Slashdot Mirror


User: JockTroll

JockTroll's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,507
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,507

  1. Re:You can't compensate the dead on EU Considering Sensors In Sewers To Detect Bomb-Makers · · Score: -1

    It's hard to compensate you when you're dead

    It's very easy to compensate for that in Europe. If they need people that badly (which isn't the case), just get another boatload of immigrants.

    or one of your loved ones is crippled and you're going to need special care for them for the rest of their life.

    Why? Euthanasia is legal in Europe and killing off cripples and other indesirables is an important part of the rich European culture. You cannot embrace European culture without embracing its nazischeisse ubermenlischesweltannschauung and kiddie scat bestiality snuff porn too.

  2. Re:Not a James Bond gadget on Police Use James-Bond-Style GPS Bullet · · Score: -1

    Exactly. One was used by the female protagonist in the pilot episode of the Robocop TV series. Of course, nobody likes to do any research.

  3. Re:re Another Revolution on UK Prime Minister Threatens To Block Further Snowden Revelations · · Score: -1

    Killing off the limeys is not genocide: it's pest control.

  4. Re:re Another Revolution on UK Prime Minister Threatens To Block Further Snowden Revelations · · Score: -1

    With what weapons? The british populace is disarmed. Moreover the UK police forces have shown to be ready, willing and able to murder civilians and the courts happy to let them go away with it (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Jean_Charles_de_Menezes). A properly terrified public opinion would side with the authorities any time. No, there's no liberation for the british. They do not deserve it. Let them live in slavery, just dynamite the eurotunnel and close off any traffic with the UK. Let them "prosper" under US rule, if they can affort to keep the little island going. Starve them to death. When they're all gone, we can repopulate with a smarter breed.

  5. Re:This act is CRIMINAL in the EU on France Moves To Protect Independent Booksellers From Amazon · · Score: -1

    Oh, come on. EU laws are only for small states. The UK doesn't care, Germany and France ARE the EU. Nobody can touch them within the "union". They could have a market for baby meat (that's it, meat from slaughtered human babies) and it would be accepted.

  6. Re:This is how we Europeans do it on Ten Steps You Can Take Against Internet Surveillance · · Score: -1

    Won't work. By Divine Holy Order of the High Lord Bonobo, skin and genitals become illegal. Legions of fawning adorers of the High Lord Bonobo patriotically castrate and skin themselves alive to please their All Hallowed Leader. Heil Bonobo!

  7. Re:Risk Perception 101: People are Idiots on Autonomous Cars Will Save Money and Lives · · Score: -1

    Cessna stopped making small airplanes in the mid 80s because of lawsuits.

    The magic word here is "mid 80s". It's a whole new world now. Big corporations are untouchable. Anyone going against the likes of Google would be bankrupt in a heartbeat.

  8. Not enough on MEPs Vote To Suspend Data Sharing With US · · Score: -1

    Denounce FATCA. Renegotiate all deals with the US government. Disband NATO. Confiscate US assets. If push come to shove, deport all US citizens who do not renounce their US citizenship. While the EU doesn't have the strength to go to war with the US, the US cannot afford it. Let's have a riot!

  9. So what? on Facebook Lets Beheading Clips Return To Its Site · · Score: -1

    Decapitations are good. Decapitations are cool. Beheading is the new twerking. We need more lopping off heads, both on video and live. Already young people from around the world are forming DAS (Decapitation Appreciation Society) chapters in their schools, bringing axes and machetes to celebrate the release of the head from the prison of the body and engaging in wholesome guillotine rituals, drawing on the rich and cultured French Revolutionary tradition. After all, anything from Europe must be good, right? One thing is certain: heads will roll. Off with their heads!

  10. Re:Sure, so long as I can identify who's wearing i on Are We Socially Ready For Wearable Computing? · · Score: -1

    You don't need to punch anyone out. Don't make them victims. Don't make them martyrs. Don't do anything that might draw sympathy to them. No, just ridicule them: point at glassholes and laugh out loud. Point out how stupid they look. Any member of the Cool People will command attention and other will feel compelled to join in the ridiculing. Or play on the "stranger danger" angle: people with google glasses will look strange, odd, standing out. Let people know that they might be recording you against your will. Tell them they might be recording their kids. Comment that pedophiles would be using google glasses. Then let things take their course.

