Slashdot Mirror


LucasArts Embargoes "Clone Wars" Reviews

An anonymous reader writes "George Lucas CGI 'Clone Wars' movie has premiered to reviews ranging from MSNBC's 'Ugly animation and an uninspired storyline drag down the film' to AintItCool's 'I hated the film. HATED IT. REALLY HATED IT.' Critics have noted the animation style, music and slapstick humor had more than a passing similarity to Pixar's Toy Story, and wondered if the introduction of new action figures (sorry, characters) like Baby Jabba Hutt and Jabba the Hutt's Gay Uncle may have taken the franchise a bridge too far. Lucas responding by enforcing an embargo, forcing the reviews to be taken down. While sites like AintItCool.com responded, by then it was just a little too late. Still, the CGI eye candy will make it popular with kids. If the 'Clone Wars' movie can't save the galaxy, can it at least save the franchise?"

603 comments

  1. George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can suck my dick.

    1. Re:George Lucas by bugeaterr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone needs to have their mod points forcefully shoved up their ass

      Don't you mean "FORCEfully" shoved up their ass?

    2. Re:George Lucas by BlueGecko · · Score: 1

      But thanks to the heavy use of "realistic" CGI at ILM, he won't actually have to!

    3. Re:George Lucas by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points to give the grandparent, though I'd probably go for Interesting rather than Insightful.

  2. Save the Franchise? by k_187 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the franchise was lost among the faithful a long time ago. Somewhere between Mesaa and Jar-Jar Binks.

    --
    11 was a racehorse
    12 was 12
    1111 Race
    12112
    1. Re:Save the Franchise? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Eh, the books are still alright. I finished the "Legacy of the Force" series a month-or-so ago and enjoyed it though I was expecting more of a finale.

      As far as video games go, some of the recent games were decent as well. The Jedi Knight series was great and the previews for their upcoming 3rd person game sound positive. Then again I haven't played Battlegrounds or SWG. Personally I want an updated "Tie Fighter" game, that was probably their best sim.

    2. Re:Save the Franchise? by Chelloveck · · Score: 5, Funny

      You young whippersnappers! Back in my day, all we had to hate were the Ewoks! And we liked it that way!

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    3. Re:Save the Franchise? by Deadfyre_Deadsoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ewoks were cool, and Lucas hadnt sold out then. Now days, with this clone wars movie, its obvious its only inspiration IS money. Whats worse, is the drivel of the story line almost negates its self. Lucasarts can embargo the reviews all they want, but the fact remains, they are still left with a pile of shite for a product and FORCE it down our throats as always.

      --
      ~DF
    4. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As far as I'm concerned, it was lost when Lucas decided to have Greedo shoot first over a decade after the movie finished its theatrical run. It's a bit late now, George.

    5. Re:Save the Franchise? by Chelloveck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ewoks were cool

      Wow. Seriously dude, I've never, ever heard those words used together like that.

      I know! The Clone Wars is supposed to be so awful it'll make someone five years from now post "Jar-jar was cool."

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    6. Re:Save the Franchise? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, I could have put up with Jar-Jar, but the midichlorians were the true knife in the back.

      However, the fanboy runs strong in this one, so I hope that one day there will be another good film or game for the universe, though for now I'm living in hiding on Tatootine.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    7. Re:Save the Franchise? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was a typo. I am certainly aware that it is Tatooine.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    8. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ewoks were cool, and Lucas hadnt sold out then.

      Is that you Steve? The reality distortion field is strong in this one.

    9. Re:Save the Franchise? by rudeboy1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I second that motion. TIE Fighter was definitely one of the best games of all time. LucasArts really had a streak going there for a while where everything they touched turned to gold. TIE Fighter, Full Throttle, Monkey Island, Dark Forces... I remember Star Wars Rebellion moved me into a completely new genre of vidja games. Recently, I played the first Galactic Battlegrounds, and as soon as I got over the spiffy graphics, I realized the company doesn't have the same outstanding sparkle it used to.

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
    10. Re:Save the Franchise? by oliderid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I was 8 when I first watched A New hope. I loved it. I watched it again few months ago...And Frankly I found the scenario a bit too simple. But my nephew simply loved it...So the real show for me was watching him :-).

      Don't you feel that we are simply getting older and the star wars franchise isn't for us anymore? Kids seem to enjoy it as much as we did (IMHO).

      As a 30's, I prefer is Battlestar Galactica II. I prefer six over the princess anyday ;-)

    11. Re:Save the Franchise? by Orleron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mmm... Six. Did you see the episode where her girlfriend, Seven ate Nine?

    12. Re:Save the Franchise? by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think they really missed the Han Solo type of character in the new stuff. Han Solo showed you can be kickass without the force. The new movies relegated everyone without the force to cannon fodder. While watching force power fights are fun they don't really make good story as they have a lot of power. But there isn't really anyone to relate to. the Jedi were too goody goody. The sith were mostly just evil. (Duko had a chance as a good vilan but they just gave him one movie (Which was horible) and killed in 5 minutes in the next) Han Solo was the good guy but had a dark side which made him more human and recognizable. The new movies didn't have that. They kinda tried with Jar Jar but he was too stupid and attempt to be a comic role (which R2D2 and C3PO took as well) we needed a serious character who was a normal guy who kicked ass.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:Save the Franchise? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, the midichlorians really threw the spirituality/mythology themes under the bus. Oddly enough, I saw the last 2/3 of episode 1 Phantom Menace just last night - I hadn't seen it since the theater when it first came out. I remember walking out of the theater thinking "well, that wasn't too bad", but last night all I could see was Mannequin Skywalker mugging through "oops, I accidentally blew up the android control satellite" as R2D2 comically whistles and squeaks, Natalie Portman's ridiculous accent, the preposterous locale for the big lightsaber duel, etc. etc. etc. It's one thing to suspend disbelief, but that movie suspends believability.

      And then of course there's Jar Jar.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    14. Re:Save the Franchise? by noewun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Me, too. This was the point at which I realized Lucas was making a product, not a film.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    15. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ewoks weren't sold out??? You didn't watch cartoons in the late 80s when the apparently Care Bear-inspired critters were running around talking and wearing stupid headgear.

    16. Re:Save the Franchise? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1, Troll

      I never got the whole Jar-Jar hating. His character isn't that bad. Now, the young Anakin's character is very poorly-written but Jar Jar is okay. I'm not going to say I really like him but I certainly don't mind him.

    17. Re:Save the Franchise? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think they really missed the Han Solo type of character in the new stuff. Han Solo showed you can be kickass without the force. The new movies relegated everyone without the force to cannon fodder. While watching force power fights are fun they don't really make good story as they have a lot of power.

      And now they have a Force Unleashed game coming out where they amp up the Force powers until it's like frickin' Dragonball Z. All that's missing is Vegeta screaming "HIS POWER LEVELS ARE 9000??!!!" Crazy-stupid boosting of character powers for drama's sake, it's like their script was something 13-year old boys were furiously masturbating over. All that remains is for Anakin to scream out "I AM THE BEST JEDI EVER! AND THAT IS TRUE ULTIMATE POWER!"

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    18. Re:Save the Franchise? by jellomizer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I so wish I was a villein for Dragon Ball Z. When they take 8 episodes to through their power attack. I just wont sit there and marvel at their method or their power level. I would just take a gun and shoot him.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    19. Re:Save the Franchise? by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's one thing to suspend disbelief, but that movie suspends believability

      Yeah, cuz all the other Star Wars movies were much more believable ;)

      I mean, what kind of self-respecting galactic overlord would have a throne room without a deep reactor pit of death in it?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    20. Re:Save the Franchise? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      No. The fanbase merely got divided. That doesn't mean the franchise was lost.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    21. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Luckily for me, I've got the original theatrical versions of the original trilogy on DVD. Fuck you, George Lucas: I've got mine!

    22. Re:Save the Franchise? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >mannequin Skywalker mugging through "oops, I accidentally blew up the android control satellite" as R2D2 comically whistles and squeaks,

      He's no worse than Mark Hamil.

      > Natalie Portman's ridiculous accent,

      Oh please all the movies are full of ridiculous accents.

      > the preposterous locale for the big lightsaber duel

      But the Death Star with its magical earth-like gravity generator makes sense?

      Look, the original three had a lot of creative spark and energy in them, and a couple of good actors who stole the show, but most of all you were like 5 years old when they came out. To kids today the new movies are just as good. At the end of the day I have to agree with Lucas and say that these are really kids movies and we are simply nostalgic for them.

      There's also no shortage of original star trek fans who saw TNG as bland, sexless, and too serious.

      I think Lucas is just getting on in years and we are not seeing output from a motivated young man trying to break into hollywood, but an older billionaire who is still making films.

    23. Re:Save the Franchise? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I enjoyed TIE Fighter, but I have to say that I liked X-Wing more. TIE Fighters don't have shields, which meant that a couple shots to you would often end up bringing your ship down. Manipulating the direction and power of the shields, while accounting for how it would affect the speed of your craft added an extra layer of complexity to X-Wing. Personally, I think both were great, and really wish they would put out a similar game with updated graphics.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    24. Re:Save the Franchise? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Eh, I'd agree with you that we didn't have a "normal guy" character but I'd make the case that Obi-Wan was actually the most believable and well-rounded character in the prequels. He always struck me as somewhat removed from the Jedi orthodoxy (compared to Yoda.... the supposedly all knowing "perceptive" one who didn't even know that Anakin was getting some) and less wooden than most of the other characters.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    25. Re:Save the Franchise? by noewun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gotta say, I've gone back and watched those as an adult and been shocked at how mediocre they really are. I guess nine year olds are an easy audience to please.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    26. Re:Save the Franchise? by MagdJTK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't forget Grim Fandango, possibly the most overlooked videogame gem ever.

    27. Re:Save the Franchise? by residieu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, I'll admit I liked the Ewoks. I was pretty young when I saw Jedi, but since I liked the Ewoks back then, I still like the Ewoks. (I also liked the first of the Ewok movies they made after Jedi, but I'm willing to bet that won't stand up as well to another viewing).

      The ewoks were at least cute, Jar Jar's just annoying. (But it IS fun playing the Lego Star Wars game and slicing Jar Jar up all day (or shoving him off cliffs) with no penalty whatsoever)

    28. Re:Save the Franchise? by cephah · · Score: 1

      Not to forget Knights of the Old Republic 1 & 2, both excellent games.

    29. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. Then again, we've seen better stuff over the years, and now have a standard by which we can judge Star Wars. It sure as hell doesn't stack up to The Count of Monte Cristo, IMO.

    30. Re:Save the Franchise? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Well, I was 8 when I first watched A New hope. I loved it. I watched it again few months ago...And Frankly I found the scenario a bit too simple. But my nephew simply loved it...So the real show for me was watching him :-).

      Don't you feel that we are simply getting older and the star wars franchise isn't for us anymore? Kids seem to enjoy it as much as we did (IMHO).

      As a 30's, I prefer is Battlestar Galactica II. I prefer six over the princess anyday ;-)

      If you look at the film from a literary perspective, I think that you'll find a great deal of content you missed in the past. Think of it in terms of Greek epic, for starters.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    31. Re:Save the Franchise? by BeeRockxs · · Score: 1

      Only the very first missions are actually flown in a no-shields TIE-Fighter. Later you get to fly TIEs with shields.

    32. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You young whippersnappers! Back in my day, all we had to hate were the Ewoks! And we liked it that way!

      When I was your age, all we had to hate was the "Star Wars Holiday Special."

      Now get off my lawn.

    33. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Midichlorians were silly, but Jar Jar struck me as racist, with his Little Black Sambo patois.

    34. Re:Save the Franchise? by methuselah · · Score: 1

      Chelloveck
      Anything worth killing is worth over-killing.

      unless you want to eat it

    35. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to defend jar jar or anything but someone had to hand the republic over to the empire. He served his purpose.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    36. Re:Save the Franchise? by Orleron · · Score: 3, Funny

      "What know I of getting some? Quarter-inch penis I have." --Yoda

    37. Re:Save the Franchise? by fbjon · · Score: 1
      I liked the ewoks as well.

      Anyway, this movie will probably be slammed by hordes of devoted fans, all of whom don't realise it's targeted to people 20 years younger than them.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    38. Re:Save the Franchise? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      After watching Episode III, I re-read the Timothy Zahn series. It really made me realise quite how bad Lucas' versions were. Zahn brings far more depth and texture to the universe in a single one of his books than Lucas did in all six films.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    39. Re:Save the Franchise? by twilson94070 · · Score: 1

      Yes the Han Solo character shows how cool it is to be a space smuggler with a low-slung blaster who never ever shoots first.

      --
      f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
    40. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, going to have to disagree with you there. For me the most believe able character was Han. He seemed to be the only character there that had any dimension. Luke was the good guy, Leah was the damsel in distress, Chew... was ... hairy, Vader was the bad guy, and Obi-Wan was Moses preaching from on high.

      Han started as scum and became a force for good all with out some ancient weapon or jack up religion. Well until they pissed on him with the remix.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    41. Re:Save the Franchise? by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ewoks were cool, and Lucas hadnt sold out then.

      Ah, obviously you haven't heard the back story of Return of the Jedi. No, I don't mean the bit where it was called Revenge of the Jedi. There's more.

      I'll cite nothing because I have no idea where this information leaked from, and you can take it with a grain of salt because I heard it years ago. But apparently the original story for Jedi worked like this:

      The forest moon isn't Endor, it's Kashyyyk. The furry friends aren't Eworks, they're Wookies. You can still see an echo of this in the final film, because the very word "Ewok" is an anagram for "Wookie" (with a couple letters dropped). No one knows why this happened, but it's a safe bet the Wookies would have been way cooler than the Ewoks were. Popular opinion has it that the merchandising for cute teddy bears was more attractive than that of Wookie action figures, but no one knows for sure. Perhaps Lucas felt burned by the negative reaction to the Wookies in the 1978 Christmas Special.

      Anyway, the idea was that Kashyyyk was a slave planet. That the Empire had enslaved the Wookies was a preexisting concept, and it explainined why Chewbacca so hated the idea of wearing handcuffs in A New Hope: he was a former slave, and Han had rescued him years ago. The story of Jedi was originally to have involved the Wookie uprising. Instead we got Ewok booby traps. Also, Vader doesn't take Luke to the new Death Star. Instead, he takes him to the capital planet of the Empire, and it's there that Luke encounters the Emperor. The setting wasn't named "Coruscant" back then (that's Timothy Zahn's name for it) but Ralph McQuarrie concept art from the 1980s still exists for it.

      Later versions differed from the final story in key ways as well. For example, Michael Pennington's character Moff Jerrjerod (the dude who meets Vader in the docking bay at the start of Jedi) originally had a more expanded role. At the film's climax, he realizes that the Emperor is dead and that the Rebellion is about to destroy the new Death Star, so he decides to aim the primary weapon at Endor. The idea is to generate an explosion that will destroy the entire Rebellion in one swift stroke (not to mention the Death Star and much of the Imperial fleet, but he decides that's a small price under the circumstances). This adds significant tension and makes the Rebellion's last-minute destruction of the Death Star that much more urgent.

      Of course, the last story element to drastically change was the loss of the Millennium Falcon. Originally Lando does not manage to escape with the Falcon (why did you think Han and Chewie weren't on it?), making Han's last moment with his favorite ship the scene in the docking bay where Lando promises to return it without a scratch. Remember how Han comments to Leia that he feels like he'll never see it again? Originally he didn't. Lando redeems himself for turning Han over to Vader by sacrificing himself to save the Rebellion. Han loses the Falcon, but in a way this is good for his character's development because it means he finally gives up his old ways and lands the princess.

      Rumor has it that they filmed Lando's death but it bothered test audiences (who do they get for these idiot test audiences, anyway?) so Lucas and director Richard Marquand decided to change it.

      While I like Jedi, I've always believed that something fundamental snapped between the glorious Empire Strikes Back and the final film. Lucas lost track of what was good about the universe and the characters, and it only got worse from there.

    42. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry to troll: but after having lucas arts present this to us in early concept stage, we were completely uninspired, it looks and feels b-grade. plus the animation style is somewhere between dreamworks madagascar and the lego video game stylising of the starwars characters. (and posted anonymously for obvious reasons)

    43. Re:Save the Franchise? by MeatballCB · · Score: 1

      Lucas has become destroyer of worlds in my opinion. First Star Wars and now Indiana Jones. So, I'm left wondering, how much money does one really need? Apparently it's worth ruining your reputation for in George's case...

    44. Re:Save the Franchise? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, the midichlorians really threw the spirituality/mythology themes under the bus.

      Actually, now that I think of it, I don't think that having force-related science was really the problem. It's entirely to be expected -- remember, we're talking about a civilization which has lasted tens of thousands of years. There's no reason to think that anything, no matter how mystical, would be left unexplored by science.

      No, there are two bigger problems with midichlorians:

      First, they sound like mitochondria, and are functionally vaguely similar. It really breaks suspension of disbelief if you know any basic cellular biology, because you can't help but realize that whoever wrote that crap was sort of vaguely remembering their high school biology, and not going back to research it.

      And second, they completely change the dynamic of who gets to be a Jedi. It's official, now -- it's nature, not nurture.

      The mechanic is somewhat like if some of us were born super-muscular (think Captain Hammer), while some were born weaklings, and no amount of lifting weights and working out would turn a weakling into a musclehead, and no amount of slacking would turn a musclehead into a weakling.

      The real world is much kinder. There is some nature, certainly -- there are those who are naturally skinny, and those child geniuses who graduate college at age 12 -- but the rest of us can study hard and work out and make up some of the difference.

      In the Star Wars universe, having a high enough midichlorian count to be Force-sensitive is rare, and if yours is low, you're SOL, you'll never be a Jedi.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    45. Re:Save the Franchise? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      That was one of my favorite parts of Knights of the Old Republic. The game was buggy and all, but it had an engaging storyline, and there were several non-force powered characters who were still useful and fun.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    46. Re:Save the Franchise? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      X-Wing Alliance was pretty good, and has bunches of mods including graphic updates online.

    47. Re:Save the Franchise? by jabithew · · Score: 1

      I can't watch the pointless medal scene at the end of a New Hope. It feels like he just ran out of ideas and just said "Shit, I've got to finish this film somehow". For me it ruins the film.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    48. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ewoks were cool

      Wow. Seriously dude, I've never, ever heard those words used together like that.

      I know! The Clone Wars is supposed to be so awful it'll make someone five years from now post "Jar-jar was cool."

      Listen to the Ewok Gospel:

      It's been a quarter of a century now, people, since the Rebels won the day
      They destroyed that evil empire and the galaxy was saved
      Han Solo, Luke, Leia, Lando -- they're the heroes we all recall
      But let's not forget about their big-hearted friends who are only one meter tall

      I'm talking about the Ewoks
      They were more than just cute, cuddly bears
      Let's give some credit to the Ewoks
      Without their help, the Alliance didn't have a prayer.

      I was surfin' the Star Wars message boards and Lord, I was shocked to read
      All the haters puttin' down the Ewoks -- they say they ruined the first trilogy
      Well, they may have been added for the children and they may have been comic relief
      And it may not make sense that they could beat Stormtroopers with such primitive weaponry

      But why you hatin' on the Ewoks?
      Tell me what did they ever do to you?
      Where's the love for the Ewoks?
      Let's give it up 'cause it's long overdue (clap your hands now)

      EWOKS -- they're tiny warriors
      EWOKS -- they fought so bravely
      EWOKS -- livin' like the Amish
      EWOKS, EWOKS

      (take it Billy Dee...)

      After Princess Leia crashed her Speederbike, who had our sister's back? (the Ewoks!)
      And who was it that led the Rebels to the bunker backdoor for their sneak attack? (the Ewoks!)
      And at the end of Act 2 when all was lookin' bad, who set those captured Rebels free (the Ewoks!)
      Can somebody remind me who throws the hottest treetop parties in the galaxy?
      You know he's talking about the Ewoks
      They've still got it goin' on after twenty-five years
      Ewoks! Sing it loud so all those haters can hear

      EWOKS -- they're inspirational
      EWOKS -- they sold so many toys
      EWOKS -- a yub-nub now
      EWOKS, EWOKS

      Download the MP3 here:
      http://www.runawaybox.com/extras.php?vid=425

      Special Thanks To:
      Billy Dee Williams, Leticia Ugwueke & The Gospel Singers, United Methodist Church

    49. Re:Save the Franchise? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      But movies like Shrek, Toy Story, Monsters, Inc, and many many others proves that just because a movies is targeted at kids doesn't mean it can't also be made enjoyable for adults. Not to say i plan to be one of the ones crying (I never even say Revenge of the Sith), but it sound to me from the reviews like Lucas Films missed the boat. It is a kids movie, so no one should expect it to be otherwise, but lots of kids movies are still a lot of fun to watch.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    50. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've read there is even more to the story than that. My rumors are very old so their sources are long gone but I'm sure some fan boys out there will correct my errors for us.

      I read that in the following movies, well call them 7, 8, and 9, for lack of a better name, Luke was supposed to turn to the dark side. He was really supposed to take the Emperors place, or something like that. When I watch Return and Empire with that in mind I think I see the foreshadowing of how that happens.

      In Empire Luke leaves with out his training being complete so that makes him venerable to the dark sides influence. And of course in Return he is dressed in black.

      But the thing that sold the deal to me was in the Emperors throne room where the Emperor told him to pick up his sabre and strike. And that is exactly what he did. To me it doesn't matter that he didn't finish the strike be for Vader blocked it. But for all intent and purpose he intended to kill the Emperor right there. For me that was when Luke went over.

      Now I'm sure this has all been explained away in some book that I haven't read. I would love to know how it was.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    51. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not about the money anymore, its about not letting anybody else take on the star wars universe after he's gone!

    52. Re:Save the Franchise? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, going to have to disagree with you there. For me the most believe able character was Han

      That would be why I qualified it with "Obi-Wan was actually the most believable and well-rounded character in the prequels"

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    53. Re:Save the Franchise? by robertjw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I never liked Jar-Jar much, but I agree, that wasn't all that was wrong with the movie.

      He is at about the same level of annoyance that the Ewoks were in Jedi, the difference is the rest of the movie. Jedi was a GREAT story, and even if the acting and some of the dialog was a little shaky. Episodes I, II and III all suffered from poor writing. The story just wasn't there. It made annoying characters like Jar-Jar just stand out all the more.

    54. Re:Save the Franchise? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Damn it, I think I would have actually liked that version. It looks like virtually everything that was wrong with Return of the Jedi is fixed in the above. Or, to put it more accurately, Lucas broke the movie.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    55. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Good point. I missed that. I totally agree with you. I think the most unbelievable able character in the prequels was Yoda. I almost coughed up a lung when the green midget went in to his light sabre duel.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    56. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What know I of getting some? Quarter-inch penis I have." --Yoda

      Judge him by his size, do you? Size matters not!

    57. Re:Save the Franchise? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the midichlorians really threw the spirituality/mythology themes under the bus

      Never did understand that objection. The midichlorians are described as the mechanism by which people interact with The Force. The Force is still spiritual in nature, the midichlorians do nothing to change that.

      (This is assuming you're not one of the people that misunderstood the description of them in TPM - I've noticed some think that Qui-Gon Jinn is describing them as the force, whereas he's quite clear in describing them as the interaction mechanism. But I've noticed some objections too from people who understood the description, but still feel it undermines the spirituality of the Force somehow, and for the life of me I don't understand why people think that.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    58. Re:Save the Franchise? by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd put it another, sadder way: the first two movies were "broken" from what Lucas really wanted, and it wasn't until Jedi and the prequels that he started to exercise greater control. Or rather, what you like best about A New Hope and Empire is not what Lucas was really shooting for: these were all meant to be kid's movies, and that the first couple attracted adults and sci-fi lovers was a profitable accident.

      The more control Lucas has over the story and filming, the worse the film ends up. Go see Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and then read one of the leaked copies of Indiana Jones and the City of the Gods on the Internet. The latter is a professionally written screenplay by someone who loves the characters, the former is Lucas's "corrected" version. We need to stop having high expectations of the man.

    59. Re:Save the Franchise? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You hit the nail on the head. The writing/scripting in the newer Star Wars movies wasn't that great. Actually, it was mainly just the dialogue that was poorly-written. I think the stories were there for the most part though, we just had poor dialogue to listen to.

      Lucas is a master at coming up with stories, he just isn't great at actually writing them. He's given us Star Wars, Indiana Jones, and Willow. He is also good visually; all the Star Wars movies look fantastic visually and have awesome special effects. He just needs to let other people write and direct and only be involved at a creative level (artistic direction, overarching story, visual effects, etc.).

    60. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have to admit when Greedo shot first that bug didn't crawl up my ass anywhere near as far as adding the scream in Empire. When Greedo shot first that just made Han somewhat less a scoundrel but didn't completely change the meaning of that scene.

      Well not as much as the scream did. Right there Luke had two choices, turn to the dark side or die. With the scream it makes Luke look like the choice was taken from him and he slipped. He could have been thinking of joining Vader.

      With out the scream it re-enforces that Luke made a distinct decision to let go and die. and he never regretted that decision all the way down.

      Adding the scream changed the entire meaning of that scene.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    61. Re:Save the Franchise? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      > He's no worse than Mark Hamil.
      I meant the way the scene/dialog was written for cutseypoo comic effect, not necessarily the actors per se.

      > Oh please all the movies are full of ridiculous accents.
      Go back and watch it again. Hers is just breathtakingly bad.

      > But the Death Star with its magical earth-like gravity generator makes sense?
      Yup, same one they used in the Star Trek franchise, Space 1999, Babylon 5, Dr. Who, and others.

      > ...but most of all you were like 5 years old when they came out.
      Actually, my first exposure to Darth Vader was in the theater, just after my fiance and I had smoked a huge joint. When he came onscreen, I said "Oooooh, he's eeeeevil".


      But we were talking about midichlorians. That was the thing that broke the soul (literally) of the first three episodes. Suddenly good and evil, force or dark side didn't matter anymore, being Jedi was just something you were born with.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    62. Re:Save the Franchise? by Ironchew · · Score: 0

      Maybe he meant Han was the most believable in staying the hell out of the whole thing.

    63. Re:Save the Franchise? by G-forze · · Score: 1

      What about Jango Fett? He's like the Han Solo of the evil side - a normal guy with lots of useful equipment. He's not necessarily evil either just doing his job. Sure, he didn't have that big a part but still.

      --
      "There's someone in my head but it's not me." - Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
    64. Re:Save the Franchise? by k_187 · · Score: 1

      They might be the interaction, but either way they become a switch that places everybody into "jedi" or "not jedi". And there's nothing spiritual about that.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    65. Re:Save the Franchise? by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the expanded universe, I think either Luke, or his children, turn over to the dark side, but return. I am not sure, as much of the expanded Star Wars universe was written by others.

      Considering that Star Wars, is itself Fiction, you can always debate about it, but considering that it IS fiction, you are right and wrong. It doesn't matter.

      However, the incident with Luke and the Lightsaber, it was never denied that Luke DID turn to the dark side at that point. He did intend to take the life of the Emperor, and did turn to the dark side. Its better described in the official book. However, he "came to his senses" and rescind the dark side later when he cast the lightsaber, and declared that he is a Jedi, and always will be a Jedi, just like his father before him. Especially he did it with a sense of realization and compassion. You have to remember, if he finished off Darth Vader at that point, he would have been the apprentice. HE had nothing to know that his friends had actually succeeded in Endor, and the end was near for the Galactic Empire. As far as he knew, all had failed, and the Empire was set to win. He had experienced some of the power of the dark side, and the promise it gave. Yet he declined it, and in the end was willing to sacrifice his life for it, Begging for help from his father, when the emperor used his dark force on him. It was that which also brought Anakin Skywalker back from the dark side to save his son. And why Anakin died as a Jedi, and not a Sith.

      That makes a whole big difference. Just because a Jedi turns to the dark side doesn't not make him a Sith. He is a Sith for as long as he or she embraces the Dark side. The moment a sith rescinds the Dark Side in a real and genuine manner, he or she ceases to be a sith, and returns to the light of the Jedi. With Luke, he returned far quicker. Anakin took much longer, but the intent was still noble (he knew of his death, yet he destroyed the emperor and save his son, the son who refused the dark side)

      --
      Have a nice day!
    66. Re:Save the Franchise? by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look, the original three had a lot of creative spark and energy in them, and a couple of good actors who stole the show, but most of all you were like 5 years old when they came out. To kids today the new movies are just as good. At the end of the day I have to agree with Lucas and say that these are really kids movies and we are simply nostalgic for them.

      That argument is nonsensical. Everyone who saw Star Wars in 1977 was not 5 years old at the time. It got fairly damn good reviews. It was nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Screenplay, Best Supporting Actor, and a ton of stuff in the technical area. Star Wars was considered Good. What kids today think about the latest boatload of tripe is not relevant.

