Slashdot Mirror


Taking a Crack At Recycling E-Waste

An anonymous reader wrote to mention a New York Times article being hosted at News.com. It touches on a new initiative in upstate New York to deal with the problem of e-waste. The Town of North Hempstead has positioned helpers at the dump the last four weekends, assisting people with a flood of old monitors, keyboards, laptops, word processors, and even a Pong game or two. Besides the obvious benefit of getting this junk out of our homes, the article highlights why this should be a growing concern around the country. From the article: "While federal law regulates the disposal of electronics by businesses and government agencies, it does not affect individual consumers, who account for more than half the e-waste produced annually, according to the federal agency. Every old computer monitor contains about four pounds of lead, and other parts are filled with heavy metals like mercury, arsenic, cadmium and chromium. They have toxins that hover in the air after incineration or leach into the water supply when buried in landfills. Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh say that dumps around the nation's major cities, including New York, hold more than 60 million computers."

183 comments

  1. Obligatory by jpaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    This post made with 100% recycled electrons.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can tell. It looks like you just took /dev/null and shook it out over the keyboard. PLEASE take your bit bucket to the recycling center in the future instead of just dumping it.

    2. Re:Obligatory by jdray · · Score: 1

      Free Geek here in Portland uses volunteer labor to recycle technology. They do a bang-up job of it. They've open-sourced their business model and new ones are evidently cropping up around the country.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  2. "word processors"???? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    I may be mistaken, but software doesn't actually generate any waste. The packaging already has ways to be recycled. What am I missing?

    1. Re:"word processors"???? by clarkc3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      besides software word processors, you used to be able to buy hardware ones that were the equivilent of a really fancy typewriter. I know I used one for a year or two before I got my first computer back around 1996

    2. Re:"word processors"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you were born, a "word processor" sometimes was a dedicated piece of equipment (some computer predating a PC which ran only word processing software)

    3. Re:"word processors"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word processors are also small eletronic devices that are generally a keyboard and a small thing that does one thing: word processing. http://www.alphasmart.com/ comes to mind.

    4. Re:"word processors"???? by daeg · · Score: 1

      Before PCs were widespread, there were standalone typewriter-style word processors. It was basically a small computer + keyboard + printer built into one. It typically could save the documents to a small bit of memory or external diskettes (although really early models didn't save). Later models had more formatting options (such as bold, underline, text alignment...), things that traditional typewriters didn't have (without swapping or using very expensive models).

    5. Re:"word processors"???? by N3Roaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you may just be too young. Before home computers were commonplace, there were these machines that were sort of like a computer, printer, monitor, and keyboard stuffed into the same box, but the computer part only ran primitive word processing software. It was a step up from the typewriter (saving, editing, printing multiple copies, keys generally didn't jam up), but not as expensive as a computer+monitor+printer+software. These were called word processors.

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    6. Re:"word processors"???? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      A lot of history.

      Before the PC, was the ,<a href="http://www.digibarn.com/collections/systems/ wang2200a/">Wang Word Processor</a>

      The link shows some of the later ones. I remember one, in the Air Force, the size of an <a href="http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/026.htm l">old keypunch machine</a>.

      Some of us started coding on keypunch. . . then some rich kid brought some fad called an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_PC">IBM PC</a> into the dorm. 4.77 Mhz. 16 K of RAM. No graphics whatsoever.

      We figured it would never last. Guess we were wrong. . .

    7. Re:"word processors"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi! I'm gonna do a do-over of the other guys post, with HTML enabled! My way of recycling.

      //Begin parent.

      A lot of history.

      Before the PC, was the Wang Word Processor.

      The link shows some of the later ones. I remember one, in the Air Force, the size of an old keypunch machine.

      Some of us started coding on keypunch. . . then some rich kid brought some fad called an IBM PC into the dorm. 4.77 Mhz. 16 K of RAM. No graphics whatsoever.

      We figured it would never last. Guess we were wrong. . .

      //End.

    8. Re:"word processors"???? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, equipment from Videc and Wang, among others. There were also a number of dedicated CAD systems of similar vintage.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:"word processors"???? by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      Every typewriter can do bold and underline. To underline, you press backspace then underscore. To bold, you press backspace then press the same letter again.

    10. Re:"word processors"???? by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      You're overlooking the hardware itself.
      Solder is often composed of lead, tin, and a number of other amusing elements.
      High end circuitry is composed of gallium arsnide, which in addition to being relatively valuable,
      contains elements that are not recommended for consumption.

      If you take a look at the effects of consuming silver in its known compounds, you'd see that even
      the more stable heavy metals can cause blindness or other afflictions that people don't want to have.

      By recycling this waste, it's possible to slow down the terminal point where we've consumed all
      copper on earth, and prevent permanently damaging our environment.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    11. Re:"word processors"???? by loconet · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      [alk]
    12. Re:"word processors"???? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What am I missing?

      Age.

      KFG

    13. Re:"word processors"???? by mikael · · Score: 1

      The e-waste is a bit misleading. Basically, they are talking about hardware that is no longer compatible - stuff like non plug'play accessories (14.4K modems), RS-232 mice, CRT monitors (all that lead and coppper) and old-fashioned word processors.

      The very earliest word processors were electric typewriters with a LCD display that could store one line
      of text. You could type in a line of text, make corrections, and when you pressed return, that line was
      printed. These are still being manufactured (finding this picture surprised me).
      Later, the LCD display was replaced with a monochrome 80 column monitor, and the documents could be saved/loaded from a floppy disc. Some versions supported a separate spreadsheet application accessible from a main menu. All software was stored on ROM so upgrading was more or less impossible. For home users, a personal home computer was a cheaper solution (and more entertaining), while the IBM PC clone became popular for offices.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re:"word processors"???? by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Bold was a 3 character strike.

      When I was in high school, typing was still a class.
      CC documents sucked as it was what the abbreviation stands for, a copy made from a sheet of carbon paper.
      You learned how to type correctly as there was no delete key.
      Liquid paper sucked. Liquid paper sheets were a godsend.
      You knew how to use the Return key as it brought your carriage to the beginning of the next line.

      Now, I knew how to use a manual typewriter where you had to flip the lever to return the carriage but those IBM selectrics were nice.

      Anybody remember the beep for the 5 character (a word) limit near the end of the margin?

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    15. Re:"word processors"???? by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      A beep? You spring chicken! I always heard a "ding"...

    16. Re:"word processors"???? by bendodge · · Score: 0

      When I read the title I thought it was talking about things like racks full of old server logs. Too bad they weren't, as I can provide a wonderful solution cheap.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    17. Re:"word processors"???? by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "A beep? You spring chicken! I always heard a "ding"..."

      Heheh...I hear ya.

      Was funny, the other day I was with a friend who is collecting and restoring old pinball machines. The 'digital' ones are quite fun, but, I'd forgotten about what a real pinball machine was supposed to sound like until I got onto his selection of EM machines, that had actual bells, and chimes on them for sounds.

      The clicking and clacking of the score reals, especially when resetting for a new game.....ahhh...was like reliving some old childhood dreams.

      There are just some things where analog will always be superior IMHO to digital....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:"word processors"???? by justinchudgar · · Score: 1

      Around the time I had a programmable TI calculator with a BASIC interpreter and 4kB of RAM, I had a "word processor" for typing papers for school. It was basically an electric typewriter body, complete with replaceable daisy wheel for "fonts". The keyboard input went into a buffer that was viewable through a tiny (~2 rows x 40 chars) where you could make post-typing edits like soft word processors. Once you were finished typing and editing, you could either print to the daisy wheel or save to floppy. If I recall correctly, the floppies contained marked-up text, so, if you could use them on different machines from the same OEM. Much nicer than a basic typewriter for someone who is not an accurate typist; but, not a computer by any means.

      --
      WARNING: Smoking this sig may cause lowered IQ, insanity or short term memory loss. It is also really bad for your monit
  3. So how much of that stuff gets... by Channard · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. 'helped' onto E-Bay. If it's working or repairable, I guess some of the stuff gets pocketed and recycled onto E-Bay or put into home use. You can replace the batteries on defunct iPods for example. My own iPod mini, for example, was screwed, but I managed to get the 4GB drive out of it, which was working fine, and the drive now stores my music for my 360.

    1. Re:So how much of that stuff gets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we can hope. Reuse is invariably better, environmentally speaking, than recycling.

    2. Re:So how much of that stuff gets... by mike9z · · Score: 1

      So much the better if it gets resold on eBay. It is sort of like recycling paper keeps one cycle of paper out of the ground. After recycled once, the paper loses its strength and is not even much good for newspaper.

      If we can even keep one cycle of the stuff out of the ground or eek the last cycle out of a PIII processor before admitting that even the first grader in poor America cannot use it, it is a gain in education and a lower demand in production.

      The downside to reselling used hardware is that it makes computer hardware like the hot potatoe game: one does not want to be the last person holding it as they lose. What I mean is that whoever is holding the computer or the monitor when its useful life is effectively zero, has to pay the piper to get it recycled. If there is aluminum or copper in the item, they are safe. If it is lead such as what one may find in a monitor, than this is a cost. For the thousands if not millions of monitors (CRTs) we have shipped to poorer regions of the world, we have exported a long term problem for places that can ill afford these issues.

  4. What about dumping in rural China? by IntelliAdmin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think one of the solutions is to get companies to donate old equipment, or give it to organizations that will fix it up and give to the needy. I have seen companies trash perfectly good computers, but refuse to give them to anyone. These computers were far from useless, and could be used by grandma to get email and surf the net. I think if these type of programs were setup at companies it would reduce the level of waste considerably.

