Slashdot Mirror


More Links And Reports On Terrorist Attacks

Timothy has compiled a good list of links related to this morning's terrorist attacks around America. Many photos and video clips. There's a lot of good links there and I highly recommend that you read them. And thanks to the Slashteam for keeping the servers up through this. Its not easy dealing with 3x the traffic. I apologize to readers that have been inconvenienced.

Two major news updates: the plane downed near Pittsburgh is reported not to have been shot down. A fifth plane which had been feared hijacked, this one a Korean Air jetliner, was forced down by Canadian Air Force planes over the Yukon. However, this plane is reported not to have been hijacked -- instead, its emergency beacon was triggered by a low-fuel indicator.

Importantly -- remember, blood is in demand. The Red Cross' site is mobbed, but here's the blood donation information on a the cached page at google.

More details of the attack and its aftermath: a report at at gnome.org, and a photo at indymedia.org. pajama links to NYC Police scanner traffic (winamp) streamed online, and an anonymous reader also points to another scanner feed.

Shadowwalker Delaforge writes "Hey guys: I'm submitting my web site to yours to get the word out. I've been compiling web sites, and info on the U.S. Attack. These sites are ones that work, and arent' swamped out of existence. I'm also adding new data about where people can donate money, blood, and other things dealing with this.

soccerdad writes "Due to the activities of today, the internet/networking experts at my firm have been asked by some of our clients to be on standby in case anything untoward occurs. They've been monitoring backbone activity, etc., in a "just in case" mode. They've described the activity they're seeing as somewhat strange. The backbone is, according to them, at about 80% utilization -- they've never seen it above 40% before. However, the main portal sites such as Yahoo aren't having substantively higher than normal traffic. They're working on doing some traffic analysis but haven't completed that effort yet."

A small piece of that bandwidth may be saved if you go to the link Kalak suggests: "William Shunn is collecting short notes from people in the terrorist affected areas so you can see who is OK." Look here (or post your name here if you're in an affected city) before tying up a phone connection. Alex Fabrikant submitted another personal information site at Berkeley

Thapthim writes "http://cbc.ca/ has all sorts of information, even in our own city buildings are being shutdown, all air traffic has been suspended. However Canadian Airports are taking in international flights heading into US so the air ports there are free for emergencies."

sn0wcrsh wrote to say that a "short blurb on Channel 7 Boston that the CTO of Akamai was on the fateful plane that hit the trade center" confirms the earlier reports that he was on board.

And ectrix writes: "The CFO of my company, Netegrity was on United Airlines Flight 175, which has been confirmed to us by United Airlines to have hit tower two of the WTC.

WAVY NBC - Norfolk, VA (among other local TV stations I'm sure) is reporting on the air the Threatcon levels at the area Naval, Air Force, and Army bases. They are all at Threatcon Delta. Their website currently only lists their status as of the beginning of the attacks, which was Threatcon Charlie. Norfolk, VA is the home port for the US Atlantic Fleet. Local TV stations also are showing armed (M16s, shotguns) guards patrolling the base grounds and perimeters."

There are updated photos and videos here, and CarbonFusion wrote with another good link to photos and videos.. eddiem writes: "http://www.flightexplorer.com/ will soon let you view the flight path of the planes." Explanations of airport security at How Stuff Works and Cryptome are an interesting read under the circumstances as well.

Bard, Andrew wrote with some updates as well:

"Just to let you know:
  1. I heard a woman who was on the 92nd floor of the first WTC building when the plane hit it. She was able to escape and so was everyone "in her company" so it is assumed that virtually everyone from the 92nd floor down was evacuated successfully - an estimated 20,000 people of the 25,000 in the building.
  2. the plane that went down in PA had a woman onboard who locked herself in the bathroom with her cellular phone - she was telling authorities about the hijacking when the plane crashed and killed her - that is the only way the authorities knew for sure what plane went down in PA so quickly, she gave her flight number
  3. the Mexican border is completely closed and the Canadian border is still open - all International flights have been redirected to Northern Canada
  4. the planes from Boston were presumably chosen because they were going on long flights (to LA) which would make them larger than average airliners with full tanks of gas
  5. when the first WTC building crashed (which was the 2nd one to be hit), 125 firemen were down below fighting the fire on the first building to be hit... none of them have been heard from yet - 10,000 emergency personnel in NYC responded to the first WTC getting hit... it is unknown how many of those were crushed in the two collapsed buildings."

1,056 comments

  1. Correction by SquierStrat · · Score: 4, Informative

    Canadian border has been since sealed.

    --
    Derek Greene
    1. Re:Correction by seann · · Score: 0

      from what I heard, only the rainbow bridge was closed (New York area).

      I live in Niagara Falls, I'm scared to go down to the bridges and see the horrendus backup.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:Correction by Meech · · Score: 0

      I am also from Niagara Falls and all of the bridges are up and running except for the Whirlpool bridge, which noone uses anyway.

    3. Re:Correction by Talaran · · Score: 1

      The news I've read reported that the Canadian/US border was going to be closed, but still has not been. But you can bet security there is extremely tight.

      I live and work under the Vancouver Airport flight path. The skies are pretty clear today.

    4. Re:Correction by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      AM 750 WSB here in Atlanta, which is very much connected with CNN, the Canadian border is closed. So, I can't confirm anything.

      --
      Derek Greene
    5. Re:Correction by Ho-Lee-Cow! · · Score: 1
      Why is the parent modded as Flamebait? The US/Canada border -was- sealed, along with the US/Mexico border. Air traffic has been grounded in both countries as well.

      A bunch of someones flew great big bombs into the sides of 3 buildings, using commercial airliners. Communications in and out of NYC have been devastated by the loss of equipment on top of the WTC. Of course, given the basic unknown nature of the threat, they closed the borders. This is -that- serious.

      --
      In space, no one can hear you moo.
    6. Re:Correction by ndetroit · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Canadian border is not entirely closed.

      If you meet the following conditions, you will be allowed entry to the U.S at this time:

      1.) you must be a U.S. citizen
      2.) you must be on official U.S. business, or have an immediate emergency need to return to the U.S.

      The borders are backed up quite a bit just about everywhere right now, but in most areas, the RCMP are trying to intercept people heading that way, in order to help the border guards filter out the traffic..

      I live in Vancouver, and every single hotel and lodging is booked solid. They are having a hard time finding places to put all the people who got diverted here from other internation flights.

    7. Re:Correction by Husaria · · Score: 0

      There was a huge backup on the 290 today, from UB. Of course, that's the result of all the state offices being shut down and Buffalo.
      Today we cry,
      tomorrow, we let the wind dry our tears as we sift the mess
      and the next day, we will be strong again.

    8. Re:Correction by jdg · · Score: 1

      Our local TV news (Rochester,NY) reports border
      crossings at Niagara Falls are closed.

    9. Re:Correction by seann · · Score: 0

      no way, another canadian?

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    10. Re:Correction by Meech · · Score: 0

      I am sad to say that I am on the other side of the river, such a sad city compared to your side.

    11. Re:Correction by seann · · Score: 0

      you guys have Gagsters, they have the *best* wings on the boarder.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  2. appreciate the info by quannump · · Score: 1

    if it wasn't for slashdot i wouldn't have been able to stay informed of the situation. I thank all people involved with providing such information.

    --

    1. Re:appreciate the info by combat+chuck123 · · Score: 1

      I completely echo this statement... This is one of the few sites I could get to reliably come up all day.

      Thank you.

    2. Re:appreciate the info by bartle · · Score: 2

      This is probably some of the best work I've seen from the Slashdot editors. They've been putting up reliable information faster than some of the big sites. They're dedication in this case is appreciated.

    3. Re:appreciate the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BFD. Don't pat folks on the back for getting info on the web, you can use a radio.

      Low tech is often more effective.

    4. Re:appreciate the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. When CNN was bogged and I was starved for the details, Slashdot came through. Thank you.

  3. The best photo I've seen of this nightmare by hakkikt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.spack.nu/wtc/wtcboom.jpg

    1. Re:The best photo I've seen of this nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an FTP up with many pictures captured from CNN by myself as well as 7 hours of audio in 2 large segments from CNN from 10am to around 5.

      132.177.76.231 login: file pw: file

  4. Links by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    Opinion stuff: National Review Online
    The Economist
    The best commentary I've picked up today.

    1. Re:Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be joking.

      The National Review commentary is precisely the kind of small minded, jingoistic, isolationist expression of american hegemony that will encourage further outrages. After an appropriate response design to discourage the notion that such attacks can be carried out with impunity, a re-examination of U.S. foreign relations -- particularly with regard to Israel -- is in order, not the simplistic intensification of past failures advocated by the National Review!

  5. Link to Photos by akiaki007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here is a link on Yahoo! that is just their most recent pictures. I saw up to about page 5 or 6 that were just of this.

    --
    "Time is long and life is short, so begin to live while you still can." -EV
  6. You can also view images and movies at by CRiMSON · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.unspeakable.org/wtc

    Please email me all your pics and movies, as I will put them online also.

    email them to crimson@unspeakable.org

    --
    oogly boogly!
    1. Re:You can also view images and movies at by -=Izzy=- · · Score: 1

      slashdotted... The box got slaughtered. I hope to have it back up soon.

  7. Another building collapsed by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wish I could be more informative, but check the tv - building 7 (part of the WTC complex) collapsed, but it was expected and officials were waiting for about a half hour, from what I heard. Apparently, injuries from this collapse are minimal.

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    1. Re:Another building collapsed by TOTKChief · · Score: 2

      The building was on fire prior to the collapse, and had been completely evacuated.

    2. Re:Another building collapsed by Andux · · Score: 1

      Ditto for building 6, according to NBC. Also heard that the Mexican border in not closed, but security is very tight.

      --
      (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
    3. Re:Another building collapsed by Jburkholder · · Score: 5, Funny
    4. Re:Another building collapsed by bugg · · Score: 2
      It may have been evacuated, but right next to it there's a giant pile of rubble in which there may be many people who were still alive.

      It's a big deal, because there may be survivors in there, and until the fires stop and it becomes safe, more of them might die.

      --
      -bugg
    5. Re:Another building collapsed by jallen02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know.. our country is in a sad state of affairs when x10 is doing something helpful with their advertisement :(

      Usually when something bad happens or something tragic occurs I can make people smile and make them laugh and find the brighter side of everything. Today not even I can really cheer myself up let alone others. How truly stunning and sad. I feel crushed not only from the loss of life but the symbolic gesture and the hard fight ahead of us as american people now.

      We MUST NOT EVER let the terrorists take away our freedoms. There will be people in the government trying to pass very tough laws, for example a law banning encryption or something, and we must fight and fight hard. We cannot let this change our way of life AT ALL. We cannot let laws that take away our freedoms come to pass. Please people stay ever vigilant now more than ever. We cannot sacrifice our freedoms and let laws protect us, when in reality they take away our freedoms. To quote a famous quote, "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. " We cannot bend, we cannot break. None of the world can.

      The prime minister of israel had some good perspective on this. This is an attack against civilization, not just us americans.

      Jeremy

    6. Re:Another building collapsed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those fanatics should have used a browser that lets you block pop-up ads, like Konqueror (KDE only) or Mozilla. And to anyone else thinking of doing something similar: being free from pop-up ads is not worth thousands of innocent lives! (And yes, most of them were innocent; just because many of the people who worked WTC towers were/are capitalists doesn't mean they were responsible for the recent deluge of online advertising.)

      I'm saddened that X10 has given in so quickly. I dislike pop-up ads as much as the next guy, but doesn't X10 realize that appeasement only leads to more threats and more violence in the long run?

    7. Re:Another building collapsed by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

      That's a very admirable thing to do -- to facilitate better communication for people by giving up the bandwidth normally used for their ads. I wish more corporations had the cojones to do real things that "give" from their actual bottom line back to the community that supports them. I don't know why your comment was modded as funny . . . I take things like this pretty seriously. It's a hopeful sign that not everybody running a business in the world today is a backstabbing blackguard.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    8. Re:Another building collapsed by SlippyToad · · Score: 2
      Another thought: X10 is taking the chance that they may or may not benefit from this by having a (very small, to be sure) community notice that they've done it and turn to them later on for business as a way of returning the favor.

      Unlike, say, the gas stations around my town who have openly advertised that they intend to raise their gas prices to $5 in response to this. When the opportunity comes around for the community to decide on theirfate, there's a good chance we'll remember the knife they chose to stick in our backs in a time of tragedy. . .

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    9. Re:Another building collapsed by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      "that not everybody running a business in the world today is a backstabbing blackguard."

      I am sure these business people who died in WTC aren't anymore.
      You should be happy, your arch enemies just died in large numbers.

    10. Re:Another building collapsed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will not remember anything and , just like you did for the last x years, you will forget about this stuff by the next super bowl.
      Southerners are so fucking predictable, it is scary.

    11. Re:Another building collapsed by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      >facilitate better communication for people by giving up the bandwidth normally used for their ads.

      Except that the thing still pops under and uses bandwidth and links to their site. It *is* still an ad. It is an ad disguised as a statement of sympathy.

      >I don't know why your comment was modded as funny

      Neither do I. I certainly didn't intend it as such.

  8. Foreign correspondance by crankydoodle · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that the entire world is reporting on this as well... the BBC in particular has some excellent resources.

    --
    I'm almost certain I'm not cranky at you...
  9. Kudos! by soulsteal · · Score: 2

    I would like to (try) to be the first to thank the Slashteam, the editors, and all Slashdotters themselves for their response to this. I woke up and just happened to check Slashdot before I left for work. I arrived an hour late thanks to CNN and my own astonishment. Later through the day, while news sites went up and down, Slashdot's commentary provided ample links to news sources for those of us trapped in cubicles.

    Huzzah to you!

  10. WTC Update by crumbz · · Score: 0

    The 3rd building just collapsed. CNN reports either building 5 or 7 which has been burning since this morning, went down.

  11. Don't care if I get modded down by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 2, Informative
    A third building has collapsed. Building 7 if that means anything to anybody.

    I'm in Canada, and despite our differences with our friends to the south, this incident is just horrific. Seeing the towers collapse was the most stunning and sickening sight I've ever seen.

    Condolences and regards to all those in New York, and around America.

    One question. Where was that 4th plane headed? Looked like the Pentagon from the ATC displays CNN showed...

    1. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apparently the third building was the Salamon (sp?) Brothers building - other buildings in the area are also said to be unstable.

      The BBC (tv) here in the UK has been doing a great job of keeping up with the events today.

    2. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by DavidJA · · Score: 1

      Australian news is reporting that the 4th plane was possably headed for Camp David.

    3. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australian news is reporting that the 4th plane was possably headed for Camp David.

      This might be coincidence but I think September 11 1978 was the start of the Camp David accords. Perhaps 'somebody' protected this 'holy' area from this insane and barbaric act.

    4. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's coincidence, if the attack are middle-eastern in origin, then it's usually on a special day, like the ramadan, and yom kippur attacks.

    5. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by sharkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A third building has collapsed. Building 7 if that means anything to anybody.

      AFAIK, Building 7 housed the BATF and OSHA.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by H1r0Pr0tag0n1st · · Score: 1

      It also housed the NYC Secret Service field office, where they were in preperation for the start of UNs annual meeting next week.

      --
      Americans could not be more self absorbed if they were made of equal parts water and paper towel. -Dennis Miller
    7. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by Garc · · Score: 1
      One question. Where was that 4th plane headed?

      Do you mean the plane that crashed in PA? If so, I no that it was on its way back east when it crashed. On the news in cleveland, they said they had it on radar "making a U-turn over lake erie".

      garc

    8. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by M-2 · · Score: 1

      It also housed Solomon Smith Barney's NYC IT group, including the Exchange server administration team and the Novell and NT admins.

      Friends of mine on the Exchange group. I'm glad they got out.

    9. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by sharkey · · Score: 2

      God bless. Know that they are in our prayers here in Indy, those that survived, those that didn't, and those that may not.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    10. Re:Don't care if I get modded down by alptraum · · Score: 1

      I heard off of one of the news sites that one of Bin Laden's friends/occomplices(sp?) was going to be tried today at a place near the WTC, thus a possible motive for yesterdays bombing.

  12. Mexican Border / Canadian Border by __aapbgd5977 · · Score: 1

    Actually, that statement above is exactly the opposite of correct. ABC is reporting the Canadian border crossings are closed (remember the guy they nabbed on the runup to Y2K in Washington State). Mexican border crossings are open, except for San Ysidro (near San Diego).

    1. Re:Mexican Border / Canadian Border by stcanard · · Score: 1

      I live in Vancouver, so I can fill in some details here:

      The Canadian border is open, it was closed briefly. Don't bother trying to get through, you need a specific reason and every car is being searched. A CBC reporter was let through, but they put spikes down in front of the car before searching it just so he couldn't get through.

      Planes are being diverted to whatever Canadian airport can handle them, not just northern ones. I can see the Vancouver airport from where I am, and it's just a sea of planes. I don't see how anymore could possibly get in, but I still hear more circling overhead. They've obviously opened a runway they don't normally use, because the planes are coming down on a line they don't normally take.

      Finally, I don't know what they're going to do about accomodations! I don't see how we can possibly have enough hotels by the airport for this, so they're going to have to send people far afield. That's going to be a real problem.

    2. Re:Mexican Border / Canadian Border by M.+Silver · · Score: 2

      Finally, I don't know what they're going to do about accomodations! I don't see how we can possibly have enough hotels by the airport for this, so they're going to have to send people far afield. That's going to be a real problem.

      You said it. Guess there are a lot of planes that got directed to land in what's usually flyover country. Wichita's hotels, according to the radio, are full, and they'll be putting Mid-Continent passengers (or unpassengers, as it turns out) in hotels clear out to Salina. Salina's something like an hour away. (But it's on I-70, so if you're not able to fly, at least you're on a major highway. Although I hear Greyhound isn't running now, either.)

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    3. Re:Mexican Border / Canadian Border by XO · · Score: 1

      The Mexican border was closed first. The Canadian border was not CLOSED entirely, however the stations from New York to Canada were.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    4. Re:Mexican Border / Canadian Border by moose_hp · · Score: 1

      Well... the real problem are the guys who landed (and got stuck) in a U.S. airport without an American Visa, you may ask how, because many people (most form Mexico) that travel to another country dont care about geting a visa that they will only use twice for one hour or so , so they stayed in the airport in transit (TWOv).

      The problem is that people without visa MUST stay in the airport, they arent alowed to exit the airport until their airplane departs.

      --
      DON'T PANIC.
  13. Better security on planes by niftyzero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm disappointed that it is so easy to hijack planes. I think airplane crew should be armed and the cockpit better protected. Airplanes are vulnerable targets with a large payoff for terrorists, and should be protected accordingly.

    1. Re:Better security on planes by ThymePuns · · Score: 1

      If a gun goes off on a plane, it's bad even if it misses any person. You wouldn't want a hole in the plane either.

      But it is a shame, like all of today's events.

      --

    2. Re:Better security on planes by Token+User · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was knives and box cutters/openers according to a CNN contact who was onboard and calling the station before it went down. No shots fired - not that it made any difference.

    3. Re:Better security on planes by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      You don't want a hole, but a plane then becomes an unguided weapon at worst. In this case, the plane was very much a guided weapon.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:Better security on planes by mlheur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree with arming all flight staff. Not everyone likes to be gun-toting and power hungry, and your average man could easily out-muscle your average flight attendant from behind before she could grab the gun.

      As for better protecting the cockpit, I agree. Maybe something more than a cloth curtain or particle board door is in order, how about someting like steel with a keyless deadbolt? Maybe a firearm in a lockbox in the cockpit? Something that can actually keep people out.

    5. Re:Better security on planes by Brainboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard the knives and box cutters report too. But something doesn't make sense. You can fight a guy with knife. Hell a large group of people (remember the two planes were a 757 and 767) could tackle a small group of people with knives. What the hell happened?

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
    6. Re:Better security on planes by ThymePuns · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They probbaly wouldn't want to fight and risk their life, since they probably didn't think that they would be run into a building :(

      --

    7. Re:Better security on planes by Detritus · · Score: 2

      After everybody started hijacking airplanes to Cuba, the FAA started putting armed sky marshals on selected flights. I'm not sure if they still do that.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    8. Re:Better security on planes by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      Having firearms on a plane even for the crew's use would be absolutely insane. Suddenly, crafty hijackers wouldn't need to smuggle their own arms on board as they're already there. Also, no matter who fires the gun, a stray bullet on an airplane can be fatal for all on board.

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    9. Re:Better security on planes by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      He said armed, stun guns & tasers would work just fine for this kinda stuff.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    10. Re:Better security on planes by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These guys smuggled KNIVES on board. The problem is not that guns are easy to get on board, they arent. The problem is that people arent trained to resist as if their life depends on it, since usually it doesnt.

      A hijacking usually means that the plane is redirected to another location and the hostages are traded for some demands, etc etc.

      Now I think that people will fight back a lot harder the next time someone tries to hijack a plane with a knife.

    11. Re:Better security on planes by UpeoWaMacho · · Score: 1

      A national guard friend of mine said he thought this

      The plane that went down in penn probably had someone who was allowed to carry a gun on board - like a marshal or fed. The guy probably started a shoot out or something... and a hole in the plane, or something like it sent it down. I think the woman who called 911 from her cell phone while locked in the bathroom mentioned a gunshot...

      Also, i bet there was inside help on American and United. Hence why it was on two of their planes. And someone on the ground crew could have easily smuggled weapons on board.

      And remember, the flights weren't full. Only about 200 (i think) people on all 4 planes.

      --
      Upeo
    12. Re:Better security on planes by chinakow · · Score: 1

      well if you depressurised a plane at 20 thousand or more feet then everyon one on board would pass out without oxgen , i know pilots have ther own takes so it could actually subdues the terrorist lon enough to incapacitate them

      Jon

    13. Re:Better security on planes by vulg4r_m0nk · · Score: 1

      Given that their weapons were mere knives, a single well-armed sky marshall on each of these planes would have likely prevented this from happening. I expect we'll have them on flights regularly starting ASAP.

      And I certainly hope we see a retrofit of supposedly "user friendly" cockpits such as in 757/767s with biometric devices to identify pilots. After all, almost certainly the pilots were either killed or incapacitated, the planes being flown subsequently by the terrorists.

    14. Re:Better security on planes by livitup · · Score: 1
      There is a Federal Air Marshal Service. They are chartered to protect planes while in the air. They operate in plain clothes, and look like regular passengers. You'd never know if one was sitting next to you. They are armed. However, there's nowhere near enough of them to be on every flight, and they only operate on International flights.

      Here's a FAA page about the service.

    15. Re:Better security on planes by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

      You're right. Die like sheep instead.

      Guns = Bad, unconditionally, of course.

      Arm the friggen pilots, not the attendants!

    16. Re:Better security on planes by SlippyToad · · Score: 2
      See, I think this problem could be solved by adding three people to the personnel normally in the crew complement of an airplane. Two gigantic hulking kevlar-vested security guards with cattle prods or stun guns would be required for every ~100 or so passengers. And a third undercover guard armed with an actual pistol would be added. His identity would be unknown to anyone onboard except for the pilot and the two kevlar-vested thugs.

      But that's just my opinion. If the airlines cannot bear the additional cost that security must require, well that's tough titty. They are operating machines that can kill lots of the rest of us. We should demand and require that they have control of those machines at all times, or revoke their license to operate them.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    17. Re:Better security on planes by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

      hardcore conspiracy theory here....

      But what if the pilots themselves did it? If this has been planned over years, what would have stopped the terrorists from becoming actual pilots in order to perform their task? What kind of background checks are pilots required to go through?

      Not likely or probable, but a tiny possibility nontheless.

    18. Re:Better security on planes by libreazul · · Score: 0

      First of all, the idea of complete suitacase, carry-on and personal searches have to be considered. Beyond that, "sky-marshalls" must be employed on every flight. Add to that an armed and/or sealed-off cockpit.

      "The horses are gone, let's lock the door"

    19. Re:Better security on planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously your stupid brain cannot digest the fact that these airlines operate on very thin margins and forcing them into stuff like this will inevitably result in less money being spent on maintenance and similar issues.
      You want to revoke their licenses?
      What the fuck do you know about aviation to even comment on this stuff?
      Why is that, when tragedy struck, all kids of idiots come out of their hiding?

  14. Innocents.. by joss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Killing innocent civilians serves no good purpose. I just hope that principle is remembered even in anger and during calls for revenge. If you can positively identify and kill those responsible, fine, but if you are prepared to see the deaths of innocent civilians in the pursuit of revenge, then you have no moral advantage over the terrorists.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    1. Re:Innocents.. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Killing innocent civilians serves no good purpose. I just hope that principle is remembered even in anger and during calls for revenge. If you can positively identify and kill those responsible, fine, but if you are prepared to see the deaths of innocent civilians in the pursuit of revenge, then you have no moral advantage over the terrorists.

      Put another way, consider what the terrorists actually did: kill innocent civilians. All of the suspects (Muslims, domestic, etc.) would have been motivated by revenge. If we kill or harrass everyone who might be associated with a terrorists, in the hopes of silencing or scaring our enemies, we will have become terrorists ourselves - literally, acting by terror.

      The US is already close enough to ruling by fear (note the "chilling effect" - Supreme Court's legal term - extended by the DMCA and other recent legislation, going far beyond the intent and, often, the letter of the law). It doesn't need to go further down that path just now.

    2. Re:Innocents.. by theDEFT · · Score: 0

      Give the US more credit. Sounds like you are describing a revenge response by the US that involves killing innocent civilians in hopes that we weed out the bad seeds. We're smarter than that. Any revenge sequence should be slow and methodical: Surgically and carefully executed.
      Reminder that you don't have to kill to get revenge.

    3. Re:Innocents.. by martyb · · Score: 3, Informative

      First off, my heartfelt condolences to those who have lost family, friends, and loved ones in this tragedy.

      I met with a number of friends at lunch. Some had loved ones who they had been unable to reach to see if they were okay.
      I felt powerless over what had happened, and indeed there is nothing anyone can do to change what has already happened. But, I did what I could, today. I offered a shoulder to cry on. I encouraged them to have hope, to know that not knowing does not mean the worst. That there is already a tremendous pulling together of support. Calls for blood donations, people reaching out to friends they hadn't talked with for a long while, and countless other acts across the country and the world where people offer support to one another.

      This tragedy can become a rallying point, an opportunity to show the world what we are made of here in the US of A. The Oklahoma bombing, the flooding of the Mississippi River, hurricanes, tornadoes, and earthquakes. We are a people that has a long history of reaching out to help.

      A proverb I've liked: "If I cannot do great things, then I will do small things in great ways." (Don't know who wrote it, sorry.) Each person who lends a hand, a shoulder, a caring heart does something tangible. And all of those seemingly small acts, when taken together, can show the world, and ourselves, that we are greater, MUCH greater, than these attacks.

    4. Re:Innocents.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We're smarter than that
      That's the first real laugh I've had all day. Go tell that joke in Kabul.
    5. Re:Innocents.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a fool. Have you seen the pictures of the celebrations in Palestinian camps in Libya? There are precious few innocents among the seed of Ishmael.

      May we purge the remnants of this sub-human race of animals from the face of the planet!

    6. Re:Innocents.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appearently, 12 hours ago, no one in the US knew this was going to happen. Now Afganastan is being bombed...

    7. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2

      It depends on who is guilty and how you define 'innocent'. The video of those people celebrating in Middle Eastern countries sickens me. I would feel no remorse for them if they or their leader is responsible and they were made to suffer the same fate as those whose deaths they cheered, or feel the same pains as those who lost loved ones today.

    8. Re:Innocents.. by _Swank · · Score: 2

      while i mostly agree, there is some slight difference (very). the terrorists have targeted and killed civilians and civilians only. The difference is really in the intent. This aggression if taken as an act of war may result in innocent civilians being killed. War, by its nature, kills and does not (and cannot be expected to) differentiate between innocent and guilty.

    9. Re:Innocents.. by joss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Suppose US decides to bomb Baghdad in response. Suppose film showing a bunch of rednecks cheering this action was shown in Amman. Do you think this would justify further bombing of America ?

      Maybe they were raised on anti-american propoganda, maybe you were raised on anti-arab propoganda, whatever... ignorance, misunderstanding and hatred is responsible for this insanity. The first defense against this crap is to try to understand where it's coming from. Even if this comes down to nothing more than "know your enemy", you would be well advised to find out a little bit about why palestinians hate the US so much.

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    10. Re:Innocents.. by nusuth · · Score: 1

      Wars can and did differentiate between civilians and soliders. In this case the target is terrorist and I belive a civilized country with vast intelligence resources can and SHOULD differentiate between civilians and terrorists. US has taken far too many civilian lives during the last five wars he participated, can not even the deaths of thousands of its own children teach him that killing civilians is unjustified, whatever the cause?

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    11. Re:Innocents.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it turns out the attacks were not related to the middle east, then these comments become invalid.

      I believe the terrorists believed they were at war with the US. But if they are at war, why aren't they facing the Israeli Army?

      There are two answers:

      1) They are cowards.
      2) They somehow think this will be more effective. The last time the Arab world faced Israel head on, they lost ground.

    12. Re:Innocents.. by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2
      Two problems with that:
      1. If we're unsure that our target is guilty, the actual guilty party may be on another continent when we attack, and then we'd be targetting and killing civilians and civilians only - at least, so far as anyone other than our military and the military that attacked us is "civilian".
      2. Even if we are sure the attack was, say, sponsored by some specific country, and we attack the country blindly as opposed to selectively taking out its military and leaders, then the military and leaders are likely to be among those who have forewarning and get out of the way of our attacks - and again, the effect of our attack is to target and kill civilians and civilians only. (No allowance for "but we thought the military would still be there, so we were targetting the military" if we didn't think at all before attacking.)
    13. Re:Innocents.. by kettch · · Score: 1

      The methods available to the government to bring the animals responsible for the attack to justice put it in a catch-22 position. One one hand If the animals responsible for this attack are identified a public trial would most likely happen. However, a public trial would make sure everone in the world knows who the terrorists are, and why they did it. This would be, in fact, exactly what the terrorists would want to happen. That is why any terrorist does what he does, for the attention.

      On the other hand, if the terroists were discovered and dealt with in secret, then the terrorists would have also succeeded to some degree. They would have caused such a stir that they were able to get the most powerful country in the world to abandon it's own principles of justice for all. Granted, these people are animals and deserve a slow and painful death.

      I think that if the ones responsible are caught, their identities and motivations should be kept secret. A trial should be held with leaders from major nations present. It may be possible to try, and dispose of the terrorists without abandoning American principles, yet still deal a telling blow to the terrorists cause by not allowing them any free publicity.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    14. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2

      Ok, heres the deal. First of all even the Palestinan president has denounced these attacks. It's fairly obvious that our attempts at sanctioning peace talks between the palestinians and the israelis did NOT justify the genocide of what will possibly be 10's of thousands of people. if they had then the president of the people we were supposed to have wronged so greatly wouldn't be on OUR side. Secondly we are talking about the lifes of innocent people. Had we just went over and killed thousands of civilians in one fell swoop, I doubt any "rednecks" would be out cheering. That is a sick and immoral act. But most importantly everyone keeps saying that we need to be peaceful. I can't believe anyone could be that stupid. If we don't fight back, they don't fight back, right? Fine, what about in 5 years when another terrorist groups is thinking of such an act? Would you rather them look back on this attempt and realize that they would get away with it, or realize that the full wrath of the US and her allies (which as it is shaping up now is at least Russia, and Britian, probably many more) will rain down upon them if they carry it out? What about 5 years after that, and 5 after that? Letting terrorists get away with Genocide will only show the worlds madmen that they too can get away with such an act. If more blood has to be shed now, to prevent what could be innumerable mass murder attacks in the future, then I for one say so be it. And I for one would be willing to fight and die to see that this never happens again.

    15. Re:Innocents.. by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      "genocide" is the act of wiping out a race. What took place today was in no way genocide.

      --
      - Toby
    16. Re:Innocents.. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Rather like we all celebrated the execution of Timothy McVeigh?

      Welcome to the international brotherhood of terrorism:
      ...just as they are happy to see the death of any Joe Average American, even though Joe isn't personally responsible for the atrocities they claim of the USA,
      ...you're happy to see the death of Joe Average midEaster, even though Joe isn't personally responsible for the terrorist attack.

      Let's not descend to their level.

      There should be justice. Let's make sure it's just.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    17. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2

      You are correct. I apologize, the term has been thrown about many times today and I suppose it was lodged in my head. Although I'm not sure I agree with you completely. Genocide isn't the "wiping out" of a race, but rather the mass murder of a race. The most famous genocide being the Holocaust at the hands of the Nazis. That was certainly genocide but the Jewish people were obviously not "wiped out". That being said, I think in a way genocide still applies. They might not have all been the white race, or the black race, or the asian race, but they all were the AMERICAN race and though we might not scientifically be one race, I think this incident has proved that all but the most bigoted of us pull together as if we were blood brothers when our lifes, and way of life, is threatened.

    18. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2

      Umm, maybe I missed something, but Average Joe Mideaster CONFESSED to the Oklahoma City bombing. Did the thousands of people in the WTC confess to something that I don't know about? If so, what was it?
      Your analogy is way passed silly. You are talking about cheering the death of the man confessed to be responsible for the death of hundreds, and the cheering of the death of thousands who did not confess to a crime that has not been committed.

    19. Re:Innocents.. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Nonono.

      Let me repeat:

      The people that are cheering in the midEast are cheering the deaths of civilians who are not personally responsible for the atrocities that the terrorists accuse the USA of perpetrating. Their hatred doesn't recognize individuals as innocents.

      If you cheer the presupposed death of midEast civilians, you're no better than they are: you cheer the death of people who are not personally responsible for the terrorist attack.

      Sorry to confuse you. The Timothy McVeigh comment was irrelevent to the remainder of the post.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    20. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2

      Oh, OK. But I think you are misunderstanding MY intent as well. I didn't mean that the US should go randomly and intentionally bombing Palestinian citizens. What I meant was that if those people who cheered our deaths were to become civilian casualties as a result of our retaliation to their leaders act of war (if it was their leaders responsible) then I would feel no remorse over their loss. There is a big difference IMNSHO between feeling no remorse for civilian casualties during wartime, and cheering civilian casualties during an act of terrorism, and if the USA (or anyone) had killed palestinians civilians without warning during peacetime for no appparent reason, I doubt very many of us would be in the streets celebrating.

    21. Re:Innocents.. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Ah, yes, gotcha.

      My newsfeed ("The National," CBC TV) ran a bit on the television programming in Palestine.

      I'm now *very* disgusted, and am beginning to believe that they've incubated an nation of hate. I was not previously aware that the Palestine government actively supported the "death to America" brainwashing.

      I'm hoping that my newsfeed is being stupid, jumping abroad the hate-Palestine train. But I somehow doubt it: CBC is usually an extremely rational, truthful newsource.

      I find myself becoming more open to putting them under glass... !

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    22. Re:Innocents.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. an ac talking about cowards. but seriously, i completely agree.

    23. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2

      Well, from all accounts I've heard the president of the Palestines has denounced the attacks, so I don't know exactly how much the government over there agrees with the "death the the US" sentiments of it's citizens.
      The citizens I saw though were armed militant looking types. Perhaps their attitude towards us is one reason our peacemaking attempts continually fail over there.

    24. Re:Innocents.. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Yah, I just stumbled on a BBC report.

      Now I'm not sure who or what to believe.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    25. Re:Innocents.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed you used the phrase "get away with it". Do you fail to grasp that these people aren't the least bit interested in getting away with it? They're suicide bombers. If you think some sort of retaliation is going to make future terorists reconsider their plans, you are sadly mistaken. The only way of dealing with this would be to 1) identify the perpetrators. 2) hunt down and kill all involved (assuming there are some involved who aren't dead already). This again, accomplished nothing. Perhaps a way of dealing with it would be to cut down on US support to Israel, but then we're giving in to their implied demands, and hence they accomplished their goal, so we clearly can't do that. It's a lose lose situation, where we clearly lost, but on the other hand they didn't gain anything except reduced sympathy for their cause..then again, i don't think they care...

    26. Re:Innocents.. by emc · · Score: 1

      midEaster, as in from the Mid East (Think Globally), not from the MidWest(Think Domestically... US)

    27. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2
      A few of these terrorists might have been suicide bombers, but not ALL terrorists are suicide bombers. Furhtermore if there goal is to pull us out of Israel and away from the Palestines, and the result of the attack is a counterattack on the Palestines (Arafat denounced the attacks, so this is all just speculation of course), then the attack accomplished the exact opposite of its goal.
      If we do nothing then we are setting ourselves up for an "It can't hurt to try" attitude from every two-bit wannabe terrorist out there. Most of whom, although willing to die, are not outright suicidal.

    28. Re:Innocents.. by Dr.+Facetious · · Score: 1

      "Furhtermore if there goal is to pull us out of Israel and away from the Palestines, and the result of the attack is a counterattack on the Palestines (Arafat denounced the attacks, so this is all just speculation of course), then the attack accomplished the exact opposite of its goal."

      It is much more likely that their goal *is* to get us to retaliate, thus killing more innocent people and generating more anti-American hatred. If these terorists can successfully pull off such a sophisticated attack, they probably don't have any illusions about what the U.S. response will be. Nor are other demented individuals capable of mass killing likely to be deterred by the prospect of "their own people" getting killed in retaliation, wether they are suicidal or not.

      This is not to say that we shouldn't try to stop would be terrorists before they strike when we can find them, but we should take great care not to kill more innocent people and escalate the hatered and violence between the U.S. and much of the rest of the world.

    29. Re:Innocents.. by DeadRangerBoy · · Score: 1

      The one factor you fail to take into account is the terrorist mindset, which is very different from that of you or I. Terrorists justify the acts they perform by saying that it is the product of "ideological purity", ie. they claim that their beliefs justify any action no matter how inhuman. In essence they separate themselves from their humanity. This also generally leads them to exhibit a fanatical dedication to their cause. Few would argue that anyone is more dedicated to an idea than a terrorist. Because they have lost touch with their humanity, and because their resolve is so strong, they take the idea that no one has as strong a resolve as they do and translate it into "no one has a strong resolve *except* me". These people really do believe that we will roll over and do whatever we want if they make a graphic enough display of their resolve. If we (we being freedom-loving people everywhere) do not stand up and demonstrate, once and for all, that this is not the case, then the problem will only get worse. I do not like the idea of killing innocents to get at he people who did this, but I am afraid that it seems to be the only way that will produce results.

    30. Re:Innocents.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swank Wrote:

      the terrorists have targeted and killed civilians and civilians only.

      Err, dude, the Pentagon, remember???

    31. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2

      Exactly, one only has to read the interviews with the Palestinians to illustrate your point. Lots of them said things such as "This is exactly what was needed to get the US to pull out of Israel." That is a fairly good example that these people who condone terrorist attacks do in fact believe that the US, and indeed the rest of the world, will just roll over for them.

    32. Re:Innocents.. by JohnG · · Score: 2
      "Nor are other demented individuals capable of mass killing likely to be deterred by the prospect of "their own people" getting killed in retaliation, wether they are suicidal or not."
      Terrorists have a very focused mindset. It has been clearly stated by interviews with the Palestinian people that they believe this is going to make us pull out of Israel. The terrorists beyond a shadow of a doubt feel the same way. In their delusional heads they are powerful enough to make the US surrender. If the goal which they are so strongly fighting for and so adamantly adhering to pull us out of Israel, then trust me, pushing us further in is the last thing they want.

      "ut we should take great care not to kill more innocent people and escalate the hatered and violence between the U.S. and much of the rest of the world."
      Are you hearing the same news reports as I? The Prime Minister of Canada is certainly on our side, the Russians have sad "This is an inhuman act which must not go unpunished", the EU has echoed that sentiment, Yasar Arafat (sp?) himself is on our side and he is the president of the peoples who are supposed to hate us so much!, and NATO has offered the full use of it's military powers. Retaliation isn't something that would make the world mad at us. Retaliation is something that the civilized world stands ready to help us achieve, your definition of "much of the rest" in that sentence is very distorted.

  15. Bush Whereabouts by spikeovsky · · Score: 1

    Most people seem to not know where Dubya is right now...CBC Radio here in Toronto is reporting that the "undisclosed" location of the president is in fact at a National Security meeting in Nebraska.

    Thought some of you would like to know. I still don't believe this is happening.

    1. Re:Bush Whereabouts by rohdem · · Score: 1

      He was at an Offet Airforce base in Omaha, Nebraska and I believe he had some sort of teleconference with his advisors, etc.

      I think he is back in Washington now, though.

  16. The Internet has Helped by pgrote · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am amazed at how well the internet has helped disseminate information. I am surprised by the lack of rumors and the amazing compilation pages of information.

    What was really heartening was this:

    http://www.worldtradecenter.com

    Usually it's some jerk looking to make money. This person looks to be really trying to help.

    1. Re:The Internet has Helped by ez76 · · Score: 1
      What is disheartening are the dozens of "world trade center destruction video" auctions that popped up on eBay within minutes of the attack.

      eBay seems to be pulling these auctions; at least they have a soul.

    2. Re:The Internet has Helped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I checked this site out earlier today and the domain was for sale, so it really seems like he is being genuine.

    3. Re:The Internet has Helped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      like theres anything wrong with making money! we're supposed to provide all this work and bandwidth for free?

    4. Re:The Internet has Helped by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      Yeah whatever. It takes upwards of four days for a domain name registration to trickle through to my shitty DNS...meaning this guy was squatting on the domain LONG before the bombing.

      Even if this person is seeing the light, it's only as a result of the deaths...yesterday, they were the same as all the other squatting moneygrubbers.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:The Internet has Helped by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      Meant crash and not bombing. I'm a dumbass. But I'm a mod 40+ dumbass ;)

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:The Internet has Helped by elronxenu · · Score: 1
      Usually it's some jerk looking to make money. This person looks to be really trying to help.

      I visited the site about an hour after the initial attack. At that time, it was some jerk looking to make money. The page said something like:

      This domain for sale. Please email somebody@some.domain

      I can't remember the email address. It doesn't matter anyway.

  17. gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by MattW · · Score: 2, Troll

    KMBZ radio reports Kansas City, MO has gas at $5/gallon, and another of $4/gallon in Louisville, KY.

    That would imply that there is an expectation of serious middle eastern turmoil.

    Oh, and thanks for bumping that ass Katz. Maybe next time you'll have the sense to just remove that crap. Only a total fool would try to label this event "Techno-Armageddon".

    1. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by M.+Silver · · Score: 2

      Or an expectation of a short-term high demand as everyone panics. (I filled up the twenty-five-gallon tank on the van promptly this morning. Should last me six weeks. Somehow, I doubt that's going to be long enough to outlast the fallout from this. Sigh.)

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    2. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by jcrowe · · Score: 1

      About 150 miles North East of Kansas City several gas stations are shut down because they ran out of gas. Sucks to be me!

    3. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      In St. Louis, my wife called me at lunch and said that some stations had raised prices by $0.40/gallon. I ran out to the nearest QuickTrip and filled up at yesterday's $1.47 price.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    4. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen prices at $5.89 for regular.

    5. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by Johnny+Starrock · · Score: 1

      Lifted from Drudge Report:

      "MO atty gen Jay Nixon says that the prices up to $5 a gallon in KC are the result of opportunistic gouging and are illegal and that he will prosecute..."

      Say what you will about Drudge, but his site's been devoid of its typical rumor mongering today... anyways, grain of salt.

      --

      end communication
    6. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by sharkey · · Score: 2

      One station here in INDY raised its prices to $3.60/gal. for 87 octane, due to a misunderstanding. Seems that a clerk overheard a conversation regarding high prices elsewhere, and unilateraly raised prices. When the manager returned from lunch, the prices were returned to their proper level.

      No name was mentioned on the report I saw, and I don't wish to speculate based on the shot of a wall they showed.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    7. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by FatalException · · Score: 1

      I just bought gas for 1.65 in louisville. There were short lines, but they were not bad given that radio was saying it would go to $4 tomorrow.

      I will believe it when I see it.

    8. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by Yakko · · Score: 1
      Gas was $1.54 in Waldo area (75&Wornall) at 04:15pm today. I filled up at 103&Wornall for the same price at 01:00pm in anticipation of the LONG LINES that were present at 04:15pm. (no line; topped the tank off anyway, should last a few weeks)

      I expect the gas prices to be hiked because it's always been the gouging norm here when shit happens.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    9. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by Soothh · · Score: 1

      here by indy, in noblesville gas hit $6.00 a gal.
      but the northside just went up $1.00, making it about 2.58 a gallon, this is STUPID

      --
      We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
    10. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by gamenfo · · Score: 1

      Prices for gas will go up for normal reasons due to this though... everyone is filling up, oil prices spiked today in trading around the world, and many refineries were shut down today making supply an issue. I know the ones in Baton Rouge were shut down, not sure if they are up and running again now.

    11. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by askii64 · · Score: 1

      When I walked to school today, gas was $1.75 a gallon(yes, high, but this is Oregon), now its $1.95 here. It went up $.20 within 8 hours. Thats ridiculous!!

      --

      -This quite possibly mangled, stupid, demented comment was brought to you by Askii64.
    12. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

      Yeah. "In other news, the impending turmoil has inspired the greedy, bloodsucking bastards in the oil industry to use this panic and disorder as a fucking feeble excuse to juice up their profits."

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    13. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

      When the Gulf War started, I was driving down a stretch of road in Denver. This was after the invasion, but before the "desert storm." We knew it was coming. I passed one gas station, and the price was sitting at about $.85 or so, whatever was the norm then. And then the radio broadcast was interrupted and they started reporting on the results of Desert Storm. The very next gas station we passed had already posted a price of $1.30. This was within five minutes.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    14. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by rwsorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just saw a discussion on WGN news where the reporters were speaking with a representative of the Illinois Petroleum Council (I may have the organization's name slightly wrong). The reporters were pressing him pretty hard about price gouging and he all but admitted that that's basically what was going since:

      1) Wholesale petroleum prices had not increased significantly.
      2) The only shortages that were being experienced were caused by people flocking to the pumps in greater numbers than normal.
      3) The widely varying increases statewide in Illinois (from nothing to upwards of $4.00 extra per gallon) indicates "dealer profiteering" driven by hysteria.

      In my immediate area (Shiloh, Illinois), gas prices for 87 octane unleaded presently range from $1.49 (Casey's) to $2.05 (Mobil). Friends of mine in Edwardsville, Illinois saw prices shoot up during rush hour to $2.99 for 87 octane unleaded at an Amoco station.

      My advice: remember these "price gouging" gas stations and avoid buying gas (or anything else, for that matter) from them when times aren't so tough.

      The last thing our nation needs right now is a pack of bottom-feeding, opportunistic gas stations.

    15. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by sharkey · · Score: 2

      You should report that to the Better Business Bureau, and especially to the Governor's office. O'Bannon has apparently made a statement to effect that the Indiana Government will not tolerate price-gouging at the pumps, and will prosecute stations doing so to the extent that they can.

      I just walked in the door. The Marathon @ 86th St. and Ditch was charging $1.91 for 87 octane. I don't know if that's unusual for them as I don't trade there. Speedway at the same intersection was charging $1.57. They had their signs half-down as if they started to change them, then stopped. So did Shell across the street. Speedway employees were on the tarmac doing a half-assed job of directing traffic, and making a big show of checking their tank levels.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    16. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by mreece · · Score: 2

      >KMBZ radio reports Kansas City, MO has gas at
      >$5/gallon, and another of $4/gallon in
      >Louisville, KY.

      Here in Louisville, gas is not *that* expensive. On the other hand, rumors of impending gas price hikes did lead to it being almost impossible to drive anywhere because of all the people trying to get gas in fear of it going up. Some of the outlying towns in southern Indiana did have higher gas prices, according to the local news (they showed $2.65 at some places; I don't know if it was more elsewhere). The mayor made a statement earlier that gas prices will be kept from skyrocketing, and that any reports of price-gouging will be investigated. The real problem isn't the price, it's that people aren't keeping their heads and acting sensibly about the rumors.

      Let's all try to use a little caution in discriminating rumors from fact. I was amazed by the reports and footage today of how New Yorkers acted calmly and so many were able to evacuate the WTC. Just think how much worse this all could have been if people didn't keep their wits about them. We all need to keep that in mind, to avoid economic consequences or hasty assumptions about reprisals.

      And, as with everyone in the U.S. and most of the world right now, my condolences to all those who have been affected by this tragedy. I can't find the words to express how angry and shocked I am right now.

      --
      Matt Reece
    17. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The $5 gas was just plain greed! And it wasn't everywhere. The 2 stations near me were both at $1.57. In spite of the mile long lines.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    18. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by Engdy · · Score: 0

      I don't have any moderation abilities, but I think the other moderators need to moderate this guy up some more. He knows his stuff!

