Slashdot Mirror


NASA To Announce Module Name On Colbert Show

olddotter noted that NASA's Facebook page says "NASA's newest module for the International Space Station will get a new name on April 14. The agency plans to make the announcement with the help of Expedition 14 and 15 astronaut Sunita 'Suni' Williams on Comedy Central's 'The Colbert Report.' The program will air at 11:30 p.m. EDT."

201 comments

  1. The new name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The USS Jon Stewart.

    1. Re:The new name? by sopssa · · Score: 1

      I would like to see The USS Slashdot

    2. Re:The new name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Go onto the Colbert Report to name something for the show that comes before him? Sorry, Try Again.

    3. Re:The new name? by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      Doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Go onto the Colbert Report to name something for the show that comes before him? Sorry, Try Again.

      Good point. They'll probably name it the USS Manilow.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    4. Re:The new name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, that'd be funny. Can't have comedy on a comedy show.

      That's what Fox news is for.

    5. Re:The new name? by megamerican · · Score: 0

      Me

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    6. Re:The new name? by eln · · Score: 1

      Right, because there's never been any good natured ribbing between those two shows before. They've certainly never played off each other for laughs.

    7. Re:The new name? by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should send USS Goatse to check out some black holes.

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    8. Re: The New Name? by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      They would never name it after a bunch of terrorists!

    9. Re:The new name? by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

      It makes vast amounts of sense, especially if you're miffed at Colbert using his popularity leverage to push his own name through the vote. Go on his show, name it something else, just to mess with him. :P

    10. Re:The new name? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Number one, make it so!

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  2. I know the name by reidiq · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, everybody. There was a lot of talk about the name of this module. We are on the Colbert Report tonight to talk about what name we picked after all the submissions. Tonight, we are glad to announce that the name will be, Jonathan Stewart!

    --
    Sig? No thanks. I don't smoke.
    1. Re:I know the name by stereoroid · · Score: 5, Funny

      The module won't be named after Colbert, because NASA has already found a place for his name: a new commode. As in "back in a few minutes, I need to go and use the Colbert".

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    2. Re:I know the name by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

      This reminds me of the Howard Stern Rest Stop controversy in the middle 1990s. When Christine Todd Whitman was elected governor of NJ, one of her campaign promises was to name a highway rest stop after Howard Stern. The designated rest stop ended up being one that is notorious for anonymous gay sex.

    3. Re:I know the name by Chupathingy · · Score: 0

      Ok, everybody. There was a lot of talk about the name of this module. We are on the Colbert Report tonight to talk about what name we picked after all the submissions. Tonight, we are glad to announce that the name will be, Jonathan Stewart!

      Actually, since we already call all of our Earth-bound toilets "Johns". Maybe we should start calling the ISS toilets "Colberts".

    4. Re:I know the name by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The designated rest stop ended up being one that is notorious for anonymous gay sex.

      Hopefully that won't be the case for the Colbert Commode ... gay astronauts in zero-g sex probably isn't the image NASA wants to project.

  3. Too "Colbert".. by bradgoodman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It would be too "Colbert"...for NASA to come on his show and announce that they decided to name it "Tranquility", or whatever else they were planning on actually naming it anyways.

    You'd assume this means they decided to name it after him...wanna bet?

    1. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I do wanna bet. More likely, coming on the show is a consolation prize for the fact that they're going to name it something else, despite the fact that he got the most votes.

    2. Re:Too "Colbert".. by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Not Tranquility, Serenity.
      As a member of both the Colbert nation and the Brownshirts, I'm torn.
      But, since it is essentially a toilet, I think Colbert should get the honors; Serenity should be the name of a spacegoing vessel.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    3. Re:Too "Colbert".. by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      NASA has done segments with Colbert before, such as when the astronaut aboard the ISS was interviewed on his show. I would imagine Colbert's core audience of young college students appeals to NASA quite a bit. The trick, as for anyone that shows up on his program, is to go with a good non-ridiculous name and present it in a funny way on his show.

      I think their best bet would be to name the node itself Serenity and name the actual urine recycling unit inside "Colbert". That should appease his audience and make for good TV as well.

    4. Re:Too "Colbert".. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But, since it is essentially a toilet, I think Colbert should get the honors; Serenity should be the name of a spacegoing vessel.

      Amen to that. Let me try this comment again, I think it got modded down by the dumber side of the Firefly fanbase (you know, the side I'm not on) last time: Serenity is a spaceship. This thing is not only not a spaceship, but its ass does not glow. It does not make any sense whatsoever, whatsofuckingever to name it Serenity. I know a lot of you loved the show, so did I; I know a lot of you voted for that name, but it was silly. Don't get your back up because you're wrong :D

      I do have to admit to liking the idea of naming just the toilet after Colbert. He likes to twist people's dicks after all (metaphorically speaking, so far as I know) and it would only be justice. But then we'd probably end up with a toilet module named Serenity which is just not much of a tribute. Sorry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Too "Colbert".. by bradgoodman · · Score: 1
      I think the worst part of it is - the name "Serenity" is so damn boooring - as were all the other "NASA" names. It's grey, meaningless, and forgetful - just like all the others. Committee decided and approved.

      The Simpson's said it best:

      "Todays [astronaut] crew is a real diverse bunch - we have a mathematician, a different kind of mathamatician, and a statistician."

    6. Re:Too "Colbert".. by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think their best bet would be to name the node itself Serenity and name the actual urine recycling unit inside "Colbert".

      I think the node should be called Colbert and the commode/urine_recycling_unit be named Serenity. Don't you want to experience Serenity on the Colbert as well?

    7. Re:Too "Colbert".. by clintp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm reminded of the dumbasses that lobbied to get the shuttle prototype named "Enterprise". Due to design changes, it never went into space. Nice tribute.

      On the plus side, it didn't blow up either.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
    8. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhh, Browncoats. The brownshirts were a little different.

    9. Re:Too "Colbert".. by digitalhermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Serenity is as meaningful as "Enterprise". Hell, the name "Enterprise" is pretty damn boring without the back-history. It conjures visions of boardrooms and suits, "enterprise-wide mandate", "enterprise agreement", "enterprise regulations".

    10. Re:Too "Colbert".. by wezeldog · · Score: 1

      I think you meant Browncoat.
      Brownshirts have a completely different initiation ceremony...

    11. Re:Too "Colbert".. by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Ooops. Thats gonna get me kicked out of the fan club.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    12. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 1

      How about "Albatross" for the station?

