Slashdot Mirror


Laser Shortage to Stall High-Def Disc War?

An anonymous reader writes "DigiTimes reports that several major vendors, including Sony and Matsushita, have suspended shipments of the blue laser diodes that drive both high-def disc formats. The rumored laser shortage could result in shipment delays for new models of Blu-ray and HD DVD players and drives past the upcoming holiday season, cooling the next-gen DVD format war until 2007."

148 comments

  1. Animal Cruelty by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

    Won't ANYBODY think of the sharks!

    They are driving themselves insane out at sea, they were all psyched to go into battle with some kick ass frikkin laser beams on their heads now they have to continue practicing with mop-handles tied on.

    Shame on you Sony.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Animal Cruelty by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      They are driving themselves insane out at sea, they were all psyched to go into battle with some kick ass frikkin laser beams on their heads now they have to continue practicing with mop-handles tied on.

      I think it's detente

      Blame all those pacifists in the pacific!

      none for me, none for you

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Animal Cruelty by Rockinsockindune · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everyone knows they use red lasers for the sharks.

      --
      I abuse commas, I cannot help myself.
    3. Re:Animal Cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have had ENOUGH of these motherfucking lasers on these motherfucking sharks!

    4. Re:Animal Cruelty by curunir · · Score: 1

      Dude...what do you think caused the shortage in the first place???

      Clearly there is an army of sharks (and few dolphins, for good measure) off the coast of California that are being fitted with the entire world's supply of blue lasers. We have to believe an attack is coming any day now. While our government has spent the past few months keeping people from bringing bottled water onto airplanes, they've completely ignored the possibility of an army of trained marine life using the latest advances in weaponry.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    5. Re:Animal Cruelty by kimvette · · Score: 1

      That is why you are the diet coke of evil, my friend!

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:Animal Cruelty by gbobeck · · Score: 2, Funny
      Everyone knows they use red lasers for the sharks.

      Red lasers for sharks are so 1997, just like ill tempered mutated sea bass. All sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads want to look cool, and therefore only use blue lasers.
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    7. Re:Animal Cruelty by Matt+Edd · · Score: 1

      I almost used my last mod point to mod you +1 informative. Some would object but I think it fitting.

    8. Re:Animal Cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Your Laser Base are Belong on Sharks.

    9. Re:Animal Cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motherfucking snakes on motherfucking planes on the other hand... keep 'em coming!
      It'll still be funny for another couple weeks before it tires out.

    10. Re:Animal Cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. Mom, fine! I get the frickin' hint! Geez.

      With all the complaining about Dad's performance and all, I figured you liked that sort of thing. It's not like it's easy for me to go into stores like that to buy stuff, much less for my own Mom. Just frickin' tell me what you want for your birthday next year, ok? It's not like you're the easiest person to shop for.

  2. Sharks! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    I KNEW we were using too many on those damn sharks.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Sharks! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      AND not enough cowbell!

      Gimme more cowbell I tell ya.

  3. Illegal collusion to fix the market by topham · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wouldn't happen to be intended to delay the adoption of the new players until next year would it, by which time maybe they will figure out how to actually sell a usable product...

    1. Re:Illegal collusion to fix the market by li'l+opie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Delay is a great strategy. Next generation DVD will be the first format to be obsolete before it even launches.

    2. Re:Illegal collusion to fix the market by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      But in the meantime, someone could come up with a UV laser and 500EB discs and seize the market from under their nose !

      This is a risky strategy.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  4. Gee, those marketing people by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just get those green laser pointers over Thinkgeek and rename the product "green ray". Really, blue is cute, but green is okay too...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Gee, those marketing people by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Well, at least it'll attract the hippie crowd. Mention anything 'green' and they're all over it.

  5. meanwhile... by legoburner · · Score: 5, Funny

    meanwhile somewhere on the outskirts of Tokyo, the head of Microsoft's XBOX division and the head of Nintendo's Wii division are shaking hands whilst laughing as their lackeys bolt the doors on a warehouse full to the roof with blue laser diodes.

    1. Re:meanwhile... by Amouth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      my thoughts exactly.. MS doesn't have to have the blue lasers.. the 360 doesn't need them.. just the add on hd drive which they havn't released yet.. ps3 needs them and i am sure sony will either not sell to others till they have what they need or run short them selves.

      if they run short they are just putting salt in the wound where they shot them selves in the foot.

      if they are just stopping sale to out side people so that they will have what they need for the ps3 they are going to piss their partners off even more.. because they can't stop selling to hd-dvd people and not blue-ray people... that would be anti competive

      should be intresting to see how the next 6 months role out..

      as for the big N - they have nothing to fear, as always

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:meanwhile... by MufasaZX · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a REALLY short article, is it really that hard to read? "Utilizing BD drives in its own PS3 game consoles, Sony suspended shipments of blue laser diodes to other customers, the makers indicated, adding that only Nichia, Sharp and Sanyo continue shipping the diodes."

    3. Re:meanwhile... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i did read it.. and i still find my comment fine.. as

      Nichia, Sharp and Sanyo != Sony

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    4. Re:meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. create an artificial shortage on components that lasts through the holidays. 2. ??? 3. Profit!

    5. Re:meanwhile... by interiot · · Score: 1

      Utilizing BD drives in its own PS3 game consoles, Sony suspended shipments of blue laser diodes to other customers

      Which means the effective cost of PS3 is higher. Sony is eating the opportunity cost of selling the blue lasers to other customers, who would certainly pay higher-than-otherwise prices due to decreased supply.

      Capitalism is set up to encourage people to allocate scarce resources as efficiently as possible. Sony, on the other hand, is allocating scarce resources to 8-year-old Johnny who only wants the latest console.

  6. Won't anyone think of the poor PS3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if they didn't have enough problems already, now they have to deal with a laser shortage?

    Poor Sony.

