Slashdot Mirror


An Affordable Air Purifier For Dusty Computer Labs?

Alcimedes writes "Our lab has a serious issue with dust. I've had a number of power supplies stop working because of dust clogging up the fans, and it's getting annoying. So I'm looking into some kind of small (under $500) air filtration system, and was wondering if anyone else out there has already gone down this road. If so, what did you buy and would you buy it again? I'd prefer something where I don't have to keep buying filters, but that may just be a pipe dream." Anyone with cats knows the feeling. Can you suggest a reasonably priced answer to dust-borne failure?

552 comments

  1. air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    despite the hype, the sharper image "ionic breeze" actually collects a lot of dust, and doesn't require replacement filters. I have one near my computer at my house, and it definitely collects a lot of dust.

    1. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      thats funny, I've got an 'ionic breeze" next to my computer to, and my computer collects a lot of dust!

    2. Re:air purifier by spike2131 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I bought a product very similar to the iconic breeze, and it does wonders to cut down on dust in our home. The one I have is called the Gerry Air Purifier. That's "Gerry", as in the baby products company. It was marketed to be put in a nursery to filter air for newborns, but it works just the same as the one for adults, at a lower price.

      I didn't get it at Sharper Image, though, it was on special at Wal-Mart.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    3. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to my wife's asthma, I have three in my house. They require no filters, are completely silent, and collect a lot of dust.

    4. Re:air purifier by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Which ones? The Sharper Images or Gerry?

    5. Re:air purifier by rzbx · · Score: 1

      *sarcasm*

      You have one near your computer and it still collects a lot of dust? and yet you claim "ionic breeze" collects a lot of it.

      *sarcasm*

      --
      Question everything.
    6. Re:air purifier by t0qer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I thought these worked because static electricity charges the dust around it to stick to the collectors. Isn't static electricity bad for components?

      I would think a hepa based filter product would result in less burned out hardware, despite messy filter changes.

    7. Re:air purifier by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Informative
      Completley wrong my good sir. Consumer Reports tested the ionic breeze and *was unable* to measure its effectivness because its filtration was "below measurable levels" if it was doing anything at all.

      That being said the ionic breeze uses the *best* technology for air cleaning, but the lack of a fan makes it completley useless. There are other models out there that use the same technology and have fans.

      I would recommend spending the 5$ or so to get a copy of the air filters report from http://www.consumerreports.org (no I don't work for them, I'm just a fan:) (I seem to have lost my print copy of the article otherwise I'd tell you the recommendations). If you aren't familiar with consumer reports, basically they are a non-profit who buys everything from spackle compount to cars and tests it rigorously using the scientific method. Their reports include an overview of the different technologies involved, overview of pro's and cons, and a discussion of what devices are suited for what applications, and finally their *scientific* tests of the devices and their results. Devices are then ranked by overall score in each category measured (some categories can be objective like "ease of use"). In the case of air purifiers they put each purifer in a chamber with a known quantity of (measureable) debris, and after a ceartin period of time they saw how much/little was left.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    8. Re:air purifier by cfallin · · Score: 1

      I thought these worked because static electricity charges the dust around it to stick to the collectors. Isn't static electricity bad for components?

      Yes, static is bad for components. That's why you shouldn't stick your components inside your Ionic Breeze purifier. A grounded PC case? In that case, no danger at all.

    9. Re:air purifier by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Funny

      You said:

      That being said the ionic breeze uses the *best* technology for air cleaning, but the lack of a fan makes it completley useless

      followed later by:

      no I don't work for them, I'm just a fan

      Hmmm... I see potential for a link-up here :-)

    10. Re:air purifier by GreatOgre · · Score: 2, Informative

      So did they just put them in a chamber with no movement whatsoever? The way I understand how the ionic breeze works is that uses the air flow already in the house so as not to require fans which are noisy.

      Now, you may say that the air in your house is still. Not so, the air just moves sooooooo slow that it feels still to use.

      But overall, I would say that unless their chamber had some air flow, it was not a very scientific test. Now, if they used several different air velocities during the tests, then they may have a point. Might have to scrounge up a copy of that report at the local library to find out for myself.

    11. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Honeywell sells two models similar to the ionic breeze but with a fan through Radio Shack.

    12. Re:air purifier by cornjchob · · Score: 4, Informative

      No measurable levels of filtration?

      No effin' way.

      I'm in highschool, and my English teacher has an Ionic Breeze in his class--I have absolutely horrendous allergies and sinus problems, but as soon as I set foot in his class, it's beautiful. My sinuses clear up and I can breathe; it's incredible. And I was very skeptical at first (I mean, how seriously can one take those god awful commercials?), but when I took his apart to see the plates--man, just caked with dust. These things work, make no doubt about it.

      And there doesn't need to be a fan--the difference in charge pulls the air. It's actual physics, and it definately works. Take a plastic spoon and rub it a bunch of times against wool. Then, go to your nearest sink and turn on the water so that you have a nice, smooth flow. Hold the spoon next to the water, and it bends near the spoon. Same principal.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    13. Re:air purifier by chrysrobyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Completley wrong my good sir. Consumer Reports tested the ionic breeze and *was unable* to measure its effectivness because its filtration was "below measurable levels" if it was doing anything at all.

      The original poster claimed to have one installed, and claimed that it was pulling dust out of the air. You state that he's wrong because some magazine said so? I'm not quite sure what you're thinking. Perhaps you'd like to provide some evidence that the original poster's computer room is not actually cleaner?

      I've got one of these things. My wife can't breathe through her nose for 24 hours if I leave it turned off or if it's dirty. I have to clean it every week or two because it collects so much stuff it starts to make noise otherwise. Your post, and that of another here, actually dropped my opinion of Consumer Reports. Perhaps it's not that good for cleaning whatever lab setup they had, but perhaps it is good at my real world (read as "5 cats", in a room adjacent to the litter box, vacuum monthly, ceiling fan on during summer) scenario.

      Calling someone's personal observations "wrong" because they have a claim that disagrees with what you've read about is an interesting tactic.

      I've seen, first hand, how dirty a HEPA filter can get, how quickly. I've seen, first hand, how dirty an Ionic Breeze can get, how quickly. I'm not equipped to measure anything, but those Ionic Breeze blades sure do pick up lots within 24 hours (especially if you burn a scented candle). I'm not going to claim that the Ionic Breeze got all the particle sizes a HEPA does, but I will claim that, for my bedroom of moderate size where the door is never closed, the Ionic Breeze cleans the room well enough for my wife who's allergic to dust mites to breathe, and quiet enough for my picky ears to let me sleep.

      You can't tell us we're wrong, because Consumer Reports said so, and expect to be believed by any reasonable human being.

    14. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumer Reports Dude: Word of mouth still rules. As you can see, quite a few people like the product. Yet another blow to C.R. What a sad magazine.

    15. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least i understand the pointed-out pun :)

    16. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling someone's personal observations "wrong" because they have a claim that disagrees with what you've read about is an interesting tactic.

      I find this viewpoint intriguing. Please provide some URLs to elaborate.

    17. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. Your sense of humor is astonishing. RSD, clearly you are the alien contact I was sent to make contact with. Take me to your leader!

    18. Re:air purifier by GnarlyNome · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried to ionize my principal in high school but the principle was wrong so i got detention instead

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    19. Re:air purifier by Monkelectric · · Score: 0, Troll

      I can make no arguemnt against such ignorance.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    20. Re:air purifier by Hodr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the "Effect" of the Ionic Breeze is actually the creation of ozone which makes the air "smell" fresh but actually does little to cleanse it.

      Try looking at any online opinion site (like epinions.com for example) and in nearly every case long time users of this product say its so inefficient that dust actually settles on and around it.

    21. Re:air purifier by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      It's not the spoon that bends, it's the wa...

      There is no sp...

      Never mind...

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    22. Re:air purifier by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'll reply to you since you were the only one who was polite :) There are two measurements of efficency for air filtersm;the percent debries removed and "Air exchanges per hour". An Air Exchange/hr is exactly what it sounds like -- the entire volume of air in the room must pass through the unit in one hour. The percent debris removed by electrostatic filters is *VERY* high, however, it makes no difference if no air reaches the filter to be cleaned. The HEPA standard is 6 ae/h (i'll abreviate from now on), and some high end models achieve 15 ae/h. The problem is of course the ionic breeze *ISN'T MOVING AIR*, and thus is hopelessy inefficent.

      Suppose for a moment you are correct and the ionic breeze does recieve some benfit from the normal movements of air in the house. There is no way that it could achieve the necessary 6 ae/h, and If thats not important to you -- you still must agree that a filter *with* a fan is almost infintley more efficent :) How many cubic meters of air do you think pass through an ionic breeze due to normal house currents? My 70$ honeywell moves 5000cubic feet of air per hour.

      Sharper image is selling the same old snake oil, and the people who attacked me are pretty much defending their shiny 500$ pieces of crap, and that saddens me :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    23. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Not-for-profit consumer group? QUANGO, more like.

    24. Re:air purifier by ndogg · · Score: 3, Informative

      I won't don't that it works well, but have you used other products of this type to be able to compare?

      Perhaps the Ionic Breeze works well, but perhaps there are other filters that work many times better, and that's why CR rated the Ionic Breeze as poor.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    25. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, anyone knows that ``there is no spoon''.

    26. Re:air purifier by Vengeful+weenie · · Score: 1
      I had the first version of this unit, and it did seem to collect some dust. It also was very quiet and the ozone had a very pleasing effect.

      On the down side:

      1. I had some real mechanical problems with the unit about six months out, even after I sent it in for service.
      2. The unit did not move a lot of air. The newer models seem to have larger fins, which move more air.

      That said, I wouldn't dicount the review in CR. Just because there is dust and dirt on the coils doesn't mean that it removes more dust, or even just as much dust as other models. The big selling points are no filters (cheap) and very little power consumption (also cheap).

    27. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ozone does clean air, it oxidizes impurities, killing germs and removing smells...

    28. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and the people who attacked me are pretty much defending their shiny 500$ pieces of crap, and that saddens me :)

      They attacked you because you were being a dick, and you are still being a dick.

      If you are rude to others, expect them to be rude to you. No emoticon will change that.

    29. Re:air purifier by supz · · Score: 1

      I have a honeywell hepa filter in my room, and my computers still collect plenty of dust :D

      What I can say, is that my allergies haven't been as bad as previous years when I did not have it in my room. However, it is a bit more difficult to sleep now, with it running 24/7, even on the Low setting. Sometimes I just turn it off, for the sake of sleep.

    30. Re:air purifier by oever · · Score: 1

      The poster asked for a solution to the dust in his computer room: his fans were clogging up with dust. If the ionic breeze is not moving air itself, it could be placed near the most powerful computer fan in the room.

      This solution would be very cheap and environmentaly friendly: no new filters and no extra power consuming fan.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    31. Re:air purifier by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There is no spoon!

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    32. Re:air purifier by Lord+Prox · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have had a major problem with dust in the air at my place. A new shopping mall is going in back of my place and the construction is hell. Earth movers, graters, if it's big n yellow is there. I finally got pissed and did something...

      1 Old cardboard box
      3 scrap box fans
      1 "filtree" by 3M furnace filter.

      Blend with duct tape and let simmer for 24 hours over lo heat and volia! Big reduction in dust

      Best of all clean up was a snap! The whole damn thing cost me less that 5 bucks so I just tosses it when I was done. With a little more work you could build a larger, more permanate version. Not a $500 ionizer (I have a good idea of what is in there and it ain't 500 bucks worth. More like 10-20, but you know market forces good marketing, what have you.)

    33. Re:air purifier by shepd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Consumer Reports tested only what the Ask Slashdot question wanted to know (ie: Dust removal).

      A large byproduct of these ionizers is ozone. Which brings me to my next point: Does your wife find it easier to breathe outside just after a lightning storm?

      If so, it isn't the dust removal that's helping, it's probably the ozone. You might want to ask your doctor, though, if there's a danger of overexposure to ozone from these things. I doubt there is, but it is something to consider. You also may want to consider just using an ozone generator instead, which could be more effective.

      But let me repeat: You really need to talk to your doctor about this. Some scientists say ozone is dangerous, and some say ozone is not a problem. It's up to you and your doctor to decide if ozone is the best way to go.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    34. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I had no luck finding a web page that had details on the Gerry Air Purifier, can you give more details, model #, where did you buy it, etc.

      Thanks.

    35. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Consumer Reports said so.

    36. Re:air purifier by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      You are misleading what was said.

      And you obviously have NO sense of humor.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    37. Re:air purifier by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The original poster claimed to have one installed, and claimed that it was pulling dust out of the air. You state that he's wrong because some magazine said so? ... Calling someone's personal observations "wrong" because they have a claim that disagrees with what you've read about is an interesting tactic.

      The magazine in question does actual scientific studies with equipment, such as dispersing a measurable amount of air pollution (dust) and then measuring the quantity remaining after a period of time: In the end there is simple scientific fact derived by experimentation.

      An individual person, making a subjective observation, is widely acknowledged as having flawed perception and a hearty "placebo effect": People are certain that the magic marker around the outside of their CD makes it sound better, and putting a spoiler on their 89 Civic makes it go faster. There are numerous legendary examples I could give of people simply believing something works and convincing themselves of the same, and that seems to be what you're advocating.

      You can't tell us we're wrong, because Consumer Reports said so, and expect to be believed by any reasonable human being.

      What's with the CR hate? It's a non-profit organization just looking at avoiding "belief", but instead judging products based upon scientific experimentation. Question the method used to evaluate the product, but questioning the evaulation itself seems rather flawed.

    38. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ dude, how many times are you going to reply to your own post because you feel a little embarrassed about your snake oil?

    39. Re:air purifier by archen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but just think of all that UV radiation that doesn't come through the windows anymore =P

    40. Re:air purifier by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Ozone does clean air, it oxidizes impurities, killing germs and removing smells...

      Technically this is true. However, there are problems with ozone in that the molecule is one helluva free radical generator and free radicals have been implicated in lots of things that can make you life unpleasant. Things like cancer and other disorders. It makes me wonder about all those Tyco race car sets I used to play with and that lovely smell that filled my bedroom.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    41. Re:air purifier by jethroT · · Score: 1
      I guess the important difference between the CR tests and some positive personal observations is the amount of air circulation. The prinicple of Ionic Breeze won't work over a range of more than a few centimeters (comparable to the range of a magnet). So Ionic Breeze won't work unless there is a measurable draft in the room that sends a lot of dust in the path of the machine. Test it in a room with doors closed and it probably will fail miserably.

      You can say CR used an unfair testing precedure or you can say Ionic Breeze works only under some conditions and is inferior to products with a fan.

      Disclaimer: I don't have any Ionizer, this is just guess work.

    42. Re:air purifier by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Disclaimer. I haven't used the Ionic Breeze, nor any other such air purifier. I haven't read the Consumer Reports evaluation, either. (Consequently, I am a typical Slashdot poster.)

      I gather that CR's chief complaint was the lack of a fan to draw air past its blades. Perhaps the performance of the unit varies wildly depending on how much ambient air circulation there is. An earlier anecdotal report cites good performance in a school classroom. Well, there's going to be lots of dust to work on, and having twenty or thirty kids fidgeting all day in a confined space will keep the air moving. This poster also cites good performance in a room with a ceiling fan.

      Perhaps CR chose a dust size or type that wasn't picked up well by the Ionic Breeze, or perhaps their test wasn't sensitive enough, or perhaps all of the other models tested did happen to perform significantly better. They probably tested in still air, but not having the report, I cannot say for certain.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    43. Re:air purifier by Chrome-Dragon · · Score: 1

      "No measurable levels of filtration?" in a zero air movement environment. Is the point. In a class room with 30 students coming in and out and stirring up the air or in a server room lets say where the air con moves the air around it might work great.

    44. Re:air purifier by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to be another impolite theoretical poster responding to your actually researched arguments, but wouldn't dust, etc be removed in a perfect filtration system by simple chemical dispersion? For example, in a plate of water, a drop of colored liquid will disperse and color the entire liquid even if there is no regular current in the liquid. Lacking such a movement, there is always the random but real movement of molecules known as heat...

      I am not a HEPA engineer, but I would expect a perfect filter in any given room would reduce the airborne particulate matter as a function of the ambient temperature and the amount of particles entering the room. Personally I would attach a fan as a precautionary measure as X times .001 is a lot smaller than X times 1, but for sufficiently large values of X the air could remain reasonably clean.

    45. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree here. 2 phish-head roomates smoking hourly joints/bonghits, and I can't remember that last time I felt any kind of contact high. all because of that I.B.

    46. Re:air purifier by blakestah · · Score: 1

      I am not a HEPA engineer, but I would expect a perfect filter in any given room would reduce the airborne particulate matter as a function of the ambient temperature and the amount of particles entering the room.

      Generally, air exchange and quality of filtration of that air are considered the relevant variables. Certainly in some rooms diffusion and random currents of air, and a filter that worked on large particles, may be more than adequate.

      That being said, you'll never see an Ionic Breeze produce an air quality suitable for even a class 100 clean room. But it could easily make life more bearable for someone with allergies.

    47. Re:air purifier by dmarcov · · Score: 1

      Calling someone's personal observations "wrong" because they have a claim that disagrees with what you've read about is an interesting tactic.

      I'll rephrase for the scientifically minded:

      "Calling someone's anecdotal evidence 'wrong' because they have a claim that disagrees with a scientifically tested hypothesis is an interesting tactic."

      Yeah. Really interesting.

      For the record, the folks at Consumer reports stuck these devices in rooms with a known quantity of household dust, etc. And then after 24 hours measured how much had been collected. They found that while other "Ionic" type air cleaners were effective, namely because of the fan, the Ionic Breeze did not measurable change the air quality of the room.

      If you want to question the science they used to determine the results, that's great -- but to say that anecdotal evidence is superior to a reasonably conducted test, with measurable results -- well, that's just crazy talk.

    48. Re:air purifier by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Put the filterm in your air intake to your ventilation system.
      I don't know whay they dont make sall ons that go in your vents.

      hmmm...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    49. Re:air purifier by geekoid · · Score: 1

      first:
      " My wife can't breathe through her nose for 24 hours if I leave it turned off or if it's dirty"

      then:
      "read as "5 cats", in a room adjacent to the litter box"
      then:
      "vacuum monthly"
      rhen:
      "(especially if you burn a scented candle)"

      Get rid of the cats, vacume DAILY(better yet, get rid of the carpet), put out the candle.

      "Calling someone's personal observations "wrong" because they have a claim that disagrees with what you've read about is an interesting tactic."

      People personal observations can be Based on expectations or unseen influences, and thus suspect.

      " the Ionic Breeze cleans the room well enough for my wife who's allergic to dust mites to breathe"

      the number 1 place for dustmites is in the bed, followed by the carpet. Be sure to cover the bed in plastic.

      Finally, I noticed you find fault in consumer reports based on what some poster claims to have read. Very much like claiming someones personal observations is wrong because of something you read.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    50. Re:air purifier by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Horseshit! No breeze? And you own one? Did you plut it in?

      I own one, and yes, it is expensive. Yes, I think it could be designed better when it comes time to clean. But shit, mine blows a breeze at me from 15 feet away. Does it blow my hair back like that old poineer print ad? Of course not. Can I feel air moving? Yes. Maybe yours is broken. I am on my third one (warranty replacements). The first one did just sit there with the lights lit and not working.

      But, if it is working correctly, it will cycle and suck air through and blow out the other side. I know it works, I have the dirtly collector to prove it! :)

      Tony

      --

      WTF? Over?

    51. Re:air purifier by HamNRye · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is about volume of air cleaned per second. I work in Air Filtration so hear me out. There are many similar air cleaners out there that use the same technology as the Ionic breeze. If they have a fan that pushes 265 CFpm through a filter, it will clean more air than a fanless model that pulls 20 CFpm through.

      The Ionic breeze works fine as long as you have something else circulating air, such as a ducting system or human movement. The way most of these filtration methods are tested is by placing them in a sealed container, and measuring how quickly they remove contaminate. That is one of the reasons fanless systems perform very poorly in the lab. That being said, it would most likely be perfect for a computer room that has tons of fans going.

      A far cheaper, and easier method is to go to your local air filter supplier, and get polyester filter material. We use BT1 (Blue Tint, 1" thick) and cover the grills of our intake fans. The stuff is incredibly cheap, does not overly restrict air flow, and will get most large contaminates out of the air. (> 1 micron). You can get a 20'x20' roll here for about 2 bucks.

      If you are interested in a system like the Ionic Breeze, try a Trion air cleaner. It uses the same electrostatic plates, but has a pre-filer that catches larger contaminate making the plates more effective (because they are working with smaller contaminate) and reduces the cleaning frequency. These are also fan driven models that will clean a larger amount of CFpm. They are generally $100-$200 cheaper than the Sharper Image product and can be found at Sears. However, electrostatic plates are generally designed to work with extremely small contaminate particles like smoke. I would assume that most computer rooms are worried about dust which is a 5 micron or greater particle. The poly pre-filters in front of intake fans shoud work best in these situations.

      Basic Air Filtration:

      1 Box Fan
      1 Roll BT1

      Cover the intake of the fan with BT1. Run fan.
      This Filtration system should run about $15. Get a fan with a high enough CFM rating that it will circulate the air in your computer room 2-3 times per hour. Change filter monthly.

      For an upgrade, get a pleated filter and a bigger fan. Pleated filters will reduce airflow by 10-15%, figure that into your CFM calculations. Pleated filters are also far more efficient.

      PDF on trion air cleaners: http://www.trioninc.com/pdfs/residential/02-0251.p df
      (Also has a diagram of how an electrostatic air cleaner works. ala Ionic Breeze)

      One final note: Do not use Ozone Generators. They don't get large particles, only smaller ones, and they are potentially dangerous.

    52. Re:air purifier by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Hold the spoon next to the water, and it bends near the spoon.

      Aha -- it only works if the spoon is NEXT TO the water. You can't bend the water stream by holding the charged spoon on the other side of the room.

      And this is why an air purifier without a fan will not be effective -- it'll purify the air right next to it fine, but the air on the other side of the room will remain just as dusty.

      You probably saw good performance in your classroom because the air in there is well-circulated, either by an HVAC system or the motion of people within the room. Under controlled conditions as in the Consumer Reports study, it would not do as well.

    53. Re:air purifier by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      I had an ionizer rebranded by DAK about ten to twelve years ago, and one of the biggest problems we had with the thing was its effectiveness. The entire segment of the wall next to it was clogged up with dust but the rest of the room was spotless, meaning it was strong enough to pull the dust but wasn't pulling it to the filters quite so well.

      Still, it made allergies quite a bit more bearable, and cleaning my computers wasn't nearly so bad -- and this considering I live in Arizona!

    54. Re:air purifier by HamNRye · · Score: 1

      Especially when competing products are much cheaper and work better. All of you posters who are soooo happy with your Ionic Breeze... It's called an electrostatic Air Cleaner. I picked up mine for $25 each on closeout. A pre-filter will get much of the larger stuff so you don't have to clean it each day, and a fan will move more air. Even if you maintain that it moves air by static charge, you can't deny that static charge plus fan moves more air.

      Check Sears. They run about $125 new, full price. Lot less than $500.

    55. Re:air purifier by instarx · · Score: 2, Informative
      OK, I am what you are calling a HEPA engineer, although there really is no such thing. I have had some backbreaking aerosol physics and ventilation design courses in graduate school and designed and tested clean rooms for years. Here are some facts you should consider...


      The ionic cleaner works by producing charged ions and releasing them into the room. The theory is that dust particles attach themselves to these charged ions and are then attracted to surfaces such as walls and floors (and, I guess, computers and electronics). It is the number of ions released to attach themselves to particles that makes the ionic cleaners work, not the amount of air that passees through them. Some ionic cleaners have an oppositely charged plate that helps collect the charged particles, but mainly the particles get collected on walls. The mistake everyone is making is in thinking that ionic cleaners filter air when they do not - they just release ions. You do not need a large airflow to release zillions of ions.


      Air filtration systems on the other hand rely directly on the amount of air passing through them and the efficiency of the filter. To determine the efficiency of a filter you must define the particle size. A chickenwire filter is 100% efficient for tennis balls, but lousy for dust. A HEPA filter is by the way, 99.98% efficient for particles >=.03 microns.

      Air chages per hour is a particularly bad way to judge the efficiency of a filtering system. Air changes per hour is really a term of art used in the ventilation trades as a yardstick to meet general ventilation standards for different room types. One air change per hour does NOT mean that all the air is changed in the room every hour. Most people think that a filter passing 5000 cubic feet of air per hour will filter all the air in a 5000 ft3 room in one hour. Not so. Because the clean air is constantly mixing with the dirty unfiltered air you are essentially cleaning the same clean air over and over again. Therefore it takes a lot longer to pass all the dirty air through the filter. I could give the equation, but a good rule of thumb is 7 times the volume of the room in acph to filter 99% of the air at least once. In other words a 5000 ft3 room will need a filtering system cleaning 35,000 ft3 of air per hour. That isn't really that hard - only ~500 ft3/minute. BUt who says you need to filter all the air every hour? Put another way, a filter with a Q (flow rate) equivalent to 1 ac/h (5000cfm) will take about 7 hours to filter all the air in the 5000 cf room. Because it is a logarithmic function you get about 85% filtering in 4 hours.

      A big difference in ionic cleaners and filters is that ionic filters do best with very small particles while filters do best with larger particles. An ionic cleaner will remove many more particles than will a filter because it is easier to get a higher charge/mass ratio in small particles, but the filter will likely remove much more mass from the air. (Small particles don't weigh much).

      The best and cheapest thing for the original poster to do is to buy a floor fan or two and put some cheap trimable filtering material on the upstream side of the blades. Air conditioner foam filters for example. The pressure difference should be enough to hold it in place.

    56. Re:air purifier by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I find this viewpoint intriguing. Please provide some URLs to elaborate.

      That's funny. Unfortunately, I almost missed the humor -- and hopefully it was intentional.

    57. Re:air purifier by instarx · · Score: 1

      Oops. I meant a Q of 5000cfh will take 7 hours to filter 99% of the air, not 5000cfm.

    58. Re:air purifier by tchapin · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you should look here for products to help alleviate your wife's allergies. I'd also really suggest ripping up any carpets you have in your house. A lot of indoor allergies can be alleviated with a number of easy steps: 1. Remove as many dust-holding (i.e. fabric) items from your house as possible (carpets, rugs, curtains); 2. be extremely vigilant about dusting and vacuuming (you can buy HEPA vacuum cleaners or even bags for an existing vacuum cleaner); 3. get rid of any environmental allergens (pets); 4. launder sheets and towels more frequently (2x a week at least); and 5. take allergy medication, like Allegra.

      Todd

      --
      -- !todd erases a red dot! I steal music on the internet.
    59. Re:air purifier by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The problem is of course the ionic breeze *ISN'T MOVING AIR*, and thus is hopelessy inefficent.

      Gee, really? I could swear that, when I stick my hand in front of either of my units, I can feel air moving. Thus the name "Ionic BREEZE". No, it obviously doesn't move as much air as some big HEPA unit, but then it also doesn't make quite as much noise - as in, zero.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    60. Re:air purifier by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I agree. I installed two ionic breeze filters in one room of my house. (The one I spend the most time in.)

      One day a good friend came over. He doesn't come over frequently because my place is rather dusty and his allergies don't like it. In the room with the ionic breeze units he didn't sneeze and had no allergy problems. In the other rooms he was his same old sneezy self.

      He had no clue the ionic breezes were there. They weren't even visible.

      So, those who disregard other's firsthand observations can stuff it. :)

    61. Re:air purifier by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ummmm...I would recommend that. The Ionic breeze works on the principle of charging dust particles and then attracting them to an oppositely charged plate. Some of the ionized particles get through. I'd have to think that injecting ionized air into your PC is not a wise idea. I'd have to question whether having them in the same room as your ocmputer equipment is a bright idea either.

      As for the guy who says that Ionic Breeze doesn't work isn't familiar enough with the technology. Electrostatic air filters have been in effect for years with forced air systems. However, with proper design it can charge air/dust particles and accellerate them out the other side. I did something similar as part of my ionic engine science fair experiment in 1982 (I used a 200,000 volt differential and iodine gase as my propellent). Worked quite well.

      What nobody is discussing is that these systems generate low to moderate amounts of ozone. While it's great to have in the upper atmosphere, ozone in your breathing air is quite corrosive to your lungs. If you suffer from ashma, I'd go with a filtration unit over an air ionizer.

