Slashdot Mirror
SCO Tuning for Services, Ports Tarantella
According to a story on Sm@rt reseller, SCO is tuning now to be a service company (not just to Linux but to AIX and other unices), and they are porting (this is unofficial and not confirmed) Tarantella to Linux. Can anyone post details about Tarantella? What is it? How is it compared to Citrix's Metaframe?
Click here
and deserves to be taken out
is ANY slashdot news ever officially confirmed??? seems like /. will post anything heard on #efnet, in the corner grocery, or from anywhere else...
-- your knees hurt, don't they?
SCO will add a lot to the Linux community with this. They will never have the influence that some other companies have, directly. But, indirectly, they will have a big impact on the future of the community. Their products have already had a big impact otherwise.
Eh...
J
Okay, we take signal out. Dinner & a movie.
You buying?
Remember this story from last September where SCO was bashing Linux? To quote:
The bandwagon is getting a mite crowded...
In the words of Infoworld's Nicholas Petreley, "Tarantella is middleware that pretends to be a client to a heterogeneous mix of applications platforms" For the full description and comments, check it out at http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/00/01/10/ 000110oppetreley.xml
I keep forgetting to hit the damn "HTML format" option. Sigh. Here's that link.
The market for things like Citrix and Tarantella(sp?) is shrinking rapidly. The cost of PCs have dropped, making the cost of deploying PCs and deploying Citrix probably close to being the same. The only place where something like this would work is where there is a limited support structure.
For example:
Airline terminals (oops, they're using Java)
Remote offices (but probably not telecommuters, bandwidth issues).
I would include Linux users to that list, but the amount of quality software that works with Windows is increasing by the day, so compatability with Windows doesn't matter anymore.
Anyone remember SCO's nice comments about Linux maybe 6 months ago? We don't hold a grudge. Welcome to the party.
-- Ever notice that fast-burning fuse looks exactly the same as slow-burning fuse? I didn't... (Edgar Montrose)
can't. mom didn't give me allowance yet :(
hahahaha! moderate +5
SCO UNIX might have had it's place in the market 10 years ago, but the steamtrain that we call Linux robbed it of it's right-to-existance many years ago.
After my experiences with the above mentioned SCO UNIX box, I can only hope that their services are better than their software. SCO UNIX felt like a car at the crash derby, with bits and pieces falling off to the left and to the right constantly. In my mind, there's not real justification to their (continued) corporate existance.
Well, I'm glad we got that cleared up!
Ok, so it gets slightly more informative, but apparently the most important thing about the product is that it's fully buzzword compliant.
box -> boxen
Just follow the pattern.
thus, unix -> unixen!
I think a Linux port of Tarantella is likely. Have a look at this page which says SCO will "introduce a portfolio of server products for the Linux market." at LinuxWorld Expo.
Following this link on the above page mentions Tarantella for Linux.
Interesting, they say "SCO has been working on Linux and Open Source initiatives for more than two years," but weren't they talking about how crappy Linux was not 6 months ago(as someone else pointed out)?
Their other OS is UNIXWare, which is an incredible OS with new features that even Solaris doesn't have such as the built-in Veritas file system which supports jourtnaling. They say it's based on System V Release 5.0.
"Enterprise class features"? Antimatter warp drives, voice controlled computers with interstellar communication links? Control panels with colored smears which require special training? Okay.
for customers demanding an extensible, scaleable solution.
I'll settle for several hundred staff members to start with. If extension requires more ships, I'll deal with the accountants when that is needed.
Tarantella Enterprise II servers can be configured as a centrally managed array, supporting thousands of users. They can also connect to hundreds of application servers providing the reliablility, availability and scaleability needed for enterprises.
Well, I'll have to see some reliability figures. It seems to me that the Enterprise class encounters major problems on a weekly basis.
What is Tarantella software? Is it middleware? In a way it is middleware, but that term does not truly describe the full capabilities of the Tarantella product ("Tarantella"). Tarantella is middleware in that it sits between your appliation servers and client devices.
I thought the Enterprise class did not sit between things, it tends to travel between things.
But unlike most traditional middleware, Tarantella allows you to deploy existing server based applications, as well as new ones, over the network, via a web interface, without the need to rewrite anything.
Can I deploy remotely with a photon torpedo?
I shouldn't feed the Trolls, but hearing that SCO donates money to the NRA (assuming this is in fact true) would be one of the first GOOD things I've heard about them in a long time. As for the assertations that the NRA is pro-violence, it seems to me that the venom is in your rhetoric, not the NRAs. On the other hand, you could be posting just to get a reaction, if so, your just a little too far over the edge to have much credibility.
What the....? Talk about divergence from the thread....
They are both using different technology for their implementation. SCO's is Java based and therefore more portable. That's why it is available for so many platforms such as OpenServer 5.x, UnixWare 2.x and 7.x, Solaris, AIX, Tru64, HP-UX, and soon Linux. It allows for any application server to serve applications to any client through a Java capable browser. MetaFrame is purely for serving Windows applications, but Tarantella allows you to run Mainframe apps, Linux apps, Unix apps, Windows Apps, etc... on any client. It provides a much better solution as an ASP than MetaFrame ever could. It's flexibility and robustness is not easily matched by any other solution.