    1. Re:Won't anyone think of the poor PS3? by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, Sony's stopped shipping the lasers to other people because they are using them in the PS3.

      Plus, the artificial shortage they are creating will likely increase the prices for whatever lasers they do decide to sell to others, while the shortage of lasers means less competition for Sony players.

      How is Sony losing, here?

    2. Re:Won't anyone think of the poor PS3? by grapeape · · Score: 1

      If thats Sony's idea of how to corner the market they are deluding themselves. Surely you dont think that Sony would see a benefit to creating a shortage in the standalone player market when its the High End early adopters that are needed for the new format to survive. How many people on average actually use their game console as their primary dvd player? I would guess its probably well under 25% here in the U.S., in fact I dont know of anyone personally that watches DVD's on their PS2 at all. The only time I have ever watched one on mine was using it with a flip up screen so the kids could watch movies before I had a DVD player in my van. Even if it was an unprobable 50% thats still a tiny fragment of the overall movie market. If anything this will hurt the PS3 the most, since many that would have bought one will wait for artifically inflated prices to drop or go elsewhere for their entertainment.

    3. Re:Won't anyone think of the poor PS3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, that would be a first. Sony deluding themselves on the effects of their market actions, attempting to keep supply low while overpricing their products. It worked pretty well for Beta didn't it?

    4. Re:Won't anyone think of the poor PS3? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Unless I misunderstand things, both HD-DVD and Bluray use the same blue laser diodes (the differences are elsewhere).

      Sony suspending shipments of diodes to horde them for itself doesn't disadvantage Bluray, it hurts other makers regardless of format; Sony is still making both standalone players and the PS3, and all of those will be Bluray, and none HD-DVD.

      While the overall shortages may drive up prices and slow overall adoption of next-gen DVD players, Sony doesn't seem to be hurting the chances of Bluray winning the format war; indeed, if anything, its maximizing Bluray's chances by guaranteeing that all the Sony diodes end up in Bluray players.

  7. This just gets better all the time by Nice2Cats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First they do the two-format-thing all over again. Then they keep all kinds of crap that pissed people off with DVDs such as the Regional Code. After that, they tell us that there will be draconian DRM. The prices are simply sick. And in the end, the added quality just doesn't change my life. Cool, yes, impressive with computer generated films, of course, but worth the price, the loss of control and the hassle? No way.

    This is turning out to be all stuff and nonsense, and I think I'll just skip HD-DVD and Blu-ray one and wait for the next next generation, when maybe somebody with half a brain is involved. DVD is perfectly good enough for me, thank you very much.

    1. Re:This just gets better all the time by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      But, can it play these old DivX DVDs I got at a discount at Circuit City? -true backward compatabilty!

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:This just gets better all the time by JanneM · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is turning out to be all stuff and nonsense, and I think I'll just skip HD-DVD and Blu-ray one and wait for the next next generation, when maybe somebody with half a brain is involved. DVD is perfectly good enough for me, thank you very much.

      Agree with the sentiment.

      It is quite unlikely for there to ever be a next generation, though. The lead time is, oh, ten years or so, and by that time it seems more than likely that using a physical carrier for video is not going to be a mainstream technology anymore. There's going to be physical data carriers, of course, but not aimed at selling video.

      What might happen, though, is that these two formats both end up stillborn - laser discs of the 21st century - and pushes the major manufacturers to quickly (as in within a year or two) replace them with a common format that avoids the most egregious mistakes of these two. But that would be replacement, not a generation shift.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:This just gets better all the time by Threni · · Score: 1

      > There's going to be physical data carriers, of course, but not aimed at selling video.

      By then there could well be wifi (or something similar) *everywhere*. Your player - be it portable (such as a phone/psp etc), or a box by the TV - will receive data from the net via wireless technology, and you'd subscribe to Fox/Sony/Microsoft/HBO and get your stuff from them direct. Your flat rate subscription, entitling you to play/listen to whatever you wanted whenever you wanted would mean there would be no point in squirrelling away music/video on huge hard drives as playing that would be less convenient than streaming it direct.

    4. Re:This just gets better all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have 3 HD TVs, (1 Projection gotten early 2001, 1 LCD and 1 Plasma - both this year) and I can attest that I won't be moving from DVD soon. The leap of VCR->DVD style improvements (CD like control) just isn't there. The DVD was backwards in some respects like regional encoding (please don't tell me that lack of regional coding on VHS tapes made it easier for pirates) and forcing you to watch the FBI warning and promos and the extra resolution isn't worth it if it gets worse than this.

      And you are right. The next generation is even worse with DRM. Why does it seem every anti-Piracy measure only punishes the paying consumers? Wonders what incentive there is NOT to pirate. Please don't say the "making of" features or other stupid "extras". I don't watch that on 99% of DVDs.

      Before I am asked, I bought the HD for the widescreen and programming like Discovery HD.

    5. Re:This just gets better all the time by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1
      carrier for video is not going to be a mainstream technology anymore.
      I'm not so sure about that. There is a lot to be said for the "impulse" buy and all the fancy packaging. While my entire music collection is on my computer/iPod I'm certainly in a minority and I've had to fight tooth and nail to get my fiance to follow suit. Perhaps we will instead of little ram drives that contain the movie which is downloaded to our players? I'm also not sure that a subscription service will really work for movies as I doubt that all the movie studios will get behind one service and then you'll have to either subscribe to a dozen or pick and choose.

      On another note, I thought that HD-DVD used standard lasers for their format and simply changed the compression algorithm to fit more onto a single disc. Thus making it cheaper to produce a player that is backwards compatible since you don't need two lasers to read it. Perhaps I am missing something but if this is the case it spells bad news for blue ray but NOT hd-dvd.
      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    6. Re:This just gets better all the time by Mex · · Score: 1

      I'll be honest, I forgot what the changeover from VHS to DVD was like. Were people eager to get DVDs?

