Yea, okay. They take an official position on a matter that is 100% in agreement with the Slashbot position and you STILL bitch and moan about it.
I think that pretty much says everything about what the slashbots really feel about burning music and movies. Even when they're officially with you as a matter of policy, you whine. What's going to keep you from whining? I would wager nothing short of them just giving away the content completely free of charge with no restrictions or ads. Because, frankly, that's all you whiny babies really want, and nothing less is going to make you cheap bastards happy.
I'm sorry, sir, I don't speak gibberish, kindly enroll in 3rd grade English classes and return here when you can communicate using the language on something higher than a completely unintelligible level.
What the fuck are you, five years old? Not only is your gibbering post practically unreadable through the endless spelling mistakes and pre-school-like grammar, your pointless, meandering train of "thought" serves no apparent purpose, unless you are TRYING to make me think you're a social case that somehow got hold of an intarwebs connection.
Unless you're just playing some sort of practical joke on me, you're THE poster child for election litmus tests.
[QUOTE]the left is afraid it might lead voters like idiot sheep (or was it imbeciles?) to the polls to vote however the magical imaging machine showed them to.[/QUOTE]
Typical of a republican, I suppose: Democrats are doing the wrong thing by pointing out dishonesty.
I think that says pretty much everything we need to know about your moral clarity on political matters, thanks.
Let me translate your post, Mr. Eichmann: "It's okay, I like it when propaganda is used to convince people that the Jews [replace with: environmentalists, Arabs, gays, whatever the right hates for no reason today] should be murdered in massive numbers, because I'm a Bush voter".
I like how when things like this show up the rethuglicans always spin it as "oh, we didn't do anything bad. THEY do it too!". But, of course, what the thugs did is always about one hundred times more morally bankrupt than what the dems did.
See, the problem with dems paying kids to push their talking points by phone is that it's telemarketing, and people hate telemarketing.
The problem with thugs paying a PR firm to produce a smeer video full of false information under the guise of gentle jesting by a person who is in no way, shape, or form even remotely like the company that actually made the video is that it's deceptive on every possible level and treats potential voters like idiot sheep who can be led about like brainless imbeciles by whatever pretty pictures and funny words can be put to celluloid (or bits, in this case).
But, yea, those two things are exactly the same. Oh. And the republicans are "for the working man". And millionaire party snob Bush is a real folksy guy. Uh huh.
It doesn't really challenge anything meaningful, the popularized stance in the article just makes it seem that way. There's always been a simmering debate over what, exactly, a "planet" is. Other than contributing to that relatively innocuous argument over terminology, there's nothing here that was previously thought to be impossible. There's absolutely no reason a stellar object MUST form in the area of a star, nor is there any reason it can't form in the area of a star and then be ejected by some stellar event.
This is a farely rare phenomena, but not new, nor does it challenge any fundamental understanding of how objects form in space. It's just fuel for the "what is a planet" bickering that is constantly going on.
Blah blah. You made a snide, derogatory remark without any justification for it. The specifics are unimportant, and if you're that much of a prick about technicalities, do the substitution between "idiots" and "people lacking judgement" yourself, because the content of the post is just as valid whether it's directed specifically at you or at the Slashbot community as a whole.
Now sod off you pedantic little whelp. I don't have the patience to deal with numbskulls who want to bicker over the specifics of a thing to try and cover their asses after they say something stupid. The USPTO is pulling in hundreds, in some cases thousands, of dollars in fees per patent application and leaving most of the work up to the businesses anyway. They're doing a fine job of handling applications, and your idiotic take on the matter doesn't change that.
Yea, they're so wholly idiotic that they're raking in huge amounts of money from corporations without having to do much work, since they don't really vette the applications any, leaving the legwork up to the company legal departments, thus basically engaging in a business model in which rich people willingly hand them huge wads of cash for no actual service in return.
What morons they are!
Jesus, I wish I could be that stupid.
Just out of curiosity, is there anybody on Slashdot who actually thinks their comments through anymore, or is it pretty much the norm these days that no matter how successful a process is in its goal, the people engaging in it are "idiots" and "stupid" if the nerd collective finds it unappealing?
I like how there's a "click here" link on the site. Yea. As if a million desperate nerds aren't all going to sit there clicking it obsessively because they're trying to fix the scratches on their animu hentai cd collection before they have to head for work this morning....
Are they so smug that they made Windows and Linux boxes explotable too?
define: explotable - an exploit native to Windows and Linux machines which enables an attacker to remotely detonate the target machine, e.g. as if it were a bomb
Thank you captain obvious for pointing out that we should continue doing things that nobody proposed we stop doing.
Just out of curiosity, is anybody PAYING you to spam that stupid link in inane comments like this, or do you just not have anything better to do with your time?
If you think the learning curve for handling a trailer and hitch is that steep, you might consider looking into social help programs for people with your condition. It's really not that complicated. Not intuitive, of course, but I've seen some pretty stupid people learn how they behave after only a couple of attempts.
Slashdot Mirror
Yea, okay. They take an official position on a matter that is 100% in agreement with the Slashbot position and you STILL bitch and moan about it.
I think that pretty much says everything about what the slashbots really feel about burning music and movies. Even when they're officially with you as a matter of policy, you whine. What's going to keep you from whining? I would wager nothing short of them just giving away the content completely free of charge with no restrictions or ads. Because, frankly, that's all you whiny babies really want, and nothing less is going to make you cheap bastards happy.
I'm sorry, sir, I don't speak gibberish, kindly enroll in 3rd grade English classes and return here when you can communicate using the language on something higher than a completely unintelligible level.
