It's just a choose your own hell scenario here. Either a complete idiot that says anything he think will win him votes and probably won't know how to do anything once in power vs a T500 with the wrong skin. Of course, you could just "waste your vote away", but if enough people do...
SJWs aren't exactly "the left". They're the end result of a "safe space", where actual discussion is considered a crime punishable with banning to "protect the fragile people from harm". In this kind of sick ambient, you get a spiral of bad ideas being echoed and amplified without anyone to point out how stupid it sounds. Add a layer of paranoia/blaming that "anyone can be one of the awful trolls", and you basically create a weirdass cult.
And i can see that completely working with let's say "the right", or even "the liberals" or "the chiuaua club of yorkshire", because its more about the system the community work rather than what is being discussed.
Now imagine if twitter for example suddenly decided to became a safe space. As i pointed out, it don't even NEED to be specifically a left safe space, which it probably won't. Imagine if it was a corporate safe space, where any bad opinion about a product that is on twitter's payroll is "trolling".
The fact there are only two actually viable parties and that they have Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as their candidates is already proof enough that the american voting system is completely broken.
Trump will just say what he thinks will get him in the char and/or give him free advertising. He probably would be a lot more cautious if his opponent was not hillary.
Well, they're not SJWs because its a definition specific to a certain group of left winged people. But yes, you can say that there are conservatives that act like SJWs, but for their own thing. All you need is a "safe space" where the actual discussion is shot down by the moderation or similars and no idea coming from the "right person" is a bad idea to get to a group of lunatics.
They will teach it that the letter "a" by itself is an racist remark or something, and this will simply shut down the whole comment section being protected by the AI.
But then what they would do if they could not do the BLM thing? occupy wallstreet again and only leave when they got decent jobs? Gotta keep em distracted with trivial matters or else.
Well, asian people generally get paid more and have better jobs than white people. So if that social justice bullshit of "an invisible hand manipulating everything to make sure minorities get shafted" was a thing, it would be favoring the asians over whites as well.
Any sort of "quota" is awful and racist, because it paints the worker as "a guy that needed a hand from the HR to be hired", and his actual merits get downplayed in the process. Now if you for example subsidie GOOD schools on the poorer cities/neighbors, you give em an equal chance to get the jobs fairly.
Also if there was any sort of systemic racism in place, it would be favoring asians rather than white people.
Both staying and leaving were awful options, but those are the only two options that were given by people that only wanted to use it as a pressure tool, not expecting leave to actually win. The "actually fix EU" option was never on the table.
Javascript is the necessary evil, as you need something to execute code to run more complex webpages. Java on other hand is the unnecessary evil people still use due being trendy.
Well, you can say its "islamophonbia" as in actual fear of the islamic people as well, but if was actual racism, half of the population of a country? there would be a LOT of cases of dead muslims around the whole country, and that's not exactly what we see here.
I think most trump electors are either on the "he gonna get the jobs back" or "i want to burn the system down" camps, because believing that 50% of US is actually racist is a bit of a big stretch.
Well, when they succeed, they get a much higher profit by selling the hardware and software than they would on IOS. Also they don't have to deal with a fuckton of different hardware configurations, or things interrupting the game flow horribly like crapware bundled by phone operators.
It's just a choose your own hell scenario here.
Either a complete idiot that says anything he think will win him votes and probably won't know how to do anything once in power vs a T500 with the wrong skin.
Of course, you could just "waste your vote away", but if enough people do...
SJWs aren't exactly "the left".
They're the end result of a "safe space", where actual discussion is considered a crime punishable with banning to "protect the fragile people from harm".
In this kind of sick ambient, you get a spiral of bad ideas being echoed and amplified without anyone to point out how stupid it sounds.
Add a layer of paranoia/blaming that "anyone can be one of the awful trolls", and you basically create a weirdass cult.
And i can see that completely working with let's say "the right", or even "the liberals" or "the chiuaua club of yorkshire", because its more about the system the community work rather than what is being discussed.
Now imagine if twitter for example suddenly decided to became a safe space.
As i pointed out, it don't even NEED to be specifically a left safe space, which it probably won't.
Imagine if it was a corporate safe space, where any bad opinion about a product that is on twitter's payroll is "trolling".
Should the postal service decrypt any mail before delivering it to the government, even if they don't even have the means to do so?
It don't pass the basic SJW test #1:
It is an real issue?
I think most of the trump electors are actually voting to him BECAUSE he's awful, like completely government nuking awful.This and fear of Isis.
The fact there are only two actually viable parties and that they have Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump as their candidates is already proof enough that the american voting system is completely broken.
Trump will just say what he thinks will get him in the char and/or give him free advertising.
He probably would be a lot more cautious if his opponent was not hillary.
"15 million facebook users infected with malware in a popunder ad."
I wonder how much of this research is being influenced by Eve Online, and it's insanely huge and complex market.
Well, they're not SJWs because its a definition specific to a certain group of left winged people.
But yes, you can say that there are conservatives that act like SJWs, but for their own thing.
All you need is a "safe space" where the actual discussion is shot down by the moderation or similars and no idea coming from the "right person" is a bad idea to get to a group of lunatics.
This is like watching a train heading to a broken bridge and the operator shoving more coal to attempt to make a jump.
They will teach it that the letter "a" by itself is an racist remark or something, and this will simply shut down the whole comment section being protected by the AI.
Or alternatively, they can go the movie/game reboot route and call it just Windows, without any indication of the version of the system in the name.
Actually, even a beefy Amiga could be snappy as hell.
But bad programmers gotta bad program.
You never know when you can end getting some weirdass fetishist after you.
But then what they would do if they could not do the BLM thing? occupy wallstreet again and only leave when they got decent jobs?
Gotta keep em distracted with trivial matters or else.
Well, asian people generally get paid more and have better jobs than white people.
So if that social justice bullshit of "an invisible hand manipulating everything to make sure minorities get shafted" was a thing, it would be favoring the asians over whites as well.
Any sort of "quota" is awful and racist, because it paints the worker as "a guy that needed a hand from the HR to be hired", and his actual merits get downplayed in the process.
Now if you for example subsidie GOOD schools on the poorer cities/neighbors, you give em an equal chance to get the jobs fairly.
Also if there was any sort of systemic racism in place, it would be favoring asians rather than white people.
Both staying and leaving were awful options, but those are the only two options that were given by people that only wanted to use it as a pressure tool, not expecting leave to actually win.
The "actually fix EU" option was never on the table.
Javascript is the necessary evil, as you need something to execute code to run more complex webpages.
Java on other hand is the unnecessary evil people still use due being trendy.
Well, you can say its "islamophonbia" as in actual fear of the islamic people as well, but if was actual racism, half of the population of a country? there would be a LOT of cases of dead muslims around the whole country, and that's not exactly what we see here.
If they somehow make a third party candidate win...
I think most trump electors are either on the "he gonna get the jobs back" or "i want to burn the system down" camps, because believing that 50% of US is actually racist is a bit of a big stretch.
Well, there is a person he could fire that would solve the issue.
Well, when they succeed, they get a much higher profit by selling the hardware and software than they would on IOS.
Also they don't have to deal with a fuckton of different hardware configurations, or things interrupting the game flow horribly like crapware bundled by phone operators.