    7. Re:This just gets better all the time by calethix · · Score: 2, Informative

      taken from howstuffworks:

      But three important differences allow them to hold quite a bit more information than DVDs:
      * They use 405 nanometer blue-violet lasers rather than 650 nanometer red lasers.
      * The pits are smaller and the tracks are closer together.
      * They use more efficient compression to cut down the size of the files they store.

    8. Re:This just gets better all the time by Night+Goat · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'll be honest, I forgot what the changeover from VHS to DVD was like. Were people eager to get DVDs?

      Yes, definitely. I was working at Circuit City at the time (1998 or so, I think) and between the obvious picture quality difference, DTS/Dolby Digital sound, and not having to rewind anymore, it was a killer product. The prices on players were still a little too prohibitive for non-enthusiasts so you didn't see grandmas buying DVD, but younger folks were really into it. Another thing that helped the adoption of DVD was that prices of movies on DVD were substantially cheaper than they were on VHS. I remember "The Matrix" pretty much hovered around $9.99 ever since it came out. You used to have to pay $25 or more for a VHS tape, and many VHS titles plain didn't get stocked because they were priced at $99 for video stores. DVDs flattened the price point and made it so video stores bought the same thing regular consumers did. DVDs were definitely a big deal. I don't see anywhere near the same excitement over Blu-Ray and HD-DVD.
    9. Re:This just gets better all the time by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Some of us are perfectly happy with VCD.. or even vhs ( prefer beta over vhs tho and vinyl over cd )

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    10. Re:This just gets better all the time by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes.

      There were early adopters who went out and bought the obscenely priced first generation DVD players, but by and large the rest of the world didn't really follow suit until the players dropped below about $200 and Blockbuster started stocking a lot of new releases on DVD. And I wouldn't say that DVDs became ubiquitous until the cheap chinese ($50) "WalMart Special" DVD players came onto the scene.

      Frankly, early on I think the biggest benefit to most people of DVDs versus VHS is that you didn't have to rewind it. I know my parents just thought that was the coolest damn thing; you could talk to them about digital audio until you were blue in the face, but what they liked was the ability to jump instantly to any point in a film, pause it for extended lengths of time without "wearing" the disc, and never having to worry about rewind anything.

      I think whichever HD-disc format wins, it'll end up being like that. Mainstream consumers aren't going to buy it, until there are movies down at Blockbuster that they can rent, and they can buy the player at Walmart for under $200-250. Normal people just don't spend much more than that on what's effectively a fancy videocassette player (even if it's not really a cassette player...in most people's minds, the function is exactly the same, to play movies).

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    11. Re:This just gets better all the time by Ankou · · Score: 1

      How bout something like this instead.

    12. Re:This just gets better all the time by timeOday · · Score: 3, Interesting
      between the obvious picture quality difference, DTS/Dolby Digital sound, and not having to rewind anymore, it was a killer product.
      Add to the list: (1) compatibility with existing (NTSC) TV sets, and (2) don't degrade with repeated viewings (if you don't understand yet, wait until you have kids).
    13. Re:This just gets better all the time by evilviper · · Score: 0
      The prices are simply sick.

      $500 for an HD-DVD player isn't much higher than a simple progressive-scan DVD player, and you get the added benefit of being able to play HD discs in the future, if you like.

      And in the end, the added quality just doesn't change my life. Cool, yes, impressive with computer generated films, of course, but worth the price, the loss of control and the hassle? No way.

      You could have said the same things about DVDs as well. They weren't cheap, they have CSS DRM which took years to crack (which didn't slow sales), etc.

      DVD is perfectly good enough for me, thank you very much.

      VHS is perfectly good enough for me.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:This just gets better all the time by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I remember "The Matrix" pretty much hovered around $9.99 ever since it came out. You used to have to pay $25 or more for a VHS tape,

      I've NEVER seen a $25 VHS tape in stores, and I don't remember seeing a single $10 DVD until nearly 2 years after The Matrix was released, and that was some lowsy movie which happened to bomb, and they wanted to get rid of.

      I get the feeling your memory is exactly backwards. Either that or CC was doing something crazy with pricing to try hard to push DVD/DIVX.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:This just gets better all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I got a progressive-scan DVD player for 39 dollars. Two years ago.

    16. Re:This just gets better all the time by Mr2001 · · Score: 1
      Another thing that helped the adoption of DVD was that prices of movies on DVD were substantially cheaper than they were on VHS. I remember "The Matrix" pretty much hovered around $9.99 ever since it came out.

      That was still relatively late in the DVD game. The first few DVDs I bought (Austin Powers, Face/Off, 12 Monkeys) were $30 or more apiece.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    17. Re:This just gets better all the time by Darth+Liberus · · Score: 1

      I got a progressive-scan DVD / VHS combo for $99 a couple months ago.... I don't think a fivefold increase in price can be called "not much higher."

      --
      Beauty is just a light switch away.
    18. Re:This just gets better all the time by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I've NEVER seen a $25 VHS tape in stores


      You don't? My brother paid nearly $100 for Schindlers List on VHS when it first came out. VHS tapes used to be extremely expensive.
    19. Re:This just gets better all the time by prockcore · · Score: 1

      $500 for an HD-DVD player isn't much higher than a simple progressive-scan DVD player


      When was the last time you were at the store? I recently (6 months ago) bought a Philips progressive-scan DVD player that supports xvid and divx etc, for $80. That's right.. $80.

      In fact, the *only* dvd players that were more than $120 were DVD recorders.
    20. Re:This just gets better all the time by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      First they do the two-format-thing all over again. Then they keep all kinds of crap that pissed people off with DVDs such as the Regional Code. After that, they tell us that there will be draconian DRM. The prices are simply sick. And in the end, the added quality just doesn't change my life. Cool, yes, impressive with computer generated films, of course, but worth the price, the loss of control and the hassle? No way.