      --
      Revive the Constitution.
    13. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      enterprise software

    14. Re:Too "Colbert".. by centuren · · Score: 1

      Serenity is a spaceship. This thing is not only not a spaceship, but its ass does not glow. It does not make any sense whatsoever, whatsofuckingever to name it Serenity.

      I've been watching NASA's mostly-boring cable feed, and the crew on the ISS (American, Russian, and Japanese alike) all seem to refer to and consider the ISS a spaceship. It's certainly not fixed in space, and it tends to act much like the space shuttles do (orbiting w/ maneuvering thrusters, etc).

      I haven't really looked to closely at it, and obviously it's not going to fly to the moon any time soon, but at this point in history I think it's a little farfetched to categorize the ISS as "not a spaceship". If I were to stretch really far and make a bad comparison, I'd say it's more like an aircraft carrier than an oil rig, as it still moves around the "ocean" nut has different purpose and functionality than your average "ship" (bad analogy, feel free to ignore).

      Glowing arses aside, When I saw the name suggestions (on the last Slashdot story, I didn't vote or know there was a vote in progress), I thought Serenity was a perfect name for an ISS module. Not out of lore, or likeness, but simply as a good name (my Firefly fan days are behind me, for the moment anyway). I don't think out-dated cargo ships will be flying around out in space anytime soon, so holding out until there's something resembling the show hardly seems worth it.

      I don't mean to argue any merits, as it's just an opinion. My main point was that while I greatly enjoy Colbert's influence and ability to have huge numbers of people do this sort of thing, I hope that there's a line drawn somewhere. A bridge is one thing, but an ISS module is another. Give it a good name. It's not about having enjoyed Firefly, or any other Sci-Fi TV show, it's about being interested in the space program since childhood.

      Colbert can be entertaining, but I hope (futilely, I know), that NASA reserves the name for someone who's more deserving than Colbert. If Serenity is too spaceship-y (which I can understand, I'd never want a module to be called Enterprise or Galactica), what about one of the influential Sci-Fi authors? Or an early astronaut/cosmonaut, scientist, etc.

      I guess I'm leading up to, why let the public pick at all? We'll just end up with the Butthead Memorial Auditorium. Nasa is stocked with nerds, they can be trusted to do the right thing. If NASA wants to bring back the public's interest, they should do it by acts that capture the public's interest, not passing amusement. How about a moon base already?

    15. Re:Too "Colbert".. by centuren · · Score: 1

      I finally RTFA, and hopefully the "top suggestions" won't be considered.

      LOL @ Xenu, though. I'm sure that would go over well.

    16. Re:Too "Colbert".. by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Serenity is somewhat appropriate since this node has the viewing cupola which will be a popular hang out spot for off duty astronauts.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    17. Re:Too "Colbert".. by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      How about "Albatross" for the station?

      Can't do that. That's one of the names they're giving to the mass-drivers they're putting in geo-synchronous orbit above Afghanistan and North Korea.

    18. Re:Too "Colbert".. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I haven't really looked to closely at it, and obviously it's not going to fly to the moon any time soon, but at this point in history I think it's a little farfetched to categorize the ISS as "not a spaceship".

      It's not going anywhere and more to the point, it really can't. If they added a scaffolding and enough drive to travel to some other celestial body, then it would be a spaceship.

      If I were to stretch really far and make a bad comparison, I'd say it's more like an aircraft carrier than an oil rig, as it still moves around the "ocean" nut has different purpose and functionality than your average "ship" (bad analogy, feel free to ignore).

      Oh, if only I could! The ocean of space and the ocean of the Earth are just not directly comparable. I'm not one of those people who thinks you can't compare apples and oranges (both are fruit, after all) but we're talking about two entirely different situations and mediums. This is even worse than the average car analogy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Too "Colbert".. by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting

        The word "serenity" predates a certain wonderful science show by quite a few centuries.

        It fits in very well with the nomenclature used for the other modules.

        It also describes the feeling of seeing the earth from orbit.

        I've seen entirely too much of this "OMG it's from a teenager science fiction drama" on this site to think that there are many adults (!=age) on this site anymore.

        Even if it was named after the valley where a certain SF character lost a war and/or a SF spacecraft, what the hell is wrong with that? The story gestalt in Firefly was about freedom to go and explore and survive.

        You have no fucking imagination and as far as I'm concerned no damned right to comment on spacecraft names at all. You just plain don't get it.

        Go live in your little world.

        Shadowbearer (who is old enough to remember why the prototype space shuttle was named Enterprise)

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    20. Re:Too "Colbert".. by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      The word "serenity" predates a certain wonderful science fiction show by quite a few centuries.

        Corrected.

       
      Slow Down Cowboy!

      Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

      It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

        Kiss my shiny metal ass.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    21. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      +5 The honest truth.

    22. Re:Too "Colbert".. by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Nah, they should name the node Colbert, and the urine recycling unit Serenity, after the expression the astronauts doubtless make when using it.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    23. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gah. Just don't name it Voyager!

    24. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still want to know why NASA wants to name the module after disposable underwear?
      http://www.hdis.com/brands/serenity.asp

    25. Re:Too "Colbert".. by centuren · · Score: 1

      This is even worse than the average car analogy.

      Completely right, although I know there are even worse out there. You have no argument from me,11:40am was early morning today. Still, I'd prefer to have all celebrity names and commercial brands stay out of space.

    26. Re:Too "Colbert".. by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      I don't think out-dated cargo ships will be flying around out in space anytime soon

      Too late.

    27. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      The problem with naming the node "Serenity" instead of the popular voted choice "Colbert" is that it sends the following message: When NASA asks people to vote on a name, they've already made up their minds and will give it whatever name they've decided in advance and will dump the winning choice in the toilet (or permanently stamp it on its side, depending on their mood)

    28. Re:Too "Colbert".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Brownshirts"? Did you run out of COATS?

    29. Re:Too "Colbert".. by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to argue any merits, as it's just an opinion. My main point was that while I greatly enjoy Colbert's influence and ability to have huge numbers of people do this sort of thing, I hope that there's a line drawn somewhere. A bridge is one thing, but an ISS module is another. Give it a good name. It's not about having enjoyed Firefly, or any other Sci-Fi TV show, it's about being interested in the space program since childhood.

      It's a [human] waste recovery module. I don't want it named after Serenity, Sagan, Heinlein, or Enterprise. I loved Serenity and I think it'd be a great name for NASA's manned missions to mars, but if they named a waste recovery module after Serenity I'd probably be protesting and organizing a letter writing campaign. If I have a choice between Serenity, Xenu (damned scientologists), and Colbert... I go with Colbert. We can call the mid-stage recycled waste "Xenu", though.

