Slashdot Mirror


Windows Vista Released To Manufacturing

Many readers wrote in to make sure we know that Microsoft execs have signed off on the code and Windows Vista has been and released to manufacturing. As APC put it, "It's good to go — or as good as it is going to be until the first round of patching begins." CNN has a good roundup of Vista's long development history.

172 comments

  1. leaked by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Leaked in 3 2 1..

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:leaked by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      Leaked in 3 2 1..

      As far as I'm told, this is the same release as RC2, which has already been leaked.. :)

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    2. Re:leaked by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      Which is why I tag anything to do with Vista as defectivebydesign... same with any DRM related topics

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  2. Anyone else miss read? by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Thought it said "Windows Vista Release Malfunctioning", can't imagin why I would of thought that....

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  3. Good to go? by klogg_siebentag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Woohoo, Vista is here! It must be 2003 already! Oh wait...

    1. Re:Good to go? by hoy74 · · Score: 1

      No, that was longhorn. :)

    2. Re:Good to go? by nickos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wish this had been released back when they originally said it would be. If they've improved the security as much as they say they have this should drive down the number of zombies that are responsible for spam and comment spam etc...

    3. Re:Good to go? by hritcu · · Score: 1

      It's called Longhorn you ignorant!

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  4. Norton Antivirus? by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have Symantec solved their issues with Microsoft? If not, be prepared for an even louder rant from Symantec. Adobe should also watch out. For me, I doubt I will touch this Vista thingie anytime soon. Windows 2K and Xandros are still doing OK for me.

    1. Re:Norton Antivirus? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

      "For me, I doubt I will touch this Vista thingie anytime soon."

      I suspect a lot of people fall into this category. However, as soon as it launches, anyone buying a new PC is going to get it rammed down their throats whether they want it or not. If you turn off most/all of the eye candy, it's much like XP, but it comes with all that mess turned on by default.

      Cheers,

    2. Re:Norton Antivirus? by mcai8rw2 · · Score: 1

      Despite publicly commenting that they had allowed Symantec [and Mcafee and loads of other software houses] can now access the Vista Kernel in their development, i still believe that they have put too many restrictions on the vista kernel to allow for efficient usage between antivirus packages and OS.

      You mention that you won;t be touching vista? a fairly valid opinion that I shared up until I learnt that DirectX10 is vista only. Thats a real kick for anyone thats into games even slightly. Holding us over a barrel maybe? Time should tell.

      --
      >>>Scanning for I.D.I.O.T.S. >>>
      >>>I.D.I.O.T.S. FOUND! >>>
    3. Re:Norton Antivirus? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      If you turn off most/all of the eye candy, it's much like XP, but it comes with all that mess turned on by default.

      The default eye "candy" in WinXP is obnoxious enough; I crank it down to something that looks more like Win2K. Will Vista do that?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  5. CNN !=CNET by SNR+monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Amazingly, the summary has an error, the link is to a CNET article, not a CNN article. It doesn't make much sense for CNN to be covering the RTM of an operating system.

    1. Re:CNN !=CNET by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Yes there is an error, but why shouldn't CNN cover the completion of Vista?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:CNN !=CNET by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 1

      orly?

      CNN article

      --
      time is a perception of a being's consciousness
      time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    3. Re:CNN !=CNET by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      hmmmm try again:
      Yes there is an error, but why shouldn't CNN cover the completion of Vista

      Slash just eaten my comment.
      how bizarre, it exists but its not in the threadtree.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:CNN !=CNET by Moby+Cock · · Score: 1
    5. Re:CNN !=CNET by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 1

      orly?
      CNN Article

      --
      time is a perception of a being's consciousness
      time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    6. Re:CNN !=CNET by SNR+monkey · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess CNN did cover the RTM of Vista, my mistake. The article I found was a little lacking on details though.

    7. Re:CNN !=CNET by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      It doesn't make much sense for CNN to be covering the RTM of an operating system.

      Nevertheless, it's currently linked from their front page under the "technology" section.

    8. Re:CNN !=CNET by SecretAsianMan · · Score: 1

      Amazingly, the summary has an error, the link is to a CNET article, not a CNN article. It doesn't make much sense for CNN to be covering the RTM of an operating system.

      Think again:

      http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/11/08/windows.v ista.ap/index.html

      I also heard about it on NPR during the commute this morning.

      --

      Washington, DC: It's like Hollywood for ugly people.

    9. Re:CNN !=CNET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It doesn't make much sense for CNN to be covering the RTM of an operating system.


      Funny you should say that.

      CNN story.
    10. Re:CNN !=CNET by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to make sense, but here is CNN's coverage of it.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    11. Re:CNN !=CNET by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Funny, it was on CNN (televised) when I was walking in to work this morning. "This is the first major upgrade to the Windows operating system in 5 years" is what the anchor said, IIRC. Something also about a consumer release in January.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    12. Re:CNN !=CNET by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Amazingly?

      You must be new here.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  6. New Features by Chayak · · Score: 1

    Remember it's not a bug, it's a feature...

    1. Re:New Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, what, a FOSS zealot got mad?

  7. where is... by cucucu · · Score: 5, Funny

    the torrent of the .iso image?

    1. Re:where is... by JPDeckers · · Score: 1

      Given the fact that MSDN is now displaying a "MSDN Subscriber Downloads Service Outage Notification" for 7:00PM to 9:00PM Pacific time, Friday, November 10, 2006, I guess you'll just have to wait one more day

    2. Re:where is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check Mininova.org tomorrow

    3. Re:where is... by ramunas · · Score: 1

      you could try to find it here

      --
      ./R My blog
    4. Re:where is... by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Why the '+Funny' moderation?