What the fuck are you, five years old? Not only is your gibbering post practically unreadable through the endless spelling mistakes and pre-school-like grammar, your pointless, meandering train of "thought" serves no apparent purpose, unless you are TRYING to make me think you're a social case that somehow got hold of an intarwebs connection.
Unless you're just playing some sort of practical joke on me, you're THE poster child for election litmus tests.
[QUOTE]the left is afraid it might lead voters like idiot sheep (or was it imbeciles?) to the polls to vote however the magical imaging machine showed them to.[/QUOTE]
Typical of a republican, I suppose: Democrats are doing the wrong thing by pointing out dishonesty.
I think that says pretty much everything we need to know about your moral clarity on political matters, thanks.
Let me translate your post, Mr. Eichmann: "It's okay, I like it when propaganda is used to convince people that the Jews [replace with: environmentalists, Arabs, gays, whatever the right hates for no reason today] should be murdered in massive numbers, because I'm a Bush voter".
I like how when things like this show up the rethuglicans always spin it as "oh, we didn't do anything bad. THEY do it too!". But, of course, what the thugs did is always about one hundred times more morally bankrupt than what the dems did.
See, the problem with dems paying kids to push their talking points by phone is that it's telemarketing, and people hate telemarketing.
The problem with thugs paying a PR firm to produce a smeer video full of false information under the guise of gentle jesting by a person who is in no way, shape, or form even remotely like the company that actually made the video is that it's deceptive on every possible level and treats potential voters like idiot sheep who can be led about like brainless imbeciles by whatever pretty pictures and funny words can be put to celluloid (or bits, in this case).
But, yea, those two things are exactly the same. Oh. And the republicans are "for the working man". And millionaire party snob Bush is a real folksy guy. Uh huh.
Hello toto. That one must've been a F5!
It doesn't really challenge anything meaningful, the popularized stance in the article just makes it seem that way. There's always been a simmering debate over what, exactly, a "planet" is. Other than contributing to that relatively innocuous argument over terminology, there's nothing here that was previously thought to be impossible. There's absolutely no reason a stellar object MUST form in the area of a star, nor is there any reason it can't form in the area of a star and then be ejected by some stellar event.
This is a farely rare phenomena, but not new, nor does it challenge any fundamental understanding of how objects form in space. It's just fuel for the "what is a planet" bickering that is constantly going on.
YHBT
HAND
Suffer from a crippling neurolgical disorder that makes you incapable of focusing long enough to make an informed decision, become a congressperson.
Spend the first forty years of your life a drunken, aimless slob with no business acumen and bad manners, become president.
I think I'm beginning to see some cracks in the stout facade of democracy here....
They don't have any wings.
Things don't fly well without any upward force under them. I know. You ever tried to make a Gamecube fly?
Yea.
"oops" is spelled "t-h-a-n-k g-o-d f-o-r u-n-e-m-p-l-o-y-m-e-n-t b-e-n-e-f-i-t-s"
Blah blah. You made a snide, derogatory remark without any justification for it. The specifics are unimportant, and if you're that much of a prick about technicalities, do the substitution between "idiots" and "people lacking judgement" yourself, because the content of the post is just as valid whether it's directed specifically at you or at the Slashbot community as a whole.
Now sod off you pedantic little whelp. I don't have the patience to deal with numbskulls who want to bicker over the specifics of a thing to try and cover their asses after they say something stupid. The USPTO is pulling in hundreds, in some cases thousands, of dollars in fees per patent application and leaving most of the work up to the businesses anyway. They're doing a fine job of handling applications, and your idiotic take on the matter doesn't change that.
Yea, they're so wholly idiotic that they're raking in huge amounts of money from corporations without having to do much work, since they don't really vette the applications any, leaving the legwork up to the company legal departments, thus basically engaging in a business model in which rich people willingly hand them huge wads of cash for no actual service in return.
What morons they are!
Jesus, I wish I could be that stupid.
Just out of curiosity, is there anybody on Slashdot who actually thinks their comments through anymore, or is it pretty much the norm these days that no matter how successful a process is in its goal, the people engaging in it are "idiots" and "stupid" if the nerd collective finds it unappealing?
I like how there's a "click here" link on the site. Yea. As if a million desperate nerds aren't all going to sit there clicking it obsessively because they're trying to fix the scratches on their animu hentai cd collection before they have to head for work this morning....
define: explotable - an exploit native to Windows and Linux machines which enables an attacker to remotely detonate the target machine, e.g. as if it were a bomb
And you all laughed when the warnings came. For shame, for shame.
Hello astroturfer. Hope you got five hundred bux.
gb2 /b/ idiot
in b4 crappy nothing to see here joke
Hmmm.... that last sentence is also probably the most insightful thing ever posted on this "fine website".
How fitting that the most accurate story and comment ever on Slashdot were both entirely pointless.
Apparently, exposing the fact that you like to comment on stories you didn't read....
Now we have some fun playing with somebody who's misusing the popular term "Dark Age" in the commonly pejorative and wholly inaccurate manner.....
I'd like you to go out and find me some historical backing for your claim of the ban on secular medicine....
Thank you captain obvious for pointing out that we should continue doing things that nobody proposed we stop doing.
Just out of curiosity, is anybody PAYING you to spam that stupid link in inane comments like this, or do you just not have anything better to do with your time?
And the names of the magical drugs that somehow miraculously disperse and break down in a dead human body are called...?
If you think the learning curve for handling a trailer and hitch is that steep, you might consider looking into social help programs for people with your condition. It's really not that complicated. Not intuitive, of course, but I've seen some pretty stupid people learn how they behave after only a couple of attempts.
Of course, that's true, since your criteria includes every single thought process ever committed to writing for any reason at all.
Since that's not what we're talking about, however, kindly stop introducing unrelated bits of drivel like that.