None of that matters, the ECU itself is inside a metal box. I'd think about other theories of operation, before settling on "the microwaves have to touch the ECU."
That shielding won't save you, and is actually the point! The shielding absorbs the energy, causing a large transient voltage spike in your car's electrical system. That causes the ECU to crash, because it isn't designed for those conditions.
One of the key things to understand here is that the car only has two electrical connections, battery + and battery -. Battery - is often called "ground," it will tend to be at local ground because it is referenced to the vehicle chassis which will likely be at ground potential when you start the car. But it doesn't have a third wire with an actual Earth connection, and the wheels are usually electrical insulators. What that boils down to is that shielding works by converting the RF interference into a short voltage spike, some of which is converted to heat in the ECU and any other electronics with voltage regulation. All the devices in the car are already expected to survive "double battery condition," which is when the tow truck driver gives you a jump start using 24V, which is really 28V+ because their engine is running and their battery is charging voltage. So there is a huge amount of voltage margin and the shielding works well without even having system-wide voltage regulation. But in the extreme case, as with this device, you eventually overload the ECU's voltage regulation, and since the circuit is designed to be robust, it simply crashes and reboots as soon as the spike dissipates. Repeated use could easily damage a vehicle, though.
For protection against this, I'd want to try something low-tech like a wire brush connected to the chassis that can drag on the ground slightly, so that voltage spikes can find a path to Earth instead of getting stuck in the circuit.
No. Also, this was demonstrated on American television 12 years ago; the demo had a driver in the car, and the journalist standing right next to it, because there is no reasonable health danger from short-term exposure.
The thing about "starting a family" tells me you watch a lot fictional television "shows," and that you don't understand what the content is.
I pay more to hide that information than I pay for the domains, so this sounds like a feature for Europeans to me.
If a person actually wants to post information about a domain online, they can use an "about" or "contact" page. This isn't the 1990s, where a website might be down and the company didn't notice for a week until somebody called the ICANN contact.;)
ICANN can't "find a solution," there is no solution. They're not supposed to be a decision-making body, they're supposed to be a management body that coordinates maintenance. That makes this the EU's problem; they're the decision-makers who did a thing that contradicts the other thing they don't control.
The real point is that this isn't something ICANN even does; they only handle how the different registrars coordinate to implement and maintain the database. Each registrar is the one actually managing individual entries, not ICANN. They don't even have any sort of authority with which to do anything. That's why ICANN warns that registrars will be implementing varying policies depending on each of their interpretations of the law.
If somebody ever comes in to interview and they take a phone call to do another interview at the same time... I'm going to honestly mean it when I thank them for their time, because I'm going to get at least 5 minutes of solid belly-laugh out of it.
This doesn't surprise me at all, I wouldn't expect you to get any better than that.
What I was told was, "She isn't going to tell you what she wants, she expects you to understand her well enough to know already."
Just because somebody simplified the saying for you doesn't mean that reality is that simple. It only means she was trying to understand what advice you'd know how to make use of when she considered her words.
I've worked with LEDs, and what you're not considering is that daylight is a broad spectrum, and LEDs are multiple narrow bands. An LED that puts out light that averages the same temperature as daylight is actually very different. Maybe it is the same for some application, since the average is the same, but also maybe not.
Beware of waving your hands and presuming you have knowledge. It is a lot easier to wave your hands and presume you have ignorance, and instead of preventing you from understanding new things it will actually prepare you for considering them.
It goes beyond even just no strings attached, too; they're making a preemptive threat against people who don't agree to their terms, who might want to offer them different terms. They seem to consider offering them something on proposed terms to be a "shakedown."
My advice to security researchers, if you find an Uber bug, sell it to Uncle Sam instead.
Last time I bought a laptop, I booted into Windows to make sure the hardware worked before installing linux, and it did boot and appeared to be some sort of functional desktop OS.
It seems to be playing out so that if there is a deal, all the important parts will be negotiated by the Korean leaders first, and if that deal adds up to a deal that the US can support, then whoever is the US President on some day shortly after that will sign some papers that also say the same things. And they will get some attention for it.
