There aren't any gold vending machines in Germany. The company did install 1 (in word one) machine at the Frankfurt airport and even that was for a testing period only. So AFAIK there is just one single machine installed in Germany, in Geisslers gold shop in Reutlingen. Try finding one on their website: http://www.gold-to-go.com/ .
Of course there should be gazillions (=480;-) ) of gold vending machines in Germany by now, at least that's what he planned when installed the test machine at Frankfurt airport in spring 2009.
This Thomas Geissler guy is quite clever at spinning the PR wheel. But 100 gold vending machines? ILMAO...
One at his gold shop in Reutlingen and (presumably) one in Dubai.
Google Translate is 100% based on statistics, so there are no special algorithms for translating from one language to another. The translation gets better when Google has *a lot* (gogoool) of sentences in a pair of laguage and knows that they have the same meaning. If the language pair is Russian - Ukrainian or German - Swaheli it's almost guaranteed to fail.
Artficial Intelligent god Peter Norvig (guess where he works) always says: We don't have better algorithms, we just have more data. And if they do not have enough data, well, then Google translates fails.
I wouldn't try WLAN. 5.000 hotspots at T-Mobile seem to be a lot, but in my case (inside a city with a population of mor than 200.000) the next Wifi-spot is more than mile away. Fon is a disaster as well. But cell phone coverage and prices are good and cheap in Germany, so who cares?
You can get prepaid cards in nearly every supermarket. Aldi uses eplus (see above) and costs 14,90 per month. AFAIK the data plans of all the other discounter data plans do not offer good data plans.
Blau.de is an ePlus reseller and ePlus is the slowest network in Germany. A lot of areas are still EDGE, many are normal speed UMTS (384kbit/s) and only a few are UMTS/3G. A kind of "official" reseller of eplus is called Simyo. They offer 1 Gig data for € 9,95 valif for a month. If the gig is used up just buy a new card for 10 Euros. No plan whatsover.
o2 is the second of the two smaller providers in Germany. Their coverage ist a bit worse than that of eplus, but in urban areas their network is usuallly faster. o2 has a prepaid plan as well called Fonic. Their rate is 2,50 Euros per day. USB stick costs 60 Euros.
Vodafone and T-Mobile are the two big providers and usually offer the best network coverage and best speed. But they are more expensive. A day with a maximum of 1 Gb costs 4,95 Euros (Vodafone Websessions) or 4,95;-) (T-Mobile Websessions). Vodafone has 7 days with 1 Gb data for 9,95 as well.
USB sticks should be no problem. If you buy one at the phone store you'll get them some Euros cheaper, but in most cases they will have a simlock, but you can go to an electronics store and buy one without a simlock. That should be the easiest part...
After a short check there are no pages in English on their websites (vodafone.nl has them).
Microsoft reorganized their business multiples times in the past. I wonder if these reorganisations disturb the numbers from the graph. IIRC Hotmail was in the online division some years ago, now it seems to be reported in the Office division. I remember similiar things for their server OSs (were Office, now seem to be Windows), their embedded OS (where is it now? Entertainment or Windows?), the xbox etc.
Microsoft has a bunch of products that don't make money or at worse loose a lot of money. On the other side they have some products (Windows 7 (incl. Server) and Office) that are cash cows like nothing else on this planet. Microsoft seems to be quite eager at mixing these parts. So that Microssofts customers can't see their extreme margins on Office and Windows (which are 95% plus) and their shareholders won't complain about Microsofts many lossmaking products (everything online, embedded Windows (whatever it's called today), xbox,...)
The more computer you have the better your average utilization gets (if you use virtualization internally). Therefore the smaller the IT division gets the smaller the utilization gets. Thus i'd say that smaller companies could profit even more from (private) clouds.
The price of the Veyron will never be lower than now. At least there's a rather good chance of climbing prices for this car as for a lot of other supercars before. A used McLaren F1 is now twice the price a new McLaren F1 was ten years ago.
4.000 Euros for a set of tires are not a problem. But 4.000 Euros every 12 minutes is a different beast..
"But that's OK, cause the fuel runs out in only 12 minutes."
Unbelievable.
The problem with the tires is, that they are f***ing expensive. Around 4.000 Euros (> 5.000 Dollars) per set. At 400 km/h you'll need a new set every 12 minutes...
The problem: Leopard already *has* some big improvements under the hood like address space randomization. Despite their "geeky" nature these features were promoted rather heavily. But for some strange reason we haven't seen any widespread adoption. IIRC even Safari doesn't use any of those advanced secority features. And we're at 10.5.7 now.
