Slashdot Mirror


Russia's War on Piracy/Malicious Software

tmk writes "Russian minister Leonid Reiman has announced new legislation to fight software piracy. According to official information the share of pirated software in the Russian Federation decreased in the last years from 90 to 60 percent. Reiman dismissed as a myth the impression that many viruses originate in his country: 'Viruses are written all over the world. Russia is waging a consistent and successful war on malicious software.' Reiman calls for an international organization to fight Internet crime. Last year Russia agreed to take down Allofmp3 after the United States intervened."

150 comments

  1. Copyright and fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are natural partners. Expect the USA, China and Russia to embrace draconian copyright law enforcement as an _excuse_ to monitor and control all transmission of information with their borders. All copyrightists are scum.

    1. Re:Copyright and fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, just keep in mind that when that same government is mugging you for crappy things like Socialist Security et al., those thuggings are somehow OK.
      Because CNN said so.

    2. Re:Copyright and fascism by teh+kurisu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US is just defending their interests abroad. They are the largest exporter of copyrighted material in the world, and large-scale copyright infringement abroad can have an effect on American jobs.

      All copyrightists are scum.

      By that logic, people who use the GPL are scum, since it is copyright law that prevents non-GPL derivatives.

    3. Re:Copyright and fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      GPL users aren't copyrightists - the FSF line has always been "Without copyright, the GPL would be unenforceable. It would also be unnecessary.". Using copyright doesn't make you a copyrightist - supporting copyright law does.

      As to hurting american jobs? So what - you're making the classic "broken window fallacy" error. Should we all smash windows to keep glaziers employed?

      And do bear in mind that international opinion of the USA is at an all-time low - there are plenty of people who wouldn't normally even think to infringe copyright, but once they hear america claiming that doing so might hurt USA's interests, they do so with abandon,

    4. Re:Copyright and fascism by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We already embrace draconian copyright law and we already monitor all transmissions (it's called echelon or whatever they're calling it these days).

      And for people who are going to say "hey, the RIAA/MPAA/BSA/US Government are only protecting our interests abroad!"... um... no. They are only protecting corporate interests abroad and doing so by manipulating and demanding how other nations will behave.

      This is a case of American corporations not liking the laws other nations have within their own borders. The reason we want to change their laws and force them to abide by our broken copyright systems is the same reason we want them to become democracies and the same reason that we allow corporations to do business in countries that are a risk to our nation by threat of military actions, spying and have terribly humanitarian records. That reason being that corporations have saturated existing markets. Everyone who is going to by a Justin Timberlake CD in America, Austrlia and the United Kingdom already has done so. To continue expanding their corporations, they need to expand into new markets.

      Helping bring other countries into competition with us at the expense of our own nation and citizens will eventually level them off to a point where they can all afford to buy our CDs and DVDs and videogames, as long as their legal systems and copyright systems (which we will force them to devise and comply with to our liking). Meanwhile, the average person in America and the UK can have their lifestyles seriously reduced in quality before they will no longer be capable or willing to buy content from these corporations.

    5. Re:Copyright and fascism by EzInKy · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Yeah, just keep in mind that when that same government is mugging you for crappy things like Socialist Security et al., those thuggings are somehow OK.

      Because CNN said so.


      Actually Social Security began long before CNN was even a gleam in Ted's eye in an attempt to keep the millions of hopeless people from "thugging" the rich at a time when pure capitalism proved to be a great failure.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    6. Re:Copyright and fascism by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      The stuff about "all copyrightists(sic!) are scum" is silly, but he may have stumbled across something. How come this "call to law and order" comes just as Putin puts together a national body to "oversee" all media, a body which is just ripe for censorship and abuse of human rights? I smell a big two-faced rat here.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    7. Re:Copyright and fascism by mrbluze · · Score: 3, Funny

      What I'd like to know is, why does everything have to be a "War on Something" nowadays?

      The more they advertise something, the more likely that "something" is the opposite of what's stated. For example:

      • Department of Health = Department of The Sick
      • Freedom of Information = Prevention of access to information
      • Working for Government Benefits = Working for Practically Nothing
      • War on Terror = War on Peace

      Let's declare war on war!

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    8. Re:Copyright and fascism by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to know is, why does everything have to be a "War on Something" nowadays?

      Haven't you heard ?
      We've always been at war with Eastasia^H^H^H^H^HOceania ...

  2. I can't wait by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Russia agreed to shut down Allofmp3
    "The government will be expected to begin complying by June 1, 2007."

    They only agreed to it is so they could get into the WTO.
    We'll see how strong their resolve is & how quickly Allofmp3 returns.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  3. Allofmp3 by Venik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Allofmp3 is still alive and well. What happens to it in June, when new legislation is enabled, is not at all clear. I doubt they will just disappear. As to levels of software piracy in Russia, I doubt they are as high as in the US.

    1. Re:Allofmp3 by bockelboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh... you've never been to Russia, have you?

      Walk to the subway station, and there are about 5 vendors who will happily sell you pirated version of any music CD, most DVDs, and almost any software for $5.

      While there are plenty of people who download software in the US, you'll have a hard time finding that sort of rampant piracy in the US.

      In fact, in Russia, I only remember one store where I could buy non-pirated CDs. The piracy isn't even the same order of magnitude.

    2. Re:Allofmp3 by efence · · Score: 1

      Piracy in Russia is still rampant. Most stores are still selling pirate software exclusively. As well as many organizations are running it.

    3. Re:Allofmp3 by Venik · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, I am from Russia. Just because they sell pirated software in Moscow subways, does not mean there is more software piracy going on there than in the US. There are many more computer users in the US and in the "West" in general. Many Russians don't even have computers at home, so why would they need to pirate software? Don't confuse Moscow with Russia.

    4. Re:Allofmp3 by cyclone96 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Walk to the subway station, and there are about 5 vendors who will happily sell you pirated version of any music CD, most DVDs, and almost any software for $5.

      I actually put that to the test last time I was in Moscow. Was in one of the high end shopping districts near Red Square and walked up to one of the multitudes of CD street vendors. Asked her if she had Borat (which had been released to theaters only a couple of weeks before, and is actually banned in Russia).

      Yup, had it. Just under the table. Commanded a premium price though, I seem to remember it was around 300 rubles (about $10).

      --
      Worst...sig...ever!
    5. Re:Allofmp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I respect your desire to defend your country, however you're incorrect. There is simply truckloads of evidence that Russia and its former republics are huge pirate dens. Sorry, but it's well known and well documented.

    6. Re:Allofmp3 by drix · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh... you've never been to Russia, have you?

      Actually, I am from Russia. Rarely has the entire essence of what this site stands for been summed up in so few lines.
      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    7. Re:Allofmp3 by Venik · · Score: 1

      What kind of trucks are we talking about here? Tonka trucks? Do you have any specific numbers that compare software piracy in Russia vs software piracy in the US? Or is your opinion is based solely on Microsoft's press releases?