      I guess I'm leading up to, why let the public pick at all? We'll just end up with the Butthead Memorial Auditorium. Nasa is stocked with nerds, they can be trusted to do the right thing. If NASA wants to bring back the public's interest, they should do it by acts that capture the public's interest, not passing amusement. How about a moon base already?

      Stop for a minute, and think about it. You probably wouldn't have heard about this if Colbert didn't bring it up on his show and get hundreds of thousands to vote for him... which caused it to become a mainstream news item, which led to politicians weighing in the matter, which led to even more news coverage... and us talking about it here. NASA has been quietly naming things for a very, very long time. When is the last time the discussion about a name of a module/node was a mainstream news item?

      I really hate to throw buzzwords around, but think about "Web 2.0". Let the peanut gallery have some say in what's going on, get their feedback (voting), and get them involved... allow some controversy and debate. Is there really any chance that so many Americans would know or care the NASA was putting a waste recovery module on the ISS? I think you already know the answer. This is probably the most popular coverage since the last disaster. And I think that's a good thing.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    30. Re:Too "Colbert".. by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      It's not going anywhere and more to the point, it really can't. If they added a scaffolding and enough drive to travel to some other celestial body, then it would be a spaceship.

      Space dinghy? Perhaps SS Minnow would be more appropriate.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  4. common sense people! by meow27 · · Score: 1

    If the toilet can be named the "crapper," the urine->water module can be named the "colbert" with no problem!

    1. Re:common sense people! by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thomas Crapper helped popularize the toilet, as well as come up with a few innovations. I am not sure what Stephen Colbert has done in the same respect to warrant comparison.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:common sense people! by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      The fact that someone named Thomas Crapper came up with an invention called the ballcock has to be the greatest semi-useless factoid ever.

    3. Re:common sense people! by Exawatt · · Score: 1

      His show turns mainstream news (urine) into hilarity (water).

    4. Re:common sense people! by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough the article you cited explains that the phrase "to crap" existed before his inventions. Further reading indicates it came from crappe, a "grain that was trodden underfoot in a barn, chaff." (c.1440)

    5. Re:common sense people! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You take a crap because of the guy's name. The phrase wasn't in usage until he came up with his inventions.

    6. Re:common sense people! by thestallion · · Score: 1

      You take a crap because of the guy's name. The phrase wasn't in usage until he came up with his inventions.

      According to Wikipedia, your statement is false.

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Crapper:
      'It is incorrectly claimed that the verb "To crap" comes from Crapper, but the verb first came into use before Crapper was born. It is believed that this could be an example of nominative determinism, in which people are more likely to do a job connected with their name.'

    7. Re:common sense people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here are more of them:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative_determinism#Examples

  5. A Strategem by agorist_apostle · · Score: 0, Troll

    NASA actually needs to start moving more into the public eye and pop culture again. The general public won't care about space exploration until there's a joint mission with Britney Spears and Dale Jr. onboard (I'll wait for the obligatory Challenger-type jokes). Otherwise, people will go "WTF are we spending money on space for?" I'm no fan of government spending for anything, as it involves confiscated taxes, but at least space exploration might lead to some real progress again.

    1. Re:A Strategem by ericrost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, you obviously didn't get much out of that tax funded public education, so I can see where your "ideals" come from. /burn karma burn/

    2. Re:A Strategem by agorist_apostle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're right. I didn't want to be in school, however since we live in a "free"* country, government enforcers made me attend so tax-funded bureaucrats in my local school district would be able to keep their educational budgets intact even while making do such rudimentary things as coloring maps in a CP-level History Class or trying to learn German from the woman who'd been the Spanish teacher the year before. I found it was far more effective to pursue an education by exploring on my own, coupled with finding mentors who knew a great deal about certain subjects. Maybe that sounds elitist, but the same path is open to anyone with a little curiousity about the world. Crazy idea, I know, not wanting to use tax dollars taken from other people for my own benefit.

    3. Re:A Strategem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they teach you to use such broad strokes when painting your generalizations in your bigoted ivy league school? Seriously, WTF!?!?

    4. Re:A Strategem by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I said it before, and I'll say it again:

      The public's lack of interest in NASA has nothing to do with pop culture, it's that NASA isn't doing anything interesting anymore.

      In the days of the space race, it was very exciting. The "us vs them" competition with the USSR, people doing things never done before, going to places nobody ever went before. And all that done by launching people with experimental hardware done on monumental scales.

      Where is all that now? NASA keeps shuttling people between ground and space station, where they do amazing experiments, such as how spiders react to a lack of gravity. The hardware is still big and dangerous, but now if something goes wrong it's not because it's new unproven tech, but because the management at NASA is stupid. The Mars robots are about the most interesting thing being done these days, and even that isn't all that exiciting.

      What's needed is not nonsense like Britney getting involved in the space program, but a space program that does something the public would be interested in. A colony on the moon, and astronauts on Mars would be a start. Sure it's dangerous and expensive, but it's also very much exciting, and the danger didn't stop anybody in the race of getting to the moon.

    5. Re:A Strategem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britney Spears and Dale Jr.

      What is this 2002? Get with the times.

    6. Re:A Strategem by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you didn't get much of a sense of humor in your intellectual wanderings, did you?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:A Strategem by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Nope, product of a public education, I just value the access of everyone to a decent education for free if they want one. I think we can do better, but "libertarians" tend to be those who think they didn't get much from their eductaion (and usually didn't).

    8. Re:A Strategem by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did want to know what the ants did in low gravity, but that shuttle blew up.

    9. Re:A Strategem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could combine pop culture and serious research by starting a competition about who is the first that returns a whale to his home, the moon. Bonus points for a humpback whale.

    10. Re:A Strategem by jae471 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know about the ants, but the worms survived

    11. Re:A Strategem by Mendokusei · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you got your answer...

    12. Re:A Strategem by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      but now if something goes wrong it's not because it's new unproven tech, but because the management at NASA is stupid.

      Proven tech? I guess, if your idea of "proven" is fewer flights in a product's lifetime than there are flights per day in the US.

      It takes about 8 minutes for the shuttle to reach orbit. With 125 launches, that's less than 17 hours of real-world testing. Aside from single-launch vehicles, the shuttle probably has the *least* amount of "proven technology" of any product currently in use anywhere in the world.

