They're doing the right thing by not bringing up their kids reliant on computers, especially since the rich end of the industry is moving away from actual progress and toward litigious attacks on anyone who writes software or uses a computer.
You could figure that out for yourself, but I suspect you're not actually interested in having your snarky rhetorical question shot down with an answer.
You might want to look up "Larrabee" - there's a fairly significant thing preventing massive numbers of weak x86 cores being put on a single chip for handling thousands of small IO jobs: nobody cares.
SSL2 has been gone in any decent browser for a long time now. The latest versions of Chrome (currently 15.0.874.1) don't even have checkboxes for SSL3/TLS any more, so fuck knows what data it's leaking behind my back...
Nah, it's just Intel admitting they lost the mobile market to ARM and the value-for-money market to AMD, so all they have left is the ricer and more-money-than-sense market.
Another "completely useless" here - only I went through this farce in college. In the end I just up and quit halfway through the second year, went and learned Perl instead, and have had a stable job for years since. Apparently they couldn't find any other good programmers locally to fill the position...
and start pointing non-technical people to it. The sooner Skype dies, the better.
Same reason C# exists in spite of Java.
And the new name is a truthful representation of what this law's sponsors intend to do with it, unlike the old one.
So how much are MS paying you for the astroturf?
They're doing the right thing by not bringing up their kids reliant on computers, especially since the rich end of the industry is moving away from actual progress and toward litigious attacks on anyone who writes software or uses a computer.
I guess it's more cost-effective to shakedown directly than using SCO as a proxy.
Are you 12?
So I take it you're a Scientology supporter?
Just for anyone who may not know: Channel 4 is the closest thing the UK has to Fox News.
You could figure that out for yourself, but I suspect you're not actually interested in having your snarky rhetorical question shot down with an answer.
I'm decades under 45, and you can go fuck yourself with a rake.
God help you if you ever have to use an OS with a package manager...
The correct word is "crackers", but I wouldn't expect tabloid media like Slashdot to have such vocabulary at this point.
Already exists, and already supported by Webkit. Firefox has a similar, but proprietary, interface.
https://operasoftware.github.com/Emberwind/
You might want to look up "Larrabee" - there's a fairly significant thing preventing massive numbers of weak x86 cores being put on a single chip for handling thousands of small IO jobs: nobody cares.
It supported my DG834 better than DD-WRT, which does not.
I'll repeat myself: in 15.0.874 those boxes are gone.
Linux will do it for free without requiring unreliable OCZ hardware.
SSL2 has been gone in any decent browser for a long time now. The latest versions of Chrome (currently 15.0.874.1) don't even have checkboxes for SSL3/TLS any more, so fuck knows what data it's leaking behind my back...
Nah, it's just Intel admitting they lost the mobile market to ARM and the value-for-money market to AMD, so all they have left is the ricer and more-money-than-sense market.
Gee, I wonder if the >$100 "developer license" with its 40-volume EULA and triplicate forms had anything to do with that...
Another "completely useless" here - only I went through this farce in college. In the end I just up and quit halfway through the second year, went and learned Perl instead, and have had a stable job for years since. Apparently they couldn't find any other good programmers locally to fill the position...
They have crushed the competition before (Cyrix, PowerPC, DEC, AMD)
Interesting definition of "crushed" you're using - is it measured in terms of cost, gigahertz, collusion deals or in Celsius?
Microsoft at it again, ripping off other software's names. First Midori and now this.