Slashdot Mirror

To add to that, a little WHOIS:

Domain Name: theohiostar.com
Registry Domain ID: 2090314152_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: WHOIS.ENOM.COM
Registrar URL: WWW.ENOM.COM
Updated Date: 2019-01-01T04:37:07.00Z
Creation Date: 2017-01-15T20:10:00.00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2020-01-15T20:10:53.00Z
Registrar: ENOM, INC.
Registrar IANA ID: 48 Domain Status: clienttransferprohibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clie...
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY

It's the same story for the other two websites. All three are registered though the same registrant.

I realize that's not completely odd, but what news organization has all of their registration information redacted?

Even if there is rampant speculation, and assuming a 26-character alphabet, there are 1.46*10^11 domain names between two and 10 characters. If 137 million of these are registered, that means only 0.0001% of all possible domain names have been taken.

About a decade ago, I was trying to think of a domain name to register for a website. I wrote a short program to put together English phonemes to generate every possible pronounceable word (up to 7 letters).. Then I had the program do a whois database lookup for each fictional word as a .com domain, outputting a list of the unregistered domains. (Yeah, I'm probably part of the reason why ICANN now makes you solve a captcha before doing a whois lookup).

All the 4-letter .com domains were gone. Most of the 5-letter domains were gone too, and the few which weren't sounded horrible. Most of the 2-syllable 6-letter domains were gone. But there were lots of 3-syllable 6-letter domains still available. There were lots of 7-letter domains still available. So many that I killed the program part-way through (at domains starting with the letter 'f' if I remember). The list of available domains it was generating was becoming so long it would've taken me too much time to look through it, trying to find one that seemed decent.

The evaluation fee is US$185,000. Applicants will be required to pay a US$5,000 deposit fee per requested application slot when registering. The deposit will be credited against the evaluation fee. Other fees may apply depending on the specific application path.

Of course it is expensive. That's the 'wholesale' price, which will be paid by Registry Service Providers, Internet Hosting Services, etc.

It will trickle down, eventually.

If you're thinking that some else (a Registry Service Provider) will bear the brunt of these fees, that's not quite right. Anyone who applies for a dTLD is in effect applying to become a Registry Service Provider. As described in the FAQ:

Please note that applying for a new gTLD is not the same as buying a domain name. An applicant for a new gTLD is, in fact, applying to create and operate a registry business supporting the Internet's domain name system. This involves a number of significant responsibilities, as the operator of a new gTLD is running a piece of visible Internet infrastructure.

The evaluation fee is US$185,000. Applicants will be required to pay a US$5,000 deposit fee per requested application slot when registering. The deposit will be credited against the evaluation fee. Other fees may apply depending on the specific application path.

Of course it is expensive. That's the 'wholesale' price, which will be paid by Registry Service Providers, Internet Hosting Services, etc.

It will trickle down, eventually.

The evaluation fee is US$185,000. Applicants will be required to pay a US$5,000 deposit fee per requested application slot when registering. The deposit will be credited against the evaluation fee. Other fees may apply depending on the specific application path.

I'm not saying, "That won't happen!!" What I am saying is that the current fee is $185,000 to start up a new gTLD, plus a $25,000 yearly fee, plus there's a sunrise period, review period before you do go live because you also need to submit a rules and regulation prospectus to ICANN, that review period is to look over everything you've submitted and can take as long as four years to complete, and you need to provide the name/address of your legal representative whom they indicate that they will be contacting. You can find all of that at ICANNs site about getting a new gTLD. So yeah, so if someone is really, really, really wanting to do that which you described, there's little stopping them outside of the process that's been indicated.

As far as if gTLDs are good or bad. Meh, I can think of worse things that ICANN could have done. I'm pretty ambivalent about them really. I think you're looking at the absolute worse case here, which means you're still technically correct. There's just a ton of better ways folks can already go about obfuscating junk and I think they'll go those routes way before they attempt starting up a brand new gTLD.

https://www.icann.org/dns-resolvers-checking-current-trust-anchors

It's a key rollover event

https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/ksk-rollover

There are several changes a year worldwide. I can't find a true changelog, but the tz-announce mailing list gives you some idea.

Domain Name: DUCKDUCKGOOGLE.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2064927099_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.register.com
Registrar URL: http://www.register.com/
Updated Date: 2016-10-10T16:21:40Z
Creation Date: 2016-10-10T16:21:39Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-10-10T16:21:39Z
Registrar: Register.com, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 9
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@web.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8003337680
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTr...
Name Server: DNS1.REGISTER.COM
Name Server: DNS2.REGISTER.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned

ICANN now has a little over a month to come up with a replacement

After having been given almost three years of notice to do something about it. Look, it was never a point about if ICANN could or could not fix it. ICANN made it quite clear from their actions that they were not ever going to fix it. This whole thing shows that the most recent round of directors at ICANN are commercial focused buffoons that lack any real understanding of law or technology. It's a shit show right now at ICANN so this entire thing like, "Oh No! WHOIS will break!" is crap. Have idiots running an organization, watch idiotic results flow from that organization. It's that simple.