    13. Re:A Strategem by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      It's hard to generate genuine public interest in a space program or any other program when the public as a whole would rather wallow in trendy fads and pseudo science. Those who think NASA is doing nothing interesting are quite wrong. Take for instance the Cassini-Huygens probe that NASA launched to study Saturn and her moons. Here was a great example of a bold, recent mission by NASA. It involved a lander, an attempt to search for traces of life, and studying one of the most known items in our solar system, Saturn's rings. Yet, despite the awe that such an undertaking would impose upon most people, this mission became mired in public criticism over the fact that it used plutonium as a power source. The simply fact of the matter is, once you push beyond the asteroid belt, things like solar panels become terribly inefficient for power generation so something like nuclear material needs to be used. Nonetheless, this fact didn't stop high profile physicists from complaining about nuclear matter being used on board a spacecraft that would be operating in an environment that is already crawling with radiation (you didn't think all of those charged particles belched out by our sun just fizzled did you)?

      So NASA stands in an incredibly precarious situation. Every move they want to make to the 'final frontier' will involve increasingly complex, risky, and costly developments. Yet, they still must push forward because, well, that's the whole point of the organization. Then, even when they do something right (Cassini was and still is a great success), their programs are still stained in criticism and filth because it is so easy to rally the ignorant public into a critical frenzy by dropping phrases like, "environmentally unfriendly," "a danger to public health," or "a waste of tax-payers money."

      This isn't the only place we see this kind of thing happen. Worldwide, nuclear physicists are under criticism for trying to develop and streamline nuclear power production terrestrially. Robotics and AI fields get attacked for developing "dangerous, possibly threatening" near sentient autonomous weapons (paranoid much?) And even the medical field gets it when they investigate something like stem-cell research or human growth factor and the whole ordeal becomes a blasphemous religious issue.

      It seems that the general population is too stupid to think for themselves so they let themselves be rallied by the loudest (and often very biased) sources, by tactics like fear-mongering or mercy pleas. The only reason this wasn't allowed to occur during the Cold War days was because Joe public was more worried about the 'evil commies' than he was about 'cooking the dolphins with plutonium.' Now there are no evil commies to fear so we fear the unknown instead.

      The last great revolution in society was the digital revolution supposedly. Some experts think the information and robotics revolutions are next. It seems to me that we are more likely to see a "naive complacency revolution" instead...

      Cheers.

    14. Re:A Strategem by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      The public's lack of interest in NASA has nothing to do with pop culture, it's that NASA isn't doing anything interesting anymore.

      Well, isn't that fun.

        We can't have public interest in NASA doing anything important if public interest isn't in NASA doing anything important.

        Maybe if "the public" at large would get off it's fat lazy tv-addicted ass and start caring about something more than the fate of the latest soap characters, we might see funding for things that really matter to the human race as a whole.

        Meanwhile, the people involved with NASA and all the other attempts to try and show people what a wonderful, beautiful universe it is, are wasting their time? Why don't we just disband it completely, then?

        Sorry, not sniping at you. You just gave me an opening...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    15. Re:A Strategem by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      If he's an intellectual, then I'm the internet.

      Log on to me and despair! :D

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    16. Re:A Strategem by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      It takes about 8 minutes for the shuttle to reach orbit. With 125 launches, that's less than 17 hours of real-world testing. Aside from single-launch vehicles, the shuttle probably has the *least* amount of "proven technology" of any product currently in use anywhere in the world.

      By that standard, nuclear weapons are, perhaps, the most unproven technology in existence. I'd seriously doubt if they had a full millisecond of real world testing.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  6. Nice Summary by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    The program will air at 11:30 p.m. EDT. The name, which will not be publicly released until the program airs."

    The paragraph, which will not make sense until this sentence is substantially revised.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Nice Summary by olddotter · · Score: 3, Informative

      For the record, that is a cut and paste from the NASA announcement.

      I love your comment, ROFL.

    2. Re:Nice Summary by Refrag · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sentence is straight from NASA. LOL! Come on, y'all, this isn't rocket-science!

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    3. Re:Nice Summary by RasputinAXP · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shaka, when the walls fell!

    4. Re:Nice Summary by Hottie+Parms · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow. I got this joke immediately. I feel uber-geeky.

    5. Re:Nice Summary by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I got it too. I had to watch the whole TNG series last month, after seeing that they were available as a torrent. To be sure I did not miss a single episode back in the days. And this was one of those that I missed on TV.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Nice Summary by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, that's the problem. NASA does rocket science, not grammar!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    7. Re:Nice Summary by Predathar · · Score: 1
      What is rocket science?

      via failblog

    8. Re:Nice Summary by Tteddo · · Score: 1

      Now that was funny!

    9. Re:Nice Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Nice Summary by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder what they call toilets in that language.

    11. Re:Nice Summary by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Overheard at JPL, while working on a problem with entry on the next Mars rover project...

      "Come on, people, it shouldn't be this hard! This isn't exactly talking to the opposite gender, you know."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:Nice Summary by Etherized · · Score: 1

      I tried to wrap my brain around that wording for a while, and just decided to give up.

    13. Re:Nice Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel ungeeky -- I couldn't remember that it came from TNG... somehow thought Stargate :/

    14. Re:Nice Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Colbert, his pants down his jaws clenched

    15. Re:Nice Summary by kindbud · · Score: 1

      Cosby, when the kids dropped off at the pool.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    16. Re:Nice Summary by illumastorm · · Score: 1

      Colbert, whom the waters flushed.

    17. Re:Nice Summary by gzine · · Score: 0

      Saddly, You are not alone.

    18. Re:Nice Summary by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should measure that in Sagan units ;-\


      Slow Down Cowboy!

      Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

      It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

        And that in Goering units.

        (Godwin, you say? Fuck you and your revisionist history)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    19. Re:Nice Summary by Lendrick · · Score: 1

      They accidentally the sentence.

    20. Re:Nice Summary by skeeto · · Score: 1

      Wow. I got this joke immediately. I feel uber-geeky.

      Soca, his eyes open!

    21. Re:Nice Summary by initialE · · Score: 1

      Man, they outsource everything to India.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  7. Editors are supposed to edit... by kclittle · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "The name, which will not be publicly released until the program airs."

    I know this is slashdot, but can we at least have complete sentences? Please?

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    1. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      I know this is slashdot, but can we at least have complete sentences? Please?

      The sentences, that won't be completed until slashdot gets pro editors.

    2. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by black_lbi · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you can accidentally the whole sentence? You'd wish!

