Slashdot Mirror


SourceForge Code Release

Precision writes "SourceForge, the opensource hosting service provided by VA Linux, has announced the initial code release. You can grab a copy here." SourceForge rocks my world.

97 comments

  1. good to see VALinux continuing to give back by JimRay · · Score: 1

    It's good to see these guys keeping the community alive. I couldn't help but notice that their stock was up today, to the tune of something like 25 points. When am I going to be able to buy a VALinux PPC box??

    --
    My other computer is your Windows box
    1. Re:good to see VALinux continuing to give back by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      I just grabbed a copy for myself... Not like I'll probably do anything with it, but it's still nice to know that I can one day rummage through it and other OS projects, if for nothing else, educational value.

      On the second note - Does VA build their own motherboards? Even if they did, I can't imagine that they'ed have enough volume to justify building PPC boards. Even with IBM releasing the specs for free. If you want LinuxPPC, go get a Mac.... But then you'll always get 2nd rate support than if you'd opted for an x86 system... I'm saying that, and I'm a Mac fan...

  2. hey /. - follow their lead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    now if taco would just get going and post the slashdot source, we'd be all set....

    1. Re:hey /. - follow their lead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prepare to be moderated to hell!

    2. Re:hey /. - follow their lead... by linuxci · · Score: 1

      In case you weren't trolling, or for others that don't know, there is slashdot source code available from http://slashdot.org/code.shtml

      However this source code is not very up to date, so that may be the reason why some people aren't happy about it. I'd like to see the slashdot code in its current state perhaps kept in CVS and then when considered stable a tarball can be made available from FTP.

      However, remember that anyone who writes code should be free not to release their source code if they don't want to. I'd like to see more upto date slashdot source but it's not my right to see it and I'm grateful for what we've been given.

    3. Re:hey /. - follow their lead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've been given squat by slash...

      A year old tar ball, that draws tables with stories in it, summarizes the number of total vs number of comments above a users threshhold, rotates pictures based on the stories' category...

      That in and of itself doesn't seem very noteworth or impressive, therefore I'm not interested very much in it...

      However, if we could get a tarball with the moderation features included, then that would be something worth toying with... And why bother extending the 0.3 tarball to handle moderation when an acceptable form has already been developed?

      Really. The tarball taht's posted is so outdated, everyone would have to reinvent wheels that rob's already built to get the same functionality, rather than really extending the functionality of Slash.

    4. Re:hey /. - follow their lead... by Anonynous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is a computer program? So that stuff about my page being generated by a Team of Elite Squirrels is a lie?

    5. Re:hey /. - follow their lead... by LoginFailure · · Score: 1

      Pardon my idiocy please... what source code do we want from /.?

    6. Re:hey /. - follow their lead... by linuxci · · Score: 2

      True

  3. sourceforge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is sourceforge anyway?

    1. Re:sourceforge by spaceorb · · Score: 2

      Zdnet did a pretty good write up of SourceForge a couple weeks back or so.

    2. Re:sourceforge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sourceforge is a stupid system designed such that the download link is a CGI and is thus completely useless for a number of browsers and applications. I gave up trying to download from sourceforge just yesterday - too much hassle. Though it is exceptionally more annoying than Freshmeat and its refreshes.

    3. Re:sourceforge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's easily fixed in php with something like

      Header ( "Content-Disposition: $whatever; filename=$file");

      You can also add:

      Header ( "Content-Length: $filesize");
      Header ( "Content-type: $type");

  4. Watch Out ... by scrutty · · Score: 2
    Here comes the inevitable hordes of whiners complaining about the absence of the Slashdot code release ...

    But seriously, although opensource is cool and everything and the more of it around the better, how useful is this code release likely to be for people ? Not intended as a criticism, just genuine curiosity. It would seem to me that the usefulness of this site is in the resources offered rather than the code itself. But still ,kudos, good show to VA, definitely one of the companies that "get it"

    --
    -- Oh Well
    1. Re:Watch Out ... by tweek · · Score: 1

      ACtually for me it will be really helpful. I host opensource projects for people and something like the sourceforge code would help me ramp up my services. I plan on spending a few hours Sunday and pouring over it and seeing some of the admin portion.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    2. Re:Watch Out ... by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 4
      No not really. I've come to the conclusion that the /. gang just doesn't want to release the code for whatever reason and just uses the "the code's ugly, it still has bugs, it only works on our systems" rationalizations as excuses. Why? Who knows. Who cares. There are a number of other products out there now, like Squishdot that HAVE released the code, so I'll use those instead.

      As for the usefulness of SourceForge code, you better believe it! I work for a small software shop - one that's too small to be able to afford to buy some Big Brand Name project management software. Not that that's ever really hurt us - we're using pretty much all the same tools that SourceForge is front-ending, which means that if I can slap SourceForge on top of the stuff we're already doing, whammo, I have instant web-based project management for our little company and the only thing it cost us was the time it takes me to get it set up! And besides, I'll have all the code that makes it run, so I can easily modify it to suit our needs if I need to! Yes, my time is valuable and I could have been out there working on pay projects, but I think the end-result is much more valuable to us than if we had bought some closed-box software of which we didn't understand the inner workings.