      --
      Siggy Wiggy Figgy Tiggy a bana bo Biggy!
    19. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach on brother Engdy.

    20. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh, at least you have comparison to what it's like to buy gas in euroland, avg. $0.75 per LITER!

    21. Re:gas hits $5/gallon, katz still insane by warmiak · · Score: 0

      "the impending turmoil has inspired the greedy, bloodsucking bastards in the oil industry to use this panic and disorder as a fucking feeble excuse to juice up their profits"

      Sad.
      Our tragedy has inspired various lowlifes and other activist to use this panic and disorder to take nasty shoots at some industries accusing them collectively of nasty deeds committed by few individuals.

      --
      The only way liberals win national elections is by pretending they're not liberals.
  18. Still doesn't seem real. by Skyshadow · · Score: 3
    Hijacked planes hitting skyscrapers, national landmarks crashing into the streets of New York, bombing at the State Dept., attacks on the Pentagon, F-16s ready to shoot down anything that enters New York/DC airspace.

    My God, what happened?

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      America just got a dose of reality.

      The kind of reality that many of the countries overseas have frequently have had to face, in some cases U.S. sponsored; in many cases not.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by SideshowBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think its fair to say that we (meaning the U.S.) have been very fortunate to have been spared for so long from this sort of terrorist attack.

      Maybe some good can come out of this tragedy: I hope that Bush and the rest of the current administration get it through their thick heads that billion dollar strike fighter programs and missile defense systems mean about as much in the 21st century as black powder musket production would've meant at the beginning of the 20th century.

      Hijackings, biological and chemical attacks, and yes, even net warfare are the new weapons of mass destruction. We will ignore them at our own peril.

    3. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >America just got a dose of reality.
      >
      >The kind of reality that many of the countries >overseas have frequently have had to face, in >some cases U.S. sponsored; in many cases not

      I hope this is a joke. At a time like this, living in our great country you have the balls to imply that we in any way deserve this. I don't remember the US hijacking any foreign flights and slamming them into 110 story buildings, do you? Get a life, you have freedoms that most of the people on this planet cannot dream to have because of the people who have run this country. And now, at a time like this, you criticize? Embarassing . . .

    4. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by aozilla · · Score: 2

      Hijackings, biological and chemical attacks, and yes, even net warfare are the new weapons of mass destruction.


      Net warfare? You can't conduct an act of war without physical access to the victim. Every penny spent trying to protect people from such things is a penny which could be spent saving people's lives instead.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    5. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by SideshowBob · · Score: 1

      > Net warfare? You can't conduct an act of war without physical access to the victim.

      Oh really? Know any air traffic control centers that use computers? That's but one example.

      Extract your head from your posterior aozilla.

    6. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      I don't live in the U.S.; you see?

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    7. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Erm... you can crash or misprogram a computer that is involved in keeping the victim alive.... thus killing the victim from the comfort of your armchair (think air traffic control, etc)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by aozilla · · Score: 2

      Know any air traffic control centers which use the internet? Last time I checked they use radio waves, which is a form of physical access.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    9. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by anotherone · · Score: 1

      Do a lot of ATC centers have computers that are hooked up to the internet?

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    10. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by aozilla · · Score: 2

      Any computer that is involved in keeping the victim alive should not be hooked up to the internet. Try again.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    11. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      "Should not" and "is not" are two different things. Certainly lesser things (such as people's credit card information and passwords) are kept on computers hooked up to the Internet, and an attacker could manipulate those in ways that would lead to deaths.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    12. Re:Still doesn't seem real. by aozilla · · Score: 2

      4417 1284 5032 4056. How you gonna kill someone?

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  19. 5th Plane by DavidJA · · Score: 1

    Slashdot reported a 5th plane crashed in an undisclosed location. Australian news also speaks of 5 plans. BUT MSNBC & CNN all report 4 planes. Where did the 5th plane go?

    1. Re:5th Plane by Nf1nk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 5th plane was a Japan Air plane that was forced down by the Canadian Airforce. it was not hijacked, its emergancy beacon was turned on by a low fuel condition

      --
      I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
    2. Re:5th Plane by jmkf · · Score: 1

      This could be the Korean plane low on fuel because of divertion to Canada and forced down there by the AF.

    3. Re:5th Plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rumour: Forced or shot down by USAF. Unconfirmed.

    4. Re:5th Plane by stcanard · · Score: 1

      At one time (this morning) they were talking about a 5th plane crashed somewhere in Colorado, but that's dropped out of all the American and Canadian news sources, so it appears it was a rumour.

    5. Re:5th Plane by allism · · Score: 1

      I can tell you it DIDN'T crash near Boulder or Denver.

    6. Re:5th Plane by chromakey · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 5th plane was coming in over the potomac at a high rate of speed. It was reported as being downed, but nothing more than that. I -speculate- that it was shot down and does not want to be reported because it was so close to hitting DC the military HAD to shoot it down.

    7. Re:5th Plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sed 's/AF/RCAF/g'

    8. Re:5th Plane by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Ahh, I think I know how that happened. They listed the 4th plane as having gone down in somethingorother county, and shortened it to somethingorother CO -- hence Colorado...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:5th Plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is interesting, I thought I heard American news also say there was another plane a 5th. Then I never heard another word about it. No "sorry it was a rumor", nothing. Does anyone have any information(website, TV?) pertaining to this? The only reason not to put this on the new was that it was shot down, I'm not trying to start any conspiracy crap, just looking for what happened.

    10. Re:5th Plane by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Gah! And your source for this info is? I heard no rumour of any 5th plane over the Potomac in any news report. There was the rumoured "Camp David" aircraft, which might have been the Pennsylvania crash, but that was it.

      Informative, ha!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  20. POLL? by Roadmaster · · Score: 0

    and with all that's going on, we still have the stupid surge protector poll on slashdot? cmon people, show some sense of opportunity! give us an interesting poll!

  21. Gas prices as a result by kvandivo · · Score: 1

    I've heard through the grapevine that gas prices are going through the roof in some areas. Supposedly Lafayette, Indiana has $7 a gallon
    gas prices and here in central Illinois where I'm at the stations have long lines.. What about where you are?

    Kirby

    --
    http://www.WinWithRealEstate.com/
    1. Re:Gas prices as a result by thilmony · · Score: 1

      $1.69 in Minneapolis, 4pm CDT

      --
      YES, there is a McDonald's in Hanoi Square.
    2. Re:Gas prices as a result by kvandivo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This morning when I came into work it was 1.77. It is now (as of 4:45 CDT) 1.99 and the gas station next to the building where I work has cars out on the street waiting to pull in. It will be interesting to see where this ends up.

      Kirby

      --
      http://www.WinWithRealEstate.com/
    3. Re:Gas prices as a result by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      $1.67 in North Florida. But we almost always have the cheapest gas.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:Gas prices as a result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gas prices here in Northern Indiana (Warsaw) were at $1.59 when I filled up at 3pm. Local filling stations report they have no plans to raise prices more than .20, but the cars are still lining up 15 or more deep at each line, with some cars waiting along the nearby roads just to get into the parking lots.

    5. Re:Gas prices as a result by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      It's around $4.00/gal in the Quad City area (western IL).

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    6. Re:Gas prices as a result by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Well, regular unleaded at my favorite station in metro Atlanta is $1.339; it was $1.179 yesterday.

      However, the increase occurred hours before the WTC attack -- I assume it was merely coincidence, unless QuikTrip employs psychics.

    7. Re:Gas prices as a result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not.. Go to the gas station you idiot.

    8. Re:Gas prices as a result by davey23sol · · Score: 2

      I am FROM Lafayette, Indiana, have been on the phone to Lafayette, Indiana today and I can assure you this is *FALSE*

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    9. Re:Gas prices as a result by anotherone · · Score: 1

      smells like a rumor to me...
      I heard from a friend that in Peoria, IL; gas is $5 a gallon. Just after I heard that a friend of mine who lives in Peoria just ICQ'd me and asked how I like the $4 a gallon here. (It's still ~$1.70 here)

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    10. Re:Gas prices as a result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      $2.68 in indy right now, they're reporting it may reach $4.. I just drove by a gas station, so this is accurate.

    11. Re:Gas prices as a result by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

      A friend of mine (here in Louisville) called a local gas station and was told that the price was $1.65 at the moment, but he had already been given the word that his next increase was taking it to $5.00. I was sitting there when he called.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    12. Re:Gas prices as a result by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      Apparently only on the Illinois side. It's $1.69 on the Iowa side of the river although I passed 4 stations that were closed and out of gas tonight. Grocery store I stopped at tonight (Eagle's) had people there buying everything in sight. Damn fools. I just wanted to get in, buy a 6 pack and some toilet paper and get out. Seems like I was in line forever.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    13. Re:Gas prices as a result by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you have state tax, I don't.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    14. Re:Gas prices as a result by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      I did. An Amoco, in fact. You idiot.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    15. Re:Gas prices as a result by SeriousDomains · · Score: 1

      A little over $2 next to the campus, and lots of Purdue Students at the corner of Northwestern and Stadium in lines around the corner and creating a traffic hazard. Similar story elsewhere in town. Some greedy gas stations perhaps jumping the gun to take advantage of the situation, or a true price increase on the horizon... but nevertheless, seems opportunistic and premature. Zionsville exit on I 65 outside of Indy on the corridor to Chicago was reportedly just over $4, according to an Indy commuter coaching my son's soccer team.

      --
      Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. ~Martin Luther King, Jr. from Birmingham Jail, 1963
    16. Re:Gas prices as a result by Brew+Bird · · Score: 1

      This was a result of total bastards trying to take advantage of the situation. Report any such station to the local attorney general's office.

    17. Re:Gas prices as a result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell your friend to stop fucking his own mother.
      These things are NOT considered normal here so please conform to our standards or move your ass to some place in Smoky Mountains.

  22. IT-companies by eXENCE · · Score: 1

    Here's a list over IT related companies in WTC (comments in swedish):
    http://nyheter.idg.se/display.asp?ID=010911-SOS6

  23. KNX 1070 newsradio by Nf1nk · · Score: 0

    KNX 1070 newsradio has news on this and seems to be handling the load fairly well
    they also have links to a lot of good images and videos

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  24. Just crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I don't even know what to say.. Just had to say something........

    What a grave day..

  25. If you value your democracy .... by ayden · · Score: 4, Informative


    VOTE!

    Please remember that in many parts of the US today is an ELECTION DAY.

    Bruce Davis
    UNIX Systems Administrator
    Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products
    Burlington, MA USA

    --
    "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    1. Re:If you value your democracy .... by x24 · · Score: 1

      Here in New York, Governor Pataki postponed all of the primary elections.

    2. Re:If you value your democracy .... by aozilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can't vote in NY. Gov. Pataki has shut down the primaries.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    3. Re:If you value your democracy .... by ayden · · Score: 2

      I know everyone says the election in NY has been postponed.

      However, we are still voting in MA.

      I'm on my way to vote now.

      Bruce Davis
      UNIX Systems Administrator
      Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products
      Burlington, MA USA

      --
      "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    4. Re:If you value your democracy .... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Lucky, Washington State is next Tuesday.
      Check out Washington Voter

  26. Even rotten has info by mauri · · Score: 1

    Its on their today in history page.

    --
    __
    L.
    1. Re:Even rotten has info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy cow, that's the first time I've ever seen them update a page...I've sent them corrections on bits they've published, and a year later, they're still wrong...

  27. Congrats as well by M_Talon · · Score: 1

    On the fear of being redundant, you guys at Slashdot did a spectacular job. When other sites were getting blitzed of the net by traffic, Slashdot and other tech news sites (CNET and WIRED for starters) picked up the slack and kept people informed. You also did an incredible job keeping the servers up under the crushing weight of everyone. Thanks again, guys.

    --
    Electronic Frontier Foundation for online civil rights information
  28. And don't forget Poliglut by rw2 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Poliglut we've got a running diary with links of the whole day.

  29. the middle east by dirtyhippie · · Score: 4, Flamebait

    I find it highly ironic that, yet again, everyone instantly jumps to the conclusion that it was Arabs who are behind these tragedies. Does anyone else remember Oklahoma City, and the rush to judgement there, when in the end it was a white hick with a gap tooth. Let's face it, there's a whole lot of people out there that hate the US, and for good reason (I was going to put a list here, but it's really just about everyone except Israel, Japan, Western Europe, and Canada). We've been exploiting these places economically for decades now, and if you ask me, it's about time they stood up for themselves. And, before you say "economic domination does not merit this kind of response" - let me pose this question - what other way is there to respond when you are facing an opponent who has the money, owns the world legal system (has the money), and owns large numbers of world politicians (has the money)? In any event, let's hope that the American government can set an example in not responding with force until it is COMPLETELY positive who it is retaliating against, and let's hope as well that civilian casualties that come from the retaliation are minimal. Furthermore let's hope American citizens wake up to what their government and corporations are doing around the world in time to prevent more of these attacks, before they happen, because that is the only way to eliminate the problem.

    1. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do you include Western Europe in your list of people who *don't* hate the US ?
      Anonymous Frog

    2. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I find it highly ironic that, yet again, everyone instantly jumps to the conclusion that it was Arabs who are behind these tragedies.

      I fail to see why this is 'ironic'. More than that, I fail to see why it is unreasonable. As another poster wrote elsewhere, this is their MO. It's hard to believe this was done by anything less than a major organization, one with tons of manpower and $$$, and one which is into the suicide approach. I don't think it is racism to suspect the people who best fit the bill.

      As for McVeigh, he was a script kiddie compared to this, a complete hack. This was organized, and obviously involved a great deal of $ and engineering knowledge.

    3. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Im too lazy to create a slash account .. my name is Darren.

      Why are the Arabs the prime suspects -
      1. Who is celebrating in the streets as we deal with this atrocity?
      2. What other group (besides the Japanese kamikaze) makes use of 'suicide' bombers?

      OKC bombing was far from a suicide attack. This attack has all the earmarkings of a cowardly act by Arab fanatics.

    4. Re:the middle east by prpllrhd · · Score: 0, Troll

      You have the moral equivalence of the demented murderers who carried out this attack.

    5. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to imply that we american's in some way are responsible for this attack

    6. Re:the middle east by jmcnamera · · Score: 0, Troll

      How does the post I'm replying to merit being here? They argue that killing kids and parents is justified because he/she thinks America exploited someone.

      Mod them to -2.

      --
      this is not a sig
    7. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... because we don't.

      Most of the UK, for example, looks more and more like the US every day. Without the US aid packages after WWII, Germany would be as economically significant as Holland.

      The French are the most voluble 'anti-US' campaigners in Europe, but, hey, they're French... point a tank in their direction and they'll roll over. They only care about the food and the language, anyhow. Find an equivalent to McDonalds owned by a Frenchman that uses frogs and snails instead of beef :).

    8. Re:the middle east by mr_don't · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. What about domestic attacks?

    9. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy that just posted is a moron. I think he would feel differently if someone close to him had died in this attack. Yes, America is not liked around the World, but as people have posted innocent people died. Retaliation will come, the US Navy is already positioning our floating cities off potential attackers coasts...trust me. Trying to place blame on a country made up of many ethnicities is very difficult to justify. Wherever you may be located I pray for you and your judgment you have posted here.

      A proud member of the US Navy and an AMERICAN!!!!

    10. Re:the middle east by unformed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alright, I agree with you, unlike the other replies. But let me explain a few things better:

      First and foremost, I do NOT think the actions today are justified; it was a horrible act, and furthermore, not just an terrorist attack, but an -act of war-. The US should retaliate, should find whoever committed the act, and show that we will not take this sitting down.

      OTOH, we have to understand why this happened. It's hard to look at things rationally when something like this happens, especially when its a direct attack to our country, but we still do need to understand why things happens so we can prevent it later.

      Here, let me use an analogy that (most) of you will hopefully understand. When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot up Columbine High School, there were a lot of people (especially here) who said that their acts were horrendous, but they understood why they were committed: the boys were bullied and tortured constantly for years; they were finally getting revenge, kamikaze style.

      That said, (from what i've read) the Palestinians are extremely angry at the US because we supply Israel with weapons, money, and generally advocate their actions, and Israel in turn torture Palestinan citizens and generally treat them like shit (for lack of a better term). This is their act of revenge, and although I say we should understand it, it should definitely not go unpunished. However, simply destroying Afghanistan (which we can without a doubtr easily do) will do no good.

      Furthermore, here's my guesses on how things will pan out:

      Assuming we bomb (or attack) Afghanistan (not just bin Laden) there will be further retaliation, and eventually start another war. If other countries don't get involved, that'll be it, and hopefully it'll end as quickly as the Gulf War. If other countries do get involved, I can easily see this turning into a World War III. Let me mention that we do -not- want a WWIII, simply because of the arms technologies available now. (Nuclear and atomic weapons, biological and chemical warfare, etc)

      Anyways, that's it for now, focus back to CNN....

    11. Re:the middle east by jesser · · Score: 1

      This attack has all the earmarkings of a cowardly act by Arab fanatics.

      How is suicide cowardly? (Other than that, I agree with you -- McVeigh wasn't a suicide bomber, and suicide tactics aren't common among Americans.)

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    12. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not the way to grab the USs' attention. Although "spectacular" (as said by CNN), it's only making the US more stringent to terrorist threat, thereby not reducing the level at which the US is willing to cooperate with said countries.

      Paranoia is a dangerous thing. People tend to do things "just in case".

    13. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that will satisfy these terrorists is the USA being under Shari'a (Islamic) law.

    14. Re:the middle east by ksheff · · Score: 2

      According to the BBC an Arab newspaper in London said that bin Laden warned about a big attack against the US three weeks ago. If he didn't coordinate the attack, he knows who did.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    15. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you in one respect. I am worried that the attacks were not Terrorist at all. The level of organization required for these actions was close to governmental Special Forces training.

      One nasty twist that I could come up with is that an ally did this and planted evidence to make it look like Palestinian terrorists.

      Why? Well one scenario is Israel frustrated at losing US support of its tactical measures against Palestine uses special forces to commit this atrocity as a "Palestinian attack" to galvanize US support for continuing violence against Palestinians.

      That is complete heresy with not a scrap of truth to it, but ideas like that chill me a lot more than a good honest terrorist attack.

      Most likely was a terrorist group we will never know of. I am sure the government will find a group to target and provide supporting evidence later to make people feel safe, but with this level of organization I could easily see that the true terrorists get away while we target the easiest to find enemy. (i.e. Bin Laden)

      Maybe I am just a cynic, but I wouldn't be surprised. Whoever did this was good at doing what they did. All that it takes is someone as smart as me on the other side. *sigh*

      My heart goes out to everyone hurt in this tragedy.
      ~Z

    16. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How isn't it?

    17. Re:the middle east by TheMidget · · Score: 2, Informative
      When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot up Columbine High School, there were a lot of people (especially here) who said that their acts were horrendous, but they understood why they were committed: the boys were bullied and tortured constantly for years; they were finally getting revenge, kamikaze style.

      This comparison is eery, especially since they too planned to crash a plane into New York City (scroll towards the end of the article).

    18. Re:the middle east by Meech · · Score: 0

      What is the matter with you? Do you realize how stupid you sound? It is about time that they stood up for themselves? Let me get this straight; some terrorists kill thousands of people and you commend them on it?

    19. Re:the middle east by Byteme · · Score: 1
      It is easy to do. Tim McVeigh was not a suicide bomber. Curiously, as we compare this to Pearl Harbor as many seem to be doing, we must remember the Kamakazi (sp?).


      Just as you claim that we should not jump to conclusions, I would ask that you don't jump down the throats of those that do. There was a cellphone call from one of the planes, and there will be recovery of at least one of the black-boxes... we will have the details soon.


      What I fear is some bigoted backlash from hicks and KKK card-carrying freaks. Moments after the OK City bombing a Palestinian woman was murdered in the streets by a mob... and again, during WWII we had violence against Asians in the US.

    20. Re:the middle east by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " I find it highly ironic that, yet again, everyone instantly jumps to the conclusion that it was Arabs who are behind these tragedies. Does anyone else remember Oklahoma City, and the rush to judgement there, when in the end it was a white hick with a gap tooth."

      You failed to mention that since that time, two US embassies and a US destroyer were bombed, and Islamic extremists were responsible. Heck, the last time the World Trade Center was attacked, it was Islamic militants. It would seem safe to say that OK City was the exception rather than the rule.

      "Let's face it, there's a whole lot of people out there that hate the US, and for good reason (I was going to put a list here, but it's really just about everyone except Israel, Japan, Western Europe, and Canada)."

      Iran is democratizing little by little and is interested in normalizing relations with us. Lybia is desparately trying to find a way to get back on our good side without taking credit for Pan Am 103 (and may end up doing it anyway). More and more Eastern European countries want to join NATO. Several countries in South America want to join NAFTA (and is more or less the impetus behind the FTAA).

      In general, its quite safe to say that the US-haters out there are a very vocal minority. In fact, Americans abroad get a bad rap because we tend to assume that everybody hates us.

      "it's about time they stood up for themselves."

      You describe what they did as "standing up for themselves?" I'm not sure whether to be angry at you or pity you.

      "And, before you say "economic domination does not merit this kind of response" - let me pose this question - what other way is there to respond when you are facing an opponent who has the money, owns the world legal system (has the money), and owns large numbers of world politicians (has the money)?"

      "The money" you describe tend not to ride on commercial jets. "The money" tends not to work in the World Trade Center (they just do business through them). "The money" tends not to work above-ground in the Pentagon. And yet these people saw fit to kill all these incidentals.

      "Furthermore let's hope American citizens wake up to what their government and corporations are doing around the world in time to prevent more of these attacks, before they happen, because that is the only way to eliminate the problem."

      OK, let me get this straight: You imply that what was done today was because of the way we treat the rest of the world, especially civillians. You imply that civillians are killed or exploited or whatever by the US. THAT justified killing a whole mess of our civilians.

      HOWEVER, having OUR civilians slaughtered by the thouands means we have to tip-toe where everybody else can violate Geneva conventions as they please?

      While I agree we need to be tempered while deciding on a response, your "logic" is extremely two-faced.

    21. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why are the Arabs the prime suspects -
      1. Who is celebrating in the streets as we deal with this atrocity?

      If Saddam Hussein had been killed (by a "competitor"), the US would have been the first to celebrate. Similar symetry.

      2. What other group (besides the Japanese kamikaze) makes use of 'suicide' bombers?

      Any fanatic groups, and there are some of them in every country of the world. Search fro "waco" on google for instance.

    22. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is suicide cowardly?

      When you don't show your face and fight like a man, you're a coward in anyone's dictionary.

    23. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are you trying to imply that we american's in some way are responsible for this attack.

      Well, in some way, yes. Do you think US had been neutral all those days? How many civilian dead in Serbia, for instance? Serbian deaths are "colateral damages", but American deaths are unbearable horrors that must been instantly and blindly punished ?

    24. Re:the middle east by mrdild0nics · · Score: 1, Troll

      you unpatriotic sonfabitch. How dare you even suggest that our Great Nation deserve ANYTHING of this nature and that we should "wake up" to prevent this kind of thing. No one deserves this, you bastard, and if you had an ounce of respect for this Country and what it has done for you, you'd be grieving with the rest of us instead of sticking up for some goddamn terrorist cowards.
      you and the terrorists can go to hell
      God Bless America

    25. Re:the middle east by Hobbes_2100 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey dirtyhippie, take a fuckin' shower. How are we (how am __I__) exploiting these middle eastern fucks? You know who is exploiting them? Other middle easter fucks. Actually, the seconds fucks are the real fucks and the first fucks are just screwed common people (like those that get screwed here in the good 'ole USA).

      For those who didn't follow. It is the dictatorial governments of these countries that exploit their OWN citizenry ... the average (or the "powerful") American.

    26. Re:the middle east by chuqui · · Score: 1

      > I find it highly ironic that, yet again, everyone instantly jumps to the conclusion that it was Arabs who are behind these tragedies.

      It sure wasn't the Navajo....

      (modded -1, ironic flamebait)

      --
      Chuq Von Rospach, Internet Gnome = When his IQ reaches 50, he should sell
    27. Re:the middle east by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      They fought with the only method they had. It's the only way for a very small group of people to cause such radical damage. If 30 people stepped off a boat in New York and ran through the street with knives, do you think they would have had near the amount of effect? Of course not. We like to call them "cowardly" because we want to assign every bad attribute we can to these people, even if it doesn't exactly fit. Terrorism isn't cowardice, it's simply the action they feel will have the greatest impact. If they die in the attempt, it could actually be called bravery. They have courage. You don't have to like it, but not every instance of courage is for a noble purpose.

    28. Re:the middle east by The_Messenger · · Score: 0
      It's not the suicide that's cowardly. It's the killing-thousands-of-unarmed-and-unaware-civilans. Maybe that fuckhead retard OBL doesn't know this, but the WTC isn't a gov't building like the Pentagon, and thus isn't a valid target for politically motivated attacks. And even in the case of the Petagon, I'll bet that there were more casualties on the aircraft than in the building.

      The kamikaze were attacking armed, uniformed US soliders on the battlefield. These OBL scum attacked civilians in a large city. So, they are cowards.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

    29. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quite the bit riled up there for a citizen of the most hated country in the world. May God help you. But don't rely on him too much. Those jets didn't hit their target on luck alone. You can't be responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths and then expect impunity for free. Your freedom will be the price of your exploitation.

    30. Re:the middle east by shaum · · Score: 1
      If Saddam Hussein had been killed (by a "competitor"), the US would have been the first to celebrate.

      Maybe, maybe not. but I can't see Americans celebrating the death of Iraqi civilians, even during wartime. We know who Hussein is, many believe (rightly or wrongly) that his actions deserve punishment, even death. But celebrating the death of civilians, about whom you know nothing but their nationality, is another matter entirely.

      Any fanatic groups, and there are some of them in every country of the world. Search fro "waco" on google for instance.

      I assume you're talking about the Branch Davidians; a Google search for "Waco" would turn up a lot of information about a city in Texas having nothing to do with fanaticism, religious or otherwise. (And as a native of Oklahoma City, I'm disappointed that my former hometown is now a popular synonym for domestic terrorism.)

      It's far from proven that the Branch Davidians committed suicide. Neither were they terrorists; trouble came looking for them, not vice versa.

      No, we shouldn't make assumptions about who is responsible, and unless the government has a lot more information than the public does, it's way too early for retaliation. But the Palestinians have shown that, even if they're not the ones responsible, they consider those responsible to be friends, allies, and even (retch) heroes. How could we not suspect them?

    31. Re:the middle east by Storm+Damage · · Score: 1
      When Americans dressed as natives and dumped tea into Boston Harbor, we are taught it was a brave act of patriotism.


      Americans subverting the rules and traditions of warfare to obtain their independence from a tyrannical king were brave, noble and selfless.


      Anyone who shows the same values (willingness to attack property, willingness to break the rules) yet uses them against our interests, is now re-labeled a coward and a terrorist.


      How do you suppose the American Revolution was covered in the British Press at the time?


      Like it or not, this is a brave act by a resolute individual. They hit us where it hurts, and it's easy to denounce such actions as evil, cowardly, and wrong. Yes, these actions contradict international law, they break the established rules and traditions of warfare. But how else can individuals or groups who view themselves as oppressed win their independence and freedom by any other means?


      The fact is, weak nations of the world CAN NOT effectively advance their interests at the expense of stronger nations by following the rules of international law, because those rules are written by the powerful, and enforced by the powerful. The struggle to develop into a position of power is too hard, takes too long, and only results in more debt, increased poverty, and greater inequality.


      We can crush the people who did this, and retain our pride, but we will then have to acknowledge it can happen again. Unless we, and the other "leading" nations learn to walk humbly among our neighbors in the world, it WILL happen again.

    32. Re:the middle east by Erbo · · Score: 2
      The operation was just too well-planned and well-executed to be the work of some loner, or even some band of loners. To pull this off, four planes had to be hijacked at precise times, and strike their targets in sequence. (They knew that, after the first WTC tower was hit, virtually every TV camera in NYC would be pointed that direction to see the second one get hit.) This had to have been planned very much in advance, and without anyone figuring out what was up. Even the selection of which planes to hijack is telling; they were all transcontinental flights, meaning big planes with lots of jet fuel on board. This is miles beyond just parking a Ryder truck full of fertilizer and diesel fuel in front of a building, setting a timer, and running.

      You know what's a scary possibility? What if they brought along a couple of carryon bags full of anthrax or botulism spores, or some other nasty germ? True, many germs would have perished in the fireball, but many would survive, too, to be sprayed like a fine aerosol all over Lower Manhattan. Don't roll your eyes yet; they could have, and we wouldn't necessarily know it for a couple of days yet. By then, thousands more could be dead or dying.

      Food for thought...

      Eric

      P.S.: Electric Minds is tracking the reports of the disaster. I have also temporarily closed down our "Playground" conference out of respect for the dead and injured.

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    33. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When you don't show your face and fight like a
      > man, you're a coward in anyone's dictionary.

      Like when you shoot laser-guided missles into schools from miles away?

    34. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they did was cowardly. If you're going to commit an act of war, at least attack the military and not the civilians. Cowards attack those who can't defend themselves.

    35. Re:the middle east by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      How is suicide cowardly?

      Easily. If you kill yourself because you're afraid to face life, it's cowardly. If you kill yourself because you can't face the consequences (guilt, arrest, torture, what have you), it's cowardly.


      There is no intrinsic moral value to the suicide bomber. There are causes worthy of dying for, and there are causes no worthy. Many people lose their way between the two.

    36. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd actually be pretty stupid. Why go to all the trouble of blowing up a plane full of the stuff when they could have flown a crop duster full of it over the city with 1/1000th the planning time and cost and probably many times the effectiveness.

    37. Re:the middle east by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Which is interesting, since the Navajo have more cause to hate the U.S. than anyone in the middle east...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    38. Re:the middle east by Drazi100 · · Score: 1

      time to wipe iran,afghanistan,iraq off the face of the earth.. NUKE EM NUKE EN NOW!

      SEE 1 2 3 .. CAMEL JOCKEYS GONE.

      make it a nuclear zone

    39. Re:the middle east by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      To pull this off, four planes had to be hijacked at precise times, and strike their targets in sequence.

      Translation: The perps had to have access to advanced chronotechnology (watches) and training in their use (they knew how to tell time).

      Sorry, but I'm getting a little sick of comments along these lines. On CNN earlier some idiot was talking about how the terrorists must have been piloting the planes, therefore they had to be pretty sophisticated to pilot a high-tech jet. Err, sorry, but although there's no way in hell I could get a 767 off the ground, or land it without making a large flaming disaster, get someone else to get the thing airborne and I could easily fly it into any sufficiently hard to miss target. Once they're in the air, they're not that hard to fly, assuming everything is and continues to work perfectly.

      In any case, we don't know who did this, but they did not require planning above and beyond the capabilities of most groups, nor any particular sophistication or training. Maybe they were sophisticated, maybe not. Maybe the planned it for six months, maybe they planned it over the weekend. There's no real evidence one way or the other yet.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    40. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up and learn to discern what is real and what is propaganda... Right now you're acting like the perfect little trained sheep.

      Your parallel is far from it.

      Did you just take some 'hate whitey' college history class or something?

      Sorry, but we did not board boats back to Grand 'ol England and proceed to slash the throats of thousands of innocent farmers, in order to gain soverignty from England.

    41. Re:the middle east by samdu · · Score: 1
      First, let me say that I agree that our response to the truly cowardly act of war today needs to be measured, precise, and only after we're SURE about the culprits. Nothing the US has done deserves the killing of 10's of thousands of innocent civilians. On the other hand, the US's policy towards the Middle East has been exactly what it should be for at least the last 6 months or so. FIX IT YOUR DAMN SELF!!!. We have scolded both the Palestinians and the Isralis recently and they BOTH deserve scolding. It is not the responsibility to fix the crap going on in the middle east. Both sides need to realize that nothing is going to change unless THEY change it. BOTH sides are behaving like barbarians. If a faction of a people perpetrates a wrong against you, you go after that faction, not an entire people. I say let them fight it out until they realize this or they've killed each other.

      -Sam

    42. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's not the troll, you miserable asshole moderators. fuck slashdot for having so many terrorist apologists. i'm sick of putting up with them in EVERY FUCKING THREAD ABOUT THIS.

    43. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suicide is perfect and admirable. Please feel free to commit it, you fucking trash.

    44. Re:the middle east by santeri · · Score: 1
      We have scolded both the Palestinians and the Isralis recently and they BOTH deserve scolding

      Yet you still sell more arms to Israel than to any nation on earth. Not exactly scolding.

      --
      ______________
      OTTERS RULE.
    45. Re:the middle east by mrdild0nics · · Score: 1

      it figures that an Anonymous Coward would take shots at a Proud Citizen of the most Innovative and Free country in the world. Its funny how your using the American developed Internet to respond to me. Probably on an American designed computer. You are a coward and a lowly snake of a creature. I don't dare consider the likes of you a Human being. You don't deserve that. Only people stuck in dogmatic, backwards, un-democratic, uncivilized nations would dare do this. Who have I killed? What have I done? What did the father of three that had his flesh seared off in the explosion do to deserve his death? Or the thousands of others who were just trying to live productive, un-violent lives. At least I don't live in a country that thinks drowning your wife is a perfectly legal form of divorce or that killing innocents in a cowardly manner is a admirably quality. Anyone one of those that died is a better person than you. I don't belive in you hateful god. I believe in Freedom and America and all things Positive. you believe in nothing but destruction and horror. you uncivilized piece of filth. I hope other like-minded citizens join with me against people like this. I wish you were on that plane, hurdling to you death.

    46. Re:the middle east by albanac · · Score: 1
      Lybia is desparately trying to find a way to get back on our good side without taking credit for Pan Am 103 (and may end up doing it anyway).

      I find it fascinating that to an American, an incident is 'Pan Am 103', where to a Briton, most of Europe, most Africans etc. the same incident is 'The Lockerbie bombing'. A great many things depend heavily on one's point of view.

      ~cHris
    47. Re:the middle east by debrain · · Score: 1
      Actually, that attitude is common among the vast majority of undereducated Americans that give the USA a bad name. You belong to a country that has states that make it legal to rape your wife (Tenn.). It is the only country in the world not to have ratified the Rights of the Child. (Somalia was the 2nd last, in 1996, iirc) Sure the USA innovates a lot, but a fraction compared to the rest of the world anymore.


      The sad thing about this attack on the US is that nothing good will come of it. You'll have less freedom now, which is exactly what the terrorists wanted. You will not be able to cross borders into free countries, or pass through your airports unchecked. And yet, terrorism will still slip through, despite the seeds of a totalitarian regime that represents your government. The USA is not a free country. It never has been; it sponsors the illusion of freedom to promote corporate interests of exploitation and slavery. Your President was appointed by your judicial system. A democratic country elects its government, in case you weren't aware.


      Ask yourself what you cannot do today that you could do before the towers came crashing down. I pity every American that will lose a little more of their freedom, in much the same way they have lost their digital rights with DMCA et al., and the way they sponsor monopolistic anti-capitalistic companies, like Microsoft and RIAA and Exxon, with impunity and even legislative backing.


      You are hippocrittical and ignorant; you wish death upon others for their arbitrary beliefs. This is not uncommon. Few Americans believe that the US prison system is 3rd world, and that it is constantly chastized by NGO's such as Amnesty - in fact there was a whole campaign by Amnesty International dedicated to nothing but human rights violations in the USA. Think, and educate yourself, before you post your opinion. You probably won't understand most of this post, but many will, and it is something that should be stated in the case that it does open your eyes.

    48. Re:the middle east by mrdild0nics · · Score: 1

      For all your talk about Amnesty and everything else Its so great to see how much you sympathize with the sensless taking of life. I don't believe ANYONE deserves to have something like this happen. Regardless of political, economic or religious views, what happened is a cowardly and uncivilized action and those that committed and support it don't deserve to have their views considered in any way, shape or form. They gave up their right to be considered when they disregarded the lives of others. At least we are trying to pursue freedom, even if you disagree that we have it. At least we are trying to be better. Thats more than the scum who committed this can say. They arent trying to make anyhthing for anyone better. Open your eyes and see that acts of violence don't change any of the problems you stated. Do you really think that killing thousands will make anything better? That's pretty goddamn ignorant. Think about how enraged you would be if your father was just on his way to work when he was burned and buried alive, or even if it was you. I don't think I would wish that on anyone except those who believe that doing that to others is good and righteous. you are are unsympathetic and inhuman. I am done responding to subhumans like yourself. Grow up and join the human race and then maybe Ill consider any argument you might have.

    49. Re:the middle east by Storm+Damage · · Score: 1
      No we didn't, but we did ambush British soldiers in transit and camp without warning, and ran away before they could organize or return fire, not just to whittle down their numbers, but mostly to cause terror and confusion among their forces and the loyal colonists who would support them (don't forget that the decision to Revolt was not unanimous). We did target attacks to kill officers before enlisted troops. Both of these tactics were considered cowardly and horrific (to the Brits anyway) and were against the established rules of warfare at the time. Both of these tactics also were the only way we had a chance of victory.


      There is no way a small force can hope to win by attacking U.S. military production facilities by the rules of warfare that WE have established. I'm not saying it's right, and I'm not saying "hate whitey" I'm saying the consequences of our economic imperialism include that people will eventually get pissed off enough at us to revolt, And that with no realistic alternatives for combatting against our military and economic institutions on our terms, they will resort to breaking the rules and making attacks like this.


      The more invincible we make our military defenses, the more we will force our enemies to circumvent them and attack us where it really hurts instead. And the more we continue to implement imperialist policies which advance our interests against those of people who already have good cause to hate us, the more we will assure that we have enemies with the will to attack us.

    50. Re:the middle east by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      It's always made more sense to me since Lockerbie wasn't the target, just what happened to be under the plane at the time of deonnation.

    51. Re:the middle east by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up and join the human race? You haven't managed it yet, so kindly stop pretending to be an authority on the human race and shut the fuck up.

    52. Re:the middle east by mrdild0nics · · Score: 1

      violent coward

    53. Re:the middle east by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. Are American citizens (such as myself) responsible for the attack? No. Are American politicians, through their history of economic control backed by threats of force across large portions of the world, responsible for the attack? Why yes, in some ways I think they are. And we vote for them.

    54. Re:the middle east by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      Where did I say it was justified? Nowhere. The point I was trying to make is that there are people out there who are VERY F*CKING ANGRY with us, and instead of rushing to kill like so many frenzied assholes, maybe we should consider why it is they are angry with us.

      My roommate lost 1/10 of his high school class. My best friend's father is dead, he was like a second father to me. My sister was missing for most of the day, and for a horrible moment we worried that she was gone too. Don't accuse me of not realizing the immense gravity of the event.

      My only point is this - when people are backed in to a corner for long enough, they end up fighting. And we've been backing all sorts of people in to corners of various shapes and sizes for years. Going out there and exacting revenge will only make more terrorist attacks, if not outright wars, occur.

    55. Re:the middle east by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      Wow, one of 3 intelligent replies to my post. I apologize for my lack of sensitivity, but I was trying to rattle people up because I honestly believe the only way to stop more horrible attacks like this is to address the grievances these terrorists are airing - and many of them do have legitimate grievances. I'm not saying Bin Laden has legitimate grievances, but I do know he would have a much tougher time finding support if America didn't act the way they did (Gulf War, Panama, etc.)

      You failed to mention that since that time, two US embassies and a US destroyer were bombed, and Islamic extremists were responsible. Heck, the last time the World Trade Center was attacked, it was Islamic militants. It would seem safe to say that OK City was the exception rather than the rule.

      I just meant to point out that anything is possible, and it's best not to jump to conclusions about such a horrible tragedy. Civilians lives will certainly be lost in foreign countries, and they deserve it no more than we Americans deserved what happened on Tuesday. In general, its quite safe to say that the US-haters out there are a very vocal minority. In fact, Americans abroad get a bad rap because we tend to assume that everybody hates us.

      Here I must disagree wholeheartedly. Perhaps I should have clarified - what people in other countries hate is the American government, and the American businesses that come to their country. They fail to realize that many if not most Americans are uninformed of world events, and what their governemnt/businesses do overseas. Furthermore, they fail to realize that the average American is not the one benefitting from the exploitation that the gov't and businesses do, and therefore hate Americans. Much the same way that many Americans are voicing their anger with Arabs right now, not realizing that Bin Laden (for example) is a freaking fanatic who has been disowned by his own family, and that most Arabs who live in this country are NOT fanatics. You describe what they did as "standing up for themselves?"

      I just don't think someone in their position has any other option to get attention over here. It was a horrible event, I just think that we are reaping what we sow. And what we are reaping is still nothing compared to the civilian casualties in the Middle East from the Gulf War, to name the most obvious example. "The money" tends not to work above-ground in the Pentagon. And yet these people saw fit to kill all these incidentals.

      Again, I refer you to the civilian casualties in the War for Oil, not to mention Panama, Somalia, Serbia, etc. THAT justified killing a whole mess of our civilians.

      Nowhere did I say this was a justified attack. I realize now that my wording was unclear. Time to stand up for themselves, yes. Time for something of this nature, God no. But what else is there to do against an opponent who has you cornered and totally dominated? You fight.

  30. Website for uptodate information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://usterror.nashlink.net has been setup to keep up to date information on the attacks, and their aftermath. It's running slashcode, please stop by and take a look, or help post information and links from sites to keep people up to date. Thanks.

  31. the canadian border hasn't been sealed... by canning · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Reports that came earlier in the day point towards the Canadian border crossing to be closed. This is not the case. The borders are open but long lines as extensive searches may have lead to the rumour that they were closed. Truck and car traffic is being allowed to cross. Some crossings are ghost towns because of the rumours.

    My office building is right behind Lester B. Pearson Airport in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and it's usually very busy with airplane traffic. It's eerie now that there is none. The shock can be felt around the world. Deepest sympathies from Canada.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
  32. Re:Fuck you TACO!!! by katsushiro · · Score: 1

    Um, if you'll take a quick read up there *beforE* overreacting, he says 'give more blood' not give *me* more blood'. And as far as I am concerned, it is both appropriate and important. There is little that any of us can do in this tragedy, we cannot hunt down those responsible, we cannot directly aid those hurt, we cannot turn back the hands of time and stop this from ever having happened. But one thing that we can all do is donate blood, which is sorely needed in these relief efforts, especially if you are Type O. Next time, take a breath, calm down, and make sure you know what you're reading before writing.

    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the first one." - Albert Einstein
  33. Re:Fuck you TACO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "give more blood" and it refers to the need of more blood donations.

    First learn to read properly, then come back to bitch and moan.

  34. Read it again... by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

    You must've been educated in public school... it says "give-more-blood"... without the "me".

    It's a call to donate... you might want to pick up a brain while you're there. He's not THAT ignorant.

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  35. For those speaking German by friday2k · · Score: 5, Informative

    /. is international, so you might wanna check it out:

    Tagesschau
    Welt
    Rheinische Post
    Spiegel Online
    Stern

    All of these sites have good picture coverage for those who do not speak German. And they are way faster than all US sites at the moment!

    1. Re:For those speaking German by netsharc · · Score: 0

      I was in Germany, it was 4 PM when this happened, I tried CNN.com, MSN.COM, MSN.DE, they were quite "slashdotted", Yahoo! only had a 2 line article about the first crash, but a picture. I had to go to an Australian server to read about it...

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  36. Call for a new poll by jafac · · Score: 2

    I think the current poll is inappropriate.

    I think that it would be cool if slashdot would use the poll to see what people, in general, are feeling about todays events.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:Call for a new poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I think we should retaliate against CowboyNeal.

  37. Abnormally high backbone utilization? by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "They've described the activity they're seeing as somewhat strange. The backbone is, according to them, at about 80% utilization -- they've never seen it above 40% before. However, the main portal sites such as Yahoo aren't having substantively higher than normal traffic. They're working on doing some traffic analysis but haven't completed that effort yet"

    The data at Internet Health Report would lead me to believe that, other than a higher-than-usual web browsing traffic to specific sites, it's business as usual for the majority of the internet.

    I'd like to see any contrary information, though.

    --

    This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

    1. Re:Abnormally high backbone utilization? by Elminst · · Score: 1

      Check out Matrix.net you can see the spikes in packet loss and reachability in the 9-10 AM EDT hour.
      http://average.miq.net/index.html
      And the overall reachability has been around 85% instead of the usual +93%
      It's on a 24 hour loop, so you'll only see it for about 12 more hrs.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  38. Tech Disaster Links by SEWilco · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Tech Disaster Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those trying to access Red Cross you can also make donations to Red Cross Disaster Relief fund at:

      http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/paypage/PKAXFNQ H7 EKCX/

      More info also at http://www.amazon.com/

    2. Re:Tech Disaster Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That URL properly is:

      http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/paypage/PKAXFNQ H7 EKCX/

  39. Thank you by zeedotcom · · Score: 1

    Let me be among the first to thank Timothy for the links. If possible, could somene point to a source on engineering that would explain if/how it is possible for a building to collapse from the top down, as the towers did?

    --

    If you want my respect, give it first...
    If you don't want my respect, expect mine before you give it.

    1. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The steel used to support the building weakens during the fire and the weight from above it causes the steel to deform which causes the building to collapse.

    2. Re:Thank you by mutantcamel · · Score: 1
      BBC News 24 said something about the towers having no concrete columns inside them, so the whole weight of the planes was being taken by the 'outside' of the buildings. As the fuel from the planes burned the metal that the towers where constructed with got softer until it finally gave.

      In UK: (for what it's worth):

      UK news has been running constantly with this since 2:00pm, Tony Blair has convened a COBRA commitee (basically a war cabinet) and has banned all air traffic over London.

    3. Re:Thank you by succotash · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, but my friend has a brother in New York who is a construction engineer and explained this to me:

      There is only one good way to bring down a steel high-rise, and that's by starting a significant fire in the top 1/3 of the building that is beyond the control of the fire suppression systems. This causes the steel supports in the floors above to become unstable and collapse. The result is, of course, bringing the rest of the building down on top.

    4. Re:Thank you by gwms · · Score: 1

      Per architect John Young (from cryptome.org) on Declan's mailing list this morning, the WTC used a lattice architecture design which puts all the weight on the outer shell. This makes the building very strong as long as the lattice is intact; however, once the shell is broken, the outer layer peels off and the floors inside implode, which is what we saw happen. Twice.

    5. Re:Thank you by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      The WTC towers were built on what was then (late 60's-1970) a new type of steel construction that provided most of the support of the building via a "tube" of steel on the outside of the building (basically, most of the vertical supports are the perimeter girders)

      Whilst the towers did have central columns for stability, they did not provide much vertical strength. The planes pierced this external "tube" of support on both sides of the building in Tower 1, and on THREE sides of the building in Tower 2 as the plane enter on one side and pierced a corner of the opposing side.

      The buildings were designed in such a way that when the support on 2 or 3 sides was compromised, the weight of the upper sections of the building was being disproportionally supported on only 1 or 2 sides of the "tube" and the stress caused failure in the lower portions of the building, not the upper portions of the building which were actually still quite together.

      Immediately after the collisions, the buildings were still stable, a true tribute to the design. It's the fires that wore away at more of the supports, putting more stress on the lower sections of the building causing them to fail.

      Since tower 2 had 3 sides compromised, that's why it collapsed first even though it had been hit second.

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    6. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just saw this on MSNBC, thought it might be informative.

      http://slate.msn.com/Code/explainer/explainer.as p? Show=9/11/2001&idMessage=8265

    7. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the levels the two planes crashed into the towers of the WTC, it leads me to speculate that once the floor(s) of impact were damaged and the fires began consuming everything it touches, the upper level support began to destabilise. The force of the weight of the 20+ floors landing on the lower levels caused a cascade effect, bringing more levels down. This is clearly seen in the tower which fell down second. The upper floors were charred and suddenly gave way. The 'fountain' like effect is where the damaged levels struct the untouched levels of the building, sending debis further outwards, before collapsing ontop of itself. (How do I know? I'm an engineer.)

      From the arial shots I saw on the news (from Australia) it looked like a nuke was let off in downtown Manhattan.

      My condolences.
      From - http://wsite.envy.nu/ (my email there)

    8. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely correct. The steel structure if the Trade Centers are steel, coated to protect them from "normal fire" hazard, NOT sustained temperatures above 1100 degrees F. The steel weakened from the sustained heat and the top 20-40 floors slammed down on the lower floors, hammering the structure to the gound like a huge jack hammer.

      Sorry about the anonymous post, but I can't recall my password, and it's not showing up in my active mailboxes (sigh)
      signed celtichack

  40. VERY strange coincidence by zsazsa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was flipping through the latest Wired magazine while watching the news reports. I was looking through the record reviews and saw THIS. An album cover of the WTC exploding. I was floored.

    ian @ polpo . org

    1. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's a high-res version. Believe it or not.