Perhaps Apple doesn't want to make that mistake again.
* Linux servers posted year-over-year revenue growth of 10.0%, for a total of $1.9 billion in the quarter. Linux servers now represent 13.4% of all server revenue, up from 9.4% a year ago.
* Unix servers experienced year-over-year revenue growth of 7.7%. The high-end enterprise segment of the Unix market was strongest of all three segments (volume, midrange enterprise and high-end enterprise), as worldwide Unix revenues totaled $4.6 billion in 2Q08, representing 32.7% of quarterly server spending. Unix servers account for the second-largest segment of spending, by operating system in the worldwide server market.
* Microsoft Windows server revenue was $5.1 billion in 2Q08, showing 1.7% year-over-year growth and comprising 36.5% of all server revenue in the quarter. Windows servers account for the single largest segment of spending, by operating system, in the worldwide server market.
* IBM's System z servers running z/OS experienced the second consecutive quarter of positive revenue growth, with 31.7% year-over-year growth in 2Q08 to $1.6 billion. IBM mainframes running the z/OS operating system accounted for 11.8% of all server revenue in 2Q08."
So Linux is at 13.4%, proprietary Unixes 32.7%. Solaris is the Unix with the highest markt share, so Solaris' marke share is somewhere in the same region as Linux from several different vendors combined.
So yes proprietary Unixes are still relevant. And these number are rather up-to-date from Q3-08. If you look at the higher market share of Solaris in the past it's even more relevant.
I'm not saying that Sun is *such a strong* contender. I'm just saying that reports of Sun's death are greatly exaggerated. And in case you've missed it: Solaris gets open sourced more and more. I'm quite sure that it gets more relevant by this. Cause there are real gems (ZFS, dtrace) inside Solaris (and there are not many of these gems that are missing from OpenSolaris). ZFS is worth the switch alone if you're thinking about a disk storage.
Linux tends to be a bit overhyped in media. It's the winner and media loves winners. If you look at market share by the number of servers (not the revenue) Linux' numbers look much better. And Sun still sells a lot of these big iron machines.
I use Linux too. And it's good and all that. But a lot of customers still prefer Sun's stuff. They don't care about saving 5K per server when they know that they'll get a good, proven and solid combination of hard-, software and services.
Bye egghat
Re:Sun's Declining Business == Trolling? Ha.
on
Oracle Buys Sun
·
· Score: 1
Sorry, don't want to waste my time discussing Sun. What matters now is Oracle+Sun. You can be quite sure that this will be managed better than Sun has been in the past (great products, worst marketing ever)
bye egghat
Re:I'm quite sure that IBM hates itself now
on
Oracle Buys Sun
·
· Score: 1
I'm not that sure. IBM + Sun had a lot of overlapping stuff that essentially would have destroyed value. I don't see that many overlapping stuff in Oracle + Sun.
If you think in terms of a viable competitor you may prove correct.
bye egghat
Re:Sun's Declining Business == Trolling? Ha.
on
Oracle Buys Sun
·
· Score: 1
"Quoting IDC's figures doesn't lend you much credibility."
Quoting abyolutly nothing doesn't lead to much credibility either.
Don't get me wrong. IBM is not a bad company. I'm not calling the death of IBM. But I'm sure that the harm Oracle+Sun will cause is worth more than the few hundred million Dolars more Sun wanted from IBM.
And if you really really want to see Sun als a SPARC company only (which is way off the mark), i could stil point you to the demise of IBMs Power-based workstations. Face it: All non-i86 CPU-architectures between 200 $ and 10K$ are essentially dead.
Bye egghat
Re:Niagara should have a future
on
Oracle Buys Sun
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
CPUs are a "scale" business. Bigger is better, cause it's extremly expensive too design and produce a CPU. That is why most of the non i86-architectures have vanished.
I might second you statement that Niagara *should* survive, but nevertheless I doubt it.
Slashdot Mirror
What level of success? I know just one installation (in Dubai). Frankfurt airport was just a test.
Greets from Germany.
There aren't any gold vending machines in Germany. The company did install 1 (in word one) machine at the Frankfurt airport and even that was for a testing period only. So AFAIK there is just one single machine installed in Germany, in Geisslers gold shop in Reutlingen. Try finding one on their website: http://www.gold-to-go.com/ .
Of course there should be gazillions (=480 ;-) ) of gold vending machines in Germany by now, at least that's what he planned when installed the test machine at Frankfurt airport in spring 2009.
