Slashdot Mirror
Domain: 74.125.47.132
Stories and comments across the archive that link to 74.125.47.132.
Comments · 117
-
Ahh, good old WEAK Squad.
- The main links are Slashdotted, so here's its Google Cache: link
- Are all of Best Buy's ads printed nationwide, or do they vary by region? If the latter case is true, then I can't say I'm truly surprised, as shoddy areas would be more likely to offer shoddy services such as this. On the other hand, if the false service was nationally marketed, then it would make me even more worried (and more confident) that Best Buy is caring significantly less about being a quality chain post Circuit City/CompUSA's demise.
-
countermeasures?
So, any ideas about how to legally stop OCR of the plate#?
After a little searching, I found the following in a google cache (this seems like
it is for the stoplight-runner cameras, but still: they've put some thought into this):* Platefinder - Sophisticated firmware continually searches the camera's field of view for the presence of a license plate.
* Dual Lens Camera - As a license plate is detected, the dual lens camera is triggered to capture both color and infrared images of the vehicle and plate. Infrared cameras are able to see license plates regardless of sun glare, darkness, or other adverse conditions.
* Triple Flash Technology - This patented technology varies the flash, shutter and gain settings of the camera to capture multiple plate images, ensuring the highest quality photo regardless of light or weather conditions. Only the image determined to produce the highest quality read is sent on for processing.
* Optical Character Recognition "Engine" - Unlike some players in the ALPR community, MVTRAC does not use generic OCR engine for all states and regions. MVTRAC uses a customized OCR engine specific to the state or region of interest. MVTRAC OCR engines are very tolerant of skewed and off-axis plate reads, various plate sizes, syntax rules, and designs. The engine reads the captured infrared plate image and converts it to a data file.
* Processors - In addition to housing the patented Platefinder and triple flash technologies, MVTRAC processors perform the OCR translation and can use the captured data in a variety of ways via a MVTRAC software application or third party solution.
* Application Software- Software interfaces, specific to the industry or application, allow the user of the system to easily view and manage the data. -
Re:Great news!
... and the rulings will likely be influential in other circuits, as explained in TFA.
TFA might be getting slashdotted, though. Google has it cached: http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:http%3A%2F%2Fwww.consortiuminfo.org%2Fstandardsblog%2Farticle.php%3Fstory%3D201002190850472 -
Readable version of page on Google cache
Readable text version of article for older browsers or just for quick loading.
-
Re:Before the dust settles
-
Re:Go look at the NFL versus Louisiana over Who da
It's really too bad that "who dat" has its origins many years prior to the NFL coming to New Orleans.
The Wikipedia link is broken so all I have is the Google Cache version
-
Here is a google cached version
-
"Success Rate" not "Accuracy""100% Accuracy" implies a positional error of zero meters (to infinite decimal places), which is obviously not what they're talking about. Amazingly, this mistake is not just in the Slashdot summary, but in the cached FA as well.
If we go to the referenced Nature article abstract we see that the development "yields programmed targets in all cases."
The correct terminology then would be "100% Success Rate" not "100% Accuracy".
P.S. Presumably "success" is defined by something like "90% Accuracy", to put an ironic spin on it. But it makes no sense to speak of accuracy in terms of percentage without a reference, such as "a single atom". So the criteria was probably something like X nanometers accuracy.
-
Cached Version
Looks like it's Slashdotted already. Here's the cached page: http://74.125.47.132/search?hl=en&q=cache%3Awww.significant-bits.com%2Fframerates-do-matter&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
-
Re:Garbage men..
Worst. Example. EVER.
Where are the lengthy articles on what's wrong with military culture that's to blame for this?
Here, you loon.
-
Re:Video taken down
Who can claim copyright on their wedding? Apparently it's the groom who took down the video. Why would you tell the world you got married, then try to take it back? Looks like the video is still up, my guess is the video in this post wasn't the original. Next stop: plastic surgeon to fix his wife's beak. Looks like being a software guru doesn't get the chicks after all.
-
Re:And good luck with Google, too
Ah, apparently it's not working anymore. It was working earlier, and here's the google cache to prove it.
-
Slashdotted...
The current state..
The last few days have been difficult. What has become clear now is that the Android Open Source Project is a framework. It's licensed in such a way so that anyone can take it, modify it to their needs, and redistribute it as they please. Android belongs to everyone. This also means that big companies likes Google, HTC, Motorola, and whomever else can add their own pieces to it and share these pieces under whatever license they choose.
I've made lots of changes myself to the AOSP code, and added in code from lots of others. Building a better Droid, right?
The issue that's raised is the redistribution of Google's proprietary applications like Maps, GTalk, Market, and YouTube. These are not part of the open source project and are only part of "Google Experience" devices. They are Google's intellectual property and I intend to respect that. I will no longer be distributing these applications as part of CyanogenMod. But it's OK. None of the go-fast stuff that I do involves any of this stuff anyway. We need these applications though, because we all rely so heavily on their functionality. I'd love for Google to hand over the keys to the kingdom and let us all have it for free, but that's not going to happen. And who can blame them?
There are lots of things we can do as end-users and modders, though, without violating anyones rights. Most importantly, we are entitled to back up our software. Since I don't work with any of these closed source applications directly, what I intend to do is simply ship the next version of CyanogenMod as a "bare bones" ROM. You'll be able to make calls, MMS, take photos, etc. In order to get our beloved Google sync and applications back, you'll need to make a backup first. I'm working on an application that will do this for you.
The idea is that you'll be able to Google-ify your CyanogenMod installation, with the applications and files that shipped on YOUR device already. Or, you can just use the basic ROM if you want. It will be perfectly functional if you don't use the Google parts. I will include an alternative app store (SlideMe, or AndAppStore, not decided yet) with the basic ROM so that you can get your applications in case you don't have a Google Experience device.
