linux, firefox were developed during at an era when the open source movement was in development itself. tools, methods, issues, were not known.
now, not only we are mature, but also we have endless number of tools to facilitate distributed development.
yes, indeed, with the variables given, one thing that is certain is that it would be much shorter than before, to develop an entire language, using the distributed development model now.
Writing an SDK from scratch in a homebrewed language that does everything the Java SDK does? Well, good luck anyway.
why not ? if enough people decide it is a good idea and participate, it may take much shorter than you can imagine.
the open source community now knows open source effort works. linux prevailed, firefox prevailed. people have self esteem and faith now, and know the ways to make it work. now, they will make work, whatever they decide to make it work.
literally that is. dont excuse the rough wordage - screwed is not enough for this :
in turkey, up to 6 gb is $30, and per each 1 gb afterwards they charge $30 afterwards. (over the 6 gb quota)
we have 4 mobile carriers. there are those among them who even provide cheaper. you people are really, really being fucked in the apex of fine capitalism. in the land of the free. ill remember this next time when a right wing republican or libertarian or something blabbers about 'free market' in america to me.
are you fucking kidding us ? tell that to the people whose accounts are subpoenaed and are going to be revealed to u.s. government soon. just for knowing people in wikileaks. only and only.
why are you trying so hard to reject a fucking government document ? is it so hard to admit that there are flying saucers ? why ? will your hair drop out ? will other people call 'cuckoo' on you ? will you be discredited ?
you are trying so hard that it is hysterical. now its about 'understanding plain english'. it says government procured 3 saucers and bodies, in plain english there. it cant be plainer than that.
thankfully another nutso who is so doggedly bent on ignoring reality slapping his face just made a similar comment, and i will save time replying to you.
here. keep ignoring reality by yourself. conditioned like a middle age peasant to reject what he had been conditioned against.
'no further investigation was attempted' in secret service jargon means 'we have been told not to interfere'.
really. why are there so many morons, acting out of conditioning than pure reason on slashdot. this was supposed to be a place where smart people regulared. instead, there is one idiot after another displaying a different kind of conditioning in parallel with religious zealotry, or political zealotry. appallingly, you lot criticize each other too.
never mind never mind. dont need to answer. i dont have time for conditioned individuals. ill put you in the same basked with right wing ayn randists and religious types. have a nice day.
are you a moron, or do you have problems with reading comprehension ? here :
report says that AN INVESTIGATOR FOR AIR FORCE STATED THAT three flying saucers and bodies HAD BEEN RECOVERED.
the investigator for air force, STATES that three flying saucers were recovered at roswell.
the 'informant' part, is the last part in the last paragraph about the REASON for the saucers being found in roswell, and relevance of radar to the incident.
the 'informant' of the usaf investigator takes part in that explanation. NOT about recovery of saucers, in roswell. it says ACCORDING TO MR XXX'S INFORMANT, THE SAUCERS WERE FOUND IN NEW MEXICO DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS A VERY HIGH POWERED RADAR there, and it interferes with saucers' control mechanisms.
what the informant of the usaf investigator says, the REASON for the saucers being found in new mexico is government's radar.
really. wordage like 'nothing to see here' and all that, trying SO hard to reject, its being ridiculously pathetic and sad.
its a fucking fbi document using clear words like STATED and whatnot.
why the fuck are you trying SO hard to still reject and ignore ?
never mind - i dont give a fuck. i have no time to lose with an idiot who is so doggedly conditioned to ignore reality even it slaps him in the face as an official government document. have a nice day.
50 years ago most of the technology you see today wasnt even a rumor. 100 years ago, the technology that was there 50 years ago, was not even ridiculed.
in 3-4 decades you may see something that WORKS OUT OF THE SUBATOMIC SCALE, based on what is working on subatomic scale, JUST LIKE HOW YOU HAVE NUCLEAR ENERGY NOW. IT ISNT MAGIC - IT HAPPENS. one has to be either exceedingly ignorant, or highly shallow, or a moron to discuss in such a subject, and yet somehow be unable to think what i just have told.
how are you idiotically insisting the 'miss' the fact that, it was not a 'random dude' telling an fbi investigator, but, AN OFFICIAL USAF INVESTIGATOR telling an official fbi investigator that saucers were there in roswell ?
less evidence has been used in senate commissions or court cases to convict wrongdoings or politicians before.
this report, can be used as evidence in a court case, yet, random internet persona discredits it by saying 'some dude' 'local police report'....