      This is a serious question. Us nerds should be trying out the OS which will be making all our lives a misery over the next few years.

      I've seen countless Vista RC# and similar torrents. But as yet no (real) final release torrents.

    5. Re:where is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:where is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:where is... by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
  8. You are mistaken sir, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2003 was the release date of Duke Nukem Forever, which we already all played to the bone.

  9. WTF?? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

    How did the guy who tags all the other articles "itsatrap" miss this one?

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:WTF?? by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      Its not just a "guy" who tags these things as traps... its a highly trained team of crack evaluation-monkeys, and they don't act until they've all had a chance to read the article and discuss amongst themselves (an ugly process involving the much poo-flinging and the occasional sex act) whether or not it is, indeed, a trap.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    2. Re:WTF?? by Rixel · · Score: 1

      hmmm....

      itsatrap

      its a trap

      Vista trap

      Forgot the 'V'

      --
      Never play chicken with a passive aggressive.
    3. Re:WTF?? by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      I'm tagging this one "manybothansdiedtobringusthisinformation" instead.

    4. Re:WTF?? by halfnerd · · Score: 1

      There, fixed it.

    5. Re:WTF?? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
      How did the guy who tags all the other articles "itsatrap" miss this one?


      Anyone who misses the fact that this one is a trap deserves what they get. ;)
    6. Re:WTF?? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

      When I visited the front page for the first time today, the only visible tag was "itsnotafuckingtrap". It's gone now, but I got a good laugh out of it. Preemptive strikes are rarely this funny.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  10. Is slash turning into Digg? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Top level comments only?

    Its just eaten 2 comments, well they exist in my history but not in the flow.
    There is a gremlin in the database.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Is slash turning into Digg? by Jerom · · Score: 1

      [off topic]

      Strange,

      I'm just trying to reply

      J.

    2. Re:Is slash turning into Digg? by Jerom · · Score: 1

      Sure enough it does not seem to work any more

  11. 50/50 by 4solarisinfo · · Score: 1

    Only here on slashdot could a new OS get POUNDED (appropriately so) and still have everyone asking for a copy...

  12. Only missed deadline by a few days... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find it funny that after all the delays to Vista, the RTM was delayed by like 2 weeks? I mean, they "launch" to major businesses at month's end, I'm glad they're getting the code out a bit before the launch.

    1. Re:Only missed deadline by a few days... by linuxci · · Score: 1

      The real deadline was to beat Duke Nukem Forever, as they achieved that all the Vista team get huge bonuses. Now Microsoft really does have an OS fit for 2004 that needs 2007 standard hardware.

  13. Overheard by rootnl · · Score: 5, Funny

    It compiles! Ship it!!

    --

    We are the people our parents warned us about.
    1. Re:Overheard by j0kkk3l · · Score: 1

      This is not Linux, you know. Windows works more like: "It's gonna make us money. Ship it."

  14. How soon for a zero day hack? or is it a feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How doon before zero day hacks? mailto:ITGAdmin.Prod@sherwin.com

  15. Last version of Windows by CrazyTalk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With each release Windows becomes more bloated and bug ridden, and it takes more time for a release. For the avearage consumer, computer OS's have reached maturity - there is really very little motivation for the average user to upgrade from XP to Vista (unlike going from DOS to Windows 3.1, or Windows 3.1 to Win 95 etc. which were huge changes). How much longer can this continue? Is anyone else convinced that this will be the last version of Windows as we know it?

    1. Re:Last version of Windows by fruey · · Score: 1

      I never had any motivation to upgrade to XP until I discovered that hardware I had bought (with Win2K drivers) didn't actually work in Win2K. So I upgraded, and it worked.

      Of course, it being a USB digital TV dongle (for DVB free transmissions), I was asking for trouble.

      Vista won't run on anything I own right now, so I won't be rushing out to buy it / download it / whatever.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:Last version of Windows by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      "Is anyone else convinced that this will be the last version of Windows as we know it?"

      It certainly should be but I don't know if MS has the balls that it takes to drop the entire OS and start again. What I expect will happen is that they will keep retreading this tired old crossply of an OS until it finally blows. In our company we treat Windows as a second place OS now. All workers have a copy of Windows running under VMware on their workstations but it is really relegated to running MS Office and a few other Windows only apps. Everything else is Linux or OS X depending on their preference. Windows Vista isn't even on our radar.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    3. Re:Last version of Windows by DerGeist · · Score: 1
      Yes and no. The concept of an "operating system" is becoming increasingly outmoded as everything moves to internet applications. Probably we'll see the internet becoming more tightly integrated -- we'll all own "hubs" that connect to the 'net and suck our computing power from somewhere else. Most things will be web-based, making our dumb terminals cheap and just about everywhere. Appliances, too, will be connected allowing complete control over our homes remotely and within the home. (Cue the "self-aware" and SkyNet jokes...)

      But, seriously, Microsoft's worst enemy and toughest competition has always been previous versions of Microsoft products. Word, Excel, and the like haven't changed much in quite some time save for esoteric features 99% of the population doesn't even know about. Same with Windows, lots of people run 2000 and they're just fine. Obviously the adoption of any new Windows OS isn't going to be immediate and overwhelming; it takes time as people purchase new computers with Vista preinstalled and games begin demanding Vista only (just as they began demanding 2000 only, etc.). Windows OSs always creep into popularity rather than becoming overnight successes. I myself didn't like XP and really didn't think I'd ever upgrade, but eventually I found myself liking it more and more and finally moved over entirely. It's great; I like the stability and performance it provides. It took some time, however, before my PCs were up to the challenge. I feel the same will eventually be true of Vista and the hardware requirements we're all so worried about will, again, fade away. Microsoft likely put high requirements on purpose to ensure the operating system has a decent lifecycle. Like buying a shirt that's too big for a child since they'll "grow into it" anyway.