I'll have more updates soon as I get all the code hammered out.
Thanks for all the support thru all of this.
This entry was posted on September 27, 2009, 9:41 am and is filed under Home.
-
Re:Differences between versions
The link you provided seems to be down. Fortunately, Google seems to have cached everything.
-
FTP
any hospital with a legal or compliance department would be ensuring that any data that would be covered under HIPA would be sujbect to that laws data security standards
"FTP Today considers its services "HIPAA Ready," and proper use of the tools we provide should meet your needs of HIPAA compliance, however you should consult your own attorney in that regard."
xTy Technology: "When enabled, the encryption strength of our products meets (exceeds) the HIPAA data encryption requirement.
"FTP Voyager Secure is a fully HIPAA compliant FTP client."Falcon
-
Why does Ion.SIMIAN.c hate HOSTS files? #3 of 5
Because he obviously is a botmaster (or wannabe "hacker/cracker" who loses profits by blocking known bad websites in HOSTS files since adbanners have been compromised before), or some webmaster (as they lose monies on adbanner blockage, despite it taking away a users' speed online, OR, via malicious code in them that bushwhacks the unwary user):
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139923&cid=26983715
----
"But don't you see? Your favorite sites are going to have to shut down if you use AdBlock, 'cause then you're stealing their content! You're really going to just have to take one for the team." - by ion.simon.c (1183967) on Wednesday February 25, @01:32PM (#26983715)
----
I would ordinarily stop on that note alone, seeing as Ion.SIMIAN.c is obviously one profiting by these things (even though they're known to be infested with malicious code the past few years now & the fact that adbanners eat up an online user's bandwidth THE USER PAYS FOR no less)... but, that's not all, with wannabe, Ion.SIMIAN.c... far from it!
He hangs out @ the "hacker/cracker" websites online, like this one -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:T1ikOtt242AJ:hackaday.com/2009/02/22/x11-on-android/+%22Simon+C.+Ion%22&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Thus, it's quite possible he is trying to somehow "discredit me" to others, since I have done guides that stop that type of loser (hackers/crackers), the worst kind of online SCUM that there is, via this guide I did in late 2008 -> http://www.tcmagazine.com/forums/index.php?s=5bf29ea6ca49162314f25f9ebf2aba68&showtopic=2662
He also likes things like "PhreakNic", a 'hacker/cracker' type event apparently -> http://wiki.yak.net/0.photos.simoncion?size=L and those are his photos from it...
APK
P.S.=> Keep using TOR (another indicator ion.SIMIAN.c is nothing but someone up to "no good" again most likely), & going slow as hell due to their total lack of speed (like any "anonymous proxy" usually is) being the "wannabe hacker" you *THINK* you are, apparently... NOW - You said this to me:
"2) You're talking to APK... His depth of knowledge is *really* shallow, so don't expect a good conversation out of him." - by ion.simon.c (1183967) on Thursday August 06, @08:09PM (#28980845)
Time to show YOU, what is what & everyone else here, where it's at, on that account... with your own list of massive screwups. I will keep to my word, because I laid off on you, thinking you'd leave me be from the last time we "had it out" for your trolling me, & you lost badly (which my other replies here clearly illustrate)... So, from now on, under this "ion.simon.c" registered user account you have here? I'll do as you requested -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1230601&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=28076381 , & post this in reply to your posts, see how you like eating your own words... apk
-
Wow...Google /.ed
You gotta hand it to
So what do we have here, in the google ache, its the wave.google.com site HereGotta love google, and gotta love
-
Why does Ion.SIMIAN.c hate HOSTS files? #3 of 5
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139923&cid=26983715
----
"But don't you see? Your favorite sites are going to have to shut down if you use AdBlock, 'cause then you're stealing their content! You're really going to just have to take one for the team." - by ion.simon.c (1183967) on Wednesday February 25, @01:32PM (#26983715)
----
I would ordinarily stop on that note alone, seeing as Ion.SIMIAN.c is obviously one profiting by these things (even though they're known to be infested with malicious code the past few years now & the fact that adbanners eat up an online user's bandwidth THE USER PAYS FOR no less)... but, that's not all, with wannabe, Ion.SIMIAN.c... far from it!
He hangs out @ the "hacker/cracker" websites online, like this one -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:T1ikOtt242AJ:hackaday.com/2009/02/22/x11-on-android/+%22Simon+C.+Ion%22&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Thus, it's quite possible he is trying to somehow "discredit me" to others, since I have done guides that stop that type of loser (hackers/crackers), the worst kind of online SCUM that there is, via this guide I did in late 2008 -> http://www.tcmagazine.com/forums/index.php?s=5bf29ea6ca49162314f25f9ebf2aba68&showtopic=2662
He also likes things like "PhreakNic", a 'hacker/cracker' type event apparently -> http://wiki.yak.net/0.photos.simoncion?size=L and those are his photos from it...
APK
P.S.=> Keep using TOR (another indicator ion.SIMIAN.c is nothing but someone up to "no good" again most likely), & going slow as hell due to their total lack of speed (like any "anonymous proxy" usually is), You haven't replied here, and have been gone for over 3++ days or so now... why? Because I am exposing YOU as the dunce you are, clearly! You said this to me:
"2) You're talking to APK. He exists to write wall-of-text comments. His depth of knowledge is *really* shallow, so don't expect a good conversation out of him." - by ion.simon.c (1183967) on Thursday August 06, @08:09PM (#28980845)
Time to show YOU, what is what & everyone else here, where it's at, on that account... with your own list of massive screwups. I will keep to my word, because I laid off on you, thinking you'd leave me be from the last time we "had it out" for your trolling me, & you lost badly (which my other replies here clearly illustrate)... So, from now on, under this "ion.simon.c" registered user account you have here? I'll do as you requested, & post this in reply to your posts, see how you like eating your own words... apk
-
Does this test qualify as "verified design"? apk
PERTINENT QUOTE EXCERPT:
----
"Class A1: Verified design adds formal model for security pol-
icy, formal description of TCB must be proved to match the
implementation, strict protection of source code against unau-
thorised modification"----
This is in regards to the Operating System being of "verified design", the reason I ask this is simple: Years ago when I was first getting into the Operating System security world (where you hear rating terms like "C2" from the "Orange Book" etc. et al), there were NO SUCH ANIMALS (OS' of "verified design") @ that point, & I have heard of a "Green Hills OS" that supposedly had been granted such status...