      Actually, Blu-Ray sucks worse in the protection department than HD-DVD. I believe HD-DVD has eliminated the region coding as everyone disliked it and it never worked that well anyhow. HD-DVD players still have a region, but that's for DVDs. I believe the box of the HD-DVD player I saw said "DVD only region" with the region mark, and I don't recall any mark on the HD-DVD discs themselves. Even the HD-DVD/DVD combo discs have a region code marked with "DVD Only". So it looks like HD-DVD has no region coding at all.

      At the very least, the DVD Forum learned something for their next-gen format. Too bad Sony didn't, and not only kept region coding, but added additional protections over what HD-DVD has (they both have ICT and AACS, and Blu-Ray adds to that, too).
    21. Re:This just gets better all the time by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      You must be pretty young then.

      I remember when Star Wars was $80 for a Beta tape in 1981.

      I paid $29 each for Star Trek:TMP and III in 1984.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    22. Re:This just gets better all the time by Ucklak · · Score: 1
      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    23. Re:This just gets better all the time by Knara · · Score: 1
      Sure, until the companies realized there was indeed a home market.

      Most of those VHS tapes were priced for video rental places, where after a dozen rentals max you made a profit. Once the installed home base of VHS was significant, the prices dropped enormously.

      This had happened by the early 90's at the latest, incidentally.

    24. Re:This just gets better all the time by mcmaddog · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't try amazon, buy.com, and other online retailers. At about the same time DVDs were becoming popular, online retailers were trying to win customer loyalty by selling below cost. All part of the fun that was the "Dot Com bubble." The first DVD I bought was The Matrix and I think it was about $15 from Amazon.

    25. Re:This just gets better all the time by Lex-Man82 · · Score: 1

      Wow, I live in England and getting DVDs in 1998 was near impossible. It took me a trip to central London to even find somewhere that stocked the discs or even new what they were. I went into a shop in Wimbledon near where I lived (WH Smith) and asked if they stocked any DVDs and was answered with a reply of "What the hell are those?" by the assistant. Also the title I could buy were terrible and around twice the price of pal videos also the discs were all two sided meaning you had to turn the things over midway through to watch the whole film.

    26. Re:This just gets better all the time by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This is turning out to be all stuff and nonsense, and I think I'll just skip HD-DVD and Blu-ray one and wait for the next next generation,

      Well, quality-wise I doubt you'll get anything better... 1080p is for normal TV distances beyond human vision everywhere but the small field dead center in your vision, and even then you need to be have 20-20 sight and sit fairly close to the screen. If you do the math sitting right next to a computer montior then the limit would be about 2160p though.

      If the Blu-Ray tools gets a) their head out of the ass and ship tools using H.264/VC-1 (MPEG4/WMV) instead of MPEG2 and b) ship 50GB discs so HD-DVD is excellent and Blu-Ray a little bit better (instead of opposite as today), then that should be good enough for everyone. What's left are DRM issues but I doubt the MPAA will ever budge there.

      Now, internet speeds have increased considerably for the last few years but I hardly think it'll be cost-effective to send around 30/50GB HDTV-images anytime soon, even if the MPAA would offer a download service. So while sticking with DVD isn't a bad option, if you want to wait for the next next format I think you'll be waiting a veeeeeeeery long time.

      Even the MPAA state this as their "last chance" for DRM and I agree. They'll have a hard enough time replacing the installed base of DVD players with HDTV players. If they are broken too, there's definately no way they'll convince people to replace those again. Just like the music industry will probably never get rid of the CD (or at least not for many decades).

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    27. Re:This just gets better all the time by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Correct, I didn't. But then neither did most people, so you can't really say below-VHS pricing was one of the things that made people switch to DVD.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    28. Re:This just gets better all the time by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called movielink.com and cinemanow.com. When one of these companies or viacom or whatever makes a box that I plug into my TV and internet connection, with an easy remote and under $200 pricetag, I will never rent or buy a movie again. Dude, renting ONE FUCKING VIDEO usually costs me $15-20 because I forget to return them and get the late fees. Plus just going to the video store PISSES me off, because they don't have many videos.

      Cinemanow and Movielink do not have very many videos either, but they would if everyone started using them. Look at netflix, they have so much crap I'm like a kid in a candy store. Go to movielink.com and order one of their .99cent videos. They have a special player app, it buffers your video up to like 10% (takes about 4-5 minutes at 200kB/s, so you can go pop the popcorn or pop out for a cigarette or whatever) and then you can start watching and it finishes the download in the background. It's already almost easy enough, but I want that 100-200 dollar box that plugs into my TV and reciever. BTW, the videos are over 640x480 which is more than enough for a regular TV, and the sound is perfect.

      I'm sure the current DVR boxes can handle this also, they just need someone to write the software and someone to serve the movies. Oh, but that's right, there's huge megaconglomerates based on trucking plastic disks around and stacking them on store shelves. So until they can make $5 per rental, they aren't going to do it. Maybe some underground film should only release to one of these services, and that would be the driving force that starts the plunge.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    29. Re:This just gets better all the time by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      I actually considered the no-rewinding to be a PITA. Sure, rewinding takes time, but at least the tape remembers where you left off. With DVDs, you have to seek back to where you were, if you're lucky enough to remember where you were.

      Still, with DVD-Rs costing under $.40 for over 10 hours of capacity (xvid format) and with them much easier to copy (which makes up for them being more fragile), I'll take them any day over tape.

    30. Re:This just gets better all the time by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Informative

      everywhere but the small field dead center in your vision

      Due to the way human vision works, the resolution in the center of the field of vision *is* the resolution of human vision. The only way you could take advantage of the lower edge resolution would be if you could predict, with certanty, exactly where the viewer would be looking all the time.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    31. Re:This just gets better all the time by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Your average DVD player will remember where you are for the last five or ten discs you watch.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    32. Re:This just gets better all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, doesn't VHS use digital audio? I thought it was the same as CD's though I could be wrong. Someone had a description as to why CD sample rate is 44.1K. Something to do with NTSC VHS and the number of bits squeezed between scan lines. PCM decoders where cheaper since every VCR needed one. Though I could be wrong.