      -=-=-=-=-

      --

      -=-=-=-=-
      My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    3. Re:Watch Out ... by fusion94 · · Score: 1

      The usefulness of the site is in the resources being offered. We are in a constant development cycle to continue the feature set of the site and decided to release the code to reaffirm our commitment to practicing the Open Source Philosophy. We also viewed this as a way for the community to help shape future direction of SourceForge

    4. Re:Watch Out ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell. Slashdot seems to be this forum that pushes for Open Source, but it doesn't really commit to it. Hypocrisy, clear and simple.

    5. Re:Watch Out ... by grem · · Score: 1

      It would seem to me that the usefulness of this site is in the resources offered rather than the code itself

      Not true. Monday morning, I'm going to suggest to my manager that we use SourceForge internally, since we're about to switch to CVS anyway. And, we certainly could use all the SourceForge extras, like bug tracking, forums, web interface, etc. Remember, we can't use the public SourceForge site because our product uses a closed license.

      You're right in that, if VA does a good job, there probably is not a need for a public clone of SourceForge. But corporate developers will love this for internal use. Unfortunately, it will be difficult to measure how widely it's being used since the public will never see these sites.

      --
      Murphy's law - "Anything that can go wrong, will." (Actually, this is Finagle's law, which in itself shows that Finagle
  5. Microsoft could take a clue. by Jikes · · Score: 4

    With places like server51, sourceforge, xnot, and all their ilk, any dork who can type gcc can enter the world of program creation... This is a good thing. It gets people comfortable with software creation and the tools used.
    Microsoft is one of the biggest software manufacturers there is. Their products cover EVERYTHING. Yet not much else than Visual Basic is readily accessible by the average computer enthusiast. Why would it not be in MS's best interest to flood the market with dirt cheap or free copies of VC++ and development kits for the younguns to play with? Or do they do this already? Just a thought.

    --
    -troll taker
    1. Re:Microsoft could take a clue. by a42 · · Score: 1

      If they did, sooner or later somebody would start a lawsuit claiming "unfair business practices" etc. Seriously, though, if MS thought there was a profit to be mad in it I suspect they would do it. Somebody (Borland maybe?) used to sell an "entry-level" compiler (C? Pascal? Don't remember) available only to college students. Don't know whatever happened to that. --john

    2. Re:Microsoft could take a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most college bookstores sell semi-old (4.0 ish - STL is busted but otherwise ok) versions of VC++ lite (no optimizing, license [illegally?] disallows use for producing commercial software) fairly cheap. VC++ includes the src code (x86 asm & C) to the libraries. [Slashdot doesn't release the Slashdot source...]

      I've seen a few different packages in bookstores (learn to program C/C++, learn to write games in C/C++) that were fairly cheap & came bundled with VC++ lite (4.0 ish).

      So, one can legally get a cheap copy of VC++.

    3. Re:Microsoft could take a clue. by Hector · · Score: 2

      I don't think that MS is giving away their software for free, but here at my college (IU) We were one of the schools that struck those big deals with MS, which sorta sucks cause all the computers run buggy Office 2000, but we get the whole Visual Studio for like 25 bucks or something and I know in a class Im in now, we can get J++ Visual Studio for free, so MS is doing some stuff, personnally I live in UNIX and like jdk and gcc and everytthing else, but free and cheap compilers are defintly the way to go about getting people interested in programming, I had to save up for like a year to afford a student copy of metroworks compiler when i started leanring about programming in mac, but it was worth every cent, the whole reason I got into linux was the free tools.

    4. Re:Microsoft could take a clue. by hubie · · Score: 1
      You can get the development software (VBasic, VC++, etc.) deeply discounted at colleges and universities. About a year ago the educational price for the Visual Developer Suite 6.0 Professional (VB, VC++, J++, FoxPro, and one other) was $250. The pro editions of VB or VC++ were on the order of $100. I recall seeing them advertised outside of the university for about 2-4 times these prices, so in some sense they do provide "dirt cheap" copies in the sense that the discounts are up to 75%.

      In a relative sense these are huge discounts. Of course, in an absolute sense this is a whole lot more expensive than gcc, et al.

    5. Re:Microsoft could take a clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is server51? I haven't seen that one.

    6. Re:Microsoft could take a clue. by Surak · · Score: 2

      Why would it not be in MS's best interest to flood the market with dirt cheap or free copies of VC++ and development kits for the younguns to play with?

      Well, they do offer deeply-discounted educational versions for students. Like $99 or something.

      I agree, though. Flood the marketplace with free compilers. They could place restrictions on compiling commercial apps with it and then real developers would by the real thing. Not that I like closed-source software, but I guess M$ has to make money somehow. There software is just too crappy to give away for free. :)

    7. Re:Microsoft could take a clue. by Zurk · · Score: 1

      server51.freshmeat.net..andovers soon to be answer to sourceforge.

