That's one interpretation. My point is that a law, the community and every other influence does not stop someone who is intent on breaking a law for personal profit - as I believe spammers are. That holds for bank robbers and murders where there is financial gain.
In a round way, I'm saying the technology must change... Though I recognize it will only begin the next phase for spam.
This is of no value. If it was, we wouldn't have Bank robberies (there are laws against it too). As long as there's money in it, and the technology supports it, it'll sadly continue.
Well it's true, there are a lot of things that seem to be common sense that aren't yet patented. For example, my upcoming patent for a simple gesture to signify the consummation of a business deal. I like to call it the handshake.
This doesn't seem as much the 'Death of Domain Parking' as much as the 'Death of Domain Parking as we know it'. It's unfortunate that we continually find ways to feed 'services' providing no value, and wind up with 1,890,000 hits on Domain Parking.
We're all taking part in this merger. In the short time since divestiture, the Bells, MCI, Sprint and the like, have gone from an incredibly profitable business model, to one far less stable. The irony of divestiture is that local phone service still has almost no competition, but the threat to the Bells comes from new communications that were not very formidable back then. Cable, which now shares the 'mother' moniker in most places in the US, stands to be affected most by a strong Bell presence. Hopefully, the competition will bring the benefits divestiture was supposed to deliver.
You're speaking as though The NY Times is some sort of moral beacon. If we ignore for the moment the number of mainstream journalists who were found to have... ummm... improvised the facts, the NYT is still one of the most jaundiced media outlets.
The would be just slightly more believable if they changed the upper left front to read "All the news that fits, we print".
> shouldn't news be subjective not objective even if it is only for nerds?
Umm, I think we all got your point, but Subjective would make the omission fine and expected. It's Objective we want...
North Hempstead isn't even in northern Long Island (on which it lies), much less upstate New York. Hope the rest of the facts aren't so liberally interpreted.
> This design has given AMD great performance during the past few years, but resulted in processors that were almost twice the size of its single-core chips."
And?
Academically, sure. But since this provides a how-to be unethical, what exactly does academia have to do with it? Is it a unalienable right to provide education to be unethical?
Slashdot Mirror
That must explain the empty prisons
That's one interpretation. My point is that a law, the community and every other influence does not stop someone who is intent on breaking a law for personal profit - as I believe spammers are. That holds for bank robbers and murders where there is financial gain. In a round way, I'm saying the technology must change... Though I recognize it will only begin the next phase for spam.
This is of no value. If it was, we wouldn't have Bank robberies (there are laws against it too). As long as there's money in it, and the technology supports it, it'll sadly continue.
Well it's true, there are a lot of things that seem to be common sense that aren't yet patented. For example, my upcoming patent for a simple gesture to signify the consummation of a business deal. I like to call it the handshake.
You say that as though it wasn't so....
Indeed, it is not. Why Software is hard: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/0 2/03/2147222
It seems to me, the real problem is this; http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/0 2/03/2147222/ discussed here just last week.
still, it sounds to me like the ads are beginning to have an impact...
mmmmm... low tide....
how appropriate... the word buttplug coming from an asshole
This doesn't seem as much the 'Death of Domain Parking' as much as the 'Death of Domain Parking as we know it'. It's unfortunate that we continually find ways to feed 'services' providing no value, and wind up with 1,890,000 hits on Domain Parking.
Still, the extension cord is problematic
The part that I thought was really surprising was "More attractive" and "more promiscuous"... Anybody else see a connection here?
We're all taking part in this merger. In the short time since divestiture, the Bells, MCI, Sprint and the like, have gone from an incredibly profitable business model, to one far less stable. The irony of divestiture is that local phone service still has almost no competition, but the threat to the Bells comes from new communications that were not very formidable back then. Cable, which now shares the 'mother' moniker in most places in the US, stands to be affected most by a strong Bell presence. Hopefully, the competition will bring the benefits divestiture was supposed to deliver.
Does this mean Santa will finally have time with the family?
Does this mean it graduates to Clogger now?
AMD needs to do what they have been doing - thinking independently and coming up with original solutions.
It's a dup only in that it's TWICE in two days this has happened to SCO
So improvement to an original idea, sure. Innovation (that is to say new ideas), no.
Looks like I picked a bad day to quit Vicodin
You're speaking as though The NY Times is some sort of moral beacon. If we ignore for the moment the number of mainstream journalists who were found to have... ummm... improvised the facts, the NYT is still one of the most jaundiced media outlets. The would be just slightly more believable if they changed the upper left front to read "All the news that fits, we print".
> shouldn't news be subjective not objective even if it is only for nerds? Umm, I think we all got your point, but Subjective would make the omission fine and expected. It's Objective we want...
North Hempstead isn't even in northern Long Island (on which it lies), much less upstate New York. Hope the rest of the facts aren't so liberally interpreted.
> This design has given AMD great performance during the past few years, but resulted in processors that were almost twice the size of its single-core chips." And?
Academically, sure. But since this provides a how-to be unethical, what exactly does academia have to do with it? Is it a unalienable right to provide education to be unethical?