We're not telling you what to do; receiving access to US intelligence is a benefit for the recipient country. Being military information, sharing it has restrictions. That isn't telling you what to do, that is merely telling you what the conditions of being that close of friends are.
It is so European to be given a choice, where you can do it our way and get full access, or do it your own way with partial access, and we're still going to cooperate either way; and you present that as telling you what to do, because we didn't give you all our toys for free?
Personally, I hope your politicians are as stupid as your internet denizens, sharing our military intelligence with Germany was always an iffy proposition.
We remember the soldiers who died for us every year with the whole village.
Well you do a shitty job at it. Those Canadians are close allies of the US, you weren't saved by Canada. Canada was part of an allied effort mostly contributed by the US. There is no way around that.
That was jointly developed by General Dynamics. From Virginia.
Your argument is so weak; because we buy some parts for spy satellites from allies, that causes you to think we couldn't build them on our own?
We buy those parts to help support your industry, in the hopes that somebody protecting you will cost us less of our own blood and treasure.
The dick-waving "we do nuclear weapons better than you" is hilarious though. Dude, when you're waving a fake dick that hard, it is called "projection."
German cars are not something "everybody wants because they actually work." If you want a car that "actually works," you buy Japanese. Everybody knows that. The German cars that "everybody wants" are luxury cars. And guess what? People want luxury cars wherever they're from.
You can't even build enough transports to move your military equipment, even after decades of considering it a priority.
You didn't know this, but almost all the US military equipment is made in the USA. You thought you were building our rockets? And airplanes? Wow, get you some internet.
I'm sure you could design some military hardware, but good fucking luck trying to spend the money it takes to actually build it. You'd have riots in the streets before you were even ready to challenge Canada.
Uh, I think you'd have less information about threats in the world without access to American information gathering.
That's about it. What do I care if Germany has 25% more terrorist attacks? It won't effect the parts of their economy that affect me.
And it isn't like Germany spends money collecting an equal amount of information to share.
I want the US Government to focus on protecting Americans; if we share data with allies, it is because we have shared values and a common cause. If the other country decides that is no longer true, then damn straight we should stop sharing data. Fucking DUH, that's what us American fuckwits think. But we have the same information access either way, too, so who is the fuckwit?
Also, nobody gets to kill Venezuelans but Venezuelans. Hasn't Germany done enough killing on their own, why are you chomping at the bit to see more killing? Why the fuck would the US bomb Venezuela? Are you that clueless that you don't even know that wars have causal factors?
It is like electrical inductance; the negative value comes from the mass already being stored inside the phenomena before the part where you're counting it.
Like when you shut off an electric motor and get an inductive spike as the stored power bleeds out.
Action/reaction, all that jazz, but with a slight temporal buffer.
That's exactly it; you would require so much sound that you'd heat the air to an uncomfortable level without creating enough force to lift more than a sheet of paper.
And how are you going to generate sound that vibrates preferentially in one direction? How much motion can you generate that isn't immediately reversed by the oscillating signal? 1 Planck's constant in a rounding error?
You can't. And so, you have to simply use less speed on the return of the voice coil. But that screws your duty cycle, and now you need a whole bank of speakers to make the sound of one speaker. This isn't going in the right direction for this technology to have promise.
And even if you did build it, all you have is a really really inefficient fan.
If you understood classical physics, you'd understand that there is no difference between the statements. The wind cannot push the tree without the tree swaying. The tree cannot sway without pulling the wind. Pulling and pushing are identical; we call one an "action" and the other a "reaction" because it is easier for humaans to understand, but they're not separate; you can't have only one, which would be required for it to be causal.
Most 1st World countries, airlines order it with the optional AOA indicator. So if the AOA sensor is faulty, there is a related indicator that will show what is wrong.
The problems are if you don't have that option, and also don't know the new procedures for the AOA sensor.