APK
P.S.=> (I did not read the article in its entirety yet, so, to save time? I am asking - STILL HAVING COFFEE THIS A.M., so, if reading the article would have satisfied this question, disregard please... thanks for your time!)... apk
-
Why does Ion.SIMIAN.c hate HOSTS files? See here..
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139923&cid=26983715
"But don't you see? Your favorite sites are going to have to shut down if you use AdBlock, 'cause then you're stealing their content! You're really going to just have to take one for the team." - by ion.simon.c (1183967) on Wednesday February 25, @01:32PM (#26983715)
I would ordinarily stop on that note alone, seeing as Ion.SIMIAN.c is obviously one profiting by these things (even though they're known to be infested with malicious code the past few years now & the fact that adbanners eat up an online user's bandwidth THE USER PAYS FOR no less)... but, that's not all, with this little toad wannabe, ion.SIMIAN.c... far from it!
He hangs out @ the "hacker/cracker" websites online, like this one -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:T1ikOtt242AJ:hackaday.com/2009/02/22/x11-on-android/+%22Simon+C.+Ion%22&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Thus, it's quite possible he is trying to somehow "discredit me" to others, since I have done guides that stop that type of loser (hackers/crackers), the worst kind of online SCUM that there is, via this guide I did in late 2008 -> http://www.tcmagazine.com/forums/index.php?s=5bf29ea6ca49162314f25f9ebf2aba68&showtopic=2662
He also likes things like "PhreakNic" -> http://wiki.yak.net/0.photos.simoncion?size=L and those are his photos from it... now, IF I looked like a bony little weasel like that? I might be tempted to be a little prick like he is also, but... that assumes I was a wannabe like Ion.SIMIAN.c is, who can't even get a GIGABYTE IRAM to work on Linux (as he could not, but, yet it works on Windows, just fine), and he looks like an AIDS victim to boot.
APK
P.S.=> Keep using TOR (another indicator this little prick ion.SIMIAN.c is nothing but someone up to "no good"), & going slow as hell due to their total lack of speed (like any "anonymous proxy" usually is), because you're going to be unable to hide from me, from now on!
You haven't replied here, and have been gone for over 3++ days or so now... why? Because I am exposing YOU as the dunce you are, clearly!
AND, this time? I will keep to my word, because I laid off on you, thinking you'd leave me be from the last time we "had it out" for your trolling me, & you lost badly (which my other replies here clearly illustrate)... So, from now on, under this "ion.simon.c" registered user account you have here?
From now on, in every post you make here?
You're going to see, and so will everyone else, these same replies to you, so everyone can see how STUPID you are, little wannabe (and, so you cannot continue to mod me down as you have been & then posting wiseguy AC comments afterwards)... Going to send you back to "Alabama", with your tail between your legs, you 33 yr old troll.
Then, of course, you'll use your sockpuppet "Random Destruction" account to do so as he did here (note the 'wall of text' comment & same speech pattern -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1327945&cid=28980845 ), but that's ok - I have a lot more than I have here so far on you, Ion.SIMIAN.c (this? This is JUST THE START)... lol! apk
-
Re:So who was it ??
I browsed the comments on the Opera blog and I could not find any definitive answer although HP and Dell are mentioned as possible culprits.
Funny story. I have a large Dell LTO tape array, and it has a web-based management tool. Part of the management web pages generate on-the-fly images in XBM format. IE had a security flaw in the parsing of XBM images, and since XBM images are so rare, Microsoft simply disabled XBM images entirely.
So, I am forced to use firefox to manage the tape array.
-
Some snippets of the thread from caches.
Here it is, ladies and gentlemen, The Thread That Cost Someone $42.5 Million Dollars:
Page 1.
Page 2 (John posts as "Doghead" on this page).
Page 4.
Greg Smith's threat/post.
Mirror - Page 1
Mirror - Page 2
Mirror - Page 4
Mirror - Greg's Threat
If there are any other pages I missed that got picked up in the cache, post them here. -
Some snippets of the thread from caches.
Here it is, ladies and gentlemen, The Thread That Cost Someone $42.5 Million Dollars:
Page 1.
Page 2 (John posts as "Doghead" on this page).
Page 4.
Greg Smith's threat/post.
Mirror - Page 1
Mirror - Page 2
Mirror - Page 4
Mirror - Greg's Threat
If there are any other pages I missed that got picked up in the cache, post them here. -
Re:permission denied
-
Name tossing, & evvading answering questions?
"It's worth a chuckle if you enjoy watching a Microsoft fanboy kook in his natural habitat." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Tuesday July 07, @04:15AM (#28605039)
Name tossing now... yes, the very THIN veneer of "Sprocket's cool" is fading... torn apart, by facts he cannot overcome (such as the definition of the word PERFECT and the fact that Ken Richmond of NASDAQ stated that is EXACTLY how MDDS, which is composed of SQLServer 2005 + Windows Server 2003 are performing @ NASDAQ, verbatim, and that it yielded a solution that gave NASDAQ "Enterprise Availability")...
LOL, "TOO EASY"...