The difference with Iran is that Iran and Israel are about to go to open warfare, and then that deal won't even matter.
If different American groups support a deal in Korea in the future will depend on North Korea's behavior; if they observe international norms, most Americans will support it.
Iran is very different; many Americans would never support any sort of deal with Iran as long as Revolutionary forces remain in power there, because they're still mad about all the mean stuff that Iran did. And they know that Iranians are still mad at us about the mean stuff we did. So they're very distrustful of any ideas for maintaining peace. Korea doesn't have that sort of interest level without the nukes. Probably because Korea is divided and the good half is our friend. People worried about North Korea, other than with nukes, are worried about Communism more generally, and North Korea is small and distant. People who care about that are more worried about closer threats, like Cuba, and bigger threats, like China.
Not the test facility, just one of the main tunnels under the mountain.
Reports since then reported work at other nearby sites, presumably working on new tunnels.
The Chinese have warned them in the past that they were over-using the tunnels and risking a collapse, they just didn't want to do the work of prepping a new tunnel until it actually happened. Workers died, but try to understand; workers at this site are constantly dying, and they bring new ones in. They don't have radiation safety programs. Their system is simpler; important enough people don't have to do that job.
It doesn't even occur to these dill weeds that maybe they help certain corporations because they want to, because they believe in fighting to put some class of people ahead of other people.
Not all politicians are out to help corporations, certainly none of the politicians representing me personally in Congress have that sort of failing. So it is rather idiotic premise in the first place; but even when you encounter such people, there is no reason to just assume it is based on money. It may simply be based on the fact that they both have money, and therefore like each other, and nobody paid anybody off. Wake up, reality isn't your conspiracy theory.
After seeing the picture of Kim Jong-Un blushing while posing with Red Velvet I figured, OK, this might be for real, he might really be ready to focus on trade.
Plus, China told him he had to do it; he went to China and they went on the news together, and North Korea had agreed to give up their nuclear program, and China had agreed to remain their ally. Sounds like a good deal to me, right?! Good deal for everybody, actually.
So how do you soften the hearts of the Generals? With kpop. Duh.
Works for me! I'm more of an AoA fan, but I can totally see Red Velvet being better for this mission.
It only takes a few dozen sales in a day to increase the prices, the Chinese companies are good at this; if you mention something like that on 1 popular youtube channel, the ebay price went up. The amazon prices are more stable, but they still jump. Good deals like that are real, but it is often in error to insist that it is a repeatable activity.
The banggood prices are real prices, not teasers; they're high, sure, but they'll tend to track the local price, and if you're ordering in volume you'll get good discounts. Cheaper outlets will never have a firm price.
You're just waving your hands and saying the word "money," but at this point national elections are awash in more money than there is things to spend it on campaigning. It is mostly only unviable candidates that even have to try to raise funds, thanks to Citizens United. There are a limited number of television spots available to purchase, and dumping more money in just raises the prices but doesn't change the number of minutes that are available, or how often you can run the same ad before you create a backlash of angry viewers.
You seem somewhat ignorant of the difference in intent between Democracy, and Mob Rule. Having procedures that push things towards the center is not automatically problematic; it seems to many people that being moderate is more of a compromise than just taking turns having things decided by 51% of the day's whims. Super-delegates are current and past elected officials; there is nothing undemocratic about giving people who have already been elected under the party's banner a larger say in who caries the party's banner. That is silly. It just acts as a low-pass filter and slows the rate of change; if forces a candidate with radical ideas to also take into consideration the people who like the old way, and to transform their radical ideas into incremental changes. If society actually moves in their direction over the long term, eventually those incremental changes will add up to their ideas; but not by the social trauma of radical change. And if they were telling the truth when they claimed to agree with the party's past "platform" then they would only actually be wanting incremental change anyways. Being part of a "large umbrella" party is not an invitation for minority views to take power, instead it offers to take into consideration the biggest concerns of all the groups.
It was an interesting thought experiment until the discovery of DNA, but now we understand that the egg clearly comes before the chicken.
