Slashdot Mirror

"The summary was wrong, dumbass. Check the date. If Timothy wrote that (it may have been in the original story submission for all I know) it was after 3.6.2 was ALREADY released... old, OLD news!" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @01:29PM (#31736324)

See the post date of this article, & timothy stating FF wasn't fixed at the time of the posting (or my PS below)... simple!

HOWEVER: THERE IS NO COVERING YOUR SCREWUP ON OPERA 10.51 ALREADY HAVING BEEN OUT, vs. your "security company" info. on an OLD VERSION OF OPERA 10.50 when 10.51 was out already before timothy posted his news here...

Pretty simple: All the libel, name tossing & other "geek angst" you're displaying? Give away the fact you blew it... face it, & the proof's below in your own words, quoted.

APK

P.S.=> You cannot cover your numerous errors with FUD & BS like changing the subject (and of course, your libelling me too, along with your "geek angst" name calling directed my way constantly here, which of course, only shows HOW BADLY YOU BEAT YOURSELF (you did the job FOR ME, see your errors below)):

"LOL, and THE FACT THAT FIREFOX ALREADY HAD version 3.6.2 out already by the time this article was put up on slashdot as well?" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

AND, what did the news poster TIMOTHY WRITE? Well, ok, another quote of proof:

"Note: the warning (from the Federal Office for Information Security) is provisional, and should be rendered moot by the release later this month of 3.6.2. - Posted by timothy on Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM

Note the BOLD part? FF didn't release a fix on time, & it came later on... simple!

(Learn to READ man, & make sure your information ISN'T STALE (which, it was... too bad for you!))

----

"I said that ONCE, lol, and it was a TYPO (do you know the meaning of the word?)" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

I sure do - you illustrated it, "beautifully", lol... see below:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

----

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

----

AND, of course (as to your "current security company information" (not))?

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news was posted on /. on March 23rd (& a firefox fix didn't issue until the next day)...

(So much for your "current information" from your "SECURITY COMPANY", eh? Too bad it was STALE ALREADY, lol!)... YOU? YOU LOSE! apk

"The summary was wrong, dumbass. Check the date. If Timothy wrote that (it may have been in the original story submission for all I know) it was after 3.6.2 was ALREADY released... old, OLD news!" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @01:29PM (#31736324)

See the post date of this article, & timothy stating FF wasn't fixed at the time of the posting (or my PS below)... simple!

HOWEVER: THERE IS NO COVERING YOUR SCREWUP ON OPERA 10.51 ALREADY HAVING BEEN OUT, vs. your "security company" info. on an OLD VERSION OF OPERA 10.50 when 10.51 was out already before timothy posted his news here...

Pretty simple: All the libel, name tossing & other "geek angst" you're displaying? Give away the fact you blew it... face it, & the proof's below in your own words, quoted.

APK

P.S.=> You cannot cover your numerous errors with FUD & BS like changing the subject (and of course, your libelling me too, along with your "geek angst" name calling directed my way constantly here, which of course, only shows HOW BADLY YOU BEAT YOURSELF (you did the job FOR ME, see your errors below)):

"LOL, and THE FACT THAT FIREFOX ALREADY HAD version 3.6.2 out already by the time this article was put up on slashdot as well?" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

AND, what did the news poster TIMOTHY WRITE? Well, ok, another quote of proof:

"Note: the warning (from the Federal Office for Information Security) is provisional, and should be rendered moot by the release later this month of 3.6.2. - Posted by timothy on Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM

Note the BOLD part? FF didn't release a fix on time, & it came later on... simple!

(Learn to READ man, & make sure your information ISN'T STALE (which, it was... too bad for you!))

----

"I said that ONCE, lol, and it was a TYPO (do you know the meaning of the word?)" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

I sure do - you illustrated it, "beautifully", lol... see below:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

----

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

----

AND, of course (as to your "current security company information" (not))?

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news was posted on /. on March 23rd (& a firefox fix didn't issue until the next day)...

(So much for your "current information" from your "SECURITY COMPANY", eh? Too bad it was STALE ALREADY, lol!)... YOU? YOU LOSE! apk

See subject-line (also, neither does your libelling me either).

So, to answer the question you stated? OK, I'll help you out!

I show ZERO THREAT LEVELS in my application @ Computer Associates in fact (call Greg Jensen himself the head of CA's SECURITY SUITE (he'll know who I am & what this is about (easiest proof I can offer in fact is this, because I can't put up attached files here for those scans you ask for))

Why zero threats in my app @ CA (the source of all this in fact)?

Well - because I took CA's 21 point removal test, & passed EVERY question is why)!

So you know, again - plus, again, the same has happened to Dr. Mark Russinovich of Microsoft (he & I used to do work for Sunbelt software @ the same time in the mid to late 1990's in fact, & I helped HE out of bugs in his pagedefrag.exe program, & he thanked me in email for it no less), plus, Nir Sofer of NIRSOFT had it happen on a LOT of his wares (which sux, because his wares are quite useful & NOT spywares)...

Still - YOU, changing the subject though, after ALL YOUR ERRORS?

Man, face it - You LOSE! The data of your errors in my PS below shows all your screwups... face the music pal, see below:

APK

P.S.=> You cannot cover your numerous errors with FUD & BS like changing the subject (and of course, your libelling me too, along with your "geek angst" name calling directed my way constantly here, which of course, only shows HOW BADLY YOU BEAT YOURSELF (you did the job FOR ME, see your errors below)):

"LOL, and THE FACT THAT FIREFOX ALREADY HAD version 3.6.2 out already by the time this article was put up on slashdot as well?" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

AND, what did the news poster TIMOTHY WRITE? Well, ok, another quote of proof:

"Note: the warning (from the Federal Office for Information Security) is provisional, and should be rendered moot by the release later this month of 3.6.2. - Posted by timothy on Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM

Note the BOLD part? FF didn't release a fix on time, & it came later on... simple!