i am reiterating - IT IS NOT A RANDOM PERSON BUT AN USAF INVESTIGATOR, WITH HIS NAME ERASED, TELLING AN OFFICIAL FBI AGENT THAT SAUCERS WERE RECOVERED IN ROSWELL. NOT YOUR RANDOM SOMEONE TELLING THINGS. USAF INVESTIGATOR THAT INVESTIGATED ROSWELL, TELLING FBI INVESTIGATOR. it is official.
so, it is nonsense for you ? and you, random internet persona #3956829's ridiculeing of my 'opinion' is, somehow, for some obscure reason, is more respectable and solid than a fucking government agency report ?
there is nothing in your post, but the implied ridiculousness of actually believing an official government report admitting to an incident that the government had been vehemently denying, with potential repercussions for all those involved in the denial of.
so, we are to take random internet geek's random emotions regarding the incident and its attributed ridiculousness, as opposed to a government report. or, is your displayed ridicule and scorn, expected to make me somehow realize the error of my ways in believing a fucking GOVERNMENT report about the existence of extraterrestrials or saucers ? WHY ? "hey, random internet geek #3956829 ridiculed me - i'd better forget that fucking GOVERNMENT REPORT"..... is it ?
sheer morondom. nothing else.
again, word of a government report admitting something that is very detrimental to the government, versus, random ridicule of random internet personality without any basis.
yes. quoting opinion of random scholastic academician, at the wake of an actual fbi report SAYING that these extraterrestrials exist and government has procured their remans.
this is precisely the point i have made with my grandparent - so, i should believe someone's own OPINION at the wake of an actual government report of an actual incident. AFTER and DESPITE the admittance of the incident and its nature ?
why.
dont answer. the question is rhetorical. if one looks at science history, there are bigger morons than feynman, ridiculeing and calling impossible to things that we take as granted today. here is an excerpt :
i dont know whether youre an idiot or not, but in regard to good manners, i will respond :
the quantum physics experiments dabbling on the frontiers of TIME, was an example to how far even we already have gone, as a half assed civilization that can only hop its own planet for now. if, this concept does not open your mind to new frontiers, i wont be able to reply you anymore.
then you read it with your ass instead of your eyes - its not 'an informant'. its USAF INVESTIGATOR telling FBI investigator. not 'someone'. it was usaf investigator investigating the incident.
not to mention that he is forgetting that we are already playing with experiments that change the experiment result AFTER the experiment has been concluded in quantum physics, debating the mechanics of wormholes, leave aside existence of, and the means space-time continuum can be warped. and as of this moment, a cyclotron is trying to find the smallest base particle.
his 'logic' comes from sheer ignorance of what his civilization is ALREADY doing.
what he sees as important, totally depends on his views and aims in life. his motive may be much more superior than anything you may dream of here, or much more simpler than what you can guess at. in either case, its his views and aims in life.
'story is PATENTLY' absurd, says the random persona on the internet. random person on the internet using strongly expressed and stressed wordage against an actual official government agency's official report stating the nature of an incident.
and for that, he shows 'how can xxxx, yyyy, zzz' as reasoning. the mindset is 'it cant be'
this is what i am talking exactly is about -> usage of mind, open mind, and looking over the horizon. 'HOW CAN' is the NEXT question. at this point, situation is 'IT HAS'.
you are producing reasons against the official admittance of an incident which will bring great problems and pains against not only the government, but also even retired personnel of that or other agencies. it goes way back. the minimum that will happen even if they dont prosecuted and crucified, would be getting subjected to endless number of inquiries in front of senate commissions the minimum. noone in any government would dare risk disclosure of something that would bring great pains to themselves if disclosed.
yet, it has been disclosed. it had happened.
your situation is at this point, is of denial -> you are wanting to return to earlier comfortable status quo. that is not the behavior of an open mind -> the open mind would accept the situation, and then start asking questions like 'who', 'why', 'how', 'when', 'what followed'.....
and really, stop with the pathetic wordage like 'if xxxx yyy, you are a credulous moron' -> dont sweat it. its OFFICIAL fbi document's word against random internet smartie's word.... expecting to discourage others from accepting what you personally despise or cant bring yourself to accept, is much more sad and pathetic.
it is an official document that declares that 3 flying saucers and 3 apparently nonhuman entities were confiscated in roswell, and then the subject has remained hidden. period.
official usaf investigator TELLING official fbi investigator (washington bureau chief if i remember right) that they procured 3 flying saucers and 3 bodies in roswell, and this being reported to fbi director, definitely something unimportant and irrelevant.