    4. Re:Last version of Windows by archen · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately with the move to 64 bit multi-core cpus, they still have some slack. I recall people saying that the windows 2000 codebase was far to large for anyone to manage. Then they tacked even more crap on with XP. And now Vista... Hardware wise I think they can go for another 1-2 iterations. Management wise... I'm not sure. And I think that's where the entire thing is going to collapse if they haven't figured this out. Windows will become too much code to manage at some point, and I think it's getting pretty close now.

    5. Re:Last version of Windows by adolf · · Score: 1

      No.

      By saying that Windows is finished, you are also, by extension, saying that computers are finished.

      And that's just not so. Hardware is still more difficult than it should be to configure, and software still crashes. I still don't have a flying car, and my games are not photorealistically rendered with real depth in the air in around me.

      Really, now. Saying that Windows is finished is like saying that the Internet is complete. That cars are done. That there is nothing left to learn about medicine. Or spaceflight. Or whatever.

      It's absurd.

    6. Re:Last version of Windows by davegravy · · Score: 1

      There are many examples of consumer electronics that have reached maturity which people buy new models of simply due to marketing and the fact that they're newer. Vista doesn't have to do anything new for it to sell, there's an expectation that newer is improved. Just make it look nicer, and maybe use some new shiny retail packaging.

    7. Re:Last version of Windows by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else convinced that this will be the last version of Windows as we know it?

      If they have any sense they will realize that the idea of completely rewriting everything from the ground up each time is just dumb. Much more sensible to do it the way Apple does - a big incremental upgrade each year.

      Of course, Microsoft's problem has been that they've had to completely rewrite because their code has been so crappy. Hopefully the vista code isn't crappy, and so in that sense you're probably right - this is the last version of Windows. From now on they'll be just regular incremental upgrades, if Microsoft has any sense.

    8. Re:Last version of Windows by screaser · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you mean by "as we know it".

      I would have thought that the MacOS was pretty much mature and stable, and they did some pretty groundbreaking stuff moving to OSX.

      Until we have an OS that lets us interface like the guys in Minority Report (or, hell... like HAL) we may not be finished.

    9. Re:Last version of Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who's not just an insane advocate of any one OS, I disagree. Windows is getting better and more stable and anyone who geuinely uses it on a grand scale must agree. New (compared to odl versions) features like Active Directory simply crap over the competition in terms of mass management of systems. Forget the zealotry, Linux & Mac simply don't have a competitive product that you can mass control the most tiny details of the end user experience across thousands of computers with a few clicks of a mouse. (Please don't mention ridiculous ideas, like self-made scripts that require strong programming knowledge and frankly don't have 1% of the power of AD).

      Windows has bugs. Windows has flaws. But for the mass, end user desktop, there is NO alternative. No other OS can be controlled in such a centralised way, without the need for teams of in house programmers.

      I work all day with computers, Macs, Linux and Windows. All servers that can be are linux and small clients who can live with macs get them, but large organisations simply need Windows - and it's getting better each relese.

      The Windows XP box i am typing this on hasn't needed to be rebuilt ever (over 2 years of use). Still runs like a charm.

    10. Re:Last version of Windows by chrisb33 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can always find ways to force people to upgrade - for example, locking DirectX 10 to Vista only. Want to use that shiny new video card? Pay up.
      It's unfortunate that the competitors lag so far behind that Microsoft is free to force upgrades - still, as you mentioned, OS's are nearly feature-complete, so it may be harder and harder to find features worth upgrading for.

    11. Re:Last version of Windows by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it takes more time for a release

      Really? What was the gap between Win95 and Win98? Between Win98 and Win2k? Between Win2k and XP? Let me give you a clue.

      I'm not debating that Vista has taken a metric shit-load of time to drag itself to RTM (we didn't use to call Longhorn Longwait for no reason), but your assertion that each release takes longer than the last is demonstrably false.

      there is really very little motivation for the average user to upgrade from XP to Vista

      There's very little motivation (beyond not wanting to feel that their computer is old and out of date) for the average user to upgrade from any given OS to any other. Most people do not upgrade their OS, they upgrade their PC and use whatever OS comes with it. They upgrade their PC as and when they feel that their current one is too old and slow for their needs; that varies from person to person. Even some gamers are still using Win 98 (see Valve's survey, scroll down to/search for "Windows Version"), and gamers are the group most likely to upgrade their OS.

      Is anyone else convinced that this will be the last version of Windows as we know it?

      I'm not convinced that it will be, but I concede that it might be. Don't expect Windows to go anywhere any time soon though, it's far too popular (as much as we might hate it) and makes MS far too much money for that to happen.

    12. Re:Last version of Windows by Renraku · · Score: 1

      This release is a (thinly) veiled attempt at wedging DRM securely into the OS.

      Look at the pretty graphics..look at the DX10..look at the networking stuff..

      *exaggeration* Oh, you can't play music or DVDs anymore without paying us for a two hour licence. No refunds on the software, either. If you violate it, we'll format your hard drive for you. Immediately and without warning. And all connected drives.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    13. Re:Last version of Windows by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      DirectX 10 will be Vista-only. So most gamers will want to upgrade. :)

  16. You remind me why I don't use Windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post reminds me of one of the main reasons I don't use Windows: I don't want to deal with companies like Microsoft, Symantec, McAfee and Adobe.

