Hell, I don't even WANT the job, really. I'm just in a position where I have a realistic shot at winning the election given the dislike of the incumbent and nobody running against him usually. So, yeah... I don't want to be in politics. I generally hate most politicians. My plan is to simply run for this one election and, ideally, not have to do it ever again as there might be someone willing to take my place and actually represent the people.
I'm not in the group that also ascribes to laissez-faire capitalism. The start of the fourth paragraph might help too. The whole article isn't bad.
As for you other post, Bernie's not that far away, really. We'd take him under the tent. We'd have to work on his idea of big government. Unfortunately (fortunately, maybe?) there have been a lot of people who've waved the flag. Take a gander at the Wikipedia article.
It looks available to download but, honestly, I haven't even given running it any thought, really. I'd have no idea what to do with it and I couldn't give an objective critique. He appears to be a straight up lunatic.
I forget the number but a good majority of the Linux code comes from paid developers working on their company's dime. Lots of companies are pushing code up stream these days. It's not like it used to be and that's a great thing.
It costs me a lot but that's because I donate more than I'd pay for a proprietary OS. I'm not really in it to save money, however. I'd write code but, frankly, you don't want me to do that.
If you frequent torrent sites you'll find you can, indeed, pirate Linux. I've seen a number of RHEL torrents but I've never tried it. I should give it a shot in a VM sometime.
I don't contribute code - I will, if you want but rest assured that you do not want that - trust me on this. I've done lots of coding, lots. Eventually I hired capable people to do it for me and eventually they pretty much told me to stop helping. I listened. However, I donate. I donate a lot to a number of the various FOSS folks. I figure it is what I can do and that I must do something. I think my next big donation (probably silent) will be one of the bug bounty programs. I don't have any particular bugs that need fixing but, well, they do. Somehow I manage to generally escape such or just work around it without complaint.
But you gain stability at that loss of performance. The dude that got the Minix going has some nice writings about microkernel designs. Given that he wrote THE book on operating systems, well, I do respect what he says. However, I don't use Minix. I generally stick with Linux or BSD - I've been enjoying GhostBSD a lot lately but the *buntu family is just so huge and handy so I'm often booted to Lubuntu.
I don't see Macs4All or CanadianMacFan in here, either. There's usually a few more. Anyhow, Gibson, of GRC fame, is pretty level headed. I admire his work greatly. He's also a very eloquent conversationalist though much of what he says goes a bit over my head. He's pretty bright or I'm pretty stupid - both could be true.
I use Linux and, sometimes, BSD. I kind of like having to enter a password to do shit. I like needing sudo gksudo su etc... I don't mind the extra time. I do like the extra safety. I don't even venture out of the blessed repositories much these days. I prefer signed code and, in Linux, it's usually all signed but, honestly, I seldom check anything as I don't really stray far from the nest any more. I like my stuff to just work. I have some very complicated stuff at home and, yet, it generally always just works.
My niece switched to a Mac. Bam... Day one. She's seemingly got something called "MacHelper" or something akin to that. Sounds innocuous but it's really not - it's sort of ransom ware from what she described. She called me up wanting me to help. Good luck with that. I have no idea how to help except to follow directions at Google.
We let anyone into the tent - it's kind of like Buddhism or Hinduism in those regards. I don't believe we should have. One of the biggest problems is that people mistake Libertarianism with an economic model, it's not - it's a political ideology. The rights of the people, the rights of the commons, and so on down the line in that order. It's in the title - liberty. However, it's been bastardized all to hell. I blame our own lax standards with allowing anyone to claim they're a Libertarian and Ayn Rand. Well, I blame a few others as well but you get the idea. There are anarcho-capitalists, anarchists, even socialists and neo-cons under the tent. I'm not sure where they fit but they seem happy here. It's not helping. I'm probably best referred to as a Classic Libertarian.