(Learn to READ man, & make sure your information ISN'T STALE (which, it was... too bad for you!))

----

"I said that ONCE, lol, and it was a TYPO (do you know the meaning of the word?)" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

I sure do - you illustrated it, "beautifully", lol... see below:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

----

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

----

AND, of course (as to your "current security company information" (not))?

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news

See subject-line (also, neither does your libelling me either).

So, to answer the question you stated? OK, I'll help you out!

I show ZERO THREAT LEVELS in my application @ Computer Associates in fact (call Greg Jensen himself the head of CA's SECURITY SUITE (he'll know who I am & what this is about (easiest proof I can offer in fact is this, because I can't put up attached files here for those scans you ask for))

Why zero threats in my app @ CA (the source of all this in fact)?

Well - because I took CA's 21 point removal test, & passed EVERY question is why)!

So you know, again - plus, again, the same has happened to Dr. Mark Russinovich of Microsoft (he & I used to do work for Sunbelt software @ the same time in the mid to late 1990's in fact, & I helped HE out of bugs in his pagedefrag.exe program, & he thanked me in email for it no less), plus, Nir Sofer of NIRSOFT had it happen on a LOT of his wares (which sux, because his wares are quite useful & NOT spywares)...

Still - YOU, changing the subject though, after ALL YOUR ERRORS?

Man, face it - You LOSE! The data of your errors in my PS below shows all your screwups... face the music pal, see below:

APK

P.S.=> You cannot cover your numerous errors with FUD & BS like changing the subject (and of course, your libelling me too, along with your "geek angst" name calling directed my way constantly here, which of course, only shows HOW BADLY YOU BEAT YOURSELF (you did the job FOR ME, see your errors below)):

"LOL, and THE FACT THAT FIREFOX ALREADY HAD version 3.6.2 out already by the time this article was put up on slashdot as well?" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

AND, what did the news poster TIMOTHY WRITE? Well, ok, another quote of proof:

"Note: the warning (from the Federal Office for Information Security) is provisional, and should be rendered moot by the release later this month of 3.6.2. - Posted by timothy on Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM

Note the BOLD part? FF didn't release a fix on time, & it came later on... simple!

(Learn to READ man, & make sure your information ISN'T STALE (which, it was... too bad for you!))

----

"I said that ONCE, lol, and it was a TYPO (do you know the meaning of the word?)" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

I sure do - you illustrated it, "beautifully", lol... see below:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

----

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

----

AND, of course (as to your "current security company information" (not))?

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news

I did, right on the FRONT PAGE OF THIS ARTICLE from the news poster himself:

PERTINENT QUOTE:

AND, what did the news poster TIMOTHY WRITE? Well, ok, another quote of proof:

"Note: the warning (from the Federal Office for Information Security) is provisional, and should be rendered moot by the release later this month of 3.6.2. - Posted by timothy on Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM

Note the BOLD part? FF didn't release a fix on time, & it came later on... simple!

(Learn to READ man, & make sure your information ISN'T STALE (which, it was... too bad for you!))

----

Why was your "security company" info. stale? Simple - Opera already had 10.51 version out:

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news was posted on /. on March 23rd (& a firefox fix didn't issue until the next day)...

(So much for your "current information" from your "SECURITY COMPANY", eh? Too bad it was STALE ALREADY, lol!)... YOU? YOU LOSE! apk

APK

P.S.=> Now, if others posted here as AC (as I do, to avoid trolls like yourself tracking me via my comments page which registered users are victim to & WHY I won't register here (especially since I know how to beat the 10 posts per 24 hour restriction /. places on us AC's & I do so, in under 10 seconds flat no less (no proxies either, lol, or diff. machines, just using 1 here to do it with ease no less)? I can see them doing so, posting as AC!

(Just so error prone trolls like YOU don't bother them (as you have attempted with me, but your own errors and stale information + FUD did you in, easily... "too, Too, TOO EASILY" in fact))... apk

"LOL, and THE FACT THAT FIREFOX ALREADY HAD version 3.6.2 out already by the time this article was put up on slashdot as well?" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

AND, what did the news poster TIMOTHY WRITE? Well, ok, another quote of proof:

"Note: the warning (from the Federal Office for Information Security) is provisional, and should be rendered moot by the release later this month of 3.6.2. - Posted by timothy on Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM

Note the BOLD part? FF didn't release a fix on time, & it came later on... simple!

(Learn to READ man, & make sure your information ISN'T STALE (which, it was... too bad for you!))

----

"I said that ONCE, lol, and it was a TYPO (do you know the meaning of the word?)" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

I sure do - you illustrated it, "beautifully", lol... see below:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

----

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

----

AND, of course (as to your "current security company information" (not))?

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news was posted on /. on March 23rd (& a firefox fix didn't issue until the next day)...

(So much for your "current information" from your "SECURITY COMPANY", eh? Too bad it was STALE ALREADY, lol!)

