Slashdot Mirror


Trump Endorses Permanent Daylight Savings Time (thehill.com)

President Trump on Monday threw his support behind efforts to keep the United States permanently on daylight saving time, which took effect Sunday morning. "Making Daylight Saving Time permanent is O.K. with me!" Trump tweeted. The Hill reports: California and several other states are considering measures that would end the biannual clock changes between standard and daylight saving time. Three GOP lawmakers from Florida introduced legislation in Congress this month that would end the November clock change from daylight saving time back to standard time. The measures, introduced by Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott and Rep. Vern Buchanan, would keep the country in daylight saving time, the clock change made in early March that is observed by most states for eight months of the year. Rubio introduced a similar measure in 2018. That bill did not advance in the Senate.

376 comments

  1. Just pick a damned time by Snotnose · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't care if it's DST or standard, just quit changing the damn thing twice a year. Myself, I prefer it getting darker later, whichever one that is. But I don't care enough to change my damned sleep cycle twice a year.

    1. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, darker later is the way to go.

    2. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mmm no.. in the south you need to get up with sunrise anyway, because the sunset is the hottest part of the day. In the north, the sunlight in the winter is so short that you will go to work at dark and leave work at dark. Staying in permanent offset is idiotic

    3. Re:Just pick a damned time by supremebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I never really understood why we "fell back" to standard time during winter, the one time of the year where the extra hour of daylight in the evening was the most useful.

      Daylight until 8:30 PM during Summer never seemed all that helpful, but daylight when you're trying to drive home from work around 5:30? Now THAT is useful!

      Yeah, sure... It would be better yet if management left everyone leave at 4 PM during Winter to improve their commutes, but we all know that's not going to happen in most organizations.

    4. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if it's DST or standard, just quit changing the damn thing twice a year. Myself, I prefer it getting darker later, whichever one that is. But I don't care enough to change my damned sleep cycle twice a year.

      Sure. Convince the whiny soccer Moms already. They're the ones constantly bitching about shifts in daylight hours affecting games and other lame ass excuses.

      Sports seems to be the primary reason we endure this stupid shit twice a year.

    5. Re:Just pick a damned time by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2, Informative

      DST was originally to benefit farmers whose workday was dictated by daylight hours. Since that's not an issue anymore we don't need DST.

    6. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live near Miami so I know what it is in the south, and on the eastern edge of a time zone. And yes, darker later is better.

    7. Re:Just pick a damned time by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Because daylight earlier in the morning helps people wake up. I know it helps me.

      Permanent day light savings time would be fine with me though. But congress is the only one that can change it. Individual states can't.

    8. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So driving home in daylight is OK, driving to work in the dark is OK? Not sure I understand your logic. I lived in Arizona for 15 years, no DST. People had no problems in either summer or winter.

    9. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would farmers care what time the clock showed?

    10. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

              Re:Just pick a damned time (Score:?)
              by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 11, 2019 @09:48PM

              Yes we don't need DST. But the story about helping farmers is a myth. Farmers hate DST. Always have, always will.

    11. Re:Just pick a damned time by Beeftopia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A more "colorful" history of DST:

      At some point in elementary school, many American children learn that Daylight Saving Time was originally intended to give farmers an extra hour of light to work the fields.

      That is, in fact, a lie.

      Farmers actually hated the practice, because it cut an hour of daylight in the morning, leaving them with an hour less to get goods to market, according to Michael Downing, author of the book Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time. In reality, the extra hour of evening daylight was good for one thing: selling products. ...

      Specifically we have the candy lobby, the barbecue lobby, and the golf ball lobby to thank for modern American Daylight Saving Time. But we’ll get to that in a second.

      And another article, from Smithsonian magazine.

    12. Re:Just pick a damned time by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, the idea was to save electricity, as in switching on lights later etc.
      For farmers it does not matter at all, they don't care what time is displayed on their watch.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re: Just pick a damned time by Penis!+8D · · Score: 0

      The AC that posted that or the darkies?

    14. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the "share croppers" need to know when Wall Street is open and trading.

    15. Re:Just pick a damned time by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Indiana (when they didn't observe) and it was glorious. The only thing we ever noticed was that all our summer TV shows were 'central time'.

      This whole twice a year thing is jarring. We ate dinner at 9 tonight because we're used to looking outside to judge when to start stuff.

      Plus all the studies of morbidity in hospitals and traffic accidents.

      Daylight-saving time is literally killing us

      But each year on the Monday after the springtime switch, hospitals report a 24% spike in heart-attack visits around the US.

      Then again, I'm sort of a diehard UTC person. College caught me that who cares what time you wake up on the clock. Especially with the global economy I know business meetings across 4 timezones and all their nuances would go a lot smoother if we just set UTC meeting times.

    16. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because I for one don't like going to work in the dark.

      Coming home in the dark, that I don't mind. It's no different from if I'd been out with friends after work. But going out in the dark? That's just depressing.

    17. Re:Just pick a damned time by magarity · · Score: 1

      DST was originally to benefit farmers whose workday was dictated by daylight hours. Since that's not an issue anymore we don't need DST.

      You've confused DST with traditional long summer break school year calendars.

    18. Re:Just pick a damned time by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Then explain Arizona - no DST. Or Hawaii - no DST. States can opt-out if they want.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    19. Re:Just pick a damned time by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then again, I'm sort of a diehard UTC person. College caught me that who cares what time you wake up on the clock. Especially with the global economy I know business meetings across 4 timezones and all their nuances would go a lot smoother if we just set UTC meeting times.

      China has all one time zone - it's rather strange to fly west 4 hours and not change your watch. And the sun comes up at 3 am. Although their mentality about it is that Beijing is the center of their universe so everyone is on that city's time.

    20. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And I live in Arizona and what the clock says has absolutely no meaning anyway. If you have to do something outside you do it at sunrise. if you want to have a been and hike, you just go out when you feel like it. The length of a daylight in a day does not change, regardless if the sun rises at 4am, 9pm or whatever the lazy drug addicts want the clock to show. If you want a longer day, move to a polar circle. .

    21. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you seen the ADOT crash statistics study - its scary what permanent DST will do

    22. Re:Just pick a damned time by XanC · · Score: 2

      They can opt out, but they can't go for permanent DST without Congressional approval.

    23. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for the time change is so that kids wouldn't have to walk to school in the dark. Now we have reflective clothing, and parents are too weak to let their kids walk even a few blocks.

      It's interesting that your ignorance is celebrated.

    24. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >_ I don't care if it's DST or standard, just quit changing the damn thing twice a year. Myself, I prefer it getting darker later, whichever one that is. But I don't care enough to change my damned sleep cycle twice a year.

      That might be better that the continuous change, but it would still have adverse effects.

      Daylight Savings Time is actually a misnomer for the entire process. It should be called Sleep Reduction Period, because people have to wake up earlier -- often in the pitch black darkness -- to reach work / school / whatever at the first light of the day.

      Besides, even if it's still day when you leave work, you'll be robbed of quality time at home (or with friends at the bar/pub), because you just have to try to sleep earlier to compensate for waking up before you were fully rested.

      Except you won't be able, as the body wants to sleep one hour later, daylight or not.

    25. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, if you don't fall back, you get up in pitch blackness for too long in the northern part of the US. I want NO DST ever. Let's stop playing games.

    26. Re:Just pick a damned time by mark-t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Daylight until 8:30 PM during Summer never seemed all that helpful, but daylight when you're trying to drive home from work around 5:30? Now THAT is useful!

      Not nearly as useful as having exposure to at least *some* sunlight in the morning before a person start's their work day. While it's true that many people begin their commute while it is still dark in the winter, a *vast* majority of them still get to experience at least some sunlight before heading indoors at the end of their commute. Exposure to even just 15 minutes of sunlight in the morning boosts seratonin levels, which in turn boosts melatonin production in the evening and is vital for having healthy and restful sleep... delaying exposure to sunlight until later in the day does not boost seratonin levels as high as it will in the morning and further delays melatonin production, leading to health problems related to the lack of restful sleep. You're talking about a "nice to have", but comparing it to something that we are biologically adapted to, which is to function primarily during the day.... well, as I've said before on this subject, evolution is not a democracy.

      And while you wouldn't get the sudden chaos that changing the clocks twice per year brings, instead slowly ramping up and then slowly ramping down throughout the winter, but keeping the clocks pushed ahead through the winter months would be certainly disasterous for a period of about 3 to 4 weeks in the middle of winter for people who live north of about 45 degrees, which while not a majority of Americans, is still not a small a number.

    27. Re: Just pick a damned time by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      Morning traffic is naturally spread across a 3-5 hour window of time. In contrast, when DST ends, EVERYBODY (statistically) goes running for the door between 4:30 and 5:30pm, causing INSTANT gridlock that persists for hours.

      It's particularly graphic in South Florida. In the summer, people without kids tend to work later, avoiding the instant 5pm gridlock that happens during the winter.

      Think of it as time-domain multiplexing for freeways. If everyone on a cellular network tries to transfer a megabyte at 5pm, the network grinds to a halt and NOBODY'S data gets through. Stagger that same megabyte over a longer interval of time, and data gets through. When the sun sets early, it induces people to all hit the roads at once.

    28. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They better fing opt out! How dumb would it be for az to always be on California time and Florida to just stay 3 hours ahead?

      Sorry but yâ(TM)all are crazy if you think permanent dst is a good idea. Itâ(TM)s like deliberately choosing the wrong time!

    29. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... left everyone leave at 4 PM ... to improve their commutes...

      Same s***, different time.

    30. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but daylight when you're trying to drive home from work around 5:30? Now THAT is useful!

      Yeah, unless you are driving into the sunset...

    31. Re:Just pick a damned time by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Why can't the individual States decide? Here, in Canada, it is a Provincial decision. Shit there's currently a private members bill in my Provinces legislature to create a new time zone splitting the Province, and it could pass and officially we'll follow the Western States decision to stay in sync according to the government.
      Probably have to give the feds notice though as they're in charge of stuff like ships and railroads.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    32. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DST all year round results is very dark mornings in the winter. It was tried in the 1970s. It was a disaster.

    33. Re:Just pick a damned time by yorgasor · · Score: 5, Informative

      They never did. They get up when the animals do or when the fields need taking care of. They couldn't care less what the clock says.

      --
      Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
    34. Re:Just pick a damned time by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, the idea was to save electricity, as in switching on lights later etc.

      The idea was to save the whales, as in lamp oil, or I mean, at least, to save money on candles and lamp oil.

      You were at least right that light was involved, so you're ahead of the curve.

    35. Re:Just pick a damned time by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      While I agree changing the clock is stupid and lame, the "killing people" part is a bit iffy.

      The statistic presented sets off my BS detector, because who cares about a 1 day spike? What people actually care about is if more heart attacks happened than would have happened otherwise. So when they give you the statistic about same-day admissions and things, it seems to imply that they didn't have the better stat; an actual increase in total heart attacks.

      So lets say that some people with heart disease are really close to heart failure, and a small change in their stress level causes a heart attack; is that a temporary condition? Or does the progression of the disease mean that they'll be in the same dire straights next week, and the week after, and will probably die soon? That isn't really a big public health issue. And the total numbers that month don't even change.

      OTOH, if it was an increased chance of heart attack across the board, then it wouldn't be followed by a week with less heart attacks; the numbers per month would also be higher, and there would have been more total deaths. That would be a bigger deal; and if they had studies that showed that, they'd lead with that one, not the other one.

      So maybe, but probably not really. You're also more likely to have a heart attack during or after exercise, and yet, if you exercise your total risk usually goes down, not up.

    36. Re:Just pick a damned time by acrimonious+howard · · Score: 1

      DST was originally to benefit farmers whose workday was dictated by daylight hours.

      Surprisingly, nope. Farmers were vociferously against DST for a long time. Apparently, their intense opposition got them associated with it.

    37. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the chicken wanted to cross the road during daylight?

      No,

      Because thyme farmers wanted to corner the market by clocking in earlier.

    38. Re:Just pick a damned time by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      My interpretation was that it was always about giving your employer the best hours of your day.

