Domain: current.nu
Stories and comments across the archive that link to current.nu.
Comments · 36
-
You are soo full of shit.I've already adressed someone who has TRIED to make a case for what your TRYING to say, so I won't waste too much time.
But, given the fact that we all NEED a Social Security card to WORK, a Drivers Licence to DRIVE, a ID to buy Cigerettes and Beer, why not have ONE ID?
I am a long standing Libertarian (As in lp.org, not liberal), and I am very for the National ID. Your kidding yourself if you really think that the ID is the problem. The ever expanding government is the problem, not some piece of plastic that makes it hard to counterfit an easier on my wallet weight!
and for the record, I'm not a full Libertarian, ONLY because I am isolationist, very much a Jeffersonian, as our founding fathers intended. I think the government fell apart with "the great FDR" who made us the world's policeman
... which the LP's "open borders" doesn't transision well into given the world culture now days.How the hell did THIS crap get moded to +5 on
./? I thought much better of the readers and mods.... -
Get me a JOB!!!!"my clients' pay upwards of $10M a pop to get people to comment on their commercials."
You get that much "a pop," either your raking in BOATLOADS of cash, or the "suckers" are about a year apart in frequency. JUST TO TELL YOU IF THE AD IS INTERESTING? Yet 90% of the TV ads SUCK?
If that's all true, well then here is my resume! I'm well educated and extremely critical by nature!
With all due respect, I'll listen to you guys when it comes to tech stuff
Oh, BTW, for you, that's going to cost "10M a pop" from now on. Consider each Slashdot page load "a pop." My lawyers will contact you shortly.
PS: VMS is an OS, and an old one... Good luck trying to call it!
-
Re:Similar to an idea I've been mulling over
Yea sure, there were a number of people working on BUILD, but have drifted off... I probably could put in a little time myself. rob@current.nu
-
My Mirrorhttp://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=21548&cid=228
2 928>HERE
I still say we do it, long term, 3-4 day, maybe 2-4 week full content, powerful mirror of best images.
My Mirror of some stuff is at http://www.current.nu/
EFF god help me...Prove GNU spirit is good for something!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if not, I will admit to being one that pushed the idea, and end up leaning on EFF, so donations there (Free me only after all of Elcomsoft are in Russia!
-
But the good stuff is gone
Notice, the site that Gile's page refers to, http://bash.current.nu/ is gone, hacked. Hope to see it back soon, and complete. BUT, there is another site that actually has the bashprompt package at http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutil
s /unversioned/bashprompt/, but that one is so old it refers to the bash.current.nu page before they even got thier own homepage. -
Bashprompt.