APK

P.S.=> Man, I just GOTTA say it again, for 'posterities' sake' -> "too, Too, TOO EASY"... just TOO easy (to get the better of "the likes of you" a name-tosser & someone in yourself who attempts to spread "FUD" via falsehoods, your mistakes, & YOUR STALE OUT OF DATE INFORMATION)... apk

"LOL, and THE FACT THAT FIREFOX ALREADY HAD version 3.6.2 out already by the time this article was put up on slashdot as well?" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

AND, what did the news poster TIMOTHY WRITE? Well, ok, another quote of proof:

"Note: the warning (from the Federal Office for Information Security) is provisional, and should be rendered moot by the release later this month of 3.6.2. - Posted by timothy on Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM

Note the BOLD part? FF didn't release a fix on time, & it came later on... simple!

(Learn to READ man, & make sure your information ISN'T STALE (which, it was... too bad for you!))

----

"I said that ONCE, lol, and it was a TYPO (do you know the meaning of the word?)" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @12:45PM (#31735520)

I sure do - you illustrated it, "beautifully", lol... see below:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

----

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

----

AND, of course (as to your "current security company information" (not))?

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news was posted on /. on March 23rd (& a firefox fix didn't issue until the next day)...

(So much for your "current information" from your "SECURITY COMPANY", eh? Too bad it was STALE ALREADY, lol!)

APK

P.S.=> Man, I just GOTTA say it again, for 'posterities' sake' -> "too, Too, TOO EASY"... just TOO easy (to get the better of "the likes of you" a name-tosser & someone in yourself who attempts to spread "FUD" via falsehoods, your mistakes, & YOUR STALE OUT OF DATE INFORMATION)... apk

In contrast I can still use my old Win98 laptop and run the latest browsers.

The lastest version of Firefox does not run on '98
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/system-requirements.html

The latest version of IE does not run on '98
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/internet-explorer/support/system-requirements.aspx

The latest version of Opera does not run on '98
http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/386/

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news was posted on /. on March 23rd (& a firefox fix didn't issue until the next day)...

(So much for your "current information" from your "SECURITY COMPANY", eh? Too bad it was STALE ALREADY, lol!)

APK

P.S.=> Man, I just GOTTA say it again, for 'posterities' sake' -> "too, Too, TOO EASY"... just TOO easy (to get the better of "the likes of you" a name-tosser & someone in yourself who attempts to spread "FUD" via falsehoods, your mistakes, & YOUR STALE OUT OF DATE INFORMATION)... apk

Opera 10.51 was out already -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

On a roll: Opera 10.51 for Windows released

By Haavard. Monday, 22. March 2010, 10:00:00

On March 22nd in fact - WHICH PREDATES THIS ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT NO LESS, because this news was posted on /. on March 23rd (& a firefox fix didn't issue until the next day)...

(So much for your "current information" from your "SECURITY COMPANY", eh? Too bad it was STALE ALREADY, lol!)

APK

P.S.=> Man, I just GOTTA say it again, for 'posterities' sake' -> "too, Too, TOO EASY"... just TOO easy (to get the better of "the likes of you" a name-tosser & someone in yourself who attempts to spread "FUD" via falsehoods, your mistakes, & YOUR STALE OUT OF DATE INFORMATION)... apk

"No, I got a recent quote from a security/tech website about OPERA VERSION 10.50 in which they recommended NOT USING IT." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @11:42AM (#31734568)

PROVE IT - Funny, because the only error you posted was your first reply, but that was about Opera 9.23 (very, VERY old version - as the ABSOLUTELY current Opera build is 10.52.3344, as of this date)

----

"I posted it elsewhere in the discussion on this very article" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @11:42AM (#31734568)

Once more, where is it? You've been asked this, repeatedly, and you continue to AVOID IT LIKE MAD (because you either lied, or made a mistake and you KNOW it)

----

"now since you're so good at mis-quoting me you can see if you can find it.:by clone53421 (1310749)" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Monday April 05, @11:42AM (#31734568)

This is NO "misquote": It's your own words, in plain black & white, where you said you had "SECURITY COMPANY INFO" and yet you posted about an OLD VERSION OF OPERA:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

APK

P.S.=> What are your result? Well, what many /.'ers here call an "EPIC FAIL"... or, can you disprove what you wrote above? Apparently not... keep calling me names, or lying as you have been (making mistakes no doubt & trying to "cover up" your screw up by avoiding answering up to your mistakes now)... but, no matter what you do now?? YOU LOSE... "too, Too, TOO EASY!"... apk

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW? Didn't you also say you got your data on that OLD bug, from a "SECURITY COMPANY"?? Doesn't look that way to me, it's from Opera's site, besides being way, Way, WAY OLD too, lol, and FAR FROM CURRENT (as of the date of this article being put up here on /.)...

APK

P.S.=> "too, Too, TOO EASY!": Just TOO easy! apk

HOW ON EARTH DO YOU EXPLAIN BEING MODDED UP THEN, FOR THESE MISTAKES YOU MADE:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

Didn't you also say you got your data on that OLD bug, from a "SECURITY COMPANY"??

(Doesn't look that way to me, it's from Opera's site, besides being way, Way, WAY OLD too, lol, and FAR FROM CURRENT (as of the date of this article being put up here on /.))...

APK

P.S.=> "too, Too, TOO EASY!"... just TOO easy! apk

"I never said "2.62". You are the one making HUGE errors, LOL" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Sunday April 04, @11:01PM (#31729606

You made an error, right from the start, that led to yet another error (or was it a LIE about getting data on Opera from a "SECURITY COMPANY"? You got an OLD ERROR on Opera 9.23, from years ago, FROM OPERA'S WEBSITE - not a security company as you said & tried to pass off as current no less)... anyhow, on FireFox? Well, this is your statements (that made you have to "eat your words" on "living in the past", which was funny):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past?" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.6.2', lol!