As far as network admins vs. programmers?
No it is the truth - plain & simple: Network Admins use tools that coders create, but very few of them actually do any coding (and batch files, or even shell scripts (albeit here to a lesser extent), are NOT full blown programming @ all, anymore than webpage design is in HTML - simply because they are NOT as difficult as full-blown coding (care to show me batch files that do pointers, for example?)
It is, just how it is, & I know: I hold or have held BOTH titles over 16++ yrs. now professionally, in addition to myself being multiply internationally published for my works 10x or so in the science of computing (how about you troll)?
There is a big difference between the two titles in terms of skills & know-how - & the logic to determine THAT much is simple: One (network admins/techs) only USE the tools the other (coders) create for them to USE... & therein, lies the difference, period.
APK
P.S.=> For everyone's reference who is reading: THIS BELOW is what got "SpRoCkEt" the troll all "rattled in his game", & produced his "frothing @ the mouth" name calling he did here (calling me a 'microsoft kook' etc. et al) & his "ongoing evasions" of the questions & proofs I put into this reply, pasted here again for your reference (& of course, his further embarassment):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:
Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY) here:
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org] [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219 [linkedin.com]
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which i
-
Name calling & wall o text? Troll Sprocket is
"I certainly got under your skin, didn't I?" - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Tuesday July 07, @03:52AM (#28604931)
No, I'd have to say it is the other way around, especially considering you "prided yourself" on not calling names, & yet? That VERY THIN VENEER cracked when you stated this:
----
"It's worth a chuckle if you enjoy watching a Microsoft fanboy kook in his natural habitat." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Monday July 06, @01:44PM (#28596879)
----
"Pot calling the kettle black", once again... & the very fact you have to 'break your own rules' makes me realize you are TOO easy to manipulate - seeing you do so makes me realize you can be EASILY "rattled in your game"... too easily.
(Small wonder you are a nobody in this field who has never accomplished anything worth noting that was noted so by others...)
More "trollish delusions", & what I predicted - evasions of defining the word perfectly, and also evading defining AVAILABILITY, as it applies to computing uptime and he is disregarding the definitions I put out... predicatable, typical, & TOO EASY, like usual.
(All "SpRoCkEt" here has, is semantics of word games - & it took him FOREVER to come up with that block of crap/wall of text above no less in the post prior to/parent to this one... lol! That's how I know his "cage is rattled" the most, and, the fact that he evades questions to no end - for DAYS, lol, doubtless "formulating more b.s. answers" in his DULL brain... lmao!)
----
"I guess it hard to handle when you've been proven wrong" - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Tuesday July 07, @03:52AM (#28604931)
Oh, really: Funny, I am NOT the one avoiding defining a simple word, PERFECTLY, as you have, now am I? No... when asked questions, I answer them, & not "skirt around them" evading them, as you did here -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1292401&cid=28597129
TOO EASY... & that sure "got under YOUR skin", lol...
(By forcing what I knew & predicted would happen out of you - once more, you avoid answering simple questions, & you lose by default right there, because you know, & so does anyone else reading, that if you do so you will defeat yourself even moreso).
(LMAO - Ah, "too easy!")
APK
P.S.=> Oh, & by the way? Here is what "rattled sprocket's game" so badly, once more for reader's reference here, from -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1292401&cid=28597129
SPROCKET define PERFECTLY & AVAILABILITY, won't you? Why do you avoid that simple set of questions??
(LOL, I know why... _Sprocket? shot his big mouth off saying NASDAQ's MDDS was not doing 99.999% uptime, & when HE was asked to prove that? He admitted he COULD NOT!)
Also?
See subject-line above, & this data:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:
Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
-
"Pro-*NIX" trolls, step inside... apk
Witness some proofs/evidences, vs. the "-1 Troll mod-down" I received for posting the truth (vs. the "Pro-*NIX crowd's b.s, they're the TRUE trolls around this website which is sadly INFESTED by them & their false propoganda) especially of companies (with larger "tpm"/transaction-per-minute or per day than NASDAQ even has etc. et al, no less) that are doing GREAT using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133 [microsoft.com]
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789 [cwhonors.org]
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999% uptime):
----
"The move from large mainframe computers to SQL Server 2005 and Intel-based servers is something of a milestone in the industry. For years, we used large mainframe computers because of their reputation for reliability" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
"The fact that we can move mission-critical applications from large mainframe computers to SQL Server 2005 and Intel-based servers shows how both Microsoft and Intel are creating enterprise-grade solutions." - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
----
-
"Pro-*NIX" trolls, step inside... apk
Witness some proofs/evidences, vs. the "-1 Troll mod-down" I received for posting the truth (vs. the "Pro-*NIX crowd's b.s, they're the TRUE trolls around this website which is sadly INFESTED by them & their false propoganda) especially of companies (with larger "tpm"/transaction-per-minute or per day than NASDAQ even has etc. et al, no less) that are doing GREAT using Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133 [microsoft.com]
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789 [cwhonors.org]
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
AND, Here is a rating of "does the job PERFECTLY" by Ken Richmond, the guy who RUNS THE SHOW IN IS/IT @ NASDAQ FOR YOUR FURTHER REFERENCE (& perfect? MEANS PERFECT - 99.999% uptime):
----
"The move from large mainframe computers to SQL Server 2005 and Intel-based servers is something of a milestone in the industry. For years, we used large mainframe computers because of their reputation for reliability" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
"The fact that we can move mission-critical applications from large mainframe computers to SQL Server 2005 and Intel-based servers shows how both Microsoft and Intel are creating enterprise-grade solutions." - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
----
-
NASDAQ 99.999% uptime evidences inside... apk
See subject-line above, & this data:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:
Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System (composed of Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005)
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY) here:
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org] [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271 [microsoft.com]
As far as the word "PERFECT"?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfect [merriam-webster.com] [merriam-webster.com]
perfect
Main Entry:
1perfect
1 a: being entirely without fault or defect
----
The terms PERFECTLY and ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY? They BOTH equate to 99.999% uptime (the "Fabled '5-9's'" , of uptime)... period!