    33. Re:This just gets better all the time by grant420 · · Score: 1

      Uhh DVDs have been widely available since the early nineties, not just since '98.

    34. Re:This just gets better all the time by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I remember when Star Wars was $80 for a Beta tape in 1981.

      Beta != VHS
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    35. Re:This just gets better all the time by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      The 3 that I've seen (PS2 and 2 low-end DVD players) don't, or at least it's too well hidden a feature or requires that the machine be kept on.

  8. Those who do not learn from their OWN history.. by PhakeDC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..are doomed to repeat it!

    1. Re:Those who do not learn from their OWN history.. by NewToNix · · Score: 4, Funny
      Those who do not learn from their OWN history... are doomed to repeat it!
      And those that DO learn from their own history, are simply doomed to repeat it several more times, hoping for a different outcome...

    2. Re:Those who do not learn from their OWN history.. by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that one of the definitions of insanity? Or maybe a proverb. To do the same thing over and over, expecting different results.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    3. Re:Those who do not learn from their OWN history.. by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      To do the same thing over and over, expecting different results.

      Eh... I keep buying scratchers hoping for a big win.

  9. PS3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what this will do to the PS3?

    1. Re:PS3? by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It will do nothing to the PS3, the article said that Sony has suspended shipments of Blue Laser Diodes to other manufacturers, aka they are keeping them for their own products.

    2. Re:PS3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      if this won't affect the PS3, is this a way for Sony to get a leg up on HD-DVD? eg, divert blue LEDs to the PS3 a Blu-ray device, while leaving HD-DVD manufacturers out of luck? despite all the necessary caveats on the PS3, at least some will be sold this year. not trying to be a conspiratist, but is this one of the fallouts? or does sony already only ship to Blu-Ray manufacturers?

    3. Re:PS3? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Huh? We already know the PS3 is being delayed partially due to BluRay shortages. The fact that they're turning away business ($$$) from other companies does not imply adequate supply either.

    4. Re:PS3? by miro+f · · Score: 0

      I very much doubt sony were supplying blue LEDs to the HD-DVD manufacturers...

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
  10. Argh! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Illegal collusion to fix the market - Wouldn't happen to be intended to delay the adoption of the new players until next year would it, by which time maybe they will figure out how to actually sell a usable product...

    There was no way in heck I was going to get one of these damn things anyway.

    But now, now I feel I must have one! Aaarrrggghhhhh!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. That does it! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DigiTimes reports that several major vendors, including Sony and Matsushita, have suspended shipments of the blue laser diodes that drive both high-def disc formats.

    Bad enough that Sony is shoving an over-priced PS3 down consumers throats. Now they're throttling the market for other players. The Sony monopoly must die!

    Or, at least, cut the damn prices on the PS3.

  12. Obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ha ha!

  13. Clearly this is bad news for Sony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly this is very bad news for Sony.

    Because... you know, everything is, somehow.

    1. Re:Clearly this is bad news for Sony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're right. I don't see how a shortage of lasers for Blu-Ray drives affects Sony and the PS3 at all. No connection what so ever. All sarcasm aside, this may not affect the PS3 much. If they haven't started manufacturing them yet then they won't be able to produce that many by years end. I doubt the laser component will cause PS3, sorry PLAYSTATION 3/PS3[R], manufacturing much at all.

    2. Re:Clearly this is bad news for Sony. by htnprm · · Score: 1

      Time to start using those Sony share certificates for wallpaper...:-) Kinda like the German Papiermark during the 1920's...

    3. Re:Clearly this is bad news for Sony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Bad news? When they are limiting the availability of the diodes to their competitors when they will be able to flood the market with PS3's, so they become the default next-gen high definition player?

      Sony are being very clever here. They are doing all they can to abuse their position to assume dominance.

  14. Are the sharks (or snakes) missing? by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Has anyone checked to see if any sharks and/or snakes are missing?

  15. The blues by MECC · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sounds like BlueRay has a bad case of the blues...

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  16. I think "war" might not be the right word.... by ProppaT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't exactly see anyone chomping at the bit to buy into HD video at this point, especially seeing that the movie selection is low and most DVD afficienado's already have a very large collection of discs at this point. This war is being aimed towards gear heads and gadget collectors. There is no real compelling reason to switch formats, especially if it means paying more for media. I think DVD is good enough for the population now and that people realize that. Especially seeing that the adoption rate for HD is well under where everyone speculated it would be years ago. This "war" is going the same way the surround sound cd war went. No where. No one really felt like investing money rebuying cd's, which sound good enough. On top of that, the music nuts that would normally be into this kinda thing have invested enough money in their "stereo" rig where they don't always want to invest twice again that much money in a surround sound system. It's very rare that you'd get a chance to listen to music in your livingroom (where your surround system is probably set up to begin with) with family around anyway. I guess the point to this rant (and common theme throughout this rant) is the word "enough." I think society as a whole is suffering technology burnout. Things change so quickly that the general population wants to sit on the sideline, see where all these rapid advances eventually take us, and then buy in. Then again, seeing our current political situation, maybe war is the right term for this. A fight that no one wants but big brother insists on.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    1. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      and most DVD afficienado's already have a very large collection of discs at this point.

      Plain and simple FUD. HD-DVD and Blu-ray players will play all your current DVDs just fine. Implying that you have to go rebuy your collection is unbelivably stupid.

      I think society as a whole is suffering technology burnout.

      And the whole basis for this belief of yours is...?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      I think society as a whole is suffering technology burnout.

      And the whole basis for this belief of yours is...?


