Except now Blockbuster is gone, so not like stomping on a McRib. The difference being that everyone loves McRibs. No one misses BB, except the people that lost their livelihood. So, I guess if they were still around, they could give a shit?
Which looks like it confirms the original poster's statement: Mozilla doesn't ship Firefox as an.msi, just an exe. You can script the exe, but still not an.msi.
Devito: "You mean, let me understand this cause, ya know maybe it's me, I'm a little fucked up maybe, but I'm informative how, I mean informative like I'm a philosopher, I enlighten you? I make you think, I'm here to enlighten you? What do you mean informative, informative how? How am I informative?"
I use interactive debugging, but I try not to be in such a rush to hit f5, f8, f10 or whatever. I read the error message that was generated and think about it and the code for a few moments. I may not have to fire up the debugger at all. Maybe there are assertions that help identify the bug. This may be the only option in some environments where interactive debugging is verboten.
Nothing wrong with the interactive debugger. I've used it to brute-force my way through some ugly and unfamiliar stuff. It may not be the most efficient debugging tool for every occassion.
Taxes if they are general obligation bonds. If they are general revenue bonds, the money would hopefully be generated the project they are funding (toll roads, stadiums, utility fees).
Dr. Royce used it as an example of a methodology that doesn't work, but what he described was easy to understand so it gained traction with management types. It's like the joke where the guy says he's looking for a lost quarter under a streetlamp because the light is better than where he lost it.
http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/spring2003/cmsc838p/Process/waterfall.pdf
I think his suggestion was to 'build it twice' via prototyping to discover what was missed in the requirements gathering and design phases.
Sounds fair enough. More power to him, then. The post was a confusing read. FWIW, there's an anti-pattern called "The Golden Hammer" where once someone has a tool in their toolbox, they try to apply to everything: I've got a hammer and everything I see is a nail. MVC being the latest and greatest hammer.
I don't think the people behind Django would hold it up as a paragon of pure MVC either.
I'm assuming he pulled the uncited quote from the django book: http://www.djangobook.com/en/1.0/chapter05/
Here's another:
Taken together, these pieces loosely follow the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern.
They don't seem to be too hung up on design pattern purity. Maybe it is different in IRC or the forums.
Not exactly Object-Oriented Programming, but IBM had this concept on the Series i (AKA AS/400) for some time now:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS/400_object. Best command line interface ever...
I don't think he could have done Kashyyyk in Return.
Lucas' original concept of the battle featured hundreds of Wookiees. Due to costs, this idea was scrapped and replaced by a battle featuring relatively few diminutive Ewoks. A large-scale battle with hundreds of characters was eventually realized in The Phantom Menace. The Battle of Kashyyyk in Revenge of the Sith finally brings this concept to the screen.
I have the same recollection but I probably read it in Starlog. Another reason for the switch was also driven by the logistics of the time. Lucas wanted a planet of Wookies, but they couldn't pull it off. Later I heard someone use it as a way to describe what a director does vs. a producer. A director is someone who wants a planet full of Wookies. A producer is the guy who tells him it is not in the budget. Of course Lucas was the producer so it doesn't make sense...
Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to compile a SQL statement is insignificant next to the power of the Force.
Nah...still not doing it for me.
Let's have the first guy have a fake arm. The second guy, he's got an eye-patch and armored polar bears for guards.
And fit a giant spider in the end. Nature's fiercest killers.
- Jon Peters
Depending on you situation, you don't have to search the web. Open Adept Manager in KDE and you can drag and drop key words to narrow down the list. You can search as well. Synaptic is similar. If I recall correctly, SUSE had a nifty hierarchical organization.
Slashdot Mirror
Except now Blockbuster is gone, so not like stomping on a McRib. The difference being that everyone loves McRibs. No one misses BB, except the people that lost their livelihood. So, I guess if they were still around, they could give a shit?
Which looks like it confirms the original poster's statement: Mozilla doesn't ship Firefox as an .msi, just an exe. You can script the exe, but still not an .msi.