APK
P.S.=> Enjoy... the proof's all here, as well as in my other postings on this subject, & completely legitimate + verifiable... apk
-
NASDAQ 99.999% uptime evidences inside... apk
See subject-line above, & this data:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:
Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System (composed of Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005)
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY) here:
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org] [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271 [microsoft.com]
As far as the word "PERFECT"?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfect [merriam-webster.com] [merriam-webster.com]
perfect
Main Entry:
1perfect
1 a: being entirely without fault or defect
----
The terms PERFECTLY and ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY? They BOTH equate to 99.999% uptime (the "Fabled '5-9's'" , of uptime)... period!
APK
P.S.=> Enjoy... the proof's all here, as well as in my other postings on this subject, & completely legitimate + verifiable... apk
-
Why refuse to define PERFECTLY & AVAILABILITY?
" Reading comprehension obviously isn't your strong suit" - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Monday July 06, @01:39PM (#28596821)
LMAO, what an ABSOLUTE bullshitter you are, utterly hilarious!
Man - talk about the "pot calling the kettle black", well, then I will get the definitions from the dictionary & wikipedia for the word PERFECTLY & also AVAILABILITY, & post them here below, to make you once more, "Eat your WORDS", troll... here goes:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY) here:
ON THAT NOTE?
"It doesn't mean what you think it means" - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Monday July 06, @01:39PM (#28596821)
LOL, well, "yea, ok" (Sarcasm)
Why don't we see what wikipedia says, then:
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org] [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271
As far as the word "PERFECT"?
"It doesn't mean
-
Why refuse to define PERFECTLY & AVAILABILITY?
" Reading comprehension obviously isn't your strong suit" - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Monday July 06, @01:39PM (#28596821)
LMAO, what an ABSOLUTE bullshitter you are, utterly hilarious!
Man - talk about the "pot calling the kettle black", well, then I will get the definitions from the dictionary & wikipedia for the word PERFECTLY & also AVAILABILITY, & post them here below, to make you once more, "Eat your WORDS", troll... here goes:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY) here:
ON THAT NOTE?
"It doesn't mean what you think it means" - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Monday July 06, @01:39PM (#28596821)
LOL, well, "yea, ok" (Sarcasm)
Why don't we see what wikipedia says, then:
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org] [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271
As far as the word "PERFECT"?
"It doesn't mean
-
LOL: Sprocket STILL won't define PERFECTLY
See subject-line above, which simply proves _Sprocket_'s trolling got his behind "PERFECTLY kicked" (& now, as you see? He has nothing better to say, than this evasive b.s. (as is per his usual - avoiding answering questions his big mouth wrote a check for which his know-how cannot ca$h)):
"Pay close attention to what he links and what he THINKS they are saying. It's worth a chuckle if you enjoy watching a Microsoft fanboy kook in his natural habitat." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Monday July 06, @01:44PM (#28596879)
Please do, all reading: See how "_SpRoCkEt_" the big mouthed troll REFUSES to define the word PERFECTLY or PERFECT, and how he has had to RUN from there (but, for all his hassling me on the SEMANTICS of WORDS, which was all this troll sprocket had, he ran, lmao).
"Awesome. Everyone should follow that above link to see how the apk troll (see below) operates." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Monday July 06, @01:44PM (#28596879)
That's all I have been asking of folks really... & you are a fool, because they're going to see what I posted to you here, and see that you put words in my mouth also (stating I was saying NASDAQ ran it ALL (quote trading data) on MDDS, & I never said such things... you IMPLIED, & INSINUATED I did, and had to "eat your words" troll, lol... as well as about uptime 99.999% also, & I am going to post THAT MUCH HERE, once more as well):
SPROCKET define PERFECTLY & AVAILABILITY, won't you? Why do you avoid that simple set of questions??
(LOL, I know why... _Sprocket? shot his big mouth off saying NASDAQ's MDDS was not doing 99.999% uptime, & when HE was asked to prove that? He admitted he COULD NOT!)
Also?
See subject-line above, & this data:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY) here:
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availabil
-
Yet more proof of NASDAQ 99.999% uptime
See subject-line above, & this data:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY) here:
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271
As far as the word "PERFECT"?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfect [merriam-webster.com]
perfect
Main Entry:
1perfect
1 a: being entirely without fault or defect
----
The terms PERFECTLY and ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY? They BOTH equate to 99.999% (the "Fabled '5-9's'" , of uptime)... period!
APK
P.S.=> Enoy... the proof's all here, as well as in my other postings on this subject, & completely legitimate + verifiable... apk
-
Yet more proof of NASDAQ 99.999% uptime
See subject-line above, & this data:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY) here:
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271
As far as the word "PERFECT"?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfect [merriam-webster.com]
perfect
Main Entry:
1perfect
1 a: being entirely without fault or defect
----
The terms PERFECTLY and ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY? They BOTH equate to 99.999% (the "Fabled '5-9's'" , of uptime)... period!
APK
P.S.=> Enoy... the proof's all here, as well as in my other postings on this subject, & completely legitimate + verifiable... apk
-
SPROCKET define PERFECTLY & AVAILABILITY
See subject-line above, & this data, _Sprocket_, you troll
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY, which Sprocket your fellow troll REFUSES to define that term for us in this thread as well, vs. what is quoted below in regards to "PERFECTLY") here:
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271
----
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
So please, _Sprocket_:
Would you define the terms PERFECTLY and ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY please?