    Still we need a solution to the problem of lead and other toxic chemicals leached into the soil. That makes me wonder...what happened to all the stories of businesses dumping this type of waste in rural China?

    Steve Wiseman
    http://www.windows-admin-tools.com

    1. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I think there's a certain degree of (not entirely unjustified) paranoia on the part of corporations that are afraid of confidential information that might leave on old systems. They figure it's just better to have the stuff destroyed rather than risk some ghetto kid getting hold of next year's financial projections.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it is 100% unjustified. Remove the hard drives, destroy those only. Some of the CTO's are so retarted they think that data can be stored even in the power supplies of the computers.

      when I worked for Comcast the security guys, the experts they hired for computer security (ex cops for computer security, funnest damned thing I ever seen. demanded that all screen be smashed before shipping to the trash because screen "burn in" can have sensitive data still in the screens. Yes even LCD screens had to be smashed.

      It's the fact that the people in charge of the gate are either retarted or incredibly undereducated for their jobs.

    3. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Reusing computers is a good idea. With the current increase in metals pricing it becomes desirable to reclaim the metals. Within 30 years you will see 'landfill mining' to recover, metal, plastic, rubber and organics. I would suggest investing in a large one. :)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    4. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most of the problem isn't about corporate data - any charity that recycles computers guarantees that the data is wiped and uses specialist equipment to clean the drives, but that they only accept relatively good computers.

      Look at ComputerAid International that uses MoD-specified data wiping tools, but won't accept anything less than a 450Mhz P3.

    5. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by triffid_98 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, that's not what really happens. Due to the massive trade imbalance, container shipping back to mainland china is practically free, so vast amounts of the stuff get shipped back to China for 'recycling', otherwise known as burning and recycling the copper,gold,steel and nasty airborne pollutants. Since China doesn't have any environmental laws to speak of this is a real money making operation, not only do they get paid to take the cheap crap they originally sold us but recycling it is a profitable operation in of itself.

      Still we need a solution to the problem of lead and other toxic chemicals leached into the soil. That makes me wonder...what happened to all the stories of businesses dumping this type of waste in rural China?
    6. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      what happened to all the stories of businesses dumping this type of waste in rural China?

      Then we have massive problems such as this.
      'Rural China' does not equal uninhabited. Someone is going to take that stuff apart for the valuable bits. And leave the rest to rot.

    7. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think one of the solutions is to get companies to donate old equipment, or give it to organizations that will fix it up and give to the needy.

      Part of the problem is the piggish resource consumption of modern software. Neither commercial nor FOSS bloatware is going to run well on these old Pentium 1 and Pentium 2 systems that are being thrown out (to say nothing of old 486 systems).

      I wish the Open Source community would look at the forgotten middle ground of software! Your choices for text processing under Linux seem to be vi or OpenOffice; with nothing in between. Why is there no FOSS version of Microsoft Works (or Windows Write)? If you want to edit images, your only choice seems to be GIMP. Why is there no lightweight Paint clone? No lightweight PDF viewer? No lightweight Flash player? All of the above, all using the same attractive and easy-to-use UI?

      Throw out the entire Linux userspace and start from scratch!

    8. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by noigmn · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen most of what big business throws out are generally good computers. A lot of the stuff they get rid of these days are things like 17" monitors and pentium 2 or 3 computers normally around 533Mhz, that are definitely good enough to run internet and word. They also have 10 or 20GB HDDs and quite a few 256MB memory chips around too. I think in Australia a lot of it gets redistributed to others though, if possible. Anything from let employees have first grab, to give to charity, to resell, or even put it obviously in the dumpster for someone to take :).

      --
      Slashdot is powered by your submission.
    9. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      You don't even need to physically destroy the hard disk drives. Even a single overwrite makes data unrecoverable, Gutmann paper notwithstanding. I have this on the advice of a data recovery specialist who has had to explain this to a pissed-off customer.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    10. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than two-thirds of equipment that is "recycled" still gets shipped overseas. The good news? some overseas processors are cleaning up their act, but it is the exception, not the rule. Computer donations are a huge business, btw. Some equipment goes to schools, like CRC http://www.crc.org/ and http://www.pcsforschools.org/, others just do the biz, like Intechra/Retrobox http://www.retrobox.com/. Some people talk about this on blogs http://www.ewasteinsights.info/

    11. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You are so correct. So many people think that recovery is possible after a single overwrite. The cost and effort to recover data overwritten even once is so astronomical to be not worth it.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      It's in almost nobody's interest (except ordinary people's, yours and mine; and we are mere pawns in the game) for that truth to be out. If it's believed that The Authorities have a method for recovering overwritten data from a hard drive, they won't have to admit the use of ..... shall we say ..... other techniques they might be using to recover data. If they are not content with mere overwriting as a method of making data unrecoverable (even though it is), it makes The Enemy think that they may know how to get it back. And anything that recommends destruction of used HDDs (either directly, or through increased wear and tear due to needless overwrite passes), sells more new HDDs.

      Quick noob-friendly secure file erasure instructions for Windows: (1) Don't delete anything yet, (2) create lots of junk files until you run out of room, (3) delete the files you want rid of, (4) create more junk files -- now the only place they can possibly be going is over the top of the files you deleted at step (3), (5) defragmentate the drive, (6) delete all the junk files.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    13. Re:What about dumping in rural China? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Works in unix-like OS too, even easier. In either situation I don't see a need to do two stages of filling up the free space. Just delete what you need deleted, then fill up the free space.

      "cat /dev/zero > bigfile" and wait for it to fill up.

      If you are paranoid you can use /dev/urandom instead, but it's going to be slower.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  5. Why not... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful
    just keep computers longer and not toss them every 2 years. My HP Kayak Station ca. 1999 works just fine for word processing and 'net surfing. Which is all fully half of users probably need.

    -b.

    1. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I just installed the latest version of OpenBSD v4.0 on my seventeen-year-old VAX and I use it to surf the net.
      I completely agree...keep the old stuff around.

    2. Re:Why not... by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Or FreeCycle them. If they no longer meet your needs there's bound to be someone else whose needs they do meet.

    3. Re:Why not... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      just keep computers longer and not toss them every 2 years. My HP Kayak Station ca. 1999 works just fine for word processing and 'net surfing. Which is all fully half of users probably need.

      Keep computers for two years? I wish I could afford to replace mine every two years. The one I'm typing this on I got in 2000, it's almost 7 years old. Another one I have, on the other side of my chair, I got in 1997 so it's 9 years old. The only reason I got the newer one is because the older one is a DEC Alpha and I wasn't able to get much software installed on it.

      Falcon
    4. Re:Why not... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I generally don't dump entire computers anyway. I agree with you: you don't need a 2 Ghz machine to read mail and browse and write letters. I tend to upgrade my machines piecemeal over time, consequently I put relatively little old hardware into the local landfill. People that toss an entire system in the dumpster because they feel the need for a new one are most of the problem.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Why not... by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      What are you - some kind of communist?!?

      Silliness aside, our entire economy is geared towards encouraging (though maybe 'coercing' or 'brainwashing' would be better words) people to spend and consume more. Your suggestion, while fair and reasonable, is unlikely to happen while the marketing-droids hold the reins of our society.

      In my opinion, geeks/nerds are particularly big suckers for marketing hype. Just as bad as the fashion victims...

    6. Re:Why not... by mordors9 · · Score: 1

      Don't discourage this. I need the 4 lbs of lead from those monitors to line my room with. Soon the aliens in our government will not be able to read my thoughts and I will finally be free....

    7. Re:Why not... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      My concern goes further than that. When I was a kid, I learned a lot and had a lot of fun taking stuff apart to learn how it works, etc. All that stuff that the article claims "Besides the obvious benefit of getting this junk out of our homes," sounds like my mom throwing all the cool stuff away each summer when I went to summer camp.

      This is a nerd/geek site. And that does NOT only mean 'IT' nerds (grrr). There's a place in every community where some nerdy guy has hoarded up a lot of cool older electronic gear and is adapting it to other uses.

      I'm sorry, but the 'recycling' regime comes off as a bit fascistic, sometimes. Like 'we forbid you to keep that old stuff around' and the likes. Many recycling centers specifically forbid people from pulling out the cooler bits to do stuff with.

      Any classic computing buff knows that some of the recyclers are 'cool' but that lots of them are total jerks towards anybody who shows an interest in saving/restoring the old stuff.

    8. Re:Why not... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There's a ton of good software to run on that Alpha. You can run the latest version of NetBSD, for instance, with nearly the entire collection of packages. And I mean the most current up-to-date packages available.

      Obviously, you won't be able to run Microsoft Word 200x or Visio on it, though.

      (isn't life great?)

    9. Re:Why not... by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      just keep computers longer and not toss them every 2 years. My HP Kayak Station ca. 1999 works just fine for word processing and 'net surfing. Which is all fully half of users probably need.

      People keep TVs for 10 years, and I don't think the average person who buys a desktop or notebook is thinking of it as just a two year purchase. Now that's the "average person" of course. It's the techies who want constant upgrades and the latest and greatest. I saw saw someone in a Mac forum recently who claimed to buy the latest high-end Mac notebook as soon as it was released, then he'd sell his 9 month "old" one on ebay. Ugh.

    10. Re:Why not... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      then he'd sell his 9 month "old" one on ebay. Ugh.

      That might actually not have been unreasonable if he needed to run WinTel applications and his old Mac was a G4.

      -b.