    39. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can I come visit you in binary world sometime, where people live either on the southern or northern border and the season is either the heart of summer or the deep of winter.

    40. Re: Just pick a damned time by houghi · · Score: 2

      I was thinking about the times you stated an then realized that the whole of the US is more south than Europe.

      So in summer it is light for a few more hours in many places.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    41. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all well and good for you. In more northern latitudes, we end up with darkness until 9am in winter - it's already bad enough with darkness until 8am, but 9am will really piss me off.

    42. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, changing the fucking time back and forth is idiotic.

    43. Re:Just pick a damned time by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      By the time DST was introduced (during WW1) oil lamps long switched to kerosene (probably even in Dunwall), and electric light was already common enough in the cities.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    44. Re:Just pick a damned time by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 1

      Darker later = get up earlier. It that what you want?

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    45. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm no.. in the south you need to get up with sunrise anyway, because the sunset is the hottest part of the day. In the north, the sunlight in the winter is so short that you will go to work at dark and leave work at dark. Staying in permanent offset is idiotic

      So is skin cancer.

      People can and do live just fine without an abundance of sunlight during the waking hours. Spent a few years in northern Alaska, and now I live in the south. Stop your bitching already.

    46. Re:Just pick a damned time by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      They spring forward to ‘save’ daylight because otherwise sunrise would be 4:30AM. I dont get why everyone is such a pussy about the whole thing. Try going on a WestPac deployment. We changed times more than 24times in 6mos. Go across the internatiomal date line and see how far off that throws you. Being the navy, they never gave you that extra hour during sleep. It was always lose an hour at night and gain an hour during ships working hours (0600 - 1600). With our current timechanges, If I’m losing an hour of sleep then I just go to bed earlier as of the time had already changed. But it does happen on Sunday so if I’m still tired I sleep in. As long as I get six hours of sleep it doesn’t matter what the clock on the wall really says

    47. Re:Just pick a damned time by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Europe is ditching the DST switching as well, there was a public EU wide poll which apparently went 80% or more in favor of dropping the time shifting (but have in mind 70% of all votes came from central europe which was affected most by the constant time shifting lightwise and hated it most)
      So in the end we will drop it around 2020/21 over here, but it is not yet clear if france and spain for instance will move into the GMT timezone because they were in the wrong timezone anyway (for business reasons) and keeping a permanent DST might be painful for them.
      Thats the hard part to figure out and agree on. The worst which can happen is a tapestry of timezones instead of clear border lines.

    48. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because there's literally a federal law about it. A state can choose to adhere to the federal time change rules or can remain on standard time year around. What they can't do is stay on daylight savings time year around.

    49. Re:Just pick a damned time by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      If a state wishes to observe DST they must do so on the Federal schedule. A state can choose to stay on standard time without any federal approval. The quirk here is that these states are wanting to be on DST year-round, which means they are observing DST off the federal schedule, so they actually do need approval for that. If a state lies in multiple time zones they can actually split the policy by zone. Indiana did this for a while.

      Here's wikipedia on the relevant law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    50. Re:Just pick a damned time by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Why would farmers care what time the clock showed?

      Yeah, "but farmers" always struck me as a bizarre argument.

      What, the cows won't be ready to be milked unless their clock matches yours? It never made any sense.

      It's hard to think of another profession except maybe "hermit author" that is less affected by other people's clocks.

    51. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kaiser instituted it during WWI to save oil and help them win the war.

      It was a failure then and it is a failure now.

    52. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because daylight earlier in the morning helps people wake up. I know it helps me.

      Me as well, I'm having a hard time getting up again as of this week because we're back to a pitch black bedroom when my alarms go off rather than already being awoken by the sunlight coming in through the window. I'm also not a fan of being back to driving to work with the sun in my eyes the entire way and going home with the sunset in my eyes the entire way as well.

    53. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you do not work; because if you did you would realize your work schedule changes with the time. Go out and get a job.

    54. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone that's been a farmer, most farmers felt DST was developed so city folks had more time to golf. Nobody seems to have any idea why it actually came to be, and everybody's pointing fingers at everybody else about it. Maybe it's time we just stop it because it's clear nobody gives a damn about it at all.

    55. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump may he an idiot, and I may dislike him for a lot of reasons.... but on this point, I agree with him.

    56. Re: Just pick a damned time by Cederic · · Score: 3, Funny

      if you want to have a been

      What the fuck?

      The length of a daylight in a day does not change, regardless if the sun rises at 4am, 9pm or whatever

      No, but whether it's light when you go to work/school or light when you get home from work/school does change and does matter to people.

    57. Re: Just pick a damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      So? Go to the school board meeting or talk to your manager to get the start/stop time changed. Why do we need to fuck up every clock in the nation twice a year to accomodate local variances?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    58. Re:Just pick a damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      No. The quirk here is that this whole argument is ridiculous. The "clock" is a figment of our imaginations instituted to coordinate cooperation between people. There is literally no other reason for having a clock other than to be able to agree on when events will occur. Modifying the clock twice a year upsets the coordination, the only point in having the damn thing in the first place.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    59. Re:Just pick a damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      The solution to that is to talk to your manager and get your work hours shifted.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    60. Re:Just pick a damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      You can muck with the hands or digits on your clocks all you want. It will make not one iota in the lightness or darkness of mornings or evenings anywhere. That is controlled by the tilt and speed of the Earth's rotation, not the arbitrary numbers on your clock.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    61. Re:Just pick a damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      You're pissed off by an arbitrary number on a dumb device?
      Dude, you should really get out more.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    62. Re:Just pick a damned time by Heathren-bert · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Indiana (when they didn't observe) and it was glorious. The only thing we ever noticed was that all our summer TV shows were 'central time'.

      Yes, the biggest question we would have is if we were the on the same time as New York or Illinois. And it would get dark enough in the summer earlier so kids could catch lightening bugs. Now it doesn't start getting dark until 10pm here on the western side of Indiana.

    63. Re:Just pick a damned time by nbritton · · Score: 1

      No, the idea was to save electricity, as in switching on lights later etc.

      The idea was to save the whales, as in lamp oil, or I mean, at least, to save money on candles and lamp oil.

      Electricity is dirt cheap now, but lives aren't. Driving home from work in the dark after you're exhausted and tired from a long days work is a recipe for disaster and the crash statistics bear this out. The winter time is when we need extra light hours in the evening because winter road conditions and it being dark outside can lead to more vehicle accidents.

    64. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't. It's too dark out.

    65. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it is so kids are not picked up in the morning darkness.
      Nixon tried in on winter in the '70's to offset the oil shortage.
      Kids were getting hit by cars since it was so dark.

      I too want the change over to end and just go back to standard time.
      It was good enough for the founding fathers, it's good enough for us.

    66. Re: Just pick a damned time by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      No, he wants the artificial Daylight Savings Time on, rather than sticking with Standard Time. The problem here is that people start to assume that if it's dark for them in the morning that it must be dark for everyone in the morning. Time zones are the fundamental problem here and the weird ways that the borders were drawn. Natural time is when the sun is at its highest point at 12:00PM, going to DST permanently means that the sun would be approximately overhead at 11:00AM instead. So it focuses on the mornings and not the evenings. And if you are so enamored at having more daylight in the morning at the expense of darker afternoons, then switch the time by two or three hours!

      So if we're getting rid of time change it should be to be Standard Time year round, and if that's not good enough then just dump time zones altogether and have a single world time. But doing to Daylight Savings Time year round is just stupid and ignorant.

    67. Re:Just pick a damned time by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Everyone leaves for home around 3pm here. I'm not ever trying to leave early anywhere between 3 to 6 because those are peak commute hours.

    68. Re:Just pick a damned time by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The reason that this was good for farmers was mostly a myth and a way to sell it to politicians. The real reason it got enacted wide scale was to keep businesses open later in the evening to hopefully help out the economy.

      No one would care that much if the time zones were more uniform and no one was ever more than 30 minutes off of natural time. But some people might be 45 minutes to an hour off, and that hour difference might help them out (while simultaneously inconveniencing someone on the opposite side of the time zone).

      They should just ditch time zones altogether and have one time world round. Then the local work place might say "work hours are roughly 16:00 to 00:00" (or 9 to 5 PST). But we'll never get here because it's confusing, too many politics, too many people not understanding time very well, etc. Remember the US couldn't even manage to get to metric because so many people complained about it, imagine trying to fix something like time.

    69. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The natural lengthening and shortening of the day is symmetrical with a fixed clock, so dawn comes later and dusk earlier in winter.

      The idea behind daylight savings time is to pin dawn to a specific time so that in summer you gained daylight in the evening where it was more useful rather than the morning where Your need to get to work interferes with the ability to use the extra daylight. The implementation of changing clocks by an hour twice a year is a compromise between the complexity of a clock that pins dawn to a specific time and the benefit of having the extra summer daylight be in the evening.

      The economic argument is that it turns out people use more artificial light in the evening than morning so having more natural light in the evening reduces energy costs wether its lamp oil and candles as in the original, or electricity now.
      Though I believe the actual lobby for it in its curent incarnation was sort of a reverse as it was meant to encourage outdoor cooking and thus sell more charcoal/gas and related accessories.

    70. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      No, the idea was to save electricity, as in switching on lights later etc.

      What? There are people who turn on or off lights based on a clock instead of the actual level of light available?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    71. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      The winter time is when we need extra light hours in the evening because winter road conditions and it being dark outside can lead to more vehicle accidents.

      OK, then set that as the standard time. It still doesn't sound necessary to change clocks twice a year.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    72. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Indiana is a great example of what not to do for time zones.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    73. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't for the farmers. you are correct they do not care about the time much,
      I believe it was started during the war.

    74. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or I work from around 6am to around 8pm in current time zone, but can take extended breaks when I feel I need those.

    75. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was originally intended to conserve fuel needed for lighting things after dark. Look it up.

    76. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      At some point people need to realize that they've chosen to live in a place where the sun rises late in the winter, and become OK with that fact. Adapt to it. Move work hours back or whatever you need to do, maybe just come to terms with the realities of living in the northern quarter of the planet. What's stupid is expecting a bunch of other people to change their clocks twice a year.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    77. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      That's interesting that a country that large and populous can operate on one time zone. Different regions wake up and sleep at different times and no one changes their clocks. Makes sense.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    78. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    79. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-daylight-saving-time/2015/03/06/970092d4-c2c1-11e4-9271-610273846239_story.html?utm_term=.9d21dff48ea5

    80. Re:Just pick a damned time by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What? There are people who turn on or off lights based on a clock instead of the actual level of light available?
      Yes, e.g. automatic lights in show rooms, shops etc. which are often on mechanical time switches. People often don't care to adjust them when DST is switched on or off.

      And no, ordinary humans go after the light level, and hence switch on light later when DST is on ... I guess you knew that ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    81. Re:Just pick a damned time by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No, the idea was to save electricity

      The concept of DST predates electricity, but you're on the right track. Think more oil and candle wax.

    82. Re:Just pick a damned time by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      College caught me that who cares what time you wake up on the clock.

      And when you grow up and enter the real world you'll find plenty of people care about when you do what with your life, including your neighbours if you wake up at 6am to mow the lawn because it's the only time of the day with light, and your boss because he doesn't want you coming late.

    83. Re:Just pick a damned time by mark-t · · Score: 1

      At some point people need to realize that they've chosen to live in a place where the sun rises late in the winter, and become OK with that fact.

      Perhaps they are... right now. But if you end up pushing sunrise back an entire hour, they aren't the ones who chose to suddenly have to now always do their entire commute before dawn, because on standard time, they didn't have to worry about it, and during the summer, the sun comes up early enough that DST doesn't keep them out of the sun either.

      What's stupid is expecting a bunch of other people to change their clocks twice a year.

      Absolutely. But pushing the clocks into permanent DST isn't the way to do that.

