Slashdot Mirror

Electric cars are also cheaper to run. You get regenerative braking as a help but basically it is more efficient to have high delta T at the power generating plant and coal is also cheaper than oil.
--
Solar is cheaper still: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

I blogged on this a while back. Kyoto was modeled on the Montreal Protocol and now both are in bad shape. Here's a fresh link in the NYT http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/business/worldbu siness/15warming.html to look at if you want to read the blog which links to an older and now subscription only article http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/02/heir-of-leader ship.html.

You don't have to put the panel on the car, you can put it on your home roof http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html. The cars take about 4 hours to charge with their on board compressors if that fits your driving habits.

You can get on a wait list for a car here http://www.theaircar.com/models_iwantone.html. NB, the solar link is also a wait list.

I think I'm going to wait for batteries in a car because that solves my back up power needs but this gets to my speed needs better than the zebra: http://www.zapworld.com/ZAPWorld.aspx?id=188.

Unlike the majority of traditional cars on the market, MDIs vehicle's have fibreglass bodies which makes them light, silent urban car. The car's body is tubular, light weight, and is held together using aerospace technology.

The recharging of the car will be done at gas stations, once the market is developed. To fill the tanks it will take about to 2 to 3 minutes at a price of 1.5 euros. After refilling the car will be ready to driver 200 kilometres.

According to an (unofficial) post by Kimbal Musk in 2005, "The highest winds we want to launch in is 24 knots [~27.6 mph]." I don't know if that's still there policy, but current wind speed is just around 15 mph.

For anybody looking for more frequently-updated sources of info and don't feel like watching the entire webcase, here's some other useful sources of info:

* SpaceFlight Now's Mission Status Center: According to the status center, they're having some problems with remotely-monitoring the telemetry stream, which may end up postponing the launch.

* Kimbal Musk's "Kwajalein Atoll and Rockets" blog: Kimbal is Elon Musk's brother, and often posts interesting (and highly unofficial) updates from the launch site. He sometimes goes into liveblogging mode, but hasn't done this yet today.

"Apollo will work on Mac and Windows to begin with, Linux support to follow."

http://myblah-blah-tech.blogspot.com/2007/01/15-th ings-about-adobe-apollo.html

Hope that unlike the HTML/Javascript/CSS soup we have now, this technology is designed from the ground up with security in mind.

I guess Flash/Flex/ActionScript/whatever the heck this stuff is turning out to be, is the Next Big Language? http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2007/02/next-big-l anguage.html

I just hope it works on mobile phones, it has to be a better solution than Sun's J2ME/JavaME mess. Is OpenLaszlo going anywhere?

anything is funny when you substitute the word pants:

• ask not what your pants can do for you. ask what you can do for your pants.
• i want pants for the full expression of my personality.
• god is pants.
• he is ill clothed that is bare of pants.
• friends, nobles, countrymen, lend me your pants.

Everyone seems to know of high-profile cases, such as AllOfMp3. No wonder, AllOfMP3 used to one of the most popular music shops out there, just a bit less popular than iTunes.

Unfortunately, due to this 'fight', a lot of innocent people get hurt by the system. You heard of Ponosov's case, where a headmaster of God-forgotten school in Perm region has been tried for an alleged 'intellectual property violation'. And this case was not brought on by Microsoft. It was brought by a regional prosecution office. And that was just a beginning...

Nowadays corrupted goverment officials and law enforcement officers use 'software piracy' as yet another way to make a 'quick buck' in bribes. Their demands are completely ridiculous. Here is a couple of examples:

1. In big cities they stop people for documents checks and 'random' searches. And now if they see a laptop, they demand to turn it on and demand a license for the software. And that's suppose to be an 'antiterrorist' activity...
2. Police came over to some company recently and confiscated their Linux servers with the following explanation: Your computer does not have 'My Computer' icon, so it must be illegal. No other explanation was given. When the company visited local police office and demanded explanation, they were told: you can sue us and wait for another half a year until the court processes your case. Keep in mind, though, that all this time your equipment is going to lie here as evidence. Alternatively, you can just pay the fine that is reasonable to both of us and get your sh&t outta here.... What do you think the businessmen have done? You can read about it (in Russian)here and here.