      RD

    62. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had no clue the ionic breezes were there. They weren't even visible.

      Yet it was you and your subjective interpretation of his reaction to the environment that is questionable: YOU knew where they were.

    63. Re:air purifier by rcamans · · Score: 0

      You say that the principal of the Ionic Breeze will not work over a range of more than a few centimeters. I do not know where you got that idea, but it certainly was not in any college physics class. Brownian motion is a very effective disburser of particles and molecules. open a bottle of perfume in a very large room without any air circulation equipment operating. I gaurantee that a person standing at the far end of the room will smell it in a few seconds, even though you can do the experiment so that the do not know when you open the bottle. A physics 101 demo. Admittedly, if you ar in the room, there is a very large hot air dispenser going full blast, but that is another subject. Another way that Ionic devices operate to change the distribution of particules in the air is by charging them. This causes them to clump togehter, and setle into the carpet. When you vacuum up the carpet, you get a noticable release of the stuff in it.
      Another method of operation is that the ozone and ionization actually kills off some of the pathogens in the air. some bacteria, etc. this is a scientifically proven item. Admittedly, the Ionic Breeze is probably the most expensive way to get the benefits, so do a little factual research, and find less expensive products. Notice the word factual above. Many of the respondents are not factual, just making what turn out to be dumb assumptions. They are in /. for the fun of it, not for accuracy.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    64. Re:air purifier by pmz · · Score: 1

      You can't tell us we're wrong, because Consumer Reports said so, and expect to be believed by any reasonable human being.

      From what I've seen, Consumer Reports' "scientific methods" are often quite subjective. I read a tire review a while ago that left me baffled, but, then, I realized their results were true given their choice of measurement technique. Consumer Reports tends to project their opinions into their methods rather than their writing, which can actually mislead the reader.

      I generally accept that Consumer Reports does good reporting when they have huge aggregate datasets for things like cars and appliances but question their reporting when they do their own home-brew experiments on a small number of products. The home-brew experiments really just end up being like the product reviews in the Sunday newspaper (unless there are blatant pros or cons to something, the review is worthless due to the author's bias).

    65. Re:air purifier by instarx · · Score: 1
      You are missing a critical point. Ionic air cleaners do not filter air - they release ions that attach themselves to aerosolized dust particles. It does not matter how much air passes through an ionic cleaner because airflow across the corona wire (ion producer) is simply not an important measure for ionic air cleaners. Some have charged collection plates, but most particles collect on walls and floors. Only air filters filter air, and for them the airflow though the filter IS an important measure. You are comparing apples and oranges. The important stat for ionic cleaners is the number of ions they put into the room air, and the important stats for filters is flow rate. Filters don't put ions in the air and ionic cleaners don't filter air - but both clean air.

      Ionic air cleaners are basically a version of electrostatic air cleaner that uses room surfaces as the collection plate.

    66. Re:air purifier by Umrick · · Score: 1
      And there doesn't need to be a fan--the difference in charge pulls the air. It's actual physics, and it definately works. Take a plastic spoon and rub it a bunch of times against wool. Then, go to your nearest sink and turn on the water so that you have a nice, smooth flow. Hold the spoon next to the water, and it bends near the spoon. Same principal.


      Sorry, no. The spoon and water effect you're talking about is actually the "Coanda Effect," first described by Henri Coanda, and has nothing to do with electrostatic buildup.

      A very interesting man.
    67. Re:air purifier by BTM1001 · · Score: 1

      The reason that the water stream "bends" closer to the charged spoon is because of the shape of a water molecule (H2O). The Oxygen ion has a negative charge(-2), and the Hydrogen molecule has a positive charge (+1). The 2 electrons that give the negative charge "belong" to the O ion, but it lends them to the H+ to balance out. While the electron spends most of the time around the O-H area, it does float in other areas around the Oxygen ion. Since the union of these ions to create H2O forms almost a triangle shape, with the H ions less than 180 degrees apart on the Oxygen ion, you wind up with a molecule with a slight dipole property. This is not to say that the product does not work, just that the attraction of the water depends on the charge the water already contains. Unless the particles in the air can become charged, or are charged by default, setting up a magnet won't attract it.

    68. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, from the air's point of view you are just another impurity. Ozone will act to oxidize, kill, and remove you too. Yes, it takes more to do the deed on you, but in your lungs cell-by-cell you look no different than a bunch of germs.

      Just like most any environmentally applied chemical treatment ment to kill things. Really, its best if you aren't there while it's doing its business.

    69. Re:air purifier by Gnasty · · Score: 1

      CR is at least consistently comparing things. If you buy into their test setups, you'll get an accurate comparison. They don't have the Wife Factor involved, nor the Dust Mite Allergy Plus 5 Cats, a Litterbox, and a Ceiling Fan Factor.

      Having a passive unit in a main airflow of the home (does your master bedroom have a cold air return?) would certainly push significant air through it's field of operation.

      Maybe if the vacuum cleaner cost more and had a Sharper Image logo on it you'd pick it up more than once a month. :-)

    70. Re:air purifier by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Not my reaction, his reaction. He actually asked me, "d00d, why aren't I sneezing?"

      Empirical criticism, lesson 1: Ask (gather data) before you assume you know the situation. I provided insufficient information, but you filled in the gaps with your criticism.

      See, this is my problem with kneejerk skepticism. You're assuming I have reduced powers of observation / self awareness.

      Reign in your own assumptions before you criticise.

    71. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly high school student! There is no spoon.

    72. Re:air purifier by rhombic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you realize that you just suggested to the poster that he should replace his currently working solution with the destruction/abandonment of five animals, engaging in household renovation, and otherwise altering behaviors that are enjoyable? (shakes head) slashdot. Jeez, the guy has anecdotal evidence that the breeze works for his wife. There can be all sorts of individual case reasons why it works in this situation, but it does. So why not accept that in this particular case, given lack of contrary evidence, the Ionic breeze is producing the desired results? Disregarding a datapoint without reason is just as bad science as asserting a general rule from an anecdotal response.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    73. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is he definite that it was his English teacher? I don't think the English teacher is doing too good of a job or else he's definitely just a poor student.

    74. Re:air purifier by zrk · · Score: 1

      That's because he bought an IRONIC breeze purifier, not an ionic one!

    75. Re:air purifier by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      One thing you should really be aware of: in most larger buildings, ventilation is a major thing. In a school especially, the air in a given classroom is being exchanged completely fairly frequently. In the case of the Ionic Breeze, by itself, its ability to circulate air is incredibly weak, so it relies on ambient circulation at least as much. And even then, it's highly unlikely that it would compete with the circulation abilities of your building's ventilation. It's like turning the heat on in the dead of winter with all of your doors and windows opened. It's literally trying to filter the air of the entire school.

      You are most likely experiencing a placebo effect, or some other environmental difference in his room that just makes it feel better to you.

      Though I may be wrong here. Maybe your school is really old, or maybe your teacher is using a freakin' huge Ionic Breeze. Obviously I don't know these things, but just be sure you're considering all of the possibilities here.

      I too have used an Ionic Breeze and have replaced it with a true HEPA filter system. The difference is literally *visible* in the air and orders of magnitude better when you actually examine just the pre-filter for the HEPA system. The Ionic Breeze would certainly collect dust (and it was kind of nifty the way it worked), but it really wasn't very significant and it worked very slowly.

    76. Re:air purifier by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      mine blows a breeze at me from 15 feet away... Can I feel air moving? Yes.

      I highly doubt this. I used to own an Ionic Breeze and while I could detect the very slight movement of air around the device, there's no way in hell you're going to say that the thing puts out a breeze at 15 feet.

      Again, I disagree with the other poster in that the Ionic Breeze does move air, but it's nearly imperceptible. It is sufficient to scrub most of the air in a room over the course of a few days (maybe 24 hours or less for a smaller room), but I'd be really skeptical of someone claiming that it works faster than that.

      I realize you're taking the parent post a little personally, and you're probably exaggerating to try and make your point better, but try not to go so overboard.

    77. Re:air purifier by Pinky · · Score: 1

      Given what I have seen with the placebo effect I would rather not believe my own personal observations until I could quantify them. Much less those of someone else. It's entirely reasonable to discount personal observations. With these types of things personal observations should *always* be discounted. Presumably consumer reports did the proper tests and it's therefore reasonable to point to those tests as evidence that they are not very effective. In any case, the proper way of resolving this is to setup repeatable experiments showing the effectiveness of one filter verses another and to publish the results.

    78. Re:air purifier by fataugie · · Score: 1

      No, I am not exaggerating, sitting on my couch watching TV, I can feel air moving across my face that has that ozone smell. It comes in bursts, coinciding with the the cycling of the ionic breeze. How do I know? When the freakin thing needs cleaning it crackles. It's crackling and I can feel it.

      Did I not say the air movement was not drastic? Trust me, I'm not stretching it at all. If the thing does not blow air, then there is a problem.

      I don't think the parent post author knows what to expect. I think he is expecting either a constant torrent of air, or something that will blow the newspaper off the counter. Neither will happen. It cycles every 30 seconds or so, and it's a gentle breeze.

      My biggest complaint with the thing besides shoddy components sometimes (I had a power switch go out) and one complete failure, is the lack of easy dissassembly for complete cleaning.

      The total failure manifested itself in that the lights were lit, but nothing was happening.....at all. Both times they replaced it no charge. The last time was the power switch, and that was out of the warranty period.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    79. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can feel my Ionic Breeze Quadra from _at least_ 20 feet away when it's set on High.

      Also, it works quite well. Don't believe me? Try getting a shitload of traditional incense (mostly vapor, very little large particle matter) and see how quickly it needs to be cleaned when set to High. ;)

    80. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have worked in sales and have seen products that were "junk" rated highly by Consumer Reports. Also products that worked well in the real world, that they gave a low score.
      In short, lab testing is no substitute for real world results.

    81. Re:air purifier by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Hey everybody has had a problem with Principal and principle.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    82. Re:air purifier by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      I guess I'll just have to accept that.. I've never noticed any breeze from the unit I had, unless I was close enough to the device.

    83. Re:air purifier by Asgard · · Score: 1

      I had a similiar type setup; the dust particules were practically welded to the wall! It took quite a bit of work to get them out. You could definetely see the color difference though. No other normally-uncleaned areas of the wall suffered such a fate.

    84. Re:air purifier by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that you should duct tape your Ionic Breeze to the top of your Roomba robotic vacuum cleaner, so the cleaner will move around the room while your floors get vacuumed! ;)

    85. Re:air purifier by crackervoodoo · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, forget all this filtration talk....I wanna know where I can get a magic fish!

    86. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ dude with you quit with your AC anti CR bullshit? If you don't like the magazine, don't subscribe. It sounds more like you bought something that got panned so now you're on a spiteful train of revenge. Thankfully to most people you just come across as a wanker.

    87. Re:air purifier by killfixx · · Score: 1

      I've worked in many clean room environments where traditional and electronic filtering were taking place...Air so damned clean you got sick going outside...But the point was...these rooms were also filled with multi-million dollar electronic equipment...If it's a bad idea to ionically(sp?) filter air next to electronic equipment...why did every desk in these places have their own mini-ionic-purifier...

      --
      "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    88. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snort. Laugh.

      On the one hand, you're asserting that all anecdotal evidence should be disregarded. And on the other hand, you're prepared to accept the hearsay results of an experiment for which you have no access to experimental method, or positive and negative control results, and hasn't been peer reviewed. I'm glad you're not working in my lab.

      Tests on removal of contamination in a lab environment would be what I'd put on par with phase I clinical trials of a drug-- all they tell you is that nobody died, and it might have some effect, or not. The real world test, like a good phase II, ought to involve shipping out a bunch of the machines, about half of which should randomly have their corona wire disabled. Check whether or not people feel the machine's been effective, then unblind and see if there's a correlation between placebo/real machine and effectiveness. Until it's in the real world, no lab test will tell you squat about it's real world behavior.

      You might not want to be so quick to disregard anecdotal evidence. If it wasn't for uncontrolled anecdotal evidence coming out of a clinical trial, Viagra would never have come up.

    89. Re:air purifier by astro-g · · Score: 1

      my duron heatsink is caked with dust,
      but I wouldnt claim its filtering the air that passes through it......

    90. Re:air purifier by astro-g · · Score: 1

      at least, not withou ridiculus charge levels on the spoon, which wont last for long

    91. Re:air purifier by alexburke · · Score: 1

      I'd quote your whole post, but by debunking the following FUD, the whole premise of your comment falls apart:

      The problem is of course the ionic breeze *ISN'T MOVING AIR*

      Wrong, wrong, wrong. I bought one for a relative, and I tested it before I gave it to her. When you turn the Ionic Breeze on, you can feel air flowing out of the front of the unit, and if you tie little streamers (like thin, light ribbons)to the front grating, they start flapping in the breeze the moment you throw the switch. Yet there are no moving parts, and operation is totally silent (not just really quiet, I mean SILENT). I can't even hear any high-pitched sound from the power supply!

      (Needless to say, they have an even better unit now, but oh well.

      So how does it work, you ask? Well, Sharper Image has a somewhat-dumbed-down explanation of what they call the "Zenion Effect" here, or you can dive in head-first here.

      One more BS rumor debunked. <accent character="Apu Nahasapeemapetilon">Thank you, come again!</accent>

      After all that, if you're interested in buying an Ionic Breeze, don't buy it from the Sharper Image for US$299 or US$349 or whatever stupid amount they want for it. You can get them on eBay for something like US$160 or so, either new or factory-refurbished with full warranty (but photocopied manual, oh darn).

      On another note, what's with the "No Subscriber Bonus" checkbox? Am I gonna start posting at +3 by default now?!

    92. Re:air purifier by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      No placebo effect--I asked him if he had a filter or not because I started noticing my symptoms going away. And the building is old, circa...I wanna say around '63? As far as filtration/circulation goes throughout that part of the building, it's none if you're that lucky. But, like other posts had mentioned, it's probably the large movement of air caused by people jostling around that compensates for the lack of a fan. But that's a real world scenario, and it works. Thanks a lot to the other posts I'm too tired to reply to, especially any ones that proved me wrong.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    93. Re:air purifier by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

      The equipment is probably very well grounded and shielded...something most home and basic office equipment is not. I'd also suspect your ionic filters in the clean room are a bit higher quality than those of consumer grade and go further to trap excess ions from escaping the unit.

      Shielding of components is getting better and most offices are now grounded (i.e. 3 prong vs 2 prong). When I ran my science fair experiments in 1982, which produced a lot of ions, I'd have 1/4 sparks jumping from file cabinents to the floor. Granted, my experiments were designed to product a boatload of directed ions, but this was at 50 ft (should watch neon bulbs and phosphoresent panels glow as well). Given that that beam pattern expanded (given electrostatic repusion and I tried to inject neutralizing ions into the stream), this is a frightening prospect to sensitive consumer electronics since it only takes on relatively small electrostatic discharge to punch a hole through your CPU's silicon substrate and render it useless (my experiments did not go into this area...I was building an ion engine turned raygun).

    94. Re:air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps there are other filters that work many times better

      Yeah, in the lab conditions created by the testers.

  2. Slightly off topic by fatwreckfan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But what about the same type of thing for my PC? Air filtering cases are generally crazy expensive...any cheap alternatives for filtering the air into my PC? Cat hair does short work of fans.

    1. Re:Slightly off topic by ni4882 · · Score: 1

      What about using a wire mesh like they use in clothes dryer lint collectors? I think the big problem is that you need to be diligent about cleaning it otherwise you won't have any airflow and you'll start overheating. This probably isn't going to work to well with dust either, just cat fur.

    2. Re:Slightly off topic by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Gee, if the environment is that bad, what about your lungs?

      But back to the topic, how about building a plywood or MDF box for your computer, with weatherstriping on the door. Size it to take a standard furnace air filter (intake), and put a bathroom ceiling fan in it to blow the hot air out. Shouldn't be too hard to make, shouldn't cost too much, and you'll know when the filter needs changing just by looking at it.

      Tip (and this applies to your furnace, too): Spray the filter with Endust. It'll pick up way more dust that way.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    3. Re:Slightly off topic by CliffH · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've built plenty of rackmount systems with filters in place (cloth and wiremesh). It's a pretty common thing for servers and wonder why it hasn't caught on for workstations and home systems yet. I'm sure the cases are out there with the filtering on them, I jsut haven't had a look for any yet. If anyone is going to have them though, check out Lian Li, Procase, Saturn, Enlight, Inwin, or just do a general search. WHat you're probably looking for is something with a removable, reusable filter. DO a goole search and I'm sure you'll find what you're looking for on the cheap (ie. stay away from Lian Li for cheap). Otherwise, nice lil DIY project if you have some time, patience, and a spare case you don't mind butchering.

      Cliff

      --
      sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
    4. Re:Slightly off topic by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      The Lian Li case I have uses a small cleanable mesh infront of the front case fans to trap dust. Does a pretty decent job, instead of the usual dustbunnies inside a case, there's just a bit of powder that you need to clean once in a while.

      Definately a nice thing.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    5. Re:Slightly off topic by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      Is there anything wrong with just placing a tissue (the kind you use to blow your nose) over the fan intake? Of course you'll need to be careful that the tissue is porous enough to allow adequate airflow, but strong enough to catch dust without breaking from the force of the fan.

      I've been thinking about doing this for a while, but I'm not sure if it's safe.

    6. Re:Slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i like using those green scrubby pads for cleaning pots. they are great for filtering and they can be cut down easily. tape those suckers over your inflow grates even

    7. Re:Slightly off topic by StArSkY · · Score: 1

      As does my antec Sonata. Just tip it backwards and pull it out the front.

      Since installing the Sonata I now have NO dust in my case.

      --
      lounge around on the blue couch
    8. Re:Slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woulnd't that be a bit loude for the average user though?

    9. Re:Slightly off topic by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I love the tip at the end; the makers of endust are engenius for making a product that temporarily removes dust but causes it to build up faster after its applied. This way when you dust your house with endust, the time til the next dusting (and subsequent purchase of another can of endust) is shortened. Classic.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    10. Re:Slightly off topic by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      Oh, you could probably make it quiet, but then it probably wouldn't be affordable. Or else it would be huge. I was thinking of a box not much larger than the PC. If noise is an issue, then why not put the PC in another (cleaner) room? There are exising ways to do that, too.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    11. Re:Slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I do is grab some open cell foam from wall-mart (in the section for weatherstriping), intended purpose is for window AC units. I lay it over strips of ventalation holes and over the front of the case behind the plastic bezel. I then snip out the appropriate patern and use hot glue to tack it down. Don't forget to open your case up every month or two and vaccum all the crap out of the filters! It doesn't take that much effort, but it keeps the insides squeaky clean... cheap as hell too!

    12. Re:Slightly off topic by Alioth · · Score: 1

      How about putting an air filter in the actual PSU?

      A company called Misys (which makes a custom server for insurance brokers, running an obscure OS called Tripos) has air filters in all the ventilation systems of the machine they build (power supply etc.) I had a look inside one which had been powered on for a few years, and unlike the usual dusty catacombs that are the hallmark of a PC that's been on for a while, the inside of the machine still looked brand new.
      The machines are physically the size of a full tower unit or a 'double wide' full tower unit.

    13. Re:Slightly off topic by arivanov · · Score: 1

      All 3 and 4 U ACME rack cases used to come with a filter on the air intake.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    14. Re:Slightly off topic by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 1

      Eeek! No no no, no plywood!

      A LOT of fan-based filters use a plywood backing to support the fan. The problem is that often plywood is made using a glue that contains, get this, formaldahyde. Guess what is a major alergen for a lot of people? That's right, formaldahyde, which these filters blow into the air as quickly as their fans can handle. (Source: My allergist who has been in the business for about 40 years.)

      I once got a HEPA filter at home that apparently had a plywood backing. I'm allergic to about a dozen airborn allergen, ranging from dust to pets to trees. I could only sort of breathe before I got the filter. With the filter on, I was in constant misery. If I turned it off, 12 hours later I could breathe again. No kidding. Avoid any air filter that uses plywood in its construction.

      I have 2 of the Ionic Breeze air filters now myself, one for the living room / computer room and one for my bedroom. I don't know what Consumer Reports said about them, but they work fine for me. I clean them about once a week, which involves wiping them down with a wet paper towel and getting globs of black ugly stuff coming off of it; black ugly stuff that I would be breathing otherwise. My nose seems to notice the difference. :-) I've not tried the cheaper knockoffs like Radio Shack's stuff, but I've heard from other patients that those work fine too.

      Honestly, your best bet is to ask your doctor for a referral to a good allergist, and ask them what they recommend. Ask 2 or 3, in fact. Given the number of people who are allergic to dust, and that cat hair and dust are the same as far as your computer's concerned, they'll probably give you some really good answers.

      One other thing: Make sure your computer room is a smoke free area. The tar in cigarette smoke is even more lethal to a computer than it is to you, and that's saying a great deal.

      --

      --GrouchoMarx
      Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    15. Re:Slightly off topic by kfuq · · Score: 1

      No one here has once mentioned just cleaning out the dam filter in the regular house furnace. That will do wonders for dust.. |-)

      --
      iF yOu WAnT to C YOUr iP agaIn gAThEr tWO MilLIon dOLLArS IN Non - cONsEcuTivE TweNtY's AnD AWaiT FuRThER iNstrUctIoN
    16. Re:Slightly off topic by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      You may want to monitor the air quality for particle matter for a few days.
      Shinyei makes a small nephelometer (a device for detecting the amount of microscopic dust and pollutants in the air) for about $10. I don't know if you would be able to get a sample or a test unit. See it at: http://www.shinyei.com/dust_e.htm

      A company in Portland Oregon called AirAdvice will monitor your environment for air particle levels and send you daily reports. See:
      www.airadvice.com

    17. Re:Slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So go put a Boston Fern in the same room as your filter. Looks nice and cleans the formaldehyde out of the air.

    18. Re:Slightly off topic by instarx · · Score: 1

      Go to the hardware store, but some foam air conditioner filter material. Trim it to fit and place it over the air inlets on your PC. $3 including tax.

  3. Windex by eggsurplus · · Score: 2, Funny

    $2.99 about. Pretty cheap and effective.

    1. Re:Windex by pimpybra · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What are you, stupid? Yeah let's windex the INSIDE of a power supply.

  4. Sharper Image by BrianGa · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Ionic Breeze gets wonderful reviews. A friend of mine uses one in the house. I'm sure a few of them strategically placed could help your dust situation...no filters or bags to be replaced, so minimal upkeep. Link to follow: http://www.sharperimage.com/us/en/catalog/productv iew.jhtml?pid=175000&pcatid=1&catid=101

    1. Re:Sharper Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 redundant for this entire thread.

  5. Intake Filters by Cyb3r · · Score: 1

    I've read about people putting Filters at the bottom of their PCs to keep the dust out...

    just buy a metal mesh filter, you can wash those

    might want to look into that... of course youd need an intake fan at the bottom too

    1. Re:Intake Filters by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      my case came with 3 nice plastic mesh ones in the front. the case fans/power-supply fans draw enough air through for the filter to work. i rinse them out in the sink a couple of times a year, they're always loaded with dust. now i just have to find a place that sells just the filters so that i can put them into all my other computers.

  6. HEPA filters by Zugok · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's what you need. I work in a cleanroom making IV infusions and we have HEPA filters in the ceilings of the clean rooms. Of course we have HEPA filters else where as well, but it start with the room. That's the expensive option. The next best would be a Dyson vaccum cleaner with a HEPA filter to really suck up all the dust out of your lab.

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    1. Re:HEPA filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dyson vacuum cleaners rock.. (www.dyson.com) For slobs, or peole that don't have alergies and such, stick with your Hoover, but the Dyson HEPA filter rocks.

  7. Common sense helps by cpct0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are a few air purifier that might do the trick for not a lot of money. I'd say the few parts you should first look at is WHERE does the dust comes from.

    If it's airborne, air purifier.

    If it's more like cat hairs (like in my house) simply elevate your computer from the floor. 1ft high and you will get 1/8th the dust you used to have.

    If it falls from everywhere, put your computer under something... and a good paint job can help too.

    I know it's all common sense, but usually you can remove most of your problems with common sense.

    Have a nice evening
    Mike

    1. Re:Common sense helps by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Common sense helps, but please realize that not everyone has it. Therefore, those with common sense need to make sure it is enforced on those without it.

      I have a specific example. I'm currently working at a place that prints a lot of mail. Hence, thousands of tons of paper, millions of chop cuts and trim pieces running through pipes. Paper dust is EVERYWHERE, despite a massive bag house where thousands of CFM are filtered out to the high 99's.

      Next to the baler, where all the trim paper goes to be disposed of, is a computer for recording waste tonnage etc.,. It is in a totally enclosed, forced-air filtered box, and the printer is in a smaller version.

      That's all well and good, but after changing about three filters, accepted maintenance procedure currently consists of removing the clogged filter. Period.

      Other PC's have not been treated as well. When I used to work in IT there, I opened many a computer that was half full of fluffy dust. Thankfully those were Pentium 100's, so it wasn't the hot 60's or any modern chip....

      Find some way to do it, then make sure it happens.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Common sense helps by hazem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of paper dust...

      I used to work in a university computer lab. A few years ago, the university required that we switch to recycled paper for the laser printers. When that happened, we found that our air conditioner's filters plugged up much more frequently with the dust, and had to be replaced every 4 months instead of once a year. My understanding is that the fibers in recycled paper are smaller than fibers of "virgin" paper. So, the paper sheds more of them while being processed.

      I don't even like to think about breathing it!

    3. Re:Common sense helps by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a lot of really tiny, microscopic wood splinters, and some clay, and some other random chemicals....

      Perhaps that's why OSHA is so interested in keeping our filter system in top working order.

      --
      ...
    4. Re:Common sense helps by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      but usually you can remove most of your problems with common sense.

      This Common Sense sounds very useful!

      How come I've never heard of it before now?

      I've never seen any advertisements for it on television!

      Do you know places where I might buy Common Sense?

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  8. Radioshack has something, and it actually works. by Sponge! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.radioshack.com/Content/Environizer.asp

    Suprisingly, for a radioshack product, they really work, and are a lot cheaper and easier to clean than "The sharper image's" ionic breeze thing...

    The $199 one should do a medium sized computer room.

    My opinion may be nullified by the fact that I work for RS, but I speak now of my own free will.

    --
    Sponge!
  9. First Things First by Gefiltefish · · Score: 5, Funny


    Since a large portion of the dust that we encounter comes from dead skin cells that are shed from our bodies, a clear solution presents itself:

    Convice some of those dirty bastards using your lab to wash once in a while.

    Need for air filter: GONE.

    1. Re:First Things First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would wash their more often. Some (most/all?) of the keyboards in my school labs are filthy. My personal (home) keyboard has never been washed and it's clean after about 2 years of use.

    2. Re:First Things First by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dude, if that's true, there must be hundreds of dead people in my attic. My house is massively dusty.

    3. Re:First Things First by Gefiltefish · · Score: 2, Funny


      I'll bet it's all you. Here's the experiment to find out:

      Wrap your self from head to toe in saran wrap. After a month wrapped in saran wrap, if you don't notice a drastic decrease in dust, I'll give you a dollar.

    4. Re:First Things First by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      Some people just excrete more than others. I have a friend that could use my mouse for an hour it would be covered with this dark grey gunk. I use it for weeks and its still clean. I probably wash my hands more than him, but not much. His hands are cold and clammy. Mine are dry to the touch. Personally, it digusts me, but you can't fight genetics.

    5. Re:First Things First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but he can start exercising and strengthen his heart. If he does nothing, he will be dead in ten years.

    6. Re:First Things First by BJH · · Score: 2, Funny
    7. Re:First Things First by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Turn it upside down and shake it ugh.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    8. Re:First Things First by unitron · · Score: 1
      "After a month wrapped in saran wrap, if you don't notice a drastic decrease in dust..."(or at least a lot more people approaching you for kinky stuff...)

      You won't be able to notice any change in dust level because the humidity in your exhaled breath will condense on the inside of the wrap and obscure your vision.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    9. Re:First Things First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah... something awful link of the day pervasion! FAPFAPFAP OMGWTFBBQ

    10. Re:First Things First by Poeir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention the asphyxiation.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    11. Re:First Things First by Big+Nothing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, most of the dust on workplaces and in the home comes from textile fabrics. The first thing to do if you want to get rid of dust is to get rid of fabric; curtains, carpets, clothes.

