I might thrive in such an environment, except that in that case you would be utterly, completely dependent on the client/employer for providing you with meaningful, satisfying work. If they fail to do so, as many employers do, that might make for some looooong work days.
In my purely anecdotal experience, it is the older folks who are far worse about holding authoritarian viewpoints, never questioning their assumption that if the gov't wants/needs any particular power then that want/need is completely legitimate, etc.
Every person who has told me "Snowden is a traitor" has been > 50 yrs old.
The U.S. people, for the most part, don't spy on the U.S. Government or its intelligence agencies. So there are some parties involved who retain the right to some valid indignation.
... though not without exception.
I would select interview candidates based on their apparent skill and intelligence, and would select the *older* candidate as a tie breaker.
Not true. I have had plenty of access to such information and have always avoided looking at it. It's immoral.
It doesn't help the situation that ONE person hasn't looked at privileged information. The situation is only helped if no one peeks at the info, which could only be the case if proper access control measures and auditing are implemented.
Yeah, it is a shame that they went under. I was with them for almost 100% of my almost 11 year military career which just ended, and needless to say, I appreciated the worldwide accessibility of their system, as well as the nice online bill payment options. I was very happy with their service right up until the FDIC notice was posted on their website. The customer service was good and the lack of fees was nice, and they even had a few ATMs in my local area.
No, I didn't lose anything in this process and I am still able to log in to the same website pretty much seamlessly, but of course I'll be looking for some other banking option here in the near future.
I recommended searching for the "Even I am not above the policy..." Seinfeld excerpt. Sadly I cannot find it anywhere right now.
http://xkcd.com/870/
Is anyone else getting a laugh out of this?
I might thrive in such an environment, except that in that case you would be utterly, completely dependent on the client/employer for providing you with meaningful, satisfying work. If they fail to do so, as many employers do, that might make for some looooong work days.
Yeah I'm guessing they make their frameworks nice and open, but certain things like Visual Studio go on costing a pretty penny.
In my purely anecdotal experience, it is the older folks who are far worse about holding authoritarian viewpoints, never questioning their assumption that if the gov't wants/needs any particular power then that want/need is completely legitimate, etc. Every person who has told me "Snowden is a traitor" has been > 50 yrs old.
You should use Javascript.
Name a system of government in which people are effectively prevented from making backroom deals which benefit them.
This issue is a matter of the proportionality of the punishment, not whether the person was "arrested."
Wow. Some of your comments feel like they should be famous quotations.
The U.S. people, for the most part, don't spy on the U.S. Government or its intelligence agencies. So there are some parties involved who retain the right to some valid indignation.
Why would you want to knock the guy over?
How about for every other type of non-acute medical treatment then?
"I could have done more . . . open source!"
... I'll PirateBay
... though not without exception. I would select interview candidates based on their apparent skill and intelligence, and would select the *older* candidate as a tie breaker.
How much? Where do you draw the line?
Not true. I have had plenty of access to such information and have always avoided looking at it. It's immoral.
It doesn't help the situation that ONE person hasn't looked at privileged information. The situation is only helped if no one peeks at the info, which could only be the case if proper access control measures and auditing are implemented.
Yeah, it is a shame that they went under. I was with them for almost 100% of my almost 11 year military career which just ended, and needless to say, I appreciated the worldwide accessibility of their system, as well as the nice online bill payment options. I was very happy with their service right up until the FDIC notice was posted on their website. The customer service was good and the lack of fees was nice, and they even had a few ATMs in my local area. No, I didn't lose anything in this process and I am still able to log in to the same website pretty much seamlessly, but of course I'll be looking for some other banking option here in the near future.