    My data is too valuable to become victim to the insecure software of Microsoft. My time is too valuable to be wasted trying to clear my system of malware.

    My system's performance is too important to be hindered by anti-virus software, be it from Symantec, McAfee, or any other anti-virus software vendor.

    I also do not want to use crash-prone software like Adobe Acrobat Reader, which often takes down the web browser when using it as plugin to view PDFs online.

    I know there are many alternatives for the products put out by the big name companies. But again, I don't want to spend hours tracking down this software, and then dealing with any installation problems. That's why I use NetBSD. Between its solid core, excellent development team and pkgsrc, I can get easy and fast access to all of the software I need. And I don't need to install performance-degrading anti-virus software, nor do I worry about malware infections. Best of all, it just plain works.

  17. In other words.... by Rixel · · Score: 1

    "until the first round of patching begins."

    AKA Vista 2008

    --
    Never play chicken with a passive aggressive.
    1. Re:In other words.... by klogg_siebentag · · Score: 1

      aka December 2006

    2. Re:In other words.... by Rixel · · Score: 1

      Or....

      wait for it

      ReVisit8

      not perfect, but let the linux marketing fanboys play a bit and I guarantee there's a meme in there

      --
      Never play chicken with a passive aggressive.
  18. Tagspam by Fyz · · Score: 1, Informative

    Someone is either seriously paranoid or is abusing his right to tag the summaries.

    What's the point with those tags anyway? Are they mini-posts or what? They certainly can't be used for searching...

    1. Re:Tagspam by Fez · · Score: 1

      Subscribers can use tags so they can more easily find stories they liked later on. Under your personal page there's a 'tags' link and the stories you have tagged appear there with the tag names.

      The tags are displayed publicly, I suppose, so that others can see how people have classified the story. Sort of suggestions for your own tags.

      I suspect that someone has quite a large tags page full of stories that are very trap-like...

  19. Time to milk the cash cow by GomezAdams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And by SP2 all the older Office apps will be crippled forcing an upgrade to the Vista Office suite. Just think of the billions of dollars taken out of the world wide economy that could have been spent on REAL business improvements.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
    1. Re:Time to milk the cash cow by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Just think of the billions of dollars taken out of the world wide economy that could have been spent on REAL business improvements."

      But would most likely have been spent on higher salaries for top executives, jets for top executives, apartments in the most expensive areas of the world's most expensive cities for top executives to use when they spend a day there once every three years, high-class hookers pushing wheel-barrows full of cocaine into said apartments during that day, share options for top executives, golden parachutes so top executives can live like kings after the creditors have picked over the bones of the company that the incompetent top executives have ruined, but not before selling all those shares they optioned, thus rendering other employee shares worthless, and siphoning the pension fund into a series of untraceable numbered overseas accounts

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  20. Is it Vista or Vista? by AnXa · · Score: 1

    I'm having good vista out of my window...

    --
    -Seeing the problem is ½ of solution-
  21. Yes, but by wumpus188 · · Score: 5, Funny

    will Linus send them a cake?

    1. Re:Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And does the cake run Linux?

    2. Re:Yes, but by macs4all · · Score: 1

      No, but Steve Jobs will!

    3. Re:Yes, but by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Preferably in the face?

      What? Ain't like it's never happened before!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Yes, but by Hangeron · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he'll send the kernel of the cake, and eat the rest himself.

  22. Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: by Luscious868 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    Ultimately, we never could have achieved this milestone without you, the enthusiast community, who have played a key role in making this the highest-quality, most secure, most reliable and most usable version of Windows the world has ever seen.

    Really? If each new release of Windows is marketed as the highest-quality, most secure, most reliable and most usable version of Windows then why has each new release of Windows had more security patches released than the previous version?

    Just look at the amount of holes that have been plugged since XP SP2 was released. The heck with waiting for Vista SP1, I'm telling my clients to steer clear of Vista all together until Microsoft stops releasing patches to new vulnerabilities found in XP.

    1. Re:Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I'm telling my clients to steer clear of Vista all together until Microsoft stops releasing patches
      > to new vulnerabilities found in XP.

      They have stopped releasing patches. It'll be just incremental updates from now on.

    2. Re:Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Being the most secure, most reliable and mose usable version of Windows is like being the fastest one legged marathon runner.

      I mean, this is said like it's some kind of achivement. Of course Vista is more secure and stable, or at least it better be! MS be damned if it isn't! That's to be expected. I do also expect a 2006 BMW to be more secure, more reliable and more comfortable than a 1986 model.

      Why should I not expect it from my OS?

      Being the most secure... Windows is to be expected from the most current version. If it's not, take it to the trashcan and we'll stay where we are.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? If each new release of Windows is marketed as the highest-quality, most secure, most reliable and most usable version of Windows then why has each new release of Windows had more security patches released than the previous version?

      If you compare 95 to 98, 98 to ME, ME to 2K and 2K to XP, you see a marked improvement in the security and the security models of those operating systems over time relative to each other. The difference that makes this seem paltry is the networked environment in which we are operating today, as opposed to the standalone environment that 95 was primarily used in. One small bug, a misplaced equality operator or a comma instead of a semicolon and you can have a back door into someones computer today, whereas before you had to be there. The Windows code is improving, but it's high stakes since the programmer has to be perfect every time, the hacker only has to find one hole in the whole wall to bring the house down though.