    3. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well. If there was a sentence before that, that included that same, it makes sense. But maybe it is some German thing, because in spoken German sentences like this are not that rare.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by alta · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wrong wrong, I'm using the 'Pro' version of slashdot.
      In the Pro version, all grammar is corrected. There's also the political distortion field. There's a slider at the top of the page that lets me choose ConservativeLiberal.
      By moving the slider everyone's comments are automatically refactored to reflect my beliefs. Go ahead, say something positive about B.O. I'll never see it!
      It also merges duplicate stories, merging their comments.
      And best yet, I NEVER have any missing poll options. It gives me a text field where I right in the correct answer, and then it's always the most popular.

      This is great, you should get the pro version.
       

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    5. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It is a complete sentence.

      The name
      which will not be publicly released until the program
      airs.

      The name airs.
      The name will not be publicly released until the program.

      They could have used an extra comma maybe, but it still makes sense.

      (FUCK SLASHDOT "EDITORS"! THEY FAIL EVERY TIME!)

    6. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Wrong wrong, I'm using the 'Pro' version of slashdot. In the Pro version, all grammar is corrected...where I right in the correct answer

      Ouch.

    7. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

      Obviously you're not using the Pro version.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Briareos · · Score: 1

      Go ahead, say something positive about B.O. I'll never see it!

      To be honest, I'd rather they did something about body odor instead of talking around it...

      np: Denzel + Huhn - Kinogat (Time Is A Good Thing)

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    9. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Crowdsourcing.

    10. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by alta · · Score: 1

      Seeing that your posting this comment you obviously aren't using the pro version. I through in a little bad grammar to test who was pro and who's not. However, I will have to assume that's what you are commenting about, because pro corrected it for me automatically.

      Thanks for playing.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    11. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by tag · · Score: 1

      Wrong, wrong. I'm using the 'Pro' version of Slashdot. In the Pro version, all grammar is corrected ... where I write in the correct answer

      Ouch.

      If there's an ouch there, those of us with the Pro version aren't seeing it.

    12. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obviously not using the Pro version.

    13. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      In the Pro version, all grammar is corrected. [...] It gives me a text field where I right in the correct answer

      You should try the Platinum version, it even corrects syntax and makes your posts sound automatically both funny and insightful!

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    14. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      And before anyone tells me I should have seen this mistake if I was using something as good as the Pro version, the Platinum version comes with an irony detector.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    15. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that "names" don't "air". You can only announce names on the air. So the sentence still doesn't make any sense, even if it might technically be syntactically correct.

    16. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think yours was the first /. post I ever laughed out loud at. Good job!
      All the while, secretly wishing there was a /. Pro.
      +6 Funny

    17. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I'm not upgrading until the irony detector highlights all ironic posts by platinum members for non-platinum users - they're the ones I have the most trouble with... (and until they fix that bug where it keeps detecting Alanis Morissette irony.)

    18. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wording used is definitely not valid in English. I don't remember enough German to try to extrapolate further on your comparison though.

      However, the sentence WOULD be valid if they removed the comma and the word "which". It would then read: "The name will not be publicly released until the program airs."

      I'm guessing there was originally supposed to be a second part to the sentence, and it got deleted.

    19. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        You forgot how it all moves in a clockwise direction.

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  8. Re:It's a shame by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    that the same person Colbert would vote for if he himself were not running.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  9. The name by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The summary, which the editors did not read.

    Is this some sort of crazy neo-yoda-speak? Am I missing out on a new meme? :(

    --
    Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    1. Re:The name by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Is this some sort of crazy neo-yoda-speak?

      Nah. Neo-Yoda speak would be something like "Kung-fu, know I."

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:The name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name, which will not
      be publicly released
      until the program airs

      ...what? Too many syllables? Oh well, I thought it was pretty... almost mystical.

    3. Re:The name by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Am I missing out on a new meme?

      Behind the times falling, you are, hmmm?

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    4. Re:The name by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you meant, "The times, which you are falling behind."

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    5. Re:The name by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      All the cool kids, who use subordinate clauses.

    6. Re:The name by Binestar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah. Neo-Yoda speak would be something like "Kung-fu, know I."

      Whoa.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    7. Re:The name by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      When I think of Yoda speak, the phrase "Around the survivors, a perimeter create" springs to mind. I think mine is closer to the spirit of that Yoda utterance. It would be better with his voice and inflection.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re:The name by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Is this some sort of crazy neo-yoda-speak? Am I missing out on a new meme? :(

      Jeez man, where have you been? NeoYoda was publicly executed six years ago by UberKhan, in the aftermath of the GeoDax wars.

    9. Re:The name by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Pop-culture, which does not reach Alaska. :/

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    10. Re:The name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Kung-fu knows YOU

  10. Glad they are playing along... by iamhigh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is probably the first time in 10 years news about NASA has stuck in my mind. Sure some scientific stuff is interesting to read... sure I hear press releases and news tidbits, but those go in one ear out the other. This is the best "stick to your ribs" news (aka marketing) NASA has made with the post baby boomers.

    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    1. Re:Glad they are playing along... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      2003 called. It says we lost another Space Shuttle.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Glad they are playing along... by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      2001 Called. It said it's sorry, Dave, but it's afraid it just can't open the pod bay doors.

    3. Re:Glad they are playing along... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      This is probably the first time in 10 years news about NASA has stuck in my mind. Sure some scientific stuff is interesting to read... sure I hear press releases and news tidbits, but those go in one ear out the other. This is the best "stick to your ribs" news (aka marketing) NASA has made with the post baby boomers.

      This says something sad about you but if you are representative of the rest of the population as well, it says something sad about all of us.

      Personally, I've been luvin' me some NASA news for ages. Between Hubble, the mars landers, greater internet access to space imagery, the ISS... Shit, losing a shuttle didn't garner your attention?

      I will agree that huffing some goof-balls and going on the Colbert Report is good PR but I'd be sad to think that circus antics is the only way we could interest people in space. If that's the case, may as well rent the module out to Vivid and shoot some zero-g porn to get funding for the new moonbase.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:Glad they are playing along... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      And ultimately - that's the problem. If it's not entertainment, the post Boomer generation couldn't care less. As you say, in one ear and out the other.

    5. Re:Glad they are playing along... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        Indeed it is.

        It points up the incredible stupid silliness that has pervaded our culture and society - via our media - in the last half century.

        Any sane culture would reject that particular mode of bullshit.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  11. Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Land toilet -> crapper, ship's toilet -> head, space toilet -> colbert

    Let's start a campaign. From now on a space toilet shall be a "colbert".

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by Talderas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry chap, I'm going to have to take a short break from this experiment. I feel a most dire need to drop a deuce in the Colbert, lest I drop a deuce in my suit, and we know what happened the last time that happened.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    2. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Land toilet -> crapper, ship's toilet -> head, space toilet -> colbert

      Let's start a campaign. From now on a space toilet shall be a "colbert".