    11. Re:Why not... by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, keeping something electronic longer than two years? I dunno, living in the bay area, I don't see a lot of that. I see computers thrown in dumpsters all the time that can't be more than 4 or 5 years old. I've thrown a few Pentium II machines away myself simply because I don't have room for them. I also do tend to upgrade a major component in my computer every 6 months or so, so I have a lot of older expansion cards and HD that I have to get rid of regularly. Heck, who wants an old 56k modem, 10bT ISA ethernet card, or 2GB hard drive anyway? Sure there might be someone out there, but honestly I don't have the time or patience to deal with e-bay. Not worth how much I could get for this junk.

      I am however responsible... I have a 19" CRT that's in good condition that I have to PAY to get disposed of simply because I don't use it anymore. Soon to be replaced by a 24", 6ms Samsung :D

  6. North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by Vultan · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's as "downstate" as you can get, on Long Island. The recycling company is upstate in Buffalo, NY.

    1. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by MadEE · · Score: 1

      Pthhh. Only if your a conformist sheep and follow the heard by holding the map with North on the top. Real men don't confine themselves by such frivolous things such as standards!

    2. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by kfg · · Score: 1

      And Buffalo is only upstate if you live south of Scarsdale. These people will also call Scarsdale (and maybe even Hempstead for that matter, which is really pretty funny) "The Country."

      In a releated note when someone from Alaska visits North Hempstead (it could happen, although I'm not sure why) he does not "go south," he "goes east."

      KFG

    3. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, it's not Zonk's fault! Sony made him say it!

    4. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by RevMike · · Score: 1
      And Buffalo is only upstate if you live south of Scarsdale. These people will also call Scarsdale (and maybe even Hempstead for that matter, which is really pretty funny) "The Country."

      I caught my wife once saying that she was going "upstate" to visit a friend. I said "Upstate? They live in Yonkers!" She replied "Well, its above 96th St!"

    5. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... I live around Buffalo and we call ourselves Western New York. When you we hear Upstate, we think Watertown and Plattsburgh.

    6. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by kfg · · Score: 1

      "Upstate? They live in Yonkers!" She replied "Well, its above 96th St!"

      If you aren't terribly careful you run a serious risk of learning something new every day. Today I learned that I was born upstate - East Harlem.

      And all these years I thought it was another country.

      KFG

    7. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by sexybomber · · Score: 1

      Watertown is in Central New York. But you'd be right with Plattsburgh.

      "Upstate" is a roughly-drawn rectangle about 50-60 miles wide with Poughkeepsie at the center of the southern end and Plattsburgh at the northern end. It includes Albany and Saratoga, which is where I happen to hail from, so I should know.

    8. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by szembek · · Score: 1

      Central NY is upstate. There are multiple terms used, but if it's not downstate, it's upstate. And I can assure you that Watertown and Albany are not downstate. Neither is Binghamton, Syracuse, Buffalo, etc... Western NY , Central NY, Southern Tier, are all upstate.

      --
      nothing
    9. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Having lived on Long Island my whole life, upstate always meant (to me) any part of NY that I need to cross 2 bridges to get to. Or, in other words, anything past Tarrytown on the Thruway.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    10. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by RevMike · · Score: 1
      Having lived on Long Island my whole life, upstate always meant (to me) any part of NY that I need to cross 2 bridges to get to. Or, in other words, anything past Tarrytown on the Thruway.

      The problem with that definition is that the East Bank of the Hudson would not be considered upstate. Certainly Poughkeepsie and Troy are upstate, but they can be reached from Westchester without crossing a bridge.

      I always counted the communities outside of typical commute distance to be upstate. So generally anything beyond Westchester, Rockland, and parts of Orange.

    11. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      This is all technically true. However, the current use of the term "Upstate NY" shows a NY==NYC mode of thinking that mildly offends those of us who don't live there. Since half of the population lives in the NYC area, the term has stuck and will stick forever. That doesn't make it any less narrowminded. To say that Jamestown is in Upstate NY is geographically rediculous.

      Interesting side note on the whole NY==NYC thing. I was in Newport News, VA one time having a discussion about this issue and as an example of how far I live from NYC, I brought up to Google Maps. One from Newport News and one from Niagara Falls. Newport News is closer than I am. There are points in 11 states that are closer to NYC than Western New York.

    12. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by szembek · · Score: 1

      I know what your saying. Sometimes when speaking to people out of state you simply have to bite the bullet and say upstate. Even if it isn't the best description, at least it specifically says that you are not from NYC. A very very different place than the rest of the state.

      --
      nothing
    13. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      True enough, though a determined soul could technically get to pretty much anywhere in NY without crossing the Hudson, though you might not necessarily want to.

      I went to school for a little while at RPI (in Troy) and I always went up I-87 to get there, so Troy still counted as upstate for me.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    14. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by RevMike · · Score: 1
      I went to school for a little while at RPI (in Troy) and I always went up I-87 to get there, so Troy still counted as upstate for me.

      I went to RPI for a bit too in 91-92. I sometimes went I-87 but sometimes I'd take the Taconic as well.

    15. Re:North Hempstead isn't in upstate New York by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      I went to RPI for a bit too in 91-92.

      I'm a whippersnapper then... 96-97 for me.

      I might have investigated more ways to get there if I hadn't been booted. I really wasn't mature enough 10 years ago to put in the effort needed for college.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  7. Works for me. by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a recycling site near here, and the best part is they don't mind people taking away stuff that's been left there (with the usual disclaimers). It's a bit depressing to find out some people will throw away perfectly fine (and often new) PCs just because the windows installed on it got spyware.

    1. Re:Works for me. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      It's a bit depressing to find out some people will throw away perfectly fine (and often new) PCs just because the windows installed on it got spyware..

      Well, when I have people over for dinner and somebody says something like "No thanks, I don't like mashed potatoes" I just say, "Goody .. more for me."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Works for me. by Durrok · · Score: 1

      What kind of commie doesn't like mashed potatoes?

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    3. Re:Works for me. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Post an ad in the paper, you pay $10.00 for computers for recycling. My son got 5 P-4 1.8ghz machines that way (I know omg, how fricking slow!) for almost nothing.

      Most rich people think it's cheaper to buy a new Dell every 6 months than call the idiots at "geek squad" to tinker for a few hours and then charge $300+ for cleaning the PC when you can get a new one for $250.00-$280.00.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Works for me. by tftp · · Score: 1
      Most rich people think it's cheaper to buy a new Dell every 6 months than call the idiots at "geek squad" to tinker for a few hours and then charge $300+ for cleaning the PC when you can get a new one for $250.00-$280.00.

      Those rich people are rich for a reason - they are smart. It is indeed cheaper to buy a new box than to fix the old one. Even smarter would be to sell the old box, but on this scale it is irrelevant. Rich people value their time - say, $100/hr (just as the geek squad) - so a $300 expense on a new computer is peanuts, and you get a new, faster and better, computer out of this.

    5. Re:Works for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, rich are not smarter not by a long shot, they are simply lazy and have the resources to waste the money. otherwise they would buy a computer that does not get this kind of problems.

      Typically the Rich have less smarts than the poor, they simply have better social skills and know how to work reality... I.E. it's not what you know but who you know.

      It's truth, get over it, rich people are in fact dumb.

      But, I'm gonna get in on this robbing the rich because of their stupidity... Time to start printing computer recycling flyers.

    6. Re:Works for me. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      They're better mashed that pressed-into-french-fry (er... 'american fry') shape as is the norm at Burger King. I ate there last weekend for the first time in a long while. They STILL have reformulated fries (not sliced and fried, pulped and formed into 'fry' shape). Ick. Very, VERY unAmerican. True 'French' fries, one might say.

      heh

      (too many layers of sarcasm to sort out in above. so best just hit 'submit' and possibly kiss karma g'bye.)

    7. Re:Works for me. by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

      Most rich people think it's cheaper to buy a new Dell every 6 months than call the idiots at "geek squad" to tinker for a few hours and then charge $300+ for cleaning the PC when you can get a new one for $250.00-$280.00.

      This is perfectly fine provided the new PC works out of the box for you. If you are a typical professional working on a computer beyond casual web browsing, you need to install software, customize settings, transfer old files, get accustomed to new features and bugs, calibrate and/or get used to the new monitor (in case you do image work), etc. For me, this would take several hectic working days.

      If you can replace your computer like a drinking cup or a chair, you are not using it for much.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    8. Re:Works for me. by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

      If you can replace your computer like a drinking cup or a chair, you are not using it for much.

      ...in which case, you do NOT need a new computer, except when your existing one is 6+ years old. So I don't quite get why those people would replace a machine every six months. Is buying a new machine in a store cheaper than having a clean operating system install (to get rid of viruses and spyware)?

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  8. Yet again, Zonk gets it wrong by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1

    North Hempstead is on Long Island, and is thus not in upstate New York. (And, no, the word "upstate" is found nowhere in the original article; Times writers and editors know what upstate encompasses, even if Zonk doesn't). This is as incorrect as saying that Pasadena is in the San Francisco Bay area or that Palo Alto is in the Southland.

  9. Is this new? by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are the United States really so far behind in environmental issues?
    I understood from Bush that he does not really care about the environment (relative to other issues), but I would think that lower levels of government would already have acted more responsibly.

    Over here, the separated collection of waste, including separate places where electronic waste (computers, household electronics) has been in place for many years.
    We even pay a small fee on new equipment to pay for the recycling of old equipment.

    I think the US should change from "we only care about economics and hate to pay for others" into something more responsible.

    1. Re:Is this new? by value_added · · Score: 1

      Over here, the separated collection of waste, including separate places where electronic waste (computers, household electronics) has been in place for many years.

      And we can see from your Slashdot User ID that you live in ...

    2. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think the US should change from "we only care about economics and hate to pay for others" into something more responsible.


      Some of us here in the U.S. agree with you, but sadly we appear to be a small minority.