      Windows Vista will still have holes, no doubt. But I'd rather run that than Windows 95. Linux isn't a reality for 90% of the world yet, and while an incumbant can lie and get away with it, Linux and it's users dont have the luxury of spurious reasoning when trying to convert users.

      Regards,
      -Steve Gray
    4. Re:Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: by frogstar_robot · · Score: 1

      Just look at the amount of holes that have been plugged since XP SP2 was released. The heck with waiting for Vista SP1, I'm telling my clients to steer clear of Vista all together until Microsoft stops releasing patches to new vulnerabilities found in XP.


      That will only happen when MS decides to stop supporting XP. Not to defend MS, but any codebase as vast as that of Windows will inevitably have bugs and patches throughout it's lifecycle. It isn't bugs you need to worry about but how they are responded to and how things are designed. Designwise Vista won't be a radical departure from XP. It's still Win32/64 after all.

      Now, it probably is wise to wait for the first Service Pack before adopting Vista. Many bugs won't be found until the multitudes have Vista in their hot little hands. There's just some bugs that aren't easy to find without a million monkeys pounding away. XP should be supported until then. By the time Vista SP1 arrives, XP will have fewer years of active support remaining from MS. You may HAVE to upgrade by then.
    5. Re:Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: by ericfitz · · Score: 1

      Complete brainless robotic anti-M$FT FUD, and if you had spent even 60 seconds checking your facts, you would have found that your statement is a lie.

      Windows 2000 Pro: 250+ security bulletins
      Windows XP Pro: 187 security bulletins
      Windows Server 2003 Std: 124 security bulletins

      Source: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security

      So not only is your statement untrue, it's the opposite of reality.

      Check your facts before you post.

    6. Re:Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 1

      What do you have to back up your claim of "more security patches released that the previous version"?

      If true, perhaps this actually suggests they are paying more attention to security than before?

      In any case, I'm glad we haven't seen anything on the scale of Blaster since XP SP2.

    7. Re:Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: by nasch · · Score: 1
      That will only happen when MS decides to stop supporting XP.
      I think that's his point - you're better off sticking with XP until MS stops supporting it, at which time you should upgrade (across-grade?) to a supported OS.
  23. Remember kids... by Yuioup · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... every time you install Vista a penguin loses its wings.

    Y

    1. Re:Remember kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And every time you use NTFS or EXT3 Reiser kills a woman.

    2. Re:Remember kids... by Valdoran · · Score: 0

      Oh no, then they can't fly anymore!

    3. Re:Remember kids... by IflyRC · · Score: 1

      Good!

    4. Re:Remember kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you mean "a penguin looses its wrapper"??????

      http://www.mcvities.co.uk/80256C1A0047922E/vWeb/pc TSTT5EPGG9 (in case you don't know!!!)

    5. Re:Remember kids... by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      Ceiling penguin is watching you fsck...

    6. Re:Remember kids... by mqduck · · Score: 1

      ... every time you install Vista a penguin loses its wings.

      Oh teh noes! Then Tux/Tuxette won't be able to fly!! *sniff*

      --
      Property is theft.
  24. The tagging by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, the tagging is rapidly dissolving into childish rubbish (even by Slashdot's standards). I'm fed up of seeing every story getting tagged with "itsatrap". Can it be removed or can the lameness filter be extended to the tags?

    1. Re:The tagging by mackertm · · Score: 1

      It's a trap!

      Seriously, I agree. While the first time or two I saw that tag pop up (when it was relevant), it was funny/useful. Now it's on EVERY article. I suppose that's the problem of user tagging of content combined with groupthink.

    2. Re:The tagging by archen · · Score: 1

      Maybe what they need are "tag moderators". Like the moderation system, some people are elected to be allowed to tag. Then everyone is allowed to meta-moderate those tags.

    3. Re:The tagging by cybermage · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the tagging is rapidly dissolving into childish rubbish (even by Slashdot's standards)

      Well, I, for one, welcome our trap-detecting overloards!

      I offer them these gifts: a beowulf cluster; Natalie Portman; and, of course, Hot Grits (tm).

      Oh, and remember: In Soviet Russia, Cowboy Neal options you!

      --
      under-reported news with commentary

    4. Re:The tagging by ledow · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it was of course inevitable. Unless you want to mod and meta-mod tags themselves, we were always going to get this rubbish. You can't stop the tags any more than you can stop spam email coming through by blocking anything that contains the word "penis" in it. They'll just change the word, change the spelling, etc. and you'll still end up with spam. Tags never were a bright idea, it's the AUTHOR or EDITOR who should be tagging stories, not the general Slashdot populous.

    5. Re:The tagging by cybermage · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the tagging is rapidly dissolving into childish rubbish (even by Slashdot's standards)

      Well, I, for one, welcome our trap-detecting overloards!

      I offer them these gifts: a beowulf cluster; Natalie Portman; and, of course, Hot Grits (tm).

      Oh, and remember: In Soviet Russia, Cowboy Neal options you!

      --
      under-reported news with commentary

    6. Re:The tagging by suffe · · Score: 1

      My idea would be for something that lets everyone tag and then only uses the most popular tags (or a slightly more complex sorting routine). That still doesn't change the underlying problem though. People tag things for their own personal use (see flickr, del.icio.us etc) and not for other peoples use (see slashdot). I mean, honestly, how many times a week does the average user search old slashdot articles? But, but, but it's TAGGING. It has to be good, right?

