This pretty much THE case (esp. this cat bacteria which is very famous and mentioned multiple times all over the place) of a very interesting semi-symbiotic phenomena (host more aggressive ? more manly ? drawbacks also ? intriguing).
Also, what always, kinda, shocks me is that, how no sufficient effort exist to really go in-depth about the bacterial influences on populations, and esp. on human population.
I really think some bacteria are akin to hive-existence, having their agenda, methods, and the means to implement them. They make up an appreciable portion of biosphere and should be studied with much greater vigor.
Seeing as some bacteria influece our perceptions of the world directly by manufactoring certain neurotransmitters, etc ?
> Think about that every time you text, check Facebook status changes, click refresh on your e-mail client, reload news sites, or troll slashdot comments
Well, this describes one type of internet user, and not a very productive one at that.
There are many more things to pursue on the internet. Exchange of meaningful information. Reading science publications (on the topic you're interested in). Maintaining your own website, which may be meaningful and useful for plenty of people. Coding open source soft, which is impossible without the net. Etc.
In my opinion, we should see breakthrough in this area after carbon nano-materials become cheaply available.
I have never thought about it, but apparently, a baloon with internal structure designed for optimum implosion resistance would be a revolutionary way to lift objects up to certain levels (depending on the payload) in the atmosphere.
This is basic mercenary in action, and mercs are motivated by money too. Any "victim" of such caliber could outbid the merc and send him/her back on you, and it is not just movies.
To accomplish what you propose, there's need to be ideologically motivated people, who are, actually, if combined with the required skillset, surprisingly hard to find...
You assume default omni-directional compassion in a capitalist society where people not only jokingly, but some (many?) times actually, hate one another.
I could kill my boss if it were legal and all that.
Some people may be aesthetically displeased of a fat bastard they hate sporting their organs.
Hey now, I have nothing against people who chose the accumulate-body-mass-for-possible-future-calamity route, but.
I am one of those bastards who actually can eat upwards (and more than, measured actually) 5000 kcal a day and not gain any (can walk barefoot with shorts in snow tho, no prob).
Why the 2050s ? It is as arbitrary as any date range.
It might appear tomorrow via some fluke breakthrough, and it may be (surprise) only realistically feasible in (space based, gravity based) stars, thus, we'd need to make a star of our own.
I don't know how big, but my guess would be non-engineerable in current day means (think Ringworld complexity and resources). Also, at that hypothetical resolution, I would guess cosmic dust (H+ ions) would severely obstruct your view. Just guessing based on my intuition - someone could calculate the theoretical mirror size needed for that, as say, for 1 telescope image pixel needed for 1 1 meter ET display. 500 meters ? I think not:P
This problem is trivial.
The real problem in this case is proper parsing of a sentence, which it seems different people have different ideas for. This is why I hate at least some english speakers - this absurdity would not arise in German, I bet:P
girl girl pairing is ruled out by the stating of the problem itself. You keep forgetting this, and add gg prior to considering the true scope of the problem, which has no gg. This is what I think, and I think it correct. Seemingly, I am not the only one in this thread. The truth is, you cannot assign mothers here, it is inconvenient and irrelevant to the ACTUAL problem.
Again, you keep forgetting that one of the boys, Tboy (Tuesday-born boy), is unique, and persistent.
There are 4 groups, as per problem:
Tboy boy boy Tboy Tboy girl girl Tboy each 1/4 prob which adds up to 1/2 for Tboy boy (ordering is irrelevant, only the sum matters). And Tuesday, is too, not relevant. Except as a convenient naming measure for the unique boy, Tboy.
BB is two times because you do not know which is the first mentioned boy, as with the girl case. Do you see the light now ? gb bg constricts to bg for stat purposes, and bb bb constrict to bb for stat purposes. Tuesday, as per spoken language of kings, Yon English, is irrelevant.
Mo.
Extended set is
bb
bg
gb
bb
BB is two times because you do not know which is the first mentioned boy, as with the girl case. do you see the light now ? gb bg constricts to bg for stat purposes, and bb bb constrict to bb for stat purposes. Tuesday, as per spoken language of kings, Yon English, is irrelevant.
1/2.
Slashdot Mirror
> She could have *least* thought that I was going to drive trains.. alas.. Oy, does not compute ! Drive trains is a plural noun ! :P
Most of the "famous people" IQ tests are bogus, and it only takes a "small bit" of intelligence to see that.
Classifying being picky about my picky eating a disorder, punishable by punching in the face, repeatedly ?
There are no more picky picky-eating criticizers as meat eaters.
It is a fact in my life.
This pretty much THE case (esp. this cat bacteria which is very famous and mentioned multiple times all over the place) of a very interesting semi-symbiotic phenomena (host more aggressive ? more manly ? drawbacks also ? intriguing).
Also, what always, kinda, shocks me is that, how no sufficient effort exist to really go in-depth about the bacterial influences on populations, and esp. on human population.
I really think some bacteria are akin to hive-existence, having their agenda, methods, and the means to implement them. They make up an appreciable portion of biosphere and should be studied with much greater vigor.
Seeing as some bacteria influece our perceptions of the world directly by manufactoring certain neurotransmitters, etc ?
> Think about that every time you text, check Facebook status changes, click refresh on your e-mail client, reload news sites, or troll slashdot comments
Well, this describes one type of internet user, and not a very productive one at that.
