So she's saying that Assange should temporarily step aside as spokesman for Wikileaks until the facts of the case have been sorted out.
That is what I got from The Daily Beast article. But by habit I skipped the article text and only read the quotes from her. From the replies here I was wondering if anyone actually read TFA.
What does hating the US have to do with suggesting it is the CIA at work here? It is completely reasonable to suggest this, based on past activities of the CIA.
I bet people within the CIA even believed they did it. When the story first broke, there were probably CIA spooks asking others, "Are those women our agents? Did we authorise this?"
Is it possible to create a competing trojan/virus that, instead of turning the machine into a spambot, disables all network connections and displays a message saying: "SECURE YOUR FUCKING COMPUTER!"
Such a big deal? It's garbage... you separate recyclables, you put it in a bin, someone collects it. The end.
Why are people bringing up the constitution? Seriously.
You guys really need to get over such fucking petty squabbles about every single issue. Learn to accept the government can't please everyone and the same time...
Don't worry, somebody will fill those empty countries, and the "future generations" don't look like they will be the types of high-tech folk who will keep things green, care about your culture, or be high-tech enough to get homo sapiens "off this rock".
You are saying immigrants from less developed nations are uninsightful idiots? That's just a little bit racist.
Yeah it wasn't too old, and would have been fine if nothing much changed. But when you consider they're in an industry that has an increasing use of technology (such as the high res imagery) and the site has increased in size in previous 5 years, it's being a little cheap. Especially when they make literally hundreds of millions in profits every year.
It's hard to convince management to spend money on it when everything apparently 'works fine' and they have no understanding of it. It doesn't help that IT is semi-outsourced and offsite.
The main "file server" had only 2 TB of storage, for a ~200 user site. Our department started using high resolution imagery, and we were burning through the remaining 500 GB of free space. They told us our department needed to upgrade the hardware, and offered to set up a 4 TB NAS for us for $10,000 (or maybe $20,000?) I questioned why don't they upgrade the file server and they said it was full. I found out later all the servers on site were 5 year old HP machines.
Isn't that the ideal? Pretty much the opposite of sexism, that.
Yes but, think about how men treat each. I routinely insult, hit/play fight and pull cruel jokes on my male friends. They do the same back to me. We enjoy this. Most women would not enjoy that.
Do you actually have any idea? Do you know what the glycemic index (GI) is? Refined sugar, which has a high GI, is absorbed into the blood stream very quickly. If you eat a lot of it you will get a large spike in energy, followed by a large dip (crash) when your body produces crap loads of insulin to counter-act all the sugar in your blood.
Yes most foods have 'sugar', or more accurately, carbohydrates. Anything with a relatively low GI will not cause you to have a sugar high and crash, as the energy is absorbed slowly and the insulin is released slowly, or more consistently.
Do you even have children? Have you known a child since you were a child yourself?
Slashdot Mirror
How hard is it to use your eyes when crossing a road?
Is the headline ever accurate?
So she's saying that Assange should temporarily step aside as spokesman for Wikileaks until the facts of the case have been sorted out.
That is what I got from The Daily Beast article. But by habit I skipped the article text and only read the quotes from her. From the replies here I was wondering if anyone actually read TFA.
What does hating the US have to do with suggesting it is the CIA at work here? It is completely reasonable to suggest this, based on past activities of the CIA.
I bet people within the CIA even believed they did it. When the story first broke, there were probably CIA spooks asking others, "Are those women our agents? Did we authorise this?"
I think you take me too seriously.
Is it possible to create a competing trojan/virus that, instead of turning the machine into a spambot, disables all network connections and displays a message saying: "SECURE YOUR FUCKING COMPUTER!"
Such a big deal? It's garbage... you separate recyclables, you put it in a bin, someone collects it. The end.
Why are people bringing up the constitution? Seriously.
You guys really need to get over such fucking petty squabbles about every single issue. Learn to accept the government can't please everyone and the same time...
It isn't like they have a choice.
Your "observation of culture" is that almost every culture is stupid, except yours?
Don't worry, somebody will fill those empty countries, and the "future generations" don't look like they will be the types of high-tech folk who will keep things green, care about your culture, or be high-tech enough to get homo sapiens "off this rock".
You are saying immigrants from less developed nations are uninsightful idiots? That's just a little bit racist.
Don't listen to him! He is a terrorist! You don't need to measure his brainwaves to know he is guilty.
You're a traitor! You're a thought-criminal! You're a Eurasian spy! I'll shoot you, I'll vaporize you, I'll send you to the salt mines!
It will reveal an image.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
What's the ratio in SI units?
The key holders are the Elders of the Internet.
Yeah it wasn't too old, and would have been fine if nothing much changed. But when you consider they're in an industry that has an increasing use of technology (such as the high res imagery) and the site has increased in size in previous 5 years, it's being a little cheap. Especially when they make literally hundreds of millions in profits every year.
It's hard to convince management to spend money on it when everything apparently 'works fine' and they have no understanding of it. It doesn't help that IT is semi-outsourced and offsite.
People buy HDMI cables? I have three in my draw at home, which all came with something. Currently I have nothing to use them on though.
I thought that display port was taking over from HDMI? I see many devices not just video cards with display port as an option.
Display port is replacing DVI. In other words, display port is for computers, HDMI for home theater. At least, theoretically.
The main "file server" had only 2 TB of storage, for a ~200 user site. Our department started using high resolution imagery, and we were burning through the remaining 500 GB of free space. They told us our department needed to upgrade the hardware, and offered to set up a 4 TB NAS for us for $10,000 (or maybe $20,000?) I questioned why don't they upgrade the file server and they said it was full. I found out later all the servers on site were 5 year old HP machines.
Can we still root outside the zone? I haven't had a root in a while, but there's always the possibility.
Isn't that the ideal? Pretty much the opposite of sexism, that.
Yes but, think about how men treat each. I routinely insult, hit/play fight and pull cruel jokes on my male friends. They do the same back to me. We enjoy this. Most women would not enjoy that.
It's not because you're a woman but because the men are treating you like any other man.
Yes, IT guys/geeks don't know how to treat women so they treat them like men. Men who function more typically socially will treat women differently.
Many discoveries in science are made by people following their 'gut instinct'.
Contrary to popular belief, your own personal 'musk' actually repels women.
Do you actually have any idea? Do you know what the glycemic index (GI) is? Refined sugar, which has a high GI, is absorbed into the blood stream very quickly. If you eat a lot of it you will get a large spike in energy, followed by a large dip (crash) when your body produces crap loads of insulin to counter-act all the sugar in your blood.
Yes most foods have 'sugar', or more accurately, carbohydrates. Anything with a relatively low GI will not cause you to have a sugar high and crash, as the energy is absorbed slowly and the insulin is released slowly, or more consistently.
Do you even have children? Have you known a child since you were a child yourself?