It was implemented after the "Wild West" style of domain name registration, ownership, and transfer in the 1990s. The dispute goes through ICANN and is resolved by ICANN, not some French court. There's a section of the domain name dispute resolution policy specifically earmarked for trademarks. The trademark holder files the claim with ICANN, who receives evidence from both sides and grinds the wheels for a while, before deciding who ultimately gets the domain name. At that point, the registrar transfers ownership. France using the French court decision to pressure web.com to turn over ownership to them is probably illegal, even if they are correct that they own the trademark on "France".

(Also, I seriously doubt the French government holds a legitimate claim to the International trademark on "France". If that were possible, then China could register "China" as a trademark, and force all websites to cease using the word "China" in ways the Chinese government didn't like.)

On October 1, 2016 ICANN ended its contract with the United States Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and entered the private sector.
Citation: https://www.icann.org/news/ann...

Congress didn't renew the contract, the Republican majority congress... Thanks Obama!

Importantly, Slashdot's editors failed, IMO, to maintain a key point in this submission, that ICANN has been basically negligent and delusional in ignoring this pending law and failing to take any action in the TWO YEARS since the law was passed. And then at the last minute they asked for a moratorium and said otherwise they won't be able to adhere to the law. If you read the many months worth of coverage that The Register has published on this, it is a mindblowing story of incompetence and irresponsibility by ICANN. (Read the Register link in the OP, and the related articles will guide you.)

Submitted:

In a letter sent to DNS overseer ICANN, Europe's data protection authorities have effectively killed off the current service, noting that it breaks the law and so will be illegal come 25 May, when GDPR comes into force.

ICANN now has a little over a month to come up with a replacement to the decades-old service that covers millions of domain names and lists the personal contact details of domain registrants, including their name, email and telephone number.

ICANN has already acknowledged it has no chance of doing so. The company warns that without being granted a special temporary exemption from the law, the system will fracture, perhaps even resulting in the Whois service being turned off completely while a replacement was developed.

Critics point out that ICANN has largely brought these problems on itself, having ignored official warnings from the Article 29 Working Party for nearly a decade, and only taking the GDPR requirements seriously six months ago when there has been a clear two-year lead time.

European agencies responded and tore ICANN's plan to shreds, pointing out that it needs to be much more precise and to include both compliance and auditing functions. Critically, however, it did not address ICANN's request for a moratorium.

Even the idea of a moratorium appears to have been invented by ICANN. This is no evidence of a similar request from any other industry, and the GDPR is, after all, a globally applicable law that affects everyone.

---
ICANN gives domain souks permission to tell it the answer to Whois privacy law debacle
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

As GDPR draws close, ICANN suggests 12 conflicting ways to cure domain privacy pains
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

Whois is dead as Europe hands DNS overlord ICANN its arse
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

US government weighs in on GDPR-Whois debacle, orders ICANN to go probe GoDaddy
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

ICANN takes Whois begging bowl to Europe, comes back empty
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

Europe fires back at ICANN's delusional plan to overhaul Whois for GDPR by next, er, year
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

https://www.icann.org/en/syste...

https://www.icann.org/news/ann...

Importantly, Slashdot's editors failed, IMO, to maintain a key point in this submission, that ICANN has been basically negligent and delusional in ignoring this pending law and failing to take any action in the TWO YEARS since the law was passed. And then at the last minute they asked for a moratorium and said otherwise they won't be able to adhere to the law. If you read the many months worth of coverage that The Register has published on this, it is a mindblowing story of incompetence and irresponsibility by ICANN. (Read the Register link in the OP, and the related articles will guide you.)

Submitted:

In a letter sent to DNS overseer ICANN, Europe's data protection authorities have effectively killed off the current service, noting that it breaks the law and so will be illegal come 25 May, when GDPR comes into force.

ICANN now has a little over a month to come up with a replacement to the decades-old service that covers millions of domain names and lists the personal contact details of domain registrants, including their name, email and telephone number.

ICANN has already acknowledged it has no chance of doing so. The company warns that without being granted a special temporary exemption from the law, the system will fracture, perhaps even resulting in the Whois service being turned off completely while a replacement was developed.

Critics point out that ICANN has largely brought these problems on itself, having ignored official warnings from the Article 29 Working Party for nearly a decade, and only taking the GDPR requirements seriously six months ago when there has been a clear two-year lead time.

European agencies responded and tore ICANN's plan to shreds, pointing out that it needs to be much more precise and to include both compliance and auditing functions. Critically, however, it did not address ICANN's request for a moratorium.

Even the idea of a moratorium appears to have been invented by ICANN. This is no evidence of a similar request from any other industry, and the GDPR is, after all, a globally applicable law that affects everyone.