      And everyone knows that a room full of naked computer geeks is just plain yummy. *cough*

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    12. Re:First Things First by unitron · · Score: 1

      Catching on to that was an exercise left for the reader.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    13. Re:First Things First by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      i totally agree

      and magically their odor would start to disappear too. would also be nice if they washed their hands after using the bathroom. we use the same keyboards they've been using...

    14. Re:First Things First by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Indeed - I used to maintain cash registers, uh, 'point of sale terminals' in stores and the ones with the most dust, I mean inch thick layer of dust over the mainboard in about a year, were in textile departments, clothing, curtains, carpets, etc.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    15. Re:First Things First by Alan+Cox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Humour aside the first thing to do is to work out why the environment is so dusty to cause these problems. Is it lack of cleaning. If you are trashing systems for the lack of an hour a week with a decent vacuum its a bit silly.

      Similarly look for environmental issues - crumbling concrete floors for example.

      Failing that you could just buy fanless PC's in future 8)

    16. Re:First Things First by Gefiltefish11 · · Score: 1


      The added benefit of washing would be that the labs would empty out once some of these poor saps finally smelled clean enough to get a date!

      Again, dust problem: GONE.

    17. Re:First Things First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Actually, most of the dust on workplaces and in the home comes from textile fabrics.

      So... you're saying that fabrics somehow magically create dust?

    18. Re:First Things First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a turd!!!

  10. Ionic Breeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ionic Breeze from Sharper image is the way to go. I've had one awhile back and it was the best thing. Ever night I would pull the rods to find all sorts of black filth and dust. Just wipe them down and that's it. Not only that, but it gives off ions for that "open window in your house" feel of fresh air. Though, I'm not sure if this would pose a problem for electronics over time. But I doubt it, it's never cause problems with my stuff.

    By the way, I don't one anymore because the last model I had would always short out internally. Though, the newer GP model hs been majorly overhauld in design. So I'm sure it's not an issue any more.

    1. Re:Ionic Breeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a set of flat steel rods from a hardware store and put them on the other side of the room. You'll find they "collect" just as much dust as the Iconic Breeze.

  11. Who cares about dust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a computer lab, I'm more concerned about the general flatulence and B.O. generated by most computer science majors. On a hot summer day, the smell can peel paint from the walls.

    1. Re:Who cares about dust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats mostly the CS majors from india. There's nothing quite like the smell of BO and curry

    2. Re:Who cares about dust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that's no joke.

      I never go into our CS building's main computer lab for a few reasons:

      1) its fucking cold
      2) everytime i go in there for the first time of the semester, i get sick.. seriously! the germs just recirculate
      3) it is soooooo raunchy smelling. the BO smell in there is horrible. good thing X-term works fast over resnet-ethernet

  12. skin by blackmonday · · Score: 0

    I heard that most dust comes from human skin, so just scrub extra hard in the shower.

    1. Re:skin by nelsonal · · Score: 0

      Buy em all loophas, those sponges you use with body wash. They will get the side benefit of younger healthier looking skin too. I'm sure I missed the spelling on both but you get the idea.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:skin by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      i just double-up on the mites. they chow down hard core on my dead skin cells.

    3. Re:skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of skin, anyone know of a better way to get rid of black heads beside pinching them? There's this really hot chick I went out with, and she was actually impressed by my computer and music skills, but I bet I'd have better chances getting a third date if I could clear up my skin. Maybe it has something to do with all the dust in the air?

    4. Re:skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't know how to use one, find a girl and have her show you. It could be fun.

    5. Re:skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude this is slashdot. no one here has any contact with a) girls over 10 or b) are not related

  13. Potential solution for many a dust-bunny host by QuietRiot · · Score: 1

    Used dryer sheets. Tape them over your inlet vents in your case/power supply/whatever. Watch the temperature.

    1. Re:Potential solution for many a dust-bunny host by DisKurzion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Make sure you use USED dryer sheets, or you'll find you're PC components covered in a weird film. Another plue is that it keeps your PC smelling fresh.

    2. Re:Potential solution for many a dust-bunny host by BKX · · Score: 1


      You must smoke pot.

      Seriously, pot smoker's have known that for years, I can't believe computer nerds had no idea before then. If you don't want you're house (car, dormroom, whatever) smelling like weed when you smoke it, smoke out of a oney (a type of pipe that holds enough pot for one hit) and blow the smoke through a dryer sheet. If you use new ones, the whole room will smell morning fresh. If you use old ones they'll just get stained and the room won't smell like pot much. On a computer you wouldn't want to use fresh sheets because that smelly shit will coat your electronics. That's potovation for you.

  14. Cats by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 3, Funny
    Anyone with cats knows the feeling. Can you suggest a reasonably priced answer to dust-borne failure?

    Scissors only cost a buck at Wal-Mart... Or you could go the more expensive electric haircutter route for about $15. Or, you could actually save money by getting rid of the cats.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea! and instead of paying the vet to put the cats to sleep you can "get rid" of them using the scissors!!

      muhahahahaa

    2. Re:Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, name your Pit Filter.

    3. Re:Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      More efficient defense of all your base?

    4. Re:Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AHAHAHAHHhhahahahah I am rolling with laughter!

    5. Re:Cats by jokercito · · Score: 2, Funny

      What?? Get rid of the pussy??? NEVER!

    6. Re:Cats by DinkyDoorknob · · Score: 1

      Cats hate scissors, and the buzz of an electric haircutter freaks them out even worse. The only effective way to de-hair a cat is with nair. Unless you're a horrible sadist, in which case, opt for tweezers.

    7. Re:Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I groom my cat all the time with electric clippers and the sound doesn't bother her at all. If you really want to freak the cat out, introduce it to the hair dryer.

      There's a lot to be said about keeping the cat groomed, both short and long haired. I brush my cat everyday, takes less than 5 minutes. I groom the cat every few months, and I also bathe her to wash away cat dander. Sure, cats hate water, but if you do it from when they're a kitten, they're more tolerant.

      As a result, I see less dust bunnies around the house, and in my computers.

    8. Re:Cats by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Divorce... oh wait, that's not cheap.

    9. Re:Cats by polymath69 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yeah, can anyone suggest a cheap filter to remove cats?

      grep -v -w cats ?
      sed 's/cats//g' ?

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    10. Re:Cats by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what about all of those neighborhood cats?

      Me, I have a tank of hair depilatory I run through the lawn sprinklers each week. Keeps those cats pink and shiny, and I haven't sneezed in months.

    11. Re:Cats by stu_coates · · Score: 1

      Borrow a large dog for a few days! ;-)

    12. Re:Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy has some different ways to get rid of cats.

    13. Re:Cats by um3k · · Score: 1

      1. Buy a door to the computer room.
      2. Close the door. (Make sure cats are outside room.)
      3. Cat hair problem eliminated.
      4. ???
      5. Profit

    14. Re:Cats by bpalmer · · Score: 1

      Went out and got one. Didn't help. They sleep together on the couch now.

  15. Computer filters by DarksideDaveOR · · Score: 1

    This has already been suggested, but I have to reiterate it. Put filters in front of the intake fans on your PCs, and clean them regularly. That takes care of the dust in the PCs problem, and probably makes the air in your lab a bit cleaner, too. Works great in my personal experience.

  16. Dryer Sheets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I use dryer sheets in my case fans. They work great and make the case smell good for a few days.

  17. Replacing filters not neccessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can buy purifiers that use oil to trap particles.

    True, you have to replace the oil, but nowhere *near* as often as with conventional filters

  18. Re:MICHAEL IS A DIRTY LINUX HIPPY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As do I!

  19. Cheap DIY by jhines · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One or more 20x20 furnace filters, and a box window fan. Some duct tape, or bungee cords.

    Should be about $25 at your local mart, in the spring and summer. Hard to find the fans in the winter.

    1. Re:Cheap DIY by hamjudo · · Score: 1
      I do that in my basement after construction projects or other dust generation activity. The air pressure holds the filter in place. No duct tape needed. I leave the fan on 24 hours a day until the dust has cleared.

      The $0.47 filters will catch dust particles large enough to clog up a computer. Small dust just flows right through the computer, unless it is sticky like smoke. I use the $2.50 filters to catch smaller dust particle that only bother me.

      I hardly ever need to buy filters. The secret is to buy lots of filters at once, they're cheaper that way.

    2. Re:Cheap DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate the be the bearer of bad news, but you are fooling yourself. That kind of filter only catches the large particles that you notice. The smaller particles (less than 5u) are not captured, and those are the very particles that cause the most damage to your lungs. Invest in a good filter. You will thank yourself in 20 years.

    3. Re:Cheap DIY by hazem · · Score: 1

      Funny! I do the same thing when brushing my cats.

      If you brush your cat vigorously, the hair flies up everywhere and gets in your face. I hate that.

      I put the fan on high, with the filter on the backside of the fan. Then I just park the cat behind the fan and brush like crazy. Plus, the hair kind of looks cool as it slowly lifts off the cat and then rushes into the fan.

    4. Re:Cheap DIY by yppiz · · Score: 1
      Actually, the 3M Filtrette series of furnace filters is up to the task. They claim sub-micron filtering.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    5. Re:Cheap DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was me, I'd take the grill right off the fan, crank it up to 'strong gale' and toss the cat in head first.

    6. Re:Cheap DIY by NoData · · Score: 1

      Indeed, make that furnace filter the 3M Filtrete 1250 Ultra-allergen filter, and apparently you have a highly effective air purifier on the cheap. Several reports suggest this. Google for "box fan" and "filtrete"

      e.g.
      www.onlineallergycenter.com/aircleaner/
      w ww.healthhouse.org/new/press/A_guide_for_Healthie r_Home.pdf
      www.healthboards.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/0 00088.html
      etc,

  20. PMS by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Informative

    The military's solution is called Preventive Maintenance (or PMs for short - yes, it's real). It basically boils down to wiping off the dust on a regular basis, just like you would with the rest of your house. It's not fun, but it works, and it's well under $500.

    1. Re:PMS by duplo · · Score: 1

      I'm in the military and wiping dust is crap. I actually started looking for a dust filter for my room today and to my surprise this article came up (thankyou slashdot)...you would not believe how much more dust my pc attracts than the rest of the room.

    2. Re:PMS by joib · · Score: 1

      Uh, does the US military have to come up with acronyms for absolutely everything?

      When I was in the army, we cleaned our barracks 3 times per day (if we were there of course), and we had no damn acronym for it! :)

    3. Re:PMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waaiiit a minute. This solution involves work. Have you forgotten? This is Slashdot: News for Nerds too lazy to go out and find the news on their own.

    4. Re:PMS by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      That's great, except one problem... that doesn't always work.

      Take my apartment, for instance: They're doing a LOT of construction just outside my apartment (one of the things they are doing is renovating the Chicago Real World house [which is freaking huge] into a Gym).

      Now that the weather is warming up a bit, we are opening our windows a lot more. Yesterday, in the course of watching one movie (Commando for those who care) I had to get up and dust the TV screen 3x!

      Preventative maintenance helps, but not when I have to get my ass off the couch 3x during the source of one movie.

      Bryan

    5. Re:PMS by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      Yes, and has anyone heard of a vacuum?

  21. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Sponge! · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Sponge!
  22. Clean the computers by Visoblast · · Score: 1

    I avoid trouble by occasionally opening up the computer and power supply and cleaning out all the accumulated dust. It may not be the most convenient option, but it's probably the most effective.

    --
    "Luncheon meats make the sawdust in your stomach explode."
    • -- Crow T. Robot
    1. Re:Clean the computers by crazyaxemaniac · · Score: 1

      Yes, an air compressor works wonders for cleaning out the case and power supply. My computer had actually stopped functioning after a small fire had filled it with soot. After blowing it out and wiping it down, it's working fine again. It worked much better than the canned air I had been using.

    2. Re:Clean the computers by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Yes, an air compressor works wonders for cleaning out the case and power supply."

      It also works wonders at forcing dust particles into things. Use a vacuum cleaner and a small paintbrush.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Clean the computers by crazyaxemaniac · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that you say that because it sure is cleaner than when I started. No noticable amount of dust left in it. I'm sure I just blew it all over to other parts of the room instead of the case. Yeah, it'll come back eventually, but at least it's not clogging up my case right now.

    4. Re:Clean the computers by unitron · · Score: 1
      "No noticable amount of dust left in it."

      That's because the dust left in it has been embedded into a bunch of dark little places inot which you can't see, like inside floppy and CD drives, into bus slots and RAM sockets, etc.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  23. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. HEPA filter by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get a HEPA filter with a washable dust prefilter. Walmart sells several and you can get them rated for 20X20 foot rooms for $200, if your room is bigger then get two and set aside whatever is left over for replacement filters. Plus if your environment is that bad you should be cleaning the area for the workers sake, equipment is cheap to replace, sick or disgusted workers are not.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  25. have you tried by thanjee · · Score: 1

    have you tried a doormat?

    --
    Saying your OS is the best because more people use it is like saying MacDonalds make the best food
    1. Re:have you tried by doormat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, and its nothing but trouble.. ;)

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  26. Put it in reverse??? by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

    Just a thought, but seriously, will reversing the direction of the airflow (reverse-mount the fans) keep dust out? I'm curious, but I don't know a lot about power supplies/fans...

    1. Re:Put it in reverse??? by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Generally not. Most computers of the server type have both an input and output fan. One sucks air in, the other blows it out. The power supplies are the same way. Reversing the direction would just redirect the dust. Most power supplies also get their intake from the inside of the computer and blow to the outside, reversing this order would significantly heat up the inside, and just get the power supply even more dirty as its directly sucking air from the outside. The easist solution is just to have simple mesh filtering screens in front of the fans. Keeps most of the stuff out.

    2. Re:Put it in reverse??? by unitron · · Score: 1

      If you reverse mount the fan so that it blows outside air into the case so as to raise the air pressure inside the case relative to the air pressure outside, that'll help to keep dust from entering the case anywhere except at the fan's intake. Put a good filter in front of that intake. Clean or replace it frequently. If your case has provision for an extra fan that can be mounted to blow air in from the outside with a (regularly cleaned or replaced) filter mounted in front of its intake, do that as well because your power supply fan is now having to work harder sucking in outside air through its filter which means a reduction in its airflow which means less cooling than before.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  27. paper towels by ejaw5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had to deal with dust accumulating inside my athlon box, occasionally cloging up the GPU fan.

    Here's what you do: "filter" all the intake holes in the side/back of your computer cases with paper towel sheets cut to size (Bounty works great for me, but dust can sometimes be a Brawny mess), both inside and outside wherever feasible. Air still flows through, but less dust comes inside. Haven't noticed an increase in operating temperature.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
    1. Re:paper towels by afidel · · Score: 1

      actually this just leads to faster problems if you do not routinly change the filters as the dust blocking the filter will lead to problems long before the accumulated dust would have.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:paper towels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use metal mesh filters on my boxes (backed up by fans to suck air through them). You can find them on most overclocking sites.

      They let plenty of air through, but accumulate lots and lots of dust. The cool thing about them is that when they get dirty you can clean them by holding them under a running tap, without having to buy replacement filters.

    3. Re:paper towels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, paper towels are madde from paper, but they're more fibrous and fuzzy than standard paper, which will produce dust. Using a paper towel for a dust filter is probably counterproductive.

  28. See if your manager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    will spring for a french maid with a short miniskirt, high heels.

    1. Re:See if your manager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean a freedom maid?

    2. Re:See if your manager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAH

    3. Re:See if your manager... by gangien · · Score: 1

      /. never ceases to amaze me. A guy makes a remark about hiring some chick for him to look at and it gets modded interesting.

      What the hell is interesting about that comment???

    4. Re:See if your manager... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      "What the hell is interesting about that comment???"

      Use your imagination!

  29. Panasonic for room air filters by cporter · · Score: 3, Informative
    Panasonic makes some small, effective air purifiers that have filters for odor as well as small particles down to 0.3 microns. I bought the F-P20HU1 for 600 sq ft apartment. Not sure about dust but it's great for seasonal allergies and kitchen odors. Panasonic claims life of 1 yr for odor filters and 3 years for HEPA.

    They're only about 6" deep with a front intake and top exhaust so you can push them right against the wall.

    List prices in the $199 - $239 range. Check out appliances.com or even better, Froogle for retail pricing.

    1. Re:Panasonic for room air filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd second this basic recommendation, though I haven't tried the Panasonics. I have four portable HEPA-based air purifiers in my house, two Honeywell and two Austin Air. They all work quite well (we got them after construction, to protect us and especially our baby from dust) --- after running them for a couple of hours, one no longer sees dust motes dancing in the sunlight. In living quarters I would strongly recommend the Austin Air ones, since the Honeywell has a really noisy fan, but that may not be such a big issue in an already noisy environment. And the Honeywells are half the price (around $120 versus $250 per unit, rated for 500-700 sq ft).

      -DG^2

  30. Particle Size by jbyron · · Score: 2, Informative

    HEPA filters are great for removing very small particles (like pollen) but they don't do anything for larger crudites. Hair and other dust settles so quickly that a HEPA wont get it unless the wind speed in your room is over 40 mph. And most HEPAs are rather noisy. For cat hair, a simple fiberglass filter near the computer will work fine. And a vacuum cleaner.

  31. Re:An Affordable Dick Fluffer For ScottK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    poop!

  32. .. but HVAC supplies plenty of dust. by mr.+methane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your HVAC system will continue to supply plenty of fresh dust, so without a large filtering system, it's hard to have much of an effect on it.

    I had a similar problem with a dusty store basement, and the solution was (please don't laugh) a chrome air cleaner (sized for a Holley 750 double pumper) attached to the blower fan. The automotive air filter was really cheap, replaceable, and quite effective. They have a big enough surface area that you have very little flow restriction. We did end up using a larger-diameter fan, which had a side benefit of making the server quieter.

    1. Re:.. but HVAC supplies plenty of dust. by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Sweet.. but I'd go for the brushed aluminum dual quad setup myself.

  33. Sharper Image Ionic Breeze by sirinek · · Score: 1

    I have a Sharper Image Ionic Breeze. For $350 it does a decent job of cleaning allergens and some dust out of the air, but it will NOT keep your home office dust-free.

    And its a royal pain to clean.

  34. Electrostatic Air Filtration by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative
    I would think that a form of electrostatic air filtration would do the best job. Sharper Image has two or three (here, or here) would be the kind of thing your after. There are different sizes, etc, but this is probably the best thing you can get. On top of this, you might want to invest in some of those fan filter covers for computer fans that are made of fabric or whatever to keep dust out. There are some here, here, and here. I would think that the combination of these things would keep you pretty low on dust. That said, make sure to clean the air purifier and check the fan filters every once in a while to make sure they're clear or else thing might end up worse than before. Once the room is clean (after the first week or whatever) and you've cleaned everything out, I'd imagine that you'd wouldn't have to check the fan filters much at all (maybe only when working on that specific PC) as long as you keep the electrostatic air filter going on clean.

    Also, see if you can talk to whoever in incharge of the heating/AC system in the building to see if there is anything they can do. Maybe Allergy Free has a filter that would work with the system or maybe you could get together the with the other groups of people in the building and buy an electrostatic air filtration system for the whole building. They work great on both dust and allergies. These are just wild ideas from brainstorming, they really aren't that realistic I guess. The first paragraph though will probably work well.

    PS: We have electrostatic air filters installed in our house. We also had them installed in the house we had before this one. Our family has allergy problems and when we clean them, you'd be amazed the colors the water turns from what comes off them. They really do catch alot.

    PPS: Or you could just watercool everything and run it all through one massive radiator. But this would be a bit more than $500. More pipedreaming.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Electrostatic Air Filtration by Keith+McClary · · Score: 1

      Our family has allergy problems and when we clean them, you'd be amazed the colors the water turns from what comes off them.

      I know what you mean.

    2. Re:Electrostatic Air Filtration by killfixx · · Score: 1

      Mod this up +5 funny... Our family has allergy problems and when we clean them, you'd be amazed the colors the water turns from what comes off them.

      --
      "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
  35. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by logullo · · Score: 5, Informative

    IIRC, Consumer Reports gave the Sharper Image Ionic Breeze a hefty thumbs-down.

    You might look at air cleaners of the type used in woodworking shops... they'd be a bit louder than the Ionic Breeze (understatement), but they'd actually do something useful for the money spent.

  36. Radio Shack vs Sharper Image by fliptout · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, the Environizer sold by Radio Shack(made by Honeywell) is a pretty good product. There are two huge differences between the two air purifiers sold by RS and Sharper Image: 1. The Honeywell Environizers have a silent fan built in; the SI product does not. Having a fan means you can clean a much larger volume of air. 2. Price. RS has much lower prices, at least $100 less than the competition for a comparable product.

    I love my Environizer and recommend it to everyone who wants cleaner air.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:Radio Shack vs Sharper Image by Sponge! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only that, but the Environizer's cleaning rod can be removed and jsut rinsed off... IIRC the ionic breeze thing needs to be wiped with a rag/paper-towel etc. Just make sure to read the instructions, there's a step int here to clean the wires so it doesn't buzz. You have to flip it upside down several times to slide a cleaning thing up and down the wires...

      --
      Sponge!
  37. Cats by antiquark · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone with cats knows the feeling.

    Yeah, can anyone suggest a cheap filter to remove cats?

  38. Have you checked... by Ironpoint · · Score: 1


    Have you checked walmart or target? The filters will easily last several times as long as the box suggests unless you live in the desert or something. put it by the dust source such as the door or air AC vent.

  39. Cats? by djupedal · · Score: 1

    With the largest percentage of particulates most likely human (dead) skin, you might want to attack the problem directly, instead of trying to deal with it after the fact. Gain more control over reducing the source, and you may find your current filtration system(s) more than adequate.

  40. Electrostatic Filter by switched4OSX · · Score: 1

    Get a purifier with an electrostatic filter element. No need to constantly buy new media, just give it a regular cleaning every month. The media should last for years, and most trap down to 0.1 micron size

  41. Re:Put it in reverse??? NO by ArsonPerBuilding · · Score: 1

    Reverse mounting fans won't help the problem. I presume the computer lab is using OEM computers or beige boxs, not someones killer 8 fan box with dBs of death. Reversing the fans will make the problem of shorting the PSUs worse. If the air intakes at the front of the case there is more chance for dust to settle on the bottom of the case. If the air intake is at the PSU more dust will settle there, accumulating and then killing the PSU faster.

    --
    1 tequila 2 tequila 3 tequila floor
  42. A Friedrich C-90A is your best bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    At $499 it is just barely in your price range, but it is one of the top-rated small air cleaners. It is electrostatic like the Sharper Image model, but includes a large fan to move air over the plates, making in much more effective for a lab environment. I believe that it is rated for an area of up to roughly 500 square feet. You can just throw the electrostatic plates in the dishwasher once every couple of months, and you really don't need to replace the charcoal filters unless you are trying to remove odors. I have been using one for 6 months and am very happy with it. The downside is that it is very ugly-- looks like medium-sized pet carrier.

  43. Vacuums by rzbx · · Score: 1

    Under $500, takes only a few seconds per machine, and you probably have one laying around: a vacuum.

    Air filtration is good and all, but don't rule out the old vacuum. Although I would recommend an industrial strength one or a shop vacuum.

    --
    Question everything.
  44. FIltration by SeanTobin · · Score: 2, Informative

    This may sound a bit odd, but I've done it on a few computers (where the case permits) with abnormally good results.

    Take a coffe filter, cut to size, and tape it infront of/behind all the air inlets to your case. Even after a year of sitting on carpet in a dusty area, the interrior was devoid of fuzz and dust pup^H^H^H bunnies.

    Now, the last time I did this was in the pentium 133 area... Be sure to monitor processor temperatures for a few days to make sure you are getting adequate cooling.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
  45. Ionic by (X)Paul · · Score: 1

    Is the way to go. I never remembered to change the filters. If you can't go for the $harperImage, then here is a link to a 12v one the could easily be modded. http://www.natlallergy.com/allergy/products/cart/s earch/view_one_spread.txt/spreadid/1122 I was also interested in the Ramsey kit. http://www.ramseyelectronics.com/cgi-bin/commerce. exe?preadd=action&key=IG7 Gotta Love Ramsey.

  46. Air Filtration by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't know exactly how your computer room is set up, but here's what I did. There are two basic types of "filters" - mechanical and electrostatic. The mechanical filters work by trapping the dirt onto the filter. Throw away the filter, throw away the dirt. The electrostatic filters work by placing a charge on the dust particle. The particle is then attracted onto a nearby surface. This nearby surface may be part of the filter element (like with a permenantly-charged electret filter or a powered electrostatic filter), or it may get stuck to a nearby wall, ceiling, or piece of furniture. This is what happens with a lot of the "ionic" filters. The dust is out of the air, but it's not really removed from the environment. What I have on my central AC unit is a disposable pre-filter (like a conventional AC filter), a high-capacity HEPA filter (a cartridge that looks like a bunch of folded-up paper towels), and a powered electrostatic filter. I change the pre-filters monthly (they're cheap), change the HEPA filters once a year, and wash out the electrostatic element every 3-6 months. This keeps my computer and other electronics fairly clean, even with multiple cats. One way to tell is by the amount of stuff that gets attracted to the TV screen; not much. The only disadvantage to a powered electrostatic filter is the possibility of the creation of ozone.

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
    1. Re:Air Filtration by jred · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only disadvantage to a powered electrostatic filter is the possibility of the creation of ozone.

      Wait. Not to sound like a dumbass, but isn't this a *good* thing? I thought there was a shortage of ozone due to cars or cow farts or something like that...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    2. Re:Air Filtration by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      There is (some claim) a shortage of ozone in the upper atmosphere. This is a layer of O3 that absorbs and reflects a lot of the sun's ultraviolet radiation and allows us humans to live on the surface without wearing sunscreen and still remain different skin colors. Without the ozone layer we would all be dark brown (perhaps not a bad thing).

      Ozone in lower parts of the atmosphere are hazerdous to humans. Breathing air that has high levels of ozone is attributed to several heath maladies such as asthma. Ozone near the ground is also a major component of smog, that ugly brown cloud that hangs over most major cities.

      Unfortunately ozone generated on the ground does not politely rise through the atmosphere to the ozone layer where it can do some good. If you get too much ozone in your office, you could always release som CFCs, which readily break down O3 and make it harmless.

      The cows you mention emit methane, which is considered a green house gas, and also the most common and insideous greenhouse gas: Hydrodgen Oxide. Methane at least can be used as a fuel to generate electricity or heat. Gaseous hydrogen oxide has no such qualities, but can be used as a very powerful cleaning agent (especially under pressure and temperature).
      If cows somehow emit ozone, this would be the first I've heard of it.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    3. Re:Air Filtration by yroJJory · · Score: 1

      : One way to tell is by the amount of stuff that gets attracted to the TV screen; not much.

      Damn. I got rid of all my CRTs and replaced them with flat panels. I guess I should have kept one around as a dust magnet!

      --
      Jory
    4. Re:Air Filtration by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 1

      Actually... Ozone at ground level is a pollutant. We commonly have "ozone action" days around the midwest. They encourage you on these hot dry days to carpool or ride public transit to cut down on the pollutants.
      Ozone levels reach heights where you can actually smell it in the outside air. NOT GOOD :}
      If only we could find an efficient way to pump it to the upper atmosphere...

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
  47. Well actually, by labratuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've stumbled across the solution yourself.

    Obviously the dust is collecting in these machines. How do you 'remove' dust? You collect it.

    So, all you have to do is build a bunch of redundant computers*, and design them with really bad air flow, so dust gets trapped everywhere in them. Once a month, open up these machines and turn them upside-down over a dustbin (outside). Voila.

    *Imagine a Beowulf cluster.

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  48. Don't Try This Method by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    I once watched a co-worker use a shop vac inside a very dusty PC. The shop vac sucked a chip out of its socket ....

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Don't Try This Method by rzbx · · Score: 1

      Damn! I posted that idea just a minute ago. Then again, just vacuum the fans from the outside. I doubt the suction would be powerful enough to cause damage from there.

      --
      Question everything.
    2. Re:Don't Try This Method by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      Using a heavy vac or compressed air on a fan can cause it to spin so fast that it burns the bushings out of it.

      I've seen that done too. "Hey, listen to this fan spin." WERrrrrr... (Later) "This case fan isn't spinning up anymore, it seems really stiff, but I just cleaned it."

    3. Re:Don't Try This Method by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that shop vac might be interested in the story as a potential ad.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:Don't Try This Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine had the unfortunate experience of doing that to the processor fan on his athlon, but the problem was obvious a bit sooner. He held the air compressor nozzle a bit too close to the fan, and sheared 3 of the blades off when they collided.