(They BOTH equate to 99.999% uptime... period!)
APK
P.S.=> Why did you refuse to define the word "PERFECT" or "PERFECTLY" over in that thread -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290967&cid=28584687 , _Sprocket_? Hmmm?? Maybe because you shot your loud mouth off spouting words you now have to eat? You ran like the troll you are, & it served you right... nicest part is? I do get that "last laugh", on YOU
-
SPROCKET define PERFECTLY & AVAILABILITY
See subject-line above, & this data, _Sprocket_, you troll
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY, which Sprocket your fellow troll REFUSES to define that term for us in this thread as well, vs. what is quoted below in regards to "PERFECTLY") here:
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271
----
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
So please, _Sprocket_:
Would you define the terms PERFECTLY and ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY please?
(They BOTH equate to 99.999% uptime... period!)
APK
P.S.=> Why did you refuse to define the word "PERFECT" or "PERFECTLY" over in that thread -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290967&cid=28584687 , _Sprocket_? Hmmm?? Maybe because you shot your loud mouth off spouting words you now have to eat? You ran like the troll you are, & it served you right... nicest part is? I do get that "last laugh", on YOU
-
MDDS information you said doesn't exist? It's here
"NASDAQ does not mention MDDS anywhere on their website that I could find. Please find a page served by nasdaq.com that mentions they even sell MDDS to anyone, I could find no mention of anyone who buys or receives the MDDS service anywhere." - by k10quaint (1344115) on Friday July 03, @05:19PM (#28575205)
Well, then HERE YOU ARE (this is what made your fellow troll, SPROCKET, take off like a scared little girl, because it shows 99.999% uptime/Enterprise Availability levels from MDDS @ NASDAQ):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY, which Sprocket your fellow troll REFUSES to define that term for us in this thread as well, vs. what is quoted below in regards to "PERFECTLY") here:
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271 ----
----
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219 [linkedin.com]
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us [74.125.47.132]
APK
P.S.=> How you were modded up to +5, after all of your mistakes here? Boggles the mind... actually, lol,
-
MDDS information you said doesn't exist? It's here
"NASDAQ does not mention MDDS anywhere on their website that I could find. Please find a page served by nasdaq.com that mentions they even sell MDDS to anyone, I could find no mention of anyone who buys or receives the MDDS service anywhere." - by k10quaint (1344115) on Friday July 03, @05:19PM (#28575205)
Well, then HERE YOU ARE (this is what made your fellow troll, SPROCKET, take off like a scared little girl, because it shows 99.999% uptime/Enterprise Availability levels from MDDS @ NASDAQ):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY, which Sprocket your fellow troll REFUSES to define that term for us in this thread as well, vs. what is quoted below in regards to "PERFECTLY") here:
----
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time data without slowing the delivery of trading data. It has worked perfectly for us" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
FROM -> http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49271 ----
----
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability [wikipedia.org]
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219 [linkedin.com]
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us [74.125.47.132]
APK
P.S.=> How you were modded up to +5, after all of your mistakes here? Boggles the mind... actually, lol,
-
Did I say MDDS was quote trading data system? NO
"Now that your pathetic attempt to conflate NASDAQ trading system uptime with MDDS uptime has been dispelled" - by k10quaint (1344115) on Friday July 03, @05:19PM (#28575205)
You're once again, trying to put words in my mouth, I NEVER STATED... not once! In my VERY FIRST POST, I said this, verbatim:
NASDAQ has maintained the "fabled '5-9's" of 99.999% uptime on Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 (in failover clusters) since late 2005, acting as the official dissemination system of official trade data
FROM HERE (for others' reference) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290967&cid=28571315
(Which IS what I stated it was, I NEVER ONCE SAID IT RAN ANYTHING BUT THAT, despite your trolling crap placing words into my mouth I never uttered, lol!)
The quote trading data system is run by another program (they doubtless have millions into it, & it works, no reason to change)... but, that quote trading data system does NOT run the reporting to customers + end users for NASDAQ does it? No... it does, what IT does, & that is IT...
Does the TIBCO middleware custom in-house app for NASDAQ that runs the shop floor quote data, also do the reporting? NO.
(I.E.-> No 1 single program "does it all")
Well, Ken Richmond of NASDAQ (VP of market system development) says it runs "PERFECTLY" for them... care to define what PERFECTLY means? Your fellow troll SPROCKET will do ANYTHING in this thread to avoid defining that term, as it will PROVE 99.999% uptime of MDDS to he & others, lol!
Also? More data on THAT account (99.999% uptime in NASDAQ's MDDS system)?
Ok:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
(Note my keyword SEARCH term? "Enterprise + Availability"? This is ALL what came up almost, as evidence as t
-
RAMMS+EIN, more evidence of MS 99.999% uptime
See my subject-line, & this data in the URL below, RAMMS+EIN (of all people, I think YOU will like it... a LOT):
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1290967&cid=28587301
See there, I think you will like it...
ESPECIALLY XEROX (which does do a HIGHER transactions-per-day amount than even MDDS @ NASDAQ & at 99.999% uptime (it's official trade data dissemination system, which DOES pull 99.999% since Mr. Ken Richmond states it runs PERFECTLY for them, & has noted it gains ENTERPRISE AVAILABLITY for NASDAQ alao) has, by ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE (100's of thousands per day, vs. NASDAQ reporting system doing 100,000 queries per day)) XEROX truly is the classic example, & there ARE a few others, like THE MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY, + more...