    8. Re:Allofmp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Last time I was in Russia ( no, not Moscow ), I had to look for an internet point for hours. When finally found, it was an old PC running winME on a dial up... Yes no doubt piracy is "quite common" there, but seems people just care less, noone dies, noone gets jailed for life if he sells some music CDs on street. Western price is same 5-10$ per music CD? 100-200 rubels? = 1/10th - 1/20th of an average salary. But in west, we are all proud, especially US. We hate pirates, yet enjoy bittorrent downloads on our fancy 10mbit connections.

    9. Re:Allofmp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia sites stand for you!

    10. Re:Allofmp3 by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Meh. Why go all the way to Moscow? It's just as easy to go to Canal Street in New York City for anything from DVDs to designer watches and bags to surprisingly good salsa.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    11. Re:Allofmp3 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Just because they sell pirated software in Moscow subways, does not mean there is more software piracy going on there than in the US. There are many more computer users in the US and in the "West" in general.
      It all depends on how you calculate it. If it's by absolute number of users pirating software, or "lost" profits, then you are of course right. But the number we see more often is the percentage of all users who use pirated software - and that is certainly much higher in Russia. The 60% figure is a joke as well, I'd be surprised if it's less than 80% in Moscow (where businesses are forced to move to legit software these days), and something around 99% in the rest of the country (where noone really cares, and businesses use pirated software no less than home users do).
    12. Re:Allofmp3 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Nothing will happen to allofmp3. They will just move to Ukraine. Or even Belarus. Good luck pressing the latter to reform their copyright laws to match the ones of the US...

    13. Re:Allofmp3 by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Canal Street isn't exactly a "high end shopping district," though.

  4. obligatory by Ixlr8 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia malicious software fights you!

    --
    -- Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Regarding intellectual property, the Soviet Russia joke is (unfortunately) more accurate when reversed :

      e.g. : In Soviet Russia, you own your software, in America your software owns you.

    2. Re:obligatory by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      The second I saw the title, I knew in my heart that I'd find a Soviet Russia joke here.

    3. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the joke finds YOU.

    4. Re:obligatory by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      Oh snap!

  5. Great. I can't wait till... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the Chinese, Russians, Americans, etc come looking for me because I use http://www.openpgp.org/, http://www.truecrypt.org/, and http://www.openvpn.net/.

    -terrified Canadian

  6. yarr, malicious software must go... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    but thy pirates will keep dem treasures buried and safe. To all Prussian pirates, Yarr maties!

    1. Re:yarr, malicious software must go... by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      First of all, 'thy' is improperly used.

      Second, you've got the word 'but' and 'pirates' MUCH too close to each other for my liking.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:yarr, malicious software must go... by init100 · · Score: 1

      Yarr maties!

      Do you know why this yarr phrase is associated with pirates? I see it everywhere on the 'net, but I fail to see the connection. My spontaneous guess is that it comes from some movie, but I really haven't got the faintest idea.

    3. Re:yarr, malicious software must go... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your guess is right. The actor playing Long John Silver in this movie started this "pirate dialect" tradition that included "arr" and "matey".

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  7. Damn! by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For instance, a number of plants that were producing illegal copies of CDs and DVDs have been closed down

    Damn!
    --
    for sale
    I'm a self-modifying sig virus
    1. Re:Damn! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, I think Damn is still producing cracks, but I could be wrong.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  8. Russian Pirates, by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    that is, [cough]. YARR!

  9. Eye witness report. by rumith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am system administrator in a large nuclear physics institute in Moscow, which is by no mere coincidence a vital part of the Russian internet backbone. Since my day one I've been advocating Linux and free software, and here's the fruit: already about 10% of the institute's workers, including the director himself, use various distributions of Linux [mostly Ubuntu/Debian, Mandriva and Red Hat]. Besides, I'm currently engaged in talks with Sun regarding our migration to Sun Ray, which will run on a customized Debian system.

    I believe that if the result will look as I expect it to, the university [it's the largest university in Russia and AFAIK Europe] which we are a significant part of might break off Microsoft crap in toto, although this statement can be considered a pure speculation at this moment.

    1. Re:Eye witness report. by rumith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is connected if you engage your brain a little, little troll. The piracy-fighting hype [among which was the physics faculty wide order to remove all the pirated software from faculty computers before March, 31th] was one of the reasons the migration was started in the first place. So I brought this in to show that yes, the piracy rate is decreasing, but not quite the way Microsoft and BSA would like it to.

    2. Re:Eye witness report. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      This is good, I often times wonder how people that buy pirated software know that there isn't spyware embedded in it or a rootkit preinstalled on the disc for reinfection each time the software is reinstalled.

      At least with Linux, it is fairly easy to know where the code is coming from and verify that it is the same as all the other copies.

    3. Re:Eye witness report. by heinousjay · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So all I had to do was add context not suggested by either the article, or your post, and it all made sense. I can see how that's reasonable.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:Eye witness report. by westlake · · Score: 1
      At least with Linux, it is fairly easy to know where the code is coming from and verify that it is the same as all the other copies.

      Is it still so easy when your only source for Linux is the sidewalk vendor and your only access to the net is the Internet Cafe?

    5. Re:Eye witness report. by N3Roaster · · Score: 1

      Yes. You hash your copy, go to the Internet cafe and check that your hash matches the hash of what you thought you were getting. It isn't fool proof, but it probably is good enough.

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    6. Re:Eye witness report. by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Free software IS piracy!

      Damn Russian communists!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  10. Stop the slanting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Call it what it is, "Data duplication." Or perhaps even "copyright infringement."

    Stop calling it "piracy." This nomenclature implies a very debatable moral judgment. Since it is quite obvious that data duplication does not include rape or murder, it is a very ill-fitting term to begin with.

    Just stop using it.

    1. Re:Stop the slanting by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That will probably happen just after the media (and everyone else) stops misconstruing the word "hacker".

      In other words, not soon.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Stop the slanting by h2g2bob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keep calling it pirating - pirates are cool!

    3. Re:Stop the slanting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      OED:

      2. The unauthorized reproduction or use of an invention or work of another, as a book, recording, computer software, intellectual property, etc., esp. as constituting an infringement of patent or copyright; plagiarism; an instance of this.
      [1654 J. MENNES Recreation for Ingenious Head-peeces clxxvi, All the wealth, Of wit and learning, not by stealth, Or Piracy, but purchase got.] 1700 E. WARD Journey to Hell II. vii. 14 Piracy, Piracy, they cry'd aloud, What made you print my Copy, Sir, says one, You're a meer Knave, 'tis very basely done. 1770 P. LUCKOMBE Conc. Hist. Printing 76 They..would suffer by this act of piracy, since it was likely to prove a very bad edition. 1855 D. BREWSTER Mem. Life I. Newton (new ed.) I. iv. 71 With the view of securing his invention of the telescope from foreign piracy. 1886 Cent. Mag. Feb. 629/1 That there are many publishers who despise such piracy..does not remove the presumption that publishers and papermakers have been influential opponents of an equitable arrangement. 1977 Gramophone Apr. 1527/3 Governments have begun to realize that unauthorized reproduction of records (so-called piracy) adversely affects also the rights of..composers, authors and performers. 1996 China Post (Taipei) 1 May 16/3 Authorities here said they have cracked down on piracy in recent years, but foreign computer firms claim they are still soft on piracy.