    5. Re:Don't Try This Method by beegle · · Score: 1

      Quick quiz:

      Q: What's the difference between a vacuum cleaner and a Van de Graaff generator? (You know, that doodad from high-school physics that makes kids' hair stand on end)

      A: Not much.

      Really, computers and vacuum cleaners should never mix. The static charge from the vaccuum cleaner can zap components or damage data. That's why people use those silly cans of compressed air.

      --
      --
    6. Re:Don't Try This Method by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. In the shop where I used to work, one of the techs used the shop vac to clean out a laser printer that'd had a major toner leak. Unfortunately, the toner particles were a heck of a lot smaller than the filter in the vac, and they went straight on through. For years afterward, it looked like there'd been a fire in the place that'd left soot all over the ceiling.

    7. Re:Don't Try This Method by akedia · · Score: 1

      I've actually found that using the Shop Vac as a blower (with the hose attached to the output) can be very useful to quickly dust out the inside of cases. The flexible hose and powerful stream of air can dust out a full-tower ATX case in a matter of seconds. Especially useful for power supplies that are clogged with dust and other things that you wouldn't want to disassemble. Just remember to do this outside and disconnect the power from the motherboard.

    8. Re:Don't Try This Method by ralico · · Score: 1

      Oh, that sucks!

      --

      SCO to Hell
    9. Re:Don't Try This Method by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      I once watched a co-worker use a shop vac inside a very dusty PC. The shop vac sucked a chip out of its socket ....

      Or the opposite... I once got a discount on a tow for installing a tape drive in the owner's PC. There's nothing like a compressed air hose for blowing out a PC in a machanics shop.

      Just make sure you have the rubber feet on the bottom...

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    10. Re:Don't Try This Method by mink · · Score: 1

      I have central vac in my house, so no static charge. Works quite well on computers and other equipment and sucks harder then all the uprights I have had in my life.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  49. Buy one used by kimbly · · Score: 1

    If you're in the Boston area, I'm selling one on Ebay right now.

    Sorry, I just couldn't resist.

  50. Air Cleaners by Pengel+the+squib · · Score: 0

    Try to make sure you don't have negative pressure in the room as this just tends to pull in dust, particularly from above suspended ceilings. As for cats, I'd try Nair. My cats like to nest on the nice warm fuzzy computers (when they aren't walking on the keyboard and/or getting online).

    Good Luck,
    pts

    The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.
    -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum

  51. isn't this the same article as.... by midnight_dsob · · Score: 1

    PC Cases for High Dust Enviornments?

  52. Got a cat problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put the cat in a plastic bag.

    1. Re:Got a cat problem? by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1
      No, no, better yet just introduce your little food seeking furballs to the pleasures of a drier ride. It's like Magic Mountain but for our feline friends! I keep two cats and I can tell they just love it by the way they run around in circles, walk sideways and act all silly after a good drier ride. That and tossing a softening sheet in there makes them smell all springy-scent fresh and they're just oh so fluffy too! Good times ;-)

      ***DISCLAIMER!***
      Neither of my cats have ever actually riden in the drier or any other household apliance of mine for that matter, at least to my knowledge. There was that one time when my son was 5 and had been hanging out in the laundry room. The cat kept bumping into furniture and walls and he was laughin and I had thought I heard the infernal machine running briefly but that's it, I SWEAR! This is a posting of humor so please don't bother hunting me down and sicking animal control and a pack of flesh-eating lawyers on me. 'Nuff said, PEACE OUT!

    2. Re:Got a cat problem? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Put the cat in a plastic bag.

      Toss 'em in the dryer and let the lint filter pick up the hair.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  53. Seek out an expert. by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 1

    I've got the Honeywell Hepa (that round thing that makes a lot of noise -- never did replace the main inner filter -- probably distributing around 10 year old cat dander); three Sharper Image ionizers (one for my basement, one upstairs, and, well, one out of commission -- great, but expensive to buy, and cheap to maintain).

    I'm currently in the market to find a nice high room volume air cleaner, so naturally, I went to Air Cleaners.com. The guys are funny loons, but they know what the hell they're talking about. 5 year guarantee on the Austin Air series, which is what my company is probably going to pick up (a couple units).

    1. Re:Seek out an expert. by Emont319 · · Score: 1

      I myself have tried the Austin Air Series, and while they do have a nice warranty for the inner filter, they mostly just make a lot of noise. You still need to vacuum the outside of the unit off each week, as the pre-filter clogs quickly.

      I am very pleased with the Oreck Air Cleaner which uses the same idea as the Sharper Image Ionic Breeze, but also utilizes a pre-filter, a charcoal filter, and a fairly quiet metal blade fan.

      I have been using mine (the first version) for over two years and have been pleasantly surprised with the difference. I generally clean it once every other week w/ very hot water, and I'm always amazed how much dirt accumulates on the plates. It definitely beats the Austin Air series, although it may not have the yuppie appeal of the Sharper Image.

    2. Re:Seek out an expert. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      From the Oreck link:

      Uses the same clean-air technology that U.S. Navy submarines use.

      Any submariners in here that can attest to this?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:Seek out an expert. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have a second question on it...

      How often does the charcoal filter need to be replaced? The site talks a lot about the warranty on the permanent filter, but at $15 a piece (sold in pairs for $30), that could get annoying if they need to be replaced too often.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:Seek out an expert. by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Charcoal filter is used in face mask to catch Chlorine or other funny gas. After a certain amount of gas is adsorbed, the filter will not take any more gas. To reactivate the filter, use steam. Yes, go to your kitchen, boil some water and blast the sucker. You are left with the mess of drying the filter. A hair drier is your help. But most people will find replacing a charcoal filter easier.

    5. Re:Seek out an expert. by Emont319 · · Score: 1

      I used mine constantly for over a year, and haven't replaced the charcoal filter yet. In addition to the Professional model I provided a link to earlier, Oreck also has some cheaper models (which is what I own) on their website.

  54. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by CliffH · · Score: 1

    No need to knock Radio Shack. Over the years they have put out some damn fine equipment for cheap. I can remember at one point they had the best (as in fidelity, price, durability, and features) portable CD player on the market, bar NONE. Also, from an audiophile standpoint, you'd be surprised how good of interconnect and speaker cable you can make out of the cable on their spools. :) I just hate the fact I don't have a RadioShack here (I'm in NZ now, and no, Dick Smith's is NOT a good alternative). Ok, done with my ranting... :)

    Cliff

    --
    sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
  55. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

    Hmm... An impartial product testing company that doesn't take advertisements from companies is "shit"?

    Bzzzt. Try again.

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  56. Don't you have a ventilation system? by jmuzic1 · · Score: 1

    Why not just put a higher quality filter in your air conditioning or ventilation system? It would probably work better than other filters and probably much cheaper. I have heard good things about aller-pure or something like that, you just have to wash it every once in a while. Or just get those disposable 3M filters. Anything better than the loose fiberglass filters that let everything through will help exponentially.

  57. Cheap PS Fans by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    Your trouble may not be dust. I have noticed that the fans in PS's in the last few years (5-8) to be crap. Myself and a friend Mark go to HAM fests and look for older "quality" fans. Panaflow a Papst seem to be the best although NMB fans also seem to be much better than the new stuff. I have only had one Panaflow go bad in over 15 years and I have never seen a Papst fan go bad despite the fact I have several over 18 years old.

    1. Re:Cheap PS Fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can extend the life of your new fans by appling light oil to the bearings. Don't assume that your new fan is properly lubricated.

      Since manufacturing methods have improved somewhat, newer fans are better balanced from new, so they require less lubrication, and can survive for a surprisingly long time on none. Whereas the older fans were slightly unbalanced and hence required decent lubrication from the start so that they would have acceptable noise and performance levels.

      Also it depends heavily on the marked increase in average fans speeds in the last few years.

  58. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Sponge! · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they have put out some good stuff. (Heck, we actually got the FCC to approve the FRS radios) But as of late they have thought up some really *DUMB* stuff. Gold plated fiber optic cables for example... The pay is ok if you can manage to sell a minimum of two cell phones and one satelite system per day, otherwise its just another minimum wage job. :-/

    --
    Sponge!
  59. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consumer Reports is bunch of shit. Anyone who takes there info seriously is indeed an idiot.

    Better back that one up. I suspect you're in the small minority that has that opinion. Without support, I'd say you're the one spewing the shit.

  60. Try a pressurising fan by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not sure on your lab setup, but if the dust is *outside* the lab, try a pressurising fan setup.

    Get a 2 inch outlet cyclonic type air filter, typically used in tractors, bobcats and small motorised machinery.
    Hook it to the suction of a blower fan, outside your lab.
    Duct the exhaust of the blower *into* your lab.
    Try and close as many doors and windows as possible.

    The blower will pressurise your lab with clean air, which will try to escape out all the nooks and crannies in your lab, keeping the dust outside.

    Don't forget to check the filter every couple of weeks until you get a handle on the maintenance interval required, and don't get a cyclonic filter too big for your fan, as they need high airflow to spin out the dust particles effectively.

    This works for a coal lab of ours that is located very close to a 100,000t stockpile of loose,dusty coal. The dust is bad enough that if a blank piece of paper with a pen on it is left outside the "clean room" (still inside the building) you get a "shadow" of the pen on the paper in about 6-8 hours.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
    1. Re:Try a pressurising fan by sowellfan · · Score: 1

      Only problem is that, while the air coming into the space may be bringing dust, it's also cooling the space. Pressurize the space to keep the dust out, and you've screwed yourself as far as cooling is concerned. Also, depending on the climate, you could be bringing in lots of humid air, making for humidity problems.

      The people who designed the buildings A/C system designed it with proper building pressurization in mind (I am making an assumption here, but it'd be bad engineering not to keep pressurization in mind - I design HVAC systems BTW). You start bringing in lots of outside air and that just throws a huge wrench into everything. For the parent post's situation in the coal mine, though, I'd probably have to think for a while to come up with a better solution than they're using. Trying to actually filter all that coal dust out with filtration would be a nightmare, and you'd have to change filters every week or so.

    2. Re:Try a pressurising fan by Imazalil · · Score: 1

      Whatif you set this up at a small level, like your computer. Get rid of your fans sucking air in, cut a hole into the computer, attach a hose, and get a small air pump, with filter attached to blow air into your case. Thigns should be kept cool enough from the air coming in, and the dust would be pushed out. Would be great for 'loose' cases like mine, I have my air intakes covered, but the dust still gets in through the holes between my cd-r and dvd, zip, and jaz drives etc.

    3. Re:Try a pressurising fan by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      True - in our location at said coal mine, the temperature goes from 2 degrees C in winter to 45 deg C in summer. Heating's fine in winter, we have a number of 800 degree C furnaces in our lab ;-)
      Cooling's sometimes an issue in summer, but the humidity is very low in summer, and with the lab sealed pretty well (seals under doors etc), there's actually not much airflow through the system when it's closed, so the A/C keeps up ok.

      Of course, when I say "lab", it's just a 3 room portable building with no ducted air, just wall A/C's with about 30,000 BTU total.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  61. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Coniptor · · Score: 1

    Their smaller model will do a small to medium sized room according the specs you can read on the box. The larger one witch I own can do a anywhere from a large room to a whole floor level depending on the size of your house. Plug it in and in an hour or less any odors and dust are quickly removed and you have nothing but fresh air. They work great.

  62. Full of dust = time to replace. by Wargames · · Score: 1
    I avoid cleaning the inside of my computer. I want my computer to die of old age as soon as it will. I would like to buy a new computer but the thing will not die. I know that there is one monster dust devil whipping around inside my case. My CPU should be overheating. I also know that the thing is 4 years old and needs to be replaced. Who cares if I spent $5,000 on it. I could buy a brand new one that is 10 times better in every way for $500. I hope the dust clobbers this thing. I wish I lived in a dustier place. I will have to stop taking baths. I will have to get a kitty or two.


    Does anybody have plans to turn a PC into a HEPA filtration device? mine would be great because you would never have to change the filter.


    The universe is twice the size now that it once was.

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
  63. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consumer Reports is the best source of imformation about consumer level products around. They buy everything off the shelf so they don't get tweaked demo units, they do not accept advertising so they can remain unbiased, and they use repeatable scientific methods to test the products. Why would anyone not like them??? Just because you have had some kind of psychosematic aleviation of your symptoms does not mean that scientific principals are suddenly invalid.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  64. Word for word by Dancing+Tree · · Score: 0, Troll

    Am I lucidly forcasting the future or did I just see this "ask slashdot" question a short while back? You mean there is so little going on that the eds feel the need to post recent history as news? Or perhaps they didn't feel the question was adequately addressed the first time around? Looks more like a wake up call to see if anyone is actually reading the damn thing (which there is. sometimes. occasionally. ho hum...).

    --
    :::Horrendous Experiences Make Amusing Anecdotes:::
    1. Re:Word for word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ever get that deja vu feeling, it means a change was made to the matrix. Beware.

  65. Re:air purifier should be away from computers by mdfst13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The way the ionic air purifiers work, you should move it *away* from the computer to get maximum effect. The way that you are doing it, when the device pulls dust back towards it, some (most?) of the dust will get diverted by the air flow of the fans. In fact, I would suspect that by putting the device *next* to the computer, you are actually increasing the dust flow to the computer.

    An ionic air purifier has two parts. One sends out charged ions which collide with particles of dust and impart a charge to them. The other is an area on the unit itself that has the opposite type of charge. I've never used one, so I don't know how effective they are. However, given the way it works, it seems logical to me that the best place for it would be away from the computer. The desired effect of the device is to pull dust into its area. Instead, it might be better to have it so that it pulls dust away from the computer. Besides, I would think that throwing electric charges (which is the basis of the ionic effect) around near a computer would be undesireable.

  66. Friedrich air purifier by kaybee · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you have a subscription to Consumer Reports, they did some tests of air filters. Contrary to other replies to this post, they found the Ionic Breeze to be next to useless. Maybe their test environment did not properly represent the real world, or maybe they are right. In any case, they said that the Friedrich C90A removed more dust than any other air filter that they tested. It operates with electricity like the Ionic Breeze, but has a powerful fan and more filter stages. No filters to buy, but it is definitely bigger and less attractive than the Ionic Breeze.

    Here is a link to purchase it: Friedrich C90A

    1. Re:Friedrich air purifier by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      Actually, the link you referenced mentions they DO need filter replacements, specifically every 3 to 6 months.

    2. Re:Friedrich air purifier by sam+the+lurker · · Score: 2, Informative
      From Consumer Reports, February 2002
      You can also save the $72 annual cost of replacing the Friedrich's auxiliary carbon filter. Designed to remove odors, carbon filters have not been very effective in our tests. We found you can leave the Friedrich's original filter in place without losing cleaning performance.
    3. Re:Friedrich air purifier by doubtless · · Score: 1

      I consistently find more dust on my monitor screen, which acts like an electrostatic filter anyway.

      It is really almost next to useless, and I can't take their commercial that quotes NY Times saying indoor air pollution is 5 times worse than outdoor air pollution, unless they are looking at CowboyNeal's basement.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    4. Re:Friedrich air purifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but the thought of leaving a filter on for a few years just doesn't sound appealing (or healthy) at all...

    5. Re:Friedrich air purifier by kaybee · · Score: 1

      It is an output filter -- i.e. after the air has been through the pre-filter-screen, the pre-filter, and the electrostatic filter. I haevn't changed mine yet and it doesn't appear to be dirty, but it will eventually stop removing odors.

  67. Sharper Image/Ionizers by aaronhaley · · Score: 1

    Do not work. They simply collect dust, they do not reduce airborne or other dust, pollen, or dander in the room. According to Consumer Reports it gives the SI unit the lowest ranking in it's group tested. Part of this is because it has no fan so it can't efficiently collect the dust. The Friedrich C-90A unit gets better ratings and has good reviews in many other places as well. We have recently placed this in our lab and it is doing a great job.

    --
    --And sektor spoke and said unto the people. Hey, buttwipe hand me the cheezeos.
  68. Filters, cats and pipes by arvindn · · Score: 1
    I don't have to keep buying filters, but that may just be a pipe dream." Anyone with cats knows the feeling.

    That's right: filters, like cat, are most often used as part of a pipe.

    *ducks*

  69. My solution by fruity1983 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take the fans out of your computer, it wo

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  70. Sharper Image Ionic Breeze by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

    I can only echo what I've already read in this thread. You don't specify the size of the room you need to cleanse, and you don't specify if you have any special requirements (allergies demanding HEPA or smokers, or both).

    The Sharpter Image Ionic Breeze has been a godsend in my household since 1999.

    I bought it because my girlfriend's HEPA filter sounded like a vacuum cleaner 24/7 and I had trouble sleeping with it... for 2 years. When I moved out of the college housing to get a real job, I got one of these that was advertised as "silent" in the hopes that when she followed me 3 months later, she'd not need the HEPA beast. I don't know how close the Ionic Breeze gets to HEPA, but it's close enough for her. After almost 4 years of service, the first one gave up the ghost. I think it was my fault, putting the blades back wet always made crackling noises and bad smells, but I was lazy and water improved the cleaning process. Screw the fact that I had a masters in EE and knew better. Over the 4 years, it paid for itself in the costs of replacement HEPA filters for her original one. Okay, maybe that's a lie... I can no longer find filters for it. But, if they were still available, the original $199 purchase would have been paid back. Anyway, it stopped moving air after all this time and I went to take it apart and broke one of those tiny wires that makes the whole thing work.

    Prices have gone up a bit. I just bought my second (and third, they are running a promotion where the second one is 50% off). They have two sizes (smaller than first). I don't honestly know how they work, but it seems like they negatively charge the air with tiny wires and then the air gets sucked to the positively charged metal blades where it leaves off all the bad stuff. It's not silent, but if you have even the slightest background noise, or are more than 3-5 feet away, you'll not hear it.

    If your lab is the victim of smokers, no filter in your pricerange will prolong your computers' supplies. Regardless, if it's a problem, taking the computers apart every 6 months to vacuum can cause only 20-30 minutes of downtime apiece and only costs what you put in vacuum electricity.

    If anybody cares, and has read this far, aforementioned girlfriend became wife in 2000 and shortly will receive the title "Mom". Not that I'm prouder than hell about it or anything.

  71. Air purifiers: Just the facts by robson · · Score: 1

    Go to cadr.org. They maintain a list of air purifiers and their performance measurements. I ended up getting a Hamilton Beach model, and have been happy with it, but your needs may vary. (Note on cadr.org that the highly-hyped Sharper Image model actually does a very poor job of cleaning air.)

    1. Re:Air purifiers: Just the facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you go to goatse.cx and get an ass-reaming. You'll be very happy, though your needs may vary.

  72. Sneeze.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could also check out sneeze.com. It might be a cheesy name but they do sell good filtration products.

  73. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by mattkime · · Score: 1

    Are there any numbers on the number of square feet these things clean?

    Seems like this would be an important number.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  74. Ionic Air Purifiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a side note ionic systems like the one from sharper image has the unfortunate side effect of creating ozone and can cause more harm then the dust it collects.

  75. Use environmentally safe natural dust attractant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed some time ago that the spooge on my monitor/keyboard/mouse captured a great deal of the dust in the air. So now I try to keep the general area around my computer nice-n-sticky. Having trouble finding inspiration? Check this out: http://www17.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030422/index.h tml

  76. REVERSE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dust you have to watch out for is when that big iron (several kW in fans) dectects the sheaf of papers you just dropped into the intake; Its comming back at you, NOW, at speed.

  77. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you guys have jaycar?

  78. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who spend too much money on a crappy product when they could have bought a much better one for much less money typically have a hard time admitting it.

    I know it is hard to admit that you made a poor buying decision, but with time maybe you can come to the truth. In the mean time, being hostile won't help.

  79. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by elmegil · · Score: 1
    Hell the cheap thing for a woodshop is a box fan with a furnace filter on the front of it. I hear it works a treat, though I haven't put mine together yet (not a lot of shop work lately).

    Whether that'd do much for more generic types of dust, I can't say.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  80. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Sponge! · · Score: 1

    It's more of a YMMV thing. once it pulls th ebulk out of the ai rit can clean as much air as you can get in and out of it. If you have really dirty air they'll clean less than if your air is nice and fresh. sort of like an oil filter. If the oil is dirty, the filter isn't goign to last as long as if the oil were clean to begin with.

    --
    Sponge!
  81. Akk dangers of Ionizers by Voltronalpha · · Score: 1

    Most people don't realize that all ionized air filtration systems produce o3. o3 is not safe for humans, the government regulates how much o3 a device can emit (and they base this off of how humans react to a certain dose of o3 during the course of 24 hours) they don't look into long term health side from prolonged exposure nor do they look at the fact that a product that emits o3 has the ability to create o3 that will build up in the closed room or house. o3 is commonly referred to as ozone which can kill just about any living cells (it's like a organic cleanser).

    Most people think Ozone is a good thing, well and in a case that is true: Ozone up in the atmosphere is a good thing down here on the ground though it's considered pollution.

    Generally ionizers are used in areas like hospitals to disinfect the air, I think living in a closed environment with one of these things is barbaric.

    --
    There is evidence to prove both Democrats and Republicans are lying cocksuckers. Vote independently.
  82. Good Filters Don't Necessarily Work Well by jeffreyjakucyk · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt that those Sharper Image filters work well, but only with the air that actually manages to get through them.

    Think about it like this. Say that filter can remove 99.99% of all the dust particles that enter its intake. That's good, but it won't help if it's only moving a tiny amount of air. It'll clear out the dust in that corner of the room, but it won't affect much of the rest of the space since it can't capture any of the air in those other parts of the room. That's why getting your HVAC system well-filtered is the best way to reduce dust, because it moves the most air.

    If you can't get any response from your HVAC guys, you could always try what my mom did in her office at school...put filters over the air supply vents. If you need to get your own air filtration unit, look for the highest CFM (cubic feet per minute) rating, so that it can move the most air, and thus catch the most dust.

    Electrostatic filters do work quite well, but they need to have a fan...none of that ionic breeze nonsense.

  83. lose the duct tape by v1 · · Score: 1

    I know, I know, it's the handyman's secret weapon, but it's really not necessary. I had a dust problem in my basement where my servers hide, and I cured the problem cheaply and easily, no duct tape required.

    Get a cheapo box fan, $15-20 at your local wal-mart/k-mart/s-mart store. (shop smart, shop s-mart!) While you're there, look at the furnace filters. Buy the cheapest they have. Stick the fan where you need it, turn it on high, and set the filter on the intake side. Suction will hold it on. You can ignore the gaps around the sides, they really don't require sealing up, although I actually had to go find a little bit of scrap to lean against the filter because it falls off if the power fails. (unless you're puting your fan on the UPS...)

    The filter works fine to remove dust, lint, hair, and other sorts of airborn junk. Zero hassel to change the filters, and they're cheap. (under a buck each, usually) Mine require changing about every 2 months. You might want to experiment a bit on fan placement... it's important to find the best spot where airflow is optimal. If you run an AC unit in the room, this will also help cut down on how often you have to clean its intake filter.

    I like the Endust idea someone else posted, I'll have to try that. Good advice also to keep the equipment off the floor, setting your box on the floor is the fastest way to fill the case with dust bunnies and sieze up your fan.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  84. You need more intake than outtake by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    If you've got more outtake than intake, like most generic PCs that have an outtake on the PSU and maybe a second one at the back, you're creating negative air pressure in your case and causing it to suck in dust.

    If you only have one fan, the PSU fan, reversing it will keep out the dust, but your PSU will overheat. But if you have, say, 2 intake fans (with filters) and one exhaust, you'll have positive air pressure in your case and dust will be blown out of it rather than sucked in.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  85. Answer: Humidity! by digitect · · Score: 1

    A decent level of humidity can greatly improve dust problems. We purchased a cool-mist home humidifier several years ago (for our home, not a lab or office) and found especially in winter time that dust levels went down. Side benefits include better capacity of the air to store latent heat energy (feels warmer in winter) and much decreased propensity for annoying static electricity.

    Of course, there are a whole host of issues with humid air, too: more likelihood of growing molds, better environment for diseases to grow (ever wonder why hospitals are so dry?), higher energy costs in winter (more heat needs to be applied to the air since it now has more capacity to hold it), humidifier filter replacement (once a season), etc. But my wife and I are relatively careful and feel it's a strong net gain.

    Second point: you need to check that your building's HVAC systems are being properly maintained. Being in the building design business (A/E), I'd guess only 10% of engineered building systems are properly maintained. Probably the same figure for residences, too. People usually think about vacumming the carpet on occasion, but the 1-5 US dollars required to change your HVAC air filters every month is more important for air quality.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    1. Re:Answer: Humidity! by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Being in Houston, Texas... I've got more than a fews word for you about adding to the humidity.

  86. Hope you use breathing masks... by Yahnz · · Score: 1

    With that amount of dust *in* the building, SARS has nothing on you. This stuff will kill you.

    Jan

    1. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We *do* work in a coal mine and we *are* aware of "miners lung", thanks very much :-)

      Yes, we wear dust masks when outside collecting / grinding samples, and also have a 6 monthly respirable dust check, where we get to wear a minature version of what I've described above (battery air pump , cyclone, filter) around for a day to check on the amount of respirable dust we breathe in. Every 5 years you're required by law to have a chest x-ray to check for silicosis if you still work in the industry.

      It's generally only particles below 10 microns that you have to worry about breathing in, as they're the ones that *never* come out again. Particles bigger than 10 micron get removed via mucus and cilia in your nose/airway/lungs without much hassle. Luckily, 10 micron particles and below generally don't stay suspended in the air too long, they drop out pretty quick.

      And anyway, we try not to go outside the lab too much. (Ahhhh! the light! It burns, it burns!!) :-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by neibwe · · Score: 2, Informative
      >"10 micron particles and below generally don't stay suspended in the air too long" You may have to worry about >10 micron particles. The larger sizes simply deposit at different locations.
      Size and density of particles, mist or aerosol - determines site of deposition. Maximum alveolar deposition at 1-5 micron size. Airway deposition 5-10 micron; nose 20 micron; fume 0.2 micron - not deposited (e.g. metal fume fever)[1]
      Smaller particles stay aloft a longer --not shorter-- period. Maybe that's why fresh outside air is suggested when a workplace has been contaminated by silicates or asbestos fibers?
      The first is that large particles tend to settle out of the air more rapidly than do small ones. The settling rate for sub-micron particles is so slow as to be inconsequential. These particles stay suspended in air and drift with ambient air currents. A 0.01 microns particle will sink through air at a rate of about 140 days to settle1 meter in air. A 0.1 microns particle will settle about 10 times as fast, and will require about 14 days to settle 1 meter. A 1 micron particle will require about one hour to settle 1 meter. The point is that these small particles remain in the air long enough to be inhaled, and they will remain in the air long enough to be swept around by ambient air currents.[2]
      Hope the info helps =D _____________ [1] Woolcock Institute of Medical Research. DISEASES OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM NOTES from the Department of Medicine, University of Sydney [Online] citing "Chang-Yeung, M., Lam S. "Occupational Asthma". Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986. 133;686-703" [2] David Abrams, CIH. Airborne Dangers. [Online](05/01/1999)
    3. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by ndogg · · Score: 5, Funny
      Every 5 years you're required by law to have a chest x-ray to check for silicosis if you still work in the industry.


      Can't you spell the word out? For Pete's sake, it's only 45 letters long:
      pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconios is
      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    4. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Smaller particles stay aloft a longer --not shorter-- period

      Funny, I was always told that they dropped out quicker due to less surface area for air molecules to hold them up. Learn something new every day, hey :-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    5. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by bradams · · Score: 1

      Also see:
      This
      and
      This

      --
      I like to build things and wire stuff together.
    6. Re:Hope you use breathing masks... by neibwe · · Score: 1

      You heard right, they likelydo have less surface area than a larger object. But their surface area to mass ratio is greater --like, for a cube of water, you'd get:

      A 2cm cube
      surface area 24 square cm
      mass 8 grams
      area/mass ratio 3:1

      A 1cm cube
      surface area 6 square cm
      mass 1 gram
      (surface area) / (mass) 6:1

      Surface area has indeed gone down, but area per gram has gone up. Though I think asbestos and other fiber type particles have even more lift because they're fibers of evil rather than little spheres of evil. =D

  87. Try This Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a Rainbo vacuum cleaner. Runs the air it takes in through a couple of quarts of tap water. I just plug the vacuum hose into the air outlet and use it to blow out the computer. The volume of air it puts out is way more than a can of compressed air produces even if not quite at the same pressure.