---
ICANN gives domain souks permission to tell it the answer to Whois privacy law debacle
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

As GDPR draws close, ICANN suggests 12 conflicting ways to cure domain privacy pains
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

Whois is dead as Europe hands DNS overlord ICANN its arse
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

US government weighs in on GDPR-Whois debacle, orders ICANN to go probe GoDaddy
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

ICANN takes Whois begging bowl to Europe, comes back empty
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

Europe fires back at ICANN's delusional plan to overhaul Whois for GDPR by next, er, year
https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

https://www.icann.org/en/syste...

https://www.icann.org/news/ann...

Angel you are Chinese, if you are a Chinese citizen you aren't even allowed to speak out against your country. For all we know you are propaganda troll working for the Chinese government. Here you are posting on a chinese site https://ask.helplib.com/java/p... https://whois.icann.org/en/Loo... . I think the Chinese people are smart, hard working people but the Chinese government has been for some time manipulating trade and currency to benefit their own country that has gone too far.

Chinese troll says China is doing nothing wrong. Are you even allowed to speak out against your own country? The answer is no, unless you want to go jail . Here you are posting on chinese help forums. https://ask.helplib.com/java/p... on a Chinese site https://whois.icann.org/en/Loo... .

Were you also aware that an open source software developer, Theo de Raadt, had already registered the domain name openbsd.org on October 12th, 1995 and created a public source code repo called OpenBSD on October 18th, 1995?

Excuse me, but I'm pretty sure that (despite occasional drama) Theo is not a woman in tech.

He therefore does not count.

Please report to the reeducation camp immediately.

Since you thought of the term 'open source' on February 2nd, 1998, were you aware that someone else had already registered the OpenSource.com domain name on January 8th, 1998?

Were you also aware that an open source software developer, Theo de Raadt, had already registered the domain name openbsd.org on October 12th, 1995 and created a public source code repo called OpenBSD on October 18th, 1995?

And if not, do you still believe you can claim you coined that term 'open source' when it was clearly in use for published source code several years before 1998?

Since you thought of the term 'open source' on February 2nd, 1998, were you aware that someone else had already registered the OpenSource.com domain name on January 8th, 1998?

Were you also aware that an open source software developer, Theo de Raadt, had already registered the domain name openbsd.org on October 12th, 1995 and created a public source code repo called OpenBSD on October 18th, 1995?

And if not, do you still believe you can claim you coined that term 'open source' when it was clearly in use for published source code several years before 1998?

https://www.icann.org/news/blog/documentation-is-key-to-recovering-hijacked-domain-names

Asking whether to trust CAs or domain registrars to guarantee that you are connecting to the site you think you are, is like asking whether to trust Hillary or Donald on their promises to help the middle class (as defined outside Manhattan).

So, just like DNS records then?

You're pre-supposing that there exists a contact page on the website.

Worse case scenario is you could check the WHOIS contact info that is supposed to be kept up-to-date for maintaining the domain. When a Slashdot troll posted dick pics with my contact info on Russian websites, I used the WHOIS contact info for the few websites that didn't have an email address or contact form. Most of the time I got a response that the dick pic was removed. The non-responses included bounced emails because mailbox is full or no response at all.

"Thousands" was hyperbole. But there are a buttload. Here's the list: https://www.icann.org/registra...

This has been ruled on by the courts.

This particular thing has not. Nor even really this class of things.

Were this thing to have happened two years ago there would have been some precedent covering this. Before October 2016 ICANN operated the DNS system at the behest of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration of the US Department of Commerce. I am not a lawyer but it would have been easy to argue this arrangement would have made ICANN a state actor, and restricted from engaging in content based limitation of speech just like the government itself.

But now that ICANN has moved from being managed by the Department of Commerce to a "Multi-Stakeholder Community" the legality of this move is much more uncertain. While private institutions are free to enforce their own policies and restrictions can they take over a government built and designed system and do the same? Especially if the government was instrumental in supporting and developing the system in the first place and leading to it's success. the current DNS system we have in place is roughly equivalent to the Interstate Highway System in that both form a major backbone of their respective systems. I imagine many people would complain if the US government ceded control of the highway system to private enterprises, especially if that private enterprise started blocking highway access to people they deemed undesirable. Yet that is what is going on here, and I am not sure what the legal ramifications are for it.

Incidentally one of the main criticisms of moving ICANN out from under the DOC was the concern that other nations without as robust protections of free speech as the United States would try to take down domains that fall afoul of their laws or politics. It seems that their fears from those days may have been justified.

Maybe, but for those rare free speech absolutists who really are arguing Nazis should have a neutral DNS registrar available on free speech grounds (as opposed to the alt-right nuts we see here), there are, actually, rather a lot of DNS registrars, even if you remove the duplicates. The idea Stormfront cannot get someone to register their website is ludicrous. And frankly, if an organization is so terrible that they can't get one of the literally thousands of registrars to talk to them...

No they are doing what they are supposed to

Has to be like that for the first 120 days I think.

whois query on steampowered.com gave me this: Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTr... What does that could mean?