      The term "piracy" has been used in this context for centuries. Nobody, reading about piracy as in copyright infringement, makes any mental association with the original definition of pirate in any way, since the alternate definition is something they have grown up with. If you want proof, just look at The Pirate Bay. If they honestly thought there would be serious negative connotations, would they name it that? It's not like the term "theft", where there are valid reasons to argue it (e.g., the fact that theft is still a very real problem in people's minds, thus equating the two could sway their opinion). Get over it.
    4. Re:Stop the slanting by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, fine. You're not a "pirate". You're a "data duplicator". And the RIAA still wants to sue your ass.

    5. Re:Stop the slanting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...Linux is a stinking pile of shit.

      hmmm, and how is this is on topic?

    6. Re:Stop the slanting by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      What does "piracy" have to do with rape and murder? Pirates are *really cool* guys like Captain Jack Sparrow who try to look tough but are really good at heart. "Pirate" is also a somewhat amusing term for people who like to share data that other people are trying to sell.

      Trying to fight against the terminology at this point is silly. It's much faster and easier to just accept the term and run with "Pirates are cool" - it's not like the term really has any negative connotation at all among people young enough to make a difference culturally.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    7. Re:Stop the slanting by h2g2bob · · Score: 1

      That's not what I said. What I said was "Keep calling it pirating - pirates are cool!"

    8. Re:Stop the slanting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright then. The term "nigger" is scientific and being used for centuries. But it is prohibited in some areas of USA. Why? I don't know. But the term "nigger" or "jew" is definitely less insulting than a pirate.

  11. ISR by eneville · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia virus makes you!!

    1. Re:ISR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I can't think of any good Russian reversal jokes either.
      Would be so funny...
      It's a travesty, but at least you tried...

      Also, it would be virus writes you.

    2. Re:ISR by eneville · · Score: 1

      I know, I can't think of any good Russian reversal jokes either.
      Would be so funny...
      It's a travesty, but at least you tried...

      Also, it would be virus writes you. yes, the article had so much promise, but the headline just didnt have enough material for a good joke. i think its obligatory that we all make the jokes now.
  12. Imperialism by iamacat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why else would a country enact laws against the interests of both country's population and its future economic power? I can see limited term copyright laws being beneficial in Russia, but only with exemptions for income levels and educational use. How does anyone benefit from a kid being computer illiterate because his parents one year salary still can not buy Vista, Office and Photoshop? If one day oil cartel countries force US women to wear burkas, you will know how that feels. Stop mucking with democratically chosen laws of sovereign nations.

    1. Re:Imperialism by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why else would a country enact laws against the interests of both country's population and its future economic power?

      To keep your domestic cultural product -- your cultural heritage -- from being utterly extinquished by cheap foreign imports?

      Copy Wrong: Internet Piracy and Dickens and Melville

      To help build and protect an export market?

      How much do you suppose "James Bond" and "Harry Potter" have returned to the UK? J.K. Rowling went from being on the dole to being richer than the Queen in under ten years.

    2. Re:Imperialism by cyclop · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate copyright and agree with you, the potential benefit of it all could be a massive switch to free software. Let's wait and see (not that I have many hopes...)

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    3. Re:Imperialism by stubear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Stop mucking with democratically chosen laws of sovereign nations."

      Russia is requesting membership into the WTO and part one of the requirements is to respect international copyright law. They are more than welcome to ignore international copyright laws all they want but it will come at the cost of not being allowed membership into the WTO.

    4. Re:Imperialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WTO needs russia, not vice-versa. Russia should grow a spine. But of course, the fact of the matter is that Putin WANTS strong copyright law and is using this shit as an excuse to get it. Copyright is just the state power to censor* sliced into chunks and doled out to the state's cronies.

      * No semantic games: if you can be restricted from passing on any information at your discretion to a willing recipient, you're being censored. Censorship by copyright holders is commonplace and may be accepted in america, but is little different to censorship by the state.

    5. Re:Imperialism by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Copywrite's got little to do with pricing levels. There's nothing to stop companies like Microsoft releasing their products at lower prices on the streets of Russia and China than they do on the streets of the US. This is the whole "what the market will bear" thing, after all. Capitalism was meant to be about that.

      Given the above, how is copywrite law against the interests of the population and future economic power? Do you fundamentally disagree with the concept of copywrite, or do you disagree with the pricing models set up by US software companies?

    6. Re:Imperialism by MadJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But do they really need more than 50 years of monopoly on their copyrighted material?
      How long did it take JK Rowling to earn that much money? Certainly not the amount of time that currently is set in the copyright laws. It's just too long. A lot of great content is locked up by this law, no one in this generation will ever learn of them if this law will still stand.

      I'm not against copyright laws, but the ones in place right now are outright ludicrous in regards to amount of time they span.

    7. Re:Imperialism by davecarlotub · · Score: 1

      Copywrite? Sounds like some obscure backup command...

    8. Re:Imperialism by servognome · · Score: 1

      How does anyone benefit from a kid being computer illiterate because his parents one year salary still can not buy Vista, Office and Photoshop?
      There are many alternatives that would make a kid actually computer literate rather than just another powerpoint whiz.
      It is in the best interests of countries to not develop their economic infrastructure based primarily on a foreign product like Windows. Because if they continue allowing copyright violations then the rich countries impose sanctions and stifle investment. Also, Cold war hysteria aside, there is the possibility of the US government working with Microsoft to track/steal information (only to stop terrorists of course).
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    9. Re:Imperialism by westlake · · Score: 1
      Certainly not the amount of time that currently is set in the copyright laws. It's just too long. A lot of great content is locked up by this law, no one in this generation will ever learn of them if this law will still stand.

      There are over 1,000 titles in print in the Penguin Classics series alone. 750 pounds of books. 80 linear feet. The Penguin Classics Complete

      The Movies Unlimited catalog runs to 800 pages.

      Conservation costs money. Restoration costs money. That is why your $2 commercial DVD rip of a movie from a public domain source and not a studio master looks and sounds like crap.

      There is nothing significant missing from the Disney studio achieves. Its archieves are self-financing.

      That can be said of almost no other film and television studio in the world.