Everyone seems to know of high-profile cases, such as AllOfMp3. No wonder, AllOfMP3 used to one of the most popular music shops out there, just a bit less popular than iTunes.

Unfortunately, due to this 'fight', a lot of innocent people get hurt by the system. You heard of Ponosov's case, where a headmaster of God-forgotten school in Perm region has been tried for an alleged 'intellectual property violation'. And this case was not brought on by Microsoft. It was brought by a regional prosecution office. And that was just a beginning...

Nowadays corrupted goverment officials and law enforcement officers use 'software piracy' as yet another way to make a 'quick buck' in bribes. Their demands are completely ridiculous. Here is a couple of examples:

1. In big cities they stop people for documents checks and 'random' searches. And now if they see a laptop, they demand to turn it on and demand a license for the software. And that's suppose to be an 'antiterrorist' activity...
2. Police came over to some company recently and confiscated their Linux servers with the following explanation: Your computer does not have 'My Computer' icon, so it must be illegal. No other explanation was given. When the company visited local police office and demanded explanation, they were told: you can sue us and wait for another half a year until the court processes your case. Keep in mind, though, that all this time your equipment is going to lie here as evidence. Alternatively, you can just pay the fine that is reasonable to both of us and get your sh&t outta here.... What do you think the businessmen have done? You can read about it (in Russian)here and here.

DD-Wrt is done by one guy, and his goal is to make it as useful as possible for what he thinks users want to use it for.

DD-Wrt is based on the now-GPL violating commercial WRT distro called Alchemy - mostly because they wanted the project to continue despite the fact that it's owner wanted to start closing the source.

I guess we shouldn't use Apple products, the Linux kernel or browsers either eh?

http://projects.info-pull.com/moab/ - Month of Apple Bugs
http://projects.info-pull.com/mokb/ - Month of Kernel Bugs
http://browserfun.blogspot.com/ - Month of Browser Bugs

I read a blog recently that questions the integrity of one of dd-wrt's developers. Apparently, the guy who calls himself brainslayer and who seems to have done most of the integration work (IINM), is now selling the work of others as his own. ... and other accusations. Read for yourself :

http://xwrt.blogspot.com/2007/02/dd-wrt-continues- to-exploit-free-open.html

I'm not sure if there's anything wrong with it myself, but you might want to consider your options, if such things are important to you.

I'm using dd-wrt myself, and I'm looking at replacing it with Tomato, since dd-wrt's web server (the GUI) keeps locking up (logging into it wish ssh reveals httpd is using 100% CPU and killing it causes it to be relaunched). Also, I really don't need all the crap that's in the regular version of dd-wrt, so I'd move to the micro version of dd-wrt anyway, but since that will likely have the same httpd problem, I figure I might as well give Tomato a try.

Yeah, you might care more about the httpd lockup than the developer's integrity. Just a couple of things to consider. YMMV

Similar issues were raise in the article. You can judge for yourself here: http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1748-9326/2/1/014002 /erl7_1_014002.pdf.
--
Solar power: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

You might want to consider choosing one of the alternatives to dd-wrt :

http://xwrt.blogspot.com/2007/02/dd-wrt-continues- to-exploit-free-open.html

or not...

I have been running dd-wrt for a long time, but the fact that it's httpd always uses close to 100% of the CPU (after running ok for a while) so I have to ssh in and kill it (it's restarted automatically), made me look for an alternative. I'm going to try the 'tomato' one, I think :

http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato

An AC really stood up for the name coward today on another thread. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=226977&cid=183 87065. Trolling used to be such a fun sport, catch a fish or two, enjoy the Sun and the water.... Now they dynamite the fishes.

But, it is not clear which side is threatening the warming deniers. It could easily be their own side to manipulate them into crying about it. It turned out that the guy who said he was threatened was a PR guy so it makes you think. They have been less than scrupulous in other ways: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/your-opinion-c ould-be-paid-for-by.html.