So it doesn't seem like an extreme mitigation is even useful from an FAA perspective; the version flying here isn't likely to confuse pilots in the same way. It is also less likely for planes to keep flying with a faulty sensor here; precisely because we have the FAA.
While I understand not everybody believes the eye witness reports of noise, smoke, and a trail of falling luggage, it does seem especially odd to me to believe just the smoke/fire part.
Although in your comparison, if I tell my computer to do more math than it can finish quickly, it does indeed make some sproinging noises; it could use a new fan. It's normally quiet at regular speeds but it rattles and chirps over 3500 RPM.
It is bad enough when people pronounce that abomination, but why would you go on the internet and use it? Just to warn everybody you're from the South and might be horrible inside?
While I agree changing the clock is stupid and lame, the "killing people" part is a bit iffy.
The statistic presented sets off my BS detector, because who cares about a 1 day spike? What people actually care about is if more heart attacks happened than would have happened otherwise. So when they give you the statistic about same-day admissions and things, it seems to imply that they didn't have the better stat; an actual increase in total heart attacks.
So lets say that some people with heart disease are really close to heart failure, and a small change in their stress level causes a heart attack; is that a temporary condition? Or does the progression of the disease mean that they'll be in the same dire straights next week, and the week after, and will probably die soon? That isn't really a big public health issue. And the total numbers that month don't even change.
OTOH, if it was an increased chance of heart attack across the board, then it wouldn't be followed by a week with less heart attacks; the numbers per month would also be higher, and there would have been more total deaths. That would be a bigger deal; and if they had studies that showed that, they'd lead with that one, not the other one.
So maybe, but probably not really. You're also more likely to have a heart attack during or after exercise, and yet, if you exercise your total risk usually goes down, not up.
You'd be amazed how many things in your life you take for granted are that way because...
Because somebody told you that the things were that way, and instead of taking that as encouragement to look the subject up since it interested you, instead you just believed whatever the person told you. And so you've got this giant load of bullshit inside your head that you carry around and sometimes share.
It involved shopping in a way, but not directly; it was the BBQ Lobby that encouraged the last extension.
The biggest shopping day of the year is in November. The biggest shopping season is late fall/early winter. I don't think the retail world is as dumb as you posit.
I have a collection of thousands of recorded bagpipe songs, and I'd like to point out; there is a good reason, a very good reason, that Scotland the Brave and Amazing Grace make up 95% of the bagpipe music played in public.
If you really want to torture them, play something like Duart's Castle. The first minute or so will have you wanting to dance, but that's just about when the song falls into Duart's Moat for the kill. Nemo me impune lacessit!
You may not know this, but the guy on the screen talking in the first person is just an actor. He didn't actually do any of this himself, other than reading it to you. And maybe writing some of the jokes. Maybe.
Who do I trust to have a better handle on it, John Oliver and the lawyers at HBO, or random anonymous internet guy?
And I don't even doubt you're a lawyer. It is just that your swollen head won't make your opinion as important as the opinions of the lawyers who are involved. They put a lot of work in to make his show even possible.
A) are mostly not regulated by the FCC B) are excepted from most of the rules about captions
It is the free over-the-air broadcast stations that are required to follow those sorts of rules. The authority of the FCC to regulate them comes from the fact that broadcast bandwidth is a limited public resource.
Slashdot Mirror
We're not telling you what to do; receiving access to US intelligence is a benefit for the recipient country. Being military information, sharing it has restrictions. That isn't telling you what to do, that is merely telling you what the conditions of being that close of friends are.
It is so European to be given a choice, where you can do it our way and get full access, or do it your own way with partial access, and we're still going to cooperate either way; and you present that as telling you what to do, because we didn't give you all our toys for free?
Personally, I hope your politicians are as stupid as your internet denizens, sharing our military intelligence with Germany was always an iffy proposition.
We remember the soldiers who died for us every year with the whole village.