Bashprompt, the original BASHISH was cool. I helped the project a little, providing screen captures of the themes, and making a theme of my own for bashprompt. Their server was recently cracked, and they've run out of funding. Lets all pitch in and save this project. Mods: mod this one up please, thx
da w00t. -
Bashprompt.
Bashprompt, the original BASHISH was cool. I helped the project a little, providing screen captures of the themes, and making a theme of my own for bashprompt. Their server was recently cracked, and they've run out of funding. Lets all pitch in and save this project. Mods: mod this one up please, thx
da w00t. -
prompt funk
Mine looks sorta like this, with some color added:
-[hynfiecl@xenos:~]--- ---[2001/07/06-11:05:42]-
$
I have a pretty nasty script that hacks it together. I wrote it after reading the Bash Prompt HOWTO and visiting a Bash themes site that has since been haxx0red. There are more good example prompts, though, at this site. Here's my script, base 64 encoded (sorry, but uuencoding is not conducive to slashposting):
IyEvYmluL2Jhc2gKCmZ1bmN0aW9uIF9wcm9tcHQgewoJbG9jYW wgICAgICBub25lPSJcWxtbMG1c
XSIKCWxvY2FsICAgICBibGFjaz0iXFsbWzA7MzBtXF0iCglsb2 NhbCAgICAgIGJsdWU9IlxbG1sw
OzM0bVxdIgoJbG9jYWwgICAgIGdyZWVuPSJcWxtbMDszMm1cXS IKCWxvY2FsICAgICAgY3lhbj0i
XFsbWzA7MzZtXF0iCglsb2NhbCAgICAgICByZWQ9IlxbG1swOz MxbVxdIgoJbG9jYWwgICAgcHVy
cGxlPSJcWxtbMDszNW1cXSIKCWxvY2FsICAgICBicm93bj0iXF sbWzA7MzNtXF0iCglsb2NhbCAg
ICAgIGdyZXk9IlxbG1swOzM3bVxdIgoJbG9jYWwgICBka19ncm V5PSJcWxtbMTszMG1cXSIKCWxv
Y2FsICAgbHRfYmx1ZT0iXFsbWzE7MzRtXF0iCglsb2NhbCAgbH RfZ3JlZW49IlxbG1sxOzMybVxd
IgoJbG9jYWwgICBsdF9jeWFuPSJcWxtbMTszNm1cXSIKCWxvY2 FsICAgIGx0X3JlZD0iXFsbWzE7
MzFtXF0iCglsb2NhbCBsdF9wdXJwbGU9IlxbG1sxOzM1bVxdIg oJbG9jYWwgICAgeWVsbG93PSJc
WxtbMTszM21cXSIKCWxvY2FsICAgICB3aGl0ZT0iXFsbWzE7Mz dtXF0iCglsb2NhbCAgICAgICBy
ZXY9IlxbG1s1bVxdIgoKCWxvY2FsIEg9JG5vbmUkYmxhY2sKCW xvY2FsIE09JEgKCWxvY2FsIEw9
JE0KCWxvY2FsIFQ9JG5vbmUkZ3JleQoJbG9jYWwgUD0kVAoJbG 9jYWwgTj0kbm9uZQoKCWlmIFsg
IiRESVNQTEFZIiA9ICc6MC4wJyBdCgl0aGVuCgkJbG9jYWwgRD 0ixCIKCQlsb2NhbCBBPSLaIgoJ
CWxvY2FsIEI9IsAiCgkJbG9jYWwgTD0itCIKCQlsb2NhbCBSPS LDIgoJZWxzZQoJCWxvY2FsIEQ9
Ii0iCgkJbG9jYWwgQT0iICIKCQlsb2NhbCBCPSIgIgoJCWxvY2 FsIEw9IlsiCgkJbG9jYWwgUj0i
XSIKCWZpCgoJaWYgWyAtbiAiJEJBU0hfVkVSU0lORk8iIF0KCX RoZW4KCQlQUzE9IlwKXAoke0h9
JHtBfSR7RH0ke0x9JHtUfVx1JHtQfUAke1R9XGgke1B9OiR7VH 1cJHtQV0QvXCRIT01FL359JHtI
fSR7Un0ke0R9JHtEfSR7RH1cCiQoX3Byb21wdF9tb3ZlX3JpZ2 h0IDEzMikkKF9wcm9tcHRfbW92
ZV9sZWZ0IDI1KVwKJHtIfSR7RH0ke0R9JHtEfSR7TH1cClwkKG RhdGUgK1wiJHtUfSVZJHtQfS8k
e1R9JW0ke1B9LyR7VH0lZCR7UH0tJHtUfSVIJHtQfToke1R9JU 0ke1B9OiR7VH0lU1wiKVwKJHtI
fSR7Un0ke0R9XApcblwKJHtIfSR7Qn0ke25vbmV9XCQgXAoiCg llbHNlCgkJUFMxPSJcClwKJHtI
fXske1R9XHUke1B9QCR7VH1caCR7UH06JHtUfVwke1BXRH0ke0 h9fVwKJChfcHJvbXB0X21vdmVf
cmlnaHQgMTMyKSQoX3Byb21wdF9tb3ZlX2xlZnQgMjApXAoke0 h9e1wKXCQoZGF0ZSArXCIke1R9
JVkke1B9LyR7VH0lbSR7UH0vJHtUfSVkJHtQfS0ke1R9JUgke1 B9OiR7VH0lTSR7UH06JHtUfSVT
XCIpXAoke0h9fVwKXG5cCiR7SH17JHtncmV5fVwkJHtIfX1cCi R7SH17XAoke059XAoiCglmaQoK