    10. Re:Imperialism by iamacat · · Score: 1

      J.K. Rowling went from being on the dole to being richer than the Queen in under ten years.

      In the meantime, if copyright laws were not so strict, other writers would be able to get off welfare to decent living by writing additional stories in Harry Potter universe. In time, some of them would build up their reputation and publish further books unrelated to Harry Potter. UK would have a thousand new good writers, J.K. Rowling would still be doing well and British people would avoid the embarrassment of having a few books valued more than a thousand years of tradition.

    11. Re:Imperialism by MadJo · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that we don't have to be able to preserve content, because Disney's stuff is well preserved? In other words, only Disney makes content that's worthy of preservation.

      Are you serious?

      There are a lot (and I do mean a lot) of content that's missing from public record, and we are denied access to it, by these insane laws.

      The copyright-law's intention is to encourage content creators to make new content, and to have a short period of monopoly on their product, before it went into public domain for other people to build on. In the olden days people were able to stand on the shoulders of giants, if you do that right now with music or film, you can be certain to be sued to oblivion and back.

      btw, when was the last time you could buy a copy of Steamboat Willie? You know that first piece of film where Mortimer -Oh excuse me- Mickey Mouse played a part. It might be well-preserved, but we, the people, aren't allowed to make remixes of it, or create a sequel on it (if we would desire to do so)

    12. Re:Imperialism by iamacat · · Score: 1

      China has censorship, forced abortions and is threatening to invade an independent, peaceful nation. They are in WTO. India has widow burning and widespread starvation right next to prosperous technology parks. They are in WTO. If an organization puts copying mp3s above burning people alive, perhaps it's not in a decent country's interest to seek membership.

    13. Re:Imperialism by iamacat · · Score: 0

      It's not a priority of companies like Microsoft to sell to poor people, say like 90% of russian population. Well-off individual should be indeed required to buy software for a limited (say, 7 years) duration of copyright. There is no point to impose this restriction on people who are not able to financially reward the content creator.

    14. Re:Imperialism by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      I generally agree with you. However, you should know that Steamboat Willie is included on the 'Mickey Mouse in Black and White, vol. 1' DVD. You can get it on Amazon.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    15. Re:Imperialism by AdonaiElohim · · Score: 1

      There are over 1,000 titles in print in the Penguin Classics series alone. 750 pounds of books. 80 linear feet. The Penguin Classics Complete
      The Movies Unlimited catalog runs to 800 pages.
      Conservation costs money. Restoration costs money. That is why your $2 commercial DVD rip of a movie from a public domain source and not a studio master looks and sounds like crap.
      There is nothing significant missing from the Disney studio achieves. Its archieves are self-financing.
      That can be said of almost no other film and television studio in the world.


      1) I don't understand why you wrote any of that. What is your point? That the Penguin Classics series is a large and thick series? That some other book is large and thick? That the Disney studio "achieves" are large and admirable and probably many feet thick? So what?

      2) My $2 commercial DVD rips look and sound SPECTACULAR. But thanks for trying.

    16. Re:Imperialism by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I suggest telling Adobe and Microsoft to die in a fire and using Free Software that can be fully supported locally instead. These harsh copyright laws are doing you a favor - why let yourself get sucked in to the upgrade treadmill and culture-crushing poor local language support that is proprietary software?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    17. Re:Imperialism by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Right. If only these brilliant writers didn't actually have to come up with an idea of their own to be able to sell books, they'd be able to write best-selling novels!

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    18. Re:Imperialism by iamacat · · Score: 1

      It's called popular culture. To break in, you need to start with something people are already familiar with. You don't see many vampire novels that do not mention Vlad Dracula, and these days it would be tough to write a really successful magician novel that doesn't mention Harry Potter. Why do you think J.K.Rowling stuck with magic wands, unicorns, giants and house elves? She should have come up with her own ideas to sell books!

    19. Re:Imperialism by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between coming up with original characters and creating a whole new genre, or by your arguments Rowling would have needed to write about Merlin to be at all successful.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    20. Re:Imperialism by stubear · · Score: 1

      I don't think China or India should be members either but they are and there's little that can be done about it now. Russia, however, is not a member and they are violating the laws of the WTO by allowing rampant piracy, therefore they are being denied entrance. Others doing something illegal is no excuse for one's own illegal actions.

    21. Re:Imperialism by iamacat · · Score: 1

      and there's little that can be done about it now

      Why is that, surely they can be expelled from WTO for using increased profits it brings for oppressing their own population and violating international laws?

      Others doing something illegal is no excuse for one's own illegal actions.

      It's a matter of legal debate

  13. An article +pix on huge pirate market Gorbushka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cracking down? So why is Gorbushka growing?

    Have a look here:

    http://www.moscow-blog.com/?p=202

  14. War on piracy...pffft! by iminplaya · · Score: 0

    What we need is a war on copyright. That's your REAL piracy, right there. The only legitimate issue is plagiarism. Everything else is no different from the old railroad monopolies maintaining their turf. It is pure robbery.

    So put down your keyboard and pick up a gun
    We're gonna have a whole lotta fun
    And it's one, two, three
    What are we fightin' for
    Don't ask me I don't give a damn
    Next stop is Disneyland
    And it's five, six, seven
    Open up them big steel gates
    Aint no time to wonder why
    WHOOPIE! we're all gonna buy...

    --
    What?
    1. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      What we need is a war on copyright. That's your REAL piracy, right there. The only legitimate issue is plagiarism. Everything else is no different from the old railroad monopolies maintaining their turf. It is pure robbery. That's only too true. Fortunately, there are some freedom fighters left: http://pirate-party.us/ , http://www2.piratpartiet.se/international/english
      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by westlake · · Score: 1
      So put down your keyboard and pick up a gun
      We're gonna have a whole lotta fun

      The call to arms from the privileged elite. You never quite know whether to cry or to laugh.

    3. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The call to arms from the privileged elite.

      Yeah. Just like the old days. Kinda makes me nostalgic.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You actually believe there's no benefit whatsoever to copyright? I haven't heard this a lot. Most people want to see copyright reformed - with reasonable limits on exclusivity before the content enters the public domain. Is it your opinion that copyright just shouldn't exist? And if that is the case, do you also see no value whatsoever in what copyright offers?

    5. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "privileged elites" are people from families like Gates, Kennedy, Bush and so on, the modern american aristocracy. Tech geeks are not "privileged elites", nowadays often making less than unskilled construction workers, at least where I am - it is copyright and patent law that places artificial limits on human ingenuity and the uniquely human ability (at least in degree) to learn from others and apply that learning and keeps the geek down. It's past time to reject it.