Well you do a shitty job at it. Those Canadians are close allies of the US, you weren't saved by Canada. Canada was part of an allied effort mostly contributed by the US. There is no way around that.
You're just an ungrateful asshole.
That was jointly developed by General Dynamics. From Virginia.
Your argument is so weak; because we buy some parts for spy satellites from allies, that causes you to think we couldn't build them on our own?
We buy those parts to help support your industry, in the hopes that somebody protecting you will cost us less of our own blood and treasure.
The dick-waving "we do nuclear weapons better than you" is hilarious though. Dude, when you're waving a fake dick that hard, it is called "projection."
German cars are not something "everybody wants because they actually work." If you want a car that "actually works," you buy Japanese. Everybody knows that. The German cars that "everybody wants" are luxury cars. And guess what? People want luxury cars wherever they're from.
You can't even build enough transports to move your military equipment, even after decades of considering it a priority.
You didn't know this, but almost all the US military equipment is made in the USA. You thought you were building our rockets? And airplanes? Wow, get you some internet.
I'm sure you could design some military hardware, but good fucking luck trying to spend the money it takes to actually build it. You'd have riots in the streets before you were even ready to challenge Canada.
Uh, I think you'd have less information about threats in the world without access to American information gathering.
That's about it. What do I care if Germany has 25% more terrorist attacks? It won't effect the parts of their economy that affect me.
And it isn't like Germany spends money collecting an equal amount of information to share.
I want the US Government to focus on protecting Americans; if we share data with allies, it is because we have shared values and a common cause. If the other country decides that is no longer true, then damn straight we should stop sharing data. Fucking DUH, that's what us American fuckwits think. But we have the same information access either way, too, so who is the fuckwit?
Also, nobody gets to kill Venezuelans but Venezuelans. Hasn't Germany done enough killing on their own, why are you chomping at the bit to see more killing? Why the fuck would the US bomb Venezuela? Are you that clueless that you don't even know that wars have causal factors?
It is like electrical inductance; the negative value comes from the mass already being stored inside the phenomena before the part where you're counting it.
Like when you shut off an electric motor and get an inductive spike as the stored power bleeds out.
Action/reaction, all that jazz, but with a slight temporal buffer.
The mass is real. It is the idea that the sound "has" the mass that is meta.
Right, a small amount of energy is stored inside the phenomena and so if you interrupt it, you notice a tiny transient spike in a variable.
It is like a slight inductance.
Makes me glad didn't read it, yikes.
"so loud they would start your hair on fire,"
That's exactly it; you would require so much sound that you'd heat the air to an uncomfortable level without creating enough force to lift more than a sheet of paper.
And how are you going to generate sound that vibrates preferentially in one direction? How much motion can you generate that isn't immediately reversed by the oscillating signal? 1 Planck's constant in a rounding error?
You can't. And so, you have to simply use less speed on the return of the voice coil. But that screws your duty cycle, and now you need a whole bank of speakers to make the sound of one speaker. This isn't going in the right direction for this technology to have promise.
And even if you did build it, all you have is a really really inefficient fan.
If you understood classical physics, you'd understand that there is no difference between the statements. The wind cannot push the tree without the tree swaying. The tree cannot sway without pulling the wind. Pulling and pushing are identical; we call one an "action" and the other a "reaction" because it is easier for humaans to understand, but they're not separate; you can't have only one, which would be required for it to be causal.
Most 1st World countries, airlines order it with the optional AOA indicator. So if the AOA sensor is faulty, there is a related indicator that will show what is wrong.
The problems are if you don't have that option, and also don't know the new procedures for the AOA sensor.
So it doesn't seem like an extreme mitigation is even useful from an FAA perspective; the version flying here isn't likely to confuse pilots in the same way. It is also less likely for planes to keep flying with a faulty sensor here; precisely because we have the FAA.
While I understand not everybody believes the eye witness reports of noise, smoke, and a trail of falling luggage, it does seem especially odd to me to believe just the smoke/fire part.