Heck, I will post it here for your reference, specifically on NASDAQ also:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
(Note my keyword SEARCH term? "Enterprise + Availability"? This is ALL what came up almost, as evidence as to what THAT term means)
----
"The move from large mainframe computers to SQL Server 2005 and Intel-based servers is something of a milestone in the industry. For years, we used large mainframe computers because of their reputation for reliability" - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
"The fact that we can move mission-critical applications from large mainframe computers to SQL Server 2005 and Intel-based servers shows how both Microsoft and Intel are creating enterprise-grade solutions." - Ken Richmond, vice president for software engineering, market information systems at NASDAQ.
"We saw an early demonstration of Snapshot Isolation and knew this was the solution we needed to run queries against real-time da
-
How did he get to + 5 informative? Sock Puppets??
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133 [microsoft.com]
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789 [cwhonors.org]
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:VgxcewyAjkgJ:download.microsoft.com/download/F/D/5/FD568D9A-F2A1-4CCF-B087-2C88EE7BE917/MSC.pdf+%22SQLServer%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=19&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us [74.125.47.132] [74.125.47.132]
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
As well as Mr. Ken Richmond stating that SQLServer 2005 + Windows Server 2003 doing the job as the OFFICIAL TRADE DATA DISSEMINATION SYSTEM (MDDS) operating PERFECTLY for NASDAQ, below, quoted:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 wit -
How did he get to + 5 informative? Sock Puppets??
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133 [microsoft.com]
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789 [cwhonors.org]
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:VgxcewyAjkgJ:download.microsoft.com/download/F/D/5/FD568D9A-F2A1-4CCF-B087-2C88EE7BE917/MSC.pdf+%22SQLServer%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=19&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us [74.125.47.132] [74.125.47.132]
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
As well as Mr. Ken Richmond stating that SQLServer 2005 + Windows Server 2003 doing the job as the OFFICIAL TRADE DATA DISSEMINATION SYSTEM (MDDS) operating PERFECTLY for NASDAQ, below, quoted:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 wit -
How did he get to + 5 informative? Sock Puppets??
"The marketing was clever enough to fool anyone who would believe Windows can have that sort of performance and uptime
on Friday July 03, @01:27PM (#28573263)Hey, wiseguy: Take a read, especially in regards to your IGNORANT comment I quoted above...
For Sprocket ( the troll himself ), k10quant, cbiltcliffe & the A/C one most of all, time to "eat your words", wiseguys:
----
FUJIFILM = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
"This is a mission-critical project, which needs to keep running on 99.999 percent availability. Stoppages are just not acceptable. SQL Server 2005 gives us the reliability we require." - Michito Watanabe, President and Managing Director, Fujifilm Computer System Company
----
XEROX = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?CaseStudyID=49133 [microsoft.com]
"SQL Server 2005 is mission critical to the Xerox Office Services application. To achieve the 99.999 percent uptime required by the application, we rely on SQL Server 2005 clustering capabilities." - Kirk Pothos Software Development Manager, Xerox Global Services
----
ANTHONY MARANO COMPANY = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer 2005:
http://www.cwhonors.org/viewCaseStudy2008.asp?NominationID=789 [cwhonors.org]
"By migrating to the Fujitsu platform, Anthony Marano has gone from 95 percent system availability to 99.999 percent availability"
----
MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY: = 99.999% uptime on SQLServer:
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:VgxcewyAjkgJ:download.microsoft.com/download/F/D/5/FD568D9A-F2A1-4CCF-B087-2C88EE7BE917/MSC.pdf+%22SQLServer%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=19&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us [74.125.47.132] [74.125.47.132]
"MSCLinkis anapplication that must be available without fail24hours-a-day,seven day seachweek, and 365 days a year",says Catassi. "WithSQLServer 2005 weve
enjoyed 99.999 percentavailability"----
As well as Mr. Ken Richmond stating that SQLServer 2005 + Windows Server 2003 doing the job as the OFFICIAL TRADE DATA DISSEMINATION SYSTEM (MDDS) operating PERFECTLY for NASDAQ, below, quoted:
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 wit -
Ken Richmond & AVAILABIITY data evidence
"Now if you can show me where it notes what they're talking about beyond "high performance technology", we might be able to clear this up. I'm especially interested where it mentions Microsoft products. Or even MDSS." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I am right here, "better data", per what you requested (& much to YOUR regret, little troll), even though you avoid SIMPLE quetions when I ask them (like YOU defining the word PERFECTLY for us, lol, why is it you avoid THAT? "Inquring minds want to know", lmao):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
(OH, I think THAT will do, for now... lol!)
"You want to prove your point? Come up with better data." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I did, per YOUR requests for EXACTLY what you wanted... so, why don't YOU come up with better data & some answers to my questions in my P.S. below? Quit evading that question, where I ask you to DEFINE PERFECTLY for us all...
"And as an aside - I don't have to put words in your mouth." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
QUESTION: Did you, or did you not, ask me if I thought I was telling about the quote trading data system @ NASDAQ in this thread or not? Because in my 1st post, I definitely said "The official trade data dissemination system",
-
Ken Richmond & AVAILABIITY data evidence
"Now if you can show me where it notes what they're talking about beyond "high performance technology", we might be able to clear this up. I'm especially interested where it mentions Microsoft products. Or even MDSS." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I am right here, "better data", per what you requested (& much to YOUR regret, little troll), even though you avoid SIMPLE quetions when I ask them (like YOU defining the word PERFECTLY for us, lol, why is it you avoid THAT? "Inquring minds want to know", lmao):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
(OH, I think THAT will do, for now... lol!)
"You want to prove your point? Come up with better data." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I did, per YOUR requests for EXACTLY what you wanted... so, why don't YOU come up with better data & some answers to my questions in my P.S. below? Quit evading that question, where I ask you to DEFINE PERFECTLY for us all...