Where you draw the line between what you call a "chicken" and what you would consider a proto-chicken is arbitrary, but wherever you draw that line, a proto-chicken laid the first egg that would grow into a chicken.
If you go back far enough, when the egg shell was first invented, the proto-bird and proto-mammal were the same. We came out of the shallow sea together, the mammals and birds, and diverged some time after that. It doesn't really matter where you draw the lines; the Proto-foo gave birth to the Baby-foo, which grew into a Foo. The egg comes before the thing it grows into. At some point you draw the line "not chicken/chicken," and it starts with the egg.
Wait, didn't Debt Island sink? Did it float back up?
/s
How much coastline does Bermuda have during a storm?
The real absurdity of it comes when you consider coastal salt marshes, which is a lot of land. Are brackish swamps land or sea? Do you have to measure how far the water goes up the mangrove trunks at high tide? How many days of the year the dirt is exposed at low tide?
This is exactly it; the question of how long the coastline "really" is is of no interest to "science" or government or civics or any physical human activity: all that matters is the establishment of a system that gives predictable values that are "good enough" to keep most people from fighting over them. That's all. Make a rule; measure to the rule. It is useful to know generally how much coastline one place has in comparison to another place, but the details don't matter.
Scientifically it is a nonsense question; who cares where you drew the line between the two words? If you wanted to measure the displacement of the continent within the US territories there are various physics models that can do a good job without ever needing to decide that. Instead you'd want to start from a good datum of the Earth's mass, and a detailed 3d surface map. There are lots of things that you would naturally measure or total in doing that, but coastline isn't likely to be one. You'd only worry about that in cartography, and then only in reference to some sort of arbitrary standard.
Slashdot Mirror
None of that matters, the ECU itself is inside a metal box. I'd think about other theories of operation, before settling on "the microwaves have to touch the ECU."
That shielding won't save you, and is actually the point! The shielding absorbs the energy, causing a large transient voltage spike in your car's electrical system. That causes the ECU to crash, because it isn't designed for those conditions.
One of the key things to understand here is that the car only has two electrical connections, battery + and battery -. Battery - is often called "ground," it will tend to be at local ground because it is referenced to the vehicle chassis which will likely be at ground potential when you start the car. But it doesn't have a third wire with an actual Earth connection, and the wheels are usually electrical insulators. What that boils down to is that shielding works by converting the RF interference into a short voltage spike, some of which is converted to heat in the ECU and any other electronics with voltage regulation. All the devices in the car are already expected to survive "double battery condition," which is when the tow truck driver gives you a jump start using 24V, which is really 28V+ because their engine is running and their battery is charging voltage. So there is a huge amount of voltage margin and the shielding works well without even having system-wide voltage regulation. But in the extreme case, as with this device, you eventually overload the ECU's voltage regulation, and since the circuit is designed to be robust, it simply crashes and reboots as soon as the spike dissipates. Repeated use could easily damage a vehicle, though.
For protection against this, I'd want to try something low-tech like a wire brush connected to the chassis that can drag on the ground slightly, so that voltage spikes can find a path to Earth instead of getting stuck in the circuit.
No. Also, this was demonstrated on American television 12 years ago; the demo had a driver in the car, and the journalist standing right next to it, because there is no reasonable health danger from short-term exposure.
The thing about "starting a family" tells me you watch a lot fictional television "shows," and that you don't understand what the content is.
You didn't add anything to what I said, so I question if you even understood it since you replied anyways.
Nothing in WHOIS is needed by networks. Everything the networks need is in the DNS database.
I pay more to hide that information than I pay for the domains, so this sounds like a feature for Europeans to me.
If a person actually wants to post information about a domain online, they can use an "about" or "contact" page. This isn't the 1990s, where a website might be down and the company didn't notice for a week until somebody called the ICANN contact. ;)
ICANN can't "find a solution," there is no solution. They're not supposed to be a decision-making body, they're supposed to be a management body that coordinates maintenance. That makes this the EU's problem; they're the decision-makers who did a thing that contradicts the other thing they don't control.