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ " - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW? Also, didn't you state you found data from a security site that said "stay away from Opera" that is CURRENT NEWS (as of the time of this article's being put up here on /.?)... so, where is that?? Oh, it DOESN'T EXIST!

(Man - LOL, you either LIE, or make so many mistakes and I caught you in them that you are forced into "name tossing" like some frustrated child!)

APK

P.S.=> Your name tossing directed my way all over this exchange? Hey, that is NOT helping you either, by the by, it's only showing your "geek angst" frustrated tantrums is all... apk

Didn't say it was Firefox 2.62 this was about? Even though the article is about GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLE TO STAY AWAY FROM FIREFOX 3.6 (as they did about IE before that too)?? Ah, too easy:

See subject-line, & this set of 2 "choice quotes" from you:

"What explains your moronic insistence that Firefox version 3.62 even exists? Hmm? It's 3.6.2, dumbass" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Sunday April 04, @04:23PM (#31726658

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW? Also, didn't you state you found data from a security site that said "stay away from Opera" that is CURRENT NEWS (as of the time of this article's being put up here on /.?)... so, where is that?? Oh, it DOESN'T EXIST!

(Man - LOL, you either LIE, or make so many mistakes and I caught you in them that you are forced into "name tossing" like some frustrated child!)

APK

P.S.=> Your name tossing directed my way all over this exchange? Hey, that is NOT helping you by the by, it's only showing your "geek angst" frustrated tantrums is all... apk

Didn't say it was Firefox 2.62 this was about? Even though the article is about GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLE TO STAY AWAY FROM FIREFOX 3.6 (as they did about IE before that too)?? Ah, too easy:

See subject-line, & this set of 2 "choice quotes" from you:

"What explains your moronic insistence that Firefox version 3.62 even exists? Hmm? It's 3.6.2, dumbass" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Sunday April 04, @04:23PM (#31726658

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW? Also, didn't you state you found data from a security site that said "stay away from Opera" that is CURRENT NEWS (as of the time of this article's being put up here on /.?)... so, where is that?? Oh, it DOESN'T EXIST!

LOL, you either LIE, or make so many mistakes and I caught you in them that you are forced into "name tossing" like some frustrated child.

APK

P.S.=> Your name tossing directed my way is NOT helping you by the by, it's only showing your "geek angst" frustrated tantrums is all... apk

See subject-line, & this set of 2 "choice quotes" from you:

"What explains your moronic insistence that Firefox version 3.62 even exists? Hmm? It's 3.6.2, dumbass" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Sunday April 04, @04:23PM (#31726658

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582892

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

LMAO, see the above quote first, & THEN? THEN SEE THIS ONE about "living in the past", making HUGE errors, & 'FireFox 2.62', lol!

Please - wait: IT GETS BETTER (as far as "living in the past"):

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

"Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability! http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/" - by clone53421 (1310749)
on Tuesday March 23, @09:27AM (#31582488) Journal

Which is about OPERA 9.23, which is HOW MANY YEARS OUT OF DATE NOW?

APK

P.S.=> You also stated you got your information from a "SECURITY COMPANY", about Opera - but, lol, that doesn't look like a security company's site to me. It looks like Opera's site in fact, lmao... getting a bit "rattled in your game", or are you just one of those illiterate "10 below plantlife IQ" types?

(Additionally, YOU also that german gov't. said to stay away from Opera too... so, where did the germans say that, as they have regarding IE or FF?)...

Again: "too, Too, TOO EASY!"... just TOO easy! apk

Flash Magazine got their stats from Opera.

"Note: the warning (from the Federal Office for Information Security) is provisional, and should be rendered moot by the release later this month of 3.6.2." - Posted by timothy on Tuesday March 23, @02:51AM from the fuer-ihre-sicherheit dept.

This article was about FF 3.6 having a major bug, & the german gov't. warned its people to use another webbrowser (not IE or FF though) - read the above. Now, what did YOU say it was??

"WRONG, IT IS ABOUT FIREFOX RELEASING VERSION 3.6.2 ALMOST A WEEK EARLY. lrn2read, faggot." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Saturday April 03, @12:51AM (#31713160)by clone53421 (1310749) on Saturday April 03, @12:51AM (#31713160)

Clone the clown: Making YET MORE ERRORS, complete with his usual trolling profanity, & his big mouth wrote more checks his inability to read or understand, cannot ca$h (as usual)... here are more:

----

"They released 2.6.2, or are you stuck in the past? - by clone53421 (1310749) on Tuesday March 23, @09:53AM (#31582892) Journal

First of all, see the quote again, from the article itself @ the top of my reply, it is 3.6 the article here on /. was about!

AND? Well - note what version YOU SAID IT WAS?

2.62??

Again - The article is about 3.6, not 3.62 (though they stated, in plain black & white above, that 3.63 would be released in the future/later (at the time of the writing of the article/report here on this website, which was about FF 3.6, not 3.62 & certainly NOT 2.62 as you wrote, lol!)).

----

"Then they went on to say that the German government had advised against using version 2.6, which was OLD NEWS and anyone with a brain would know this from reading TFA. As I have one, and did, and know this, which are apparently the differences between me and you... LOL!" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

WRONG: That says "later this month" & is a "note" ONLY, you fool - once more, see the line I quoted at the top of this reply in fact...

THUS, the article IS ABOUT VERSION 3.6 when it was written, & that it had a serious bug! Hence, why Germany warned about using FF to its people... troll, you're not even GOOD @ trolling.

