16Mhz is your crappy arduino board, you can't blame the ATmega328 for that.
And stop saying P at the end, the ones you buy have -P at the end which stands for PDIP, but the actual 328P with the P as part of the processor name is exactly the same as the 328 it just uses less power on standby. So you don't mention the P part when its true, you only mention the P when you're confused about the part numbers.
ATmega328 supports up to 20Mhz using an external oscillator. It actually works up to over 30Mhz. But out of the box without an external oscillator it runs at 8Mhz, out of the box divided down to 1Mhz. So the number 16Mhz doesn't even come up.
That may not sound fast, except that, you get an instruction every cycle. For some workloads it is faster than a x86 running at 3Ghz. This is because the cache, pipelining, etc, in a CISC processor are designed to maximize average throughput, but the potential worst case times are worse than if you had no pipelining or cache at all. One instruction might take thousands of cycles on the x86, and only 1 on the AVR. And if the exact timing of the instructions matters, then it is even worse, because the AVR is totally deterministic and can merely count cycles to know where it is in the algorithm, but the x86 is non-deterministic and will have to do a bunch more work to track not only elapsed cycles, but where it is in the algorithm.
All of that said, it should have been "throughput, security, cheap; pick two." You can absolutely have fast, secure, cheap. That's actually easier than fast, secure, expensive because then you have to support a lot more memory, probably different types of memory, and now it is hard to get speed without non-determinism, which cuts into security!
Not that quantity of vulnerabilities is everything but Intel and Arm are in serious relative trouble... again. How many of their performance and power advantages over the last several years have been substantially due to the of taking secure design shortcuts? AMD may be even further than the lead than we've realized.
Basically none of the ARM advances over the past several years would be rolled back by this, because it is only a tiny portion of their portfolio that is even vulnerable at all, and those are the newer chips that are in few products. The affect on ARM has to do with promised offerings in the future, not the offerings in the past whose advantages have driven their adoption in the marketplace.
You can't stop us from using the Warp Drive to kill mosquitos, I don't care how many subspace cultures we destroy. Do we live in subspace? No. So do we care? No.
If you're flying high and they're calling you Icarus but your wings don't melt, and so you keep flying higher, and then they say, "Oh now he's trying to fly into the center of the Sun!" you should probably just look down and laugh at the dimwits.
Predictions aren't useful or knowledgy if you double them whenever they're wrong. You can't Martingale your way to science.
That's how it works, non-adaptive modifications take themselves back.
Positive feedback loops will kill themselves. Negative feedback loops are self-limiting, and can evolve.
The reason you get shouted down is probably that your concerns are hand-wavy, and easily replaced by hand-wavy stuff with different conclusions. Also, the fatalism; fatalists should just shut the fuck up because even they don't believe they're adding anything to the conversation.
Stop trying to slut-shame Windows. Let it choose whatever lifestyle it wants; let it run around wearing just its Defender, what harm is it doing you? Whatever harm you can accuse, it was consensual; you're just as guilty. Why do you place the blame on Windows?! I blame you; everybody already knows what sort of a date Windows is. You knew!
I should be allowed to make that choice, and I cannot.
If you actually thought you should be allowed to make that choice, you'd have chosen software that respects you freedom and lets you make whatever choices you want.
There are a wide variety of choices that respect your freedom.
The answer is: because we continue to operate operating systems and software which are acutely vulnerable to malware - and because we refuse to learn from the lessons of past mistakes.
A big part of the problem is that we've now had malware present in our lives for such a long period of time...
Whoever "we" are, they should be ashamed of themselves, and they should also start taking personal responsibility for the machines under their, erm, responsibility.
People for whom malware is a persistent part of their life should find a babysitter before sitting down at a keyboard.
It depends, was it caused by a design flaw, or was it just one of a small number of drives that are expected to fail earlier due to manufacturing variances?
Also, was it advertised as a way to store important files, or as a convenience item?
The problem is, they really did have a bug deleting people's files.
And, his testimony that he had the files is already evidence that they existed.