      That really does fit. Space toilets are odd machines to begin with. They actually use an impeller to move the waste into the collection unit since there's no gravity to rely on. So in other words, the shit hits the fan by design! If that doesn't sound like a Colbert device, I don't know what does.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by Curlsman · · Score: 1

      Can we call what goes in the Colbert a zune?

    4. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by binpajama · · Score: 1

      the shit hits the fan by design!

      Why not call it a Vatican then?

    5. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the shit hits the fan by design!

      Why not call it a Vatican then?

      Because no little boys are being molested?

    6. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by willith · · Score: 1

      Factoid -- in one stage of development, the impeller was informally referred to as the "Whopper Chopper".

    7. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        +5 culturally significant comment

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    8. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The diaper caught it?

    9. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Colbert Toilet needs a fan to keep the shit away from the Bear!

  12. The medium is the message by rlseaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real news was that this was announced on the NASA Facebook page. The medium is always the message - as Colbert's success demonstrates.

    1. Re:The medium is the message by lbk70 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This information is on the NASA home page, right at the top.

    2. Re:The medium is the message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the boat. Go down the street and turn left at the docks.

    3. Re:The medium is the message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, and I just read about Marshall McLuhan in Gore's book today. Smart guy! (Both, but more so McLuhan)

  13. Pro-Science Colbert by Mordac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know its been covered a lot elsewhere (scienceblogs.com) but I don't think it can be understated. Colbert Report is a great venue for science, a wonderful public face. He's had on lots of scientists, more than any show I can recall in a couple decades.

    I don't recall the last fun show that had the host actually talking to an Astronaut in orbit.

    So even if NASA goes with Serenity for the name, I'm glad they went onto Colbert to announce it.

    1. Re:Pro-Science Colbert by spydabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's exactly what NASA wanted with this contest. Publicity. They couldn't have done better...

  14. Fairly obvious name... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think, judging by their chosen venue, the name they release will be obvious. To do otherwise would just be tacky.

    "Yes, we'll get all the recognition we can from your show, but not scratch your back in kind."

    Glad they went with it, as it was the winner. Aside from that, the name marks much more than anything like Serenity would.

    Serenity shows the world what? There are a few scifi geeks in NASA? At most, maybe that they find inspiration in grand goals. Naming it Colbert, on the other hand, signifies a return to pop-culture significance. That the people are excited about space again. Or at the very least, naming it after Colbert will ensure that the module stays in the public eye as he continues his "status updates" (like he did for his baby eagle and a few other stunts). It would be a huge missed marketing opportunity NOT to name it after a television host who has supported science more than any other in recent history.

    Of course, they already know this. That's why it's being revealed on his show.

    1. Re:Fairly obvious name... by mea37 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not sure I'd declare victory until the facts are in. I don't know which way they'll go, but if I were to bet, I would bet against the name being Colbert.

      Saying it would be "tacky" to announce a name other than Colbert on Colbert's show misses the entire context in which this is happening. Colbert doesn't take these stunts seriuosly. If anything, the Colbert character needs things to be outraged about.

    2. Re:Fairly obvious name... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      True. But the character also needs things to be egotistical about. And let's face it, NASA needs all the public support they can get. And I think they know it. Their job has - regrettably - primarily been justified by the government as a morale builder. It's in their own best interest to keep people excited about space. If they had a vote that they didn't plan on upholding, that would just cause those that participated to lose faith in the organization.

      Outside of the tongue-in-cheek nature of the show, it still wouldn't be "kosher" to announce the name is something other than the host's when on the host's show when said host was in the running and your organization has faced criticism for considering other names when the host's name got the most votes.

      Also, I think the "we can name it whatever we want" clause was primarily stuck in there to prevent the next module from being named something like "PissFountain 9000"

    3. Re:Fairly obvious name... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I think, judging by their chosen venue, the name they release will be obvious. To do otherwise would just be tacky.

      You forget, tackiness is the whole point of The Colbert Report! The host thinks with his gut, doesn't like facts, is proud of his narcissism, and has an irrational fear of bears. When introducing a guest, he himself runs around in front of the audience accepting their applause while the guest remains seated. His book is titled "I Am America (And So Can You)". He calls himself "Sir Dr. Stephen T. Colbert, D. F. A." after receiving an honorary Doctorate of Fine Arts from Knox College and recently being knighted by the Queen of Jordan. He periodically has debates with himself through the use of camera tricks, in a segment called "Formidable Opponent".

      I don't think tackiness will be a huge obstacle here.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:Fairly obvious name... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, I'm pretty sure they won't name it Colbert, because an international venture such as the ISS is hardly the venue to recognize a B-List comedian. I'm pretty sure that announcing the name on the Colbert Report *is* the concession, rather than the name itself. I'd put my money on "Serenity" as the winner.

    5. Re:Fairly obvious name... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is true. But it's also done as satire. The dog and pony show, which is in some respects pure genius, is all in an effort to shine a light on the ridiculousness of the media and the institutions that it reports on.

      Sir Dr. Stephen T. Colbert D.F.A. attacks most "harshly" the things that common sense says there's no point in attacking. Controversial subjects are glazed over while minutia are battled. It's a show that goes much farther than the reach of the TCR stage. In a recent interview on the Today show (or was it GMA?) when asked if he would turn down the naming of the module after him, his response was laughter, followed by something along the lines of "Are you serious? Why would I do that?"

      But that's not to say the guests who come on his show behave in the same way. Yes, they know what the show is. They know what it represents. They know that the host is a fun-house version of FOX News. But that doesn't prevent them from going on for their own purposes (usually to promote a book, or in the case of NASA- to gain popular support).

      I think they'll be naming it after him just based on the question: if they don't plan to announce the name is Colbert, why would they go on his show to announce it?

      Either way, I'm sure it'll be great for ratings. I know I'll be tuning in (I catch maybe 50% of the episodes). He knows how to build drama where there is none (always has), and how to get his audience to care about relatively trivial things. That's 90% of the reason we're talking about this on /.

    6. Re:Fairly obvious name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tacky", maybe.

      "Funny", definitely.

    7. Re:Fairly obvious name... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I think they'll be naming it after him just based on the question: if they don't plan to announce the name is Colbert, why would they go on his show to announce it?

      Why wouldn't they?

      NASA showing up on The Colbert Report, acknowledging Colbert's overwhelming personality and the strength of his fan base, will make his fans happy, regardless of whether they name the ISS node after him or not.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    8. Re:Fairly obvious name... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Yes, but picture this:

      ------------

      NASA: Steven, we'd really like to thank you for all of the support and attention you helped draw to this endeavor.

      Colbert: So you're naming the module after me?

      NASA: No. We decided to name something even more critical, the waste reclamation unit.

      Colbert: And thats more important because ... ?

      NASA: When you're out in space, you only have whatever you bring with you, so all of the water and other items need to be reclaimed from the astronauts waste for reuse.

      Colbert: So, without the "Colbert Waste Reclamation Unit" the station wouldn't be able to function.

      NASA: Exactly

      Colbert: [Insert jokes as he preens and pretends his ego is stroked]

      ------------

      I could VERY easily see them do something like this. It would allow them to name the module something else, let Steven Colbert get a lot of millage out of how "important" he is, and provide coverage for NASA on the deployment of the module, all while essentially naming the toilet after him, something Steven Colbert (the satirist, not the character) would probably get a kick out of.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    9. Re:Fairly obvious name... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        Sometimes "democracy" shows it's ugliness in the ignorance of it's adherents.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    10. Re:Fairly obvious name... by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      I expect it to go like this:

      Williams: "Stephen, I'm sorry, but we are going with the second-place winner, 'Serenity', for the name of the module."

      Colbert: "What? No! NASA, you're in for it! This is the last---"

      Williams: "Hold on! We're naming the module Serenity. However, we recognize the value of democracy, and in order to respect the wishes of our voters, we will be naming the space-toilet itself 'Colbert.'"

      Colbert: "My very own space toilet?"

      Williams: "Yes. And from now on, NASA declares that all toilets in space will be referred to as 'colberts.'"

      Colbert, wiping away a tear: "That's...I'm so honored. I've always wanted this. Let's hear it for NASA!"

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    11. Re:Fairly obvious name... by adamkennedy · · Score: 1

      For me, the Serenity name is perfect, because of the earth observation port.

      Who wouldn't feel serene sitting in there during any rare off-time, just looking down at the earth moving by.

  15. Watching it online? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to watch this show, but I don't have cable. It's very nice that they have full episodes available on Colbert Nation. However, is there any way to watch the show online Tuesday night? Does anyone know how long they wait before putting that night's show onto the web?

    1. Re:Watching it online? by akzeac · · Score: 1

      Here in Germany I watch it around 9 - 10 AM. Sometimes the page gets updated a bit later. That would mean usually before 3 - 4 AM in US time.

    2. Re:Watching it online? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Just scream "RAIN!!!" every time someone tries to tell you about it until you can watch the torrent. That's what I plan on doing.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    3. Re:Watching it online? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's usually available in torrent form within 2 hours of airing. At least, that's the norm for every other show on TV.

      Of course there's a third option: Make some friends.

    4. Re:Watching it online? by dmlr3d · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's usually available for me by 3:00 AM US Central time.

    5. Re:Watching it online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to watch this show, but I don't have cable. It's very nice that they have full episodes available on Colbert Nation. However, is there any way to watch the show online Tuesday night? Does anyone know how long they wait before putting that night's show onto the web?

      Hulu.com usually has it online by 1 am pacific

    6. Re:Watching it online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eztv.it

    7. Re:Watching it online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They usually put them on around 5-6pm Japan time. Convert as needed.

  16. Crapper? by coryking · · Score: 1

    Bloody yanks! The proper term is crappiæ.

    1. Re:Crapper? by maxume · · Score: 1

      I like to call my toilet Australia.

      Anyway, I'm off, got to send some Brits to Australia.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  17. I can vouche for this by coryking · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a slider at the top of the page that lets me choose "American Fat-Cat" / Communist. By moving the slider, everyone's comments are automatically refactored to reflect my beliefs. Go ahead, say something negative about Fidel Castro. I will never see it!

    Good to see you agree! Fidel isn't some capitalist pig-dog like Obama. Amazing that this site is so full of people who agree!

    Did you mention the cameo appearances by Sean Hannity and the Back Street Boys?

  18. Who else hopes it's Serenity by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

    Serenity now! Serenity now! SERENITY NOW!

    Hehe, I loved that episode. What is this "Firefly" you speak of? Was it on before or after Seinfeld?

  19. I'd give them extra brownie points if.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA guy introduces Patrick Stewart who walks out in robes and a crown and says, "From this day forth, all the toilets in space shall be known as... Colberts!" Then he beams off the stage. They don't even have to name the module just all the toilets. I'd be happy even though I voted Colbert.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  20. Parenthesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These mistakes would be less common if people would use parenthesis where they can be used.

    It's unlikely that anyone would write:

    The name (which will not be publicly released until the program airs).

    Commas are often seen (and taught) as superior to parenthesis in style. I disagree. I've been pleased to find that some authors use parenthesis. I've noticed in particular that the Nobel price winner Orhan Pamuk used plenty of parenthesis in his book "Istanbul".

    1. Re:Parenthesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These mistakes would be less common if people would use parenthesis where they can be used.

      It's unlikely that anyone would write:

      "The name (which will not be publicly released until the program airs)".

      Commas are often seen (and taught) as superior to parenthesis in style; I disagree: I've been pleased to find that some authors use parenthesis. I've noticed in particular that the Nobel prize winner, Orhan Pamuk, used plenty of parenthesis in his book "Istanbul".

      There, fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Parenthesis by WCguru42 · · Score: 1

      These mistakes would be less common if people would use parenthesis where they can be used.

      It's unlikely that anyone would write:

      The name (which will not be publicly released until the program airs).

      Commas are often seen (and taught) as superior to parenthesis in style. I disagree. I've been pleased to find that some authors use parenthesis. I've noticed in particular that the Nobel price winner, Orhan Pamuk, used plenty of parenthesis in his book, "Istanbul".

      You shouldn't bash the comma, there were a few places where it would have worked quite nicely in your post. Though I agree wholeheartedly that parentheses get left out in grammar classes (if you're lucky enough to get them) in the US education system.

      --
      "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    3. Re:Parenthesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use brackets [you insensitive clod!]

    4. Re:Parenthesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use braces {you insensitive clod!}

  21. Colbert should have asked... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ...his followers to name the module after one of the phrases flashed during the opening sequence of his show. I would have loved to see it named "Multigrain".

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Colbert should have asked... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      ...his followers to name the module after one of the phrases flashed during the opening sequence of his show. I would have loved to see it named "Multigrain".

      You know, that actually would be a great name for an ISS node.