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    7. Re:The tagging by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%. Yesterday, it seemed like every single story was tagged with most or all of "itsatrap", "notatrap", "fud", "notfud", etc. Today, it looked like someone had woken up and seen some sense, as most of them were gone. Unfortunately, it looks like they're slowly but surely coming back.

      Oh, one thing I do find amusing though is that someone has tagged the story about the bar owner being arrested for copyright violation for performing tunes on his harmonica with "riaa", even though the entire incident took place in Japan and the RIAA had nothing to do with it...

      Tags seem like a good idea, but I can't help feeling that enough of the slashdot readership is too immature and irresponsible for it to work properly, and that's a real shame.

      To answer your question though, I very much doubt that "itsatrap" is going to go away any time soon; it's even used as an example in the tagging FAQ. Monkey see...

  25. Interesting counter point by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The other day, MS was trying to convince business to install both Vista and Office 2007 at the same time saying it would be easier on companies. If you read this article, MS basically provides a counter point why companies should not:

    Allchin said that, with Vista code done, businesses will "now start hard-core deployment testing" and make sure their applications work with the operating system. . . .
    "Businesses need to do their testing. They need to be very comfortable," he said.

    Given MS long history of releases and patches and patches to fix patches, only fools would not take on two simultaneous large scale MS deployments at once.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Interesting counter point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In genereal, I'd agree that you want to do deployments one at a time -- but with Micrsoft it's a different story.


      I'd be quite afraid that they only test Vista with Office 2007; and only test Office 2007 with Vista -- so if you're off trying to do XP-with-Office-2007 or Vista-with-pre-Office-2007 you're pretty much on your own no matter what they say about supported versions and configurations. That's one of the big problems with proprietary software -- even if customer demand suggests people want to do one deployment at a time, the vendor can pretty much force you to buy both simply because of their own poor internal QA processes.

  26. hrm by thejrwr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know! lets install vista into R2-D2

  27. I predict.... by Trelane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stunning profits as soon as it's pre-installed on millions of PCs worldwide.

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  28. Disappointed by HikingStick · · Score: 4, Funny

    I saw the news piece in a headline on CNN.com. It read "Vista is done." I was sorely disappointed when I read that "done" meant finished rather than "done for," "kaput," or "ain't gonna happen."

    Well, it was a pleasant dream while it lasted...

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  29. wow! by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    2003 is already here! This is going to rock!. Funny how conan is still singing about the year 2000. Silly conan.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  30. Re:Has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...By the ragging hormones of young females lawyers, horny at the tought of sue you..., hey, this is a porn site!

  31. I'm waiting for the final. by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or, in MS terms, "Service Pack 2".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. XP? Y'all from the future? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    I'm a power user and developer, and I can't see a compelling reason to upgrade from Win2K Pro. Any suggestions?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  33. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Congratulations to all at Microsoft for getting Vista out of the door. Heard the good news this morning at the EVO Roadshow in Bristol, United Kingdom. Just thought I'd post the first non-insulting message, that's all.

    1. Re:Congratulations by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      But you're just a bunch of carrot-chompers around Bristol way...

      We take you lot seriously when you talk about tractors or next year's cabbage harvest, not operating systems. :-)

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  34. This will keep going forever by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Not because we need the new features or the new gadgets, but because MS will not implement (and now won't allow to implement) drivers for new hardware, and they will stop patching bugs and security holes in old software. In short: They drop support, so you have to upgrade.

    Look at NT4.0. Basically, unless you're fond of games, this is all you really needed. Unless you want to use USB sticks. Because there is no (official) USB support for NT4.

    Win2k. Even if you're into games, this is all you would ever need. Unfortunately even the worst security bugs ain't being fixed anymore for this system. So you can use it... and be a spam chucker because some holes will never be fixed.

    WinXP. Now, could you ask for any MORE flashing lights and convenience? Is there anything missing? Well, there will be, because there will be no DirectX 10 for XP, and games will sooner or later requre DX10 or refuse to run.

    So in a nutshell, no, there is no imminent need to switch to a new system. MS creates that need.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. Re:Somebody knock on Taco's door to fix threads by UncleRage · · Score: 1

    Filters: One Line = None

    Refresh, or if truly impatient (and on a slow connection), click one line link afterwards to expand.

    --
    #SickNotWeak
  36. Re:New Features?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it is not a feature, it's a trap!

  37. Where's a good history by jbengt · · Score: 3, Informative

    "CNN has a good roundup of Vista's long development history" links to CNET, and doesn't have a history of what became Vista.

  38. RC1 avalible for download (legally) by @madeus · · Score: 1

    You joke, but you can actually download the ISO of RC1 freely from Microsoft (without having to jump through lots of hoops - assuming you have a Passport [MSN/Hotmail/X-Box Live] account already, or don't mind creating one). You need to give your details to get a licence key (which is immediately presented, and emailed to you for good measure), and you can use it on up to 10 PC's.

    You must apply for a licence before November 30th to get a serial number though! If you do purchase it you can upgrade to the full release (i.e. you won't have to wipe your existing install). I actually think that's pretty cool. It makes me wonder why - as far as I can tell - you can't just 'unlock it' on line by paying for it with a credit card (the way I buy most of my Windows games now - e.g. through Stream or from similar systems like EA Downloader). I would expect that to cut down casual piracy amoung lazy people who can't be bothered to work out how to get round the 'activation/validation' that's increasingly required.

  39. See http://slashdot.org/tags by cmdrbuzz · · Score: 1
    What's the point with those tags anyway? Are they mini-posts or what? They certainly can't be used for searching...

    Have a look at http://slashdot.org/tags

    Not that I agree with the idiots that are spamming the tags...