So if that is all the court has, then that adds up to, they deleted his files.
The question of value is a bit harder for him, but perhaps he has additional video files that were not deleted whose value can be established. If so, then he'll likely get paid. If not, then he's going to get some token amount.
This gets settled, they don't throw a fit or else they'll end up paying what he said.
I did mention 3 groups I'd want to see in the study, and you're right; I mis-identified the missing one.
But my complaint is still largely the same.
Another complaint I have; this study only used the sperm of one mouse.
The actual interesting part of the story isn't the mice though, it is the follow-up experiments they did using humans. Multiple humans, even. If the mice were the interesting part, they'd have redone it at a normal scale instead of switching to humans.
amazon wants to sell things that are supported by manufacturer, not randoms
If that was true, then why did it take years for Apple to force Amazon to do this, and why did they resist so long?
I'm guessing that if you shop at Amazon, you probably type "Brandybrand(TM)" into the search instead "[type of item]" because how else would you avoid seeing hundreds of listing of the same items by random sellers?
Slashdot Mirror
16Mhz is your crappy arduino board, you can't blame the ATmega328 for that.
And stop saying P at the end, the ones you buy have -P at the end which stands for PDIP, but the actual 328P with the P as part of the processor name is exactly the same as the 328 it just uses less power on standby. So you don't mention the P part when its true, you only mention the P when you're confused about the part numbers.
ATmega328 supports up to 20Mhz using an external oscillator. It actually works up to over 30Mhz. But out of the box without an external oscillator it runs at 8Mhz, out of the box divided down to 1Mhz. So the number 16Mhz doesn't even come up.
That may not sound fast, except that, you get an instruction every cycle. For some workloads it is faster than a x86 running at 3Ghz. This is because the cache, pipelining, etc, in a CISC processor are designed to maximize average throughput, but the potential worst case times are worse than if you had no pipelining or cache at all. One instruction might take thousands of cycles on the x86, and only 1 on the AVR. And if the exact timing of the instructions matters, then it is even worse, because the AVR is totally deterministic and can merely count cycles to know where it is in the algorithm, but the x86 is non-deterministic and will have to do a bunch more work to track not only elapsed cycles, but where it is in the algorithm.
All of that said, it should have been "throughput, security, cheap; pick two." You can absolutely have fast, secure, cheap. That's actually easier than fast, secure, expensive because then you have to support a lot more memory, probably different types of memory, and now it is hard to get speed without non-determinism, which cuts into security!
If you have a rack in your closet and have to protect it from yourself, you have worse problems.
This should only be a concern if you have a rack in somebody else's closet, or somebody else's rack in your closet.
Not that quantity of vulnerabilities is everything but Intel and Arm are in serious relative trouble... again. How many of their performance and power advantages over the last several years have been substantially due to the of taking secure design shortcuts? AMD may be even further than the lead than we've realized.
Basically none of the ARM advances over the past several years would be rolled back by this, because it is only a tiny portion of their portfolio that is even vulnerable at all, and those are the newer chips that are in few products. The affect on ARM has to do with promised offerings in the future, not the offerings in the past whose advantages have driven their adoption in the marketplace.
If this affected all computers equally, you'd even have a point; as it is you're just trying to be misleading while sounding smaht.
Trademark doesn't even protect a "work." If it was doing work, we know it wasn't a mark.
Maybe apply for a design patent next time.
Words on paper won't stop that at all.
You're either afraid that your neighbors will nuke you for doing it... or you're not.
If words on paper were going to stop you, you'd already not be doing that thing without an agreement.
but but but but but it has a WARP DRIVE so it goes REALLY FAST and we'll all die if viruses hit us at that speed... right?
You can't stop us from using the Warp Drive to kill mosquitos, I don't care how many subspace cultures we destroy. Do we live in subspace? No. So do we care? No.
Back off the gene warp, cowherd.
If you're flying high and they're calling you Icarus but your wings don't melt, and so you keep flying higher, and then they say, "Oh now he's trying to fly into the center of the Sun!" you should probably just look down and laugh at the dimwits.