      And the CAPCHA I must now enter is "repress", hmmmmm...
    3. Re:Is this new? by William_Lee · · Score: 1
      I think the US should change from "we only care about economics and hate to pay for others" into something more responsible.

      Nothing like a blanket generalization about an entire nation of people...A great deal of us are responsible here, do care about the environment, and try to recycle as much as possible.

      A great deal of us are also sick of hearing from other nationals about how much the US and Americans suck, and can pretty much do no right anywhere...

      I'm sure you don't like generalizations and ignorant comments about your nation...

      Pot meet kettle...

      If I had any mod points today, I would have just hit you with some flamebait and left it at that...

    4. Re:Is this new? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Are the United States really so far behind in environmental issues?

      No.
      " California e-waste law took effect on January 1, 2005, and requires charging customers a fee at the time of purchase to cover recycling of certain electronics products at the end of the product's useful life."
      "Effective January 1, 2006, Maine's new e-waste law will take effect"
      "Effective January 1, 2006, Maryland's new e-waste law will take effect."

      I think the US should change from "we only care about economics and hate to pay for others" into something more responsible.

      I think the rest of the world should not apply sweeping generalities to what happens in the US.

    5. Re:Is this new? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Nice US-bashing. I guess just because we're "only" ahead of 95% of other nations instead of 100%, you see that as a horrible crime against humanity. In 40 years when China finally decides to do something about their environment, I hope you enjoy writing about how great China is for doing so.

    6. Re:Is this new? by hador_nyc · · Score: 1
      I think the US should change from "we only care about economics and hate to pay for others" into something more responsible.
      Making a sweeping generalization about us Americans is about as accurate as making one about Europeans. Have you forgotten that the EU is very roughly the same size, in population and land area, as the US. It's just as ignorant for us to say there is no difference between a say French person and a Czech person, as it is for you to say that we are all the same.

      I guess America isn't the only place burdened with people with small minds. I'm getting awfully tired of Europeans thinking that all of us here are oil burning George Bush supporters. Half of us voted against him. I myself, along with millions of others, pay extra for electricity to buy our power from low impact sources like wind and hydro. Most states have tax rebates or other similar incentives to encourage the use of low impact energy sources. Bush, himself, recently created the World's Largest Marine Sanctuary. I'm not saying he's a good guy, but he's not all evil either. To say that America is some environmental destruction zone is false, and I am sick and tired of ignorance laced opinions like yours. We have pleanty of room to improve here, but the place that was first to set aside protected land is not the worst either.
      --
      - Mike
      Once you've lost your temper, you've lost the argument - Me
    7. Re:Is this new? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Some people can... they often have similar (letters-digit-letters) slashdot IDs.

    8. Re:Is this new? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      When we see your president on TV, he is proclaiming that he does not care about the environment when saving it would hurt the US economy or American jobs.
      This makes others in the world angry because they are voluntarily doing things that may hurt their economy and help the environment.
      They constantly meet the fact that the country that burns the majority of the world's oil does the least to tune down that consumption. They complain about gas prices that are 1/2 to 1/3 of what they are in other parts of the world, for example.

      Of course you would have been much better off with Gore as president.

      About being not able to do right: this continues all the time. Why did the US veto a UN resolution to condemn the Israeli action against the Palestines? Normally the US is first in line to condemn terrorism, but when it is done by their friends in Israel there is no problem. They ivade Iraq for not complying with a single UN resolution, yet have no problem with Israel never complying with ANY UN resolution and even veto new resolutions.

      Small wonder that some people are hating you.

    9. Re:Is this new? by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Well, it certainly feels that way out here :(

      I actually called the 'waste management' company to ask about a monitor after reading one of these articles.
      Answer: Toss it in trash !!

      I didn't really think incinerating those was a good thing but he didn't give me any other choices to work with :(

      At least the battery recycling is close.

  10. Schools and Gov't Agencies by robinesque · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have about 60 HP Vectras sitting in a closet at my school. They're being used for nothing, and the school district refuses to let them go. So they're going to have to be thrown away. I know any number of people that would like to pick one up to play with, whether to use it as a spare Linux box, or simply to take apart and salvage parts out of. But the district can't get out of it's own way to put them to use, so they're probably going to sit in that closet until someone can take them to the dump.

    1. Re:Schools and Gov't Agencies by British · · Score: 1

      Can you convince the school board to sell them, like a bake sale or something, cheap and get some $ out of it? That would sound better than having to spend money to get them hauled away.

      Just sell them next to the lemon bars & rice crispie treats. Offer a discount or first crack at students who don't have one at home.

    2. Re:Schools and Gov't Agencies by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Volunteer to get rid of them... a few to your friends, a few on ebay, a few to recycling charity (that will come and collect), the knackered ones to the dump. Go on, do your bit, don't just sit there and type how terrible it is.

    3. Re:Schools and Gov't Agencies by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

      Often things like that have already depreciated, and thus making a profit on them in a sale would entail too much effort, red-tape, and lawyers. They could probably give them away, though.

      I recently sat my 17" Princeton Graphics CRT out on the curb with a sign that said, "Free. Works fine." It was gone by the end of the day.

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    4. Re:Schools and Gov't Agencies by robinesque · · Score: 1

      You assume we haven't already tried. I've spent time at the board meetings. Like I said, the district won't let students touch them. Only IT guys are allowed to even move the computers around.

    5. Re:Schools and Gov't Agencies by orangepeel · · Score: 1

      Then kick it up a notch. Write to your local newspaper, except not just about your particular situation. Start it off as a letter-to-the-editor about the growing problem of ewaste, and then bring up your situation as an example. Include a few lines about recycling old electronics as being "a valuable lesson for our children" or something to that effect and you're golden.

      You've got the 800 pound gorilla on your side, dude. You get to use a variant of the old, "won't someone think of the children," line. Seriously ... their crotches are bare, and you're standing there holding a nine-iron. Yeesh. Start swinging!

      --
      Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    6. Re:Schools and Gov't Agencies by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. I recently obtained a Underwood typewriter from a local hospital. Circa 1940s. It had been sitting in their shipping/receiving room for probably 20 years in a corner and nobody had ever taken it to a dumb or anything. It's a little damaged, but the thing's worth a couple hundred at a trendy antique store.

  11. Redirecting recycling efforts? by LokiSnake · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Perhaps the nation as a whole should put more effort into recycling e-waste and less into the more inefficient plastics and glass, since heavy metals can cause big problems if not taken care of properly. I've also heard that the only thing proven to be efficient to recycle (in terms of energy) would be aluminum (link). Since the other ones probably don't even save us energy, why not put more efforts into something that may save us in the future? All the other recycling is probably done just for politicians to cozy up to environmentalists.

    1. Re:Redirecting recycling efforts? by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Remember, though, that recycle isn't only about energy. It's alsto about saving materials.

      --
      :x
    2. Re:Redirecting recycling efforts? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the nation as a whole should put more effort into recycling e-waste and less into the more inefficient plastics and glass

      There's no reason plastics and glass along with e-waste can't be recycled. I recall as a kid in the 1970s walking around collecting bottles, cans, and jars then taking them to recycling centers for a little more spending money. Sometimes I'd find returnable coke bottles too. Now instead of being paid to recycle you're taxed to have recycles picked up, in areas that separate recyclables and trash.

      Falcon
    3. Re:Redirecting recycling efforts? by couchslug · · Score: 3, Informative

      Steel is quite efficient too. I'll take all I can get, because the nice folks at the scrapyard pay me for it.
      I find the whole e-waste thing questionable for one reason.

      I buy cars to part out and then send to the crusher.
      A car has hundreds of pounds of plastic, glass, and miscellaneous metals including lead in the battery.
      I watch those cars go straight into the crusher.

      When I have old comps and monitors and televisions, they go into those cars along with a wide variety of scrap from my shop.
      The folks crushing the cars don't care, and the materials are sorted at the shredder.

      There is nothing in the computers that isn't in the cars, so why not scrap them together? The computer waste stream is dwarfed by the auto recycling stream, and the auto recycling process is highly refined.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Redirecting recycling efforts? by rampant+poodle · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea which probably works as well as anything discussed in this thread. Steel is by far the best example of recycling that works.

      I have always wondered about the possibility of treating electronics waste as a low grade ore. Shred/grind everything - then use, (mostly existing), separation and refining techniques to recover both ferrous and non-ferrous metals. Ideally you would wind up with an assortment of metals, slag, and large pile of plastic and related waste. Two of the three have significant market value. Unfortunately no one has yet come up with reasonable used for used mixed plastics.

      Probably not economically possible now. However, the value of the trace and precious metal component will always increase. Lots of past examples where material considered as waste by one generation or process became the raw material of the next.

    5. Re:Redirecting recycling efforts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boys, this is how you do it, car crush rules.
      Fit 20 monitors in easy, and get paid for the extra weight.
      Given the platinum in cat converters, and the copper/nickel car crushers are not the fools people believe.

      In .au the stupid .gov in one provence introduced a $14 per monitor and $10 per computer recycling charge. Note, nothing is actually recycled, it goes to a partitioned landfill. Note, they get testy about monitors, but never mind about auto batteries.

      Thus households smash em to bits, and mix them with the trash, or give them to uncle billy bob, whose local tip is unrestricted/no fees in some dying country town. Judging by the number of paid disposals, the other 75% is an indication of something not working.

      While common sense tells us what should be done, what happens when DU contaminated military hardware, or copper cable from nuclear plants gets sent to the crushers in the US??

    6. Re:Redirecting recycling efforts? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "While common sense tells us what should be done, what happens when DU contaminated military hardware, or copper cable from nuclear plants gets sent to the crushers in the US??"