I have seen a piece of the technology used for Tarantella in a tool provided in UnixWare 7.1.x called Webtop. It allows a administrator to adminstrate the system from any browser. It also allows clients to execute X applications in a browser. One of the coolest things I saw was a full X desktop in a browser. This can be done in any client. I know for windows you would need an X emulator, but this solution now does away with that for windows clients.
It is a very cool product that I see being a very good addition to the applications available for Linux. You can also look at it as another way to attack Microsoft dominance.
---- "It is never too late to give up our prejudices." --Henry David Thoreau(1817-1862)
Greetings!
We evaluated Tarantella a while back as an interesting way to make a single, cohesive environment out of a variety of application environments (shell apps, X apps, Windows apps). Then we woke up and realized that it was overhead and that user training was the most critical function necessary - not hiding the applications behind a web browser.
If you're interested in having business users that don't understand X use a Linux app in a browser, then you'll also be interested in products like GraphOn, Exceed Web, and the X11R6.3 X browser plugin (also known as Broadway or LBX). Sun/Netscape/iPlanet/AOL/Time Warner/Great Satan also has a competitive product they acquired from a startup that if I recall properly gave them the "iPlanet" name. This can be found at http://www.iplanet.com/products/infrastructure/rem ote_access/s_web_entprs/index.html .
IIRC Tarantella is based on VNC, you can find out more about the technical details of VNC on the UK AT&T website. The basic idea is to use a very simple protocol with most of the work done at the server end allowing the clients to be very simple. For example I have seen pictures of KDE running on someones cell phone using VNC.
Agreement with SoftwareJanitor -- if SCO donates money to the NRA, they may have some of my sympathy. After all, the various TLAs have to stick together, eh? But then again, if I were an investor, I'd certainly hope that they're getting an appropriate tax benefit from the transaction, and thus saving money. Otherwise, let me (and the neighbors) make our own charitible donations, eh? I don't mind so much a technology company giving away CS scholarships, or supporting programming projects. And though I believe in the right of human beings to arm themselves for self defense, it's not the sort of contribution I'd (indirectly) vote for were I a stockholder.
On-topic aside: remember how SCO was denigrating Linux as inferior to the "proven" SCO what, 6 months ago? Interesting.
timothy
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
The thin client version of the Client/Server application architecture is not dead at all. It has just not yet been widely embraced. That is, unless you consider the Web, which is a perfect example of this model.
As others have noted, thin client doesn't have to mean 'Network Computer', 'Java' or any of the other buzzwords of 2 years ago. It also doesn't have to mean Citrix. Citrix, in my opinion is a workaround for deploying todays fat applications in a 'thin' way.
True thin-client apps are architected to be thin. You do this by severing the GUI from the application logic. That's how web-based applications get their deployability and scalability. PeopleSoft and SAP have know this for years. It doesn't work for every kind of app, but for most (especially traditionall vertical market apps) it's definitely the way to go.
This being the case, it sucks, case closed.
This is a good thing to hear; both for SCO and the computing community as a whole. SCO has been selling and supporting some nice enterprise unices/unix-novell hybrids. But it was about time they changed directoin.
I have had most experience with SCO OpenServer 5. Its a nice enterprise solution. Its sort of a unix that you dont really want to work on, probably set it up for a company requiring an e-commerce solution but too scared to run a Linux box. It does not come with the development package by default (gcc/libraries/header file) - so its not targeted at developers at all. Being a descendant of Xenix, it has a lot of superfluous anomalies. It does not like talking to other operating systems too much either. The technical support by SCO was good, however. SCO OpenServer has pretty good security too. SCO Unixware 7 is also a nice OS, but face it, you can't cross UNIX and Novell and expect something nice to come out. It's a great thing for novell entusiasts, i'd say, but UNIX guys probably wont like it. Even still, UW7 is WAAAAY better than UW2 and earlier!
These are limited application OS's.
SCO unfortunately did not see the direction the community was going, and targeted too much on servers to please the Managers, not the techs. Their OS's are too hermitic to compete with the versatility of Linux and BSDs and Sun. Its better now to target their attention on thing that would be beneficial to both the community and to themselves.
I hope SCO goes out of business. They have never produced anything innovative or usefull.
If you're using a slow dialup link to get remote access to the Unix boxes you're admin'ing and suffer from needing to ocassionally run an X GUI you will love Tarantella. Our big use for it is the X Gui for Veritas Netbackup which feels about 10x faster using Tarantella instead of running an Xserver natively....
There is a good review of Tarantella at Network Computing.
Tarantella offers a new twist on thin-client computing, and it packs extraordinary
Web-based functionality. Developed by SCO, Tarantella lets users access and run
applications hosted on Windows NT Terminal Server, Unix X Window servers and legacy
mainframes with little more than a Java-enabled Web browser.
One might compare Tarantella to VNC, Citrix and other products in the same genre. However, Tarantella is more "Enterprise-oriented" than these:
In my view, Tarantella is as much an enterprise and management solution as a technical solution. In a number of companies, this counts as much as the technology part.