  11. Re:Yeah, right ... on Facebook Comment Prompts Arrests In Cyberbullying Suicide Case · · Score: -1

    Whenever you're up against a minor, it's ALWAYS self-defence. More important, it's defending civilization against barbarism like only kids can inflict upon society.

  12. Re:Yeah, right ... on Facebook Comment Prompts Arrests In Cyberbullying Suicide Case · · Score: -1

    You don't "negotiate" with kids. You don't "argue" with kids. You do not "beg, plead or bribe". A parent's authority over the kids must be absolute and unyielding. There must be no compromises, ever. Authority must be established through strength both moral and, if necessary, physical. Remember one thing: kids do not own ANYTHING. Parents own, parents pay for the stuff they're generously allowed to play with. Kid doesn't obey? Slap it. I say "it" because a kid is not a person. In older and more enlightened times, kids were treated as property while nowadays they're just a burden. Throws a tantrum? Smash its games console or sell it (better to smash it even if it's a monetary loss because it drives the point home more abruptly and shows the kind of power it's messing with). Keeps doing it? Have its pet(s) put down. You're not stepping back, ever. Threatens to run away? Laugh in its face "Yeah, right. Like you can bear not having your two hot meals a day. Go, I'm not stopping you. You won't last a minute out there. Don't come back sniffling and crying like the sniveling coward you are, because the door will be locked." If you have other kids, tell it you have spares. If you don't, inform it you can always have more or you'll simply enjoy the good life you had before you decided to waste time and effort on its useless carcass. Point out to it that its funeral will be way less expensive than its continued existence so the cold hard equations say it's better off dead. Under no circumstances you must allow the critter to challenge your authority.

  13. Re:Return to the 1980's! on South African Education Department Bans Free and Open Source Software · · Score: -1

    Yeah, because infringing on the rights of a majority based on skin color is equivalent to not using crappy software made by amateurs. Drill a hole into your skull and let in some air to shake the cobwebs and get rid of the smell of shit: NOBODY CARES WHAT YOUR STUPID COMPUTER RUNS.

  14. Interesting times on Digital Revolution Will Kill Jobs, Inflame Social Unrest, Says Gartner · · Score: -1

    Well, if you're a programmer, a system designer or anything to do with the "digital revolution", maybe you'll be better off hiding it. You'll never know when some disgruntled worker out of a job may decide to come for you. It may get nasty. It may get bloody. By all means, can't wait for violence against IT workers to become commonplace. What's the better line: "computer programmers hanged" or "computer programmers necklaced"? Lynching can take so many interesting forms.

  15. Re:Hal is correct that parents have a resonsibilit on 'Dangerously Naive' Aaron Swartz 'Destroyed Himself' · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    First, you don't have kids because no-one would screw you. Second, even if you could reproduce through artificial insemination or through rape (a common fantasy among geeks until they actually try and get beaten up HARD) your polluted genes would produce a substandard specimen just like you are. And third, you don't have the money to send a kid to study anywhere. Now, be like you hero swartz and kill yourself. Did you know that he was all purple in the face, with his tongue hanging out and his bloodshot eyes bulging out when his mama found him? His pants were soiled with piss and shit. What AN HERO he was. :)