What have we seen of their stewardship? A cray number of stupid domain names which screech spam and malware, and inflating domain name fees which are disproportionate to their cost of provision: basically rent seeking and profiteering. ICANN is technically non-profit, but it pays out big salaries, nice junkets and favors to industry.

"Last week, ICANN said Public Technical Identifiers, a nonprofit public benefit corporation, had been incorporated in California, to eventually run the IANA functions under contract from ICAAN, after the transition was complete." So who are "Public Technical Identifiers"? These articles say they were incorporated by ICANN who designed the "transition plan". No body ever willingly gives up power. Is PTI an ICANN facade? http://www.computerworld.com/a... https://www.icann.org/news/ann...

Information on the "Affirmation of Commitments" can be found here

Are you thinking of ARIN?

https://www.icann.org/get-star...

"ICANN plays a unique role in the infrastructure of the internet. Through its contracts with registries (such as dot-com or dot-info) and registrars (companies that sell domain names to individuals and organisations), we help define how the domain name system functions and expands."

----before you Reply/criticize, please read at least one of the links I posted below - thank you ---

Change in ICANN has been impossible to come by. The only "representative of the people", Karl Aurbach
tried for years to get some accountability, some rationality, some responsibility. Instead all he got was
stonewalled. It makes for interesting but not hopeful reading that ICANN is ready to manage a global
network with ANY sort of eye to "the stakeholders."

It's like letting the MAFIAA manage the Internet. Their goals are to please THEIR stakeholders, which
do not include those of us who enjoy Pandora, Spotify, Hulu, Bittorrent, etc.

Here's that "interesting reading" I promised. It's a small but representative subset.
http://www.circleid.com/posts/...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
http://archive.icann.org/en/co...
https://w2.eff.org/Infrastruct...

Ehud

The big problem is the lack of support from so many TLDs.

Except selling a domain like that is explicitly against the rules and will result in you losing the domain.

Refer to section 4.b. i-iv in https://www.icann.org/resource...

Also note the date of the policy; this is not a new thing.

Some other AC wrote some time ago:
http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

Out of all the people who responded to my comment here http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

I'll respond here. Really, this shit should be put on the front page of Slashdot maybe some old school readers would actually be interested.

That link hairyfeet added above is the last piece of the puzzle. The Czech guy checked here http://localghost.org/posts/a-...

In that article is this:

Information transmitted

All text typed on the keyboard is stored in temporary files, and sent (once per 30 mins) to:

oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
pre.footprintpredict.com
reports.wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com

Ok so you look for whois nsatc.net

NSATC.NET - Domain Informationnew
Domain NSATC.NET [ Site Info Traceroute RBL/DNSBL lookup ]
Registrar MARKMONITOR INC. MarkMonitor, Inc.
Registrar URL http://www.markmonitor.com/
Whois server whois.markmonitor.com
Created 27-Sep-2001
Updated 01-Dec-2014
Expires 27-Sep-2015
Time Left 30 days 0 hours 4 minutes
Status clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientUpdateProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited) clientTransferProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited) clientDeleteProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited)
DNS servers A.NS.NSATC.NET 199.93.44.45
B.NS.NSATC.NET 8.12.212.49
C.NS.NSATC.NET 64.152.2.44
D.NS.NSATC.NET 205.128.93.51
E.NS.NSATC.NET 212.187.162.134
G.NS.NSATC.NET 205.128.88.25
L.NS.NSATC.NET 8.255.48.47
g.ns.nsatc.net 205.128.88.25
e.ns.nsatc.net 212.187.162.134
d.ns.nsatc.net 205.128.93.51
a.ns.nsatc.net 199.93.44.45
b.ns.nsatc.net 8.12.212.49
l.ns.nsatc.net 8.255.48.47
c.ns.nsatc.net 64.152.2.44

Now who is MarkMonitor, Inc?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.popsci.com/technolo...
https://torrentfreak.com/torre...

Ok so what happened? Microsoft took consumers money for decades of virus-laden shitware. Botnets, anti-virus suites, ransomware, all that shit.... you bought it hook line and sinker. They profited. Now they used the money consumers gave them to hire career lawyers. World gov's said hey, what the fuck? Anti-trust, etc.. then they started fuckin.

You will want to uninstall your Windows 10 "The Spyware of all Spywares Edition" because the only anti-virus that will work is Linux or other *nix.

If you installed Windows 10 because of lies about being free, or DX12, your homework is:
https://www.google.com/#q=roll...

You have 30 days after you took the spyware upgrade to roll back or it self-deletes the backup files.

You may or may not decide to keep any Windows at all... but you won't want any new ones. Microsoft surely should by fried for this gig, but they used consumer money to buy lawyers so you can see how they do shit. You can't buy a ticket to the Resurrection according to Tony Montana in Scarface.

distrowatch.com
KDE on Linux for anything that's not a Windows game.