This Thomas Geissler guy is quite clever at spinning the PR wheel. But 100 gold vending machines? ILMAO ...
One at his gold shop in Reutlingen and (presumably) one in Dubai.
GOLD AUS DEM AUTOMATEN! (Sorry, in German only).
Google Translate is 100% based on statistics, so there are no special algorithms for translating from one language to another. The translation gets better when Google has *a lot* (gogoool) of sentences in a pair of laguage and knows that they have the same meaning. If the language pair is Russian - Ukrainian or German - Swaheli it's almost guaranteed to fail.
Artficial Intelligent god Peter Norvig (guess where he works) always says: We don't have better algorithms, we just have more data. And if they do not have enough data, well, then Google translates fails.
There's a very interesting video of a presnataion done by Peter Norvig n YouTube. Highly recommended.
Norvig - TODAY: Innovation in Search and Artificial Intelligence
Damn. I forget two things:
I wouldn't try WLAN. 5.000 hotspots at T-Mobile seem to be a lot, but in my case (inside a city with a population of mor than 200.000) the next Wifi-spot is more than mile away. Fon is a disaster as well. But cell phone coverage and prices are good and cheap in Germany, so who cares?
You can get prepaid cards in nearly every supermarket. Aldi uses eplus (see above) and costs 14,90 per month. AFAIK the data plans of all the other discounter data plans do not offer good data plans.
Blau.de is an ePlus reseller and ePlus is the slowest network in Germany. A lot of areas are still EDGE, many are normal speed UMTS (384kbit/s) and only a few are UMTS/3G. A kind of "official" reseller of eplus is called Simyo. They offer 1 Gig data for € 9,95 valif for a month. If the gig is used up just buy a new card for 10 Euros. No plan whatsover.
o2 is the second of the two smaller providers in Germany. Their coverage ist a bit worse than that of eplus, but in urban areas their network is usuallly faster. o2 has a prepaid plan as well called Fonic. Their rate is 2,50 Euros per day. USB stick costs 60 Euros.
Vodafone and T-Mobile are the two big providers and usually offer the best network coverage and best speed. But they are more expensive. A day with a maximum of 1 Gb costs 4,95 Euros (Vodafone Websessions) or 4,95 ;-) (T-Mobile Websessions). Vodafone has 7 days with 1 Gb data for 9,95 as well.
USB sticks should be no problem. If you buy one at the phone store you'll get them some Euros cheaper, but in most cases they will have a simlock, but you can go to an electronics store and buy one without a simlock. That should be the easiest part ...
After a short check there are no pages in English on their websites (vodafone.nl has them).
Why is everyone only thinknig about beer? Longdrinks with oxygen enhanced water could be quite cool ...
Active O2 (Warning: flashy shit)
Microsoft reorganized their business multiples times in the past. I wonder if these reorganisations disturb the numbers from the graph. IIRC Hotmail was in the online division some years ago, now it seems to be reported in the Office division. I remember similiar things for their server OSs (were Office, now seem to be Windows), their embedded OS (where is it now? Entertainment or Windows?), the xbox etc.
Microsoft has a bunch of products that don't make money or at worse loose a lot of money. On the other side they have some products (Windows 7 (incl. Server) and Office) that are cash cows like nothing else on this planet. Microsoft seems to be quite eager at mixing these parts. So that Microssofts customers can't see their extreme margins on Office and Windows (which are 95% plus) and their shareholders won't complain about Microsofts many lossmaking products (everything online, embedded Windows (whatever it's called today), xbox, ...)
Sorry, German only, but rather funny ...
Titanic: Papst 16.0
For all the people that don't have the time for the 80 minute version:
An introduction to Google Wave
E.G. does Zarafa work as an exchange clone on the server for Snow Leopard clients? Or Scalix?
The more computer you have the better your average utilization gets (if you use virtualization internally). Therefore the smaller the IT division gets the smaller the utilization gets. Thus i'd say that smaller companies could profit even more from (private) clouds.
Really. Take a look at it.
GWT DatePicker
See the example and the code.
No HTML or Javascript whatsoever. Only CSS needed for styling.
The price of the Veyron will never be lower than now. At least there's a rather good chance of climbing prices for this car as for a lot of other supercars before. A used McLaren F1 is now twice the price a new McLaren F1 was ten years ago.
4.000 Euros for a set of tires are not a problem. But 4.000 Euros every 12 minutes is a different beast ..
"But that's OK, cause the fuel runs out in only 12 minutes."
