Sorry, I was thinking that other readers would try thinking just a little harder. So to reframe so anonymous posters can understand it more clearly: Was, before this investigation, an investigation underway, thereby making the investigation not new to Google, but in fact, an investigation already underway?
Right. In fact the user did not find what the title claims. He found the point at which they would ask WTF. And it turns out TF was that he was doing something the TOS said he couldn't. Nice job misleading.
I'm not sure - what is the payback? If you have a quantifiable amount that would be helpful. Is it 2% of all corporate tax collected in the US? Is it more than $5B a year?
Or, since they exceeded on all those counts, is it more because you think they should be punished? Again, make it quantifiable.
I for one completely understand the rage. I think I was assigned this examiner - some of the things done must have been very similar to what he describes. It enraged my otherwise calm, quiet reserved patent attorney to the point he had to wait a week before responding or it would have been in much the same way. This poor bastard just didn't wait the week.
Reading the headline does not give you any information at all. Some lawsuits were dropped. And only because they probably used Alan Cooper's name (illegally).
You seem hell bend to describe how this wasn't intended. I was there. It was intended - including the spent submarine cores, and represented a significant portion of the 135,000 metric tons.
No, it does not cover the details of the confusing part.
Moreover, it incorrectly implies that Enterprise Services is Autonomy. The first hammer to fall in August was the write down of $8B for the acquisition of EDS --- NOT Autonomy. The November write down of $8.8B was for Autonomy.
The only thing clear here is that HP had a mess of losses associated with Enterprise Services, and that the first hint that things were really hosed was when they identified EDS as the reason for the first $8B+ write down.
imo, it has nothing to do with demand. The ill organization, of which there are now many - treat IT, its services, and infrastructure as a cost center. That means that when cuts are needed, IT is the first to get singled out as a burden that nobody wants. It's only till after the damage of this kind of thinking takes place, that the least dumb among them realizes what a big mistake it was.
Treating IT as an integral part of a robust and growing organization - and salaries, satisfaction, productivity and success will be more prevalent.
Slashdot Mirror
How is a joke referring to the arguably freshness and lightness of Chinese food racist?
Now, now... From a weasel's perspective, they might very well look like witch doctors.
There you go... Written with all the eloquence, intelligence and creativity I knew you had.
Thank you for making my point more eloquently than I did.
Sorry, I was thinking that other readers would try thinking just a little harder. So to reframe so anonymous posters can understand it more clearly: Was, before this investigation, an investigation underway, thereby making the investigation not new to Google, but in fact, an investigation already underway?
'We have not heard anything from the FTC regarding any new antitrust investigation.'"
Does that mean the investigation was already underway?
Actually, I'm not. You're confusing ethical with legal. Do you work on wall street by any chance?
Right. In fact the user did not find what the title claims. He found the point at which they would ask WTF. And it turns out TF was that he was doing something the TOS said he couldn't. Nice job misleading.
I'm not sure - what is the payback? If you have a quantifiable amount that would be helpful. Is it 2% of all corporate tax collected in the US? Is it more than $5B a year?
Or, since they exceeded on all those counts, is it more because you think they should be punished? Again, make it quantifiable.
Uhhh, you know he was re-elected in 2010, right? That's why the parent you posted to was talking about 2016?
Really. Carnivore has been around for 15 years.
They need to overhaul their current submission process before worrying about the rest of this.
Literally definition changes
Hmmmm. Now, imagine how this might be spun if the submitter actually understood what was done. BB and Knox were approved. Please... continue...
I for one completely understand the rage. I think I was assigned this examiner - some of the things done must have been very similar to what he describes. It enraged my otherwise calm, quiet reserved patent attorney to the point he had to wait a week before responding or it would have been in much the same way. This poor bastard just didn't wait the week.
Ummm, then the answer should be no. Betteridge's Law
" the entire mobile industry has been headed this way for years now"
Reference please?
Reading the headline does not give you any information at all.
Some lawsuits were dropped. And only because they probably used Alan Cooper's name (illegally).
Right. In the same way that Exxon is over, though they too just don't know it yet.
Unless either of them come up with another way to make money after their huge cash cows are done.
You seem hell bend to describe how this wasn't intended. I was there. It was intended - including the spent submarine cores, and represented a significant portion of the 135,000 metric tons.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/24/at-the-hanford-nuclear-reservation-a-steady-drip-of-toxic-trouble.html
Mmmmm, indeed. $7 billion worth of hurt.... Ouch.
No, it does not cover the details of the confusing part.
Moreover, it incorrectly implies that Enterprise Services is Autonomy. The first hammer to fall in August was the write down of $8B for the acquisition of EDS --- NOT Autonomy. The November write down of $8.8B was for Autonomy.
The only thing clear here is that HP had a mess of losses associated with Enterprise Services, and that the first hint that things were really hosed was when they identified EDS as the reason for the first $8B+ write down.
imo, it has nothing to do with demand. The ill organization, of which there are now many - treat IT, its services, and infrastructure as a cost center. That means that when cuts are needed, IT is the first to get singled out as a burden that nobody wants. It's only till after the damage of this kind of thinking takes place, that the least dumb among them realizes what a big mistake it was.
Treating IT as an integral part of a robust and growing organization - and salaries, satisfaction, productivity and success will be more prevalent.
Imagine arguing with your significant other...
And seeing an ad for a divorce lawyer.
I do. I'd like to hear any argument suggesting that it is not mine.
The City of Albuquerque recently cancelled its Red Light camera program after a vote resoundingly said to get rid of them.