it has to be.
it has to be, because, because we are 'smart', we have to be sarcastic, skeptic and conditioned to react and reject against it like a different kind of sheeple. just because endless number of government officials and private think thank and establishment linked academicians ridiculed it, we have to do the same. because, this is what 'respectable' smart people people do, right ? 'smaaart'.
even if 3 major countries of the world releases ufo files with endless unexplained cases, even if fbi discloses a document that confirms a real ufo case, we have to reject and be sarcastic because some 'respectable' people before our time did that. respectable wordage is in quotes, because it is questionable what the motives of those individuals who had had to be in good relations with the established policy for business and career reasons, had been.
no. really - this behavior is no different than a high school teenager trying to fit in with the tastes and culture of his/her high school. the very behavior that most of the people here, actually saw the wrongness and irrationality of.
Really ? something concerning potential extraterrestrial civilization and technology, is 'idle' ?
which moron tagged this 'idle' ?
Or, is it that the reflexive conditioning (like another form of sheeple) that a lot of the 'smart' people have against this ufo subject, justifying the belittlement and despising of the subject as 'idle' ?
this is fbi's official document finally hitting mainstream attention, despite it existed since 30 years, and has been dismissed easily because it wasnt easy for public to reach it themselves. (thanks internet).
a better disclosure and admittance from this, would be various usaf, nsa directors, maybe 1-2 deceased ex presidents resurrecting and giving a press release in tears, saying that they are sorry they hid this from public, and braving the crucifixion that would bring up.
since that wont happen, and those responsible always try to cover their ass, this is as disclosure as it gets.
despicable is the scorn of the scholastically inclined, to things that are yet unknown or new, despite being taught a lot of things that were previously unknown before in their education.
there are two kinds of intellectual people in this world ; those who think further than the horizon into the yet unknown, and those who parrot what the previous pioneers from the first group has discovered before.
How well the government has been successful in not only hiding this subject despite how they were trading information in between agencies, but also how they have been able to suppress that information and been able to discredit those who stalked the information and made them appear as cuckoos.
Its a downward spiral actually. once you start suppressing information that public may take as important and create victims through either direct repression or public image assassination, you accrue liability - in case of public learning this, it is inevitable that those who were victimized by this disinformation and repression would start suing the agency, government and those responsible. so you are locked in denial and repression cycle. especially in this case, public would ask whether any advanced technologies were recovered from these craft, and what usaf did with them - if the fact that advanced technology that could help our civilization was recovered, but hid, public will rightfully want to crucify those who hid it.
one thinks that, considering how well they have hid this information, what else they may be hiding.
another curious part is, how big and well a maneuver fbi has done by releasing this in an easily accessible manner to the public. even tho this was available in 1970, not having direct access to this info had made it dubious in the eyes of the public. but broadcasting it directly from fbi site basically makes even the hardest skeptic question, and the masses take notice of this, leading to one very important result :
fbi has basically dropped the bomb in usaf's lap. now, in the case of disclosure happening, noone will lynch fbi, because the document basically says that fbi didnt have any responsibility in that matter - it was usaf's doing. military arm of the government will be taking the heat, totally liberating and saving active and retired fbi personnel.
a wise move in the light of the fact that last 2-3 years have been the years that major governments of the world has been releasing their secret ufo files, despite u.s. resisting doing the same and even ridiculing existence of such secret files. (leave aside how stupid it is to ridicule existence of those files, after russia, britain, france released theirs).
it can be expected that we may see other agencies trying to evade any responsibility in the matter by taking precautions.
its an official fbi document, on official fbi site, stating that an official usaf investigator has had told an official fbi agent that 3 saucers were recovered in roswell.
its an official memo piece of an official fbi agent. political investigations have been conducted and charges conveyed in court cases and inquiries with lesser testimonies and evidence before. yes, its solid enough.
and this information was reported to j edgar hoover, the greatest psychopath to be ever in charge of a major organization in united states. he had made a habit of knowing every single usable information piece in order to keep his hold on a lot of matters, and apparently this was no exception. it is 100% that, hoover, in all his control mania, had not left that case there, and obtained further information.
Slashdot Mirror
linux, firefox were developed during at an era when the open source movement was in development itself. tools, methods, issues, were not known.
now, not only we are mature, but also we have endless number of tools to facilitate distributed development.
yes, indeed, with the variables given, one thing that is certain is that it would be much shorter than before, to develop an entire language, using the distributed development model now.