Unbelievable.
The problem with the tires is, that they are f***ing expensive. Around 4.000 Euros (> 5.000 Dollars) per set. At 400 km/h you'll need a new set every 12 minutes ...
The problem: Leopard already *has* some big improvements under the hood like address space randomization. Despite their "geeky" nature these features were promoted rather heavily. But for some strange reason we haven't seen any widespread adoption. IIRC even Safari doesn't use any of those advanced secority features. And we're at 10.5.7 now.
Perhaps Apple doesn't want to make that mistake again.
if not "for months"
I'm sure that buses will get faster. I just wanted to add a perspective *how* fast Terabit/s is.
bye. egghat.
(better, acs?)
English is not my native language. There is a rather high probability that my German is better than yours ;-)
bye Anonymous Coward
But that's not terabit/s. Even with PCIe3.
Or am I missing sth?
Bye egghat
cause the PCIe bus is way too slow for transporting terabits.
Or am I wrong?
bye egghat
First:
"Top-Level Server Market Findings
* Linux servers posted year-over-year revenue growth of 10.0%, for a total of $1.9 billion in the quarter. Linux servers now represent 13.4% of all server revenue, up from 9.4% a year ago.
* Unix servers experienced year-over-year revenue growth of 7.7%. The high-end enterprise segment of the Unix market was strongest of all three segments (volume, midrange enterprise and high-end enterprise), as worldwide Unix revenues totaled $4.6 billion in 2Q08, representing 32.7% of quarterly server spending. Unix servers account for the second-largest segment of spending, by operating system in the worldwide server market.
* Microsoft Windows server revenue was $5.1 billion in 2Q08, showing 1.7% year-over-year growth and comprising 36.5% of all server revenue in the quarter. Windows servers account for the single largest segment of spending, by operating system, in the worldwide server market.
* IBM's System z servers running z/OS experienced the second consecutive quarter of positive revenue growth, with 31.7% year-over-year growth in 2Q08 to $1.6 billion. IBM mainframes running the z/OS operating system accounted for 11.8% of all server revenue in 2Q08."
So Linux is at 13.4%, proprietary Unixes 32.7%. Solaris is the Unix with the highest markt share, so Solaris' marke share is somewhere in the same region as Linux from several different vendors combined.
So yes proprietary Unixes are still relevant. And these number are rather up-to-date from Q3-08. If you look at the higher market share of Solaris in the past it's even more relevant.
I'm not saying that Sun is *such a strong* contender. I'm just saying that reports of Sun's death are greatly exaggerated. And in case you've missed it: Solaris gets open sourced more and more. I'm quite sure that it gets more relevant by this. Cause there are real gems (ZFS, dtrace) inside Solaris (and there are not many of these gems that are missing from OpenSolaris). ZFS is worth the switch alone if you're thinking about a disk storage.
Linux tends to be a bit overhyped in media. It's the winner and media loves winners. If you look at market share by the number of servers (not the revenue) Linux' numbers look much better. And Sun still sells a lot of these big iron machines.
I use Linux too. And it's good and all that. But a lot of customers still prefer Sun's stuff. They don't care about saving 5K per server when they know that they'll get a good, proven and solid combination of hard-, software and services.
Bye egghat
Sorry, don't want to waste my time discussing Sun. What matters now is Oracle+Sun. You can be quite sure that this will be managed better than Sun has been in the past (great products, worst marketing ever)
bye egghat
I'm not that sure. IBM + Sun had a lot of overlapping stuff that essentially would have destroyed value. I don't see that many overlapping stuff in Oracle + Sun.
If you think in terms of a viable competitor you may prove correct.
bye egghat
"Quoting IDC's figures doesn't lend you much credibility."
Quoting abyolutly nothing doesn't lead to much credibility either.
Don't get me wrong. IBM is not a bad company. I'm not calling the death of IBM. But I'm sure that the harm Oracle+Sun will cause is worth more than the few hundred million Dolars more Sun wanted from IBM.
And if you really really want to see Sun als a SPARC company only (which is way off the mark), i could stil point you to the demise of IBMs Power-based workstations. Face it: All non-i86 CPU-architectures between 200 $ and 10K$ are essentially dead.
Bye egghat
CPUs are a "scale" business. Bigger is better, cause it's extremly expensive too design and produce a CPU. That is why most of the non i86-architectures have vanished.
I might second you statement that Niagara *should* survive, but nevertheless I doubt it.
bye egghat.