The real point is that this isn't something ICANN even does; they only handle how the different registrars coordinate to implement and maintain the database. Each registrar is the one actually managing individual entries, not ICANN. They don't even have any sort of authority with which to do anything. That's why ICANN warns that registrars will be implementing varying policies depending on each of their interpretations of the law.
Can an entire relationship be developed by paid proxies?
Yes, they'll exchange phone numbers very rapidly, stop talking, and consider it a wonderful relationship.
Relationships have stages, and this only exists at the pre-phone-number phase.
If somebody ever comes in to interview and they take a phone call to do another interview at the same time... I'm going to honestly mean it when I thank them for their time, because I'm going to get at least 5 minutes of solid belly-laugh out of it.
This doesn't surprise me at all, I wouldn't expect you to get any better than that.
What I was told was, "She isn't going to tell you what she wants, she expects you to understand her well enough to know already."
Just because somebody simplified the saying for you doesn't mean that reality is that simple. It only means she was trying to understand what advice you'd know how to make use of when she considered her words.
When you're mad that people didn't laugh, just stop talking. Until after you've had a full night's sleep.
I've worked with LEDs, and what you're not considering is that daylight is a broad spectrum, and LEDs are multiple narrow bands. An LED that puts out light that averages the same temperature as daylight is actually very different. Maybe it is the same for some application, since the average is the same, but also maybe not.
Beware of waving your hands and presuming you have knowledge. It is a lot easier to wave your hands and presume you have ignorance, and instead of preventing you from understanding new things it will actually prepare you for considering them.
It goes beyond even just no strings attached, too; they're making a preemptive threat against people who don't agree to their terms, who might want to offer them different terms. They seem to consider offering them something on proposed terms to be a "shakedown."
My advice to security researchers, if you find an Uber bug, sell it to Uncle Sam instead.
Last time I bought a laptop, I booted into Windows to make sure the hardware worked before installing linux, and it did boot and appeared to be some sort of functional desktop OS.
Definitely still runs.
The ban is on outdoor use (agriculture, garden, landscaping). You can still spay roaches in your house.
Always spay roaches in the house, if you do it in the yard They will see you.
I always said I wanted to hear Hyejeong and Yuna sing more. They seem more focused on acting, though.
It seems to be playing out so that if there is a deal, all the important parts will be negotiated by the Korean leaders first, and if that deal adds up to a deal that the US can support, then whoever is the US President on some day shortly after that will sign some papers that also say the same things. And they will get some attention for it.
The difference with Iran is that Iran and Israel are about to go to open warfare, and then that deal won't even matter.
If different American groups support a deal in Korea in the future will depend on North Korea's behavior; if they observe international norms, most Americans will support it.
Iran is very different; many Americans would never support any sort of deal with Iran as long as Revolutionary forces remain in power there, because they're still mad about all the mean stuff that Iran did. And they know that Iranians are still mad at us about the mean stuff we did. So they're very distrustful of any ideas for maintaining peace. Korea doesn't have that sort of interest level without the nukes. Probably because Korea is divided and the good half is our friend. People worried about North Korea, other than with nukes, are worried about Communism more generally, and North Korea is small and distant. People who care about that are more worried about closer threats, like Cuba, and bigger threats, like China.
Not the test facility, just one of the main tunnels under the mountain.
Reports since then reported work at other nearby sites, presumably working on new tunnels.
The Chinese have warned them in the past that they were over-using the tunnels and risking a collapse, they just didn't want to do the work of prepping a new tunnel until it actually happened. Workers died, but try to understand; workers at this site are constantly dying, and they bring new ones in. They don't have radiation safety programs. Their system is simpler; important enough people don't have to do that job.
It doesn't even occur to these dill weeds that maybe they help certain corporations because they want to, because they believe in fighting to put some class of people ahead of other people.
Not all politicians are out to help corporations, certainly none of the politicians representing me personally in Congress have that sort of failing. So it is rather idiotic premise in the first place; but even when you encounter such people, there is no reason to just assume it is based on money. It may simply be based on the fact that they both have money, and therefore like each other, and nobody paid anybody off. Wake up, reality isn't your conspiracy theory.