      That stuff has a chain of custody and isn't likely to make it out of the system.
      Plenty of asbestos-jacketed copper cable does beat safety controls (which is why burning cable to get #1 grade scrap is NOT smart!) but I haven't seen anything else questionable.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  12. The hardest part is almost done by Neoncow · · Score: 2, Funny

    The hardest part is sorting out the ones and the zeros without generating more ones and zeros than you started with. Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University believe they are on the cusp of a major breakthrough in the E-Waste initiative.

  13. This is why counties like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    South east asia, mexico, and nigeria and iberia exist, to accept our refuse. God save them, and the Queen.

  14. Handouts by JoshJ · · Score: 1

    I'll take them. I can put Linux on them and use them as random servers or whatever.

    Or they could do the smart thing and give them to students.

  15. Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by undeaf · · Score: 1

    ...or at least a big part of it, they have such a stranglehold on the OS market and they don't make any operating systems designed for reusing old PCs, and the prices they charge for their OS's make them impractical for installing on PC's of such low worth. Yes, there are leftover copies of windows 98, but it's unstable, unsuported and a hassle to set up.

    1. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Yes, there are leftover copies of windows 98, but it's unstable, unsuported and a hassle to set up.

      2k isn't that much more resource hungry. Also, there's the option of Ubuntu or some other easy to use distro of Linux. Will work just fine for Web surfing and word processing/DB/spreadsheets. It even works with a lot of digicams.

      -b.

    2. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by undeaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2k isn't being sold anymore either, and it was expensive and AFAIK there aren't all that many copies out there among consumers, and then there's the question of how many of those that have it would want to part with it. Most people haven't even heard about linux, and most of those that did probably think of it as "something only for crazy nerds" or something along those lines.

      Yes, recycling computers is definitly doable, the problem isn't how hard it is for someone who actually wants to do it, the problem is that it's not being done much.

    3. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      2k isn't being sold anymore either, and it was expensive and AFAIK there aren't all that many copies out there among consumers, and then there's the question of how many of those that have it would want to part with it.

      A lot of older - ca 1999 - hardware is licensed to use 2k anyway (and thus has a valid key). If you don't have the disk, you can always get a pirated copy - MS isn't losing anything since the hardware is licensed to use 2k anyway (that is, if you care about MS losing money).

      -b.

    4. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by undeaf · · Score: 1

      But most people, who don't think that there's really anything wrong with throwing away computers in the first place, are indoctrinated to believe that piracy is a mortal sin.

    5. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      are indoctrinated to believe that piracy is a mortal sin.

      Nah, plenty of "normal" people pirate music, software or whatever. Besides, if you're licensed to use it, it isn't really piracy since a copy for that computer has already been bought by someone, somewhere. Not that I'm a huge fan of piracy - ultimately, corporations, people, whatever should be treated fairly and equally. By cheating MS, you're expressing your willingness to cheat other smaller, more innovative (and possibly more fragile financially) companies.

      -b.

    6. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      98 is about as good as 2k (I only switched because of bitrot), and the only real
      advantage to 2k (besides all the patches MS shoves down your throat) is better APM.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    7. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      Switch 98 to 2k and 2k to XP and I might have agreed with you. 98's networking is abysmal, as is it's PCMCIA handling, lack of wireless support, etc. make it useless in many cases.

    8. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Okay, but considering we're talking about reusing antiquated machines wireless doesn't
      seem too relevant, there are plenty of PCI wireless NICs with 98 drivers though. As for
      "networking", well... Auntie Mae with a single machine on dialup or cheap-ass DSL ought
      not have any issues.

      PCMCIA? Bah. I'll grant iffy USB though, which could be an issue for some users.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    9. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by PayPaI · · Score: 1

      Iffy USB, mainly due to horrid support for things that should be built in (looking at you mass storage).
      PCI NICs, yes. Your original mention of APM was mainly the trigger for my comments about PCMCIA. On a desktop, neither 2k or 98 will do anything interesting with APM (except for unstable hibernation in 2k)

    10. Re:Microsoft's monopoly is probably the problem... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      I use hibernation all the time, and have only ever had it fail a handful of times
      (some recoverable with a reboot for another try at loading the image). OTOH "Standby"
      is definitely unstable (on my hardware).

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  16. Beowulf Cluster? by Nixusg · · Score: 1
    say that dumps around the nation's major cities, including New York, hold more than 60 million computers

    Just imagine all those in a beowulf cluster!

    1. Re:Beowulf Cluster? by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Since at least 30% of said cluster nodes would not work because the equipment is borked, it would approximate the functionality of a windows cluster. Not cool.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:Beowulf Cluster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone tried that with the stone supercomputer:
      http://stonesoup.esd.ornl.gov/
      But it was later decommisioned.

  17. $100 Computers by mykepredko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While probably not solving the problem but displacing it, how about using old computers for the $100 computer initiative for developing countries.

    They would definitely use more power than the $100 computers designed for this purpose but chances are they would provide the same amount of processing power, better graphics, more hard drive space and would have available monitors and network/WiFi adapters.

    As I said, that this is displacing the problems as now the developing countries will have to deal with the waste at some point in time. But, it could give their economies & education systems a much needed boost.

    myke

    1. Re:$100 Computers by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Type 'computer recycle charity' into google, and see just how many hits you get. Or click this link ComputerAid International if you're too lazy :)

      The $100 computer thing is more about a PC that can be used in places where there isn't the kind of electricity supply that would be needed to power most PCs.

    2. Re:$100 Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One problem is support - who's going to handle getting all of these inconsistent platforms running the same software? Someone's going to have to troubleshoot any problems, whether they're hardware problems or software incompatibilities with certain hardware or combinations of hardware (like some of the stuff that seems to have been blissfully ignored in the 2.6 series of the linux kernel). What if these machines die while in the field? The problem is ongoing.

      It's not that I totally disagree with you, but this is probably the view of the companies building and deploying the new machines. Also, governments will typically go with the solution that yields more new jobs on the production side because that's more easily understandable up front than a "we won't know how many people we'll need until we see how broken the products are" approach.

    3. Re:$100 Computers by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      how about using old computers for the $100 computer initiative for developing countries.

      Where are you going to plug them in?

    4. Re:$100 Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While probably not solving the problem but displacing it, how about using old computers for the $100 computer initiative for developing countries.


      The $100 computer will be a nearly solid state device with a standard software and OS package. The documentation for both hardware and software would be completely open and readily available. It would be relatively easy for someone with little or no computer experience to use and maintain one of the machines-- or a hundred of them.

      Compare the logistics of that, to dumping a hundred assorted used machines from different manufacturers (and even different eras.) Each OS install would have to be tweaked for whatever , and once they are running it would be a nightmare to maintain "in the field" (the field being a third world country where parts for old machines would have to be shipped from elsewhere.) Meaning, where in the first case a relief worker with general computer knowledge can maintain dozens of machines (and the recipients can learn for themselves quickly), in the latter you would need to send Geek Squad along with the crates of random used computers.

      (Someone else brought this up too but the power is also a concern... The $100 machine is designed to be used with spotty third world power sources, a used machine is designed to be plugged into a reliable first world wall outlet. It can pretty much be assumed that finding African power supply cords for a 1999 eMachine will be impossible, so a converter would also be needed for each of the used machines, and as anyone who has used them can attest these converters are not 100% reliable-- particularly the cheaper ones-- and should certainly not be used as a permanent solution sensitive equiptment in a place where brownouts and surges are common.)

  18. How exactly does lead leach out of CRTs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone got a link? I've always thought this was so much enviro-hippie BS, but I'd be willing to change my opinion if someone can actually explain how lead that's locked in CRT glass can end up in the water table.

    1. Re:How exactly does lead leach out of CRTs? by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      how lead that's locked in CRT glass can end up in the water table

      Well, it isn't locked. Have you ever seen a monitor with a lock?

    2. Re:How exactly does lead leach out of CRTs? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      I would imagine in much the same way that leaches out of your dinner crystal and into
      your wee doch-an-dorrach. Or is that fictitious too? And of course, if your local MSW
      is incinerated all bets are off.

      For a more direct answer (a study specifically about CRT leeching) see this study.

      See also http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/riafile.nsf/vwAN/S9 9-23.pdf/%24File/S99-23.pdf (It's probably not a bad idea to recover the Yttrium either.)

      P.S. Intellectual laziness is pathetic.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:How exactly does lead leach out of CRTs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      P.S. Intellectual laziness is pathetic.

      So is running around like Chicken Little over a few nanograms per milliliter here and there.

    4. Re:How exactly does lead leach out of CRTs? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      a) Lead is bio-accumulative
      b) Those "few nanograms" equate to half a milligram, in the drinking crystal example.
            If you bothered to check out the CRT example you'd see that this is a non-trivial
            amount, especially when you consider how much leaded glass is produced and discarded.
            (As of the date of the report, CRTs were the second largest source of Pb after
              batteries, some 70,000 tons).
      c) Tempting though it may be to believe that the Earth is the center of the universe,
            and more specifically humanity thereupon it, not all species respond to chemicals
            in the same manner.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    5. Re:How exactly does lead leach out of CRTs? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I lost a few orders of magnitude there, that should be half a microgram
      (as opposed to half a milligram). For reference, lead poisoning is measured in
      micrograms per deciliters.

      The leaching study yielded up to 400 mg Pb/l (weighted average) in leachate from
      a small sample, not more than 100g of crushed CRT. Prolonged exposure to the
      environment might yield more, and a single CRT certainly masses more than 100g.
      So estimate 280 tons of mobile lead per year from CRTs (with average composition,
      leaching and no recycling). This exceeds anthropogenic mercury
      emissions (160 tons per year).