      AC

    2. Re:VERY strange coincidence by ClarkEvans · · Score: 1

      Yes. Even in the same locations. Looks like we found our perpertrator.

    3. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any of you guys got Peace Sells...But Who's Buying? by Megadeth? Not being facetious, but it has similarities.

    4. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is with the chopsticks?

    5. Re:VERY strange coincidence by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you are now witnessing a cover that is destined to become a collector's item when the record company pulls it from the stores? ;)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    6. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight. It's time to setup strategic bombing of Motown and Harlem.

    7. Re:VERY strange coincidence by huskerdoo · · Score: 1

      Here is a lot bigger picture of the album cover:
      http://www.girlieaction.com/coup/coup-index.html

    8. Re:VERY strange coincidence by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

      Very odd indeed. The title of the album, "The Coup." On a related note, my wife is reading a novel written around 1985 whose premise is that a terrorist group blows up Wall Street (the only difference being, the group first calls and tells them to evacuate). She said it's been very surreal to go through today because the events described in the novel mirror pretty closely what's happening now. And she just picked it up last week. It's by someone named Patterson.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    9. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt. The title of the musical group, "The Coup."

    10. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another one -

      a couple weeks ago I drove to Virginia (I live in Massachusetts) to visit a friend taking summer session classes at William & Mary. One night she had to stay up to type a paper.. so I spent the night in the computer lab with her. ;) Anyway, after getting bored.. I found MS Flight Simulator installed on all the computers in the lab. So I started playing. I was not very good - especially with no instructions. ANyway.. one of the scenarios was flying a 737 over New York. I crashed it into one of the WTC buildings...

    11. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Kafir · · Score: 1

      The title of the album is not The Coup, the title is Party Music. The Coup is an excellent politically-minded hip-hop group from Oakland, led by vocal communist "Boots" Riley.
      This is their fourth album, all of them have been fairly provocative in parts. The first album, for instance, was called Kill My Landlord; the third album includes a song in which Boots gives his reasons for pissing on George Washington's grave.

      The coincidence of the exploding WTC cover on an album coming out this week is chilling as hell; as far as I can tell the album has already been pulled from amazon.com, but is still listed at amazon.co.uk.

      I wonder if this will kill the album or make it famous.

    12. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Heh. Not much of a coincidence. Nearly everyone who plays with FS2 tries putting an airliner into the WTC, just to see how it looks. I spent an hour doing it once.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    13. Re:VERY strange coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your wife Arabic ?
      Eh, nah .. knowing your southern customs she is most likely your own sister anyway.
      Forget about it.

  41. Re:What Would Ender Do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forgive his enemy, and try to avoid destroying them. A lesson most of the jerkwad posters round here need to learn.

  42. Message from Canada... by madchris · · Score: 1

    I live on Prince Edward Island, Canada. I have been following the news (mostly CNN) since I heard about the attrocities perpetrated on you, our southern cousins.
    Though it may not be very helpful in a practical way, I offer you all, at least the vibrational support (all I have to offer) in your time of grief. I know I'm not alone in the way I feel up here in Canada.
    You "Yanks", as we sometimes call you are our friends and historically very much our cousins. You are family. We have you in our hearts.

    1. Re:Message from Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

    2. Re:Message from Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't change the fact that we hate you and want to kill you. Canada will die. Sorry, buttfucker.

    3. Re:Message from Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pathetic... Hopefully his cranial cavity will colapse in its void.

    4. Re:Message from Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      times like this, the support from Canada has been the best. I think it's more like brothers and sisters.
      David

  43. Daniel Lewin of Akamai died. by sv0f · · Score: 5, Informative
    In addition to Timothy's link, Akamai's web site contains the following message:

    Caryn Brownell
    Media Relations
    Akamai Technologies
    617-444-4661
    cbrownell@akamai.com

    AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES MOURNS THE LOSS OF CO-FOUNDER AND CTO DANIEL LEWIN

    Cambridge, MA, September 11, 2001 - With great sadness, Akamai Technologies, Inc. today announced the passing of Daniel C. Lewin, co-founder, chief technology officer and board member of the Company. American Airlines confirmed that he was on board the Boston to Los Angeles flight that crashed in New York City today. Danny was 31 years old and is survived by his wife and two sons.

    George H. Conrades, chairman and chief executive officer of Akamai said, "Danny was a wonderful human being. He will be deeply missed by his many friends at Akamai. Our thoughts and prayers are with Danny's family, friends and colleagues during this time of national tragedy and personal loss."

    I copied this from here.
    1. Re:Daniel Lewin of Akamai died. by jlowery · · Score: 1

      I hope this gives young, driven people striving for monetary success pause to reflect on what is truly important in their lives.

      --
      If you post it, they will read.
    2. Re:Daniel Lewin of Akamai died. by Mask · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer - not speaking for anyone but myself.

      I am totaly shoked. 5 years ago, we worked together at IBM research in Haifa, Israel. He was a super talented person.

      It was the same person that served in the special forces in the Israeli army, was brilliant and was a great coder. He could write 2000 lines of code in one day.He once complained that he lost thousands of lines of code he wrote one day due to a computer crash.

      He finished undergraduate studies with honor in two faculties simulatneously, worked full time job at IBM, wrote CS and math articles and had a wife and a baby (all at the same time).
      An amazing person by any standard, a legend, a huge loss.

  44. Pictures by Pludodog · · Score: 1

    http://members.home.com/pludodog/page1.htm

    My friend took this from the Jersey shore with his cam, they may not be better than the news, but they're still frickin scary.

  45. Read before you act... by shakamojo · · Score: 1

    He's saying "GIVE MORE BLOOD"... as in DONATE to the Red Cross... Don't jump to conclusions until you've read these things carefully... we're all upset and hurt. Spreading more hate and anger isn't helping anyone.

  46. For Once. by Ho-Lee-Cow! · · Score: 1
    The NY Times site isn't free registration. :-(

    --
    In space, no one can hear you moo.
  47. A Point to Make by orangesquid · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is not a troll. I repeat, this is not a troll. I just want people to think about the philsophy behind these lyrics, and how it applies to the terrorists, the people shouting "WAR", the people shouting "Bomb the Middle East", the people shouting "Turn the Other Cheek", and everyone else who has formed some opinion...

    My point: are we really all assholes? Who's the asshole here? Who's supposed to be the asshole? Who wants whom to be the asshole?

    Asshole [Guttermouth]

    I don't like the things you like
    And you don't like the things I like
    She don't like the things they like
    So who the fuck is really right
    See a skinhead at a show
    Let him know he's got to go
    Fuck white power, the KKK
    A-S-S-H-O-L-E!

    Chorus
    Everyone's an asshole ("Raging asshole")
    My mom's an asshole ("Fuck you asshole")
    You're a fucking asshole ("Fucking asshole")
    And I'm a goddamn asshole

    Mom and dad, the Grateful Dead
    Major labels and straight edge
    Coors and school and roller blades
    God, Rick James and Oakley shades
    Fishing, Wayne, silly jocks
    Nazis, midgets, new tube socks
    L.D. from M.R.&R.
    And fucking Zeppelin Man

    Everyone's an asshole ("Raging asshole")
    My mom's an asshole ("Fuck you asshole")
    You're a fucking asshole ("Fucking asshole")
    And I'm a goddamn asshole

    Everyone's an asshole ("Raging asshole")
    My mom's an asshole ("Fuck you asshole")
    You're a fucking asshole ("Fucking asshole")
    And I'm a goddamn asshole

    Hippies, harleys, Pearl Jam
    Chili peppers, case of Spam
    Riot grrls, Ponch and Jon
    Squash and pork and carmel flan
    We hate these things
    We hate you, too
    Go fuck a monkey in the zoo
    Oscar Meyer has a way with
    B.O.L.O.G.N.A.

    (I apologize in advance if I got any of the lyrics wrong.)

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    1. Re:A Point to Make by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Moderation: -1, Troll"

      It's not sarcasm, it's an honest question... it seems most moderators are quick to shoot down anything they personally don't like. Oh well :(

      Slashdot used to be cool.

    2. Re:A Point to Make by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh you are aware that not all Skins are racist, right? You fucking piece of shit.

  48. Farewell to the twin towers. by mrsam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Only a few short weeks ago I walked a couple of times across the Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges, to get some fresh air. I took a bunch of pictures of the evening New York City skyline. Amongst them were a couple of shot of the WTC towers. Little did I know that this would be the last time I'd see them.

    Please see my short tribute to the World Trace Center towers:

    http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/5799/ farewelltowtc/index.html.

    God have mercy on these souls.

    1. Re:Farewell to the twin towers. by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      semi-OT: Your geocities page "pops under" an interesting X10 "public service" message...

      http://ads.x10.com/all/suspend.htm

      "We have suspended our service out of sympathy for the victims and families of this national tradegy. Our heartfelt thoughts and prayers go out to them."

      Wow. Even annoying advertising has been affected.

    2. Re:Farewell to the twin towers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "tradegy"... really?

    3. Re:Farewell to the twin towers. by BadlandZ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      OK, I blew 3 points on this thread modding, then decided to post because this might be more important?

      Here's what the dihard SlashDot'ers NEED to do (if you agree mod this up!)

      • Go Give Blood
      • Start a system of mirrors.
        • mirror as much shit as you can find, photos, media clips, etc...
        • Someone write a simple script that any UNIX'er can use (tarball probably, rpm and deb them later) to stick on the mirrors W/ instructions for the newbies... I suggest a high speed site be listed IN THE README to the script that has the primary IP/URL to mirror, that we DO NOT make public unless you run the script!!!
        • Post them mirrors...
        • those running the mirrors update hourly off the IP/URL from the README in the script.

      • come up with better ideas.
      • Find someone to sort the primary source into good images, good text, good video, etc... maybe a 1 to 5 star rating? We could come up with a MOD system, but f- that for now, let's just find SOMEONE to do it and start it up!

      I am about to mirror some of what I found, sometime somewhere soon, TBA.... I hope we can band together to pull off a media spread fast and informative.

      Comment on Trademarks and Copywrights: Screw them, this is too important. DO NOT white out sources, GIVE FULL CREDIT IF YOU CAN!!! But, we want the news spread clear and fast, with as much detail as we can. So, give credit, and if they don't make the credits for the photos or media clear enough in the content, it's THIER FAULT for not taking credit... Let's just mirror shit so we don't choke down the major news sites and the best photos we can find.

    4. Re:Farewell to the twin towers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll notice they are still popping under and getting their name out though.

    5. Re:Farewell to the twin towers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh god, a fucking typo.... oh no!!

      geez, thanx for pointing that out, nimrod

    6. Re:Farewell to the twin towers. by cpfeifer · · Score: 1

      Here's 4 more pictures of the Twin Towers by a freind of mine who lives across the river from the financial district.
      The first picture shows both towers on fire, the next shows first tower collapsing. Third picture shows one tower standing, and the last photo shows neither tower standing. Very unnerving progression.

      --
      it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
    7. Re:Farewell to the twin towers. by kettch · · Score: 1

      I heard on the radio that all of the major news services had agreed to share any and all information they got freely among themselves. I think that if the system you are envisioning were to be created, then it would count as a news service and would fall under that agreement.

      Unfortunately, I only heard it on the radio, so i don't know any details

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  49. W? by Smallest · · Score: 1

    /. was down 1/2 the morning and it's been in flake-mode ever since - you know where links always go back to the front page, logins are lost, etc.. no big deal, there was probably a lot of traffic.

    the only places i was getting news from were www.codeproject.com (aussie winodws programming site) and www.washingtonpost.com.

    -c

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
  50. Psychics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice that there were no psychics predicting this diaster or any of the other major ones in the past? Will we ever learn that they're all frauds?

    1. Re:Psychics by kaoshin · · Score: 1

      Nobody's perfect. Take your spelling for example :)

  51. Best source! by guanxi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Stratfor

    Concise, more comprehensive than anything else I've seen, and by far the best analysis.

    Usually, they're a leading foreign policy website, focusing on 'intelligence' rather than 'news'.

    Remember, the power of terrorists is terror -- don't let them win.

  52. Ahem: Southern Canada by Pope · · Score: 2

    There are no large airports in Northern Canada! The big ones, where most if not all of the flights are heading, are Vancouver, Toronto, and Goose Bay. These are the ones that can handle the traffic. Please see a post above from Vancouver, here in Toronto it's pretty nuts.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:Ahem: Southern Canada by rakerman · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify the Canadian airport situation from the East Coast perspective: with American airspace closed, there are two diversions required - incoming planes coming across the Atlantic and Pacific, and outgoing planes from Canada. Outgoing traffic from Canada to the US has been diverted substantially to the international airport of Halifax and also to New Brunswick (mainly Moncton) airports. Planes coming across the Atlantic have been diverted to Newfoundland - Gander's international airport and the smaller one at St. John's

    2. Re:Ahem: Southern Canada by rakerman · · Score: 1

      They're reporting on Global National that 9000 Americans will have to spend the night in and around Halifax, as all of their flights to the US East Coast were diverted here.

    3. Re:Ahem: Southern Canada by Silver222 · · Score: 1
      Edmonton International has three flights on the Tarmac that originated in London, and were due to fly into San Francisco, according to my family that is there.

      --
      "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
    4. Re:Ahem: Southern Canada by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      The big ones are Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal. Secondary are airports like Halifax, and tertiary are ones like Abbotsford.

      Realistically though, they are landing planes at any runways they can land planes at, if necessary.

      --Dan

    5. Re:Ahem: Southern Canada by rakerman · · Score: 1

      The final tally is still 9000 for Halifax and 30,000 people in the Atlantic region, which is an incredible number particularly for the small Newfoundland communities where most of them ended up. Report can be found at Atlantic provinces shelter thousands.

  53. Allah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blackbox recovered.

    Hairy Islamic camelfucker: "God is great. God is Great. IEEE!! Allah! Death to the Great Satan."

    Explosion. Silence.

    This comment violates the comment compression filter. So I've had to add this bit in. Fuck slashdot.

  54. Flight Instructions - MS Flight Simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Word has it the terrorist learned to fly the aircraft aided by a copy of Microsoft Flight Simulator!

    1. Re:Flight Instructions - MS Flight Simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I was thinking the same thing. What with all these "professional" level flight simulators available, is it any wonder terrorists can fly 757s these days? I think we should retaliate by boycotting Microsoft.

  55. Internet rememberance campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A rememberance campaign has been started to mourn today's victim and their loved ones. Webmasters are encouraged to participate and replace their banners in commemoration. Small ribbon images are available to place on your website. Please see http://remember.worldatwar.org

  56. Welcome to the Holy War America by disc-chord · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    (assuming this motivated by Islamic Terrorists)

    This is the first time America has suffered tremendous casualities of the Holy War ongoing in the middle east. I hope that when the dust settles america realizes that the people who commited this horenous act... are in fact people too. Despite how painful it might be to acknowledge this, they are people just like you and me.

    Most people like you and me are not motivated sufficiently to give up their life for a cause. In fact, in Islamic traditions, suicide means a certain fate in hell. Yet today we have been visited with a horror that could only be brought by suicidical means.

    How could people like you and me veto their natural basic instict for survival? God. The devout belief in God provides an "out". You don't need to worry about your survival if your mind is operating on the assumption that there is something greater than life.

    I would hope that Americans can set aside their own personal beliefs and unite in an attempt to ban practicing religion. It is religion that killed the Aztecs. It is religion that brought us the inquisition. It is religion that has brought us the non-stop terror in the middle east. 2 very talented programmers (and slashdot readers) I know were drafted into the Isreal Armed Forces last year. 4 Months ago one of them was killed. I lost a friend because of a "Belief". How many friends and family did you lose today because of a "Belief"?

  57. good ol' friendly americans by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 1

    Having watched this on uk tv all day, one thing i've noticed is that almost every american interviewed firstly makes the point that it was "an attack on civilization and democracy" and "the whole world", whereas everyone else (and me included) is of the opinion that it was an attack on the american authority and all that jiz.

    The second point they make is that there will be no delay in american retaliation. I heard one guy say [something like] "thousands have been killed today. America will be sure to retaliate immediatly, and with great force" (ok so i can't exactly remember but you get the idea). Another one said "this is not a case for a single missile strike [about the usa's retalliation], more a sustained attack", presumably meaning the usa plans to use their patented "bomb the f#ck out of everyone" technique to make themselves feel better.

    1. Re:good ol' friendly americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      NORTHEN IRELAND

      enough said....

    2. Re:good ol' friendly americans by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 1

      actually not enough said. i'm to thick.

      i don't understand.

      BTW. seems USA has already begun the afore-mentioned super-great-bomb plan.

    3. Re:good ol' friendly americans by raaum · · Score: 1

      ok.. i'll bite.. you say it is an attack on 'american authority and all that jiz'. (whatever that means).. You phrase this in a way that makes me assume that you mean 'this is an attack on american imperialism; we, as benevolent brits, have nothing to fear'.

      Which is the more imperialistic nation through history? Which nation is america's closest foreign policy ally? Which nation is most likely to be emphatically supportive of US foreign actions (whatever they may be)? Which nation is host to the longest running internal dissidency (sp?) outside of the middle east?

      Not that I support indescriminant retaliation, however I find it somewhat offensive that anyone would say the equivalent of 'it's what you deserve.'

    4. Re:good ol' friendly americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up yours, who are to judge anyone. Try standing in their shoes.

      btw, I do condone blowing the hell out of anybody who attacks me. Its easy to sit your lame ass in a chair and judge others isnt it.

      America should retaliate, when they have evidence of who caused this tragedy. To do otherwise would show them weak and only entice their enemies to push harder. Study strategy sometime, moron, and try to close your mouth now and then. The foul air is bothering us.

    5. Re:good ol' friendly americans by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but basically what i'm trying to say is that i find the majority of the american response is "someone is going to pay for this", which might please the american public, but i can't believe it's the best way to go.

      yeah, i agree the uk is sucking so hard it hurts. TB was saying pretty much the same as those US guys.

      but i still say it's not the right way to go about it. (Maybe i'm speaking too early - they haven't actually done anything yet, but you have to admit, it's been the pattern for most of these kind of things in the past.)

    6. Re:good ol' friendly americans by raaum · · Score: 1

      ok.. i'm down with that.. I don't believe that a knee-jerk response it the way to go..

      What to do? what to say? I don't believe there is a good response in any way to this. Bombing the hell out of someone is satisfying, but ultimately worthless.

      I guess the only thing that I would say is that we _MUST_ condemn anyone and any group that celebrates this pathetic, barharic act. We must retaliate (not necessarily by bombing) but by emphasizing that we will not promote the goals of those that would fall to these lows..... Terrorists must not find their goals affirmed....

    7. Re:good ol' friendly americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You f*cking brits gave us all these grand ideas in the first place. You're the ones with the magna carta and that like to stick hot sticks up your king's a*s when he abuses the citizenry ... get off your high horse.

    8. Re:good ol' friendly americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another Brit I have to say that the only appropriate action is to support our American friends in this moment of incredible tragedy.

      Our hearts and thoughts are with you all today, and I'm sure that the (understandably) high emotions from individuals will level off a bit and that will pave the way for a reasonable, ideally international, reaction.

      We here in Britain cannot pretend that we will not also be targets in the future for this kind of terrorism.

      In my opinion, it certainly should be treated as an attack on western civilisation, and furthermore I believe that we should not hesitate in showing solidarity for our friends across the Atlantic.

    9. Re:good ol' friendly americans by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Say that to the guy who just had to pull another body from the wreckage.

    10. Re:good ol' friendly americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      Hope you don't frequent Afghanistan too often...

    11. Re:good ol' friendly americans by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 1

      yup.

    12. Re:good ol' friendly americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Northern Ireland what? Nobody ever suggested wiping out the Nationalist community for the sins of the IRA.

  58. Stratfor.com coverage by Brad+Moore · · Score: 1

    There is good coverage of this at http://www.stratfor.com/ with analysis of the impact on an economic and political scale.

  59. The two 747's that landed in Whitehorse by Lawmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First off - my previous post had 2 errors, 'Debt of Honour' was Clancey's book, and yes, GWB was not in power last year, my apologies in writing at too fevered a pitch.

    Now, my report regarding the escorted landing of two 747's at Whitehorse International Airport:

    11:42am A Korean Airlines cargo 747-400 landed using every inch of available runway

    11:50am We spotted another inbound jet
    11:52am A Korea Airlines passenger 747 landed coming down just 15 feet above the fence....an awesome and scary sight from only 100 feet away. 3 F-18's (hard to say, they were pretty high up) escorted them in and continued to circle Whitehorse's airspace.

    Luckily Whitehorse's runway had just been extended to facilitate 747's last year.

    Emergency vehicles kept their distance from both planes, the passenger plane having taxied back to the north end of the runway, as far away from the terminal as possible.

    A gray truck approached the passenger plane, dispersing ground personnel to chalk the wheels, then fell in behind an officer wielding a long barreled weapon and backed up behind the officer to the truck and departed the scene

    A ramp was brought to the aircraft but no one left for about 20 minutes (at 12:36pm) when a single male came down and walked towards the police vehicles (we could hear the occasional word from a police loudspeaker) he made it about half way when he was obviously ordered to lift his shirt up, turn around, lift his pant legs, then he removed the shirt completely, holding it over his head while continuing to walk towards the vehicles. People with binoculars were able to see several FBI jackets amongst the police. There was a lear jet nearby which was probably used to get the FBI here from Alaska (since as far as I know we don't have any resident FBI in Yukon).

    At 12:43pm we were ordered away from the area by the RCMP. Apparently for 'our own safety' - we were on crown land, outside the airport's perimeter fence.

    There is the possibility that we may be receiving up to 10 planes, but I have no idea where they could park them.

    Further information available at:
    http://www.canoe.ca/MoneyNews/sept11_yukon-dow.h tm l
    http://www.canoe.ca/CNEWSWorldTrade0109/11_white -c p.html
    http://cbc.ca/

    1. Re:The two 747's that landed in Whitehorse by kirkb · · Score: 1
      Wow. I grew up in Whitehorse, and am shocked that it's now able to accommodate 747's. I can just imagine a hapless bunch of Korean tourists trying to find their way around the city. Oh dear.


      glonq at hotmail dot com

      --
      Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    2. Re:The two 747's that landed in Whitehorse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yep- The passenger jet was KE Flight 85.

      http://www.koreanair.com/advisory/advisory.htm

  60. Kudos Slashdot by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

    Kudos for slashdot for being one of the only sites to stay up during a world crisis. You rose to the challenge when needed.

  61. MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by David+Hume · · Score: 5, Informative
    From MSNBC:

    THE SCALE of the attacks and the loss of life -- mostly in New York City's World Trade Center, but also in Pittsburgh and Washington -- ensured that "no option has been taken off the table," senior U.S. officials said. Asked if that included nuclear weapons, one senior official said: "I said no option is out of the question. That's precisely what I mean."


    Further:

    Among the options under active consideration:

    Major retaliatory airstrikes: The United States could strike at Afghanistan with missile strikes -- possibly even tactical nuclear weapons -- to demonstrate its anger and the grave consequences of such an attack on U.S. soil.


    The entire article is copied below.

    U.S. pondering its response

    'No options taken off the table' -- senior U.S. official

    By Michael Moran

    MSNBC

    Sept. 11 -- Reeling from the most devastating day of terrorist attacks in history, President George W. Bush and his advisors struggled on Tuesday to devise a response that would convey the depth of the outrage felt across the United States without appearing to lash out blindly.

    THE SCALE of the attacks and the loss of life -- mostly in New York City's World Trade Center, but also in Pittsburgh and Washington -- ensured that "no option has been taken off the table," senior U.S. officials said. Asked if that included nuclear weapons, one senior official said: "I said no option is out of the question. That's precisely what I mean."

    The nature and precision of the attacks, along with their unknown origin, left the United States with no useful precedents or contingency plans to fall back on. Procedurally, the attacks prompted officials to institute safeguards consistent with a state of war: Airspace over major American cities was cleared of commercial traffic and replaced by military interceptors; large, obvious targets like the White House, Capitol building, the Disney theme parks in Florida and California and the Sears Tower in Chicago, were evacuated. Most tellingly, the president, vice president, congressional leaders and other key government officials were spirited to secure, undisclosed locations -- an indication that the attacks achieved an astounding degree of surprise.

    Indeed, many officials echoed the words of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet's commander, Navy Adm. Robert J. Natter: "We have been attacked like we haven't been attacked since Pearl Harbor." He then dispatched aircraft carriers to the waters off New York and Washington -- an unprecedented step -- to provide air cover.

    HIGH ALERT

    The United States military and its diplomatic organs quickly ordered steps consistent with imminent action.

    President Bush placed American military commands around the world, including North American Air Defense Command, or NORAD, on their highest level of alert. Air Force One, carrying Bush, landed briefly at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska, the home of Strategic Air Command, the nation's nuclear war fighting command, as well as the so-called "doomsday plane," a flying command post meant for use in case of a nuclear attack on America.

    Ambassadors of the world's most powerful military alliance, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, scheduled an emergency meeting for 5 p.m. ET to discuss the crisis at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium.

    While no public accusations of blame were made by the U.S. government, senior officials, along with experts on terrorism, were unanimous in their belief that the attacks were the work of Osama bin Laden, the Saudi exile who leads the shadowy Al-Qaeda terrorist organization. "No one else but Bin Laden has the capability to do this is Bin Laden," one senior intelligence official said. "No one."

    Bin Laden is living in Afghanistan as a guest of the Islamic regime there, the Taliban. The United States already has warned the Taliban that any act of terrorism on American soil by bin Laden or his followers would be regarded as an act of war.

    That said, exactly how to hit out at bin Laden has been a continuing problem for the United States. U.S. intelligence agencies once tracked his movements within Afghanistan fairly reliably by eavesdropping on cell phone communications. Bin Laden has long since stopped using cell phones and is now said to sleep in a different safe house each night. Three years ago, after the dual bombings at American embassies in Kenya and Mozambique were tied to Al-Qaeda, the United States launched Tomahawk cruise missiles at suspected bin Laden training camps in Afghanistan and a plant in Sudan the CIA suspected of ties with him. Neither air strike did much to dissuade him. The U.S. suspects bin Laden's hand behind the April 2000 attack on the USS destroyer Cole in Yemen.

    MILITARY OPTIONS

    As President Bush weighs options, the difficulty of pinpointing bin Laden -- if in fact the United States decides he is responsible -- presents a dilemma. Among the options under active consideration:

    Major retaliatory airstrikes: The United States could strike at Afghanistan with missile strikes -- possibly even tactical nuclear weapons -- to demonstrate its anger and the grave consequences of such an attack on U.S. soil.

    Military invasion: The president could declare war on Afghanistan and order a buildup of forces similar to that which preceded the Gulf War in 1990. Such a move, however, would require the acquiescence of a neighboring state -- either Pakistan or one of the former Soviet Central Asian nations.

    Manhunt: The Army's Delta Force or other assets could be inserted into Afghanistan to hunt down Bin Laden.

    Proxy action: The United States could exert extreme diplomatic pressure on Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, two states that have supported the Afghan Taliban in the past, to bring Bin Laden to justice.

    'NO EASY ANSWERS'

    Each and every one of these options has drawbacks, however, and those potential pitfalls will animate the debates of the coming days within the U.S. national security establishment. For instance, the use of nuclear weapons, in any form, risks alienating a world that is almost united in its revulsion at such attacks -- and whose help will be necessary in preventing future such attacks.

    "The worst thing we can do is to completely lose our cool and overreact," said Sean Anderson, domestic terrorism expert at Idaho State University who studied the Oklahoma City bombing and the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993.

    "The best thing we can do is carry on, not to depart from our ordinary constitutional legal processes ... get the markets open today and carry on with our lives."

    Indeed, it is quite possible the United States will refrain from any immediate action until investigators have time to more thoroughly make the case against whoever directed the attack.

    "There are not a lot of easy answers," former Secretary of State James Baker told NBC News. "The president, I think, did the right thing when he said 'we're under terrorist attack and we're going to hunt down those responsible.' "

    1. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This makes me sick. The notion of using nuclear strikes is tantamount to expressing a blatant desire to murder innocent people. I know of no precision nuke that wouldn't kill or irradiate nearby civilians. I don't care how angry people are; the US does not stand for murder. There was no justification for it in Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and there is definitely no justification for it now. If you can tell me that killing hundreds of thousands of civilians to save the American lives that would be lost in an assault (as was the excuse given after WW2), then you're telling me that America stands for nothing that it was meant to stand for. We can't claim that our armed forces exist to fight and die in the name of freedom and basic human rights, when we're willing to forcefully trade civilian lives for those of our armed forces.

    2. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I think they were just trying to show how serious they were. I don't believe they really are considering a nuclear strike (knock on wood)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by seaker · · Score: 1
      It is to be hoped that any revenge attacks (because that is what they will be) will be better thought out than the last ones against Bin Laden (or whoever is blamed for this atrocity.



      The last cruise strikes against a Sudanese chemical factory that turned out to be innocent and a few innefectual attacks at camps in Afghanistan is not the way to ensure that this sort of thing happens again. fighting fire with fire just gets everyone burned.



      I hope some thought is given to looking at what so enrages a person that they are willing to give their life and take thousands of others for some reason.

      --

      -----------------------------
      If you can't blind them with brilliance, baffle them with bull.
    4. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by pnatural · · Score: 1

      There was no justification for it in Nagasaki or Hiroshima

      um, no. there was a justification back then: stop the war. it worked, too. it worked so well that nukes haven't been used since.

    5. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by madeye+the+younger · · Score: 1

      Why in hell would a tacnuke be necessary? fuel/air bombs serve much the same purpose without the half-life.

      Remember, this is now nearly an open war. It is only PARTLY about justice/revenge; it is now also about deterrance. It is becoming necessary to remove not only the means of attack, but the will to do so.

      How can this be done when the enemy is not a country, but a 'religious' group? I wish I knew...

    6. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow!
      Bravely said, considering the number of people that have fought and died over the years to guarantee you the right to speak like an idiot.


      Of course, in Imperial Japan, you wouldn't have hesitated a moment before critcizing the bombing of Perl Harbor. If you had in North Korea, you voice would have been raised against the invasion of South Korea. And, with your brilliant hindsite, you would have gladly sent hundreds of thousands of Allied soldiers to their deaths to keep your skirts morally clean. You must amaze yourself when you think of how (self-)righteous you are.

    7. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by uk_greg · · Score: 1

      Also, the apparent ready availabilty of nuclear weapons to some terrorist groups makes a US nuke strike fairly unlikely.

    8. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by bladel · · Score: 1

      I think W answered your question in his speech tonight:

      "We will no longer make the distinction between those who commit these acts, and those who harbor them."

      Sounds like a blank check for actions in Afghanistan, Libya, Iran, Iraq, etc.

      --


      Information wants to be Free. Useful Information will cost you.
    9. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were reasons for using fission bombs against Japan in WW2. According to many estimates, using these bombs to end the war saved not only American lives, but Japanese lives as well. Note: A single firebomb raid on Tokyo was much more deadly than both fission bombs put together.

      Your point about the deaths of civilians still stands, though.

    10. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still personally debating the morality of turning the large number of guilty parties (and small number of 'innocents') into "human shadows", however, the fact that we (the US) are coming across with a strong and uncompromising verbal/policy response should help send a strong, scary message to the cowards that exist throughout the world.

      The lowbrow reporters who ask quesitons about using nuclear weapons completely forget to inquire about our ability to take out large numbers of *individuals* (e.g. terrorist leader in hiding, Iraqi Pres, Cuban Dictator, Palestinian 'leader', moronic middle-eastern 'civilians' who cheer in the streets) with no trace, no notice and no mercy.

      I hope I wake up tomorrow morning with the headlines filled with the mysterious deaths of a dozen or so world figures. Maybe the drones that hang on every word they say will snap out of their trance and realize how they have contributed to this disaster.

      Keep the borders closed. Shoot first and ask questions later. And, show no mercy.

    11. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "I know of no precision nuke that wouldn't kill or irradiate nearby civilians."

      You should talk to the Indians (and possibly Pakistanis), then. They seem to have mastered the art of making extremely clean, sub-kiloton tactical nukes. Fall-out is a sign of inefficiency, and we've had over 50 years to work on it.

      "There was no justification for it in Nagasaki or Hiroshima"

      Oh?

      The US submarine force does to Japan what Germany has only dreamed of doing to the UK for decades: A total blokade. Japan slowly starts to starve. They don't surrender. Heck, they're busy training children in school how to use a bamboo spear to help fend off an American invasion.

      The US bombs Hiroshima. They don't surrender.

      The US bombs Nagasaki. They don't surrender.

      The USSR (after having won their Great Patriotic War) declares war on Japan.

      A few days later, Emperor Hirohito records a surrender message to be broadcast the next day. That night the Japanese Army tries to stage a coup to keep the emperor from surrendering. They wanted to die a glorious death rather than surrender.

      And even after all that, starved, bombed, and a few million angry Soviets on their back, it takes OVER A MONTH for them to finally sign the official surrender.

      Anybody who thinks that Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't justified either doesn't know the facts or is underestimating the willingness of the Japanese to die for their emperor. Consider the fact that it took two bombs.

      "If you can tell me that killing hundreds of thousands of civilians to save the American lives that would be lost in an assault (as was the excuse given after WW2), then you're telling me that America stands for nothing that it was meant to stand for."

      America doesn't stand for throwing perfectly good young boys into a meat grinder for no damned good reason, just to satisfy some bushido sensibilities. We don't use human wave tactics for a reason, and its not for want of troops.

      Besides, US troops aren't the only ones that were saved. If the Japanese had their way, their country would have ceased to be in the process of conquering it.

      "We can't claim that our armed forces exist to fight and die in the name of freedom and basic human rights, when we're willing to forcefully trade civilian lives for those of our armed forces."

      We don't. We don't want our soldiers to die for the state. We expect our citizen-soldiers to protect us from aggressors and to visit harm upon those aggressors. They're there to kill people and break things, not to die.

      When push comes to shove, foreign nationals don't vote, so one American life will always be worth more than one foreign life.

    12. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh ya poor little pussy --- yeah maybe nuc_butchery is what it takes ,,, step right in front ya bleating bastard. With your pussy attirude, ya might as well have killed those people yourself.

    13. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by kimihia · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? And you're telling me that no innocent people died today?

    14. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can this be done when the enemy is not a country, but a 'religious' group? I wish I knew...
      MECCA MAKES A TASTY TARGET!!
      Let them pray to ashes!

    15. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

      A few questions then; why did we have to invade Japan? Why did it need to surrender? It was blockaded, it couldn't mount any significant attack that wouldn't have met russian and american forces, so why were the only choices invasion or nuclear attack? At what level do military casualties become hefty enough to warrant the murder of unarmed civilians that chose not to fight? Why not nuke a naval base? Why not shell targets from the shore, focus on anti-aircraft capabilities, and end with non-stop carpet bombings of military targets? Why not send every american soldier home, away from the obviously defeated Japan, and let the threat of taking on the world alone have it's effect? Why no 'warning shot' over the water to see if letting Japan see the effects of a weapon that was, at that time, mistakenly thought to be the end of the world, would inspire and end to aggression, and possibly a surrender? Surely it's not possible that our immediate reaction was mass murder, because the people and the government wanted revenge, or because the government wanted to flex it's muscles for the world...

    16. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

      Oh that's right! Thank you for reminding me! Well, surely the humane and noble response to the death of innocent people is the murder of other innocent people in the name of killing terrorists who could just as easily be brought to justice without eradicating whatever town they happen to be in.

    17. Re:MSNBC: Nuclear Retaliation "Not Off The Table" by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "why did we have to invade Japan? Why did it need to surrender? It was blockaded, it couldn't mount any significant attack that wouldn't have met russian and american forces, so why were the only choices invasion or nuclear attack?"

      Well, besides the fact that the Allies decided they needed unconditional surrenders at Yalta, while the Japanese islands were isolated, their troops were still free to rape/pilage/burn/use biological weapons (!) on mainland Asia. Also, there was no telling what they might be able to do with the resources they had (scrape together enough to build those submersible carriers they were talking about, starting putting anthrax on those balloons they were sending over the NW USA...).

      "Why not nuke a naval base?"

      You mean like Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

      "Why not shell targets from the shore"

      1.) If you can hit them, they can hit you.

      2.) Ground targets can be buried, reinfoced with feet of concrete, dispersed along the countryside, etc. Dreadnaughts tend to stand out like sore thumbs, and must obey the laws of hydrodynamics.

      3.) 16" guns only reach so far in-land.

      "focus on anti-aircraft capabilities,"

      1.) If you can hit them, they can hit you.

      2.) Air power isn't the end-all be-all of military campaigns. Never has been, never will be. Consider the examples of the Battle of Britain, Vietnam and Yugoslavia.

      "non-stop carpet bombings of military targets?"

      Who said we weren't?

      "Why not send every american soldier home, away from the obviously defeated Japan, and let the threat of taking on the world alone have it's effect?"

      If they were willing to stare down the idea of nuclear annihilation (even welcome it), why would they be worried about that? Going down in a fight against the world would bring great honor and glory. Just the way a samurai hopes to die.

      "Why no 'warning shot' over the water to see if letting Japan see the effects of a weapon that was, at that time, mistakenly thought to be the end of the world, would inspire and end to aggression, and possibly a surrender?"

      What if it didn't work? Better yet, if a "warning shot" would have been effective, wouldn't Hiroshima have been that much more effective?

      "Surely it's not possible that our immediate reaction was mass murder, because the people and the government wanted revenge, or because the government wanted to flex it's muscles for the world..."

      Yeah, nothing to do with the fact that this was after almost four years of involvement in the greatest conflagration the world has ever known, or that we had these bombs already after a heated arms race with the Germans, or...

  62. My thoughts. by ChrisPaget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not american. I'm british. I work 100 yards from the London Stock Exchange, which was evacuated - so were we, by our MD. I was scared shitless. I can't imagine how you're feeling in the US. This has proved to the entire world that nowhere is safe from terrorism.

    My suggestion? I assume that there will be a fund set up to help those injured in these attacks, and their families. It may have been set up already. My suggestion - donate your tax rebates to this fund. I received a tax rebate from the UK government a couple of weeks ago - I intend to donate mine. It's the least I can do.

    1. Re:My thoughts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a good man.
      thanks and may our countries always stand together, in good times and bad (I'm a yank)

  63. AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES MOURNS THE LOSS OF CO-FOUNDER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the press release from Akamai itself.

  64. Re:CALL to CRACKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, the title of that post is so ... appropriate

  65. How to organize it? by hoppy · · Score: 1
    There is litle known about what happened. But at first the attack seems to be low technologie. Blade to destroy two towers and the pentagon.


    Every body assume attack comes from a very powerfull organization, but could it be organized by a very little group of people (a dozen may be). This people are working in airports and some are pilots, and they just hacked security airport ? What could be their motivations ?

  66. What if Bin Laden didn't do it? by Casca · · Score: 1

    Just imagine what must have be going through his head if he didn't do it? Sheer abject terror would be my guess.

    I do hope that whatever the American response is, there is not a lot of collateral damage. A surgical strike that only removes Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Iran from the world scene would probably be the best we can hope for.

    I can only imagine what the members of the American forces in the middle east must be thinking right now...

    --
    Casca
  67. reach out by kevin+lyda · · Score: 1

    the way to fight terrorism is through unity. currently it's assumed that it was fundamentalist islamic terrorists. true or not, i hope non-muslim americans will reach out to the muslims in their community who are no doubt just as horrified. all americans - muslim and non-muslim - as well as citizens the free world over need to be united in their revulsion to this horror.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  68. explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan by SonCorn · · Score: 1

    CNN is reporting on TV that there are explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan

    --
    What good is a used up world, and how could it be worth having? --Sting
    1. Re:explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here from germany , you americans , are sooo silly , bombing afgahnistan

    2. Re:explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. We have not yet taken credit, but perhaps we have decided to finally pave over the Taliban and build a Walmart.

    3. Re:explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who said it was us? have we taken responsibility for it yet? Don't just to conclusions! maybe its the chinese...

    4. Re:explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was an orange ball of flame on the horizon there.. very bright but not large. High precision bombing run?

    5. Re:explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the last few days there was an abortive assasination attempt made on the life of General Massoud, the major "anti-Taliban" leader in Afghanistan. Any explosions in Kabul are more likely to be the result of "payback" by Massoud's supporters than the U.S.

  69. kabul, afghanistan under attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just on cnn

  70. Take a deep breath... by stonewolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let it out slowly...

    Now ask yourself:

    What can I do to help?
    What can I do to make sure nothing like this happens to ANYONE again?
    What must I NOT do because it will just make things worse?

    Take another deep breath...

    Let it out slowly...

    Now, go do what you know is right.

    Stonewolf

    1. Re:Take a deep breath... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to this, between breaths perhaps, dont panic, dont horde supplies, food, gas et al. Respect those around you in rationing your own consumption--no one knows what we're in for but survival lies in unity

      Eustace Gulliver
      (michael@REMOVETHISfightdot.com)

  71. Nostradamus prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the world will end...and... I FUCKED YOUR MOM (and am proceeding to skullfuck every corpse in new york, guffaw guffaw guffaw).

  72. KABUL SEEMS TO BE UNDER ATTACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Video on CNN

  73. Please, please do not let the US spin this! by ronfrown · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the beginning we've heard essentially that these attacks were "unprovoked acts of terrorism" I seriously suggest everyone consider that carefully. From my perspective the two biggest suspects are American Militia groups and Islamic Fundamentalists, possibly Palestinian ones. Either way, would an attack by them upon the US be "unprovoked?" I seem to remember several incidents where the US Gov't has trampled the constitution in their dealings with militia groups. The reactionary FBI raids that have left dozens dead, most of whom weren't resisting (Randy Weaver's wife, etc.) Then what if it is Palestinians? I seem to remember the US funding and arming the Israelis, who constantly persecute the Palestinians in rather Nazi-esque manners at times. Yes, the deaths of US citizens are tragic, but do not let Uncle Sam get away with spinning this as someone else's fault! Do let these deaths be meaningless, they are all martyrs, they were all slain in cold blood by the enemy, and that enemy is the US Gov't! Mod me down as some fanatic or weirdo, but look at the facts, I don't see Canada getting attacked, and that's because Canada isn't funding programs of genocide against domestic and foreign peoples alike.

    1. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a complete dumbass.

    2. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by King_TJ · · Score: 0

      Granted, the FBI has bungled a whole slew of things in recent years, and the ATF is just as much to blame.

      Still, I fail to see how those issues directly equate with this one. Of course they didn't attack Canada. Canada has chosen to remain basically neutral in regards to the Middle-East political situation. (For similar reasons, you don't see lots of terrorist actions against Switzerland or Sweden.) Does neutrality automatically equate with doing "the right thing"? Is it better to sit back and watch people die than to try to intervene, and take a side?

      Personally, I don't see how the U.S. factors in at all to the behavior of Israel vs. Palestine. They've been fighting for a LONG time now, and I don't see the supposed "Nazi tactics against the Palestinians" as ending just because the U.S. decides not to arm or fund Israel any more. The Palestinians will continue to see the United States as evil and against their religious beliefs, whether we take a stand or cower in neutrality, off to the side.

      Uncle Sam isn't putting a "spin" on this at all by blaming the individuals responsible for the attacks. Or do you suppose it's a big conspiracy, and our political leaders were up in those planes, crashing them into our buildings?

    3. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah Yeah, fight the government, kill them all, kill whitey, etc.

      Shut the hell up.

    4. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nobody is attacking Canada because the Canadian government consist of a group of international wimps. They won't even stand up for their own citizens outside a little bit of lip service.


      In the last decade, quality of life has been steadily decreasing in Canada compared to the US. One of the reasons for this is because Canada is always accomodating outside interests. Canada does not step on other people's toes and Canadians are suffering for it in the long run.

    5. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Maskirovka · · Score: 0

      it's a rare combination to find an american (much less >4) who would be both suicidal, and intelectually competent to operate an airplane.

      AND, Genocide is by definition mass exterminations of people. What genocide have we funded in the past 100 years? If you want to be modded up, maybe you shouldn't write in such a fanatical fashion :P

      Maskirovka

      I guess my coment above about suicidal americans is a bit overbroad. That statement applies to most cultures and nationalities, though a few cultures seem to encourage this sort of thing more than others.

    6. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is, off course, assuming that today's events weren't caused by US citizens themselves. I realize this is a horrible thing to say, but remember Oklahoma? There are extremist groups in the US who would kill their fellow citizens to reach their goals, whatever that goal may be...

    7. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I must have missed something. ???


      Tell me again how many unprovoked suicide bombers the Israelies have sent into Palestine, Siria, Iraq, Iran, egypt and Afghanistan?


      How many times have they launched pre-emptive military strikes against their neighbors, on their neighbors religious holidays?


      Which one of their leaders speaks openly about peace and cooperation but travels to South Africa and is picked up on an open microphone stating that their goal is to wipe Palestine off the face of the earth?


      Oh!, That's right. It's the other way around.
      Thanks for reminding me.

    8. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Sentry21 · · Score: 0

      I sincerely doubt that Palestinians would take on something of this magnitude. Israel will probably not have to worry about international opinion of them, no matter what they do to 'keep down' the Palestinian people, so them doing these attacks (if they even could have) would be giving their persecutors a carte blanche against them.

      Also, Canada isn't getting attacked because even though Canada supports the US in almost everything they do, people are too blinded with hatred for the US to notice, and even if they did, Canadians are too nice for anyone to believe that they could help out such an evil empire.

      --Dan

      Disclaimer: I am a Canadian who spent 3 weeks in Israel this August; do not confuse my comments with bias, for I love both Canada and Israel very much; facts, however, speak mostly for themselves.

    9. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadians are giving my country and my people the best support possible at the moment, which shows who our real friends are.

      Anyone who speaks out against Canada or Canadians has earned this American's enmity...

      David (an American living in Hungary who is shocked about the entire thing)

    10. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spin this? Spin this? How on earth do you spin thousands and thousands losing their lives? How do you spin an attack against the embodiments of a nations' power? The palestinians may not be responsible, but they were dancing in the street, as innocent civilians bled to death. DON'T say they are blameless DON'T accuse america of spinning this to out advantage. WE lost today, no spin will ever make this a better day for America.

    11. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by cyclist1200 · · Score: 0

      Please, please explain to me how, even if they were "provoked", how does this justify this slaughter? Because you seem to think it is justifiable.

    12. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America

      Love it or leave it!!!
      See ya in Canada!!!

      O-`,`,-O

    13. Re:Please, please do not let the US spin this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u son of a bitch!

  74. Someone moderate this up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kabul, Afghanistan is being attacked from the air apparently. Turn on CNN if you have a TV.

  75. Afghanistan being attacked by .@. · · Score: 2

    Wathing CNN right now. Kabul, Afghanistan is being attacked from the air.

    --
    .@.
    1. Re:Afghanistan being attacked by Chester+K · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wathing CNN right now. Kabul, Afghanistan is being attacked from the air.

      I saw this on one of the other discussions, but it deserves repeating for anyone that might have missed it: If you can't get CNN on TV, or you're stuck at work, you can read the CNN closed caption stream by pointing an IRC client to chat.cnn.com, and joining channel #CNN_Newsfeed

      --

      NO CARRIER
    2. Re:Afghanistan being attacked by cymen · · Score: 1

      Attacked by whom?

    3. Re:Afghanistan being attacked by cymen · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> I NEED TO INTERRUPT YOU
      <CC> JUST A SECOND, CNN WOLF
      <CC> BLITZER IN WASHINGTON DOING
      <CC> SOME REPORTING ON THE
      <CC> PRESIDENT, THE PRESIDENT'S
      <CC> ACTIVITIES WOLF, JOIN US,.
      <CC> >> THANK YOU AARON33
      <CC> WERE NOT PART OF THE U.S.
      <CC> RETALIATORY STRIKE.
      <CC> ONCE AGAIN A REPEATING
      <CC> EXPLOSION THAT NIC ROBERTSON
      <CC> BEEN REPORTING ABOUT IN
      <CC> KABUL NOT PART OF ANY U.S.
      <CC> MILITARY STRIKE.
      <CC> CLEARLY INDICATING THIS IS
      <CC> PART THE CONTINUING CIVIL
      <CC> WAR THAT'S BEEN UNDERWAY IN
      <CC> AFGHANISTAN NOW FOR
      <CC> SOMETIME.

    4. Re:Afghanistan being attacked by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      CNN updates on the website indicate that the US has emphatically stated that this is not a US retaliatory strike. They're guessing it's related to the internal Afghani civil war.

      In this particular case, I'm inclined to believe the US govt. If they were to launch a retaliatory strike, I think they would damn well sure make sure everyone knows about it (since most Americans would support it anyway), not try to cover it up.