    84. Re: Just pick a damned time by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2

      They're not going to change opening hours for one person, or even for a few people. Too much of the world works on expectations of business opening times of 9:00, not a shifting time throughout the year based on sunrise. It has these expectations because they work, otherwise you're back to cities 100 miles apart working on slightly different schedules based on their local sunrise and sunset. We got rid of that for a reason.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    85. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of call, calling it Daylight "Savings" Time is stupid and ignorant. It's Daylight "Saving" Time. It's not plural, you stupid feck.

      Second of all, daylight in the morning is useless for 99% of the world population, so "Standard" time is also useless, as it is a relic of a bygone era.

      I saw another poster suggest having clocks adjust continuously based on GPS location to have sunrise fall at the same clock time every day year round. Now that's the smartest thing I've ever seen on Slashdot, bar none.

    86. Re:Just pick a damned time by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      While it's true that many people begin their commute while it is still dark in the winter, a *vast* majority of them still get to experience at least some sunlight before heading indoors at the end of their commute.

      I'm not sure where you're working that you get 15 minutes of time outside before work, but it seems to be fairly rare in my experience. Working at a large place might mean a sprawling parking lot but could also mean a parking structure. Even with the sprawling lots, it's rarely more than a few minutes to get inside. Before parking, you're in the car, which often means tinted glass so not much brighter than at home.

      And in the winter, in those places with serious darkness issues, they're going to rush inside anyway to get out of the cold on most days, days that will also often be cloudy and rainy or snowy.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    87. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot. DST means more daylight LATER in the day, not in the morning.

      Standard Time would be dreary and fucking stupid. I'm sorry, but I don't want it to be 16:00 when the sun sets.

    88. Re:Just pick a damned time by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you're working that you get 15 minutes of time outside before work

      On the commute to work, perhaps? Honestly, that's all it takes. While it's true that no small number of people do need to start work before the sun actually comes up in the middle of winter, the reality still is that most do not. Moving sunrise an hour later would, however, subject virtually everybody to a completely sunless commute except those who start work *very* late.

    89. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Winter I get up at night,
      And dress by yellow candle light.
      In Summer, quite the other way,
      I have to go to bed by day.

    90. Re:Just pick a damned time by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

      I never really understood why we "fell back" to standard time during winter,

      I do. They tried not falling back one year in 1974. We schoolkids had to walk to school in the dark. It was no big deal for me at the time, as school was 5-6 blocks away.

      But all the parents freaked out ("Little Johnny will get hit by a car!"*) and that was the end of it.

      .

      .

      .

      . * No one worried about kids being kidnapped and raped while walking to school in the dark, because we weren't all pussies back then. You're welcome and get off my lawn.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    91. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move south?

    92. Re:Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop lying, farmers, chickens, cows, and plants don't give a fuck what the clock says.

    93. Re:Just pick a damned time by bigtech · · Score: 1

      In "Standard Time", the sun is directly overheard at noon. That's what we "fall back" to. I guess it's some kind of cosmic rule.

    94. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      they aren't the ones who chose to suddenly have to now always do their entire commute before dawn

      If they decide to open their businesses before sunrise then they most certainly are the ones choosing that. I don't understand the confusion. It's not like there's a federal law which states that any public business needs to be open no later than 8am or whatever. Open when the sun is out if that's important to you, regardless of whatever the clock says.

      There are places in the US, like Seattle, which experience fewer than 9 hours of sunlight in a day in the winter. If they want to be open for 10 hours a day, is it possible to do that in a way where both commutes are during the light? Of course not, absolutely no amount of fucking with a clock is going to give you more than 9 hours of sunlight in one day. But people make the choice to live there, so they're choosing to deal with that. They understand the sun is going to set before 5pm and not come up again until 8am. It's just a fact of life, and I'm not going to change my clock in Arizona because people move up there and realize that the days are much shorter.

      It does not matter at all if it's always standard time or always DST or whatever. REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE DAMN CLOCK SAYS, open your business at a time that you want to open and close it whenever you want to. It does not matter what time the clock says when you do these things. That is not important. If people need to get used to the fact that school starts at 10am, they'll get used to it. It's not a big fucking deal and I have no idea why people are using so many words to talk about this issue. It doesn't deserve it. It's a really really simple issue. People need to quit thinking that all businesses need to be open at 8am or some arbitrary time on the clock. They don't.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    95. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      So if a business is open for 12 hours a day, and they have their lights on while they're open, and turn the lights off a certain amount of time after they close, you're suggesting that power consumption for those lights changes based on things like the time of the year or the time of day? At what time of day does a light bulb that is turned on use the least amount of electricity?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    96. Re:Just pick a damned time by mark-t · · Score: 1
      It's worth noting that the reason that people typically think that businesses should be open at time X is because the sun is always up by that time, even in the middle of winter.

      If you push sunrise back an hour, then that isn't true anymore.... and regardless of how high the soapbox is that you stand upon to preach about it, it's unlikely that the perception is going to change. At the very least, you are going to be looking at having to push school start times back an hour to compensate, and that in turn is going to mess with everyone's schedule if they have kids.

    97. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      That's just the price they pay for wanting to live in the northern quarter of the planet I suppose, where daylight might be less than 9 hours. I'm sure they'll figure it out without expecting the rest of the country to change their clocks. If they refuse to change their perceptions then I guess they're setting themselves up for an irritating life for no good reason. That, too, is not my problem.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    98. Re:Just pick a damned time by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I agree, and in the 21st century, it's just insane, because 24 hour business cycle etc. is a fact of life. It's just an inconvenience, now. But many of the idiots in our government in the USA, of both parties, and many of the citizens of the nation, actually believe we DO "get an extra hour of daylight" rather than just shift the clock.

    99. Re:Just pick a damned time by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Or... they could also just leave the goddamn clocks alone and let 12PM actually define the middle of an actual solar day like it more or less actually is on standard time.

      If people are so freaking upset about not having any daylight in the evening, why don't they just quit their job and find another one with more favorable hours?

    100. Re:Just pick a damned time by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      That's another good option.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    101. Re:Just pick a damned time by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Dude, DST was introduced in germany around 1975.
      Shops usually closed around 18:00/19:00.
      In summer it gets dark around 21:00.
      Shops activate lights around 20:30 and keep them on till about 22:30.
      With daylight saving time hey save one or two hours of electric light.
      For a whole country, that adds up.

      Not to mention homes where people like to sit outside and do not need electric light because: uh, it has light longer in the evening, wow, that was so easy.

      Sorry, no one can be so dumb not to grasp this simple thing.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    102. Re:Just pick a damned time by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Most countries don't have a 24 business hours circle of life. The shops in Germany that close at midnight are just a hand full. Everything else closes 20:00 or 21:00 and opens in the morning around 8:00 / 9:00.

      Same for France or Thailand, and I doubt rural USA is any different.

      "actually believe we DO "get an extra hour of daylight" rather than just shift the clock."
      Because you actually do get an extra hour of daylight, or are you used to get out of bed at 4:00? Idiots all around, I don't get how people can be so stupid.

      I get up between 9:00 and 10:00: so I get an extra hour of daylight. YMMW ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    103. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already live in southern California. That's about as far south as you can get in the US without having to live in a redneck place like Texas or Florida and Hawaii is way too isolated and difficult to travel from.

      Changing the time twice a year is both annoying and bad for our biological clocks. Just leave it on DST so that we all have more daylight hours throughout the entire year.

    104. Re: Just pick a damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even a broken clock is right once a year thanks to time changes.

  2. About damned time by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trump says something that isn't completely idiotic!

    1. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And he even got the Daylight vs Standard Time distinction correct, and expressed a policy choice succinctly.

      Which means somebody else wrote the tweet.

    2. Re:About damned time by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      About time he says something right. [paraphrased]

      You know what they say about a broken daylight savings clock being right twice a year.

    3. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump's twitter account was hacked.

    4. Re: About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't change timezone without permission from the Feds, Paco.

    5. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump says something that isn't completely idiotic!

      A tired 4-year old understands the logic of ending DST, so that's not really saying much.

    6. Re:About damned time by rnturn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah but there's always the chance that he said that because he thinks it's actually saving daylight.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    7. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't cut yourself with that edgy "the left is terrible" rhetoric.

    8. Re:About damned time by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Trump says something that isn't completely idiotic!
      Could have been just dumb luck, it's a simple binary choice.

    9. Re:About damned time by spitzak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even a stopped clock is right twice a day!

    10. Re: About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only every other word he says is a lie

    11. Re:About damned time by meerling · · Score: 1

      I so want to argue that point with you, but this is trump we're discussing, so....

    12. Re: About damned time by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      States can't change their timezone or the definition of their timezone. That's a power reserved at the federal level. They do have the choice to honor daylight savings time, 2 states don't participate (AZ is one).

      But to change timezones or their offset from UMT you have to have an act of congress and up to this point it's never happened because of vested interests.

    13. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't care about the politics of Trump, but going to year round DST is stupid.

    14. Re:About damned time by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Maybe he meant Daylight Slaving Time
      #maga #just-kidding

    15. Re:About damned time by Krishnoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And he said 'Saving' instead of 'Savings'. I'm suspicious.

    16. Re: About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See spoken like a true mindless liberal.

    17. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump says something that isn't completely idiotic!

      Well there went my hope for world peace. I hate that man and what he represents more than I can say. It's not as if lies and distortions are new, but having it continually up at 1000 on a scale of 1 to 10 is new and exhausting.

      When I studied history in high school I thought. America is stable. There is no way we will ever go back to the crazy past and such. It's amazing how thin the line really is. I'm okay with the DST change.

      Just today the Sarah Sanders refused to denounce the whole Democrats hate the Jewish people nonsense that Trump was started. Jon Stewart is a liberal hero for goodness sake. I'd think I'd notice if I hated him. (Please come back and do your own show Jon.)

    18. Re:About damned time by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"it's a simple binary choice."

      Not really. It is a simple trinary choice-

      1) Do nothing and continue this insane time changing twice a year that the vast majority of people dislike or even hate.
      2) Stay on standard time year-round.
      3) And the BEST choice of all- stay on summer time (daylight saving time) year-round.

      But somehow even this will be made partisan, like everything else now, and then go nowhere. So we will be stuck with the worst choice (#1). Count on it.

    19. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that's the actual name? It's Daylight Saving Time.

      Perhaps you should consider who the idiot is, if you he's correct but you believed the wrong thing.

    20. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is in fact fairly idiotic. It would make much more sense to just kill the idea of daylight saving time altogether. Then at least noon on the clock would roughly correspond to the actual noon.

    21. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump says something that isn't completely idiotic!

      Yes, but now you did!

    22. Re:About damned time by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Numbers 2 and 3 really depend on where in your timezone you are. There's an hour or so difference between the east and west.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    23. Re:About damned time by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You really think there are only three choices? Tisk.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    24. Re:About damned time by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      He's a rich asshole; he may have poor grammar, but he's still going to accidentally repeat some big words that people around him say.

      Or, maybe it was just a typo.

    25. Re:About damned time by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's the joke; it is suspicious because it is a common mistake, but he didn't make it. And he makes a lot of grammatical and spelling mistakes.

    26. Re:About damned time by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      A broken clock is right twice each day

    27. Re: About damned time by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      According to this(http://timezonereport.com/?page_id=313) you’re almost correct. Doesn’t take an act of Congress, but instead they need to “Petition the Secretary of the Department of Transportation and request a change of time zone designation.” Which is much easier than getting Congress to agree on anything ever.

    28. Re:About damned time by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The flaw in your third proposal is, staying on summer time year-round does not make it summer year-round.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    29. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, its a nice change from the resent presidents.

    30. Re:About damned time by bobbied · · Score: 1, Informative

      Trump says something that isn't completely idiotic!

      Love him or hate him, Maybe you should be listening to what he says and tweets more often... Where he is often what you apparently expect, he has said a lot of things which are quite insightful, even more so than this statement. Trust me, the guy is not dumb or even crazy as some claim, he's just not very polished or PC in what he says so it's easy to make fun of him.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    31. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And the grammar police in the media are looking for *any* reason to make fun of him, so they report on every jot and tittle he gets wrong.