    67. Re:Save the Franchise? by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Really? Graphics updates? I am intrigued and wish to learn more :o

    68. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, not to get TOO into this discussion, but wasn't it always implied that Force sensitivity was inherited? I mean Darth Vader passed along his potential abilities to his son, so it always seemed like being a potential Jedi was a family thing.

      Anyway, Star Wars is a kind of goofy universe if you actually think about ANY of it.

      Posting anonymously due to embarassasment at caring about this crap...

    69. Re:Save the Franchise? by Spudtrooper · · Score: 1

      The midichlorians make perfect sense if you think about what happens to Vader. As a whole-body person, he was supreme. The Emperor turned him to the Dark Side because of his power with the Force. Then Obi-Wan laid the smack down on Mustafar, reducing his body mass (and, thus, his midichlorian count) by 50%. After that, Vader was a mechanical wretch, the Emperor's little whipping boy unable to live up to his full potential. That's why the Emperor wanted Luke. He wasn't stunted like Vader was. He had the potential to be far more powerful than Vader. Vader is a truly tragic character. He turned to the Dark Side due to the promise of power, then he lost it all. Also, Dooku and/or Palpatine arranged for his mother to be kidnapped and tortured by the sandpeople. Anakin's fall was set up right away from his introduction. The prequels aren't as ham-fisted as people like to make out. But Jar Jar still sucks.

    70. Re:Save the Franchise? by DimGeo · · Score: 1

      I think they really missed the Han Solo type of character in the new stuff. Han Solo showed you can be kickass without the force.

      That would be Padme.

    71. Re:Save the Franchise? by sce7mjm · · Score: 0

      George in an interview on one of the digitally remastered videos ( but before they added scenes etc..) says that the ewoks were wookies. But.. when producing the first film he loved wookies so much he had to have them in, not knowing whether he would be making any more, so he replaced Hans co-pilot with a wookie. Having introduced wookies already before Jedi he had to invent ewoks. Something like that anyway.

    72. Re:Save the Franchise? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Should have played longer. The Empire had a much cooler collection of ships.

      TIE interceptors are my favorite. Uber-manuverable, and no wussy shields. But you also had Assault Gunboats (Imperial answer to the Y-Wing, with Lasers, Ions, and Warheads), TIE Bombers (Slugs with BIG warhead stocks), and MISSILE BOATS (TWO full loads of warheads. *fap fap*)

      Of course, The TIE Advanced and TIE Defender were scrub ships. Lasers, Shields, Hyperdrives, and Ions on the Defender. Plus faster and more manuverable than any other ship. If you wanted to fly that sort of pussy thing, you should be a rebel. :P

    73. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: (-1, LOUD GROAN)

    74. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Sir! If I had a beer I would salute you. I never though about that but in my mind that would do it. Luke did turn to the dark side but repented. That works for me.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    75. Re:Save the Franchise? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have minded the Jedi being too goody goody.

      Lucas, to me, made the Jedi the corrupted do-gooders who are now looking out for their own good instead of the galaxy's. Basically just 'this' side of being equals to the Sith. Who were doing exactly what the Jedi were up to, just being a lot less coy about it. Goodbye childhood nostalgia.

      Of course, the Jedi we're supposed to like are the rebels and generally "bad" Jedi. Qui-"Stick it in your pointy ear"-gon for rebelling against the increasingly outdated and outmoded rules. Obiwan, or Qui-gon the Lesser, for being stuck between loyalty to Qui-gon and loyalty to the order and generally siding with his friends and allies and not the order. Though we still didn't have an everyman protagonist.

      Genndy Tartakovsky's micro series was probably the best of the prequals. The Jedi are the Jedi you'd think of if ep. 4,5,6 had the effects budgets and stunt coordinators of this day and age. I think it was supposed to be Cody, who was a good example of a non-force user that could actually be useful and effective.

    76. Re:Save the Franchise? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Oh, there's more than just the first few.

      First you go though TIE Fighters. Then Interceptors. Then Bombers.

      Then, finally, you get the TIE Advanced, gunboat, defender, etc. Although you still end up back in a bomber a few times.

      That said, I still loved it, and really wish a new version with graphics and inertial physics would come out.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    77. Re:Save the Franchise? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      (But it IS fun playing the Lego Star Wars game and slicing Jar Jar up all day (or shoving him off cliffs) with no penalty whatsoever)

      Penalty? On the 360 version, that's an ACHIEVEMENT!( "Crowd Pleaser")

    78. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://swc.hard-light.net/

    79. Re:Save the Franchise? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      But movies like Shrek, Toy Story, Monsters, Inc, and many many others proves that just because a movies is targeted at kids doesn't mean it can't also be made enjoyable for adults.

      Just because a movie is animated doesn't mean it's targeted to kids. Take Antz for example -- I can't imagine a normal kid even understanding the story, let alone liking it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    80. Re:Save the Franchise? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Where did you get them? Make a Torrent? :)

    81. Re:Save the Franchise? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Han didn't have that much useful equipment. He had a blaster (which the movies made them less effective then todays guns) and a cargo ship that had been souped up for a extra speed. Jango Fett had a weapon for any situation. Plus a personal flight suit....

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    82. Re:Save the Franchise? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      In the Star Wars universe, having a high enough midichlorian count to be Force-sensitive is rare, and if yours is low, you're SOL, you'll never be a Jedi.

      But the same kind of thing may be true in the real universe. Just because we don't currently know of a biological basis for those who are great artists, writers, mathematicians, composers, etc., doesn't mean there isn't a biological basis for such traits. Those with no artistic, literary, mathematical, or musical talent are just SOL and will never be great in those fields no matter how hard they try. Perhaps there's a biological reason.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    83. Re:Save the Franchise? by clem · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I could have put up with Jar-Jar, but the midichlorians were the true knife in the back.

      You're just bitter because your blood tested low for midichlorians. The truth hurts -- you'll never be a Jedi.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    84. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original version, if it did indeed exist, sounds like a film of the calibre of The Empire Strikes Back. I would have enjoyed that.

      Curse you, George Lucas!

    85. Re:Save the Franchise? by WeeLad · · Score: 1
      There's also no shortage of original star trek fans who saw TNG as bland, sexless, and too serious.

      TNG brought a little class and dignity to the galaxy. Kirk and those crazy, sex-ed up hooligans were just out there causing trouble.

      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
    86. Re:Save the Franchise? by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that's what the Timothy Zahn (sp?) trilogy of books addresses.

    87. Re:Save the Franchise? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      I bought them. They were bonus discs to the DVD releases of the refitted and beshitted originals.

    88. Re:Save the Franchise? by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Ditto. The first movies were good at the time because of what was around at the time. But compare that to Alien made IIRC one year later. Its a true classic today even if the alien was a quadruped. My nephew didn't like Aliens much thou.. ;)

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    89. Re:Save the Franchise? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Full Throttle sucked, and Dark Forces was just ok.

      I agree that Lucas Arts used to make some amazing games, but you use Full Throttle to illustrate that? Not, say, Grim Fandango or the Quest for Glory series?

    90. Re:Save the Franchise? by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

      On one of the bonus features of one star wars dvd I remember one quote from Lucas along the lines of "We didn't have enough money for tons of Wookie suits, so we chopped them in half and called them Ewoks". I'm 100% sure of the second half of the line, because it was memorable, so I think the first part is accurate too.

    91. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, now we know what not having a life must be like.

    92. Re:Save the Franchise? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      But the same kind of thing may be true in the real universe. Just because we don't currently know of a biological basis for those who are great artists, writers, mathematicians, composers, etc., doesn't mean there isn't a biological basis for such traits.

      Maybe there is, but as of yet, there's no evidence to support that -- and there is, in fact, evidence to the contrary.

      Those with no artistic, literary, mathematical, or musical talent are just SOL and will never be great in those fields no matter how hard they try.

      I actually haven't seen people like that, outside of Internet trolls. I've seen people who have no artistic, literary, mathematical, or musical motivation, and people who struggle at these things. But I've met very few people who actually can't do these things.

      No, they'll never be great in those fields, but the Force makes it absolutely impossible to even be mediocre or bad in those fields.

      Regardless, it's not so much that I feel it's unrealistic, it's that I feel it's uninspiring.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    93. Re:Save the Franchise? by russotto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You hit the nail on the head. The writing/scripting in the newer Star Wars movies wasn't that great. Actually, it was mainly just the dialogue that was poorly-written. I think the stories were there for the most part though, we just had poor dialogue to listen to.

      The backstory -- Palpatine manipulating everyone and everyone, both as Senator and as Sith, so that no matter what happened, he won -- was great. But the main story, which, in II and III, should have been an equally great story about the corruption of Anakin Skywalker, was horrendous. Not just the dialog either; Anakin's fall was just not believable.

    94. Re:Save the Franchise? by Danse · · Score: 1

      The more control Lucas has over the story and filming, the worse the film ends up. Go see Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and then read one of the leaked copies of Indiana Jones and the City of the Gods on the Internet. The latter is a professionally written screenplay by someone who loves the characters, the former is Lucas's "corrected" version. We need to stop having high expectations of the man.

      I don't think most of us have had high expectations of him since RotJ. We'd mostly just like to see him stay the hell away from Star Wars, especially when it comes to writing, directing, casting, etc. The books that followed RotJ were much better than any of the movies. Get some decent authors to work with the material and they show us what can be done with it. They put Lucas to shame.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    95. Re:Save the Franchise? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Lucas had full control over the first movie, though. He saw through every detail, at least according to the documentary included on the DVD set. He personally edited practically the entire film, if not the entire film.

      In short, I don't buy it.

    96. Re:Save the Franchise? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      wasn't it always implied that Force sensitivity was inherited? I mean Darth Vader passed along his potential abilities to his son...

      Well, yes, but that was a bit more like the idea that traits which might lead to, say, skill as a musician, or as an athlete, might be passed on to a son. And, in certain feudal societies, you were actually born into what you would do for the rest of your life.

      But today, well... My father's a stockbroker, but that's no reason I can't go off and train and become, say, an Olympic athlete. (The fact that I'm in my twenties means I missed that chance, but you get the point -- how many Olympic athletes are children of former Olympic athletes?)

      Posting anonymously due to embarassasment at caring about this crap...

      You, sir, are pathetic.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    97. Re:Save the Franchise? by immcintosh · · Score: 2

      More than the writing, more than the dialog, I would have to say it was the directing that was abysmal. He had some very good (normally at least) actors, and managed to direct them in having all the personal affect of a moist cardboard box. And to get that out of Samuel Jackson is an absolutely astounding feat of directorial incompetence.

    98. Re:Save the Franchise? by xhrit · · Score: 1

      I didn't know you like anime. Gankutsuou is awesome.

    99. Re:Save the Franchise? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I mean, what kind of self-respecting galactic overlord would have a throne room without a deep reactor pit of death in it?

      If you were a self-respecting galactic overloard we all know you'd want to sit on top of that power source, too. I know I would. But not for too long, who knows how mediclorines react to cancer...

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    100. Re:Save the Franchise? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Episode I, they put their main power reactor in a DOCKING BAY full of fighters. They didn't even need to blow up the trade federation ships, they could have just waited until some pilot accidentally made a bad landing.

      Also, pretty much my favorite scene in that movie is where Anakin, somehow, manages to get through the trade federation mothership shields. Something which is impossible for the trained pilots in the exact same ship. The movie doesn't explain how he does this, except they do make it a point of having the other pilots ask, "how did he do that?" Thus, specifically pointing out to the audience that the script makes no damned sense.

      Protip: if you're a screenwriter and you put something crazy in your script, don't have the other characters comment on it!

      (Unless it's a gag, like with the motion detector scene in Alien.)

    101. Re:Save the Franchise? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      The midichlorians make perfect sense if you think about what happens to Vader.

      Only in the context of the prequels.

      Then Obi-Wan laid the smack down on Mustafar, reducing his body mass (and, thus, his midichlorian count) by 50%. After that, Vader was a mechanical wretch, the Emperor's little whipping boy unable to live up to his full potential.

      Except, in the context of the original movies, he was absolutely not a "mechanical wretch", nor was he the "Emperor's little whipping boy" -- he was a fearsome Dark Lord, one of the scarier bad guys, second only to the Emperor. And not even in power -- after all, he did kill the Emperor in the end.

      That's why the Emperor wanted Luke. He wasn't stunted like Vader was. He had the potential to be far more powerful than Vader.

      Vader had to talk him into that, though -- he was all for simply killing Luke before he could be dangerous at all.

      Honestly, I think it was more about having another Jedi at all, rather than having a "whole" Jedi.

      The prequels aren't as ham-fisted as people like to make out. But Jar Jar still sucks.

      Oh, I agree. They got more right than people give them credit for.

      But it's not just Jar-Jar -- Lucas has gotten far too much wrong, at this point. Han shot first!

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    102. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George stated that he did not want to use Wookies for ROTJ because he wanted to have a primitive race overpower a technologically advanced race. He said that showing wookies flying spaceships didn't make them look technologically primitive.

    103. Re:Save the Franchise? by andy9701 · · Score: 1

      You might have read about it in The Secret History of Star Wars, which was discussed here a few months ago.

      It's a very interesting read, and puts the whole saga into a new light. The basic premise is that Lucas didn't have it all laid out initially, but just made it up as he went. I have no idea how accurate it is or not, but due to the crazy amount of information he has, at least some of it has to be true.

      One side affect of this book is that if you ever read it, and then listen to the commentaries on the DVDs, you end up yelling at the screen every time Lucas talks about having something planned out from the beginning, which he clearly didn't.

    104. Re:Save the Franchise? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      Maybe there is, but as of yet, there's no evidence to support that ....

      Actually there is in the form of idiot savants. Almost all of them are blind, mentally deficient, and yet have extraordinary musical ability -- beyond what any normal person could do -- ever. And it almost always happens with that trinity of blindness, mental deficiency, and musical ability. That strongly points to a biological basis.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    105. Re:Save the Franchise? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Two words killed that franchise: "Phantom Menace". Is there ANYONE who doesn't think Lucas jumped the shark with that movie? Sadly,he has taken what was a cherished memory of my childhood and turned it into "Spaceballs 3 1/3: The search for more money". Sadly these things have gotten so bad I doubt even Mel Brooks could make a decent parody of them now. But as always this is my 02c,YMMV. But even my 15 year old,who never really got Star Wars and thought it was just okay,saw Phantom Menace and said "That whiny little kid is Vader? And what is with the racist sidekick? And why are the bad guys doing bad Japanese accents? This movie sucks!" It is one of the few things he and I agree on.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    106. Re:Save the Franchise? by Danse · · Score: 1

      I bought them. They were bonus discs to the DVD releases of the refitted and beshitted originals.

      Are they still available?

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    107. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Six from Blossom? That show was the pinnacle of Sci-Fi...I mean the CGI on Blossom's nose was fantastic. It's actually 3 times bigger in real life.

    108. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      six? i dont see why people think shes hot. so shes blonde, big deal... boomer's where its at.

    109. Re:Save the Franchise? by andy9701 · · Score: 1

      I read that in the following movies, well call them 7, 8, and 9, for lack of a better name, Luke was supposed to turn to the dark side. He was really supposed to take the Emperors place, or something like that. When I watch Return and Empire with that in mind I think I see the foreshadowing of how that happens.

      All I've read is that he never really had anything planned for the "sequel" trilogy. The only bit he had thought about was when Yoda mentions "there is another" when Luke leaves Dagobah at the end of Empire. That was supposed to be revealed in the sequel trilogies (in fact using the "other" as the main character). However, after Empire Lucas grew tired of making these movies, so he decided to wrap it all up in Jedi.

    110. Re:Save the Franchise? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      If you want to see one of the orginal potential SW plots, that Lucas recycled into another movie, go rewatch the "Willow".

      Willow - Luke
      Mad Martigan - Solo
      the sorcerus Fin Raziel - Chewy ("I expected something less fuzzy")
      the Brownies-R2D2/C3P0
      the general - Vader
      the Queen - the emperor
      the princes well was the princes, though Sorsha took over the adult roll (love interest, who also didn't think much of Martigan on first sight) of Leia and who just happens to be the daughter of Queen Bavmorda (Vader/Emperor).

      Of course Warwick Davis, our hero Willow Ufgood, played the ewoc Wicket in RotJ.

      The whole coming of age/discovering your potential while on a journey was a direct rip off from the Wizard of Oz

      Which goes a long way to explaining Lucus' little people fetish.

    111. Re:Save the Franchise? by andy9701 · · Score: 1

      In the expanded universe, I think either Luke, or his children, turn over to the dark side, but return. I am not sure, as much of the expanded Star Wars universe was written by others.

      I know that Luke turns to the dark side in one of the first comic series that was released in the 90's - called Dark Empire I think? That's when the Emperor is cloned or something, and he manages to turn Luke for a time. I believe that Leia gets him back, but I'm not sure.

      I also think that one of Han and Leia's kids turns to the dark side in the books eventually, but I haven't been keeping up with all of the new Star Wars books over the last five years or so.

    112. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story that you describe would have been so, so much better. It shouldn't be just the bad guys that pay the price in these stories, the good guys have to make sacrifices and take loses too (and not just 'red-shirts' and Ewoks), so Lando dying could have been used to emphasis that point. There were too many convenient escapes in this movie. The ground force with Han and Leia in the bunker, Lando, Luke (not to mention Vader's last minute, relatively low cost redemption), the entire rebel fleet...
      The whole "happy ever after" thing seldom works out in real life.

    113. Re:Save the Franchise? by andy9701 · · Score: 1

      Or you could play through Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis. That would make a pretty good movie, IMO.

    114. Re:Save the Franchise? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the midichlorians really threw the spirituality/mythology themes under the bus.

      Not just that. The Force used to be an egalitarian concept. Dirt farmer on Tatooine, aristocrat, smuggler, it didn't matter. You could *learn* the Force. Obi Wan even offers to teach *Han* how to use it.

      The midichlorian changed it from being a mark of aristocracy, a bloodline. If you aren't born one of the chosen, you're cut off from it. Tough luck. It's the exact opposite of how it started out.

    115. Re:Save the Franchise? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I mean, what kind of self-respecting galactic overlord would have a throne room without a deep reactor pit of death in it?"

      The place was still under construction, and evil space empires don't have "DANGER--DO NOT ENTER" yellow tape. Heck, as pointed out by Family Guy, they don't even install safety railings in completed Death Stars.

    116. Re:Save the Franchise? by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      They kinda tried with Jar Jar but he was too stupid and attempt to be a comic role (which R2D2 and C3PO took as well) we needed a serious character who was a normal guy who kicked ass.

      That's what I wanted to see: Jar-Jar growing out of his bumbling goofiness into someone who could kick some ass. Oh well.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    117. Re:Save the Franchise? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      And at least you got to see some Ewoks die.

      Also Ewoks were not in your face the whole time, they did thier thing in hte forest, and that was it, but Jar Jar was like a fucking tick attached to your eye.

      Also at least Ewoks made sense. They were spear pointing primitives, the gun guns were stupid, they lived in a super high tech underwater city, but they were supposedly the underclass, they fought with these energy ball things, but they thew them from primitive catapults.

      And best of all, Ewoks knew how to shut their mouths.

    118. Re:Save the Franchise? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      In the books, the emperor comes back, a little something he had batched up from the ol' clone wars, and starts trouble. They kill him again, and low and behold he's back again. Luke's like "WTF!?" so he ends up taking his father's place at the Emperor's side just to figure out his trick.

      Luke basically goes on a killing spree where the end's justify the means and wipes out anyone that get's in his way, Imperial, Rebel, or Neutral.

      There's a whole story line where Luke once, brought back to the Light becomes all passive and goes out of his way to avoid anything that would hurt anyone. R2D2 fills the gap in one fight after getting tired of watching Luke get his ass kicked over and over and goes and gets Luke's X-Wing and hovers over to the fight and starts blasting people at point blank range with the ships guns.

      I think we are going to have to hope Lucas's dies sooner than later, or someone pulls off, first of it's kind, class action lawsuit that can get him declared mentally incompetent(for pissing off just about everyone over the age of 7), before we start seeing movies that are half as interesting as some of the books.

    119. Re:Save the Franchise? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Ya, save the franchise? The prequels crashed the franchise into a thick, thick wall. This cartoony CGI thing is like trying to start the engine and then accelerate, from an initial position inside the wall itself.

      > Ugly animation

      Ugly? They're duplicating that ridiculously gigantic upper torso ala the modern Superman and Batman cartoons, aren't they?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    120. Re:Save the Franchise? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Hense the first two seasons of clone wars (lucas hands off they were awesome) A friend of mine saw the new one last weekend and he had a similar review as the ones here. It probably should have stayed on the planned small screen release as a kids cartoon. He said it would be great as a saturday morning cartoon, didn't fit well as a movie.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    121. Re:Save the Franchise? by Danse · · Score: 1

      They might be the interaction, but either way they become a switch that places everybody into "jedi" or "not jedi". And there's nothing spiritual about that.

      While I originally hated the whole midichlorian thing (I think I groaned out loud in the theater during that scene... people were looking at me...), I think I've been trying to mentally fix it in my head so that it doesn't screw things up so badly. All I can really come up with is that being force-sensitive or not has always been something that the person has no control over. Luke and Leia had a parent who was very strong with it, so they are too. Training helps you to learn to control it better, but doesn't change your potential.

      The books that come after Jedi obviously don't speak of midichlorians because Lucas hadn't injected that yet, but they do have Jedi seeking out young people who have force potential so that they can be trained before they get tempted by the dark side. This seems in line with the idea that only a few have the potential. Midichlorians may be the mechanism, but there must still be some underlying reason why the midichlorians are present in some and not in others. Presumably it has something to do with the person themselves. Otherwise people would be getting midichlorian injections to get force powers.

      So, the spirituality aspect can still exist alongside the midichlorian explanation. It would have been better off without it, but that's Lucas for you. He's always gotta get in there and insert his own special brand of suckage into the story. Someone should have tossed his ass down a reactor pit ages ago.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    122. Re:Save the Franchise? by Glothar · · Score: 1

      In the Star Wars universe, having a high enough midichlorian count to be Force-sensitive is rare, and if yours is low, you're SOL, you'll never be a Jedi.

      When did you ever think this wasn't the case? Even as a five year old this was what I assumed to be true. There are even loads of scenes and lines to support the belief.

      The mitochondria, er... midichlorians were a bit lame, but they don't really change this fact. It's been quite clear since the very first movie that the force was something that some people just had and everyone else didn't.

      I guess I would have found it to be much more lame if everyone could get to be a Jedi if they just worked really hard. Way to take all the mysticism away. Want to be a Jedi? No talent? Well if you're rich you can buy your way in by getting the best tutors.

      Having the only requirement to being a Jedi be "working hard" would effectively kill the mysticism of it. Why isn't everyone a Jedi? Why aren't they all waving their hands about? Why doesn't the Empire train all Stormtroopers as Jedi (or Sith, as the case may be)?

    123. Re:Save the Franchise? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I did play a lot of it, can't remember if I finished it though. Now that you bring it up, I do remember having shields on some ships. However, there was quite a few missions without them, and I remember those being quite annoying. The whole concept of being a career TIE fighter pilot was flawed anyway. It's like being a pilot for the Japanese in WWII. Where they just sent out a million people in planes, and won by sheer numbers. Death was likely, and, in the case of kamikaze missions, downright inevitable, but it was all worth it if you end up taking down one of the adversaries in the process.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    124. Re:Save the Franchise? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think the franchise was lost among the faithful a long time ago. Somewhere between Mesaa and Jar-Jar Binks.

      Uh, OK, if you like. I take it that you've never seen the 1978 Star Wars Holiday Special?

      Seriously, it's real. It's not an urban legend. Phantom Menace? Jedi Bratz? Nothing on Leia singing. Nothing on Itchy and Lumpy. That thing will eat your soul, then crap it back out on your face.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    125. Re:Save the Franchise? by wezeldog · · Score: 1

      I have the same recollection but I probably read it in Starlog. Another reason for the switch was also driven by the logistics of the time. Lucas wanted a planet of Wookies, but they couldn't pull it off. Later I heard someone use it as a way to describe what a director does vs. a producer. A director is someone who wants a planet full of Wookies. A producer is the guy who tells him it is not in the budget. Of course Lucas was the producer so it doesn't make sense...

    126. Re:Save the Franchise? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I liked Rogue Squadron as well.Tying up those walkers with your tow cables was quite satisfying.But I have to agree that an update TIE and X-Wing would rock.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    127. Re:Save the Franchise? by toriver · · Score: 1

      Certainly most original premise. And unique (for a video game) style. A bit linear, though.

    128. Re:Save the Franchise? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Only the very first missions are actually flown in a no-shields TIE-Fighter.
      > Later you get to fly TIEs with shields

      Darth Vader: Admiral Pooet

      Admiral Pooet: Yes, Lord Vader?

      Vader: Whose bright idea was it to send out recruits in ships without proper shielding?

      Admiral Pooet: It was mine, Lord Vader. They didn't deserve it because then it would be too easy to accomplish their missions.

      Vader: And this lead to the loss of hundreds of thousands of these fighters?

      Admiral Pooet: Yyyy...essss.

      Vader: The Empire has vast resources, Admiral, but not infinite ones. Have you never heard the old saying that if you find yourself in a fair fight, you haven't done your homework?

      (Pooet collapses)

      Vader: Admiral Foopfoop?

      Admiral Foopfoop: (visibly uncomfortable) Yes, Lord Vader?

      Vader: Please send for Moff Krunktor. I wish to discuss with him sending out recruit stormtroopers with defective blasters that have a tough killing those little squeeky mouse/doggie robots in fewer than 8 hits.

      Foopfoop: Yes, Lord Vader.

      Vader: (To himself) Which reminds me, I have to go have a "chat" with the Sith Academy teacher on Korriban. I don't like these pathetic lightsabers the young Sith are using which can't seem to effortlessly cut through a metal sword or suit of armor, to say nothing of melting a huge hole in a reinforced door.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    129. Re:Save the Franchise? by AVPMechman · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the mod support. I've still got 200 megs of custom ships from all of star wars on my hard drive for that game.

    130. Re:Save the Franchise? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Only slightly. In future books written about the history of the Jedi, there had been a few that fell to the dark side and then returned, but only to die shortly after. Darth Vader was one of these. Luke was at one time considered the first to fall completely to the dark side and then return to the light in the Dark Empire (??I think??) series.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    131. Re:Save the Franchise? by toriver · · Score: 1

      He was well animated, had a uniqueness that contrasted greatly with the ham-fisted, chewing "acting" that the live actors managed.

      Maybe fans hate that Jar-Jar showed that noone apart from the animators cared?

    132. Re:Save the Franchise? by Krater76 · · Score: 1

      I'll cite nothing because I have no idea where this information leaked from, and you can take it with a grain of salt because I heard it years ago. But apparently the original story for Jedi worked like this:

      The forest moon isn't Endor, it's Kashyyyk. The furry friends aren't Eworks, they're Wookies. You can still see an echo of this in the final film, because the very word "Ewok" is an anagram for "Wookie" (with a couple letters dropped). No one knows why this happened, but it's a safe bet the Wookies would have been way cooler than the Ewoks were. Popular opinion has it that the merchandising for cute teddy bears was more attractive than that of Wookie action figures, but no one knows for sure.

      Actually, Lucas has said many times that the intent was to have the 'mighty' Empire toppled by a simple civilization. Originally this was supposed to be Wookies but he realized that the audiences would probably have a hard time accepting that Chewbacca's people were so technologically inferior when one of them was Han's co-pilot and was seen multiple times trying to repair a spaceship.

      I have never heard the rumor of the alternate ending you propose but damn it sounds like that would've been out of the park. In hindsight, having the coolest and only black guy in the galaxy die would've been way before it's time since even the black robot died in 'Transformers'.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    133. Re:Save the Franchise? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He was also younger and less powerful at the time. He surrounded himself with great talent that would advise him and criticize what needed to be fixed and he'd listen. The more power in the film industry he got the more yes men would bubble up to become his support staff. The less outside influence made it in and Lucas began making a movie from a very singular vision and little of the great outside talent helping.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    134. Re:Save the Franchise? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

      The rumor is that George Lucas had nothing to do with the Star Wars Holiday Special and had just licensed it, and when he saw how terrible it was, he stormed around Hollywood personally destroying every copy. Well, in light of the second trilogy and especially the reviews of the new cartoon, I'm beginning to suspect that the old rumors need to be reexamined.