    5. Re:Afghanistan being attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Afghanistan is in the middle of a civil war. Apparently, a leader in the Taliban opposition was recently killed - possibly triggering action from the northern resistance.
      Or so reports CNN's "guy in Kabul".

      The BBC also briefly reported this, but i haven't heard them reiterate that bit about the opposition leader's death. Just citing that rockets are being fired from 2 helicopters in the city of Kabul.

      Tom

  76. Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters. by mazur · · Score: 5, Informative
    First my deepest empathy for everyone personally affected by this atrocity.

    Aditionally, I just heard, that Barbara Olsen, passenger on one of the planes, told her husband, that the terrorists were armed with no more than "knives and cardboard cutters". To me, this basically spells, that there is, no way, that it is virtually impossible to rule out forever a repeat of this kind of sickness. Of course, any kind of sharp object should and will be banned from any future flight,, but that just means they will have to invent a new type of weapon, one that will go undetected, like a wooden knive sheathed in a wooden sheath, together seeming a simple, harmless stick.

    Smuggling simple weapons will be almost impossible to eliminate totally.

    Some kind of military type fight seems to have broken out in/around Kabul. See other news sources for details.

    Stefan.

    --
    The truth shall make you fret. (Ankh-Morpork tImes motto)
  77. Misc... by HongPong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I still find it difficult to bend my mind around the idea that today's attacks occurred not in Chechnya or Israel, but in the heart of American civilization. The very heart. I know, however, that America will survive this attack at punish those responsible. While perhaps "Pearl Harbor" is an extreme comparison, because we don't seem to be at war with a defined nation, it certainly will provoke almost as strong a change in public opinion and policy as that surprise attack.

    Here at Macalester College in St. Paul, far far away from today's incidents, The state of MN has responded by shutting down the Mall of America and some of the larger buildings in downtown Mpls. and St. Paul. All over the cities, people are congregating, grieving for those lost and for the massive, mindless hatred and violence of today.

    I think for millions of us, the most striking thing about this incident is its totally surreal nature. It is reminiscent of the end of Fight Club, or some kind of cartoonish super-villiany. The incident in Oklahoma City seemed far more within the realm of reality than "The destrucion of the WTC and a chunk of the Pentagon?!? Oh, please!"

    In my opinion the best photo I've seen is located here. I suspect it'll be on the cover of TIME or Newsweek.

    As for those of you angry with Mr. Katz for being trite: FUCK YOU! Thousands of people are DEAD and you have the balls to be angry with a man who's lost someone and prayed about it?! Only on the anonymous Internet would a person dare to tell someone they were being trite mourning a friend lost violently. You cruel bastards...

    Oh on one last note, remember the trailers for the Spiderman movie? Will the scene with a bad-guy helicopter caught by a web between the WTC towers be kept for final theatrical release??

    1. Re:Misc... by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      >>Oh on one last note, remember the trailers for the Spiderman movie?

      >>Will the scene with a bad-guy helicopter caught by a web between the WTC towers be kept for final theatrical release?

      Yes, that's it, lets think about how this affects Hollywood...

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    2. Re:Misc... by TACD · · Score: 1
      I am in England, and watching a late-night news program I can tell you for certain that that picture features on the front page of The Sun... not exactly the most substantial newspaper, but still...

      Also, another (more reliable) newspaper has a picture of a man leaping from one of the towers... very poinaint.

      --
      Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
    3. Re:Misc... by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      Here at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities we canceled classes for the day. I think everybody here is pretty shaken by this. Pray that this sort of violence doesn't happen again.

      --
      If not now, when?
    4. Re:Misc... by johnjtrammell · · Score: 1

      I work in Eagan, a suburb of St. Paul, just across the river from airport MSP. After getting used to hearing planes go overhead every 10 minutes, today's silence was... creepy. That airplane noise is never going to be quite the same.

    5. Re:Misc... by HongPong · · Score: 2

      Huh, mdad said the same thing today actually. It contributed a weird subdued atmosphere at work. He works in Eagan too... how 'bout dat?

    6. Re:Misc... by albanac · · Score: 1
      I still find it difficult to bend my mind around the idea that today's attacks occurred not in Chechnya or Israel, but in the heart of American civilization.

      Why?

      Why is it any more feasible when it happens to someone else?

      ~cHris
  78. Missile attacks in Kabul. Afganistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just listen it in the radio.

  79. New Twin Towers by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    Thoughts...when will the new ones be built?

    1. Re:New Twin Towers by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Probably never...would you want to work in an office built there? I wouldn't. They'll probably clear the site and put in a park with a tasteful memorial to the victims-- perhaps separate ones for those employed in the WTC buildings, and the police, fire and rescue workers caught in the collapse.

      IIRC, the WTC was close to where you catch the ferry to the Statue of Liberty, so it will get lots of visitors.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:New Twin Towers by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about this one all day...
      My thoughts upon waking up were "How tough a job will it be to fix the towers?
      30 minutes later, I was thinking "Wow... I hope they put it an incredibly powerful, well crafted monument at the Tower 2 site...

      Shortly after that, I was thinking there are 3 possibilities -

      A - In a triumphent display, we rebuild both towers

      B - The land, being incredibly valuable as it is, is developed in some other venture

      C - My personal choice, something I think that would be even more important than the Oklahoma City Memorial, turning the entire Plaza into a memorial to this tragedy.

      We will see...

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    3. Re:New Twin Towers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All good responses. I kind of like option A... rebuild them. Only this time make them even bigger and stronger. A sign of America's unwillingness to lay down and play dead at the first sign of trouble. Go for the world's tallest building title!

      A monument to the fallen would also be a good idea.

    4. Re:New Twin Towers by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      How about making the buildings the monuments at the same time?

  80. Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by MattW · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    In Kabul, Afghanistan, CNN reports that there is anti-aircraft fire going up from the city, along with tracer fire. Missiles flying across the city, a building is on fire.

    1. Re:Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by pvicente · · Score: 1

      This appears to be true. Saw it now on the news.
      It appears that America is acting by instinct.
      What if tomorrow we discover that it was other country that was behind this attacks?
      And did you really think that all Afghans are guilty of todays bombing???

    2. Re:Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by jobber-d · · Score: 1

      pvi, you're doing the exact thing you are accusing the americans of doing. what if it ISNT america that was bombing afghanastan?

    3. Re:Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope you didn't sprain anything jumping to conclusions there.

    4. Re:Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by kaoshin · · Score: 1

      From what I hear is they think it may be Afghanistan Opposition forces, and not the U.S.
      They don't know what country it is but they are blowing the crap out of them.

    5. Re:Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by m2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      CNN is reporting that the White House says those attacks in Kabul are part of their internal civil war and not a U.S. attack.

    6. Re:Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope we're arming the rebels well. *smirk*

    7. Re:Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by crazyj · · Score: 1

      The President has indicated that this is NOT a counter strike by the United States. It is believed to be a part of the continuing civil war in Afghanistan, possibly a strike by the same group that hit the United States.

    8. Re:Breaking News: Afghanistan Bombing/AA fire by Mr.+Punch · · Score: 1

      President Bush commented that the United States was in no way involved with the attacks in Kabul.

      Thank goodness.

  81. Retaliation by Tolomak · · Score: 1

    So Afganistan is after all... Kabul is under siege

    Looks *exactly* like the beginning of the Gulf War

  82. Another WTC building in NY has collapsed by kjj · · Score: 2, Redundant

    According to MSNBC 40 story WTC 7 has come down as well. I tried to find more info on there page but there doesn't appear to be any. Please post more infomation or other links if you have them.

  83. Retribution... by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kabul, Afghanistan is under attack.

    Looks just like Baghdad in 1991.

    ::Colz Grigor

    1. Re:Retribution... by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 2
      Damn... could my .sig be any more ironic?! For those of you who don't speak German, it translates: "Whoever fights with monsters must be careful that they don't become a monster themselves."

      People killing people is a viscious cycle. I know you're angry, now. I'm angry and I don't know how I feel about this. But ask yourself, "Is killing another human being, with family and friends just like you, ever the right thing to do."

      I don't know the answer. But I know we need to answer it before we fight back.

      ::Colz Grigor

      --

    2. Re:Retribution... by cymen · · Score: 1

      >> I NEED TO INTERRUPT YOU
      <CC> JUST A SECOND, CNN WOLF
      <CC> BLITZER IN WASHINGTON DOING
      <CC> SOME REPORTING ON THE
      <CC> PRESIDENT, THE PRESIDENT'S
      <CC> ACTIVITIES WOLF, JOIN US,.
      <CC> >> THANK YOU AARON33
      <CC> WERE NOT PART OF THE U.S.
      <CC> RETALIATORY STRIKE.
      <CC> ONCE AGAIN A REPEATING
      <CC> EXPLOSION THAT NIC ROBERTSON
      <CC> BEEN REPORTING ABOUT IN
      <CC> KABUL NOT PART OF ANY U.S.
      <CC> MILITARY STRIKE.
      <CC> CLEARLY INDICATING THIS IS
      <CC> PART THE CONTINUING CIVIL
      <CC> WAR THAT'S BEEN UNDERWAY IN
      <CC> AFGHANISTAN NOW FOR
      <CC> SOMETIME.

    3. Re:Retribution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whoever fights with monsters must be careful that they don't become a monster themselves."

      When we find out who this is, we will show them what a monster truly is.

    4. Re:Retribution... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      What if Bin Laden is responsible, and he also orchestrated this missile attack on Kabul, to implicate the US? That'd be above and beyond the X-Files...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  84. Explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan by Hans · · Score: 1

    Kabul is under fire according to CNN. no link yet.

    This is getting very, very scary....

  85. Re: My God, what happened? (Tragedy of the commons by dpilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >My God, what happened?

    The ultimate "tragedy of the commons".

    The United States has been a wonderful experiment in an open society. On /. we bemoan what corporatism in league with the government are doing to the information sector, but it still remains uncommon to be able to travel over 3000 miles with as few controls as are possible here. But an open society requires a citizenry (and alien residents and visitors) that values it and behaves accordingly.

    That last assumption may no longer be valid, and what that does to an open society, I have no idea.

    On a slight side note, this does the Palestinians no good at all. If they really wanted sympathy and to affect US policy, they should have made a movie set on the West Bank, with everyday life as a backdrop. Instead they've merely upped the body count. (Presuming it's not Son of Timothy, and the data IS rather indicative.) While I agree that 'appeasement' doesn't work, I fear what may have been awakened in the US, and only hope our response, whenever it comes, is properly 'measured'.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  86. US bombing Kabul? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone is bombing kabul.

    If it's the US, which is the most likely,
    how, exactly, is this different from the
    'cowardly' assault on NY and Washington?

    1. Re:US bombing Kabul? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is the US (which never kills innocent people)... these are 'surgical strikes' (which never hit the wrong targets)... the US have God on their side... and it's in a small country, far far away, with no Congressional lobbyists.

  87. Are we at war with Afghanistan? by an+ominous+cow+ward · · Score: 1

    It's sure starting to look that way.

  88. US hitting Kabul right now. by philgross · · Score: 1

    that was quick. images live on CNN. Cruise missiles, apparently.

    US-speak for "we would like you had over Mr. Bin Laden please. Like, now."

  89. afganistan is being attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    afganistan is being attacked

  90. Kabul? by Dragonfly · · Score: 1

    Who is attacking Kabul? Anyone in non-US countries with access to different news sources? No news from anyone except CNN here.

    1. Re:Kabul? by Alpha_Geek · · Score: 1

      Who says they are bombing civilians?

    2. Re:Kabul? by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      Who says they are bombing civilians?

      Experience.

      They're not aiming at civilians, but such attacks rarely hurt those who deserve it.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    3. Re:Kabul? by q-soe · · Score: 2

      I would think that if Afgahnistan were stupid enought to be involved in this lunacy then they will reap the whirlwind. - the bombings are being carried out by the Afghani opposition and the mujahadeen rebels against the governemtn BUT the loss of a few civilians of a country that funds and supports terrorism and murders women whilst stamping all over and freedom society has is nothing weighed against a possible 50,000+ dead in the US

      --
      I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
  91. Kabul Hit by kerrbear · · Score: 1

    CNN is reporting that Kabul is under attack. Pretty swift retaliation I would say...

  92. Retaliation Has Begun by grendelkhan · · Score: 1

    We are attacking (at least) Kabul, Afghanistan as I sit here. My hope is that evidence from the flight recorder of the plane that crashed in PA led to this and it's not just a "shoot first ask questions later" kinda thing.

    --
    Wu-Tang Name: Half-Cut Skeleton Get your own Wu-Na
  93. Afghanistan? by stcanard · · Score: 1

    There's explosions in afghanistan now. Kabul has multiple explosions, CNN is suggesting that they see lights that look like they were at the speed of cruise missles. Anyone heard more about this?

    1. Re:Afghanistan? by cockroach2 · · Score: 0

      on tv they keep saying it might be the us army, but they're not sure...

    2. Re:Afghanistan? by allism · · Score: 1

      Radio station here (Colorado, KOA) said that CNN is reporting bombs going off in Afghanistan. No conclusions being drawn as to who is responsible.

    3. Re:Afghanistan? by stcanard · · Score: 1

      They're now saying that the gov't has confirmed it's not US, that it has to be from the ongoing civil war.

      Interesting timing.

    4. Re:Afghanistan? by janke · · Score: 1

      Yahoo is carrying it.

      http://us.news2.yimg.com/f/42/31/7m/dailynews.ya ho o.com/h/nm/20010911/wl/crash_afghanistan_dc_1.html

    5. Re:Afghanistan? by logicnazi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has been denied by a US official that the US is involved. The current speculation is that it is the guerilla enemies of the taliban retaliating for attacks that occured over the weekend. In other words at best weekly connected to the events in the US.

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    6. Re:Afghanistan? by UpeoWaMacho · · Score: 1
      Last i heard it was one of two tings

      1) Europe action as a declared action of war (very scary thought)

      2) Afghanistan civil war action... The US has said very definatly that it IS NOT THE US or any part of us retalitory strikes.

      --
      Upeo
    7. Re:Afghanistan? by Stoney+Goat · · Score: 1

      Here's a bit of speculation (based on the speculation that Bin Laden is behind this):

      If you were Bin Laden, wouldn't you be imitating an American airstrike at this point?

      Just a thought....

    8. Re:Afghanistan? by allism · · Score: 1

      CNN: "Afghanistan opposition claims responsibility for Kabul explosions. Details soon."

    9. Re:Afghanistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the U.S. Army has developed teleporters, guy. Wishful thinking can't transport cornfed marines more than a few blocks, let alone the thousands of miles that most would have to come, if they meant to get serious.

    10. Re:Afghanistan? by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Well also remember that 3 weeks ago, a representative of binLaden warned of an impending "unprecidented strike against US interests." Draw your own conclusions.

    11. Re:Afghanistan? by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      If you were Bin Laden, wouldn't you be imitating an American airstrike at this point?

      Actually, no. Please tell: Why would he want to do that?

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    12. Re:Afghanistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      freedom of speech is a fine thing, but i tell you this, until every last koran has been destroyed, every last word of it erased there will be no peace

    13. Re:Afghanistan? by Sehnsucht · · Score: 1

      Because then it'd make it look like the US was retaliating without making sure who did it, which makes the US look bad.

      Do you think Bin Laden gives a flying @(#^ about anyone in Afghan except himself, if he's there?

    14. Re:Afghanistan? by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      Because then it'd make it look like the US was retaliating without making sure who did it, which makes the US look bad.

      Argh! The whole point of the U.S. taking revenge would be to maintain the "we're america and we dont take any shit" aditude of the american people! How would it do any good to retaliate and not tell people?!

      I don't think many people in the world would find it feasable that the the U.S. would retaliate in a low-profile manner. The BBC didn't; they attributed the bombings there to "continued civil war" (not everyone there is down with the taliban).

      I think when (if?) revenge is taken we'll all hear about it. Thats the whole point of it!

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    15. Re:Afghanistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possible attack by Massood forces from the south.., (anti-talaben)

    16. Re:Afghanistan? by cockroach2 · · Score: 0

      he, you NEVER know. these army guys keep inventing all kinds of weird stuff...

  94. Trouble in Afghanistan by [magus] · · Score: 1

    CNN is showing something in Kabul, Afghanistan, explosions and tracer fire

  95. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >To me, this basically spells, that there is, no >way, that it is virtually impossible to rule out >forever a repeat of this kind of sickness. Of >course, any kind of sharp object should and will >be banned from any future flight,, but that just >means they will have to invent a new type of >weapon, one that will go undetected, like a >wooden knive sheathed in a wooden sheath, >together seeming a simple, harmless stick.

    Rather than banning all sharp objects on flights, how about stationing security personel on the flights with something (a 6 shooter, a cattle prod, or a blowgun, for instance) capable of defeating a cardboard cutter.

  96. Afganistan bombed by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

    Just heard this on the radio.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  97. Update - explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan by uk_greg · · Score: 1

    CNN (TV) is now reporting explosions in Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan. No word on the source.

    Not to be redundant, but we all need to stay rational and cool headed right now.

  98. another crash by YodaToad · · Score: 1

    Apparently there was just another plane crash in West Dayton, OH. I'm not sure if it's related to what's going on at all, but my friend who lives about 5 miles from it said that he heard a big boom, the windows rattled and he turned on the TV to find out there'd just been a plane crash.

    1. Re:another crash by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 2

      False alarm. Sonic booms plus a grass fire. Details at:

      http://www.activedayton.com/partners/whiotv/news /0 911_vacenter.html

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

  99. CNN on tv by Glorat · · Score: 1

    I've been watching various channels (in UK) on TV and CNN has been getting the best and quickest coverage IMO.

    So for those that don't have CNN on their telly, explosions are going on in Kabul, Afghanistan. Watching the video feed, you can see a huge fire lit up, probably a fuel dump hit. I wonder if the US are already retaliating?

  100. donate money by cockroach2 · · Score: 0

    to donate money to the red cross, check https://www.redcross.org/donate/donation-form.asp

  101. CALL to Arms for CRACKERS by troll0vision · · Score: 0, Troll

    Do not wait for the US to retaliate. Lets get those responsible NOW.

    Here is the main site of the terrorists:

    www.afghanistan-ie.com

    The site has been nmapped and it appears quite vulnerable. Lets OWN THIS MACHINE for the US and for democracy. Show them our technical superiority.

    Btw, its hosted in SINGAPORE so we now consider us at cyberwar with SINGAPORE too.

  102. do NOT retaliate by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 0

    As terrible as this action was, a number of people (enough to find at least 5 experienced pilots under them) were prepared to give their lives for a chance to deliver a blow to America.

    Think about that before you make things worse.

  103. /.ulations by psych031337 · · Score: 1

    What we have seen today, I think, was an impressive demonstration of the Internet. It jammed but it wouldn't break. News sites DoS'ed but came back soon. Some were online all the way through (sky.com), maybe because it ran Solaris. People set up their own news servers/mirrors.

    And slashdot camde back to their motto. Well half of actually.

    Not really news for nerds. But definately stuff that matters.

    --
    +++ath0
  104. Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn fucking Afghanistan into a piece of glass. Hunt down anyone and everyone (and every country) who has ever sympathized with or donated so much as a nickel to Ben Ladin or anyone even remotely connected to him and kill them. Then go after the Palestinians and anyone connected with them. We should also hunt down every last apologist and sympathizer for these scum. Our response should be so overwhelmingly devastating that noone will ever, ever think of trying something like this again.

    1. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck! How do you know it was the Palestines for Christsake! ON Fox news network they claimed it could of been the work of the REd Brigade, the infamous japenese terrorist group. THey think they might of done it for revenge in what happened in Hiroshima! Dont say something if all you can back it up with is shit!

    2. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As far as anyone knows, it might have been Americans who did it.

    3. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Turn fucking Afghanistan into a piece of glass. Hunt down anyone and everyone (and every country) who has ever sympathized with or donated so much as a nickel to Ben Ladin or anyone even remotely connected to him and kill them.

      Did you know that the U.S. recently gave Afghanistan millions of dollars?

    4. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy was being sarcastic to point out the line of thinking of many Americans who do have similiar feelings.

    5. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely. The only other domestic terrorists we have experience with (McVeigh + Nichols) didn't have the resources or the skills to pull off something of this magnitude. The coordination required to hijack 4 commercial jetliners within a half hour of each other is staggering. Believe me, this is Osama Bin Laden's work. 3 weeks ago he prophesized it and I think it's time we accept it. It's time for payback. Turn Afghanistan into glass.

    6. Re:Excellent. by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      Not to mention that Bin Laden used to be on the payroll of the CIA. We created this monster, and he is the ultimate chicken coming home to roost. Assuming it was him (which does look likely at this particular moment).

      Also I wonder if those considering nuclear retaliation really understand the effects such retaliation would have? A nuclear war in Afghanistan would make chernobyl look like a barbecue. Do you remember Chernobyl?

  105. NEWS Mirrors, and Video archive by tweakt · · Score: 1

    Mirrors of news sites and alternative footage of the events @ www.tweakt.net/news

  106. Whitehorse Yukon by Lawmeister · · Score: 1

    We have 2 747's (Korean Airlines) sitting on the runway at Whitehorse International Airport in Yukon.

    See my report on their forced landing and authorities' actions:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=21548&threshol d=0&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=2281846

    1. Re:Whitehorse Yukon by Pope · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I knew about those :)
      I was commenting on the story summary: it made it seem like they're *all* landing in Iqualuit and Churchill, and Whitehorse.

      Now: I'm sure any Pacific flights will be diverted to the nearest location, and that would be Vancouver or Whitehorse.

      Meanwhile, here in Toronto, Candian Blood Services and Sunnybrook Hospital are *packed* with people giving blood. This is a great thing to see! I'll be off to give blood tomorrow. Also, Mayor Mel has pledged emergency service support (firefighters, paramedics, etc) to NYC, which is also very good to see.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  107. give credit where credit is due by thetman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is an old article, but still very true today. In hindsight, America does things wrong, but overwhelmingly what they do is good. When was the last time you heard someone say thank you?

    "The Americans" - Original Script

    "LET'S BE PERSONAL" Broadcast June 5, 1973 CFRB, Toronto, Ontario

    Topic: "The Americans"

    The United States dollar took another pounding on German, French and British exchanges this morning, hitting the lowest point ever known in West Germany. It has declined there by 41% since 1971 and this Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as the most generous and possibly the least-appreciated people in all the earth.

    As long as sixty years ago, when I first started to read newspapers, I read of floods on the Yellow River and the Yangtse. Who rushed in with men and money to help? The Americans did.

    They have helped control floods on the Nile, the Amazon, the Ganges and the Niger. Today, the rich bottom land of the Misssissippi is under water and no foreign land has sent a dollar to help. Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy, were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of those countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United States.

    When the franc was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it.

    When distant cities are hit by earthquakes, it is the United States that hurries into help... Managua Nicaragua is one of the most recent examples. So far this spring, 59 American communities have been flattened by tornadoes. Nobody has helped.

    The Marshall Plan .. the Truman Policy .. all pumped billions upon billions of dollars into discouraged countries. Now, newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent war-mongering Americans.

    I'd like to see one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplanes.

    Come on... let's hear it! Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tristar or the Douglas 107? If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all international lines except Russia fly American planes? Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or women on the moon?

    You talk about Japanese technocracy and you get radios. You talk about German technocracy and you get automobiles. You talk about American technocracy and you find men on the moon, not once, but several times ... and safely home again. You talk about scandals and the Americans put theirs right in the store window for everyone to look at. Even the draft dodgers are not pursued and hounded. They are here on our streets, most of them ... unless they are breaking Canadian laws .. are getting American dollars from Ma and Pa at home to spend here.

    When the Americans get out of this bind ... as they will... who could blame them if they said 'the hell with the rest of the world'. Let someone else buy the Israel bonds, Let someone else build or repair foreign dams or design foreign buildings that won't shake apart in earthquakes.

    When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down through age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an old caboose. Both are still broke. I can name to you 5,000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other people in trouble.

    Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake.

    Our neighbours have faced it alone and I am one Canadian who is damned tired of hearing them kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high. And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating over their present troubles.

    I hope Canada is not one of these. But there are many smug, self-righteous Canadians. And finally, the American Red Cross was told at its 48th Annual meeting in New Orleans this morning that it was broke.

    This year's disasters .. with the year less than half-over... has taken it all and nobody...but nobody... has helped.

    ORIGINAL SCRIPT AND AUDIO
    COURTESY STANDARD BROADCASTING CORPORATION LTD.

    (c) 1973 BY GORDON SINCLAIR

    PUBLISHED BY STAR QUALITY MUSIC (SOCAN)

    A DIVISION OF UNIDISC MUSIC INC.

    578 HYMUS BOULEVARD

    POINTE-CLAIRE, QUEBEC,

    CANADA, H9R 4T2

    1. Re:give credit where credit is due by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Thank you

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:give credit where credit is due by ksheff · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplanes. Come on... let's hear it! Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tristar or the Douglas 107? If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all international lines except Russia fly American planes? Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or women on the moon?

      This part certainly isn't true anymore with the AirBus consortium.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    3. Re:give credit where credit is due by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Canada does, too. Bombardier builds planes like they're going out of style. Kicks ass on the world market, too...

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:give credit where credit is due by thetman · · Score: 1

      Airbus (I think) and Bombardier (definitely) are subsidized by their respective governments. And like I said, the article is old, but the general idea of it is very true. When has the US ever asked anyone for help, when have they given it without being asked, and does anyone ever say thanks (and mean it)

  108. Afghanistan being bombed right now by Yanna · · Score: 1

    I am watching CNN and at this moment (11PM GMT), Kabul seems to be under some sort of bombing. They say that multiple explosions have been heard over the city. The images show heavy fire.

    Will continue watching and updating if they say anything new.

  109. Observations on secondary vs. primary news sites by ChrisDolan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree with others that Slashdot was great today. The focus on the disasters was admirable, and the information was high quality. Extra kudos to the posters who offered high quality links when it seemed that the world was slashdotted.

    That said, I found that Slashdot was not the right source for news today. The news I got here was delayed (the stories) or hard to sift through (the posts). I found great fringe material (red cross info, missing persons sites, etc) and lots of mirrored material (thanks to all!) but it was diluted by speculation, rumor, flames and unchecked emotion. On the plus side, there was also support, prayers and many thoughtful discussions. Again, this diluted the news for better or for worse.

    Instead, I found ananova to be the best site on the net today, with a simple, chronological list of relevent wire reports: ananova.com topic focus.

    But I suspect I will find Slashdot to be the best site on the net for reflection over the next week or so.

    Note, that this isn't criticism, but observation. Slashdot is more a community than a news source. This was an interesting mini-revelation for me today. Maybe Slashdot needs a QuickNews feature which lets stories go up faster (and get pulled down faster when proved inaccurate or inappropriate). I think a community run, up-to-the-minute news source would be valuable. Just some thoughts...

  110. Retailiation on Afghanistan by CBNobi · · Score: 1

    CNN/NBC/MSNBC has a report which states Kabul, Afghanistan has been bombed (explosions).

  111. MSNBC reporting explosions in Kabul! by smagruder · · Score: 2

    MSNBC is reporting apparent missile explosions near the airport in Kabul, Afghanistan. The US could already be retaliating!

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    1. Re:MSNBC reporting explosions in Kabul! by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      The US has denied that they're involved in the explosions, guessing that it's related to the civil war there.

      And in this case I'm inclined to believe them, as if they did retaliate I'm pretty sure they'd make sure everyone knows about it, not cover it up.

  112. A real mirror for vid/pics by beefdart · · Score: 1

    I put this up on my college computer so it should take the traffic well... Here

    1. Re:A real mirror for vid/pics by c_g_hills · · Score: 0

      Its a shame you don't give credit to the hardworking developers at www.postnuke.org [postnuke.org] for creating your web site :(

  113. Kabul? by EasyTarget · · Score: 2

    Here in the UK I'm hearing reports that missiles are falling in Kabul.

    Two wrongs don't make a right. The civilians of Afghanistan deserve it no more than the civilians of New York.

    --
    "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
  114. Events still unfolding by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    Another building just collapsed due to the explosion and pressure.

    I still wonder if anyone *gets it* anymore from a suggestion to the parallels to the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

    This is an instance where war or its declaration has been brought to American soil.

    The main difference is the Japanese had the brass cajones to at least explain why they felt it was necessary (i.e. on what grounds).

    These "Anonymous Cowards" currently are of the "If you don't know we aren't going to tell you" mindset.

    That does not work, because if you are going to do battle (or are prepared) you damn well better be able to *explain* it to the rest of the world for they may get involved if the want to or not.

    I can gurantee you if this is from a "violent cell/faction" where not all of the nations people agree with that faction...they just might "deliver them to our doorstep" for that swift justice.
    If not, another similar faction may just give them up, get the hell away and pray whatever is done does not take them with it.

    Whoever it is, IS an AC... (sorry for the conclusion) because if you have the BRASS ONES to "taunt the tiger" you f*cking better be able to take him on or run like hell where you will never be found.

    IMO.

    Moose

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  115. Someone set up us the bomb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ha ha ha, I am so funny.

  116. look at cnn! by psychalgia · · Score: 1

    kabul is burning down...what the fuck is going on?!

    --

    ________________________________________________

  117. if they know this is the source by S.+Allen · · Score: 0, Troll

    and they're sure about their target, then this better not be a puny fucking response.

    1. Re:if they know this is the source by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      What, you'd prefer an indiscriminate, all out attack that kills hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands of people with no connection with the atrocity in question?

      Hmm. Sounds kind of like blowing up the World Trade Centre and murdering thousands of people because you dislike the policies of the US government, don't it?

  118. Bombing at Afghanistan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm watching WB33 for north-texas and apparently there are explosions going off in the city of Kabul. Does anyone have any more information regarding this? Who is doing the attacks?

    --
    MrJag (sorry I didn't have the time to make an account) agheno@nospam.yahoo.com

  119. Explosions in Afganistan!! by crotherm · · Score: 1

    There are reports and vidoe in the news channels about missle attacks on Afganistan right now....

    --mark

    --
    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    1. Re:Explosions in Afganistan!! by LX.onesizebigger · · Score: 1

      It's the end of the world as we know it, and I don't feel so fine.

      Ladies and gents, smile, because CNN is giving us a first row ticket to World War III. They are going to blow it all up.

      How *damn* stupid can they get? Fools, goddamn fools!

      --
      I for one welcome our new SCOviet Russian overlords to whom all our base are belong.
    2. Re:Explosions in Afganistan!! by geordie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Might not be the US attacking Kabul...
      The Taliban have been attacking targets just north of Kabul as recently as last night.
      http://www.afghan-web.com/aop/today.html

    3. Re:Explosions in Afganistan!! by GNUman · · Score: 1

      Hearing on the radio right now that it isn't the US. No word on who it is, though...

  120. Economic Aftermath by nick_burns · · Score: 0

    The number of lives lost in this heinous act makes me sick. But one of the problems that will come up in the next few weeks is the monetary amount of damage. Not only did someone lose the amount of money for the lease on the building (some $3 billion I read), but much money will be spent on cleaning up the three inches of ash covering lower manhattan. Plus, if it is some mid-east country or terrorist organization responsible, then those countries may not send us oil when we launch our retaliation.

    If Osama bin Laden is responsible for these actions, which seems most likely, then we should not only hunt him down for the sake of properly resolving this conflict, but we should seize his assetts (somewhere in the billions of dollars) and use them to partially rebuild what we have lost. We can never regain what we have lost today.

    God bless the victims and their families
    God bless America

  121. Kabul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We started bombing kabul in Afganistan. Hells yeah!!!!

    1. Re:Kabul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the united states is already retaliating before any investigation is completed?
      ameriKKKa deserves to be nuked off the face of the earth.

  122. Re:Kabul? -confirmed by psych031337 · · Score: 1

    It's in the german news just right now as well...

    Well, what you expect from a Texan?

    --
    +++ath0
  123. My account by smartin · · Score: 5, Informative

    My building is about 4 or 5 blocks away, I got up about 9ish to go
    get a coffee and noticed that the air was full of papers, like a ticker tape
    parade, then i saw that one of the wtc towers was on fire. I asked some guys in
    another office what happened, they said that they had heard that a plane hit it.

    A this point we were thinking small plane, accident. While we were
    watching, all of the sudden we heard the second one and could see it really
    low doing a steep turn. Then we watched it fly right into the second tower. At
    that point it was obvious that this was not an accident. I thought, i'm on the
    37th floor of one of the buildings cloest to the water, i'm getting the fuck out
    of here. Grabbed my stuff went to the elevator. The first one was packed so
    i took the stairs. When I got out of the building, i figured that I wanted to
    get off the island. I usually take the ferry, but the one i catch is too close
    to the wtc so I took the wall street one from the east side of the island. I
    didn't care where it was going as long as it was New Jersey. I was pretty early
    so i didn't have to wait too long. As my ferry was going up the Hudson beside
    the wtc the first tower collapsed, it filled the whole downtown area with thick
    black smoke about 100 ft high. I caught a train from Hoboken and got 3/4's of
    the way home and the power failed. So i got
    off and walked until i found a pay phone, cell phones pretty much didn't work. Called my wife and she
    came and picked me up. We gave some other people rides home as well.

    In all it was kind of exciting, very unreal and very horrible. I'm sure that the
    horror of the whole thing will come out in the next few days.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:My account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thanks for the post. My heart goes out to you and your family.

      It's hard to imagine sitting here in London what you must be feeling, but I've been watching the news reports on TV and on on the net, I'm kind of in shock. Anyway, I wish you all the best.

    2. Re:My account by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      I saw that smoke cloud on tv - I figured it was hot, asphyxiating and full of debris, so you did the right thing in getting the hell out of there.

      I don't envy you. I wish you and those around you the best too.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  124. Bombs in Afghanistan... by andkaha · · Score: 2

    Hmmm... Someone is making loud noices in Afghanistan.

    I hope it's not the US, and if it is, I hope they have a very good reason for it.

    Was just listening to Swedish radio...

    --
    It's 11pm, do you know what your deamons are up to?
    1. Re:Bombs in Afghanistan... by thanq · · Score: 1

      I hope they have a very good reason for it.

      If it's true that it is U.S., the very good reason for it is all around you since 8am this morning. Wake up.

    2. Re:Bombs in Afghanistan... by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      The US claims it's not, and I'm inclined to believe them, as I would think they would want to publicize any retaliation as much as possible, not cover it up.

  125. Slashdot limit? by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

    The story below seems to have maxed out at 2047 comments...

  126. Unleash the hounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time for all you script kiddies to prove yourself yousfull. When the country the supported The terrorist that did this is discovered I suggest, no I task you, to assault of there systems. We need to teach the world that all of us, not just our military, will retalliate in any way we can.

  127. The Ever-Confusing Nostradamus says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In WWWIII many existing diplomatic ties between nations will be broken and realigned. One that will continue to hold however is the alliance between France and the U.S. A force aligned with the Antichrist will send a bomb aimed at New York City. It will be spotted and tracked as it approaches. The U.S. defense system will feverishly concentrate on diverting or disabling the bomb, and the U.S. will not be able to retaliate. As proof of their loyalty the French are asked to retaliate, which they do with several bombs and weapons.

    The response will be immediate. The American leader uses a hotline to communicate to the French Marshal, who launches self-propelled bombs with "tongues of fire" against the aggressor. In this war some of the bombs will hit New York and some will be diverted. The bomb referred to here will be prematurely detonated along the flightpath, saving the city. Many human lives will be spent when planes flying around the bomb, trying to divert or destroy it, are blown up.

    1. Re:The Ever-Confusing Nostradamus says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nostradamus also talks about the "Cabal"... does he mean Kabul?

    2. Re:The Ever-Confusing Nostradamus says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or how about this one?

      "The sky will burn at 45 degrees latitude, fire approaches the new city. Suddenly a huge, scattered flame leaps up, when they want to have verification from the Normans {France}. C6 Q 97

      New York City sits exactly on 45 degrees latitude. It would be the prime target of a nuclear attack against the USA; crippling the financial center and poisoning the waters of the East Coast. "Verification from the Normans" means USA will contact NATO to determine exactly who launched this ICBM Missile.

  128. Explosions in Afghanistan by alienated · · Score: 1

    This off the evening news: there are explosions and fires on the perimeter of the city of Kabul in Afghanistan. Is this the beginning of retaliation for the real or imagined perpetrators?

    --
    ----- Trapped in time. Surrounded by evil. Low on gas. --Army of Darkness
  129. The news hear said differently by a+humble+lich · · Score: 1
    At least two news stations in San Diego said that the Mexican border was open, but they were carefully checking all incomming traffic. The border wait was at least 2 hours.


    They also said that no commercial ship were being allowed into the harbour at this time

    --
    may you run like a vicuna
  130. Kabul by aoihai · · Score: 1

    Apparently someone is now bombing Kabul, Afghanistan with incendiaries. Hopefully, this is not the U.S., but it haven't seen any confirmation either way yet.

    --
    You were eaten by a grue.
  131. CNN: Explosions Seen, Heard in Kabul, Afghanistan by David+Hume · · Score: 3, Informative


    From CNN:

    As rescue workers tried to reach the injured and recover the dead at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, explosions were seen and heard in Kabul, Afghanistan. President Bush will address the nation at 9 p.m. EDT.
  132. news by email by nambit · · Score: 1

    ananova are sending emails straight off the wire as news comes in...

  133. Condolences by ColdGold · · Score: 1

    We offer our sincerest sympathy from Australia

  134. You primitive Americans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Kabul is already being attacked by US cruise missiles as I write this. YOU MORONS DESERVE EVERYTHING YOU GET!

    1. Re:You primitive Americans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cos that will sort everything.

      Bush: "who is thar folks what did done turn my purty pentagon to rubble?"

      mr pentagon man: "i don't know. cnn says it's this guy in afganistan."

      bush: "i want it flat by midnight"

    2. Re:You primitive Americans! by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      I'm trying really hard to be calm, levelheaded and fair about this whole thing. Maybe you should do the same, and remember that Afghanistan's in the middle of a civil war right now before shooting your mouth off.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:You primitive Americans! by Mike+A. · · Score: 2

      Except it's not. It's been pretty thoroughly confirmed that the explosions in Kabul are part of an ongoing internal rebellion.

      --

      --
      Do I look like I speak for my employer?
  135. CNN reporting attack on Kabul by taggedfordeletion · · Score: 1

    CNN is reporting attacks against Kabul, Afganistan.
    Source of attacks seem to be unknown.

    1. Re:CNN reporting attack on Kabul by anno1602 · · Score: 1

      for the german speaking ./ers, good coverage on heute online

  136. did anyone else notice..... by canning · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    that the short hand of todays date is 911?

    Eerie.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
    1. Re:did anyone else notice..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you what's eerie, that the Camp David mideast peace accords were signed 23 years ago today and that bin Laden was scheduled to be sentenced in a NYC federal court tomorrow.

    2. Re:did anyone else notice..... by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      Or that today is U.N. "International Day of Peace"?

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
  137. Blame Microsoft by Ratbert42 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I can hear Joe Lieberman now, blaming companies like Microsoft for publishing violent computer games.

    1. Re:Blame Microsoft by fantastic · · Score: 1

      How about their full featured 'professional' flight simulator. Would this be useful for
      hijackers to learn the controls on a commercial plane? Assuming they have a little flying knowledge...

  138. Son of Timothy? by TimFreeman · · Score: 1

    Presuming it's not Son of Timothy, and the data IS rather indicative.

    I can state categorically that my son was
    at school all day and had nothing to do with all
    this.


    Seriously, who is this Son of Timothy group?

    1. Re:Son of Timothy? by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      "Son of Timothy" = "Followers of Timothy McVeigh"

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    2. Re:Son of Timothy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, didn't make the correlation either.

  139. The Church of Jesus Christ's statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those interested, here's the official statement from the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints:

    "In this hour of sorrow, the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints expresses profound sympathy to those whose loved ones, friends and associates were lost or injured in today's senseless acts of violence. We offer our prayers in behalf of the innocent victims of these vicious attacks. We ask our Heavenly Father to guide President Bush and his advisors as they respond to these devastating incidents.

    "We join with others in prayers that the Savior's peace and love will comfort and guide us all through this difficult time.

    "The resources of the Church will be made available to any relief agency requesting assistance."

    Missionaries in NY and DC are reported to be fine. In addition, "Any appropriate humanitarian response is still under consideration, pending further assessment of needs."

    More available at:
    http://www.lds.org/media/article/0,5422,116-6250,F F.html

    1. Re:The Church of Jesus Christ's statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That link should be http://www.lds.org/media/article/0,5422,116-6250,F F.html -- Slashdot doesn't support TARGET="_new" in A tags.

  140. disturbing google newsgroup thread / prediction? by valmont · · Score: 1
    It's gotta be a coincidence, yet the subject of the message being 911 as in 09/11, seems kinda disturbing. I found that thru google searches while trying to gather stuff about today's events.

    Here's the link:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&frame=right& th=54ab4d241c34e0cc&seekm=3b8fd177%40monitor.lanse t.com#link1

  141. more info from cnn by MattW · · Score: 2, Informative

    The explosions in Kabul have apparently ceased for the time being. No officials have been able to confirm who is responsible. The burning building is apparently an ammunition dump. No URL links available to the story yet.

    CNN speculates that it is possible that the fighting could actually be infighting within afghanistan, and this may be civil infighting. No one has been able to pinpoint the missile's origin.

  142. attack in Kabul? by Nf1nk · · Score: 0
    Taken without permission from cbs's channel 2000


    The Latest: Explosions Rock Kabul; U.S. Retaliation?


    U.S. Suspects Osama bin Laden For Attacks Against America


    Posted: 8:55 a.m. EDT September 11, 2001
    Updated: 6:12 p.m. EDT September 11, 2001


    NEW YORK -- CNN is reporting explosions in the Afghanistan capital of Kabul. Videophone images from Kabul show flaring bursts of light and flame.


    Afghanistan is where suspected terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden is being sheltered. Earlier today, the country's hardline Taliban rulers rejected suggestions that bin Laden was responsible for terror attacks in New York and Washington.


    Nic Robertson of CNN says missiles have started flying across the city of Kabul. It is dark in Kabul, and tracer fire can be clearly seen over the city. Robertson says he hears the sound of large missiles exploding in the city. The biggest fire has broken out somewhere near the center of Kabul, perhaps a fuel dump, with flames leaping high into the air.


    He says he estimates that the rockets are traveling several hundred miles an hour, which is characteristic of cruise missiles. Fire somewhere near the center of Kabul, perhaps a fuel dump, with flames leaping high into the air.


    The rest of the city of Kabul still has electricity.


    The United States suspects Osama bin Laden (pictured, below) in terrorist attacks, two U.S. officials say.


    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  143. Re: My God, what happened? (Tragedy of the commons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    On a slight side note, this does the Palestinians no good at all. If they really wanted sympathy and to affect US policy, they should have made a movie set on the West Bank, with everyday life as a backdrop My God! How do you know it was the palestinians! You have no right to sya anything until the facts come in. For all you know it could be IRA for Christsakes!

  144. Jon Katz: #@ +1 ; Descriptive @# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should be exported.

  145. CNN: by David+Hume · · Score: 2


    From CNN:

    As rescue workers tried to reach the injured and recover the dead at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, explosions were seen and heard in Kabul, Afghanistan. President Bush will address the nation at 9 p.m. EDT.
  146. Kabul - Not neccesarily the U.S. by katsushiro · · Score: 1

    There's no confirmation of who's firing the missiles. The city of Kabul is in a state of civil war right now, and it *could* be part of that civil war. However, it is still strange, and this kind of intense attack is not typical of this war. Still, they could be opportunists taking advantage of the confusion generated by all this to do their own attack. Still too early to tell either way.

    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the first one." - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Kabul - Not neccesarily the U.S. by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      May not be missles either. Also we do have operatives there. They may have attempted some asassinations of talban leaders.

    2. Re:Kabul - Not neccesarily the U.S. by geordie · · Score: 1

      Might not be the US attacking Kabul...
      The Taliban have been attacking targets just north of Kabul as recently as last night.
      http://www.afghan-web.com/aop/today.html

  147. A Real Mirror for Videos by beefdart · · Score: 0, Troll

    I put this up on my college computer so it should take the traffic well... Here

    1. Re:A Real Mirror for Videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking pain in the ass pop up ads. Mod this down, do not go to it. What a fucking money grab. Makes me wish you were in the WTC. Karma/money whore. My god you're a dick.

  148. Please Mod Me? by BadlandZ · · Score: 1
    OK, I mod'ed 3 points on this thread, trashing my mods now to post.

    Here's what the dihard SlashDot'ers NEED to do (if you agree mod this up!)

    • Go Give Blood
    • Start a system of mirrors.
      • mirror as much shit as you can find, photos, media clips, etc...
      • Someone write a simple script that any UNIX'er can use (tarball probably, rpm and deb them later) to stick on the mirrors W/ instructions for the newbies... I suggest a high speed site be listed IN THE README to the script that has the primary IP/URL to mirror, that we DO NOT make public unless you run the script!!!
      • Post them mirrors...
      • those running the mirrors update hourly off the IP/URL from the README in the script.

    • come up with better ideas.
    • Find someone to sort the primary source into good images, good text, good video, etc... maybe a 1 to 5 star rating? We could come up with a MOD system, but f- that for now, let's just find SOMEONE to do it and start it up!

    I am about to mirror what I found on www.spack.nu/wtc/ to be at www.current.nu sometime somewhere soon, TBA.... I hope we can band together to pull off a media spread fast and informative.

    Comment on Trademarks and Copywrights: Screw them, this is too important. DO NOT white out sources, GIVE FULL CREDIT IF YOU CAN!!! But, we want the news spread clear and fast, with as much detail as we can. So, give credit, and if they don't make the credits for the photos or media clear enough in the content, it's THIER FAULT for not taking credit... Let's just mirror shit so we don't choke down the major news sites and the best photos we can find.

  149. ARD (german tv): Kabul apparantly attack not by US by anno1602 · · Score: 1

    all said, more is not known

  150. internet rememberance campagin - do your part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://remember.worldatwar.org has started a rememberance campaign to mourn today's victims. What you can do: include thumbnail ribbon images on your site, replace your ad banners with special commemorative banner.

  151. Nice by ElDuque · · Score: 1

    No more camera ads for today, if no one else has gotten that yet.

    http://www.x10.com/home/offer.cgi?!TT11,../techtoy s11.htm

  152. The thing that scares me most. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just had to explain to my son earlier today what today's events are about and did not realize the somewhat sage things I said until just now.

    Remember that in Pearl Harbor there was a *clear objective and "visible" enemy*.

    WWI, WWII, were the same.

    Desert storm/shield was quoted by Bush Sr as "not going to be another Viet-nam" for the simple reason that if you go in shooting and stay w/o a reason...you've lost already.

    Is this the same?
    This has elements of Perl Harbor because it has been brought to our soil, but the elements of Viet-nam are the "enemy" has yet to show himself...That *scares* the hell out of me, and makes me even angrier.

    Moose.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:The thing that scares me most. by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      Holy shit read the date. 9-4. He says you will not see me afeter seven days ie 9-11 !!!

      Somone should forward this to the FBI. He predicted the exact day and he said he would not be around afterwards. he may have been ine of the suiciders.

  153. US retaliation? by bark76 · · Score: 1

    Kabul, the capitol of Afghanistan just experience some explosions about 15 minutes ago (it's all over CNN), they're speculating right now about whether it could be a US retaliation or not.

  154. MSNBC: Officials: Not likely U.S. action by David+Hume · · Score: 1, Redundant

    CNN is reporting on TV that there are explosions in Kabul, Afghanistan


    From MSNBC

    Officials: Not likely U.S. action
    May be Taliban opposition
  155. Re:disturbing google newsgroup thread / prediction by katsushiro · · Score: 1

    It might not be a coincidence. Read through that thread. The guy posts on the 4th that he willbe leaving in 7 days and not returning. 4 + 7 = 11th. Could this have been one of the suicide pilots?? This is scary.

    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the first one." - Albert Einstein
  156. Way to go, Mr. Irony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice that there were no psychics predicting this diaster

    Great logic.

    "Nobody can prove the negative, but because you DIDN'T predict something that happened, you're a fraud."

    Oh, the irony!

  157. The Solution? by lasertech · · Score: 1

    I'm not really sure what the answer to all this is, but historically, whenever a group has made attacks on American targets, if it has been small attacks, ie, the USS Cole, Americans get angry for a very short time then for the most part it's forgotten. However,whenever someone has been able to make the entire country angry as a group, then very bad things happen to the percieved group/nation behind it. Things are going to get real ugly in a very short time.

  158. Afghanistan under missile attack by TrixX · · Score: 2

    Anybody knows more about this? Is it the US.