---

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

No, first of all - YOUR INFO. IS MANY MAJOR + MINOR BUILD VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD (9.23 is what you noted, from Opera & not a "security company" as you said, & Opera's up to 10.52.3344 now)

Secondly/#2?

Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, NOT A "SECURITY COMPANY" as you lied about, earlier here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

""Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also!

"They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

"It's really quite funny that you want to publicize this spat." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @06:46PM (#31710776)

Not sure what you mean by that, but, it's FUNNIER watching you run from answering questions, and to see you running from your own mistakes and outright blunders, here:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31706790

Anyone can take a peek at the URL above, and realize you screwed up, so badly (via your own mistakes and words) that all you have now is your b.s. (pretty simple).

----

"Any sane person could see from this thread that you are clearly batshit insane" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @06:46PM (#31710776)

Got a PHD in Psychiatry to your name? No?? Didn't think so. Have you performed a FORMAL TEST on myself, in person, in order to dispense your "prognosis" there, Dr. Quack?? Again, no. All you have is your b.s. & mistakes which I will repost in my p.s. below (just to show anyone reading this what a trolling screwup you are, lol!).

(LMAO - You? You're "too, Too, TOO EASY!")

APK

P.S.=>

"Then they went on to say that the German government had advised against using version 2.6, which was OLD NEWS and anyone with a brain would know this from reading TFA. As I have one, and did, and know this, which are apparently the differences between me and you... LOL!" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

WRONG: That says "later this month" & is a "note" ONLY, you fool... THUS, the article IS ABOUT VERSION 3.6 when it was written, & that it had a serious bug! Hence, why Germany warned about using FF to its people... troll, you're not even GOOD @ trolling.

I get that "last laugh" on you, BIGTIME (because you shot your mouth off with false information (not to mention constant name tossing & such as well, the SURE SIGN of those defeated by facts & reason in debate no less).

---

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

"They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

THE QUOTATION ABOVE IS YOUR OWN WORDS ABOVE STATING THE GERMAN GOV'T. WARNED ITS PEOPLES ABOUT OPERA (which they never did, as they did regarding FF &/or IE, proofs below):

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German governme

"Then they went on to say that the German government had advised against using version 2.6, which was OLD NEWS and anyone with a brain would know this from reading TFA. As I have one, and did, and know this, which are apparently the differences between me and you... LOL!" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

WRONG: That says "later this month" & is a "note" ONLY, you fool... THUS, the article IS ABOUT VERSION 3.6 when it was written, & that it had a serious bug! Hence, why Germany warned about using FF to its people... troll, you're not even GOOD @ trolling.

---

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

"They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

THE QUOTATION ABOVE IS YOUR OWN WORDS ABOVE STATING THE GERMAN GOV'T. WARNED ITS PEOPLES ABOUT OPERA (which they never did, as they did regarding FF &/or IE, proofs below):

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

SO - once more: Can you show me where German government EVER SAID NOT TO USE OPERA? No, you cannot... even though you said they did (b.s., & this below ALL proves that much easily, with your OWN LYING WORDS no less, easily ("too, Too, TOO EASY" in fact!)).

You'll never find that the germans said "stay away from Opera", EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY GERMAN GOV'T. DID ABOVE (pure b.s. OR a mistake on your part, take your pick) - they have never done so, afaik @ least!

(You're either "thick" in the head, an incorrigible TROLL (this is the case imo), or just well... "less than a 10 below plantlife IQ" bearing individual (& please - listen to Alice in Chains & take their advice and "CHECK YOUR BRAIN", or @ least your inability to read... thank you!))... apk

APK

P.S.=> Your information is also SO STALE (considering you posted a very old bug from OPERA 9.23) & OPERA IS CURRENTLY AT VERSION 10.52.3344 as of today, here -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/ ... so, so much for "your information being current" (far, Far, FAR FROM IT in fact - what you posted is YEARS OLD on a guess/iirc)... apk

"Then they went on to say that the German government had advised against using version 2.6, which was OLD NEWS and anyone with a brain would know this from reading TFA. As I have one, and did, and know this, which are apparently the differences between me and you... LOL!" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

WRONG: That says "later this month" & is a "note" ONLY, you fool... THUS, the article IS ABOUT VERSION 3.6 when it was written, & that it had a serious bug! Hence, why Germany warned about using FF to its people... troll, you're not even GOOD @ trolling.

---

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

"They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

THE QUOTATION ABOVE IS YOUR OWN WORDS ABOVE STATING THE GERMAN GOV'T. WARNED ITS PEOPLES ABOUT OPERA (which they never did, as they did regarding FF &/or IE, proofs below):

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

SO - once more: Can you show me where German government EVER SAID NOT TO USE OPERA? No, you cannot... even though you said they did (b.s., & this below ALL proves that much easily, with your OWN LYING WORDS no less, easily ("too, Too, TOO EASY" in fact!)).

You'll never find that the germans said "stay away from Opera", EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY GERMAN GOV'T. DID ABOVE (pure b.s. OR a mistake on your part, take your pick) - they have never done so, afaik @ least!

(You're either "thick" in the head, an incorrigible TROLL (this is the case imo), or just well... "less than a 10 below plantlife IQ" bearing individual (& please - listen to Alice in Chains & take their advice and "CHECK YOUR BRAIN", or @ least your inability to read... thank you!))... apk

APK

P.S.=> Your information is also SO STALE (considering you posted a very old bug from OPERA 9.23) & OPERA IS CURRENTLY AT VERSION 10.52.3344 as of today, here -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/ ... so, so much for "your information being current" (far, Far, FAR FROM IT in fact - what you posted is YEARS OLD on a guess/iirc)... apk

"Then they went on to say that the German government had advised against using version 2.6, which was OLD NEWS and anyone with a brain would know this from reading TFA. As I have one, and did, and know this, which are apparently the differences between me and you... LOL!" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

WRONG: That says "later this month" & is a "note" ONLY, you fool... THUS, the article IS ABOUT VERSION 3.6 when it was written, & that it had a serious bug! Hence, why Germany warned about using FF to its people... troll, you're not even GOOD @ trolling.