    1. Re:Try This Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.

      Sounds a lot like a bong, you filthy hippie.

    2. Re:Try This Method by thogard · · Score: 1

      If you don't keep the water clean, you get mold growing in the water and then when you turn it on, you spary modl spores all over the place.

    3. Re:Try This Method by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      That's why you have to dump the water, clean the pan and the bottom of the vacuum after each use. Personally, I think Rainbows are a waste of money.

  88. Air Cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to check out an air cleaner used for woodworking. It is all about moving air through it and how many times you can turn over the air in the room. Look to www.woodcraft.com for examples.

  89. How big are the dust particles??? by mediahacker · · Score: 1

    Some of the replies are pointing to high-end (sub-micron) filter systems. This is great if you are dealing with pollen in a small room but they don't do well with the larger chunks.

    For this, how about one of these:
    http://www.grizzly.com/products/item.cfm?itemnumbe r=G9956

    I use something similar for woodworking and have little dust problem in the rest of the house. A bit noisey but you said that this was a lab so that is do-able.

  90. I know of one by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
    Its called a feather duster. Its your custodian's repsonsibility to dust the office. If dust is a problem then he is not doing his job since the majority of the dust comes from desks monitors and computer cases. As it builds up it tends to move around in the air where the fans on your system suck it up.

    1. Re:I know of one by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Actually, most feather dusters just stir the dust up again, so it falls elsewhere - like on the carpet, so it can be vacuumed up.

      If they wet-wipe, then the dust gets trapped, but only a brand new feather duster will grab the dust, I've always found.

  91. air filters / cleaners by mrbill · · Score: 3, Informative

    After doing extensive research on the subject, and looking at tons of stuff that was available, I ended up plunking down $250 last November on a Sharper Image Ionic Breeze, the "Compact" Quadra version.

    It hasnt completely reduced dust in our hosehold (we have unstained, un-sealed concrete floors, which are the #1 culprit, plus three cats), but its done an incredible job of keeping nicotine stains off everything in the computer room (my wife smokes). I put it next to her desk, and clean the "blades" every 3-4 days with a handi-wipe.

    Definitely worth the money, but they're not the perfect solution for everyone. I'll probably be buying a refurbished full-size version from their online store or eBay soon (I dont see paying full retail price again).

    Beware of stuff that is just negative ion/ozone generators - TOO MUCH ozone can be *really* bad for your health. The Ionic Breeze units put out a TINY amount (your laser printer, for example, probably puts out 10x as much), and the amount it puts out is well under federal health and safety standards.

    1. Re:air filters / cleaners by VCAGuy · · Score: 1

      your laser printer, for example, probably puts out 10x as much Actually, it probably doesn't. Speaking for HP LaserJets, the originals (2686A, II series and III series) all had replaceable ozone filters. The newer ones (4 series and newer) use transfer roller technology (invented by Canon) that replaced corona wires. Instead of a corona, charged rollers are used to directly charge the paper on contact--voila! No ozone!

      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
  92. Cheap by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I have one of the ubiquitous antec/chieftec/whatever alienware clone cases. A vent filter for forced air registers fits perfectly in front of the intake fans (they sell em at home depot for like 3 bucks of a dozen). It's an ultra budget solution, but like I said, they fit perfectly, and you cant see it, and it works great.

    The exhaust fans have been repinned to run at 5 volts, just to make sure that the air into the case comes through the front through the filter, rather than being sucked through other little gaps (like around the drives).

    There's a *lot* of dust around since I've been remodelling the house. I replace the filter whenever it gets dirty, from once a week to once a month depending on what's going on.

    I haven't seen a spec of dirt inside this case yet, whilst my 'unfiltered' older machines need a thorough cleaning every other month or so.

    I just popped the side off to verify myself, and the HSF on the CPU is as clean as the day I took it out of the box six months ago.

    I can also vouch for the steel filters for range hoods, they do well trapping smoke and dust, and you can run 'em through the wash when they get dirty.

    You shouldnt be spending 500 bucks to keep dust out of a regular PC, it just seems excessive. You'd be better off to let it clog and die and spend the 500 on a fancy new PC - but that's just the way I think.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  93. Before you get fancy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Filter
    Box fan
    Duct Tape

    Cheap, simple, effective.

  94. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahahaha

  95. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by DietHacker · · Score: 1

    If you are looking for an opinion on Consumer Reports, then Check out this "Consumer Distorts" page. So they do have their non-anonymous critics.

  96. DON'T FOLLOW ABOVE LINK by swagr · · Score: 1

    It links to a Lisp website.

    .... sorry, couldn't resist.

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
  97. change buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your lab probably shares a ventilation system with an area that is carpeted and has wood fiber ceiling tiles. Move the lab away from those two dust sources and the filters in the ventilation system will be more than sufficient.

    If you can shop for another building, ask existing tenants if they ever notice dust accumulation. Dust is simply not a problem in some buildings.

    Also, suicide and murder rates are higher among people who spend a lot of time under ceiling tile.

  98. Dust causes fires as well as clogs by dethl · · Score: 1

    My freshman year of high school, we couldn't go to computer science because so much dust had collected into a computer, and a fire has been started. I do agree that dust is a serious issue, and as such, do simple things like using compressed air to spray the dust off the components and out of the power supply. If you can get the dust to settle outside of the computer/power supply, its alot better than still having it inside.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  99. There are lots of them! by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    There are lots of air cleaners out there, intended for the woodworking industry. Very small particles of wood aren't good when you breathe them in. Here are a few from Grizzly, there are plenty of other manufacturers:

    http://www.grizzly.com/products/item.cfm?itemnum be r=G5955

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  100. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by outsider007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just because you have had some kind of psychosematic..
    if you're gonna use big words at least learn how to spell them.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  101. Ionic breeze is an ozone hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ionic breeze and other "ionic" cleaners are health hazards. They produce a lot of ozone and this is especially bad in confined areas. The side effects are many, but include contributing to asthma and ozone combine with chemicals present to form even more toxic substances. The OSHA site used to carry a technical paper on the ozone producing aspects of these and similar products, but I can't locate it now. Not only that, but they charge heavier particles and makes them stick to surfaces such as your nice white walls and makes them dirtier over time. These are horrible filters and should be avoided.

    The best air cleaner by far for home/office use is made by Austin Air. They are pricey, but quiet, efficient and work very well.

  102. Anyone with CATS knows the feeling. by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

    All your hair are belong to us?

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  103. cats? by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sell the cats to a Chinese restaurant. End of problem.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  104. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by Marx's+Ghost · · Score: 1

    That is a very unconvincing website. It would be interesting if it provided actual detailed information about the "junk science" that CR purportly uses, but instead we have a number of quotes by people in several different organizations without any context given to make sense of them.

    An aside, when CR rated Coors and Budweiser as top beers, I knew they were untrustworthy.

  105. Here are the links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't find the government page, but here are a couple of links:

    http://www.lungusa.org/pub/cleaners/air_clean_to c. html

    Specifics of ozone generators:

    http://www.lungusa.org/pub/cleaners/air_clean_ch ap 4.html#h

    Stay away from ionizing air cleaners....

  106. Re:Syphilitic Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lovely. More sophomoric humor, please.

  107. Rainbow vacuums! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might look into the Rainbow vacuum cleaner. It uses water filtration and is said to be very effective at filtering dust. Apparently, people with allergies like it because you can simply turn it on and just let it filter the air. It may not be as good as a HEPA filter, but it is cheap (~$200) and the filter is trivial to replace: dump the water and fill with clean water!

    Disclaimer: I have never used one. Caveat emptor

  108. Electrostatic air cleaners are health hazards by crowland · · Score: 1

    Don't use electrostatic air cleaners. They produce ozone and are a health hazard indoors. In addition to that, they don't work. The American Lung Association specifically recommends *against* using them:

    http://www.lungusa.org/pub/cleaners/air_clean_ch ap 4.html#h

    Buy an Austin Air cleaner and be happy. They work great and are quiet.

    1. Re:Electrostatic air cleaners are health hazards by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the article you mention suggests that they do a pretty good job - it is ozone generators that are recommended against. It does warn that "ozone generators, negative ion generators, and certain other electronic air cleaners that are not listed by the FDA, or cannot otherwise prove that their ozone emission levels are lower than 0.05 ppm, may produce levels of ozone recognized as unsafe for humans and are not recommended for use in occupied spaces because of the risk of generation of ozone"; however, that depends on the air cleaner and is probably much smaller with devices not intended to produce ozone. (Anyone know if there are any results from such tests? Consumer Reports, maybe?)

    2. Re:Electrostatic air cleaners are health hazards by tgd · · Score: 2, Informative

      That link comes up a lot when people are asking about the Ionic Breeze and the like online. FWIW, I have four of them on 24/7 in my house to manage dust and allergens until I pony up the cash to put one in the HVAC system directly.

      That article talks about air cleaners, not air filters. These are ozone generating machines you'd use if, for example, someone took an explosive dump in your car. It uses very high amounts of ozone to physically removed odors and clean the air in there.

      Ionic Breeze's are electrostatic air filters, totally different beast. An electric potential between two ionizing wires in the back and three collector rods in the front pulls air through without any noise, and the dust picks up a static charge and sticks to the collector rods. Thats it. In terms of controlling dust, one big thing that Sharper Image doesn't mention, which may counterindicate their use in a computer lab, is that if your air is fairly dry, it puts a slight static charge on every damn thing in the room. Fantastic for controlling dust, because you can just vacuum it off the couch, but you're always zapping yourself.

      Anyway, my point is, there's nothing in common between these filters and what ALA is talking about.

  109. How woodshops handle dust & data center design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In dealing with a lot of dust (wookworking creates a lot of airborne particles of varying sizes...) we've found that the problem needs to be approached on several fronts. Some of your dust is generated in the room (dead skin, dust falling from clothing, etc.) but most is likely coming from outside the space.

    First, look at your walls, doors, windows, etc. Are there leaks around them? You might talk to a building energy consultant and get a "smoke" test done to see where air is entering and leaving the space. I suspect that most dust is riding air currents into the lab when the door(s) are opening & closing. Adding an "airlock" chamber would help this (In the past when I designed "machine rooms" (old name for data centers), I almost always arranged the operators office space, lounge, etc. flanking a hallway to the main room(s). Each end of the hallway had reasonably sealed doors.

    Second, investigate your existing air flows. It might be that the lab space is acting as the collector for the air return system. This means that it would be at a slightly negative air pressure for the rest of the building. You want the lab space/data center to be at a slightly higher air pressure than the surrounding space. The slight overpressure will tend to move dust & dirt out and away. Just don't go overboard. I've been in spaces were this was overdone. Opening an entrance door meant facing a stiff breeze...

    Next look at a large room or shop filtration system. Depending on the size of the space, it will have one or more inlets & outlets. It will be designed to move the dust laden air through a series of filter media to trap increasingly fine grained material. (In a woodshop the first stage is large cloth bags to capture sawdust!) For a computer lab/data center, I should expect the first stage filters to be a fairly coarse media (thing household furnace filters @ $1.00US each. Depending on usage, these get changed every week, every 2 weeks, or once a month (should be part of regular PM...) The next stage will either be a very dense fiberglas media or large pore paper. These get changed out on the order of 1/2 as often as the 1st stage filters. 3rd and 4th stages can vary, either HEPA style paper units, or electrostatic panels. Whichever it is, these stages are responsible for only the smallest air-borne particles. p> Finally, look at filtering air flow through the individual pieces of equipment. Bear in mind that almost all PC type machines will have "inexpensive" fans that quite likely will have problems with the additional load caused by air flow through filters.

    Since you are attempting to stay around $500 for the solution (number I saw being thrown around...) I would

    • Try to get building air returns relocated from the main space to a nearby attached space (office(s)?)
    • Add additional supply outlets to main space from the building air system.
  110. Where is the dust coming from? by toybuilder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All this talk of ionic and HEPA air filters is missing the first question: where is the dust coming from? Maybe you can take steps to reduce the ingress of dust into the lab. Maybe you need to punihs people for leaving the lab room door open to the dirty outside air...

    If it's a university computer lab in a realtively modern centrally-ventilated building, it might just be enough to have a positive-pressure airflow of filtered air to push the dust out of the room. You might be able to hang the charge to the Buildings & Ground's account.

  111. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by DietHacker · · Score: 1

    This link has more context. To clarify, I don't want to be in the position of defending this site. However, if anyone thinks Consumer Reports is above criticism, then think again. No ads does not equal objectivity. It is their spin, the line they use - like "Hey babe, I'm a doctor". BFD.

  112. be sure to clean it if you burn a candle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one too and I agree that they definitely work, but they do come with a warning to clean them immediately if anything burns in the house, food, candles, etc. Otherwise, bad fumes can result. So, I hope you are cleaning them after you burn those incense candles!

  113. Cheap filter idea. by a+man+named+bob · · Score: 1

    One of the guys I know buys some cheap filter paper at walmart (in the section where all the furnace and ac filters are) and just cuts it to size and attaches it to the grill on the power supply. His systems are almost 100% dust free.

    1. Re:Cheap filter idea. by anubi · · Score: 1
      Does his fans blow OUT or IN?

      Mine blow OUT.

      ( Filtering exhausted air won't do much good. )

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  114. Dirt Bag by buzz_mccool · · Score: 1

    Instead of purifying the air of the entire room, you can just purify the air going into your computer(s). The Dirt Bag is a filter bag that fits around a computer.

    Buzz

    What is is a dirt bag?

  115. Look into Data Center & how wook shops handle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (I may have posted part of this before finishing it. Clicking while should be thinking...)

    In dealing with a lot of dust (wookworking creates a lot of airborne particles of varying sizes...) we've found that the problem needs to be approached on several fronts. Some of your dust is generated in the room (dead skin, dust falling from clothing, etc.) but most is likely coming from outside the space.


    First, look at your walls, doors, windows, etc. Are there leaks around them? You might talk to a building energy consultant and get a "smoke" test done to see where air is entering and leaving the space. I suspect that most dust is riding air currents into the lab when the door(s) are opening & closing. Adding an "airlock" chamber would help this (In the past when I designed "machine rooms" (old name for data centers), I almost always arranged the operators office space, lounge, etc. flanking a hallway to the main room(s). Each end of the hallway had reasonably sealed doors.


    Second, investigate your existing air flows. It might be that the lab space is acting as the collector for the air return system. This means that it would be at a slightly negative air pressure for the rest of the building. You want the lab space/data center to be at a slightly higher air pressure than the surrounding space. The slight overpressure will tend to move dust & dirt out and away. Just don't go overboard. I've been in spaces were this was overdone. Opening an entrance door meant facing a stiff breeze...


    Next look at a large room or shop filtration system. Depending on the size of the space, it will have one or more inlets & outlets. It will be designed to move the dust laden air through a series of filter media to trap increasingly fine grained material. (In a woodshop the first stage is large cloth bags to capture sawdust!)
    For a computer lab/data center, I should expect the first stage filters to be a fairly coarse media (thing household furnace filters @ $1.00US each. Depending on usage, these get changed every week, every 2 weeks, or once a month (should be part of regular PM...) The next stage will either be a very dense fiberglas media or large pore paper. These get changed out on the order of 1/2 as often as the 1st stage filters. 3rd and 4th stages can vary, either HEPA style paper units, or electrostatic panels. Whichever it is, these stages are responsible for only the smallest air-borne particles.
    p>
    Finally, look at filtering air flow through the individual pieces of equipment. Bear in mind that almost all PC type machines will have "inexpensive" fans that quite likely will have problems with the additional load caused by air flow through filters.


    Since you are attempting to stay around $500 for the solution (number I saw being thrown around...)
    I would

    • Try to get building air returns relocated from the main space to a nearby attached space (office(s)?)
    • Add additional supply outlets to main space from the building air system.
    • Add foam/rubber gaskets to the doors, windows, etc. to slow air leakage into the space.
    • Add a ceiling or wall mounted dust system to keep air in the space moving and trap air-borne particles.


    • Good Luck!

      John Farmer
      jfarmer@goldsword.com

  116. Furthermore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes, this is an admirable solution. As the supervisor/manager of the largest computer lab in one of the largest universities in America, we have dedicated "porn stations" that could function as dust collectors. Anything to hinder their performance further.

    These "porn stations" are not designated as such to the users, but I made sure that every corner computer has the crappiest monitor/video card/default settings, the oldest CPUs, stickiest mouse, brokenest keyboard, etc. etc. So when the fat guy comes in to sit in the back, turn the monitor to the wall, and enjoy his porn, he gets a "quality" experience.

    Christ it's funny watching some of these guys try to navigate the web in 32 colors, 640x480 resolution, with a broken mouse, in front of a monitor with rainbows in 3 corners.

  117. Doesn't make economic sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a thought, but computer power supplies are cheap as all get out. It's going to take you a loooong time to spend $500 on new power supplies. So why blow $500 on an air purifier that may or may not help the situation? You can invest that money and probably pay for new power supples with the interest it makes.

    Sometimes we the managers in the business world see things differently than those in the trenches. It's what keeps companies running smoothly and profitably.

    1. Re:Doesn't make economic sense by anubi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Sometimes we the managers in the business world see things differently than those in the trenches. It's what keeps companies running smoothly and profitably.

      One of the managers at a company ( which is no longer ) that I worked it looked at things like this.

      I am an engineer. This is how I see it.

      You lose a power supply. No big deal - but in the process of losing the power supply, you corrupt your system. Big deal. This could be very costly to recover from.

      Now, even if you were lucky and the system suffered no damage from the failing power supply, you have the time to account for to take the system offline, obtain, and replace the supply. Time is expensive. You are now losing on two paths: You can not use the machine, and you are expending time finding parts and fixing the machine.

      Personally, I find it much much more expedient to provide the infrastructure for trouble free operation than to let things fail and try to fix them. Yes, the power supply is cheap. So are engine bearings. But saving money by scrimping on oil changes is hardly a way to "keep companies running smoothly and profitably", rather, as an engineer, I see this the quickest way of running a company into the ground with soaring overhead maintenance costs.

      Given my own knowledge of the costs involved and failure statistics, I would opt for prevention, but should the company see fit to make me subordinate to someone who sees fit to override my judgement, I would obey, but find somewhere else to work, for the higher-ups are apparently clueless about the mountain of maintainance costs heading their way - and have no idea how much the management skills they hired is really costing them.

      I normally would not be so straighforward, truthful, and harsh in my reply, but you did post AC, so I feel you are fair game.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  118. Perhaps too simple? by h8macs · · Score: 1

    The way I interpreted his question is as such. He has much dust, at work, possibly a "workshop" environment. I am thinking manufacturing, and I am not thinking ionic breeze. I am thinking big fans that, serve to keep things cool and also direct dust debree out of crucial areas.

    Sound to simple? It's still expensive, so it just might work! ;-)

    --
    :-( --- argh. Despair, I owe again. :-b
  119. ozone is a toxic gas by gumbi+west · · Score: 1
    From EPA we have "Ozone is a toxic gas." and
    Available scientific evidence shows that at concentrations that do not exceed public health standards, ozone has little potential to remove indoor air contaminants.
    the rest of the EPA document is worth a read.
    1. Re:ozone is a toxic gas by Sponge! · · Score: 1

      What does ozone have to do with this though? These work on electrostatic charge, and as a byproduct make negative ions and some ozone... they use static electricity to pull the dust out though.

      --
      Sponge!
    2. Re:ozone is a toxic gas by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Ozone has nothing to do with it.
      The discussion is about dust particle removal. (To avoid clogging fans in your hardware).

      Ozone does not remove dust particles from air. Ozone is bleach-like oxidizer that destroys stinky odors (and yor nose, lungs and latex/rubber object in the process). Ozone generators can be found in pet hotels to supress the stink - and and I found myself the iritating ozone background less tolerable then the animal urine odor.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    3. Re:ozone is a toxic gas by kcelery · · Score: 1

      To say Ozone is a toxic gas is as true as saying sunlight is bad for your skin. Ozone is around for millions of year, and so is sun light. The amount of ozone generated by ion breezer is quite low on ozone. The real toxic gas is in fact oxide of nitrogen generated by these machines when the moisture is high. When inhaled it forms nitrous acid and that is hurting your lung. In a busy traffic, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides are the ones that gives you the most discomfort. If you insist on the toxicity of ozone. Take a shot-gun and blast your 21" TV. Replace it with an LCD.

  120. Some suggestions by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As others have mentioned, you don't state the size or "enclosedness" of your lab, but some thoughts anyway:

    1. Most (90%+) dust inside a home or office is generated by the shedding of human skin and hair or our clothing. Hence, most dust is generated within 5 feet of the fans sucking it in to the computer. In these environments you should have at least low density foam filters (think about the one on your hair dryer) on each intake fan. The case fans of your systems should be positively pressurizing the case so that all incoming air passes through a filter, not through any small openings.

    2. Try to keep the intake fans on the computer cases as high off the ground and as open/exposed as possible. Ex: don't stick the fan in a corner under a desk, this is where air currents will deposit the most dust. In that same vein, your HVAC intakes should be on the ceiling, not near the floor. Moving them can be quite inexpensive.

    3. Don't use ionizers. Ionizers are different than electrostatic filters. Ionizers are designed to change the balance of electrical charge in the ambient air (they spit out electrons). To me that's just a bad thing when highly sensitive electronic parts are about. The more out of balance the charges are, the more likely you are to experience static discharges, and we all know that kills computers.

    4. For larger labs/offices I recommend an electrostatic filter that gets built in to the HVAC system. These things are highly effective at removing the lightest/smallest of dust particles. They are a bit expensive to install, and aren't the easiest things to clean, but they do a great job and you probably have a cleaning/maintenance crew. These devices do put out a small amount of ozone but this is usually not a problem with the normal air exchange that takes place in an average building. If you have a VERY high efficiency(tight) building, consider having an indoor/outdoor air/heat exchanger installed, or have the power in the filter unit reduced so ozone production is minimized(this is usually a jumper setting in the power supply). Most U.S. buildings will not require such measures.

    5. Don't underestimate the effectiveness of a simple furnace filter at the air intake and/or exhaust points from your HVAC system. Paper is the best filter, but reduces flow the most. Foam filters are pretty good, especially the "charged" ones. The cheap "spider web" filters are useless, don't use them. They'll catch large debris, but not the stuff clogging up you case fans.

    6. If this is a very small room, one or more portable HEPA filters will help immensely. I install these in all the smaller server rooms that I work in. Run them continuously(24x7).

    7. If at all possible, have your cleaning crew use HEPA filters on all vacuum cleaners used in your lab. Otherwise, a significant amount of light dust will simply be blown out of the vacuum unit and in to the air where it can be sucked in to the computers. Even better than the HEPA filters is to use a built-in type vacuum system where exhaust air is routed outdoors.

    In my home, I use central electrostatic filters, a central vacuum, and keep my computers on the desk, not the floor. I have VERY little dust accumulation in my systems (or anywhere else).

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    1. Re:Some suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh, so does the radio shack "environizer" that another poster mentioned count as an "ionizer" and not an "electrostatic filter"?

    2. Re:Some suggestions by RKBA · · Score: 1
      "3. Don't use ionizers. Ionizers are different than electrostatic filters. Ionizers are designed to change the balance of electrical charge in the ambient air (they spit out electrons). To me that's just a bad thing when highly sensitive electronic parts are about. The more out of balance the charges are, the more likely you are to experience static discharges, and we all know that kills computers."
      Sorry, but that's incorrect. I write embedded systems firmware/software for spacecraft and since I sometimes work with flight hardware, I and everyone else who works with spacecraft flight equipment, are required to take a course in Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) every two years. One of the means of reducing the possibility of ESD is to ionize the air. The reason it works is that it increases the conductivity of the air, thus allowing static charges to bleed off to ground slowly before they can build up to high enough potentials to create a spark. It's similar to the reason ESD mats are made of resistive material rather than purely conductive material (ie; metal) - it allows the charge to bleed off slowly rather than rapidly.

      Increasing the humidity is another good method of reducing the possibility for ESD.

      -- Ron

    3. Re:Some suggestions by anubi · · Score: 1
      Yeh, there are two types of these things.

      One is specifically for anti-static buildup and they typically put out both negative and positive ions. They come in several flavors. Simco makes the bipolar types which alternately release waves of positive and negative ions. You can note them as they either drive the ionizer grid with high voltage 60Hz. AC ( my old SIMCO ionizer uses a neon-sign transformer to get the HV to the grid ). Some smaller desktop units have two separate high voltage inverters, one positive and one negative, driven by a small switch that alternately powers one then the other.

      There is another ionizer out there that delivers only ONE polarity... usually negative. Thats the one thats bad news. There is all sorts of claims out there that they are healthful. I have no proof of any of it... but they will clean the air - no doubt about it. They charge up every particle in the air and the charged particles attach themselves to anything they can find in the room.. furniture, walls, lamp fixtures, equipment, anything. It does NOT make the dust go away, nor does it collect any. It just makes the dust go attach itself to something else. Because the ions are of only one polarity, they have a tendency of charging everything else in the room up. There is even one book on the market I recall as showing how to make a remote "zapper" out of a high-voltage flyback transformer for prank charging of things so that recepients of the prank get zapped with static charges accumulated from the ion streams beamed to it.

      The electrostatic filters are of the second type but provide a convenient removeable surface of the opposite charge to attract the dust charged by the first grid. The Sharper Image unit uses this technique. The grid is an array of small vertical wires ( charged negative ). The removable plates are charged at a lower positive potential. The negatively charged dust is then attracted to the much larger plates and deposit themselves on it, where they will be easy to remove and clean. The higher negative voltage will generate the ions, whereas the lower positive voltage provides the attraction without that much ionization. The attractive forces also draw air along with the dust which creates the "zenion effect", which is also known as "ion wind" to anybody whose played with tesla coils.

      I would think the Sharper Image unit would be quite effective in removing dust, but I am concerned about the ozone generation. I have not measured the device, so I do not know if the device emits a balanced quantity of positive and negative ions, which is necessary for making the air "conductive" so that ionic charge buildup is mitigated.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    4. Re:Some suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ionizers are used to _prevent_ static discharge: the ions neutralize static buildup (opposited attract). They are widely used to protect sensitive electronic equipment.

  121. Re:Look into Data Center & how wook shops hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really nice, thoughtful response. This sounds like the right course of action to me. Especially looking for negative pressure in the machine room; that would certainly account for plenty. If this is a more normal office space, having regular floor vacuuuming is a good idea; those dust bunnies will grow otherwise.

  122. I have a filtering case by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1
    and it was free,
    I made it my self. Forget about trying to put a filter over the ventilation holes. There are too many cracks and leaks. Open up the power supply and turn the fan around. Don't just reverse the polarity, turn the whole thing around. You will also need to reverse any other case fans you may have. I also had to cut off and turn over a fan on the processor because of its position relative to some ventilation holes in the PSU. The next thing is to make a filter box to hand on the back of the power supply. I used an 2" x 2" x 6" cardboard box. Then I cut out the faces and hot glued in some panels of open-cell foam. Now you have a positive-pressure case with a filtered air supply. This means that not only will you not suck in a dust, but none can leak in from any of the cracks.

    I vacuum the panels around once a mouth for 10 sec. and there is NO dust in the PC. This also will solve the problem of dust and hair getting sucked into the A drive. The only thing you need to worry about is making the filter box large enough so you don't over heat the PC. My 2x2x6 box is big enough. I also made clips out of soft wire and hot glue so the whole thing snaps onto the back of the PC.

    1. Re:I have a filtering case by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Well that freaking kills your efficency.

      Power supplies blow off hot air, don't want that going into your computer.

      Put a filter over the fans blowing in and call it a day.

    2. Re:I have a filtering case by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1
      Power supplies blow off hot air, don't want that going into your computer.

      True, I may be running a little hotter than if it was the proper way around, but I'm not seriously overclocking so it's not really a problem.

  123. Routine Maintenance and Compressed Air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Keep a can of compressed air handy. Once a quarter, shutdown and remove the cover from all of your machines. Use the compressed air to remove the dust from the innards, and from the power supply.

    About once a month, go thru and use the compressed air to clean the vents of your machines. Shoot the compressed air directly into the power supply exhaust vents -- this will help keep too much dust from collecting on the fan.

    Finally, buy Sun equipment. I've seen a five-year old SparcSTATION 20 that had never been cleaned (or even moved!) in the entire time the user owned the machine. The amount of dust in that machine was incredible -- and the machine ran just fine.