    32. Re:About damned time by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Don't cut yourself with that edgy "the left is terrible" rhetoric.

      Here I thought the comment was quite blunt...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    33. Re:About damned time by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Not when the clocks go forward and we lose an hour. That day it's never 01:30!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also often makes multiple claims in direct opposition of each other.

      It wouldn't surprise me if I agree with a lot of his tweets. It's just that he made a dozen more that contradicts them too.

    35. Re:About damned time by UPi · · Score: 1

      Him endorsing sticking with DST is the first time I start doubting that it is a good idea. It's like an exercise regimen recommended by a sloth: suddenly and inexplicably it sounds terrible, even if you've been doing it all your life.

    36. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, if you squint your eyes hard enough looking at him he kinda resembles Antonio Sabato Jr.

    37. Re:About damned time by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      He also straight out denies having said things we have a clear record of.

    38. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the grammar police in the media are looking for *any* reason to make fun of him, so they report on every jot and tittle he gets wrong.

      Doesn't need the media if you are at least know how to speak English. Foreigners know better English than many native speakers.

    39. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HURR DST = moar light! Not the fact that it's summer or anything!

    40. Re:About damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Doesn't need the media if you are at least know how to speak English. Foreigners know better English than many native speakers.

      WOW! And you did that with a straight face. I'm at a loss for words.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    41. Re:About damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      You need to pull up a news outlet that will let you hear about Ilhan Omar's repeated antisemitic remarks.

      Or, just continue on in your willful ignorance and hero worship of all things Democrat. Your choice.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    42. Re:About damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Unless it is DST switchover time. Then it might in fact be right three times in one day.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    43. Re:About damned time by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      And, which politician doesn't? Could you name names?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    44. Re:About damned time by spitzak · · Score: 2

      On the day clocks go back a stopped clock can be right 3 times, however. So it makes up for it.

    45. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the clocks go forward there's no 02:01 to 02:59, 01:30 still exists ;)

    46. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Covfefe Saving Time?

      Gotta save the covfefes!

    47. Re:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      choose the middle ground then

  3. I'm all for it - really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Donny has applied his formidable brain and famous thoughtful, reasoned intellectual rigor to the problem, it must be the right choice.

  4. knowing that guy... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet he asked it be named, "Trump Standard Time". And maybe "Time Force" the second option.

    1. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orange Man Good! Any criticism is bad. Trump is God! Ook! Ook! Maga! Maga!
      This cannot be questioned!

    2. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes orange man is bad.
      Thanks for recognizing it this once.

    3. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you are learning. There's hope for USA after all.

    4. Re: knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, somebody can't stand an obvious flippant joke about how Trump has a proclivity for naming things based his self promotional arrogance.

      Let me guess, you don't believe he said "Tim Apple" either?

    5. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree with you there

    6. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In TST, both arms on the clock are short.

    7. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time Force all the way!

    8. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flubbed the joke of "both hands are small"

    9. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet he asked it be named, "Trump Standard Time". And maybe "Time Force" the second option.

      Actually, he just wants to do away with the 'spring forward' part. It's a loss of hours for the workers...

    10. Re:knowing that guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd choose TCT, for "Trump Clobbering Time".

    11. Re: knowing that guy... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you don't believe he said "Tim Apple" either?

      I believe that the fact you find that worth mentioning is absolute proof you have no beef with him aside from the fact he's not "your" guy.

  5. It is the seventh sign.. by Major_Disorder · · Score: 1

    Trumpy and I agree about something. Repent, for the end is near.

    --
    First law of people: People are generally stupid.
    1. Re:It is the seventh sign.. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Actually, if even Trump is for ditching the time changes, it makes me wonder. Who the hell is it that likes it, and convinces our legislators not to get rid of it.

    2. Re:It is the seventh sign.. by Kargan · · Score: 1

      Popular Mechanics, apparently:

      https://www.popularmechanics.c...

      --
      Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
    3. Re:It is the seventh sign.. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Barbecue makers.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  6. It's not Daylight Savings Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's Daylight's Savings Times

  7. MORON AGREES, AIR EXISTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well let's all just fucking fawn over some basic shit, shall we? Excellent job, Captain fucking moron.

    1. Re:MORON AGREES, AIR EXISTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orange man bad! Surprise, not this time. Need new principle to guide us!

  8. not permanent; end it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a bad idea that should have never been started

  9. Lessons learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that crayon eating moron endorses it, turn yourself 180 degrees, and RUN do not walk, RUN in the opposite direction.

    Daylight savings time? WE LOVE IT!! STAY THE COURSE! NO CHANGE!!

    #NEVERTRUMP2020

  10. Can we also stop timezones? by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

    Seriously, time is relative. We have fricking time zones literally 15 minutes apart in areas. We have major confusion when you call somewhere and they say they are closed at 5:00 and you look at your watch and go, but it's 3:00 how can you be closed?

    P.S. going out into space or anywhere where our narrow view of the date/time exist will only make this worse (like Mars)! Stop the madness now!

    This message brought to you by the Let's Count Ticks Since 0 council.

    1. Re:Can we also stop timezones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No trump can't stop time zones that are 15 minutes apart. He is not the president of canada, or nepal, or india. or any place else that has half hour time zones much less 15 or 45 minute time zones.

      Also counting ticks is a poor measure of time particularly when talking about space travel where the length of a tick changes...
      If you are going to count ticks you need to define where you are counting ticks, how fast is that place moving, how much gravity is there, etc.

      Going to UTC is a poor choice for most of the world where it'd be a substantial change in time, but not for europe where it wouldn't be.
      I'd propose of having central time stay on DST and eastern time stay on standard time... eastern and central are both now on the same time.
      Do the same with mountain and pacific... We've now got two time zones, and an unfortunate 2 hours jump between east and west, but the good news is it's in a place that is sparsely populated, so very few people would be crossing a 2 hour time change on their morning commute...

      No clock changing, 2 fewer time zones... we can even try to get those two time zones to meet in the middle at some point in the future, but people are going to need some time to adjust to the new sunrise and sunset first...

      We should probably also get alaska and hawaii on the same timezone... which just makes sense given that they are even in the same longitude...

    2. Re:Can we also stop timezones? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, time is relative. We have fricking time zones literally 15 minutes apart in areas. We have major confusion when you call somewhere and they say they are closed at 5:00 and you look at your watch and go, but it's 3:00 how can you be closed? P.S. going out into space or anywhere where our narrow view of the date/time exist will only make this worse (like Mars)! Stop the madness now! This message brought to you by the Let's Count Ticks Since 0 council.

      So you propose what exactly? Everyone's business hours are that of 9-5 UTC? I'm sure people in the west coast would love starting their day at the equivalent of 2AM.

    3. Re:Can we also stop timezones? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      After approximately one week, no one would think twice about it.

      Going metric would require/ has required serious money to convert infrastructure. Switching to a universal clock is little more than changing signs on advertisements. We're not even talking about changing the units. Just agreeing on a different number of when the workday starts.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    4. Re:Can we also stop timezones? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      After approximately one week, no one would think twice about it.

      Because they'd move?

      Everyone just sleeps during the day?
      Entire countries needing to use more electric because their "business hours" are when the sun isn't around?
      Businesses that literally depend on Sunlight (or lack thereof)?

    5. Re:Can we also stop timezones? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      So you propose what exactly? Everyone's business hours are that of 9-5 UTC? I'm sure people in the west coast would love starting their day at the equivalent of 2AM.

      Why is that so confusing and scary for you?

      Our office is open from 15 GMT to 0 GMT. I wake up around 13 GMT and go to bed around 5 GMT. If I moved across the country, all that would change.

      OOOOOh, scary!

      It would sure make scheduling things across countries easier, wouldn't it? Of course, if you only do business and interact with people within a 100-mile radius of where you were born, maybe you wouldn't enjoy it as much. Then again, it would be the only system you ever knew and ever had to learn.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    6. Re:Can we also stop timezones? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Everyone just sleeps during the day?

      You're pretty confused, aren't you?

      "The day" isn't some arbitrary number on a clock, it's the 12 or so hours centered around when the sun is at its peak. When you understand this then I'll explain "the night," that will REALLY blow your mind!

      Entire countries needing to use more electric because their "business hours" are when the sun isn't around?

      Why the fuck would a business catering to the public decide to open its doors when everyone is sleeping? "BUT the sign on the door says we have to be open from 9am to 5pm (whatever "pm" is supposed to be!), and there's no timezone listed on the sign so we HAVE to be open from 9 GMT to 17 GMT! We have no choice! The sign dictates it!"

      Businesses that literally depend on Sunlight (or lack thereof)?

      Here's a crazy motherfucking idea, and I'm going to go quick so try to stick with me: if your business depends on the sun being out, then be open when it's out. If it depends on the sun being down, then be open when it's down. I hope I didn't move too quickly.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    7. Re:Can we also stop timezones? by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      Because they'd move?

      Everyone just sleeps during the day?
      Entire countries needing to use more electric because their "business hours" are when the sun isn't around?
      Businesses that literally depend on Sunlight (or lack thereof)?

      Such narrow thinking. Think about it realistically and what time really means. Ie, a day is just how long it takes before we see the sun again, which is mainly dependent on how fast the sun spins. Move to the moon and a 24 hour day doesn't mean as much, move to Mars and things are worse, live on the space shuttle that orbits several times in a 24 hour period and your all out of wack. A year is defined by how long it takes us to go around the sun, which again on Mars would be totally off. Heck I keep hearing people saying the summers in California are hotter because we are closer to the sun [eyes roll], don't get me started.

      So back to how this would work, say we use UTC as the basis and Standard Time everywhere. Then take California as an example, it has a UTC of -8. All that means is that whatever the UTC time is subtract 8 hours to get the California time. So your typical workday that starts at 8:00am "California Time" would instead start 8 hours later at 4:00pm UTC when the sun comes up in California; you normally get off work at say 5:00 "California Time" which corresponds to 1:00am UTC time. So in California stores would typically be open from 4:00pm to 1:00am. On the East coast stores would typically open at 1:00pm and close at 10:00pm.

      Now each area is free to set their store hours, so if you wanted a 15 minute advantage in California, you would open at 3:45pm and close at 12:45am. If you called up a store anywhere in the world and they said they closed at 1:00am, you could look at your watch and see it's 11:00pm and know the store is still open.

      Stop shifting the world around what is convenient for you, your not the center of the universe.

    8. Re:Can we also stop timezones? by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      which is mainly dependent on how fast the sun spins.

      Sorry, that should be:
      which is mainly dependent on how fast the Earth spins.

  11. For how long? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    If you know this president then it's that he flip-flops when the pressure is on. As soon as a Republican objects he will change his position. Count on it.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  12. Gradual time change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd like us to advance a minute a day for half the year, pause for a day, then recede a minute a day for the other half. In leap years, we'd do without the pause day.

    1. Re:Gradual time change by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      We'd wear out the stems on our watches and clocks in a few months.

  13. Exactly:About damned time by Texmaize · · Score: 0, Troll

    Trump says many things that are not idiotic. You are just brainwashed into reflexively hating him and do not think things through. If you did, you would see the merits of several (not all) of his points. The fact that it took you this long speaks poorly of you as a so called thinking human being. But, congrats on finding something simple enough to grasp.

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
    1. Re:Exactly:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you did, you would see the merits of several (not all) of his points.

      Ha ha ha. Now pull the other one.

      I hate him because he's a narcissistic idiot. He's racist. He's a fascist. He's a liar. He's a crook. He's a draft dodger, a tax cheat, a serial adulterer, and a bully. Etc., etc., etc. Do you claim to be religious? Christian? Tell us how you think fucking a porn star while his wife was pregnant is worthy of your adulation. And vote.

      He didn't even want the job. He thought running would be the greatest infomercial ever for the Trump brand.

      Drain the swamp? Yeah, right.

      Have you done your taxes yet? How's that "tax cut" working out for you?

      So yeah, don't project your "brainwashed" bullshit on those of us who have seen through him since the beginning. How's about you do some "thinking things through" yourself and get back to us.

