No - this would be more like the medic refusing to help you because they have already seen to many traumatic pictures browsing facebook while on the way to the accident.
Ban fast food as well, correct? I know more teens addicted to McDonald's than vaping.
Alcohol too right? I know more adults that drink alcohol than vape. I know more people that have lost a loved one due to a drunk driving incident than of lung cancer.
Honestly, banning something for adults because teens are illegally using a substance is insane.
Yep. And honestly, if you are a teen vaping to look cool, you are in a much better situation than smoking cigarettes simply do to the fact that you can use a 0 level nicotine juice and skip the addicting factor all together.
It's much easier to be a "social vaper" than a "social smoker."
When it changes a bunch of services to have to be provided for free and climates any choice by requiring everyone to have insurance, of course the price is going to hike.
So have I too. So have most people that have worked in low skilled jobs.
I think a lot of people posting here (and Bernie) never have actually been in this situation and don't realize the negative effect it would have against people they think they are trying to help.
Very few companies would be affected, and those that do are currently undercutting more responsible employers.
How much do you think most companies pay cashiers and stockers?
Have you ever worked one of these jobs? I have. There have been times in my life - especially when starting out - that I was very glad for low skill low paying jobs. There was small risk for the employer to hire me and it allowed me to build a resume.
Or stop hiring so many people and work to death the fewer people it has left that are now full time but with better benefits.
You do realize this is what will happen? Did you learn nothing after the ACA mandate that lowered the full time requirements from 40 hours to 32 hours?
Stop coming up with regulations when you have no idea how employment actually works in a non-centrally run economy.
That's not a straw man argument. Either you know that or you don't know what a straw man argument is.
Look at both Amazon and Wal-Mart employees. You'll see single mothers with one, maybe two children who need benefits to survive.
Honest question, should walmart honestly be required to pay each employee based on their household situation rather than the job itself?
Expecting a job that takes 30 minutes to train with no skill needed to support a single parent (not sure why you had to specify mother instead of parent - I'm a widowed dad of 2 kids) and that parent's family is ludicrous.
Slashdot Mirror
Besides that, I would really like to see what the person who down modded you selected for the reason.
They chose "Troll". If you click on the current score it will tell you.
because the minority can't cram it into their shitty life, only privileged white cis-het-male can easily do it, it's discriminatory !
Wow - one of the most racist lines I have read here
I was being sarcastic
No - this would be more like the medic refusing to help you because they have already seen to many traumatic pictures browsing facebook while on the way to the accident.
Account validated by official ID or it gets closed.
Why do you think minorities shouldn't be allowed on facebook? I mean, isn't that the reason we don't require ID's for voting?
You are suggesting that minorities should only have a voice at the ballot box but otherwise that their voices should not be heard.
Shame on you!
I hold my TV manufacturer responsible for every commercial I see. And my radio for all commercials I hear.
And I hold my friends criminally responsible if they suggest (or advertise) a product to me as well.
Amazon is pretty upfront when buying a version of their devices that displays ads.
It's for ChromeOS not Chrome.
You want to see something that no longer exists? How would they do that?
For point 1 and 2, the advantage to vaping over smoking is you can get nictone free liquids and no one is the wiser.
Obviously the better solution is for kids to not care about social pressure but I agree that's easier said than done.
They are only a gateway to smoking if we ban them.
No one is voluntarily going to go from a tasty $50 a month habit to a $150-$200 a month habit that also tastes terrible.
Ban fast food as well, correct? I know more teens addicted to McDonald's than vaping.
Alcohol too right? I know more adults that drink alcohol than vape. I know more people that have lost a loved one due to a drunk driving incident than of lung cancer.
Honestly, banning something for adults because teens are illegally using a substance is insane.
Yep. And honestly, if you are a teen vaping to look cool, you are in a much better situation than smoking cigarettes simply do to the fact that you can use a 0 level nicotine juice and skip the addicting factor all together.
It's much easier to be a "social vaper" than a "social smoker."
You can but the juices at any nictone level including 0.
I use it instead of smoking cigarettes.
This ban is a shitty idea. It's already illegal to sell to teens.
You missed the reference
When it changes a bunch of services to have to be provided for free and climates any choice by requiring everyone to have insurance, of course the price is going to hike.
It's planned for long after he is out of office. This is one of those glory grabbing bills
Every job should not be required to pay for a family of 2.
They are stealing jobs from people that need it!
They are old and should stay home. Same for kids in high school or still living with their parents.
At least, that is the thought process of people supporting stuff like this who couldn't imagine anyone wanting to work a job like this.
You think police, fire departments, and military equal socialism? I guess Congress also equals it too
So have I too. So have most people that have worked in low skilled jobs.
I think a lot of people posting here (and Bernie) never have actually been in this situation and don't realize the negative effect it would have against people they think they are trying to help.
Very few companies would be affected, and those that do are currently undercutting more responsible employers.
How much do you think most companies pay cashiers and stockers?
Have you ever worked one of these jobs? I have. There have been times in my life - especially when starting out - that I was very glad for low skill low paying jobs. There was small risk for the employer to hire me and it allowed me to build a resume.
The Democrats won't do this. Well they might now that Trump is president since they will have deniability when it fails.
Or stop hiring so many people and work to death the fewer people it has left that are now full time but with better benefits.
You do realize this is what will happen? Did you learn nothing after the ACA mandate that lowered the full time requirements from 40 hours to 32 hours?
Stop coming up with regulations when you have no idea how employment actually works in a non-centrally run economy.
That's not a straw man argument. Either you know that or you don't know what a straw man argument is.
Look at both Amazon and Wal-Mart employees. You'll see single mothers with one, maybe two children who need benefits to survive.
Honest question, should walmart honestly be required to pay each employee based on their household situation rather than the job itself?
Expecting a job that takes 30 minutes to train with no skill needed to support a single parent (not sure why you had to specify mother instead of parent - I'm a widowed dad of 2 kids) and that parent's family is ludicrous.