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    6. Re:How exactly does lead leach out of CRTs? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Gah! Freaking slashcode's inability to edit posts, and one's tendency to miss one's own errors in a long composition...

      That should be 500 mg / liter (speed reading), and 96 tons of mobile lead per year from CRTs; I missed a few factors :-/
      9.6 ktons glass * ((500 mg Pb/liter leachate) / (100 mg glass/2 liter fluid)).

      Also compare EPA permissible limits for drinking water, which are not necessarily 100% science based.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  19. One foes not... by Alcari · · Score: 1
    ...throw away sacred relics of the past!

    The Town of North Hempstead has positioned helpers at the dump the last four weekends, assisting people with a flood of old monitors, keyboards, laptops, word processors, and even a Pong game or two.
    1. Re:One foes not... by Alcari · · Score: 1

      which is of course spelled with a D, and not an F

  20. North Hempstead isn't even in northern Long Island (on which it lies), much less upstate New York. Hope the rest of the facts aren't so liberally interpreted.

    1. Re:Nit by Bio2431 · · Score: 1

      North Hempstead is about as far north as you can get on Long Island. It comprises all the villages and surrounding areas from the halfway point up to the water between Queens County and The town of Oyster Bay. But it is far from upstate.

  21. Recycle computers while not destroying them? by Sneakernets · · Score: 1

    Instead of destroying old computers that work, why not put them to other uses? A small computer store where I live does exactly this, and they have made a killing at it, too. For poor income families, and casual computer users, it's a win-win situation. In fact I was a customer: I bought a maxed out IBM PC300GL for 25 dollars, and I had no problems with it. Most Modern software worked beautifully on it. While it wasn't a gaming computer, it did just what I bought it for.

    --
    "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Recycle computers while not destroying them? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Yes, most people don't need P4s for gmail or AbiWord (but almost for OO); I still use
      a KII-3 for my primary desktop. And these processors tend to sip lightly too, however
      the power supplies (like many modern ones) tend to be rather inefficient. One must also
      keep in mind that these machines probably do not support APM/ACPI but ought to at least
      have DPMS. Finally, one ought to ensure that the new owners are encouraged to properly
      dispose of the (older, dirtier) machine when it is EOL'd.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  22. My suggestion for a general solution by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    1. Each thing sold must be taxed for its recycling (kind of an additional VAT, with standard amount for item category and the possibility for sellers to certify a different packaging or item composition which gives em a discount)

    2. Consumers can either choose to dump stuff in the bin or go to recycling sites and get refunded for the amount and quality of the material they give back.

    IMHO that would pressure producers to consider packaging more carefully, let consumers get something in return for the effort of getting stuff properly recycled, and somebody might want to sort garbage to get a lil money.

    I know that the idea of tax is not popular. But we pay anyway in the end in a polluted environment.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    1. Re:My suggestion for a general solution by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      That's about how it works in some European countries.

      Each thing sold must be taxed

      There is a specific recycling tax on electronics equipment, paid by the shop to the distributor, or directly by the end user to the supplier (in cases like direct orders from Dell, Apple, etc.).

      The amount is small (around 1%).

      However, you are not allowed to just throw the stuff away in a rubbish bin. It must be brought back either to a recycling place, or to any shop around the corner selling the same type of equipment.

      The shops must collect the junk and organise to have it picked up for recycling. It is free (both for the people and the shops) since it was paid for through that specific tax.

    2. Re:My suggestion for a general solution by andmalc · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this - the only serious and responsible way to recover the cost of disposal is to put a surcharge the original purchase. Otherwise, this cost is downloaded (or 'externalized' in the language of economists) to the environment and the public. Here in Ontario they do this now for car tires.

  23. E-waste by akar_naveen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    At first sight the word e-waste looked like it meant waste data. Does anyone else think it's a misnomer?

    It could be just me. I was just shopping online for a second external hard drive after the first one got full, with some useful but mostly 'can't delete yet-might need in future' kind of stuff.

    1. Re:E-waste by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Waste information, huh? A bit of an oxymoron.

      No, it's a long established name, short for electronic(s) waste.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:E-waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the other poster said, e=electronic. All of the material is electronic, it's just that language has shifted recently to make "electronic" mean the bits themselves rather than the transistors they flow through.

  24. How dare you!? by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny
    Pong is junk? Blasphemy!! Burn the witch!

    Next thing you'll be saying is Pacman is gay. Hello? Ms. Pacman? Pacman is a red-blooded heterosexual disc with a triangle cut out.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  25. That's why I shoot my old computers and parts. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Until they aren't recognizable as computers.

    I still have a 640 Meg SCSI drive with netmare 2 or it that I filled with 30-06 holes. It has a few jagged edges but now it's a good memory.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:That's why I shoot my old computers and parts. by MollyB · · Score: 1

      If the intention of the program is to rid the environment of dangerous/toxic material, I fail to see how adding hot lead to the mix solves anything...

  26. How much of that is Directv Satellite Receivers? by HonestDirect · · Score: 1

    Ever replace one because it was giving you Searching for Satellite and then found out it was the cable? Here's a guide that would have helped! http://honestwealthgroup.com/files/howto-troublesh oot-sfss-on-your-directv-equipment-rough.pdf Check back later for further updates!

    --
    Discover a Financial Lifeline Tracker.HonestWealthGroup.com
  27. FUD by ahayes_m · · Score: 1

    NYT article, need I say more?

  28. What federal law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "While federal law regulates the disposal of electronics by businesses and government agencies,..."

    Say what? Our environmental folks say there is no federal law regulating electronics disposal in the USA by businesses, although there are state laws.

    Does anyone have a cite on this alleged federal law?

    Thanks,

    Bob

  29. The easy solution by billsoxs · · Score: 1

    There is a place close to me, called erecycler, that resells a bunch of things - mostly used computers from businesses and schools. This is a really good way to cut down on the waste. (Yes eventually it does wearout but this gives it a longer life.) I've bought stuff from them with good luck.

    --
    This message was brought to you by "Lack of Sleep."
  30. make manufacturers responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If a person company wants to build a bridge or building or something, then the effect on the public and environment is often considered.

    But if a company decides to make millions of widgets and sell them to the public, the effect of this is often overlooked.
    Company says the consumer bought the toys containing plastic and lead, so claims that the problem is offloaded to the consumer.

    But the consumer does not decide how to make the widget or what it is made of. This is what the company and government regulation does.

    The way to control waste is not by creating "recycle" programs after the fact, but rather to more tightly control product creation to reduce waste from the start. This applies to anything that can fill up the landfills/ditches, or create a hazard.

    1. Re:make manufacturers responsible by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      mod parent up!

  31. Recycle NYC by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The Lower East Side Ecology Center is running an electronics recycling event today, coordinated by Manhattan Boro President Stringer, the NYC Council (City legislature), and the Upper West Side councilmember, Gale Brewer:
    Electronic Recycling Drop-Off Event
    Sunday, November 12th, 8am to 12:30pm
    Lincoln Center - Service Road

    We will accept working and non-working computers, laptops, monitors, printers, keyboards, mice, cables, TVs and VCRs(no wooden consoles only plastic case models), fax machines, cell phones and pagers.

    Saturday, December 9th, 8am to 4pm at PS 321
    180 7th Avenue, between 1st & 2nd Streets
    Park Slope, Brooklyn

    Sunday, January 7th, 2007, 8am to 4pm
    4th annual 'After the Holidays' event at Union Square Park - North Plaza 17th St & Broadway


    Brewer and Stringer are promoting a new City law, Intro 104, to require manufacturers to recycle products in a complete product lifecycle:
    Intro. 104, sponsored by Council Member Bill De Blasio, which would require manufacturers to collect discarded electronic products. Intro. 104, the Electronics Recycling and Reuse Act, would remove many of these products from landfills and incinerators currently used by the City of New York, as these products pose an environmental risk when burned, buried or recycled improperly.


    The Council's Technology in Government committee is running a public feedback survey on recycling.

    When the World Is Running Down" by the Police
    Turn on my V.C.R., same one I've had for years
    James Brown on the T.A.M.I show,
    Same tape I've had for years
    I sit in my old car, same one I've had for years
    Old battery's running down, it ran for years and years

    Turn on the radio, the static hurts my ears
    Tell me, where would I go? I ain't been out in years
    Turn on the stereo, it's played for years and years
    An Otis Redding song, it's all I own

    When the world is running down
    You make the best of what's still around
    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Recycle NYC by pla · · Score: 1

      Brewer and Stringer are promoting a new City law, Intro 104, to require manufacturers to recycle products in a complete product lifecycle:

      Hello, "interstate commerce" calling?

      The city can perhaps force in-city vendors to take back "empties" for processing. The federal government might have a thing or two to say about restricting trade across state lines, however.



      Don't get me wrong, I would love to see a purchase-time "recycling" tax on consumer electronics, because currently, we have a system that ENCOURAGES people to chuck it in the woods/swamp/ditch. And even for non-hazardous PC parts, the garbage collectors have no idea what they can or can't take... completely gutted PC cases, for example - nothing but clean steel or aluminum, yet it would sit on the curb until it rusted away, rather than Sanitation hauling it off (I actually had something like that happen - After three weeks, I made a point of asking them why they wouldn't take it... "We can't take computers"... Explaining the situation to them didn't help, although friends have told me that offering them a beer will get them to take anything you can imagine).

      But any city or even individual state that passes a law like this, just begs the USSC to spank them back into submission.