    I was watching TV News when the continuous repetition of the twin towers falling switched to images of missiles in the night and an explosion (very confuse), and the reporter said that those were images from Afghanistan, but it was unclear what was happening. More news about it anyone?

  159. Karbul by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    BBC news said the US had DENIED the attacks.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  160. Afganistan has just been bombed by automatic_man · · Score: 1

    Or at least there was a big explosion in Kabul. CNN's got some shots on now.

    --
    "On the Internet, everyone is an equal until they prove themselves to be a moron." - Emmanuel Goldstein
  161. Pimping Mod Points Now Please? by BadlandZ · · Score: 0, Redundant
    OK, I blew 3 points on this thread modding, then decided to post because this might be more important?

    Here's what the dihard SlashDot'ers NEED to do (if you agree mod this up!)

    • Go Give Blood

    • Start a system of mirrors.

      • mirror as much shit as you can find, photos, media clips, etc...

      • Someone write a simple script that any UNIX'er can use (tarball probably, rpm and deb them later) to stick on the mirrors W/ instructions for the newbies... I suggest a high speed site be listed IN THE README to the script that has the primary IP/URL to mirror, that we DO NOT make public unless you run the script!!!

      • Post them mirrors...

      • those running the mirrors update hourly off the IP/URL from the README in the script.



    • come up with better ideas.

    • Find someone to sort the primary source into good images, good text, good video, etc... maybe a 1 to 5 star rating? We could come up with a MOD system, but f- that for now, let's just find SOMEONE to do it and start it up!


    I am about to mirror what I found on www.spack.nu/wtc/ to be at www.current.nu sometime somewhere soon, TBA.... I hope we can band together to pull off a media spread fast and informative.

    Comment on Trademarks and Copywrights: Screw them, this is too important. DO NOT white out sources, GIVE FULL CREDIT IF YOU CAN!!! But, we want the news spread clear and fast, with as much detail as we can. So, give credit, and if they don't make the credits for the photos or media clear enough in the content, it's THIER FAULT for not taking credit... Let's just mirror shit so we don't choke down the major news sites and the best photos we can find.

  162. Ghandi said... by Moray_Reef · · Score: 1

    'An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.'

    M.K. Ghandi

    This following is only a sig.

    --
    If you voted for Nader, THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT!!
    1. Re:Ghandi said... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      perhaps he should have studied the meaning and history of that saying.
      It has nothing to do with extracting physical retribution.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Ghandi said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, Ghandi's dead.

  163. Re:disturbing google newsgroup thread / prediction by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. sounds unlikely to me that a conspiricy(spelling?) kept secret from the entire world was announced on a nostradamus ng..

    Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
    Date: 2001-09-04 12:40:28 PST

    Wait 7 days, and then maybe I'll answer this post. You see, I am going away
    in seven days, and you will not hear from me again.

  164. Reality check... by dispensa · · Score: 1

    Wow.

    First and foremost, my heart goes out to everyone personally affected by this tragedy. It's a terrible attack on the entire "free world".

    Probably redundant, but I am struck by the reality check. I manage a small team of talented programmers, working 60-100 hours a week. I was pondering how to increase our effeciency the other day as we race toward our deadline, and I thought about throwing my two cents in the other day in the management and quality article. Then I fall asleep for a (long) while after a 36-hour coding binge, and I wake up to this.

    There's more to life than deadlines and code.

    Wow...

    -sd

  165. Gas Price Thread by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1

    I hate to bring this to light, as the rush of people going to get gas will make it worse, but:

    The station I get gas at, 70 miles north of Atlanta was selling unleaded at $1.15 this morning.

    As of 6pm,EST, unleaded is now $1.45.

    Let the gouging begin.

    Letus know how YOUR gas prices are being affected folks...

    1. Re:Gas Price Thread by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Well, at my station in Alpharetta (20 miles north of ATL), gas was $1.339 early this AM (before the WTC attack), and was still that price this PM.

      However, it was $1.179 yesterday PM; so, unless QuikTrip employs psychics, I'm not ready to ascribe this to price gouging.

  166. breaking news: bombardment of Kabul by Mr.+Punch · · Score: 1

    Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, has been bombed by what the CNN reporter believes to be cruise missiles.

    I hope the US had nothing to do with this.

    1. Re:breaking news: bombardment of Kabul by Mr.+Punch · · Score: 1

      According to Bush's statement, the US was in no way involved in this attack.

  167. US did not attack Afghanistan by an+ominous+cow+ward · · Score: 1

    Apparently an official statement was issued, the US is denying responsibility for the bombings.

  168. Nostradamus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard someone mention Nostradamus, but I didn't put much stock into it.... although this is a scary link:

    http://www.dreamscape.com/morgana/nosproph.htm

  169. Link of pictures by Frijoles · · Score: 2

    Bunch of pictures of what is left.[http://www.scottrossi.com/wtc/]

    I knew it would be bad, but a picture is definately worth a thousand words.

    --
    -Frijoles-
  170. What does it take to kill the internet ? by mami · · Score: 1

    I am just wondering what kind of action it would take to bring the internet down by terrorists ?
    What is the most resilient mode of communication for the average person in Washington D.C. or NY in case of an attack ? Telephone or internet ?

    1. Re:What does it take to kill the internet ? by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Don't forget, the internet (or rather the ARPANET on which it was based) was originally designed to be resilient in case of a nuclear attack. There's a lot of built in redundancy, probably an order of magnitude more than the telephone networks.

      See here for a brief explanation of the history of the net.

  171. http://www.asu.net/wtc/wtc56.jpg by yawble · · Score: 1

    http://www.asu.net/wtc/wtc56.jpg

    For the gruesome in you.

    :(

  172. Correction - US Mexico Border in San Diego Open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US - Mexico border was closed for awhile this morning, but is currently open under tight security. The delay to get over the border has been running more than 2 hours since the re-opening.

    http://www.thesandiegochannel.com/sand/news/stor ie s/news-95631020010911-080959.html

  173. Theory by jjr · · Score: 2

    Maybe it is Bin Ladin who is attacking Afghanistan and attacked NYC and DC. Maybe He is trying to take over that country and start his "world domination". Yes I know it sound so cliche but you never now. He does want to create a solid muslim state so this might be the beginning of that process. I will most likely be marked as a troll but I can not do anything about that.

    1. Re:Theory by Kilroy · · Score: 1

      Creating himself a solid, known base of operations would be the dumbest thing I could imagine him doing right now.

  174. Re:I hate today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez its not so bad. I imagine a guy on the second plane:
    "Geez, we are going straight to the towers. Ops, what's there on the top of the tower? Its smoke! My God we are really going to hit it."
    ..the last thoughts before the crash:
    "That's it we're hitting it. Hitting the NY trade towers! Can you believe the consequences? The NY towers down? Is this possible? This is going to explode in the minds of people worldwide. Nor I nor anybody would ever imagine that. And I won't live to see it. But its really happening."

    So it happened.

  175. Kabul - Officially not U.S. according to CNN by katsushiro · · Score: 1

    Just saw on CCN that offically the US is denying that the bombing in Kabul is theirs, and they are attributing it officially to the civil war.

    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe, and human stupidity. And I'm not sure about the first one." - Albert Einstein
  176. Not the U.S. by SideshowBob · · Score: 2, Informative

    CNN is reporting that the White House has denied any US involvement in the Kabul bombings and that its likely part of the ongoing civil war in Afghanistan.

  177. Re:Kabul attack-US Officials say not involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN has just released a Statement by a senior US Military offical that the US is not involved in any attack in Afghanistan. Personal note: I don't think even GWB is that crazy.

  178. Word from White House: Kabul attacks NOT from U.S. by MattW · · Score: 1

    CNN just reported that the attacks are definitely not from a U.S. source. The white house press secretary passed on word regarding that. That leaves civil war fighting, or possible attacks from a third party (much less likely).

  179. US NOT Bombing Afghanistan by Chump1422 · · Score: 1

    Just in ...

    The White house denies ordering the attack in Kabul, Afghanistan.

  180. Incredible link by dmccarty · · Score: 1

    Searching on Google for "twin towers" I came across the following, amazing link: http://www.playlouder.com/feature/515kingsofconven ience/. Scroll down to the part about "episode two." In light of today's events, simply amazing.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  181. Re:Slashdot Strikes Back by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i think that's a shite idea

  182. mod me? by BadlandZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hairbrained idea, mod up if you think it's good (please). Here's what the dihard SlashDot'ers NEED to do (if you agree mod this up!)

    • Go Give Blood
    • Start a system of mirrors.
      • mirror as much shit as you can find, photos, media clips, etc...
      • Someone write a simple script that any UNIX'er can use (tarball probably, rpm and deb them later) to stick on the mirrors W/ instructions for the newbies... I suggest a high speed site be listed IN THE README to the script that has the primary IP/URL to mirror, that we DO NOT make public unless you run the script!!!
      • Post them mirrors...
      • those running the mirrors update hourly off the IP/URL from the README in the script.

    • come up with better ideas.
    • Find someone to sort the primary source into good images, good text, good video, etc... maybe a 1 to 5 star rating? We could come up with a MOD system, but f- that for now, let's just find SOMEONE to do it and start it up!

    I am about to mirror some of what I found, sometime somewhere soon, TBA.... I hope we can band together to pull off a media spread fast and informative.

    Comment on Trademarks and Copywrights: Screw them, this is too important. DO NOT white out sources, GIVE FULL CREDIT IF YOU CAN!!! But, we want the news spread clear and fast, with as much detail as we can. So, give credit, and if they don't make the credits for the photos or media clear enough in the content, it's THIER FAULT for not taking credit... Let's just mirror shit so we don't choke down the major news sites and the best photos we can find.

  183. "Not part of any US retaliatory strike" by roystgnr · · Score: 2

    CNN is claiming that this is an Afghanistan civil war battle, and not a USA attack.

    God, I hope so. For the US to respond in force in less than 12 hours would practically imply that someone giving orders knew about the trade center attacks before they happened.

    1. Re:"Not part of any US retaliatory strike" by update() · · Score: 1
      For the US to respond in force in less than 12 hours would practically imply that someone giving orders knew about the trade center attacks before they happened.

      Or that they're going to blame Afghanistan and Bin Laden without bothering to make sure. I'm as eager as anyone to see the terrorists get paid in full, but for God's sake, make sure we get the right people!

      (Latest updates suggest this is, in fact, internal Afghani conflict.)

    2. Re:"Not part of any US retaliatory strike" by spankfish · · Score: 1

      For the US to respond in force in less than 12 hours would practically imply that someone giving orders knew about the trade center attacks before they happened.

      Funny you should mention this. When I was driving to work this morning, I was listening to the radio here in LA (KYSR, Jamie and Danny) and someone had called in saying that they were in the Army Reserve, and was told LAST NIGHT to go on standby!

      Somebody knew some shit was going to hit the fan, but didn't want to cause an outbreak of panic and hysteria, I guess.

      --

      NO TOUCH MONKEY!
    3. Re:"Not part of any US retaliatory strike" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention bombing an insignificant ammo depot in retaliation for this would be like me slapping someone for killing my parents. No, I'm afraid many terrorists will need to die to level the field on this one. If it means sending in the special forces to wipe out every single camp in terrorist countries, so be it.

    4. Re:"Not part of any US retaliatory strike" by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      The US intelligence agencies had been picking up indications of an imminent threat to American interests, and had sent an advisory last week to all American embassies to be on heightened alert, but they weren't sure where the attack, if it were to come, would be. Basically, they knew something would probably happen, but since their information was so vague it was practically useless - I'm guessing they expected another embassy bombing.

  184. Missles over Kabul by roningroup · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any other news of this. Here are two links reporting this. http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,284159 8%255E1702,00.html http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story _page/0,5936,2841598%255E1702,00.html Kabul City Map Link http://www.afghan-politics.org/Reference/Maps/kabu l_city_map.htm

  185. The WORST photo I've seen of this nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. is the wtca.org web cam: "Live Picture from WTCA Headquarters on the 77th Floor of the New York WTC" .. the page doesn't even load - "The remote host or network may be down.". Says it all really.

    What's realy haunting is that the google cache of the page has some javascript that displays the local current date/time.

    Australia is thinking of you guys, and as a member of the Intell community, I'll try my damndest to do what I can to assist.

    1. Re:The WORST photo I've seen of this nightmare by !recycle · · Score: 1

      here is the google cache of the wtca.org

      http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:U8rrAJ-wMWw :w ww.wtca.org/+&hl=en

      --
      my sig sucks.
  186. X-10 ads suspended by yolto · · Score: 1

    An x-10 ad window popped up on my screen, with the message -
    "We have suspended our service out of sympathy to the victims and families of this National tragedy. Our heartfelt thoughts and prayers go out to them.

    We have either feel hopeless or powerless or we can take action. (Most of us will do all 3!) Make the call or click on the links to find your local support center."

    Below it has some links to the Red Cross and blood donation information.

    The ad is at http://ads.x10.com/all/suspend.htm

    1. Re:X-10 ads suspended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they have suspended their service then how did the message pop up on your screen? Sounds like they're just trying to use the tragedy to gild their image.

    2. Re:X-10 ads suspended by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      And yet it still popped up.

      Fuck X-10 and their phony show of sympathy.

      -Legion

    3. Re:X-10 ads suspended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The X-10 ads pop up due to scheduled content on the sites where they have bought advertisements. They can't 'turn it off' because they don't control the code that spawns the window in the first place. The only thing under their direct control is the advertisement itself, which they changed.

      Given that, yeah, it's kind of a slimeball thing to do. But is it, really? Amazon has dedicated their entire front page to collecting donations. Is it a matter of humans reaching out to one another, or is it a matter of Amazon wanting to generate publicity for their tip-jar system?

      I think it sucks that this event has made us question people who are doing what is in their power to help.

  187. Where is united 175? by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1

    http://www.ual.com/Response/PressReleases/0,11641, -1__1760_1,00.html

    The 2 American planes hit the towers.

    United 93 hit the ground in PA.

    No one has announced the location of 175.
    Images of the Pentagon show NO debris that looks plane related. If it were 175, why hasn't that been announced?

    1. Re:Where is united 175? by drodver · · Score: 1

      Could be that no one can get close enough to it / there isn't enough left to be sure right now.

  188. REBUTTAL by orangesquid · · Score: 2
    "Uh you are aware that not all Skins are racist, right? You fucking piece of shit."

    It's Guttermouth's song, not mine. Besides, you'll notice they list a whole bunch of things, not necessarily connected to each other.

    I stated that my point was "who is the asshole?" et cetera. To clarify: I am commenting on the fact that I am watching everybody lay the blame on each other here, at school, on the news -- the people laying the blame do so because they think they know who the "asshole" is, yet they're being assholes themselve.

    Please read comments carefully. Don't assume that because I quote something I believe it. If someone said, "Never in my life... I would have voted for Bush." If you only saw the "I would have voted for Bush" part, and not the first part, you would have completely missed the point the person was making, just because you didn't take the time to read it fully.

    [To say nothing of my personal feelings!] I firmly disapprove of prejudice and stereotyping and I can't stand people who do it. Don't assume I stereotype unless you know for a fact that I do. It's your kinds of comment that deserve "-1, Troll".


    "Moderations: Troll=2"
    Let me explain my point in more obvious terms, since it is apparent you did not take the time to read carefully.

    • Many People Are Laying Blame. Hence I am examing the following ideas:

    • People claim that so-and-so is responsible.
      (This would make so-and-so an asshole of immense proportions.)
    • Immense numbers of people are blaming groups and individuals.
      But wouldn't those laying undue blame be assholes themselves then?
    • People *want* certain groups to be responsible.
      Just like in the song, people are stereotyping. I have seen more "Bomb the Middle East" posts than I can count. <SARCASM>So I guess everyone in the Middle East deserves to die, eh...</SARCASM>


    Hah. Now I know why experienced slashdot users sometimes write sarcasm in all caps; otherwise the triggerhappy moderators might not see it.

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  189. From google thread by TastyWheat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&frame=right& th=54ab4d241c34e0cc&seekm=3b8fd177%40monitor.lanse t.com#link1

    Below is the google thread:
    He predicts the exact day!! He says he would not be around after!!! He may be a suicider!!

    From: Xinoehpoel (tesnal@psl.moc)
    Subject: Re: 911
    Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
    View this article only
    Date: 2001-09-04 12:40:28 PST

    Wait 7 days, and then maybe I'll answer this post. You see, I am going away
    in seven days, and you will not hear from me again.

    X

    1. Re:From google thread by Bluesee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey man, go to deja.com and do a search on this guy. There is something going on here.

      http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Xinoehpoel&hl= en &lr=&safe=off&btnG=Google+Search&site=groups

      --
      SDMI: Finally! Music that won't rip or burn! Brought to you by the fine folks at RIAA.
    2. Re:From google thread by z4ce · · Score: 2

      Okay.. this is freaky. Mod this guy up. Read the other posts by this guy. He sounds like a madbomber. I think this could definitely be a potential bomber or someone clued in on it. He speaks of Allah, hate against america, the whole bit. He predicted this kind of thing would happen 7 days before it did... freaks me out. Could these be posts by the actual suicide bombers?!

    3. Re:From google thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really looks like he is a hijacker...
      Note the 2nd phase is suitcase nukes....

  190. U.S. Attack Blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The folks at SiliconValley.com have assembled a very thorough Web log covering today's ugly events. Lot's of first hand accounts, pointers to an assortment of media coverage, even a refer to Jon Katz's piece.

  191. Just found out about this by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2
    Forgive me if it's old news:

    http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11

    That link again: http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11

  192. White house denies bombing kabul by ironman_one · · Score: 1

    Acording to swedish state radios reporter in Washington DC. Whitehouse oficial denied bombs in Kabul

  193. Fighting in Afghanistan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard radio reports that an attack is under way in Afghanistan, though details are sketchy. Also, there are rumours that our Naval assets in the area have been given the greenlight to attack.

    But who's fighting on the ground? We don't have but a couple thousand marines, tops, that could be there by now.

    They said on the radio that there was fighting on a front 50 miles outside of Kabul. The closet border is Pakistan, or is it some sort of civil uprising?

    Who knows!?

    1. Re:Fighting in Afghanistan! by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      We would support the local rebels. We may have given them a green light to attack the taliban.

    2. Re:Fighting in Afghanistan! by metachimp · · Score: 1
      It has to be the Northern Alliance (the Taliban's opposition). There was a skirmish on Sunday, and so it has to be them.


      If it was us, we have to have launched planes from the Indian Ocean several hours ago. It would be jumping the gun to say the least for us to attack the Afghanistani capital, considering that Bin Laden may operate from inside Afghanistan, it is unlikely that he's in Kabul.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  194. Radio? You must live in a low-tech world by p3bf · · Score: 1

    Wow. Here amidst the racks, with servers humming, it's easy to forget that radio exists when all you can get is static.

    No TV, no Radio; Many sites sluggish, but Slashdot is holding up and being informative.

    I think I'll go high-tech, thanks all the same.

    --
    Slashdot: Everything in Moderation, including Moderation itself.
    1. Re:Radio? You must live in a low-tech world by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Amazing. The first time in weeks that I could consider Slashdot to be reliable. They came through in time.

    2. Re:Radio? You must live in a low-tech world by tzanger · · Score: 2

      Wow. Here amidst the racks, with servers humming, it's easy to forget that radio exists when all you can get is static.

      How about you properly shield and ground your servers? I have a dozen servers here and six workstations in my office (yeah, it's great in this office... not) but the radio comes in just fine.

    3. Re:Radio? You must live in a low-tech world by p3bf · · Score: 1

      So that's what that humming was... I'll just reach over to ground them while I stand in this pool of spilled water...

      Actually, my building tends to weed out all but the strongest of signals, and what collateral interference does occur from various pieces of equipment takes care of the rest.

      --
      Slashdot: Everything in Moderation, including Moderation itself.
    4. Re:Radio? You must live in a low-tech world by askii64 · · Score: 1

      actually computers give off quite a bit of RF noise even if properly grounded. So I guess they must not be sheilded very well.

      --

      -This quite possibly mangled, stupid, demented comment was brought to you by Askii64.
  195. CoffeeCup's CEO letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Some people is becoming very irrational to this situation. They want revenge at any price. This is very well known but i decided to post when i received this letter from the CEO of CoffeeCup Software:

    Hello everyone,



    This is Nicholas Longo, the CEO of CoffeeCup Software.
    As you may have heard the World Trade Center and Pentagon
    were attacked about 45 minutes ago.


    The Team at CoffeeCup would like to send our heart felt
    sorrow to those that perished in these attacks.


    We would like to also say on record that if any country
    is found responsible for these attacks, we call for that
    country's complete destruction and annihilation.


    Do not let terrorism which is designed to create fear
    and stop production, halt your life or work.


    Stay focused and do not stop what you are doing.



    -May God bless us all and the decisions we must make.


    Nick-




    I was too lazy to unsubscribe for months from their mailing-SPAM-list. But i immediately did after receiving this letter.


    If you want to tell them a word or two, you can reach them at helpdesk@coffeecup.com.

  196. CTO of Akamai Killed by digital_freedom · · Score: 1

    CNN article

    Interesting facts:
    Previously, Lewin worked at IBM's research laboratory in Haifa, Israel, where he was a full-time research fellow and project leader while simultaneously completing two undergraduate degrees at the Technion.

    Born in Denver, Colorado, and raised in Jerusalem, Lewin is an officer in the Israel Defense Forces, having served in the country's military for more than four years.

    He is survived by his wife and two sons.

    Poor kids...

  197. Palestinians rejoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Shocking images from Reuters. In light of this kind of behavior, I think we should really start to reassess out relationship with the Palestinian people. It is now clear that our only allies in the Mid-East are the Israelis, who, in stark contrast, announced a national day of mourning. The flags over the Israeli parliament are lowered. I'd really like to see if the Palestinians, Lebanese or Syrians have made the same gesture.

  198. Obvious response... by Zeekamotay · · Score: 5, Funny

    rm -rf /bin/laden

    1. Re:Obvious response... by David+Ham · · Score: 1

      i needed that humor to put a smile on my face in a day that was completely lacking in that regard. thank you.

      --

      --
      you must amputate to email me
      i read all replies to my comments

  199. they are bombing, it's a government conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so they're not bombing afghanistan? YEAH RiGHT! iT'S A GOVERNMENT CONSPiRACY!!!!11111 i saw da b0mb1n' on mah tv, we're k1ck1n sum maj0r ass

  200. IRC: chat.cnn.com - channel #CNN_Newsfeed by David+Hume · · Score: 2

    If you can't get CNN on TV, or you're stuck at work, you can read the CNN closed caption stream by pointing an IRC client to chat.cnn.com, and joining channel #CNN_Newsfeed


    Please mod the parent post up. It has very useful information for those of us without access to a TV or radio right now.

    1. Re:IRC: chat.cnn.com - channel #CNN_Newsfeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this guy up, i didnt know about this irc channel!

  201. Info for Caltech students, facutly, staff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've setup a site at www.knouf.com for people to post information about Caltech students, faculty, and staff involved in today's terrorist attacks.

    Nick Knouf

  202. cell phones on planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the plane that went down in PA had a woman onboard who locked herself in the bathroom with her cellular phone - she was telling authorities about the hijacking when the plane crashed and killed her - that is the only way the authorities knew for sure what plane went down in PA so quickly, she gave her flight number

    Who'd have thunk it? It's true what they say about using your cell phone while in flight..

  203. I wish i was making this up by Husaria · · Score: 0

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb." "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning."
    -Nostradamus 1654
    I wish i was making this up

  204. more media by ravidew · · Score: 1

    available at http://wtc.ravidew.net/ .. at this time I am still uploading files

  205. Caught this one on Antiwar.com by Fixer · · Score: 2
    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/010911/80/c3mes.html

    It's a report that basically says that lots of incoming missiles are raining on the Afghanistan capital.

    Any word if this is our retaliation?

    --
    "Avast! Prepare for the rodgering!" THWACK! "Arrr.. me nards.."
    1. Re:Caught this one on Antiwar.com by moose_hp · · Score: 1

      Yes, Im seeing that on CNN, but if you think this deeply you found that maybe some terrorist groups (involved on Palestinan civil war) are just trying to make it look like the U.S. is firing... personaly I dont think that U.S. would counteratack an unknown enemy (or a know one wihout leting others see ho is)

      well thast my opinion

      --
      DON'T PANIC.
  206. Alternative to giving blood by Gerv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If, like me, you can't give blood for whatever reason, you can donate to the American Red Cross of Greater New York here.

    Gerv

  207. Article from Russian Website (translated) by DigitalDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get this info in Russian from HERE and use Babel, or read this:

    ----
    all last information about the tragedy in THE USA .

    Information constantly is renewed
    nformatsiya about the tragic events in THE USA, arranged/located in this article, constantly it is renewed.
    Fresh information is isolated with medium boldface type .

    According to the communication/report to TV broadcasting company SI-N- N, which leads straight/direct reporting from kabul, in the Afghan capital several powerful explosions were heard . In several places of city the fires arose. Correspondent SI-N- N reports that the explosions in kabul " greatly resemble the explosions of the cruise missiles, which it observed two ago in Yugoslavia ".

    According to the preliminary data, one of the explosions occurred in the place, where in kabul large fuel depot is located. In the sky above the city, reports SI-N- N with the reference to the eyewitnesses, were noticed several cruise missiles.

    According to the data of urban authorities, in that become on Tuesday the object of the most destructive in the history OF THE USA attack of terrorists the complex of the center of international trade, which was being considered one of the main sights of the largest city OF THE USA, it worked to 50 thousand people, skyscraper- twins assumed/took daily higher 10 thousand visitors " this- nightmare it is worse/worst, which could happen ", he said in the interview, hardly holding in control tears, the mayor of New York Rudolf Dzhulianni.

    According to the data of the special services OF THE USA, the terrorist acts, carried out on Tuesday in Washington and New York, organized the international terrorist Of usama Ben Laden . On this reported the TV broadcasting company " Fox ".

    As a result of today's teraktov, when both towers of world commercial center in New York were brought down, were injured not less than 2100 people, of them about 600 with the heavy injuries were delivered into the hospitals. On this reported the mayor of New York Rudolf Dzhuliani, transfers BY CHNN. the number of those been killed as before unknown and it will be named only into the medium or even on Thursday. At the same time, according to the data of spasateley, a quantity of victims still can grow considerably - according to the preliminary data, at the moment/torque terakta in the towers of world commercial center were located not less than 40 000 people.

    As a result of terakta in the building of the Pentagon, supposedly, perished about 100 people. The aircraft of vrezalsya into the compartments/rooms, where were arranged/located two departments of the Pentagon for fight with the terrorism.

    As a result of fire the 40- storeyed building, which entered into the complex of world commercial center in New York, collapsed. The house, which is building the number of 7 complexes, obtained damages and it inflamed after caving as a result of terakta of two 110- storeyed skyscrapers. Somewhat previously collapsed the building of smaller height - number 6, also entered into complex. In all into the complex of world commercial center in New York entered 7 buildings, including two 110- storeyed skyscrapers.

    All commercial flights of the aircraft above the territory OF THE USA are stopped at least to noon of medium on the local time " not some aircraft to this time it will take off ", stated director on the communications of the White House Of keren of Hugh meanwhile approximately 500 voyages, which were being sent to the USA because of the boundary were perenapravleny into the Canadian airports

    CHNN reported the last data about the numbers of the voyages, by which had to fly the aircraft seized by terrorists: the voyage of 11 companies " Amer. Airlines " Boston-Los- Angeles, the voyage of 77 companies " Amer. Airlines " of Washington (airport Dallesa)-Los- Angeles, the voyage of 93 companies " United Airlines " Newark-San- Francisco, the voyage of 175 companies " United Airlines " Boston-Los- Angeles.

    The ministry of defense OF THE USA declared the highest degree of anxiety - " readiness for the war ", reports CHNN. it is declared general mobilization. Are put into operation the alternate command posts of the army OF THE USA sky above America closed, PVO l - AIR DEFENSEm OF THE USA monitors entire territory of the country from the command center in the state of Colorado.

    The President OF THE USA George Bush could not rapidly return to Washington from Florida and he stated on the military base in the state of Louisiana that all armed forces to THE USA and abroad were given to the increased combat readiness. According to him, " attack underwent democracy itself and democracy will be protected ". To 21:30 on Moscow time the President OF THE USA could return to the capital, but it does not communicate about his location.

    As reports RIA of " news " , the special session of the permanent council of North Atlantic agreement will be assembled in the nearest hours in the staff office OF NATO in Brussels.

    According to the deputy chairman of senate committee on reconnaissance Richard Shelbi, American special services government organizations obtained " absolutely no information " about prepared teraktakh, reports RIA of " news " .

    TV -6 reports that one of the aircraft, which flew from Moscow to THE USA, was as other international voyages, perenapravlen into Canada and villages. Russia forbade the departure of all aircraft, which follow in THE USA.

    About 9 hundred in the evening on Moscow time the representative of Russian federation in THE UNITED NATIONS Sergey Lavrov reported that, according to his data, among the colleagues of official Russian representations in New York and Washington and the members of their families there are no been killed. The opening of the current 56-1 session of the general assembly OF UNITED NATIONS outlined for Tuesday is abolished.

    Information more lately entered, that one additional driven away passenger aircraft " Boeing-747 " approaches Washington. As reported CHNN, it was biased/beaten BY VVS OF THE USA in all, according to the data of TV broadcasting company NYUK, in THE USA were seized 11 (eleven) passenger aircraft. Location 4 of them is unknown Until now.

    One additional communication/report entered 18 hours 50 minutes: near the large American city Pittsburgh fell " Boeing ", which belonged " to United Airlines ". On its board/edge it was 81 people. Broke one additional aircraft in the Washington airport Dulles, on his board/edge it was 54 people. It communicates also that in the last hours in THE USA occurred 8 (eight) avikatastrof.

    It communicated that one additional aircraft, which turned above Washington, was constrained by USAF l - United States Air forcem land and collapsed not far from the residence of the President OF THE USA into the camp -Devide (state of Maryland). Late officials refuted this information.

    A quantity of victims cannot be even assumed, but out of any doubt, it is enormous. Perished pilot- suicide and the passengers of three aircraft (according to the preliminary data, only in one of the aircraft it was located 160 people). Majorities of 50 000 TSMT were already at their work sites at the moment of attack. TV -6 reports that people jumped out from the burning buildings of the center of international trade. There were at the places and the colleagues of American military department. Furthermore, precisely, on the upper levels of two New York towers are located running plates completely popular among the tourists.

    According to the last estimations/evaluations, perished not less than 50 thousand people. American cities are panic-stricken. Is declared state of emergency in the largest cities OF THE USA - in New York, Washington, San Francisco, Los Angeles. Thousands of victims enter into the hospitals of New York and Washington.

    Sky-TV reported that the responsibility for these terakty took upon itself the democratic Front of the release of Palestine, but this late communication/report was disproved by officials DFOP. The leader of the Palestinian autonomy of yasir Arafat also condemned the terrorist acts in THE USA also about his nonparticipation they stated and the leaders of motions " khamas " and " Islamic dzhikhad ". According to the data OF CHNN, in the territory of Palestinian autonomy it passes a kind of the celebration, which passes into the the people of gulyaniya. In East Jerusalem is conducted the demonstration of several ten Arabs, who praise Usamu Bean Ladena.

    According to last data, terakty were condemned " main suspected " - by Afghan fundamentalistskim motion " taliban ". this statement made the ambassador of talibov to Pakistan. According to the information CHNN, taliby also stated that Usama Bean Laden was not participating to these teraktam. According to them, it simply does not have this technical capability.

    The President Vladimir Putin expressed the condolence of the people OF THE USA it was conducted special communication/report with the power ministers. About 9 hours of msk the President RF appeared on the television and brought on behalf of the people of Russia his condolences to American people. The Minister/Secretary of Defense RF Sergey Ivanov made statement, that the servicemen of Russia were ready to render assistance OF THE USA in connection with teraktami in the American cities.

    --
    http://dtum.livejournal.com
    1. Re:Article from Russian Website (translated) by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      wow! that's pretty impressive for a webtranslation program!

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  208. Goose Bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The airport here, itself, is very small... The runway is incredibly long, due to being a US Air Force base, which it was till '92.

    From what I heard, only 4 of the flights actually landed here (in Goose Bay).

    around 20 were in St. John's though.

  209. Two pictures. Before/After by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before (taken 5 months ago):
    http://community.webshots.com/photo/8916386/891652 5MrRHyhTMIA

    After (sept 11th, around 1:00pm):
    http://community.webshots.com/photo/21192612/21192 864qZXvgWteKm

    Both photos taken by me

  210. Re:Not the U.S. (Thank God) by EasyTarget · · Score: 2

    You're right (BBC reporting that too).

    KNEE_JERK_REACTION_MODE==FALSE

    Hope that holds true for Dubbyah too..

    You can look at this (about Afghan civil war) for more details on what is going on there recently.

    --
    "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
  211. Our leaders are very thoughtful w/ open minds. by ClarkEvans · · Score: 1

    "This looks like the signature of Osama bin Laden," said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who had been briefed by high-level government officials on the attacks. "We're going to find out who did this and we're going after the bastards."


    Sen. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, agreed."I have no doubt in my mind it's Osama bin Laden," he told CNN. "It's very much in keeping with the threats he has made."

    Bush: "Make no mistake, The United States will hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts"

    1. Re:Our leaders are very thoughtful w/ open minds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They are being thoughtful...they haven't attacked anyone yet and are investigating the source. Although I did hear on the radio program I am listening to, that they had intercepted communications TO bin laden that two targets were hit, or something to that effect. (echelon perhaps?)

      Has it occured to you that they have ALOT better intelligence info on the subject that you and I right now? Time will tell the facts...but they haven't made anything that I consider a bad move yet. Quite the opposite. Don't make it sound like they are closed minded as they more than likely know whats going on a little bit before you and I...and that is for an honest national security reason under circumstances such as this. What do you want? A broadcast of the battle plan now?

      Hatch has got the right idea as far as I am concerned. Unfortunately...getting pounded seems to be all that they will understand, again, unless you know alot of things the rest of us don't.

  212. WTC destruction =~ 1 normal day's death by TimFreeman · · Score: 1
    Let's say the life expectancy in the US is 80 years. That's 80 * 365 days. Say there are 250 million people in the US. Divide, so somewhere around 8600 die each day. Maybe that or twice that died in today's terrorist attacks in the US. So, to get the scope of the thing, imagine that you wasted one day of your life doing something completely useless, or maybe two, and scale that up to the whole country.

    Not a significant amount of damage.

    1. Re:WTC destruction =~ 1 normal day's death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it to a slashdot geek to use numbers as a means of downplaying a national tragedy.

      You sir, have done a better job than even the master of the art, Jon Katz himself.

    2. Re:WTC destruction =~ 1 normal day's death by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, please tell this to the kids whose parents aren't coming home because they went to work this morning. Death is not about numbers. Have a heart.

    3. Re:WTC destruction =~ 1 normal day's death by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      That's *in addition* to the other 8600 deaths you're mistakenly calculating happened today. Please take a statistics course or two before posting drivel like this again.

      -Legion

    4. Re:WTC destruction =~ 1 normal day's death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if we're lucky, you'll accidentally fall into a vat of boiling hydrocloric acid.

      Fuck you very much.

  213. gas prices by psychalgia · · Score: 1

    i just got a report that texas is selling gas for $8/gallon, OPEC raised their prices to $3/barrel, and we are three and four cars deep up here in Wisconsin at the gas station. Anyone that can give truth to these rumours?

    --

    ________________________________________________

    1. Re:gas prices by breadbot · · Score: 1

      $4.00 a gallon in Danville, central Illinois, but only $2.00 in Champaign-Urbana.

    2. Re:gas prices by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      is that new, or is that typical?
      we are usually 1.80 here....and its still the same, just really busy/

      --

      ________________________________________________

    3. Re:gas prices by breadbot · · Score: 1

      It's about 20 cents high.

  214. Re:Kabul is under attack by G.+Waters · · Score: 1

    Looks like your post was a knee jerk reaction.

    Too bad.

  215. MIRROR of video and pics by ender- · · Score: 3, Informative


    Some video that wasn't on the news [at least when I got it] and some pics that look to be from someone's digital camera nearby.


    and I'm still trying to collect more videos and pics...

    1. Re:MIRROR of video and pics by ender- · · Score: 2
      Damn...try that link again.


      www.spack.nu/wtc

      That will teach me not to skip preview.

    2. Re:MIRROR of video and pics by themoe · · Score: 1

      I have a mirror of videos from various sources on the 'net. See:
      US: media.us.ametrika.com
      UK: media.uk.ametrika.com

  216. High resolution pictures from WTC by ehiris · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recieved some pictures from a friend and they are the most detailed and clear that I've seen so far so I added them onto my site:

    http://www.hiris.com/nycpics.htm

  217. Amazing.. by nebby · · Score: 2

    The thing that amazes me is the fact that Palestinians aren't scared out of their mind as they celebrate. They're acting as if they've "defated" the United States, while all it's really done is cause the entire population to turn red with rage against them. Whereas Pearl Harbor may have given the Japanese a reason to celebrate a potential victory over the U.S. power, our military is as strong tonight as it was this morning. We have the big guns, so they're basically going to be fucked in the end if the higher up's find out their country was involved.

    I know that if I were in their place, even if I wanted to celebrate, I'd do it privately. Also, if I realized my country's population were celebrating in the streets and being filmed on international TV, I'd get the hell out of the country before the bombs started falling.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Amazing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention them firing their guns into the air. That's got to be safe...

  218. interesting to note that todays date is 9 11 by Atilla · · Score: 1

    stupid, but weird

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  219. blood by jesser · · Score: 2

    Importantly -- remember, blood is in demand. The Red Cross' site is mobbed

    I'm worried that might be true in more than one way.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  220. To Sum It Up: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What hath God wrought?

    - 'nuff said

  221. GAS PRICES!!! by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    What the HECK is wrong with these people! I have two gas stations near my house....one is $1.59 a gallon and another is $4.99 a gallon! The one with $1.59 a gallon has a line a block long! Oil has been 30 dollars a barrel before....why are thes gas stations hiking the price???

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:GAS PRICES!!! by breadbot · · Score: 1
      War in the middle east --> difficult to get oil?

      Maybe that's what people are thinking.


      We should start worrying if transportation starts breaking down though, and it gets hard to find food in the cities. But that seems pretty unlikely, since we can feed ourselves in this country. It would take a lot of panic to do that much harm.

    2. Re:GAS PRICES!!! by smokinburt · · Score: 1

      from drudgereport.com:

      KMBZ radio in Kansas City, Missouri, is reporting $5 a gallon for gas...

      MO atty gen Jay Nixon says that the prices up to $5 a gallon in KC are the result of opportunistic gouging and are illegal and that he will prosecute...

      Rumors of $5.00 per gallon in Detroit...

      Gas lines formed all afternoon throughout Tulsa, blocking major streets and intersections. Tulsa County Sheriff had to ask for calm...

    3. Re:GAS PRICES!!! by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      Who says anyone in the Middle East did this?? I maintain it would have been WAY easier for a American to do this then someone in the middle east. Some people say it sounds too complex for a smaller group to pull this off...I say no.

      Slashdotters of all people should know that the airlines have the schedules on the web. Take that, and 30-50 people could definitely pull this off. What does it take to hijack a plane?? 4-5 people with glocks per plane or some other easily sneakable gun onto the plane. Put the gun to the pilots head and he'll take you anywhere you want. He may not steer it into the World Trade Center, but after you get close, how easy would it be to do this??

      --

      Gorkman

    4. Re:GAS PRICES!!! by breadbot · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I think it would be pretty hard to find at least four capable pilots willing to commit suicide for a murderous attack of this magnitude and keep it quiet. Sure, the capability is there, but the motivation would be pretty hard to scare up.

  222. And ......: @# +1 ; Timely #@ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    very old. This was posted in the morning.
    Where were you.... smoking a joint?

    Thanks and have a LSD-induced weekend.

  223. Pimping mod points, calling all favors.... by BadlandZ · · Score: 2, Funny
    OK, I blew 3 points on this thread modding, then decided to post because this might be more important?

    Here's what the dihard SlashDot'ers NEED to do (if you agree mod this up!)

    • Go Give Blood
    • Start a system of mirrors.
      • mirror as much shit as you can find, photos, media clips, etc...
      • Someone write a simple script that any UNIX'er can use (tarball probably, rpm and deb them later) to stick on the mirrors W/ instructions for the newbies... I suggest a high speed site be listed IN THE README to the script that has the primary IP/URL to mirror, that we DO NOT make public unless you run the script!!!
      • Post them mirrors...
      • those running the mirrors update hourly off the IP/URL from the README in the script.

    • come up with better ideas.
    • Find someone to sort the primary source into good images, good text, good video, etc... maybe a 1 to 5 star rating? We could come up with a MOD system, but f- that for now, let's just find SOMEONE to do it and start it up!

    I am about to mirror some of what I found, sometime somewhere soon, TBA.... I hope we can band together to pull off a media spread fast and informative.

    Comment on Trademarks and Copywrights: Screw them, this is too important. DO NOT white out sources, GIVE FULL CREDIT IF YOU CAN!!! But, we want the news spread clear and fast, with as much detail as we can. So, give credit, and if they don't make the credits for the photos or media clear enough in the content, it's THIER FAULT for not taking credit... Let's just mirror shit so we don't choke down the major news sites and the best photos we can find.

    PS: Send donations to EFF, I'm going to need them if it works......

  224. Slashdot's support by mrmag00 · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to say that today, while at school, teachers were constantly trying to load populair websites (which were of course dead). Slashdot, which I immedately mentioned, loaded up instantly and provided very accurate information. Moderation and user comments work VERY well in situations such as this: you get reports from people who actually see the attacks, valid reports get modded up, etc. great job.
    Maybe some populair sites will see this and will add such abilities? I love reading comments from people who saw it. The descriptions from a real person form a more vivid image in my mind then any picture or video has.

  225. MSNBC: Net rallies relief work, housing, help by David+Hume · · Score: 2, Redundant



    From MSNBC:

    Kindness, bravery amid the horror

    Internet used to rally relief work, offer housing and help

    Sept 11 -- In the midst of terror and tragedy, charity fought back across America -- and across the Internet. Tales of thousands of small heroes are emerging, from a New York City bus driver who sped people to safety amid falling debris to a McDonald's manager near ground zero who kept his store open to give rescue workers water. But the kindness has spread far and wide outside New York and Washington D.C. Long lines outside blood donor agencies started forming spontaneously Tuesday morning. And around the country, homeowners near airports are offering free housing to stranded travelers through Internet message boards.

    HUNDREDS OF STORIES of spontaneous acts of kindness are emerging. As always, horrendous acts of hate have a way of bringing out strong acts of love.

    When Maria Trotta, who was stuck in a subway under the trade center for 45 minutes, finally emerged from the smoke-filled subway, the smoke was even worse above ground. But instead of running home, she took care of a woman who had asthma.

    "I went looking for a mask for her, but couldn't find any, but the only thing I could find was a pair of (fortunately clean) athletic socks," Trotta said.

    She guided her several blocks, finally leaving her in the care of EMTs at a rescue station. Only then did she walk across Manhattan Bridge back home to Brooklyn to meet her husband. "I never got her name."

    Jay Lacny was on a bus that sped away from the World Trade Center just moments after the second plane hit. He was one of thousands who are currently sharing stories describing how lucky they are to be alive. He was with a crowd that was standing in the street watching the fire in the first tower when the second plane hit the other building.

    "We then literally ran for our lives with debris crashing all around us," he said. "A bus pulled up a couple of blocks away and everyone rushed on and then sped us to safety a mile away. The driver and all of us were scared for our lives, but did nothing out of the ordinary. I'm sure that many others have contributed greatly and risked their lives."

    Much of the real heroism came from fire and police workers at the rescue scene. A New York City police officer who declined to share his name was carrying victims out of Five World Trade Center when it collapsed.

    "The fire department were getting people out from the rubble and we [the police officers] were carrying them out," he said. "I carried some out and was going back in to get more, but they wouldn't let me back in. They said the structure was unstable. That's when the second tower collapsed." He said many victims were still inside, and several were still alive after the collapse -- and too stunned to yell for help.

    "(People) were dazed and shocked. It was surreal. I've never seen anything remotely like it. There just are no words to describe it," he said.

    Across New York, thousands of volunteers pitched in. Store owners opened their doors and gave away flashlights, water, food or anything else that would help rescue workers or victims forced to walk home to Brooklyn, Queens, New Jersey or elsewhere once public transportation was shut down. A Duane Reade pharmacy gave out free water, snacks and first aid supplies. A Mrs. Fields Cookies gave away all its food.

    Others helped by offering free rides to victims trying to get home.

    "A lot of my neighbors here in Cobble Hill were driving around and organizing car pools to bring the refugees to the Atlantic Avenue train station and other places where they could catch a train," said Gian Trotta. "And I saw some kids from the projects at Red Hook walking up to give blood at Long Island College Hospital."

    Blood donors who showed up at hospitals were eager to help out the same way.

    "At 11a.m. today, I could not stand watching the TV any longer and I told the people in my office that I was walking over to NYU Medical Center to give blood," said Joshua Glantz. "Six people followed me and we gathered more people on the 20-minute walk. It was depressing but also heartening to see people turn in their tracks to join our group. When we got to the hospital, we found an eight-hour wait to give blood."

    Across the Hudson River in New Jersey, blood donor lines wound around Hackensack Medical Center, too -- in fact, the hospital was so flooded with donors that a remote donor station was in the works at a nearby church in Wood-Ridge, N.J.

    Outside the city, thousands of Netizens began to hunt for ways to help during the crisis. Soon after word came that all flights at U.S. airports had been grounded, offers flooded in for free housing for the night.

    "We are 30 minutes from Salt Lake Airport," Greg Smith wrote to a Princeton University alumni newsletter. "Plenty of room for stranded travelers and we can do an airport run to pick anyone up."

    Graham Doran made the same offer for folks in San Francisco: "Plenty of couch space. Already picked up one guest, can handle a couple of more," Doran said.

  226. Mexican Border Open, too by Smitty825 · · Score: 2

    Here in San Diego, CA, the US-Mexico border is open, but it is on Level 1 security (the highest level, which means you will get searched). Supposedly, officials are guessing it will take at least 3 hours to cross the border, possibly longer. It won't be fun tonight if you have to cross the border...

    --

    Doh!
  227. I've seen a lot of "couragous" talk here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My next trip to the US will be on the 9th
    of January 2002 - premeeting of USENIX 2002.

    For Your Convenience - flight numbers will
    be published when available.

    We Will Not Step Down Due To This.

    Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
    Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
    Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
    Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)

  228. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

    Very good idea, IMO! At those distances and angles, tasers and batons - and training in martial arts, to use them and be able to fight unarmed if necessary - would seem sufficient. It's not easy to smuggle heavy armor onto a plane, so the variety of situations would probably be limited: terrorists get up from amidst the passengers, possibly bring out a knife or a gun, possibly have one or more bombs on the airliner...

    Heck, it'd probably be rather easy to train security against most hijacking situations. One or two security specialists in addition to the stewards...or possibly just have at least one or two stewards on each flight be security-trained and equipped. Most flights, the baton wouldn't come out (and could be hidden under the uniform, so you wouldn't know who's armed unless you know they're all armed), so make sure to refresh the training every so often. This might help against air rage, too.

  229. nostradamus by main() · · Score: 1

    I hope I speak for everyone in the civilised world in offering the USA our deepest sympathies and support.

    I hope no-one takes this the wrong way, but on reading about todays tragedy, I felt the need to lookup nostradamus' predictions -

    (on the third anti-christ)

    Out of the country of Greater Arabia
    Shall be born a strong master of Mohammed...
    He will enter Europe wearing a blue turban.
    He will be the terror of mankind.
    Never more horror.

    In the year 1999 and seven months
    From the sky will come the great King of Terror.
    He will bring back to life the King of the Mongols;
    Before and after war reigns.

    The war will last seven and twenty years. (Guentte)

    The sky will burn at forty-five degrees.
    Fire approaches the great new city.

    By fire he will destroy their city,
    A cold and cruel heart,
    Blood will pour,
    Mercy to none. (Guentte)

    I guess its possible to read too much into these things... but.

    Si

    ps. the quotes above were ripped blatantly from "http://boisdarc.tamu-commerce.edu/www/w/willmc/no stra.htm"

    1. Re:nostradamus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHAME on people for posting this kind of nonsense. Nostradamus has been discredited numerous times.

      You need to read some books by James Randi, such as The Mask of Nostradamus.

      Some other skeptic-related links:

      http://www.randi.org/
      http://www.csicop.org/
      http://www.skeptic.com/

  230. The reason they crashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear they were using old maps that showed an airport in lower manhattan.