      Doesn't it now seem more plausible in hindsight that through some incredible stroke of luck, Episode IV was brilliant, and then the next thing Lucas did himself was The Star Wars Holiday Special, and that was his real vision for the future direction of the series? Concerned people who revered the first movie managed to pry the writing and direction of the next two entries out of his hands following the total rejection of The Star Wars Holiday Special, and thus we ended up with Leigh Brackett (screenplay)/Irvin Kershner (director) on Episode V and Lawrence Kasdan (screenplay) and Richard Marquand (director) on Episode VI. But after many years, Lucas's friends and colleagues weren't still around and pressing so hard to try to beat some sense into him and maintain the quality they'd fought for following Lucas's first brilliant fluke and amazing failure. Thus came the second trilogy, where Lucas at least attempted to go more the first series route than the Holiday Special route due to memories of critical reception of Episode IV vs. Holiday Special, but still couldn't help himself from doing things like Jar Jar. And now he's almost into full relapse, with Baby Jaba sounding an awful lot like Lumpy.

      Yes, I know the "Episode IV was a fluke" theory doesn't square so well with Lucas's pre-Star Wars movies being pretty good. Maybe we need to modify the theory- maybe sometime between Episode IV and The Holiday Special Lucas got hit on the head, or OD'd on something, or was deeply influenced by seeing The Care Bears or such (yes, I know they didn't come out for a few years after TSWHS, but maybe something similar). Anyway, just one interpretation.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    135. Re:Save the Franchise? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have them as well. The unfortunate part is that they didn't even clean up the film. It is a direct transfer of a copy of the film that had been played a few too many times. It is full of bubbles, artifacts, hairs and fuzzy scenes. It is a great way to turn a $10k home theater into a $1.50 theater experience. I think the DVD even made my floor sticky.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    136. Re:Save the Franchise? by andy.ruddock · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously trying to compare Star Wars with the Iliad or the Odyssey?
      literary perspective - oh please, give me a break.

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    137. Re:Save the Franchise? by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      Lego Indiana Jones gives you the same thrill, but with Short Round.

    138. Re:Save the Franchise? by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      excellent games, and more entertaining than all the new horseshit combined.

    139. Re:Save the Franchise? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      not completely born with. "The force is strong in the Skywalker family." and "Midichlorians are something you're born with." We're the themes of both movies. Being a jedi is about honing a talent. Falling to the dark side is about exploiting a talent. Lucas fights this well.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    140. Re:Save the Franchise? by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      To make that entire scene awesome, all they would have to do is redub the dialogue with Anakin being enraged by the deaths of some of the other pilots and going postal, with the implication that the Dark Side is guiding his actions. Then the other pilots would react with a mixture of awe and horror as this little kid, screaming bloody murder over the radio, single-handedly saves the day - 'We are thankful, but we are also Very, Very Scared Of This Guy.'

    141. Re:Save the Franchise? by EagleEye101 · · Score: 1

      how many Olympic athletes are children of former Olympic athletes?)

      A lot actually... especially when it comes to running and such. Of course there are times when the parents did not compete because maybe they held no interest and never got into the sport and such, but to even come close to getting to the Olympic level you need to very lucky with your genetics.

    142. Re:Save the Franchise? by Sethus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What really irked me was how Lucas and Lucasarts 'approved' all these expanded universe books and gave them their seal of approval. Then they turn around and just destroyed the whole expanded universe in the prequals and claimed the expanded universe was untrue. I know that makes me sound fanboy, (and I am) but I just have a harder time accepting the Prequals and Canon than the Expanded Universe.

      I know that's pretty backwards, but those stories had so much more depth and better characters to them. I even went back to re-read the Timothy Zahn series just this year, and came to the same conclusion as you.

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    143. Re:Save the Franchise? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      When Greedo shot first that just made Han somewhat less a scoundrel but didn't completely change the meaning of that scene.

      Small nitpick: It's not the Greedo scene that it changed. It's the Millineum Falcon's return to save the day at the end that it severely damaged.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    144. Re:Save the Franchise? by EagleEye101 · · Score: 1

      I saw Episode 1 when I was 12. Besides the awesome lightsaber fight at the end. I found it quite boring. Even now I still can not get through it.

    145. Re:Save the Franchise? by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      they just sent out a million people in planes, and won by sheer numbers.

      Except... Ah... um... Ahem... They lost.

      So apparently the whole "send out millions of guys in inferior fighters to crash into the enemy and die" thing only works in Starcraft. Not in the Star Wars universe, and not in real life either.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    146. Re:Save the Franchise? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Hey, he's old, he's got that rheumatoid arthritis, do you know how cold those throne rooms get at night?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    147. Re:Save the Franchise? by noewun · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think the DVD even made my floor sticky.

      That wasn't the DVD. . .

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    148. Re:Save the Franchise? by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, your (their?) version is so much better. By the way, here's how I remember the switch from kashyyk/wookies to endor/ewoks:

      Lucas caused a plot line problem when he did the first movie. He actually wrote all three up front. But it was obvious that it was too big for one movie, so he split it into three. Before making a new hope, it wasn't obvious that it would be the huge success that it turned out to be. He thought he might only get to make the first of the three movies. And he liked the chewbacca character so much, that he ditched the old copilot character and replaced him with chewie. This caused a plot line problem later with the whole jungle/slave planet/kashyyk thing. From the documentary I was watching, I believe lucas' words were, "so cut them in half and call them ewoks." :-P

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    149. Re:Save the Franchise? by stinkbomb · · Score: 1

      What people ALWAYS seem to forget, is that George Lucas always intended the Star Wars series for a young audience. Lucas doesn't make movies that fanboys will like, he makes movies for CHILDREN.

    150. Re:Save the Franchise? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Well not official updates, just mods replacing the models with higher textured onces, etc. Check out X-Wing Alliance Upgrade.

    151. Re:Save the Franchise? by oliderid · · Score: 1

      Using Greek mythology as the basis of a storyline is as old as rome (litteraly).

      Anyway the star wars manicheism is far from the Greek mythology. It is more related to middle east and the religion of the book IMHO.

      Besides if you like a soap of Greek mythology, battlestar galactica is what you need ;-). Good isn't that good and bad isn't that bad...We are all puppets of the gods...That sounds more like Greek mythology to me.

    152. Re:Save the Franchise? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      To make that entire scene awesome, all they would have to do is redub the dialogue with Anakin being enraged by the deaths of some of the other pilots and going postal, with the implication that the Dark Side is guiding his actions.

      I'd add one thing to that image. Cut away from the battle scene once or twice to Palpatine. He's sitting alone somewhere on Coruscant and gets a really satisfied look on his face as Anakin begins to "go postal". Maybe play the radio chatter from the battle in the background at a really low volume.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    153. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Quest for Glory series was made by Sierra.

    154. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the scenario a bit too simple [...] Don't you feel that we are simply getting older and the star wars franchise isn't for us anymore? Kids seem to enjoy it as much as we did (IMHO).

      I don't think we are getting too old, but Lucas is. When he did A New Hope, Empire and Jedi he had a childlike wonder to him - the characters were more intimate and there was a sense of exploration. The new trilogy is anything but these things - it's about political intrigue, very little exploration and we also spend less time with the characters interacting. Because everything has to be of such epic proportions in the new trilogy the intimacy is completely lost and we can no longer relate to the characters in the same way as we did in the first one.

      As lovely as Natalie Portman is she always seemed like a fish out of water in the Star Wars universe and we don't have any other solid lead characters to hold on to. Hayden Christensen was way too whiny for my taste and he's supposed to turn into Darth frikkin Vader, and we knew from the start he was going to turn. Ewan McGregor's Ben Kenobi is the real tragedy because he should've been made the "Luke" of the new trilogy and not the supporting role he turned out to be.

      Yeah, the old trilogy was - as you put it - simpler, but it was also a lot easier to love. Sure there was political intrigue in the old trilogy too, but they were never the central theme - the characters were. The new trilogy is OK, but that's just not good enough for Star Wars.

    155. Re:Save the Franchise? by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Sweet, this might make me dust the ol game off, thanks!

      And now if Slashdot ever lets me submit this post (19 seconds since my last reply what the hell?)

    156. Re:Save the Franchise? by mblase · · Score: 1

      "Me, too. This was the point at which I realized Hollywood was making a product, not a film."

      There, fixed it for you.

    157. Re:Save the Franchise? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I guess I would have found it to be much more lame if everyone could get to be a Jedi if they just worked really hard.

      Out of curiosity, do you like Batman? Because that's one of the things that I love about Batman -- he's human, and he's not even particularly special as a human, beyond having trained very hard.

      Want to be a Jedi? No talent? Well if you're rich you can buy your way in by getting the best tutors.

      You still wouldn't be as good a Jedi, and it would still take a lot of training and discipline.

      Having the only requirement to being a Jedi be "working hard" would effectively kill the mysticism of it. Why isn't everyone a Jedi?

      I don't know. Why isn't everyone a Kung-Fu Master? Why doesn't everyone at least have some martial arts or self defense training?

      Some of it is skill, and some of that is innate.

      And some of it is that everyone has their own lives, and their own problems, most of which can't be solved with Kung-Fu.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    158. Re:Save the Franchise? by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The worst part is that their own, official stories in the new movies fit less well with the universe created in the original trilogy than much of the Expanded Universe stuff does. Midiclorians? WTF? The stormtroopers are all clones of Boba Fett's dad? It's like really, really bad fan fiction.

      I could name a half-dozen prolific SW writers who could have scripts for the prequels that would have been better than Lucas' in every way. Zahn, Stackpole, and even the much-maligned Kevin J. Anderson would have been good choices, for instance. All three have shown a talent for keeping the "feel" of the original trilogy in new works, and KJA even managed it with stories set way, way back in the past (the great Tales of the Jedi comics)

      Even the ships they came up with for the new trilogy felt wrong, while the expanded universe people have created TONS of new ships, and only rarely have they had that problem. Some of them were even supposed to have been from the Clone Wars time period, and could have been "borrowed" by Lucas for the new movies (Victory-class Star Destroyers, Z-95 Headhunters, etc.)

    159. Re:Save the Franchise? by bar-agent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, the midichlorians really threw the spirituality/mythology themes under the bus.

      I kind of figured that midichlorians were an indicator of Force ability. Like how a magnetic field attracts iron particles, Force ability attracts midichlorians. But the Force can't be scanned, while midichlorians can.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    160. Re:Save the Franchise? by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There should have been way more of Anakin trying to do the right thing, but moving closer to the dark side in the process. It would have made some of the parts of the original trilogy more meaningful, especially where Ben and Yoda implore Luke not to go to Cloud City.

    161. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The coming of age/discovering your potential is a rip from the process of individuation in Jungian psychology, simplified and censored for the general public by Joseph Campbell.

      Lucas was good friends with Campbell. Then Campbell died, and all Lucas's films went to shit.

    162. Re:Save the Franchise? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      X-Wing Alliance was pretty good, and has bunches of mods including graphic updates online.

      Definitely. Tie Fighter may be my #1 space sim but Alliance is #2.

      I've played it a couple of times lately, mostly because I can coax my PC to play it easier than I can force my rig to play Tie Fighter. I think I even tried using the graphic updates at one point.

      Oh well, it's my feeling that the era of LucasArts space sims ended for good some years back and I doubt it will ever make a re-appearance. I'd be happy with Tie Fighter with an up-to-date engine with some upped graphics that installs/runs easily on XP (or Vista).

    163. Re:Save the Franchise? by Fallingcow · · Score: 3, Informative

      He personally edited practically the entire film, if not the entire film.

      My understanding of it is that the first edit was a complete mess, and bombed at a couple of test screenings. A couple other people (one of whom being his wife, IIRC, or I may be thinking of something else) totally re-did the whole thing, including some famous creative editing (the looped Tusken Raider thing), often having to search through various takes to find one that had what they wanted, then take that shot right up to the word "cut".

      There's an amazing SW fan documentary out there that covers all of this, WHILE showing the whole movie in the background, seamlessly splicing in behind-the-scenes shots, long-ish cut sections (including the entire Tosche Station scene) and interviews. It's THE best making-of documentary I've ever seen. Called "Deleted Magic". You can probably find it on some torrent sites. WELL worth a watch.

    164. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between (paraphrasing) 'the ability to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power of the Force' and 'by studying Kung-Fu for 30 years, I have risen to be the champion of the Xichan province! Witness my monkey style!'

      Different orders of magnitude!

    165. Re:Save the Franchise? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      You're right, they did lose, and it is a bad strategy. I was more referring to the battles they did win, not the war as a whole.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    166. Re:Save the Franchise? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      And at least you got to see some Ewoks die.

      Bingo. The Ewoks were designed as cute, cuddly bears in a primitive village, but given that setup the story treated them fairly realistically and didn't shy away from the consequences of their actions. They had clever tactics to use against the AT-STs, and they were shown getting shot, exploded, writhing in painful death throes, and mourning the newly fallen. Jar-Jar was a similarly silly character, but he was never treated seriously -- just a bunch of pratfalls that pulled you out of the rest of the movie.

    167. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I was 8 when I first watched A New hope. I loved it. I watched it again few months ago...And Frankly I found the scenario a bit too simple. But my nephew simply loved it...So the real show for me was watching him :-).

      Peado!

      What does liking peas have to do with anything? ;-)

      Pre-empting your oblivious response; no, that's not the British spelling- "pAEdophile"- either, fuckwit!

    168. Re:Save the Franchise? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      He's no worse than Mark Hamil.

      Bull. Mark Hamill successfully played 'average-joe-turned-hero'. That was one of the ingredients of the original Star Wars' success. The kid in Phantom Menace played a kid whose life was taken over by a rather aggressive form of fate. His heroic contributions to the movie were barely more than accidental. Mark Hamill was an attractive point for Episode 4 and Jake Lloyd was a detractor for Episode 1. You can blame the actor or you can blame the director, either way you slice it, he was worse than Mark Hamill. We're not even talking a neck-and-neck race, here.

      But the Death Star with its magical earth-like gravity generator makes sense?

      Yes, it does, actually. Over-simplification does not a good point make, sorry.

      To kids today the new movies are just as good.... At the end of the day I have to agree with Lucas and say that these are really kids movies and we are simply nostalgic for them.

      That depends on how you look at it. I cannot generalize about what people like in those movies or how many of them there are. But I can tell you that there are defficiencies within the Star Wars prequels that made them inferior to the original trilogy. This isn't about nostalgia, it's about the stories just plain being weaker. Episode 4 made you care about the Rebellion. Episode I told you that Anakin was special because of Mr. Spock's tricorder readings. Episode 5 ended with the Rebellion losing a battle, an emotional loss, and Luke making a small win against the Dark-Side. Episode 2 ended with Yoda magically appearing just in the nick of time with an army that a dead-Jedi purchased, just after sickening us with the worst love story ever made. Episode 6 gave us a suspensful glimpse of Luke briefly turning to the Dark-Side. Episode 3 gave us "NooOOOOoooOOoooOOOoo!"

      The original trilogy, for all its faults, had a measurably good story structure. The prequels, however, weren't given this care. They were, quite arguably, worse than the trilogy. Not just slightly-worse. I mean: hamburger-minus-the-beef worse. None of these movies will ever go down in history as being 'deep'. That doesn't mean they all measure equally against each other. To put it another way, it's not like a club was formed on 05-19-99 whose mission is simply to rid the universe of Star Wars Prequel loving scum.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    169. Re:Save the Franchise? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Ford and an number of the upper level production staff were pushing
      for Han to get offed midway through Jedi. It wasn't an idea that
      was completely foreign to the production team. It was just something
      that Lucas was dead set against.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    170. Re:Save the Franchise? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I so wish I was a villein for Dragon Ball Z. When they take 8 episodes to through their power attack. I just wont sit there and marvel at their method or their power level. I would just take a gun and shoot him.

      Yeah, that never seemed to work out real well when it happened in Dragonball and DBZ... Raditz caught the bullet that was shot at him and threw it back at the guy who fired it and killed him... And Goku was able to dodge bullets since he was like 12 years old...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    171. Re:Save the Franchise? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      And now they have a Force Unleashed game coming out where they amp up the Force powers until it's like frickin' Dragonball Z. All that's missing is Vegeta screaming "HIS POWER LEVELS ARE 9000??!!!"

      ...or 8000 in the original...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    172. Re:Save the Franchise? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      "What know I of getting some? Quarter-inch penis I have." --Yoda

      Judge him by his size, do you? Size matters not!

      When 900 years old you reach, look as good, you will not...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    173. Re:Save the Franchise? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Some of them were even supposed to have been from the Clone Wars time period, and could have been "borrowed" by Lucas for the new movies (Victory-class Star Destroyers, Z-95 Headhunters, etc.)

      Victory-class Star Destroyers and Z-95 Headhunters were both in the old Star Wars games. Lucas Arts even used a lot of the extended universe stuff in the games - in one of the X-Wing files I remember a close flyby of the Wild Karde. With all of the other media stuff being so much better than the official films it's pretty easy to pretend that the films don't exist.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    174. Re:Save the Franchise? by Number14 · · Score: 1

      The furry friends aren't Eworks, they're Wookies. You can still see an echo of this in the final film, because the very word "Ewok" is an anagram for "Wookie" (with a couple letters dropped). No one knows why this happened, but it's a safe bet the Wookies would have been way cooler than the Ewoks were. Popular opinion has it that the merchandising for cute teddy bears was more attractive than that of Wookie action figures, but no one knows for sure.

      I had heard this story before and always heard it said that, in this pre-CGI era, they just didn't have the casting options to get that many people to play wookies, whereas it was much easier to find people who could play the ewoks.

    175. Re:Save the Franchise? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      It would have been totally worth it if he had died of electrocution when he stuck his nose in the power thingy on the pod racer. Especially if lil anakin had cried over his still smouldering corpse.

    176. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eight? i dont see why people think shes hot. so shes asian, big deal... cavil's where its at.

    177. Re:Save the Franchise? by Number14 · · Score: 1

      Yup. Luke went from Zen Master to Loser. Thank you, I had forgotten that change, but I totally agree that it is the worst one in the remakes.

    178. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And second, they completely change the dynamic of who gets to be a Jedi. It's official, now -- it's nature, not nurture.

      I hear people complaining that TPM was the movie that settled that dispute, but it really wasn't. It was settled from the beginning of the story that it was all about nature. Training was necessary to let your reach your full potential, but you needed to be born with the ability.

      From ANH, Luke is given his father's lightsaber, so even before we find out Vader is Luke's father, we know his father was a Jedi. Obi-Wan tells Luke that the Force runs strong in his family implying that there's something different in him from other people. After they meet Han, who is incredibly intelligent and skilled, no attempt is made to train him. Before Luke was fully trained by Obi-Wan (in fact, he had only a few days with him), he is able to use the Force to target the Death Star's exhaust ports, and Darth Vader has trouble targeting him because "the force is strong with this one" but it wasn't with any of the others.

      In TESB, after Luke runs off from Dagobah to save his friends, Obi-Wan comments to Yoda that hope is completely gone if Luke is lost. Yoda reminds him that "no, there is another." We don't know it's Luke's sister yet, but we know that it's not about picking any random guy off the street and sending him to Yoda. There's saying that there's only one other person who could possibly be trained to fight Vader and the Emperor.

      In ROTJ, Luke tells Leia that after he turns himself in, if he doesn't return, everything will fall upon her. She replies by saying, "you have a power I don't understand, that I could never have" and Luke, again, says that "the force is strong in my family. My father has it. I have it. My sister has it." She had never been trained in anything Jedi related, but she "has it" anyway, because she is his sister.

      There was never a question that being a Jedi was something only a small group of elite individuals could achieve. And that the ability was a hereditary one.

    179. Re:Save the Franchise? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Couldn't pull it off? I can't imagine that it would be easier to assemble an army of "small actors" for Ewoks than it would be to get to get some college baseketball players (tall, thin) to play Wookies.

    180. Re:Save the Franchise? by Number14 · · Score: 1

      The Force fights were awful. No, I don't mean the lightsaber fights- those were kickass. But any time two people fought each other using just the Force it turned into Telekinesis! Block! Telekinesis back! Block! Telekinesis again!

      Maybe I've seen the RPGs too much with their wide variety of force powers, but I was really, really hoping that when Yoda and Dooku had their force battle it was going to be epic. (Note, this was also my exact reaction to the Gandalf/Saruman battle in the movie Fellowship of the Ring.) Instead, in both cases, it was a bunch of telekinesis.

    181. Re:Save the Franchise? by wezeldog · · Score: 1
      I don't think he could have done Kashyyyk in Return.

      Lucas' original concept of the battle featured hundreds of Wookiees. Due to costs, this idea was scrapped and replaced by a battle featuring relatively few diminutive Ewoks. A large-scale battle with hundreds of characters was eventually realized in The Phantom Menace. The Battle of Kashyyyk in Revenge of the Sith finally brings this concept to the screen.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kashyyyk

    182. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ACTUALLY, in KoToR you use vibroswords and personal shields to counter light sabers. Apparently between then and phantom menace, everyone conveniently "forgot" that those technologies existed. I can't speak for the doors, though.

    183. Re:Save the Franchise? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      six? i dont see why people think shes hot. so shes blonde, big deal... boomer's where its at.

      I actually thought six was far hotter in the episode where she appears to Gaius without any of her makeup, no perm (long, straight hair in a ponytail), and sweatclothes instead of her skanky gear.

    184. Re:Save the Franchise? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Gotta teach kids that war is family friendly fun somehow.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    185. Re:Save the Franchise? by Mex · · Score: 1

      The midichlorians absolutely destroyed my admiration for the series. I haven't bought anything Star Wars related since 1999, and I don't plan to.

      It just put the whole franchise on the level of a Flash Gordon film or something.

    186. Re:Save the Franchise? by DocHoncho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Quest for Glory series was Sierra.

      Perhaps you're thinking of Monkey Island?

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    187. Re:Save the Franchise? by johnny0099 · · Score: 1

      Funniest sh*t I read in a week. Thanks.

      --
      Get your dogma outta my yard!
    188. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was so much better back then. Remember the Star Wars Christmas Special? Man, that shit was the bomb!

    189. Re:Save the Franchise? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      After he mercilessly butchers the Sand People I had a hard time believing him to be a nice guy just trying to do good. At that point he was already acting like a sociopath.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    190. Re:Save the Franchise? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      The Ewoks were also strong enough to shoot twigs into stormtrooper armor. Or maybe stormtrooper armor is just made of styrofoam.
      The Ewoks should have been Wookies. It would have been a better movie in my opinion.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    191. Re:Save the Franchise? by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      no shit. most of the eu back stories are a million times better.

      --
      ...
    192. Re:Save the Franchise? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Obi-Wan tells Luke that the Force runs strong in his family implying that there's something different in him from other people.

      Good point.

      After they meet Han, who is incredibly intelligent and skilled, no attempt is made to train him.

      Given Han is not particularly interested or trustworthy, that makes sense.

      Darth Vader has trouble targeting him because "the force is strong with this one" but it wasn't with any of the others.

      Well, he has been training a bit, at that point.

      It could also imply -- both this, and the previous statement -- that the force tends to behave as a living entity, picking favorites.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    193. Re:Save the Franchise? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      There are some very nice bootlegs of the original versions transferred off of laser disc. Including full menu and chapter support on the DVD.

      Don't tell George!

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    194. Re:Save the Franchise? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Given that the Jedi order in the prequels act like a bunch of elitist, self righteous, overblown assholes - the aristocracy angle works better for those movies.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    195. Re:Save the Franchise? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I found the end light saber battle ruined by the unexplained purple force field crap that separates Obi Wan from Qui Gon. It's like some obstacle you would encounter in a bad video game. The only point was so we could see Obi Wan scream as his master gets killed and he can't do anything to help despite his Jediness.
      Laaaaammmmme.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    196. Re:Save the Franchise? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Mmmmmmm doped out Leia hanging for dear life on Chewie's arm while belting out lyrics to the Star Wars theme.
      What about Itchy's virtual porn and his humping noises? Jefferson Starship rocks out! Thirty minutes straight of Wookies grunting at each other! Bea Arthur cuddling up with cantina monsters and singing "It's good night my friend but not goodbye my friend".
      The Star Wars Holiday Special is like something from an alternate universe. The surreal sense that overcomes you when watching it is amazing.
      Horrible? Yes.
      Fascinating? Well I think so.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    197. Re:Save the Franchise? by haggus71 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I could hear the Fonz revving up for the shark tank when Lucas released the "improved" versions of the first movies. Everything since has just been another nail in the coffin. At least WB got smart and restarted Batman with quality acting and directing after the "nipple suit" movies.

    198. Re:Save the Franchise? by Cratylus_DS · · Score: 1

      Lucas is a master at coming up with stories, he just isn't great at actually writing them. He's given us Star Wars, Indiana Jones, and Willow.

      Lucas's storywrangling gave us the worst of the Indy movies.

    199. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only read one or two of the YJK books (mostly since they were 100 pages long and cost as much as a 300-400 page novel). But I seem to remember reading along those lines that in book 10 or so Jacen turned to the Dark Side after some conflict regarding Tenel Ka (The daughter of the Hapan Prince and the Princess chick from Dathomir). I don't remember hearing what came of it however.

    200. Re:Save the Franchise? by manly_15 · · Score: 1

      I recently played through the original Dark Forces in Dosbox, having only played Dark Forces 2 and a bit of Jedi Academy. It was amazing how addicting the game was, how well the missions were structured, and how even with the ancient graphics it drew me in. The only issue I had was a few places where the rendering engine could "hide" halls and doors on specific angles due to the size of the pixels.

      The sparkle is gone, and it's very sad.

    201. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, no that was never the case. In the Star Wars universe you were either Force Sensitive or not. There was never any of this, if I try really hard then even I can use the Force. Thats shown to be the case in all Expanded Universe material, including the original Marvel comics. Its not a part of the galaxy that was introduced 10 years ago.

      Obi-wan offers to teach Han about the Force, not to teach him to use it.

    202. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just reminded me of a detail from Ep IV: The force truly worked in mysterious ways since it was only Han's changing his mind about running off to pay back Jabba that led to Luke surviving long enough to blow up the death star. If he hadn't showed up just then Vader would have taken his shot, best case luke would have fired before being blown up, and maybe destroyed the death star at the expense of himself (and possibly vader, neither of which would have dramatically affected either the Empire or Rebel's struggle compared to pre-Death Star.)

    203. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that not believable? He was the second (or third?) most powerful force user throughout all the movies. If Anakin can do all the stupid jump attack shit, why the hell can't Yoda? The only reason Luke never does that is because of limited special effects techniques at the time of filming.

    204. Re:Save the Franchise? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Holy shit dude! That would have been a seriously AWESOME film. It would have catapulted Star Wars into the history records for centuries to come. Why oh why did they cut off their own testicles? :(

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    205. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same goes for Wall-E I think.

    206. Re:Save the Franchise? by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      But they didn't do that at the beginning, when they were winning.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    207. Re:Save the Franchise? by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like really, really bad fan fiction.

      Lucas is his own biggest fan. So the "like" is redundant.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    208. Re:Save the Franchise? by Fierythrasher · · Score: 1

      actually this has been said by Lucas himself MANY times. His original script for Star Wars had a big battle on Kashyyyk with primitive Wookiees defeating the empire. But since he couldn't do that he kept in Chewbacca and made him an engineer/co-pilot. He felt when he got to Jedi that Wookiees were too sophisticated with electronics to make the point of primitive vs. technological so he created Ewoks. Wookiees are tall, Ewoks are short. Wookiees have long fur, Ewoks have short fur. And viola, a muppet was born.

    209. Re:Save the Franchise? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I think that would be even more heavy-handed than what Lucas has done with the films.

    210. Re:Save the Franchise? by Glothar · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, do you like Batman?

      Batman isn't bad.

      Because that's one of the things that I love about Batman -- he's human, and he's not even particularly special as a human, beyond having trained very hard.

      Well, it's more than that. Batman's superpower has always been "being rich". In the end, all of his abilities came back to that. As someone who grew up in the lower middle class, I guess that just doesn't thrill me. Sure, it was a rich guy who (for once) was interested in doing more than just being selfish and voting Republican, but there really just wasn't much there for me to find inspiring. It wasn't even that he worked really hard. He had the money to buy the toys that made the difference between "hard-working dead guy" and "superhero".

      You still wouldn't be as good a Jedi, and it would still take a lot of training and discipline.

      That's not so far from the way it is, just with a much lower ceiling than you'd probably like. The implication from the very start was that the Force was everywhere and in everything and everyone had it to some small degree, but that there were special people who were able to control it enough to get stuff done.

      See also: "The Force is strong in your family." (Which, in retrospect, was an utter lie.)

      Everyone else around Luke accepted his abilities and there was even some implied envy, though of the "you have powers I could never have" sort of way.

      I don't know. Why isn't everyone a Kung-Fu Master?

      Because the benefits of being a Kung-Fu Master wouldn't make much of a difference in people's lives. The abilities of the Jedi would. The two aren't really comparable. Being (strongly) Force sensitive was always treated more like being a prodigy. No matter how much you'd like to be one, you either are or you aren't. You can train all you like and you might actually get really good, but you'll never really reach prodigy-level.

      I'm not really saying your foolish or wrong, I was just pointing out that even during Episode IV, it was strongly implied that using the Force wasn't something anyone could do, even with oodles of training.