CVBTMj0iXAokKF9wcm9tcHRfcG9zX3NhdmUpJChfcHJvbXB0X2 1vdmVfdXAgMSlcCiR7TH3DXAok
KF9wcm9tcHRfbW92ZV9yaWdodCAxMzIpXAoke0x9tFwKJChfcH JvbXB0X3Bvc19sb2FkKVwKJHtM
fcAke019JHtEfSR7SH0oXAokKF9wcm9tcHRfcG9zX3NhdmUpJC hfcHJvbXB0X21vdmVfcmlnaHQg
MTMyKSQoX3Byb21wdF9tb3ZlX2xlZnQgMilcCiR7SH0pJHtNfS R7RH0ke0x92VwKJChfcHJvbXB0
X3Bvc19sb2FkKVwKJHtOfSBcCiIKCWV4cG9ydCBQUzIKCWV4cG 9ydCBQUzEKCXJldHVybgp9Cgpm
dW5jdGlvbiBfcHJvbXB0X21vdmVfdG8gewoJZWNobyAiXFsbWy R7Mn07JHsxfUhcXSIKCXJldHVy
bgp9CgpmdW5jdGlvbiBfcHJvbXB0X21vdmVfdXAgewoJZWNoby AiXFsbWyR7MX1BXF0iCglyZXR1
cm4KfQoKZnVuY3Rpb24gX3Byb21wdF9tb3ZlX2Rvd24gewoJZW NobyAiXFsbWyR7MX1CXF0iCgly
ZXR1cm4KfQoKZnVuY3Rpb24gX3Byb21wdF9tb3ZlX3JpZ2h0IH sKCWVjaG8gIlxbG1skezF9Q1xd
IgoJcmV0dXJuCn0KCmZ1bmN0aW9uIF9wcm9tcHRfbW92ZV9sZW Z0IHsKCWVjaG8gIlxbG1skezF9
RFxdIgoJcmV0dXJuCn0KCmZ1bmN0aW9uIF9wcm9tcHRfcG9zX3 NhdmUgewoJZWNobyAiXFsbW3Nc
XSIKCXJldHVybgp9CgpmdW5jdGlvbiBfcHJvbXB0X3Bvc19sb2 FkIHsKCWVjaG8gIlxbG1t1XF0i
CglyZXR1cm4KfQoKZnVuY3Rpb24gX3Byb21wdF9jbGVhcl9zY3 JlZW4gewoJZWNobyAiXFsbWzJK
XF0iCglyZXR1cm4KfQoKZnVuY3Rpb24gX3Byb21wdF9jbGVhcl 9saW5lIHsKCWVjaG8gIlxbG1sy
S1xdIgoJcmV0dXJuCn0KCmZ1bmN0aW9uIF9wcm9tcHRfY2hhcn MgewoJY2F0IDw8IEVPRgogICAg
ICAgICAgMCAgIDEgICAyICAgMyAgIDQgICA1ICAgNiAgIDcgIC A4ICAgOSAgIGEgICBiICAgYyAg
IGQgICBlICAgZiAKICAweDAwOiAKICAweDEwOiAKICAweDIwOi AgICAgICAhICAgIiAgICMgICAk
ICAgJSAgICYgICAnICAgKCAgICkgICAqICAgKyAgICwgICAtIC AgLiAgIC8gCiAgMHgzMDogICAw
ICAgMSAgIDIgICAzICAgNCAgIDUgICA2ICAgNyAgIDggICA5IC AgOiAgIDsgICA8ICAgPSAgID4g
ICA/IAogIDB4NDA6ICAgQCAgIEEgICBCICAgQyAgIEQgICBFIC AgRiAgIEcgICBIICAgSSAgIEog
ICBLICAgTCAgIE0gICBOICAgTyAKICAweDUwOiAgIFAgICBRIC AgUiAgIFMgICBUICAgVSAgIFYg
ICBXICAgWCAgIFkgICBaICAgWyAgIFwgICBdICAgXiAgIF8gCi AgMHg2MDogICBcYCAgIGEgICBi
ICAgYyAgIGQgICBlICAgZiAgIGcgICBoICAgaSAgIGogICBrIC AgbCAgIG0gICBuICAgbyAKICAw
eDcwOiAgIHAgICBxICAgciAgIHMgICB0ICAgdSAgIHYgICB3IC AgeCAgIHkgICB6ICAgeyAgIHwg
ICB9ICAgfiAgICAKICAweDgwOiAgIIAgICCBICAggiAgIIMgIC AgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgMHg5
MDogICAgICAgiSAgIIogICCLICAgjCAgIAogIDB4YTA6ICAgoC AgIKEgICCiICAgoyAgIKQgICCl
ICAgpiAgIKcgICCoICAgqSAgIKogICCrICAgrCAgIK0gICCuIC AgryAKICAweGIwOiAgILAgICCx
ICAgsiAgILMgICC0ICAgtSAgILYgICC3ICAguCAgILkgICC6IC AguyAgILwgICC9ICAgviAgIL8g
CiAgMHhjMDogICDAICAgwSAgIMIgICDDICAgxCAgIMUgICDGIC AgxyAgIMggICDJICAgyiAgIMsg
ICDMICAgzSAgIM4gICDPIAogIDB4ZDA6ICAg0CAgINEgICDSIC Ag0yAgINQgICDVICAg1iAgINcg
ICDYICAg2SAgINogICDbICAg3CAgIN0gICDeICAg3yAKICAweG UwOiAgIOAgICDhICAg4iAgIOMg
ICDkICAg5SAgIOYgICDnICAg6CAgIOkgICDqICAg6yAgIOwgIC DtICAg7iAgIO8gCiAgMHhmMDog
ICDwICAg8SAgIPIgICDzICAg9CAgIPUgICD2ICAg9yAgIPggIC D5ICAg+iAgIPsgICD8ICAg/SAg
IP4gICD/IApFT0YKCXJldHVybgp9CgpfcHJvbXB0ICRURVJNCg ==
-
In other wireless news...Funny, I tried to submit a REAL news story about wireles a couple days back "2001-03-29 00:17:32 Color Cell Phones (articles,tech) (rejected)." Thought was still interesting, so I put the story on MU with a few references. It was announced by Sprint themselves Yesterday, and Yahoo, AND... cnet have already ran the story now too. PDA Buzz has mentioned it yesterday. And it's not like it's shocking news if you look at some of the cell phone stuff going on, like the PalmOS Samsung and the countless other PDA replacement cell phones coming out.