      If programming worked like the way lawyers draft legal documents (intrinsically open-source - funny how you don't see lawyers suing over patents on innovative legal strategies or complaining that another contract has clauses inspired by one they drafted! The Lawyer elite knows and understands the benefits of unlimited open source, they just don't want us non-privileged-elite tech geeks to be allowed to have them too), then programmer salaries would be on a par with lawyers.

    6. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is my opinion that copyright should not exist, except for anti-plagiarism provisions (i.e. no right to restrict redistibution, only a right to be identified as the author of a work). Copyright has brought us the USA's "culture". If attacking copyright diminishes the power of the USA, that has got to be a good thing.

    7. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      I see a distinct value in affirming author's moral rights; to be recognized as the author/creator and to be able to prevent misuse of their works, such as them being used to promote values clearly not in line with the author's.

      If the reason is to create artificial scarcity in an effort to maintain a certain type of private monopoly, I see no societal use for copyrights whatsoever.

      US copyright has good fair use, European copyrights have good moral rights. I'd like to see those two combined and the rest stripped away as much as possible.

      Here's a piece to think about: http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/10/07/opinion/eds miers.php

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    8. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      I've created this: http://www.p-i-x.net/ What have you created?

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    9. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 1

      "If the reason is to create artificial scarcity in an effort to maintain a certain type of private monopoly, I see no societal use for copyrights whatsoever."
      If an author creates a work that is read by tens of thousands but only actually sold it to 1 person, who then copied it and profited, that author will not continue to have the time to write other works because he'll need to have another job to pay the bills. Do you not see it that way?

    10. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      If an author creates a work that is read by tens of thousands but only actually sold it to 1 person, who then copied it and profited, that author will not continue to have the time to write other works because he'll need to have another job to pay the bills. Do you not see it that way?

      No, simply because this is not what actually happens. It is a theoretical worst case scenario with no grounding whatsoever in reality. First off, how do you propose this person could profit from the author's work? He does not have the author's support in selling copies (no book-signing tour, no live gigs, no nothing), no advantage in production (printing and distribution costs are the same whether or not you are the author) and he still has to out-sell the author by a 10 000-to-1 margin. That's quite impressive.

      Now, let's say this person instead makes a digital copy and releases it for free. What happens? Well, we actually know what happens since not only do several authors give away their books for free (Cory Doctorow, Larry Lessig, to name but a few) as does several bands and record companies. They still sell lots of books and records, even though the subject matter is available for free. Most report increased sales after freeing their content, due to the advertising value in doing so.
      People are willing to pay, even if there is a free option. Sometimes the motive is a perceived increase of value in the "real deal" but often, it is simply the easiest way to confer appreciation to the author. Paypal donor buttons work pretty well for many on-line comic artists, even though it is totally free to read their strips. Heck, Scott Adams is pretty well off, even though I can read Dilbert for free every day. I give away my pictures for free on the web and rake in the Adsense dough (OK, I don't get rich, but it's paid for a brand new camera). Judging by the competition, I could not realistically expect to sell a single copy of any of my images. :-)

      Also, there's yet another flaw in your argument: You pre-suppose that it is not the norm today that author's have day jobs. They do. There is a large (and growing) industry of printer/publishers who, instead of giving you an advance on your upcoming book, simply charge you for printing and distributing it. And people flock to them in droves.

      There is simply no reason to assume that people create things only because they may sell a copy some day. People create things of their own volition today, on their own time, on their own dime. Very, very few can live off creating and manage without that day job. The rich artist is to a very large extent a myth created by the publishing industries to avoid having to pay reasonable wages. "Don't worry, you'll live in luxury off the royalties later, we'll just deduct this expense from them, no worries". The result? This: http://www.negativland.com/albini.html

      There's an anecdote about a similar situation (which apparently copyright does not actually protect against in all cases):

      The first edition of The Lord of the Rings to be published in the United States was a pirated edition from Ace Books. For reasons which I now forget, Tolkien could not take legal action against Ace. But when Ballantine came out with its own official author-approved American edition of The Lord of the Rings, Tolkien started a campaign against the Ace edition. The Ballantine edition was released with a notice from Tolkien in a green box on the back cover stating that this was the only authorized edition, and urging any reader with respect for living authors to purchase no other. Moreover, every time he answered a fan letter from an American reader, Tolkien appended a footnote explaining the situation and requesting that the recipient spread the word among Tolkien fans that the Ace edition should be boycotted.
      Although the Ace edition was cheaper than the Ballantine, it quickly lost readers and went out of print. The boycott was successfu

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    11. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 1

      "He does not have the author's support in selling copies (no book-signing tour, no live gigs, no nothing), no advantage in production (printing and distribution costs are the same whether or not you are the author) and he still has to out-sell the author by a 10 000-to-1 margin.
      The author wants his book distributed in a certain format, let's say hardcover. Barnes and Noble purchases a single hardcover and begins printing paperback editions and/or digital copies that the author did not want his work published in. Without copyright, this is completely legal and since Barnes and Noble owns the distribution chain, they'll have no problem outselling him. In fact, they can choose not to carry the author's release so there's really no competition in many areas.

      "Well, we actually know what happens since not only do several authors give away their books for free (Cory Doctorow, Larry Lessig, to name but a few) as does several bands and record companies."
      You can't cite a niche of the market and say it will apply to the whole. That's not good statistical analysis, "we" do not know how it will work.

      "You pre-suppose that it is not the norm today that author's have day jobs."
      No I do not. I do pre-suppose that authors supplement their income with secondary jobs but they do earn money on the writing they do. My worst case scenario takes that away and so there's no incentive for them to continue.

      "There is simply no reason to assume that people create things only because they may sell a copy some day."
      I never made that assumption. I do believe that it is in society's best interests to allow the author some control over work after the sale though.

      I would appreciate a more respectful tone in any further replies.

    12. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they do earn money on the writing they do. My worst case scenario takes that away and so there's no incentive for them to continue.

      Again, even apart from the rest of your drivel, and not necessarily accepting their financial gain will be reduced, you apparently think the only incentive is monetary gain, basically. This reflects more on you than anyone else!

      We might (or might not) get less art without copyright law - but if get less art "inspired" primarily by the desire for financial gain (and even glorifying it - witness chart "rap" music!), that's fine by me.


      "There is simply no reason to assume that people create things only because they may sell a copy some day."/
      I never made that assumption.


      Er. Yes you did, blatantly. Lying troll-wannabe.

      I would appreciate a more respectful tone in any further replies.

      No doubt you might. You don't really deserve it though. Suck it down, chump.

    13. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by westlake · · Score: 1
      Yeah. Just like the old days. Kinda makes me nostalgic

      The Virginia planter was sunk in debt before the Revolution. The Virginia planter would be sunk in debt after the Revolution.

      Export low priced agricultural goods. Import high priced manufactured goods.

      Work the soil to exhaustion. Tie up your capital in slaves and land. Invest in nothing else.

      The trade financed at both ends by bankers in London and New York, at a very good rate of interest.