    Buy quality products, and they'll last longer.

  124. Regular Maintainance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How about cleaning your equipment on a regular basis? Or does that sound too much like work? Just because you have got or are getting a degree, does not excuse you from having to do menial tasks every once in a while.

  125. Two points, 0.02c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Dust Control / Filtration etc .
    SARS virus spreading.
    Coincidence?

    2) If you let cats in your lab, you are either downright weird, or sick. Most people, inc me, dont let anything at all near my PCs and equipment. Cats are for people who are lonely and have know friends. You have a computer. You have slashdot. You have friends.

    1. Re:Two points, 0.02c by anubi · · Score: 2, Funny
      I keep cats out of the computer room because they have an almost uncontrollable urge to pee on the monitor, keyboard, and CPU.

      Cat pee is extremely corrosive. One spray sucked up by the system would probably ruin it. ( remember, the fan exhausts air, so any contaminant sprayed around the case is going to go IN. )

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  126. Get A Honeywell by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

    I have a Honeywell HEPA airfilter that I have in my dorm room. It works great in filtering out the dust and mold (I've gotten a lot fewer sinus infections since I got it). The great thing about HEPA filters is that the longer you wait to change the filter, the better it is at filtering the air. They aren't that expensive (under $100 for my small one), and they work wonders. I've never had any problems, and the only thing you need to do is to replace the charcoal pre-filter every 3 months, which isn't much trouble.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  127. Re:Do what woodworkers do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't agree more with the moderator. Why by industrial grade equipment when you can buy toys from "The Sharper Image" or just strap a furnace filter on a box fan. What was this guy thinking!!! -1 : 100% overrated!

  128. Living Air Classic by krsjuan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Living air classic is great. We've tried many different heppa filters over the years and haven't been completely satisfied either because of the total cost of ownership or because of the noise.
    A friend of mine had been raving about the Living Air Classic for a while so I decided to finally order one to see what the fuss was about. They range in price depending on the size of home you have but the one we have cost us around $400.00 and it can clear a 3,000 sq ft house in a few days. It's quite and doesn't need any maintence.
    The site is www.livingairclassic.com

  129. Clean Air Solution! by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    After living in Lubbock, Texas for six years and dealing with the effects of huge volumes of blowing dust in my computers, I finally discovered a solution to all of my dust problems.

    I moved to Austin.

    Peter

  130. HEPA vs. Ionic by rbrooks_na · · Score: 5, Informative

    HEPA filters were originally developed during World War II to prevent discharge of radioactive particles from nuclear reactor facility exhausts. They have since become a vital technology in industrial, medical, and military clean rooms and have grown in popularity for use in portable residential air cleaners. A true HEPA filter is defined as having a minimum particle removal efficiency of 99.97% for all particles of 0.3 micron diameter. The HEPA rating is determined using a test smoke with particles of 0.3 micron average diameter. To qualify as a "true" HEPA, the filter must allow no more than 3 particles out of 10,000 to penetrate the filtration media.

    Negative ion generators force high-voltage electricity to one or more needlepoints. Electricity is simply electrons in motion and since electrons repel one another, when they reach the needlepoint, they jump off and attach themselves to the molecules in the air forming negative ions. At that point the allergens and other particles are attracted to grounded surfaces where they can get rid of that extra electron, causing them to settle on , floors, furniture and other grounded surfaces, even on your bed. It's important to remember that a simple negative ion generator doesn't capture or collect the particles in the air, it simply causes them to precipitate out of the air.

    Electrostatic precipitators are used to scrub the air coming out of factories, but the same technology has grown in popularity in home ventilation systems and some room air cleaners. They are ionizers designed to charge and then collect particles from the air once they have been charged. First, the air is passed through an ionizer where the particles gain a particular charge. Then that air is passed between plates with the opposite charge that attract the charged particles. Electrostatic precipitators have one major drawback though; they rapidly loose effectiveness as dust builds up on the plates.

    They Ionic Breeze is essentially an electrostatic precipitator with no real means of circulating the air past the ionizer and then past the charged plates making it essentially useless.

    I run an Austin Air Cleaner in my computer room and it does an excellent job keeping it dust-free. The cool thing about it is that the filter needs to be changed only every 5 years and the pre-filter is vacuumable instead of replacable. I've found it to be a very cost effective cleaner compared to most HEPA-filter based air cleaners where you must change the pre-filters every three months and the HEPA filters every year.

  131. BAD BAD IDEA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a story to tell here... I tried this exact thing a few years ago... Two 12cm fans, holes cut in side of case for them. Fans were powerful enough to maintain positive pressure in case, thus preventing dust from coming in other then through the filter (theoretically).

    Now, add tissues over intakes. (masking tape around edges to hold them on). Turn computer on. Worked well for about, hmm, 5 seconds. After that, the fans force stretched the tissues into the path of the blades, whereupon the tissue was shredded into a billion pieces and uniformly distributed into every nook and cranny of everything. I had to take the PC apart to get it all out. And even then, 3 months later when my overheat alarm went off I discovered yet more tissue clogging the CPU heatsink.

    BAD BAD IDEA

  132. 3M Filtrete by yppiz · · Score: 1
    Here's the web page for the 3M Filtrete. It's a bit short on details.

    http://www.3m.com/us/home_leisure/filtrete/

    Here's a description of how the filtrete works.

    http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/waac/wn/wn03/wn03-1 /wn03-101.html

    --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

  133. Vacuum cleaner filters and table fans by slaida1 · · Score: 1
    better yet, go buy vaccum cleaner filter sheets and cut them to suitable sizes, those let air flow more freely than paper and you'll have something that's designed for cleaning air. Buy HEPA filter kit for some expensive brand name vacuum cleaner and you'll get even better results.

    Even better and quieter solution would be using large table fan: remove the stand, cut big round hole to the side of your computer case, remove frontside protection crate from the fan and attach the fan on the side of your case to blow air inside the case. You can cover the backside crate of the fan with filtering sheets, use noise killer power unit wich won't use it's fans if there's no heat. Effective, quiet and geeky.

    Higher Air pressure inside (blowing in instead of sucking out) you case is better because you have control where air goes in ( with lower pressure air leaks in where ever it can and cases aren't very airtight).

    --
    Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
  134. Get a Volkswagen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they have anti-allergic filters build-in and should also filter dust.. all you need is to remove the air conditioner from the car.. It will work with 12V

  135. Re:Use environmentally safe natural dust attractan by unitron · · Score: 1
    "So now I try to keep the general area around my computer nice-n-sticky."

    After a comment like that I was expecting a different kind of link to a different kind of inspiration :-)

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  136. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Cleans 50,000 square feet!!!* using only 120 volts**.

    *assumes 3 inch high ceilings.
    **requires dedicated 20 Amp circuit.

  137. 3M Filtrete Air Filter by Rimbo · · Score: 1

    First, clean your ducts. Then, start using these babies in your a/c system. Problem solved. Make sure you replace them whenever they need it, too.

    Nothing a wee bit of good duct maintenance can't solve.

  138. PM is your friend. by silicon1 · · Score: 1

    getting rid of dust is very expensive to near impossible, preventative maintenance on computers is the best solution.

  139. Super Cheap anti dust solution by extrandall · · Score: 1

    Why not place a Chux wipe (or similar dish washing cloth with tiny 'breathing holes') over the exhaust fan of the power supply. While your PC is switched on, this hole pushes out hot air, but while your PC is off, it attracts dust very quickly.

    The good thing about these wipes is that there is enough room for air to still pass through it, but the dust doesn't.

    Cheap, and it works pretty good!
    Well under $500 (Send your change to me!)

    Note: You may also want to place something similar over the air intakes at the front of your case... Normaly at the front of your case at the bottom. Just make sure you buy the right cloths!!! They're the ones that look almost see through!

  140. ...lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if you're too lazy to clean the inside of your computer, you're too lazy to clean a filter. Blocked filter = fried computer...filters added by you will also restrict flow. Nice way to burn down the house.

  141. So do ionizers create ozone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is that only the ozone generators/electrostatic filters do this? Confused...

  142. A bong by gregm · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was thinking... you could blow air into the bottom of a barrel of water, let it bubble up to the top and put it back into the room. I know from a really reliable source that water bongs get much of the nasty stuff out of pot and make the smoke much smoother. Of course I've never actually tried to clean the air in a room with one but it seems like it might work.

    1. Re:A bong by Shadestalker · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did filter the air in my home, but I did not inhale.

    2. Re:A bong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right.

      Blow smoke through a bong type device (versus sucking). What comes out the top of the water? Smoke.

      It only traps a tiny percentage of the particles, most of the particles are in the air bubble that travels up and releases everything into the air.

      The "smoother smoke" effect you're talking about is due to the air and smoke being cooled by the water. Nothing more.

    3. Re:A bong by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Well...maybe, but if this process actually removed a lot of stuff from the smoke, then you'd be wasting all that marijuana, wouldn't you? The problem is that bubbles in the bong have a relatively small ratio of surface area to volume, so most of the particles in the bubble never 'see' the surrounding water.

      Perhaps if you modify the concept a bit--a larger volume of water, a system to generate smaller bubbles, and lots of baffles to keep the bubbles submerged for longer periods of time.

      Another trick might be to create a water fog in an enclosed space. The very tiny droplets are quite good at removing particles and odours.

      After either process, you will have to add a dehumidification stage, because the air will be at effectively 100% humidity--not good for people or computers. Also, instead of worrying about filtering air, you'll have to filter the water...still, the novelty of adding a bong to your computer lab might be worth all the trouble. ;)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:A bong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've just described the scrubbers that coal power plants use to clean their smoke before it goes out the smoke stack.

    5. Re:A bong by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Bongonic brease?

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  143. What's next? by archetypeone · · Score: 1

    Natural Light?

  144. My allergy doctor says by The+Panther! · · Score: 1

    ...to buy a typical box-fan of the 3'x3' variety at your local WalMart, go to the air conditioning section and buy a 3'x3' inexpensive pleated filter (or two, as filtration is directly related to the square footage of the filter media) and tape one or more in series onto the intake side of the fan. The more filters you put on, the cleaner the air will get, to a point. If you're really nuts, put a HEPA nearest the fan and lower density filters further out, to reduce clogging on the HEPA. Electrostatic filters can work similarly, but require monthly cleansing and re-spraying to add an ionizing charge to the filter.

    This is pretty darn inexpensive, even if you count the cost of duct tape. It's guaranteed to clean the heck out of a room, and you can just glance at it occasionally to know if it's dirty.

    If you're extremely paranoid about microbes too, you can buy a UV light and hook it to the outgoing side and a shield to block UV leakage into the room--UV will kill anything that gets through the filters. UV lights can run a hundred bucks or so, but is still well under your $500 mark.

    That said, real computer labs like those in Motorola's IS department, use laminar flow and raised flooring to force air upward and pull it out through the ceiling, to prevent settling and clogging. Their setups were fantastic for keeping the dust clear even with cramped quarters. That's definitely the expensive way to go, but the best.

    I've been tested to have reactions to about 2/3 of the standard tests (I live in Austin, mold and pollen capital of the world--yay!), and this cheap filter has made a real difference with my asthma. Oh yeah, we moved into a house with no carpet--just tile and wood floors.

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
  145. Where can I buy the Environizer in Switzerland/EU by tosspot1 · · Score: 1

    I'm sold on the Environizer, but the RS website says the version they sell is 120VAC only. Does anyone know where I could buy this in Switzerland? Perhaps it is sold under a different product name? I did a search with google but could not find anything. Any help would be most appreciated.

  146. Photonics labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'm a grad EE student, and I have made stuff in our photonics lab. It's 100 times cleaner than Intel's clean room/fabrication standards which is neat to boast about.

    But if you smoke 1 cigarette inside the clean room, it will take 6 months, and hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of filters, to get it clean again.

    Just thought that'd be interesting to you all.

  147. ionized air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have an ionic breeze... sharper image claims it produces ozone, which i kinda believe since it generates a funny smell.

    but ive heard some ppl tell me that ozone damages the lungs. so is it actually safe to operate the ionic breeze indoors when people are around? right now, i only turn it on when i leave my room, and when i come back, open the windows.

  148. that's odd... by raehl · · Score: 1

    The water always bent AWAY from my Principal.

  149. It makes perfect sense for him to call you wrong.. by raehl · · Score: 1

    Because to him, he has the choice between believing what he READ from some anonymous user on Slashdot, and what he READ in Consumer Reports.

    Now which is more credible?

    YOUR personal experiences may be more credible to YOU, but they're likely not very credible to complete strangers.

  150. comparision by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Both the Ionic Breeze and HEPA filters have been mentioned. As someone with alergies that has used both, I can tell you right now that there's a huge difference between the two. I'm not sure what the Ionic Breeze goes for, but for a $200 HEPA filter house solution, you fix the air in your entire house - and much better than the IB can in a single room.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:comparision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I forgot my login account) I've built some computers for the laundry and dry cleaning industry. The computers that control all the systems in the plant needed cleaning or fan replacement every 7-8 months.

      There are 2 main environmental conditions that I had to consider, the dust and gases (steam and others) and it had to be a very low maintenance or passive solution (also inexpensive). Fortunately, computers are not allergic.

      Electrostatic, ionic or any other electric device was going to tempt fate. These types of devices were not designed for industrial applications and I'm not going to allow the consequences when these things break. Maintaining a 1.5Mil BTU boiler is hard work enough.

      1) The solution that we came up with is to enclose the whole computer box in another air tight box.
      2) The outside box has an intake fan which spins a little slower than the exhaust fan (negative pressure inside the box).
      3) The exahust pipe has a 90 degree downward bend and the intake pipe has 2 180 degree bends (easy PVC pipes or the like or easy disassembly and cleaning).
      4) The ends of the fan assembly have A/C type filters (car filters can also be used).

      To improve, you can apply some oil (special oil) onto the filter to trap more dust (like the K&N air filter for cars). The actual design of this thing I'll leave to you. The solution that I built costs $100 and is still working today (roughly 4 years in operation; opened the computer box just to check, there was a fine coat of dust that slipped past the filters). The filter gets replace when the air current gets below some value. This is probably the best solution without getting crazy.

      This may or may not apply to your situation, but it worked in mine. The computers that we encased were from a Pentium 233MXX to a 500MHz type machine. Maintaining this filter box is a 5 second operation.

      Hope this helps

  151. i've got a cheap idea by crimsontiger6 · · Score: 1

    its called a vacuum cleaner :)

    --

    be vigilant, be pure, behave
  152. Re:Where can I buy the Environizer in Switzerland/ by Sponge! · · Score: 1

    Here, add one of these to your cart. :)

    Yeah, its overkill for a device usign less than 10 watts, but hey, you could plug 3 or 4 environizers into one. :) Hope this helps.

    Ok, time for bed for me now, have to open my RadioShack in 5 hours...

    --
    Sponge!
  153. Re:It makes perfect sense for him to call you wron by Fat+Casper · · Score: 1
    Because to him, he has the choice between believing what he READ from some anonymous user on Slashdot, and what he READ in Consumer Reports.

    Now which is more credible?

    YOUR personal experiences may be more credible to YOU, but they're likely not very credible to complete strangers.

    And that's why you're reading Ask Slashdot?

    My beef with Consumer Reports is their wierd form of objectivity. An air filter can't be rated by the contaminants it removes, because the test is set up to measure volume of air moved. What's up with that? I also don't rate cars based on their number of cupholders.

    --
    I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  154. Aluminium Foil by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

    I covered up the holes in one of the panels of my ATX case with Aluminium Foil and I haven't seen a lot of dust lately. Also, it makes a good effect with a Cold Cathdote light :-).

    Or wait until you remove a reversed LED fan, look at the dust!

    1. Re:Aluminium Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made a hat out of aluminium foil, that made me realise that the dust is just an illusion made by the lizards to keep us busy!! Not realizing the top level of The Herbsmoking Rulers!

      P.S
      You have to "earth" the hat, e.g connect it to a radiator. And pray in thunder.

  155. smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont have an ionic breeze but my old roommate did, we were smoking in his room and it did pull in the smoke, and the smoke did not come out of the other side. I havnt seen one since I moved out of that apartment, but I figured I would post that little blurb for all the critics out there

  156. Re: CFCs and Ozone by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you get too much ozone in your office, you could always release som CFCs, which readily break down O3 and make it harmless.

    My understanding is that the CFCs themselves do not break down ozone.
    What happens is that, in the upper atmosphere, sunlight breaks down the CFC, releasing, among other things, chlorine (the first "C" in CFC).
    The freed chlorine is what breaks down the ozone.
    In your room, the CFC is not going to break down (at least not in any measurable amount), and so will not break down the ozone.

    OTOH, dumping Chlorox in a pan might have the desired effect :) , but this can cause other problems, as chlorine is poisonous.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  157. Remove the cats by MoobY · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not at all that much of a cat person, but if you're having troubles with cats clogging up your fans, why don't you simply remove the cats? :)

    --
    --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
  158. Bionic air purifier by JayateMo · · Score: 1

    Hey! That is what your nosehair is for!

  159. SUCKER BORN EVERYDAY by iridium1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am not really surprised how many people think that devices without fans or filters work. Wake up people. It is the same physics that make the ions stick to particles that proves that a volume of air is required to pass thru a filter if you want your air cleaned if at all. All scientific studies show that a filter (glass or carbon) must permit some pollutants to pass through in order to work. The larger the volume of air, the harder to filter, the more displacement needed (the bigger the room, the bigger the fan needed). If you have a small computer lab that you need to keep clean, a real hepa filter rated for the volume of air in your room will help. I have a small honeywell filter that was allergist recomended, I also have 4 severs and a workstation always running in my office. They collect dust no matter what. I dust gear once a month. Stay away from fanless devices. It is like filtering your room with a piece of cardboard (i dont know if anyone remembers the N.S.A. scandel that involved air filters) I have to agree with all the posts for cleaning and vacuming. That is where you start. Keep the enviornment and the gear clean first. Filter the air second. Clean again third.

    1. Re:SUCKER BORN EVERYDAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont blow off like that!

      I have a system containing of 2 6x6feed plastic sheets I got from a construction site, I put it in the server room next to each other, (less than 1 feet apart), and rub the plastic frenetically for 30 min every morning. That makes them static. Now, I shut down everything that contains a fan (computers, switches and what have you not) and sit very still for one hour(You dont want to upset the air), and presto!! The dust end up on the plastic sheets!! Roll em together carefully and take them to the shower room (if you rub as frenetic as I do, get yourself a shower). Go back and (This is crucial)and turn every thing back on.

      If you like coffie, get your self a cup. You have deserved it!!

      Yours truly

      gil Bates.

  160. don't ask slashdot,ask people w/ dusty hobbies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why ask slashdot? Go off and find yourself catalogs aimed at woodworkers. For under $250 you'll find several options for air filteration (you want an air filter, not a dust collector which would be too noisy). You'll still have filters, but these last a long time. Also google search rec.woodworking for home brewed equivalents. Hint:if "pretty" is not a requirement, find a heating and ventillation contractor, ask them if they have any old squirrel cage fans -- nearly every de-commissioned furnace has one, fasten quality furnace filter in front -- voila air filter for under $50.

    The other option is the electrostatic version that goes in-line on a forced air system in homes. They work, but are pricy and you'll get tired of washing them.

  161. I use electrolux by MS_leases_my_soul · · Score: 1

    I have on of the Electrolux HEPA air purifiers at the house and it is awesome. Yes, it is also loud, but we actually like that because it acts as a white noise generator while you sleep (we keep it in the bedroom).

    Our bedroom is pretty big (~900 sq ft) and it does a great job filtering cat hair and other crud. They run around $500.

  162. ULPA is the *best* option by caveat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ULPA (Ultra-Low Penetrating Air) filters are 1 to 2 orders of magnitude more effecient than HEPA (High-Efficency Particulate Arresting) air filters; ULPA is rated to trap 99.999% of particles at 0.12 micron while HEPA filters only catch 99.99% at .3 microns. OF course, for most airborne dust and bacteria, the difference is negligible, since they're in the single-to-tens-of micron size ranges - but ULPA is clearly the superior choice, and not much more costly than HEPA at all. Incidentally, you might want to consider ULPA filters if you make IV infusions - a lot of viruses are small enough to only be trapped in ULPA filters IIRC.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  163. Air-Conditioner filters. by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    Every lab or datacenter I have worked in was connected to some pretty intense air conditioners with filters that took care of the dust. If you guys have separate air-conditioning in the lab, you should check and see if you can get dust-collecting filters.

  164. Fans are NOT GOOD on ionic air cleaners!!! by caveat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Having a fan means you can clean a much larger volume of air.

    MORE air yes, but it's not going to be nearly so clean. Longwinded explantion that goes into theory follows:
    Ionic filters have a theoretical 100% efficiency for all particle sizes. How these ionic air filters work is an excercise left to the reader (apply - charge to incoming particles with a -1,000V grid, place a +1000V grid close by, all the ionized - charged particles stick to the + grid); there are scientific instruments to select a very specific size of dust particle that work on the same principle. Instead of two charged plates, they use a rod and sleeve electrode system with + in the center, and they have a very small exit slit at the bottom; the voltage across the rods is very carefully controlled along with the carrier gas flow rate (the dust has to be in some medium), and only one very specific size comes out the slit at the botton (+/- 1 nm). (TSI 3080 Electrostatic Classifier)

    The theoretical equation for this instrument describes the arc taken between the two electrodes for a given size particle in a given carrier gas at a given flowrate and voltage difference. The carrier flowrate is absolutely critical, a few tenths of a percent deviation will throw your size off by a few *tens* of percent. Assuming these ionic filters are going for 100% efficiency, and they aren't running some insane delta-V like -5000/+15,000, they need a fairly low flow rate to allow all the particles time to drift over to the collector (small particles won't move very fast through dense air in a relatively low electrical field - c'mon people, i know it's early, but think about it - smoke diffuses, water droplets from a spray bottle drops from the air a lot faster) - so to make my point finally, the Ionic Breeze uses the electrostatic air flow, which is actually probably a lot better than a fan-driven filter. The fanned filters can clean more air, but they're going to leave a lot of the smaller crap untouched...I actually wouldn't be surprised if a HEPA filter was actually more effective than a cheap ionic filter.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  165. Re:skin ( off-topic ) by anubi · · Score: 1
    I had those things when I was a teenager too. At that time, the drug thing was not so prevalent, so hypodermic syringes were easy to come by. I used them all the time for oiling things and refilling the ink cartridges in those old fountain pens ( I could buy an entire jar of ink for the price of a pack of cartridges ). I also found that the syringe (sans needle) made a dandy vacuuming device for removing the contents of blackheads. I would pop the blackhead, then use a little alcohol in the syringe ( so there would be no air to expand and reduce the suction, as well as the antimicrobial effects ) and pull the contents from the site of the blackhead. It seemed to make way for a good cleanout and minimal damage around the blackhead site. It seemed if I left anything in there, the blackhead would just fester up again.. but if I pulled until I just got clear blood plasma out, that did it.

    The contents of the blackhead site would then be mixed with the alcohol, which was easy to eject from the syringe, so I could use the syringe repeatedly. In those days, the plunger was glass too, and made to be used repeatedly. Because I was only pulling suction, I could use the same syringe that I oiled with. The alcohol would readily evaporate if I needed to load it with oil, and any remaining oil did not interfere with the blackhead removal.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  166. Panty hoses by yourruinreverse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I once read somewhere about an insanely simple and cheap solution: cover the inlets and outlets with pieces of your (wife's / sister's/ grandmother's) tights stretched over the in/outlet between the fan and the perforation in the casing. I've experimented with this myself, and although it is quite cumbersome to actually get it done, and more cumbersome having to remove the cloth periodically to clean it (with water and soap), it does actually keep a lot of dust out.

    --
    JeR
  167. Potovation by QuietRiot · · Score: 1
    You got me! Most common means I've seen is to take a naked toilet paper or paper towel roll and stuff it with some dryer sheets, new or used; just stuff them in there so they fill the entire air passage. The spun fiber material they are made of is pretty neat because it will catch particulate matter (like smoke, dust), yet still allows air to pass by with a very low pressure drop. (new dryer sheets will keep the odor down much better, but be harder to 'draw' through)

    If you're smoking in your dorm room, a 'oney', or 'one hitter', is probably the least conspicuous means of getting certain psychoactive chemicals into your blood, but the use of the tube as described above need not be limited to such low quantity imbibing. Water pipe, steamroller, Jay or Joint, vaporizer, chillum, blunt, or iBong smoke could also be blown through one of these things and work equally well:)

    1. Re:Potovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have noticed that the usage of "toilet paper or paper towel roll" will work but at times if you release an unexpected large amount of air (cough) it can blow the dryer sheets out. I would usually use-, er, I mean I heard it is good to use an old 20oz plastic coke bottle (completely dry of course) and stuff it with the sheets. Then cut holes out the bottom and blow from the neck.

      The other problem I have encountered is after awhile you will sit there forgetting the "blow tube" in your hand while you exhale without it. heh.

      "Woah man, did I just forget to blow through this thing? Does it smell in here? Did someone knock on the door? Shit man, we are busted... wait, no, nevermind... nobody there... damn, it is bright out there in the hallway.."

      Aaaahh... memories...

  168. Temprature Control? Ask Slashdot Hijack by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 2


    I'd like to hijack this thread for my own needs.

    I have a small basement room in our offices that I would like to turn into a server room. (10x12'). Unfortunatly it has no easy access to an external vent, and putting in the duct work would cost more than the computers it would contain.

    Is there an (affordable) environmental control unit that can be used in a space like this or am I trying to find a loophole in the laws of thermodynamics?
    -insert obligatory simpsons quote-

    Would an evaporative solution work? I'm totally HVAC ignorant.

    1. Re:Temprature Control? Ask Slashdot Hijack by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      Without ducting you are sunk.

  169. Endust? by radarvectors · · Score: 1

    OK, maybe the oil in the Endust will increase the dust-collection efficiency of the filter, like a K&N filtercharger on an automobile: http://www.knfilters.com/facts.htm

    But, what about the other components in that aerosol can? Propane, butane, hydrocarbon solvent, METHYL CHLOROFORM (1,1,1-TRICHLOROEHANE). (From the MSDS)
    http://www.herc.org/library/msds/endust.htm

    "Methyl chloroform is used as a solvent and in many consumer products. Effects reported in humans due to acute (short-term) inhalation exposure to methyl chloroform include hypotension, mild hepatic effects, and central nervous system (CNS) depression. Cardiac arrhythmia and respiratory arrest may result from the depression of the CNS. Symptoms of acute inhalation exposure include dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of consciousness, and decreased blood pressure in humans."

    http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/trichlor.html

    1. Re:Endust? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      Good point! I wonder how quickly all the nasties evaporate -- I'm sure they wouldn't be pumped into the air for very long, but if you're sensitive you should avoid this. Then again, if you're sensitive you probably don't use Endust (or other aerosols) anyway.

      This is a trick I learned a long time ago from one of those "household tips" newspaper columns. This house has an electrostatic filter so I personally haven't done this in over 10 years. But when I did it (last house) I didn't notice any chloroform smell, for what it's worth.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  170. Re:Do what woodworkers do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Amen.

    I mean, suggesting that another industry has more hardship that IT is reason enough for negative moderation.

    what was this AC thinking? didn't he know that that shit don't fly here?

  171. Re: wha' happen' by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

    Yeah, i realized (shortly after i posted) that i forgot to point out that this was an advantage that these have over other purifiers. I guess i got too into the article

  172. Electrostatic filters (Ionic Breeze, etc.) by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    I don't have one and I wouldn't reccommend one, they're WAY too expensive for what they do/contain.

    As someone mentioned, the lack of a fan reduces their efficiency quite a bit.

    But the idea of electrostatic air filtering is sound.

    My father and I both suffer from pretty nasty allergies. As a result, long ago we installed two electrostatic air filters in our house. The units we have were from Sears (probably OEMed from Honeywell or another one of the major HVAC companies), and install in the furnace ducts after the mechanical air filter. (Ours required the ducts to be cut out to fit the unit. A pain but worth the money and effort.) It's a miracle during allergy season.

    You should try to find some sort of electrostatic filter that includes a fan... You can get whole-house furnace filters for less than the $500 of the IB, and they work very well, there are probably intermediate versions good for a single room.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  173. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has all the symptoms of a high-quality troll (starts out with solid points, descends quickly into flames and spelling errors) but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt because I want to say something.