  6. Re:It's the Slashdot Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BWHA HA HA HA!!!! I'm sorry, I know that was a troll but it WAS very funny!

  7. This is neat! by jd · · Score: 5
    This is one -hell- of a system! I like it! At the moment, I've got most of the Free Film Project scattered over a bunch of systems, because no one of them provides everything I need. This will help me rationalise everything, a lot!

    P.S. To CmdrTaco - Here is a box. [] This box was donated by Ghostbusters, Inc, and comes complete with Enhanced(tm) SlashSource Troll containment fields. Place the box under such a troll, and activate, using the enclosed remote (-=). This will completely enclose the Troll in a Mk #5 Force Field, which can be released safely into any nuclear reactor core, for disposal.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  8. Microsoft users are welcome by spaceorb · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will never change its business practices unless it involves more people dumping money into their pockets, really. But there is no reason why Windows developers couldn't use SourceForge. The site is limited towards Open Source projects, not necessarily Linux.

    1. Re:Microsoft users are welcome by fusion94 · · Score: 1

      Windows Developers can use SourceForge. As a matter of fact approximately 312 of the 994 hosted projects run on Windows. The SourceForge code runs on linux but SourceForge is about Open Source.

    2. Re:Microsoft users are welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some projects hosted by SourceShit that aren't Open Source. BTW, the sites really suck with those lame CGI. Again, fuck you VAresearch. I don't think you're good.

  9. Re:It's the Slashdot Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you continue to slip. kinda sad, too. you used to be somewhat funny.

  10. Anybody have trouble getting thru? by SLOfuse · · Score: 1

    I have been having trouble getting thru to valinux and sorceforge websites for last week or so. (server not responding...) Anybody else had this problem?

    --

    Criminalize spam and telemarketing!

    1. Re:Anybody have trouble getting thru? by chrisd · · Score: 3
      Nope, but if you want to call us up, we can see what's up.

      Chris
      --
      Grant Chair, Linux Int.
      Pres, SVLUG

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
    2. Re:Anybody have trouble getting thru? by Forward+The+Light+Br · · Score: 2

      I know this is counterintuitive, but I usually get faster responces from their secure server. Try https://sourceforge.net
      We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars --Oscar Wilde

      --

      Grrr. my nick is "Forward the Light Brigade"...
    3. Re:Anybody have trouble getting thru? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey chris..just wondering what the procedure for getting my domain hosted on sourceforge is and whether all mail to my domain would be posted to my email account at sourceforge.net..I know your FAQ sez you host domains..but it doesnt give the procedure.

  11. Anybody have trouble getting thru? by SLOfuse · · Score: 0

    I have been trouble getting thru to valinux and sorceforge websites for last week or so. (server not responding...) Anybody else had this problem?

    --

    Criminalize spam and telemarketing!

  12. How is VA going to make money with this? by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

    If I read the site correctly, VA is offering this out of the goodness of their heart. While I don't don't their intentions, I wonder how long this can last if it proves to be more of a burden than they want.

    Sure, VA has tons of money right now. But what happens when the good times stop rolling, and they really need to make money? When the shareholders start asking real questions like, "how do this bring value to my shares"?

    It sounds really cool, but then lots of cool parks get built when cities have lots of money, but then the maintenance bills still come due when the recessions hit. :)


    ---

    1. Re:How is VA going to make money with this? by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 2

      Sure, VA has tons of money right now. But what happens when the good times stop rolling, and they really need to make money? When the shareholders start asking real questions like, "how do this bring value to my shares"?

      This brings publicity to VA. Most companies have a budget for publicity (not to be confused with a budget for advertising), SourceForge is part of VA's publicity budget.

    2. Re:How is VA going to make money with this? by Anonynous+Coward · · Score: 1
      VA's core business strategy has nothing to do with software. They are, esentially, a hardware sales company that happens to support Linux. By offering tools and services such as SourceForge, they raise consumer awareness of themselves, with the end result being more sales of Linux-based systems. Its a win-win situation for Linux users and VA.

    3. Re:How is VA going to make money with this? by tytso · · Score: 3

      Sourceforge is a long-term investment in Open Source. You can call it "giving back to the community", and it is that, but it's also about trying to encourage the development of more cool software. Hopefully, with better infrastructure, the Open Source coders of the world can put out better software more quickly. This is good for all Linux companies, including VA Linux.

      At some level, this is no different from the developer support programs that Apple and Microsoft have. Those programs also cost Apple/Microsoft money; they're hardly profit centers! But given that with Open Source you don't have to tease developers with special programs so they can get the API's, we don't need standard developer support programs. But we can offer web sites like Source Forge which at some level is even more powerful. The goal is the same in both cases, though: to encourge 3rd party developers to write more cool software, thus enchancing the value of the platform. This strategy works for Windows and MacOS ---- why shouldn't we try to do something similar and support Open Source developers?

    4. Re:How is VA going to make money with this? by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 0

      At some level, this is no different from the developer support programs that Apple and Microsoft have.