But I guess it's not
/. news until they can be sure to be the LAST to report it! Hmm.. Ya, but those wireless microwaves... Wooo doggy, uber geek, but... Ah, nevermind, it is sort of cool, just a bit more pointless. Just glad there are at least one or two other sources of Geek news than slashdot... -
Re:We need a better benchmark, and we need it soonI don't want a single number. I don't think you do either if you think about it.
Manufactures would just figure out what was the cheapest way to get their number up, even if it meant graphics rendering went to hell because they spent all thier budjet on cache or something... It wouldn't be a fair comparison. You need lot's of numbers, AND, don't think the CPU is the only thing that will effect them!
Hmm, maybe someday I'll find some free time to finish hwinfo2html then at least I would feel a little better about comparing system... But... I have zero time, and it has a LONG way to go before being truely usefull.
-
Blind Luck and Stupidity Mainly...I've been running (so to say, with LOADS of downtime) a site for quite some time. current.nu has been up in some form or another since about June of 1998, and had no problems at all (yet, knock on wood). I think there are some key things that keep us from having legal problems, but we probably border on having some...
Honestly, Largo (Justin Stressman) has a Window Maker theme site that probably runs the biggest legal risk, because he will snake ANY cool image for a theme. I've discussed it with him, and he goes to some effort to reference and _credit_ the original source of the images. Although his work involves extensively modifying images, in most cases to the point where the original image is almost impossible to identify, he still credits the original source whenever possible. That, coupled with the fact that we will probably pull them at the request of the original artist, probably gets us by. It's good for the artist (acknowledgement), and good for him.
Any news, software, or other content on the sites is either 1) Just referenced, not locally copied, 2) Mirror of something that is clearly public domain, or 3) our own damn work. So, there shouldn't be any problems there.
But yea, it's a big concern. For the last year we (mostly me) have been going through some legal research about founding a "corporation" for the sake of distancing personal liability. And it's not cheap ($150 in paperwork to become a incorporated is just the beginning, it's really the time and money involved with "staying legal" that makes it tough). Makes the "hobby" not much fun. Also makes you think about trying to make some money off the thing, just to cover your costs, but that's even more work.