---

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

"They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

THOSE ARE YOUR OWN WORDS ABOVE STATING THE GERMAN GOV'T. WARNED ITS PEOPLES ABOUT OPERA (which they never did, as they did regarding FF &/or IE, proofs below):

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

SO - once more: Can you show me where German government EVER SAID NOT TO USE OPERA? No, you cannot... even though you said they did (b.s., & this below ALL proves that much easily, with your OWN LYING WORDS no less, easily ("too, Too, TOO EASY" in fact!)).

You'll never find that the germans said "stay away from Opera", EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY GERMAN GOV'T. DID ABOVE (pure b.s. OR a mistake on your part, take your pick) - they have never done so, afaik @ least!

(You're either "thick" in the head, an incorrigible TROLL (this is the case imo), or just well... "less than a 10 below plantlife IQ" bearing individual (& please - listen to Alice in Chains & take their advice and "CHECK YOUR BRAIN", or @ least your inability to read... thank you!))... apk

APK

P.S.=> Your information is also SO STALE (considering you posted a very old bug from OPERA 9.23) & OPERA IS CURRENTLY AT VERSION 10.52.3344 as of today, here -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/ ... so, so much for "your information being current" (far, Far, FAR FROM IT in fact - what you posted is YEARS OLD on a guess/iirc)... apk

"Then they went on to say that the German government had advised against using version 2.6, which was OLD NEWS and anyone with a brain would know this from reading TFA. As I have one, and did, and know this, which are apparently the differences between me and you... LOL!" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

WRONG: That says "later this month" & is a "note" ONLY, you fool... THUS, the article IS ABOUT VERSION 3.6 when it was written, & that it had a serious bug! Hence, why Germany warned about using FF to its people... troll, you're not even GOOD @ trolling.

---

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

"They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

THOSE ARE YOUR OWN WORDS ABOVE STATING THE GERMAN GOV'T. WARNED ITS PEOPLES ABOUT OPERA (which they never did, as they did regarding FF &/or IE, proofs below):

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

SO - once more: Can you show me where German government EVER SAID NOT TO USE OPERA? No, you cannot... even though you said they did (b.s., & this below ALL proves that much easily, with your OWN LYING WORDS no less, easily ("too, Too, TOO EASY" in fact!)).

You'll never find that the germans said "stay away from Opera", EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY GERMAN GOV'T. DID ABOVE (pure b.s. OR a mistake on your part, take your pick) - they have never done so, afaik @ least!

(You're either "thick" in the head, an incorrigible TROLL (this is the case imo), or just well... "less than a 10 below plantlife IQ" bearing individual (& please - listen to Alice in Chains & take their advice and "CHECK YOUR BRAIN", or @ least your inability to read... thank you!))... apk

APK

P.S.=> Your information is also SO STALE (considering you posted a very old bug from OPERA 9.23) & OPERA IS CURRENTLY AT VERSION 10.52.3344 as of today, here -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/ ... so, so much for "your information being current" (far, Far, FAR FROM IT in fact - what you posted is YEARS OLD on a guess/iirc)... apk

"Then they went on to say that the German government had advised against using version 2.6, which was OLD NEWS and anyone with a brain would know this from reading TFA. As I have one, and did, and know this, which are apparently the differences between me and you... LOL!by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

WRONG: That says "later this month" & is a "note" ONLY, you fool... THUS, the article IS ABOUT VERSION 3.6 when it was written, & that it had a serious bug! Hence, why Germany warned about using FF to its people... troll, you're not even GOOD @ trolling.

---

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

"They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

THOSE ARE YOUR OWN WORDS ABOVE STATING THE GERMAN GOV'T. WARNED ITS PEOPLES ABOUT OPERA (which they never did, as they did regarding FF &/or IE, proofs below):

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

SO - once more: Can you show me where German government EVER SAID NOT TO USE OPERA? No, you cannot... even though you said they did (b.s., & this below ALL proves that much easily, with your OWN LYING WORDS no less, easily ("too, Too, TOO EASY" in fact!)).

You'll never find that the germans said "stay away from Opera", EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY GERMAN GOV'T. DID ABOVE (pure b.s. OR a mistake on your part, take your pick) - they have never done so, afaik @ least!

(You're either "thick" in the head, an incorrigible TROLL (this is the case imo), or just well... "less than a 10 below plantlife IQ" bearing individual (& please - listen to Alice in Chains & take their advice and "CHECK YOUR BRAIN", or @ least your inability to read... thank you!))... apk

APK

P.S.=> Your information is also SO STALE (considering you posted a very old bug from OPERA 9.23) & OPERA IS CURRENTLY AT VERSION 10.52.3344 as of today, here -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/ ... so, so much for "your information being current" (far, Far, FAR FROM IT in fact - what you posted is YEARS OLD on a guess/iirc)... apk

"Then they went on to say that the German government had advised against using version 2.6, which was OLD NEWS and anyone with a brain would know this from reading TFA. As I have one, and did, and know this, which are apparently the differences between me and you... LOL!by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:34AM (#31706202)

WRONG: That says "later this month" & is a "note" ONLY, you fool... THUS, the article IS ABOUT VERSION 3.6 when it was written, & that it had a serious bug! Hence, why Germany warned about using FF to its people... troll, you're not even GOOD @ trolling.