    2. Re:Recycle NYC by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, cities can put restrictions on products sold within their limits. For example, NYC has laws prohibiting dangerous devices from being sold, from guns (possibly a special case), to "blackjacks", brass knuckles, etc. The proposed NYC law is consistent with existing recycling requirements, which have not been found to violate "Interstate Commerce" privileges retained by the Federal government.

      NYC is also part of a nationwide movement of cities and states to implement Greenhouse mitigation policies, which can force out-of-state corporations to avoid acting certain ways within the jurisdiction of those entities. For decades, California has required emissions standards higher than the national requirements. That hasn't violated any "Interstate Commerce" rules, though it has turned the entire world a lot cleaner.

      So not for nuthin' does the USSC have to keep its spankhand holstered when NYC does the right thing with our own backyard. Robes are delicate, and we wouldn't want nuthin' ta break or nuthin'.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  32. Disposable society by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    It's largely an economic consequence of cheap energy and expensive labour. It's much cheaper to have machines make a new thing on a production line than it is to have humans recycle or refurbish something old.

    Of course, humans are particularly expensive because the government levies a 30-40% tax on their use.

    --
    Deleted
  33. recycling e-waste by annricks · · Score: 1

    My dad was telling me his community (Arlington, TX) had a recycling fair this past week for items such as old computers, monitors, old cell phones, etc. I understand a number of companies participated by taking the waste to recycle. I commented that it would be nice to have such an event in my city because I have several old computers, monitors, keyboards, printers, and old cell phones that I'd love to be able to get rid of without feeling guilt over just throwing them away.

    http://www.redmeow.com/
  34. "Recycling" e-waste can be worse than landfilling by delfstrom · · Score: 1

    But just "recycling" isn't enough - in fact it can be worse than landfilling it in North America!

    Why? Much of tech waste sent for recycling ends up in China and other countries where unprotected workers burn material in open fires to separate out the metals from the plastics, and use hydrochloric acid (again unprotected) to isolate gold and other precious metals. It's a horrible practice. Visit the web site of the Basel Action Network for photos of the conditions. Included in the photo gallery are American municipal, hospital and school identification stickers from material at these overseas sites.

    In Ontario there is only one company that truly recycles electronics - Noranda's plant in Brampton, Ontario. They have a lead smelter on-site, and you have to pay to send material to them. There are many companies that will take your electronics waste for free, but guess where it ends up. Not at a proper recycling plant in North America, that's for sure.

    Always ask the company who is picking up your e-waste where it is going for processing.

  35. check freegeek.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They help hardware being used longer and spread computing freedom at the same time: http://www.freegeek.org/

  36. Hmm just charge people for the E-waste by mysqlbytes · · Score: 0

    Here in ireland, we had a price hike on absolutely everything that costs money to recycle. We call it WEEE here in europe, its a good initiative to be honest, it seems to be working here, WEEE Ireland has more details . But there is also a very large market for PC Recycling, where the old machines are taken, upgraded and then sold as systems primed for solely surfing the web. With a DSL modem and a recycled pc, you can be surfing the web for less than $300.

  37. deposits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charge a decent deposit on manufactured goods, and you would see a lot more e-cycling happen. People might go chuck out an old computer and monitor, but if they got 50 bucks (whatever, it would have to be significant though) back for taking them back to the store, I bet that would happen most of the time.

  38. Recycling E-Waste by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    What's all this hubbub about "recycling e-waste"? Ain't no one ever heard of the "Recycle Bin"? Geeze.

  39. fundamental problem by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The funadamental problem with computers is the nature of their design, or rather, the current easiest/cheapest methods. Take a look at a lot of the current day products and how easy some of them are to recycle. A lot of kids toys are made of one giant piece of plastic, all the same kind of plastic. Most food containers are now that way too. Computers can't be made that way. They are a very diverse collection of parts, assembled in ways not meant to be disassembled, and the parts are so small and so numerous that even if you wanted to take them apart it would be very difficult work. I can't imagine how long it would take someone to take apart a motherboard into recyclable pieces. Optical drives, power supplies, fans, none of these lend themselves well to recycling. We can't just keep burying our trash, that doesn't make the problem go away, it just pushes it off on the next generation to deal with. Eventually we are going to have to deal with all our trash.

    Really it would not surprise me if in say, 50 years, there is an entire industry of waste reclamation, where a company bids on and BUYS a landfill, and sends in machines to process the garbage and make a proffit off what's reclaimed.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:fundamental problem by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 1

      Computers can't be made that way. They are a very diverse collection of parts, assembled in ways not meant to be disassembled, and the parts are so small and so numerous that even if you wanted to take them apart it would be very difficult work.

      You could say the same about cars, but we've actually gotten quite good at recycling them. You don't hire a mechanic to disassemble the engine, you just feed the whole thing through a giant shredder, and then use a combination of magnets, heat and chemistry to separate out the component elements. The same could be done for computers.

    2. Re:fundamental problem by v1 · · Score: 1

      The big problem with that is the chemicals that are used in electronics. There is a large business abroad in the poorer countries where places like Dell drop off cubic acres of computers in a pile and let the locals deal with them. (I'm not sure if the companies are paying for the privlege of dumping or getting paid TO dump...) Then you get these small towns of dirt poor people that tear the stuff apart, sort out the metal and what they can, and then they burn the circuit boards.

      Yes, burn. These are the boards with PCBs and mercury and formeldahyde among other things in them. Goes right up in smoke. They do this to work out the gold and silver from the boards. The last thing you want to do with chemicals like this is burn them. A common electronic component, the capacitor, is a tightly wrapped combination of plastic, aluminum, paper, copper, rubber, and steel, along with an electrolyte, and there are dozens of them on any motherboard. You get nasty gasses when you burn the plasic, rubber, or the electrolyte. But how do you intend to separate them short of burning? It would take me a good 5 minutes to disassemble a 20 cent capacitor - at that rate it would cost a lot more to recycle it than to manufacture it.

      Components like that can't be cheaply and safely recyled. The only practical system I've seen was a furnace that got so hot it broke down the PCBs, and those don't come cheap. In cases like that there is little proffit (or even loss) in the money spent vs the value of what is reclaimed.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  40. Federal law, state, and local by curebox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't typically post, much less as a grandfather, but here goes. Someone somewhere got me interested in the profitability of electronics waste(recycling). If I remember correctly, to be a recycler, all you have to do is do one of three things. Store it, sell it, or recycle it "properly" (EPA guidelines, etc--probably pretty expensive). So what do these recycling outfits do? In order to maximize profit, they charge you to take it off your hands. Then they sell as much of the stuff they "recycle" as possible, and store the rest of it in giant warehouses. What recycler would actually have any incentive to turn this stuff into non-hazardous waste? Do a google search for electronics recycling and look how big their warehouses are (typically).

    --
    Forget this. In memorial.
    1. Re:Federal law, state, and local by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      What recycler would actually have any incentive to turn this stuff into non-hazardous waste?


      One that's tired of having to rent out yet another warehouse every month, I would imagine... if that was their strategy, their costs would go up indefinitely over time.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  41. Lead in monitors by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    "Four pounds of lead in a monitor" is a bogus issue. It's in the form of leaded glass. The glass is not soluble in water.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  42. Revive the Dinosaurs! by rogtioko · · Score: 1
    Despite what post 16816536 said. I for one would think twice before buying a new computer. I read on a website on computer resouce costs that
    In 1995, the production of a single six-inch silicon wafer required 3,200 cubic feet of bulk gases, 22 cubic feet of hazardous gases, 2,275 gallons of deionized water, 20 pounds of chemicals, and 285 kilowatt hours of electrical power. In the process, 25 pounds of sodium hydroxide, 2,840 gallons of waste water, and 7 pounds of miscellaneous hazardous wastes were generated."
    http://www.ciber-runa.net/guide/ChipCosts.html I don't know anything about the cite, but it cites Tom's Hardware.

    This doesn't apply only to the computer science industry of course: what big corporations in, say, hollywood marketing that make plastic happy meal toys for movies, and plastic super-soaker water guns are doing is shortsited and wrong too. There's plenty of more sustainable forms of entertainment: like chess, checkers, and capture the flag with bamboo water guns. Sure, we'll probably never run out of aluminum and steel. But that doesn't mean finding such resources is as easy as digging a hole in a field. No, in today's world resources are getting harder to find and aren't often the easy berries in the field anymore. It's gotten to where some companies in metal mining have investigated and are seriously taking into consideration mining under the ocean

    http://www.statesman.com/business/content/business /stories/technology/10/08/8goldrush.html and in oil, well most people have their own suspicions.

    But most people planning on buying new computers probably don't consider this; while many people buy computers on a need basis, I suspect many others probably buy when they don't need to to keep pace with technology. With the allure of time conveniences and great performance associated with new technologies, its demanding, but as long as nerds takes steps similar to prolonging the use of an old computer to save resources, at least part of the population is not going to run into a doomsday dumpster world.

    While I myself am all for unregulated business, I think it's important to achieve sustainability, not so much for the current general population, but for my own interest in the future population. For example, I read on a website that

    it is now widely agreed among both economists and physical scientists that energy or mineral resource scarcity is not likely to be a growth limiting factor, at least for the next half-century or so.
    http://www.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/uu24ee/uu24e e02.htm

    As an example of the importance of recycling or continuing using copper and other such things in computers now, diesel used to be 10cents a gallon when my grandpa just started fishing with his own boat in the 1950's or so; I'm sure the price of copper and other such things have risen similarly. And I suspect that's the way its going to continue rising from today on. If something's scarce, recycle it and make a buck longterm while at it.

  43. Since when is North Hempstead upstate? by dbrower · · Score: 1
    Does it start once you get east of Flushing?

    North Hemptead on google maps.