    Just because an organization uses "science" doesn't mean it uses good science. If the CR experiment tested the filter in a sealed box with no airflow whatsoever and used those results as an indicator of performance in a home, it is bad science and will give flawed results. In any home, a central A/C or heating setup will ensure a constant air flow between the vents and the intake. (Note, I haven't measured that "scientifically" I only used "common sense" which will get you pretty far, believe it or not.)

    Does the Sharper Image thing really cost $500? If so it's overpriced, not because of how well it performs but because of the parts that go into it. The margins on those have got to be huge.

  174. Correction on ionic filters.. by caveat · · Score: 1

    Negative ion generators force high-voltage electricity to one or more needlepoints. Electricity is simply electrons in motion and since electrons repel one another, when they reach the needlepoint, they jump off and attach themselves to the molecules in the air forming negative ions.

    Only very cheap, low-voltage filters use needle points. Points allow the minimum amount of current to spill out and ionize the particles, but the area of ionization is a rather small sphere around the needle. Much better is to blast more voltage, say a few thousand, across a flat plate, with a grid collector plate; the flat plate ionizes a lot more particles than a needle and the collector has the most area to catch the crap. But that's more sophisticated, and requires a much beefire powersupply, so it's a lot more $$$ tha the cheapo $100 wal-mart ionic filters.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Correction on ionic filters.. by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      The Sharper Image Ionic Breeze uses a wire. Atleast that is 1 more dimension that a needlepoint.

      There actually is decent flow on those units. You can definitely feel the air movement - I'd estimate it to be about 60 CFM based on case fans and surface area. I put mine near a white wall and it got dark with particles.

      Anyhow 60CFM would cycle a 360 ft^2 room in an hour. That isn't so bad considering it uses very little energy and is silent.

  175. Woodworking Air Cleaners by Rob+Sweet · · Score: 1

    Check out woodworking air cleaners. They're designed to filter particles down to one micron. Some links:

    http://jettools.com/JETWood/Tools/AFS2000.html

    http://www.pennstateind.com/Merchant2/merchant.m v? Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=PSI&Category_Code=A C

    http://www.deltawoodworking.com/index.asp?e=136& p= 868

    --
    Rob
  176. buried and never read but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blow the dust out of my computer case once a month. I used to use those little $5 cans of air I would perloin from the office, but they stopped buying them because *everyone* took them home or played with them until they were empty.

    So, I now just use my paintball gun. Open case, stand back about 3ft, and shoot at the flat spots that won't be hurt by a little air shock. Cleans out the case good and moves all of the dust bunnies to the floor where I can vacuum them. I know a few people with large co2 tanks ( 6ft long welding tanks, can't remember the proper name for them ) and it only costs them about $20 to fill them from the welding gas place. Either way, my method is practically free, although it doesn't make my environment any cleaner, just keeps the computers from filling up.

  177. Sounds Like a Fire Hazard by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 1
    I opened many a computer that was half full of fluffy dust. Thankfully those were Pentium 100's, so it wasn't the hot 60's or any modern chip....

    That dust is probably just about as flamable as volitile liquids like paint thinner or gasoline. Hopefully, even with hotter processor, nothing reaches the flash point, and there aren't any spark sources.

  178. Explain the placebo effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The placebo effect is the measurable, observable, or felt improvement in health not attributable to treatment. This effect is believed by many people to be due to the placebo itself in some mysterious way. A placebo (Latin for "I shall please") is a medication or treatment believed by the administrator of the treatment to be inert or innocuous. Placebos may be sugar pills or starch pills. Even "fake" surgery and "fake" psychotherapy are considered placebos.

    http://skepdic.com/placebo.html
  179. Water by jonadab · · Score: 2

    Water makes a *great* dust filter. The Rainbow line of vacuum
    cleaners runs their output through a water pan, and the result
    is a *lot* less dust (if you sweep at all regularly). Now, those
    things run a fair penny more than the $500 you were looking at,
    but you can probably take advantage of the same principle for
    well under $500. You need two things: a system for rotating
    the room's air so that any given bit of air makes it to your
    filter system periodically, and a filter system that takes the
    air and forces it down into a bucket of water. You do have to
    change the water, but that's easier and much cheaper than changing
    a traditional filter. (In theory you could rig something up to
    automatically change the water, but probably not inside of your
    $500 budget.) You can tell that stuff is being removed from the
    air because the water turns black.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  180. ask you local woodworkers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    woodworking websites have you answers. woodworkers need to keep their shops clean of all that sawdust. search the web for woodworking tools & look @ their cleaners. here's 1 of my favorite suppliers: http://www.pennstateind.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv? Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=PSI&Category_Code=A C

  181. Re:Do what woodworkers do... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    A typical woodworking dust collection system, such as the new Jet will do wonders for cleaning the air. Wood dust is now classified as a carcinogen, due to its fine particulate nature. Makes you wonder if standard household dust has similar properties.

    These beasites can be loud, so typically you want to install them out of earshot and duct the vaccuum. A regular model will run you $250 so you could do it yourself with the ducting for the $500 you're looking at.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  182. -5 : Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just believe, damnit! Believe!

  183. Sharper Image Silent Air Purifier by CokoBWare · · Score: 1
    I don't work for the company, but I plan on buying one in the next two weeks. Ionic Breeze Quadra Silent Air Purifier has a ton of features that I think will be beneficial to computers as well as people. The thing only consumes 10 Watts! It's completely silent, and it doesn't use disposable air filters. It only uses stainless steel metal plates to filter the air. I suffer from allergies, and I think both my computer and my sinuses will thank me once I have this baby running in my appartment.

    I think that an office could definitely benefit from one of these babies! You should see what it does with cigarette smoke! Gone in a flash!

  184. Oreck by mattfusf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oreck (the vacuum cleaner people) sell an excellent air cleaner. I've had one for a little over a year and it is amazing what a difference it makes in my house.

    The model I have has three filters; a reusable prefilter, a metal collector, and a carbon filter. The carbon filter needs to be replaced every few months (they are fairly cheap, $20-$30). The prefilter just gets rinsed off and the metal collector is cleaned every 4 or 5 weeks. Mine has a fan with 2 or 3 speed settings, at the "normal" speed it is quiet enough to not be noticiable.

    I think there are a few new models, but they all operate similarly.

    Matt

  185. Correct link address for Air cleaners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Below is the correct link to the air cleaners Penn State Industries Air Cleaners

  186. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

    That is a very unconvincing website. It would be interesting if it provided actual detailed information about the "junk science" that CR purportly uses, but instead we have a number of quotes by people in several different organizations without any context given to make sense of them.

    I agree. The quotes were all regarding one thing: its alarmist slant on pesticides. And some of the sources are a lot worse than CR could ever be: The Washington Times? Give me a break. It's always complaining about other media sources being "environmentalist" which is WT's highest insult.

    Now, it's probably impossible for personal opinions to never end up affecting articles, and CR certainly has less expertise in some areas, but CR in general does a really good job at being fair.

    An aside, when CR rated Coors and Budweiser as top beers, I knew they were untrustworthy.

    As far as taste tests go: The results are simply a statistical summary of tests taken by randomly-selected double-blind taste testers. You may not agree with the results; you may wish the sample size was bigger; but you can't fault the method.

    --
    bp
  187. Tip to save about $150 by tweakt · · Score: 1

    Check ebay:

    Dutch auction, 21 availabe, $195 each:
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =2318020218&category=20610

    Just search for "ionic breeze"

  188. So it's not just me by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    That's a very interesting website... thanks for the link.

    I have, on several occasions, noticed the "green" slant of consumer reports when it comes to certain items, like vehicles. They don't seem to like SUVs much, but even some of their points regarding those vehicles are well-taken (for example, how many suburbanites really use/need the 4wd capability of their large SUV? Almost none... one of the points they make). Now, I think people should be free to buy what they want, but everyone else should be just as free to poke fun at them for buying a massive off-road vehicle that never leaves the pavement...

    I'll trust consumer reports to tell me what kind of VCR or tires to buy... but I'd be a bit less trusting towards anything with an "environmental" angle.

    Glad to see I'm not the only one who's noted this... thanks again for that link.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  189. Honeywell Environizer by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have one (the smaller of the two models Radio Shack offers) in my bedroom, and while I'm unsure what it does for dust, it certainly does a good job of removing cat odors from the room.

    Even though the unit has a fan, it's quite quiet.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  190. You obviously don't have one. by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look, guy, it's all well and good to believe unbiased reviews and so forth. I'm not saying that I'd consider CR a source of such, but hey, you believe what you want.

    However, that's beside the damn point here. The guy has one. He says it works for him. To tell him he's been duped when he's the one cleaning the dust off the blades every couple of days is a bit ridiclous.

    That's all people are saying. Nobody's defending a "shiny piece of crap", they're defending the guy who makes personal observations and decides for himself rather than simply believing anyone and everyone else's opinions.

    As for "not moving air", you're wrong. You're just simply wrong. They do move air, just not as quickly as one with a fan. You can hold up a piece of silk ribbon in front of one of the things and see that for yourself quite easily. Or if you prefer, blow smoke at it. That works just as well. I admit that it doesn't move 6 roomfulls of air in an hour, but then that's the whole point. Some people need air filtering, but cannot deal with noise. If you need air filtering and don't mind noise, then by all means get a fan system.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:You obviously don't have one. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      To tell him he's been duped when he's the one cleaning the dust off the blades every couple of days is a bit ridiclous.

      So my desk is a air filtration system? I'm literally cleaning a layer of dust off it every week (indeed I'm behind so there's a hearty layer of dust on it right now). Indeed, pretty much everything in my house must be a highly effective air filtration system as it all seems to magically attract dust. Maybe I should sell "picture frame air filtration systems" based upon the evidence that I have to clean dust off them frequently. I apologize for being sarcastic, however the observation that one cleans dust off something, without any sort of quantity or comparison to a placebo, is of limited value. Couple this with the fact that the skeptic specifically stated that the electrostatic filter approach is a good one, and will likely draw in dust in a close proximity, and one could accept that yes, sure it does draw in some dust, but it most certainly isn't a virtual fan. As far as your silk ribbon test, I suggest you declare any static object a air draw, specifically those that create heat, and hold a silk ribbon near them. ..they're defending the guy who makes personal observations and decides for himself rather than simply believing anyone and everyone else's opinions.

      Your point is contradictory: You claim that his observation should be lauded and accepted as true without question, while simultaneously holding him (the fanless ionization guy) as deciding for himself rather than "simply believing anyone and everyone else's opinions". Huh?

      Some people need air filtering, but cannot deal with noise. If you need air filtering and don't mind noise, then by all means get a fan system.

      This is the first time I've seen noise brought up at all. The original skeptic pointed out that the device in question used a good approach if only it had a fan, and that there were other units with a fan that were a far better choices. The defenders, I'd say almost certainly owners of the device in question defending their judgement in buying such a device, have come out swinging in a rather bizarre way, blaming the methodology of the Consumer Reports testing (which is fair), or worse blaming the right of Consumer Reports to test at all.

    2. Re:You obviously don't have one. by Otto · · Score: 1

      Oh good grief. If you're going to attack my point, at least attack the ones you can reasonably attack well. :-P

      So my desk is a air filtration system? I'm literally cleaning a layer of dust off it every week (indeed I'm behind so there's a hearty layer of dust on it right now). Indeed, pretty much everything in my house must be a highly effective air filtration system as it all seems to magically attract dust. Maybe I should sell "picture frame air filtration systems" based upon the evidence that I have to clean dust off them frequently. I apologize for being sarcastic, however the observation that one cleans dust off something, without any sort of quantity or comparison to a placebo, is of limited value.

      Fine. Get two of the devices. Turn one on. Leave one off. Watch the on one gather dust and the off one not.

      Look, all I was doing was to tell the guy that listening to the advice of authority is well and good, but not at the expense of your own damn experience. The original poster has the experience, and based on that experience, he says it works. To tell him that it doesn't, because authority says so, is just obviously stupid.

      Couple this with the fact that the skeptic specifically stated that the electrostatic filter approach is a good one, and will likely draw in dust in a close proximity, and one could accept that yes, sure it does draw in some dust, but it most certainly isn't a virtual fan. As far as your silk ribbon test, I suggest you declare any static object a air draw, specifically those that create heat, and hold a silk ribbon near them.

      a) This device doesn't create heat.
      b) You can feel the damn air moving out of it. Slowly, admittedly. Much more slowly than a fan, but in a double blind test you would be able to tell if it was on or off based on the amount of air being felt by your hand.
      c) If the device had a fan, it wouldn't be as effective at removing particles from the air. Adding a fan would move air through it, granted, but there's an optimal efficentcy for an electrostatic precipation system. Without extremely high voltages, you're simply not going to be able to charge fast moving particles and catch them in the shorter time that they're there. Since this isn't a high voltage system, the air must be around for a longer time in order for the filter to be effective. Really, look into the dynamics of the principle itself.

      Your point is contradictory: You claim that his observation should be lauded and accepted as true without question, while simultaneously holding him (the fanless ionization guy) as deciding for himself rather than "simply believing anyone and everyone else's opinions". Huh?

      How is this contradictory? For one thin, yes, his observation SHOULD be accepted as true, if it's a valid observation. Facts simply are. They're not subject to debate. You can question the person's motives or methods or say he's lying. That I have no problem with. But this skeptic guy didn't do that. He's believing Consumer Reports to such a great extent that he'll visiously attack someone who says "it works" because hey, authority said differently. The skeptic here blindly accepts his authority on the subject (Consumer Reports) and anyone else is obviously wrong.

      I don't believe CR for shit anymore, because they're wrong in nearly all cases I have personally investigated. You may disagree. Fine. But the point I made is not to believe anybody that blindly. Instead, get the damn thing and decide for yourself. That's the point I was trying to make.

      This is the first time I've seen noise brought up at all. The original skeptic pointed out that the device in question used a good approach if only it had a fan, and that there were other units with a fan that were a far better choices. The defenders, I'd say almost certainly owners of the device in question defending their judgement in buying such a device, have come out swinging in a rather bizarre way, blaming the methodology of the Consumer Rep

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:You obviously don't have one. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Oh good grief. If you're going to attack my point, at least attack the ones you can reasonably attack well. :-P

      Uh..ok. I'd turn that around and say the same thing to you for every reply in this entire conversation.

      Fine. Get two of the devices. Turn one on. Leave one off. Watch the on one gather dust and the off one not.

      I'm not the one claiming it works. Indeed, I'm not the one claiming that it doesn't work. However simply claiming evidence that one has to clean dust off of a device therefore it works is pretty weak evidence, though if you're willing to set up two such devices I would be very interested.I'd be especially interested if you furthermore compared it against devices that used other forms of filtration, as the original skeptic claimed that the fanless ionic filtration was weak compared to other filters (no one has said that it does _nothing_, but just that as a filter it's rather piss poor).

      a) This device doesn't create heat.

      It consumes electricity but it doesn't create heat...okay... ...Really, look into the dynamics of the principle itself.

      Oh, right, because I'm a big advocate/cynic of ionic air filtration. You're really trying for a strawman argument here aren't you? Please feel free to look thorugh my posts and deride where I wasn't specifically referring to someone else and their opinion, or a study.

      For one thin, yes, his observation SHOULD be accepted as true, if it's a valid observation. Facts simply are. They're not subject to debate. You can question the person's motives or methods or say he's lying. That I have no problem with. But this skeptic guy didn't do that. He's believing Consumer Reports to such a great extent that he'll visiously attack someone who says "it works" because hey, authority said differently. The skeptic here blindly accepts his authority on the subject (Consumer Reports) and anyone else is obviously wrong.

      Personally observations expressed as facts absolutely are open to debate. Your impression that they are faultless is truly a sign of great naivety. So when people respond favourably to placebos, that is an indication that sugar has medicinal qualities?

      I don't believe CR for shit anymore, because they're wrong in nearly all cases I have personally investigated. You may disagree. Fine. But the point I made is not to believe anybody that blindly. Instead, get the damn thing and decide for yourself. That's the point I was trying to make.

      Interesting consumer technique: Trust no-one and buy everything and see what you think personally (man I'm going to need a bigger drive way for my 200 cars). Oh, wait, simultaneously believe any subjective impression presented as fact online without question. This makes absolutely no sense.

    4. Re:You obviously don't have one. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      As a bit of a anecdote that is similar to this argument: I remember back in the late 80s/early 90s when a local BBS in my hometown hosted a file in their download section called "386to486.exe" (or a variation thereof) that, when run, scrolled by pages of fascinating numbers and little "performance tests", assuring the user at the end "Upgrade complete. 386 converted to 486.", and surely it must really have morphed the silicon on the processor given all of those fancy computer-esque terms floating by. I petitioned for the sysop to remove it in an online discussion only to be met by several people fervently advocating that they'd run the program and, lo and behold, it worked! It really did turn their 386 into a 486! Suddenly Wordperfect just "felt faster", and games "played better", and of course, oddly they had "less crashes".

      Here's where I think you and I differ. My natural instinct would be skepticism (though technically I know the feat was impossible, I'll play along just to humor them): Let's ensure that it didn't modify the click rate of the system clock (which is common for snake oil fixes like that), and run some actual benchmarks to get some before and actual metrics of the system (which is the CR methodology). Your belief, apparently, is that because they claimed that it sped up their PCs, therefore it does, and is undebatable fact that cannot be questioned or opposed. I think you can look forward to a long life of magic cleaners, oil additives, and miracle drugs.

    5. Re:You obviously don't have one. by Otto · · Score: 1

      I'm not the one claiming it works. Indeed, I'm not the one claiming that it doesn't work.

      No, you're the one defending a guy who attacked and derided someone's actual *experience* because he thought the opinion of a *magazine* was a better authority on the matter.

      You're the kind of guy that believes *authority* is more important than experience. That's what you're saying by defending the "skeptic".

      However simply claiming evidence that one has to clean dust off of a device therefore it works is pretty weak evidence, though if you're willing to set up two such devices I would be very interested.I'd be especially interested if you furthermore compared it against devices that used other forms of filtration, as the original skeptic claimed that the fanless ionic filtration was weak compared to other filters (no one has said that it does _nothing_, but just that as a filter it's rather piss poor).

      I, in fact, do have two of the devices, and while I have not set up a controlled test, experience shows me that yes, it does collect dust when on and not when off.

      However, I really fail you see where you're driving this though. Does it work as well as a HEPA filter? Of course not. Nobody made the claim that it does. And anyway, this is all beside the point. I never attacked him for criticizing the device, I attacked him for taking the word of authority and putting it over the word of actual experience. A man says "it works for me" and this guy says "CR says it doesn't, therefore you're wrong". I mean, honestly, how more stupid of a methodology can you concieve than that?

      Personally observations expressed as facts absolutely are open to debate. Your impression that they are faultless is truly a sign of great naivety.

      Open to debate, how? A fact is a fact no matter who observes it. You can question the observer, you can debate his motives and whether he's lying, but you absolutely cannot question the fact itself, if it is indeed true.

      So when people respond favourably to placebos, that is an indication that sugar has medicinal qualities?

      No, it's an indication that placebo's do have an effect on mental health. However, the "sugar has medicinal qualities" you stated is not the fact you presented, it's the conclusion you're drawing from the fact of people responding favorably to sugar pills. The conclusion may be incorrect, but the fact simply *is*.

      Interesting consumer technique: Trust no-one and buy everything and see what you think personally (man I'm going to need a bigger drive way for my 200 cars).

      Not *buy*, but *try*. If you are getting conflicting reports, then instead of deciding between them, go check the device out at a store. In your example, go test drive the car. Ask for an extended test drive, where you can take the car home for a night. In other words, what makes anybody's opinion better than yours? Answer: your opinion is better than anybody else's when it comes to you. Period.

      Oh, wait, simultaneously believe any subjective impression presented as fact online without question. This makes absolutely no sense.

      You're right. So I prefer to believe facts that are objective and repeatable by myself, personally. The fact is that a) the device collects dust from the air, b) the device moves air *without* a fan, c) consumer reports is flat out wrong or their conclusions are being presented incorrectly (if they indeed said contrary to a) or b)). These are not subjective impressions, these are facts. Unalterable. No matter who says them, they are so.

      You can question my methods or my motives, but you cannot question the facts themselves.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    6. Re:You obviously don't have one. by Otto · · Score: 1

      Let's make your example a little closer to the actual discussion:

      Your belief, apparently, is that because they claimed that it sped up their PCs, therefore it does, and is undebatable fact that cannot be questioned or opposed.

      No, but you appearantly would. See, I prefer to find out what's really going on. You, however, would accept graphs and statistics by some magazine simply because they're colorful.

      The fact that the graphs have no bearing on the reality of the situation is irrelevant. The magazine made them, therefore they must be accurate!

      Me, I'd be the one who'd try it myself, find it didn't do shit, and then proclaim it loudly. You, however, having read the magazine, would say "the magazine says it works, therefore you must be wrong despite the fact that you have tried it and I have not".

      That's a much closer analogy, I think.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    7. Re:You obviously don't have one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might simply be the fact he has tpo clean it periodicly.

      If it wasn't doing anything it could sit there for months instead.

    8. Re:You obviously don't have one. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      No, but you appearantly would. See, I prefer to find out what's really going on. You, however, would accept graphs and statistics by some magazine simply because they're colorful.

      Do you realize how absurd this sounds? On the one hand you're saying that the anecdotal evidence of one man's observation regarding the effectiveness of a single product; especially in light of the fact that, for larger purchases like the Ionic Breeze, people often become defensively non-critical; is sufficient proof of the worthiness of a product, but a comparative study between multiple competitive products with a documented, and reproducible, methodology where they observed the effectiveness isn't worthy (masked under the righteous "graphs and statistics". Uh huh). What makes this especially hilarious is that Consumer Report's #1 choice was a very similar product, but with a fan (rather invalidating your claims, btw).

      Bah. You remind me of people who are certain that smoking is healthy because they have a friend whose smoking grandmother lived to be 95. No way will they be "mislead" by fancy graphs and statistics. No sireee!

    9. Re:You obviously don't have one. by Otto · · Score: 1

      Do you realize how absurd this sounds?

      No, because what I said is not absurd in the slightest. However:

      On the one hand you're saying that the anecdotal evidence of one man's observation regarding the effectiveness of a single product...

      Whoa there, Billy. I said no such thing. I'm not saying that a) anecdotal evidence is good, nor b) that unbiased reviews are bad.

      What I'm saying is that telling someone that "the product doesn't work because XXX says so!" when the product clearly does work, and furthermore the guy you're telling that to has one and knows damn well that it works, is absurd.

      If you told me "the sky is pink and full of doughnuts", and I went outside and looked at the sky, and I came back and told you were mistaken, and then you told me that I was wrong because, while you've never seen the sky, a magazine you read once said that the sky was pink and full of doughnutty goodness.. well, I'd say that the arguement is kinda over at that point.

      If you're willing to believe anybody's outrageous claims to the extent that, despite other claims to the contrary from equally capable observers, well then, why judge anything at all? Why not simply make shit up, yeah?

      This isn't about believing anecdotal evidence over reviews, this is about dismissing *all* opposing evidence in favor of contrary viewpoints. He didn't just say "well, CR said differently and I'm more inclined to trust them", he said "You are wrong." ...is sufficient proof of the worthiness of a product, but a comparative study between multiple competitive products with a documented, and reproducible, methodology where they observed the effectiveness isn't worthy (masked under the righteous "graphs and statistics". Uh huh).

      When did "effectiveness" come into this? The original poster I complained about said that "CR said it does NOT work". Not "CR said it is ineffective". Two *wholly* different things.

      Telling someone that a thing does not work when it clearly does work and the person has stated as much seems to me to be the end-all be-all of closed-mindedness and idiocy.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    10. Re:You obviously don't have one. by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Dont take this OTTO guy too seriously. He is a troll. He got angry at me for some disagrement and since then he reads my user page and finds comments he can use to call me an idiot :) Thanks for the support.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    11. Re:You obviously don't have one. by sasami · · Score: 1

      Look, all I was doing was to tell the guy that listening to the advice of authority is well and good, but not at the expense of your own damn experience.

      Exactly. Because personal experience is always objective and reproducible, unlike controlled testing which is subjective and unreliable.

      --
      Dum de dum.

      --
      Freedom is not the license to do what we like, it is the power to do what we ought.
  191. Thankyou... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    its so inefficient that dust actually settles on and around it.

    Thanks.... for some reasons that just makes me laugh so hard, the image of the little Ionic Breeze pumpin away trying to atack dusk, and there is the dust, gently floating and sitting atop the machine. LOL.

  192. Wrong! by Otto · · Score: 1

    That article is talking about an entirely different type of cleaner. An "ozone generator" is a device that uses ozone as the primary method of cleaning. You find them a lot for industrial applications, to clean large areas of smell when people aren't around.

    These devices are "electrostatic precipitators" and are an entirely different kind of beast. They do generate ozone in extremely small quantities, as a side effect. But then again, so does the tube of your TV. So does anything with electrical fields exposed to air and, therefore, oxygen.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  193. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Tower · · Score: 1

    Cubic feet would be a better number, as air tends to be three dimensional in housing/office situations.

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  194. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by Otto · · Score: 1

    ... they'd be a bit louder than the Ionic Breeze (understatement), but they'd actually do something useful for the money spent.

    For some of us, the silence is more important than how many roomfuls of air it can move in an hour.

    Hey, reviews are great and all, but what I do know is that every 2-3 days, I have to wipe the dust off the blades of the Ionic Breeze. So, it seems to be "doing something useful" just dandy, thank you.

    It's okay to listen to claims based on authority, but not over the evidence of your own damn eyes.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  195. Dust removal by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    Years of laboratory tests have confirmed that the most effective dust removal devices are computers, so just build a giant computer case with lots of fans, and watch the dust pile up inside. :)

  196. woodworkers have this covered pretty well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dust is a problem in the wood shop, too, particularly with certain more-toxic-than-other wood species. Have a look at http://www.deltawoodworking.com/index.asp?e=136&p= 868 for two air cleaners that address this issue. Certainly fits the $500 criterion; replacing filters is just a fact of life.

  197. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by mattkime · · Score: 1

    yes, but wouldn't the settling of dust make square feet more important than cubic feet?

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  198. Re:air purifier --too fancy by r_j_howell · · Score: 1

    when the dust collecter in my father-in-law's workshop broke down, he just tied a furnace filter to a box fan with a rope.

  199. Re:Do what woodworkers do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A wood working dust collector, single or double stage, is really intended to collect large particles. What is needed in this situation is an air cleaner, designed for very small particles. Jet makes those too, and they are far more affordable.

  200. Good filters by cgenman · · Score: 1

    If the problem is dust inside of the machine, perhaps that would be the most efficient thing to filter?

    I know people who use clipped stretched pantyhose as intake filters on their machines. Not only do they not impede airflow as much as other solutions thereby reducing noise, but they are very budget efficient. On the other hand, while very effective at reducing large particles such as pet hair they would not likely pass the HEPA standard. If noise is not an issue, a standard computer filtration system might be the best option for you and your laboratory. Some are washable / reusable.

    Of course, your lab shouldn't get that dirty to begin with. If you have lab attendents, you should teach them regular maintenence procedures during their downtime... such as spraying compressed air through the bodies of the computers and keeping the surfaces of the lab pristine.(refillable compressed air canisters are available for $15 and can be refilled with any bicycle pump) If the computers are outright clogged with dust, they obviously aren't getting even the most occasional of maintenence. There isn't a fire-and-forget solution to the problem of computer dust: Even with a great filter you still have to open them up occasionally and give them a spritz.

  201. Seems to me you've already got great filtration. by tfofurn · · Score: 1

    Clearly the computers are doing a very good job of taking the dust out of the air. You just need some decoy computers to lessen the dust available for the machines about which you care. You might even be able to get away with a bunch of decoy power supplies instead of whole computers.

  202. Ah, Memories of the Horsehair bearing... by Glasswire · · Score: 1

    Probably the worst environment in the world I can think of is a veteranary clinic.

    Back in the days when LANtastic on DOS was a great small business network solution, our shop had a 286 server come that had suddenly halted dead in it's tracks (and it wasn't the power supply)

    When the service manager opened it up, the main open cavity was filled with one massive dustbunny (about 8"W x 10"H x 3"deep). Convinced we had horrible thermal problem that stopped the the cpu (or memory or anything), the unit was vaccummed out and restarted - system came up though BIOS but the massive 40Mb drive would not read - though it was recognized and there. Since the last backup wasn't perfect, we really wanted to get the drive back so it was removed and inspected. When cabled up externally the vibration was funny - the drive was not spinning!
    Close inspection showed that a very fine horsehair had wound itself around the main bearing until it was so tight it STOPPED the spindle. Fine twiser work pulled off the hair and the drive ran fine (excepting of course, the expected some loose clusters and other drive issues with open files and the sudden shutdown).