    Before you mod this down, think of how you reacted when the USAF gave this lame excuse for the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. Innocent people were murdered there, too.

  231. Gas Prices?? by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen any gas price increases?? It's rumored to be $5.00 a Gallon in Columbus, but I've also heard something about OPEC stopping production???!?

    --

    I disable sigs...do you?
  232. Not here by barzok · · Score: 1

    Local primaries were supposed to be today, but cancelled due to the incidents.

  233. More objective data by posix4 · · Score: 1

    http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/latest/DS.p20-r/si.k okx.shtml

  234. Why.... #@ +1 ; Intriguing @# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to f$ck people, you genius! Why else, to give
    them a break? What have you been doing lately,
    smoking marijuana? Wake up and snort some
    cocaine. That's what JonKatz does to write
    his classic articles.

  235. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by mrgoat · · Score: 1, Troll
    Aditionally, I just heard, that Barbara Olsen, passenger on one of the planes, told her husband, that the terrorists were armed with no more than "knives and cardboard cutters".

    Ummm...without trying to sound callous...how did CNN hear of this? Aren't all the passengers dead? Moderators, please READ the posts prior to hitting MODERATE. It helps.

    --

    'Hail Eris, baby, hail Eris...pfffffffttt.' *cough* 'Yeah.'
  236. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all the media and reports that I have seen, I haven't seen I single person ask the question of why the U.S. is such a target and have never seen anyone talk about taking steps to minimize the attractiveness of the U.S. as a terrorist target.

    So I pose the question, why do you think everyone wants to kill Americans?

    I think it is the combination of self righteousness and the control of power leads to the problem. Paranoid, fanatical religous groups are very upset about the control of power that the US has and the religous beliefs that are at the heart of the country. If the US didn't export its culture and belief system (democracy, capitalism, christianity) so fervently, I think the commitment to destruction that the fanatics have wouldn't be as strong. Just my $0.02.

    1. Re:Why by TastyWheat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think you can point to it even closer. We support the Israelies right to a stupid piece of rock that they insist on killing for. Its our apache helicotpers that bomb them over this rock, its our f-16's, its our tanks, its our bullets. I think its very simple. Blow up the temple mount and end it all.

  237. What is this war? by Lomby · · Score: 1

    A bit of reflection. This dialogue is taken from Patlabor 2. Goto, a policeman is talking with Arakawa, an intelligence officer.

    See if you can see some sense in it:

    ARAKAWA:
    What are you, the police officer, and I, the JSDF officer, trying to
    defend?
    It's been half a century since the last war.
    Neither you nor I have experienced a war.
    Peace...
    Peace is what we are supposed to defend.

    {CLOUDY RIVER AHEAD}

    But what is the peace of this city, this nation?

    {SIDE VIEW OF WHARF}

    The all-out war and the defeat. The US occupation policy. The Cold War
    under the nuclear umbrella and the puppet wars. And civil wars that
    still go on in many nations of the world.
    Ethnic clash - military conflict.

    {GRAIN SILO}

    Blood-drenched economical prosperity created and sustained by those
    countless wars.
    That's what's behind our peace.
    Peace created by an indiscriminate fear of war.
    An unjust peace that is maintained by having the wars elsewhere, but we
    keep denying ourselves this truth.

    {LOTS OF TOWERS, FLASHING RED LIGHT}

    GOTO:
    No matter how phony the peace may be, it's our job to defend it.
    No matter how unjust it may be, it's better than a just war.

    ARAKAWA:
    I understand how you hate "just wars".
    Whoever said that word was never half decent.
    History is filled with people who fell from grace believing in that.

    {BUOY}

    But you know only too well that there isn't much of a difference
    between a just war and an unjust peace.
    Ever since the word "Peace" became the excuse of the liars, we lost our
    faith in peace.
    Just as war creates peace, peace also creates war.

    {JET}

    A make-belief peace that's merely the period between two wars will
    eventually give way to a real war.
    Have you ever thought about that?
    While receiving the benefits of war, they're hiding the truth behind
    the TV screen.
    Forgetting that they're merely at the rear of the battle front.
    Or rather pretending to forget about it.
    Such deceit will be punished sooner or later.

    {LOW SHED}

    GOTO:
    Punished? By whom? God?

    ARAKAWA:
    In this town, everyone's more or less God.
    Seeing everything without being there.
    To have knowledge of everything without having physical contact.
    God does nothing. If God doesn't do it, the people will.
    We'll find out if we can't catch him.

  238. Re:For those speaking French and Dutch by DennisZeMenace · · Score: 2, Informative

    Belgian on-line media is also covering the events :

    Le Soir (in french)
    La Libre Belgique
    De Standaard (in dutch).

    Also in french :
    Le Monde

    -DZM

  239. But not in New York... by flimflam · · Score: 1

    However the primary has been postponed here in light of the situation...

    --
    -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
  240. Xinoehpoel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    somebody named Xinoehpoel on alt.prophecies.nostradamus apparently predicted this 7 days before it happened... weird...

    1. Re:Xinoehpoel by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&frame=right& th=54ab4d241c34e0cc&seekm=3b8fd177%40monitor.lanse t.com#link1

      Below is the google thread:
      He predicts the exact day!! He says he would not be around after!!! He may be a suicider!!

      From: Xinoehpoel (tesnal@psl.moc)
      Subject: Re: 911
      Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
      View this article only
      Date: 2001-09-04 12:40:28 PST

      Wait 7 days, and then maybe I'll answer this post. You see, I am going away
      in seven days, and you will not hear from me again.

      X

    2. Re:Xinoehpoel by maskdmirag · · Score: 1

      he wasn;t a suicider, he posted today http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=t1ks pt4ofuts2mviltfsc26k1h4b56o6sc%404ax.com&prev=/gro ups%3Fhl%3Den%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostradamus

    3. Re:Xinoehpoel by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      No, he didn't predict this.

      He predicted that *something* would happen.

      Well, folks, *Something* happens every day of the year. This event is just a lot closer to home than most.

      NOTHING in his post indicates that he had any idea what would happen. He speaks in vagaries - which is exactly how his prophecies can *come* true; with no details, anything that happens is fulfilment of the prophecy. It could have been an earthquake. It could have been something happening in Australia.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  241. SE Michigan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $1.60 - $1.70 at 6:56pm EST

    Lines are very long and I've heard some stations are up to $2.

  242. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by asonthebadone · · Score: 1

    Apparently the passenger, Barbara Olsen, made the phone call from within a locked bathroom stall on her cell phone. She called shortly before the plane crashed.

  243. Reflections on the WTC Disaster by Dennis+G.+Jerz · · Score: 1
    The idea of the skyscraper, and the twin towers of the World Trade Center in particular, have symbolized, for many modern writers, either prideful arrogance, or a new kind of technological beauty.

    In an effort to come to terms with what has happened, I posted the following website, which examines that theme:
    World Trade Center: Reflections on the Disaster

    --
    Literacy Weblog http://jerz.setonhill.edu/weblog
  244. Indiana Blood Center in INDY by sharkey · · Score: 2

    I just spoke with the Northside branch (Range Line Rd in Carmel) and was told they will stay until they have served all donors that are there by 20:00 EST. I am number 163 in line, they haven't reached number 100 yet. They recommended to me that if I didn't want to wait until who knows how late tonight, to call back tomorrow (or go in).

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  245. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by stcanard · · Score: 1

    She managed to lock herself into a bathroom and call 911 on her cell phone. This has been confirmed (and I remember the name, that's who called 911)

    So this is possible. I haven't heard anything about what they were armed with, just that she called 911 and reported they'd all been herded into the back of the plane and were being hijacked.

  246. 80% utilization is probably email... by weston · · Score: 2

    the backbone is, according to them, at about 80% utilization -- they've never seen it above 40% before. However, the

    main portal sites such as Yahoo aren't having substantively higher than normal traffic.


    I'd be willing to lay money on the fact that it's

    email. People are talking to each other.

  247. Google groups... by LoP_XTC · · Score: 1

    I dont know if anyone has posted this or not...but on a news group on google someone posted a Prophecy about today..


    <A HREF="http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&thread m=1d3faac8.0109111019.4025c598%40posting.google.co m&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26group%3Dalt.prophecies. nostradamus">Link</A>

    --
    "Curiouser and Curiouser...." -Alice
    1. Re:Google groups... by Oztun · · Score: 2

      This might be a fluke but man is it interesting and freaky. It seems like this guy might have been a pilot of one of the planes.

      Someone with mod points read this and mod up the post I'm replying to.

  248. Like the movies by Lomby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look at the synopsis from "The Siege", it forecasted a lot of what happened.

    A special agent of the FBI, a case officer of the CIA, and a general in the U.S. Army have all taken the same oath - "to support and defend the Constitution" - but when a bus blows up in Brooklyn and a campaign of terror begins to make its bloody mark on a city under siege, the men and women who have sworn to protect the country must now reckon with the many implications of their oath.

    Anthony "Hub" Hubbard (Denzel Washington), the head of the joint FBI/NYPD terrorism task force, is the man charged with keeping New York City safe from an array of threats that seem to grow more terrifying with every headline. As an officer of the court, his job is the apprehension and prosecution of criminals. Elise Kraft (Annette Bening) is a CIA operative, now undercover, with important sources in the Arab-American community and ambiguous ties to the suspects. Her agenda, like that of her government's foreign policy, is more complex than Hub's. And yet these two are forced to work together, forging an uneasy alliance, as the incidents of terror threaten to paralyze the city.

    But before they can accomplish their mission, the public's clamor for safety forces the hand of the President of the United States - whose only recourse is to declare a State of Emergency and ask help from the military. General William Devereaux (Bruce Willis) is a thoughtful, cautious warrior who well knows the dangers of bringing the army onto the streets of an American city. Although he argues against it, when he's given the unenviable task of imposing military order he responds as a soldier must, with unquestioning obedience and purpose.

    As the pursuit of the terrorists becomes more desperate, these three lives become intertwined in a terrible and frightening dilemma, a situation that threatens the very fabric of a democratic society and the central premises on which it is founded.

    http://www.thesiege.com/htmls/movie_info2.html

    The final parahraph is very important:
    At what point does the protection of the country's citizens conflict with the protection of their rights? Faced with such grave danger, how will the members of a free society measure up? How quickly will the country abrogate the Constitution? How shallowly beneath the surface does the ugly spectre of repression and persecution reside? Or more simply put: Will the people of this country be forced to become monsters in order to fight monsters?
    At what point does the protection of the country's citizens conflict with the protection of their rights? Faced with such grave danger, how will the members of a free society measure up? How quickly will the country abrogate the Constitution? How shallowly beneath the surface does the ugly spectre of repression and persecution reside? Or more simply put: Will the people of this country be forced to become monsters in order to fight monsters?

  249. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You moron, she called 911 from the plane on a mobile phone. Moderators, please BITCHSLAP callous idiots POSTING AT +1. It helps.

  250. Photos from Brooklyn by The+Cunctator · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some photos from Brooklyn, of the crowds leaving over the Brooklyn and Manhattan Bridges, of the smoke billowing out over the Manhattan skyline, occluding the sun.

    Some friends of mine watched the fire spread down the floors from the plane crashes before the towers collapsed.

    http://www.kband.com/photo/

    High-resolution versions of these photographs are available on request.

    --

    --
    Make mine methylphenidate.

  251. Kabul by automatic_man · · Score: 1

    The northern allience has just confirmed responsibility for the explosions in Kabul. They say more are planned.

    --
    "On the Internet, everyone is an equal until they prove themselves to be a moron." - Emmanuel Goldstein
  252. Just a New update by beefstu01 · · Score: 1

    If you haven't already noticed, Afghanistan just went boom. You know what? I think that the world is just being destroyed right before us

    1. Re:Just a New update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afghan Explosions Not U.S. Strike - U.S. Officials
      News from afghanradio
      http://www.afghanradio.com/news/2001/september/s ep 11cc2001.html

  253. Keeping informed by posting rumours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try loggin off and turning on the TV news or the radio. I would be hard-pressed to call Katz' blurd & Hemo's rumour-mongering news; if anything they offered an outlet for confused people.

    Mod me down if you like but my office is 7 blocks from the towers and I watched the first one collapse; it was too dark to see the second one go down.

    It's a tragedy and I'm still in shock but save the Katz editorials for school-shootings in middle america and save the posting of unconfirmed reports to DrudgeReport.

    Assholes.

  254. World busiest border reopen by brujito · · Score: 1

    The USA/Mexico border has been reopen. I was stuck there for a long time. The one in Tijuana close to san diego.

  255. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Pulzar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess the lesson is that all future US flights should have police/military personnel on board, so that there's somebody equipped to fight people with knives and cardboard cutters.

    I've heard all the Israeli passenger flights have a soldier on board. Can anyone confirm/deny that?

    --
    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
  256. Chinese Response by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    Sorry if this seems a little redundant, but this is the response I have seen from the chinese. I don't think they did it or anything, but I thought they the abscence of condemnation was worrying.

    From the BBC Website...

    Chinese President Jiang Zemin sent a message to President Bush, expressing sympathy over the attacks and "grave concern" for the safety of Chinese in the United States, the official Xinhua news agency reported.

  257. Congrats Taco & the rest of the /. crew by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Given the volume of traffic online today.. you guys have done a great job keeping this site up and runnning smoothly.

    Congratulations and Thanks!

  258. How hard was this, really? by bcboy · · Score: 1

    I'm seeing all these "official" speakers talking about how this must have involved an organization of at least 30-40 people, that it took months or years to plan, lots of training... one "security expert" claiming they had to have at least four people on the "inside" -- working for the airlines.

    I find this all rather hard to believe. Airport security has always looked like a joke to me -- more hand waving to reassure the public than really effective measures.

    Why would it take months to book a few flights, get a few phony ID's, and smuggle a few crude weapons on board? Probably the flight crews would give up very quickly, not expecting that the plane was going to be purposely destroyed.

    The biggest surprise is that this hasn't happened many times before.

  259. No one ever suspects Canada :P by mlheur · · Score: 1

    I think we canadians are just fed up with people making fun of our military. Now someone's done it. They've gone and taken the gun and started a war.
    You hear comedians talking about it all the time on Just for Laughs, well now it's happened.
    I just hope that no one realizes that when we say we spent billions on R&D for our new B-Double-A's that it actually stands for Bow And Arrow.

    I realize the seriousness of what's been going on, and my sorrow and prayers go out for those in need, but I do think it necessary to be light-hearted and to find ways to laugh at life and to keep moving on.

  260. Re:disturbing google newsgroup thread / prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check that newsgroup with a newsgroup reader, and search for that guys name. He last posted on 9/11/01 at 6:55 PM. He is not dead, so he cannot be one of the hijakers...

  261. The bombs in Kabul.. by Segador · · Score: 1

    Are part of the civil war. US is not involved.
    Btw... An hotel (I dont know, I'm in Barcelona now) beside TWC is about to collapse in
    any moment.

    --
    ==
    That's the time harvesters,that's the time to be care
    get back all this people, so ostentatious and arrogan
  262. Pics/Video Site Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lots of other pics + video sites + new digital cam shots available at http://www.subterrain.net/wtc FYI

  263. Re:Kabul attack-US Officials say not involved by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    this is probably just crap, but I have heard from a not very reliable source that the taleban are firing on bin laden's base.

    Make of that what you will. Personally I reckon that the taleban might just be scared enough of US retaliation to do it.

  264. If I was the Taliban... by dmoen · · Score: 1

    If I was a leader of the Taliban, I'd be moving pretty quickly to put Osama Bin Laden under arrest, for lots of good reasons. If I was Bin Laden, I'd be resisting arrest, possibly with the help of my own personal army.

    Doug Moen.

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:If I was the Taliban... by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      I agree - the Taliban has been trying very hard in the past weeks to gain some sort of legitimacy in the eyes of other countries (for example, allowing the imprisoned foreigners from Shelter Now to have foreign non-Muslim lawyers, and trying to set up their trial as an example of how fair Islamic Sharia law is). I would think that a good way to do this would be to change their previous story of "Osama bin Laden is our guest, and we have been given no conclusive evidence that he has commited any crimes, so must presume his innocence and treat him as a guest" to one of "ok, now we have evidence, so he has abused his status as a guest and we will now expel him from the country."

  265. Not so strange by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    While no public accusations of blame were made by the U.S. government, senior officials, along with experts on terrorism, were unanimous in their belief that the attacks were the work of Osama bin Laden, the Saudi exile who leads the shadowy Al-Qaeda terrorist organization. [MSNBC]

    Everyone has jumped to that conclusion because it fits his modus operandi so perfectly, including a boastful video tape alluding to such attacks that has circulated around the middle east in recent weeks (as did similar tapes prior to the attacks in Yemen, our embassies in Africa, etc.).

    If and when we determine that it was, in fact, Osama bin Laden I fervently hope we eradicate the bastards and any country which has given him and his followers any form of aid and comfort. If said eradication were to include the use of nuclear weapons I, for one, would not be in the least upset by this. On the contrary, at this moment I would probably cheer. Guilt is for later, after we have killed the enemy and exterminated the vermin, eliminating the threat once and for all.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If said eradication were to include the use of nuclear weapons I, for one, would not be in the least upset by this. On the contrary, at this moment I would probably cheer. Guilt is for later, after we have killed the enemy and exterminated the vermin, eliminating the threat once and for all."

      I love like minded people. If we got rid of these people they wouldn't be a problem. What right do they have to live being the way that they are.

    2. Re:Not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'If said eradication were to include the use of nuclear weapons I, for one, would not be in the least upset by this'

      Are you out of your goddamn mind? Willing to cause slow death to our planet out of revenge to 1 particular organization??

      Americans, sheesh...

    3. Re:Not so strange by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If and when we determine that it was, in fact, Osama bin Laden I fervently hope we eradicate the bastards and any country which has given him and his followers any form of aid and comfort. If said eradication were to include the use of nuclear weapons I, for one, would not be in the least upset by this.
      That's disgusting. The United States has done many, many bad things. It has been the source of millions of deaths over the years. Does this justify an attack on the citizens of the US? I would think not. It is unfair to blame the many individuals in the nation collectively for the actions of its government and elite.

      However, you seem to believe that the actions of those in another country condemn the innocent citizens of that country.

      I certainly hope you are simply speaking irrationally and out of reaction to your anger. For your words here are morally reprehensible. The actions you propose are exactly analogous to the actions of the terrorists.

    4. Re:Not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, kill all the people. no more problem. twit

    5. Re:Not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everyone has jumped to that conclusion because it fits his modus operandi so perfectly, including a boastful video tape alluding to such attacks that has circulated around the middle east in recent weeks (as did similar tapes prior to the attacks in Yemen, our embassies in Africa, etc.).

      If and when we determine that it was, in fact, Osama bin Laden I fervently hope we eradicate the bastards and any country which has given him and his followers any form of aid and comfort

      Hmmm... If you consider the fact that those attacks were carefully organised and timed ; that they calculated nearly maximal media coverage (a first tower was hit, then the media came, then the other, and then both could collapse live, and their collapse will be repeated every 10 minutes on many TVs on the world : compare with Pentagone crash: not much to show)... Then you should consider that US reaction was calculated to be pretty quick and hard. I won't be surprised if false "proofs" and "tracks" would have be spoofed, so that the wrong guys get punished in an attempt of hasty justice.

      On the contrary, at this moment I would probably cheer. Guilt is for later, after we have killed the enemy and exterminated the vermin, eliminating the threat once and for all.

      Eliminating the vermin? Nuke a country because of 4 hijackers armed with knives? Half of the world would be instant enemy of the US. Maybe *this* was calculated.

    6. Re:Not so strange by pspeed · · Score: 2

      Nuking a country on this planet is the equivalent of pissing in your own drinking water.

      Note: we are still feeling the affects of the Chernobl accident. Albeit, in very minor ways. Radiation is like that.

      --
      Edu. sig-line: Choose rhymes with lose. Chose rhymes with goes. Loose rhymes with goose.
      Comparing? THEN use THAN.
    7. Re:Not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't give me that Americans, sheesh.. crap. That was one persons opinon, not a whole nations! You group yourself with the one your chastising. If I were to group mankind, I guess I'd have to say, religious fanatics, sheesh.. More damn blood has been spilled over some fictious entity called GOD. When is man going to realize that this GOD they're looking for is the collective conscience of all mankind and there will be no peace until they growup and stop draging their knuckles on the ground.

    8. Re:Not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You evil, disgusting bastard, I'm just glad you posted you comments where everyone could see. I will make sure that every potential customer in this country knows what a pathetic, incompetent job your company does on web design - to fit with unmitigated sludge that is your soul.

      The U.S. is the only nation in history to give more to the world than it has taken, and you shit on it, you scum.

    9. Re:Not so strange by Flavius+Stilicho · · Score: 1

      "However, you seem to believe that the actions of those in another country condemn the innocent citizens of that country."

      When I see news broadcasts of swarms cheering in the streets, handing out candy in celebration, then yes, I do.

      I am sad to say that the time has come to finally stoop to their level. We need to respond swiftly and brutally and the response needs to be so unbelievably brutal and horrifying that no one will ever again consider attacking us for fear that everything and everyone they know and love will be utterly destroyed in response. We need to demonstrate this to the rest of the world and we need to do it every time we are attacked so that instead of cheering in the streets, they are cowering in their holes waiting for the violent death they know is coming.

      Sick, disgusting and horrible -- yes. It saddens me deeply to realize that only when the nations (and their citizens) harboring and supporting these terrorist groups are made to pay dearly will this stop.

  266. not fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    let's hope that the American government can set an example in not responding with force until it is COMPLETELY positive who it is retaliating against, and let's hope as well that civilian casualties that come from the retaliation are minimal.


    Let's not imply that my country's government will use wanton killing of civilians as a means of justice.


    We set a precident in the Gulf War of attacking the military and war-production facilities of hostile nations/factions, not innocent civilians.


    I'm confident we will respond in a measured, fierce manner. The idea is to cripple war-making faculties, no innocents.

    1. Re:not fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We set a precident in the Gulf War of attacking the military and war-production facilities of hostile nations/factions, not innocent civilians

      Do you ACTUALLY believe this crap? Hundred of thousands of civilians died in Gulf War. And situation if only slightly better in Yugoslavia. Of course there was CNN, NATO brainwashing. If many people in the US think the same as you, then you do deserve those terrorist acts, sorry for the innocent civilians. You are getting an extremely small sample of your own medecine.

    2. Re:not fair by debrain · · Score: 2
      Agreed. Few countries have committed the atrocities that can be pinpointed on the US. Especially in terms of their indirect involvement in other nations by supplying arms and munitions for guerilla warfare especially.


      The irony is that the most devastating weapon from war-making facilities of a suicidal culture is from the civilians: suicidal bombers.

  267. ddos afganistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARe they even on the internet? if so, shut them out, do what you can to prevent them from using internet

    1. Re:ddos afganistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Taliban has already banned Internet use in Afghanistan.

  268. Afghanistan Update by GNUman · · Score: 2, Informative

    From CNN.com:
    BREAKING NEWS
    Afghanistan opposition claims responsibility for Kabul explosions. Details soon.

  269. You are an idiot!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I agree that the U.S. foreign policy can be wrong in many areas, however, that doesn't justify todays action. The problem is that the U.S. is too wimpy these days to do anything signifigant.I hope I can eat my words later. I wonder if this would have happened had these type of people had the fear that we would retailiate with everything e.g. B-52 carpet bombing etc. Screw the surgical strikes. Totally devistate like the Romans. These people only understand that type of language.

  270. why they chose boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who has flown out of boston knowns what a joke the security here is. it's no surprise that they chose Logan. Hopefully this will be an impetus for our country to get some real airport security like you see in European countries.

    1. Re:why they chose boston by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Nah, all the terrorists had were knives. Knives of all things. Probably could have been caught, but it wasn't like they got a gun on the plane. No the reason they probably chose Boston was its a long flight to LA so the planes would be big and full of fuel. Bigger mess that way.

      My heart goes out to everybody touched by this terrible act.

      --
      If not now, when?
  271. No stripping news coverage by eyeball · · Score: 2

    It's good to see that the people at The Naked News have the good taste to suspend programming in light of today's tragedy.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  272. Mod this guy up!!! by roystgnr · · Score: 2

    Good point, AC! Too many people are advocating insane retaliation levels (nuclear weapons?! genocide?!) without knowing all the facts.

    Anyway, that little bit of news disgusted me. Something like $50 million dollars were given to a fucking police state theocracy because they'd been successful at reducing opium exports!

    I don't want to jump to conclusions; I don't know if Ben Ladin was responsible for today's disaster... but that money went from corrupt politicians to totalitarian monsters, whether they happen to be today's monsters or not.

  273. A great disturbance in the Force... by Rimbo · · Score: 1

    As if a million voices cried out in terror...and were suddenly silenced.

    I fear something terrible has happened.

  274. Sig An Allen Fronten!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sig An Allen Fronten!!!!!

  275. Who the Lady with the Cell Phone Was by Landaras · · Score: 2, Informative

    Barb Olsen was the passenger on the plane that went down in PA who called out on her cell phone.

    She was the wife of Ted Olsen, Solicitor General of the United States. Mr. Olsen represents the United States in cases that appear before the Supreme Court.

    I will not even begin to speculate on how this will impact our response to the terrorism.

    1. Re:Who the Lady with the Cell Phone Was by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      She was using her cellphone on an airplane? No wonder it went down...

      --Dan

  276. Is this going to spark a new terrorist spree? by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 1

    using aeroplanes as weapons?

    I've certainly never heard of it before, but it's a damn good idea (IF your a terrorist - a terrorist, not me. i'm not a terrorist) as we've seen they have quite an impact, and loaded with passengers, they can't exactly shoot them down. (especially not if they're flying over built up areas). So it seems the only way to prevent this is airport security. which by all accounts sucks on internal flights (and is definitly dubious on external).
    Have planes been used as weapons in the past?

    although we still don't know quite what they stand for, they definitly have our attention when they finally tell us. Pity it takes this kind of thing to make a statement. Peaceful campaigners never get this kind of publicity..

    1. Re:Is this going to spark a new terrorist spree? by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      "Have planes been used as weapons in the past?
      "

      Yes WWII. The Japanese Kamakazis. It was indefensible.

    2. Re:Is this going to spark a new terrorist spree? by jeff's+cape+shop · · Score: 1

      oh yeah!

      no i really meant commercial flight planes.

      kamakazis were fighter planes right? with bombs too? (i have no idea)

    3. Re:Is this going to spark a new terrorist spree? by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      Well yeah but the suicided into ships so its the same thing in a sense.

  277. Re: My God, what happened? (Tragedy of the commons by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Notice that I did open the possibility that it wasn't the Palestinians. But I had a typo when I said the 'data' was indicative, rather it's the 'date' that's indicative, as the anniversary of the Camp David Peace Accord. There is speculation that the Pittsburgh airplane was headed there. There is also some feeling that the World Trade Center was an important target to Bin-Laden, as a symbol of American Money, and considering that there had already been one attempt.

    You're right in it's early to rush to judgement.

    But at the moment, the two most likely parties appear to be Palestinians or anti-globalization Slashdotters. I really don't believe the IRA would touch this one.

    Besides, until enough facts come out to sway public opinion that it's NOT Palestinian, they'll most likely bear the brunt of blame.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  278. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, they used to have US Marshalls onboard commercial flights (in the 50s?), so they may again...

  279. Tried to vote... (Buffalo,NY) by cnicolai · · Score: 1

    > VOTE!

    Thanks for reminding me! I read your message, dashed down to the polls, and they were closed. Closed sometime this morning apparently, with no word on when or if they'll reopen.

    NY State seems to be generally overreacting around here. I work at the state univ. at Buffalo; they closed early too.

    So everyone else: go vote! I'll join you when they let me.

    1. Re:Tried to vote... (Buffalo,NY) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know about overreacting, it's more out of respect imo

  280. Knives?! I don't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find that hard to believe.

    Are you telling me that upwards of 50 people (per plane... not so sure about that number) were herded by a hand-full with KNIVES?!

    Hell, *I* would take a crack at a terrorist armed with nothing but a knife, especially if I were across the isle from someone anywhere near as big as I am (6'2" 210lbs).

    Not to say that I'm athletic or anything, but I took a little wrestling in jr. high, and have a little martial arts training here and there. I would CHEERFULLY lay my life on the line in a situation like that... and there are people around who are bigger, braver, and better trained than I.

    It is written that we should love our wives as Jesus loved the church. He laid down his life for us, and we can be expected to do no less for our loved ones.

    To have a chance at success, a highjacker needs to establish that he/she/it is NOT TO BE FUCKED WITH. A knife just isn't going to cut it (pun intended).

    Next theory please.

    On the other hand, if this does turn out to be true (anything's possible, today has certianly proven that), then these guys must have been Highly Skilled in hand-to-hand, and probably had to deal with exactly the kind of attack I would have participated in.

    --Mark (shouldn't have bothered to come to work today for all the good I've done... couple slashdot posts and 30 lines of code to show for it)

  281. Give Peace a Chance.... by sdprenzl · · Score: 1

    All retaliation is at least one order of magnitude above what the original wrongdoing called for. The Nazis come to mind, and now this attack today. Violence always escalates because the involved parties believe they will "teach the other side a lesson." The lesson of violence only teaches retaliation at least one order of magnitude too severe.

    --
    --- WWSD? What Would Strider Do?
  282. Re: My God, what happened? (Tragedy of the commons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe but the palestinians were the only ones celebrating the event on tv.

  283. Flight Explorer Graphic by eddiem · · Score: 1

    ... is at

    http://www.filepile.org:8080/f/pictures/ual175_a al 11.gif

    Shows the flight path of 2of4 planes involved.

  284. AMEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much faster would we have been able to access news if pop-up ads had REALLY been suspended?

  285. DoD threat condition by dave_c · · Score: 1

    They are all at Threatcon Delta. Their website currently only lists their status as of the beginning of the attacks, which was Threatcon Charlie.

    Many (most?) military facilities have been at Force Protection Condition Alpha since the bombings at the American Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania back in 1998 ('FPCON' replaced 'THREATCON' in June as the official term so as to avoid confusion with the Department of State's 'Threat Levels' for countries or regions).

  286. WTF!?!?! by 11390036 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I was under the impression /. was a site about computers and technology.... There hasn't been a non-terrorist posting all day!

    While we are on the subject... I think this will hurt the rights of everyone, globally. With heightened threats come heightened security, and more sophisticated monitoring tools. I think this will detract from what we consider 'anonymity'. Everything will be more closely watched, including you and I.

    The US and I'm sure other governments don't want something this horrid to happen again. I believe they will stop at nothing.

    Think, facial recognition in public areas, carnivore efforts stepped up + greater public support. I really fear these enevidable results. The US government will use this to 'hijack' their way into our lives.

    Ouch... very ouch.

    1. Re:WTF!?!?! by Graymalkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Several thousand people died today in the course of a few hours. Tonight someone's got to explain to some 5 year old why their mommy or daddy isn't coming home. Rescue workers that rushed to help people evacuate the first building were trapped under the debris of the second building when the second plane hit. 233 people boarded planes this morning along with 25 attendants and 6 command crew members. They thought they were going to suffer jet lag after landing in LA and San Fransisco. Instead they were turned into human bombs. Go fuck yourself you goddamned piece of shit.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    2. Re:WTF!?!?! by 11390036 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you didn't understand what I meant.

      Yes people died, thank you for those statistics which OMG, I couldn't have found *anywhere else*.

      Yes this is a tragedy, I'm not downplaying this at all.

      This isn't the editorial area slashdot is typically in and I'm simply highlighting this fact. Yes its tragic, but so is any loss of life, people die on a daily basis, but we don't hear about that on slashdot,unless its someone in the technology field, but then, its technology related.....

      I cannot stand stupid people like you. You're the stupid piece of shit.

    3. Re:WTF!?!?! by 11390036 · · Score: 1

      In addition....

      The bulk of my post was about how our notion of 'free' wont be the same because of how our government will take this opportunity to ramp up 'anti-terrorism' efforts.

  287. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by rknop · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aditionally, I just heard, that Barbara Olsen, passenger on one of the planes, told her husband, that the terrorists were armed with no more than "knives and cardboard cutters".

    Ummm...without trying to sound callous...how did CNN hear of this? Aren't all the passengers dead? Moderators, please READ the posts prior to hitting MODERATE. It helps.

    The report I heard on one of the news stations was that Barbara Olsen called her husband from the plane to tell him that it had been hijacked. I believe that this was the plane that went into the Pentagon.

    I have nothing to back this up other than what I heard on (I believe) CBS.

    -Rob

  288. Pork Grease on US Arms by HerrGlock · · Score: 2

    and fill hollowpoints with bacon. Time to not allow others to follow to Allah.

    DanH

    --
    Cav Pilot's Reference Page
    UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins anymore
  289. Please don't speculate at this point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I ask only this of you fellow slashdotters... Please don't make crap up or speculate at this point. It only causes more harm.

    WE DO NOT KNOW who was responsible for the attacks yet. You could guess at Middle-Eastern countries, but that just helps to alienate and insult the middle-easterners who were innocent (which is most of them.) For all we know, it may as well have been an ally.

    Today at my school many people who looked middle-eastern (notice I said LOOKED, they may not have even been) were picked on. This stems from hate and fear, which BOTH come out of ignorance. We need to shut up about what hasn't been proven.

    And the same goes for the explosions, etc., in other countries.

    I will have the most accurate, truthful information I can find along with many pictures and videos on my website, ModernPsycho.com, which has not been slashdotted *yet*.

    On a final note, my heart goes out to all that have been injured or killed from the day's events, or those close to people who have.

  290. Re:The Internet has Helped: Reaction by stcanard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just had a thought -- what effect is this going to have on the dissemination of civilian encryption technology?

    Right now everybody's trying to figure out how this could possibly have been planned in secret. Eventually the finger pointing is going to get around to encryption technology, and maybe even the recent lifting of restrictions.

    I fear we're about to be set back decades in the battle to effectively communicate in a private manner.

  291. fbi info site by yulek · · Score: 1

    http://www.ifccfbi.gov

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
  292. Notice the Date? by viper21 · · Score: 2

    Has anybody noticed that it is September 11? Or 9-11-01

    or 911.

    Coincidence? Or Irony.

    -S

    1. Re:Notice the Date? by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      Only the other 400 people who posted it before you.

      So what exactly do all you amateur numerologists claim it means? Maybe you can correlate it with the idiots who keep spouting about Nostrodamus.

      -Legion

  293. I really don't know what to say to this... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Part of me is outright angry at those who did this.
    Part of me wonders why there can't be peace on this earth.
    Part of me cries at the loss suffered by the families.
    Part of me is callous, and knows it was going to happen some day.
    Part of me stayed home this morning.
    Part of me went to work this afternoon.
    Part of me says "Go home now".
    Part of me says "Go hide under a rock".

    The whole of me is split - and I really don't know what to say...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  294. Mexican border by Wakkow · · Score: 1
    3.the Mexican border is completely closed . . .

    Not true. Local San Diego stations say it's open but each car is being inspected. Passage been slown to a halt.

  295. Re:Flight Explorer Graphic (fixed URL) by dsandler · · Score: 1
  296. it hit the 2nd building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    175 was a United plane and it was the plane that hit the second building.

  297. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by vrmlguy · · Score: 1
    From MSNBC:

    Little is known about the final moments on board the four hijacked airplanes used in Tuesday?s terrorist attacks but frantic phone calls from some passengers paint nightmarish scenes. In one, a man aboard United Airlines Flight 93 called an emergency dispatcher from a bathroom using a cell phone: "We are being hijacked, we are being hijacked!" he declared moments before the plane crashed near the Somerset County airport, about 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh.
    [...]
    On board the plane that crashed into the Pentagon, conservative political commentator Barbara Olson reportedly called her husband, U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson, on a cell phone: "Can you believe this ... we are being hijacked?" Then, the phone went dead.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  298. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If she called 911, what does this have to do with her husband???

  299. Camp David Accords by Nobelium · · Score: 1

    Well, since one of the crafts was heading to Camp David before it was shot down, let me say that the Camp David Accords was from September 5 to September 17, 1978. Although the 11th doesn't act as a significant day, it was somewhat a turning point day from where Isreal finaly came to the conclusion that they'd need to sign the agreement. Search google for the subject and read about it.

    Also, someone else says that tomorrow is / would have been the sentencing date for the first World Trade Center bombers (the ones who used a car with a bomb in it).

    --
    -Nicholas Blasgen
    1. Re:Camp David Accords by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Isn't everybody just assuming it was heading for Camp David? I cant see what the point is for crashing a plane into a holiday house. I reckon the maryland air national guard may very well have been the true target. This is of course,(Like everybody else) just speculation. http://www.mdang.ang.af.mil/

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  300. Odd to say the least. by madbobwiley · · Score: 1

    I found this article at the London Times site. Here are some excerpts.

    "Apparently no action was taken by air traffic controllers as they watched the first radar blips head south, instead of west, directly toward New York City."

    "When the second aircraft entered New York airspace, it apparently was not challenged about leaving its flight path minutes after the first aircraft, even though the fate of the first flight was already known."

    I'll let you all form you own opinions on this.

    --
    "He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man" --Dr. Johnson
    1. Re:Odd to say the least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I find it to be somewhat intrusting that when I go through a security gate at the airport I cant even sneak in a bottle of liquor, or if I have a penny in my pocket they almost strip search me... But these people somehow can organize several planes to crash only minutes apart!!! "wow that's unbelievable", everyone says. Everyone knows that war is good for the economy so what the hell!!!

      I hope everyone is prepared for 1984!!!!!

    2. Re:Odd to say the least. by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

      Reports said that they did this with knives...

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  301. Canadian Blood Donation by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

    Canadian Blood Services at 1-888-2-DONATE

    There's a blood bank at Sunnybrook in Toronto, but it's swamped -- so call the number first.

    There was a report that some burn victims might be airlifted to Sunnybrook. (500 miles) If they don't need the blood in Toronto, they can ship it on to New York.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  302. Send this around like spam by TThayer · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Send this around like spam by gurulegend · · Score: 1

      This wallpaper is sick.

      How about a picture of the NY skyline from Sept. 10th?

  303. Steps to get this escalation under control by thm-1 · · Score: 1

    - force isreal out of the settlement in palestina
    (bad moment, but necessary)
    - split jerusalem in parts of equal size and put in under un control
    - form a bilateral aliance us, eu, russia, china to coordinate actions against terrorism and make sure that every country responsible for originating of terrorism will be held responsive for this
    - remodel secret-services into dedicated terrorism fighting units

    1. Re:Steps to get this escalation under control by Segador · · Score: 1

      That's what common sense dict us.
      But honestly, i did'nt believe even this tragedy will break the long Israel/EU alliance.
      I will be fantastic and a constructive way to solve probelms.

      --
      ==
      That's the time harvesters,that's the time to be care
      get back all this people, so ostentatious and arrogan
  304. Nostradamus quote from circa 1674 by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 1

    "In the city of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers (the towers) torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress (pentagon) endures, the great leader will succumb", "the third big war will begin when the big city is burning"

    If this isn't as freaky as hell, I don't know what is.

    --
    [ ]
    1. Re:Nostradamus quote from circa 1674 by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      Once again, vague "predictions" from a fraud don't mean much when you consider the literally *thousands* of others he made which had absolutely no correlation with real life.

      -Legion

    2. Re:Nostradamus quote from circa 1674 by psike · · Score: 1

      How can NYC be considered the City of God? Maybe if this was Jurasalem...

    3. Re:Nostradamus quote from circa 1674 by Phiu-x · · Score: 0

      Was is the one thing that we (well, most people) worship in our capitalist society?

      See, money is the 21st century god.. and the WTC in New-York can very well represent that. I've heard and read most of Nostradamus stories as far back as when I was in grade school and I sincerely never thought it could be so close to reality as it seem to be now.

      My sympathy to all Americans and especially all the victims of this tragedy.

      Jonathan Dumas

      Quebec City
      Canada

      --
      This is a stolen sig.
    4. Re:Nostradamus quote from circa 1674 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you please start modding down this superstitious Nostradamus bullshit?

      See
      http://www.randi.org/
      http://www.csicop.org/
      http://www.skeptic.com/

    5. Re:Nostradamus quote from circa 1674 by Fjodor42 · · Score: 0

      Having written a few articles on Nostradamus, I am not surprised to see him mentioned in this context. "Two brothers": do you know, how many royal males where "brothers" in his time (not to mention, how many of them became enemies)? Fortresses where not peculiarities, and in 1654, you had 3 choices for "the big city": Rome (as the catholic center of the world), Paris (as Nostradamus' capital), and, of course, Babylon (as in the revelation. Sure, you can draw paralels to NY, but do you want to?).
      Do you remeber the verse mentioning Hitler? Oh, well, he wrote "Hister", but perhaps he didn't hear it right. Everyone just forgot, that "Hister" was the ancient name for the river Danube. With Hister=Danube, the whole verse makes sense, but with Hister=Hitler, only 1/2 of it does. Doesn't matter though, 'cause it sounds like Hitler, eh...?!?

      --
      "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."
  305. more updating links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here is list of stories related to the attack that should automatically update as more news gets posted around the internet.

  306. Robert Speisman killed in 2nd WTC plane by DaPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Robert Speisman, was the Senior Vice President - Sales of the Company, Lazare Kaplan International Diamonds since January 1999. He was Vice President - Sales of the Company from April 1986 until January 1999. Mr. Speisman had been a director of the Company since 1989. Mr. Speisman was the son-in-law of Maurice Tempelsman and the brother-in-law of Leon Tempelsman. He was a friend, and Uncle, a good husband to his wife Rena and a stupendous father to his children Tara, Britney, and Haley. He will be sorely missed. Keep on truckin' Uncle Bob! I love you! -Ray Barbiero

    --
    -- -=innocent ramblings from the mind of an insomniatic programmer=-
    1. Re:Robert Speisman killed in 2nd WTC plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The diamond industry exploits the native pople from the areas in which diamonds are mined.

      I'll chalk this one down as karma.

    2. Re:Robert Speisman killed in 2nd WTC plane by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      my condolences.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  307. Insightful - please read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    insightful

  308. Iraq by Utter · · Score: 1

    Iraq television has commented (but not condemned) to the act against the U.S:
    "The fruit of the american crimes against humanity"

  309. Viet Nam in one day by simetra · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind, American (USA) casualties in Viet Nam were approx 50,000. We probably lost the same number of people today.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Viet Nam in one day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heheh... one lady in the tv said at least million have died. i'd say max 2.000.

  310. South Park does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when everyone is this emotional, you do need to laugh as well as cry from time to time

  311. Thoughts from an observer by AndrewRF · · Score: 1
    I was about 10 blocks away when the first tower went down (was downtown for jury duty) and the whole experience has been a difficult one to process. How we as a nation choose to respond will play itself out over the days to come, but there is one thing that I know I would like to see happen:

    Rebuild the towers

    Put a memorial in between, but build them back up and make them even bigger this time. Send a clear message both the citizens of this country and to the terrorists who would threaten us. You can knock them down, but we'll build them right back. We won't be broken and we will not live in fear.

    My sympathies victims, their families and all those affected by today's tragedies.

    --
    ./a.out
    1. Re:Thoughts from an observer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was across the river on Court Street when this happened. If they rebuild those tower I don't know who is going to want to work there. Certainly not me.

    2. Re:Thoughts from an observer by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Maybe I am alone in this, but you know what I would like to see instead of rebuilding the towers even bigger and more dominant than ever?

      A memorial park.

      To hell with furthering the arrogance that was these people's excuse to attack us so brutally. To hell with 'bigger better faster more', to hell with 'we will make our new architectural penis even LONGER!'. To HELL with all of that, the posturing, the arrogance, the chest-thumping American machismo that got us in this position. It didn't come from nowhere.

      Clear the rubble, bury the countless dead and plant something green- let's have a memorial park.

    3. Re:Thoughts from an observer by AndrewRF · · Score: 1
      Thanks for your response. I don't suggest rebuilding the towers for the sake of posturing, arrogance and American machismo. I'd like to see them rebuilt so that having gone through the suffering and the grief, we can know that who we are and our way of life, imperfect though it may be, will not be broken and will not be dictated to us.

      I certainly support the idea of a memorial (park or otherwise). Put it between the towers, though, don't make it an either or.

      --
      ./a.out
    4. Re:Thoughts from an observer by AndrewRF · · Score: 1

      Perhaps so. Thanks for your thoughts.

      --
      ./a.out
    5. Re:Thoughts from an observer by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Our way of life is not office blocks. Our way of life is not towers, glass, steel, the power to control the life of the rest of the world. That's not the way we started out, that's not the only theme in our literature, that's not all there is.

      I'm not singling you out, I'm reacting to MANY people I've seen who have just the same opinion- "make newer bigger towers because it symbolizes our way of life!". Maybe, in the context of the larger world, it symbolizes our way of death, and damn straight it symbolizes to most of the rest of the world, 'we can kick your ass, look how rich and powerful we are'. I'm not okay with perpetuating that, and so my notion of what should be done is to turn the site into a memorial park INSTEAD of more towers.

      That would not be a rejection of our way of life- because the WTC did NOT really represent our way of life. It represented a particular tendency we as Americans have- and I think we need to consider exactly what that means rather than just charge even more determinedly along the path that has led us to this.

  312. Nobody's a Hero? by bdrexler · · Score: 1

    A lady called her husband from the bathroom of the plain that crashed into the Pentagon. She said the only weapons the terrorists had were knifes and cardboard cutters. I can't believe that of all the people on that plane, or the others for that matter, that nobody tried to "be the hero." Seems like someone on at least one of those planes could have been a big bad man, of course this isn't the movies no matter how much we want it to be....

    --


    "Excuses are like asses, everyone has one and they all stink." - Adam Corrola
    1. Re:Nobody's a Hero? by Utter · · Score: 1

      Well, people probably assumed that it was a normal hijacking. This mostly ends up in some airport in a third-world country and some demands of releasing other terrorists from prison. So you can't blame people from not risking their lives.

    2. Re:Nobody's a Hero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heroism is a tall order.

  313. Server down.... by rew · · Score: 1

    The server for wtc-top.com seems to be down.

    Read the google-cache at:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:pAFmM6tWlqU :w ww.wtc-top.com/funfacts.html+wtc+facts&hl=en

    Roger.

  314. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the right thing to do by weston · · Score: 2

    I fully agree with you that Nuclear Retaliation
    is thoroughly unjustified right now. ANY large
    scale attack that kills innocent civilians is
    unjustified.

    However, Hiroshima and Nagasaki may very well have
    been the right thing to do in their times. It's
    easy to forget that without such a display of
    devastating force, Japan would likely not have
    surrendered, and we would have spent thousands upon thousands of lives -- Japanese as well as American -- fighting to take them by conventional methods.

    It's absolutely awful what happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I don't deny that. However, faced with equally awful alternatives, the US made a choice, and it may have even been the better choice.

  315. Battle Hymn by isotope23 · · Score: 1

    Sung to "The Battle Hymn of the Republic"

    Mine eyes have seen the eagle, body bloodied, feathers torn.
    Head bowed in sorrow and remembrance as he mourns.
    The clenching of his talons and the vengeance he has sworn.
    The Eagle will fly on

    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    The Eagle will fly on

    Through the fires and the bloodshed you can hear the call resound.
    At the altar of redemption, we will gather all around
    Taken up across the country, heavens shaken by the sound.
    The eagle shall fly on

    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    The eagle shall fly on

    You can hear his cries of fury ring from every mountainside.
    His shriek of fiery justice will no longer be denied.
    He will strike the bloody-handed for the innocent who died.
    The Eagle still flies on

    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    The eagle still flies on.

    With Golden eyes of judgment and a beak of blackened steel
    To avenge the wrongly fallen, he will heed their last appeal
    He will fly unto the wicked and bring them all to kneel.
    The eagle still flies on

    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    The eagle still flies on.

    He will rise above the maelstrom, he will soar upon the wind.
    He shall fall upon the guilty and reward them for their sin
    From the ashes of destruction he will rise to fly again.
    The eagle shall fly on

    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!
    The eagle shall fly on!

    mhall - 9/11/01

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  316. Usenet poster knew? by maskdmirag · · Score: 1

    I found this threw a post on penny-arcade.

    A guy on usenet alt.prophecies.nostradamus warned of something happening on 9/11 and he posted it on sep. 4th.

    then today he follows up saying he knew this was happening.

    read posts 1 and 7

    the read this

    1. Re:Usenet poster knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone show this to someone outside of Slashdot.

      Not it.

    2. Re:Usenet poster knew? by maskdmirag · · Score: 1

      it's been reported to the fbi already, and it seems others on slashdot have seen it. and people who have called the fbi have been informed they are well aware of it.