Writing an SDK from scratch in a homebrewed language that does everything the Java SDK does? Well, good luck anyway.
why not ? if enough people decide it is a good idea and participate, it may take much shorter than you can imagine.
the open source community now knows open source effort works. linux prevailed, firefox prevailed. people have self esteem and faith now, and know the ways to make it work. now, they will make work, whatever they decide to make it work.
literally that is. dont excuse the rough wordage - screwed is not enough for this :
in turkey, up to 6 gb is $30, and per each 1 gb afterwards they charge $30 afterwards. (over the 6 gb quota)
we have 4 mobile carriers. there are those among them who even provide cheaper. you people are really, really being fucked in the apex of fine capitalism. in the land of the free. ill remember this next time when a right wing republican or libertarian or something blabbers about 'free market' in america to me.
oh boy. hahahaa.
you are marked red in my list. you wont get a reply to your argument.
quite good assessment.
are you fucking kidding us ? tell that to the people whose accounts are subpoenaed and are going to be revealed to u.s. government soon. just for knowing people in wikileaks. only and only.
pointless to discuss further. your behavior is no different than a middle age monk. have a nice day.
why are you trying so hard to reject a fucking government document ? is it so hard to admit that there are flying saucers ? why ? will your hair drop out ? will other people call 'cuckoo' on you ? will you be discredited ?
you are trying so hard that it is hysterical. now its about 'understanding plain english'. it says government procured 3 saucers and bodies, in plain english there. it cant be plainer than that.
thankfully another nutso who is so doggedly bent on ignoring reality slapping his face just made a similar comment, and i will save time replying to you.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2077214&cid=35778430
here. keep ignoring reality by yourself. conditioned like a middle age peasant to reject what he had been conditioned against.
'no further investigation was attempted' in secret service jargon means 'we have been told not to interfere'.
really. why are there so many morons, acting out of conditioning than pure reason on slashdot. this was supposed to be a place where smart people regulared. instead, there is one idiot after another displaying a different kind of conditioning in parallel with religious zealotry, or political zealotry. appallingly, you lot criticize each other too.
never mind never mind. dont need to answer. i dont have time for conditioned individuals. ill put you in the same basked with right wing ayn randists and religious types. have a nice day.
are you a moron, or do you have problems with reading comprehension ? here :
report says that AN INVESTIGATOR FOR AIR FORCE STATED THAT three flying saucers and bodies HAD BEEN RECOVERED.
the investigator for air force, STATES that three flying saucers were recovered at roswell.
the 'informant' part, is the last part in the last paragraph about the REASON for the saucers being found in roswell, and relevance of radar to the incident.
the 'informant' of the usaf investigator takes part in that explanation. NOT about recovery of saucers, in roswell. it says ACCORDING TO MR XXX'S INFORMANT, THE SAUCERS WERE FOUND IN NEW MEXICO DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS A VERY HIGH POWERED RADAR there, and it interferes with saucers' control mechanisms.
what the informant of the usaf investigator says, the REASON for the saucers being found in new mexico is government's radar.
really. wordage like 'nothing to see here' and all that, trying SO hard to reject, its being ridiculously pathetic and sad.
its a fucking fbi document using clear words like STATED and whatnot.
why the fuck are you trying SO hard to still reject and ignore ?
never mind - i dont give a fuck. i have no time to lose with an idiot who is so doggedly conditioned to ignore reality even it slaps him in the face as an official government document. have a nice day.
50 years ago most of the technology you see today wasnt even a rumor. 100 years ago, the technology that was there 50 years ago, was not even ridiculed.
in 3-4 decades you may see something that WORKS OUT OF THE SUBATOMIC SCALE, based on what is working on subatomic scale, JUST LIKE HOW YOU HAVE NUCLEAR ENERGY NOW. IT ISNT MAGIC - IT HAPPENS. one has to be either exceedingly ignorant, or highly shallow, or a moron to discuss in such a subject, and yet somehow be unable to think what i just have told.
how are you idiotically insisting the 'miss' the fact that, it was not a 'random dude' telling an fbi investigator, but, AN OFFICIAL USAF INVESTIGATOR telling an official fbi investigator that saucers were there in roswell ?