    211. Re:Save the Franchise? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Star Wars doesn't even know what a vibrosword actually is.

      It's a real technology akin to a electric turkey slicer on steriods. The principle is you have a little device that causes the blade to vibrate back and forth a miniscule amount but at incredibile speeds. More akin to a hum than a reciprocation.

      The theory is that this will effectively induce a slicing motion back and forth at a level large enough to do normal cutting, i.e. separation of molecules, and the vibration is such a high speed it should slice through flesh and so on like butter.

      Other than that, the vibrosword is nothing special, and would be sliced in half just like a "regular" sword.

      If they're going to technobabble something, they really shouldn't pick the name of something that's already defined.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    212. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jar-jar was cool.

    213. Re:Save the Franchise? by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      It wasn't Luke himself who fell completely to the dark side, but a clone, called Luuke (note 2 "u"s).

      He did break the Jedi code again, when he killed Lumiya in cold blood, in the mistaken assumption she killed his wife, Mara. IT was actually Jacen Solo, (son of Leia and Han, who turned to the dark side and became Darth Caedus), who killed his wife.

      When Luke finds out the truth, he knows that Caedus must be killed. Caedus has become very powerful, and only Luke has the necessary skills to possibly defeat and destroy him.

      However, he is unable to do it himself, because the of the way he killed Lumiya would cause him to turn to the dark side himself if he killed Jacen/Caedus.

      So he trains and assists Jaina Solo (Jacen's twin sister) to do the deed, with Boba Fett providing the training, as Boba felt that Jedi skills alone will not defeat Ceadus, as a single lapse will result in her death at the hands of her twin brother. Boba Fett, trained her to be a Jedi Knight who fought with the power and focus of a Jedi, and the tenacity and brutality of a Mandalorian warrior.

      Luke provided assistance from afar using mind tricks, and illusions.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    214. Re:Save the Franchise? by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that he was able to pull it off because, y'know, of all those midichlorians he has.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    215. Re:Save the Franchise? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Did we ever actually see a storm trooper get killed by an ewok arrow? The only stormtroopers seen getting injured were with rocks, the arrows just annoyed them.

      They were supposed to be wookies, but it's easier to find midgets in Hollywood than 7 foot tall guys.

    216. Re:Save the Franchise? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I don't think he could have done Kashyyyk in Return.

      So drop Kashyyyk then, if it was even established at the time that the planet had miles high trees. The Empire liked using Wookies as slaves, and had built a huge shield generator on Endor. Between that and the huge space station they were constructing in orbit, they would have needed plenty of labor.

    217. Re:Save the Franchise? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      He had the money to buy the toys that made the difference between "hard-working dead guy" and "superhero".

      True, money was a necessity.

      However, he also had to be more hardworking and skilled than the average rich dead guy -- and, really, anyone could go into the hills in Japan (or wherever) and train for a few years. And he had to be smart -- remember the cell phone trick? Yes, he paid some guy to come up with the basic idea, but he did have to be familiar with it himself.

      Because the benefits of being a Kung-Fu Master wouldn't make much of a difference in people's lives. The abilities of the Jedi would.

      Not really -- most of the abilities are combat-oriented. The remaining are:

        - Long-term prescience (which is unreliable and easily clouded, and they'd have been better off if they had a better understanding of politics and current events)

        - Jedi mind-tricks -- some species have a natural immunity to this, and it only affects the "weak-minded" -- I imagine you'd see people working to develop stronger minds if mind-tricking was common.

      I think that actually would tend to go against my earlier point, though.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    218. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In an interview I saw with Lucas, he explained that he couldn't account for how Chewbacca was a technology savvy starship pilot, flying around with Han Solo, when the rest of the wookies were a primitive species with no technology. That is why he transformed them into ewoks. I don't think it makes much sense, considering that Han Solo could have rescued him and taught him how to use technology and fly the Falcon, but that's what he said. I think he wanted the ewoks to be an undiscovered species that nobody knew about.
      -Matt

    219. Re:Save the Franchise? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      Yeah remember some of that from the psy class I took. The teacher had us go through our favorite movies and analyze them. The basic archtypes and all of that. It's amazing that nearly all the best movies dovetail almost perfectly into what was taught in the clase.

    220. Re:Save the Franchise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X-Wing and Tie Fighter for the PC were amazing games and I've never played anything like them since. A game that is faithful to those originals on current generation PCs or consoles would be phenomenal.

  3. Thanks, George by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we can all thank him for this one. The cartoon, as I gather, did its job well. Potential for a movie in the same spirit certainly existed.

    Then Lucas came in and axed Grievous and the art direction.

  4. editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While sites like AintItCool.com responded, but by then it was just a little too late.

    What? Come on, editors.

  5. If in doubt, read this article! by ShieldVV0lf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was QUITE surprised at the scheming behind the scenes when I read this article some time back. They *know* what they have and aren't holding back. It is interesting just how little they try to hide it and how no one really cares how much they are milking the franchise.

    Some odd FORCE really drives the market. I have a collection with items dating as recent as 1981, valued between $5000 and $7500. The original prices for the items summed to no more than $670!

    1. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by radish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some odd FORCE really drives the market. I have a collection with items dating as recent as 1981, valued between $5000 and $7500. The original prices for the items summed to no more than $670!

      Should have bought stock. Had you put that same $670 in a DJIA tracker back in '81 you'd have $8262 right now. Had you had amazing foresight and put it in Apple stock, you'd have almost $41,000!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Retric · · Score: 1

      Apple did well but go with Dell on feb 2, 1990 to now = 670$ * 465 = 311,000$.

    3. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Had you had amazing foresight and put it in Apple stock, you'd have almost $41,000!

      The amazing part wouldn't have been buying AAPL stock in 1981. The amazing part would be not selling it off during any of the low points of the following 25 years.

    4. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Should have bought stock. Had you put that same $670 in a DJIA tracker back in '81 you'd have $8262 right now. Had you had amazing foresight and put it in Apple stock, you'd have almost $41,000!

      You've got to be kidding. If this person bought Star Wars toys in 1981 instead of stock, that shows he was probably about 10 years old, maybe less. How many 10-year-olds do you know who care about buying stock? What an inane comment. I've got some Transformers packed in a box from the mid-80s that are probably worth a decent chuck of change on Ebay now, which I got when I was about 10. Are you going to tell me I should have had enough foresight to buy stock instead? I probably didn't even know what stock was at the time, nor would I have been interested had I had the choice between that and a toy.

    5. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      That doesn't really mean that at all. I'm 22 and half of my latest non-important-item-or-food purchases were toys.

    6. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by SnowDog74 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incorrect. If you purchased $670 worth of AAPL at its closing price on Jan 1, 1981, you would today have 1512 shares (three 2:1 splits) and at a price of $180 (which it hit yesterday) you would have $272,160... a 40,520% return.

      Had you purchased $670 worth of Dell at close on January 1, 1990, at 6 cents a share, you would have 11,166 shares. Since they had one 3:2 split and six 2:1 splits since then, you would today have 1,071,936 shares, or a market value of $26,798,400.

      Of course there is equal likelihood that none of you would have held either of these investments that long since the pressure to avoid Ben Graham's long term value investing principles was already huge in the 1980s, and even more so in today's age of mobile trading platforms for the millions of ADHD fools who are quickly and repeatedly deprived of their money.

      Also, in 1981 Apple was still hugely popular. In 1990, Dell was a rinkydink outfit whose market value would have made them unattractive to most investors who tend to buy already overvalued stocks rather than seeking out undervalued stocks and hanging on to them for long periods of time (e.g. 20 years). The greater likelihood is that none of us would have thought of purchasing Dell in 1990, but many of us might have considered an investment in Apple in 1981.

      Dell stayed at under a dollar a share for seven years... even those few who might have thought to purchase it might very well have gotten impatient and sold it.

      Apple would have hit some speedbumps and people would have sold LONG before anyone even conceived it possible for Apple to make a comeback... Michael Dell himself proposed in 1997 that were he to run the company, he would liquidate Apple's assets.

      Go figure.

    7. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying there's anything wrong with buying toys, no matter what your age. My point is that it's pretty lame to say that someone could have bought stock when they were 7 years old and would now have much more money than if they had bought toys. Any idiot know that, especially if you happen to pick the right stocks, but small children aren't interested in stock or financial matters of any kind. Given the demographics of typical Slashdot readership, while there might be a chance this person was in his 20s back in 1981, it's pretty doubtful. Most people here are in their 20s or 30s right now. I think it's a pretty safe assumption this person was a child when he got all these early Star Wars toys. Telling him he should have bought stock is just obnoxious.

    8. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 1

      I can only think of one.

    9. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by SadButTrue · · Score: 1

      No, the prices from something like yahoo don't work that way. Dell never traded at $.06, the jan 1 1990 close was in fact $5.63. The price you are looking at is both split and dividend adjusted. That is how the keep the graphs so continuous, else you would see gaps down in price on split dates.

      this is the price stream if you care:
      Date Open High Low Close Volume Adj Close*

      5-Jan-90 5.38 5.63 5.38 5.50 1,382,400 0.06
      4-Jan-90 5.63 5.63 5.38 5.38 3,225,600 0.06
      3-Jan-90 5.63 5.63 5.50 5.50 1,651,200 0.06
      2-Jan-90 5.75 5.75 5.38 5.63 2,284,800 0.06

      --
      grape - the GNU free, open source rape
    10. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You guys need to underline your point with the fact that had he done that he also wouldn't have the hassle of storing all that crap.

    11. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wealth! A Jedi craves not these things.

    12. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Trogre · · Score: 1

      ... and no cool Star Wars toys.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    13. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Hence Buy low and Sell high. You could make even more money if you sold it three times in those 25 years and bought it back twice more on or just coming off of the lows.

    14. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      buy on bad news, so long as you think it won't kill the company.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    15. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't know any Star Wars nerds.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    16. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Also also underline the point that he wouldn't have had the enjoyment of possessing memorabilia from a movie he really loves.

    17. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by vistic · · Score: 1

      Yeah investing is really easy when you're omniscient.

    18. Re:If in doubt, read this article! by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be omniscient to see the trends. You just need a lot of free time to tracks the markets. Like a full time jobs worth of free time.

  6. And this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the guy who's going to save Indiana Jones.

  7. The FUCK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See title.

    I know that Chewbacca and the Ewoks were always there for children, but at least the main story also had very adult parts. Now it's just children's toss, fuck that.

  8. Thank you for doing this by iampiti · · Score: 1

    ..now I have absolutely no doubt this film is not worth my time and money. I will watch something else instead

    1. Re:Thank you for doing this by Wiarumas · · Score: 1

      I can't believe the thought even crossed your mind. I thought Episodes I through III were subpar compared to the original trilogy. I still managed to watch and somewhat enjoy them despite my ill feelings of mediocrity. This one looks like its just icing on the cake for the absolute desecration of the Star Wars universe.

      --
      I will bend like a reed in the wind.
  9. Does taking down reviews ever help? by damburger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They produced a crappy film once again. Now they are trying to sculpt the reaction to it on the Internet. Do they not realise it is futile? For a mainstream film, it *might* make a dent on the number of people who stay away - but for a very nerdy sci-fi franchise its practically suicide. I haven't even read any reviews yet but I am already drawing the conclusion its a dire film based on the fact they are attempting a cover up. The disconnect between the reality of online culture and the actions of people trying to sell things to the Internet using public seems to be growing, not shrinking as you would expect it to do with more young people entering the workforce with direct experience of the culture.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by vidarh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I made the conclusion that it was shit the moment I saw the first trailers. The animation just annoys me - no story line could have saved it for me with that animation style. I'm pretty, shall we say, "flexible" about the quality I'll tolerate and still go see a movie, but this is just too far. MAYBE I'll watch it when it shows up on one of the movie channels I subscribe to, but I'm not sure I can be bothered even with that.

    2. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by ayjay29 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>Now they are trying to sculpt the reaction to it on the Internet. Do they not realise it is futile?

      Well it's one sure way to prevent people downloading it from BitTorrent.

      Worked for the "Star Wars Holiday Special" right?

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    3. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      A few seconds into the first commercial I saw, I could only think "Oh my god. What kind of pathetic monstrosity are we in for?"

      I pretty much placed it along with the barbie moves my 10 year old cousins watch...

      *shudder*

      If you don't know - that's where they send the actors and authors who can't get the quality of a soap opera, even if they are given months instead of a day.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    4. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I want to know exactly HOW he can even force them to be taken down. I guess Fox or Lucasfilm could bar reviewers from future screenings if they refuse, but it's not like he can take away their first amendment rights to say "Your movie sucked ass." Unless they signed some kind of non-disclosure agreement, they should tell Lucas to go fuck himself. No, on second thought, they should tell him "Youssa go fuck yourself."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The idea of doing a Star Wars animated feature was just a stupid idea in the first place. You don't follow up 6 live action serious movies with a goofy animated film. I think someone at Lucasfilm saw the success of the "Clone Wars" Cartoon Network serials and got more than a little cocky. This thing had "made for TV" written all over it from the get-go.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Tridus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its Warner AFAIK, and yeah, they can bar them from future screenings. If your job is movie reviews, being barred from screenings of the largest studio in the market is a pretty big deal.

      Its just like with game reviews: ones that come out first get more hits then the later ones. Being last all the time is bad for your career.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    7. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems to me that if you're a reviewer, your reputation for independence is more important than early access to films. Who cares if you review a movie early, if that review is nothing but a mouthpiece for Lucasfilm marketing?

      Every reviewer with integrity should publish what they want, when they want. If the entire industry bars them from reviewing films until they're open, then people will learn not to see films on opening day. I don't think the industry wants that.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by mpe · · Score: 1

      I haven't even read any reviews yet but I am already drawing the conclusion its a dire film based on the fact they are attempting a cover up.

      Trying to block reviews is probably more harmful to the movie than the worst possible review. Even a highly critical review might make someone curious to see if it really is that bad.

      The disconnect between the reality of online culture and the actions of people trying to sell things to the Internet using public seems to be growing, not shrinking as you would expect it to do with more young people entering the workforce with direct experience of the culture.

      Most likely these people are not the ones making the decisions...

    9. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps thats the case in magical pixie land, but here in the real world people care about getting the news first rather than about getting it right, and more about style than integrity. Roughly speaking, the general public approaches journalism the same way a sugar-starved 4 year old approaches nutrition.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    10. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Your reputation for independence comes from posting truthful reviews, rather then shills. You can do that on Friday just as well as you can do it today.

      Besides, I'm not sure how you can say "people with integrity should break an agreement made in good faith to post a review two days early." Usually integrity requires that you live up to what you agreed to do.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    11. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I pretty much placed it along with the barbie moves my 10 year old cousins watch...

      You should really wait until your cousins are 18 before letting them watch your doll-fettish pr0n collection.

    12. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      For what it is worth, I thought the trailer looked fun. Then again, Episode 1 has one of the best trailers of all time and that movie was truly awful.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    13. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aintitcool.com was funny - they announced they had to take the review down, and in the announcement said "Oh PS. Here's the review anyway" :)

    14. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's not clear that they ever agreed to that.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by malelder · · Score: 1

      It was made for TV from the get-go.

      According to the Lucas panel at Comic-Con this year, Lucas saw what they were doing and basically said "Make it a movie". After the movie, they have 22 30 minute episodes waiting to play every Friday night to continue the story.

      The reviews bug me a bit, because what they showed at the Con was really good. I went in thinking "well, I'll watch it because it's Star Wars" and left feeling really excited about seeing it. Guess I'll find out this weekend (:

      --


      Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
    16. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Tridus · · Score: 2, Informative

      "When I went to see THE CLONE WARS in Los Angeles, I was told there was an embargo on reviews until the day of release."

      From one of the summary's linked articles. So at least some people clearly did. The taken down articles did too. The ones that are still up are a mixed bag, but they weren't under an embargo (MSNBC's is negative, and the above embargoed one is positive, so its not just banning negative reviews).

      Why they did it that way is a mystery, but they're completely within the rights to say "we'll give you an advance screening if you don't post your review until Friday." They could just as easily say "we don't trust you, so you can buy a ticket on opening night and then review it later."

      Really, the whole thing is pretty routine. Its only turned into a big deal because... well, I'm not sure. Maybe out of a sentiment of sticking it to The Man®. But its not a free speech issue, and its not a reviewer integrity issue. There's nothing anywhere here that says "its embargoed unless its positive."

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    17. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      even if I had mod points, I couldn't give you a funny for that one.

      Oh well, AC anyway. damn shame.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    18. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by krazytekn0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The first trailer I saw it reminded me of those barbie movies they market to 7-10 year old girls. "ooooh look it's the Jedi of Clones forest!!"

      --
      Not all life is cyber. Extra Income
    19. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by brasscount · · Score: 1
      Agreed. It looks and feels to me like the CG stuff that is being pushed as "Direct to DVD" "Keep the kids entertained in the car, buy a $5 movie" animagarbage, like "Peter Cottontail: the movie".

      However, my 3 year old loves the clone wars, and Lego Star Wars has made him into a total fan-boy. So, we'll go see it. He's 3. Easy to please. I will enjoy watching him enjoy it.

      I remember going to see the first one with my Dad at age 5, we walked out of the theatre, then went right back in and saw it again. Greatest movie, ever. Now, its sort of humdrum, and it doesn't keep my kid's attention. The newer stuff is flashier, and does a better job of keeping the child's attention. Unfortunately it sacrifices the mystic appeal that made me hope, dream and wonder as a child.

      --
      Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: without Availability the other two are assured, as is Bankruptcy.
    20. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by lubricated · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being told there's an embargo is different from agreeing to shutup.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    21. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by DrOct · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was a stupid idea, but it looks like it may have been bad execution. They really should have gotten Tartakovsky (he also did Samurai Jack) back to do it. The Clone Wars serials on Cartoon Network were a lot of fun, and more of that would have been GREAT as a full movie.

    22. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that if you're a reviewer, your reputation for independence is more important than early access to films. Who cares if you review a movie early, if that review is nothing but a mouthpiece for Lucasfilm marketing?

      Every reviewer with integrity should publish what they want, when they want. If the entire industry bars them from reviewing films until they're open, then people will learn not to see films on opening day. I don't think the industry wants that.

      In theory, you are correct. The integrity of the reviewer is their main selling point, so they must protect it at all cost, because people are reading this reviewer's column for their judgement, not to get advertised to by some media company dickhead who wouldn't know a good movie from a hole in the ground. Content is what keeps people coming back for more right? And the advertising is only there to keep money coming in for production costs..

      The reality however, is that the advertisers have the power, not the reviewer. Especially when it comes to huge multinational corporations and media empires. Fox could effectively create, produce and advertise something in house, and few would notice that no external coverage was around. So the days of a critic with any integrity are long gone. The fact that a bad review can be pulled like this and others proves it beyond any real doubt.

      Bloggers and forums still have some integrity left, but even they are being polluted by astroturfers and sponsored blogs.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    23. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      For a mainstream film, it *might* make a dent on the number of people who stay away - but for a very nerdy sci-fi franchise its practically suicide.

      My friend's 12 year old son doesn't give a damn about internet reviews. He starts babbling about it whenever he sees an ad or a poster. No matter what, he's going to be there on opening weekend to see it. There's countless kids who hold the same view, and parents who will be dragged-along to see it.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    24. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they go in and sign an NDA saying they won't print a review until the movie is released? Or did someone just say "Please don't print a review until the movie is released"? Was this said loudly and clearly before the showing, or did it get passed around informally (or perhaps drowned out by the noise of the crowd as someone tries to get everyone's attention)?

    25. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      In businesses like this, it is more important to be first than it is to be best

    26. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      ANIMATION? The last 3 films were ANIMATED CGI with some blue screen humans placed in them to sucker you people. I can spot CGI, the muppets were less jarring!

      Who really cares-- if it was a good film nobody would care; those who complain would still probably wait hours in line to get the special edition DVD.

      Its not the animation that makes it suck.

      People identify better with toons than human characters; if they are worth identifying with (and properly abstracted.) Toons require a leap but these pseudo real CGI things jump between the real and the UNCANNY VALLEY.
      Does it condition the public to be worse at discerning the real from the fake?

    27. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Sun+Chi · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there an article a few weeks back about how PR departments mostly cared about burying bad early reviews if the movie really stank? Otherwise, early reviews were countered by good word-of-mouth from people who saw the movie and good first-weekend reviews in papers.

      Sounds like this really is a stinker if they are trying this hard. I'm trying to find this article now, I'll post if I find it...

    28. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      "As a reviewer, my reputation is valueable, but so is my ability to view screenings.

      Therefore, I shall not be publishing a review of Clone Wars. You may draw your own conclusion from this."

    29. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Seems to me that if you're a reviewer, your reputation for independence is more important than early access to films."

      A reputation for independence with no review sells exactly zero advertisements. A LucasArts shill with a review before anyone else sells lots.

      Reputation counts for virtually nothing on the Internet.

    30. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I saw a preview showing so I guess I'm supposed to be "embargoed" on writing a review but here's mine anyway:

      "My five year old daughter liked it. It wasn't too scary for her and the jokes the robot troopers made were not over her head. They made her laugh out loud. She loved the funny robots making mistakes and falling down. Plus she thought Jabba's son was both cute AND gross at the same time! He made a burrrp! Ewwww! She didn't really understand why Jabba's uncle talked in such a silly accent or why he had a feather in his head but he was pink so she thought that was pretty cool."

      There you have it.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    31. Re:Does taking down reviews ever help? by ildon · · Score: 1

      It's a kid's movie. As in 6-12. They will ask their mom if they can see it because it's Star Wars, and their moms will only read reviews to check if it's too violent or contains swearing. Not to see if it actually has a plot or well written dialog.

  10. Streisand by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Lucas really wants those bad reviews out there front and center, he's doing a bang up job of ensuring that.

    1. Re:Streisand by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Problem is that the trailer is already out. Shouldn't need to read a review to know that it look pretty terrible. I actually want to see it because I know how bad it is, but I'm certainly not willing to go to a theater on opening weekend. I'll wait a week or two until it hits the $2 place down the road. (Okay, it'll probably be high-buck for a month or so)

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    2. Re:Streisand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not the reviews you are looking for....

    3. Re:Streisand by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you strike down these reviews, they will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

  11. the clone wars tv series was awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was excited they were making more clone wars... until I saw they changed the animation style, which had me worried.

    Now I see bad reviews and an attempt by lucasfilm to suppress them. I think I'll skip this one.

    It's a shame really. Clone Wars vol II was absolutely brilliant.

  12. Franchise by Exanon · · Score: 1

    I don't think the franchise is going down the drain just because of the movies. I mean, is there someone out there who can say how many Star Wars games actually got ABOVE average scores?

    Oh and to be on topic: Streisand Effect.

    1. Re:Franchise by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

      TIE Fighter - first of the top fifty games of all time for PC Gamer 1997. Computer Gaming World's Hall of Fame. Gamespot's greatest games of all time list.

      Knights of the Old Republic - Game Developers Choice Awards' game of the year, BAFTA Games Awards' best Xbox game of the year, and Interactive Achievement Awards for best console RPG and best computer RPG. And ... game of the year from many sources including IGN, GameSpot, Computer Gaming World, PC Gamer, GMR Magazine, The Game Developers Choice Awards, Xbox Magazine, and G4. Interactive Achievement Awards awarded it for Best Story and Best Character Development. IGN gave KotOR additional awards in Best Sound (Xbox category), Best Story (PC category), Xbox RPG Game of the Year 2003, PC RPG Game of the Year 2003, Xbox Game of the Year 2003, PC Game of the Year 2003, and Overall Game of the Year 2003 across all platforms. In 2007, IGN listed it at #27 on its list of the Top 100 Games of All-Time.

      Knights of the Old Republic II - The Sith Lords has garnered over thirty-five "Game of the Year" awards. The game received high marks from several reviewers: 8.5/10 from Gamespot, 4.5/5 from Gamespy and 9.3/10 from IGN. Based on 30 professional reviews, Metacritic gave the game an average rating of 85 out of 100.

      Republic Commando - has 4/5 stars from GameSpy and 87/100 from Gamespot.

      Lego Star Wars, Complete - The feedback from the game was generally positive, though it was not considered a major improvement on the previous two games. Okay, so not so good, but decent scores and the series as a whole is supposed to be good.

      Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy - Not going to detail this one, but it has scores in the low to mid 80's on a scale of 100.

      Now I've enjoyed each game I've played from them so I have no gripes and I'm really looking forward to playing the MMO that is on the horizon. If you're complaining that they're not getting the same super inflated scores as other titles then ... well, you know how artificial those scores all.

      In other words, after experiencing some of the games, books, and movies I think the games are the best part.

    2. Re:Franchise by Exanon · · Score: 1

      Yup, those are all great games. You are totally right. I guess the shitty ones stick in my memory longer.

    3. Re:Franchise by filterban · · Score: 1
      I mean, is there someone out there who can say how many Star Wars games actually got ABOVE average scores?

      I can list several off the top of my head that all received very favorable reviews:
      1. Star Wars (Original Arcade Game - vector graphics)
      2. Super Star Wars (SNES)
      3. Super Empire Strikes Back (SNES)
      4. Super Return of the Jedi (SNES)
      5. X-Wing (PC)
      6. TIE Fighter (PC)
      7. Dark Forces (PC)
      8. Dark Forces II (PC)
      9. Rogue Squadron (N64)
      10. Rogue Leader (Rogue Squadron II, GameCube)
      11. Rogue Squadron III - Rebel Strike (GameCube)
      12. Star Wars: Battlefront (PS2, Xbox)

      And those are just the ones I can name off the top of my head.

      Honestly, the Star Wars video games, as a whole, are far better than almost any other movie-to-game translation. The original arcade game was revolutionary and I still enjoy playing it. Rogue Leader was hailed as far and away the best GameCube launch title and stole the show at E3 2001. X-Wing and TIE Fighter are also two of the best PC games ever.

      Now, sure, there's been a lot of average games, too (LEGO Star Wars, as an example), but really, the exposure each crappy game got is far less than the exposure each of the six (now seven) crappy movies got (Episodes I-III, Clone Wars, and the three "remakes" of the original where key ). Each one of those movies caused more outright damage to the Star Wars universe we know and love than all of the bad video games combined.

      --
      rm -rf /
    4. Re:Franchise by AngryUndead · · Score: 1

      Which ones aren't any good? Those are the only ones I've played or heard about.

  13. Embargo? by Osurak · · Score: 5, Funny

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re:Embargo? by Faw · · Score: 4, Funny

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Inconceivable!!!

    2. Re:Embargo? by Pope · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? It was the plot of Episode 1 after all.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Embargo? by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      -------> (whoosh) (joke)

        o
      - | - (you)
        |
      / \

      ----> (Cliffs of Insanity that way)

      Oh lameness filter that I know,
      please read these words as filter snow.

    4. Re:Embargo? by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't go up against a Sicilian when mod points are on the line.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    5. Re:Embargo? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Who runs Barter Town?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  14. I'd expect more than just eye candy from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I know, his latest films haven't been that encouraging. But that's beside my point.

    If it's coming from Lucasfilm, it should have standards at least on the level of Pixar. Instead, we get the Clone Wars TV series that ran in the runup to Ep. 3, except done in CGI. Big deal.

    If you're going to do a big CGI flick, George, your character designs and other art should be more on the level with the Final Fantasy movie. The animation character designs worked well for that animation style, but they do not port well (if at all) to CGI.

    Seriously, crusty old fart in the bathrobe looks like a lightsaber accident took off the back half of his head some years back.

    Transformers: Beast Wars had better stuff a decade ago. Get with the program, George.

    1. Re:I'd expect more than just eye candy from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Final Fantasy movie.

      Sorry, but there never was a Final Fantasy CGI movie, maybe you heard about "Spirits within" which is NOT a Final Fantasy movie, just a movie with the title "Final Fantasy" on it.

    2. Re:I'd expect more than just eye candy from Lucas. by Kredal · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Maybe he was talking about Advent Children?

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    3. Re:I'd expect more than just eye candy from Lucas. by deepershade · · Score: 1

      If Square wants it to be part of the FF series, then it is, irregardless of what you think.

    4. Re:I'd expect more than just eye candy from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      errr, what about final fantasy advent children?

    5. Re:I'd expect more than just eye candy from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gods, Spirits Within was better than that stinker.

      Just more pandering to Sephie's drooling magnesium-pantied fangirls.

      Only good bit was the cell phone ringer after the fight. That gave me a chuckle.

    6. Re:I'd expect more than just eye candy from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      irregardless? buy a dictionary, f-tard.

    7. Re:I'd expect more than just eye candy from Lucas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the last couple games? Don't give me the whole "they are games" argument. It was not a game but a DVD menu.