  317. "Mod me down as some fanatic" -- he asked for it by paranoid.android · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Uhh, so hijackers crashing planes into downtown Manhattan, killing hundreds or thousands of civilians and leveling the most important center of trade in the USA is somehow US Gov't policymakers' fault? Sorry, don't follow you.

  318. Retaliation methods by cybrpnkr · · Score: 1



    The big issue right now all over seems to be how to go about retaliating to this tragedy. I am rather offended by the people that quickly say that we should bomb the snot out of all the people involved without thinking anything over.

    I really thing this incident is attempted murder of capitolism and really should be dealt with as such. The US has been stepping on so many countries for so long that this catastrophe was long in the making. Why else would they pick the WTC? Law enforcement is a substitute for a dysfunctional system of government. Until our government becomes perfect, law enforcement will be necessary to some degree, but with this situation I believe we need to work on our system and not our intelligence agencies.

    If you weren't aware, the US is frowned upon for executing such a minimal amount of prisoners each year by Europe, one of our major trade partners. The death penelty is seen as a form of revenge, or murder. Europe believes that revenge should be left behind in the past with the middle ages. Even from a capitolist standpoint, going ahead with a massive revenge campaign would cut down on so many trade options.

    Instead of retaliating with force, I believe we have to retaliate with change. We need to work with other nations without profits in mind. Our nation needs to work toward a system of Marxist Communism where everyone helps each other without personal benifit in mind. Once we are done getting New York back in order, don't stop there! There are so many things in your community you could do to help out. Contribute without monatary or religious reasons.

    Right now I see the US similar to the Nazi's. We try to be in complete control of everything, maybe not as severe as the Nazi's, but we still try to clear a space for ourselves to lead perfect worry free lives, and everything that is wrong we try to put out of view, much like the 1950's. This is our awakening that everything isn't perfect. The world is too large, it is too difficult to have complete control over. People can't be stopped from not fitting in the system. Eventually the lowest class will take on the highest.

    Finally the underdog has giving us a taste of the tragedy, like what is everpresent in their own lives. Finally the rich that worked in the WTC have been pulled from their perfect lives and shoved into a catastrophe. I agree with the goal of the hijacking, although I am completely opposed to the means they used to prove their point. It's so very sad that so many people had to die today, but revenge isn't the way to set things right. I hope I might have convinced some of you.

    -cybrpnkr, a dumbass suburbian kid from the midwest

    Suggested Reading:
    A Series of Shock Slogans and Mindless Token Tantrums

    A document by the 1st wave punk band crass, describing how to live in global unity through anarchy. Some of it is conspiracy theory, although much can be learned from it.

    1. Re:Retaliation methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      cybrpnkr, a dumbass suburbian kid from the midwest

      No need to repeat yourself.

  319. I am horrified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    People cheering and celebrating. Doctors in Saudi Arabia (and other staff) pumping their fists and cheering when they see this.

    I don't care WHAT YOUR POLITICS ARE... anyone that could actually cheer the loss of human life (civilian by the way) is a pathetic excuse for existence. Plus, this really (and I hate to say this) shows the true face of Arabs and Islam. Islam... you have failed humanity, so expect to be punished.

  320. today's traffic by psych031337 · · Score: 1

    soccerdad writes "Due to the activities of today, the internet/networking experts at my firm have been asked by some of our clients to be on standby in case anything untoward occurs. They've been monitoring backbone activity, etc., in a "just in case" mode. They've described the activity they're seeing as somewhat strange. The backbone is, according to them, at about 80% utilization -- they've never seen it above 40% before. However, the main portal sites such as Yahoo aren't having substantively higher than normal traffic. They're working on doing some traffic analysis but haven't completed that effort yet."

    Weird. With all those news sites down during the hot phase (not that it was cooling down by now, but you know what I mean) one might wonder of there was actually more to it than information-hungry citizens. A timed DDoS attack? Using long-made backdoors to accurately take out specific sites at a given point? Paranoia?

    Can someone more knowledgeable elaborate on the possibilities (Traffic Analysis, log checking, packet statistics, ...).
    --
    +++ath0
  321. One group that could profit from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am worried that the attacks were not Terrorist at all. One nasty twist that I could come up with is that Israeli forces did this and planted evidence to make it look like Palestinian terrorists.

    Why? Well one scenario is Israel frustrated at losing US support of its tactical measures against Palestine uses special forces to commit this atrocity as a "Palestinian attack" to galvanize US support for continuing violence against Palestinians.

    That is complete heresy with not a scrap of truth to it, but ideas like that chill me a lot more than a terrorist attack.

    1. Re:One group that could profit from this... by dpilot · · Score: 2

      >but ideas like that chill me a lot more than a terrorist attack

      How about this one?

      What's the time from infection to symptoms for Anthrax? One can hope that this was ONLY planes and car bombs, as bad as those are. Imagine adding biologicals...

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:One group that could profit from this... by Samrobb · · Score: 1

      I was doing my own paranoid-fantasy spinning... imagine that the NSA/CIA knew of or were fairly sure about this, but decided to downplay the risk in order to up the chance of getting some beefy anti-terrorist powers afterwards.

      Or imagine a wealthy, ruthless individual, who's really only interested in taking out the WC and causing a US stock market collapse so s/he can profit from the chaos; and who manipulates a bunch of fanatics into doing the actual dirty work.

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
  322. Another picture by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1
    Another picture, it's the south tower collapsing. http://www.canoe.qc.ca/Topo/topophotodujour.html

    And many things on this page (it's in french though, but you can find some pictures). http://www.cyberpresse.ca/reseau/actualites/0109/a ct_101090013238.html

    I live in Canada and we all see this on almost every TV channel and every radio station since this morning. The images we can see are simply horrific and unthinkable. What scares me most is that it could lead to a WWIII. And I don't want to.

    I and my friends express our sincerest sympathy to the family's victims and all the USA.

  323. afghanian news site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some info on the current state of this torn nation:

    http://www.afghania.com/

    powered by SlashCode

  324. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to ban these dangerous knives from our city streets and airports. I ask that everyone join with me and sign my petition to ban the carrying of concealed cutlery.

  325. The U.S. government has a history of violence. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    The U.S. government has a history of thinking that violence is the answer. The U.S. government killed 2,100,000 people in Vietnam and maybe 150,000 people in Iraq. The U.S. has bombed 14 countries in 30 years, killing a roughly estimated 3,000,000 people. None of the people who were killed were in any way directly threatening the U.S.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  326. MOD THIS UP (or at least look and think about it) by weston · · Score: 2

    > >For the US to respond in force in less than 12 > >hours would practically imply that someone
    > >giving orders knew about the trade center
    > >attacks before they happened.

    > Funny you should mention this. When I was
    > driving to work this morning, I was listening to
    > the radio here in LA (KYSR, Jamie and
    > Danny) and someone had called in saying that
    > they were in the Army Reserve, and was told LAST
    > NIGHT to go on standby!

    Mod this up. This is important. If there's ANY indication the government knew something was up, then we need to know about it.

  327. Mirror for Images/Video by beefdart · · Score: 1

    We here at school have begun collecting images and video to help out with the bandwidth problem the news sites are having... Here Also feel free to send anything in...

    1. Re:Mirror for Images/Video by shogun · · Score: 1

      Here the link with http:// on it so it works:

      http://beefdart.csh.rit.edu/index.php

      But I think the site might be broken right now?...

  328. NOT American retribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QED

  329. CNN LIVE SOUND FEED by Turnesol · · Score: 2, Informative
    CNN Live Feed audio reflector

    I have set up a some shoutcast servers with the audio off CNN, for all those people who don't have access to CNN

    server1 server2

    --
    .:work is a selfinflicted handicap:.
  330. Geocities no good choice for high traffic by harmonica · · Score: 2

    If you're using geocities.com as a free service, your traffic per hour is restricted, so it's no good for providing pictures etc. IIRC, you have 3 GB / month, but your actual traffic is checked on an hourly basis and access is removed as soon as you go over a certain limit.

    Right now, your page looks like that:
    Access to this site will be restored within an hour.

  331. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to sound heartless, but isn't it illegal to use a cell phone on an airline? She could've gotten into a lot of trouble had she survived.

  332. Slashdot's Finest Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last count more than 5400 comments have been posted about today's terrorist attacks, including one story which has broken the all-time record for Most Active Stories. This goes to show how powerful online discussion forums like Slashdot are and how useful of a communication medium it truly is.

    The Internet was designed to keep operating under nuclear attack. Despite today's heavy online traffic not only is /. still running, but like ham radio networks, communication is still fluid!

  333. Predicted in a Newsgroup Thread?? by (eternal_software) · · Score: 1

    You guys might want to read this:

    "Wait 7 days, and then maybe I'll answer this post. You see, I am going away
    in seven days, and you will not hear from me again."

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&frame=righ t& th=54ab4d241c34e0cc&seekm=3b8fd177%40monitor.lanse t.com#link1

  334. Re:Knives?! I don't buy it. by swoopx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You are looking at the situation now that its happened. No one on that would have thought in a million years they were about to be flown into a building. Not even a small thought in the back of their mind. Its never happened and hopefully never will again. What usually happens when someone hijacks a plane? They set the plane down somewhere and make some demands and eventually everyone is released unharmed. Now, in the future hijacking a plane with a knife probably won't get you very far. Now that people have seen this.

  335. this is NOT American retribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read the updates

  336. http://www.google.com/currentevents/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.google.com/currentevents/ has links that are cached/ not quite flooded

  337. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by mrgoat · · Score: 1

    Thank you, you actually claim a source! Sorry if I sound a little out of it, but I don't own a television. This means that I don't really have a context for some of these posts, so a little more explanation actually helps. I do appreciate the extra effort. I still don't see what the original poster has found out that has to do with cardboard cutters...maybe the original thread poster can give some insight?

    --

    'Hail Eris, baby, hail Eris...pfffffffttt.' *cough* 'Yeah.'
  338. If you have any information, the fbi has a site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard on cnn shoutcast stream (http://131.174.207.13:8000) that you can report any related infomation to the fbi through their site http://www.ifccfbi.gov.

    Ignore the title "Internet Fraud Complaint Center." As of now the site appears to be /.ed but a quick check finds that they finaly updated it.

    Also the fbi's own http://www.fbi.gov seems to be having the same problems as well as some html mistakes, so you might want to wait for things to calm down.

  339. a comment i posted elsewhere.... by unformed · · Score: 2

    (reposting here since it was a reply earlier and people probably won't see it)

    First and foremost, I do NOT think the actions today are justified; it was a horrible act, and furthermore, not just an terrorist attack, but an -act of war-. The US should retaliate, should find whoever committed the act, and show that we will not take this sitting down.

    OTOH, we have to understand why this happened. It's hard to look at things rationally when something like this happens, especially when its a direct attack to our country, but we still do need to understand why things happens so we can prevent it later.

    Here, let me use an analogy that (most) of you will hopefully understand. When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot up Columbine High School, there were a lot of people (especially here) who said that their acts were horrendous, but they understood why they were committed: the boys were bullied and tortured constantly for years; they were finally getting revenge, kamikaze style.

    That said, (from what i've read) the Palestinians are extremely angry at the US because we supply Israel with weapons, money, and generally advocate their actions, and Israel in turn torture Palestinan citizens and generally treat them like shit (for lack of a better term). This is their act of revenge, and although I say we should understand it, it should definitely not go unpunished. However, simply destroying Afghanistan (which we can without a doubtr easily do) will do no good.

    Furthermore, here's my guesses on how things will pan out:

    Assuming we bomb (or attack) Afghanistan (not just bin Laden) there will be further retaliation, and eventually start another war. If other countries don't get involved, that'll be it, and hopefully it'll end as quickly as the Gulf War. If other countries do get involved, I can easily see this turning into a World War III. Let me mention that we do -not- want a WWIII, simply because of the arms technologies available now. (Nuclear and atomic weapons, biological and chemical warfare, etc)

    Anyways, that's it for now, focus back to CNN....

  340. Re: what is the best communication in a crisis by spectrum- · · Score: 1

    Telephone and Internet relies on copper/fibre too much. Perhaps if more internet devices were wireless it would be better. Or maybe just cell phones are the future?

    But my suggestion? Probably carrier pigeons!

    They dont get slashdotted and they cant be hi-jacked.

  341. Barbara Olson by harmonica · · Score: 2

    You might know her from writing that book about Hillary and various CNN panel discussions.

  342. Tom Clancy had a Novel along the exact same lines by sasha328 · · Score: 1

    Except that the perpetrators were Japanese. I wonder where people get their ideas from?

  343. Mirror for Media by beefdart · · Score: 2, Informative

    We here at school have begun collecting images and video to help out with the bandwidth problem the news sites are having... Here Also feel free to send anything in...

  344. Financial world devistation by davey23sol · · Score: 2

    I am listening to "Marketplace" on my public radio station. The devistation to the financial markets in the U.S. and world will be huge. The "bombings" were without a doubt a frontal assalt on our financial structure; a direct swipe at capitalism.

    Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Dutchebank, and hundreds of the bigtime names in the financial world had their main offices in that building. Thousands of U.S. dollars filtered through those offices.

    I don't want to minimize the loss of life by a long shot... this is obviously what we need to center our thoughts on right now, but just a notice that this will have major reprocussions on the economy of the United States and the world. The dollar is going to lose a lot of value in the coming days, and who knows what account information was lost in the attack.

    The world will go on. The markets will continue. We will continue... but we need to all get ready for a fight!

    --


    "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    1. Re:Financial world devistation by peccary · · Score: 2

      Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Dutchebank, and hundreds of the bigtime names in the financial world had their main offices in that building.

      Not their main offices. MWD's main offices are in midtown, though they did maintain a smaller office in the WTC. Deutsche Bank's main offices are, guess where? Deutscheland, tada! And anyway, their main NYC offices are in midtown, over on Park Ave.

  345. someone predicted this 'holy way' last week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=1d3f aac8.0109111019.4025c598%40posting.google.com&prev =/ groups%3Fhl%3Den%26group%3Dalt.prophecies.nostrada mus

    it's a newsgroup. he predicts the date, the 'holy war' style, and flight 11.

    1. Re:someone predicted this 'holy way' last week by unformed · · Score: 2

      very interesting...but here's a working link.

      This is a lameness/compression filter remover.

    2. Re:someone predicted this 'holy way' last week by nhavar · · Score: 2

      Only problem I see is that he did come back at 4:45pm or so and post again, so all his prophecy is shit. He didn't go away like he said and now he's gonna get his poop inspected with a microscope and some small tweezers because people in the newsgroup have already turned his ass in.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  346. There are 'nukes', and there are NUKES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Kickaha, posting as AnonCwd due to acct problem)

    Just as with conventional weapons, nukes come in various sizes, from the ICBM city killers to battlefield tactical nukes. Kill zone of a couple hundred *yards*, low rad. The plus? Complete devastation in that small area. Good for say, a HQ or armed camp.

    However, they have a *SERIOUS* psychological effect. "Holy crap! They used *NUKES*! They're *SERIOUS*!"

    Seems correct to me.

  347. Biological Weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NPR is offhandedly stating that there were no weapons of mass destruction involved today. I would like to point out that all the agents that have been identified by the CDC as high risk biological weapons have incubation periods of more than a day. In other words, there could easily be an Anthrax outbreak in New York tomorrow. The crash site in Penn is being investigated by officials in Haz-Met suits...shouldn't measures be taken here?

  348. As the numbness wears off... by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    Food for thought:

    Probably a question for "ask /.", but why can't a quick log analysis reveal who made reservations on those hijacked flights via the web? My thinking is that the only way to coordinate this dastardly plan would have involved that - the departure times, time needed to "secure" the cockpit, having a "pilot and crew" ready in the boarding line. With access to this, a team of profiling and/or background checkers would soon come up with *educated* guesses...

    Let's not forget another less-than-obvious way to get to the bottom of this: irc and newsgroups, the latter being a more feasible clue-getter, but the former more possible a way that these assholes communicate with each other (rather than directly).

    And, at the risk of being flamebait, it's easy to see this is a perfect application for Carnivore (as long as the suspected language(s) {including English})are understood and the proper keywords used, even though I personally was dead against any such "sniffing" sofware. Until now.

    an exerpt from a message from my stepbrother: The sophistication of the operation can be seen in the choice of flights, each of which headed West under control of separate flight regions. Each region therefore saw aberrant flight of one aircraft; no one had an overview of four large California bound aircraft vectored back toward NY and DC at the same time.

    And finally: Can't we as geeks help in the effort? Fsck the DMCA - get into the computers that have the info and expose it - to allow intelligent prosecution of the real perps!?

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
    1. Re:As the numbness wears off... by psych031337 · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget another less-than-obvious way to get to the bottom of this: irc and newsgroups, the latter being a more feasible clue-getter, but the former more possible a way that these assholes communicate with each other (rather than directly).

      If I was setting up a conspiracy like this the members would learn some file modification tasks for communication. Like...

      - Create a file with what you've got to say
      - Encrypt this file
      - Use ROT-13 like technique to turn the encrypted file into even more gibberish
      - Using steganography this gibberish is hidden in a bunch of totally boring holiday pictures sent by email

      How can you practically get to the contents of this file *not* knowing the process? How can you get to it knowing the process but not knowing the codes or encrypt-schemes involved? How can you monitor wide parts of the internet just for the *existence* of possible questionable files?

      I think it is outright impossible, and the tools are widely accessible to everyone today. A recent study which scanned the net for pictures with hidden steganography messages came up with quite some hits. One was the article description picture of a sewing machine on ebay. The message in it was not retrieved.

      If you can dictate the modus operandi, anything can be hidden or concealed. You can maybe reconstruct the trafficflow if email is used, but you never get the contents. If that is a worry, just use a ebay-like technique where the "message pictures" are put up as parts of a webpage.

      There is nothing the NSA, underfunded or not, could do about it.

      --
      +++ath0
    2. Re:As the numbness wears off... by awkman · · Score: 1
      And finally: Can't we as geeks help in the effort? Fsck the DMCA - get into the computers that have the info and expose it - to allow intelligent prosecution of the real perps!?

      As far as helping in the effort...in the midst of terrorist attacks from undetermined sources, couldn't individual attempts to ferret out inaccessible information regarding the investigation be viewed by investigating authorities as a further threat to the nation?

      I'm certainly for doing anything I can to help (planning on being a first time blood donor this week), I just wouldn't want to be doing anything even remotely suspicious in the wake of this tragedy and the knee-jerk reactions that are to follow (at least in the short term). I'm sure that there are things we can do to help and there is probably information that we can find and pass along to the authorities, I would just urge everyone to be careful about it as tensions are running high.

      I must echo other posters and congratulate /. on providing a great place to discuss this event and to keep current on the news.

      Thanks to all who have posted.

    3. Re:As the numbness wears off... by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

      I just noticed your comment. I agree, to a point. I had tried to see what the purported method that was being used, but did not spend much time on that last week. I've found more on that since, but nothing as informative as your reply. The news is just too vague, sometimes.

      --
      db
      Cig:
      ôô
      /`
  349. Passenger List - Has anyone heard anything ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...should be interesting...

  350. Strange Internet Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The backbone is, according to them, at about 80% utilization -- they've never seen it above 40% before. However, the main portal sites such as Yahoo aren't having substantively higher than normal traffic.

    I might have some insight into this. Being in New York (but nowhere near where the problems are), I was unable to reach anyone by phone (to let them know that I'm fine) until late in the afternoon. However, I was able to e-mail people. So I probably sent roughly 20 to 30 times the normal amount of e-mail.

    If everyone in New York (or who knows someone in New York) was heavily using e-mail today, that could account for a great deal of traffic that didn't go to major portals. Just a thought.

  351. #e BASTARDS by BadlandZ · · Score: 1
    OK, I wanted to help out... I went to #windowmaker on effnet and #windowmaker on openprojects. I told them about the story, I said I have a cool idea. I admit I pimped points. The post went from a 1 to a 4. I was like happy in the thought we could do some good.


    Then I made the mistake to take it too far. I went to #e, and said "sorry to intrude, if you think it's cool, read and mod up. But I want to see if we can get mirrors going."

    #e $#*$)@*#()!@ bastards (as usual) said "your pimping points) and instantly moded this story and the parent down because "It's uncool to pipm points."

    I say F*#$()#@*!() them... I just TOLD people about the story on #windowmaker, it was thier choice to mod it up for the merit of the story. #e mod'ed it to ZERO after that just to try to prove a point that "Pimping point's is uncool".


    Our nation has been attacked, all I was trying to do was find a way to spread the word. PERIOD.


    Granted I got 2-3 points from friends who agreed.... But... To trash a topic for just spite is f#*!)!) lame.

  352. easy to prevent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... just put a remote-controlled self-destruction mechanism in every plane and give the remote control to the FBI. And don't tell anyone about it.

  353. Media Archive by beefdart · · Score: 1

    We here at school have begun collecting images and video to help out with the bandwidth problem the news sites are having... Here Also feel free to send anything in...

  354. Possible solution by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This will no doubt change airline security forever. Perhaps what is needed is a total redesign of these jumbo jets, i.e., to have the pilot cabin totally sealed off from the rest of the plane. The pilots could enter a separate door, and then have each of them enter a security code in order to start the engines. Is there any reason that the pilots need access to the rest of the plane? Separating them will give the pilots a hell of a lot more options in a hijack situation. They can radio for help, and they can put the plane down on their terms. And, most importantly, it will keep terrorists from taking direct control of the aircraft. As was said on NPR today, a 767 is a terrorist's dream bomb -- up to 250 passengers on board, 20,000 lbs of fuel, and who knows how many tons of steel traveling at a high velocity.

    Let's face it, today's airliners are NOT designed with security in mind.

    1. Re:Possible solution by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      I was thinking exactly the same thing last night. If there is zero access to the crew cabin from inside the aircraft, it would be much harder for a lightly armed terrorist to commandeer the aircraft and fly it into something.

      You probably would need to emabark some kind of unarmed bouncer to deal with the idiots who drink to much and then try to punch the flight attendants, though.

      You'd also need to add a restroom in the crew cabin, just in case. Or I suppose we could make the flight crews wear the undergarment parts of spacesuits...

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  355. Local Red Cross sites by InfiniteReality · · Score: 1

    I posted a bunch of links to local US Red Cross sites over at www.everythingzen.org. www.redcross.org is getting hammered, so hopefully this will help. Any cities whose pages were hosted on www.redcross.org (Tampa and Cincinnati, for instance) are not listed.

    1. Re:Local Red Cross sites by Legion303 · · Score: 1
      It might also help if you pasted them in here if possible, seeing as how Slashdot is holding up well under the immense load.

      Here's Red Cross info for Denver, Colorado residents who want to donate blood (the wife and I will be doing it tomorrow or the next day):

      American Red Cross
      Mile High Chapter
      444 Sherman St.
      Denver, CO 80203
      303-722-7474

      -Legion

  356. A timeline of events by deusnoctum · · Score: 1

    I've provided a timeline of events for today. It's updated constantly.

    http://www.geocities.com/deusnoctum/index.html .

    --
    Je pense, donc je lis Slashdot.
  357. Nuclear Option MUST remain on the table by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2

    It would be grossly irresponsible to tell our enemies what we will not do, no matter how unlikely the exercise of that option may be. Our enemies must, at the very least, always have the thought in the back of their mind that if they anger us sufficiently WE CAN ANNIHILATE THEM.

    To our men in uniform: Good hunting.

  358. Cockpit doors are flimsy, should have armed pilots by Locutus · · Score: 2

    I don't fly much but I have wondered why the doors to the cockpit was so flimsy. So they lock it, big deal. Why isn't it armored? It's not like airplanes haven't been used for this type of distruction before ( World War II - Kamikaze's ).

    I just heard a White House official saying that all kinds of new security will be enacted but nothing he mentioned would have stopped these people. Armored cockpit doors and armed pilots would have. Even having a few plainclothed security officials on each plane would help but I like having the regular flight crew armed since they would be well known by each member.

    This shouldn't have happened. It shouldn't happen again. IMHO.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  359. Mod this up! Someone research who posted this! by warrior · · Score: 1

    See the September 4 comment by Xinoephoel. The goddam lameness filter won't let me insert a proper link to his comment.

    --
    Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
  360. Threatcon Delta by |_uke · · Score: 1

    From what an Air Force friend of mine tells me, all military bases are still in Threatcon Delta.

    From what I understand, this means no personal are allowed to leave or enter the base for security reasons. (Which means, he can not go on duity...)

    Ahh okay, my friend just gave me this link, it describes exactly what the differant levels are:
    http://www.wpafb.af.mil/sfs/threatcon.html

    I do not know about you guys, but I am totally devistated. I use my TV as an alarm clock, so the first thing I woke up to this morning was one of the towers with a huge gaping hole in it... I sat there and watched everything happen. I still could not believe what I saw when I watched the buildings collapse right in front of me on the TV.

    This has all been so intence... I could not help but to cry each time I started to comprehend what exactly I was seeing on TV. Found it fairly hard to get to work... trying to fight the tears out of my eyes so I can see the road. Then now, at work... I am having to restrain my self.

    I just can not believe how horrible all this is. I mean... geez... this is all going on in my own back yard (well, you know what I mean... I live in california... but its in the same country as I live in... this is all happening to fellow americans...)

    It was not like some army came in with attack aircraft... They hijacked our OWN commercial aircraft... filled with americans just like me... and made them part of their plan for mass destruction.

    Not to mention I am still having problems trying to grasp the consept of just HOW many people died...

    This is a very sad day...

    --
    Luke
  361. The old rules don't apply by TopShelf · · Score: 2

    Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of this situation is that there isn't a single bad-guy country out there that acts as the "enemy." Instead, we have these loosely organized groups that cross international boundaries and aren't tied to specific nation-states. There simply is no way (within the Euro-American mindset) to defend against an enemy that plans to die in the attempt to wage war.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:The old rules don't apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is no black and white. only grey.

  362. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think thats important right now.

  363. Re:I hate today. by dave_etc · · Score: 1

    What the hell is the matter with you. People like you and the fanatics who did this are the reason I hope there is Hell. I pray you suffer an eternity for your cruelty.

  364. Whodunit? by xxyyxxzz · · Score: 1

    As quick as we are to point our fingers at the arab world for this terrorist attack, who else could be responsible? In other words, who has a motive?

    * Iran, Iraq, or some group in the Arab-Muslim world - obvious and overt hatred of the US, especially with our sonstant support of Israel.

    * China or some Chinese group - well, we haven't exactly had the greatest relations with the giant of the east. They have the money, the discipline, the technical know-how (to fly the plane) and the grudge against the US

    * Russian group - while the government probably wouldn't sponsor this (they don't pay people enough over there to seal their lips about something this big) the Russian mafia has the money and ex-communist military personell have the technical know-how and grudge.

    * Internal - we have a lot of people who are disgruntled with the government and the economy of this country. Look at Oklahoma City - Tim McVeigh and (I think) Terry Nichols were in the military. Could this have been a small ex-military group fed up with the US somehow? They would definitely have the expertise.

    I'm sure other possibilities exist, but these are the few that came to the top of my head. Remember, the US has a lot of enemies.

  365. In case you've read this far: why they went down by TACD · · Score: 1
    The towers of the WTC were not constructed with many internal supporting pillars; most of the load is borne by the outer shell. So although internal bomb-blasts (or theoretically, earthquakes) could have been withstood, when the planes smashed throught the outside and mushed the inside...

    Boom.

    And also...

    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, two brothers torn apart by chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb.", "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning." - Nostradamus

    --
    Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
  366. The biggest challenge comes in the next few days by Fjodor42 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As a Danish citizen, and a member of the Danish equivalent of the national guard, I hope that my next few remarks may be considered.

    Having speculated on the prospect of going to full military awareness level, I would fully agree to going to such an excess. Noone can deny, that the attack on the US is one of the most abonimable acts of terrorism ever, but the largest threat lies not in the scale of theese events, but in the aftermath, that we are about to witness. I am not one to dispute, that the US is entitled to a retaliation, but imagine the scenario, where the US targets the wrong country/area/terrorist faction. Then we have a scenario where we have a united Middle East (well, almost) against the US, and a NATO, that cannot approve of an attack against virtually innocent civilians (let's face it. One cannot retaliate this event by attacking purely military installations). This would leave a shattered NATO (and hence a shattered UN), which would leave us all open to just about everything. I, for one, is happy, that we do no longer have the cold war to worry about...

    Thus, I would strongly advice to put a lid on the initial anger, and think of the bigger perspective.

    Not hiding behind a nickname, I submit my views as Sune Mølgaard, Århus Denmark

    --
    "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."
  367. Re:Cockpit doors are flimsy, should have armed pil by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

    Yeah and only armed with knives. It goes to show that the ultimate weapon is the human mind.

  368. Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I think this is where you wanted to link.

  369. More photos... by livitup · · Score: 1

    On the off chance that there is someone in the world who hasn't seen photos of this yet I put some video stills that I captured off TV today on my home server...

    Here.

    Let's see how long my T-1 will hold up. :)

  370. Bush didnt say anything wtf? by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

    Hey Bush didnt say a goddamn thing wtf????
    Doesnt he have any info??

    1. Re:Bush didnt say anything wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The presidents job is not to provide information but to unite the country and give hope. the press secretary has the job of providing information. I am not a Bush fan but he did the right thing in his speech

    2. Re:Bush didnt say anything wtf? by TastyWheat · · Score: 1

      And u think he did tht?

  371. Mirror by BarefootClown · · Score: 2

    I am currently in the processing of mirroring CNN's website (three cheers for wget). As soon as I have finished, it will be available at http://www.aviation.ou.edu. I am only mirroring their main site (www.cnn.com), not their sub-sites (cnnfn.cnn.com and sportsillustrated.cnn.com), so you will still have to visit their servers to get those stories (and cnnfn does have some stories), but hopefully getting at least some of the Slashdot community off of CNN's servers can help them somewhat. It will probably be slightly behind CNN (possibly as much as 30 minutes, hopefully not that long), so I apologize in advance for any outdated content, as well as for any delay in posting new stories.

    Incidentally, I am not certain about the capacity of my server, so if it should get slashdotted under the load (and it would probably be the server, not the network), please send me an e-mail at dbuckles@ou.edu, and I will try to restore it as quickly as possible.
    --Dave

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

  372. "How Could This Happen?" by Murmer · · Score: 0

    Well, the FAA just fined American Airlines a pile of money for lax security practices.

    Check it out.

    --
    Mike Hoye
  373. Australians with family in America by Technodummy · · Score: 2



    a hotline has been set up for those Australians with family in America

    1800 002 214

    Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has more for those who need it

  374. san diego - mexico border still open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not all borders are closed

  375. Parent Modded down due to Prejudice... by BadlandZ · · Score: 1
    Could have swore the parent was 5, now going down...
    Sad world when ./ politics kills a bad idea based on people hating me....

    hate me, fine, I will not post or step in again, I promise. Someone else can mirror and set things up, I swear I will step aside, just PLEASE stop mod'ing the post down, just let it happen... I'm sure someone will step up and mirror and script....

  376. Preventing hijackings by koreth · · Score: 2
    I think one result of this sad event will be an examination of ways to make hijacking airplanes more difficult. Obviously a lot will be said about tightening up airport security; I expect boarding a US commercial airliner will become a lot more like boarding an Israeli plane (when I visited there several years ago, they not only made me turn on the handheld videogame I was carrying, they actually took it apart to make sure it wasn't a transmitter or an explosive device).

    But it seems to me there are also some things that can be done to the planes to make hijackings of this sort all but impossible.

    First of all, make it impossible to get from the main cabin to the cockpit. Put a separate outside door on the cockpit and give the cockpit area a dedicated restroom and food storage area. If there's no physical access to the cockpit from the passenger area, it becomes impossible to point a gun at the pilot's head (though one could still take the passengers hostage, of course).

    Barring that -- or in addition to that -- all commercial planes should be equipped with live cockpit video feeds from multiple angles, no "off" switch, to allow ground controllers to instantly see if something is going wrong. That alone doesn't prevent hijackings, but it means you'll instantly be able to see which passenger is responsible, and potentially deploy military aircraft to force the plane down before it reaches its destination. It's also useful in non-terrorist situations.

    Live video of the passenger cabin is more problematic from a privacy point of view, but again gives you an early warning that something is wrong. It can prevent someone from being able to pop unnoticed into the restroom to disguise themselves (and thus make themselves harder to trace back to terrorist HQ) before taking a hostage or breaking into the cockpit. Personally, I don't really consider myself to be in a private space when I'm on a plane and would have few qualms with video surveillance, especially if it was of the wide-angle, over-the-seattops variety. Hell, you could even subsidize it by adding a couple extra cameras and letting businesspeople hold video conferences.

    None of this stops someone from wanting to take over a plane and use it as a missile, which is the real root cause here. But I hope there'll be some consideration of relatively simple preventive measures like these in addition to the calls for strip-searching everyone who gets on a plane.

  377. the target is new, not international terrorism by nusuth · · Score: 1

    while it is true that you cannot defend against them by passive means (increasing border security etc.), it is quite possible to defend by exterminating them. Almost all terrorist organisations confirm to your definition of current enemy, and they have always been confirming to it. With sufficient intelligence, it is possible to fight against them. World's most powerful nation should be so easy to despair. After all, many smaller nations did fight against these groups before and some have even succeded.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  378. Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because your head is shoved so far up your ass in denial doesnt mean your hands are clean. Your gov't acts on your behalf when they rape and shit on so many people across the world. Go open a history book and get some perspective miscreant.

  379. correction by nusuth · · Score: 1

    ...World's most powerful nation should NOT be so easy to despair...

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  380. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Sentry21 · · Score: 2, Informative

    All flights to/from Tel Aviv (presumably all of Israel, though Ben Gurion is the major airport in Israel) have several (3-5, apparantly) anti-terrorism agents on board to help in case of emergency. If they suspect you of being a terrorist, you're in big trouble. If you are one, they kill you (if possible).

    --Dan

  381. This could just be the beginning by jpalk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    One thing that worries me is that this was a very well organized, planned and executed series of attacks. This suggests that the people who did it weren't stupid. Add in two facts, and this is troublesome. 1- Terrorisim is, essentially, an exercise in behavior modification: 'do x, or we'll do y.' We do q instead of x. y happens until we stop doing q and do x. 2- Historically 'not playing fair' (sneak attacks, assassinations, etc.) generally have one effect on the American psyche- they piss the hell out of us. One shot terrorism does not work well against the US, because we just get mad and try and slap someone around. Consequently, if the terrorists are actually trying to change national policy, it's not unreasonable to expect to see more of this in the coming weeks or months. One time might not work, but do it enough, and it will start to have a grinding effect on the national psyche, as well as the economy (we can only take so many air traffic ground stops).


    Someone else, whose comment I can't seem to find at the moment, asked why this couldn't have been the work for a small group. Looking at most terrorist groups, fielding one terrorist requires a support network of ~50 other people, in varying levels of involvement with the organization. If we assume that there were 3-4 terrorists per plane, that gives us an associated organization of 600-800 people. Please note, this is the size of the logistical support group and involved sympathizers, not the size of the active cadre which is the number usually shown in law enforcement estimates. Also, we're dealing with suicide bombers here (essentially). Suicide bombers are usually isolated for days or weeks immediately preceding their missions, and are closely attended during those days by people who are skilled in psychological manipulation and indoctrination and are able to psych the terrorist up for his mission. This is an activity which requires at least a small handful of people for each terrorist, which is going to leave us again with at least 30-50 people actively complicit in the plot. It's hard to find 12-16 people who are a- suicidal; b-can plan an attack like this and c-can exercise enough self-restraint over a to do b. It's much easier to have a large group do the planning and logistics, and then pull a handful of suicidal or martyrdom-ready individuals from their ranks.

  382. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by peccary · · Score: 2

    I've said it before: a dozen civilians could hijack a plane with their bare hands. The only protection against mass-suicide hijackings like that is to avoid making enemies. Though locking the cockpit door would help.

  383. Security through obscurity proves its worth. by thogard · · Score: 2

    So the hijackers carried knives on the plane. How you ask? Simple, put it on the bottom of the shoe. Most FAA approved metal detectors DO NOT detect them or they will be ignored if the shoes look like they are steel toed. If the FAA is serious, they will xray shoes of everyone when the planes start up again until they can prove every metal detector works they way they should.

    This is well known (I was told about it in about 1987) by a friend who managed to find ways of getting guns through some of the detectors while working as a security guard at an airport.

    Call your local FAA FSDO office and ask them about it.

    1. Re:Security through obscurity proves its worth. by haggar · · Score: 1

      Actually, knives or not, that's not at all the point. Ultimately, you can kill a person with your bare hands. It's something the SAS and other intelligence operatives learn during their special training. Also, arms will always be smuggled, in a way or another, onto planes. Example: weapons not made from metal. Fiberglas/epoxi and ceramics are already today used for some special firearms.

      The actual point, in my view, is to expecially increasy security on board. Highly skiled and trained crew will be the key to ensure this sort of terrorist acts will not succeed in the future. There are a few airlines that terrorist don't fuck with, and it's exactly because of the training of the crew of those airlines. It's not just martial art, it's also uncompromising action against terrorists incorporated into the policies of these airlines. The airlines I am talking about had long taken some strategic decisions in respect to security. USA didn't want to take such decisions, but will probably have to, now. Decisions like, Risk the life of some passengers or crew members, in order to save the whole plane. Decisions like, not allowing access to the pilot's cabin, even if under threat. Those are tough decisions and policies, but are really the only solution to real security against terrorism in aircrafts.

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:Security through obscurity proves its worth. by spudnic · · Score: 2

      I was thinking about the ceramic knives that Ming Tsai uses on his show on FoodTV. Those things are VERY sharp!

      I'm assuming that you could have them produced to contain no metal in the handle. Just keep it in your pants and walk on through.

      Am I wrong? I hadn't thought about this untill today. I see it as a major threat.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
  384. Image and Video Archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My deepest sympathies to those who have lost friends and loved ones in today's tragedy.

    I'd just like to add one for the links: there's an image and video archive up at http://www.sexdwarf.org/wtc that looks like it's being updated reasonably regularly (and no, it is *not* a porn site).

  385. +1 Funny by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  386. Then who will fly the plane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, lets say we DO have biometrics on planes? What do we do if the pilots are dead? WHO WILL FLY THE PLANE? Sure, you don't want terrorists to fly it, but SOMEBODY has to.

    1. Re:Then who will fly the plane? by spitzak · · Score: 2

      I agree that making it impossible to fly is stupid. Instead it could set off emergency beacons so the ATC would know that it might not be controlled by the pilot.

  387. No one has noticed today is anniversary of S11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The September 11 protests at the World Trade Org meeting at Seattle last year were obstensibly about multinationals and globalisations.

    Could this attack be just coincidence?

  388. Usenet thread, possibly started by a participant by Avakado · · Score: 1

    The following link is to Googles Usenet viewer, to a post with the subject '911', in the group alt.prophecies.nostradamus (the post itself has nothing to do with nostradamus).

    The person starting the thread claims, at 2001-08-31, that "Something is going to happen tomorrow.", and reasons a bit about why.

    Then, at 2001-09-04, he states "Wait 7 days, and then maybe I'll answer this post. You see, I am going away in seven days, and you will not hear from me again".

    As far as I am able to see, the dates are correct, meaning the posts aren't made as a prank (please correct me if I'm wrong).

    Entire usenet thread

    --
    The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
  389. American Airlines have REALLY tight security huh? by dmouritsendk · · Score: 1

    Seriusly, do they expect ANYBODY ever flying with them after this? If a company allows so many fligts to get hijacked on a single day, something is not working as planned.

  390. Good point by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

    As I typed that, I realized the potention for such a response (both to my post and the action described). Still, if our technology cannot be exploited to help expose the perps, then what good is it, anyway? BTW, watching W's appearance most recently hasn't restored any confidence I might have had to think that this can be resolved easily...

    My Point was: If the "authorities" don't know what they're doing, shouldn't someone step in? I know I'm shorting the NSA in this comment, but I can't help but think they should have some hired "guns".

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  391. WHERE IS THE FIFTH PLANE? by FFFish · · Score: 2

    Early in the morning there was a *single* report of a plane down in Colorado. Since then, I've heard nothing: no corrections, no confirmations, no denial.

    NORAD is in Colorado, isn't it? Sound slike an obvious target, even if a plane wouldn't do any damage (it's designed to survive nukes).

    Anyone know if a plane did go down?

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  392. Re: Typically Undereducated by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    First of all, it's extremely unlikely that the Palestinians did this. It's not their style, it's not their scale, and it's not their area.

    Secondly, they aren't acting like they've defeated the US, they're acting like one of their allies has struck a considerable blow to one of their enemies - which is true (at the very least, under the 'enemy of my enemy (or their allies) is my friend' philosophy).

    Thirdly, they don't have a country. This is the entire point of their terrorism: they want their own country, and the Israeli government/people will not agree to this.

    Fourth, the US will not attack Palestine, for several reasons. First, it is Israeli-controlled; second, the vast majority of Palestinians live in the West Bank; third, they couldn't leave the country if they wanted to - this is another reason why they strike against the US/Israel when possible.

    --Dan

    Knowledge is not necessarily a precursor to opinion. -- Me

  393. It can fly itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No reason the plane can't be equiped to land itself or be guided down via some sort of radio control. The company I've worked for is supposed to have developed a system that will land an F-14 on an aircraft carrier better than any human pilot. Suposedly the pilot's don't want to give up this measure of control, just like they don't want to have systems to auto-eject even if the pilot is unconscious and about to crash. Of course I do work for a defense contractor so maybe people aren't supposed to be talking about this stuff, or it could be a rumor...

    Either way, other than expense and retrofitting problems I don't know why we don't do this already, but then again why should this part of the world make any more sense than the rest!

  394. more of the same. idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm so glad that everyone is now aware of the injustices of the world. as a nation, we'll soon forget this, and you know it's true. in a week it will be "the joneses have a nicer car" again.

    look how frail our lives are. anyone, anywhere could die any time. a plane could be headed for your house right now. if only a few residential areas were targeted, think of the social impact. fear, chaos. the officials say "don't panic."

    you don't feel so invincible when every car you pass on the road is potential death. but, like all of life's little problems, this can easily be forgotten. the american drug of choice is pathos.

    look how safe we are. how much of your life is wasted serving the government? ask the victims.

    i'm american. i'm free.

  395. S11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it possible thiss could be S11?

    With it being Septembetr 11th and all...
    And the fact that it was the WTC.

    -- eVirtue Dragon

  396. Re:In case you've read this far: why they went dow by Fjodor42 · · Score: 0

    I beg to differ.

    Although many may find it a bizarre area of interest, I happen to know a bit about the design of the design of the WTC. The problems were not the shocks, which they withstood, but the fact, that most skyscrabers are not designed to withstand excessive heat.

    Read my latest post to see an article about the matter.

    --
    "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."
  397. An excellent from the View Askew message board by weslocke · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Over at the View Askew boards (the makers of movies such as "Clerks", "Mallrats", "Chasing Amy", "Dogma", and "Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back"), as odd as it is to find such an excellent message from such an unlikely spot.

    You can hit it here...


    I just had a conversation with a Russian born & bred employee at my hotel about the Palestinian reaction footage.
    He says they are cheering, because they see this as a beginning of the United States, being an arrogant and intrusive entity....finally getting their due for interferring, again, where they don't belong.

    I say...but what about the innocent people that died today? How could they cheer for the deaths of many innocent people?

    He says...How did people react to the bombing of Hiroshima? Did America feel a sense of 'ha! we got you!' as a result of that...because overseas...that was what was reported.

    I say...that's different...we were at war.

    He says...but the Palestinians are at war...and have been for all of their lives.


    I don't subscribe to those sentiments personally, but I have to admit that reading that made me stop, set aside my anger for a moment, and do some serious thinking.
    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
  398. It couldn't happen again by PaxTech · · Score: 2

    You know why? Because any passenger on a hijacked plane is going to try to stop the terrorists now.

    Before, I think most people would figure, "OK, I'm going to be held hostage, we'll land somewhere, there'll be demands, and if I sit tight, I might survive this."

    Now, they'll be thinking more along the lines of "If someone doesn't stop this guy, he'll fly us into a building.." They'll be willing to risk their lives attacking the terrorists, because it's all the chance they have.

    A guy with just a knife? When twenty unarmed passengers rush him, how many will he be able to kill before they disarm him? A few, but it's better than everyone dying in a burning wreck.

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
  399. Re: My God, what happened? (Tragedy of the commons by peccary · · Score: 2

    it's the 'date' that's indicative, as the anniversary of the Camp David Peace Accord.

    Ohmigod, it's September 18 already? Where does the time go?

  400. fuck you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read the topic. If you're too stupid to understand what it means, then tell me your address, and I will demonstrate the exact meaning explicitly.

  401. Firefighter Heros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tens if not hunderds of firefighters died today trying to save everyone. These firefighters are the bravest men alive, running into a burning crumbling skyscraper to save fellow New Yorkers. Say a prayer for them and their families.

    It really hit home when 2nd Ave was closed and was just busloads of firefighters and police storming downtown. Manhattan was all sirens and people walking north with stunned faces. There was much confusion, but the police did an amazing job controlling the mahem. They were everywhere that I walked, and all over from what I saw. The national guard is on ever corner of Manhattan at the moment.

    They just said on the news, at least 78 police are missing. The firefighters and police know that they are running headfirst into a disaster of the highest danger and personal risk imaginable, and they run in anyway. The run out with those they can save, if they come out at all. They are true heros. The city will mourn their loss, mourn this dammed day forever.

  402. A bit of technical info by Fjodor42 · · Score: 0

    Many of you will find this to be of poor taste, but I translated a Danish article on the technical aspects of the reason why the two towers collapsed. The orignal (in Danish) article is here, and my translation is here

    --
    "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."
  403. And crashing planes into buildings isnt? FUCK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>This makes me sick. The notion of using nuclear strikes is tantamount to expressing a blatant desire to murder innocent people.

    god damn ignorant asshole.

  404. web news by KunstCleaver · · Score: 1

    obviously in times of crisis news from the web is useless. it took hours before i could get through to anything.

    for now on there is a good ol' fashioned radio living in my cube.

    --
    "The direction controls are the same in Nethack as they are in vi." "Yeah, I hardly ever die in vi anymore."
  405. WTC 7 by candover · · Score: 1

    Building 7 also housed NYC's emergency response bunker.

  406. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by haggar · · Score: 1

    As I already said elsewhere in the thread (and I am not going to repeat myself, who wants to, can read my other posts), it's not at all enough to increase security during boarding. It will be imposible, as you noted yourself, eliminate the danger of terrorists smuggling knives or even firearms (which don't have to be made of metal) onto planes. The thing to concentrate on, is new tougher policies and better trained crew and flight attendants, that will allow them to cope with terrorist acts more effectively. Not just to be able to fight (martial arts, perhaps carrying weapons), but also to have policies in place that will allow them to attack the hijackers, even if this means risking the life of some of the passengers, if that saves the whole plane. This is something a few airlines already do, and no terrorist fucks with them, because they know it would be, basically, futile.

    Sorry, I ended up re-telling the same thing again. But I believe it's an important point to make.

    --
    Sigged!
  407. Re:Cockpit doors are flimsy, should have armed pil by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

    They're not armed for the same reasons that guards in max security prisons aren't -- don't let them steal your gun and use it. A terrorist is more likely to be able to get a gun away from you than you are to be able shoot them.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  408. Good point... by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

    As I typed that, I realized the potential for such a response (both to my post and the action described). Still, if our technology cannot be exploited to help expose the perps, then what good is it, anyway? BTW, watching W's appearance most recently hasn't restored any confidence I might have had to think that this can be resolved easily...

    My Point was: If the "authorities" don't know what they're doing, shouldn't someone step in? I know I'm shorting the NSA in this comment, but I can't help but think they should have some hired "guns".

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  409. don't mirror, use DISTRIBUTED FILESHARING by cpfeifer · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the perfect use of Gnutella/MojoNation... cooperative, decentralized, distributed filesharing?

    I think someone should pick a file sharing app, put all of the WTC content they can find into it, tell people to use it and then let the tool do the work it was built for.

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
  410. Re: My God, what happened? (Tragedy of the commons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But at the moment, the two most likely parties appear to be Palestinians or anti-globalization Slashdotters. I really don't believe the IRA would touch this one.

    you probably wont even read this, but just so you know, Osama bin Laden is not Palestinian. He was born in Saudi Arabia, but stripped of his citizenship there due to his actions.. he's purely anti-American (I am not sure why, though it's not doubt at least partially due to the USA's foreign policy) and is supposedly based/living in Afghanistan.

  411. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another mirror:

    http://liquidvortex.net/wtc/

    Cheers,

    Nick.

  412. Let's honour the victims with a benificial result by yani · · Score: 1
    The people who died today in what seems more impossible than fiction (ie. Tom Clancy's novels) should be honoured by a well thought and purposful response. Nearly all world leaders have condemed this, and for good reasons. This almost universal sympathy should be used to promote international proccesses to hinder terrorism.