"And as an aside - I don't have to put words in your mouth." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
QUESTION: Did you, or did you not, ask me if I thought I was telling about the quote trading data system @ NASDAQ in this thread or not? Because in my 1st post, I definitely said "The official trade data dissemination system",
-
Ken Richmond & AVAILABILITY benefit proof
"Now if you can show me where it notes what they're talking about beyond "high performance technology", we might be able to clear this up. I'm especially interested where it mentions Microsoft products. Or even MDSS." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I am right here, "better data", per what you requested (& much to YOUR regret, little troll):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
(OH, I think THAT will do, for now... lol!)
"You want to prove your point? Come up with better data." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I did, per YOUR requests for EXACTLY what you wanted... so, why don't YOU come up with better data & some answers to my questions in my P.S. below? Quit evading that question, where I ask you to DEFINE PERFECTLY for us all...
"And as an aside - I don't have to put words in your mouth." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
QUESTION: Did you, or did you not, ask me if I thought I was telling about the quote trading data system @ NASDAQ in this thread or not? Because in my 1st post, I definitely said "The official trade data dissemination system", & THAT is MDDS... what I have been speaking of, all thru this thread... NOT WHAT YOU SAID/ASKED.
(Learn to read &, a YES or NO answer will do nicely here on yo
-
Ken Richmond & AVAILABILITY benefit proof
"Now if you can show me where it notes what they're talking about beyond "high performance technology", we might be able to clear this up. I'm especially interested where it mentions Microsoft products. Or even MDSS." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I am right here, "better data", per what you requested (& much to YOUR regret, little troll):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
(OH, I think THAT will do, for now... lol!)
"You want to prove your point? Come up with better data." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I did, per YOUR requests for EXACTLY what you wanted... so, why don't YOU come up with better data & some answers to my questions in my P.S. below? Quit evading that question, where I ask you to DEFINE PERFECTLY for us all...
"And as an aside - I don't have to put words in your mouth." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
QUESTION: Did you, or did you not, ask me if I thought I was telling about the quote trading data system @ NASDAQ in this thread or not? Because in my 1st post, I definitely said "The official trade data dissemination system", & THAT is MDDS... what I have been speaking of, all thru this thread... NOT WHAT YOU SAID/ASKED.
(Learn to read &, a YES or NO answer will do nicely here on yo
-
Re:NASDAQ does not equal "NaSdAq".
"Now if you can show me where it notes what they're talking about beyond "high performance technology", we might be able to clear this up. I'm especially interested where it mentions Microsoft products. Or even MDSS." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I am right here, "better data", per what you requested (& much to YOUR regret, little troll):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
(OH, I think THAT will do, for now... lol!)
"You want to prove your point? Come up with better data." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I did, per YOUR requests for EXACTLY what you wanted... so, why don't YOU come up with better data & some answers to my questions in my P.S. below? Quit evading that question, where I ask you to DEFINE PERFECTLY for us all...
"And as an aside - I don't have to put words in your mouth." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
QUESTION: Did you, or did you not, ask me if I thought I was telling about the quote trading data system @ NASDAQ in this thread or not? Because in my 1st post, I definitely said "The official trade data dissemination system", & THAT is MDDS... what I have been speaking of, all thru this thread... NOT WHAT YOU SAID/ASKED.
(Learn to read)
"You're doing a fine enough jo
-
Re:NASDAQ does not equal "NaSdAq".
"Now if you can show me where it notes what they're talking about beyond "high performance technology", we might be able to clear this up. I'm especially interested where it mentions Microsoft products. Or even MDSS." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I am right here, "better data", per what you requested (& much to YOUR regret, little troll):
NASDAQ
Spokesperson: Ken Richmond, Vice President of Software Engineering
Situation:Largest U.S. electronic stock market
Replacing aging Tandem systems
Wanted to update system for real-time trade summary, risk management and broker clearingSolution:
MDDS: Market Data Dissemination System
5K txs/second, 100K queries/day
Running on SQL Server 2005 with database mirroring for high availabilityBenefits:
Enterprise availability
Scalability to handle 8 million new rows of data per day
Lower total cost of ownership
Real-time reporting
Developer agilityKEYWORD, LISTED AS A BENEFIT NO LESS, is "Enterprise Availability", by Ken Richmond of NASDAQ no less (who also was quoted as saying Windows Server 2003 + SQLServer 2005 did the job for NASDAQ PERFECTLY)
WIKIPEDIA "HIGH AVAILABILITY" DEFINITION PAGE (which lists 99.999% no less) -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability
Need more?
"ENTERPRISE AVAILABILITY"/"HIGH AVAILABILITY" definitions (from various sources):
"for the high availability enterprise servers (99.999% availability)" -> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/omar-gadir/8/162/219
"Device techniques for high availability For years, enterprise network equipment providers strived to deliver 99.999% availability which is the standard major telecommunications companies deliver. This type of reliability is desirable and it s expected when it comes to phone service. If enterprise networks are to support IP phones, they too must deliver similar availability" -> http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:kMTHFHnbIpwJ:www.alcatel-lucentbusinessportal.com/support/includes/doclink.cfm%3Fid%3D7369+%22Enterprise+Availability%22+and+%2299.999%25%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
(OH, I think THAT will do, for now... lol!)
"You want to prove your point? Come up with better data." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
I did, per YOUR requests for EXACTLY what you wanted... so, why don't YOU come up with better data & some answers to my questions in my P.S. below? Quit evading that question, where I ask you to DEFINE PERFECTLY for us all...
"And as an aside - I don't have to put words in your mouth." - by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Friday July 03, @08:41PM (#28576591)
QUESTION: Did you, or did you not, ask me if I thought I was telling about the quote trading data system @ NASDAQ in this thread or not? Because in my 1st post, I definitely said "The official trade data dissemination system", & THAT is MDDS... what I have been speaking of, all thru this thread... NOT WHAT YOU SAID/ASKED.
(Learn to read)
"You're doing a fine enough jo