---

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

"They did come for Opera; they recommended that people stop using it until this latest version patched the security flaw they found" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

THOSE ARE YOUR OWN WORDS ABOVE STATING THE GERMAN GOV'T. WARNED ITS PEOPLES ABOUT OPERA (which they never did, as they did regarding FF &/or IE, proofs below):

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

SO - once more: Can you show me where German government EVER SAID NOT TO USE OPERA? No, you cannot... even though you said they did (b.s., & this below ALL proves that much easily, with your OWN LYING WORDS no less, easily ("too, Too, TOO EASY" in fact!)).

You'll never find that the germans said "stay away from Opera", EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY GERMAN GOV'T. DID ABOVE (pure b.s. OR a mistake on your part, take your pick) - they have never done so, afaik @ least!

(You're either "thick" in the head, an incorrigible TROLL (this is the case imo), or just well... "less than a 10 below plantlife IQ" bearing individual (& please - listen to Alice in Chains & take their advice and "CHECK YOUR BRAIN", or @ least your inability to read... thank you!))... apk

APK

P.S.=> Your information is also SO STALE (considering you posted a very old bug from OPERA 9.23) & OPERA IS CURRENTLY AT VERSION 10.52.3344 as of today, here -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/ ... so, so much for "your information being current" (far, Far, FAR FROM IT in fact - what you posted is YEARS OLD on a guess/iirc)... apk

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

SO - once more: Can you show me where German government EVER SAID NOT TO USE OPERA? No, you cannot... even though you said they did (b.s., & this below ALL proves that much easily, with your OWN LYING WORDS no less, easily ("too, Too, TOO EASY" in fact!)).

(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

You'll never find that the germans said "stay away from Opera", EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY GERMAN GOV'T. DID ABOVE (pure b.s. OR a mistake on your part, take your pick) - they have never done so, afaik @ least!

(You're either "thick" in the head, an incorrigible TROLL (this is the case imo), or just well... "less than a 10 below plantlife IQ" bearing individual (& please - listen to Alice in Chains & take their advice and "CHECK YOUR BRAIN", or @ least your inability to read... thank you!))... apk

APK

P.S.=> Your information is also SO STALE (considering you posted a very old bug from OPERA 9.23) & OPERA IS CURRENTLY AT VERSION 10.52.3344 as of today, here -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/ ... so, so much for "your information being current" (far, Far, FAR FROM IT in fact - what you posted is YEARS OLD on a guess/iirc)... apk

"LOL, better than a REAL SECURITY FIRM, I guess? Because that is where I got my source" - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

No, YOUR INFO. IS 2 VERSIONS OF OPERA OLD #1, & #2? Your link above (I went thru your posts here in this exchange) & it was from OPERA, here: http://www.opera.com/support/kb/view/865/ when you posted it, here in this exchange -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1591778&cid=31582488

(Man, YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT MUCH RIGHT... lol!)

----

"Nice try, apk, really nice try... APF is more like it though, because you really are an APril Fool (all year long! ROFL)." - by clone53421 (1310749) on Friday April 02, @10:51AM (#31706372)

Better than yours, so again: CAN YOU TELL US THE TOPIC OF THIS ARTICLE? Clue - IT'S ABOUT GERMANY WARNING ITS PEOPLES NOT TO USE FIREFOX as they did about IE also

SO - once more: Can you show me where German government EVER SAID NOT TO USE OPERA? No, you cannot... even though you said they did (b.s., & this below ALL proves that much easily, with your OWN LYING WORDS no less, easily ("too, Too, TOO EASY" in fact!)).

(1310749) on Thursday April 01, @08:29AM (#31699378) Journal

---

German government in Firefox warning -> http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/german-government-in-firefox-warning-2107853.html

and

German government warns citizens off IE -> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/german-government-warns-citizens-off-ie-664181

----

You'll never find that the germans said "stay away from Opera", EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY GERMAN GOV'T. DID ABOVE (pure b.s. OR a mistake on your part, take your pick) - they have never done so, afaik @ least!

(You're either "thick" in the head, an incorrigible TROLL (this is the case imo), or just well... "less than a 10 below plantlife IQ" bearing individual (& please - listen to Alice in Chains & take their advice and "CHECK YOUR BRAIN", or @ least your inability to read... thank you!))... apk

APK

P.S.=> Your information is also SO STALE (considering you posted a very old bug from OPERA 9.23) & OPERA IS CURRENTLY AT VERSION 10.52.3344 as of today, here -> http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/ ... so, so much for "your information being current" (far, Far, FAR FROM IT in fact - what you posted is YEARS OLD on a guess/iirc)... apk

Bu not Opera Mini, which routes all your traffic through their proxys. http://www.opera.com/mobile/help/faq/#security (third question).

Link 1 Link 2

Why not just go all the way and get a real OS?
And ceiling cat sayed: "Let there b lulz", n there wuz.
Or even chrome

Link 1
Link 2

Do you happen to know of a HOWTO or anything for doing this and integrating it with Opera? If you don't have one handy don't bother looking or anything, I just thought you might have run across one. A very quick and cursory Google search didn't turn up anything that looks immediately promising to me.

I don't know of anyone who has done it so far. I've wasted several hours trying to get DirectShow GStreamer wrapper working (it's in gst-plugins-bad), but that didn't lead me anywhere. Now that I've found out that it's ffmpeg, I might want to try again.