But, what it really depends on is your ultimate goal. You didn't really make that clear. If you are out to make a buck as a news portal selling ad space, you have a very tough road to go. Then you HAVE to make it right and legal, and cover all the bases. That means it will cost you money to get started. If your just doing something with no ads, that your doing for the joy of it, then just reference your sources, paraphrase, and link the original for content. For hobby sites, you just cross your fingers, hope and pray, and try to believe that if a big company takes you to court for "copyright violations" on your none profit hobby site, a jury will laugh them out of court, and see it for what it is, one guy with a web page vs. a multibillion dollar company.
If you think this is tough, you would love the discussions I had to have with a University sys admin about how Largo's stuff isn't porn, it's art, and it's not a serious threat to the universities bandwidth. Luckily, we pay our own bandwidth now and can do whatever the hell we want (and it shows in the slow speed of our site).
-
Gnustep is far from deadThe WindowMaker/gnustep environment is not dead, not by a long shot, projects such as the i3dkit, webkit and even the swarm simulation environment are in daily use and active development.
The problem for many people who might otherwise be interested in it is that it depends on Objective-C which is a minority language by any standard. The good thing about Objective-C is that it's built in to most of the more recent versions of the GCC, the bad thing (to the unfamiliar) is that it's the bastard child of C and smalltalk. Myself, I find it eminently readable and robust, so I'll go on using it even if it is "totally irrelevant".
For free software it all comes down to personal preference, that's why there won't be a One True Interface ®. Now or in the future, that's not to say that certain interface idioms won't become nearly universal, or that better education and more experience won't raise people's expectations. But as long as anyone can modify or alter any aspect of their system (a good thing) and as long as the only check on releasing code is the choice of uptake on the part of the users there will be only minimal interface consistency.
This isn't a bad thing, the people who want consistent UI standards are acting as if the Free Software Movement is a unitary entity that should be acting in concert towards a defined goal. Ha.
Gnustep Links for the interested Official Gnustep site
Unofficial Gnustep Site
WindowMaker
Swarm Project not part of Gnustep, but an interesting use of Objective-C. -
hey! the text inteface isn't drabTheir Helix Gnome software
masks the drab, complex text interface of Linux with rich and colorful images [...]
Pssh. Obviously they've never heard of bashprompt.
(Actually, also an example of why complex is good too.)
--
-
Libraries
Objective-C is, in and of itself, a wonderful langauge, but comes with very little functionality. Even many of the fundamental object capabilities depended on NeXT's FoundationKit et al, which for a long time, was only available in Nextstep, and just before NeXT's assimilation by Apple, in Openstep, which was Nextstep's libraries licensed to other vendors.
The GNUStep project is trying to get these libraries up to speed, meeting and in some cases exceeding the OpenStep specs, but without them, it is very difficult to develop in Objective-C on any platform but NextStep or that rare zebra, OpenStep for Solaris.
For more info on GNUStep, I suggest looking at newsWire.
-
That's Why Open Source is sooo good.I have been saying it for a long long time. There is power in Open Source software, and hardly anyone is unleashing it yet. (Although I know the lifetime of
/. articals is short, I figure if I manage to convince ONE person, it's worth a try).For years people have proclaimed "now you have the code, you can make changes if you want." Well, guess what, 99.5% of the people who use software don't know how to make changes!
So again I'd like to point out, "Now that you have the code, you can OPTIMIZE it for your system." And, yes, that does really matter. And, no, you don't need to know how to program to do it.
Take the example of Mandrake, maybe you think Mandrake is all hype, it's not. I started using Mandrake about a year ago after getting sick of recompiling everything by hand. I have done tests to prove to myself that Mandrake benchmark scores are higher than other Linux distributions like Gentus Benchmark Results on the exact same system (NOTE 1).
And that's not the end of it... that's just Pentium optimized, I could throw a few more flags in for kicks and tweak the scores more.
So, when I can get a gain of almost 40% using FREE software, try to compare the costs of doing it with hardware. A system that would be 40% faster (using hardware alone) would cost significantly more. Or, your going to get better preformance even on better hardware with optimized flags... so....
I'm a little supprised that this benifit to Open Source (that applies to all hardware types, not just x86) is soo overlooked, and "the ability to change the code" is so bragged about.
NOTE 1: Gentus is completely based on Red Hat, and Mandrake has it's roots in Red Hat software optimizations. Gentus is Red Hat with specific additions for Abit hardware, thus the better disk access times with Gentus (I can use ATA100) that with Mandrake (using only UDMA 66).
