Domain: apathy.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to apathy.net.
Comments · 12
-
Re:Now will the opposing party actually push back?
CNN is talking about Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff as a replacement. Bush may simply opt for a recess appointment to avoid a fight with the Senate, but the Senate would be hard pressed to turn down a guy most of them approved for a cabinet position only a couple of years ago. Either way, don't expect to see an Attorney General willing to appoint any special prosecutors.
-
Re:McCain doesn't have a chance anyway
If Fred Thompson enters the race which is just a formality now, there will be no chance McCain will grab the Republican nomination.
That is so, so true. Anyone who wants four more years of Bush will run for Thompson's camp. McCain is just a pale imitation; Thompson's the real thing.
Pro-gun: check. Anti-abortion: check. Pro-tax-cut: check. Paranoid, fatalistic world view: check.
Given a choice between the two, I'm actually hoping that McCain, the maverick, is just saying what the right wants to hear, but I think he's rudderless and just going whereever the RNC blows him. -
Re:The tagging
Seriously, the tagging is rapidly dissolving into childish rubbish (even by Slashdot's standards)
Well, I, for one, welcome our trap-detecting overloards!
I offer them these gifts: a beowulf cluster; Natalie Portman; and, of course, Hot Grits (tm).
Oh, and remember: In Soviet Russia, Cowboy Neal options you!
--
under-reported news with commentary -
Re:The tagging
Seriously, the tagging is rapidly dissolving into childish rubbish (even by Slashdot's standards)
Well, I, for one, welcome our trap-detecting overloards!
I offer them these gifts: a beowulf cluster; Natalie Portman; and, of course, Hot Grits (tm).
Oh, and remember: In Soviet Russia, Cowboy Neal options you!
--
under-reported news with commentary -
Re:Saddam verdict on Sunday, U.S. election on TuesThat's just a coincidence, right?
It sure does feel like deliberate timing, doesn't it. But that's not really the point. I think the Republicans would like nothing better than having their opponents squealing about the timing of the verdict, because that means everyone is talking about the verdict. No one, and I mean NO ONE, who's planning to vote Republican gives a crap about the timing.
If you want to convince people to vote for change in control of the house, talk about issues:- The enormity of the federal debt and the fact that hundreds of billions of it is owed to the Chinese.
- A congressional end to any auditing oversight of the Iraq reconstruction effort, which has put people in jail, just in time for Rumsfeld to ask congress for even more off budget spending.
- If you want to talk about timing, talk about the 25% drop in oil prices leading up to the election that is set to reverse afterward
- Or, you can talk about six years of presidential signing statements that have gone uncontested by congress -- some of which assert that the president doesn't have to obey or enforce some or all of the law he's signing.
Iraq has been a serious boondoggle for this election cycle. It may be getting the democrats some needed votes, but people prefer to vote for people who are for something over people who are against something. That's why some races have so many undecided voters.
--
real news without sensationalized crime and celebrity gossip -
Re:Saddam verdict on Sunday, U.S. election on TuesThat's just a coincidence, right?
It sure does feel like deliberate timing, doesn't it. But that's not really the point. I think the Republicans would like nothing better than having their opponents squealing about the timing of the verdict, because that means everyone is talking about the verdict. No one, and I mean NO ONE, who's planning to vote Republican gives a crap about the timing.
If you want to convince people to vote for change in control of the house, talk about issues:- The enormity of the federal debt and the fact that hundreds of billions of it is owed to the Chinese.
- A congressional end to any auditing oversight of the Iraq reconstruction effort, which has put people in jail, just in time for Rumsfeld to ask congress for even more off budget spending.
- If you want to talk about timing, talk about the 25% drop in oil prices leading up to the election that is set to reverse afterward
- Or, you can talk about six years of presidential signing statements that have gone uncontested by congress -- some of which assert that the president doesn't have to obey or enforce some or all of the law he's signing.
Iraq has been a serious boondoggle for this election cycle. It may be getting the democrats some needed votes, but people prefer to vote for people who are for something over people who are against something. That's why some races have so many undecided voters.