  40. So they finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    got their photocopier running at full speed? Took their time, too.

  41. When Googling For More News On This.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...please make sure you get your spelling correct.

    "Widows Fister" brings up completely different stuff...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:When Googling For More News On This.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But you have to admit, the ad is true. It shows you things you never thought possible!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. Re:Has to be said by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    So DRM seems to work.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  43. No , there'll be more. by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    But eventually the bloat will cause MS to release a "minimalist" OS in the same way they reduced some of the bloat on Office (alledgedly) and market this new found slimline look as a feature (in the same way cars slowly grow in size and suddenly they're too big and get shrunk down again - then start to grow again). Who knows what the long term futures holds , Windows could either predominate, be overtaken by Linux or OS/X or some other OS/hardware combo which doesn't even exist yet or there could be a complete paradigm shift in the types of computers we use. Perhaps in 20 years we'll all be typing into a self programming neural net.

  44. Re:Remember kids...Oblig Clippy by theskipper · · Score: 1

    Which is offset by having one more paperclip off the streets and gainfully employed.

  45. new activation technology by eljasbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems that Microsoft is wanting to stop people buying a volume license key and installing it on unlimited computers. They have new Volume Activation 2.0 now that gives you a central activation server or a multiple activation key now. My new volume license key is now available at their page also. I just need the iso now...

    1. Re:new activation technology by tomservo84 · · Score: 1

      I've never understood how this can't be pirated, as long as you have a (for example) linux server in your home network.

      Use the server as your local DNS server. I'm sure the activation process does not go to a specific IP, but a name. Find out what name it's using. Put this in your server and point to itself. Run a program on whatever port the activation process is using, wait for input and spit out what it wants.

      I'm not saying figuring all this out is a 5 minute process...but I can't imagine it won't be done.

      --
      Agile Spaceport - You will never find a more wretched hive of scrum and villainy. We must be cautious.
  46. Appropriate by bsc_zap! · · Score: 5, Funny

    "All that compiles is not gold."

  47. But does it come with SATA drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or will we still have to keep a god-damned floppy drive in our PCs to boot into the recovery console?

  48. I also predict... by LordEd · · Score: 1

    The profits they make on pre-installed Vista PCs will be balanced by the reduction of profits from pre-installed XP home machines.

  49. Blizzard by DarqFallen · · Score: 1

    Now if only Blizzard could do the same with Burning Crusade

  50. How? by chriskurn · · Score: 1

    This blows me away...RC2 to GM in 60 seconds?

  51. Really? by Beefslaya · · Score: 1

    My overall opinion of Vista (after beta testing) is that it is an Admin's nightmare.

    How can this be ready for production?

  52. bugs glitchs & hax o my by deviceb · · Score: 1

    I will be running it. I enjoy all the bugs, glitchs, hax as well as new tools/tech. Same reason i play games more in beta stages.

    if these things did not exist.. bordom
    no games are really ready yet for V.. /shrug

    --
    Kill your TV
  53. Vista Kernel was released long ago by macz · · Score: 1

    Since they abandoned the longhorn kernel and have merely modified the Windows 2003 Server kernel, Vista's core has been out in the wild for some time now. For all intents and purposes, Vista could be released as a service pack for 2003.

    --
    ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
  54. Yes but... by icedcool · · Score: 1

    Does it run on linux?

    --
    Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
  55. "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1". by turly · · Score: 1

    I think I'll wait for Vista SP1.

    --
    IX CCXLIX XVII II CLVII CXVI CCXXVII XCI CCXVI LXV LXXXVI CXCVII XCIX LXXXVI CXXXVI CXCII
  56. Klingon software? by mcd7756 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I thought these two items appropriate: Klingon Programmer Honour Code

    • Klingons do not "release" software. Klingon software escapes, leaving a bloody trail of design engineers and quality assurance people in its path.
    • Our users shall know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it and let them flee like the dogs they are!
    --
    Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? --Abraham Lincoln
  57. Tried it; don't like it; have switched :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have tried all versions of Vista since 2002/3 and while it showed a lot of promise back then today it is just a disappointment.

    I really hate what they have done with the UI, it looks and feels cheep, it looks unfinished and inconsistent between applications.

    I have waited as long as possible but when I used RC2 and still disliked it I decided that I was going to make the switch and today I have done just that :)

    I just bought myself a 15" 2.33Ghz MacBook Pro. Yes it was expensive but not more expensive than an identical spec Dell or HP laptop (which are of much lower build quality when I compared them side by side in my local John Lewis)*

    So in around 7 days time I will have my nice new MacBook Pro. I am a little nervous about switching however I have spent the past 15 months researching it and have borried an old iMac G5 from a friend to try it out and I think I will be very happy on OS X. A great bonus for me is that I no longer have to spend money on Visual Studio as Xcode comes included making a Mac a MUCH cheaper platform for me :)

    * I did not purchase from John Lewis, Apple gave me a much better deal on the phone.

  58. So now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want duke nukem forever.

  59. *ROTFLMAO* by msobkow · · Score: 1
    After five years and many twists and turns, Microsoft on Wednesday said that development of Windows Vista is complete.

    So I guess if you change the name from "Chicago", the project schedule starts anew, and the previous decade of effort doesn't count. :p :D :p

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  60. Comes with handcuffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comes bundled with a free pair of handcuffs!

  61. Nested comments by nickos · · Score: 2, Informative

    What the hell just happened to the "Reply to this" links - they were here a minute ago. Slashdot's best asset is the quality of the discussions, and that's only possible because of nested comments!

