Domain: paheal.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to paheal.net.
Comments · 26
-
Re:I'm A Voodoo Spell Caster With No Side Effects.
My EX-girlfriend is a level 20 necromancer with spell immunity. Pic for reference.
-
Re:Sex is scary
nah there is nothing wrong with this
-
Re:Brohoof
the writing has enough to offer to keep an adult entertained, too (so long as you're still capable of appreciating storytelling without constant gory violence, profanity, and explicit sex)
And if you can't, well, there's always Rule 34.
-
Re:Movie ratings
Pray I don't make you rate more.
-
Re:Unsafe Search, NOW!I see we've covered Monzy.
I really want to see what Google returns with 'unsafe search' turned on for truly boring and mundane words like 'Baseball', 'Database', or 'Tax return'. I bet you could find some pretty fucking weird sites with that feature....
But if you want a guarantee of pr0n: http://rule34.paheal.net/ (very VERY nsfw). Rule 34: There is porn of it. No exceptions.
This one's kinda safe for work (but the domain'll stick out like a sore thumb, so you're still better off staying at home) Now stop procrastinating and do your taxes. (I'll leave you to find the baseballs and the databases.)
-
Re:Unsafe Search, NOW!I see we've covered Monzy.
I really want to see what Google returns with 'unsafe search' turned on for truly boring and mundane words like 'Baseball', 'Database', or 'Tax return'. I bet you could find some pretty fucking weird sites with that feature....
But if you want a guarantee of pr0n: http://rule34.paheal.net/ (very VERY nsfw). Rule 34: There is porn of it. No exceptions.
This one's kinda safe for work (but the domain'll stick out like a sore thumb, so you're still better off staying at home) Now stop procrastinating and do your taxes. (I'll leave you to find the baseballs and the databases.)
-
Re:Rule 34 ...
-
Re:Alta Vista did this 15 years ago...
-
Re:SOUNDS SEXY !! (Rule #34)
-
Re:SOUNDS SEXY !! (Rule #34)
-
Re:My first thought
This so needs to be integrated into http://rule34.paheal.net/
-
Re:What the fuck is wrong with the Japanese?
Well, it's probably more creepy to have the more realistic depiction of underaged girls that might come out of Western art. I haven't seen too much of anything outside of the anime style posted on 4chan, for instance, and it's apparently legal for the loli-dumpers to do so. Either that or they're not getting banned, but still getting reported to any authority who asks...
...speaking of which. (actual Dead or Alive pr0n, nsfw) -
Re:The article title is inaccurate and inflammator
-
Re:Milking the cow...
Uh, yeah we have. Two words
-
Re:Why mine the asteroids?
Have this one on me: The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein.
-
Re:This thread is useless without pics!
Does someone still have all those cute 'anime' style Green Dam Girl pics?
This? (alert, NSFW)
-
Meh
Meh.
That's not the kind of cosplay I'm interested in. This beats tentacle monsters any day: http://cosplay.paheal.net/post/view/12435?search=Motoko_Kusanagi
-
Re:I'm waiting for something else
-
Re:Of course
Anon does not always deliver.
Rule 34 + Rosie O'Donnell = no delivery.
Actually, they did deliver. Now excuse me while I go find the closest toilet to vomit in.
-
Re:Porn star?
You joke, but it's true.
:(
http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/sun/1. (Not safe for work in any way, shape, or form.) -
Re:Rule 34!
-
Re:Good
If you eliminate scarcity, then why should anyone work? For the benefit of society? If you eliminate scarcity, the entire economic system collapses. I mean, really, good luck, but someone else already tried that.
If you eliminate scarcity, why should anyone work? Economy is about managing resources; if resources are infinite, why would they need to be managed? If something is as ubiquitous as the air you breath, why would there be economy around it? The purpose of work is to produce those resources in the first place, after all.
That said, even in a world with no material scarcity, people would still work, judging by the existence of websites like http://rule34.paheal.net/, http://www.fanfiction.net/ or http://www.wikipedia.org/. They'd simply do that for fun and prestige, rather than as a necessity of survival as currently.
In any case, I personally find the whole post-scarcity world a very unlikely prospect. It would remove the elite's power over those less rich than themselves, after all, so if someone comes up with a universal replicator, they'll stop it... because it can be used to make bombs! Yes! That's it! It must be stopped to fight the terrorists!
-
Re:Blaming Linux...
I bolded the quote to show what their real problem was. They had a shit load of threads trying to use a single socket and of course there was huge overhead involved due to the mutex lock (Semaphore on kernel side) on a shared resource (the socket). So they blame Linux instead of them selves for such a half-ass implementation of sending out packets from multiple threads with a single socket. They would have gotten the same exact result if they tried it with a single TCP connection socket and attempted to have multiple threads firing off packets with that. If you want multiple threads sending out packets use multiple sockets... Wow what a concept!
Your attitude is reminds me of a response I recently got to a bug in Firefox 3 here on Slashdot: the page which triggered the bug is "stupid", and it's not the Firefox developers fault that the program locks up when it encounters a "stupid" page. Thus it's a low priority to fix it, since it only affects users of "stupid" pages; hardly even a bug at all !
As for this UDP issue, I find it very hard to believe that a properly designed system needs to hold the lock long enough to cause significant lock contention. We are talking about adding a single item to a linked list or a comparable operation. It takes - what, setting two pointers ? Or three if it's a doubly linked list.
Besides, threads are just processes which share more context than processes in general. And a socket is just a logical construct the operating system uses in its network API. There's no inherent reason why two threads sending UDP packets over a single UDP socket should be any slower than sending them over different sockets, or two separate processes sending them over different ports, since they ultimately leave through the same hardware interface. If it is indeed slower, then that is because of the design choices a particular implementation has taken. These choices may or may not be justified; however, the user is not "stupid" simply because he didn't realize you would make these particular choices instead of some other, possibly equally reasonable ones.
Sorry for my ranting, but it just pisses me off when moron programmers blame the operating system for their own stupidity.
It is always hard to hear criticism of things you hold dear. That doesn't mean that the bearer of the bad news is a moron.
-
Is...is that Dr. Willey being choked by a rectum?
http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/206028?search=Splash_Woman
...
lol wtf pwnzr-fanboi fap fap fap fap fap oh oh guuhhhhd fap fap fap fap fap oh oh oh gud splatter my blatter fap fap fap fap fap oh oh oh mash me potatoes fap fap fap fap... Nebraska!Also, does anyone notice the similarity between the following Kikes that Japanese jewballs like to push:
Dr. Wiley
Albert Einsteen
Walter Mathau
Adam Sezzler
Tub Girl -
Re:Danger Signs
NSFW : All your fetishes are there, AT THE SAME TIME! http://rule34.paheal.net/
-
Re:Peach! NOOOOO!
http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/peach/1 This is OH SO not safe for work or your childhood memories.