....
less evidence has been used in senate commissions or court cases to convict wrongdoings or politicians before.
this report, can be used as evidence in a court case, yet, random internet persona discredits it by saying 'some dude' 'local police report'
i am reiterating - IT IS NOT A RANDOM PERSON BUT AN USAF INVESTIGATOR, WITH HIS NAME ERASED, TELLING AN OFFICIAL FBI AGENT THAT SAUCERS WERE RECOVERED IN ROSWELL. NOT YOUR RANDOM SOMEONE TELLING THINGS. USAF INVESTIGATOR THAT INVESTIGATED ROSWELL, TELLING FBI INVESTIGATOR. it is official.
"actual official fucking fbi report"
..... is it ?
...
so, it is nonsense for you ? and you, random internet persona #3956829's ridiculeing of my 'opinion' is, somehow, for some obscure reason, is more respectable and solid than a fucking government agency report ?
there is nothing in your post, but the implied ridiculousness of actually believing an official government report admitting to an incident that the government had been vehemently denying, with potential repercussions for all those involved in the denial of.
so, we are to take random internet geek's random emotions regarding the incident and its attributed ridiculousness, as opposed to a government report. or, is your displayed ridicule and scorn, expected to make me somehow realize the error of my ways in believing a fucking GOVERNMENT report about the existence of extraterrestrials or saucers ? WHY ? "hey, random internet geek #3956829 ridiculed me - i'd better forget that fucking GOVERNMENT REPORT"
sheer morondom. nothing else.
again, word of a government report admitting something that is very detrimental to the government, versus, random ridicule of random internet personality without any basis.
hahahahaa
yes. quoting opinion of random scholastic academician, at the wake of an actual fbi report SAYING that these extraterrestrials exist and government has procured their remans.
this is precisely the point i have made with my grandparent - so, i should believe someone's own OPINION at the wake of an actual government report of an actual incident. AFTER and DESPITE the admittance of the incident and its nature ?
why.
dont answer. the question is rhetorical. if one looks at science history, there are bigger morons than feynman, ridiculeing and calling impossible to things that we take as granted today. here is an excerpt :
http://amasci.com/weird/vindac.html#j43
i dont know whether youre an idiot or not, but in regard to good manners, i will respond :
the quantum physics experiments dabbling on the frontiers of TIME, was an example to how far even we already have gone, as a half assed civilization that can only hop its own planet for now. if, this concept does not open your mind to new frontiers, i wont be able to reply you anymore.
then you read it with your ass instead of your eyes - its not 'an informant'. its USAF INVESTIGATOR telling FBI investigator. not 'someone'. it was usaf investigator investigating the incident.
not to mention that he is forgetting that we are already playing with experiments that change the experiment result AFTER the experiment has been concluded in quantum physics, debating the mechanics of wormholes, leave aside existence of, and the means space-time continuum can be warped. and as of this moment, a cyclotron is trying to find the smallest base particle.
his 'logic' comes from sheer ignorance of what his civilization is ALREADY doing.
what he sees as important, totally depends on his views and aims in life. his motive may be much more superior than anything you may dream of here, or much more simpler than what you can guess at. in either case, its his views and aims in life.
'story is PATENTLY' absurd, says the random persona on the internet. random person on the internet using strongly expressed and stressed wordage against an actual official government agency's official report stating the nature of an incident.
.....
.... expecting to discourage others from accepting what you personally despise or cant bring yourself to accept, is much more sad and pathetic.
and for that, he shows 'how can xxxx, yyyy, zzz' as reasoning. the mindset is 'it cant be'
this is what i am talking exactly is about -> usage of mind, open mind, and looking over the horizon. 'HOW CAN' is the NEXT question. at this point, situation is 'IT HAS'.
you are producing reasons against the official admittance of an incident which will bring great problems and pains against not only the government, but also even retired personnel of that or other agencies. it goes way back. the minimum that will happen even if they dont prosecuted and crucified, would be getting subjected to endless number of inquiries in front of senate commissions the minimum. noone in any government would dare risk disclosure of something that would bring great pains to themselves if disclosed.
yet, it has been disclosed. it had happened.
your situation is at this point, is of denial -> you are wanting to return to earlier comfortable status quo. that is not the behavior of an open mind -> the open mind would accept the situation, and then start asking questions like 'who', 'why', 'how', 'when', 'what followed'
and really, stop with the pathetic wordage like 'if xxxx yyy, you are a credulous moron' -> dont sweat it. its OFFICIAL fbi document's word against random internet smartie's word
it is an official document that declares that 3 flying saucers and 3 apparently nonhuman entities were confiscated in roswell, and then the subject has remained hidden. period.