    14. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Meh. Moral rights don't actually exist, no one actually follows through on the idea, whatever they might say to the contrary, and they're a craptastic idea. Better to reform copyright from a wholly utilitarian approach (in which the object isn't to maintain a private monopoly, but to achieve societal goals through the careful and limited use of monopolies)

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    15. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by iminplaya · · Score: 0

      You actually believe there's no benefit whatsoever to copyright?

      Even I can see the benefits to copyright. What most people are confused about is WHO benefits from copyright. I, and maybe a few others understand that copyright is for the benefit of established distribution channels. Nothing else. It's that simple. The spin about "protecting the artist" is nothing more than a smokescreen. It is there to keep the public from understanding that it is a franchised monopoly, like the phone service was(still is, actually), cable, internet, etc. Copyright regulates who gets to distribute information, and creates a nice black market like any other prohibition. Which is actually controlled by the industry itself...until the damn internet and its P2P came along, and started blowing its cover. They are seriously trying to stuff the genie back into the bottle.

      --
      What?
    16. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      100% Overrated

      WooHoo! Drones with points! Way to hit a nerve!

      --
      What?
    17. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by gunny01 · · Score: 1

      Matthew Reilly published a book online, for free: Hover Car Racer. It still sold plenty of copies when it got to the bookstores and Matt's still rolling around in a DeLorean. And a Lotus. The point is, give people a bite, or even a whole serving, and if they like it, they'll come back for the next course.

      --
      kill all the fucking niggers
    18. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      Meh. Moral rights don't actually exist, no one actually follows through on the idea, whatever they might say to the contrary, and they're a craptastic idea. Better to reform copyright from a wholly utilitarian approach (in which the object isn't to maintain a private monopoly, but to achieve societal goals through the careful and limited use of monopolies) Moral rights do exist, in European copyright law. And on the whole they work pretty well, much like trademarks. You are 110% correct on the latter part of your post, though. I do however believe that moral rights would play an important part in that equation, particularly the right to be asserted as the author. That alone is probably worth much more as an incentive to create than a 1000-year copyright would be. Lots of people create stuff for recognition and fame alone and we will probably need some kind of moral rights structure to secure that. In effect, a ban on plagiarism via the establishment of trademark-like protection for creators.
      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    19. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you've said before that copyright is purely utilitarian, without any moral component, I'm think that's a bit disingenuous. Infringement of the right to free speech certainly has moral implications in my view. It's entirely possible society's interest in having new works created isn't sufficient to morally justify such an infringement on free speech. While I'm undecided on that question, it's a point of view I lean toward. Certainly, the less copyright the better.

      Still, I think the framework "moral rights" you decry aren't so easily dismissable. They, like copyright, obviously have utilitarian value (despite that enforcing them by government fiat is certainly less moral than not having them at all). I remember one particularly heated debate with one of my good friends, a writer, painter and (notwithstanding the foregoing) an anarchist, politically. When it came down to it, we both agreed that copyright should be significantly curtailed-if not eliminated-but we came to a vehement disagreement of the subject of plagiarism, attribution and the moral rights of the author. The idea that someone could take his work and put their name on it was too much for him. He was adamant he would stop creating if such a thing were legal and commonplace. If you did such a thing and he saw you in the street, he'd probably hit you ;). For him, part of what made creation satisfying enough to pursue was the attribution and the ability to prevent his name from being put on distortions of his work. So, clearly there's an incentive there -- one which serves the public interest in seeing works created -- just as there is in copyright.

      In many ways, many of the moral rights* are less of an infringement on free speech than copyright -- because they are so limited in the scope of what they restrict -- while accomplishing some of the same goals. Now, clearly there's value in plagiarism (just like there's value in derivative works and in freedom with regard to works). Imagine reading Marx or Ayn Rand or Bob Black without knowing those authors, or their associates, or when they wrote, or the history or zeitgeist that accompanied them, etc. That there is such value there might be enough to say that moral rights are a bad idea. On that point, too, I am undecided.

      * I certainly think the moral right to "unpublish" works you've published is, aside from being impossible, bullshit.

    20. Re:War on piracy...pffft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. I should hit preview more often: s/I'm think/I think, s/foregoing/following. :P

  15. I'm amazed at their distribution network. by khasim · · Score: 1

    Walk to the subway station, and there are about 5 vendors who will happily sell you pirated version of any music CD, most DVDs, and almost any software for $5.

    I think what you really meant to say was "most popular" and "newly released".

    The same in China. They bootleg whatever sells well ... right now.

    But they don't keep massive databanks of every DVD / CD / software ever produced. Ready to be burned, printed and sold to you.

    How could you tell the difference between pirated CD's and non-pirated CD's in a store? The ones I see appear identical to me.
  16. Yup, businesses now get audited and sued by melted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heard of this from a sysadmin friend who lives in Saratov, Russia. His company got raided and its owner was dragged to court and had to pay fines. Fines were substantial. He was also required to comply with licensing requirements in full, so fines weren't his only expenditure. I tried to "sell" them on Linux at least on the servers, but the boss is afraid of anything "free as in beer" now.

    1. Re:Yup, businesses now get audited and sued by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Get him to buy an Ubuntu desktop support package for $240 from Canonical and say that it includes unlimited desktop installs.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  17. In Soviet Russia... by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 0

    ...Allofmp3 take down YOU. (may god and /. mods forgive me)

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 1

      LOL, well I'm not surprised this got modded down, but... how on Earth can something be overrated that hasn't been rated yet?

  18. piracy rate 90% - 60%? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    Anyone believes Russian piracy rate has dropped from 90% to 60% over the last year(s) should instead believe the Russian government is capable of solving all their poverty and corruption problm by the end of this year.

  19. I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear fire by plasmacutter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    we have people starving in the streets in developing nations, nobody raises a stink about it.

    we have people dying of diseases that are curable or quite treatable because big pharma wants their patent money, you dont see anyone threatening to boot the US out for utter cruelty and neglect of human life.

    we have confirmed human rights violations (and related labor rights violations) across the boards with several of our major trading partners, and nobody raises a voice.

    but as soon as hollywood stirs ever so slightly... OMG WE GOTTA ACT KICK THIS ONE THREATEN THAT ONE. hell i wouldnt be surprised if we went to war because of it (and coincidentally, copyright laws more draconian than ours were one of the first institutions the provisional government set up in iraq, at the behest of monsanto)

    i hope we as a species die in a fire, preferrably nuclear, so the roaches can grow up and inherit the earth. theyre much cleaner, gentler creatures than we are.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  20. Allofmp3.com shut down? by gradster79 · · Score: 1

    Allofmp3.com is still operating as normal. www.allofmp3.com

    1. Re:Allofmp3.com shut down? by fyoder · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It operates within Russian law. There are two ways they can shut it down
      1. Poison everyone involved with radioactive pellets.
      2. Change the law so that allofmp3.com is operating outside it.