  15. More For Kids, I Think. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think this one is indeed more for kids. I know my Son (9 years old) is near ape-shit about going and seeing this opening day. I'm a bit skeptical about it. It'll be nice to see another new Star Wars film, but at the cost of no real story / character development / etc., I don't know if I want this to taint my view of the Star Wars saga.

    I was only 5 or 6 the first time I saw A New Hope in the theater. Indeed, as many, I was blown away and it changed the way I pictured "space" and all that. That side comment to ObiWan from Luke of "You fought in the Clone Wars?!?" in "Ben's" hut was always a very interesting thing to me. "What were the Clone Wars?" "What are the Clones?" (it was never really said the Stormtroopers were all colones and certainly no hint of them being of Bobba's Dad). I wasn't until Ep2 that "The Clone Wars" was really brought into the story and it was very little more than a passing mention in that movie. Ep3 kind of touched a bit more on it, but not really. With this movie we're supposed to see more of the struggle of the Clone Wars. I say struggle because it more about the story behind the battle. The battle we've seen (well, bits and pieces), but we've seen it. We haven't seen the story of it.

    I hope it's not as bad as this reviews are making it out to be. Since 1977 I have had huge thoughts and dreams about these half-mentioned "Clone Wars". I hope this is it.


    But it is a "new" Lucas movie...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    1. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 1

      What is all this talk "it's for kids"? Last I checked episodes 4-6 were NOT completely suited for kids. It was until 6, with the Ewoks did Lucas bring in the "kids" mentality.

      How come Pixar can make animated movies for KIDS and ADULTS?

      Lucas sucks! He just sucks. He took a perfectly good storyline and threw it in the trash. The guy is an idiot because he has all that money, connections in Hollywood and can't for the life of him make anymore decent movies.

      Step aside and let some more qualified make movies based on your stories.

    2. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 1

      A major aspect of The genius of the original 3 was the fact that Lucas started at Episode 4. I was only 7, but I knew roman numerals, and seeing Episode IV scroll accross the screen started me wondering what had gone before, even before the movie had gotten under way.

      What this did was make the Star Wars universe a bigger place. Something had come before. And when it ended on Episode 6, it felt like there should be 3 more to round it out, and so it was even bigger.

      And then Lucas had to come around and do Episodes 1-3 and destroy all that we had imagined, thereby making the Star Wars universe a lot smaller.

      Not knowing for sure how Anakan became Darth Vader, what exactly the clone wars were and how the heck did this deformed looking evil dude (was he even human?) become emperor led to endless speculation that always returned us to watching Episodes 4-6 over and over again.

      Now that the questions have been answered, I no longer feel any need to watch anything Star Wars ever again.

      That Dan Guy

    3. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      Yup, I had that same reaction to the original and to the mention of the clone wars. For me, I've just had to tell myself that non of these prequels count at all b/c they have surely ruined my original image of Star Wars. Just treat them as completely separate series... maybe a "what if" series, otherwise it's just going to ruin good memories.

    4. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by nine-times · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think this one is indeed more for kids.

      I've never understood why this is considered a viable excuse for being terrible. "Oh, this movie sucks, but it's ok. It's intended for kids."??

      Not to call you specifically out for this, but we wouldn't accept this excuse in other things. "Oh, it's ok that this baby food isn't nutritious at all. It's just for babies." That wouldn't really fly, would it? Or, "Our school system is terrible, but that's ok because it's just for kids."

      I understand that kids might be more easily fooled into thinking that a movie is going to be great than adults. I also understand that, as a parent, you can't be on constant guard and fighting every one of these battles. But in my opinion, the fact that it's for kids means that it really should be *good*. And it's not as though it's an impossible feat to make a good movie that's kid-appropriate. Pixar, for example, has been doing it for years.

      Most of the reason I'm making a point of saying this is that Lucas seems to be making horrible and stupid movies on the idea that it's appropriate to make dumb, meaningless, brain-dead movies because morons and kids will really enjoy the cheap humor. Part of the reason Ep 1 was so awful was because it was "for the kids", but if I had kids, I wouldn't particularly want them to be watching that sort of crap. I'd almost rather that kids were watching good movies that had a little sex and violence than shitty movies with absolutely no value. A lot of times, the adult themes go over the kids' heads anyway, and there's not much harm done. But if you expose them to movies with any kind of value, then some of that value might sink in.

    5. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What were the Clone Wars?" "What are the Clones?" (it was never really said the Stormtroopers were all colones and certainly no hint of them being of Bobba's Dad).

      Uh, SPOILER WARNING anyone? Hello?! Geeze.

    6. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by x1n933k · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it is for the kids. The entire series since Ep. 1 was obviously aimed at kids. Hardcare fans new and old that were older than 15 certainly can't relate to much. The plot, dialog and acting was simple to follow, simple enough for an 8 year old.

      This new movie is certainly an extention of that. If it was meant to be for the real fans, it would have been live action. American adults don't relate to cartoons in the masses like Japan and others, which is a different debate. From what I've seen of Trailers the animation style is also aimed for kids (compare with Beowulf).

      So prepared to be disappointed, or go read the books/comics.

      [J]

    7. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by mrsquid0 · · Score: 1

      The original Star Wars movie was just titled "Star Wars". There was no "A New Hope" and no "Episode 4" in the title. Lucas retrofitted those into the movie a year or two after the original release when he decided to use the backstory material to make prequels.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    8. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by RMingin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the stormtroopers in the later movies are no longer Jango clones, the Republic lost the templates and ability to make new Jango clones not too long after old purple armor decided his head should pursue a career as a solo artist. The stormtroopers by the time of Ep4 and on should all be either draftees or extremely geriatric clones. They were engineered to age faster to get them ready to fight in 2 years, so by the time of Ep4 they're supposed to be roughly 140 years old in people years. Anyways, Star Wars is just about done. There's only so much more Lucas can do to it before nobody really cares and we all just wistfully shake our heads.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    9. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      What is all this talk "it's for kids"? Last I checked episodes 4-6 were NOT completely suited for kids.

      Nor did I even hint at that. New Hope and Empire were not "made for kids". After it turned out there was a huge kid following, Retun of the Jedi threw in enough stuff (Ewoks, '3PO flying, that damn laughing thing that hangs out with Jabba, etc.) for kids to laugh at and look forward to during the "boring parts" (all the story stuff us more, (cough) adult (cough), types were seeing it for. (though I was only a "kid" for the original three, I was seeing it for the story)

      How come Pixar can make animated movies for KIDS and ADULTS?

      You answer that best yourself: Lucas sucks! He just sucks. He took a perfectly good storyline and threw it in the trash.

      :-)

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    10. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      While I can agree with most of that, in that Lucas sucks, the part about introducing a kiddy aspect into ep 6 isn't really true. Originally he wanted Wookies on Endor, but the cost of the costumes were too great, and he decided he wanted a different species (primitive) to help overthrow the empire. Whether or not all of that is true is subject to a great deal of scrutiny because Lucas has been known to say anything to save face... and sucks.

      He reminds me of kids on a playground. As soon as some one finds a hole in his logic, he patches the logic hole, "Nuh, uh! I wanted Ewoks in the first place!"

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    11. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by fwarren · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I want this to taint my view of the Star Wars saga.

      Come on, we live in the age of. "Your tongue can not repel flavor of this magnitude." George Lucas and company sold out so long ago they can't even find the receipt for it any more.

      We still have to look forward to the Star Wars theme parks. Their soul has not been entirely pimped out yet.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    12. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by fwarren · · Score: 5, Funny

      He took a perfectly good storyline and threw it in the trash

      Ain't It Cool said something I have been saying for years. What the original Star Wars films had that made them work was Lucas' wife giving good input and reigning him in.

      Now days there is no one who can tell George Lucas something is a bad idea. Midiclorians? Sure great! Yoda with a 6 pack jumping around like a frog in a blender. Cool, go for it Geroge.

      Once upon a time he had a wife who could tell him no more blow jobs till he pulls that kind of crap out of his scripts. Now they are divorced and we are left to suffer.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    13. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by fwarren · · Score: 1

      George Lucas is an idiot savant. He just happened to hit it off with Star Wars.

      At that point he started to lie. Yeah, there were 9 stories, we came in on part 4. I have it all figured out.

      Watch Episode 4 from 1977 again. The Emperor was far away. Tarken held Vaders leash. He was not in some sort of personal servitude to the Emperor. He was just another cog in the great galactic machine. Yes he wiped out the Jedi, but that would have been done serving under Tarken.

      Luke and Leia were NOT brother and sister. The good guy (Luke) got to kiss the girl (Leia). Han was dark and dangerous just to be dark and dangerous. He was not there to get the girl. He was there because Harrison Ford was able to convince George Lucas to make it a better part.

      If you could go back to January of 1977 and ask George about it, he had no plan. If there ever was another movie, Luke would get Leia, and Vadar would play some role in it but only because Luke needed some Villain to play off of.

      Vader is like Fonzie. Happy days was about nostalgia for the 50s, the good clean simple life. Every story had a moral to it and Richie was a middle child. Then America saw Fonzie and fell in love with him. It became the Fonzie Show aka "Happy Days". Fonzie took over Happy Days and changed what it was about.

      America saw Star Wars and fell in love with Vader like it fell in love with Fonzie. Vader took over Star Wars and changed what it was about. The reason Lucas cant make Episodes 7 -9 is what does he have to talk about if there is no Vader?

      Lucas's snot ain't honey. We can all agree with Harrison Ford, "Just because George can write it does not mean I can say it."

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    14. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget about it's tainting your view, don't let it taint his.

    15. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Forget about it's tainting your view, don't let it taint his.

      WISE WORDS!

      I do not. He likes (or liked - I'm not sure which these days) Jar-Jar. I have not pointed out how damn silly, childish, and down-right stupid that character is. I don't want to ruin his view of the saga for him.

      I did point out to him, when he and I were talking about all the parts we like about the new Indy movie, the brief parts in the begining with the dumb giggling prairie dogs were too out of place in an Indy move. I said that I felt it seemed a bit kid-ish for an adventure movie like that. He said that he saw my point, but still thought it was funny. I agreed that it was funny, just out of place. To that he agreed. We both still like the film.

      I did also point out that it's impossible for someone to bounce a few hundred feet locked in a refrigerator and actually survive, though...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    16. Re:More For Kids, I Think. by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, last night's (repeated) episode of The Simpsons was "Co-Dependent's Day" in which Bart and Lisa visit Randall Curtis at Cosmic Wars Ranch to tell him where he has gone wrong.

      That episode was way too close to the truth...

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
  16. Profit by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    Release over budget Disney like Star Wars cartoon Get ripped by media for turning the Star Wars franchise into CGI for 4 year olds Have a public dummy spit and then set the lawyers free on what little is left of the Star Wars franchise fan base. $$$ Profit

    1. Re:Profit by krazytekn0 · · Score: 1


      is your friend

      --
      Not all life is cyber. Extra Income
  17. Legal Action against LucasArts by daveatneowindotnet · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think most of us born from 1965 and 1985 have a pretty good case against George Lucas for retroactively ruining our childhood. Star Wars Episode 1 thru to Indiana Jones and Aliens, now this nonsense. Strangely enough the 5 minute shorts on Cartoon Network about the Clone Wars were actually entertaining, and didn't seem as geared to children, and they had that Samurai Jack animation style.

  18. So sad by Tsoat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really enjoy the original star wars so naturally I was so excited when phantom menace came out I admit that I liked it almost as much as the originals then with the second one I watched it multiple times but only because I had a crush on Natalie Portman at the time. When the third one came out I waited in line for it however after watching it I had a realization about these prequels they were missing something, and that something was heart, when George Lucas mad the original Star Wars he was a nobody so of course he had to make the story epic, so epic that it was a saga. With the prequels he didn't need to so he soldout, hardcore he has betrayed the fans and all he cares about is the money which of course he will get because well there are still raving fans who would buy crap if it had the star wars logo on it and little kids. Bottom line is George Lucas is a sellout

    1. Re:so sad by Samurai+Tony · · Score: 1

      George Lucas has beat this dead horse until it's nothing more than a thin, red paste. Scrape what's left into a hole and fucking bury it, man. It's done.

      This, for me, says just about everything that can be said. I may try and use it for a signature if you allow.

      --
      ...oh, and yo momma's so fat, her Schwarzchild radius is visible to the naked eye.
    2. Re:so sad by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Feel free.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:So sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Breathe, man!

  19. I couldn't stand the crap ad so the "movie" must by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't stand the crap ad so the "movie" must really be bad. Usually, the promo has the best parts. If those are the best parts, I can only surmise the movie (yeah, right) is the worst ever made. I liked The Incredibles, though. Holly Hunter was great, so much so it seemed as if she was on top doing all the work !!

  20. well, i'm afraid by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that star wars may have more or less jumped the mynock... the thing that really aggravates me about Lucas with star wars, is he allowed hundreds of "official" works of fiction to be written, wherein, the authors who wrote them worked very hard to follow and/or stay true to the original movies. These books really flushed out the story and universe, and then Lucas comes along with his prequels, and basically says "screw you all" and ignores all the history and back story that was created on his behalf.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    1. Re:well, i'm afraid by kaos07 · · Score: 1

      That's a really good point, and I never thought of it.

      But did the hundreds of authors of those books check in with each other? If they all had their own universes, I don't think the CREATOR of the universe can be blamed for changing things around.

    2. Re:well, i'm afraid by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      well, i used to read a ton of star wars books, and for the most part, they seem to mesh well, or at least, the authors stay out of each others way. That is to say, the ones that write about the times after star wars don't reference/create any events that would fall into and contradict the time/area of another author.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  21. What? by Blice · · Score: 5, Funny

    You say that Star Wars shouldn't be made into a cartoon for children? And you also say jar-jar binks was a bad idea for the series?

    That doesn't make any sense. Okay look, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

    Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two-foot tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this review? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this review! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a slashdotter defending a major mistake in starwars history, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're sitting there in the move theater reviewing this movie, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed review, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit!

    1. Re:What? by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 1

      WOOKIES DONT LIVE ON ENDOR!

    2. Re:What? by Blice · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, Chewbacca does not in fact actually live on Endor - though early drafts of Return of the Jedi did have the forest moon of Endor populated by Wookiees rather than Ewoks. This claim may have been an error, or may simply have been a culturally savvy intentional mis-statement by the authors.

      Woosh... Read more about it here.

    3. Re:What? by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      <quote>WOOKIES DONT LIVE ON ENDOR!</quote>

      XPUPPYKICKERX DOESN'T WATCH SOUTH PARK!

    4. Re:What? by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WOOKIES DONT LIVE ON ENDOR!

      Actually, this is another quote from South Park. The Halloween episode, where everyone dresses as Chewbacca.

    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Chewbacca never lived on Endor. He just visited.

      So it all makes perfect sense to me.

    6. Re:What? by Devir · · Score: 1

      Chewbacca had a Midget Fetish.

    7. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two-foot tall Ewoks?"

      He's kind of kinky?

    8. Re:What? by The+Redster! · · Score: 1

      "WOOKIES DONT LIVE ON ENDOR!" is also a South Park reference, like his Parent before him.

    9. Re:What? by DaveTuck · · Score: 1

      Can anyone straighten this out... Its commonly agreed (I think) that Ewoks live on 'The Forest Moon of Endor', but is the moon actually called Endor, or does this forest moon actually orbit the planet Endor? It may sound trivial but I've thought about it on and off for about 20 years :-) Anyone??

      --
      Launch each 'sig'.
    10. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      personally, I can't really argue with chewbacca's choice - don't tell me you've never seen midget porn.

    11. Re:What? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two-foot tall Ewoks?

      I dunno, cheap yet plentiful food source?

    12. Re:What? by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      <quote>

      <quote><p>WOOKIES DONT LIVE ON ENDOR!</p></quote>

      <p>Actually, this is another quote from South Park. The Halloween episode, where everyone dresses as Chewbacca.</p></quote>

      DIGITALGIBLET DOESN'T WATCH MUCH SOUTH PARK!

      I'll have to check out that episode now that they are all online...

  22. First Amendment? by grahamm · · Score: 1

    For reviews in the USA, does this not go against the spirit of the first amendment (freedom of the press) even if not the letter of it?

    1. Re:First Amendment? by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, not even the spirit. Two parties made a contract with each other, and one is insisting the contract is followed. That's just not a first amendment issue at all.

    2. Re:First Amendment? by Stanislav_J · · Score: 2, Funny

      For reviews in the USA, does this not go against the spirit of the first amendment (freedom of the press) even if not the letter of it?

      What is this "first amendment" of which you speak? No doubt some ancient and outmoded document that no one takes seriously anymore.....

      --
      "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
    3. Re:First Amendment? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if George Lucas = government

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    4. Re:First Amendment? by 91degrees · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Freedom of speech. It's a principle that the first amendment is based on. Its scope is much wider but doesn't have legal backing. It is a strong principle, considered a human right by the UN, and supported by most people, and although legal, it's bad form for a company to punish people for exercising this right.

      So, in other words, yes it does:)

    5. Re:First Amendment? by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      and...

      if you post a "negative" review of the movie, you are a terrorist. Dicking around with Hollywood money makes you a terrorist.

      Plus, won't somebody please think of the children?!?

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    6. Re:First Amendment? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      For reviews in the USA, does this not go against the spirit of the first amendment (freedom of the press) even if not the letter of it?

      That was what I was wondering, how the hell can he get reviews pulled???

      What total bullshit is that?

      Isn't that part of the purpose of things like fair use?

      I would love to see a legal experts take on this because it sounds like its way over the line. I'd love to see all the reviews just re-written without directly referencing Lucas's latest steaming pile. /Han shot first

    7. Re:First Amendment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big difference is that government and law are not involved. This is simply business. The right is there to publish the article and the right is there to decide that there are benefits to making Mr. Lucas happy by retracting it.

    8. Re:First Amendment? by BokLM · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was what I was wondering, how the hell can he get reviews pulled???

      Well, they could keep the reviews online if they wanted. It's just that they want to continue be allowed to see movies before they are released in the futur ...

    9. Re:First Amendment? by Tridus · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. The First Amendment blocks the government from telling you that you can't post a negative review of the movie.

      It doesn't say that you can't willingly enter into an agreement with a private company that will give you an advance screening in exchange for not posting a review until Friday.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    10. Re:First Amendment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first amendment only applies to governmental suppression of the press.

      Unless lucasfilm is now the government, it doesn't apply.

    11. Re:First Amendment? by gilroy · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is this "first amendment" of which you speak? No doubt some ancient and outmoded document that no one takes seriously anymore.....

      The Constitution ... an elegant document for a more civilized age.

    12. Re:First Amendment? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      So let's say I give you a copy of my book before it hits the shelves and ask you to not publish a review until the worldwide release date. Your right to free speech is to say "No, I do not agree to those terms." Of course, I cannot levy any penalties on you outside of our agreement other than to say "Well, you don't get to read my next book early." Now, if you purchased my book without entering into a contract with me (ie. you bought it on release day at a B&N), then if I tried to prevent you from publishing a review it would be a violation of your rights.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    13. Re:First Amendment? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who's talking about the first amendment? I'm talking about freedom of speech - and the spirit of the first amendment, which is based on the principle.

      Would Lucasarts have enforced the embargo if everyone said it was great? If so, then that's their right. If not, they're interfering with freedom of speech - Legal but rather unethical.

    14. Re:First Amendment? by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Well, they are enforcing it against the positive review on AICN, along with the negative one that was removed. They aren't enforcing it against MSNBC's negative one, probably because MSNBC had some sort of arrangement to get a screening without being embargoed.

      Nobody is taking away free speech. But reviewers don't have a fundamental right to be given advance screenings. This time, they were offered one in exchange for not writing about it until Friday.

      Pretty routine, really.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    15. Re:First Amendment? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      does this not go against the spirit of the first amendment (freedom of the press)

      The First Amendment prohibits the Government from restricting the Press.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    16. Re:First Amendment? by Spellvexit · · Score: 1
      I don't know all the legal ins and outs, but one of the biggest threats isn't even legal -- aintitcool said

      Yes we could break the embargo, but then we'd never be allowed to see another Warner Brothers movie again, and instead of simply being barred from reviewing this one movie early we'd be barred from reviewing every movie early.

      If you're a movie review site or even one that reports on new & cool things in popular culture, being blacklisted by WB has painful repercussions. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if WB even passed along their blacklist to other major studios.

      --
      The moon may be smaller than the earth, but it's much farther away!
    17. Re:First Amendment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. One with slaves and women without voting rights.

      More civilized.

      Yeah.

  23. poor quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I downloaded that film last week and it was just all gay porn. I couldn't understand what it had to do with star wars

  24. So much for the supposed under-the-radar status by sjonke · · Score: 1

    I had been reading/hearing that this was suppose to be the "secret" Star Wars film. It wasn't going to have a big advertising budget and was a labor of love. Obviously that was all a bunch of malarky, just another gimmick to get it in the news. I've been seeing commercials for this film pretty regularly now.

    Sadly, I'll be seeing this travesty on Saturday with my two boy and my nephews.

    --
    --- What?
  25. A long time ago... say around 2003 by denzacar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...There were Clone Wars. Animated.
    Directed by Genndy Tartakovsky of the Dexter's Laboratory and Samurai Jack fame.

    And they were decently animated and had some good stories.
    The Lucas empire even dropped a more than a decent part of the prequel trilogy's story into those episodes.
    If you look at the duration of all three seasons you come up with about two films of about an hour+, or one of two hours+.
    Hell... General Grievous is one big WTF if you don't at least take a glance at the animated series.

    But I guess that was not good enough.
    Or translated from Lucaspeek - It was not a bunch of lifeless 3D rendered puppets, reimagined once again.

    What is the matter with Lucas?
    Is he really trying to degrade the franchise beyond the "meh" level?
    The entire Star Wars universe is slowly being turned into a "you know... that saga nobody really cares about any more, but once it was the best saga evah".

    For fucks sake, lay it off for a while.
    It is becoming embarrassing to say you actually enjoyed any of it. Ever.
    Like it is American Pie or some other endlessly sequelled gag-humor movie.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by kungfugleek · · Score: 5, Informative

      General Grievous is one big WTF if you don't at least take a glance at the animated series.

      Actually, I thought all of the prequels are one big WTF whether or not I had watched the animated series.

      But then I read the Secret History of Star Wars and it all became clear -- Lucas never really liked Star Wars himself. At least, he never intended it to be the deep quasi-spiritual struggle of good and evil. He wanted a high adventure space-romp. It was Empire (which he didn't have much involvement with) that made things deeper and more spiritual. Compare Obi Wan's talk of the Force, "The Force is what gives a Jedi his powers." with Yoda's, "...for my ally is The Force, and a powerful ally it is." Obi-wan's line was written by Lucas and reveals is initial, shallow desire for the force to be a tool for magic tricks, Yoda's line, written by Brackett/Kasdan, shows where the franchise started to get deeper. It's the depth that really fascinated myself and I think a lot of us fans, but Lucas hated the idea and I think he still does.

      Lucas has been trying to lighten it up ever since then, and is quoted as saying that one of the main reasons he made the prequels at all was to "fund other projects."

      I think he doesn't care if he ruins it for us, as long as he can make money from it to fund the things he really cares about. It's sad but he has creator's rights over it so there's nothing you can do about it.

    2. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by mgblst · · Score: 1

      For fucks sake, lay it off for a while.

      Yeah, lay of it, I mean, you are going to make millions, but still...nobody want it, so lay off.

      It is becoming embarrassing to say you actually enjoyed any of it. Ever.

      Depending on who you hang with, it has always been a little embarrassing to say you like them. I mean, sure I liked them, but they weren't great masterpieces. Much more like the Mummy or early Batman than the dark knight.

    3. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by m0n0RAIL · · Score: 1

      Star Wars is the new Matrix.

    4. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

      According to TFA Lucas had little to do with the Tartakovsky series, but with this one "The early plots were then hashed out by Henry and me. We would take those ideas back to George and he'd get us feedback and move things around, teach us if the idea worked within the Star Wars universe or not. Eventually the story ideas were driven more and more by George because he became so excited about the project. He started coming to us with a bunch of stories he wanted to tell, and we worked off his outlines after that." At that point, the project was DOOMED.

      The smartest thing Lucas ever did was letting a real writer+screen writer+director do Empire. Same with Tartakovsky. Lucas needs to learn to get out of the way and professionals handle the stuff he is by his own admission bad at. Of course Lucas says he doesn't listen to his critics, so don't expect any changes. :-|

    5. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      And they were decently animated and had some good stories.

      Opinions vary. I thought they were unwatchable, between the super-short episode length and that animation style. (Samurai Jack has the same style, but at least it gets enough time to tell a real story in the course of a 22-minute episode.)

      The CGI version of General Grievous in Episode III is by far the best villain in the new trilogy; it's a shame he's almost totally wasted in the movie. If Lucas had any sense, Grievous would have been the recurring villain during the entire new trilogy, replacing the pointless Darth Maul and ... that guy in Clone Wars who's so generic I can't even remember his name.

    6. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by Ben+Newman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the original Clone Wars animated series was the only half way decent thing about the prequels. It really shows how out of touch Lucas is as a film maker that he took all of the series character development, moral ambiguity, dramatic tension and the best villain in the whole thing (Grievous) and shoved all of their scenes into a cartoon side project. It also showed all the signs of being run by people who had a deep understanding and love for the franchise rather then Lucas himself.

    7. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      You mean he's working on a Howard the Duck II?!

      Good lord...

      Or as Howard used to say in the comics, "Waugh!"

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    8. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Star Wars is the new Matrix.

      Damn, you're harsh.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Hey, I actually liked Howard the Duck, so screw you!

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    10. Re:A long time ago... say around 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas has been trying to lighten it up ever since then, and is quoted as saying that one of the main reasons he made the prequels at all was to "fund other projects."

      Heaven forbid he used the Star Wars prequels to fund shit like Indiana Jones and the Crystal skulls... I'd give him money not to produce crap like that.

  26. Obligatory by illumastorm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened. "

    1. Re:Obligatory by thedonger · · Score: 1

      No, just a migraine.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:Obligatory by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

      Or maybe: That's no moo-vie review

    3. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe: That's no moo-vie review

      Do I go the easy route and play "The Clone Wars: It's a TRAP!", or do I go the artistic route and say "The Clone Wars: Get in there, I don't care what you smell!"

      Decisions, decisions.

  27. It's Warner Bros., not LucasArts by Le+Jimmeh · · Score: 5, Informative

    At least, according to AintItCool's reply.

    1. Re:It's Warner Bros., not LucasArts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite right, OP. Not to mention that LucasArts creates video games, not films.

  28. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful, yet hot!

  29. Except that it doesn't make sense by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets not forget that episodes 1-3 were not exactly cheap to produce. If Lucas had sold out, he would have had the movies made in hong-kong on a shoe-string budget and then raked in the cash based on the brand alone. THAT is selling out.

    What he did instead is forget what made the original movies such a success, not just with kids but with adults as well (it was my mom that introduced me to Star Wars and she was an adult mother when it was released) and instead attempted to make the movie appeal to kids without understand what kids want.

    Basically, he ignored his matured fanbase and tried to appeal to a new demographic that just didn't exist.

    Lets face it, kids today got better entertainment then 3 films that are nothing but a punch and judy show (KIDS: look out punch BEHIND you PUNCH: where KIDS: BEHIND YOU), the jedis never being able to spot the baddie until it is way to late.

    It might have worked as high fantasy with a doomed ending with just a tiny bit of hope remaining but that doesn't work in a kiddy movie.

    I like the ending of episode three were you see the would be rebels dispersing, but everything before was just... Well not bad exactly, just that the actors could not act, Lucas can't write or direct and just who was the story aimed at anyway?

    The most obvious failure? Nobody quotes the new star wars to honor it. "These are not the droids you are looking for" "I am your father" "I find your lack of faith disturbing" "It is a trap".

    Where are the episode 1-3 quotes?

    George Lucas one had luck producing a movie, it is known by fans that this was not his own creation, his wife for instance seems to have played a large role. Other directors did ESB. He should go back to producing but frankly, his most crowning achievement, getting Star Wars made in the 70's is no longer anything complex with the fortune he has know and the standard high special effects movie we got know. People forgot just how ground breaking A New Hope was from a producers job. That is gone now. Lucas has nothing to do but sign the checks and so he gets involved with other things that were previously left to others.

    Lucas did not make A New Hope, he produced it. He did make episode 1-3. That's the problem.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Tsoat · · Score: 1

      Yeah you're right I called it selling out because I didn't know what else to call it perhaps I should have said he was just milking it, but I really like your explanation I feel it's pretty accurate.

    2. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by OK+PC · · Score: 1

      You are right about the quotes, I was watching A New Hope recently and realised that practically every line that Alec Guiness delivers is a well known quote!

      --
      Did you get that thing I sent ya?
    3. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where are the episode 1-3 quotes?

      YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE ANAKIN

    4. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where are the episode 1-3 quotes?

      Here's one... "Yippee!"

