I am not the GP. But yea the EMDrive is total bullshit. It is made up physics that was *shown* to be wrong but they went and did experiments that *showed* nothing outside errors and claimed it worked anyway. If it did work it would be a free energy device and it would mean all the laws of physics are different everywhere, like say in paris vrs NY. Since none of that is true and we have over 300 years of *experimental evidence* to back that up. The EMDrive is bullshit.
The thrust of a EM drive is comparable to an ion thruster. If anything they claimed was even remotely true. It would be easy to show. But it is not true, it is bullshit. Turns out you can't get propulsion out of bullshit. Many have tried before. Hell even on of the EMdrive experimenters has a patent on an anti gravity drive. Yea real credible science right there.
By definition that is not detecting anything. Detecting error is well detecting error. Also the experiments are sloppy as shit, it violates all laws nature we know of and they literally made up the theory that was proven wrong more than once.
Or you could you know look at the data. There is a lot more than just this study about this. Fact is the data is not nearly as clear cut as the summary claims. What is clear is how crops handle not using pesticide, they don't. You know organic crops use pesticide right? You think you can just ask all the insects to be nice to your crop just because you decided it organic?
You got a citation for the lacking of nutrition part? You won't find one. Because every study ever done has shown no real difference (well not quite true, one or two have shown organic to be *worse* because of the presence of fungus) between modern farming, and organic or whatever flavour of the week it is for "better nutrition". Proper blind studies have shown people can't tell the difference in taste either. Again not quite true. Some have shown people believe the "freshest and tastiest" is the modern farmed stuff.
it easily could be locked very quickly if it formed close to earth, just outside the roche limit for example. Of course if it liquid it is even harder to define "locked".
No they don't. If the logic of intimidating is good then well perhaps we should upgrade to waterboarding. I hear that can be invaluable as well. How many good people have been professionally harmed by voodoo polygraph people? Not to mention just how stupid it makes the government look.
Exactly. You don't have to trick a lie detector. They don't work in any way or form. Reading tea leaves is just as accurate. The fact that the FBI requires to take one, give me a lot of strong evidence they are incompetent.
90% of wear and tear on a turbofan is at takeoff. So yea there are good economic reasons not to do this. But over all some pilots like to gun it anyway:D. Lets face it. It is fun.
We know why they have beaten the Constellation dead horse. It space shuttle legacy. It is pork. The space shuttle represented a lot of pork. And too many didn't' want to give that up. Hence constellation. I mean still solid boosters for man rated stacks? Really?
In this particular case. It doesn't matter because tree finder is out of date and shit. But it should be noted that he did this work while doing a PhD (which he refused to finish). Also not solo. I am not sure he is the sole legal copyright holder.
br
Yea i sort of am personally know the guy. Sort of. in a round about way. He has been a certified nut job for the ten years I was on his batshit insane mailing list.
Yea why just the other day i was laid off because well they have this new machine that programs itself to do what ever you want it to do. Err but you do have to lern a formal problem specification language to use it.
I noticed *no one* on/. every cites there data/research. Clearly no actually read the paper in question for example. Since like when do you need to read something if your already told it aggress with your preconceived bias. Note it does not really say what people thinks it says. In fact it pisses me off that such sloppy statistics gets in nature. But then the shittiest papers in any field are typically in nature or science.
Yes you are. Every person that shouts "Denier" the second someone doesn't tow the line, is asking for the debate to STOP. There are many many many of you.
This debate has had nothing to do with science for some time now.
Point in fact most of the chemistry on the internet is simply not detailed enough from a safety stand point. They leave things out like heat of solutions and stuff.
But i don't believe that knowledge is the enemy here. as the quote goes:
No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making some other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
A bunch of dumb americans with guns on a plane is a premise for a B grade movie. I mean reatards all pulling guns on each other in a confined space and zero cover. Yep that will end well. It is bad enough having you retards on the street and only a matter of time before it escalates into something truly horrific. Even the NRA won't save gun restriction laws after than.
Let the monkeys believe their truthiness. I mean he would only have to read the wiki to know better. Matter of fact the shoe bomber and the scrotum sac burner also just had to read the wiki to know it wasn't going to work.
Slashdot Mirror
I am not the GP. But yea the EMDrive is total bullshit. It is made up physics that was *shown* to be wrong but they went and did experiments that *showed* nothing outside errors and claimed it worked anyway. If it did work it would be a free energy device and it would mean all the laws of physics are different everywhere, like say in paris vrs NY. Since none of that is true and we have over 300 years of *experimental evidence* to back that up. The EMDrive is bullshit.