-
That's Why Open Source is sooo good.I have been saying it for a long long time. There is power in Open Source software, and hardly anyone is unleashing it yet. (Although I know the lifetime of
/. articals is short, I figure if I manage to convince ONE person, it's worth a try).For years people have proclaimed "now you have the code, you can make changes if you want." Well, guess what, 99.5% of the people who use software don't know how to make changes!
So again I'd like to point out, "Now that you have the code, you can OPTIMIZE it for your system." And, yes, that does really matter. And, no, you don't need to know how to program to do it.
Take the example of Mandrake, maybe you think Mandrake is all hype, it's not. I started using Mandrake about a year ago after getting sick of recompiling everything by hand. I have done tests to prove to myself that Mandrake benchmark scores are higher than other Linux distributions like Gentus Benchmark Results on the exact same system (NOTE 1).
And that's not the end of it... that's just Pentium optimized, I could throw a few more flags in for kicks and tweak the scores more.
So, when I can get a gain of almost 40% using FREE software, try to compare the costs of doing it with hardware. A system that would be 40% faster (using hardware alone) would cost significantly more. Or, your going to get better preformance even on better hardware with optimized flags... so....
I'm a little supprised that this benifit to Open Source (that applies to all hardware types, not just x86) is soo overlooked, and "the ability to change the code" is so bragged about.
NOTE 1: Gentus is completely based on Red Hat, and Mandrake has it's roots in Red Hat software optimizations. Gentus is Red Hat with specific additions for Abit hardware, thus the better disk access times with Gentus (I can use ATA100) that with Mandrake (using only UDMA 66).
-
Re:CAJUN- Car Audio Jukbox UNix
It used to be at http://cajun.current.nu/ but that seems to be down. Anyone know who's maintaining it?
Try http://cajun.sourceforge.net/. -
GNUstep clarification: Support GNUstep!
People seem to be kind of confused about what GNUstep is and implies, I'll try to clarify:
GNUstep is: an implementation of the OpenStep API. The OpenStep API makes it quite easy to develop programs for it, as the developer doesn't have to worry about the little things, and spend their time innovating and writing great code . It's cross-platform (between Windows w/ the YellowBox, anything running GNUstep, Mac OS X/Cocoa). It's a dream to develop with, and the Objective-C language, to me, is much nicer to use than C++ (although I think there's wrappers for Java, and perhaps C/C++).
GNUstep will: Allow for easy ports to platforms running GNUstep from source written under OpenStep, Rhapsody, or Mac OS X (using Cocoa/YellowBox). This encourages cross-platform development, and hopefully will help bring many apps to Mac OS X/Cocoa, as well as Linux/FreeBSD/etc.
GNUstep is not: a window manager or a desktop environment. Desktop environments can (and quite easily) built with GNUstep. In fact, someone is working on a NeXT-like file manager right now, which is working and developed under OpenStep, and easily recompiled on a FreeBSD box using GNUstep.
For more information, see the GNUstep website or the unofficial GNUstep website, both of which have plenty of information on the OpenStep spec, and where GNUstep is going.
In short-- definately check it out!
Aaron -
Re:Propaganda backgroundsI agree in sentiment, but my preffered backgrounds tend to be from Largo (http://wm.current.nu/).
Some of his stuff gets a bit "out there" (and I wouldn't go there if you're really easily offended by suggestive stuff), but he also has some of the best Goth-ish stuff I've found. And some of his stuff has actually inspired artistically-challenged me to try designing some of his own.
-
What would make it a Distribution?I don't see much that would make me believe that any group didn't deserve it's own distribution, but what would make it a seperate distribution?
The underlying structure would have to be the same, becuase after all, the hardware would be the same, there are no "gender bias computers" unless all of a sudden we call the iMac or something a womans computer, and then one of the Mac distributions becomes a "womens" distribution...
The file structures would have to be the same, because without interoperability, they would be seperating themselfs in the workplace, and files couldn't be shared, and they couldn't be a "team" player...
What's left? I think I would suggest (at the risk of really offending EVERYONE, and generally making myself look like a pig), that women might have a great place in GUI or theme development.
In thinking about it, browsing through the GTK, KDE, WindowMaker, E, and other themes, there isn't a whole heck of a lot out there for women to like. I know my wife was just flat out offended by some... and Caitlin Fairchild themes sure aren't gong to win them over to Linux...