Alright. Either way, I'm buying one but am going to wait now - I was going to purchase one this spring. I'd already pretty much set it up, even. It won't do everything I want it to do but it will come a lot closer with the range that is expected to be here in a couple of years. I'm a true automobile aficionado. How could I not buy a Tesla? I almost bought a Roadster way back when. I decided against it - the tech wasn't mature enough.
If your work is like your grammar then, by all means, I can see why people would be upset. I never hired any. I've never really had much experience working for someone else other than meaningless jobs while in college. But, yeah, if I were a worker and they were bringing people in who couldn't do the job very well and firing me then I'd be pissed. I'd unionize but, still, I'd be pissed.
You don't actually know any Libertarians, do you? I'll kinda help... You're confusing a political ideology with an economic system. If you can work on that then you might get somewhere.
It could be done with a one-world-government, methinks. Now, that has about as much chance of happening as the post scarcity economy depicted in Star Trek but it *could* happen, I suppose.
I'll have to ponder some things along those lines. I'm not the most creative person but I can hire someone who is. I'm hoping it's not a pain in the butt and I won't violate my ethics to do it. I am pretty flexible though.;)
They're entirely different things. They're not even remotely similar. The only similarities they have is you can put people in them and they have wheels and brakes. Hell, the Tesla doesn't even have big breaks. They're not something you can compare with one another. Pick a BMW or something. I don't complain about the price but at least pick something that actually compares.
He doesn't appear to be giving the money back according to his site itself. Add to that the rest is kind of insane gibberish. He states that those using his software in other countries are still doing so validly but others are not. However, it looks like it's free. It appeared to be free when I clicked the download link. He's kind of out there.
Meh, we tried it at least which is probably more than you've done all while assuming it's tragic - and it is evil and should not be done at all. It just isn't nearly as bad as people seem to think it is. Calm down, wait it out, and you'll be okay.
But they're not very tasty.
> implying that there's code for BeOS
I think you're probably safe with that.
Hell, I don't even WANT the job, really. I'm just in a position where I have a realistic shot at winning the election given the dislike of the incumbent and nobody running against him usually. So, yeah... I don't want to be in politics. I generally hate most politicians. My plan is to simply run for this one election and, ideally, not have to do it ever again as there might be someone willing to take my place and actually represent the people.
I am not fond of Wikipedia but have a gander...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I'm not in the group that also ascribes to laissez-faire capitalism. The start of the fourth paragraph might help too. The whole article isn't bad.
As for you other post, Bernie's not that far away, really. We'd take him under the tent. We'd have to work on his idea of big government. Unfortunately (fortunately, maybe?) there have been a lot of people who've waved the flag. Take a gander at the Wikipedia article.
It looks available to download but, honestly, I haven't even given running it any thought, really. I'd have no idea what to do with it and I couldn't give an objective critique. He appears to be a straight up lunatic.
I forget the number but a good majority of the Linux code comes from paid developers working on their company's dime. Lots of companies are pushing code up stream these days. It's not like it used to be and that's a great thing.
It costs me a lot but that's because I donate more than I'd pay for a proprietary OS. I'm not really in it to save money, however. I'd write code but, frankly, you don't want me to do that.
If you frequent torrent sites you'll find you can, indeed, pirate Linux. I've seen a number of RHEL torrents but I've never tried it. I should give it a shot in a VM sometime.
I don't contribute code - I will, if you want but rest assured that you do not want that - trust me on this. I've done lots of coding, lots. Eventually I hired capable people to do it for me and eventually they pretty much told me to stop helping. I listened. However, I donate. I donate a lot to a number of the various FOSS folks. I figure it is what I can do and that I must do something. I think my next big donation (probably silent) will be one of the bug bounty programs. I don't have any particular bugs that need fixing but, well, they do. Somehow I manage to generally escape such or just work around it without complaint.
I must confess... I'm kind of partial to my dirty bits.