  203. Ionic Breeze in my datacenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually use a breeze in the data center with about 20 servers and two full racks of scsi drives, it does great. It captures the dust and is cheap on energy. I don't want another fan in the data center, its loud enough already. I have one in my office, and a few at home. I have no complaints. filters in hepa products have a limit to the particle size it will trap and particles smaller will pass right through. These small particles are easy for an ionic system to capture. No discontinued replacement hepa filters to waste your time searching for.

  204. Personalize your cats by instarx · · Score: 1

    Siamese cats have a gene that causes their hair to grow dark in cool areas of their body (paws, nose, ears, tail) and light in warm areas (body). To personalize your cat just shave your initials in the fur on its side. The cool air will cause the hair to grow dark. This only works with Siamese.

  205. Didn't you mean by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    grep -v -w cats ?
    sed 's/cats//g' ?

    Just like 1. 2. ? 3. proft!, the trick is in the ?...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  206. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > Isuzu might disagree with you

    And that is... why? Because Isuzus are crap?

  207. the 50 cent solution by humbads · · Score: 1

    Well, I used to work in a computer lab as one of the technicians. Periodically, we would bring each machine outside, take off the case, and clean them out with one of those vacuum cleaners that have an air-blower attachment. This doesn't cost anything except the time of the lab technician, which is usually fairly cheap (especially at a university ;). Also, you only have to clean out the computers that need cleaning.

    IMHO, getting a whole lab air filtration system is going to be overkill. To get to the point where you no longer have to do maintenance on the computers, you would need a very expensive air cleaner. You're running a lab, not a hospital. The hardware can take a lot of dust (a.k.a. neglect) before it fails.

    My own computer case, which sits in my dusty bedroom, has a slot for a case-fan in the front, but the front panel is solid. So, I drilled the front panel with holes, and then placed a filter between the fan slot and the case panel. Then I added a fan to blow air into the case through the filter.

    Where did I get the filter? I bought one of those 24"x20" home heater filters for 50 cents at the local hardware store. Since the filter is much larger than what I need, I cut out a small piece to fit in the case. I saved the rest of the filter. Periodically, I replace the old filter with a new piece cut from the saved filter.

    It's very cheap, and it drastically cut down the amount of dust in my case. I still vacuum out the inside once in awhile, because fine dust still accumulates in it. But this maintenance is infrequent. Adding a case mod like this would save you a lot of maintenance work. I'm sure some other slashdotters know where to buy cheap air-filters for computer cases.

    Good luck!
    Shailesh

  208. Re:Radioshack has something, and it actually works by Tower · · Score: 1

    The quantities in question are usually things: How much air (volume), often within a time period (exchanges per hour for a space of X cubic feet), and percent filtration or capture, which can be associated with a particle size or range (i.e. 97% of all parrticles > 5 mucron). The total dust capacity of a filter element before it needs replacing/cleaning isn't usually given, and even settled dust is a three dimensional quantity...

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  209. good air filters, HEPA, allergies, & some myth by arete · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's only one problem that I see with your inexpensive setup - not enough fan. Although, perhaps it's enough for your situation, putting in a larger fan could make much better use of that large filter media. You didn't specify, but the fans ought to suck from the filter, so they themselves are protected, too.

    A short description on filters: There is, roughly, how many particles they catch of different sizes and how much air they attempt to filter. (Back to the ionic breeze later) In general, the latter is actually the dominant force in really helping you.

    The HEPA standard is irrelevant (and no longer current) in any case where you might be standing in the unfiltered air. It's designed to keep radioisotopes from escaping laboratories. That doesn't mean HEPA filters are bad - but the HEPA standard is tremendous overkill in terms of what's important to you. A small HEPA filter, for instance, might have filtered 99.97% of very small particles out of 10% of the room air in the time another filter would have filtered out 80% of 90% of the air. (Math: about 10% vs. 72%)

    That said, traditional furnace filters still suck :) as they barely do any filtering at all. In fact, I have a box of 20x25 for sale at http://www.xig.net/sale/ near Chicago. Filtrete is a wonderful solution that doesn't cost very much - and while the parent post mentioned this, I'm not sure they put enough emphasis on it. I ended up replacing my furnace fairly soon after moving here for other reasons, and I have a Honeywell F50 electronic filter on my furnace. It's not even a very efficient filter compared to HEPA, but it uses the gigantic fan that's on my furnance, so in the end, it's better.

    There is a basic difference between electronic and physical media filters that _in general_ means electronic filters work better on smaller particles and media works better on big ones. The ideal solution typically is to put a large media filter in front of the electronic air filter - which is exactly what my F50 does. (There's a washable metal mesh filter) I believe this is the nature of the Ionic Breeze controversy - that it is ineffective on industrial debris in the air, but effective at pulling out allergen-sized particles. (Yes, allergens come in many sizes. But they're all pretty small. And, you're probably not allergic to dust mites, but to dust mite FECES - just in case you weren't sure it was tiny) I certainly think a fan might help it, but in my bedroom, for instance, it probably wouldn't matter because there's a ceiling fan and quite a bit of airflow (partially from ~ 12 case fans so it varies depending on exactly where...) My supposition is that it was designed with some sort of "average" room air circulation in mind.

    If your goal involves making it easier for someone to breathe, make sure you catch those pretty small particles - Filtrete at least, electronic ideally. If you have allergies, there are lots of other things that help tremendously - like (now NOT just plastic!) covers on your mattress, hardwood floors, washing bedding in hot water... (Perhaps I'll turn this page into a webpage. Heh. I'm happy to answer questions, though, in the meantime. If I do, it'll appear at http://www.xig.net/allergy

    Disclaimers and notes: I have a degree in Mechanical Engineering, I don't have an Ionic Breeze (they cost HOW much?), nor have I read the relevant Consumer Reports articles. I do think CR usually does great work, and I purchased my washer, dryer, and dishwasher from their reviews, but anyone can make a mistake. I do have pervasive airborne allergies, and have made a great many modifications to my surroundings to improve them.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  210. Try using what Woodworkers use by LokiFoo · · Score: 1

    Not sure how small the dust is you are dealing with, or the dimensions of your lab but maybe try what woodworkers use to clean the air of fine dust.

    Try looking at something like this that you suspend from the room ceiling. They are usually a squirrel cage blower that sucks the air through a pre-filter to get the big stuff then a second filter to get the tiny stuff and then returns the air to the room. Not the quietest solution (~65dB) but lots of computer labs are pretty noisy. To limit that, put it on a timer to scrub the air during off peak times.

    In a 20'x20'x8' room it will change the air over about 8 times an hour, capturing particles down to a few microns. Filters are reusable. All the major wood machinery companies make similar models. Under $250 gets you a unit with remote control (maybe a timer too) or you can get it in kit form where you build the box. A new challenge for case modders out there?

    (disclaimer: I don't work for them but like their products)

  211. Blueair by kongjie · · Score: 1
    The Blueair rings up at just around $500: it is beautiful, quiet at lower levels and sucks up a truckload of dust into its four easily replaceable HEPA filters. They get changed at least 2x a year and one batch costs around $70. They'll even set up up with a subscription program that sends them automatically.

    Check it out .

  212. what the hell are you doing in the lab? by nxs212 · · Score: 0

    Unless you are rackmounting servers every single day, there is absolutely no reason for you to be in there. (to do day-to-day administration) Get your company to spend $20k on a Raritan remote KVM switch to control all your servers remotely. You can connect "consoles" up to few hundred feet away and I think there's a module for remote administration (dial-up) as well.
    OR
    Get VNC software. it's free and it works. AND it doesn't blue-screen your servers.
    l8r

  213. Coffee Filters by byterbit · · Score: 2

    During Desert Shield/Storm, we airmen were faced with a similar problem. We also had no access to anything approaching a proper filtration system. However, we could get coffee filters since us zoomies can't be without coffee ('cept myself, the token tea drinker).

    We taped the filters over the preferred intake and plugged up the rest of the vents.

    Doubtless you may want something more elegant, but hey if it's an equipment room who cares.

    --byterbit


    --
    "Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not. Nothing is more common than unsuccessful men w
  214. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by pmz · · Score: 1

    ...they use repeatable scientific methods to test the products.

    This is a pretty strong statement. Do you really think their methods would stand up to a peer review?

    They basically take a few products, look them over, poke at them, collect some "data", and, then, publish it. I agree they sometimes do an adequate job in evaluating something, but to claim they produce real science is laughable.

  215. ion hurricane by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

    It's actual physics, and it definately works. Take a plastic spoon and rub it a bunch of times against wool. Then, go to your nearest sink and turn on the water so that you have a nice, smooth flow.

    No, I'd rather observe it to definately move air, just as you have suggested.

    Let me give you another example: take two magnets. One attracts the other, right? Yes, and with a force a lot stronger than your spoon attracts the water. Now take a room full of magnets... and brace yourself for a major magnet hurricane!

    Both you and I know that won't happen. But, according to your reasoning, that's exactly what we are supposed to expect. How's that?

    --

    Jobs? Which jobs?
    1. Re:ion hurricane by KiahZero · · Score: 1
      No, I'd rather observe it to definately move air, just as you have suggested. Let me give you another example: take two magnets. One attracts the other, right? Yes, and with a force a lot stronger than your spoon attracts the water. Now take a room full of magnets... and brace yourself for a major magnet hurricane! Both you and I know that won't happen. But, according to your reasoning, that's exactly what we are supposed to expect. How's that?

      Let's here it for the strawman! Here's what's going on in the original situation:
      1) Air is electrically charged
      2) Air goes through plates of opposite charge
      Question: Is air attracted to plates?

      So here's the analogy for magnetism. If you magnetized the air (impossible, since the magnetic dipoles are randomly distributed), and then put magnets all over the room, would you get air movement? Yes, yes you would.

      Hell, electrically charging the air (definately possible) would even cause a force to be exerted on the air particle (so long as it was initially moving). F = qv x B, where F is force, q is the charge of the point charge, v is the velocity, and B is the vector magnetic field.

      Mmmmm... applied physics.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    2. Re:ion hurricane by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      Hell, electrically charging the air (definately possible) would even cause a force to be exerted on the air particle (so long as it was initially moving)

      Last time I checked, it wasn't the air that was charged, but the dust particles that happened to move close enough by the air stream.
      And, as I have hinted before, check the spelling of your definately word. You might be up for a surprise... :)

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
    3. Re:ion hurricane by KiahZero · · Score: 1

      I was talking in generalities, as were you. If you were to electrically charge the air, you would cause a magnetic force on any of air particles that were moving.

      As for "definitely"... I typed too quickly, probably since I had just read it mispelled above. You know how someone mispronounces a word a few times, and then you do it too? Shit happens. It doesn't change the fact that F = qv x B, or the fact that your analogy sucked.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
  216. good fans and computers up off the floor by sleepless+one · · Score: 2

    I look after about 1200 computers in public schools. I suggest you make sure that the computers are up off the floor, the higher the better. Buying computers with decent quality fans also helps of coaurse.

  217. The Nukes use HEPA Filters. by MoronBob · · Score: 1

    I worked in the nuclear industry for 11 years and never saw an Ionic Breeze. HEPA filters were used exclusively in high contamination areas. Its very easy to determine if any particles get by when they are radio active.

    --
    Telecommuting! What about socialization?
    1. Re:The Nukes use HEPA Filters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Tim should find some old plutonium, grind it to powder, and disperse it in his lab, carefully making sure it all becomes airbourne. No need for weapons grade plutonium for this job, standard spent reactor fuel rods should be sufficient. Pick some up at your local nuclear waste facility.

      Then he can try a filter out, let it run for a day, turn the pc on, and take a gieger counter to the power supply.

      Then he will know which filters really work.

      Only problem is, he will need a new case and ps after each test. That pesky plutonium dust is soooo hard to clean out of a power supply.

      Be careful, don't breathe the dust! Plutonium dust is bad for you.

      l8,
      AC

  218. IONIC Breeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All,
    The ionic breeze is not an air or dust filter... it is an ionic microparticle trap. Pollen, cigarette smoke, mold spores and other very small particles get trapped, according to the propaganda.

    If you can see the individual particles with your eye, chances are the ionic breeze won't help, you need a filter.

    Wait, if you can't see the dust, and there is no way to tell if it works....

    What do we call a machine that works on stuff you can't see, with no measurable result?

    Snake oil...

    Now if your ionic breeze filter is filthy when you clean it, at least that dirt got trapped. Sort of like compressing air by cupping your hand out of your car window... a little bit of compression happens. With the IB, a little bit of filtering will happen.

    I am no fluid dynamics professor, but I know that it is impossible for you get your air filtered and dust free with snake oil.

    l8,
    AC

  219. air filtration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since everyone here seems to be hitting on all of the options (hepa, ionic, hairless cats, etc) I though I would add another option. Last summer my wife and I found a rainbow vac for 60 bucks at a garage sale. Since our hover was getting old we thought we'd throw some money at it and give it a try. 2 weeks after using the normally outlandish priced unit my wife noticed that she did not have to dust as often. The dusting in our home has been cut by at least %50 because we don't have a crappy vacuum spewing dust back into the air. I would never pay the price for a new unit, but this old thing sure beats any of those new vacuums that leak dust from "around" that neato hepa filter.

  220. NO MORE BASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about...

    All your base are belong to FOR THE LOVE OF GOD stop it's two years old and not funny anymore and everyone's getting really sick of hearing it and I'd really like to be able to use the words "cats," "base" and "justice" without having to hear some dumbass try to jumpstart his comedy career.

    General law: when someone prints a joke on a t-shirt, it's time for said joke to go away. Forever. Where it can't hurt people ever, ever again.

  221. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by UnclePaeng · · Score: 1

    ... aleviation of your symptoms does not mean that scientific principals are suddenly invalid
    His small words could use some help, too.

  222. Ionic Breeze and dust by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 1

    Despite what some people have said (non-owners of the ionic breeze), the thing moves air without a fan. A filter that relied on natural air movement would be useless in a closed room. But if you hold your hand in front of the thing, you can feel definite air movement all along it. It's not a strong wind, hence the name "breeze".

    At the risk of continuing this thread as an ionic breeze ad, I have to say I was skeptical of it too. But I bought one because of my somewhat unique situation. I have pet chinchillas, and they not only shed their extremely fine hairs, but they bathe in a dust bath of volcanic ash. This stuff is super-fine and the resulting dust cloud is crazy. I knew it would kill my pocketbook if I had to buy replacement filters regularly.

    So I sprung for it, and man does that thing collect dust! A HEPA filter would likely clear the air more, but I'd go broke buying replacements filters. The breeze moves enough air and traps enough hair and dust that I need to clean it weekly, and all it does is sit in front of the chinchilla cage, blowing fresh air and collecting the what flies around their room.

    So all I can contribute is that if you want the dust to go somewhere other than into your computer, an ionic filter will help. It may not be the best solution, but keep in mind it's completely silent and you never buy new filters for it. If that's important, try it out.

  223. Paper towels over the air intakes by usrerco · · Score: 1

    I taped paper towels over the air intakes of my file server where the air gets sucked into the machine, so I can see the dirt externally. When the towels get dark, I tape new ones on. Asswipe works well too. Just as long as it's thin enough, and doesn't block too much air flow. (Watch the internal heat sensors)

    Computers are basically big vacuum cleaners that are on 24 hours. They suck in air, usually have intakes low on the box, and if the box is sitting on the floor, there really is no difference between it and a cheap vacuum.

    Some towels and t/p pass air more easily than others; experiment. If it's multi-ply paper, I usually peel it into a single thin sheet, to avoid blocking too much air flow.

    With such filters, the inside of the machine stays pretty clean.

    Make sure to filter any sneaky alternate routes air is taking through the machine, such as around poorly fitted spare disk blanks, floppy drive holes, holes in the base of the box, or holes in the back of the box from slots that have no blanks. Put the blanks back, or tape off the hole.

    Also, getting the damn boxes off of floor level helps a lot, due to the fact most dust bunny migration patterns involve running across the floor towards the low air intakes on the chassis.

    You still need to check the machine for dirt, as really tiny dust particles still get through. But the big nasty stuff will be absent.

  224. huge difference - air purifier versus air filterin by jethrotull · · Score: 1

    There is a VAST difference between air purification and air filtering. The ionic/electrical purifiers cause more dust. Why? They truly are cleaning the air so the variety of airborne particles will drop to the ground, desk, equipment, whatever. It's better breathing, etc. but will cause more dust to settle. The best air filters typically yank about 30% of the air through their systems so you may need several in a room at various point. You will be changing the filters often (if the system is working). The bulk of the "dust" we see is actually skin and other elements from humans and animals and not just things that come in through the air. A combination of both purifying and filtering is probably best for you and the equipment.

  225. Problems: Static and Ozone by billstewart · · Score: 1
    We've got the Sharper Image similar product at home. There are two problems with it - static and ozone. After using it for a while, the room starts to smell like ozone, somewhat similar to a chlorine bleach smell, which is why we stopped using it. Static isn't a problem for home use, but I'd worry about it in a computer environment.

    It seems to do a decent job of picking up dust, though some of the dust will get through and stick to the wall next to it. Cleaning isn't hard if you've got a bathtub nearby; you just pop the static element out and run hot water on it. A janitor's closet sink should work fine in an office.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  226. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by mlepore · · Score: 1
    I have a Delta ambient air cleaner in my wood shop and it does an excellent job.

    Amazon carries several of them (both Jet and Delta priced from $200 up to over $500).

    I managed to find mine on closeout for $100 but they are worth the extra money. Several people have mentioned that woodworking dust is now classified as a carcinogen, so they have to work pretty well.

  227. Try a Dust Collector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.grizzly.com/products/items-list.cfm?key =570010&sort=price

  228. There's a name for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Upgrade complete. 386 converted to 486.", and surely it must really have morphed the silicon on the processor given all of those fancy computer-esque terms floating by. I petitioned for the sysop to remove it in an online discussion only to be met by several people fervently advocating that they'd run the program and, lo and behold, it worked! It really did turn their 386 into a 486! Suddenly Wordperfect just "felt faster", and games "played better", and of course, oddly they had "less crashes".

    I believe this is known as the "gentoo effect."

  229. Who cares how much air it moves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all well and good, but really, all we need the thing to do is remove dirt faster than dirt is added to the air. That's it. I don't care how many times it swaps the air in the room, as long as it's getting the dirt. Measuring the air-swapping is totally artificial. Hell, the dirt will spread out on its own, so you'll still clean the whole room even if the cleaner never sees most of the room's air! THINK!

    If the Ionic Breeze can clean well, be totally silent, and not require replacement bits, it sounds pretty darn good to me. It's definitely still overpriced, but that's capitalism and patents...

  230. Cheap, decent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used both HEPA and electrostatic. For basic floating around dust, they both work, but long term, electrostatic is cheaper- CHEAT-
    I did get the sharper image from their returns/refurbs- same warranty, 1/2 cost
    screw the 499 model, for dust, who needs a UV light?
    The 299.00 modem at 1/2 price does 500 sq feet for 167 shipped..

  231. Re:air purifier - build your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do the same thing every year for my allergies and it works pretty well. I have really bad hay fever.

    I take a big 30" box fan from KMart ($20), a big 10x15" HEPA replacement filter that goes in a Honeywell ($40-60), some cardboard, and combine it with duct tape to make a giant filter. It works surprisingly well. If I seal off the doors to my bedroom and leave the thing on for a few hours before I go to bed, I can go in my bedroom and my sinuses will clear up in an hour or two.

    Best practices I've discovered after doing this for several years:

    * leave about 4 cubic feat of air space between the filter material and the fan
    * the fan needs to suck, not push the air
    * build about another 2 cubic feat of air space out in front of the fan so it doesn't just circulate air in from the corners
    * vaccum your room really well, wash your bed, wash your clothes, etc before you crank this puppy up
    * pollen needs surface area to collect--minimize the surfaces in your room by not leaving laundry laying around, etc.

    --rose@nospam.cafwap.nospam.net

  232. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by tcc · · Score: 1

    Plus ionic-based filters will probably show in not a so distant future from now that it's harmful for the health. Breathing charged-particle of air must NOT be good in the long run.

    I have a ULPA filter (a notch above HEPA) which is "medical-class" filter. It has the Ionize button so that I can turn it on and off. When I turned it on, and blew air at the computer, I was actially getting small discharges when touching the casing. Interresting :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  233. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by JosefWells · · Score: 1

    Ahhhh.. ohh man.. pure comedy...

    Did you see that part.. where he pointed out how some words were spelled wrong.

    Woo.. somebody get this man a medal.

  234. Foil Insulation, prevent fire. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    The idea one person had about the cardboard box is very cost effective, I'd be concerned about a fire though.

    If you use a large ionic air cleaner, even though the filter will collect some dirt, almost every thing else in the room will have dirt stick to it in the first two to three months operation.

    Be prepaired to do some serious filter, room and equipment cleaning until it stabilizes.

    It also helps to place wipe mats everywhere you can afford to and have them cleaned monthly or more depending on weather.

    You may wish to look at this page, it shows a dirt trap type air filtration unit. They book covers build instruction.

    http://www.build-stuff.com/011book.htm

    You can purchase an air plenum with a filter slot or make one from flame resistant foil covered insulation. Use a good sharp box knife and foil heat duct tape to construct the device.

    You would want some sort of high volume air mover larger and slower is better, faster is not always good if it's a noise problem. Variable speed is a plus.

    For critical servers and such you can wall them off and put the air cleaner blowing into that small closet and make sure you do have an exhast opening. You may need to do some calculation to ensure cooling or just strap a 'home' air conditioner in seris as well. That foil tape is marvelous stuff. While the AC would do some dehumidification some extra dehumidifcation would not hurt and may be quite important.

    Any hardware store can probably provide all you need. A new blower is very expensive, a furnace fan may be good but is usually noisy. You can try to find a used blower or furnace fan.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  235. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by outsider007 · · Score: 1

    I know. apparently I can't get modded down when I'm trying. too bad you don't have points.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  236. Re:NO DIRT FOR YOU!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Come back one year!

    Dude that was funny as hell!! Seriously. I disturbed my class by actually laughing. Way to go! Too bad the mods don't recognize. I'd mod you up if I had the points. Peace out!
  237. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by JosefWells · · Score: 1

    Too bad.. I had points on Sunday, but I didn't check this article. Ohh well, let this be a lesson to you in any case... Do whatever you want, since the people watching are slackers.

  238. air cleaners by dr_w9 · · Score: 1

    Well I dutifully read Consumer Reports on the subject and followed their recomendation and bought a Freidrich C-90 for $425 (no tax free shipping). Works great, very well made. The first filter cleans with a brush and looks like it will last a year or two before replacement (around $20). The main electrostatic filter cleans in your diswasher and should last indefinately. Why argue over the Sharper image device when this one works really well.

  239. Cheaper alternative to Sharper Image Ionic Breeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using something called the "Fresh Air Machine" for about 4 months, and it works good for me. Same concept as the Sharper Image, but maybe 1/2 of the price. Actually I think I paid less than that. Before that I had one of those filter units--it was just plain noisy, and the filters cost way too much (like $40 each, and it took 2!). So I'm just happy to have something that doesn't need filters and doesn't cost an arm and a leg. I think the web site I got mine from was www.freshairmachine.com--too lazy to check, so if not just do a search for the name. Gets my vote.

  240. Box-fan with a 20" furnace-filter laid against it by DancingSword · · Score: 1

    The box-fan being the kind people suffer-from^H^H^H^H ..... . enjoy at cottages, the furnace-filter being held-there by suction.

    Non-woven polyester filters for low/fine-dust environs, fiber-glass washable filters for coarse/much-dust environses.

    Dirt cheap, Quiet, Effective, Good.

    --
    Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
  241. Get you a Dirt Bag... by CyberGrunt · · Score: 1

    Here's a cheap solution... http://www.dirtbag.biz/

  242. Start out with clean air by Webmoth · · Score: 1

    OK, so an air purifier would be a nice thing to have. It's also an expensive thing to have.

    You should instead be asking, "Why is my air so dusty?" There's a number of steps you can take to keep the air clean to begin with; try them and you just may find you don't need an air purifier after all.

    1) Remove the carpeting. Hard surface flooring doesn't create as much dust and it's easier to keep clean.

    2) Throw away your broom. These stir up as much dust as they collect. Use a vacuum cleaner with fine filtration; make sure its exhaust directs away from dusty surfaces (try up).

    3) Dust surfaces daily with a tack cloth or damp rag. You don't want to stir up the dust; you want to take it away.

    4) Put your printers in another room. Paper dust can be overwhelming.

    5) Enforce a dress code that prefers the use of low-lint fabrics.

    6) Make your users take showers on a regular basis. A lot of the dust in the air is dead skin. Have your users take a shower immediately before entering the computer lab; they should remain completely nude while in the lab to eliminate dust from degrading textiles. For obvious reasons, you may want to prohibit the use of digital cameras in the lab.

    7) Change HVAC filters more frequently; use finer filters (the spun fiberglass ones are junk).

    8) Get rid of the chalkboard.

    9) If you live near a busy street or highway, much of your "dust" may be diesel soot. Take steps to seal up the room, allowing only cleaned air to enter.

    10) No smoking in the compuker lab.

    11) Have you taken a close look at your users' keyboards? You could probably eat for a week on the spooge that's hiding under the keys. Clean your keyboards regularly.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  243. Then turn off (or disconnect) the fan. by guardian-ct · · Score: 1

    Probably simpler to save the $100, and remove the fan from the Radio Shack cleaner.

    Perhaps Honeywell already thought of this problem, and carefully tuned the fan flow rate.

    I wouldn't be surprised if a HEPA filter was more effective than an expensive fan-less ionic filter.

    This is sounding like the emacs/vi holy wars...

  244. Oreck Air Purifier by Malison · · Score: 1



    Has anyone tried the $199 Oreck Air 7? Oreck claims is cleans an average sized bedroom every 10 minutes. It seems a lot better than the Sharper Image models. Fan, filter, ionizer, plus charcoal to get rid of odors.

    I'm also considering the Honeywell Environizer (also $199) from RadioShack.

    Any suggestiosn?

    - Jeff

  245. Freidrich C-90 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It goes for >500 (with shipping) Not Only did consumer reports rave about it, but it works so well that I wonder if the Post was baiting us for its recommendation. Fortunately(?) trolling has ruined any chance of product endorsement for a really good product

  246. Free Trial of a remarkable air purifier. by j0ebaker · · Score: 1

    Until I'm a dealer for the Living Air Classic and other air purifiers made by Alpine Industries. I may be able to offer a free 3 day trial to a couple of data centers in the Midwest (I'm in SE Wisconsin). I'm still learning allot about the products, but one thing that seems to be unique is that these units also use RF to ionize air in nearby rooms through non-metallic walls.

    I'd been thinking about putting these machines in a few data centers to combat the dust buildup on CPU, power supply & case fans. If anybody in the midwest wants to give it a try let me know and I'll try to arrange it. Initially, I won't be able to place many units for demos until I build up my inventory.

    Some of the profits go to me - A Linux supporter.

    Joe Baker
    joebaker@dcresearch.com
    414-788-8284

  247. Re:It makes perfect sense for him to call you wron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you joking? The volume of air moved is obviously more relevant to the effectiveness of an air filter than number of cupholders is to the quality of a car. You could easily buy an air-tight box and say it removes 100% of particles from the air. It does you no good if it doesn't work on the other 299 cubic feet of air (and air particles) in the room...

  248. Alternative (cheap) dust remover by Thanster · · Score: 1

    One of the sites at my company swears by using tac mats at the entrance of their computer rooms, keeps dust way down, (a tac mat is a floor mat with layers of slightly sticky plastic that can be peeled off when the stickyness is gone.

  249. Tech used and comparison of diff. air purifiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Here are some links that people looking for air purifiers might find useful:
    http://www.allergy.com.sg/library/MARepor t.html
    http://www.allergy.com.sg/airCareFAQ.html

    It describes technologies used, advantages and disadvantages; might be biased, but pretty informative.
    Best,
    R.

  250. Re:Sharper Image ("Wonderful Reviews"???) by Marx's+Ghost · · Score: 1

    Actually, the particular article used three people who were considered beerologists or something; I recall being shocked with the results, and looking at the method. While they may have used blind-tasting, the pool of testers was very small, and not diverse (three white men).