      He read it on the internet over a high-speed wireless connection on a high-resolution multi-color display on a personal digital device nonexistant 20 years ago and that cost relative pennies compared to the delivery of information in yesteryear, and thought to himself, "Self ... I don't think this technology stuff is going to catch on ...".

    3. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by hardburn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plain and simple FUD. HD-DVD and Blu-ray players will play all your current DVDs just fine. Implying that you have to go rebuy your collection is unbelivably stupid.

      Why would I buy a next-gen player to play my old DVDs?

      If I bother to buy a next-gen player, I want as many movies in that new format as I can. Movies in next-gen formats are going to take time to get here, and the quality difference from DVDs -> HD-DVD/Blu-ray isn't as great (certainly not as much as VHS -> DVD), so I have less incentive to bother buying it. If I don't have an HD TV, the quality difference is nil.

      So, the cost of replacing my current collection is not worth the additional quality, and therefore buying a player is pointless.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    4. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by smatthew · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you buy the new player, and then begin purchasing HD-DVD or Blu-ray disks? Keep watching your old movies in standard def, and enjoy new movies in higher resolution? That would get you the best of both worlds.

      Of course, then you couldn't come bitching to slashdot.

      --
      slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
    5. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Why would I buy a next-gen player to play my old DVDs?

      Because you can buy highdef DVDs in the future, instead of more standard DVDs. There is absolutely no reason you need to re-buy the DVDs you already have.

      and the quality difference from DVDs -> HD-DVD/Blu-ray isn't as great (certainly not as much as VHS -> DVD),

      Completely, totally, factually, WRONG.

      VHS to DVD was a 3X improvement at BEST... DVD to hi-def (1080) is a 6X improvement.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by hardburn · · Score: 1

      VHS to DVD was a 3X improvement at BEST... DVD to hi-def (1080) is a 6X improvement.

      What's that based on? Just the resolution (as another reply noted)? Resolution is a raw number that doesn't necessarily correspond to how much better you perceive the increase in quality.

      VHS -> DVD is a huge increase, even over brand-new first-generation VHS tapes. VHS images are noticably fuzzy around edges, for instance. DVDs fix that (excepting the occasional encoding problem) and they don't get worse with age and copies. Plus there is a huge cost in manufacturing difference between the two, which makes it possible for independent productions like Red vs Blue to mass-market movie sales.

      What the next-gen formats offer is only an improvement in image quality, which may not be perceptible even with an expensive HDTV. If you can run a double-blind tests between DVDs and next-gen formats using a variety of TV equiptment, then you can tell me that there is a reason to be excited about the improvements in quality. Talking only about the resolution numbers is meaningless if your eye can't tell the differences.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    7. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by hardburn · · Score: 1

      What I really want is to throw all my movies on a hard drive. Then I'll throw the discs into storage and play the movies directly to my TV from my server. I can do that right now with DVDs. The DRM in next-gen formats actively hinders that (though I'm sure it'll be broken with little to no decrease in quality).

      I'll spare comments on the quality increases, since I've already stated my opinions in another reply above.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    8. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      VHS -> DVD is a huge increase, even over brand-new first-generation VHS tapes.

      You can say it all you want, but it won't make it true.

      VHS images are noticably fuzzy around edges, for instance. DVDs fix that

      Yes, DVDs fix that by introducing aliasing on the edges instead, macroblock artifacts, chroma sub-sampling, etc.

      What the next-gen formats offer is only an improvement in image quality, which may not be perceptible even with an expensive HDTV.

      Only an ignorant fool who has never seen an HDTV picture would make such a claim.

      Talking only about the resolution numbers is meaningless if your eye can't tell the differences.

      There's nobody with more than 2 brain cells that has made the claim you can't tell the difference.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by hardburn · · Score: 1

      So you're an ignorant fool now for asking for scientific verification before claiming something is better?

      Maybe double-blind testing will come back and say the next-gen formats are noticably better. I just haven't read about any such tests yet, and until I do, I refuse to take quality claims at face value.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    10. Re:I think "war" might not be the right word.... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      So you're an ignorant fool now for asking for scientific verification before claiming something is better?

      When the difference is overwhelmingly obvious, yes. Particularly when you aren't asking for any such thing where VHS is involved.

      That's doubly true when you've already stated: "the quality difference from DVDs -> HD-DVD/Blu-ray isn't as great". Backtracking now, and saying you want confirmation, is a pretty transparent move.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  17. just in time by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The rumored laser shortage could result in shipment delays for new models of Blu-ray and HD DVD players and drives past the upcoming holiday season, cooling the next-gen DVD format war until 2007.

    Great! That's just in time for me to NOT BUY ONE.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  18. In a related move by shwonline · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pioneer has suspended shipments of Sony-compatible pixels for its high-definition displays.

    --
    Do you have a flag?
  19. Wrong Joke for "Blue Laser" by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sharks? Losers. How about:

    Does this mean I can no longer buy all their playsets and toys?!

    -Peter

    1. Re:Wrong Joke for "Blue Laser" by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Funny

      The fact that I get this joke makes me a sad panda.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    2. Re:Wrong Joke for "Blue Laser" by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      The fact that I get your reference to an entirely unrelated cartoon may be the worst . . . shame . . . EVER.

      -Peter

    3. Re:Wrong Joke for "Blue Laser" by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Funny

      That reminds me of the time I was shamed by getting your reference to yet another unrelated cartoon... { cut to zany flashback skit }

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    4. Re:Wrong Joke for "Blue Laser" by roesti · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just imagine the CEOs of Sony and Matsushita yelling "I just hate you so much!!!"

    5. Re:Wrong Joke for "Blue Laser" by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Is Dante wearing a diaper and swinging a cat by its tail in this skit?

      -Peter

    6. Re:Wrong Joke for "Blue Laser" by pete-classic · · Score: 1
      Or maybe:

      Dun . . . dun . . . dun . . . crash! "Why are we walking like this again?"