You should have another look at the economics of renewables. Wind is already cheaper tha fossil fuels in Texas and, to toot my own horn, you can rent solar power for what you pay now to your utility. I think also that you are mistaken about the contribution of people to stopping nuclear power. I feel they (we) did not go far enough. You can see why here http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/knowing-warmin g.html seventh paragraph.
--
Power your home with solar: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

You should have another look at the economics of renewables. Wind is already cheaper tha fossil fuels in Texas and, to toot my own horn, you can rent solar power for what you pay now to your utility. I think also that you are mistaken about the contribution of people to stopping nuclear power. I feel they (we) did not go far enough. You can see why here http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/knowing-warmin g.html seventh paragraph.
--
Power your home with solar: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

Actually, to even get this kind of stretch you need to rely on methods which are not legal in the US. At the present rate of consumption and price for fuel we've probably got enough for a hundred years, less than what is available for the present rate of consumption of coal. Uranium is a smaller fraction of the cost for power production than coal, so it is OK to boost the cost on mining a bit and get at some less desirable ores. Suppose this gives us 300 years at the present consumption level. Then nuclear energy can replace fossil fuel use for 30 years. So, its not really worth building the reactors I think.
--
Go fusion! http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

Actually there is a link between the ozone layer and warming but it is a bit complex. The refrigerant substituted to help protect the ozone layer is also a potent greenhouse gas. And, as India and China produce more air conditioners, we are getting more of it into the atmosphere. I've blogged on it here http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/02/heir-of-leader ship.html and here is a fresher NYT link http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/business/worldbu siness/15warming.html since the one in the blog will use up one of your subscription points.

Check the spelling.
--
Now its easy being green: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

"Nymz" doesn't have to read, he's an RIAA troll. Don't waste your time on him. He knows the cases are frivolous, which is why his moron employers are getting hammered for attorneys fees.

We can already count lost sheep. Yanking this off the firehose even though it was slowly rising:

Science Daily is reporting that researchers at the Carnegie Institution and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have found that crop losses owing to global warming exceeded $100 billion between 1981 and 2002 http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Sci ence&article=UPI-1-20070316-15391700-bc-us-climate change-crops.xml. This is of interest not just because this indicates that warming is not good for crops, at least in the way that we grow them now, but that attempts to reduce warming through substituting biofuels for fossil fuels may be squeezed by this effect.

The estimated cost of crop losses is about 25% of the cost of the Iraq war so far http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com _wrapper&Itemid=182.
--
Do something: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

defendant John Paladuk was living in Florida at the time of the alleged copyright infringement

Mr. Paladuk suffered a stroke last year

sole income is Social Security Disability

Yes it is a problem, only I'm not sure the system does allow it. They are getting their head handed to them in Capitol v. Foster, and I am hopeful the 'system' is catching up to them elsewhere.

Yes it is a problem, only I'm not sure the system does allow it. They are getting their head handed to them in Capitol v. Foster, and I am hopeful the 'system' is catching up to them elsewhere.

Looking at the comments on the blog I have to agree that most of your big number for waste is just bad wording. Power generation is not all that efficient and that is the big chunk. If you heat with electricity, your taking a huge hit there because you could burn the fuel directly for heat. But, you can't run many electric appliances that way. Transmission losses are on the order of 7% of the actually generated electricity, they'd be a smaller fraction of the grey plus orange blobs in the figure.
--
Generate your power at home: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

Thanks for the information. I've added Jamendo.com to my list of links to non-RIAA music, "Liberated Music".

You seem not to understand that the safety record of the nuclear power industry is very poor. As it turns out, contrary to what we have been led to beleive, there is no full opportunity for the industry to learn from its mistakes because accidents are covered up. This particular accident has no record or analysis so it may well be repeated with worse consequences.

As you point out, different technology is called for. However, it is not at all clear that pebble bed reactors can be run safely on a commercial scale. Further, it is no longer clear that problems with such new technology will be reported or addressed.

I agree with you that biofuels based on rooted plants have limited capacity as you will see here: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/02/photosynthesis .html. But, wind and solar are not limited in this way so you seem to be selecting you example rather poorly.

See Atlantic v. Andersen, where an Oregon RICO case has been filed against them.

I've been collecting a list of links I call Liberated Music.

They're not within their rights. Their complaint is based upon a false, basically fictional, reading of copyright law, and upon zero evidence. See Elektra v. Barker and their "expert witness" deposition.

They're not within their rights. Their complaint is based upon a false, basically fictional, reading of copyright law, and upon zero evidence. See Elektra v. Barker and their "expert witness" deposition.