Women have always been very "visually smart." (here goes the really chance for me to look like a PIG). As artists, they have always been impressive, and GUI overlayers (like themes) would be an awsome place to get more women involved and stop some of the gender bias of UNIX. I tried to create a theme once myself for my wife (see this pathetic attempt). But she ended up useing KDE, and wanting me to buy her a book on GIMP so she can do her own graphics.
Frankly, I don't think many of the GUI enviroment "visual layers" (hard coded or themes) really are as attractive to women as they could create for themselfs. I would love to be able to point my wife to a "women's theme pack" or something, but themes.org has soo much almost naked women, sci-fi, or dark and demented stuff, she doesn't even want to waste her time looking at them.....
So, a distribution? I don't know. But are plenty of areas for them to work in. The hard coded application and kernel stuff, I would hope women wouldn't divert from the general code, and contribute to the base where all people can benifit. But as for GUI, I think they would be well justified in comeing up with some creative visual stuff that would please _THEM_ insted of having to sort through all the borderline porn themes to find something they can stand working with.
-
Other Stories
I see the link is broke, so it's also covered here:
http://mu.current.nu
and at
http://www.pdabuzz.com -
Re:OPENSTEP AppKit
People use BASIC because they don't know any better and/or they are lazy. The same thing goes for using the proper 'Too' and punctuation.
;-)
I think Apple is finally doing the right thing in letting Yellow Box sell itself. Most long-time Apple developers were freaking over the prospect of having to recode for Yellow Box. Voila, we get Carbon and they are happy. Check out StepWise though to see just how many quality Yellow Box Apps are already shipping for Mac OS X, an OS not even due to be delivered until early 2000. Too bad on the Yellow Box for NT licensing front though. I will personally bet that the problem there is Adobe and not Apple.
Even if Yellow Box should tank the API is alive and well, getting stronger each day. Check out
GNUStep or the GNUStep NewsWire for details. At bare minimum the fellow asking the original question needs to take a look at this.
-
GCC vs Commercial compiler w/ Linux.Actually, that's good news. We were "this" close to getting a new Alpha dual here from Microway a few months back, and didn't do it because we couldn't find a good compiler. If there would have been anything that ran in Linux that would have gave the preformance we would have wanted, another Alpha would be in the building I work in
;-)But, the only thing we found was for Tru64, so the "chiefs" decided to get some more SGI's, and keep the commercial UNIX problems all with one company.
:-( I do know for a fact though, that if the preformance (espically FP w/ Fortran) would have been there from a commercial Linux compiler, not only would there be a Alpha Linux box here, but a couple PIII's running Linux too. For pure hardware preformance, there would have been a lot of nice hardware we could have got for the price of the Origin and Octane we got insted.In the end, brand loyalty won, because it came down to a risk on something unknown, with questionable preformance from unknow compilers, compared to knowing how SGI would screw us already. As for Linux developed with a commercial compiler I say YES! I have long been a believer that people who don't optimize thier compiles, but go out and spend $700 more for a CPU that runs 20% faster are total idiots! It depends much on if the distribution was put together with the compiler, or if the compiler is included, and the price tag. Actually, I have thought about this for over a year now, and I think it was last summer some time I came to this conclusion:
"If someone is selling a C compiler for Linux, and they claim it is better than GCC, why in the world don't they bundle it with a whole Linux distribution that was compiled with thier compiler?"
If in fact the preformance was better, you may well be able to spend say $100 to $300 on a commercial compiler, and get a system that was 35% faster overall. I mean, even GCC can make your system up to 30% faster if you use the right flags (see my tests and the claims of Mandrake Linux). People are always looking for the latest greatest hardware boosts for an edge, and it's very short sighted to think about spending all that money on faster hardware when you have the source code right in front of you, and your runing unoptimized binaries.If Intel REALLY wanted to support Linux, they would port thier compiler to Linux (which is an OUTSTANDING C compiler for x86), and let VAResearch sell Red Hat recompiled optimized for each specific CPU using Intel's compiler. They would probably see a preformance boost that they can't get out of hardware alone.
Along those lines, I also believe that AMD should really start backing the GCC project by donating half a dozen of thier new Athlon processors to the top developers in GCC. If they did that, and shiped instruction set specs and details, there could be a -march=athlon flag that could potential put thier preformance WAY ahead of PIII.