    Although many previous US targets have been attacked in acts of terrorisim none touch the hearts of people around the world in such a way, this act of terrorism did not only target a military installation or represetative building or person of a country, instead it struck at thousands of civilians in the heart of a major city, no-one even those who may normally criticise the US can help by feeling sympathy for those people and anger that this was even possible, if so many people can be killed in the heart of the current superpower, then what is to stop a similair incident in any other country? Defense against terrorism has proven to be harder than defending against the military might of another nation.

    Unlike a normal war there is no sure way to target the enemy in a war against terrorism, but terrorists must live somewhere. This event could be used to rally a global alliance/movement against terrorism, that would aim to prevent any country from being able to harbour terrorists. Harbouring terrorists must be made unattrative to all those countries that harbour them hopefully through peaceful methods (eg. economic embargo/military threats) but only if neccessary a forceful method that minimizes the innocent casualties that happen in nearly any military operation.

    Am I being unrealistic in hoping for a peaceful and beneficial result? After today what is realistic? If Tom Clancy had written a book with 4 suicide planes instead of 1 I'm sure it would have been critisized as totally unrealistic.

    Of course this is just my 2 cents CDN, but I just hope Bush does not take a quick or unthought revenge which could easily start a war between countries.

  413. reasonable response by riiv · · Score: 1

    Okay, first you find the group/indivdual responsible and put them before a UN/war trial jury. If a country aided in their hiding those responsible, planning or execution of the attack, they should lose ALL access to airplanes/aviation usage for 5-10 years + punitive damages.

    --
    Unix is a standard, DOS is a standard, windows XX is not.
  414. Open Letter to US/Americans by TrixX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    September 11th, 2001

    Open Letter to US/Americans

    I'm not from the US. I'm not from Middle East, nor from any of the parties involved or suspected to be involved in the incidents of this morning.

    Although those events are shocking and extremely sad, this letter is not directly about them. It's about what you think about them.

    After reading, watching and listening news today, I started to focus on Internet discussion forums. I had reviewed several times the enumeration of facts, so I started to look for the opinion of the PEOPLE.

    I was shocked to find (among the pain, grief, and will to help) rage, desire for revenge (I said revenge, which is not the same as justice), and pleas for a war. This letter (I won't hide it) is an intention to change that, through reason. I know you might not change your opinion after reading this, but consider that you have nothing to lose reading it (well, a little time, actually), and I'm saying that you have a lot to win (a slightly better world, if you ask).

    First of all, rage won't lead you to a solution, and I think that's plain clear. Even if you think that retalliation is the appropiate response, you probably agree that even retalliation must be planned using brains, not blind rage. If you think about today events, the terrorists that had enough hatred to suicide on a plane are dead (the raging fanatics), while probably the intellectual authors of today crimes (those who use brains) are celebrating their success somewhere else. If you agree that then we have a starting point for discussion.

    A lot of people are saying "It's the Palestinians!" "It's the Afgans!" "It's the (Insert your least favorite country here)!". And a whole country is being put at judgement there. But think twice, without the rage. Think it the opposite way. Suppose some US/American hijacks a plane and crashes it over a building in my country. Would you like to have people in my country saying "It was the Americans!"?. Would you like to have the blame put on you? Would you like to return to your home and see that your wife and kids have been murdered by a "retalliation bomber"? Would you like to pay for the crimes someone else comitted?

    Well, Palestinians don't like that. Afgans neither. Nor US/Americans. Not Argentinians (if you were wondering where I am from). And it's clear that NOBODY likes it because it's not right, in the more basic forms. It's a feeling so basic that even people with very different visions of the world like you and Palestinians agree on it. And believe: In any country of the world, most people are innocent, harmless people who want to live quietly and in peace, like you. So don't blame a nation. Blame the (probably small) group of people who were behind this, and use the power that your opinion gives to get them found and judged like any criminal. Don't help turn this into a bloodshed where most of the blood belongs to innocent people.

    And yes, I'm saying your opinion is power, so use it for good. If you have the democracy you say you have, then that's the way it should be. Terrorism works by using that power you have to turn it to a given goal, that is, turning you into their weapon. Don't be a weapon of the terrorists, don't help them. The way to fight this war it's not to lose our temper, and not start killing people randomly (like some people are starting to think after the outrageous attacks of this morning... remember that war always takes innocent victims). So act quickly, and swiftly, and make sure the responsible for this are punished, but if you start a war against innocent people you'll just gain more enemies than before, and this will never end.

    If you believe on what I said, please, spread this message. Consider that the rage and violence I have seen means that the terrorists are already winning. Whoever did this obviously wanted that, so don't give it to them. Keep your power to yourself, and use it to make this a better world

    Sincerely,

    Daniel F Moisset

    dmoisset@arnet.com.ar

    1. Re:Open Letter to US/Americans by Fjodor42 · · Score: 0

      Since your text says it all, I shall let it suffice to say, that your views are those, that I have spent the last 25 hours spreading. It is comforting to learn, that I am not alone.

      /Sune

      --
      "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."
  415. Check this out... by Frankenchrist · · Score: 0


    "In the City of God there will be a great thunder, Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb"
    "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning"
    Nostradamus 1654

  416. Detailed analysis of Ramzi Yousef by FAS by ssheth · · Score: 1

    Check out the detailed analysis that the Federation of American Scientists worked up on Ramzi Yousef (the bomber who bombed the World Trade Center in 1993 and planned to blow up 11 airplanes on a single day in January 1995. It also illustrates the links between Yousef and Iraq and Saddam.

    The title of the piece is
    THE WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMB: Who is Ramzi Yousef? And Why It Matters

    A especially relevant theory that they advance is that in February 1993, Saddam ordered his agents to try to topple New York's tallest tower onto its twin, and in January 1995, Iraq sponsored an effort to destroy eleven U.S. airplanes in the Far East"

  417. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by cornflux · · Score: 1
    The only protection against mass-suicide hijackings like that is to avoid making enemies.

    Uh.... I don't think so. Some people are just insane enough to do horrible things like this, no matter what.

    Furthermore, Utopia is impossible... one will always have enemies: some people are always looking for trouble.

  418. Re:The Solution by creepy_chris · · Score: 0, Troll

    You should take Mr. Jackson's advice and "Start with the man in the mirror" Turning the gun on him would go a long way to solve an even bigger problem.

  419. Re:5th Plane -- 4th plane: County not Colorado by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

    When they listed the 4th plane that went down in whatever county, Pennsylvania, they listed it as "whatever CO, Pennsylvania".

    Any bets that someone misread it in the heat of news-reporting?

    There'd be no point in hijacking a plane over Colorado -- Where would you hit before eveything was grounded? And this damned bastard operation was timed to the second. (Any bets that killing 350 police and firefighters was a node in their plan tree?)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  420. Legal? Maybe!!! EFF if not. by BadlandZ · · Score: 1
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=21548&cid=2282 928>HERE

    I still say we do it, long term, 3-4 day, maybe 2-4 week full content, powerful mirror of best images.

    Prove GNU spirit is good for something!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    if not, I will admit to being one that pushed the idea, and end up leaning on EFF, so donations there (Free me only after all of Elcomsoft are in Russia!

  421. Re: My God, what happened? (Tragedy of the commons by dpilot · · Score: 2

    I did read it. One of those uses for picking your own userid on the front page, to keep track of threads you have participated in.

    I seem to remember hearing the same. But he has either aligned himself with the Palestinian cause, or gotten some of them to align themselves with him.

    He's allowed to not like US foreign policy. So are the Palestinians. But I have a personal working definition of terrorism, "Military action *directed* against innocents." From that perspective, Washington DC contains legitimate targets. New York City does not, except perhaps naval ships anchored there.

    Expressing outrage at US foreign policy by killing thousands of ordinary citizens is kind of like expressing disapproval of the Rodney King verdict by looting stores. Wholly inappropriate.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  422. Terrorist attacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I keep seeing references to terrorist attacks and this doesn't seem right. Both were attacks on military targets according to definitions that the West itself has adopted over the last few years. The Pentagon is undoubtedly a military target. My understanding is that the WTC was housing a TV studio and a large number of TV transmitters, which makes it a legitimate military target according to the recent NATO doctrine (see NATO statements after the bombing of the Serbian TV station in Belgrade: http://www.fair.org/articles/hammond-tv-war.html ). Apparently, the NATO definitions were accepted by the international UN tribunal for the ex-Yugoslavia when charges were brought against the NATO leaders. So, we should consider them globally accepted and respected by the international community at this point.

    Unfortunately, there were civilian casualties but by itself this fact is not sufficient to label them terrorist attack. The civilians were not more "civilian" than the people killed while travelling in trains bombed by USAF in Yugoslavia or the guard at the Sudanese aspirin factory. None of these US actions was during a war legally declared by the US Congress. Yes, the US should respond to the undeclared war but why the double standard in the news reporting?

  423. Re: My God, what happened? (Tragedy of the commons by dpilot · · Score: 2

    I got the date from the news. So if I'm wrong, it's because I didn't look it up to verify. If the 18th is the real date, did they at least sit down together on the 11th?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  424. Wired did by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    Apparently the copy that hit the stands a few days ago contains a picture of the WTC exploding.

    Regular psychics? One told a relative of mine to expect a long life. Same relative was run over and killed on the way home from the psychic's studio.

    That about sums it up for 99% of them. The other 1% are even more of a worry, the sources of their occasionally-unbelievably-accurate information are highly dangerous.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  425. My Mirror by BadlandZ · · Score: 1
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=21548&cid=2282 928>HERE

    I still say we do it, long term, 3-4 day, maybe 2-4 week full content, powerful mirror of best images.

    My Mirror of some stuff is at http://www.current.nu/
    EFF god help me...

    Prove GNU spirit is good for something!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    if not, I will admit to being one that pushed the idea, and end up leaning on EFF, so donations there (Free me only after all of Elcomsoft are in Russia!

  426. Since you follow replies by Invicta{HOG} · · Score: 2

    Just so you know since you apparently have no clue about the Middle East, blaming the Palestinians for the work of Bin Laden is stupid. What others do in your name is not your fault. The Palestinians are a group of people fighting for the right of self-determination. Bin Laden is a millionaire set on plaguing the US for its Middle East policy, which apparently accepts the subjugation of the Palestinian people. People saw one group of cheering Palestinians and drew conclusions. How do you know that those kids didn't spend last night huddled in a corner while Israeli tanks ran through their village with US support? All Arabs are not the same!

  427. Destroy all Islamic pigs. Destroy Muslims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let us expel all of the filthy wogs. Kill them. Expel them. Death to every Muslim.

  428. Oh, very rational! Fight yourself next? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    What about middle-east political sites hosted in the US? Let's nuke ourselves!

    Also... if it's so vulnerable, why haven't you attacked them yourself? Are you a coward or just incompetent?

    Finally, what are you hoping to achieve? More civilian suffering? More collateral damage? More excuses for nasties to attack the USA? Try this alternative: get a life.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  429. Scary: the most real reminder is nothing. by Snags · · Score: 1

    As I scan the cable television channels, the most real reminder of the disasters today is the black channels that used to be broadcast from One World Trade Center. You may at first feel that I am insensitive or in my own world, but think about it. I see disaster footage on that rectangular screen all the time. Sometimes it's real; sometimes it's not. But what I never see is a bunch of totally black channels. I guess this is similar to the emptiness that will appear to those familiar with the NY skyline, though I'll admit it's nothing as compared to the emptiness felt by those who have lost loved ones.

    --
    main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
    LN2 is cool!
  430. VERY interesting alt.propehcy posts!! by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&frame=right& th=54ab4d241c34e0cc&seekm=3b8fd177%40monitor.lanse t.com

    Read here, it looks like one of the hi-jackers might have been posting here. Very strange indeed.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  431. Re:We need a police state now!!! by The+Man · · Score: 1

    Thank God you express this so poorly. Too bad so many others will express it much better, and win. Oh well, there's always Brazil.

  432. Re:Cockpit doors are flimsy, should have armed pil by Locutus · · Score: 2

    that makes sense but why the heck don't they put a real barrier between the pilots and the passenger area? At least in prisons they have solid walls and bars to keep separation...

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  433. Sympathy for Serbia by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    Now Americans will find out what it takes to fight a terrorist organization. The Serbs knew it well, as they fought a civil war against the KLA. Terrorists are cowards by definition, striking against the innocent and defenseless without warning, and using human beings as shields without hesitation. Often, the only way to get at them is to not concern yourself with the collateral damage of those who are (sometimes willingly) shielding them. This the Serbs did, and were roundly condemned as criminals for it even as it became clear that the number of casualties that had always been cited -- 100,000 or more -- was a wild exaggeration.

    Bush has now said that in our retaliatory actions we will make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them, just as the Serbs did. Yes it's awful. Yes it's tragic. That's the nature of terrorism, both on the parts of the terrorists themselves and those who would eradicate them. But we may well have no choice in the matter if we are to prevent this sort of thing from recurring.

    Can we make the world a perfectly safe place? No, of course not. But we can make it clear to anyone who would contemplate killing tens of thousands of Americans that if they were to actually do so, they will -- not might, will -- be made to regret it bitterly, a regret that will be shared by anyone who aids them. That will undoubetdly make terrorists think twice about doing such a thing ever again, and make anyone who might harbor them think three times about it.

    Before anyone replies with the kind of puerile ramblings that have been modded up today: of course we will find out for sure who was really responsible before we act. Whatever good can be extracted from what it will take to wipe out the organization responsible -- whichever it may be -- will not come from striking at the wrong targets. Obviously it's not the Palestinians, or the Iranians, and probably not Libya either. But they're partying tonight in Iraq, and there seems to be information implicating Osama bin Laden. I do not doubt, given their recent public statements, that the Afghani authorities will back away from Osama in a moment if presented convincing evidence that he is responsible. They had better. No American wants to make innocent people suffer.

    But anyone who willingly harbors terrorists is not innocent.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  434. what I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whenever I read articles describing the supposed sophistication of the hijackers, they always say -must have been pilots with lots of money-lots of connections-insider links.. etc.

    and yet on NPR, their token pilot, interviewed by Terry Gross, said that flying a plane once it's in the sky is easy.

    and then I think, that our airport security, has always seemed incredibly lax...

    then I remember a story my father told me of a women who met him in the pentagon who had come from abroad with a gun in her purse- and had made it all the way in to see him, through all the "security." It was purely for self-defence of course, but he was shocked.

    Am I the only one who thinks these terrorists could have just been thugs who wanted to die. Sure they were probably motivated by some fucked up religion, or other indoctination, but did they really need an evil genius guiding the whole thing?

    I have the awful feeling were being fed only what we want to hear from the media. Like we always are.

    -

    I think destructive MEMES should be ERADICATED, not the people/place.

    ... send in the para-trooping missionaries already...

  435. Yes, all of it, wherever it's due... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy, were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts.

    Americans in general are generous and helpful (although they do tend to approach this with a we-know-better-than-you attitude), almost as helpful as ``us'' Australians* but the same cannot be said for all American businesses.

    You might think that I was talking about Microsoft, but I'm talking about companies like General Electric and Standard Oil, who made World War II possible by funding and supporting Reich war-related research and stockpiling. This is not an isolated incident. Given that the terrorists hit a business centre (and apparently tried for another stock exchange as well), rather than entirely political targets there may be a connection.

    Your history is spoon-fed. You need some roughage in your diet.

    * who invited the Indonesian Army to joint exercises in Australia, gave them a copy of The Bush Tucker Book, did everything short of laying out a red carpet embossed ``Welcome to South Irian.''

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Yes, all of it, wherever it's due... by thetman · · Score: 1
      General Electric and Standard Oil, who made World War II possible by funding and supporting Reich war-related research and stockpiling

      Huh?? You;ll have to enlighten me on this one....

  436. The Three R's by sfled · · Score: 1


    Rebuild

    Remember

    Revenge

    --
    I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
  437. Re:Better security on planes-suicide devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this is a bit morbid, but how about suicide devices on the plane?. When the pilot realizes what is going down. He can activate a device that will make the plane uncontrollable. the lives of the few vs the many.

  438. Conspiracy Nuts by mino · · Score: 0

    I'm not saying I believe this, even though these events were half a world away from sunny old Australia, the images I've seen over the last 14 hours have shocked and disturbed me, but:

    I'm amazed that no-one has mentioned the possibility, no doubt to be siezed upon by the more... creative... element of society, that the pentagon attack was a deliberate attack to breach the walls - not to destroy the building, but to physically break the shape of the pentagon.

    After all, what conspiracy nut doesn't believe, deep in their hearts, that the pentaGON is actually a pentaGRAM, designed to contain whatever godforsaken Cthulhuesque creature the U.S. government have leashed to serve their wicked ways, etc. etc. Whatever it is, it would be on the loose now, so I'm sure a lot of kooks will be stocking up on tinned food and holy water right about now...

  439. Why the WTC Collapsed by allrong · · Score: 2, Informative

    The University of Sydney has a short description of the WTC's structure and offer an explanation for why the towers completely collapsed after being struck. The link: www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.htm

    --
    What is the inverse of the Matrix?
  440. Rebuilding America by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    I'm sending this letter to everybody in my address book. I'm sure everybody knows about the terrorist attacks on our country. What some of you might not know is that people in other countries celebrated the devastating attacks on thousands of lives in our country. This was shown on television.

    I have never heard of Americans, or people of any *civilized* country for that matter, celebrating the deaths of so many thousands of *innocent* lives. I wish to point out that these same people--the ones who are celebrating right now--benefit from millions or billions of dollars of American money sent to them as foreign aid. The thought of these scumbags celebrating the deaths of those who support them disgusts me beyond belief. I am writing letters to folks in our state and federal governments, urging them to cut off monetary support for these countries. This will serve two purposes:

    1. The money should be used to help those who lost family or friends to the disaster.

    2. Cutting off foreign aid to these countries serves as a very mild punishment for their celebrating of the death and destruction in our country. If they celebrate our deaths, let them starve for lack of food and money.

    I urge you to write similar letters, and to urge your family, friends and neighbors to do the same. The time has come to help our victims and punish those who would have us slaughtered.

    I'm adding this note for posting on Slashdot:

    I realize that since the Internet spans the globe, some of you reading this are from those very countries I'm talking about. I'd like to discourage you from bitching and moaning about what I'm saying here. If you celebrated, fuck you. I mean it. If you were not such an animal and scumbag, I urge you to kick the asses of those around you who are.

  441. Re:Iraq - Link to TV Quotes by The_Myth · · Score: 1

    The SMH Has an article on this at http://www.smh.com.au/news/0109/12/world/world35.h tml
    Quote: The Iraqi commentator said that "the explosions at the heart of United States power, in particular the Pentagon, represent a painful slap in the face to American politicians to direct them to put an end to their illegitimate hegemony and their attempts to impose their authority over peoples."

    --
    The MyTh - I am a figment of the Imagination - [Im Probably even not here]
  442. Breaking: Explosives Under GW Bridge? by tankrshr77 · · Score: 1

    Don't mod me down, this is an unconfirmed report from the AFP NEWSWIRE.

    Wednesday, September 12 11:04 AM SGT Police intercept truck loaded with explosives in New York
    NEW YORK, Sept 11 (AFP) -
    Police have arrested two people and have intercepted a truck loaded with explosives on New York's George Washington Bridge, according to an unconfirmed local CBS television report.

    "The truck contained enough explosives to blow up the entire span," a television reporter said.

    Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik confirmed that "the Port Authority police stopped a van that might have had explosives," but added in remarks to NY1 television that "it is unconfirmed."

    The George Washington Bridge links the northern part of Manhattan island with New Jersey and is the only bridge spanning the Hudson River.

  443. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1
    Interesting. Remeber these ceramic knives? I imagine they would make it through the metal detectors.

    If that's the case then this may have been a breach in airport that we (the U.S.) were not prepared for.

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
  444. Re:the middle east-Plank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem with the US and quite a few of it's citizens is that we are worldly illiterate.
    Most don't know other cultures. Hell most couldn't even locate Afghanistan on a map, let alone spell it.
    Agancies of the US have done things that we shouldn't have. Remember what the CIA has done in central america. How about asia? The large body of americans aren't even aware of what their government does behind their back. Does all that excuse what happen today? NO!
    But it should temper what actions and thought
    that happen in the next few weeks. We should remove the mote from our eyes before we point out the plank in others.

  445. Re:Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the right thing to by PD · · Score: 2

    it may have even been the better choice.

    I am glad that you phrased it that way. The thing about history is that when considering alternatives, we will NEVER know for sure. We might not have lost a single man in the invasion of Japan, and not dropped a bomb. On the other hand, we might have lost half a million men, and then had to drop the bomb anyway.

    We cannot second guess history. It unfolded only one way, and that's the history we are stuck with. Debating it doesn't do any good, because there's just no way to sort out all the interpretations of what happened. Condemning people of good character for making the best choice they could with the information they had isn't fair to those people. And we will in turn want to be judged fairly by history.
    Saying that the bombing of Japan was completely unjustified is just as wrong as saying that we absolutely had to do it to win the war. All we know is that Truman and others sincerely believed that it was so, and they made a tough decision. If that decision does not sit well with us in our (as of Sept. 10th) comfortable armchairs, then all we can do is make our decisions better ones.

  446. And the problem with that is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is your problem with "BOMB THE FUCK OUT OF EVERYBODY". Perhaps we just quit too early before. We need to do much more bombing.

  447. Religion in the News by lorenlal · · Score: 1

    Before you go and say that, unless you have read the Koran (and I'll admit I haven't either), don't go and say that it's to blame. I can't name a major religion that says in the book "Kill everyone that is different than you to earn my respect".

    I'd be more willing to believe that the Arab terrorism is much like the old Christian Crusades (except with car bombs and missles). "We want Palestine back, and we'll kill anyone in our way! We want our Holy Land and to rid it of those Jewish/Chrisian pig-dogs!" Instead of "We'll kill the infidels (namely the Arabs) and win our Holy Land back for our King!"

    People pervert the meaning of religion for their own immediate ends. It's not the Koran, it what people are doing in the name of the Koran.

    I don't know any God that thinks killing other people in cold blood is a good thing.

    1. Re:Religion in the News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      unless you have read the Koran

      i can't read the koran, because i can't read arabic. i have to rely on my english translation. i'm not being pedantic here, for moslems hold that the koran, being the literal word of god, cannot be translated, to be a moslem you must learn arabic ... end of story.

      and here lies part of the problem, for what was probably a socially progressive and liberating text when it was written becomes a text that binds the world to (relative) barbarism -- a text which enforces as a religious duty an absolute antagonism to modernity, and liberal democracy and all the values these entail. only a strong religious belief could leave the perpertrators of mass-murder with feelings of moral superiority in which bin Laden and his cohort are now basking.

      I can't name a major religion that says in the book "Kill everyone that is different than you to earn my respect".

      well there's ... um islam? actually what it says is "kill anyone in my cause and you will be rewarded with the glories of paradise."

      ok, i'll admit i was pretty angry when i fired off my original post. i'm willing to revise my demands, it might not be necessary to wipe any trace of the koran from the planet. instead i think we should start be exterminating any one who professes to be a follower of islam. ... better?

    2. Re:Religion in the News by Petrus · · Score: 1

      I thought always that the Crusaedes were in response to Islamic attacks. At least what the history book says, Crusades would be never organized if there were no fall of Constantinopol (not Jerusalem) and if Europe had an organized army anwering Muslims cknocking on the door of Europe. The devastation and injustice that Mongolian troops caused was reportedly way above that of Kuvait.

      In that light, Crusades would be more justified and more defensive than the Gulf war. If there wer e any other pan-European religion or no religion at all, it would not diminish the need for Crusades and Europe would just be defended under some other banner.

      Put the proper things in the proper perspective.

      Petrus

    3. Re:Religion in the News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At least what the history book says. Crusades would be never organized if there were no fall of Constantinopol

      Buy a new history book, crusades were organised before the fall of Constantinople. In fact crusaders themselves sacked Constantinople.

  448. Re: Typically Undereducated - NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey. The U S of A sustained casualities.
    Major ones. Nobody will stop our response.

  449. Re:mod me? MIRRORS! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    The major news broadcasters have agreed to share footage - so I believe it's ok.

    I'll upload any video I get to THIS SITE .

    Some are from sites above - either way, check them out. I think it's important to get this on CD or other such backup.

    This FTP is in cincinnati ohio - so don't expect good speeds from the west coast.

    My prayers still go out to everyone.

  450. Conserving bandwidth for those that need it by littlematt · · Score: 1

    Since email, IRC, and IM have become so useful to folks in NYC after the cell and landlines died, we decided to turn off our bandwidth gobbling audio streams until the crisis and need passes.

    No need to clog things up with entertainment when others need the resource.

    We're also encouraging visitors to donate blood too.

    -lilmatt from www.tacowagon.com

    My prayers go out to all affected by this.

  451. Soldiers vs murderers, & terrorism.... by m0ng0l-h0rde · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever noticed how with the terrorist groups, or the countries that support them, will ALWAYS refer to their suicide bombers as "soldiers," or "heroes," while when their opponents / enemies are ALWAYS referred to as "murderers?" Palestine and Isreal for example. A Palestinian who walks into a pizza parlor crowded with people is a "patriot" or "hero," while any sort of retalation by Isreal is by "murderers?"

    I was channel surfing tonight, came across a BBC re-broadcast, they were interviewing an Arab man (no I don't know who), who was saying this attack was justified because of US "atrocities" in the Middle East. His examples being: supporting Isreal, the Gulf War against Iraq, and the continued bombing of Iraq.

    As far as any of that goes, Isreal was created after WWII, Iraq may be debatable, depending on wether or not Kuwait is an ally of the US, although reports of what Hussiens troops did in Kuwait would also qualify as "atrocities."

    And before ANYONE DARES to accuse me of being a "racist" or "anti-Arabic" I'm not. I am NOT saying that someone from the Middle East was behind this.

    My feelings are however that IF and WHEN the US govmnt has evidence of whoever did this atrocity, they should go after them. I do NOT want to see civilians in whatever place that may be get hurt, and would prefer a "surgical" strike to mass bombing. The perpatrators killed possibly as many as 10000 Americans? Fine. Capture them and re-open Alcatraz just for them, let them ROT for the rest of their life in a 10x10 cell with no windows and no human contact.

    Am I angry? You betcha.

    In my home town (Detroit) the news was reporting that HUNDREDs of people have been donating supplies to go to NY along with some 30-40 police officers. They had pictures of an entire 50' truck container FULL of bottled water. THAT is what an American does when someone is in need of help. They HELP.

    My condolonces to anyone who lost loved ones in the attacks, and my hopes go out to those who are trying to survive in the wreckage.

    Jason A.
    PS My apologies for beginning to ramble.

  452. Very sad by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2
    I am sad to say that the time has come to finally stoop to their level. We need to respond swiftly and brutally and the response needs to be so unbelievably brutal and horrifying that no one will ever again consider attacking us for fear that everything and everyone they know and love will be utterly destroyed in response.
    I fear that many people feel like you do, in which case there will be neither peace nor justice for a long time.

    Israel has tried this against the Palestinians -- quick, unbalanced retaliation. It has not brought them any peace or freedom from terrorism. I can see no way they will achieve that unless they annilhilate the entire Palestinian people, though blinded by their desire for vengence many Israelis seem to think that the next bit of violence will resolve something.

    That is not a path I would wish the US to follow. Justice does not mean pacifism, but anything brutal, disgusting, and horrible -- as you phrase it -- is not justice. If we value domination over justice, then we will eventually reap our rewards. Perhaps we already have.

    God help us.

  453. Canada hates the US too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I was going to put a list here, but it's really just about everyone except Israel, Japan, Western Europe, and Canada

    You probably shouldn't be so quick to add Canada to the list of places that like Americans. Many Canadian's hate Americans too, we just put up with them because our economies and fates are so intertwined. Actually, when I was in Japan, there was a lot of American resentment there too, and I've nearly been in a few fights in Europe when people wanted to hit me in bars because they thought I was American.

    None of this can condone the horrible things that happened, but maybe Americans should start to wake up and realize that most of the world hates them and start asking themselves why. It is not because they are the most powerful country in the world, but because of their heavy handed policies around the world.

    1. Re:Canada hates the US too by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      Really, this is the situation everywhere. Everyone hates Americans (or at least American institutions), but everyone realizes that they need to work with them if they want to advance in this world. There are different degrees of this however. Hell, most informed Americans that I know seem to hate American institutions as well...

  454. Re:the middle east-Plank by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    Are you aware of what YOUR government does behind your back? Or do you live in some imaginary country without hidden agendas?

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  455. I agree, it was expected by shabbavg · · Score: 1

    I agree that this was to be expected.

    Don't get me wrong I will give blood and aid but what was the cause and how do we build a supportive global neighborhood?

    For a moment assume the world is causal, that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Why did this or any act of violence happen?

    Think about a neighborhood then scale this to a global community. Start with a population of children who will hopefully grow up some day and still have to live with those kids we were unfair with.

    Think of a child who somehow gets most of the toys/food of all the other kids, however it happens.
    (The vast majority of economic wealth is in the USA)

    Eventually other kids will see what is flaunted and want their toys/food back even if they lost an honest trade/game. That one rich kid can't eat and play with all the toys at once, so why not share it? Richie Rich will have more friends, help the neighborhood, and look like a hero. When the neighborhood grows up those who were helped will return the favors (like Karma).

    Over competing causes others to feel cheated and sows seeds of mistrust and grudges.

    Recent US international activities display a poor global-neighbor example and go against the generosity they displayed after WWII which turned a disaster into a fresh start for some troubled countries and longstanding grudges:

    -not signing the nuclear non-proliferation agreement;
    -not dealing with their fair share of the greenhouse gasses and threatening the Kyoto accord (USA is by far the largest global polluter);
    -not signing the land mine ban (one of the only countries not to)
    -bullying their global neighbors into backing Star Wars and a renewed military buildup;
    -continuing to sell tools of war (as much of the world does). Surely these seeds will reap disastrous but not unexpected harvests.
    -continue to encourage a foreign policy of aggression (war on drugs, who's source is internal; Iraq, who threatened oil control; and many more examples.)

    The US is not unique, I believe people are the same everywhere. However if somebody doesn't initiate an enlightened stance and kill with kindness rather than bullets then the eye for an eye will leave everyone blind. Each individual can make an impact. Encourage your leaders, company, family members, etc to be honest, fair, and generous.

    Eventually US travelers could even wear their flag internationally without ridicule, threats, and embarrassment, which is currently not the case.

    Americans: watch international news and find out what your neighbors think. Plus you'll finally get some decent news coverage.

  456. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by GMontag · · Score: 2

    Here inn the States it will have to be some soret of law enforcement, like the sky-marshals arm of the federal marshall service. Using the military violates the "Posse Comotatas (sp?)" statute.

    Skip the fact that the existance of federal cops are not an enumerated power, thus a violation of the constitution itself... hey... maybe ya got a point...

  457. More like Parody of the commons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This simply bullshit. It's a heart-rendng story that happens to have little to do with the details of the events.

    This is the result of a small group of very determined enemies - Period.

    Nothing to do with US openness. US airport security isn't all that "open" in anyway - it's better than a lot of nations and has stopped a lot of attacks. It's still fairly cheap - airport security guards aren't high paid or anything.

    Russian and even Saudi Arabia has had hijackings - these places aren't marvels of openness. Chechnayans have done all sorts of other stuff in the Soviet Union and they didn't even have government backing. The US pulled together the Taliban to fight USSR backed troops and so they had lots of clever tricks. Too bad they've turned against the US huh?

  458. Clearest footage of second plane hitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I've seen, CNN has the clearest footage of the second plane crashing into the WTC. It's footage of the exact side of the building that the plane hit... you can even hear the sound of the plane engine in the background as it approaches its fate.

    The streaming video from CNN can be found here:
    http://www.cnn.com/video/us/2001/09/12/2nd.plane .h its.cnn.med.html

    If someone has a downloaded copy of this, PLEASE email me at changeling@yahoo.com with a location where I can download it! I want to make sure that I have a copy of this footage... what's sure to be an important part of history.

    I dont care what nationality ya are... and what feelings you have towards the US... the loss of human life should strike a chord with all humans... this, like all acts of mass murder, is a true atrocity...

  459. Clearest footage of second plane hitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I've seen, CNN has the clearest footage of the second plane crashing into the WTC. It's footage of the exact side of the building that the plane hit... you can even hear the sound of the plane engine in the background as it approaches its fate.

    The streaming video from CNN can be found here:
    http://www.cnn.com/video/us/2001/09/12/2nd.plane .h its.cnn.med.html

    If someone has a downloaded copy of this, PLEASE email me at changeling@yahoo.com with a location where I can download it! I want to make sure that I have a copy of this footage... what's sure to be an important part of history.

    I dont care what nationality ya are... and what feelings you have towards the US... the loss of human life should strike a chord with all humans... this, like all acts of mass murder, is a true atrocity...

  460. Canadian French by dadragon · · Score: 1

    For Canadian French people:

    Pour les Canadiens Francais:

    See http://radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/
    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  461. London Stock Exchange was not evacuated by frog51 · · Score: 2

    They had business as usual, but knocked off very sharpish.

  462. Actually, the pope wants that hat by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    split jerusalem in parts of equal size and put in under un control

    It's been a long-cherished desire for the Pope to control Jerusalem. The EEC/UC would back him (EEC == Europe Entirely Catholic) too. This is unlikely to be the excuse he needs, but wait... there's probably more...
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  463. Grow up by PrimeNumber · · Score: 1

    Economic domination.
    Oh yeah you are right, we are so bad, giving jobs to people and selling them shit they don't have to buy.

    facing an opponent who has the money
    The reason this country has money is because US citizens (free and slave) busted their asses for over two centuries. We eliminated the evils of slavery and became even richer.

    owns the world legal system
    And if we really did own the legal system world round, then the Koreans and the EU would not be investigating Micosoft and Intel would they? The world court wouldn't have also decided against the US after the Panama invasion, if what you are saying is true.

    The reality is that we have been attacked by fringe Islamic religious fanatics, just like *most* of the terrorist attacks against the US in the last 5 years. If anything, our being allied with Israel (another country that doesn't like us?) has contributed more than anything.

    1. Re:Grow up by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah you are right, we are so bad, giving jobs to people and selling them shit they don't have to buy.

      I don't suppose you've ever been to a sweatshop.

      The reason this country has money is because US citizens (free and slave) busted their asses for over two centuries. We eliminated the evils of slavery and became even richer.

      Either that, or we had a vast land which we cleared of the native inhabitants and were then free to rape its land and resources to the extent that we are the largest polluter in the world today.

  464. Microsoft Exploitation by doktorevil · · Score: 1

    Not content to leave the villainy to the terrorists, Microsoft decided it'd be a good time to exploit the situation. http://slate.msn.com/code/explainer/explainer.asp? Show=9/11/2001&idMessage=8270, obviously an MSN site, poses the question, 'How Good Were the World Trade Center Pilots?' and then answers that it would take an experienced 757/767 pilot to fly aircraft into a building about the size of the aircraft itself. Along the way, however, it mentions > "Flight Simulator" links to http://www.microsoft.com/games/fs2000/default.asp, just in case you wanted to PURCHASE MS Flight Simulator 2000! Presumably so that you yourself may experience firsthand the difficulty of killing tens of thousands of people...

  465. My swiss army knive now goes baggage by mks113 · · Score: 1

    I've been warned twice over the years about carrying my normal knife on the plane. I think it will be packed in baggage from now on.

    Never underestimate a trained person with a knife and a keen willingness to use it. A steak knife will do.

    I think success for these hijackers was their willingness to kill people. Pilots, anyone who resisted -- gone. It was not the threat of a knife that forced a pilot to fly where he didn't want to go -- it was the use of a knife.

  466. Do you follow replies? by dpilot · · Score: 2

    >Just so you know since you apparently have no clue about the Middle East

    Guilty as charged. I have no clue about the Middle East.

    But I think I am at least as well informed as most Americans, and I believe I have a more open mind than most.

    So YOUR job is to try and educate me. The news media doesn't help a heck of a lot, and I try to listen to the BBC or NPR for a better balanced picture. (as opposed to the ratings war of network news)

    I hear many times of the enlightenment of the Moslem religion, and how they kept the candles of civilization burning during the dark ages with mathmatics, and all that. I also hear that the Moslem religion teaches respect and equal rights for women.

    But that's not what I hear or see on the news.

    By the same token, I certainly hope you don't base your opinion of Christianity on abortion clinic bombings and the mess in Northern Ireland. I think that at the moment, it's far more enlightening to look at the hours-long lines in front of the blood donation clinics.

    I wish PBS woud run (or rerun, now is timely) some sort of documentary on the history and development of the Moslem religion.

    I mentioned it once before... More could be done for the Palestinian cause by making an "Unbearable Lightness of Being" type movie, and setting it in the West Bank. Remember that the juxtposition of Three Mile Island and the movie "The China Syndrome" pretty much killed nuclear power construction in the US. In the US, images and concepts have power, violence just makes us mad. You want us to change, try getting our sympathy. You want our sympathy, try helping us understand your plight. But attacking only helps us understand your hatred. (I'll accept that this isn't you personally, but just the general point...)

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  467. Real time headlines by mkrus · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    I run a news portal site called NewsIsFree. I put together a page showing all headlines about the events, updated every 15 minutes.

  468. Re:The Solution by Juln · · Score: 1

    Haha! American pretzels!!

    --
    Juln
  469. Re:the middle east - RETARD by MindTree · · Score: 1

    I wish your mother worked on the 99th floor of the
    WTC. You can pick which tower, I really don't care. Just try and think before you speak, you retarded fuck.

  470. Re:Let's honour the victims with a benificial resu by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
    Amen, brother.

    Let us form a new international organization against terrorism. It could be associated to the UN, and be called global defense initiative against terrorism (GDI). I'd love to see some Orcas, esp. the Orca bombers from Tiberian Sun...

    Kiwaiti

    --
    Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
  471. FBI has been informed by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Several folks from alt.prophesies.nostradamus have contacted the FBI about it. No need to fill their queue with redundant information.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  472. demo job by kippy · · Score: 1

    I have no expertise in the area aside from movies and specials on the learning channel, but did the collapse of the buildings look like the structure giving way due to the plane crash or a planed implosion? Any demo experts out there with observations?

  473. Re:Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the right thing to by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
    Japan was ready to surrender before the bombs fell, and especially after Little Boy. You may debate about Hiroshima, but Fat Man (Nagasaki) definitely wasn't necessary and couldn't even appear to be.

    Kiwaiti

    --
    Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
  474. what about the National Mall Fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard there was a fire at the national mall near the white house. or that a bomb went off there.

    I have a picture of the fire from an early news report, but i have heard nothing thus far.

    if you have any new info on that. please send it to johnny_aio2@yahoo.com

    Thanks,
    -Johnny

  475. Re:Just heard on CNN: knives and cardboard cutters by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    simple solution.
    Back in the olden days you had 1 armed man on every plane. we need to go back to having someone on every plane with a nice high power weapon. first sign of trouble shoot the bastard.

    That should also stop most of the idiots on aircraft.

    Secondly.. replace the cockpit door with a bulletproof version, and install CS gas dispensers into the passanger cabin. hijack? fill the rear of the plane with CS or BZ gas and land.

    there are solutions, we as americans are way to damned lazy to impliment them.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  476. We hear you by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    While I respect what you say, I will be blunt. When you have been so attacked, when you have friends describe to you what it is like to listen over the phone while the colleagues burn alive, then have the line go silent never to ring again, when you have friends who have died en mass, then you may speak to me of turning the other cheak.

    We will use our power to create a better world, by exterminating the vermin who are responsible for this atrocity, along with anyone and everywhen who gave them aid or comfort. We may feel guilty afterwords, and will certainly be an easy target for a world with an uneasy conscience that will cry loudly against our actions while secretly breathing a sigh of relief that someone did what needed to be done, but in the end the world will be a better place, and those that did this will cease to exist.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:We hear you by TrixX · · Score: 2

      When you have been so attacked, when you have friends describe to you what it is like to listen over the phone while the colleagues burn alive, then have the line go silent never to ring again, when you have friends who have died en mass, then you may speak to me of turning the other cheak.

      Then I will:
      As I said, I live in Argentina. From 1976 to 1983 we were governmed by a military dictatorship that kidnapped and killed people that had opinions aginst them. 30 thousand people disappeared in that time, their bodies never found. We were not attacked by terrorists, we were governed by terrorists that attacked the people.

      In 1994, the AMIA (an Argentinian-Israeli entity in Buenos Aires) was bombed. There were 85 dead, 300 wounded. Still today nobody knows who was responsible.

      In 1995, a military weapon factory sitting in a city near where I live, blew up. The apparent reason is that a group inside the government was smuggling weapons and was trying to hide the missing stuff. The city of Rio Tercero was evacuated, covered with debris, and explosive ammunition spread on the streets and backyards kept blowing for weeks. Now, ex-president Carlos Menem (president form 1989-1995, reelected for 1995-1999) is in prison accused of leading the illegal association for weapons traffic.

      So I know what it is to wonder if you'll get back home instead of being kidnapped for saying the wrong words, or for expressing you want freedom. I know what it is to fear that an explosion kills somebody you love. You have experienced perhaps the worst terrorist attack in history, but people all over the world knows how it feels.

      And I don't asked to turn the other cheek. I asked and claim for justice. But too many times justice is confused with revenge.

      I'm just asking for common sense, to avoid geting even more innocent people dead. PD: Btw, several people from my country that were in NY are missing, and I have family in TX, PA and CA. Consider again when you tell someone that he doesn't know fear of terrorism.

  477. Moron Payment, Part I. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will be transported to a gay brothel in Cairo, where fifty Egyptian and Sudanese queers will fuck you up the ass without the aid of lubrication.

  478. Re:Cockpit doors are flimsy, should have armed pil by Locutus · · Score: 2

    Just wait and see how the government overreacts. Bush is already using this to increase his defense budget and now the FAA will enact some silly security proceedures. Not that all are silly, just that what was already in place seemed to have worked, it's just that it never dawned on them that a plane would be used as a weapon.

    I remember that one guy hijacked a plane with a vile of water. He said it was nitro glycerine. The only way to prevent this is to secure the controls of the airplanes. That is it. If hijackers knew that the passengers would NOT let them take control, could this even happened?

    Doubtful. Too bad the proceedures that will be put in place will do more damage to the economy then as already been done by adding hours and days onto mail and passenger deliveries.

    IMO.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  479. Re:Iraq - Link to TV Quotes by Cletus+the+yokel · · Score: 1

    I recall one talking head on CNN yesterday, referring to the Palestinians cheering and passing out candy, "we need to remember who these people are. They are enemies of America". The American people, indeed the whole world, will indeed remember this.

    --
    Wanted: One witty yet thought provoking .sig - Apply here.
  480. A Tribute to America by r13 · · Score: 1

    Reading through the majority of the highly moded posts, I was disturbed by the level of criticism the US is getting for this incident, and IT WAS THE ONE ATTACKED. This brings to mind an editorial written by the late Canadian Journalist, Gordon Sinclair...

    [QUOTE]

    The Americans

    ...and this Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as the most generous and possibly the least-appreciated people in all the earth.

    As long as sixty years ago, when I first started to read newspapers, I read of floods on the Yellow River and the Yangtse. Who rushed in with men and money to help? The Americans did.

    They have helped control floods on the Nile, the Amazon, the Ganges and the Niger. Today, the rich bottom land of the Misssissippi is under water and no foreign land has sent a dollar to help. Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy, were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of those countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United States.

    When the franc was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it.

    When distant cities are hit by earthquakes, it is the United States that hurries into help... Managua Nicaragua is one of the most recent examples. So far this spring, 59 American communities have been flattened by tornadoes. Nobody has helped.

    The Marshall Plan .. the Truman Policy .. all pumped billions upon billions of dollars into discouraged countries. Now, newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent war-mongering Americans.

    I'd like to see one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplanes.

    Come on... let's hear it! Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tristar or the Douglas 107? If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all international lines except Russia fly American planes? Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or women on the moon?

    You talk about Japanese technocracy and you get radios. You talk about German technocracy and you get automobiles. You talk about American technocracy and you find men on the moon, not once, but several times ... and safely home again. You talk about scandals and the Americans put theirs right in the store window for everyone to look at. Even the draft dodgers are not pursued and hounded. They are here on our streets, most of them ... unless they are breaking Canadian laws .. are getting American dollars from Ma and Pa at home to spend here.

    When the Americans get out of this bind ... as they will... who could blame them if they said 'the hell with the rest of the world'. Let someone else buy the Israel bonds, Let someone else build or repair foreign dams or design foreign buildings that won't shake apart in earthquakes.

    When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down through age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an old caboose. Both are still broke. I can name to you 5,000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other people in trouble.

    Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake.

    Our neighbours have faced it alone and I am one Canadian who is damned tired of hearing them kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high. And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating over their present troubles.

    I hope Canada is not one of these.

    [/QUOTE]

    The interesting thing about this editorial is that it was written in 1973, and yet it still rings as true as it ever did. I personally am proud to have Canada as our neighbor, and am thankful for those who live there that feel our pain. People here have knocked them as cowards, but I know, and they know, that the real coward is the one who stikes anonymously from a distance.

    r13

  481. It's not my job to educate you by Invicta{HOG} · · Score: 2

    It's your job to educate yourself. I base my knowledge of Christianity on the fact that I am a Christian born and raised in the middle of Arkansas. I base my knowledge of the Middle East and Islam from READING. Pick up a book, skip the movies.

    Contemplate the founding of Israel. Where did it come from? Why did it form? What was there before? What happened to the people that were there before? The answers are important. European and American anti-Semitism combined with disregard for the "Palestinians" led to the creation of Israel. Israeli policy and racism combined with Arab anger and racism led to a powder-keg. Both sides are culpable.

    Oppressed people fight back. Both Israel and Palestine believe they are oppressed, as indeed they are.

    1. Re:It's not my job to educate you by dpilot · · Score: 2

      OK, so maybe it's not YOUR job to educate me. I can admit that maybe I'm a little heated, and back off. Can you? How about recommending some titles? At the moment, I'd prefer to focus on basic Islam rather than 'recent' history. I want to find that suicide bombings are as 'normal' to Moslems as abortion clinic bombings are to Christians. I want to find that keeping women uneducated, barefoot, and pregnant isn't a core Moslem belief, either. (I've heard this, but it just doesn't square for me, yet.) I once checked out a copy of the Koran, but didn't get far enough before due dates and real life intruded. At the time, it wasn't as critical as today, either.

      Contemplating the founding of Israel is a tough one, considering the number of times the land has changed hands. In less rational moments I'd like to see the whole area evacuated and a big fence around it. Kind of like "If you can't share it..." with kids.

      In the final round of peace talks before the whole process broke down, I was astounded that Israel actually offered to share Jerusalem. Bin Laden is up in arms about American soldiers even being in the same country as Mecca and Medina. As overbearing as Israel has been, I can't imagine the restraint they've shown over the Dome of the Rock if a church or temple stood on the site of Mecca. By the way, somewhere in the many discussion threads (/. and elsewhere) of the past few days, someone stated that Israel is the ONLY nation in that area where Arabs/Moslems are allowed to vote. (I presume they mean national elections, but don't know/verify the reference.)

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  482. Re:In case you've read this far: why they went dow by TACD · · Score: 1

    After hearing more information, I agree that you are correct.

    --
    Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
  483. Re:Iraq - Dancing in the Streets by The_Myth · · Score: 1

    Even more annoying was that in the Muslim community here in sydney there were some tasteless people dancing in the Streets and celebrating. (Some of us were not impressed)

    --
    The MyTh - I am a figment of the Imagination - [Im Probably even not here]
  484. Standard Oil by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    ...of New Jersey group, so say the reciepts brought up for the subsequent war-crimes trial,
    • donated directly and indirectly to the election funds of Hitler, his party and several other prominent candidates
    • suppressed research on artificial fuels in the US (by means of patenting it all and refusing licenses - sound familiar?) while promoting and even funding it in Germany up to and during the early stages of war - without this the Wermacht (sp? I'm not German, sorry) wouldn't have had enough fuel to do anything; and
    • expedited the pre-war transfer of large amounts of war-critical material, particularly scarce metals and chemicals, from the USA to Germany.

    Many other big names were and presumably are involved in such deals.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  485. Re:Let's honour the victims with a benificial resu by yani · · Score: 1
    Wow, I can't believe that the U.S. actually is forming a "coalition" just like I was thinking, it has yet to be seen if this coalition will operate as I thought it should but in any case I think I underestimated Bush and/or his advisers.

    I'd like to say I have a whloe new respect for them.

  486. Sorry Boys and Girls... by ender- · · Score: 2

    Sorry, but this mirror is now down...