But you gain stability at that loss of performance. The dude that got the Minix going has some nice writings about microkernel designs. Given that he wrote THE book on operating systems, well, I do respect what he says. However, I don't use Minix. I generally stick with Linux or BSD - I've been enjoying GhostBSD a lot lately but the *buntu family is just so huge and handy so I'm often booted to Lubuntu.
I don't see Macs4All or CanadianMacFan in here, either. There's usually a few more. Anyhow, Gibson, of GRC fame, is pretty level headed. I admire his work greatly. He's also a very eloquent conversationalist though much of what he says goes a bit over my head. He's pretty bright or I'm pretty stupid - both could be true.
I use Linux and, sometimes, BSD. I kind of like having to enter a password to do shit. I like needing sudo gksudo su etc... I don't mind the extra time. I do like the extra safety. I don't even venture out of the blessed repositories much these days. I prefer signed code and, in Linux, it's usually all signed but, honestly, I seldom check anything as I don't really stray far from the nest any more. I like my stuff to just work. I have some very complicated stuff at home and, yet, it generally always just works.
My niece switched to a Mac. Bam... Day one. She's seemingly got something called "MacHelper" or something akin to that. Sounds innocuous but it's really not - it's sort of ransom ware from what she described. She called me up wanting me to help. Good luck with that. I have no idea how to help except to follow directions at Google.
We let anyone into the tent - it's kind of like Buddhism or Hinduism in those regards. I don't believe we should have. One of the biggest problems is that people mistake Libertarianism with an economic model, it's not - it's a political ideology. The rights of the people, the rights of the commons, and so on down the line in that order. It's in the title - liberty. However, it's been bastardized all to hell. I blame our own lax standards with allowing anyone to claim they're a Libertarian and Ayn Rand. Well, I blame a few others as well but you get the idea. There are anarcho-capitalists, anarchists, even socialists and neo-cons under the tent. I'm not sure where they fit but they seem happy here. It's not helping. I'm probably best referred to as a Classic Libertarian.
Alright. Either way, I'm buying one but am going to wait now - I was going to purchase one this spring. I'd already pretty much set it up, even. It won't do everything I want it to do but it will come a lot closer with the range that is expected to be here in a couple of years. I'm a true automobile aficionado. How could I not buy a Tesla? I almost bought a Roadster way back when. I decided against it - the tech wasn't mature enough.
If your work is like your grammar then, by all means, I can see why people would be upset. I never hired any. I've never really had much experience working for someone else other than meaningless jobs while in college. But, yeah, if I were a worker and they were bringing people in who couldn't do the job very well and firing me then I'd be pissed. I'd unionize but, still, I'd be pissed.
You don't actually know any Libertarians, do you? I'll kinda help... You're confusing a political ideology with an economic system. If you can work on that then you might get somewhere.
It could be done with a one-world-government, methinks. Now, that has about as much chance of happening as the post scarcity economy depicted in Star Trek but it *could* happen, I suppose.
I'll have to ponder some things along those lines. I'm not the most creative person but I can hire someone who is. I'm hoping it's not a pain in the butt and I won't violate my ethics to do it. I am pretty flexible though. ;)
They're entirely different things. They're not even remotely similar. The only similarities they have is you can put people in them and they have wheels and brakes. Hell, the Tesla doesn't even have big breaks. They're not something you can compare with one another. Pick a BMW or something. I don't complain about the price but at least pick something that actually compares.
Also, hah, I am not sure why but I meant to type 630 and not 1630. I did the math correct but somehow typed it wrong.
Thanks. That's still not 1500+ years however. I also have no idea if they went on a missing to take over right on day one.
He doesn't appear to be giving the money back according to his site itself. Add to that the rest is kind of insane gibberish. He states that those using his software in other countries are still doing so validly but others are not. However, it looks like it's free. It appeared to be free when I clicked the download link. He's kind of out there.
Meh, we tried it at least which is probably more than you've done all while assuming it's tragic - and it is evil and should not be done at all. It just isn't nearly as bad as people seem to think it is. Calm down, wait it out, and you'll be okay.