      I have to admit that's an excellent point. Thank you.


      ---

    5. Re:How is VA going to make money with this? by phutureboy · · Score: 1

      By supplying free sw developers with better tools (hosting, CVS, FTP, etc) they are accelerating the pace at which Linux improves. Something on the scale of SourceForge is likely to have a dramatic impact.

      The better that Linux becomes, the more people will use it. The more people that use it, the more boxes VA sells (and the more developers there will be to improve it, repeat ad infinitum).

      They are releasing the source code because it will do them a lot of good if others use it to host free software projects. It also happens to help us.

      They are also exploiting their speed, agility, and 100% focus on Linux to become THE brand name for Linux hardware before one of the major manufacturers gets around to pulling their head out of their ass and making any substantial move.

      Overall, it seems to me that VA is a very cool company that a) knows what's up b) has a solid business plan c) makes good hardware and d) does the right thing by the Linux community. I think my next workstation will be from them.


      --

    6. Re:How is VA going to make money with this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just AppWatch with host, PHP, a bad design, money, and publicity. Hmm, yes, nothing is free.

    7. Re:How is VA going to make money with this? by deusx · · Score: 1

      Umm... AppWatch is basically Freshmeat, and neither are like SourceForge.

  13. Re:It's the Slashdot Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yo man do not talk bad about cool man

  14. yeah...well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    too damn bad. There is nothing worse than people who don't practice what they preach.

    CmdrPhony handed out awards at that open source clusterfuck awards show in New York, yet he won't open up the source here. I am surprised that Stallman and his cult would even stand next to these incredible fakes here at Slapdash.

    At least with Sun and Apple, they spell out the fact that they are not TRUE open source in their licenses. They don't give the image that they are really the "good guys"

    Please sir: I am ready for that -1. Any Slapdash source criticism will be instantly moderated down, but the people really know, they are a buch of fakers.

    1. Re:yeah...well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen, brother. fuck these bitches.

  15. Re:LIKE A PHEONIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes you have to use moderator points in the right place. Automatically subjugating all posts mentioning the code are automatically marked troll. What would be reasonable would be to stop stifling the discussion, and try to get a real answer from Cmdr. Taco et al. as opposed to the lame excuses we got during the recent interview.

  16. RELEASE THE SLASH CODE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    As much as I hate to admit it, I'm now convinced that those upset that the source to slash hasn't been released in over a year are completely right to complain.

    "slash" is supposedly an open source project - so where is the source?

    Rob, practice what you preach.

    1. Re:RELEASE THE SLASH CODE! by JordanH · · Score: 2
      Hey, give Rob a break. If we don't stop putting him on the hot seat for this, he might stop posting stories about cool new Open Sources being made availble.

      If only to save him some pain when it brings up the inevitable subject of the slash code. :-)


      -Jordan Henderson

    2. Re:RELEASE THE SLASH CODE! by Artie+FM · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that the slash code gets delayed every time someone asks him for it. I think its been moved back to 2050 or so now.

      What I'd like to see someone write is a slashdot article grabber. You could just go and grab each posting from slashdot as if it were usenet and re post them on a site with open source.

      btw: I'm very glad to see source forgge release the code. They appear to be the best for hosting your project.

      --
      Be insightful. If you can't be insightful, be informative.
      If you can't be informative, use my name
    3. Re:RELEASE THE SLASH CODE! by ramparte · · Score: 1

      Maybe there's a reason they haven't released it...maybe it's all a fraud, and they're really a M$ shop, they just don't want us to know.

      --
      "Oh, Senator, you're so gullible!" - Buckaroo Banzaii
  17. Why to release/not release the current /. source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Pro:
    • The powers that be of Slashdot openly advocate open source
    • The users of Slashdot have expressed their wishes for a current version of Slashdot source
    • The source does not gain any extra functionality when it is in a neater package
    Con:
    • Releasing the source might spawn multiple Slashdot-like (unrelated to Andover.Net) sites which would eat the revenue of Slashdot
    • There are likely security holes in the source, which might be used for unconstructive purposes

    In my opinion, the benefits outweight the negative aspects. The possible security problems might even get fixed before anyone manages in exploiting them. Thus I ask the powers that be of Slashdot to
    • Either make the current source available
    • Stop talking the talk if they can't walk the walk

    However offtopic this might be, I do hope this thought will generate some constructive discussion about the subject.
  18. reasons the slash source hasn't been released by SPorter · · Score: 0
    Top reasons the slash source hasn't been released:
    1. Rob & crew are delaying the slash source code release because it is full of bugs... security through obsurity
    2. Rob & crew have been corrupted by money and fame and no longer care about Open Source ideas
    3. Andover is pressuring /. to delay the code release for some reason
    4. Rob & crew are simply too lazy to gather up the bits of source and release them to the public
    5. Rob & crew are part of a global conspiracy to brainwash geeks all over the world in order to prepare for the New World Order and important parts of The Plan are embedded in the slash source code so the UN has issued a secret order restricting release of the slash source
    6. "There is no spoon^H^H^H^H^Hslash."