Will it fit in the margin?
Devito: "You mean, let me understand this cause, ya know maybe it's me, I'm a little fucked up maybe, but I'm informative how, I mean informative like I'm a philosopher, I enlighten you? I make you think, I'm here to enlighten you? What do you mean informative, informative how? How am I informative?"
I use interactive debugging, but I try not to be in such a rush to hit f5, f8, f10 or whatever. I read the error message that was generated and think about it and the code for a few moments. I may not have to fire up the debugger at all. Maybe there are assertions that help identify the bug. This may be the only option in some environments where interactive debugging is verboten. Nothing wrong with the interactive debugger. I've used it to brute-force my way through some ugly and unfamiliar stuff. It may not be the most efficient debugging tool for every occassion.
...and the lag sucks. I swear the publisher just rushed it out the door bugs and all to make a quick buck. Blizzard would never have let that happen.
Taxes if they are general obligation bonds. If they are general revenue bonds, the money would hopefully be generated the project they are funding (toll roads, stadiums, utility fees).
I think you meant Browncoat.
Brownshirts have a completely different initiation ceremony...
My computer. It...
Yes. And he cannot lie, apparently.
Dr. Royce used it as an example of a methodology that doesn't work, but what he described was easy to understand so it gained traction with management types. It's like the joke where the guy says he's looking for a lost quarter under a streetlamp because the light is better than where he lost it.
http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/spring2003/cmsc838p/Process/waterfall.pdf
I think his suggestion was to 'build it twice' via prototyping to discover what was missed in the requirements gathering and design phases.
Who was played by Jonathan Winters or Tim Conway.
Sounds fair enough. More power to him, then. The post was a confusing read. FWIW, there's an anti-pattern called "The Golden Hammer" where once someone has a tool in their toolbox, they try to apply to everything: I've got a hammer and everything I see is a nail. MVC being the latest and greatest hammer.
I stand corrected. But doesn't that make the rant completely pointless? Kinda like Chip Diller screaming "Remain calm!!! All is well!!!"
I'm assuming he pulled the uncited quote from the django book: http://www.djangobook.com/en/1.0/chapter05/
Here's another:
Taken together, these pieces loosely follow the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern.
They don't seem to be too hung up on design pattern purity. Maybe it is different in IRC or the forums.
Not exactly Object-Oriented Programming, but IBM had this concept on the Series i (AKA AS/400) for some time now :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS/400_object. Best command line interface ever...
I get a strange magic,
oh, what a strange magic,
oh, it's a strange magic.
Got a strange magic,
got a strange magic.
Yeah, I thought about doing that too, but Mars ain't a place to raise your kids.
Lucas' original concept of the battle featured hundreds of Wookiees. Due to costs, this idea was scrapped and replaced by a battle featuring relatively few diminutive Ewoks. A large-scale battle with hundreds of characters was eventually realized in The Phantom Menace. The Battle of Kashyyyk in Revenge of the Sith finally brings this concept to the screen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kashyyyk
I have the same recollection but I probably read it in Starlog. Another reason for the switch was also driven by the logistics of the time. Lucas wanted a planet of Wookies, but they couldn't pull it off. Later I heard someone use it as a way to describe what a director does vs. a producer. A director is someone who wants a planet full of Wookies. A producer is the guy who tells him it is not in the budget. Of course Lucas was the producer so it doesn't make sense...
Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to compile a SQL statement is insignificant next to the power of the Force.
Nah...still not doing it for me.
Let's have the first guy have a fake arm. The second guy, he's got an eye-patch and armored polar bears for guards.
And fit a giant spider in the end. Nature's fiercest killers.
- Jon Peters
Prosperity and education?
Depending on you situation, you don't have to search the web. Open Adept Manager in KDE and you can drag and drop key words to narrow down the list. You can search as well. Synaptic is similar. If I recall correctly, SUSE had a nifty hierarchical organization.
Thanks, V.I.N.CENT...