Some other AC wrote some time ago:
http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

Out of all the people who responded to my comment here http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

I'll respond here. Really, this shit should be put on the front page of Slashdot maybe some old school readers would actually be interested.

That link hairyfeet added above is the last piece of the puzzle. The Czech guy checked here http://localghost.org/posts/a-...

In that article is this:

Information transmitted

All text typed on the keyboard is stored in temporary files, and sent (once per 30 mins) to:

oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
pre.footprintpredict.com
reports.wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com

Ok so you look for whois nsatc.net

NSATC.NET - Domain Informationnew
Domain NSATC.NET [ Site Info Traceroute RBL/DNSBL lookup ]
Registrar MARKMONITOR INC. MarkMonitor, Inc.
Registrar URL http://www.markmonitor.com/
Whois server whois.markmonitor.com
Created 27-Sep-2001
Updated 01-Dec-2014
Expires 27-Sep-2015
Time Left 30 days 0 hours 4 minutes
Status clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientUpdateProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited) clientTransferProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited) clientDeleteProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited)
DNS servers A.NS.NSATC.NET 199.93.44.45
B.NS.NSATC.NET 8.12.212.49
C.NS.NSATC.NET 64.152.2.44
D.NS.NSATC.NET 205.128.93.51
E.NS.NSATC.NET 212.187.162.134
G.NS.NSATC.NET 205.128.88.25
L.NS.NSATC.NET 8.255.48.47
g.ns.nsatc.net 205.128.88.25
e.ns.nsatc.net 212.187.162.134
d.ns.nsatc.net 205.128.93.51
a.ns.nsatc.net 199.93.44.45
b.ns.nsatc.net 8.12.212.49
l.ns.nsatc.net 8.255.48.47
c.ns.nsatc.net 64.152.2.44

Now who is MarkMonitor, Inc?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.popsci.com/technolo...
https://torrentfreak.com/torre...

Ok so what happened? Microsoft took consumers money for decades of virus-laden shitware. Botnets, anti-virus suites, ransomware, all that shit.... you bought it hook line and sinker. They profited. Now they used the money consumers gave them to hire career lawyers. World gov's said hey, what the fuck? Anti-trust, etc.. then they started fuckin.

You will want to uninstall your Windows 10 "The Spyware of all Spywares Edition" because the only anti-virus that will work is Linux or other *nix.

If you installed Windows 10 because of lies about being free, or DX12, your homework is:
https://www.google.com/#q=roll...

You have 30 days after you took the spyware upgrade to roll back or it self-deletes the backup files.

You may or may not decide to keep any Windows at all... but you won't want any new ones. Microsoft surely should by fried for this gig, but they used consumer money to buy lawyers so you can see how they do shit. You can't buy a ticket to the Resurrection according to Tony Montana in Scarface.

distrowatch.com
KDE on Linux for anything that's not a Windows game.

Some other AC wrote some time ago:
http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

Out of all the people who responded to my comment here http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...

I'll respond here. Really, this shit should be put on the front page of Slashdot maybe some old school readers would actually be interested.

That link hairyfeet added above is the last piece of the puzzle. The Czech guy checked here http://localghost.org/posts/a-...

In that article is this:

Information transmitted

All text typed on the keyboard is stored in temporary files, and sent (once per 30 mins) to:

oca.telemetry.microsoft.com.nsatc.net
pre.footprintpredict.com
reports.wes.df.telemetry.microsoft.com

Ok so you look for whois nsatc.net

NSATC.NET - Domain Informationnew
Domain NSATC.NET [ Site Info Traceroute RBL/DNSBL lookup ]
Registrar MARKMONITOR INC. MarkMonitor, Inc.
Registrar URL http://www.markmonitor.com/
Whois server whois.markmonitor.com
Created 27-Sep-2001
Updated 01-Dec-2014
Expires 27-Sep-2015
Time Left 30 days 0 hours 4 minutes
Status clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien... clientUpdateProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited) clientTransferProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited) clientDeleteProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited)
DNS servers A.NS.NSATC.NET 199.93.44.45
B.NS.NSATC.NET 8.12.212.49
C.NS.NSATC.NET 64.152.2.44
D.NS.NSATC.NET 205.128.93.51
E.NS.NSATC.NET 212.187.162.134
G.NS.NSATC.NET 205.128.88.25
L.NS.NSATC.NET 8.255.48.47
g.ns.nsatc.net 205.128.88.25
e.ns.nsatc.net 212.187.162.134
d.ns.nsatc.net 205.128.93.51
a.ns.nsatc.net 199.93.44.45
b.ns.nsatc.net 8.12.212.49
l.ns.nsatc.net 8.255.48.47
c.ns.nsatc.net 64.152.2.44

Now who is MarkMonitor, Inc?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.popsci.com/technolo...
https://torrentfreak.com/torre...