    2. Re: Exactly:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you done your taxes yet? How's that "tax cut" working out for you?

      It worked well. My total tax to taxable income ratio was just over one percent lower than last year, even after exceeding the $10,000 limit on state and local tax deductions. I was pleasantly surprised.

    3. Re:Exactly:About damned time by Major_Disorder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trump says many things that are not idiotic.

      Citation needed.
      I have listened to him speak, and read many of his tweets. This is sufficient for me to know without a shred of doubt, that he is a moron.

      --
      First law of people: People are generally stupid.
    4. Re: Exactly:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I lost any federal refund even after adjusting deductions and credits. So fuck you, you piece of shit leech.

    5. Re: Exactly:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      time to take your medicine

    6. Re:Exactly:About damned time by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Trump says many things that are not idiotic.

      Citation needed. I have listened to him speak, and read many of his tweets. This is sufficient for me to know without a shred of doubt, that he is a moron.

      Go listen to his last state of the union speech. He said a lot of things during that speech that you should apparently hear. You can find it yourself on Google if you want, so I won't post links here.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:Exactly:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump says many things that are not idiotic. You are just brainwashed into reflexively hating him and do not think things through. If you did, you would see the merits of several (not all) of his points. The fact that it took you this long speaks poorly of you as a so called thinking human being. But, congrats on finding something simple enough to grasp.

      You used too many words. They won't get it. Here, let me translate:

      "ORANGE MAN BAD. REeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"

    8. Re:Exactly:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go listen to his last state of the union speech. He said a lot of things during that speech that you should apparently hear.

      First, you tried to extrapolate from one of his speech as who he is as a whole? Second, do you really believe that any president wrote the speech himself? Last, are you a moron?

    9. Re:Exactly:About damned time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it that a moron beat out so many other people for the presidency?

    10. Re:Exactly:About damned time by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      How is it that a moron beat out so many other people for the presidency?

      He's a moron with a message other morons can relate to. And most of the time he's a really affable guy. He's eminently electable. Totally incompetent. But perfectly electable.

  14. Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thoose advocating year round DST don't remember the disaster in the mid-70s. The country switched to year round DST for two years. It was quickly killed for many reasons. Scvhool children going to class in the dark was one, another was that people in cold country discovered that an extra hour of sun in the evening was of no benefit, but darkness until 8:320 or 9 was a pain.
    I hope rational heads will prevail on this, at a minimum keep the current system, or better yet, kill DST altogether.

    1. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But without DST kids will trick-or-treat in the dark.

      Also see the other replies on this page which express a desire to keep the extra hour of light in the evenings.

    2. Re: Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe kids shouldn't spend the supermajority of their waking hours at ineffective indoctrination camps.

    3. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But without DST kids will trick-or-treat in the dark.

      The little shits already do.

    4. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      School can start later in the day. Problem solved.

      What, that doesn't work with some people's work schedules? Well neither does the current arrangement. People cope with this, they can cope with that. Problem solved.

      A similar solution applies to the problem of people not liking their work schedules. These things can be changed. Problem solved.

    5. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But without DST kids will trick-or-treat in the dark.

      5/7th of the time. And it depends how far north you are. In Seattle it's likely dark anyway with DST by the time you get home and get the kids ready.

    6. Re:Standard all year by MikeDataLink · · Score: 2

      This argument baffles me. Here's a concept. Get up earlier or go to bed later. The amount of time in the day is unchanged.

      What? It's dark for kids? You know schools can choose what hours they open and close?

      What? Construction workers have to work in the dark? They too can change what hours they work. Just like they do when it rains.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    7. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of trick-or-treating already happens in the dark.

    8. Re:Standard all year by hey! · · Score: 1

      In 1969, 48% of K-8 students walked or biked to school. By 2016 that percentage dropped to less than 10%. In my part of the country, the norm of shoveling sidewalks is no longer enforced meaning that walking often requires detours into the street.

      Since this makes winter walking to school impractical, it's a moot issue. Personally, I think kids should walk to school, and the sidewalks should be cleared at least four feet wide. Schools could simply move their start later in the day.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re: Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The time should reflect the position of the sun, it is beyond our control. How we organise our activities within this has always been up to us.

    10. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the public school transportation schedule and the work hours schedule and political nonsense rather than trying to agree on appropriate times because companies are draconian to low-wage workers.

    11. Re:Standard all year by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You know schools can choose what hours they open and close?

      But many parents can't choose what time they have to be at work, and often they are affected by what time little Johnny goes to or returns from school. There's no simple solution that's not going to cause grief for some large portion of the population.

      I personally like DST, but then having worked rotating shifts for several years, a one hour change seems hardly noticeable to me.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    12. Re:Standard all year by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      In 1969, we didn't have helicopter parents. I walked seven blocks unescorted to and from elementary school in Detroit up until that year. Now, I see parents sitting out at the bus stop in front of my suburban home every day just to pick up their middle school kids on bright sunny mornings and afternoons. This is in a very crime free area of upper middle class homes. Sweet Jesus what is wrong with parents these days? None of these kids has more than a 1/4 mile walk to home. SMH

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    13. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nanny state happened. If you don't raise your kid the way social services think you should, then they take your children away from you.

    14. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my city it is now a criminal charge to leave a child unattended, including not preventing the kid from walking to school.

      Note I didn't say "for allowing". There have been situations when a kid decides to walk themselves to school before the parents wake up, and the parents were jailed for it.

      I don't know if these laws were the result of helicopter parents or not, and those types sure are bad enough, but even a parent wanting a child to grow up and be capable of taking care of themselves is being prevented by the government by force.

      Yes, things are that fucked up.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...
      https://works.bepress.com/lewy...
      http://5kids1condo.com/very-su...

    15. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public transport doesn't suddenly run on a different time table because you got up earlier.

    16. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. That's why DST all year is so dumb: Schools can choose their schedule, companies can choose their working hours, but the sun can't choose when to reach its zenith.

    17. Re:Standard all year by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Changing time schedules twice a year still requires people changing their sleep schedule, plus you have to deal with everybody changing their schedule at random times, or not at all, plus the overhead of posting the changes somewhere.

    18. Re:Standard all year by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Rather than having timezones that are basically vertical strips covering longitudes, it seems like we want them to be diagonal. People in the north on a different time to people directly south of them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Changing school hours can cause big problems though due to parents work and appointment schedules. Everything is tuned together.

    20. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live that shoveling sidewalks isn't enforced? Around here it's not typically enforced because people tend to be pretty good about it, but a couple houses who had north facing sidewalks and hadn't shoveled once all winter got their walk shoveled for them and a bill for a couple hundred dollars for the convenience.

    21. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how about this, just let local municipalities choose what they want to do... Florida voted 2 years ago overwhelming to adopt DST year round because *it makes sense for us*. Others on the trailing edge of a timezone would hate DST year round, because it makes it really crazy dark in the morning for a long time. Let them choose standard time year round. The point is, the feds shouldn't dictate this. But a law has to be passed to *say* the Feds won't dictate it, so people like Florida can decide for themselves.

      We just leaped forward. Again. 2 times now, after we voted to end it... Grrr....

    22. Re: Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Church?

    23. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Florida didn't vote to adopt DST. They voted to switch from Eastern Time to Atlantic Time. And yes, I live in Florida, and I think the idea is ridiculous. Daylight at 9 PM? No thanks.

    24. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally like DST,

      There is the mutant!

      Lets get him! :)

    25. Re:Standard all year by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

      just change the work and school hours in the winter time from 7am to 40pm or 8am to 5pm to just 9am to 3pm. that should solve the going and coming to work and school in the dark.

    26. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schools don't always get to choose either. When a school opens, at least rurally, is in large part dictated by bussing schedules for the other schools in the division. If you think an entire school division can change their schedule twice a year and not catch hell from the parents who now need to adjust their work schedules, babysitting, etc. you have no idea how a division operates.

    27. Re: Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids ALWAYS Trick or Treat in the dark. Even three year olds know this truth to be self evident.

    28. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a parent who lives in Maryland. He says that in his area, it is actually illegal to let your kids walk to school or even wait at the bus stop attended.

    29. Re: Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maryland is a bureaucrat hellscape devoid of humanity. Please, someone nuke us before our policies metastasize. Seriously. Save yourselves and put us out of our misery. Signed, 20 year resident.

    30. Re:Standard all year by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      In NC most large employers will shut down when there is the threat of snow. You know why? Because, they know that all the parents will be calling in due to school closings.

      You see what's happening there? Business will adjust when their workforce has to adjust.

      And you didn't even have to pass a law to get it done.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    31. Re:Standard all year by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      But, it would if there was a demand because lots of people got up earlier.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    32. Re: Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. And if you let your 12 year old go to the park down the street, Child Services will take them from you and put them in an abusive foster home. You know, for their own good.

      Fuck Maryland.

    33. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was quickly killed for many reasons. Scvhool children going to class in the dark was one,

      Times have changed; screwing over the younger generation is in vogue and accelerating.

      But yeah, screw the hand-wringing over "children going to school in the morning". That's some made-up bullshit that was never actually a problem in the first place. In a lot of districts, kids go to school in darkness in the morning even without DST. Source: I sure as hell did.

      people in cold country discovered that an extra hour of sun in the evening was of no benefit

      What? You may have remembered the 70s, but you apparently didn't live in a cold climate area.

      darkness until 8:320 or 9 was a pain

      What are you talking about? The "cold climates" (New England) the LATEST some states normally see light is 7am - if they switch to Atlantic Time (like MA is considering) then the latest would be 8am, for a small slice of the year. They. Will. Figure. It. Out.

      This whole thing of it being a disaster in the 70s sounds like a myth. Maybe it was because the whole thing was sold as "energy savings" when it really didn't save much energy, and the country had a lot of fatigue over the oil embargo. And maybe the country just wasn't as smart back then. Evidence: the country re-elected Nixon.

    34. Re:Standard all year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CURRENT school hours causes big problems due to parents work and appointment schedules. It's just causing problems for a different group of parents.

      And you know what? People find a way to cope.

      Changing the school hours will make things better for some, and the OTHERS can find a way to cope.

      Problem solved.

    35. Re:Standard all year by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Snow storms in NC (I'm in VA...same here) are one-off events that also affect those businesses customers. It's not their every day, 9 months out of the year situation.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    36. Re:Standard all year by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      In 1969, we didn't have helicopter parents.

      I know car accidents hadn't been invented yet in 1969, but neither kids nor drivers always pay attention to whats going on around them. So it helps to have someone pay that attention and yell to Billy to get his ass out of the road because there's a car coming around the corner.

    37. Re:Standard all year by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      No, we walked ten miles up hill both ways. It's fine, keep your head in the sand.

      https://www.psychologytoday.co...
      https://www.news-medical.net/h...
      https://www.forbes.com/sites/a...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  15. Re:As my Granpappy used to say by meerling · · Score: 1

    That watch has a higher accuracy rate than the orange potus

  16. No DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason to continue DST is cultural.About 98%+ of the population has only known DST, growing up with it as children, and what you experience as a child is what you want as an adult(McDonald's!) I lived in Arizona for 15 years, people there had no issues with staying on standard time year round.

  17. Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd forgive him a lot of things if he's just make that happen.

    And I'm not even American. Just a Canadian who knows that if it happens state-side, Canada will soon follow.

  18. Split the diff - go 30 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look I get it - Winter is dark up north. And the sun comes up really early in the summer (I have daylight from 5ish AM to almost 10pm where I live). Fireworks don't start until 9:30.

    But I too hate the 1 hour forward/back. It's miserable. Why not get the benefits of both and pick the middle.

    1. Re: Split the diff - go 30 minutes by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      I agree. Split the difference once & for all... Eastern = UTC-4.5, Central = UTC-5.5, Mountain=UTC-6.5, Pacific=UTC-7.5, etc.

    2. Re:Split the diff - go 30 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because thats what north korea did

    3. Re:Split the diff - go 30 minutes by AK9oh7 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of fireworks, where I live we set them off at 12:10am. We're probably one of the first to do so on July 4th.