      Basically, American perception that the Russian gov't is shutting down allofmp3.com is a misperception, and one which I suspect the Russians are happy not to correct. Perhaps they'll get around to changing the law, but remember that allofmp3.com pays a cut to some Russian licensing agency -- not sure where that money goes, but wouldn't surprise me if money is finding its way into gov't coffers (or politicians' pockets?)

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    2. Re:Allofmp3.com shut down? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      There are two ways they can shut it down

            1. Poison everyone involved with radioactive pellets.
            2. Change the law so that allofmp3.com is operating outside it.


      An interesting sidenote... the RIAA were narrowly outvoted on that.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  21. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by Caspian · · Score: 1

    Here's to the Apocalypse. It's been a good run, but you're right, we're totally broken. *Raises a beer to toast the coming World War III*

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  22. Amsterdam to Russia with Love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 85% of the attack attempts at my site originate in Amsterdam but have a reference URL at ?????.by.ru These include filenames like cmd.txt, cmd.gif, r57.txt and such but, in reality, are scripts to compromise the system. The source IP is usually in Amsterdasm for some odd reason. Maybe the .NL people are lax in hacking enforcement. Just an observation anyway. Posted anonymously to protect my web site :)

  23. What about all the other AllofMyMP3s-like sites? by Sad+Adam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah right. There are literally 10s of other AllofMyMp3 like sites. They have flourished like mushrooms. And not just in Russia. They seem to run out of every former Soviet republic.

    Not to mention the incredibly effective job that street based anti-piracy enforcement has achieved.Not.

    At best, it provides another opportunity for the cops to shake down stall holders.

      I think you will find anyone selling pirated CDs finds it easier to pay the cops or copyright inspects an "on the spot fine". That way everyone is happy. The CD software seller gets to keep doing business, the cop is paid, the cops boss gets a cut, and business continues.

    What are you worried about? This is the market is supposed to work, after all.

  24. Re:Yup,but nothing to do with copyright.... by Sad+Adam · · Score: 1

    I would venture anything the reason he had to go to court was because some competitor in the same town had paid the inspector to raid him, and take him out.

    I'm around 100% certain these incidents have nothing to do with copyright violations, but are rather an extension of commercial warfare, Russian style.

  25. It's the bourgeois, stupid. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0

    Why else would a country enact laws against the interests of both country's population and its future economic power? I can see limited term copyright laws being beneficial in Russia, but only with exemptions for income levels and educational use. How does anyone benefit from a kid being computer illiterate because his parents one year salary still can not buy Vista, Office and Photoshop?
    It's the bourgeois. The bourgois will only act in their self-interest, and too bad if this goes against the national interests. The US has a lot of nice goodies for bourgois all over the world who will toe their line, so the bourgeois will always seek to subvert democratic institutions in order to please Uncle Sam, because when Uncle Sam is happy, he happily gives them little trinkets while they make money on the back of their own countries.
  26. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    You need to get out more and read a bit of overseas news.

    Your points may be good as far as they go, but they hardly capture the sum total of the Human Race. Still, if you feel this way and are certain that you're right, then go ahead - lead the charge into oblivion. You go on, and the rest of us will be along later.

  27. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    What developing nations have people starving in the streets? As far as I know the only starving people are in impoverished countries, and even then they aren't being ignored, we ARE trying to help. What have you done to help? These starving people deserve nothing from me, I have no obligation to help them and neither does anyone else, and yet we do because we have compassion for them. When you understand compassion and love, you will not want our species to die in a nuclear fire. Think about it.

    --
    Qxe4
  28. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by servognome · · Score: 0, Troll

    we have people starving in the streets in developing nations, nobody raises a stink about it.
    We try to get them food, but unfortunately people shoot at us when we do. If we shoot back then we are the evil ones.

    we have people dying of diseases that are curable or quite treatable because big pharma wants their patent money,
    And without the patent money, big pharma would never have developed many of those medicines in the first place.

    we have confirmed human rights violations (and related labor rights violations) across the boards with several of our major trading partners, and nobody raises a voice.
    We raise our voice, we protest, we issue statements of condemnation. There's nothing short of war we can do to stop such violations.

    hell i wouldnt be surprised if we went to war because of it
    I wouldn't doubt it in the next few decades, though probably not about the early release to the internet of the new 007 movie.
    Information is quickly becoming the most valuable commodity, and I'm sure widespread cybercrime will lead to global political conflict.

    i hope we as a species die in a fire, preferrably nuclear, so the roaches can grow up and inherit the earth. theyre much cleaner, gentler creatures than we are.
    Compared to the average /. reader... I think you may actually be right.
    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  29. Giggleski by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 2, Funny

    > "Russian minister Leonid Reiman has announced new legislation to fight software piracy."

    Oh Mercy Me! It's great to begin my week with a good joke!

  30. What is a "copyrightist?" by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    Is a "copyrightist" someone who believes that some form of copyright should exist? Or is a "copyrightist" someone who thinks copyright laws should be extended in duration and very strong in enforcement? Perhaps a "copyrightist" is someone who uses copyright enforcement as an excuse to implement invasive monitoring of information flow. Or is a "copyrightist" merely someone who disagrees with your views on copyright law?

    I may not know what a "copyrightist" is, but at least thanks to your cogent analysis, at least I know they're all scum. But I wonder, where do these "copyrightists" fit on the Scum Ladder? Are they scummier than Big Oil executives? Scummier than used car dealers? Scummier than rapists? What about spammers? Arey they scummier than spammers?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:What is a "copyrightist?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "copyrightist" is someone who has created something. Remember, everyone elses information wants to be free.

    2. Re:What is a "copyrightist?" by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Copyrightists are approximately as scummy as your average politician. Mostly, they don't understand exactly what the economic effects of the policy they are pushing are compared to the alternatives, but they think they'll get big payouts themselves if they get it implemented.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  31. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    "compassion and love" are merely means to an end for the vast majority of people.

    for corporations and governments it's for PR issues.

    for individuals it's to engender the good graces of others by being able to say to others "i donate to this charity".

    It's all about posturing, engendering friendship in people to use in order to further your own goals, it has nothing to do with this noble compassion and generosity you say exists.

    real compassion is donating anonymously, without claims, and dying with that secret.

    I only know of one person who has ever done this, and that man is dead now.

    the truth is an ugly thing is it not? oh but i assume ill get the good old -1 (troll) or (flamebait) because the truth is so ugly apparently the mods cant stand to look at it.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  32. Why don't they develop their own software? by Supercooldude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'd think that a large and relatively modern country like Russia would be developing all its own software and wouldn't need to pirate software made by American companies.

    1. Re:Why don't they develop their own software? by muuh-gnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldnt that be a collosal wste of time, money and human ressources better spent at something else?