    --
    sporter

    1. Re:reasons the slash source hasn't been released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you missed a reason:

      7. Rob &ampl crew are too busy engaging in circle jerks.

    2. Re:reasons the slash source hasn't been released by Zurk · · Score: 1

      8. Rob and crew are waiting for andovers new server51 site - the answer to sourceforge hosted at freshmeat.

  19. Idea Convergence by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
    So, does anyone else think it would be great for the further community development of the Slash code if Rob would host it on SourceForge?

    -=-=-=-=-

    --

    -=-=-=-=-
    My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    1. Re:Idea Convergence by chadfowler · · Score: 1

      Now, THERE's a good idea.

  20. slash source by paranoid.android · · Score: 1

    Way to go, guys. Now the slash source release will be delayed 24n hours, where n = the number of slash source release complaints attached to this article. :-P

    1. Re:slash source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They never intended to release it anyway. Folks stop asking for the source when they have it!

    2. Re:slash source by 0ptimus · · Score: 1

      Who really cares anymore? If he wants to threaten us with a later code release, thats pretty passe; he's made it quite a while on his own. I mean if thats what the Open Source community is all about... threatening people with the things that should have always been there, its not quite the great community I always thought it was.

    3. Re:slash source by jslag · · Score: 1

      Maybe they will use the time to clean up the code so that it will finally be worthy of our eyes?

  21. Anyone have any luck installing it? by kuro5hin · · Score: 2
    The entire install instructions are as follows:

    (INSTALL)----------------

    There really is no SourceForge install procedure, since our
    site is spread across 14 servers.

    You can play with pieces of the site by setting up Apache/PHP
    and pointing the document root to this distribution. It will
    be necessary as well to setup MySQL and setup tables as described
    in db/sourceforge.sql.

    After that... :)

    I'm not sure we'll ever really have something as simple as
    an autoconf install, but we may be able to get certain modules
    to work better as independent systems.

    - The SourceForge Crew
    (END)

    ----------------------------

    Needless to say, that's somewhat less than helpful. I did that, and I get a lot of php errors. This appears to be in the spirit of "Here's what we run. You can use it to inspire your own development." Don't expect to install this and have your own little "mini-sourceforge." Good that they released something though, unlike certain other so-called Open Source advocates.

    "Moderation is good, in theory."
    -Larry Wall

    --
    There is no K5 cabal.
    I am not the real rusty.
    1. Re:Anyone have any luck installing it? by chrisd · · Score: 3
      Hey...

      Yep, we knew that the hardware we use the code on would make installing it (even with a large amount of documentation which it doesn't have right now) difficult.

      In the end we figured that if even the login code or otehr stuff in the code helped out, it wouldn't be a waste to release it.

      That said, I know tony and the crew are working to make the docs better. But developing the site is probably higher priority to them right now.

      Chris DiBona

      --
      Grant Chair, Linux Int.
      Pres, SVLUG

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
    2. Re:Anyone have any luck installing it? by kuro5hin · · Score: 2
      It's never a waste to release code. Good show. What would help most would be a couple pointers to where the basic config stuff is, and perhaps a quick sketch of what your setup is like (so we'd know roughly what might go where). Also, are you guys running this on php 3 or 4? I'm as good as the next guy at figuring out how to get a web application running (ok, probably better than the average next guy), but I wasn't really sure where to begin with this. Granted I only spent about 10 minutes fooling with it. :-)

      And hey, since it's a sourceforge project, maybe others will step in and write some docs. Hell, maybe I will, if I figure out what's what.

      "Moderation is good, in theory."
      -Larry Wall

      --
      There is no K5 cabal.
      I am not the real rusty.
    3. Re:Anyone have any luck installing it? by fusion94 · · Score: 2

      We apoligize for the PHP errors your receiving. We decided on Tuesday afternoon of this week to release the code today and have spent the time since then just cleaning up the code and trying to ensure that it met the standards of the Practice-Software-Release-HOWTO. If you can document your specific problems we can probably help you out. Send the reports to admin@sourceforge.net

    4. Re:Anyone have any luck installing it? by fusion94 · · Score: 1

      email me direct with your contact info and I'll see if we can burn a few cycles to help you out.

    5. Re:Anyone have any luck installing it? by chromatic · · Score: 2

      That's the hard part about releasing custom code for a website -- it usually grows out of a side project thrown together one afternoon out of a lark, with pieces hobbled, hacked, and crufted together here and there. Now add on a database with table designs and queries evolving over the months, as well as custom hacks for speed and flexibility.

      It's hard enough to keep something like that going (especially if you've coded yourself into a corner -- how many times can you take down your website for a week while you rewrite something from scratch?) let alone packaging everything up in a consistent bundle so people can install it in diverse environments on their own. You keep your web documents in /var/www? Maybe I keep mine in /usr/local/httpd/public_html. What if you're using a later version of CGI.pm than I am? Or an earlier one? How about answering a hundred questions like that every day? No thanks! Why should I hack on your code for a week just to see if I can get it to run? It's not like you're building a kernel from scratch! :)

      There's a whole lot of work that goes into organizing something like this, and VA Linux deserves commendation for getting this far. (Anyone curious about my experiences ought to check out Everything Development, a system I've played with a bit. They spent months working on installation and though it's still not perfect, their hard work has really paid off. I don't take credit for anything they've done.)

      --

    6. Re:Anyone have any luck installing it? by kuro5hin · · Score: 2
      Absolutely they deserve commendation, for releasing the code, and for being right here and offering to help. I know how dodgy web apps can get, and how environment-dependent they often are. My post wasn't meant to be a criticism so much as a pointer to where they might want to go next.

      That said, I don't think that the way things usually are, right now, is the way they should be. That is, if I'm writing an application, it's my responsibility to ensure that it will still work, even if you keep your docs in /usr/local/httpd/public_html, or etc etc. I have issues with the way the so many web developers seem to feel that "if it works for me, then it's good enough." It's NOT good enough. If I spend months of my time writing code, and when I'm finished I discover that I've created something so non-portable and incomprehensible that I'm the only one who could possibly use it, I feel like I've lost something. I feel like I've failed in some important way. More web developers should feel this way, and projects should be opened up earlier than they currently are. I don't know if this is coherent or not, but my point is that the majority of web development processes are ad-hoc and undisciplined, and therefore, in some important way, broken.

      I've of course been guilty of this myself. But I try. When I'm writing something, I try to always be thinking about how this could be made to run in another environment, how someone could easily configure it for their system, how to make it portable. The excuse that "we coded ourselves into a corner" just doesn't cut it. If you have, then fork the code and rewrite it from the ground up, if you have to.

      This is not at all meant to be a flame at you, or at VA, or anyone. It's just my thoughts on a common problem I see in web apps. The "good enough" syndrome. Hopefully as the field matures, we'll see people working harder to avoid the "write once, run ONLY HERE" mentality.

      "Moderation is good, in theory."
      -Larry Wall

      --
      There is no K5 cabal.
      I am not the real rusty.
  22. Feedback Whining makes it worse! by Pike · · Score: 3

    Don't you remember CmdrTaco saying in the recnt interview that everytime someone asks about it, he's going to delay the slash release by 24 hrs? We're already up to a couple of weeks' delay judging by the comments in this article.

    Agreed, it seems miserly to withhold the code in an ostensibly open source project just because you don't like whiners. And I note that, because of human nature, not only does release time += 24hrs * complaints but complaints[N] += complaints[N-1]*2^delay ! (feedback loop) I.e., complaints increase delay, but delay also increases complaints.

    But you guys aren't helping any. Write your own if you're so very impatient, and release it...start your own project.

  23. Re:Why to release/not release the current /. sourc by bmetzler · · Score: 2
    Stop talking the talk if they can't walk the walk

    Okay, that's enough. /. isn't an Open Source advocacy site. They are "news for nerds, stuff that matters". That stuff that matters just happens to include Open Source stuff.

    What talk should Rob stop. He's repeated said he wasn't going to release the slash source ... and he hasn't. Sounds like the talk matches the walk pretty well.

    Remember, /. isn't solely about Open Source and Linux. It's abotu all sorts of things which just happens to include open source and Linux. Maybe Rob doesn't support open source. It doesn't matter. It doesn't have anything to do with the stories on the front page.

    -Brent
  24. Re:Why to release/not release the current /. sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, IMO putting up news in the spirit of how "bad" for example Sun's community source licensing model is (because it isn't open enough) and at the same time sitting over a pile of source code and denying every attempt to make it available to everyone is somehow absurd.

    It's simple hypocrisy. I think the bottom line here might be money. I think they are afraid that someone will make a better "slashdot-like-site" and thus they will end up losing significant revenue. This is just speculation, of course, I have no first-hand knowledge about the roots of the situation. But maybe I should just stop viewing Slashdot and that way show my dislike towards the current situation.

    I really hope the attitude behind the situation isn't "Open source and all that, as long as it's someone elses source".

  25. We're using it. by MartyJG · · Score: 2

    After several 'incidents' with our paid-for virtual hosting here in the UK, we have started moving several features and replicating downloads over to our unit in SourceForge. So far it's been more reliable than our paid-for webspace, and just as quick, even though it's coming across the water.

    One downer is that there's no ftp uploading availability. Instead it allows rsync and scp file transfers. This is done for security benefits. I also need a secure logon to admin our project. Either way this has got the makings of a really impressive service.

    This is not a replacement for Freshmeat. It's something different. It's gives a central point for project developers, and also somewhere users can go to discuss project features, bugs, etc with the project maintainers.

    In the long-term, I guess VA Linux is going to put more back into the community with SourceForge, than they are with Linux.com.

    I just hope it stays free!

    --
    insignificant sig
    1. Re:We're using it. by fusion94 · · Score: 1

      Marty,
      Thanks for the compliments. We appreciate them and will continue to work hard for the community.

  26. java version of open source community software??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any one know of a servlet based open source community software like SourceForge available anywhere. I'd love to set this system up on a server and contribute to the code but don't know PHP. for that matter what is the learning curve on PHP like?

  27. Re:LIKE A PHEONIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny.
    You get some moderator pts, and after a little while you catch yourself doing the exact same thing you've been yelling and screaming about.

    These clueless moderators are us.

  28. open source -- but majordomo? by eMBee · · Score: 1

    why do they still use majordomo,
    which is not open source???

    greetings, eMBee.
    --

    --
    Gnu is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
    1. Re:open source -- but majordomo? by fusion94 · · Score: 1

      SourceForge is not using majordomo. We are using GNU Mailman to manage our mailing lists. For more info goto http://www.lists.org

  29. Arrogant and hypocritical by SurfsUp · · Score: 4

    Don't you remember CmdrTaco saying in the recnt interview that everytime someone asks about it, he's going to delay the slash release by 24 hrs?

    Yes, I perceived that as arrogant and hypocritical, and I wasn't impressed.

    --
    Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
    1. Re:Arrogant and hypocritical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Finally, it's coming soon. It'll be out when its finished. And if you ask me again I'll postpone it again."

      This is lame. The quote above was from CmdrTaco's interview. Many years ago, I used to copy the functionality of specialty "shareware" packages that were crippleware, and then make them better and make them free. There were a couple of lame shareware authors that got their "air supply" cut off by yours truely. Lately, I've been considering doing some web development and starting up a site. If this motivation carries through, I'll probably target Slashdot. Enjoy your millionaire buyout while it lasts, guys. I will copy all of your functionality, improve the interface and make it cleaner and more intuitive, provide a complete Linux install program that makes it a snap to setup, and create a license that says the code can not be used to run any website that has banner ads or any revenue whatsoever. Sounds like a "hacker dream", but it is not. Most of those things are "been there, done that--can do it again." It is a ton of work, but I am not a dreamer. This is my M.O. -- I've DONE this sort of thing in the past. This is not a bluff. Comments like the one that was made fuels my fire in a big way. Bill Gates is the LEAST of your worries. I am a very talented coder. I don't claim to know everything, because I don't--HOWEVER, when motivated by the situation i can and will DO ANYTHING to learn how to create something from scratch. And I never fail to learn. So... just hope I get lazy about this, because if I don't, I will target your success and usurp it from you. Don't piss the people off, because those are the people who will join me (and help me) first. Every time I have created something in the past that was based upon the suggestions of THE PEOPLE, was TOTALLY FREE, and DID NOT BENEFIT MYSELF IN ANY WAY, this software product *killed* the competing software products, whether they were free or otherwise. Slashdot (the website) is a software product. My formula can kill it. DON'T MOTIVATE ME--I'M WARNING YOU! I am anonymous, however those who were around in the mid 1980's would recognize the handle I used then, if I printed it here. I am not going to do that. Trust me that I have written software that was majorly distributed.

    2. Re:Arrogant and hypocritical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep taking those pills...

  30. I can tell you why in one word... by milliyear · · Score: 1

    Tech Support. (okay, two words.) The 'learning curve' of manipulating the Windows OS is quite steep (compared to command-line Unix or DOS). The developer cost for compilers reflects their cost for supporting the learning curve. The 'educational' cost for the compilers reflects the true cost of the product itself - since it is assumed an educational institution will have an internal community of experienced users to do all the hand-holding required to get through the learning curve. IMHO, of course.

  31. WHAT? Open Source? Using MySQL??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, another site using the lame combo: MySQL+PHP. And MySQL isn't Open Source. Why the fuck are you using something that's not free? Too lame to try PostgreSQL, eh?

  32. fusion94@valinux.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, nospam?

  33. But they're using MySQL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AND IT'S NOT OPENSOURCE.

    1. Re:But they're using MySQL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's open source to the extent that you can freely use it, look at the source, but has limits on commercial use.

    2. Re:But they're using MySQL by eMBee · · Score: 1

      good point, but i understand that postgres is just to slow, so there are no real alternatives...

      greetings, eMBee.
      --

      --
      Gnu is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
    3. Re:But they're using MySQL by mikaelhg · · Score: 1
      For goodness' sakes, go to http://www.mysql.com/download.html, and download the GPL version of MySQL.

      Ugh, another degrading experience, answering an AC article.

    4. Re:But they're using MySQL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GPL version is old. Bah.

  34. Centralized development site = good. by Mike+Bedy · · Score: 1

    You ever notice how difficult it is to find some of the smaller open source projects that you just know you saw around? You search the web for hours in vain?

    That will be one of the best contributions of this setup. A lot of the smaller projects are going to gravitate to web sites like Soureforge, making them much easier to locate. If you can locate an existing project, you can help it.

    Much of the competeing Open source projects probably started because someone did not know that the origional existed. Of course, i gues that's also what freshmeat is for.