Predictions aren't useful or knowledgy if you double them whenever they're wrong. You can't Martingale your way to science.
once it's done you can't take it back
That's how it works, non-adaptive modifications take themselves back.
Positive feedback loops will kill themselves. Negative feedback loops are self-limiting, and can evolve.
The reason you get shouted down is probably that your concerns are hand-wavy, and easily replaced by hand-wavy stuff with different conclusions. Also, the fatalism; fatalists should just shut the fuck up because even they don't believe they're adding anything to the conversation.
I'm pretty sure humans are genetically one species, even on Santorini.
I know the place feels magical, but still!
Stop trying to slut-shame Windows. Let it choose whatever lifestyle it wants; let it run around wearing just its Defender, what harm is it doing you? Whatever harm you can accuse, it was consensual; you're just as guilty. Why do you place the blame on Windows?! I blame you; everybody already knows what sort of a date Windows is. You knew!
I should be allowed to make that choice, and I cannot.
If you actually thought you should be allowed to make that choice, you'd have chosen software that respects you freedom and lets you make whatever choices you want.
There are a wide variety of choices that respect your freedom.
The answer is: because we continue to operate operating systems and software which are acutely vulnerable to malware - and because we refuse to learn from the lessons of past mistakes.
A big part of the problem is that we've now had malware present in our lives for such a long period of time ...
Whoever "we" are, they should be ashamed of themselves, and they should also start taking personal responsibility for the machines under their, erm, responsibility.
People for whom malware is a persistent part of their life should find a babysitter before sitting down at a keyboard.
Authors conclusion: yes, we still need wheels
I'm a mouse, and I still know how to walk.
And my linux boxen still don't need AV unless I'm serving up windoze downloads.
These days it even comes with a desktop.
It depends, was it caused by a design flaw, or was it just one of a small number of drives that are expected to fail earlier due to manufacturing variances?
Also, was it advertised as a way to store important files, or as a convenience item?
Is the devil not in the details, after all?
As long as they don't do something silly like advertise it as a tool for professionals, then that might even protect them in some way. ;)
Contracts do not overrule law, even common law. They can't escape their claim of merchantability for specific purposes.
The problem is, they really did have a bug deleting people's files.
And, his testimony that he had the files is already evidence that they existed.
So if that is all the court has, then that adds up to, they deleted his files.
The question of value is a bit harder for him, but perhaps he has additional video files that were not deleted whose value can be established. If so, then he'll likely get paid. If not, then he's going to get some token amount.
This gets settled, they don't throw a fit or else they'll end up paying what he said.
Hey, fuck you buddy, why the hell are you blaming Crete for this shit?
Have you ever been to Crete? No.
Do they have public surveillance in Crete? No.
Do they even have good cell phone access in Crete? No.
If you can manage to comprehend the story, this is being done by Fucking Texans!
Oh, did I get my own personal troll? Awesome! lolz welcome to the internet, kiddo. But no, I won't do that for you. Find a cam boy.
Wouldn't you also need to not know what is being written about, in order to observe the lack of ideas?
And how would you differentiate that from your own ignorance?
My advice, move to a place without a powerless, failed government for six months and compare.
Good job, you finally said something!
I did mention 3 groups I'd want to see in the study, and you're right; I mis-identified the missing one.
But my complaint is still largely the same.
Another complaint I have; this study only used the sperm of one mouse.
The actual interesting part of the story isn't the mice though, it is the follow-up experiments they did using humans. Multiple humans, even. If the mice were the interesting part, they'd have redone it at a normal scale instead of switching to humans.
I dunno why you got modded off-topic; at least you have the scale right! That's better than most manager around here.
amazon wants to sell things that are supported by manufacturer, not randoms
If that was true, then why did it take years for Apple to force Amazon to do this, and why did they resist so long?
I'm guessing that if you shop at Amazon, you probably type "Brandybrand(TM)" into the search instead "[type of item]" because how else would you avoid seeing hundreds of listing of the same items by random sellers?