  16. Re:Abrams is a Hatchet Man on An Animated, Open Letter To J.J. Abrams About Star Wars · · Score: -1

    Aw, come on. Don't be a dummy all the time. Nobody complains about new Dreck but loserboy nerds who have invested their very little lives into it. Their computer drives are full of dreck fanfiction, they have petabytes of photomanipulations and assorted shit cluttering them. They spend their lonesome nights chatting with other lowlife nerd scum and having slapfights on their favourite episodes that nobody can really remember. They insist on how "life-changing" or even "history-changing" rottenpenis' dreck has been. Of course, it's a bunch of shit. Star dreck was a badly written, badly acted and altogether bad show which happened in a time where other SF shows were actually worse. It had no redeeming quality and was deservedly cancelled. But the pedophile geeks couldn't let go (a sizeable percentage of convicted pedophiles are trekkies) and pestered the production for decades. Now, these days this kind of behavior would result in massive "fuck you" from the rightsholders, but the bothersome sniffles from a legion of crybabies gave a mediocre and untalented hack like rottenberry leverage to try and make a new series that got nowhere. Then they made a movie, and it was a flop. It was only when they tried to make cool action movies like "The Wrath of Khan" which happened to be set in dreckland that things changed. Now, Abrams has done the right thing: it has remade dreck for the Cool People, which is the audience that matters. So, set your phasers on "jerkoff" and shove it up your butts, loserboys, because it's not going away. Old dreck is dead. As for Star Wars, it badly needs a new direction so shove your fake lightsabers up your ass and shake it.

  17. In other words on Popular Science Is Getting Rid of Comments · · Score: -1

    The internet is not the place for adult debate. News at 11.

  18. Hello on Boot To Zork · · Score: -1

    Sailor.

  19. A modest proposal on How Long Can the ISS Last? · · Score: -1, Troll

    Colony drop it. On the Mecca. Kill two birds with one stone and if it's during Haji, kill some more. ;)

  20. Re: ALIENS on Software Glitch Means Loss of NASA's Deep Impact Comet Probe · · Score: -1

    No, not just aliens. Illegal aliens.

  21. WHAT? on Mystery of Missing Martian Methane Deepens · · Score: -1

    What kind of title is that? Does Nancy Drew work at NASA now?

  22. Classic on Angry Brazilian Whacks NASA To Put a Stop To ... Er, the NSA · · Score: -1

    Typical nerd behavior: since the actual object of their hatred is forever out of reach and forever above their abilities, they pick an unrelated and easier target that is connected to the real target only in their imagination, twisted by rationalizations of absurdity. Just like nerds in school pick on disabled and otherwise weaker kids because the jocks they hate for being so successful would destroy them in a second. Yes, it is true: nerds are bullies, like all loserboy weaklings, and they pick on the defenceless, usually the handicapped. Nerds are not "intelligent and misunderstood nice guys", they're of average or less-than-average intelligence self-centered monsters with no social skills whatsoever who shun competition as "beneath them" because, surprise surprise, they're not up to it. To make up for their inadequacy they either invent parallel realities where they're great heroes and take refuge into self-imposed autism (camouflaged as assburger syndrome) or they pick on really defenceless people. It always happens. Beat up the nerd, shit on its face, it deserves it.

  23. Re: Wow on Arrested Chinese Blogger "Confesses" On State TV, Praises Censorship · · Score: -1

    Why don't you both get into a cage armed with knives and stab each other until one (preferably both) dies? Ah, right, you would simply flap your arms left and right grunting and panting like all nerds do. Until some jock steps into the room, grabs you by your scrawny necks, bash your heads together then seize your wrists and says "look, this is how it's done" and make you stab each other in the eyes. And then he shits on your faces.

  24. Re:this has me wondering on Cruise Ship "Costa Concordia" Salvage Attempt To Go Ahead · · Score: -1

    Why end the fun with a single blast? And anyway, those megatons would go to waste: better to carpet-nuke the place than to have a single explosion, it would vaporize the ship and turn the beach to glass, but it wouldn't break up the island and melt the rock all over the place. We want to be thorough and professional in our extermination efforts, please.

  25. Re:this has me wondering on Cruise Ship "Costa Concordia" Salvage Attempt To Go Ahead · · Score: -1

    Why shaped charges and torches? Slow and lame. Detonate a nuke on it, 150 kt will be fine. I'd say three to four warheads will clean up the place nicely. Oh, wait, there's an inhabited island near by, nuke the island first so the poor folks on it don't get radiation poisoning. Six airburst in the 200 kt range will do it, then another 6 penetrating warheads at 500 kt yield to break up the island so it won't pose a hazard to navigation anymore. There's nothing you can't solve with nuclear weapons. They tend to settle the argument just fine.