    4. Re: Split the diff - go 30 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been forbidden to make compromise solutions from this point forward with that terrible idea.

    5. Re: Split the diff - go 30 minutes by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      What, exactly, is terrible about it? The fact that it involves a half-hour instead of a whole hour? Iran and India both do it already... and I think it's safe to say that if the US & Canada did it, Britain and the EU would probably do the exact same thing within a year or two (and vice-versa).

      Look at it this way... splitting the difference between standard and daylight saving time is just about the only thing at this point that's going to stop the majority of Florida from moving into year-round Atlantic Standard Time (the law was already passed, though I think it leaves the western panhandle pinned to Alabama's timezone). Once Florida gets spoiled by late sunsets all year, it's NEVER going to voluntarily rejoin the rest of the eastern US, EVEN IF the remainder eventually moves to UTC-4.5. If you think having the continental US at UTC-4.5/5.5/6.5/7.5 is "too confusing", try adding a fifth timezone ("Florida/Atlantic Standard Time") at UTC-4 into the mix as well.

      Could the feds forcibly drag Florida kicking and screaming back into Eastern if it shifted it to UTC-4.5? Sure... technically... but frankly, neither party would DARE at that point to antagonize the third-largest state in the country and risk having a half hour of "stolen" after-work daylight turn into a federal election-deciding backlash from angry voters. If Florida moves to UTC-4, "Florida/Atlantic Standard Time" will be permanent as far as Florida is concerned, REGARDLESS of what the rest of the east coast ultimately decides to do.

  19. Credit where credit is due. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't stand the goddamned clown BUT... this would actually be a pretty good, and likely very popular idea. I'm sure he'll find some way of fucking it up, though. Most likely the way will be that he'll change his mind, or do it only if he gets his stupid fucking pointless wall money. Or whatever.

  20. Wait until he finds out Obama's position... by bussdriver · · Score: 2

    FOX mistakenly probably gave him the idea with the yearly bitching that losing an hour causes; they'll set him straight on if he gets serious... unless they poll it gains him a few points... They've still got to win over the smarter portion of the below average IQ voters.

    Stupid or Evil. Ignorance of him is no longer an excuse.

  21. DST sucks. Regular time works by zkiwi34 · · Score: 1

    Why? Because it has for worked well for millenia.

    1. Re:DST sucks. Regular time works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Noon, not 1 PM, is when the sun should be overhead.

    2. Re:DST sucks. Regular time works by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The first clock was invented in 1656, so 363 years at most, but then you came here for the pedantic replies.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    3. Re:DST sucks. Regular time works by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Clocks and "standard time" have existed for a few hundred years. For millennia, people defined the start of the day as astronomical sunrise. DST is supposed to be a kind of compromise for the way astronomical sunrise time varies throughout the year.

    4. Re:DST sucks. Regular time works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have researched your answer, before claiming to be pedantic. You're talking about the pendulum clock; spring driven clocks have been in use since the 15th century. Water clocks are known for thousands of years and sun dials were in use long before those. GP used the term millenia correctly.

    5. Re:DST sucks. Regular time works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Devices for measuring time have existed for a few thousand years, and historically, at least, many people have defined the start of the day as astronomical sunset, which would imply putting the clocks back for the summer instead of forwards...

  22. Shopping by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    as has been pointed out originally it was for farmers. After that the reason we kept it around was shopping. People shop more when there's more daylight, so the retail chains fought to keep DST to maximize daily shopping time. Retail has waned quite a bit so there's less pressure to keep it.

    You'd be amazed how many things in your life you take for granted are that way because a company wanted it that way.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Shopping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as has been pointed out originally it was for farmers.

      BS, as has been pointed out.

    2. Re:Shopping by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You'd be amazed how many things in your life you take for granted are that way because...

      Because somebody told you that the things were that way, and instead of taking that as encouragement to look the subject up since it interested you, instead you just believed whatever the person told you. And so you've got this giant load of bullshit inside your head that you carry around and sometimes share.

      It involved shopping in a way, but not directly; it was the BBQ Lobby that encouraged the last extension.

      The biggest shopping day of the year is in November. The biggest shopping season is late fall/early winter. I don't think the retail world is as dumb as you posit.

    3. Re:Shopping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be amazed how many things in your life you take for granted are that way because a company wanted it that way.

      Are you amazed how wrong you are? And if that was true, does that help explain why government should have less control and regulations? (Hint, the more regulations mean more lobbying and more companies using government regulations to destroy competitors.)

    4. Re:Shopping by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I hope you actually realize that fucking with a clock doesn't change what the sun does.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  23. Even the blind acron by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    is right twice a day.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Even the blind acron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a French Macron is never right.

      Also, fuck off you lying douche.

  24. I can't believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On /. no one mentioned the headache of updating all the timezone definitions. I mean I'm all for ending this insane, dangerous practice, but it'll take at least a year to update all the computers to use new timezone definitions. If it's not done, things will really mess up when some computers change the time and others don't.

    And it'll be much worse if it's done on a state-by-state basis.

    I remember the 2007 switch to longer DST. Thousands of servers to change, most requiring a reboot for the patches. And having to coordinate that and test the applications.

  25. Daylight Saving Time by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    For the 1,000,000th time. It's DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME. You are saving daylight... It's not Savings Time. This isn't a fucking bank account. You aren't storing it for later use..

    1. Re:Daylight Saving Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a shit? I mean honestly. Everyone knows what it means. If communication was successful and not altered because of the misspelling no one fucking cares.

    2. Re:Daylight Saving Time by mark-t · · Score: 1, Informative

      It doesn't save any daylight though... it steels some from the morning to add some in the evening.

      And considering the proven health benefits that exist for having exposure to the sun in the morning, it's better from a health-perspective if the sun rises earlier rather than later anyways, so the entire concept of DST Is just plain fucking stupid, completely ignoring human biology and fundamental truths about how humans have adapted and evolved.

    3. Re:Daylight Saving Time by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet you say "hot water heater", "ATM machine", and "PIN number". Language evolves, and so should we.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:Daylight Saving Time by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah, you are -- how else are you planning to pay it back once November rolls around?

    5. Re: Daylight Saving Time by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Well, technically, it *is* "saving" daylight from the perspective of most people. Very few people are awake & take advantage of daylight at 5:30am. Nearly everyone is awake & appreciates extra daylight after work, including most of the people who ARE awake at 5:30am.

    6. Re:Daylight Saving Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it ironic that all of the brilliant folks on this thread as well as BeauHD got it wrong and yet the quote from the much maligned and insulted orange man used the correct term in his tweet?

    7. Re: Daylight Saving Time by mark-t · · Score: 1

      When the sun is rising at 5:30am, it's also setting late enough that most people are still getting sunlight after they are finished their work day.

      But it doesn't rise at 5:30 am in the winter when you go north of about 45 degrees. It doesn't rise until after 7:30 in the middle of winter, and will set sometime before 5pm.

      I realize that this is before many people are home from work, and I can appreciate how much people might want the sun to be up after they get home, but in the end, the compromise that must be made of not having sunlight in the morning is going to have far too great of an impact on people's health by changing their serotonin and melatonin cycles to be worth it. While it's true that there are a lot of people who even need to be at work before the sun comes up in the winter, a majority of people will still get at least some morning sunlight before they get to work, which wouldn't be the case anymore if you pushed sunrise to later in the day by an entire hour.

      Perpetual motion machines might be nice to have too... but I'm sorry, that's just not how the the real world works.

    8. Re:Daylight Saving Time by Roger+Wilcox · · Score: 1

      Both phrases are used in common parlance, and you aren't going to change that by shouting into the wind. Even Wikipedia acknowledges it goes by different names.

      Chill out and embrace the fluid nature of language.

  26. For the love of everything good by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

    Please pass this and eliminate the clock switching madness.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  27. To kill fewer children. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I never really understood why we "fell back" to standard time during winter, the one time of the year where the extra hour of daylight in the evening was the most useful.

    To kill fewer children - as was noticed when the US went to year-round daylight savings time during the "energy crisis" (Arab oil embargo) of the Nixon years.

    In the northern tiers of states (where the length of the day changes the most), children were going to school in the dark while sleepy drivers were commuting. This resulted in a substantial increase in the number of kids injured or killed in car-vs.-pedestrian accidents.

    But I guess, in these enlightened times, it's now OK to kill a bunch of kids in order to "send a message" about saving energy.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:To kill fewer children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You got a source for that claim? This talks about the 1974 experiment. Says it ended before Halloween, and mentions not a word about a spike in car-pedestrian accidents.

      https://www.mercurynews.com/2016/10/30/the-year-daylight-saving-time-went-too-far/ (not Ad Blocker friendly)

      But this article says that studies have shown that changing the clock twice a year has actual health risks.
      https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/experts-to-public-daylight-savings-time-is-a-434m-problem-we-could-easily-fix.html

    2. Re:To kill fewer children. by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except it doesn't actually save energy. The last study which suggested it does was conducted in the 1970's and was the impetus behind the most recent change to the DST schedule in 1996 which lengthened it by several weeks throughout the year, and while the study predicted a measurable energy savings even for those few weeks, those savings completely failed to materialize, showing very clearly that the energy demands which the study had examined and predicted a savings on were an artifact of how energy was used at the time, and not reflective of how we use energy today. The reason the clocks were not changed back was because of the expense of invoking yet another change to DST. Abolishing it entirely, by comparison, would not produce anywhere nearly as much expense because there are many places that already do not observe DST.

    3. Re:To kill fewer children. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I don't think they even let kids walk to school on the side of the road in the dark anymore in most places.

    4. Re:To kill fewer children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could start school an hour later, nothing wrong with making the school day shorter

    5. Re: To kill fewer children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cars have anti collision now :)

    6. Re:To kill fewer children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, these days it's OK because no one walks any more - least of all kids!

    7. Re:To kill fewer children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the northern tiers of states (where the length of the day changes the most), children were going to school in the dark while sleepy drivers were commuting. This resulted in a substantial increase in the number of kids injured or killed in car-vs.-pedestrian accidents.

      OK, I live in northern Europe and I am going to call BS on this.

      Changing the clock just one hour does jack shit about this.
      By changing the clock you get an extra week or two when it isn't pitch black while going to school, then the days are even shorter.

      Stop blaming everyone else.
      Northerners doesn't want to change the clock, southerners doesn't want to change the clock.
      No-one really benefits from it. It was just a bad idea that shouldn't have gotten any traction to begin with.

    8. Re:To kill fewer children. by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Here in Alabama yesterday morning, I stopped behind a school bus that was picking up children at 6:08. Pitch black dark in a rural area, and it wouldn't be daylight for nearly another hour. I think it's actually safer in a way because you can see the red flashing lights on the bus a whole lot better and from further away.

      Sunrise today is at 6:59. I start work at 7:30 and it's daylight by then. I'm lucky though. On most of my jobs I can vary my start time to match the daylight.

      We can go to year round DST, but I guarantee that some of you won't like it. You can't please everybody because people have different work schedules. Not everybody works 9 to 5.

      Or we could do it the way the Romans did a couple of thousand years ago and just vary the length of the hours themselves. Anybody for longer and shorter hours? :)

    9. Re:To kill fewer children. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      A different answer would be to change the school hours.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    10. Re:To kill fewer children. by bobschmagogee · · Score: 2

      Have you talked to a kid lately? They're idiots. They need more school, not less.

    11. Re:To kill fewer children. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      In the northern tiers of states (where the length of the day changes the most), children were going to school in the dark while sleepy drivers were commuting.

      I'm going to say something fucking crazy, just balls-out nuts, but stick with me:

      How about starting school later instead of trying to convince everyone that it's suddenly a different time now? How about making it so that children going to school and morning rush hour traffic are not the same time?

      Fucking nuts, I know. But we really need to think of the children.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  28. Trump said what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump said what?

    Shit. I must be wrong about ending DST.....

    Wait..... Unless he lying...

    Of course he's lying!!, so we don't really agree!

    Carry on a cancel the damned nuisance then.