Although in your comparison, if I tell my computer to do more math than it can finish quickly, it does indeed make some sproinging noises; it could use a new fan. It's normally quiet at regular speeds but it rattles and chirps over 3500 RPM.
Y'all
It is bad enough when people pronounce that abomination, but why would you go on the internet and use it? Just to warn everybody you're from the South and might be horrible inside?
Adjusting your trim is slightly less obvious; you would first have to look at the trim indication and realize that it's out of whack
Trim is normally set so that you don't have to push or pull on the yoke to maintain your path. You don't look at a "trim indication".
But I can haz trim adjustment in sim? I never have problem like this. If I did, it would be so easy that Ceiling Cat would save me!
That's the joke; it is suspicious because it is a common mistake, but he didn't make it. And he makes a lot of grammatical and spelling mistakes.
He's a rich asshole; he may have poor grammar, but he's still going to accidentally repeat some big words that people around him say.
Or, maybe it was just a typo.
While I agree changing the clock is stupid and lame, the "killing people" part is a bit iffy.
The statistic presented sets off my BS detector, because who cares about a 1 day spike? What people actually care about is if more heart attacks happened than would have happened otherwise. So when they give you the statistic about same-day admissions and things, it seems to imply that they didn't have the better stat; an actual increase in total heart attacks.
So lets say that some people with heart disease are really close to heart failure, and a small change in their stress level causes a heart attack; is that a temporary condition? Or does the progression of the disease mean that they'll be in the same dire straights next week, and the week after, and will probably die soon? That isn't really a big public health issue. And the total numbers that month don't even change.
OTOH, if it was an increased chance of heart attack across the board, then it wouldn't be followed by a week with less heart attacks; the numbers per month would also be higher, and there would have been more total deaths. That would be a bigger deal; and if they had studies that showed that, they'd lead with that one, not the other one.
So maybe, but probably not really. You're also more likely to have a heart attack during or after exercise, and yet, if you exercise your total risk usually goes down, not up.
I don't think they even let kids walk to school on the side of the road in the dark anymore in most places.
You'd be amazed how many things in your life you take for granted are that way because...
Because somebody told you that the things were that way, and instead of taking that as encouragement to look the subject up since it interested you, instead you just believed whatever the person told you. And so you've got this giant load of bullshit inside your head that you carry around and sometimes share.
It involved shopping in a way, but not directly; it was the BBQ Lobby that encouraged the last extension.
The biggest shopping day of the year is in November. The biggest shopping season is late fall/early winter. I don't think the retail world is as dumb as you posit.
No, the idea was to save electricity, as in switching on lights later etc.
The idea was to save the whales, as in lamp oil, or I mean, at least, to save money on candles and lamp oil.
You were at least right that light was involved, so you're ahead of the curve.
I have a collection of thousands of recorded bagpipe songs, and I'd like to point out; there is a good reason, a very good reason, that Scotland the Brave and Amazing Grace make up 95% of the bagpipe music played in public.
If you really want to torture them, play something like Duart's Castle. The first minute or so will have you wanting to dance, but that's just about when the song falls into Duart's Moat for the kill.
Nemo me impune lacessit!
You may not know this, but the guy on the screen talking in the first person is just an actor. He didn't actually do any of this himself, other than reading it to you. And maybe writing some of the jokes. Maybe.
Who do I trust to have a better handle on it, John Oliver and the lawyers at HBO, or random anonymous internet guy?
And I don't even doubt you're a lawyer. It is just that your swollen head won't make your opinion as important as the opinions of the lawyers who are involved. They put a lot of work in to make his show even possible.
TV stations you have to pay for
A) are mostly not regulated by the FCC
B) are excepted from most of the rules about captions
It is the free over-the-air broadcast stations that are required to follow those sorts of rules. The authority of the FCC to regulate them comes from the fact that broadcast bandwidth is a limited public resource.