    -dB

    --
    "It if was easy to do, we'd find someone cheaper than you to do it."
    1. Re:Since when is North Hempstead upstate? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Hehe, yeah, I noticed that too. I grew up on Long Island, and "upstate" was anything north of Westchester. That's a useless definition for the rest of us who live "upstate". Here, you've got yer Adirondacks, yer Lake Champlain, yer North Country, yer Tug Hill Plateau, yer Central New York, yer Buffalo, yer Rochester, and yer Southern Tier. All of that is "upstate" to what we call "the city" aka "the boat anchor".

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  44. running software on a DEC Alpha by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    There's a ton of good software to run on that Alpha. You can run the latest version of NetBSD, for instance, with nearly the entire collection of packages. And I mean the most current up-to-date packages available.

    Obviously, you won't be able to run Microsoft Word 200x or Visio on it, though.

    Well I got it as a dualboot system running NT4 and Redhat. In Windows NT4 I was able to get a few shareware programs but only one commercial program installed, Borland C++ PowerBuilder. I've hardly used Linux, when I ordered the computer I didn't get a modem with it as the builder only offered one of the two competing 56k versions however my ISP used the other one. I figured I'd get a compatible modem myself but I wasn't able to find a compatible one with the 56k version my ISP used. Now that I've setup a small home network and have cable access I've been thinking of getting an updated Linux that way I can use it. But I'm wondering what I'd use it for as I recently got a new pc with Linux preinstalled and am planning on getting a Macbook Pro in the next week or two. I've been thinking of donating it to someone who can use it and has the knowledge to make use of it, but I wonder how many do, I run into a lot of people who don't know how to work with an Alpha.

    Obviously, you won't be able to run Microsoft Word 200x or Visio on it, though.

    I tried installing Office 97 but it gave me the message that the processor what the wrong one. I've never used Visio. Other than Windows and what comes with it, and Office 97, I don't use MS software.

    Falcon
    1. Re:running software on a DEC Alpha by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      I had the opportunity to bring home an Alphaserver before my employer donated it. I thought it would be cool to have, but then realizing that I had far more powerful systems at home that didn't draw 500 watts, I decided to let it be donated instead.

    2. Re:running software on a DEC Alpha by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      True, but one aspect of the fun is exploring different platforms. The Alphaserver would give you the opportunity to run alien binaries that few others have the capability to run.

      I have a SparcServer 1000. It draws a LOT of power when it's up. But it's an 8-cpu machine. Probably overpowered for single thread apps by any modern Pentium based box. But it's history, man.

  45. Future solution: nanotech? by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that a potential future solution to the e-waste recycling problem is some form of nanotech. Imagine a strain of bacteria genetically engineered to "consume" some environmentally hazardous substance -- say arsenic -- and produce some environmentally safe substance as a waste by-product -- say nitrogen.

    Obviously, IANAGE (I am not a genetic engineer) :-).

    Alternatively, I can imagine some form of nanomechanical device that "disassembles" e-waste into more easily dealt with components.

    Just my 2 yen.

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    1. Re:Future solution: nanotech? by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Imagine a strain of bacteria genetically engineered to "consume" some environmentally hazardous substance -- say arsenic -- and produce some environmentally safe substance as a waste by-product -- say nitrogen.


      Heh... now imagine a few ounces of that bacteria "accidentally" getting released inside an Apple store.


      Oh, the humacnity!

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  46. I smell money by bozojoe · · Score: 1

    step 1. business plan (get accquired by )
    step 2. interview homeless people (to be done by perl AI program written by fifth grader)
    step 3. issue tinfoil hats to new homeless employees, have them eat the lead out of the monitors
    step 4. profit
    step 5. oh wait this one is the profit step, get accquired

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  47. Not everything old is junk by Zedrick · · Score: 2, Informative

    From TFA:

    old Commodore Plus/4's with cracker crumbs in the keys

    Aaaargh! A Commodore Plus/4 should not be thrown away/recycled. I would pay up to $100 for a Plus/4 depending on condition and serial numhber, and it's irrelevant if it's filled with cracked crumbs or not.

    This is like saying "Oh, I'll just get rid of these 2000-year old Roman coins, they can't be used in the store anymore."

    If you have some old 70's or 80's (or "exotic" 90's) hardware in the wardrobe, please please please don't get rid of it before first spending 5 minutes on google to see if there might be collectors that are looking for *your* wardrobe-"junk".

    I'll lie sleepless tonight, thinking about morons who might throw away their old Commodore C65 or Commodore MAX without having any idea how invaluable they are. Even common things like a C64C are still in demand, although you won't get that much for it.

  48. Reuse before recycle by drwho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of just grinding up 4 year old computers, they can be put to other uses. There ought to be more effort put into reuse before recycle. For instance, if you have some old computer you need to get rid of, at least post it up on the free section of craigslist or freecycle first. You don't even have to make a big fuss about it. Just tell people to pick it up off your porch, or say you've put it on the curb for the trash collectors the next morning, someone hurry and get it if they want. Just communicate! It doesn't take much effort.

    This doesn't go for just computers. You might be surprised how easy it is to get rid of everything from old clothes to building material to cellphones.

  49. Legal minefield by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    At least in the UK.

    I'm setting up a computer recycling project at work - I'm still wondering if it's going to be workable in the long run due to all the legalities and associated costs.

    * Need to register as a Waste Carrier (we got a note back saying we're exempt as a charity)
    * Register as a Hazardous Waste Producer, due to things like the lead in CRTs. Cost £18 (but for us, closer to £30 because we can't get a debit card and have to do it by snail mail + cheque)
    * Make sure that the donor is either a household, or a business which only throws away the equivalent of 6 computers per year - anything else and they have to register as a Hazardous Waste Producer and give us a premises code
    * Each time we take something away or pass it on to a waste management company, we have to do a waste transfer consignment note with details of the category of waste, weight of kilogrammes etc. This needs to be 100% spot on, and copies kept by all parties for 3 years.
    * Every quarter, we have to do a Consignee Return to the environment agency which costs £10 PER COLLECTION (or £19 for us, because we can't do it online) - this cost will add up very quickly. I'm working with the EA to see if there's any way around this as a charity, but initally they said it was per ITEM, which would be miles worse!

    Considering there's so much pressure to reuse and recycle, they sure do put a lot of legal and financial hurdles in the way.

  50. You're not the only one who thinks this... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    Really it would not surprise me if in say, 50 years, there is an entire industry of waste reclamation, where a company bids on and BUYS a landfill, and sends in machines to process the garbage and make a proffit off what's reclaimed.


    Unfortunately, many such landfills tend to become "other things" after the landfill is closed - most commonly tract homes, golfcourses, and industrial/business complexes. Many people would be surprised to find out that they live, work, or play on top of a former dump. How these developments would impact any future material reclamation mining is unknown (I suppose it would depend upon the longevity of the new site use in question). There is also the issue of whether there exist accurate maps of former landfills in city records. I would imagine that over time, older landfill zoning maps are either lost or discarded after ownership and use changes hands...

    Even so, you are right: there is likely a fortune to be made from old dump sites (just in metal reclamation alone - think about copper and alluminum, for example)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  51. Sometimes this can backfire... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    Currently they sit there, out-of-sight, out-of-mind. Then some bright lad decides to make a fuss, and they are brought in the limelight. Bright lad thinks he may get them - instead, at best, they get "recycled" (ie, indirectly ship 'em to China to let them deal with the mess), or worse, dumped in the garbage.


    You see, beureacracies have this problem, called CYA, er, "cover yer a**" - ie, fear of liability. When they wing it, these entities will do whatever they can, damn the consequences as-long-as-they-don't-get-caught. That is their attitude, and how they work. They don't do things for the common good. They won't just give you stuff. They might not even sell it to you (unless you are willing to pay a lot of money, or you at least look like someone they can transfer that liability to - ie, an electronics recycling company). Most of the time, they'll just pat you on the head, say thank you for bringing it up, and then dump the crap as quickly (and hopefully) as clandestinely as possible. It wouldn't matter if it was a pallet of today's latest Dells or a pallet of "boxed up" bag-kit'o'parts for brand new Altairs - they don't care about the worth or rarity, they just care about liability.

    So - sometimes, depending on the item(s) in question - sometimes it is better just to "leave well enough alone", and let it sit. Keep an eye on it, and maybe somebody will come along with a change of heart (rare, but it happens). Or, maybe they will "find" them, and decide to give them away, or maybe they will pitch them in the end. Regardless, if you stir things up now, you likely will cause them to be pitched, never to be seen again.

    Now, in the case of these Vectras, probably "big deal" - but I once caused the destruction of something potentially more valuable simply by trying to buy it. I once went to a local equipment recycler here in Phoenix, and offerred to purchase two cases worth of 5.25 inch Apple IIe floppies - I am pretty certain there was a complete copy of Eamon (including expansions) in there, among other great pieces. I had the intention of transferring all of that over to disk images for emulation usage (and releasing on the internet what I could that was legal to do so). Unfortunately, when I took the items to the office to be priced, they informed me that they could not legally sell any software without the manufacturer's permission, and that they had to take those floppies and destroy them (they wouldn't let me buy them for any price, and they wouldn't let me put them back - once found, they had to destroy them). I was pretty angry, but there wasn't much I could do. I also quickly realized that a lot of their equipment had to be worthless (at least from a hobbyist perspective) as well (much of it was electronics manufacturing and industrial equipment) - since much of it relied on computers controlled by software to operate - software they probably had to erase or destroy before selling.

    Since that time I have been very reluctant about such things when I find them, especially software or data, especially when it is very old and likely nobody cares about. Unfortunately, this is way the computer industry is - forever recycling its history, to hell with the ultimate consequences...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon