Slashdot Mirror

If that is true, their god is a false one - not that there are any true ones, so this makes their falser?.

Who the hell forbids playing the guitar?

Well, I worked out that the Muslim God is false when it told them to subdue non Muslims and kill them if they don't accept punitive taxes, not to practice religion in public, not to repair or build places of worship, and not to be able to testify against Muslims (like the non-muslim girls kidnapped and raped in Pakistan, where the rapist just has to say it was consensual and even when a whole congregation of non-Muslims witnessed it he is acquitted because there is no evidence against him.

However, if it takes the guitar being banned to convince you that the Muslim God is false, see Guitar Haraam?.

Back in the Kyoto talks, we were TOLD that if no action was taken, then the point of no return was something like 2007. Well? Based on that "science", nothing we do can help anyway.

We get predictions like that all the time. If there's anything we learned from the climategate emails, it's that a lot of the scientists working on this problem are not working in good faith.

The solution, I think, is to work on things that will help us anyway, even if AGW turns out to not be a problem. For example, improving electric car technology will be good for America, whether AGW is a big ball of hype, or whether it's real. Same with fusion electricity. We can work on those things.

You got modded troll, but you made me curious, because I seemed to remember hearing these before, too. Doing a google search of "global warming irreversible YYYY" I came up with these:

From 2009, Obama has 4 years to save the world

From 2009, global warming is now irreversible, study says(also discussed on slashdot)

From 2006, The End of the World As We Know It; THE world has already passed the point of no return on global warming.

From 2005, past the point of no return.

Also from 2005, Global warming irreversible.

From 2004, Damage from warming becoming irreversible.

From 1989, We have a 10 year window to fix the problem.

What do you think of that?

odd I hear crickets.......

You got modded troll, but you made me curious, because I seemed to remember hearing these before, too. Doing a google search of "global warming irreversible YYYY" I came up with these:

From 2009, Obama has 4 years to save the world
From 2009, global warming is now irreversible, study says(also discussed on slashdot)
From 2006, The End of the World As We Know It; THE world has already passed the point of no return on global warming.
From 2005, past the point of no return.
Also from 2005, Global warming irreversible.
From 2004, Damage from warming becoming irreversible.
From 1989, We have a 10 year window to fix the problem.

What do you think of that?

How about : "using violent means to abolish democracy"

http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?t=35541

(you see every muslim is religiously obliged to use violence to abolish democracy, you see this islam thing really isn't about veils but about terror (submission through violence))

Has anybody read 1984, the novel by George Orwell? There was this ficticious character Goldstein, invented by the government. Reminds me a bit of Osama bin Ladin.
We just need a bad guy, someone we can blame when something goes wrong. And if we want to get rid of someone, we just say: "He was a terrorist, or, worse, a friend of Osama" and everybody agrees that must be imprisioned forever, no proof of guilt necessary. Someone who is friend of personified evil has no rights at all.
It's a war we have to fight. And if we have to torture people to get the truth out of them, who cares.
In 1984, the names were just great, like, "Ministery of Love" for the institution where people were tortured.
Just like Bush's "alliance of peace and freedom", a bunch of nations that obviously only want war (oh, yes, they claim to have proof, that Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction, but, unfortunately, these proofs are so top-secret that we have to trust them. Germany trusted Hitler, so what can go wrong?)

Prisoners of war should have no rights, in the end, they fought against the US, which is bad. Don't believe this 14-year-old boy from Afghanistan who says the Taliban forced him to fight. Oh, never mind, he has no possibility to talk to a lawyer anyway.
http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/Index/AMR511862002?O penDocument&of=COUNTRIES\USA

How long has poor US government to ship suspicious people to other countries, because it's *still* illegal in America? Come on, legalize torturing, remember how much more these criminal terrorists would tell if the CIA could do whatever they want! Everything would be so much safer!
http://vigilant.tv/article/1104

You can see how civilized a country is when you look in how it treats its enemies.
http://www.ummah.com/inewsletter/massacres/afghani stan/campxray.htm

http://www.freejohnwalker.net/


I don't remember who said it, but I like this quote:
"Some people fight so hard for freedom until there's nothing left of it".

** America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. ~ Abraham Lincoln **

What the heck does Bush think he's doing? Iraq is NOT a threat to anyone but his own people now.
Yes, he is a madman and a criminal and should not be leader of a state. Maybe he wouldn't be in charge anymore if USA hadn't supported him when he attacked Iran, because without their help Iraq might have lost this war. Or if the US hadn't given Anthrax to him (he killed thousands of kurdish people with it, but never mind, he remained "our man" of the US in the gulf region).

But Saddam Hussein is NOT Al Qaida. In fact, they hate each other. Of course, this may change if the recognize they have a common enemy.

Bush must realize that he cannot fight terrorism with war. The sons of the soldiers he kills now are the suicide bombers of tomorrow. And all they need is a knife and a civil plane...

Wake up, America! You cannot fight against the rest of the world! You don't want to? So think about your actions, 1.5 billion Muslims may consider your actions a declaration of war.

I'm not auto-american, I like the American people, that's why I'm very worried about their current foreign politics.

Bush is creating a 1984-like state, with a powerful government and military that doesn't have to obey the law. Bush speaks about the alliance of "freedom and peace", but the world only sees how desperately USA wants war. And what's left of freedom when prisoners of war have no rights to see a court? When they are refused basic human rights as granted by the convention of Geneva?
http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/Index/AMR511862002?O penDocument&of=COUNTRIES\USA

When the US government has suspicious people tortured in other countries, because it's *still* illegal in America?
http://vigilant.tv/article/1104

Or suspects are locked away forever, without the right to go to court?
You can see how civilized a country is when you look in how it treats its enemies.
http://www.ummah.com/inewsletter/massacres/afghani stan/campxray.htm

http://www.freejohnwalker.net/

There was a time when America tried to show they're different from uncivilized countries, that human rights mean something to them. This time seems to be over and the rest of the world sees it.

I don't remember who said it, but I like this quote:
"Some people fight so hard for freedom until there's nothing left of it".

The potential further exists for oppressive governments to use the revocation feature to censor what we see and hear. In this Orwellian scenario it would be possible to erase from the collective consciousness striking images of the lone student facing down a tank in Tiananmen Square

Well we don't need censorware to hide political images in america. The media does it all on it's own.

Ever see this on cnn?

No.

You won't see the facts.