  35. a possible solution to the slashcode problem? by Error27 · · Score: 1

    I actually downloaded a copy of the code once a long time ago. But I never used it although I did poke around in it for about an hour just to see what was up. it's been a year since the last slashdot release, I think someone said?

    I kind of understand that Rob doesn't get paid to package the code neatly and he probably doesn't even enjoy doing it that much either. And he doesn't have a lot of free time probably.

    On the other hand I guess people would like to see the code and use it.

    So why doesn't someone offer to handle packaging for Rob. For free. (Because we expect him to do it for free) Actually maybe a bunch of people could work on it. They would be given access to a lot of fairly raw code that Rob doesn't feel is ready yet.

    They would be responcible to:

    1) package the code.
    2) perhaps fix the occasional bug.
    3) answer newbie questions.


    There could even be a full mailing list [slash-dev] for questions etc.

    This way the code would be out there and Rob could spend the afternoon in his hamock at the geek compound. Everyone would be happy. :)

    personally this doesn't sound like a whole lot of fun so I won't volunteer. but I don't use the slashdot code so I could be wrong about how fun a progect it would be.

    -error27

    1. Re:a possible solution to the slashcode problem? by kuro5hin · · Score: 2
      Hey guess what? This already exists. There's a mailing list called slash-help which was formed to help nurse people through the painful slash setup process, and to announce further development and whatnot. Once, it would have been a fertile field for just what you proposed. A truly open development project which Rob wouldn't have had to work on himself. Now, though, it's unlikely anyone there is gonna help His Highness Malda, and the list is more of a "how can we get rid of this awful legacy albatross that is Slash?" Frankly, Rob blew it. He's squandered the potential development community by being repeatedly arrogant, obnoxious, and completely dismissive of the principles /. supposedly supports. So, basically, it's too late for that. But it would have been an excellent idea, back in the day.

      "Moderation is good, in theory."
      -Larry Wall

      --
      There is no K5 cabal.
      I am not the real rusty.
  36. /. troll box by dodobh · · Score: 1

    Do you really think any nuclear reactor can withstand the might of a *slashdot* troll? The only way to safely dispose of the troll will be to carry the box to mount Doom and kill -9 troll :).

    On topic, way to go SourceForge!!

    --
    I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  37. Website Source Code by chromatic · · Score: 1

    You're absolutely right. We should all strive to write good, portable, clean, well-commented code even if no one will ever see it. (One of the Perl rules I picked up somewhere is "Always use -w and strict in a program over ten lines or a program you'll use more than twice.")

    Still, I'm willing to give groups like SourceForge and Slashdot quite a lot of slack in the matter. They don't exist to produce high-quality code to help people build similar websites. That may come about as a result of their primary mission, but it's a mistake to put that ahead of providing a good place for Open Source projects to put their stuff or to provide an outlet for interesting news and information and public discussion about the news and information.

    I'm sure they'd rather have good and useful websites with ugly code (that everyone wants to use) than boring and useless websites with beautiful code (that no one cares about using). Ideally, we shouldn't even have to make that tradeoff. Maybe someday, we won't have to.

    --

    1. Re:Website Source Code by kuro5hin · · Score: 2
      Still, I'm willing to give groups like SourceForge and Slashdot quite a lot of slack in the matter.

      I'm willing to give them some slack, but maybe less than you. Yes, producing a useful site is a noble and worthwhile goal. But the overall wastefulness of writing bad code still irks me. Imagine if the Slash code was portable, sensible, and open-source. The overall results would be:

      1) It would be easier for Rob and others to implement new features. It would take less time, and be less likely to break existing features. This is a natural result of good code, and on obvious Win for everyone.

      2) Say the work Rob and others put into the code is X. Then say the benefit of having Slashdot is Y (vague terms, but you get the idea). If the code is ugly and closed, the total benefit gained from X is simply Y. This is well and good. But then imagine that the code is open and portable. So there is some additional benefit to be had from all the other sites that could use it. Call this Z. Good prgramming is inherently more beneficial than bad. In essence, bad programming is wasteful, since it restricts it's own use and limits the benefit we all gain from it.

      I hate to feel like my work has been wasted. But many web programmers don't seem to feel that their work has any value outside of the websites they are personally running. If the webmasters who collectively wrote Apache felt that way, how much poorer would the whole web be now? All the justifications for why open source is better than closed apply just as well to web applications. It hurts me to see MS hoard and hide all their work and deprive the world of any benefit we might be able to gain from it. It hurts me equally to see a tool as powerful as slashdot hide it's code and only grant us the value of the site content itself. For MS to do it, well, that's their choice, wrong though it may be. But for slash to do it, that's just hypocrisy and selfishness.

      I will certainly cut sourceforge massive slack. They're doing the right thing. Their code is now a project on sourceforge itself, and anyone can contribute to it's improvement. But Rob and co. have had plenty of time to do things right, and simply, arrogantly, refuse to. No more slack is deserved here.

      "Moderation is good, in theory."
      -Larry Wall

      --
      There is no K5 cabal.
      I am not the real rusty.