guess using unused space is a good thing, but will it be cost effective to make these huge low nm chips? it might be more cost efficient to include two higher process chips. also batteries are always getting a little better (albeit very slowly). i think android phones especially would benefit from more cores. there are hundreds of threads running on that OS with just a few apps open.
actually ribbons are a very good way to present information on what a function will do without the user hunting through menus and trying every option. however on windows explorer they are probably misplaced. that screen real estate could be used much better.
buy up domains, prop up content farms on them, and all links on the content farms go back to eHow
this is not how the google ranking algorithm works. if eHow has a lower site rank (page rank for all its pages), then linking to it wont help you increase the content farm's page rank. what does that is when high page rank pages link to the content farms site. its a little recursive, and im sure its changed a little since the original implementation (think kludge factors).
all those sites (ehow/sexchange) were actually ranked higher since people did link to them, and the sites did provide some content that some people were interested in.
Does this mean that my Goldman issued Facebook shares are only worth half as much as they were?
If a swindler issues shares for a company run by a swindler, doesn't that make them legit? Where's the SEC when you need them?
Slashdot Mirror
guess using unused space is a good thing, but will it be cost effective to make these huge low nm chips? it might be more cost efficient to include two higher process chips. also batteries are always getting a little better (albeit very slowly). i think android phones especially would benefit from more cores. there are hundreds of threads running on that OS with just a few apps open.
word.
this would only add credibility to both. but good call, both these companies have patented / trade marked something real stupid.
They were not perfect, by any means, but at least I didn't have to waste 3 days trying to figure out where things were.
yes you did, when you first learned it.
actually ribbons are a very good way to present information on what a function will do without the user hunting through menus and trying every option. however on windows explorer they are probably misplaced. that screen real estate could be used much better.
buy up domains, prop up content farms on them, and all links on the content farms go back to eHow
this is not how the google ranking algorithm works. if eHow has a lower site rank (page rank for all its pages), then linking to it wont help you increase the content farm's page rank. what does that is when high page rank pages link to the content farms site. its a little recursive, and im sure its changed a little since the original implementation (think kludge factors). all those sites (ehow/sexchange) were actually ranked higher since people did link to them, and the sites did provide some content that some people were interested in.
Does this mean that my Goldman issued Facebook shares are only worth half as much as they were? If a swindler issues shares for a company run by a swindler, doesn't that make them legit? Where's the SEC when you need them?