Ok so what happened? Microsoft took consumers money for decades of virus-laden shitware. Botnets, anti-virus suites, ransomware, all that shit.... you bought it hook line and sinker. They profited. Now they used the money consumers gave them to hire career lawyers. World gov's said hey, what the fuck? Anti-trust, etc.. then they started fuckin.

You will want to uninstall your Windows 10 "The Spyware of all Spywares Edition" because the only anti-virus that will work is Linux or other *nix.

If you installed Windows 10 because of lies about being free, or DX12, your homework is:
https://www.google.com/#q=roll...

You have 30 days after you took the spyware upgrade to roll back or it self-deletes the backup files.

You may or may not decide to keep any Windows at all... but you won't want any new ones. Microsoft surely should by fried for this gig, but they used consumer money to buy lawyers so you can see how they do shit. You can't buy a ticket to the Resurrection according to Tony Montana in Scarface.

distrowatch.com
KDE on Linux for anything that's not a Windows game.

It's no longer open; you missed it by a day.

GNSO Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Working Group Initial Report
https://www.icann.org/public-c...

This is how it used to be done in some countries. I remember Australian registrars refusing to register .com.au domains if you didn't have an associated ABN (Australian Business Number assigned by the tax office to registered businesses). I had a problem where outdated ABN details didn't match the entry I was trying to put in the WHOIS records. Clearing the mess took a few days.

Though today it looks like click and play just like .com domains.

It's still supposed to be the case (I'm a registered domain registrar) - but it is rarely enforced, despite my continual arguments (please don't guess who I am, it should be pretty obvious but... I use a pseudonym for a reason).

MelbourneIT, GoHosting, and VentraIP are the worst offenders by numbers. The last two are the biggest scumbags (front-running and domain hijacking). GoHosting have spent years stalling on DNSSEC and avoiding penalties for flagrant breaching of policies. In fairness the fish rots from the head down and ICAAN started the shower of shit.

By law we are still required to verify an ABN and a contact address - likewise publication of the Registrant's Rights and Responsibilities (a quick Google will show you how many are compliant - likewise registration of resellers).

I'm sorry to hear about the ATO stalling on your ABN - the ATO's outsourcing of their systems is a whole 'nuther barrel of rotten fish. But thanks for saying that anyway - the problems won't go away if people don't complain.

This is how it used to be done in some countries. I remember Australian registrars refusing to register .com.au domains if you didn't have an associated ABN (Australian Business Number assigned by the tax office to registered businesses). I had a problem where outdated ABN details didn't match the entry I was trying to put in the WHOIS records. Clearing the mess took a few days.

Though today it looks like click and play just like .com domains.

It's still supposed to be the case (I'm a registered domain registrar) - but it is rarely enforced, despite my continual arguments (please don't guess who I am, it should be pretty obvious but... I use a pseudonym for a reason).

MelbourneIT, GoHosting, and VentraIP are the worst offenders by numbers. The last two are the biggest scumbags (front-running and domain hijacking). GoHosting have spent years stalling on DNSSEC and avoiding penalties for flagrant breaching of policies. In fairness the fish rots from the head down and ICAAN started the shower of shit.

By law we are still required to verify an ABN and a contact address - likewise publication of the Registrant's Rights and Responsibilities (a quick Google will show you how many are compliant - likewise registration of resellers).

I'm sorry to hear about the ATO stalling on your ABN - the ATO's outsourcing of their systems is a whole 'nuther barrel of rotten fish. But thanks for saying that anyway - the problems won't go away if people don't complain.

> ICANN exists to make money.

Not according to their own public descriptions and charter, at https://www.icann.org/. They're supposed to be a service to the Internet as a whole.

The plan is potentially _very_ helpful, in that it encourages using third party DNS providers who are more profitable customers for ICANN: they require far less support per domain name than your average domain holder, and they tend to be more organized about paying their bills. It transfers the overhead of individual customer support to those third party domain holders, where it will cost money. But it's unpredictable and aggravating expenses that ICANN won't have to deal with for people who publish insulting or misleading domain names.

Anonymity for domain names has a very positive use preventing harassment, both targeted harassment for politically sensitive domains, and the simple spam that pours into the mailbox of anyone whose email address is on the publicly available DNS information. I've been hit by that last repeatedly, and it is quite burdensome to isolate the relevant ICANN or DNS related email from the resulting spam. But it also has been used very, very negatively, by domain name squatters and by fraudulent websites to avoid prosecution. And the threshold to get a court order and reveal the legitimate domain owner has been consistently set too high to usefully act against frauds.

It can be difficult to balance: I'm afraid that ICANN has not been consistent about this, and they do need to be more clear about when and how domain owners may be revealed than they have been. But this policy change will be despised by many legitimate domain owners, such as myself.

As you've implied, but just to make it clear: It's not legitimate for someone to declare your domain's death in absentia just because they can't see anything new and cute. The domain name system was not invented for website addresses in the first place; it was invented to let people assign their own names for computers, and it's nobody's business whether they can see your list of zero or a million computers that are also none of their business. That being said, I'll mention a few tips to defend your domain against self-serving grabby types:

• As long as you already have web hosting anyway, just make sure there's a homepage that mentions that the domain really is in use. It doesn't have to have images or anything fancy at all; just enough to let people know that someone is paying attention if they pull any tricks. Maybe mention that it's been in use since 2001, to indirectly discourage anyone from thinking that a typosquatting case is going to be in their favor. In any case, it will get the point across that you're not a squatter.
• If you ever get tired of paying for hosting, some registrars (like Gandi) will host a redirect or a simple 1-page or 3-page site of your own content for free (not just placeholder spam for their own company). That's enough to tell grabby types to move along and stay off your lawn.
• If you think someone might actually try to impersonate you to hijack your registration (either by registrar move, transfer of ownership, or "updating" your contact information to theirs), have your domain registrar add protective EPP flags for your domain. You have to go through the extra step of having those turned back off later if you really want to transfer or early-delete your domain name. Some of them:
  • clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited: These stop your domain from being dropped or moved to another registrar where the attacker already has their own control in place. (Some registrars may already have them turned on.)
  • clientUpdateProhibited: If you think you're under active attack, you might ask for this; it usually means you can't even change which nameservers the domain uses, without asking for the flag to be removed first.
  • serverDeleteProhibited, serverTransferProhibited, serverUpdateProhibited: These are "super" versions of the above, but you probably don't want them unless someone is aggressively trying to steal your domain. Adding and removing them on your own request means that you have to ask your registrar, then the registrar has to forward the request to the top-level domain registry, who then has to add or remove the flags.
• While you're playing with your domain registration: Make sure your registration contact information is good enough that your registrar can actually reach you if something goes wrong. Strictly speaking, someone can file a whois data complaint against a domain, claiming the contact data is phony, and then the registrar has to make sure they can contact someone who will still claim control of the domain.

3) There is nothing wrong with hinting you are willing to sell. I'm willing to sell my home for enough money and I still live here. If someone wants to pay me 130% or market (not even an insane amount) I'm out tomorrow. The fact that I would sell for over market doesn't indicate bad faith which is the other thing that needs to be proven.

Hold your horses. Hinting that you're willing to sell is probably the worst possible thing you can do if a trademark owner is trying to take your domain away from you. From ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, the first example of a bad faith registration is: " circumstances indicating that you have registered or you have acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of your documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name."

Never signal that you're willing to sell, even as a joke. The domain is your baby, and you want it forever. If they offer an amount you're willing to sell for, then take it. But never admit before then that a certain amount would get you to change your mind. When Nissan (the car company) tried to take nissan.com from Uzi Nissan (the computer store owner) who had registered the domain long before Datsun ever began using their Nissan trademark in the U.S., they asked him how much it would take for him to sell. He replied, "A million dollars. Why can't you understand I'm not going to sell." Basically he pulled a Dr. Evil. Back when the phrase "a million dollars" was first coined and the average person made a few dollars a week, it meant a ridiculously huge sum of money. But today it's not that much money.

Nissan's lawyers immediately took the first half of his statement, snipped out the context in the second half, and presented it to ICANN as evidence he was squatting the domain to extort money from the trademark owner. ICANN then decided to take the domain away from him and put it in escrow until the dispute was resolved (eventually in Uzi Nissan's favor years later, though he lost millions because he wasn't awarded legal fees). If he hadn't used that particular phrase, he might have been able to continue using the domain throughout the legal proceedings.

Read up on the UNDRP if this is something you're really worried about.

3) There is nothing wrong with hinting you are willing to sell. I'm willing to sell my home for enough money and I still live here. If someone wants to pay me 130% or market (not even an insane amount) I'm out tomorrow. The fact that I would sell for over market doesn't indicate bad faith which is the other thing that needs to be proven.

Hold your horses. Hinting that you're willing to sell is probably the worst possible thing you can do if a trademark owner is trying to take your domain away from you. From ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, the first example of a bad faith registration is: " circumstances indicating that you have registered or you have acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of your documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name."

Never signal that you're willing to sell, even as a joke. The domain is your baby, and you want it forever. If they offer an amount you're willing to sell for, then take it. But never admit before then that a certain amount would get you to change your mind. When Nissan (the car company) tried to take nissan.com from Uzi Nissan (the computer store owner) who had registered the domain long before Datsun ever began using their Nissan trademark in the U.S., they asked him how much it would take for him to sell. He replied, "A million dollars. Why can't you understand I'm not going to sell." Basically he pulled a Dr. Evil. Back when the phrase "a million dollars" was first coined and the average person made a few dollars a week, it meant a ridiculously huge sum of money. But today it's not that much money.

Nissan's lawyers immediately took the first half of his statement, snipped out the context in the second half, and presented it to ICANN as evidence he was squatting the domain to extort money from the trademark owner. ICANN then decided to take the domain away from him and put it in escrow until the dispute was resolved (eventually in Uzi Nissan's favor years later, though he lost millions because he wasn't awarded legal fees). If he hadn't used that particular phrase, he might have been able to continue using the domain throughout the legal proceedings.

Read up on the UNDRP if this is something you're really worried about.

As I understand the plaintiff's argument, each renewal is a separate act of cybersquatting. Can anybody more familiar with anti-cybersquatting law clarify whether this is a valid argument?

Basically, no, since the laws deal with the intent of possessing the domain, so unless intent demonstrably changed from when it was first registered, this is just an attempt to shove a wedge into where the plaintiff thinks there may be a crack.

There are a few laws that can get involved, but the most important in the US is the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.

I haven't read it, but it appears the act lays out some guidelines, and among some defenses are "Registrant’s prior use of the domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of goods or services" which should apply here. The act also lists actions that would indicate bad faith by the domain holder, like "Registrant’s intent to divert customers from the mark owner’s online location" and "Registrant’s offer to transfer, sell, or otherwise assign the domain name to the mark owner or a third party for financial gain, without having used the mark in a legitimate site", but those don't appear to apply here. The fact the domain was renewed is not relevant to this law.

The other important "law" is by appealing to ICANN under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, which unfortunately has historically been more fruitful to trademark owners when going after people legitimately using a domain that contains a trademarked name since it allows a person to complain that "a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights".

Amateurs:

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
https://www.icann.org/resource....
Domain Name: concreteballoonanimals.com
Registry Domain ID: 1943371105_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com/
Update Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Creation Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Michael Chaney
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Registrant City: Franklin
Registrant State/Province: Tennessee
Registrant Postal Code: 37064
Registrant Country: United States
Registrant Phone: +1.6153611244
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Michael Chaney
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Admin City: Franklin
Admin State/Province: Tennessee
Admin Postal Code: 37064
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: +1.6153611244
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Michael Chaney
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Tech City: Franklin
Tech State/Province: Tennessee
Tech Postal Code: 37064
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: +1.6153611244
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Name Server: NS17.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS18.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned

Amateurs:

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
https://www.icann.org/resource....
Domain Name: concreteballoonanimals.com
Registry Domain ID: 1943371105_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com/
Update Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Creation Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Michael Chaney
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Registrant City: Franklin
Registrant State/Province: Tennessee
Registrant Postal Code: 37064
Registrant Country: United States
Registrant Phone: +1.6153611244
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Michael Chaney
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Admin City: Franklin
Admin State/Province: Tennessee
Admin Postal Code: 37064
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: +1.6153611244
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Michael Chaney
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Tech City: Franklin
Tech State/Province: Tennessee
Tech Postal Code: 37064
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: +1.6153611244
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Name Server: NS17.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS18.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned

Amateurs:

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
https://www.icann.org/resource....
Domain Name: concreteballoonanimals.com
Registry Domain ID: 1943371105_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com/
Update Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Creation Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Michael Chaney
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Registrant City: Franklin
Registrant State/Province: Tennessee
Registrant Postal Code: 37064
Registrant Country: United States
Registrant Phone: +1.6153611244
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Michael Chaney
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Admin City: Franklin
Admin State/Province: Tennessee
Admin Postal Code: 37064
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: +1.6153611244
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Michael Chaney
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Tech City: Franklin
Tech State/Province: Tennessee
Tech Postal Code: 37064
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: +1.6153611244
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Name Server: NS17.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS18.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned

Amateurs:

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
https://www.icann.org/resource....
Domain Name: concreteballoonanimals.com
Registry Domain ID: 1943371105_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com/
Update Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Creation Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Michael Chaney
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Registrant City: Franklin
Registrant State/Province: Tennessee
Registrant Postal Code: 37064
Registrant Country: United States
Registrant Phone: +1.6153611244
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Michael Chaney
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Admin City: Franklin
Admin State/Province: Tennessee
Admin Postal Code: 37064
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: +1.6153611244
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Michael Chaney
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Tech City: Franklin
Tech State/Province: Tennessee
Tech Postal Code: 37064
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: +1.6153611244
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Name Server: NS17.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS18.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned

Amateurs:

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
https://www.icann.org/resource....
Domain Name: concreteballoonanimals.com
Registry Domain ID: 1943371105_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com/
Update Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Creation Date: 2015-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-06-30T16:36:25Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clien...
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Michael Chaney
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Registrant City: Franklin
Registrant State/Province: Tennessee
Registrant Postal Code: 37064
Registrant Country: United States
Registrant Phone: +1.6153611244
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Michael Chaney
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Admin City: Franklin
Admin State/Province: Tennessee
Admin Postal Code: 37064
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: +1.6153611244
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Michael Chaney
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 2214 Henpeck Ln
Tech City: Franklin
Tech State/Province: Tennessee
Tech Postal Code: 37064
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: +1.6153611244
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: domains@michaelchaney.com
Name Server: NS17.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS18.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned