I've been reading Slash Dot for a few weeks now and have noticed that most of the articles posted aren't based on any kind of verifiable fact, just some raving fan boy journalists opinion. So what chance does Wikipedia have?
Wow, I live in England and getting DVDs in 1998 was near impossible. It took me a trip to central London to even find somewhere that stocked the discs or even new what they were. I went into a shop in Wimbledon near where I lived (WH Smith) and asked if they stocked any DVDs and was answered with a reply of "What the hell are those?" by the assistant.
Also the title I could buy were terrible and around twice the price of pal videos also the discs were all two sided meaning you had to turn the things over midway through to watch the whole film.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes but now, according to Alexa.com, MSN gets more traffic than Google.
I've been reading Slash Dot for a few weeks now and have noticed that most of the articles posted aren't based on any kind of verifiable fact, just some raving fan boy journalists opinion. So what chance does Wikipedia have?
I wonder if Google Toolbar works with it?
Wow, I live in England and getting DVDs in 1998 was near impossible. It took me a trip to central London to even find somewhere that stocked the discs or even new what they were. I went into a shop in Wimbledon near where I lived (WH Smith) and asked if they stocked any DVDs and was answered with a reply of "What the hell are those?" by the assistant. Also the title I could buy were terrible and around twice the price of pal videos also the discs were all two sided meaning you had to turn the things over midway through to watch the whole film.
You need at least two for that. One for the porn and the other for the spyware.
This seem quite unlikely to me. Do you have any links to back up your claim?