The problem there is that they use their own GStreamer build, which seems to be built with library names (e.g. gstreamer.dll rather than libgstreamer.dll), compiler switches etc not compatible with stock Win32 builds from http://gstreamer.net/ - so you can't just download ffmpeg binaries from the latter and drop them in. You need to get Opera's version and makefiles first, and then compile ffmpeg within that.

If/when I get that working, I'll share it (I'm residing in Canada, so there should be no need to worry about software patents for me).

If you look at Haavard's blog on the Opera site, you will find a reference to run of the SVG 1.1 Test Suite on IE9. In contrast to Microsoft's SVG test suite (of about 104 individual tests in 7 areas), the W3C's test suite has 275 tests, each of which typically has a dozen or so subtests. On the standard test, IE9 passed 28.36 % of the tests. All other browsers are above 60%. Once SVG becomes viable, I expect that all of the other browsers will quickly advance into the 90%+ range. Opera is already well above 90%. So I welcome IE9 into the SVG crowd, but they are far behind the competition.

A skeptic, that is to say, anyone who can recall Microsoft's behavior over the past 20 years, might wonder if Microsoft ran the official SVG test suite on all competing browsers to find areas where they failed. They then built a second test where they know the others will fail. The developers then focused on implementing them correctly in IE9. This would give them bragging rights when they ran their specially crafted SVG test that focussed on these areas. But it would not help improve interoperability if they grade themselves on a new test, rather than the W2C test suite. I hope I a wrong, but like the little boy who cried wolf, Microsoft has a history of misleading the community.

http://www.opera.com/press/releases/2009/04/01_2/

But, of course, you realize that which browser you are using is probably the least of your concerns, when it comes to connecting with your company's network. Are these phones compatible, in all respects, including the security software?

Best thing to do is, ASK YOUR IT PEOPLE!!

http://www.opera.com/business/partners/#Contentpartner
google pays opera to be the default search engine, same as firefox.
I am sure Apple is paid by google to be the default search as well, and thus is the dilemma, will apple relinquish a tiny little bit of the profit for user experience? doubtful...
I am sure Opera also has a default home page that gives a preferred nod to yahoo/google content for money as well.

But if that is indeed what they're doing, I dunno how they deal with animating elements (which would require the entire layout to be recalculated frame-by-frame).

They just send a server request to update the page. Because of that, they only support rather limited DOM manipulation, for example.

It's definitely not a full-featured browser. That said, it's still good enough to read Slashdot. I'm not sure what's its purpose on a phone with a proper browser, but on my Nokia 6300 (which only does J2ME), it's a godsend.

Opera's website is not entirely clear about how Opera Mini works, but I think the parent is pretty much correct. The servers that support Opera Mini run the same rendering engine that is used in the desktop version of Opera, and the CSS features which Opera Mini supports are limited by the graphics system running on these servers. This suggests pretty strongly to me that the HTML+CSS is indeed rendered to an image server-side.

Opera's website is not entirely clear about how Opera Mini works, but I think the parent is pretty much correct. The servers that support Opera Mini run the same rendering engine that is used in the desktop version of Opera, and the CSS features which Opera Mini supports are limited by the graphics system running on these servers. This suggests pretty strongly to me that the HTML+CSS is indeed rendered to an image server-side.

wow... there goes my bankaccount...

It's encrypted between Opera's proxy server and the target website, but not between your phone and Opera's server.

From their Opera Mini FAQ:

If you do not trust Opera Software, make sure you do not use our application to enter any kind of sensitive information.

Yes, because Opera has never had this sort of vulnerability!

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND OPERA HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX & IE, by far, N HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick"... as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick" - as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per these tests, & consistently, for years now no less:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick", as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA + benchmarks results which have favored Opera on ALL LEVELS for years (9/10 times):

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick" as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above - & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick", as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily))))... apk

See subject-line above & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick", as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, 9/10 times (literally, it's the "main delivery mechanism" of MOST online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily)))... apk

See subject-line above, & also, note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years, no less!

Per latest:

1.) SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087

2.) AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm

("Beat that with a stick", as the saying goes!)

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily)))... apk

See subject-line above, & also note this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

----

OPERA ALSO SURPASSES FIREFOX IN BROWSING SPEED, at BOTH the javascript processing & HTML processing/parsing speeds levels as well, consistently & for years (per latest SunSpider tests done here recently -> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/gallery/features/356350/on-test-the-hidden-seven-browsers-in-the-windows-ballot/145087 AND IT HAS BEEN "BLOWING AWAY" FIREFOX IN HTML PARSING/PROCESSING SPEEDS AS WELL, & FOR YEARS NOW, per this test years ago -> http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#win and this one too last year also -> http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49302491,00.htm )

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily)))... apk

See subject-line above, & this report from SECUNIA:

----

Vulnerability Report: Opera 10.x:

http://secunia.com/advisories/product/26745/

Unpatched 0% (0 of 5 Secunia advisories)

----

Download Opera 10.51 FINAL RELEASE, here:

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/

APK

P.S.=> Nicest part about Opera is that it originates a LOT of what folks consider cool, as far as browser features, & first (e,g, - tabbed browsing anyone), & it contains features you cannot get in FireFox & IE natively (i.e - without addons (such as site by site choices of whether to run javascript on a website, or not (javascript IS what gets you people all "hit" by these online attacks, & sites like SECUNIA.COM or SECURITYFOCUS.COM can show anybody that much, easily)))... apk

Opera has reported an increase in downloads. http://my.opera.com/chooseopera/blog/2010/03/18/the-choice-screen-effect