  62. You have to admit ..this is funny by prochefort · · Score: 1

    This story follows the one about turning sewer waste into energy...how appropriate.

    Cheers. ;-)

  63. will Vista reduce the number of zombies? by nickos · · Score: 1

    I wish this had been released back when they originally said it would be. If they've improved the security as much as they say they have this should drive down the number of zombies that are responsible for spam and comment spam etc...

  64. Ya know, for people who dev. software for a living by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Haven't the /. devs. learned about a DEVELOPMENT server? This horseshit of developing the "new comment system" on the LIVE SITE is bloody amateurish, and totally unneccessary.

    The "Reply" bugs that everyone is bitching about have already eaten one of my posts today.

    Amateurs. Go work for Microsoft. They actually EMPLOY coders like you!

  65. take a deep breath by SP33doh · · Score: 1

    damn. I've been running RC1, but as soon as it's released I'm downgrading back to XP to avoid the thousands of security problems.

  66. ? whaaa...? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    What happened to release candidates? Are they making RC2 gold or are they releasing something that hasn't been tested?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  67. Which editions? by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any idea what editions this involves? I'm not sure if the consumer one is delayed so they have more time to churn out discs for distribution, or if they needed more time to work on some of the features in the consumer editions.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  68. No Compelling Reason by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that for the most part and for the average person, there is no compelling reason to upgrade. The costs of the OS, even to upgrade, are very high (most people have XP and it does more than the average person needs).

    The majority of the costs are going to be in the hardware upgrades. I know that gets vendors all excited. The average person just doesn't need to have someone who is foaming at the mouth about upgrades trying to sell those to people who just don't need them. Be fair to the customers and sell them what they need. If they come in about vista be honest and tell them about it, and that it includes no compelling reasons to upgrade and that if they do choose to upgrade they will be asking for high costs without any real payback.

    Warn them about the DRM infections and the privacy violations built into it with the Microsoft Genuine Advantage Notifications, the potential to be cut off the next boot, etc.

    Also let them know that Vista is in the first release with known bugs some minor and most certainly some major ones (that weren't caught). Let them know there problems with hardware drivers and that few if any programs (except Office 2007) actually include any Vista features.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    1. Re:No Compelling Reason by nasch · · Score: 1
      If they come in about vista be honest and tell them about it, and that it includes no compelling reasons to upgrade and that if they do choose to upgrade they will be asking for high costs without any real payback.
      Sure, that'll happen. "Sir, rather than giving us several hundred dollars for this piece of software you would really be better served by going home and spending your money in some other store." Right...
  69. Dot Backslash by quibbs0 · · Score: 1
    Has anyone seen the method for logging onto a local Vista PC once you have joined a domain? You have to put in .\UserName


    Does anyone see a dotbackslash.org coming? If so, you can say you saw dotbackslash.org on slashdot.org first!


    Ten times fast now!

  70. No, the cat does not "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    So does this mean it will, in fact, make it in time for the PC manufacturers to make it in time for the Christmas rush?

    Er, holiday rush?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  71. I am so smrt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Duke overlords. They shall verily Nukem their foes, and shall surely rule Forever.

  72. Vista and SDL by DeepBlueGlow · · Score: 1

    This is the first release of Windows which followed Microsoft's Secure Development Lifecycle. So it would be a real test of SDL when it is deployed on machines of millions of customers. Now what XP users who intend to stay on XP need is XP SP3, merging code bases of Server 2003 and XP and adding IE7 and WMP11 to it. This would take care of a lot of security problems and make serviceability of XP easier. I wonder if Microsoft will do that.

  73. Vista Nukem by gx5000 · · Score: 1

    Oh why must I wait until I'm forced into retirement for Nukem but
    have to support in the very near future a crowd of "Vistaneers"(TM)?!

    Again my phone will bludgeon my ears with stories of woe from
    clients who should have spent the money on new PC's for Vista
    but went ahead anyways and upgraded their OS instead, and now
    will want me to "fix it".

    Maybe after all these years, Vista will be my call to better my golf game.
    But I will feel guilty about these clients left in the hands of the "Geek Squads"...

    Oh well...

    --
    End of Line.
  74. i will install Day 1 by ashish_dutt · · Score: 1

    I will install it the day it's on MSDN. I've been through the Beta, and I think it's the best thing that happened to usable operating systems since Linux.

  75. So what's the build id? by Rodness · · Score: 1

    When we go download copies of the ultimate edition, we gotta make sure we don't download a beta, er i mean release candidate, er... nevermind.

    Seriously... anyone know the build id?

  76. Duke Nukem for Vista by Zonnald · · Score: 1

    I heard the next release of Duke will be for Vista only.

  77. Well, since you asked... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    What's the point with those tags anyway? Are they mini-posts or what? They certainly can't be used for searching...

    Indeed, they have no point. They are a typical example of something that sounds good on paper, in a meeting, etc, but actually doesn't work at all in practice, because the human element wasn't factored in. Sounds like Vista, actually! Since every tag is the same, it conveys no signal, just noise. So here's the noise you have to subtract to make it even slightly useful:

    yes, no, maybe, fud, notfud, itsatrap, itsnotatrap, duh, doh, oops, haha, wtf

  78. What's this guy smoking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows not need antivirus? Yeah right. Usually within a week of the release they're already releasing the patches to cover the security flaws. Viruses constantly exploit stuff like this. And what about trojans? Is Vista going to stop an email download in transit to catch them? I don't think so. They'll make a virus proof version of windows when Andrew Dice Clay becomes the grand pope.

    - Floyd