You seem to be saying that nuclear power is better than coal power, a dubious claim, but also a logical fallacy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma. The real choice is between depletable resources and renewable resources. In terms of safety, reliability, prudence and, now, price the renewable resources win.
--
Save money with solar: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

This study http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/technical -articles/transmission/cigre/present-limits-of-ver y-long-distance-transmission-systems/index.shtml suggests that 7000 km transmission legs might be economically feasible. On the other hand, keeping Bagdad supplied with electricity is proving more difficult than keeping it supplied with generator fuel since trucks provide a work around for attacks against oil pipelines. It seems to me that what is really going on is that the sunk costs for current power generation provide inertia against which your plan has to push. What is needed is to make renewables cheaper than fossil fuel costs so that fossil fuel (and nuclear) plants have to operate at a loss to compete. This may mean placing renewable power generation closer to where it is consumed for the present.
--
Generate clean power at home: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

The one with fatalities is listed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civilian_nucl ear_accidents here. This raises a very serious issue. How complete is the list of accidents? The one in 2006 in Sweden suggests that modern plants can't be operated safely but that the risk of a very large accident is one in forty years at the present level of reliance on nuclear power. If the list is very incomplete, as this cover up might urge us to consider, then the risk of large accidents could be much higher than one in forty years at the present level of reliance on nuclear power. In that case, increasing our reliance on nuclear power seems foolhardy and decommisioning existing plants on an accelerated schedule would be a good policy to adopt.
--
Fusion power today: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

I was thinking the same thing. At Dell we have everything shutdown. http://dellcomputerdeal.blogspot.com/ great place to find the deals I get at work.

http://dellcomputerdeal.blogspot.com/ Has great deals on dell computers that you can use to travel the world and work with. Check it out.

Balmer should look inward before throwing stones at Google.

According to mini, MS is planning on hiring an additional 10-12k people in the Seattle area. No one really seems to know why these people would be hired or what they would be doing. Pre-emptive strike against Google to keep talent off the market? From what I hear MS is a fat, bloated company already. Think of all the people getting paid to do nothing once another 12k people show up at the office.

GNUstep has a lot of different projects to offer - from entry level improvements for the beginner (like compiling the missing classes in GNUstep compared to current Cocoa and creating the header files) to advanced tasks like porting Apple's WebKit over to GNUstep (here you would need proper ObjC++ and C++ skills) or improving GNUsteps integration into the MS Windows Platform (tighter integration into the Windows look and feel, Windows programming skills are welcome). So there is something for everybody.

newspieces:

http://digg.com/programming/GNUstep_participates_i n_Google_Summer_of_Code_2007
http://gnustep.blogspot.com/2007/03/summer-of-code -2007.html

ideas:

http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Summer_Of_Code_2 007 (the wiki requires a registration here: webmasters@gnustep.org since we got a lot of wikispam before)

regards, Lars

Obligatory link

I believe that actually will happen, because the judge has specifically provided that Ms. Foster can supplement her fee application after the RIAA is done with its fake 'discovery' on 'reasonableness', and denied the RIAA's application to change that provision.

I believe that actually will happen, because the judge has specifically provided that Ms. Foster can supplement her fee application after the RIAA is done with its fake 'discovery' on 'reasonableness', and denied the RIAA's application to change that provision.

I believe that actually will happen, because the judge has specifically provided that Ms. Foster can supplement her fee application after the RIAA is done with its fake 'discovery' on 'reasonableness', and denied the RIAA's application to change that provision.

As far as I am aware, there's no information about RIAA cases that have progressed to trial yet -- see http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/#tri al ("We do not have information on any trials, although it would seem that there must have been some, especially in cases where the defendants are representing themselves, without legal counsel.")

So by that token, one could say that the RIAA has not "lost" a trial related to internet piracy, either.

As I read it this just means that the data were put back into electronic form. This happens very often in science since many studies exist as hardcopy only after some passage of time. You have to enter data tables either by hand or with OCR and figures have to be measured with a ruler or with data ripoff software. NASA's ADS provides DEXTER for this purpose: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs_doc/help_pages/dexte r.html.
--
Measure the Sun with daily reports in electronic format: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html