I didn't use their support much because first, the os was rock solid (luckily), and also support was expensive and so-so. But SCO also supplied a daunting stack of manuals.
I think what SCO brings to Linux is years of experience in sales and support for large customers, and partnering with other software companies to develop apps for SCO, similar to what DEC brought to Compaq.
Question: If you look around the VNC website (FAQ), they mention that limited success has been had with running VNC on Windows Terminal Server, allowing more than 1 user to use the Windows services at once. Doing several searches on the documentation and the mailing list didn't reveal anything further. I wonder, has anyone played with a VNC + Terminal Server combination, and got it working successfully with multiple users? This would essentially do the same thing as Tarantella, the Citrix product, and the rest, but for FREE (minus the cost of Terminal server, of course). And, of course, running such a server plus Linux clients would be a great (and cheap) Windows thin-client solution!
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
The architecture for Tarantella is designed for very large deployments (several thousand simultaneous users), and it has a lot of unique benefits along those lines. E.g., you don't have to modify the application that you want to run across the network, or even the server you want to web-enable.
However, it is EXTREMELY expensive. It runs around $400/seat, plus deployment costs, and, as such, it only seems useful in special cases, not as a simple workgroup-level solution, if you ask me. I think GraphOn targets this lower-end market, but I'm not as familiar with their stuff.
As for VNC, it competes much more closely with PCAnywhere, not Citrix or Tarantella. It's a really cool program, but you can't use it to provide access to SAP to 20,000 desktops.
Overall, I think they have some issues with their product placement/pricing strategy that'll really hurt them. For instance, to use it with Windows apps, you still need the per user license for Terminal Server. So why not directly access the Terminal Server from desktops? There are certainly situations where Tarantella would help here, but it's hard to justify the huge cash layout that this'll incur, in my opinion.
As enterprise software (especially ERP and accounting packages) moves more and more to a great web-based front-end right out of the box, Tarantella will lose even more relevance.
--JRZ
I used to work for SCO and have used Taran... It is a very complicated Java Applet. I have never used a Java Applet under Linux without my browser crashing. I have used Java Applets under Windows and they are relatively stable in comparison. I think we have all experienced the phenomenon of using Netscape and turning our backs and all thats is a smoking core file.
It's a moot point but Netscape for Linux is their weakest platform. I haved used it under other operating system with pretty much works okay.
Its not just about apps. By that marker anyone who is still in MS just for Msword should be a Linux user since we have word perfect for linux now. Its also big companies like SCO helping shape a good Public image for linux. Its also about having the money to Handle the media. Even mirosoft with all its resources cannot do that so well.
... but that wasn't necessarily the one you were thinking of. Humm... can't find a link on our web server...
(I work for Bull)
I remember seeing 'virii' somewhere
Karma: Good! Napster: Baad!
Funding more than one smaller Linux distribution makes a certainly makes some sense. They are buying access to a potential customer base for support contracts. Not necessarily a bad idea. It might also be a way of hedging their bets if the day comes when they have to move their existing customers from their OS to Linux. They will have a couple of different distribution choices with which they have an existing relationship.
The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
S
M
A
R
G
L
E
ANNOUNCEMENT!
So, you heard about the smargle. You've heard how the smargle is superior. But now you want to know, "how do I join the ranks of the smargle?"
That's what this announcement is about.
If you wish to join the ranks of the smargle, you have to perform several tasks:
You must swear an oath to the smarglepriest in smargleland.
Then you have to fill out a bunch of smargleforms on smarglepaper.
If accepted, you will be notified. In such a case, you must see a smargledoctor, also in smargleland.
The smargledoctor will transform into the smargle of choice.
KNOWN TYPES OF SMARGLES:
The fish smarglegoblin. You can't transform into one of these yet, because no smargle has ever seen a fish. Only a fish smarglegoblin. And we don't know how to make you one. So there.
The blue smarglegoblin. You can't transform into one of these, either. These are specialties. And very strange. You can't be strange by choice. Only by birth. So there - again.
The fuzzy smarglegoblin. You can transform into one of these. Fuzzy smarglegoblins stay in either normal land or the city portion of smargleland. They are fuzzy. And good.
The scaled smargle or scaled smarglegoblin. If you choose to be a scaled smarglegoblin, you're just uglier than a smargle. And dumber. A lot dumber. They are scaled. And bad.
All non-blue smargles are orange. More smargles are discovered rather commonly, but rarely documented for non-smargles. Non-smargles don't deserve such information. They just deserve to know our superiority, how to become a smargle, and other announcements.
The smargle frep (myself) highly recommends that all new smargles become a fuzzy smarglegoblin. Fuzzy smarglegoblins are not uglier than fuzzy smargles, nor dumber, like scaled smargles are to scaled smarglegoblins. They're just cuter. That's how good works. They get good things if they have longer names. Understand? In any case, you should join the fuzzy smarglegoblins because they always win. Always.
That's about it. And remember - smargles are superior. Even scaled smargles.
You may now look to your right.
Continue.
- smargle frep