There are many more things to pursue on the internet. Exchange of meaningful information. Reading science publications (on the topic you're interested in). Maintaining your own website, which may be meaningful and useful for plenty of people. Coding open source soft, which is impossible without the net. Etc.
Just saying.
In my opinion, we should see breakthrough in this area after carbon nano-materials become cheaply available.
I have never thought about it, but apparently, a baloon with internal structure designed for optimum implosion resistance would be a revolutionary way to lift objects up to certain levels (depending on the payload) in the atmosphere.
Hehe, but seriously...
This is basic mercenary in action, and mercs are motivated by money too. Any "victim" of such caliber could outbid the merc and send him/her back on you, and it is not just movies.
To accomplish what you propose, there's need to be ideologically motivated people, who are, actually, if combined with the required skillset, surprisingly hard to find...
I can also punch flies and my beard is *almost* as cool as Chuck Norris'.
I am so lonely... @_@
You assume default omni-directional compassion in a capitalist society where people not only jokingly, but some (many?) times actually, hate one another.
I could kill my boss if it were legal and all that.
Some people may be aesthetically displeased of a fat bastard they hate sporting their organs.
> across our bloated bellies.
Hey now, I have nothing against people who chose the accumulate-body-mass-for-possible-future-calamity route, but.
I am one of those bastards who actually can eat upwards (and more than, measured actually) 5000 kcal a day and not gain any (can walk barefoot with shorts in snow tho, no prob).
60 kilos here :P
Why the 2050s ? It is as arbitrary as any date range.
It might appear tomorrow via some fluke breakthrough, and it may be (surprise) only realistically feasible in (space based, gravity based) stars, thus, we'd need to make a star of our own.
And we already have one, for free to boot :P
surely you know, it was repeated quite some times, by adherents of christian faith: God is testing your faith.
Supposedly, to filter you out whether you are fit for some afterlife orgy.
Or some such bs.
Generally, I consider porn to be when bodily liquids of genital genesis are displayed - described (or implied).
1. Record a video of a drugged 7 year old girl.
2. 2. ?????^H^H^H^H^HExploit her by putting video on Youtube.
3. What ? Youtube no accept ?
4 Cops !
5. :(
I don't know how big, but my guess would be non-engineerable in current day means (think Ringworld complexity and resources). Also, at that hypothetical resolution, I would guess cosmic dust (H+ ions) would severely obstruct your view. Just guessing based on my intuition - someone could calculate the theoretical mirror size needed for that, as say, for 1 telescope image pixel needed for 1 1 meter ET display. 500 meters ? I think not :P
This problem is trivial. The real problem in this case is proper parsing of a sentence, which it seems different people have different ideas for. This is why I hate at least some english speakers - this absurdity would not arise in German, I bet :P
Well, this is a case of parsing a sentence then, and I rest my case.
Bah and peh ! :P I can and I will.
Cos I am a pirate :P
what does this have to do with the task at hand ?
girl girl pairing is ruled out by the stating of the problem itself. You keep forgetting this, and add gg prior to considering the true scope of the problem, which has no gg. This is what I think, and I think it correct. Seemingly, I am not the only one in this thread. The truth is, you cannot assign mothers here, it is inconvenient and irrelevant to the ACTUAL problem.
Again, you keep forgetting that one of the boys, Tboy (Tuesday-born boy), is unique, and persistent.
There are 4 groups, as per problem:
Tboy boy
boy Tboy
Tboy girl
girl Tboy
each 1/4 prob which adds up to 1/2 for Tboy boy (ordering is irrelevant, only the sum matters). And Tuesday, is too, not relevant. Except as a convenient naming measure for the unique boy, Tboy.
Tboy boy 1/4
boy Tboy 1/4
Tboy girl 1/4
girl Tboy 1/4
Relevant added probabilities Tboy boy 1/2 Tboy girl 1/2.
1/2.
Tuesday - irrelevant pseudo logical garbage, shoving contempt for language operators.
Really, this is one of those rare cases where the article is somehow, excruciatingly, painfully wrong. This thread made my ears steam.
And the are 250 Tboy boy AND 250 boy Tboy pairs.
Also 250 Tboy girl and 250 girl Tboy pairs.
The question a priori rules out there being possible a pair of girl girl.
Gees, now I talk like a lawyer.
Really, it is easy. There are others. Join us, live a meaningful life.
Before applying a solution, first, read the problem. Then, construct the solution.
1/2, yo :P
And that is 1/2.
Fboy boy 1/4
boy Fboy 1/4
Fboy girl 1/4
girl Fboy 1/4
Group to Fboy boy 1/2 and Fboy girl 1/2.
1/2.
FFS, the probability of both children being boys is 1/2.
No.
Extended set is
bb
bg
gb
bb
BB is two times because you do not know which is the first mentioned boy, as with the girl case. Do you see the light now ? gb bg constricts to bg for stat purposes, and bb bb constrict to bb for stat purposes. Tuesday, as per spoken language of kings, Yon English, is irrelevant.
1/2.
Mo. Extended set is bb bg gb bb BB is two times because you do not know which is the first mentioned boy, as with the girl case. do you see the light now ? gb bg constricts to bg for stat purposes, and bb bb constrict to bb for stat purposes. Tuesday, as per spoken language of kings, Yon English, is irrelevant. 1/2.