      -Peter
    7. Re:Wrong Joke for "Blue Laser" by sootman · · Score: 1

      At least they aren't doing stupid things with cardboard cutouts of each other.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  20. Sony's strategy by monopole · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Increase PS3 and Blu-Ray drive costs.
    2. Declare ultimate hardware DRM system (no lasers) ensuring that drives cannot read or write any discs.
    3. Openly fret that prices are too low.
    4. ???
    5. Profit!

    1. Re:Sony's strategy by sootman · · Score: 1

      Step 6 is actually 'Profit! (but not as much as you wish)' and Step 7 is 'Blame Piracy'

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  21. Format wars ... when will people learn? by slackarse · · Score: 2, Funny

    One Format to rule them all, One Format to find them, One Format to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.

    --
    Come to Australia so we can strip search you and rob you of your internets, pr0n, rights and freedoms.
    1. Re:Format wars ... when will people learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One Format to rule them all, One Format to find them, One Format to bring them all, and in the [D]a[R]k[M]ess bind them.

  22. Pricing Ploy by triso · · Score: 1

    This is just a ploy to limit supply and keep the prices up for a longer time.

    1. Re:Pricing Ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wounder how long untill the FCC or FTC gets pissed off.

    2. Re:Pricing Ploy by triso · · Score: 1
      Wounder how long untill the FCC or FTC gets pissed off.
      Probably quite a while since they are all Japanese and Korean companies.
  23. Right, whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The idea that Microsoft is even close to Nintendo on this is purest fantasy.

    The XBox 360 has a DVD instead of an HD-DVD drive for one and exactly one reason: Because they decided to ship in 2005 instead of 2006. Microsoft is almost as big a bunch of media-control freaks as Sony, it's just that both their successes and their failures on that front have been less flashy.

  24. There is *NO SHORTAGE* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SONY has been hard at work overpricing their new Playstation and by incorporating such strong Digital Rights Management into BluRay. Add to that the fact people are perfectly happy with DVDs, so by my calculation, 40 little blue LEDs will be plenty. And that accounts even for replacements due to Playstations that catch fire.

    BluRay = Digital Betamax

    1. Re:There is *NO SHORTAGE* by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't worry, there's still a sizeable number of die-hard SONY fans out there who will buy Sony's latest crap, no matter how bad it is or how overpriced it is. They'll even take out a second mortgage on their house just to buy the latest Sony dud.

    2. Re:There is *NO SHORTAGE* by freeze128 · · Score: 1
      Don't worry, there's still a sizeable number of die-hard SONY fans out there who will buy Sony's latest crap, no matter how bad it is or how overpriced it is.

      Yes, and they're called the MPAA. Studios always buy sony monitors to appear in films. With that much of a guaranteed sale, Sony will do just fine.
    3. Re:There is *NO SHORTAGE* by xwin · · Score: 1
    4. Re:There is *NO SHORTAGE* by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Not always. I noticed right away that all of the monitors in "V for Vendetta" are obviously Dell flat panels.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    5. Re:There is *NO SHORTAGE* by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Hi welcome to 2006, sony's reputation for quality died 2 years ago for the average person...LG is the new standard.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    6. Re:There is *NO SHORTAGE* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moron

  25. Re:That does it! (completely off topic) by shadowdodger · · Score: 1

    You could worry about the prices of the PS3 or the X-Box 360 (non-crappy model) or you could just wait for the Wii to come out. :)

  26. hmmm by p!ssa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how much of this is a shortage of lasers vs. sonys desire to keep HD-DVD products off the shelf util they can get a price matching (or as near as they can get) competing products to market. Maybe I need a tin foil hat but I've seen similar tactics used in the businesses I've worked for.

  27. They're doing it all wrong by Alphax.au · · Score: 1

    I remember watching "Beyond 2000" many many years ago when they were talking about the initial development of ultra-thin lasers for high-density optical media. They discovered a really easy way to make a fine blue beam: shine a UV laser (cheap) through about 20 metres of optic fibre (also fairly cheap, and can be coiled up to save space), and hey presto! ultra-fine blue laser beam at low cost. Funny that they're using specialised blue laser diodes and they're now discovering a lack of supply...

  28. Buy and Torrent by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm thinking if there's anything on HD that I really want to see, I'll just buy it and then download it. Then I'm supporting the movie or show I like, I don't have to buy either player, and I have it in the format I prefer -- MPEG4 on my hard drive.

    1. Re:Buy and Torrent by Scrapey · · Score: 1

      Good point. For what it's worth I think HD-DVD will edge it. Better codecs, more flexible authoring tools and cheaper to manufacture.

      However, I get superb results upscaling standard dvds to 1080i on my plasma using an entry level Pioneer 696. It also plays DIVX.

  29. Laserdiscs by tgd · · Score: 1

    Laserdiscs of the 21st century?

    You do know Laserdiscs had a successful 20 year run in the videophile market, only usurped by DVDs less than ten years ago?

    A 20 year run for a technology is pretty good, even if joe six pack doesn't use it.

    1. Re:Laserdiscs by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I could have used DAT as another example. I didn't say they'd go away completely but that they, just like DAT or laserdiscs, remain a niche technology for a small minority for whom the benefits are so substantial and so important they're willing to overlook all the negatives.

      The likes of Sony, Toshiba, Universal and so on are not content with a niche technology; for them - and for most of us - something that doesn't supplant the DVD and become truly mass-market is a failure. If that is the destination for these formats they are a failure and will get a replacement whether a fringe market continues to exist or not.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Laserdiscs by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I dunno...Laserdiscs were actually starting to really become more popular right before DVD came out.

      Most all of my local Video rental shops at the time had significant LD choices. They would get the LD releases as soon as they came out, and purchase prices were dropping.