--
real news without sensationalized crime and celebrity gossip -
Whois InformationI find it interesting that Utube.com has been around for a lot longer than YOUtube.com:
Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation
YOUtube is nearly a decade after Utube. I could see them having some confusion as their names are pronounced the same.
27475 Holiday Lane - P.O. Box 287
Perrysburg, OH 43552
US
Domain Name: UTUBE.COM
Administrative Contact:
Universal Tube & Rollform Equipment Corporation sales@UTUBE.COM
27475 Holiday Lane - P.O. Box 287
Perrysburg, OH 43552
US
(419) 872-2364 fax: 999 999 9999
Technical Contact:
Network Solutions, LLC. customerservice@networksolutions.com
13861 Sunrise Valley Drive
Herndon, VA 20171
US
1-888-642-9675 fax: 571-434-4620
Record expires on 25-Oct-2008.
Record created on 26-Oct-1996.
Database last updated on 2-Nov-2006 09:15:20 EST.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS65.WORLDNIC.COM 205.178.190.33
NS66.WORLDNIC.COM 205.178.189.33
YouTube, Inc.
ATTN: YOUTUBE.COM
c/o Network Solutions
P.O. Box 447
Herndon, VA 20172-0447
Domain Name: YOUTUBE.COM
Administrative Contact :
YouTube, Inc. qq78m9kc23q@networksolutionsprivateregistration.c om
ATTN: YOUTUBE.COM
c/o Network Solutions
P.O. Box 447
Herndon, VA 20172-0447
Phone: 570-708-8780
Technical Contact :
YouTube, Inc.
qq78m9kc23q@networksolutionsprivateregistration.c om
ATTN: YOUTUBE.COM
c/o Network Solutions
P.O. Box 447
Herndon, VA 20172-0447
Phone: 570-708-8780
Record expires on 15-Feb-2009
Record created on 15-Feb-2005
Database last updated on 15-Oct-2006
Domain servers in listed order: Manage DNS
DNS1.SJL.YOUTUBE.COM 208.65.152.201
DNS2.SJL.YOUTUBE.COM 208.65.152.137
--
Real News without sensationalized crime and celebrity gossip -
Re:Good buy for GoogleCurrently simple text banner ads. But a quick look at other sites will show you a growing interest in video ads. YouTube has a lot of visitors, and if Google plays this correctly they can make more advertisement dollars.
If you're suggesting that they could insert ads infront of the video stream, I think that that is a dangerous Pandora's Box that Google almost definitely doesn't want to open for a few of reasons:- It is one thing to avoid matching ads to competitor's content (e.g., not putting Ford ads on GM's website) when you're talking about text. It's a whole lot harded with video
- Much of the content of YouTube violates copyright. Inserting ads infront of copy-infringing material could make them even more culpable than they would be just owning the site.
- Ads will create a market from an ad-free service to be a disruptive technology and come up from under and destroy YouTube
--
under-reported news with commentary -
Re:Gotta love the system...
How on earth is it legit to tack a completely unrelated bill to another and pass them both under the same vote? Am I the only one who sees how unbelievably insane that is?
They tried to tack on more than that.
I agree with you. This is completely insane and it allows bills to basically appear out of nowhere and totally bypass any sort of review. Once a bill comes out of comittee, no one reads them. The guys just vote how their told to vote - often without knowledge of things that have been tacked on at the last minute. -
Re:Passed Both Houses
Oops. My bad. Wrote that backwards. They attached the gambling measure to a bill install radiation detectors in U.S. Ports.
--
Under-Reported News and Comments -
Passed Both Houses
According to this article , the Republicans in congress attached a measure to install radiation detectors in U.S. Ports and pushed it through early this morning. It is now awaiting Bush's signature.
Hopefully, this will backfire in November.
--
Last Minute Games On Capital Hill -
Re:Dishwashers
OB Simpsons
To alcohol! The cause of and solution to all of life's problems!!!