really good controls.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  116. One or the other by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    SixAxiS: Use two sticks, twelve buttons, and be very careful about how you hold the controller to avoid accidental input.

    The way a lot of games are doing things is they let you either use the motion control OR a stick. Not both at the same time.

    And how careful you have to be depends on the games sensitivity to movement, which will be generally adjustable by the player. After all, the Wii would otherwise have the same problem with hand tremors...

    Also, for added fun, grab something in both hands as if you were holding a PlayStation controller. Anything solid will do.

    You mean like a steering wheel or flight yoke?

    Yeah, real hard.

    Now imagine trying to do a sharp banking turn in a flying game. You'll have to start moving your arms to get useful motion out of it.

    If your arms have trouble bending, I'd have a doctor check that out.

    I think you may well be using arm movement with a Wii controller as well.

    Presumably the intention is that people will only be holding the controller one-handed when using the tilt controls. Unfortunately, that'll leave it off-balance,

    No, because the controller is really light to counteract that problem. Remember back when a bunch of idiots interpreted a review saying it was "light" as "flimsy"? Nope, it was made lighter to use in a variety of ways just like this.

    Ultimately, though, you'll probably be right: it won't be any more complicated than the PS2, because after the first batch of games that use the tilt feature, no one will be using it any more.

    I guess the Wii would be screwed then, if your idea held any merit.

    If you look at upcoming game titles that's not the way the trend is going.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  117. It is not a console by ad0gg · · Score: 1

    Its a check for $2400. Most people in line aren't going to play the console, they are going to ebay it.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  118. Someone stood in line for a PS3 -- to smash it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    link. Video of the smashing posted on the web site. This is from the same guys that smashed an xbox 360 last year and taped the results.

  119. Re:I understand why....but I don't have to like it by Raenex · · Score: 1

    The 360 has already had a year head start. Sony and Nintendo weren't going to give Microsoft a second Christmas season to themselves, especially now that Microsoft has their supply ramped up.

  120. Ok Zonk by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    We know you don't like the PS3, give it a rest man!

    Some people might *gasp* actually like both the Wii AND the PS3 - and even the 360!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  121. SImply put, who puts out by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Consider this:

    With PC gaming games are constantly designed for the newest, fastest cards. So you in turn must keep up by upgrading cards and system and motherboard and memory.

    With a console, the hardware is fixed - so over time development houses learn how to do more with what they have.

    It's a matter of who spends the money for upgrades in performance in games - either you (the PC) or the game makers (with console titles).

    I know which math works better for me. And with HD support in the latest round the disparity between PC and console titles is really not all that great as it used to be, which was the major reason to still stick with PC gaming.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  122. it is worth it by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

    For those who pay it. That is how we determine what something is worth. Worth is relative. A given thing (product/service) is worth no more than the buyer will pay and no less than the seller will accept. Everything else is opinion.

    Furthermore, selling legally purchased legal products on Ebay does not a black market make. Black markets are defined as markets trading illegal goods, or legal goods illegally. AFAIK, there is nothing illegal about someone in India or France buying a PS3 on EBay, provided the unit isn't stolen and known to be (It is only illegal to knowingly buy stolen goods). To say these people standing in line to buy one to sell on Ebay are selling on a black market is tantamount to calling them criminals in the legal sense.

    --
    My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  123. Regulation would be a good solution... by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    Well, go figure what happens when proper regulation isn't in place for things like this - you have people going crazy when they can flip it. Just disregard the folks who cant seem to get the thing in the head regarding externalities such as that violence and think "opportunity cost".

    Even if it is not a "necessary-to-life item", that chaos would be stemmed if you couldn't sell it off for cost+50 until such a time where there would be a loss to hold the item. It's worked for tickets (e.g. World Cup in scalping hostile territories), maybe they could be consulted to solve that problem.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  124. Good controllers? Are you on crack? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    The Wii is finally catching up to the cyber-puck, which was part of a VR helmet (VFX1) that I had in 1998 or so.

    Console controllers suck balls. But they serve as a edge for long time players, so console monkeys like them and even claim they are 'good'. Once you waste the time to get all the button combos down you just can't admit the controller sucks. It's an old grifters trick.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Good controllers? Are you on crack? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Console controllers are absolutely great. Some games demand a game pad and the gamepads sold for PCs are crap without exception. I do have the logitech driving force wheel, which was sold as a console controller - it's a HID-class force feedback wheel for the PS2 which also works on PC and Mac etc. The areas of lack are in first person shooters (just let me use a KB+Mouse! PS2 even has flippin' USB!) and for flight sims. It's hard to get a decent flight stick on a game console.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  125. New games ONLY work as well as the old ones. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Unless you upgrade your computer. Most new games run just fine on older machines albeit with PS2 quality graphics/bitmap resolutions.

    Your console isn't magically getting more powerful ether.

    Think of it this way for one golden moment as a console player your games machine will work as well as a good PC. For the next five years you'll be stuck playing with increasingly lame graphics and already very lame controllers.

    For those of us that upgrade PCs regularly for simple economic reasons (CPU cycles are cheap, our time is expensive) it's a no brainer. Besides try to write off a console, graphics cards on the other hand are not questioned. (Yes Mr. IRS agent I need three 21 inch LCDs backed by NVidia GPUs, it improves my programming productivity!)

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:New games ONLY work as well as the old ones. by toonworld · · Score: 1

      I don't think you get my point. I DO NOT want to upgrade my PC regularly. I am sick and tired of having to upgrade my computer every year or so just to be able to get the most out of the new "game of the year". Hardware goes by so fast that if you want to upgrade your CPU, most of the time you have to upgrade your Motherboard and the RAM that goes with it.

      I have an AMD Athlon XP2500+ clocked at 1.82 Ghz with 1GB of RAM. My GPU is an ATI Radeon 9600. That's pretty decent hardware considering I bought it 2 years ago. I always buy mid-range because I refuse to pay extra for the top hardware of the month.

      Now my motherboard supports other faster CPUs that could raise the Ghz to 2.2 tops. If I want more, I have to change my motherboard... again!

      I am not saying that the PS3 is better than any PC you could build, I am saying that the PS3 would suit my needs for playing quality games with quality graphics and performance. Some of my friends have spent $800+ just to get THE BEST graphic card available on the market and this was 2 years ago. Today that card is worth much less and that's JUST for the GPU. $600 gets your a complete game console that allows you to do more than just play games.

      So while I do agree that PCs have the potential to unlock a lot more power assuming you have the right hardware to go with it, I'm still switching camps and heading for the console based on what I want and what I need. Don't get me wrong, I still use my PC for other things so I won't throw it in the trash, but you can bet your ass I won't be upgrading it for a very long while.

      --
      It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
    2. Re:New games ONLY work as well as the old ones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long is the warranty on the PS3?
      Unless it is 5 years, you shouldn't be touting the "savings".

      A defective part in a PC is easily replaced, while comparable situation with the PS3 will probably cost you quite a bit -- if out of warranty.

  126. $9000 bids are part of the scam by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    The $9000 bids are just to make the real bidders think they are getting a good deal paying $3000

  127. Re:Who will win? Jackass! by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    I suppose I'm the only one that would just sit in his seat until he smelled smoke?

  128. Whereas folks in communist countries... by Richard+Mills · · Score: 1

    ...would pay to get an advantage in a long line to purchase basic staples like flour.

    Limited supply of an item that's in demand is going to create long lines, whether it's in the Soviet Union or a country ruled by "capitalist decadence" like the USA. And some folks with more money than others are going to consider it worth their while to have someone do the waiting for them.

    Sure, it's ridiculous that people are going to such lengths to get their hands on a toy, and the PS3 lines, Ebay auctions, etc. demonstrate that some folks have waaaay more money than is good for them. But they simultaneously demonstrate that our "ugly" capitalist economy deserves some praise, too: After all, it's great that people only have to wait in these long lines for luxury items instead of basic staples like food or soap. Capitalism has warts aplenty, but one should keep things in perspective.

    But all that aside, focusing on folks paying other to wait in line for them as being "ugly" is ridiculous when people are being beaten up and robbed over a freakin' video game console!

  129. Calgary by BloodyIron · · Score: 1

    Here in calgary there was a drastic shortage. I waited over 16 hours throughout the city (eventually ending up at one location about 2am) only to discover that the mixed information we recieved (the security guards told us they had 40 units) had stabbed us in the back. They had 4 copies at the store there, and they hadn't even arrived. Some meatheads cheated and started their own line well before anyone else was allowed to, and security didnt even shoo them away. not doing this again.

  130. Racing simulators by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    It seems you could be able to enjoy rFactor. :D

    However I stopped using that gamepad technique when I bought the steering wheel.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  131. Descent 3 by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    You're spot on.

    I now play Descent 3 (yes that old game) with a game pad AND a mouse!

    Ok, sometimes only with the gamepad, much better for navigation. But if things get to hard, I move one hand to the mouse to aim better to my enemies.

    No keyboard involved.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  132. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? - MOD THIS UP by Julius+X · · Score: 1

    Great post! Mods, bump this up. It's awesome to hear both perspectives here, and a great story that made me wanting to know more of the experience, to boot.

    --

    -Julius X
    remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
  133. Re:Ugliness? How about shooting? - MOD THIS UP by MattinTibet · · Score: 1

    Thanks, dude... I wrote that because I was way too tired at work to do any work and I was hoping someone would like it. It totally made my day to see that you enjoyed it!