      DVD hit..and wham...you could get them for dollars....hell, I've still got my old LD player, and some LD's that I've not replaced with DVD yet...and some that aren't replaceable...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Laserdiscs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. LDs did not die, they were "killed" by the fact that studios stopped making them
      in favor of pushing DVDs.

      Even today there are many things you can do with LD you cannot with DVD, purely due to
      the technological issues (like smooth multi-speed motion forward AND backwards), and a high
      quality LD can look as good as a DVD without the digital artifacts.

      Alas, as soon as DVD started taking off, studios unceremoniously pulled the plug on LD.

      But the format was by no means a failure.

  30. Who's got the lasers? by musakko · · Score: 1

    We'll have an amnesity period for Jedis to allow them turn in their light sabres, but after that we'll really have to get serious..

  31. PS3 by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this will affect the launch of the PS3... specifically, since it was intended to launch about the same time as the Wii. So instead we might have the Wii launching earlier, for less. I wonder what kind of effect it would have, but I bet it wouldn't be good for Sony.

    1. Re:PS3 by Knara · · Score: 1

      Most likely Sony is using these for their own devices (PS3)

  32. 30% yield? by kclittle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nichia, which currently holds 80% of the global blue laser diode supply, reported that its yield rate for blue laser diodes reached 30%

    Could some knowledgable person briefly explain why a 30% yield for blue laser diodes is something to crow about? What, exactly, keeps yields so low for such a "fundamental" device? They fab chips with millions of elements and get better yields...

    -k

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    1. Re:30% yield? by Gemini_25_RB · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the article is saying that the yield has so far improved to 30% from the x% it was during R&D. But 30% yield does not create enough to meet the expected demand, so the companies aren't willing to release such a small # of HD drives.

    2. Re:30% yield? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about blue lasers is that the semiconductor substrates are difficult to create and have to be absolutely free of defects. The challenges of creating a manufacturable blue laser process is one of the biggest reasons they have been so long coming to market. So 30% yield is actually pretty good for such a process

  33. Looks like someone forgot to RTFA by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You do realize part of why there are shortages right? As the article says, Sony is holding back most of them - can you imagine why that might be?

    Freaking 360 fanbois.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Looks like someone forgot to RTFA by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because they found out what blue lasers did to the local critters and they are desperately trying to find a way to do some damage control before the press finds out where all those tsunamis in the indian ocean really come from ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  34. Exactly! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    With all of the people on Slashdot so rabidly Anti-Sony, I cannot believe no-one has picked up on the obvious consiracy theory yet.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  35. Pretty much declares Blu-Ray the winner by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Lets see, both systems have players delayed until next year meaning low sales this year.

    Except one system, Blu-Ray, gets millions of players out thanks to the PS3 (who Sony is holding the diodes in reserve for). What happens when you have two sides and one of them has a few orders of magnitude more consumers buying media for it?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  36. Re:Almost by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

  37. Re:Almost by whatme · · Score: 1

    > Almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

    ... and atomic bombs. Gotta get you into the modern age at least :)

  38. Real point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Isn't the real point here that PS3 shipments will be delayed into 2007?

  39. Ahh, I get it by DingerX · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...because Sony wants the PS3 with Blu-Ray to copy the success of the PSP with UMD, but on a bigger scale?

  40. Hate to break it to you.... by kid_oliva · · Score: 1

    Just because people own a PS3 doesn't mean they will automatically buy blu-ray media, which is more expensive. After you buy your over priced consule; you then have a price point of $60-$100 dollars for games. What 'I live in my mother's basement' guy is going to be able to afford replacing his dvd collection on top of purchasing his PS$ system and PS$ games??? You are assuming Sony planned far enough ahead to have enough blu-ray diodes when they haven't even began production of the system. I believe you will see extreme shortages of the PS$ system. Now if only I can find a place taking preorders, I can sell them on ebay and demand payment in souls.

    Yeah, I was abit heavy handed, but someone had to give him the real meal deal. So mod me up for being right.

    --
    I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
  41. Wow, how many ways can a post go wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Just because people own a PS3 doesn't mean they will automatically buy blu-ray media, which is more expensive.

    Really? I can buy a Blu-Ray movie for $20, about the same as a DVD. Also what you and many others forget is the power of Netflix - at first people will only rent Blu-Ray DVD's, but then when they see the increase in quality they will happily pay a few dollars more for a leap in video quality.

    After you buy your over priced consule; you then have a price point of $60-$100 dollars for games. What 'I live in my mother's basement' guy is going to be able to afford replacing his dvd collection on top of purchasing his PS$ system and PS$ games???

    If you'd stop to think about where you were going with that insult you were trying to get in, you'd have realized that guys living at the parents have a huge amount of disposable income because they have no rent or food costs. So that was just a really poor idea on you part.

    I myself own a home (notinhabited by my parents), but will still be able to afford a PS3... It's called a "job". How much do you spend drinking, or on Tivo, or Cable? I pay for none of those things and have quite a bit more money to spend on other entertainment as a result.

    You are assuming Sony planned far enough ahead to have enough blu-ray diodes when they haven't even began production of the system.

    The article says they are withholding them, so there you go.

    I believe you will see extreme shortages of the PS$ system. Now if only I can find a place taking preorders, I can sell them on ebay and demand payment in souls.

    That part you got right. Mostly because of demand though.

    Yeah, I was abit heavy handed, but someone had to give him the real meal deal. So mod me up for being right.

    You're still at one. Sorry I had to refute almost every point you made, next time please try using the left side of your brain a bit before posting.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. No.... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Because Sony wants the PS3 with Blu-Ray to copy the success of the PSP with UMD, but on a bigger scale?

    No, because Sony wants the PS3 which includes Blu-Ray (a technology endorsed by a huge range of studios and other companies including Dell and Apple) to succeed and not be in terribly short supply.

    As noted those with a bent toward conspiracy would say an additional reason would be to keep the number of HD-DVD players low while Blu-Ray in the PS3 fills the market.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley