Domain: johnlocke.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to johnlocke.org.
Comments · 9
-
The problem isn't funding for public schools
Spending per public school pupil has roughly tripled in the last 45 years (inflation-adjusted). The U.S. now spends more per student than any other OECD nation except Switzerland.
The problem is school administration. The number of non-teaching administrative staff has more than doubled in 45 years, far outpacing growth in number of teachers or students. They control how funds for education are spent. Basically every time we increase spending on education, the administrators use it raise their own pay, hire more administrators, and buy useless but high-profile bling like iPads. Every time we cut spending on education, the administrators make sure it goes straight to the teachers. The teachers then get lots of media coverage complaining about how they're underpaid and under-supplied. Which leads to further increases in education spending which the administrators sop up again, passing only a token amount down to the teachers.
If you've got a proposal for how to selectively reduce spending on only administrative staff in public schools, I'd love to hear it. If not, the only alternative we have that we know works is competition. Which means charter schools, even with all their warts. -
Re:Fortunately they are easy to identify,Considering how many states do issue FREE voter ID cards (example: http://www.sos.ga.gov/gaphotoid/FAQ.html), and how many states have very liberal (in the Locke sense of the word, not the Liberal Party sense) terms of acceptable of non-voter-ID as acceptable proof of identity (anything from driver's licenses to utility bills to welfare cards), all one would need to do is lift a finger, dial a phone number, and get a card.
10 seconds to Google: "how many states issue free voter ID"... favorite result so far: http://www.johnlocke.org/newsletters/research/2011-02-18-m0lcanosi54bel605me4poau57-regulation-update.html (oh the irony, I reference Locke and Google gives me a johnlocke.org result).
Here's another example, from New York this time: http://www.vote411.org/bystateresult.php?state=NY
ID Needed for Voting
If you are a new voter who is registering by mail, you will be required to show identification when you go to vote for the first time. If you are already registered at the board of elections or a state agency, you should not have to show identification at the polls. It is advisable for all new voters to bring identification when voting for the first time. Acceptable IDs to to vote are:- Passport
- Government ID card
- Military ID card
- Student ID card
- Public housing ID card
- Any ID specified by HAVA and New York State law as acceptable
- Utility bill
- Bank statement
- Paycheck
- Government check (Social Security, tax refund, military paycheck or paycheck stub)
- Other government documents with your name and address including but not limited to: voter registration card, hunting, fishing, or trapping license or firearm permit.
So, if you work - your paycheck stub is OK. If you work for cash - your bank statement. If you don't work - government check. If you don't work and are in public housing - housing ID card. If you have a landline phone - your bill. If you don't have a landline phone - cell phone bill with matching address. And so on, and so on. Please, PLEASE show me ONE person who can have any semblance of normal function in society and yet somehow avoid having ANY form of ID.
If someone doesn't have ANY form of ID (how the HELL do they live? How do they drive / buy cigarettes / alcohol / drugs? How do they avoid being arrested if stopped by a cop? How do they receive welfare or own a home? Who the HELL in today's society doesn't have ANY ID?), and they're too damn lazy to even call up the state and ask for a voter ID card, do we really need to hold their hand all the way to the voting booth? Or can we acknowledge that sacrificing the rights of hundreds of thousands of legitimate voters (whose vote would be canceled by someone else's fraudulent one) for the sake of a tiny percentage of lazy/arrogant jackasses who can't function on the most basic level, is a terrible idea?
Or do we instead cling to the "screw the rights of millions, protect the rights of the few" doctrine and allow rampant vote fraud to take place? -
Re:Very Strange
Well, in hopes that you will come back and actually read this, I will tell you that my main objection to greenman3601's presentation is that it's largely propaganda. It only tries to show you one side. More specifically, they spent a lot of time talking about how the climate models were able to predict the change in temperature that comes from volcanic eruptions, and I will tell you, that's not very impressive; it is a fairly well understood area of climate science, and you can make a fairly good estimate with pencil and paper. No computer is needed. So if his models couldn't do that, it would be extremely pathetic.
For evidence the other way, here is a great debate between two scientists. One of them has actually built climate models, and he gives evidence that they are inaccurate. -
I call BSI normally enjoy differences of opinion between people; it gives the opportunity for intersting conversation. However, when you start fudging data and call it fact, I have a problem with that. The actual number of days in "many days" is in the 20-30 range now. That's down from 200+ days in the past. I don't live in LA, but I travel there frequently, and speak daily people who live there. Better is still not good enough. You don't give a source here, but if it's as reliable as your next one, it's not worth much. Asthma is negatively correlated with air pollution. See this report, page 10. No. Wrong. The graph in Joel Schwartz's report you cite attempts to correlate ozone (not overall "air pollution") to asthma, and upon examination, fails.* Air pollution includes other noxious gasses and particulate matter which are also linked to asthma. Furthermore, ozone's effects on people with asthma is well-documented in the medical world.**
The report is a hack research paper designed to support a political view, not an serious attempt to understand pollution and how it affects people. It is not science. It is propaganda masquerading as science. Your misunderstanding of pollution is large. Your misunderstanding of health matters is dangerous.
* Weakness in this "report" include:
- It fails to include all data; there are about 100 counties in North Carolina; the report summarizes hospitalization in only 29.
- It aggregates ozone and hospitalization rates for 2 years, rather than correlate daily/weekly patterns of ozone and hospitalization.
- It fails to account for other contributors to asthma (pets, pollen, mold, infection, cigarette smoke, etc)
- It fails to address adult asthma.
- It fails to account for:
a) asthma in children over 14
b) asthma in children which was not severe enough to cause hospitalization
- The graph shows only one county seriously out of line with the average hospitalization rate; Swain county. Swain county is:
a) small enough to yield statistically questionable data
b) lower than the rest of the state in income and education, and
c) higher than the rest of the state in poverty.
If anything, it seems to indicate a correlation between poverty and illness. Hardly a surprise.
- Schwartz's underlying asthma data comes from a report done on children on Medicaid and asthma-related hospitalizations. The original report made no mention of ozone or pollution. The original report also gives the following caveats, which Schwartz made no mention of :
"Neither source will produce a reliable indication of the total prevalence of asthma among children."
"Other children on Medicaid with asthma may not have been diagnosed, or may not have had services paid for by Medicaid during the year."
"The hospital discharge data counts only those cases where the complications of asthma were serious enough to warrant one of more overnight hospital stays."
** The tip of this information iceberg can be found:
here
here
here
here
here
or here -
Re:Smog is way down, why is this needed?
...t fly into an LA area airport on many days, and your will actually descend through a yellowish-brown layer... The actual number of days in "many days" is in the 20-30 range now. That's down from 200+ days in the past. Paying for illnesses that are caused or aggravated by smog isn't cost effective either, both in terms of economic and human impact. Asthma is negatively correlated with air pollution. See this report, page 10. -
Consider the Source(s)
As a parent who recently bought a home deliberately OUTSIDE the Charlotte-Mecklenburg system, let me assure you, these people don't have any idea what they're doing. This school district has been in the crapper for years and years. No small part of my wife's and my decision to move OUT of Charlotte was the schools. You can check CMS's test results or you can find lots of interesting facts, not to mention things like this or this. The list goes on and on.
-
Another economic fallacy.
There seems to be a fallacy that people believe where pumping out more college graduates somehow equals to more jobs being created and also helps create a better economy. This is just not true.
You have countries like Canada and Egypt where the government spends a lot of money on education but have a higher unemployment rate than the U.S.
The notion that pumping more money into a system ( especially when the government is involved) will fix any problem is just bad economics
Here is a paper that argues that what we need is to let the free market work, to get the government out of the education biz and NOT subsidize more college graduates.
The paper is called "The overselling of higher education"
http://www.johnlocke.org/acrobat/pope_articles/the _overselling_of_higher_education_report.pdf
I suggest all /.'s take a read. -
Re:Ethnically segregated?
No, multiculturalism isn't working just fine in a America. The only reason you think its working is possibly because you ether haven't been exposed to its failures or you are simply not aware of them. If multiculturalism was working you wouldn't have problems of White flight which is a direct cause urban blight in places like downtown Detroit and other cities. Blacks start to move in and Whites move out, taking their money and their business with them. Whites simple
,as a group don't, want to live next to Blacks and I've heard plenty of Blacks say they same thing.Here in America the most discriminated people are White Americans. A White person can't even make a joke about racial problems with being branded a racist. You bring up concern about a "person of color" you risk losing your job, friends, and even your family. For instance radio talk show host William J. Bennett makes a crack about aborting Black babies to low the crime rate and he is burned at the stake by the media. While this evil sack of shit, Kamau Kambon, makes a speech on live tv about exterminating White people off the face of the planet and no one says a thing. One man because he is White gets hanged in the press, the other Black, gets cheers. Yes, people cheered and clapped when he said that.
Here is a link to Kamau Kambon http://www.johnlocke.org/lockerroom/lockerroom.ht
m l?id=5854 so you can listen to it yourself. There are video links around the web but they are getting harder to find.No, multiculturalism isn't working just in fine in America. It just hasn't reached as bad here as it has in France. In France and most of Europe there is no more room for the races to separate, while here in America there is still plenty of room. Once that room runs out though.
By they way I just want to put out there for thought that right now the most discriminated race in America is he White race.
-
Re:air purifier
Consumer Reports tested only what the Ask Slashdot question wanted to know (ie: Dust removal).
A large byproduct of these ionizers is ozone. Which brings me to my next point: Does your wife find it easier to breathe outside just after a lightning storm?
If so, it isn't the dust removal that's helping, it's probably the ozone. You might want to ask your doctor, though, if there's a danger of overexposure to ozone from these things. I doubt there is, but it is something to consider. You also may want to consider just using an ozone generator instead, which could be more effective.
But let me repeat: You really need to talk to your doctor about this. Some scientists say ozone is dangerous, and some say ozone is not a problem. It's up to you and your doctor to decide if ozone is the best way to go.