    5. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by el_chupanegre · · Score: 1

      The most obvious failure? Nobody quotes the new star wars to honor it. "These are not the droids you are looking for" "I am your father" "I find your lack of faith disturbing" "It is a trap".

      Where are the episode 1-3 quotes?

      "NNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"

    6. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      In the original trilogy, Lucas gets a lot of credit for them, but it was a team effort. In the new trilogy, Lucas played a larger role and you see the results. Lucas directed and wrote the screenplay for A New Hope but he didn't direct either Empire or Jedi. While Lucas wrote the story for all the series, he didn't write the screenplay for Empire and he co-wrote the screenplay for Jedi. The situation for Empire arose because Lucas was doing Raiders of the Lost Ark at the same time and couldn't do both. The screenwriters and director for Empire had a slightly different vision that Lucas. They made it more dark and more gloomy. This was done with Lucas' blessing as he stated the middle chapter should be darker to give the third act more of a resolution. I don't think however that if Lucas had done it, it would have been the same.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    7. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are the episode 1-3 quotes?

      "Mesa Jar Jar Binks."

    8. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 3, Funny

      He is right on about the quotes. I've seen all the "new" star wars movies at least twice and right now I can't think of a single memorable line from any of them. I can sit here and think of lines from the "old" ones all day.

      The quotes are so memorable that you can use them in a business meeting, "I find your lack of faith disturbing", and get away with it.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    9. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by lysse · · Score: 1

      If Lucas had sold out, he would have had the movies made in hong-kong on a shoe-string budget and then raked in the cash based on the brand alone.

      Anyone else thinking "Uwe Boll does Star Wars"...?

    10. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      NOOOOO!

      -Darth Vader Episode 3

    11. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas did not make A New Hope, he produced it. He did make episode 1-3. That's the problem.

      Actually Lucas did direct A New Hope (wikipedia) and all his two films before it (THX 1138, American Graffiti). It was only after A New Hope he started producing, because he claimed that directing a picture of that scale was too taxing. He would not direct again until The Phantom Menace (unfortunately).

    12. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by drodal · · Score: 1

      Where are the episode 1-3 quotes?

      Yousa say people gonna die!

      Yuck die jar jar die

    13. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most obvious failure? Nobody quotes the new star wars to honor it.

      Noooooooooooooooooo!

    14. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are the episode 1-3 quotes?

      Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

    15. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Well personally I've heard lots of people quote a line from Episode III:
      "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!"

    16. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most obvious failure? Nobody quotes the new star wars to honor it. "These are not the droids you are looking for" "I am your father" "I find your lack of faith disturbing" "It is a trap".

      Where are the episode 1-3 quotes?

      Ever wonder where "DO NOT WANT" came from?

    17. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Episode 1-3 Quotes:

      "Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate (dramatic pause) leads to suffering."

      Hard to discount this one. Apart from being very quotable it also aptly foreshadows the theme of Anakin Skywakler character in ep. 1-3

      Yoda r00lz, even when all round him, is suck.

    18. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      I think you're giving Lucas too much credit. I don't think he tried to appeal to a new demographic at all. Lucas writes for himself, and he's just not a good writer. Limitations of technology and other influences at the time (e.g., Lucas not directing Empire Strikes Back) made the original trilogy enjoyable.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    19. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. I use "aggressive negotiations", "you assume too much" and "the negotiations will be short" on a fairly regular basis.

      Did I just say that out loud?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    20. Re:Except that it doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he did direct A New Hope.

  30. Zero the Hut crosses way too many lines. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    It almost seems as if he exists to offend both the religious fanatics and homosexuals all at the same time. Its not like the position was needed; Star Wars isn't out to teach anyone anything, represent anything historically accurate, and as such doesn't need to touch on all PC aspects of modern life. At the same time they don't need to ridicule/stereotype it either with a ham handed method of trying to not offend both sides but doing so greatly regardless.

    Hell, even the name is amazing... whats next on their list.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  31. Not the biggest movie and its STAR WARS by Woundweavr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The franchise was already lost. A new Star Wars movie is coming out to theaters and its not even close to being the #1 geek movie of the summer. Even if you took out the superhero movies and Star Trek, its still lagging behind. Ten years ago that would have been inconceivable as even re-releases were huge.

    You can't live off past glory forever.

    1. Re:Not the biggest movie and its STAR WARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek? What Star Trek?

    2. Re:Not the biggest movie and its STAR WARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't live off past glory forever.

      Nope, just for life plus 100 years.

    3. Re:Not the biggest movie and its STAR WARS by MellowTigger · · Score: 1

      You can't live off past glory forever.

      You haven't read the latest copyright law rewrites, have you?

  32. Aliens by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

    What did he do to Aliens?

    1. Re:Aliens by wiggles · · Score: 1

      He sent Indiana Jones after them.

    2. Re:Aliens by daveatneowindotnet · · Score: 1

      Yes that is what I meant, sorry. "Aliens" should not have been capitalized.

    3. Re:Aliens by jzuccaro · · Score: 1

      They sent them to the "space between spaces". Go figure.

  33. Chewbacca is guilty then? by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 1

    WOOKIES DONT LIVE ON ENDOR!

    You're arguing the facts here. I take it that Lucas is indeed guilty then?

  34. Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've almost convinced myself George Lucas never made the first three Star Wars, and that it was somebody else. Look at the reviews for almost any of the other films he wrote (THX-1138, Willow, Captain EO, Star Wars I-III) and they are all rated at least an order of magnitude worse. The only other film I could find that was rated as highly was Raiders of the Lost Ark, and he shared the writing role with Philip Kaufman on that one.

    1. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Devir · · Score: 1

      THX Was a film school project. George hated writing. He has always been better at visuals.

      American Grafitti was Georges first real commercial movie made from roughly $780,000 dollar budget. Featuring Harrison Ford. It made him millions and enough prestigue to get funding for Starwars, which was almost a flop had it not been for the editing prowess of his wife (who was also sick of Starwars).

    2. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that he didn't direct Empire or Jedi. The other directors created some of the most memorable scenes in those movies. They would have been far cheesier had Lucas directed.

      He just got lucky with Star Wars as far as I'm concerned.

    3. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Lucas here, I just wanted to warn you of the danger of what you say.

      Jon Abbott, expect a letter from my team of lawyers.

      THX-1138 was a masterpiece.

    4. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he made the first one but it was an accident. I've heard stories that he thought it would be a failure, probably because it was nothing like he wanted it to be.

      For the sequels there were different directors and writers. He had some influence on the content(Ewoks).

      For the prequels however it was all him. Writer/Director.

    5. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When Lucas made the original Star Wars, I think he had three camera crews shooting in the final week because he was so behind schedule they were going to pull the project on him.

      This shortened time frame was in fact a problem throughout the entire shoot, which meant that he didn't have the time to screw it up - all he could do was let the actors go and let them put in the most natural performances they could in each scene (quickly!). I think a lot of those lines were ad-libbed by the actors themselves who were able to put their own personalities into the roles without Lucas messing things up with that tiny little brain of his.

      Then in Empire, Kasdan/Bracket took over the screenplay and gave us the deeper storyline we all know, and Kershner took over directing so Lucas wasn't around to screw up the actors dialog with his idiocy (which is why Empire has some of the best lines of the series). I think Kasdan also wrote a lot of Ep VI as well since he was involved in the screenplay.

      So basically, the Star Wars Trilogy we know and love wasn't really a George Lucas creation in the first place, and he has been taking credit for the contributions of other people that really made that series what it was. Episodes I-III are a true George Lucas creation, and he has shown his actual talent there, which isn't much in story-writing, dialog, or directing. He IS good at special effects, because that is what he knows and loves. The rest of the magic in the original series was someone else's, and with every new piece of Star Wars content that gets created George Lucas exposes himself more and more for the fraud that he is. There is such a HUGE gap between the talent of the people involved in IV & V (and to a lesser extent VI) and the rest of the series, that it is becoming painfully obvious just how un-talented Lucas actually is as a director and writer.

      I dread what he is going to do to this franchise before he is done. As someone mentioned before, it has become more and more embarrassing to admit that ever liked anything about this series. What a shame.

    6. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by eyewax · · Score: 1

      He made American Graffiti which the studio hated but was a big success and got good reviews.

    7. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I'll be honest and say that Willow is probably my favorite of the films listed.

      Anyway...

      He's known in the music industry as a one-hit-wonder. It's kind of sad in a way that there are so many artists with no real staying power who keep producing and producing and their initial fanbase keeps buying into their work, hoping and praying for another fantastic work to be released. I'm sure he'll be playing your local county fair soon. Sometimes it's better to just let things like this wither on the vine. Of course, it's only hindsight that gives us an understanding of who these people are.

      Lucas has so much cashflow at this point that even if his fans abandon him he will continue to produce. We can do little but let the train wreck happen and hope that no innocent bystanders get caught up in it all.

      It's artists like Lucas who make me feel that maybe it is a good thing that people like Harper Lee didn't work towards being a full-time writer instead of wondering why they didn't produce anything more.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    8. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      George Lucas didn't write the screeplays. ANH had its genesis as a remake of Akira Kurosawa's The Hidden Fortress. He iterated on the script for years, and then eventually got it made and the original cut was apparently absolutely terrible. He ended up getting an entirely new editing team to salvage a good film out of the pieces - really the only visionary part of his work was his overseeing the special effects.

      ESB started out as a general story idea, and from that it was fleshed out into a screenplay first by Leigh Brackett, then after her death by Lawrence Kasdan with some input from Gary Kurtz and Irvin Kirshner. RotJ was produced in the same manner, with Lucas coming up with the general idea and Kasdan doing the writing again, but I think Lucas had a larger hand in it.

      Kasdan also wrote the script for Raiders of the Lost Ark.

      Personally I've always believed that Lucas is fantastic at coming up with ideas, but terrible at making them into reality, and his successes with the original Star Wars trilogy were pretty much entirely because he had a lot of talented people keeping him in check. The instant that you take away those people and have him calling all the shots, his films turn out extremely disappointing.

    9. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      What's wrong? Take four red capsules. In ten minutes, take two more. Help is on the way.

    10. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Frenchman113 · · Score: 1

      Look at the reviews for almost any of the other films he wrote (THX-1138, Willow, Captain EO, Star Wars I-III)...

      What do you have against American Graffiti?

    11. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Never saw it. I don't have anything against THX-1138 either, but it too is generally rated far worse than the Star Wars IV-VI series. All I'm saying is that there appears to be a definite difference between Star Wars IV-VI and his other films -- enough to make one wonder how much influence he had on the former versus the latter.

    12. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time to replace the age old Bill Gates Borg icon, with a more up to date version featuring George Lucas?

      Plots are irrelevant.
      Stories are irrelevant.
      You will like Jar Jar.
      Resistance is futile.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    13. Re:Perhaps George Lucas isn't George Lucas by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Well Lucas produced the first 3 films. But he did have help. Lucas wrote the story for all 3 and he directed the first and wrote the screenplay. He did not write the screenplay to Empire and he didn't direct it either. He didn't direct Jedi either and he co-wrote the screenplay.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  35. Missed the most important one quote by jgtg32a · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lets not forget that Has Solo made "I Know" and appropriate response to "I love you."

    1. Re:Missed the most important one quote by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Informative

      'course, that also wasn't Lucas' idea (surprise surprise)... you can thank Harrison Ford for ad-libbing that line in the movie.

    2. Re:Missed the most important one quote by sootman · · Score: 1

      I've seen this in every single Slashdot discussion about Star Wars. I swear someone just throws it out there as a gift so someone else can get a +5 for replying and pointing out that Harrison made it up. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:Missed the most important one quote by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Well, good for me then! ;)

  36. Okay by mr_da3m0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, which one of those crappy websites went ahead and committed a capital sin?

    The web designer of one of the websites linked in TFA took it upon him/herself to resize my browser.

    You don't touch my browser without permission. I really wonder who the fuck tought it was a good idea to even allow such crap to take place.

    I have my browser set just the way I want it, centered exactly where I want it on my widescreen desktop. Whenever some crappy website goes ahead and wrecks this up, I end up not viewing it. It infuriates me to no end.

    Sorry for the rant, feel free to mod me offtopic, but I felt it had to be said.

    1. Re:Okay by Yosho · · Score: 1

      I have my browser set just the way I want it, centered exactly where I want it on my widescreen desktop. Whenever some crappy website goes ahead and wrecks this up, I end up not viewing it. It infuriates me to no end.

      I'm going to assume you're using Firefox.

      Open the Preferences, click on the "Content" tab, click on the "Advanced..." button to the right of "Enable JavaScript." Uncheck "Move or resize existing windows". I prefer to go ahead and uncheck everything else there, too.

      Problem solved forever!

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    2. Re:Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're on Firefox there's an extension called Controle de Scripts (and another called Javascript Options) that will prevent that. I know it doesn't address the matter of principle and the webmaster should certainly be strung up for what he did. But at least, with these extensions, when the world looks up and shouts "Resize your browser," you can whisper "no."

    3. Re:Okay by Glytch · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're on some flavour of Firefox:

      "Edit" -> "Preferences" -> "Content" -> "Settings" button next to "Enable Javascript". Uncheck everything you see.

      If you're using Opera:

      "Tools" -> "Preferences" -> "Advanced" -> "Content" -> "Javascript Options" -> Uncheck everything.

      On Konqueror 4:

      "Settings" -> "Configure Konqueror" -> "Java and Javascript" -> "Javascript" tab -> Set the last four options to "ignore".

      If you're using Safari, I think you're out of luck (win32 version of Safari seems to lack these fundamental controls, I'm assuming the OSX version does as well), and if you're using IE, well, you reap what you sow.

    4. Re:Okay by ODiV · · Score: 1

      Why the hell are you allowing websites to move/resize your browser?

      Try Firefox + NoScript.

  37. Uh Clone Wars by computechnica · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember there already being a animated Clone Wars that bridged between Episode 2 and 3. It had some interesting story lines and the Awesome animation talents of Genndy Tartakovsky. It would be great if the older series made more money than this Remake.

    1. Re:Uh Clone Wars by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

      Word.
      The Tartakovsky series is pretty good. If Lucas/Genndy had wanted to make a full length version of that I would be all over that one.
      A dreamworks/shrek/antz version of the same stories does not appeal to me.
      But hey, it gives Lucas a chance to make Haden Christensen look like even more of a puppet/tool then good for him.

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
  38. Ugly Animation -- I'll say! by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

    The first time I glanced at a commercial, I just assumed it was another video game they were hawking for Christmas. It was only when I heard "starts Friday" that I realized it was a movie. It sure as hell ain't Pixar. Or Dreamworks for that matter...

    1. Re:Ugly Animation -- I'll say! by Tipa · · Score: 1

      lol... my son said there was a Lego Star Wars movie coming out. I didn't realize what he meant until I discovered he'd seen a commercial for this one, and assumed it was all Lego.

    2. Re:Ugly Animation -- I'll say! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Heh. I thought, "Featurette" But they're sure as heck going to charge full movie price for it.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  39. Please, Oh Great One, just release Mr. Lucas by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've killed it.

    Star Wars is dead.

    Nobody is watching anymore.

    It's message has been buried.

    We're even laughing at it now.

    So really, REALLY, it is no longer a threat to you.

    With its political message about evil empires and its spiritual messages about personal power. Really. Nobody is listening to that anymore. You've muddied the waters hopelessly. You've achieved your objective.

    So please, please. Retract your mind-control claws from poor George's brain.

    Show some pity.

    -FL

    1. Re:Please, Oh Great One, just release Mr. Lucas by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      My 8 year old son and 5 year old daughters CANNOT WAIT FOR THE MOVIE.

      Lego would argue that Star Wars is still immensly relevant.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    2. Re:Please, Oh Great One, just release Mr. Lucas by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      8 and 5 year-olds were also into Ninja Turtles and Pokemon.

      In the 70's and 80's Star Wars was successful in appealing to both kids and adults. Something got lost along the way.

      -FL

  40. It's not the badness, it's the coverup by davidwr · · Score: 1

    You can get away with a lot of petty things like forgettable movies if only you don't try to cover it up.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  41. I knew not to see this when I saw the trailer by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am not in any way a Star Wars nerd anymore, take note of that.

    I saw a link to the trailer on a website I frequent back in May this year, I didn't even know a SW animated movie was coming out and honestly didn't care.
    However, I'm open to try a movie of any kind, animated, puppets, I don't care if it's good - I like pixar movies, I once liked Star Wars, I even tried the final fantasy movie.

    When the link was posted, within minutes people mocked it and laughed, it's got nothing to do with being untrue to the Star Wars franchise, if anything that may make some hardcore Star Wars fans 'forgive it' - I just saw a trailer for an absoloutely laughable looking kids film, not what I'm interested in, when "Jabba's son has been kidnapped!" is a plot element they feel worthy enough to put in a movie, I figure it's not going places.
    http://www.shacknews.com/laryn.x?id=16928277#itemanchor_16928277

    Here is something of note which I figure most of you will agree with and sadly hollywood will never read, nor understand.
    Ever since the 3 new movies, Star Wars has been forever tarnished, changing from a great story and universe I am interested in, to something I look at in my mind as simply a 'franchise' or a product.
    It's a fascinating transition and one I'm sure marketing people would love to know more about, maybe it's to do with my age or cynicism? Ultimately from my perspective the entire universe is now un-interesting to me, they've caused themselves a massive dis-service as I do not salivate at the thought of any Star Wars products, I don't even fondly remember the originals as I simply can't watch them in the same way.
    Yes they are still good but deep down I know that whole universe is diluted.
    I had the same feeling from the Matrix sequels, I have no interest even in the first film now.

    Just to clarify my stance, I was never ever a huge SW nerd, but I was I guess a light fan (I'm 30 btw) so I saw ROTJ in the cinema, too young for ANH and don't recall empire.
    I was never a major hardcore fan, I never purchased the toys or anything but I did like the universe, I did really love the movies and I would've purchased them on DVD for example.
    Even the changes to the old 3 movies, made it feel like a product (A New hope 1.01, buy it now!)

    Anyhow people go check out the new movie, word on the st is JABBAS SON HAS BEEN KIDNAPPED (oh noes!) :/

    1. Re:I knew not to see this when I saw the trailer by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Sorry about replying to my own post but in the thread I link there, someone has posted a response linking to this movie.
      It's a little over the top I admit and it's not from the Han / Leigha / Luke era which I prefer, none the less this shows how good an animated movie can be, 6 minutes of this is likely more entertaining than 90 minutes of the new movie (and most definitely many times more interesting than the poor trailer for the new one)

      Enjoy.
      http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=8348415574440242412

  42. Re:Merchandising, Merchandising, Merchandising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to any toy store.

    Yogurt got it right. It's all about the Merchandising.

    Now where's my Clone Wars Flamethrower? Oh, right here....

    PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT! (whoosh!)

  43. Insert useless subject everyone will ignore here by danwesnor · · Score: 1

    Sooo... no different than the last 3 movies, eh?

  44. so sad by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a total Star Wars nerd. Not quite a Star Wars dork -- that implies cosplaying at cons, themed weddings, and other acts of fan mortification. But I am a nerd. I grew up on these movies, I watched them over and over and know them inside and out. I would get excited every time I heard the 20th Century Fox fanfare and be disappointed when the movie wasn't Star Wars. I am 100% Lucas' prime demographic. I can obsess over the original trilogy like a Kevin Smith character, though I do differ with him on the matter of Hobbit badassery.

    But I digress.

    Lucas has managed to snuff my love affair with Star Wars. I saw Phantom Menace with great anticipation and came out inert. I torrented Clones and congratulated myself on saving the money. I only saw the last one in the theater because a gaggle of friends were going and I didn't want to be the wet blanket.

    I watched the trailer for this one. Crappy, soulless CGI. How does it differ from the nuTrilogy? I think the characters here looked slightly more lifelike here. There is not a twinge of anticipation, not even a twitch. I'll rewatch the originals (not the re-releases) but even my enjoyment of what came before has been harmed now by what has come after. George Lucas has beat this dead horse until it's nothing more than a thin, red paste. Scrape what's left into a hole and fucking bury it, man. It's done.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  45. Let's Be Realistic by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    I won't pretend to be a Star Wars geek from the outset - I was a Trek nut until Rick Berman & Brannon Braga kicked the living shit out of the franchise just to get one more dying breath out of it, these days for me it's Battlestar Galactica and proudly displaying the Union Jack tattooed on my chest with pride as we Brits proudly reclaim the "best sc-fi series" throne with the revamped Dr Who.

    So for me, the original Star Wars trilogy of movies were never something I went nutty over, I just really enjoyed them as good sci-fi entertainment that I occasionally rewatch.

    But let me say one thing here - George Lucas is a very, very shrewd businessman for creating Star Wars movies that, by their very nature, have been designed to squeeze as much money out the hands of fans with merchandise; countless vehicles that can be turned into model & Lego kits, loads of characters to write extra novels about, and even three foot high bears for the kiddies, to start them off nice and young...

    And that's all fine and dandy except for the fact that having so much crammed into so few films, it is virtually impossible to make it cohesive - at least as much as Gene Roddenberry did as the controlling hand of Star Trek over almost countless series episodes and a handful of the films.

    So what I'm really trying to say is that you cannot turn Star Wars into this realistic, cohesive fictional universe because it was never controlled that way by Lucas.

    The Star Wars franchise is, essentially, a merchandising platform, more so than ever, albeit a very well made and entertaining one (at least in the first trology anyway).

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  46. meh. by Carcarius · · Score: 1

    I personally got over the franchise a long time ago. There are many people where their childhood was heavily influenced by the world Lucas created/borrowed/repackaged/etc. It's pretty sad. I am starting to think that Lucas laughs at fans of Star Wars for being far too interested in something so meaningless. At least Star Trek (TV show - a couple of the movies were OK) had truly interesting stories to tell (based in human psychology and morality) and gave a glimpse of what mankind could be at it's best. Star Wars is eye candy and marketing. Lucas knows this and secretly (or not?) laughs all the way to the bank.

  47. Force Unleashed by Enderandrew · · Score: 0

    I downloaded the trailer for that new game you are talking about, Force Unleashed. The computer screenshots didn't seem to do it justice. I fired it up on my PS3 on my big screen and it was truly gorgeous. Not only does gameplay look great, but many people keep suggesting it has a great plot. They are doing a novelization of the game, and they suggest that a plot twist in the game will forever change how you view the original trilogy.

    I also second a new X-Wing/TIE game. X-Wing Alliance was decent, and there is still a community for that game, but I want to see a next-gen flight sim in the vein of X-Wing/TIE with all the ships in the Star Wars galaxy.

    Lastly, we need a solid KOTOR 3 to answer all the questions from the first two.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Force Unleashed by sabre3999 · · Score: 1

      I've heard alot of buzz recently about a new KOTOR. I'd personally love a third installment, but there's something wrong with the one I've heard about - its supposedly an MMO. I played Galaxies when it was fresh, and the grind really got to me. I'm hoping that if KOTOR 3 is an MMO that they find a way to do it right.

    2. Re:Force Unleashed by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Bioware has been working on a KOTOR-era MMO for a few years. I was recently confirmed. I'm still hoping for a single-player KOTOR 3 that resolves the KOTOR storylines.

      Most people don't seem to know this, but LucasArts went bankrupt and folded. They shipped KOTOR 2 really early and unfinished, and fired the pre-production team that was currently working on KOTOR 3.

      Since then, a new LucasArts team was born internally within ILM. They're working closer to the vest, and trying not to do so many games at once since they lost so much money on games like Clone Wars, Super Bombad Racing, Bounty Hunter, etc.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Force Unleashed by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Bioware has been working on a KOTOR-era MMO for a few years. I was recently confirmed.

      What does your religion have to do with it?

      Oh, wait. Jedi. Nevermind.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Force Unleashed by sabre3999 · · Score: 1

      I did know about them closing down around the time that KOTOR 2 was finished up... didn't know where the new team was coming from though. It'll be interesting to see what a game from ILM is like. I can imagine, with their artistic vision and talent for graphics design and execution, that it will be quite a gem.

      I'd actually like it if the KOTOR MMO shipped with a single-player option, complete with story wrap-up and all. I know that's alot to ask for though and would probably never happen. Still, there's no doubt in my mind that they'll finish up the storyline, stand-alone game or no.

    5. Re:Force Unleashed by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The ILM guys have been focusing on what they know well, and developing technology that will help their film and game divisions at the same time. They've been working on new physics technology, AI, animation and rendering techniques.

      They've shown some very interesting demos of Indy fighting off thugs on a hilly street in San Francisco. People never fell the same way twice. The way they attempted to regain balance was realistic, and often entertaining.

      They're creating tools that should make gameplay more dynamic. It still takes designers to develop good plots, levels, etc. But from the demos of Force Unleashed and the untitled Indy game, I think LucasArts is moving in an interesting new direction.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  48. Jabba the Hutt's Gay Uncle by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is a combination of words I never thought I would see.

    1. Re:Jabba the Hutt's Gay Uncle by Nomiwolf · · Score: 1

      I'm really hoping it is just some obscure brand of /. humour that is lost on me (Not that I'm going to make any effort to find out if its true or not - there are some things I'm just going to force myself to remain ignorant of)

    2. Re:Jabba the Hutt's Gay Uncle by Nomiwolf · · Score: 1

      Oh ffs - Lucas, what are you doing seriously? Stop flogging the franchise already, its already dead.

    3. Re:Jabba the Hutt's Gay Uncle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and hoped you'd never see on screen.

    4. Re:Jabba the Hutt's Gay Uncle by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      If only Lucas was dead. If only he had promptly dropped dead just after holy grail and as a tribute they has reissued the origional starwars, cleaned up and high rez exactly as it was that first time in the cinema.

      He would be remembered forever as one of the most loved film makers ever, instead of being that asshole who ruined every decent film he ever made then made a billion shit sequels.

  49. Not for the critics? by TheRudle · · Score: 1

    Gabe and Tycho hit the nail on the head with this comic. http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/24/

  50. Read the book - It was good by srobtjones · · Score: 1

    Lucas cannot write dialogue worth anything, which is why Natalie Portman was reduced to little more than a pretty face in the series. She did a great job in "The Professional" at such a young age. George has great overall ideas, but needs others to fill in the minute details. Hence, he employs excellent authors to write the stories which make up the books of the Star Wars mythos. The book for this movie was a good read. Karen Traviss is a good author, and I highly recommend her books if you get the free time to read. I am concerned, however, that Lucas will find a way to ruin the story with banal dialogue and by cutting out important parts fo the story. Plus, the book departs a bit from the known Star Wars mythos already established within Episodes II and III, but I cannot say how without ruining it for some.

  51. The solution is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I know my Son (9 years old) is near ape-shit about going and seeing this opening day.
    > I'm a bit skeptical about it. I was only 5 or 6 the first time I saw A New Hope in the theater.

    See it drunk. That'll bring out the 5 or 6 year old in you! :-)

    1. Re:The solution is obvious by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      See it drunk. That'll bring out the 5 or 6 year old in you! :-)

      That's what it took to get myself through watching the Mike Myers version of The Cat In The Hat when my Son "made" me take him to see it. A Dasini bottle of vodka.

      I don't drink anymore these days, though. I, somehow, have to watch this new Star Wars 100% sober... :\

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  52. Neither does George Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recall, Nute Gunray used an "Embargo" in the first movie and it worked just as well for him. :-)

  53. Oh, he's always been Lucas... by FreonTrip · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but in the past, he had interference.

    Note that most of those films were made after Star Wars made his reputation, that the first two Star Wars films were clearly either constrained by the studio or largely handed off to other people, and that despite its resounding success Return of the Jedi - the film over which Lucas had the most creative control - is widely regarded to be the worst of the first three films. His then-wife also apparently had quite a bit of creative input, if this interview with Mark Hamill is accurate.

  54. My thoughts - even though I havent seen it yet: by jzarling · · Score: 1

    Will it save the franchise?
    Depends, if by save you mean will it reinvigorate it from a story point of view, probably not. I dont think GL really cares as much about preserving the canon as he does with creating new stories that in his mind were all part of the great mythos he created back in the early 70's.

    IF by save you mean it will allow toy manufacturers to offer a slew of crap in time for the holidays, then yeah it will save the franchise and maybe just maybe baby Jabba will teach the world to love.

    Personally I want to see George remake American Graffitti within the SW universe. He could set it on Tatooine just prior to the events in episode 4. We could Luke work out some teenage angst with his friends during a crazy night cruising around Mos Eisly, and Toshi Station.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  55. TIE Fighter II by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    Personally I want an updated "Tie Fighter" game, that was probably their best sim.

    But do you really want TIE Fighter II, TIE Fighter II' Champion Edition, TIE Fighter II Turbo: Hyper Fighting, Super TIE Fighter II: The New Challengers, Super TIE Fighter II Turbo, and Super TIE Fighter II Turbo HD Remix?

    1. Re:TIE Fighter II by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given how awesome TIE Fighter was? I'd take that.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    2. Re:TIE Fighter II by sabre3999 · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I still break out the original from time to time... If infinite milking is the price I must pay, so be it.

    3. Re:TIE Fighter II by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I have to think about that...

      *remembers playing TIE Fighter*

      Yes. Yes, I do.

    4. Re:TIE Fighter II by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      But do you really want TIE Fighter II, TIE Fighter II' Champion Edition, TIE Fighter II Turbo: Hyper Fighting, Super TIE Fighter II: The New Challengers, Super TIE Fighter II Turbo, and Super TIE Fighter II Turbo HD Remix?

      And don't forget Tie Fighter: The movie. Starring CG Raul Julia.

    5. Re:TIE Fighter II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *shameless plug*

      There is a project to create a Star Wars space sim using the open source Freespace 2 engine (it's been heavily updated since it was open sourced). It will be closer to XvT than to the later arcade games, something Lucasarts hasn't done in quite a while. I think the name is Fate of the Galaxy.

    6. Re:TIE Fighter II by flitty · · Score: 1

      Tie Fighter and Xwing released on XBLA (and Windows Live) would be sweet. The graphics and network code could be cleaned up to allow for 32 players easy. The story in Tie Fighter was pretty great (when i was 10) actually helping protect and defend the TIE Advance during development and then getting to fly it, felt pretty good. Too often stories in games like that have to do with "politics" or outside forces that you have no connection to. Making your ships part of the story was pretty smart.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    7. Re:TIE Fighter II by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    8. Re:TIE Fighter II by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this one.

      I'm watching this project with a lot of interest. I just hope they don't get C&D'd.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  56. actually by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

    One use of the verb embargo means just to prohibit. It's common in newspaper publishing where wire stories are sometimes sent out a few days ahead, but are embargoed from publication till a specified date. And that use of the verb has been around at least since 1824 (the OED cites an example from Lord Byron's Don Juan).

  57. Dear LucasArts by snarfies · · Score: 4, Funny

    The more you tighten your grip, LucasArts, the more reviewers will slip through your fingers.

  58. Don't fight it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Sadly, I'll be seeing this travesty on Saturday with my two boy and my nephews.

    See you at ThePirateBay.org! I'm wondering if they'll have a Clone Wars logo. LOL Anakata! http://thepiratebay.org/legal

  59. Exactly by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    That's just what I thought when I saw the commercial, kids are going to see this in droves. However, in north america, mature animation is getting more and more common, such as with Animatrix, Family Guy, South Park, etc but people still associate it with crude humor and not the advantages it can lend to storytelling. In Japan it's already quite common to have more mature animations when making a live production is not possible, and that has resulted in many interesting animes that lots of countries import including north america, so clearly there is some market for it. It depends how this movie approaches it. I think it's just about how people see animation, they automatically discount it as being used for telling 'lesser' stories than live action ones. I think the closest thing people in north america will accept as mature entertainment which is animated, is something like Beowulf. But people need to open up their expectations a bit more and give these things a chance, animation is a great medium for storytelling and can suspend your disbelief as well as live action can.

  60. I'll fix it by kenp2002 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can save it:

    I'll craft Star Wars into a 22 season television series about the slow decay of the Jedi and the friction between the Sith Council and the the current Sith Lord Sidious.

    Sidious on the outs with the Council is in a despirate position and a critical timing to regain control of the galaxy.

    Mean while the Jedi have descended into a religious in-fighting on differing theories of the nature of the Force.

    Qui Gon is leading the "Living Force" theory basing it in the Midchlorians. Yoda is leading the Universal Force theory (mirroring the differing views of physics, partical, quantum, string, etc..)

    The Galactic Sentate is steeping in corruption and dealing with technological stagnation and the political fall out of ivolving the Sith in ending the last of the Mandalorian strong holds. (The Sith this time function as more of a mafia-like organization.)

    We then slowly start moving through the movies starting with episode 1 but spend considerably more time focusing on the the infighting of the Jedi and the drama that comes about with admitting Annakin. (Seasons 1-3)

    Ok now we are at Movie #2's content where we really start breaking down Anakin psychologically. Obi Wan is the presumed to lead the Living Force movement but is more concerned with the Jedi's pure function, protecting the Republic. Sidious is playing a dangerous game violating several of the Sith's tenants and is running the risk of losing the Sith agent's loyalty. Amadala is dealing with a considerable age gap with Annakin and is dangerously close to plunging the Sentate into a political mess. (Seasons 4-5)

    Ok Third Movie content where the Jedi implode politically just in time to get slaughtered. We focus this season specifically on Annakin\Vader and the trouble the Emperor has gotten himself into. At the last moment the Emperor has grabbed victory and appeased the Sith Council for now... The Jedi are hunted and exterminated as Vader begins his reign.
    (Season 6)

    (Fast Forward 20 Years, yes we are aging the twins from original cannon)

    Vader is a tormented soul but suprisingly the Emperor and Vader are in trouble contantly dealing with the reality of ruling the universe. Brokering deals with the Hutt, defending the Empire for invaders, and the rebellion. We paint an unapologetic yet sympathetic view of the Empire internals. Vader's confidant turns out to be Bobba Fett and the Emperor has to deal with growing threats of rebellion, knowing full well that failure will turn the Sith against him in full.

    Mean while Luke and Leia's early life plays out in short clips while, once marginal characters (Ackabar, etc.) play out in how they become part of the rebellion.

    (Season 7-10)

    Ok Movie 4 content begins as a series of riots break out forcing the Emperor to implement the doctrine of fear as a despirate response to the growing rebellion. The clock has started and the only bargining chip he has is the Death Star.

    Obi Wan gets word of the open rebellion and senses the time is right. Fate delivers Luke to him.

    Mean while the Death Star plans are stolen and the story of their delivery to Leia unfolds.

    (Season 11-13)

    Ok Movie 5 Content remains straight forward from the movie but an additional focus of the Anti-Jedi propaganda starting to fall apart and the dangerous deals the Relbellion has to make to secure ships, supplies, etc.

    Vader figures out whole Luke is and discretely tried to protect his son while playing a deadly game of cat and mouse with the Emperor, thinking Luke and himself can overthrow the Emperor and "Fix this, make things right" in his own twisted way.

    Han begins to notice that Luke and Leia act a bit too much like one another, begins to see some similarities...

    (Season 14 - 16)

    Movie 6 now, with a slightly different take. We make the Ewoks just a tad more menacing and a little less cuddly and really focus now on Vader and the Emperor as advisaries. Luke and Leia playout but we add in the "cost of victory" for th

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:I'll fix it by hubie · · Score: 1

      Forgive my lack of Star Wars geekdom knowledge, but was there mention of a Sith Council in the story? I thought at the end of the first movie Yoda says to Samuel Jackson something to the effect of there are always two: a Sith Lord and an apprentice; never more and never less.

    2. Re:I'll fix it by andy9701 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I foresee one problem with this set up: the SciFi channel will cancel this series at the most inconvenient time for the creators, thus causing them to stuff the rest of the story into a 4 hour miniseries, skipping all of the good parts that would have occurred if the series was left to run its course.

    3. Re:I'll fix it by dogeatery · · Score: 1

      I'm not watching the new film or subsequent episodes (there will be episodes for TV, right?), but I would totally watch what you just summarized!

    4. Re:I'll fix it by Atanamis · · Score: 1

      Overall, I like the conversion to a 22 season television series. I think there are some key elements from the saga you are missing though that should be included.

      Season 1: Should focus on the corruption of the senate and the deadlock of the Jedi. The focus should be built on the fact that neither the senate nor the Jedi counsel are actively enforcing law and order. The attack on Naboo will only by the final deterioration of galactic order, following years of increasing disorder across the galaxy that neither the Senate nor the Council will address. The Jedi have a conflict between Qui Gon's belief that the force should be used to actively protect those in need and Yoda's position that emotion needs to be stripped from the Jedi way of life, and that their power should be used exclusively to protect the peace. Yoda controls the Council and keep Qui Gon's allies off it. Palpatine is sympathetically portrayed as someone who fights corruption in the Senate and campaigns for the rebuilding of the fleet and army to protect the people. Main characters are Qui Gon, Obi Wan, Yoda, and Palpatine.

      Season 2: Palpatine is revealed to be secretly learning the ways of the Sith, with the intent of being able to force the Senate to establish order. Using the Force, he begins building popular support galaxy wide, but realizes that until the disorder becomes personal to him that his support will be limited. As a result, he creates the persona of Darth Sideous to foster an attack on his own homeworld of Naboo. His belief is that this final act of aggression will allow him to take control of the Senate and help those in need. He also forms a secret alliance (as Sideous) with Count Dooku, a former Jedi who also feels that the Republic is too corrupt and is building the groundwork for a revolution. Qui Gon is clearly losing his influence with the Council, despite being at a point in his career where he should BE a member of the Council. Perhaps he is specifically passed up for the role by a more junior Jedi.

      Season 3: The trade federation is lured into attacking Naboo, and Palpatine manipulates this action into a vote of no confidence for the chancellor, a well meaning but politically weak leader. His platform, to fight the corruption in the Senate and oppose the violence growing throughout the galaxy. This is the fall of Palpatine, as he overcomes his doubts about commanding an attack on his homeworld believing it is for the greater good. Before now, Sideous was the false identity and Palpatine the real, increasingly that reverses in this season. Yoda is greatly weakened politically due to his failure to foresee the return of the Sith (Darth Maul), believed extinct for 1000 years. Many of Qui Gon's followers in the order suspect that Qui Gon was deliberately sent to his death by the Council, and the Council allow Anakin into the order as a placatory move to prevent a complete schism. Obi Wan insists that Anakin skip the "pre-apprentice" stage that is taught by Yoda, both because Anakin is technically too old for it and because he has questions regarding Yoda's fitness to lead.

      Season 4: Focuses on the growth of Anakin as a Jedi. He is for the most part ignored by the Council, who fear he will be the end of the Jedi Order. Palpatine takes special note of Anakin's immense strength in the force though, and mentors him wherever possible. Palpatine focuses on the great injustices taking place in the galaxy, and how these could be addressed with a stronger central government. Obi Wan grows as champion of Qui Gon's faction arguing that protecting the Republic is the primary goal of the Jedi, and Yoda continues to lose power politically. Sideous continues to grow in power, and maintains a focus on blinding and confusing Yoda. He is aware that Yoda is his most dangerous opponent (due to his prophetic abilities), and makes special effort to reduce the respect of the order for him. Yoda is uncertain why he is no longer able to view the future, and fears he may be too old to lead effectively.

      Season 5: Dooku's rebellion b

      --
      Atanamis
    5. Re:I'll fix it by Arivia · · Score: 1

      One problem: no network drama series has lasted beyond 20 years in the US, and the two longest (Gunsmoke at 20 and Law & Order starting season 19 in January 2009) largely have their longevity explained by their standalone episode format and continually rotating cast; those factors are antithetical to your idea. Oh, and as someone who tried to catch up on L&O - watching sixteen seasons of a show that doesn't care if you skip episodes took a year. Literally. Watching sixteen seasons of a serial would take two, probably - likely too long for anyone to get into.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    6. Re:I'll fix it by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      New addition to add political pressure within an orgainzation, affords better story telling. It would take far more then just two to corrdinate all the activities. While two may call the shots there will still be people "on the payroll" so to speak.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    7. Re:I'll fix it by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Easy Fix: Animate it. While, to my knowledge, there has never been a long running animated drama, why not give it a shot with Star Wars? Can't be any worse then what Lucas has done lately.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    8. Re:I'll fix it by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      I like the additions but if Palpatine is the centuries old Plagus apprentice then we need factor that in. I like the idea of role reversal though with Maul and Palpatine as you described, perhaps Maul is the Sith's "man in their pocket" only to end up become Palpatine's secret weapon to keep the Sith placated... I like where this is going. We should get a screen play ready!

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    9. Re:I'll fix it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy!
          What a great idea! I love all the movies, and I eat up all-things-starwars. I think people are hyper-critical of the prequels despite their flaws. People my age (33) grew up with star wars, and the prequels will never live up to the star wars experience they had when they were young.
          I like reading the books, but I think Zahn did more damage to the franchise then anyone with his inconsistent novels. YOU seem to have a great perspective on what makes star wars interesting. Can we make this TV series thing happen? Maybe we can form a group of scrappy fan-rebels to storm Lucas-arts, and force them to produce this TV series with you as exec producer.
      AT least write the scripts! I'd want to read them!
      -Matt H
      (I post as anonymous coward 'cause I don't want to take the time to create an account!)

    10. Re:I'll fix it by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      "Always two there are; a Master, and an Apprentice." Not "Only two."

      Hell, he could just as easily been talking about the Jedi; they tend to travel in pairs as well. But mainly, he was pointing out that a Sith Master is loathe to take on more than one Apprentice, lest they gang up and over-power them, and a Sith Apprentice tends to become a Master by, well, defeating his Master.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  61. Yoda says by Grashnak · · Score: 1

    When so many movies you have made, suck so much you will not.

    --
    Life needs more saving throws.
  62. Secret History of Star Wars by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

    In the early days Lucas had people helping him with the art, story and scripts including his wife. He parted ways with these people, losing excellent screenwriter Kasdan, director Kershner and producer Kurtz, the last two over money - Lucas wanted to make the movies on the cheap and those guys cared about quality. I don't think he ever realized how important these people were to the vision. He just assumed he was a genius and he didn't need them. He was wrong.

    Recommend you read SecretHistoryOfStarWars.com - Bring Tissues :(

  63. Embargo this.... by blankoboy · · Score: 1
    The review before AICN caved in to Lucas's phallus attack:

    "Harry hated THE CLONE WARS!

    I've never hated a STAR WARS film before. I have weathered Jar Jar and any number of Ewoks. I survived Hayden and a wooden Portman. I even accepted Jake Lloyd. I handled all that because it felt like STAR WARS.

    I can accept all of Lucas' flaws, so long as at its heart it felt like Star Wars. I can deal with politics in Star Wars. I can deal with trade skirmishes in Star Wars. I can deal with musical numbers, breathing in the vacuum of space. Basically - so long as it feels like STAR WARS - I can watch any of it.

    Was I looking forward to STAR WARS: THE CLONE WARS (2008)?

    ******** A!

    I was dying. After Genndy's CLONE WARS - I felt that perhaps Lucas "got it" - and that this new animated series was taking a lead from Tartakovsky's brilliant assembly of pieces. Genndy's CLONE WARS got STAR WARS better than anyone has got it since Lawrence Kasdan and Irvin Kershner. Genndy took designs and characters that folks were dissatisfied with and made them cool. He did this by using and adapting the themes created by John Williams, the wholly perfect entity involved with Star Wars along with... the sound effects of Ben Burtt. He understood speed and motion - not just with action, but in editing. He understood classic film composition and iconography. And he knows what BADASS is.

    The folks behind this STAR WARS: THE CLONE WARS movie... you could tell, they looked at what Genndy did - but they didn't understand any of it. There's a ****load of battles and ***** going boom. There's noise everywhere - fury everywhere... but none of it is directed. The music by Kevin Kiner is criminally bad. Why they didn't employ Paul Dinletir and James Venable is beyond me. No, no - let's hire the composer of WALKER, TEXAS RANGER. Ahem.

    Now - I made excuses for this film as I was watching it. I don't think you understand how much I love STAR WARS. Maybe you do, maybe you do too.

    Before the movie started I was firing myself up to go out after the film and buy that new $200 Hasbro Millenium Falcon. I really wanted to go buy it, and I wanted this movie to empower my brain to go through with that. Instead, I found myself at home - putting on Genndy's THE CLONE WARS - to try and rebuild my passion - so I can go get that new Falcon.

    Instead - I'm thinking I'll just be here at home enjoying this and that'll be all I need.

    Anyway - as I was watching the film, I was excusing the sloppy shots, the sloppy use of the Clone Troopers and Droids - undoing all the awesome work that Genndy had done - and the droids are silly again. The Clone Troopers are limp. And the Jedi - they're at 25% power from the mind of Genndy. But I was accepting that. I figured that was Lucas dialing back so that the animated series wouldn't overpower his features.

    Then they introduced Baby Jabba aka Rotta the Huttlet aka Stinky. At the point of this character's introduction - it officially became, the worst character in the history of STAR WARS. If you hate George Lucas cutsiepoo bull**** - oooooooh boy. You're gonna have a field day of venting and hatred directed at this unbelievably ****ing awful little ****.

    Oh - but wait... Little Stinky the Hutt isn't the worst character in the history of STAR WARS... because Stinky got introduced earlier in the film. As much as I hated lil Stinky... I was weathering Stinky. I seriously was. But later there was a character of such immense **** - offensively bad. The character was so bad, so incredibly awful - that it was a slap to the face. It woke me out of my ****-accepting stupor and made me angry. SUDDENLY my "inner fanboy rage" was awoken.

    As I watched this terrifyingly awful character named Ziro the Hutt. A seemingly female Hutt - with tattoos and make-up that sounds like a racist take on a Black New Orleans Crack-Dealing Whore. Because this Hutt speaks ENGLISH - and it is many times worse than I'm actually describing. This character was actually too much for me. So bad

    1. Re:Embargo this.... by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's all post it in the talkbacks en masse.

      Seriously, if you have a few thousand Slashdotters posting it in the talkbacks, the moderators will have to spend all day banning people. Remember, it'll only take a few seconds for one of us to post it; whoever has to remove thousands of posts and ban thousands of people will have their day ruined.

      I wish AICN had balls like the Inquirer. The INQ laughs at embargoes and openly mocks people who try to enforce them.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    2. Re:Embargo this.... by blankoboy · · Score: 1

      Well Harry wants to be at the premier for "Raiders of the Lost Ark 9" and "Star Wars epsiode 22: The revenge of Jar Jar's great grand children". He cries about what a sellout Lucas has become yet his own site is just the same, he wants to be invited to the premiers so i can continue his own business. The sellout kisses the ass of the bigger sellout.

  64. The story arc in free fall? by argent · · Score: 1

    I saw "Episode IV" when it was brand new, on my first visit to the United States, and that's the clearest memory I have of those two weeks in Hawaii.

    This is the first I'd heard that there was a new movie.

    It's a damn shame that the story arc has turned out to be a ballistic trajectory.

  65. Reviews are only temporarily pulled by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 2, Informative
    The reviews were temporarily pulled because it was part of the agreement that they wouldn't be published until the release date of the movie. According to the aintitcool.com retraction:

    When I went to see THE CLONE WARS in Los Angeles, I was told there was an embargo on reviews until the day of release....The review is off the site until Friday.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
  66. I hope it doesn't save the franchise by Yogi_Stewart_4 · · Score: 1

    Like most "franchises" in hollywood, this is another cash hungry one that needs to die a quick death. Followed by the Pirates of the Caribbean series. And the Mummy. And the Fantastic Four garbage. And all horror movie franchises. And anything by Uwe Boll. I'll stop now.

  67. MILLLLLIONS!! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Yeah sure...
    There is also certainly millions to be made in producing a action packed adventure series featuring heroes from religion A, while they fight and slaughter evildoers from religion B and promoting holy war between those two religions.
    Hint: Sell the movie to the followers of the religion A.

    It would make millions AND insult the followers of both religions. Epic WIN!

    Or are some things perhaps just bad taste?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  68. Cool Ewoks? No way! by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

    The only reason the Star Wars Battlefront game was so popular was that you got to shoot Ewoks and Gunguns. Personally I get on the speeder bike and run a minimum fifty the little rats over a gane. Oooopeeedeee!

  69. He'll love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw a public-preview, no embargo required. I wasn't impressed but kids will love it.

    Think made-for-American-kids Japanese-warrior-animation shows of the Pokemon style plotline meets Hollywood-3D-computer animation graphics set in a Star Wars universe.

    Simple plot. Good guys win. Upper-end-TV-quality 3D-animation graphics.

  70. I hope it's as bad as they say it is by entmike · · Score: 1

    At a risk of being flame bait, I say good. I hope this movie drags this over saturated franchise down to unrecoverable depths. I dream of a day that I do not see Star Wars iterated in every form imaginable. A day where even the nerds realize it's no longer cool or hip to cosplay as Darth Vader and Princess Leia, or write slash fanfic about it.

  71. bridges by Jodka · · Score: 2, Funny

    "action figures.. like Baby Jabba Hutt and Jabba the Hutt's Gay Uncle may have taken the franchise a bridge too far."

    Yes, a bridge too far over a tank of sharks.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:bridges by Tetsujin · · Score: 1


      "action figures.. like Baby Jabba Hutt and Jabba the Hutt's Gay Uncle may have taken the franchise a bridge too far."

      Yes, a bridge too far over a tank of sharks.

      I understand the "jumped the shark" think is considered out of date these days. You might consider going with "nuked the fridge" instead, which is looking like a promising contemporary alternative...

      Though, honestly, I think if you want to talk about a franchise getting pushed too far, talk to Stallone. Maybe Schwarzenegger, too - he was looking kind of dumpy in "Terminator 3" but Stallone, with Rocky and Rambo...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  72. Jabba The Hut's Gay Uncle's Name.... Jabbitt Dabut by capitalj · · Score: 0

    or something.

  73. Oh, I have no doubt by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know exactly what's driving Lucas on this. Cash. Period. Whatever motivations he may have once had for this story and this franchise, his sole concern now seems to be the bank account.

    Supposedly the new movie was supposed to be televised first and then straight to DVD, and during preparation of the movie Lucas' people said he lit up and said something like "This is so good it needs to be in theaters!".

    I think it was more like "Hey, I think we can squeeze another 90 to 100 million out of the suckers if we put this in theaters".

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      You figured it out!

      Your keen powers of observation astound me.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    2. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

      God forbid someone making money in this world. Do you realize that Lucas paid for this movie and a full seasons worth of episodes right out of his own pocket? Shame on him for trying to make his money back. Oh and that Dark Knight movie, that is a huge cash grab...HUGE!

    3. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Insightful
      God forbid someone making money in this world.

      It isn't "making money" that is the problem. There are acceptable ways to make money, and unacceptable ways. The intersection of art and money is touchy, and selling-out usually does hurt the art (though perhaps not in proportion to the feeling of betrayal expressed by fans). If your mother and sisters announced that they had become prostitutes, surely you wouldn't object to the fact that they were making money.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    4. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know exactly what's driving Lucas on this. Cash. Period. Whatever motivations he may have once had for this story and this franchise, his sole concern now seems to be the bank account.

      I disagree. According to Forbes, George's personal fortune is immense. He's worth $3.5 billion, making him #61 on the list of the 400 Richest people in America. He could buy a new Ferrari every day for the rest of his life and still have billions left over. Ditto for yachts, mansions, and jets. What possible motivation would he have to try and amass more wealth? As Bill Gates once said, at some point, no matter how much you're able to pay for a hamburger, does it taste any better?

      What's driving Lucas here is that he thinks his films are the highest art in the land. He truly thinks he can write good dialogue (he can't), touching love scenes (dear God, no), and witty humor (for a three-year-old, maybe). He puts out this execrable dreck because, in his mind, it's all the other films that are execrable dreck. His wealth allows him to live in his own world, and I'm quite sure all those around him -- who are dependent upon him for a paycheck -- nod respectfully and praise his work as that of a master even when they'd probably rather wipe their asses with it.

      No, it's not greed that drives Lucas to destroy our cherished childhood memories of one of the most seminal films ever made. It's his pride. He simply refuses to believe he's as awful of a filmmaker as he really is, and stuff like Clone Wars is the result.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    5. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by Rakarra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Supposedly the new movie was supposed to be televised first and then straight to DVD, and during preparation of the movie Lucas' people said he lit up and said something like "This is so good it needs to be in theaters!".

      I don't know that Lucas is "only" in it for the money. The above is exactly what happened with Toy Story 2, yet the difference was that Lucas thought he had a good movie.. but he didn't. The more I look at his newer stuff, the more it's apparent that he simply doesn't have judgment with regards to the quality of his work. He has no one who can tell him "no, this sucks" anymore, and when you surround yourself with yes-men and that's all you ever hear, you begin to believe your own bullshit. While greed may be a big factor, I think a big part of it is just how out of touch Lucas is. He doesn't have the pure, forceful vision, and has no moderating influences.

    6. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "No, it's not greed that drives Lucas to destroy our cherished childhood memories of one of the most seminal films ever made. It's his pride. He simply refuses to believe he's as awful of a filmmaker as he really is, and stuff like Clone Wars is the result."

      Maybe you're right. I still don't exclude cynical greed as a profit motive... to some people, enough is never enough... but as Hemingway once said, the rich are very different from you and I, so perhaps Lucas really does think that stuff like Clone Wars is a vital addition to the arts.

      In that case, it's a good thing he's rich, because living in your own little world like that must take a lot of maintenance...

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    7. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars was and always will be dumbed down pantomime Sci Fi. It rips off Dune and loads of other Sci Fi and well, it was ok when I was 10, but now? It's for kids, I always preferred Trek....

    8. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe you're right. I still don't exclude cynical greed as a profit motive... to some people, enough is never enough...

      Being a few billion short of a billionaire myself, I offer the following as speculation:

      Wealth is a means to acquire luxury, but once you can afford a lifetime ofluxury, what good is more wealth? Once someone reaches a wealth level where (a) they need never work again in their lives unless they want to and (b) they can afford any luxury available in the entire world, I think it fundamentally alters their basis for wants. Dollars no longer matter -- literally -- so something else takes that place. For some it's status, for others it's power, or recognition, or revenge, or any of the other baser motivations for having the most, the biggest, or the best.

      George loves making movies. That is not a crime, and it would be a good thing if either (a) he were any good at it or (b) he kept them to himself. Unfortunately neither (a) nor (b) apply, and that's why Star Wars has gone downhill -- and at increasing speed -- since Empire Strikes Back.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    9. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by Johnny+Chinpo · · Score: 2, Funny

      If anyone was willing to pay for sex with my mother or sisters, they have bigger problems than their cashflow.

    10. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      It is probably both his pride, and cash. Look, strange as it may seem, and disregarding the few people who actually manage to avoid it, you can never have enough money.

      Seems weird. But there are many, Many, MANY people who have so much money that they don't know what to do with it - yet they still work like crazy to make even more of it. Apparently you get addicted to it...

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    11. Re:Oh, I have no doubt by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Admiral Akbar: It's a trap!

      George Lucas: Shut your trap!

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  74. Large Contradiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or is there a glaring contradiction from what I've read about the overall plot.

    Anakin Skywalker and his Padawan learner are sent on a mission to .... blah blah blah.

    In Revenge of the Sith Anakin was allowed to sit on the council and not promoted to a Jedi Knight and thus would not have a Padawan to apprentice him. He was still Obi-Wans Padawan himself. By the end of the movie he became the Darth Vader we all know and love.

    That seems like a gross oversight to me on Lucas' part or am I completely missing something?

  75. Ewoks cool? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "Wow. Seriously dude, I've never, ever heard those words used together like that."

    Any moment now, Mr. T is gonna throw snickers bars at him.

    "Get some nuts!"

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  76. Wife saw it, it was bad by cduffy · · Score: 1

    Per subject -- we were given a ticket to admit two to an advance screening last weekend. I didn't go because I had work to do; turns out it was for the better.

    The Wife (very much a geek -- she planned our first Valentine's Day to see Lord Of The Rings, and I'm right now wearing her Say No To Dubs shirt from a long-ago anime con) said it was awful -- "I might have enjoyed if I'd been a 7-year-old boy", IIRC ...so yar, bad reviews aren't surprising me one bit.

  77. Jumped the Shark by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I think the franchise was lost among the faithful a long time ago. Somewhere between Mesaa and Jar-Jar Binks.

    I didn't have a problem with Jar-Jar. I actually liked the Gungan dialect. I don't understand the basis for the huge tide of animosity against Jar-Jar. Sure, he was bumbling and inept, but he was there for comic relief.

    I can understand George Lucas wanting to polish off episodes 4-6, and some of the additions were good. Most stood out too much because the CGI did not match the model shots. I don't like the music he chose when the Ewoks are celebrating the destruction of the Death Star. I like the original better. Of course, the biggest foul-up was changing the Han/Greedo gunfight. It took the most three dimensional character of the franchise and squashed it flat.

    A kid in a pod race, who also happens to knock out the Droid Command Ship, and save the day. Anakin should have been played by someone closer to Hayden Christensen's age. Anakin should have been played with a little darker character. He started off too good.

    The midichlorians sucked the mystery right out of the force.
    The romance between Anakin and Padme was, well, bland.
    Darth Maul was killed off too quickly.

    All of these things I could put up with. Sure it was bad, but none of these things made me want to stop watching. The point for me when I was no longer able to immerse myself in the films, the point where Star Wars jumped the shark was when R2D2 flew.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  78. Mediocre? by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gotta say, I've gone back and watched those as an adult and been shocked at how mediocre they really are. I guess nine year olds are an easy audience to please.

    I don't think the original is mediocre at all. Simple, maybe, but that doesn't equal mediocre. I think your opinion may be colored by the fact that for 30 years, competitors have tried to ape Lucas' original genius, by adding more and more special effects, and by making the story more complex, adult, and "real".

    But that's missing the point completely. Star Wars struck such a universal chord in us because it's essentially a fairy tale with a moral story at the center. The simplicity was actually part and parcel of why it was so effective. Simple was a virtue in that movie. We didn't want nuance and intrigue and grey areas. After Vietnam, Watergate, Pol Pot, Jonestown, Charles Manson, urban riots, and Soviets stretching across the globe, we had all the nuance, intrigue, and gray areas we could handle, thanks. What we needed was a simple, old fashioned, black and white tale that showed good guys should still beat beat guys. Lucas gave us exactly what we needed, what our souls were craving; a cut and dried heroic epic with a moral to the story. He just did it with spaceships and wookies.

    And maybe that's why the last few movies were so abominable. He went from a straight up "good guys are better than bad guys" allegory to "only the Sith deal in absolutes"; he took away our simple heroic fairy tale, and gave us... nuance, intrigue, and gray areas.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Mediocre? by Danse · · Score: 1

      And maybe that's why the last few movies were so abominable. He went from a straight up "good guys are better than bad guys" allegory to "only the Sith deal in absolutes"; he took away our simple heroic fairy tale, and gave us... nuance, intrigue, and gray areas.

      No, I think the problem was still just horrible writing, casting and directing rather than an inherent problem with the story. The stories could have been better, but they weren't the real problem. Get rid of Jar-Jar, cast someone that can actually act to play Anakin, and cut some of the dumbest slapstick stuff out and maybe add in some (even slightly) more intelligent humor, and the movies would have been a lot better. Han's sarcasm and banter with Leia and Chewie worked. Jar-Jar is just really really dumb.

      The audience for the prequels could easily deal with the little bit of "gray-ness". It's not like it really made it too hard to tell good from bad. It was the extra crap that served no purpose except to highlight the crappy dialog and casting that really messed things up.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:Mediocre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a crappy kid actor, a very crappy CG character, a stilted, whiny Anakin, a terrible performance from Portman, and a whole bunch of other crap. But you do make a good point.

    3. Re:Mediocre? by noewun · · Score: 1

      My chief problem isn't with the structure or the actors: it's with the writing, and it's because of this I think they're mediocre. There is so much exposition, such that you wonder where Lucas was when they taught "show, don't tell." I have a theory that Lucas just didn't trust his ability to tell the story using only visuals and Brackett's script and felt the need to modify her words in order to drive. the. point. home.

      To contrast: I actually do believe the young Luke's scenes with his aunt and uncle. He's this whiny kid stuck in the middle of nowhere, and I buy him and the relationship between he and his guardians. I even buy Harrison Ford and his cowboy swagger. But when the characters start talking about the Force, or the politics of the time, we're suddenly being lectured to. It's almost as if the movie was shot using two scripts, which is what makes me think the shitty parts are Lucas and the good parts are Brackett.

      Anyway, enough nerding for today.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  79. Now its all about the special effects by jjm496 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When Lucas made the first 3 his people developed new cutting edge special effects, but because it was all so time consuming and difficult they had to be frugal in their use. The effects were there to support the elements of the story. The movies therefore had to bring their points across with real storylines and acting ability. Elements had to be left to the imagination.

    Now, since CGI effects are a dime a dozen, he can throw them in everywhere he wants. Now the storyline and characters are just supporting elements for all the "cool" visual effects. He doesn't want anyone to imagine anymore, he wants to spoon feed you everything the way he sees it.

    Maybe a braindead audience is easier to sell "made in taiwan" toys to?

  80. ANH as lit by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Looked at in isolation (which is all we had in '77 and '78), Episode IV (back then, simply known as "Star Wars") fits nicely into the Arthurian legend as well.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  81. Grow up by rgviza · · Score: 1

    Star Wars is written mostly with 10 year olds in mind as entertainment for kids. If you try to enjoy it from the perspective of an adult, of course it's going to be lacking.

    It's really a bigger league Power Rangers kind of franchise. I think too many people watch a new Star Wars flick with too much expectation. I'm not sure whether they are looking for the meaning of life or an oscar worthy film, or whatever they expect, but if it's more than what a 10 year old is looking for, the expectations are too much.

    The only problem I have with any of Lucas' movies is the last 2 were a little too mature for 10 year olds(so are a little too intense or scary). Lucas said that himself that the last movie was for adults. I think it was a huge mistake, because you can never make adults happy with a Star Wars movie, but kids eat it up. I think Episode III proved it. I just wish my kid didn't have to wait until he's much older to see it.

    I'm glad to see Lucas has gone back to kid's movies. I'm going to see the new one with my son. I'm sure he'll love it. I'll love it too, because I'm expecting to see a kid's action film, not find the hidden meaning of life within a star wars plot.

    Grow up?

    -Viz

    --
    Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  82. Haven't seen it, but... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of clips; I can't tell you the storyline or the quality of the writing or music from what I've seen, but the quality of the animation and style of the rendering is quite good, IMO. A lot better than the Genndy Tartakovsky style, which was fine for Samurai Jack, but not Clone Wars.

    Keep in mind, this is a TV show... yes, I know it's going to be playing in theaters, but it's basically just a few episodes of the latest Clone Wars series on Cartoon Network, from what I understand, and it will continue on in TV series at some point after the movie.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  83. This confirms it beyond a shadow of a doubt by sneakyimp · · Score: 1

    George Lucas is a man with his head up his ass.

    1. Re:This confirms it beyond a shadow of a doubt by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Impressive when you consider the man hasn't had a neck in about 20 years now, that requires some skills that even Goatseman would envy.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    2. Re:This confirms it beyond a shadow of a doubt by sneakyimp · · Score: 1

      Totally! Personally, I've always wondered why he shaves some of his chins and not the others.

  84. george lucas makes me rolf ---- what arrogance!! by freeballer · · Score: 1
    George, you got nobody else to blame for the ginormous POS you've put out since the orignal trilogy... No not ep 1-3, not remastered or even dvd copies of "original trilogy" but the laserdisk masters. Was before he got the dumb idea to remaster, remake and generally turn into a money grubbing sob. I am not one of these who HATES the movies, I luv the original's and was one of my favorite movies to watch on tv and took every chance when was a kid. BUT NOW you have soul calibur with sw, a remade tv show with cartoonish graphics I have yet to look at toys 'r us for the crap sold there.

    I sincerly hope; a) he comes up with something GOOD and original star wars b) studio gets another original idea and produce themselves c) george gets off his high horse, riding the only good thing he's ever done in his lifetime (career wise -- and by himeself cause indy was george / speilburg) D) THIS IS ONE OF THE FINAL NAILS IN THE OLD COFFIN FOR STAR WARS OR THAT FANS START DEMANDING BETTER STUFF FROM GEORGE INSTEAD OF LAPPING UP HIS BS YEAR AFTER YEAR.

    BTW george, it's called free speach. It does not defame you, it offers an opinion of a creative work you've published (half-hassardly) for all to see.... Just as these are my opinion, and I'm entitiled to them, I have not defamed you or anybody speficially.. And for the record, I don't need them to laugh at the commercials and shake my head

  85. Ah, to quote somebody... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more Warner Bros. tightens their grasp, the more these reviews will slip through their fingers!

  86. Mod parent up!. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Just in case the article gets banned.

    For posterity.

    Bwahahahahaha.

  87. Low production value by Animats · · Score: 1

    I've only seen the trailer for "Clone". Which is awful. It looks like machinema made with some PS2 game. The movement is wooden and the faces are expressionless. It's 1990s 3D animation technology, about at the level of "Reboot". When I first saw the trailer in a theater, I thought it was for a game, not a movie.

    Lucas's work is all about production value. As Roger Corman once wrote of Lucas, "George spends a lot of money, but it's all up there on the screen". Lucas is terrible at dialogue and character development, and mediocre at directing. He's great at production design and managing large-scale effects-heavy films. Which is what the Star Wars franchise is all about. "A new set every minute of film" - that's Lucas. This distracts the audience from the weak characters and dialogue.

    So a low-budget cartoon as a product line extension seems like a mistake. This is a killer for Lucas's franchise.

  88. CGI and kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking as someone who works in CG animation, I can tell you that most kids find traditional (2D, hand-drawn) animation a lot more appealing than 3D stuff. Even 2D vector CG is significantly less popular than stuff drawn completely by hand. I'm no big fan of Disney (especially nowadays), but their "12 principles of animation" are absolutely correct, and are much harder to implement in CG.

  89. Mr. Knowles - On First Exposure by Opalima · · Score: 1

    I'm new to AICN, but are Mr. Knowles' reviews always that poorly written? If his "writing" style and compositions qualify as reviews and all it takes to build a fanbase and a web empire then when I get home I'm all over that and be up and running by tomorrow :-)

  90. When you corporate MORONS will learn by unity100 · · Score: 1

    that you CANT force or suppress views and trading of information on the internet through lawyers ?

    just because of the SHIT you have pulled, i may not go see your movie, even though i have been a long time star wars fan.

    next time, use your BRAINS, not lawyers.

    MORONS.

  91. You got the company name wrong. by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

    It's LucasFilm not LucasArts.

  92. I think we can conclude two things from this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....George Lucas is a talentless shithead and Aint it Cool is a PR whore.

    Good job I dont watch either.

  93. I Just Felt Something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just felt a great disturbance in the force, as if a great cry went up from thousands of dissapointed sci-fi geeks all at once.

  94. WHY SHOULD WE HAVE POOR EXECTATIONS OF LUCAS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should have poor expectaions when i loved the prequils more than the old ones...i mean the old ones were great,
    but there's something about the ep 1-3 that really does it for me...
    I know im in a small group...but they really do feel right to me...
    with revenge of the sith as the best of all 6 in my opion...
    the old ones are kinda slow..especially the first 3rd of "a new hope"...i'm also excited for the clone wars...so why should i assume somethings going to be bad if if love whats been happening, maybe other people can't appreciate...that their problem...i'm happier to be me...

  95. No love for Plo-Koon! by file_reaper · · Score: 1

    I for one am furious about Lucas not giving any screen time to the Jedi Master Plo-Koon.

    I mean COME ON! He's the master of Form V of Lightsaber combat, he has an alternative for Sith Lightning called Electric Judgement and the dude can freaking manipuate weather to aid in combat! But noooooooooooo...we have to see shitty Ki-Adi-Mudi and crappy Shaak-Ti.

    What the hell Lucas?! Stop keeping the bad-ass characters in the dark and emo-wimpy ones in the frontlight (aka Obi-Wan)

    -One really pissed off Star Wars fan.

  96. Catholicism by toby · · Score: 1

    Just because a Jedi turns to the dark side doesn't not make him a Sith. He is a Sith for as long as he or she embraces the Dark side. The moment a sith rescinds the Dark Side in a real and genuine manner, he or she ceases to be a sith, and returns to the light of the Jedi.

    That's just ripped off from Catholicism, isn't it?

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:Catholicism by k_187 · · Score: 1

      If you don't see the parallels between anakin and jesus, you're not looking hard enough.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
  97. Yes, you can still get them. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    According to Amazon.com, they are.

    A New Hope
    The Empire Strikes Back
    Return of the Jedi

    May the Schwartz be with you!

  98. It's obvious it sucks from the trailers by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I'd rather see a movie done in Lego Star Wars (and I do mean the videogame) than watch this.
    Sappy Disneylike "I'm not too young to be a padawan" girlpower storyline, just to name one really laughable element.

  99. Lucas' Money by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    God forbid someone making money in this world. Do you realize that Lucas paid for this movie and a full seasons worth of episodes right out of his own pocket? Shame on him for trying to make his money back. Oh and that Dark Knight movie, that is a huge cash grab...HUGE!

    First, I have no problem whatsoever making money. I think that as long as its not your most important value, making money is a good thing. I'm a capitalist, and a staunch advocate of capitalism.

    Second, he paid for it out his pocket. Ok. So what? That's an investment on what he's probably correct in asserting will be a larger return. It's business, and in Hollywood, self-financing your project isn't exactly unheard of. People do it all the time. This just means Lucas doesn't have a take a cut or pay a percentage to someone else.

    Lastly, the problem isn't money, the problem is that he's pushing yet more crap in the guise of quality. The fault really isn't with Lucas. The fault is with us if we fall for it. Lucas is just doing his best P.T. Barnum here... there's a sucker born every minute, or in the case of Star Wars fans, several of them. Hey, Barnum was rich too. He didn't get that way by being stupid or by giving a sucker an even break.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Lucas' Money by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Lastly, the problem isn't money, the problem is that he's pushing yet more crap in the guise of quality.

      You people really need to get a grip and take a second look at
      a) what he was ripping off to begin with
      b) what happened when people tried to make "knock offs" of his stuff.

      It's STAR WARS. It was never Shakesphere.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Lucas' Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It was never Shakesphere.

      And here I thought I'd encountered every possible variant spelling of Shakespeare... *this* is why I love Slashdot - I learn something new every time I come here.

    3. Re:Lucas' Money by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was never Shake*sphere*

      That's no moon...

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    4. Re:Lucas' Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I have no problem whatsoever making money. I think that as long as its not your most important value, making money is a good thing. I'm a capitalist, and a staunch advocate of capitalism.

      Do you even know what staunch means? Synonyms, please. I wouldn't want you to promise yourself to your own slavery.

  100. biggest problem I have... by filthpickle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The guy already had enough money for several lifetimes. He was in a position to make any movie he wanted with the prequels, he could have taken it anywhere, it was going to make money anyway...and he fucking cashed in, then he cashed in again.....then he cashed in AGAIN.

    How much money is enough?

    Fuck you Lucas.

  101. Remember... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    The more you tighten your grip, Lucas, the more reviewers will slip through your fingers.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  102. George is such a charmer by heroine · · Score: 1

    If only he used computer animation for an artistic reason instead of saving money on actors. Fortunately, it's no different than slashdot moderators embargoing anti-corporate comments.

  103. Kids? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    FTA: "Still, the CGI eye candy will make it popular with kids." My kids are pretty typical American kids and they said it "looks gay". Not that there's anything wrong with that...

  104. Publicity by uxbn_kuribo · · Score: 1

    I think that George Lucas is falling victim to the Streisand Effect--- How much publicity would the shitty reviews have gotten if he hadn't worked to put them down? Okay, probably alot, but now he looks like a douche AND a crappy filmmaker.

    --
    No portion of this post may be rebroadcast without the express, written consent of Major League Baseball.
  105. Lord Orkut by djMouton · · Score: 1

    I just want to further vent about the ridiculous naming conventions that popped up after the initial trilogy. Darth Vader, Chewbacca, Emperor Palpatine, 4LOM - these are at least sort of single entendres. Darth Maul, Darth Sidious, General Grievous - these are pretty much actual, English language character descriptors.

    And everybody else just sounds like a startup. /rant

  106. I'm reminded of Bose suing Consumer Reports by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

    In 1981 Bose sued Consumer Reports for libel for describing Bose speakers as having vague imaging, which is an understatement IMO. Strangely the case was dismissed because the comments were published "without malice" and not because they were in fact true.

    Note how MSN's criticism "Ugly animation and an uninspired storyline drag down the film" does not imply malice, but AintItCool's "I hated the film. HATED IT. REALLY HATED IT" does have a more malicious than journalistic tone. Mod AintItCool -1 Troll.

    --

    War as we knew it was obsolete
    Nothing could beat complete denial
    - Emily Haines
  107. Space sounds by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Don't forget all the sounds of space battle Star Wars made so popular.

    Laser blasters that are SLOWER than guns?

    The 1st Star Wars films were a fluke of artistry and a team effort; the mythology was intact and it had gaps in the right places (almost as if a committee that required consensus was involved.)

    The modern ones are made as if by people who didn't understand the 1st ones. It was like Disney's take on greek mythology...

    1. Re:Space sounds by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      It was like Disney's take on greek mythology...

      Hey, I liked Fantasia. Sure, not terribly faithful to the mythology, but it was still poetic.

  108. sorry - wishful thinking by toby · · Score: 1

    your reputation for independence is more important than early access to films

    IF ONLY THAT WERE TRUE. But it's just wishful thinking in Bizarro-America.

    --
    you had me at #!
  109. Gankutsuou by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Heh. I wasn't talking about Gonzo's excellent anime adaptation. I was talking about the novel. :)

  110. Animated Series Worth a Watch! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    And they were decently animated and had some good stories.

    I'm a hater of the prequels (note: Kenobi's age proves it's set in a different universe, so it's OK) but I really did like the Clone Wars animated series, especially Volume 2, I even bought that one. And I don't care for its animation style at all. (And I really don't like Samauri Jack, just to frame my perspective)

    See, it had Jedi who acted like Jedi and, by in large, didn't forget about their Jedi powers when the shit hit the fan. Granted, some were rather weak Jedi, but if you've seen Episode II you know what I'm talking about.

    If there's a common theme about what ruined the prequels, it's that the Jedi were a bunch of weak, stupid, underpowered bozos who were only incidentally empowered by a quasi-infection. Of course, writing a story that was interesting with forty thousand Ben-Kenobi-level Jedi and their extermination would have required creativity and talent, and that was just asking too much.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  111. Scrappy-doo-the-hutt by 18_Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Seriously? Lucas needs to stop. People, don't go see the movie, it only encourages him.

  112. Hong Kong by toby · · Score: 1

    would have had the movies made in hong-kong on a shoe-string budget

    Actually pre-CGI that's exactly where and how most of Hollywood's animated features were made (just check the credits). Nobody was trying to hide it, and nobody complained about the quality because there was a huge base of inexpensive, experienced cel animation talent there.

    --
    you had me at #!
  113. was going to ask, jumped the WHUT? by toby · · Score: 1

    Then decided to Google first. But there seems to be some confusion as to what a Mynock is?

    --
    you had me at #!
  114. Creativity and talent? No, not particularly... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    All Jedi must come to Corusant sooner or later.
    Have the entire planet, or just Jedi temple, covered with nanobots that block or disrupt their connection to the force.
    Kinda like Jedi-AIDS.

    Activate order 42. Which consists of turning on the nanobots via a wireless link of some kind (Activate the nanoclorian field!) and just shoot them all like they did in the movie anyway.

    Vader and Palpatine are covered cause they are the badguys, Luke and Leia are not born yet and Yoda might be able to find out at the last moment.
    Too late to save all the Jedi out there but just in time to save himself and Obi-Wan.
    Or they could just play Yoda and Obi-Wan as they did - "not enough gun" and fuckin' lucky.
    And they would even get to use the obligatory Cool Tech WordTM - nano.

    There... plausible Jedi demise.
    And that is just me... not a writer with like... writing school... college... or however they call that place where they learn how to write and be creative and stuff.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  115. Let the franchises die by Oyjord · · Score: 1

    Folks, please, I know many of you love Star Wars and Star Trek, but please, let them die. They were good in their heyday, but they've long since lost their appeal.

    Science-fiction is about pushing the envelope, it's about seeing the world through a very different pair of glasses than the ones you're wearing now. It's about creativity and freshness.

    There's NOTHING creative or fresh about the Star Trek and Star Wars IPs anymore.

    Let them die so we can change glasses, consume some new content, and come back around to appreciating the one thing that makes humans so damn interesting: their ability to imagine.

  116. Music similar to Toy Story's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Critics have noted the... music... had more than a passing similarity to Pixar's Toy Story

    Oh please say the soundtrack is all Randy Newman singing along to the Star Wars Theme. Please please please.

  117. Of course it's shit by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Did anyone honestly expect that not talent hack to come up with something decent. The last decent thing to come out of LucasArts was Grim Fandango.

  118. That's just a silly objection by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    What's the chance that a 7 year old in 1981 had a discretionary budget that allowed them to buy $670's worth of Star Wars toys?

    If you insist on being so picky about this, let's put it this way: if the original poster was 7 in 1981, should his parents have bought him $670's worth of Star Wars toys, or $670 worth of the Vanguard 500? (If it was up to me, I'd say $500 of the index fund, $170 in toys. The kid's gotta play too...)

    1. Re:That's just a silly objection by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...all of which of course ignores the simple fact that you were not
      able to buy a mere $600 worth of ANY stock in those days. Unless you
      had a considerable amount of funds to dedicate to the venture, you
      were completely locked out of the market.

            In 1981 it wasn't 2008.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:That's just a silly objection by Froboz23 · · Score: 1

      What's the chance that a 7 year old in 1981 had a discretionary budget that allowed them to buy $670's worth of Star Wars toys?

      A very good chance, if you spread it out over several years. I was born in 1971. During my "Star Wars toy years", ('77 to '81), I accumulated the large scale Death Star, Millennium Falcon, Tie Fighter, Troop Transport, Robot Droid Factory, the 12' R2D2, numerous smaller scale spaceships, at least two dozen action figures, and a large number of Star Wars themed comic books, collector cards, board games, puzzles and Atari cartridges. I financed my habit through Christmas gifts, birthday gifts, allowance and doing extra chores. The total cost was around $500, spread across 5 years.

      As for the new movie, it answers the unasked question of what you'd get if you rendered an entire movie with just a 3DFX Voodoo video card.

      I won't be bothering to see this movie. I may not even bother to rent it.

      --
      Take off every Sig. For great justice.
  119. Genndy Tartakovsky by Dr.Horrible+Protoge · · Score: 1

    I've said that the Clone Wars series that had originally aired on Cartoon Network between 2 and 3, was the best thing to come out of the pre-quels. Then to go and do it all in craptacular computer animated terribleness... It makes me sick. Genndy Tartakovsky's rendition was beautiful.

  120. That scumbag got what he deserved by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 1

    It should be noted that the production was initially intended for TV. As such TV quality production standards were used. The models tend to be lower quality, and the animation quotas are much tighter. When you animate for TV you have to animate quickly, so quality takes a hit, but it's expected and completely acceptable in that medium. For TV animation a quota can be anywhere from 30 to 60 seconds a week. Whereas if you're working on a movie intended for theatres the animation quota will be around 2 to 4 seconds a week (so you can see where the quality comes from).
    Everybody went into the project intending it to be put on TV and it was treated that way. And it should also be noted everybody who worked on it were payed for tv work. So the movie being released to theatres was effectively a kick in the teeth to anybody who worked on it.

    The movie not doing well is completely George Lucas's fault. He was the jackass who thought it'd be a good idea to put a tv show up in theatres.

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
  121. STAR WARS MYTHOS by ravensee · · Score: 0

    Dear Sillies, I am laughing at the sad minions who think of George Lucas as a god fallen because he has sold out or broken away from a "Star Wars mythos". Basically, George Lucas was once a guy full ideas and a great story. He used his story and made the Star Wars trilogy. Then he made money. Did people forget that his creative brain was all used up in making American Graffiti and THX 1138? Then he made Star Wars with bad direction and bad acting! Did you forget? The only thing that held up that movie was the "Jedi story" and the special effects. Oh and being a kid with a big box of popcorn going "Ooooh AHHHHH!!!" Then he spent many years in his Fortress of Solitude, aka Skywatcher Ranch, putting money into creative and technological processes in film. THEN HE CREATED JAR JAR AND A NEW STAR WARS *money idea cough cough* WAS BORN! He sold out. So what? Whaddya want? Go see Bladerunner again and then talk about Ridley Scott. Go see Taxi Driver and then talk about Martin Scorcese. Go see Clockwork Orange and then talk about Stanley Kubrick. They're all people that make money making movies in Hollywood. I don't know where I'm going with this. My son wants to see Clone Wars and well, George Lucas is a dad (and might I mention the bad love story lines that sound like they are written by a 60 year old virgin who plays video games and ONCE touched a breast!) and makes interesting shows. He's into entertainment. Not some philosopher. Heck this Jedi idea IS NOT ORIGINAL. Ask the Buddha! Ask Jesus! Silly fans, Star Wars is for kids (and kids at heart). Love Jackie

  122. Great lines from the prequels by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    He is right on about the quotes. I've seen all the "new" star wars movies at least twice and right now I can't think of a single memorable line from any of them.

    Bah! Allow me to step off your lawn and educate you!

    Who can forget the classic "Around the survivors a perimeter create"? The tender emotion of "I hate sand"? The comic mischief of C-3PO's "I'm beside myself!"? Or those wacky merchants lamenting, "We will not survive this!" and "We should not have made this bargain!" Or Obi-Wan's quip about blasters being "so uncivilized" after his desperate life-or-death battle with Grievous... Or how about "You don't want to sell me death sticks. You want to go home and rethink your life." when Obi Wan is in the bar? And don't forget, the dramatic pinnacle of the movie, after Anakin discovers Padme is dead and he's been turned into a cyborg: as he curses the heavens, screaming "DO NOT WANT!"

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  123. Nuked the fridge!! by tguyton · · Score: 1

    Is it really possible that no one's made a "nuke the fridge" comment yet? Ah, well. I'll be the one to say it - looks like Lucas really nuked the fridge with this one.

  124. DO NOT WANT by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

    Well, it's not a DIRECT quote, but Ep III spawned "DO NOT WANT!" thanks to some bad subtitles ...

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  125. Why Star Trek will always be better... by bbasgen · · Score: 1

    Gene Roddenberry never sold out. ;p

  126. Sounds like anime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, couldn't resist. Seriously though, it might not be a bad idea. 22 seasons is way too long of course, I have never been able to watch anything longer than a few seasons, but the idea makes sense. Sometimes I think anime gets things right where Hollywood misses the mark.

  127. Thank goodness for Google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank goodness for Google cache

    [I don't want to post a link to the cached review I found because I don't know the legality of it.]

  128. the potential to be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what breaks my heart about watching the new films is the potential...you can see how truly great they could have been.

    if george had of had any conception of his abilities and the sort of ego that let him do only what he was best at, he would have just sat back, wrote the story, done the visual art direction and the CGI and thats it, let someone else script and direct.

    think about it... padme and annakin, their love is supposed to be so strong that annakin goes over to the dark side and kills children because of the risk of losing her, and padme DROPS DEAD when she loses annakin. unfortunately the scripting of the relationship and the actor direction is so bad that you cant even really believe that they are into each other. so what happens doesent even make sense. and despite having natalie portman (an actress of such skill and beauty that she makes my nerd loins quiver) i totally couldnt care less when she dies. there isnt a shred of romance.

    likewise, when he murders the tribe of sand people for killing his mum, during his seduction by palpatine, during his betrayal of the jedi council, and finally when he is put in the needle machine to become darth vader....you can see how it had the potential to all make sense, to be a thing of beauty and tragedy and pathos. something really moving. imagine watching the original movies again and thinking about all that whenever vader strides onto the screen.

    you see, i wonder what someone like chris nolan could have done with with a character arc like that. or any good director actually.

    unfortunately, the director of these films was a merchandising magnate first, and a film-maker second.

    oh well. at least the computer games are usually great. hopefully george just stays the hell away from the new bioware MMORPG based on KOTOR

  129. So Jar Jar Binks and an Ewok... by kerashi · · Score: 1

    Jar Jar Binks and an Ewok walk into a bar

    Bartender says "What is this some kind of a joke"

    Ewok say "Nope, George Lucas's idea for the next Star Wars movie"

  130. He's also selling LucasArts services by pimproot · · Score: 1

    I think the reason we were subjected to shitloads of soulless CGI wasn't because Lucas is blind, but rather because along with JarJar collectibles, he's ALSO MARKETING LucasFilm/ILM as a movie production powerhouse. No doubt there's yet more millions to be made by using Star Wars as a showboat for his render farm. Unfortunately his friend Spielberg is also in on this plan, and it seems like only a few underfunded outsiders in Sci Fi realize that puppetry and costumes are still better than CGI.

    I acknowledge this may change some day, of course.

  131. that's what he's good at.. by SuperDre · · Score: 0

    Yep.. that's what mr Lucas is good at, taking something great and turn it into crap.. just look at the EP1-3, and Indy 4.

  132. Languishing Lucas's lander lost. by mmwithpeanuts · · Score: 1

    What started out as a great idea quickly got stupid, simply because Lucas doesn't have Joseph Campbell (Myth Of A Thousand Faces) is his camp anymore. Joseph is the one who instructed him, like a Jedi Knight on the most important elements in story telling. Most of the original story comes from the Mayan Book called, Popol Vu, which describes the fight between the Dark Lords Of Illusion and the Hero Twins. In one scene there is a fight, where one of the twins gets his right arm cut off. Ben in Mayan means, he who walks in the sky, as in Skywalker. Of course when Joseph gave the interview with Bill Moyers, he mentioned every source of story inspiration, leaving out the Popol Vu. How interesting, that right after that interview back in the eighties, no other Star Wars movie has reached such greatness. It's probably due to selective memory on the part of our genetic memory, which doesn't let this sort of shit fly!