      My favorite of Colbert's opening adjectives was one he used for only a couple of days, while the Pope was visiting the United States: "infallible".

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  22. It's rather obvious by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    The name to be announced will be "Colbert's Serenity", as in being in the the state of "serenity" while sitting on the "Colbert".

    If this shows up in tomorrow's episode, Colbert owes me $50,000 for my writer's fee.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:It's rather obvious by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow's episode is already in the can.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  23. I don't think so. by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think that announcing it on the show is an attempt at a graceful way to say "no."

    1. Re:I don't think so. by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I think you're absolutely right. Being on the show is a nod to his involvement, and the people that voted for it, but they're going to do with a different name. They just don't want to snub the popular endorsement of Colbert.

    2. Re:I don't think so. by JimFive · · Score: 1

      I think they're going to go the University Endowment route and call it the "Stephen Colbert Serenity Module"
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    3. Re:I don't think so. by mea37 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's possible to use the words "Stephen Colbert" and "Serenity" in the same sentence. ...

      I stand corrected.

  24. "Enterprise" by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 1

    Note that "Enterprise" has a long history even outside of fiction. A USS Enterprize was one of the most famous ships of the wars against the Barbary Pirates, c. 1800. As far as I know, that's not the case for the name Serenity.

    I wouldn't knock the word "Enterprise" as a cool name either. It's similar to "Endeavor," "Adventure," "Challenge" and related concepts of hurtling into danger. I think the word "Adventurer" originally referred not just to seafaring traders/explorers but to their financial backers as well, so even "Adventure" has a corporate-finance connotation. We just usually say "venture" instead.

    --
    Revive the Constitution.
    1. Re:"Enterprise" by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "Note that "Enterprise" has a long history even outside of fiction."

      Here's a link to that long history you were talking about. According to the list there had been nearly two dozen ships named Enterprise before Star Trek was even thought of. Here's a few that made it to wikipedia.

      It's thought that the Star Trek Enterprise was named after this famous aircraft carrier which was the most-decorated U.S. Navy vessel of World War II.

      So even without Star Trek it's likely that we would see many vessels named Enterprise.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    2. Re:"Enterprise" by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      It's thought that the Star Trek Enterprise was named after this famous aircraft carrier which was the most-decorated U.S. Navy vessel of World War II.

      Indeed... One of my first models was the Enterprise complete with tiny gray aircraft :D

      I knew about the aircraft carrier (at least everything that was written on the pamphlet inside the box) long before I'd ever started watching Star Trek...

  25. What I Find Most Interesting by Cormophyte · · Score: 1

    Is that it took all this time for NASA to figure out they should probably team up and help promote themselves through one of the most popular tv shows on earth once they had become a fixture on that show. It's almost like Colbert said to NASA, "Hey, guys. Here's a gift. Don't screw it up." It looks like they just may not, at that.

    1. Re:What I Find Most Interesting by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Is that it took all this time for NASA to figure out they should probably team up and help promote themselves through one of the most popular tv shows on earth...

      If that was what was happening, Nasa would be on American Idol; unless, that is not their target market.

  26. Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    that will be named Bush or cheney. Always full of crap and fails a lot.

    1. Re:Nah by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Funny

      And all this time, I thought W.C. stood for Water Closet. Instead, it was W and Cheney.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  27. Why not on land too? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    Why can't we call it a Colbert on land too? "I'm heading to the Colbert to take a Colbert." "Man, my Colbert stinks! I shouldn't have had those tacos for lunch." One if by land, two if by Colbert.

    For the record, I love the Colbert Report. Especially the one a week or so ago where he lambasted Glen Beck for making his career off of 9/11. Colbert and Stewart are amazing.

    1. Re:Why not on land too? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I've never seen his show. I learned everything I know about him from Slashdot.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Why not on land too? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      You're missing out. Seriously. Catch up with his show on Miro or Youtube.

  28. Its called "Node 3" by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 1

    Whatever name is announced to the public, The engineers, mission controllers, and astronauts will call it "Node 3". That's what we have been calling it all through the design stage. For example, in this photo, you can see the hatch is labeled "To LAB", short for US Laboratory Module, not "Destiny".

    http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/060707/060707_last-hatch_hmed_1p.hmedium.jpg

  29. Transcript from the segment by Ifni · · Score: 4, Funny
    "NASA's newest module for the International Space Station will get a new name on April 14. The agency plans to make the announcement with the help of Expedition 14 and 15 astronaut Sunita 'Suni' Williams on Comedy Central's 'The Colbert Report.' The program will air at 11:30 p.m. EDT."

    Transcript of NASA segment from the April 14th, 2009 Colbert show.

    Colbert: As many of our watchers will recall, NASA recently had a contest allowing the public to vote for the new name for "Node 3", the newest module of the International Space Station. Thanks to you, my fans, the highest voted name was "Colbert". However, NASA reserves the right to select any name they choose, regardless of the results of the contest, leaving many wondering if my prestigious and time honored name will indeed grace the new module.

    (laughter from audience)

    Colbert: Tonight, we have a very special guest from NASA - a two time visitor to the International Space Station - here to officially announce the selected name. Please offer a warm welcome for Astronaut Sunita Williams!

    (audience cheers) Sunita walks on stage, shakes hands with Colbert.

    Colbert: Thank you for coming.

    Sunita: It's a pleasure to be here.

    Colbert: I know we are all waiting to hear what NASA has decided, but first tell the audience a little about yourself.

    (Snipped for brevity - read about her here. She was one of the astronauts to use the ametuer radio stations on the station to talk with school children - very cool stuff.)

    Colbert: Thank you "Suni". You've done some amazing things, and we look forward to the contributions yet to come. (applause from audience) Ok, it looks like we might have a revolt on our hands if we don't cut to the chase. NASA has chosen you to officially announce - here, tonight - the name of the newest module for the International Space Station.

    Sunita: Yes.

    Colbert: Then, without further delay, Sunita Williams, ladies and gentlemen.

    Suinita: Thank you. "Node 3", as it has been known, is the newest addition to the ISS, due to be sent up February 2010. It will provide life support systems, including water recycling and oxygen generation, for the ISS. Tonight, it is my great honor to announce on behalf of NASA that it has now, officially, been renamed "Xenu". (laughter from audience) No, seriously.

    (Sunita can't keep her face straight, causing Colbert to break from script with a smile. Sunita breaks into laughter)

    Colbert: We are going to get sued for this.

    End Transcript - sorry, you're going to have to wait for tomorrow's airing for the revelation of the true name.

    --

    Oh, was that my outside voice?