official usaf investigator TELLING official fbi investigator (washington bureau chief if i remember right) that they procured 3 flying saucers and 3 bodies in roswell, and this being reported to fbi director, definitely something unimportant and irrelevant.
it has to be.
it has to be, because, because we are 'smart', we have to be sarcastic, skeptic and conditioned to react and reject against it like a different kind of sheeple. just because endless number of government officials and private think thank and establishment linked academicians ridiculed it, we have to do the same. because, this is what 'respectable' smart people people do, right ? 'smaaart'.
even if 3 major countries of the world releases ufo files with endless unexplained cases, even if fbi discloses a document that confirms a real ufo case, we have to reject and be sarcastic because some 'respectable' people before our time did that. respectable wordage is in quotes, because it is questionable what the motives of those individuals who had had to be in good relations with the established policy for business and career reasons, had been.
no. really - this behavior is no different than a high school teenager trying to fit in with the tastes and culture of his/her high school. the very behavior that most of the people here, actually saw the wrongness and irrationality of.
Really ? something concerning potential extraterrestrial civilization and technology, is 'idle' ?
which moron tagged this 'idle' ?
Or, is it that the reflexive conditioning (like another form of sheeple) that a lot of the 'smart' people have against this ufo subject, justifying the belittlement and despising of the subject as 'idle' ?
this is fbi's official document finally hitting mainstream attention, despite it existed since 30 years, and has been dismissed easily because it wasnt easy for public to reach it themselves. (thanks internet).
a better disclosure and admittance from this, would be various usaf, nsa directors, maybe 1-2 deceased ex presidents resurrecting and giving a press release in tears, saying that they are sorry they hid this from public, and braving the crucifixion that would bring up.
since that wont happen, and those responsible always try to cover their ass, this is as disclosure as it gets.
despicable is the scorn of the scholastically inclined, to things that are yet unknown or new, despite being taught a lot of things that were previously unknown before in their education.
there are two kinds of intellectual people in this world ; those who think further than the horizon into the yet unknown, and those who parrot what the previous pioneers from the first group has discovered before.
most of the academia falls into the second group.
and ?
How well the government has been successful in not only hiding this subject despite how they were trading information in between agencies, but also how they have been able to suppress that information and been able to discredit those who stalked the information and made them appear as cuckoos.
Its a downward spiral actually. once you start suppressing information that public may take as important and create victims through either direct repression or public image assassination, you accrue liability - in case of public learning this, it is inevitable that those who were victimized by this disinformation and repression would start suing the agency, government and those responsible. so you are locked in denial and repression cycle. especially in this case, public would ask whether any advanced technologies were recovered from these craft, and what usaf did with them - if the fact that advanced technology that could help our civilization was recovered, but hid, public will rightfully want to crucify those who hid it.
one thinks that, considering how well they have hid this information, what else they may be hiding.
another curious part is, how big and well a maneuver fbi has done by releasing this in an easily accessible manner to the public. even tho this was available in 1970, not having direct access to this info had made it dubious in the eyes of the public. but broadcasting it directly from fbi site basically makes even the hardest skeptic question, and the masses take notice of this, leading to one very important result :
fbi has basically dropped the bomb in usaf's lap. now, in the case of disclosure happening, noone will lynch fbi, because the document basically says that fbi didnt have any responsibility in that matter - it was usaf's doing. military arm of the government will be taking the heat, totally liberating and saving active and retired fbi personnel.
a wise move in the light of the fact that last 2-3 years have been the years that major governments of the world has been releasing their secret ufo files, despite u.s. resisting doing the same and even ridiculing existence of such secret files. (leave aside how stupid it is to ridicule existence of those files, after russia, britain, france released theirs).
it can be expected that we may see other agencies trying to evade any responsibility in the matter by taking precautions.
it says usaf's initial guess is that new radar brought them down. that is just a guess. they did not say that they know radar did.
its an official fbi document, on official fbi site, stating that an official usaf investigator has had told an official fbi agent that 3 saucers were recovered in roswell.
its an official memo piece of an official fbi agent. political investigations have been conducted and charges conveyed in court cases and inquiries with lesser testimonies and evidence before. yes, its solid enough.
and this information was reported to j edgar hoover, the greatest psychopath to be ever in charge of a major organization in united states. he had made a habit of knowing every single usable information piece in order to keep his hold on a lot of matters, and apparently this was no exception. it is 100% that, hoover, in all his control mania, had not left that case there, and obtained further information.