Slashdot Mirror

It doesn't have that evil, 'evolution' promoting OS Darwin, like Apple's product has, with its evil demon duck mascot. Serioiusly.. They're not doing a very good job keeping their ties to the forces of darkness a secret, are they?

http://objectiveministries.org/creation/propaganda.html

Some choice quotes (since it is a long article):

"the newest version of the Macintosh operating system (MacOS X) is called... Darwin! That's right, new Macs are based on Darwinism! "

"Furthermore, the Darwin OS is released under an "Open Source" license, which is just another name for Communism. "

"Consider the name of the company and its logo: an apple with a bite taken out of it. This is clearly a reference to the Fall, when Adam and Eve were tempted with an apple by the serpent."

"This OS -- and its Darwin offspring -- extensively use what are called "daemons" (which is how Pagans write "demon" -- they are notoriously poor spellers: magick, vampyre, etc.) "

"to open up certain locked files one has to run a program much like the DOS prompt in Microsoft Windows and type in a secret code: "chmod 666". What other horrors lurk in this thing?"

Also, OS X and BSD promote evolution, the devil, as covered by Objective Ministries.

Windows may be guilty of 7 sins, but its main competitor on the desktop is derived from an OS with a daemonic mascot.

How right you are! I found a page which details Mac OS X's satanic connections.

WEll..... try here: http://objectiveministries.org/creation/sciencefair.html 1st Place: "Life Doesn't Come From Non-Life" Patricia Lewis (grade 8) did an experiment to see if life can evolve from non-life. Patricia placed all the non-living ingredients of life - carbon (a charcoal briquet), purified water, and assorted minerals (a multi-vitamin) - into a sealed glass jar. The jar was left undisturbed, being exposed only to sunlight, for three weeks. (Patricia also prayed to God not to do anything miraculous during the course of the experiment, so as not to disqualify the findings.) No life evolved. This shows that life cannot come from non-life through natural processes. 2nd Place: "Women Were Designed For Homemaking" Jonathan Goode (grade 7) applied findings from many fields of science to support his conclusion that God designed women for homemaking: physics shows that women have a lower center of gravity than men, making them more suited to carrying groceries and laundry baskets; biology shows that women were designed to carry un-born babies in their wombs and to feed born babies milk, making them the natural choice for child rearing; social sciences show that the wages for women workers are lower than for normal workers, meaning that they are unable to work as well and thus earn equal pay; and exegetics shows that God created Eve as a companion for Adam, not as a co-worker.

It doesn't parse.

That's why I used initial capital letters.

It's just a name. A symbol. A mere designation (disclaimer: average Creation Scientist may not prove to be either so hot or so cool as 7 of 9).

It doesn't really have to mean what it says.
Just check all the United, People's and Democratic Republics of whatever throughout history.

P.S. If you want a laugh, go here. Check the projects. Try the veal. You have been warned.

Someone posted this site on a mailing list i frequent. I imagine they will be getting a shitload of funding from Kansas