  29. News by tsa · · Score: 1

    The idiot said something.

    Why is this even news? Amd why is it on /.?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:News by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Because based upon comments here, it's the first time a majority of /.ers have agreed with him.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just because to avoid cognitive dissonance, they try to forget all his other good ideas.
      Such as Europe paying their fair share for NATO, or ending Chinese postage subsidy.
      Can't have Trump be anything but pure evil of course!

  30. So much for drive-in movies. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Interesting

    darker later is the way to go.

    IMHO Daylight Savings Time was much of what killed the drive in theatres. Come summer, with DST, there wasn't enough time after sunset to attend a double feature and still get home and to bed in time to get up before sunrise and make it to work.

    In the summer what we're short of isn't light. It's darkness. If the government must screw around with the clocks twice a year, they should move them BACK in the spring and return them to standard in the fall.

    I call it "Night Life Savings Time".

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the government must screw around with the clocks twice a year, they should move them BACK in the spring and return them to standard in the fall.

      I call it "Night Life Savings Time".

      Hmmm... a real dilemma: No drive-in theaters vs. the sun streaming in at 3:30am in the summer.

      I'll side with 99.9% of the population and ditch the drive-ins.

    2. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by GoingDown · · Score: 2

      In Finland, we had poll about whether to stay on DST or winter time. Result was 52% in winter time and 48% in DST. Of course because this was a public poll results are only giving a direction, but it is nowhere near 99% vs 1%.

      I myself really do not care. If we all go to DST, then slowly and gradually our wake-up hours will shift little bit later and later, until we see that when previously we were living in (for example) 7-22 wake-up hours, then after years of permanent DST wake-up hours shift for 8-23.

      It really would not matter. People to tend to go to sleep too late anyway, and wake up with too little sleep.

    3. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good, but the OP proposed *anti* DST, moving sunrise and sunset one hour *earlier* in the summer (and still changing clocks twice per year). I really don't think that would poll well at all.

    4. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Result was 52% in winter time and 48% in DST.

      So will of the people then? Did your gov then try to go through with it despite it being a bad idea with no way to pull off well and everyone telling them so?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    5. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by GoingDown · · Score: 1

      It is still on discussions. There is EU wide proposal to get rid of time changes. Every country have option to select either time to stay on.
      https://www.timeanddate.com/ne...

      Here in Finland, it has not been yet decided which time is the one we stay on.

    6. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

      Your argument for standard time over DST is a virtually extinct business? How drive-in theaters even exist still in the US?

    7. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by rcharbon · · Score: 1

      VHS (and Betamax), cable TV, and the internet killed drive-ins, sonny.

    8. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      IMHO Daylight Savings Time was much of what killed the drive in theatres.

      IMHO the horrible concept of watching a movie in the least comfortable way using the worst possible sound in a poor quality environment killed drive in theaters.

      But why tell you when I can sing it for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    9. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In Finland

      You are further north and thus present a very difference case for anything to do with time and clocks than literally 99.8% of in the population of the country we are talking about. 52% vs 48% Applies to Finland and quite possibly Estonia, parts of Sweeden, parts of Russia, Greenland, Iceland, parts of Canada and maybe Alaska (the 0.2% of US population there).

      You'll find people care a lot more when its actually relevant and your country isn't half in perpetual night / day for half a year.

    10. Re:So much for drive-in movies. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      IMHO the horrible concept of watching a movie in the least comfortable way using the worst possible sound in a poor quality environment killed drive in theaters.

      Actually, toward the end the sound was great. The theatres would have a low-power FM transmitter carrying the sound track. (Couple it to the wiring to the speaker cables, "carrier current" style, and the signal was strong at the cars but too weak to give free shows to those living or parked nearby.)

      Tune to it on your car audio system and you got great - (at least) stereo - sound, not the awful squawk box sound from the old-style clip-on-the-window speaker.

      Subwoofer lows would shake the car, just like they'd shake your seats in an indoor theatre.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  31. Did anybody bother to ask why the conman supports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight savings time was created during WW2 to save electricity during times of the year when it would be dark during working hours without that shift. So of course big oil conman Trump is told to announce it. Who exactly in the public gives a shit about ending daylight savings? Nobody. It's a non-issue. Except for the dying fossil fuel industry which is doing everything they can under their Trump administration to try to stem their imminent decline.

  32. Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    A million Unix sysadmins' heads would explode.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because we'd be surprised he knows what UTC is. Otherwise, I'm all for UTC and 24-hour clocks. Less ambiguity all around.

    2. Re:Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, TAI is where we need to go. Screw leap seconds.

    3. Re:Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      The only people who would like this idea are Unix sysadmins. For the rest of us, it matters that lunch is around noon, that office hours are roughly from 8-5, that people are usually in bed at midnight. We don't care what time it is in Greenwich, UK.

    4. Re:Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      We don't care what time it is in Greenwich, UK.

      Those who work with people in other countries would care a lot, and those who do any long-distance travel. Which not a small bunch. For those, a global standard time would be extremely convenient.

      Of course, this would mean a lot of adjustment for your local time. But DST already makes solar noon at 1 PM, which is not its natural time. Your local working hours would still be around solar noon, just not using numbers like 8 AM to 5 PM. Especially when "AM" and "PM" refer to before and after noon -- you really should move on to 24-hour time by then.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Notice I didn't say anything about solar noon.

      With our current system, we all have to do match to figure out what time it is in India.

      If everybody uses UTC, then we all have to do match to figure out when working hours are in India.

      So we really don't gain much, except confusion for locals, by all using UTC.

      It's kind of like using a GPS. When you're driving, you don't want to see the whole map, oriented with north up. You just want to see the perspective of the road ahead, and whether your next turn is to the right or left. Likewise, as we navigate through our day, we just want to know what the local time is, not taking into account the rest of the world. Our current time zones are a good compromise.

    6. Re:Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      For those, a global standard time would be extremely convenient.

      Nope, because you'd still have to know what everybody's office hours are.

    7. Re:Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to use GPS time... It's week 2044, 219920 seconds after the first week number rollover. My lunch time will start at week 2044, 234320 seconds after the first week number rollover.

    8. Re:Now, if he'd come out in favor of universal UTC by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      For those, a global standard time would be extremely convenient.

      Nope, because you'd still have to know what everybody's office hours are.

      Scenario 1: UTC everywhere

      -So, about that teleconference. Is 14:00 OK with you?
      -Sounds a bit early, my office hours start at 16. Would that work for you?
      -Sure. See you then!

      Scenario 2: local timezones

      -I'll call you around 2 PM, is that OK?
      -Wait, what time would that be over here?
      -Let's see... we're on EEST.. I think that's UTC+2 but I'll have to check.
      -What's UTC?
      -Never mind, I'll check it for you. You're on East coast time, right? Do you guys use DST?
      etc.

      If you used UTC everywhere, office hours would be different, but you'd still know what your own office hours are. In both cases, you'll have to ask if a given time is OK, but it will be a lot easier with UTC. Heck, even within the same timezone, people can actually have different "working" hours.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  33. Re:Daylight Savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll start saying "Daylight Saving Time" instead of "Daylight Savings" (note: no "Time") as soon as you convince the Brits to start saying "Math" instead of "Maths."
    Deal?

  34. WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!!11111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I swear to GOD. Kids fuck everything up.

  35. The sun. It dictates human experience. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TAI doesn't account for the day/night cycle. That's why you're wrong.

    Human tools should benefit humans.

  36. Greatings from Ottawa by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    Ottawa is in about the middle of the Eastern Time zone. 9 to 5 is the standard work day. Sun rise in Ottawa in late december is after 7:30am. If we went to DST it would mean sun rise at 8:30am. So leaving for work in darkness. If we move west in the time zone things get worse. Detroit sun rise would be 9am so the entire morning commute would be in the dark. Poor Thunderbay would see the sun rise at 10am.

    1. Re:Greatings from Ottawa by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I'm west of Detroit. I'd prefer dark in the morning when I'm driving to work than dark at night when I'm driving home. Even after falling back, it's still dark in the morning eventually.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  37. Re:Did anybody bother to ask why the conman suppor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who exactly in the public gives a shit about ending daylight savings?

    The people it kills every year to change the clocks twice a year. The people who's sleep schedules take weeks to adjust after each clock change.

    These clock changes come with real health risks:
    https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/experts-to-public-daylight-savings-time-is-a-434m-problem-we-could-easily-fix.html

  38. a case of history repeating itself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They tried this back in the 70's and I will tell you why it was abolished back then -- a dozen or so kids were killed waiting for the buss in the middle of the night...

    When you move the time to DST (Daylight Savings Time) you are advancing the clock an hour, and and in November/December the kids are waiting for the bus well into the dark hours everywhere in the States. By all means abolish DST, but keep it to standard time. I have lived in places like Arizona which done away with DST decades ago, and frankly I really liked not having to switch the clocks. THat said, they settled on Standard Time and not DST.

    No, I expect that history will once again repeat itself.

  39. WTF I hate permanent DST now by melted · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Liberals will now find reasons to hate on this, too. Basically Trump can control them through reverse psychology. Support Jews, and liberals become literally Hitler. Checkmate.

    1. Re:WTF I hate permanent DST now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a liberal and I like this idea. I know that there were a lot of people who hated everything about Obama and can't comprehend that someone might maintain their position even if a political opponent comes out in favor of it, but this is one of those rare instances that I agree with Donald Trump on something (the others being the TPP and going to the Moon).

    2. Re:WTF I hate permanent DST now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump could literally fund research that ends in a successful, affordable, and straightforward cancer cure, and someone would say "What about all the black people dying from HIV? Trump hates black people, cancer is a white people issue."

  40. Oh crap, now his opponents will fight to keep it! by Babel-17 · · Score: 1

    I just ordered a new watch that sets DST automatically, and I hope I remember correctly that that feature can be disabled. Yeah, now that I think about it, it was mentioned that some locales don't use DST, so the option is there.

  41. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I figure it's because the transition days can potentially rob a broken clock its ability to be right twice a day.

  42. Idiocracy by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    What is wrong with permanent standard time? Trump upholds idiocracy.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      I for one would like earlier sunrise, summer or winter.

      This bloody aggressive "We want permanent summer time" is really beginning to grate. I'd far prefer permanent "Winter time" if people don't want to have clock change.

      Additionally, people seem to think this will give them an extra hour sleep every night (rather than just an apparent gain once a year). Dumbasses.

    2. Re:Idiocracy by guacamole · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with permanent standard time? Trump upholds idiocracy.

      People want an extra hour of sunshine in the evening when they are free to be outside, not in the morning when they work in offices, attend school, or still sleep.

    3. Re:Idiocracy by Pyramid · · Score: 2

      There's an easy solution to this. It's called, "getting up an hour earlier".

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    4. Re:Idiocracy by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I agree, we need special clocks for idiots.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  43. Re:Oh crap, now his opponents will fight to keep i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering, Trump for the first time didn't propose complete bullshit or outright evil stuff, the Dems get a chance to show, whether they behave like the Republicans during the Obama years or think before blocking the president's actions.

  44. Very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from the terminology error (you already have permanent DST - DST is the practice of having 2 time zones and switching between "standard" and "daylight" time twice a year - what he's actually endorsing is abolishing DST and sticking with the daylight time zone permanently), this is a very sound decision. DST causes all sorts of problems and solves nothing, while most of the world (regardless of latitude) that has either never used DST or has abolished it in the past is doing just fine in this regard.

  45. 12:00 is when the sun is in the zenith by Gunstick · · Score: 1

    so why do we want to change that?
    The definition per-se of noon is "sun in zenith".

    If people feel it's dark too early, well then change working times par law, instead of changing time per law.
    It's so silly
    Some law says we should start work at 8, but it's dark. Oh, let's do another law to change the time, so it's sunny at 8.

    This is sooo Trump

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
  46. genius. total genius. by mad7777 · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, Mr. Trump, you've done it again!

    Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

    --
    Might makes right irrelevant.
  47. Re:Daylight Wasting Time by crow · · Score: 1

    No, let's frame the discussion with the correct terminology. For four months in the winter, we use Daylight Wasting Time. That term correctly describes the current system, points out the stupidity, and make clear the solution.

  48. Standard Time all the Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only proper way to eliminated DST is to truly eliminate it. NOT make it DST year round. No DST will also likely break a lot less things then full-time DST will as there are already places that don't to DST. And it just makes so much more sense.

    Furthermore, whatever the change is, plenty of time (5-10 years) should be allowed before it goes into effect.

  49. Stop calling it "Permanent DST" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For those who advocate "permanent DST", let's apply a little terminology. "DST" is a term that applies to the practice of changing the clock to something other than your actual time zone. It's not an actual time zone like EST or PST. If DST is made permanent, you're not in "DST" anymore, because the term is then meaningless. Rather, you're in the next time zone to the east of you.

    So let's call a spade a spade here. If your standard time zone is PST and you advocate "permanent DST", what you really want is to switch from Pacific Time to Mountain Time -- even though you live in San Francisco. If you live in Texas and like the idea of "permanent DST", what you really want is to switch from Central Time to Eastern Time -- even though you live in the middle of the damn country. And so on.

    Now we can finally see that the idea of "permanent DST" is ridiculous, confusing, and short-sighted. To be clear, if the stupid practice of changing the clocks was never invented in the first place, we would have all gone about our lives happily ever after, and never gave a second thought to it. But because we spent a few decades clinging to this stupid practice, now we have a debate. I say get over it, accept the time zone you live in, and wake up an hour early if you truly want to. Nobody is preventing you from doing that.

  50. Saving Rope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "saving daylight" in the same way that cutting a foot off a length of rope and taping it to the other end is "saving rope".

  51. End the madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its time to end the madness from a national level so that we don't end up with a confusing situation where some adopt a single time and some don't. Some states already show signs of this and its better to just make it so on a national level. Let's hope Congress can at least agree to do this simple and logical act so that our body clocks can all be much happier.

  52. story by FredVasco · · Score: 1

    Not a bad story

  53. Sundials invented pre-Ancient Greece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, yeah, wrong.

  54. Beyond stupid... by Pyramid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't make a rope longer by cutting a foot off one end and attaching it to the other. "Permanent DST" is identical to getting up 1 hour earlier. Just leave how we indicate time alone so the sun is (roughly) at its greatest height on the ecliptic at noon in any given time zone instead of playing a stupid shell game that doesn't do anything but mess up astronomical time.

    --
    ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    1. Re:Beyond stupid... by jarlsberg71 · · Score: 1

      No, it's shining a light on part of the rope, and yet renumbering the rope with numbers just 1 number greater than what was there

      --
      E8B8B
    2. Re:Beyond stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the point. The point is that DST is a waste of time and money, so it's best to get rid of it. As a consequence of DST you have 2 different timezones that you alternate between - if you abolish DST then you need to pick one or the other, and the president is simply endorsing sticking with the timezone that is more popular than the other option.

    3. Re:Beyond stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to choose one time. Either the adjusted hour of DST, or the non-adjusted time. It doesn't matter in the least which one chooses and your rope analogy is worthless. The point of the argument is to stop the twice annual clock adjustments!

  55. N iggers, chinks, and ESPECIALLY Mexicans stink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus christ I fucking HATE mexicans. They stink link COMEPLETE SHIT, and I love beating them within an inch of their life.

    See a Mexican? Shoot that dumb beaner. Make America normal again.

  56. Like Russia by Zemran · · Score: 1

    Russia did this a couple of years ago and it is great. No more confusion twice a year. Great to see the US following Russia's lead.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  57. Trump's Real Reason? All About the Golf... by Koreantoast · · Score: 1
    Perhaps the real reason for Trump's support (half sarcastic)? From the Smithsonian article quoted by someone else:

    Today we know that changing the clocks does influence our behavior. For example, later sunset times have dramatically increased participation in afterschool sports programs and attendance at professional sports events. In 1920, The Washington Post reported that golf ball sales in 1918 – the first year of daylight saving – increased by 20 percent.

    And when Congress extended daylight saving from six to seven months in 1986, the golf industry estimated that extra month was worth as much as $400 million in additional equipment sales and green fees. To this day, the Nielsen ratings for even the most popular television shows decline precipitously when we spring forward, because we go outside to enjoy the sunlight.

  58. Trump for Prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good enough for me.

    It's not like Trump really cares about DST, anyway. Kinda hard to care when soon, he'll be measuring his time in years.

  59. Causes more problems then it solves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wake up Monday morning very tired half asleep and i'm late driving to work. Everyone on the road is a maniac rushing because they are also late. When I get to work, all the wall clocks have to be changed, the phone system time has to be changed, camera systems need the times adjusted, copiers and fax machines all have to be manually adjusted. On top of all that, schedules and meeting times get messed up, the whole day is a mess and takes about a week to fully recover all the time changes. A month later i'll find some other system that didn't get updated and caused some other issue that ripples down the line. Changing the clocks 50 years ago may not have been such a big deal, but today it's a nightmare!

    1. Re:Causes more problems then it solves by krray · · Score: 1

      Go to sleep earlier on Sunday. You won't be tired Monday.
      If you have to change your phone system, cameras, copiers, faxes, and much of anything else ... then you're doing it wrong. They should all be automated or dumped.

      I have all the same equipment here. I had to change nothing. Except the center old school analog clock in my car. Shame on Chrysler [300 SRT8 thank you :-]. And no, Chrysler didn't factory make this car for me. I just made it really fucking fast to get in front of all the maniacs on the road. I am king maniac.

      Seriously though -- all the equipment you mention, if updated in the last TWO decades, should be able to handle a NTP server. Set one up. Use it... (?)

    2. Re:Causes more problems then it solves by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      NTP has no concept of time zone or DST. It uses UTC time; it's up to the operating system to manage the conversion.

      The only decent ways for mobile devices to handle TZ, DST and sync is to either listen to WWVB (coverage is only good at night) or a cell network (costs money).

      Beyond this, why are you complaining that the clock in your car doesn't auto-update twice a year? How lazy are you?

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  60. This would make Trump... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    ...The Best President Of All Time.

    Literally.

  61. Re: First clock was invented in 1656 by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    You never heard of a sundial?

  62. Just how the law got written by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Why can't the individual States decide?

    Because that's the way the laws were written a few decades back when they implemented the current system. Not saying it is good or bad, just that that's what happened. Canada evidently wrote their laws differently which is neither better nor worse - just a different solution to the same problem. For whatever reason the federal law in the US allows states to opt out of DST permanently but does not permit opting in permanently. Not sure why but that's what happened. Since this is a federal law it requires congress to change it.

    There is evidently a workaround that at least one state is considering which is to move their time zone to the next one over (which states evidently can do) and then opt out of DST. Same effect on a technicality in the law.

    For the record I'm STRONGLY in favor of DST all year round. More daylight in the evening is a good thing.

    1. Re:Just how the law got written by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Your workaround won't work, the same federal law gives the feds sole authority to decide where the timezone boundaries are. No state can move to another timezone without congress writing a bill to allow it.

  63. Give me the hour of evening daylight by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Not nearly as useful as having exposure to at least *some* sunlight in the morning before a person start's their work day.

    Disagree. It is FAR more useful to me to have the extra hour of daylight in the evening and I think most others

    Exposure to even just 15 minutes of sunlight in the morning boosts seratonin levels, which in turn boosts melatonin production in the evening and is vital for having healthy and restful sleep...

    That's fine but DST doesn't really impact this. Sunrise where I live on Dec 21 last year was 8:01am. Most people are already at work by that point of the day. Speaking locally, our school district starts their day before the sun rises for a sizable chunk of the school year when standard time is in effect. DST would not change this at all.

    Furthermore any improvements from the cycle you mention are typically drowned out by other effects including but not limited to electronic device exposure, social schedules, indoor lighting, and a host of other factors. The extremely modest improvement in sleep by some people from a few minutes of morning daylight is not nearly enough justification.

    You're talking about a "nice to have", but comparing it to something that we are biologically adapted to, which is to function primarily during the day.... well, as I've said before on this subject, evolution is not a democracy.

    No YOU are talking about a "nice to have". The adaptation you are talking about is an extremely mild one that we can and do routinely ignore.

    1. Re:Give me the hour of evening daylight by mark-t · · Score: 1

      No YOU are talking about a "nice to have".

      I'd somewhat rank physical health as a somewhat more important "nice to have" than what ultimately only amounts to a whimsical preference to happen to want daylight in the evening.

      The adaptation you are talking about is an extremely mild one that we can and do routinely ignore.

      Citation, please. Right now, most people actually *DO* get some amount of morning sunlight which they would not receive if you moved sunrise to being an hour later. While it's true that some do need to be at work before dawn and don't ever see the sun in the winter, not even during their morning commute, this number does not represent the majority of people. Inflict that on everyone, and you are going to see very real and very unpleasant results.

      There is a reason why after trying two years of year-long DST in the early 1970's it was scrapped and went back to the way things were, and that reason is just as true today as it was then.

  64. Just maybe... by urusan · · Score: 1

    We should have noon match up with the sun being directly overhead.

    Then we could regularly adjust our schedules to make sense for the seasons.

    Why is 9-5 so sacred in our society?

  65. FFS it's a tweet by POTUS by kenh · · Score: 1

    President Trump on Monday threw his support behind efforts to keep the United States permanently on daylight saving time, which took effect Sunday morning. "Making Daylight Saving Time permanent is O.K. with me!" Trump tweeted.

    Can we stop acting like everything that spills out of his twitter account is comparable to signed legislation/executive order?

    As has been proven with nearly every tweet ever issued by Trump, either as private citizen, candidate, or President, he simply tweets what's on his mind.

    Reminds me of the time Bush '41 said he didn't like broccoli, and people acted like they based their eating habits on the personal tastes of POTUS.

    --
    Ken
  66. Human stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are we even changing clocks, instead of business hours?

  67. ch-ch-ch-ch-changes... by racerex · · Score: 0

    As long as it stops changing... I always thought it was stupid in the first place.

  68. I almost never notice DST now by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

    This discussion seems one-sided, so here's another point of view:

    In the past I would forget to change the clocks the night before, and I once missed an airplane because of it. But now I go to bed and the next morning all the clocks and notifications have changed on their own, and other than the sun going down earlier or later I just don't notice it.

    It's amazing to me that one hour more or less of sleep twice a year gets people so messed up. Surely I'm not the only one who feels this way.

  69. Just live your life on your schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, why do we even need clocks?

  70. REEEEEE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OrAnGe FaN SAD

  71. ORANGE FAN SAD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU fuckers are the ones always screaming "TDS!" and here you are proving what kind of projecting bastards you really are. No one said shit about this. YOU brought it up.

  72. THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you! I came to write exactly this.

  73. Go back to chanting the "Lock her up!!" mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does that differ from your over-hyped, blind hatred of Hillary and all things associated with her . . .

      . . . and Bill . . .

      . . . and Obama?

    At least their policies make sense. Hell, Bill and Obama gave us two of the best economies, well, ever.

    Don't know how much longer it wil last with Trump's wreckless tariffs, and the lack of long term gains from those tax cuts that did absolutely nothing for the middle class. I've been hearing a lot of predictions of a 2019-2020 recession. Hopefully Trump hasn't fucked it up too bad.

  74. What a coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making Trump's relocation to Mars permanent is OK for me too!

  75. No DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I support a return to standard time. Period.

  76. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last, a policy statement and direction (even if Twitter), that can be debated on the merits. Most of Trump's eruptions are so larded with The Stupid, you struggle to get anything out of them beyond The Stupid.

  77. Changing time zones by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Your workaround won't work, the same federal law gives the feds sole authority to decide where the timezone boundaries are. No state can move to another timezone without congress writing a bill to allow it.

    It does require federal approval for a state to change time zones but importantly changing time zones explicitly does NOT require an act of congress. It merely requires petitioning the Department of Transportation for a change which is obviously a much easier hurdle.