      And btw, they aren't "pirating" anything, they are sharing stuff that works for them with their fellow men. Why should it be their problem when some greedy-as-fuck overseas copyright fascists want to censor interpersonal communication and information exchage?

    2. Re:Why don't they develop their own software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already went down that road with their rocket program.....

      The fact that they are pirating American technology shows that they learned their lesson.

    3. Re:Why don't they develop their own software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the lesson? That it's tough to be the best?

    4. Re:Why don't they develop their own software? by Vr6dub · · Score: 1
      Yeaah mon...preach it bro.

      Pass the doobie when you're done.

  33. No one paid anything by melted · · Score: 1

    A disgruntled employee has left and tipped off the authorities. This stuff is all the rage over there right now.

    1. Re:No one paid anything by Sad+Adam · · Score: 1

      What makes you think "the authorities" didn't negotiate with the organizations competitors? Do you really believe anyone in Russia gives a shit about copyright?

  34. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Have you never done something for someone else because of compassion or love? Most people do things for mixed reasons: partly selfishness, and partly compassion. It is quite rare to find someone who acts completely out of love, or completely out of selfishness. Real compassion is doing something for someone because you care about them, whether it be secret or not, and it makes you feel good and alive (although if you are doing it because you want to feel good, then all of a sudden it's not compassionate any more, and it won't make you feel so good. Deliciously paradoxical, isn't it?)

    --
    Qxe4
  35. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
    And without the patent money, big pharma would never have developed many of those medicines in the first place.

    Why should they? Put the research where it belongs, to university labs. Keep it open and shared, and develop cures for more diseases instead of having three manufacturers making three expensive patented variants of the same drug that differ only by a position of an unimportant methyl group, or that are different salts of the same molecule. The same money that are paid for drugs by insurance companies and Medicare, if invested purely to open research and testing, are likely to yield more of cheaper meds for the entire world, instead of being wasted on duplicated effort, lawyers, and marketing. According to some figures I encountered long ago, the cash spent on PR, advertising and marketing often exceeds the cash spent on R&D.

  36. Yes I do by melted · · Score: 1

    They (the police) don't believe in copyright (nor do they know what it is in minute detail, I'm sure), but they do believe in edicts from their superiors. They were told to enforce, and they did enforce. Just a few years ago they couldn't even do it since there was no legal mechanism for doing so.

    I'm sure the guy could have gotten away with it for much less if he had connections in the police, though.

    1. Re:Yes I do by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean "militia"? :P

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  37. To be precise by dallaylaen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be precise, in Russia you own someone else's software.

    The American part should be changed accordingly.

    --
    WYSIWIG, but what you see might not be what you need
  38. The reality of fighting software piracy in Russia by ezh · · Score: 1

    Everyone seems to know of high-profile cases, such as AllOfMp3. No wonder, AllOfMP3 used to one of the most popular music shops out there, just a bit less popular than iTunes.

    Unfortunately, due to this 'fight', a lot of innocent people get hurt by the system. You heard of Ponosov's case, where a headmaster of God-forgotten school in Perm region has been tried for an alleged 'intellectual property violation'. And this case was not brought on by Microsoft. It was brought by a regional prosecution office. And that was just a beginning...

    Nowadays corrupted goverment officials and law enforcement officers use 'software piracy' as yet another way to make a 'quick buck' in bribes. Their demands are completely ridiculous. Here is a couple of examples:

    1. In big cities they stop people for documents checks and 'random' searches. And now if they see a laptop, they demand to turn it on and demand a license for the software. And that's suppose to be an 'antiterrorist' activity...
    2. Police came over to some company recently and confiscated their Linux servers with the following explanation: Your computer does not have 'My Computer' icon, so it must be illegal. No other explanation was given. When the company visited local police office and demanded explanation, they were told: you can sue us and wait for another half a year until the court processes your case. Keep in mind, though, that all this time your equipment is going to lie here as evidence. Alternatively, you can just pay the fine that is reasonable to both of us and get your sh&t outta here.... What do you think the businessmen have done? You can read about it (in Russian)here and here.
  39. A proud day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you, but it brings a tear to my eye to see a formally-socialist state which persecuted and exploited the masses set aside their differences with a capitalist nation which persecutes and exploits the masses to defend the rights of large corporations to persecute and exploit the masses; this land is my land, this land is MY land, doo-dee-doo doooooo doo....

  40. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

    Well, I work in a university lab doing pharmaceutical research. It's one thing to do the sort of basic research to develop an active molecule, it's a completely different thing to bring a formulation to market. Just be glad that drugs are covered under patent instead of copyright, in which case aspirin would cost $10 a pill.

  41. "a kid being computer illiterate"??? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    I think that kid will be more computer literate if he would stay with Linux, OpenOffice and Magick instead of "Vista, Office and Photoshop".

    There are plenty of benefits using open software. There are fewer games, less distraction to serious work with computers, more transparent access to the internals of the programs.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:"a kid being computer illiterate"??? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      1. Will his "working poor" parents be able to setup a Linux disto?
      2. How will this impact his job opportunities vs using the software that most companies use. "A great graphics designer with extensive experience in Magick"

    2. Re:"a kid being computer illiterate"??? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      You are mixing job experience with literacy. I have never used Photoshop (I think). That does not make me illiterate.

      Literacy = general basics of computer skills
      Education = knowledge in specific areas

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  42. Re:I give up on humanity,hope we burn in nuclear f by servognome · · Score: 1

    Put the research where it belongs, to university labs.
    Who is going to pay for the research, and who is going to decide what drugs to research? You'll end up with more government bloat and politics. Do you really want people to hold political rallies so that their disease will get proper funding. Is it fair for government to take your money to spend on medicine you will never need? A market driven environment means the people who benefit from a drug end up paying for it.

    According to some figures I encountered long ago, the cash spent on PR, advertising and marketing often exceeds [oftwominds.com] the cash spent on R&D
    Which indicates a competitive environment, if there were only 1 medicine to treat a specific disease, there would be no need to market. In fact, a perfectly competitive environment has more money spent on marketing; J&J spends $250M on advertising Tylenol.
    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  43. The word has a different meaning here in the US by melted · · Score: 1

    No text.

  44. One AC deserves another. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea that someone could take his work and put their name on it was too much for him. He was adamant he would stop creating if such a thing were legal and commonplace. If you did such a thing and he saw you in the street, he'd probably hit you ;). For him, part of what made creation satisfying enough to pursue was the attribution and the ability to prevent his name from being put on distortions of his work. So, clearly there's an incentive there -- one which serves the public interest in seeing works created -- just as there is in copyright. Fortunately we wouldn't have to change a thing to protect your artistic friend because fraud is already illegal and human history has a great tradition of punishing liars. There's no reason to believe fraud would ever become legal.