I'm also hoping that IBM pays some close attention to GCC now that they are supporting the Linux community, with the G3 and the older Cyrix based stuff they still own, they could really make Linux on thier hardware "wake people up."
Don't get me wrong, I think GCC is doing pretty darn well. But I do think that GCC development and support is much more important than elevating Linus to the level of a god.
-
MU has some stories...
MU News has been tracking this story a bit, and has some links if you wanna learn more about MAJC.
-
Why Alpha/Linux is NOT popular...The reason Alpha/Linux isn't popular is because of GCC.
GCC is a fairly good compiler for x86, even when compaired to commercial compilers. GCC is really getting better every day for x86, literally.
But if you compare Alphas with True64-UNIX (formarly DEC-UNIX) and commercial compilers to Alphas running Linux using GCC, there is a HUGE gap in preformance. There is a simple solution though... Get the GCC guys some 21264's ASAP
;-)BTW, IBM is seems to putting faith into other people's CPU's for Linux ports is a popular idea now, check MU for a story on IBM porting Linux to PowerPC 405.
-
Who Exactly Is Homeless?I guess I don't know off hand what sites were hosted there, but I suppose I could pick up maybe _A COUPLE_ of people who are left homeless on current.nu. (Seeing as Chris Gann got nailed by some users, I think I would insist on him vouching for you first though).
If you know who might need a host, email me at rob@freshmeat.net.
-
Re:Related Links
Oh, I don't work on coldfire. check out mu.current.nu if you think those links are cool. It's sorta slashdot like, but focused on this kind of news specificly...
-
I am still ShockedI am still bothered by the fact that all these benchmarking tests and comments don't clearly address one of the basic advantages to open source. You can optimize the binaries for your specific system, and get rid of the 386/486 limitations... Sure, you loose binary compatiblity, but who cares when they can get thier own source and compile it too, and your system sees a 30% boost in speed?
System tuneing is IMPORTANT. Important enought that it can make one OS faster than another. I think we should be pointing out that open source is much more tunable, not only in the ability to modify the code, but also in the ability to optimize it for specific hardware. (quick note on some stuff I tried to see the diffrence, click here)
Why can't someone do some intellegen testing on this, and give credit to the people who REALLY make GNU/GPL and all of open source a success, the folks who write the COMPILERS! Linus did write some nice stuff, as well as many others, but without the right compiler, it's worthless.
-
Who Compiled Apache?
I wonder who compiled apache, and with what compiler, and what flags
;-) Compilers do matter, as I just learned myself today, I wonder how much they would affect apaches preformance. -
Re:He did get lost in his feelings
> All I want out of MP3 is to record my tapes and
> LPs onto my hard drive, squunch them into
> MP3 format, and burn them onto a CD, 100 at a
> time, so that I can play them in my car.
> Anybody with a How-To?
For the playing in the car part, you might want to check out Cajun
-- -
Got `em.. Another mirror.
-
GemWM, anybody?GUI CrUD is site created for people who want to use GNU/GPL stuff to create a GUI that functions similar to existing GUI's. This might be usefull in situations where you want to use Linux, but would have to retrain your staff, or your family in order to use it. Just set it up to look work just like a Mac, or whatever, and they don't have to deal with too much change....
I kept hearing people talk about it, and ideas floating around. Someone asked me for some webspace for it, I slaped the pages together, and stuck them up.
Unfortunately, I personally don't want to lead any of these projects, I only offered the site space, and some server side stuff (mailing list setup/mantainance, etc...). And, so far only about a dozen people have showed any interest, so there isn't much to do or talk about yet. If anyone wants to work on it, let me know, I'd be happy to give ya some space, or just the list of names I have so far....
-
Package ListI know someone asked what was in it (kernel at least), I grabbed the package list
for those who wanna see what is in there.
-
CAJUN
This is the goal of the CAJUN (Car Audio Jukebox UNIX) project, isn't it?
:-) -
Link Correction.
http://gnustep.current. nu/comments.php3?sid=99/01/27/125608 is the correct link for the story.
-
News GroupsNewsgroups are hot on this topic. Here is a link to some Selected Postings about X on the new SGI for anyone who may be interested.
They aren't my posts, but I thought they were interesting, so I decided to share them with you
;-)