Domain: start64.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to start64.com.
Comments · 4,369
-
gmhowell & trolltalk.com AC stalkers: READ!
My single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
In fact, Dr. Mark Russinovich &/or Nir Softer of NIRSOFT have had this happen to their applications too (pstools & others M.R. wrote, & many Nir Sofer wrote - but they are "double edged swords" tools, just like ping is!) Write either of them, they won't & DON'T deny it (and they don't like it, neither do I).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit!
APK
P.S.=> There's also a pack of trolls here, literally ADMITTED trolls, they run a domain called "trolltalk.com" in fact!
In THIS case, ac trolling me? Pay attention to "C" below, on gmhowell - he's stalking me via AC trolling posts!
(gmhowell, tomhudson, webmistressrachel, squiggleslash, ountertrolling, mcgrew, & other registered LUSER 'guises'),
They regularly cheat/game the moderation system, literally, in 2 ways:
---
1.) Modding themselves up in collusion/teams
2.) Modding down those they are stalking/harassing/trolling
---
Think it's bullshit? Ok, fine - here's where they LITERALLLY ADMIT TO ALL OF THE ABOVE & how they cheat the mod system here:
---
A.) countertrolling telling others how to moddown opponents as registered lusers 1st, then to logout to save your karma/cookie state of your reg'd luser account, & then to troll others via ac replies ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Plenty was done to Jay Little
CrystalTech removed Jay Little's website for libeling myself and making death threats directed my way.
Jay Little then moved to hosting it himself as he told them he would do in retaliation. Jay Little's just "bent" that I got the best of him in front of MILLIONS of readers @ Windows IT Pro forums on Exchange Servers (he claimed to be "EXPERT" on them, & "yours truly" SCHOOLED him), RamDisks/RamDrives, & Windows NT-based OS' error stopcodes too... then, his website being forcibly removed by CrystalTech.com his hosting provider for libel & death threats he directed my way as well out of his "geek angst" (pretty pitiful). He just did it again elsewhere as CrystalTech.com's staff told me he would out of "effete retaliation", lol... pitiful.
---
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
---
Saying I was raped here -> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2619084&cid=38694116 & other libel of myself's going to have me have to take care of this, and you with it, one way or another... period.
Count on it. Spending money on "stop orders" with attorneys is better spent on gassing up the car & taking a little trip to pay those who libel others a nice visit - just like you.
APK
P.S.=> In the end here MichaelKristopeit (IF that's who you truly are)? You'd better HOPE that only the legal dept. here does the right thing, because if not ->
-
Dr. Mark Russinovich has too
"THOR SCHMUCK" refused to answer on PING.EXE + SPYBOT S&D which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE on his own website. That made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
I'm not too concerned about it, because they also do it to others (along with other Antivirus/Antispyware companies, and we all know how "effective" those are, especially lately vs. today's "blended threats").
In fact? I am actually in GOOD COMPANY on that account as others have had it happen to they as well!
Ask Dr. Mark Russinovich of Microsoft or Nir Softer of NIRSOFT if they've ever had their numerous apps libeled along with themselves in the same manner... (answer = they have, so I suppose I am in "good company" here, eh?)
Thor Schmuck doesn't even have a CSC degree or even a single A+ type certification to his name.
APK
P.S.=> All I can say to and about Thor SCHMUCK, is this: GOD BLESS TY TYMKOVICH (LOL, run that by him, it ought to be good for a laugh... the fool got wickedly SUCKERED by him to the tune of $5,500)...
... apk
-
He can say he's Prime Minister of the UK
LOL, doesn't mean I believe him: I want proof... he has zero to that effect. However, fact remains, even YOU know I work(ed) for Fortune 100's or I did contracting...
Still - all he says (it's you just posting again is all, you fool no one here)? HEY - he's got NO PROOF either as usual!
Especially to his 'statements' (see my subject-line above) bragging he's a "lead developer etc. @ a large company" etc./et al.
E.G./I.E.-> Again - I could say I am Bill Gates too, online, but I don't (unlike the ac trolls here, yourself included).
---
Now, as to your usual b.s. regarding Jeremy Reimer & Thor SCHMUCK, here is my std. reply disproving your b.s. troll:
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
I'm not too concerned about it, because they also do it to others (along with other Antivirus/Antispyware companies, and we all know how "effective" those are, especially lately vs. today's "blended threats").
In fact? I am actually in GOOD COMPANY on that account as others have had it happen to they as well!
Ask Dr. Mark Russinovich of Microsoft or Nir Softer of NIRSOFT if they've ever had their numerous apps libeled along with themselves in the same manner... (answer = they have, so I suppose I am in "good company" here, eh?)
Thor Schrock, lol, another "credible expert" (NOT): That guy doesn't even have a CSC degree or even a single A+ type certification to his name.
All I can say to and about Thor SCHMUCK, is this: GOD BLESS TY TYMKOVICH (LOL, run that by him, it ought
-
Re:Good
How exactly does one "astroturf" a product that is free and isn't even from the offical channels? the only reason I'm happy to point it out is that XP X64 users have been treated like the bastard stepchild from MSFT from day one, hell even their own WMP 11 is missing features compared to the x32, and it is just a damned shame.
Windows server 2K3 X64 is the business OS MSFT SHOULD HAVE given us instead of the bloated abortion that is Vista, and since XP X64 is just 2K3 with an XP desktop shell and compatibility mode it is a truly scary badass business OS. Supports up to 128Gb of RAM, rock solid stable, easy to lock down with GPO, runs all my old software just fine (unlike Vista), only uses 458Mb of RAM with Comodo AV/Firewall and plenty of pretty on while leaving the rest of my 8Gb free for MY apps, immune to 32bit bugs, etc. It really is a rock solid business desktop and the customers I've switched over agree that the X64 XP is a little slice of goodness.
So how is it astroturfering to point out that there is an actual x64 build for an OS that gets no love from its parent company? linux users have had x64 Firefox for quite awhile from what i understand, and unlike Windows they even have x64 flash (whether or not that is a "good thing" is debatable) so how is giving Windows XP x64 users a link and the benchmarks "astroturfing"? It certainly isn't my site, but for those X64 XP users out there here is a little more love from da feet, a site with lots of X64 software and drivers that work just great on XP X64. Enjoy fellow X64 users!
-
Re:Good
Actually it doesn't. in fact I have found (in my own personal experience) that FF64 running on XP64 uses less resources that FF32, with both running the same extensions. If you would like to see some benchmarks that someone was nice enough to put up here you go. These were made when Firefox was at 3.0.x but I have found that if anything FF64 has just gotten better, whereas FF32 seems to have gotten a little slower, at least in my experience.
So why not give it a try if you are running 64bit Windows? It is free and will only take a little bit of your time. If you are gonna use it long term I would suggest using the same version number as the 32bit you have installed, otherwise you'll get a tiny nag about "upgrading" when you go from the smaller number to the bigger. But since they seem to update the 64bit version pretty quickly it really isn't hard to keep them synced. If you have 64bit it really is a nice experience, and as you can see from the benchmarks the 64bits does help with the speed.
-
Re:Good
They don't have an official version, but there is a 64bit Firefox and I have found it to run much faster on XP X64 than 32bit Firefox. The only hangup is there is no 64bit flash for Windows, but since I'm not looking at flash it doesn't bother me. if I find a video that I absolutely must watch, well there is always Firefox 32 for that.
-
Re:64-bit support?
Turns out it's just a matter of wanting to do it.
Start64 pointed me to Deer Park builds from Vector64, and it seems to work fine with my plugins. Granted, I haven't tried Flash yet, but I'm in no hurry to test that.