The thrust of a EM drive is comparable to an ion thruster. If anything they claimed was even remotely true. It would be easy to show. But it is not true, it is bullshit. Turns out you can't get propulsion out of bullshit. Many have tried before. Hell even on of the EMdrive experimenters has a patent on an anti gravity drive. Yea real credible science right there.
No they really haven't. Really.
By definition that is not detecting anything. Detecting error is well detecting error. Also the experiments are sloppy as shit, it violates all laws nature we know of and they literally made up the theory that was proven wrong more than once.
Your funny. Also you didn't look at the data did you.
I love the heavy dose of scientific evidence in this post.
Or you could you know look at the data. There is a lot more than just this study about this. Fact is the data is not nearly as clear cut as the summary claims. What is clear is how crops handle not using pesticide, they don't. You know organic crops use pesticide right? You think you can just ask all the insects to be nice to your crop just because you decided it organic?
Bees is a small subset of insect pollinators.
You got a citation for the lacking of nutrition part? You won't find one. Because every study ever done has shown no real difference (well not quite true, one or two have shown organic to be *worse* because of the presence of fungus) between modern farming, and organic or whatever flavour of the week it is for "better nutrition". Proper blind studies have shown people can't tell the difference in taste either. Again not quite true. Some have shown people believe the "freshest and tastiest" is the modern farmed stuff.
it easily could be locked very quickly if it formed close to earth, just outside the roche limit for example. Of course if it liquid it is even harder to define "locked".
It was open source. He has retroactively changed the licence. Again, he probably can't even do that.
No they don't. If the logic of intimidating is good then well perhaps we should upgrade to waterboarding. I hear that can be invaluable as well. How many good people have been professionally harmed by voodoo polygraph people? Not to mention just how stupid it makes the government look.
Exactly. You don't have to trick a lie detector. They don't work in any way or form. Reading tea leaves is just as accurate. The fact that the FBI requires to take one, give me a lot of strong evidence they are incompetent.
90% of wear and tear on a turbofan is at takeoff. So yea there are good economic reasons not to do this. But over all some pilots like to gun it anyway :D. Lets face it. It is fun.
We know why they have beaten the Constellation dead horse. It space shuttle legacy. It is pork. The space shuttle represented a lot of pork. And too many didn't' want to give that up. Hence constellation. I mean still solid boosters for man rated stacks? Really?
The government is also ignorant of this. Back doors don't work. Both practically and mathematically.
In this particular case. It doesn't matter because tree finder is out of date and shit. But it should be noted that he did this work while doing a PhD (which he refused to finish). Also not solo. I am not sure he is the sole legal copyright holder.
br Yea i sort of am personally know the guy. Sort of. in a round about way. He has been a certified nut job for the ten years I was on his batshit insane mailing list.
Yea why just the other day i was laid off because well they have this new machine that programs itself to do what ever you want it to do. Err but you do have to lern a formal problem specification language to use it.
Sheesh, its the god dam luddites all over again.
I noticed *no one* on /. every cites there data/research. Clearly no actually read the paper in question for example. Since like when do you need to read something if your already told it aggress with your preconceived bias. Note it does not really say what people thinks it says. In fact it pisses me off that such sloppy statistics gets in nature. But then the shittiest papers in any field are typically in nature or science.
No one is asking for scientific debate to stop.
Yes you are. Every person that shouts "Denier" the second someone doesn't tow the line, is asking for the debate to STOP. There are many many many of you.
This debate has had nothing to do with science for some time now.
Err not not really. There is plenty of debate about the causes. It is a long way from settled science.
But i don't believe that knowledge is the enemy here. as the quote goes:
No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making some other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
.
A bunch of dumb americans with guns on a plane is a premise for a B grade movie. I mean reatards all pulling guns on each other in a confined space and zero cover. Yep that will end well. It is bad enough having you retards on the street and only a matter of time before it escalates into something truly horrific. Even the NRA won't save gun restriction laws after than.
The Terrorists are a lie.
Let the monkeys believe their truthiness. I mean he would only have to read the wiki to know better. Matter of fact the shoe bomber and the scrotum sac burner also just had to read the wiki to know it wasn't going to work.
The Terrorists are a lie.
because not everyone is a coward without a gun. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...