After seeing the picture of Kim Jong-Un blushing while posing with Red Velvet I figured, OK, this might be for real, he might really be ready to focus on trade.
Plus, China told him he had to do it; he went to China and they went on the news together, and North Korea had agreed to give up their nuclear program, and China had agreed to remain their ally. Sounds like a good deal to me, right?! Good deal for everybody, actually.
So how do you soften the hearts of the Generals? With kpop. Duh.
Works for me! I'm more of an AoA fan, but I can totally see Red Velvet being better for this mission.
"5 available."
It only takes a few dozen sales in a day to increase the prices, the Chinese companies are good at this; if you mention something like that on 1 popular youtube channel, the ebay price went up. The amazon prices are more stable, but they still jump. Good deals like that are real, but it is often in error to insist that it is a repeatable activity.
The banggood prices are real prices, not teasers; they're high, sure, but they'll tend to track the local price, and if you're ordering in volume you'll get good discounts. Cheaper outlets will never have a firm price.
You're just waving your hands and saying the word "money," but at this point national elections are awash in more money than there is things to spend it on campaigning. It is mostly only unviable candidates that even have to try to raise funds, thanks to Citizens United. There are a limited number of television spots available to purchase, and dumping more money in just raises the prices but doesn't change the number of minutes that are available, or how often you can run the same ad before you create a backlash of angry viewers.
You seem somewhat ignorant of the difference in intent between Democracy, and Mob Rule. Having procedures that push things towards the center is not automatically problematic; it seems to many people that being moderate is more of a compromise than just taking turns having things decided by 51% of the day's whims. Super-delegates are current and past elected officials; there is nothing undemocratic about giving people who have already been elected under the party's banner a larger say in who caries the party's banner. That is silly. It just acts as a low-pass filter and slows the rate of change; if forces a candidate with radical ideas to also take into consideration the people who like the old way, and to transform their radical ideas into incremental changes. If society actually moves in their direction over the long term, eventually those incremental changes will add up to their ideas; but not by the social trauma of radical change. And if they were telling the truth when they claimed to agree with the party's past "platform" then they would only actually be wanting incremental change anyways. Being part of a "large umbrella" party is not an invitation for minority views to take power, instead it offers to take into consideration the biggest concerns of all the groups.
How many laps around the library of congress building is that?
Exactly 1, the Library of Congress is already inside the land border!
It was an interesting thought experiment until the discovery of DNA, but now we understand that the egg clearly comes before the chicken.
Where you draw the line between what you call a "chicken" and what you would consider a proto-chicken is arbitrary, but wherever you draw that line, a proto-chicken laid the first egg that would grow into a chicken.
If you go back far enough, when the egg shell was first invented, the proto-bird and proto-mammal were the same. We came out of the shallow sea together, the mammals and birds, and diverged some time after that. It doesn't really matter where you draw the lines; the Proto-foo gave birth to the Baby-foo, which grew into a Foo. The egg comes before the thing it grows into. At some point you draw the line "not chicken/chicken," and it starts with the egg.
Wait, didn't Debt Island sink? Did it float back up?
How much coastline does Bermuda have during a storm?
The real absurdity of it comes when you consider coastal salt marshes, which is a lot of land. Are brackish swamps land or sea? Do you have to measure how far the water goes up the mangrove trunks at high tide? How many days of the year the dirt is exposed at low tide?
This is exactly it; the question of how long the coastline "really" is is of no interest to "science" or government or civics or any physical human activity: all that matters is the establishment of a system that gives predictable values that are "good enough" to keep most people from fighting over them. That's all. Make a rule; measure to the rule. It is useful to know generally how much coastline one place has in comparison to another place, but the details don't matter.
Scientifically it is a nonsense question; who cares where you drew the line between the two words? If you wanted to measure the displacement of the continent within the US territories there are various physics models that can do a good job without ever needing to decide that. Instead you'd want to start from a good datum of the Earth's mass, and a detailed 3d surface map. There are lots of things that you would naturally measure or total in doing that, but coastline isn't likely to be one. You'd only worry about that in cartography, and then only in reference to some sort of arbitrary standard.